this special Faith alone to be the cause of Justification that is that man is justified before God in that he believes stedfastly that Christ has fully satisfied for their sins for by this Faith Christ's satisfaction is applied to them and made as it were their own so that by it they are reputed just before God although their Will is not inwardly changed Therefore whilst this Faith remaineth no sin can hurt them because they remain in the righteousness of Christ which they retain firmly by Faith Upon this Doctrine there is no reason to fear the commission of any sin for no punishment no vengeance of God is to be feared since God imputes no guilt to them by reason of Christ's satisfaction communicated to them by Faith Can any Atheist desire a greater liberty to sin and lead as wicked a life as he pleases Certain Presbyterian Ministers in England confess this sufficiently who from this Opinion of Calvin tounhing Justification by Faith only among others deduce and defend these Conclusions 1. That all those err Refert ex Fono Guil. Reinold l. 10. p. 120. which think to be saved for doing many good works 2. That there is no need of labouring to do good Works for the obtaining Eternal Life because we have it already 3. This is one of the chiefest errors reigning in the Christian World to imagine that good Works can any whit avail to Salvotion 4. That our sins nothing diminish the Glory of God all the damage of sin is placed in the scandal of our Neighbour 5. Christh as redeemed us with his Blood and delivered us from all Sins and Laws so that there is no Law which obliges us in Conscience Here we are clearly freed from the Decalogue or Ten Commandments and from all the Sacraments 6. That you are nothing to God but by Faith as to confess Jesus Christ and believe that he is risen from the dead for so you shall be safe in all other things God has left you at liberty to do what you will for you may do all things without any scruple of Conscience Neither can you Perish or be Damned for any thing you outwardly do or leave undone All these things they infer and that rightly from Luther and Calvin's Foundation namely that Man is Justified by Faith only in whose Writings all these things are to be seen almost verbatim Who can wish or desire a greater liberty to be vicious Add hereunto what is above-said in the second Consideration where we have mentioned three other ways whereby this liberty is granted I omit also that Window which Calvin has opened when he teaches F. 3. C. 25. S. 12. That the pain of the Damned is nothing else but to apprehend God to be angry with them and terrifying them although thit punishment is represented to us by corporal things as darkness weeping gnashing of Teeth unquenchable fire c. by which words he sufficiently and clearly shews that Hell is nothing else but a vain fear for if God inflicts no punishment upon the Damned but only terifies them surely that fear is vain and ridiculous and Hell Torments nothing to be regarded The Tenth Reason from raking up and reviving old Heresies EVery Religion is to be avoided which conteins Heresies condemned of old by the Catholick Church which have been always taken for Heresies But these New Religions contain such Heresies yea they seem to be nought else but the very Scum of divers Heresies broach'd by several Arch-Hereticks in former Ages and of old condemned by the Catholick Church therefore we ought to fly them The Minor is to be proved Let us consider then the chiefest Tenets of these Religions First Both Luther and Calvin teach that there is no Free-will And Luther in his Thirty sixth Article affirms this to be the chief Foundation of his Religion But this was the old Heresie of Simon Magus and Valentine as St. Augustine witnesseth August Heres 46. Hier. in Prolog contr Pelag. Clemens l. 3. recognit Concil Const Sess 8. Secondly Both teach That God is the impulsive Cause of all Sin and that all Wickedness is done by the Divine Decree This was the old Heresie of Simon Magus and Florinus Vincen. Liri Euseb l. 5. c. 21. Thirdly They both teach That Good Works are not necessary to Salvation but Faith alone is sufficient This likewise was the old Heresie of Simon Magus and of the Eunomians about the year of our Lord 360. Iraen l. 1. c. 20. August Heres 4. Fourthly They hoth teach That no Sins be they never so many and great can hurt them that have Faith because the Malice of them is not imputed to Believers Which was formerly the Heresie of the Eunomians and of Basilides Carpocratis Witness Irenaeus l. 1. c. 23. 