Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	article_n	believe_v	creed_n	2,820	5	10.5298	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A67209	Anguis flagellatus, or, A switch for the snake being an answer to the third and last edition of The snake in the grass : wherein the author's injustice and falshood, both in quotation and story, are discover'd and obviated, and the truth doctrinally deliver'd by us, stated and maintained in opposition to his misrepresentation and perversion / by Joseph Wyeth ; to which is added a supplement, by George Whitehead.	Wyeth, Joseph, 1663-1731.; Whitehead, George, 1636?-1723. Snake in the grass.	1699 (1699)	Wing W3757; ESTC R16372	333,418	578

make the Quakers Blood to be the Blood of Christ by which we are saved To which false and scandalous Charge the Man himself Thomas Speed who writ that Book being yet Living he answers for Himself and Us as follows For the satisfaction of all Persons whom it may concern I do make this my following Solemn Declaration viz. 1. I never knew nor ever heard of any Person or People of what Perswasion in Religion soever that were of so sordid nonsensical and sottish an Opinion that the Blood of any tho' the most righteous of Mortals was the Blood of Christ the Son of God by which Men are saved 2. I do and ever did with utter detestation abhor any such blasphemous Principle as to assert that the Blood of the Quakers or any other sort of Men is the Blood of Christ by which we are saved Which in the Power of Truth I do openly and boldly assert to confront the Snake in the Grass who herein appears to to be the Child of the Father of Lies who was a Murtherer from the Beginning Bristol the 10th Month 1698. Thomas Speed The next and last Quotation which the Snake makes Ibid. p. 120. in this Section is from p. 22. of the Book last mentioned of T. Speed's which is a Reproof and Testimony against false and flattering Titles given to men Upon which the Snake bids See what Tender Consciences are here who at the same time wipe their Mouths and excuse all the bloody Blasphemies before-mentioned And I Reader may here in fit place desire thee to see and consider not how Tender but how hardned and feared is the Conscience of this our Adversary who hath against knowledge and against the true and plain meaning of our words and upon bare hearsay frequently in this as also his other Sections accused us falsly of matters which we never did spake or intended which will also be further manifested in the ensuing Sections to which I now proceed SECT VIII Concerning Our Belief in the Holy Three that bear Record in Heaven IT hath been an Objection often made sometimes foolishly sometimes enviously but always falsly That we deny The Holy Three mentioned 1 John 5.7 which bear Record in Heaven Because we cannot but think the word Person too gross to express them We own their Distinction in all the Instances of it recorded in Holy Writ and have a thousand times declared our sincere Belief in Almighty God the Creator of all things and in Jesus Christ his Eternal Son by whom all things were made and in the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father and the Son Yet this because it is not given in the Terms of Athanasius or the Nicene Council has been unreasonably refused as insufficient This refusal were the less strange and unreasonable were it not in Persons who pretend the Scriptures to be their only Rule of Faith c. But as it is the refusal of such Persons it is certainly a violent contradiction in them to damn as Heretical an Article of Faith deliver'd in the very words of that Rule But be their Fault in this matter what it will we are not therefore to be moved from believing That the Holy Spirit by which it was dictated as is acknowledged did and does know all the weaknesses of men and the Designs of Satan and has accordingly fenced the Article from his Subtilty and explained it to our Capacities And I take it to be a great aggravation of the former contradiction in this Adversary and our other Opposers herein that they would upon less Evidence of Truth and a Determination not Infallible which they will not affirm either that of Athanasius or the Nicene Council to be infallibly press their Exemplifications made to the Article That such Practices are wrong all Parties in their turns as their several Interests and Necessities have pressed them have declared and many excellent Arguments by divers Men have been urged against it I shall content my self only with some part of what Jeremy Taylor late Bishop of Down and Connor in Ireland hath said on this Subject in that excellent Treatise of his Intituled Liberty of Prophecying p. 47. For it is says he most considerable that altho' in reason every clause in the Creed should be clear and so inopportune and unapt to variety of Interpretation that there might be no place left for several Senses or Variety of Expositions Yet when they thought fit to insert some Mysteries into the Creed that called the Apostles which in Scripture were expressed in so Mysterious Words that the last and most explicit sense would still be latent yet they who if ever any did understood all the Senses and Secrets of it thought it not fit to use any Words but the Words of Scripture particularly in the Articles of Christ descending into Hell and sitting at the right Hand of God to shew us that those Creeds are best which keep the very words of Scripture and that Faith is best which hath greatest Simplicity and that it is