Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	article_n	church_n	tradition_n	2,712	5	8.9857	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A51443	The preachers tripartite in three books. The first to raise devotion in divine meditations upon Psalm XXV : the second to administer comfort by conference with the soul, in particular cases of conscience : the third to establish truth and peace, in several sermons agianst the present heresies and schisms / by R. Mossom ...	Mossom, Robert, d. 1679.	1657 (1657)	Wing M2866; ESTC R32966	363,207	375

discendum quod de Deo intelligendum as Hilary speaks we must learn from God what we may understand of God even as we discover the Body of the Sun by the light of its own beams yea God it is who prepares the eye of the practical judgment and proportions the palate of the rectified will to discern the evidence and rellish the sweetness of supernatural Truths and he does it in this order The Church by a Ministerial Manuduction and Ecclesiastical dispensation to those matriculated by Baptism born in her Lap and bred in her Bosom tutored to a reverend esteem of her Maternal Authority to them she transmits this indubitate principle of Christian Verity That the sacred Scriptures are the Word of God But to them who are without the Infidel and Heathen the Church hath her arma praelusoria her preparatory Arguments of Right Reason to fit the minde for a candid reception and diligent examination of the Scriptures And upon this the Spirit of Truth comes in with Conviction to the Conscience perswading the Soul to this assent of Faith that they are the Word of God Wherefore besides the Ministry and Manuduction of the Church there must be an illuminating power of the Spirit yea a power rectifying and raising the minde to a capacity of supernatural light otherwise the Mysteries of Grace to the Natural man will be as the varieties of colours to the blinde the colours are not discerned till the faculty be restored nor are those Mysteries understood till the minde be healed And when thus by the Spirit of God the minde is fitted to the Word and the Word revealed unto the minde then does the Soul discern an excellency in the sacred Scriptures above what is in Humane Writings with as sure a distinction though not so clear an evidence as the eye does discern a beam of the Sun from the blaze of a Candle Quest 3 Thirdly In doubtful cases how may we best interpret the sacred Scriptures Answ I answer That Interpretation of Scripture is best which holds conformity to the Analogy of Faith and consent with the judgment of the Church two sure rules of Scripture interpretation approved and observed by the ablest Expositors of Gods Word 1. Which holds conformity to the Analogy of Faith Rom 12 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which Analogy of Faith is none other thing then that summary and fit proportion which is in the general principles of Christianity and cheif mysteries of Grace plainly set down in the sacred Scriptures A sum whereof we have in our publick Confessions of Faith the Decalogue the Lords Prayer and the Doctrine of the Sacraments seeing then it is the Scripture phrase to be built up in our holy Faith As that stone Jud. 20. which holds not proportion with the rest of the building is either fitted or rejected by the Architect so that interpretation of Scripture which holds not Analogy with the received Doctrines of Faith it must be either amended or cast away by the Religious And in doing this the Faithful of Christs Church they shall according to St. Pauls precept 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phil. 3 16. walk orderly by one and the same rule and so preserve the unity and peace of the Church in being of one and the same minde 2. Consent with the Judgment of the Church For that no Scripture is of private interpretation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.20 to be interpreted by a mans own wit fancy or reason but by the enlightning power of the Spirit of Truth for as the Scriptures came not by the proper will Vers 21. so nor are they to be interpreted by the private judgment of men but the same Spirit who is the Author must also be the Interpreter And where may we with more confidence rest assured that this holy Spirit is then where Christ did expresly promise he should ever be with his Church Matth. 28.20 John 16.13 And especially with the Pastors of his Church to whom our Lord gives the promise that His Spirit should lead them into all truth But here it may be demanded what I call the Judgment of the Church I answer The antient perpetual and universal consent of holy Doctrine received at all times in all places and of all the faithful But especially do we fix upon that judgment of the Church in the antient perpetual and universal consent of holy Doctrine collected out of the most consonant Writings of the Primitive Fathers and the sacred Decrees of the first Councils For that without controversie even by confession of all parties in that time were the most Eminent Saints for holiness of life excellency of learning purity of doctrine and constancy of martyrdom And he that will think to go to Heaven in any other path then what these blessed Saints have trod before him I say to him as Constantine to Acesius Erige scalam ascende solus Raise thy self O man a Ladder and climb up alone Now this antient perpetual and universal consent of holy Doctrine collected out of the most consonant Writings of the Primitive Fathers and the sacred Decrees of the first Councils This is that we may call in the language of St. Ambrose Liber Sacerdotalis Ambr. de fid ad Grat. l. 3. c. 7. That Sacerdotal Book signatus a confessoribus multorum Martyrio consecratus signed by the confessions of the most eminent Saints and consecrated by the blood of the holiest Martyrs As then the Authority of the sacred Scriptures gives us the sure rule of Faith so the judgment of the Universal Church gives us the right line of interpretation according to which two it is well worthy our observation the Church of England did exactly draw the platform of her Reformation And this is evident in her Doctrine and Practice 1 In her Doctrine Art 20. amongst many other instances see it in her Book of Articles expresly acknowledging the Church to be the witness and keeper of the sacred Oracles and in her Book of Canons as expresly denying any doctrine necessary to be religiously held and believed which the Catholick Fathers and old Bishops of the Primitive Church have not collected out of the Scriptures And 2 that her practice is suitable to her Doctrine appears by her owning the four General Councils the Apostles Nicen and Athanasian Creeds And in all her disputes against the now silent adversary otherwise too busily employed the Jesuite justifying her reformed estate as conformed to the Primitive Church within the first five Centuries of years And here give me leave to observe unto you how the Presbytery laid the way to their own and our Churches ruine even by setting up private interpretation of Scripture in opposition to the received judgment of the Universal Church For do not the Brownists the Anabaptists under the name and notion of Independents presently beat them with their own weapon The Presbyterian abolisheth the Publick Liturgy and takes away Regular Ordination