24. August Heres 54. Fifthly Calvin denies the Real Presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist This was formerly the Heresie of Berengarius about the year of our Lord 1051. where you must note First that although some privately doubted of the matter before Berengarius and raised Questions yet none was so bold as publickly to profess the same Witness Hugo Lingonensis Aldelmanus Brixiensis in Epist suis ad Bereng Paschasius l. de verb. instit hujus Sacram. So that this was the constant Doctrine of the Church untouched by all Hereticks till the time of Berengarius And the Opinion of Berengarius was in his Life-time condemned by Five Councils and himself three times renounced his Opinion and at length died in the Catholick Faith very penitently who being dead this Heresie was extinguished almost 200 years till the Lollards revived it as Trithemius observes in his Chron. to the year 1315. The same Heresie after Wickliff held as 't is manifest in his Third Article When Wickliff died then this Heresie died also for about one hundred years till Zwinglius revived it whom Calvin and some others followed Whereby it manifestly appears that the said Opinion was always reputed in the Church for a notorious Heresie Therefore either the Church always erred in the chief Article of her Faith and so was never the Church of Christ or this Opinion which denies the Real Presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist is truly a Heresie Sixthly Both of them take away all Traditions and will have all things contained in the Scriptures only This was the Heresie of the Arrians as appears by St. August l. 1. cont Maxim c. 2. ult Also of Nestorius Dioscurus and Eutyches as you may see in the Seventh Synod Act. 1. Seventhly They both deny the Sacrament of Pennance and Confirmation The same Heresie the Novatians taught of old Witness St. Cyp. and Theodor. l. 4. Epist 2. l. 3. Heret Fabul Eighthly They both teach That the Church consists of the Good only That at first it was visible but for many Ages perished yet all that while to exist in them only This was plainly the Heresie of the Donatists as St. Augustine Witnesseth l.
and this he confesses he did on purpose against Limbus Patrum Purgatory and Christ's descending into Hell which he calls foul Errors and marvelleth that most of the ancient Fathers were in that error namely of Christ's descent into Hell and delivering the old Fathers What need we more He opposeth himself both against plain Scriptures and ancient Fathers perverting the one and contemning the other to overthrow that truth which is an Article of our Creed whereby it is evidently false which some of them say for their defence That none of them did purposely translate falsly Calvin so expounds almost all the places of Scripture which the Holy Fathers alledge to prove the Trinity of Persous and Godhead of the Son and Holy Ghost as to make them invalid whereby as he followed the Jews Sabellians Arians and Macedonians so he made way for the Socinians who first came up from among his followers The whole 53 Chapter of Isaiah which manifestly speaks of Christ's Passion Death and Satisfaction he Metaphorically Expounds of the troubles of the Jews which they suffered for their sins What could be more violently wrested oe more absurdly explicated What can more resemble the Jews perfidiousness Christ says If thou wilt enter into life keep the Commandments Matth. 19.17 Calvin will have this to be spoken ironically or in a Jeer. It is written in the Epistle to the Hebrews Christ was heard for his Reverence Calvin Expounds for his fear and doubt and says that it signifies Christ was strucken with so great fear and terror of Death that he despaired as it were of his Eternal Salvation Monsieur de Plessis a Calvinist in a certain Book of his touching the Lord's Supper has corrupted above a hundred Testimonies of the ancient Fathers and Doctors by adding or diminishing and several Objections which the said Fathers urged against the Truth and afterwards solv'd as 't is frequent with St. Thomas and other School Doctors he has produced as their proper Judgment and Opinion Of which matter he was publickly convicted by the Bishop of Eureux be fore the King of France These things are known over all France The same tricks use all their Writers when they allege any thing out of the Fathers in defence of their Heresies Besides they omit plain places where the Scriptures or the Fathers explicate their meaning on set purpose and clearly and fly to obscure places of Scripture and of the Fathers where they speak only by the by or of another thing and do but touch upon the point in dispute How many Arguments do they bring not only against the Real Presence of Christs Body in the Eucharist but also against other most evident Articles of Faith As against Free Will Inherent Justice Merit of Good Works Authority of General Councils c. for there is nothing in our Faith so clear which may not in appearance be contradicted by certain obscure places in Scripture or the Fathers Nor is there any thing so absurd which may not be defended For what can be more absurdly said than that Christ's Body is every where as his Divinity is And yet they endeavour to confirm this by many Testimonies of the Scriptures and Fathers What is more absurd than to say God is the Author of all Evil That Man has no Free-Will And yet they instance many obscure places out of the Scriptures and Fathers to ratifie these things If they seek the Truth why do they let pass the clear places of Scripture and run from the plain to the obscure and in the explication of them why do they not acquiesce to the Judgment of the Antient Fathers and Doctors who were before our time but will rely upon their own sence only When any obscure Sayings of the Fathers seem to favour them presently they cite them and endeavour to strengthen their Doctrine with the Authority of Fathers But when Catholicks quote out of the Fathers that which clearly overthrows their Doctrine They Answer That the Fathers were men subject to Errour but themselves depend upon the Word of God which cannot err They reject