better in all cases humbly to Submit than curiously to inquire and prey into the Mystery hid under the Cloud and to Hazzard our Faith by improving our Knowledge If the Nicene Fathers had done so too possibly the Church would not have repented it And indeed the experience the Church had afterwards shew'd that the Bishops and Priests were not satisfied in all circumstances nor the Schism of Arius appeased nor the Persons agreed nor the Cannons accepted nor the Article understood nor any thing right But when they were over-born with Authority which Authority when the Scales turned did the same Service and Promotion to the contrary Thus he and as I doubt not but the Truth and Reason of his words will weigh with the Impartial Reader so his Character of Bishop ought to be of some weight with the Snake Snake p. 121. The Quakers and Socinians acknowledge a Three but deny a Trinity which is to confess the same thing in English and to deny it in Latin For Trinitas is only Latin for Three But the meaning is they would not have the Three in Heaven to be Three Persons Though they cannot make sense of what Three they are if not Three Persons What the Socinians acknowledge is not my business to inquire But for our selves We acknowledge the Three mentioned in Holy Writ which bear Record in Heaven and we need not the Pedantry of the Snake to Translate the word into Latin And the sence we make of the Three so bearing Record is the same which is declared by the Holy Ghost and when the Snake shall shew that the Holy Ghost hath declared them Three Persons We will not fail so to express them Ibid. p. 121 122. And the Quakers who own the Divinity of Christ are under greater difficulties than the Socinians who deny the Divinity of Christ. For if Christ be God and that there is but one Person in the Godhead it must necessarily follow that God the Father

once owing to the Father These Reader are some of those Consequences which W. P. shews do naturally follow that strange and rigid Notion That it is altogether Impossible for God to remit or forgive without a plenary Satisfaction and that God could not by any other way obtain Satisfaction or save Men without inflicting the Penalty of infinite Wrath and Vengance on Jesus Christ. And if the Consequences are Blasphemous it is owning to the Doctrine not W. P's natural deducing of them from it any more than the Glass that is truly Cut and Ground can be in fault to reflect the Deformities that are set before it But whether true or false the Snake says p. 151. His Arguments are the old Socinian Job-trot But if in the reverse the Job-trotting proves the Non-jurors W. P's Arguments may be good still and I think it will hardly pass for sufficient reason that Arguments are therefore bad because either Socinian or Non-juror may have used such like to other purposes If this be so then why not further and reject all the true Articles which they may believe as well as the Arguments which they may use And if the Snake is resolved to keep at this distance from us and disbelieve an Article because we believe it he must resolve to deny God and Jesus Christ and all hopes of Salvation by him Together with all the Holy Doctrines which the Scriptures teach and which we firmly Believe But how shy soever he may be of us herein yet himself is a notable Job-trotter for that his Arguments his Accusations his Stories and numerous Perversions are no other than what have often from Adversaries of many Names been objected against us and as often answered by us Yet as false and as often rebuffeted as this Job-trot has been The Snake hath licked it up and improv'd it as is commonly observed Lies do improve by carrying Ibid. p. 153. But upon the Socinian and Quaker Scheme one of God's Attributes must fight with and conquer the other And his Justice must quit the Field to his Mercy This is great Nonsense as well as Blasphemy and utterly inconsistent with the first Notions of a God 'T is true that they who believe and say that God's Attributes combate and conquer each other do believe and say Nonsense and Blasphemy because all Jarr and Strife is utterly inconsistent with the Unity of his Being But that the Quakers have ever so believed or said is false and does yet remain to be prov'd Which it can never be for we as well as the Snake p. 152. do say That God's Justice is greatly exalted in that it did require and accept the full and compleat Satisfactory Offering which Christ did give of himself to offended Divine Justice And that God's Wisdom and Mercy is also greatly exalted in finding out and affording that means And we say also That these are fulfilled Infinitely in the wonderful Oeconomy of our Salvation in that compleat Satisfactory Sacrifice All this and more to the like purpose we believe as well as the Snake But the Snake tho' with his false Glossings he would represent W. P. and the Quakers as deniers hereof yet does not declare himself to believe the Article as it was propounded by W● P's Opponents and opposed by him Tho' insinuatingly and Snake-like he says p. 151. W. P. denies the Satisfaction What Satisfaction Why The Satisfaction Which the Snake has not declared himself to believe That it is altogether impossible for God to remit c. as above p. 231. Now Reader Whether exceeds in Impudence the Snake in this his liberal Character and Charge that we deny this most Fundamental Doctrine c. or himself in refusing them same terms which are the matter of his Charge This shews the Snake did by his own practice