brings in the Directory and sets up Lay Elders and all upon this ground That what they did was conformed to the Doctrine of the Scriptures of whose interpretation themselves would be Judges But at the heels of the Presbyterian follows close the Independent and treading in his steps at last over-teacheth him in his design and carries away his Helena from him he pulls down the Classes and the Synod as humane inventions and remains of Antichrist denying That by the Scripture any Presbyters or persons whatsoever ought to have power over the Churches of Christ which are by Scripture-rule Independent in their Government to any Secular or Ecclesiastical power whatsoever And for this they urge their Scripture Texts with much heat of contention against the Presbytery pleading this their common ground of interpretering Scripture by the Spirit whose inspirations and revelations they pretend to above what the Presbytery dare own or acknowledge As then in joyning the Authority of the Scripture with the judgment of the Church was our Reformation so is it Satans subtlety and the Jesuites design both acting by the Enthusiast That in dividing the judgment of the Church from the authority of the Scriptures may be our ruine To the prevention whereof what God hath joyned together let no man put asunder The Word of God and the Ministry of the Church for so faith Christ in Instruction to his Apostles Go ye disciple all Nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Baptising and teaching Teaching whatsoever I have command●d you 2 Having resolved you the three seasonable Questions we proceed to clear unto you two Vulgar Errors no less dangerous then epidemical as mischievous in their consequents as spreading in their infections First That the sacred Scriptures are the onely rule of all mens actions Secondly That every man may be an Interpreter of sacred Scripture Which two make up that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that grand and primary falshood which laid the ground for all that division and disobedience which hath of late broken forth into violence and blood both in Church and State 1. That the sacred Scriptures are the onely rule of all mens actions 1. Vulgar Error An opinion however made plausible yet is it indeed pernicious To state the case right That the Sacred Scriptures are our perfect rule of direction as to the knowledge of supernatural Truths in the objects of divine Faith and the exercise of supernatural Graces in the duties of Evangelical obedience we willingly acknowledge and therefore reject all humane Traditions urged by the Romanist as supplements to the Doctrine of Faith and Codicils to the Testament of Christ But now that the sacred Scriptures are our onely rule of direction in matters Civil or Natural especially as extended by the Brethren of the Separation to indifferent actions whereas indeed this opinion makes no actions to be indifferent all being commanded by the Word of God This we can by no means admit of it being an opinion which makes an in●et to all Schism and Sedition For Beloved upon diligent search and judicious observation you may finde That in the Controversies of this last age since the Reformation they who have so earnestly preached printed and what not for the change of Church Discipline and Government they have certainly made this the head Theorem of all their Pulpit discourse the very Corner stone of all their Babel-argumentation That simply whatsoever we do and are not thereto commanded and directed by the Word of God it is sin As if when God gave his Scriptures he then made null the Law of Nature and of Right Reason which Law of Nature and Right Reason imprinted in our hearts is as truly and indeed the Law and Word of God as that written and printed in our Bibles And therefore Non differet Scripturâ an ratione consistat Tert. de cor Mi● c. 4. so Tertullian it will not matter much whether our warrant be from Scripture or from Reason both being the Word of God onely with this difference That Humane Reason is subordinate to Divine Revelation Besides if the Scriptures are the onely rule of all our actions then where there is no Scripture there should be no rule and where no rule no Law But to the Gentiles having no Law written in Tables there is a Law written in their hearts Rom. 2.15 and according unto this Law their Consciences do either accuse or excuse them And thus If the Gentiles have a Law then have they a rule of their actions and that to excuse too and so not every thing which is done without direction of the Scriptures is therefore sin nor yet the written Word the onely rule of what is Natural and Civil To say as some do to mitigate the rigidness and harshness of this opinion to say That the Scriptures are the rule of all mens actions in those general maxims dispersedly and occasionally set down of doing unto others Matth. 7.12 as we would they should do unto us and of doing all things decently 1 Cor. 14.40 Rom. 15.2 Phil. 4.8 orderly and to edification and the like especially of doing whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are honest whatsoever things are just whatsoever things are pure whatsoever things are lovely whatsoever things are of good report c. This were indeed to the purpose if those maxims known principles of Nature and Reason had never been heard of but by Scripture Revelation But in that holy Scripture points us expresly to those maxims in general it withal directs us implicitely to the use of Nature and Reason in all ordinary affairs in particular To convince you more fully of the great danger see the evil consequents of this Erroneous opinion which are especially these three 1. An unavoidable guilt of Superstition 2. A vexatious perplexity of Conscience 3. A seditious contempt of Humane Laws whether Civil or Ecclesiastical First An unavoidable guilt of Superstition For that this opinion takes away the indifferency of things and actions making all necessary as commanded or else to be sinful So that it is well observed the Romanist and Separatist as they go upon contrary grounds yet both false so they run into quite contrary errors yet both superstitious The error and superstition Affirmative on the one hand that 's the Romanists who cutting short the Scriptures perfection impose Humane tradition with an opinion of absolute necessity and divine authority The Error and Superstition Negative on the other hand that 's the Separatists who extending too long or rather laying too low the Scriptures perfection they condemn Natural and Civil Actions with a censure of being sinful which yet the Word of God condemneth not And thus to take away what is indifferent in its self by commanding it as absolutely necessary or forbidding it as absolutely unlawful is Superstitious By commanding it as necessary when Gods Word requires it not and by forbidding it as unlawful when Gods Word condemns it not Secondly A vexatious perplexity