the Fathers If you tell them that the Fathers relied upon the Word of God They Answer That the Fathers followed not the mind or Spirit of the Divine Word and therefore they were deceived If you ask them how they came to know that the Fathers observed not the true sence of God's word but that themselves do observe it They will Answer It is evident by the Word of God But how is it evident when there are so many different Interpretations thereof and all the Fathers interprete otherwise than themselves and the Lutherans otherwise than the Calvinists or Anabaptists Then they reply 'T is evident to him that has the Spirit but to others it is not evident So the Patrons of each Sect will Answer and the final Judgment of their several and different Opinions they refer to the private Spirit They reduce all things to the private Spirit The Calvinists therefore say that all the Fathers and Doctors and all the General Councils wanted the Spirit to understand the Scriptures the same Holy Spirit they affirm the Lutherans and Anabaptists wanted but themselves only possess him that God has given him only to the Calvinists and therefore to themselves its manifest that whatsoever they teach is the pure word of God The Lutherans say the same thing of the Councils and Pathers and also of the Calvinïsts and Anabaptists that they all want the Spirit of God which is given only to themselves and so say they it is clear that what we teach is the plain pure word of God In fine the Anabaptists do the same challenging to themselves the said Holy Spirit and denying him to all others But how absurd are all these things and how distant from all reason How incredible is it that all the Catholick Doctors and Fathers should lack the Spirit of understanding the Scriptures and that this Spirit should be granted only to the Calvinists Lutherans or Anabaptists How vain and ridiculous is it for every Sect to claim this Spirit to their own followers and without any other proof than to say It is manifest and clear to him that has the Spirit but not manifest and clear to him that has not the Spirit Is not this to walk in a Circle and beg the Principle and resolve all Controversie into that which is chiefly obscure and can be manifest to none For how shall I know that you have the Spirit When ever did the Doctors of the Catholick Church in this manner prove their Tenets For every proof or provation ought to be drawn from that which is more manifest to the Adversary and easier granted by him But this probation upon which is founded all their Principles proceeds from what is more obscure and depends only upon the Testimony of a private Man who is a Party and Accuser in the Cause for you cannot prove to me that you have this Holy Spirit but by
de unitati Ecclesiae Ninthly They both deny Prayer for the Dead Fasts in Lent or at any other time c. This heretofore taught the Arrians Witness Epiphanius Heres 75. and St. Aul de Heres c. 33. Tenthly Both of them deny Veneration to Sacred Images of Christ and his Saints and to Holy Relicks and call it Idolatry The same of old did Vigilantius as St. Hierome witnesseth and so did the Iconomachists witness Zonoras Cedrinus Nicephorus Iconomachis Hereby is clearer than the Sun at Noon day that the Chief Tenets of Luther and Calvin's Religion are old Heresies long ago condemned by the Church and were always taken for Heresies in the Church The same might be easily proved of other Sects Hence it follows that these New Religions are nothing but the Filth and Scum of old Heresies formerly condemned Vid. Bel. de nov Eccl. c. 9. Coccium de sign Eccl. l. 8. c. 30. The Eleventh Reason from the want of a Rule of Faith THese New Religions have no certain Rule of Faith which you may follow Therefore they are not to be allowed For Points of Religion ought to be defined certain and immutable That they have no certain Rule of Faith whereby can be determined what is necessary to be believed and what not is manifest First Because they will not allow the Traditions of the Church nor the Authority of General Councils nor of the Ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Church who were before our Debates Luther rejects all Traditions in the First Chapter to the Galat. And Calvin l. 4. Instit And both of them teach That nothing is to be believed nor received which is not contained in Holy Seripture L. 4. c. 8. s 6 7 8. in Antidoto ad 4. Sess Coneil Triden General Councils which have had hitherto in the Church the highest Authority for they are as the Assemblies of Princes and Noblemen in Christ's Kingdom Luther so contemns that whatsoever they have defined he would have it all to be subject to the judgment of every private Person Nay he says 'T is a great madness that Councils should conclude what we are to believe In Art 115. c. Moreover what we ought to believe and what not is to be left to the judgment of every Spiritual Man The same Calvin insinuates saying ' The ' Church ought not to judge what Books are Canonical and what not but this belongs to the private Spirit L. 1. c. 7. s 1.24 Lastly as touching the Fathers Luther ' cares not for a thousand Augustines ' nor a thousand Cyprians Lâ— cont Reg. Augl Calvin also in many places contemns them and averrs that they erred Therefore none of these is a Rule of Faith to them Whether the Scripture is a sufficient Rule of Faith but they say The Scripture it self is their Rule of Faith for this cannot err But 't is easie to shew that this Rule is not sufficient First Because by this Rule we cannot judge of Scripture it self that it is Scripture So that this Rule is uncertain to us which ought to be the most certain of all things For it cannot appear out of Scripture that this or that Book is truly the Scripture that it is not supposititious or counterfeited by some Impostor that this or that Sentence is not perverted c. Lastly that there is nothing added or diminished pertaining to the substance of Doctrine All this cannot appear out of Scripture but is only proved by some humane and weak Conjectures if you exclude the Tradition of the Church and so the whole Foundation of our Faith will depend upon a few uncertain Conjectures Then again the force of Scripture consists not in the sound of Words but in the Sence which is the Life and Soul of Scripture But there may be a thousand Controversies of the Sence which cannot be decided out of Scripture if you exclude Tradition and Exposition of the Fathers as 't is manifest by experience For touching the sence of these Words This is my Body and of many others there is a great dispute between the Lutherans and Calvinists If you say with Calvin that the Judge of Scriptures Whether the judgment of Scripture belongs to the private Spirit and the Sence thereof belongs to the inward Spirit this is nothing else but to constitute the dictamen of the Interior Spirit that is the private judgment of every one to be the chief Rule of Faith For every one may say that he has the Spirit and by his inspiration judges this part to be Holy Scripture and not that this to be the right sence of Scripture and not that So a Lutheran according to his Spirit judges the Epistle of St. James to be straw and the Revelations of St. John to be of doubtful Authority But a Calvinist by his Spirit judges both to be the Word of God So Luther judges by his Spirit to abolish the false Opinion That there are Four Gospels In the Prologue of the New Testament for the Gospel of St. John is the only true beautiful and principal Gospel and to be preferred far before the other three Likewise the Epistles of Baul far excel Peter's The thee Gospels of St Matthew Mark and Luke he would willingly have renounced because they are clearly for Merits necessity of Good Works and Observation of the Commandments and commend Chastity and Poverty But since he durst not totally reject them he is willing to disparage their Authority and to insinuate that they were not written by the Spirit of God In like manner Calvin by his Spirit judges this to be right sence of these Words This is my Body That is This Bread is the Figure of my Body But Luther according to his Spirit judges otherwise and says these Words of Christ This is my Body are thus to be understood This Bread is truly my Body I omit many other sayings whereby it is manifest that according to them the private Spirit of every one makes a Rule of Faith or which is the same thing the Scripture is expounded according to every Ones private judgment Secondly That is not to be held a proper Rule of Faith which is equally accommodated or fitted to all contrary Opinions For all the Sects of this time although they are at Daggers-point about many principal Tenets adopt the Scriptures to be their Rule and fit it for their purpose For the Lutherans say they rely upon Scripture so do the Calvinists and likewise the Anabaptists nor is it any wonder because every one receives the Scripture not according to the common understanding of the Church or exposition of the Fathers as Catholicks do but according to the sentiment of every one's private Spirit So you may easily adapt the Scripture for all Heresies Whence it is plain that a Rule thus framed can be of no moment being referred to every one's private judgment Thirdly If there should be a Judge that should so give sentence in any
ean a false Faith avail to Salvation Then 't is all one Whether you believe the Creed in such a manner or in no manner Then every one may be saved though he does not believe many Articles of Faith The same I may say of the Scriptures for if it be sufficient to believe the Scriptures according to every one's interpretation since his sence may be oftentimes erroneous 't will be also enough though you do not believe them at all For a false Faith can be no more necessary to Salvation than no Faith whereby a Man believes nothing absolutely But if you say that we must believe the Symbol or Creed in its true sence then you condemn the Sectaries of these times none of which believe all the Articles of the Creed in the same sence with Catholicks and all of them differ in the explication of the Creed amongst themselves Therefore since there is but only One Truth all the Religions of these Times must necessarily swerve from the Truth except One only and therefore are insufficient to Salvation That they differ much in the sence or meaning The differences of Sectaries in understanding the Creed of the Creed is manifest For that Article And in Jesus Christ his only Son is explicated one way by the Arrians and many Calvinists namely that the Son is less than the Father and by the Catholicks and Lutherans another way for they hold him equal and of the same Substance with the Father The Article concerning Christ's descent into Hell the Calvinists interpret one way saying Christ sustained the Torments of the Damned doubted of his Salvation and was afraid he should have been utterly swallowed up by Eternal Death The Catholicks and Lutherans interpret it another way and will admit of no such exposition saying it is Calvin's Blasphemy The Article of Christ's Ascension into Heaven c. the Lutherans and Vbiquitarians expound one way holding Christ's Body to be every where as his Divinity is otherwise the Calvinists and Catholicks who doubt not but that such Expositions do overthrow in a manner all the Creed as Christ's Incarnation Nativity Passion Death Assension into Heaven and his Coming to Judgment The Article of Judging the Quick and Dead Catholicks expound one way saying that Christ shall so Judge as to reward our Good Works in Heaven and punish our Bad Works in Hell otherwise the Calvinists and Lutherans who deny all reward to Good Works and averr that an account will be only had of our special Faith at the Day of Judgment The Article concerning the Holy Ghost Catholicks and Lutherans understand one way the Arrians and many Calvinists another way The Article of the Church Lutherans and Calvinists understand of the invisible Congregation of the Predestinate Catholicks of the visible Congregation of Catholicks in which many are Predestinated and many Reprobate The Article of the Communion of Saints the Luthcrans and Calvinists so extenuate that they take away almost all Communion which is taught by Catholicks The Article of Remission of Sins they explicate of no imputation not acknowledging any Internal Renovation by inherent Justice and Grace infused as Catholicks judge Sins to be remitted Hereby is manifest how great a difference there is in the understanding of the Creed Therefore since there is but one Truth this we have shewed in our Consultation to be amongst Catholicks all Sects must of necessity hold a false Faith and false exposition of the Creed If therefore a true belief of the Creed is requisite it cannot be that every one may be saved in his own Faith If a false Faith sufficeth how can a false Faith be profitable to Salvation Sixth Reason The Holy Scripture is of no less Authority than the Apostles Creed nor is it a less injury to God to deny any thing expresly declared in the Scriptures than to reject any Article of the Apostles Creed therefore there is no reason why our Faith should be tyed to the Creed and in other things we should be left to our Liberty seeing we are as much obliged to believe all things in Scripture as in the Apostles Creed For although we are not bound to know all things distinctly contained in the Scriptures yet we ought to believe in general insomuch that we cannot without the sin of Heresie reject any part thereof as false and doubtful With what colour therefore or what probable shew of reason can it be said it matters not how you believe in other things so be it you believe in Christ and the Apostles Creed Why are we bound to believe the Creed rather than the whole Scripture since it is not of greater Authority than the Scriptures This is a fancy certainly too vain and rude void of any foundation Seventh Reason In all our Faith we must not only regard what we believe Our whole Faith depends on the foundation or motive of our belief but likewise and that chiefest of all upon what foundation we believe or what is the sole motive of our belief For upon this the whole Nature and Property of our Faith depends For as the motive of our belief is which we call the Foundation of our Faith such is the Faith it self If that be certain and cannot be deceitful our Faith also is certain and infallible If it be deceitful our Faith also will be uncertain and liable to Errour For Example The Turk believes that there is one God Creator of all things Why Because the Alcoran so teaches which he believes to be written by the Spirit of God His Faith although this which he believes be true depends on a false and fallacious foundation by force of which he is bound to believe many false and blasphemous things as that there are not Three Persons in the Godhead Father Son and Holy Ghost that Christ is not God and that he is less than Mahomet that Circumcision is to be observed and the like Therefore this Faith by virtue of this foundation is fallible and erroneous 'T is the same case with all Hereticks The Faith of all Sects depends on a false foundation This being laid down I thus argue That Faith which depends on a fallacious foundation although it believes some things which are true yet cannot be said to be sufficient to Salvation but the Faith of all Sectaries of this time depends on a fallacious or wrong foundation therefore it cannot be sufficient to Salvation The Proposition is manifest of it self For how can that which is false and lying be the Basis or Foundation of Eternal Salvation how can the true Religion whereby we please God be founded on a false belief Certainly this is as far from all reason as if you should say that Truth depends on a Lye Wisdom upon Errour and Vertue upon Vice It remains then to prove the Assumption or other proposition viz. That all Sectaries rely on a fallacious foundation A threefold foundation I shew thus They believe their Opinions either for the authority of