make that Judgment which he hath falsly given of us p. 143. They He it must now be read can upon a pinch subscribe the whole Creed and not mean one word of it c. For the present we have done with his Charge from Sandy Foundation shaken c. and the Snake next quotes p. 154. a passage from W. P. but names neither Book nor Page it is I suppose from Reason against Railing c. p. 91. If it is our Duty to forgive without a Satisfaction receiv'd and that God is to forgive us as we forgive them then is a Satisfaction totally excluded That is such a Satisfaction as his Opponents contended for Yet of this the Snake declares He hath exposed the poorness of this Argument in Satan Disrob'd A poor shift that his Reader must take his word But to shew that W. P's Argument is not so poor as the Snake does suggest Please to take some more of W. P's Argument which the Snake has by a poor cunning left out It is thus Christ farther Paraphrases upon that part of his Prayer v. 14. For if you forgive their Trespasses your heavenly Father will also forgive you Where he as well argues the Equity of God's forgiving them from their forgiving others as he encourages them to forgive others from the Example of God's Mercy in forgiving them Now if this Exposer can also shew the poorness of our Saviour's words not only in this of Mat. 6.14 but also in that of Mat. 18.23 to the end of the Chapter he may then be deem'd a thorough pac'd Exposer Till then I must think that his Exposing is much more poor than the Arguments which W. P. does shew do arise from Christ's words The Snake's last Quotation from our Books in this Section he makes from Serious Apology p. 148. in very false and injurious sort he thus says and quotes p. 154. W. P. speaking of our Justification by the righteousness which Christ hath fulfilled in his own Person for us But here the Snake hath left out these words in a Parenthesis wholly without us which is all that W. P. did oppose in the place above refer'd to in these words And indeed this we deny and boldly affirm it in the Name of the Lord to be the Doctrine of Devils and an Arm of the Sea of Corruption which does now deluge the whole World Yes Exposer it is still true that we do deny and boldly affirm it to be the Doctrine of Devils That Men are justified by the Righteousness which Christ hath fulfilled in his own Person for us wholly without us And for our so denying and affirming we have the warrant of Holy Writ wherein is abundantly testified of the Spirit of Christ in Man to which he must be obedient in order to his Justification and the Apostle in express words speaking of the Righteousness which is of Faith which is Christ's saith Rom. 10.8 The word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy Heart that is the word of Faith which we preach And to the same purpose see Rom. 3.24 28. Rom. 5.1 Tit. 3.7 Then not wholly without us Ibid. p. 155. See this further enlarg'd upon in

says we are in pag 3. he says We speak Sense and English have in a great measure reform'd from the Errors of the Primitive Quakers Thus as his Mood Humor and Occasion Changes we are with him either Subtile or Simple speak Sense or Non-sense Blasphemous to the hight or in some measure reform'd But after all the Ipse Dixit of an Enemy is neither good Argument nor Conclusion as will hereafter appear in the examination of the several Heads of Doctrine P. 3. Many of them have really gone off from that hight of Blasphemy and Madness which was professed among them at their first setting up in the Year 1650. and so continued till after the Restauration Anno. 1660. What the Snake doth acknowledge is at present Sober and Christian in us is really no other than what he calls at our first setting up the hight of Blasphemy and Madness for the colourable Pretences of these are only the spurious Brood of his own ill-forming Fancy and as bad joyning Fingers which have been imploy'd in Mangling the Books of our Friends in his phraise not unlike Rats and Moths Ibid. p. 3. Therefore they endeavour all they can to make it appear that their Doctrine was Vniform from the beginning and that there has been no alteration And that endeavour has not been in vain it having been often made so to appear Ibid. p. 4. I would perswade them openly and above-bord to Renounce George Fox and their first Reformers and all their Blasphemous and Heretical Doctrine Before this be done two things are necessary First to examine whether what our Adversary calls Blasphemy and Heresie be so or not and then to know what he would perswade us to for the first hard names are no Proof For in the Way which some called Heresie the Apostle did Worship God and our Saviour himself The Green Tree was call'd a Blasphemer And for the Last it 's not Good or Safe to be at all much less easily perswaded to forsake Truth for Lying Vanities Ibid. p. 5. And I must say it they give the same Proof for their extraordinary Inspirations as the Quakers do that is none at all but their own confident averring of it And I must say that our first Reformers from Popery having urged for their Separation the Authority of the holy Spirit and being asked for Proof of that Authority could give no other but what in the Language of our Adversary is none at all but their own confident averring of it The Apostle Paul when questioned by the Corinthians for a Proof of Christ speaking in him did not evade the question nor direct to an impertinent Solution of it when he advised them Search your selves try your selves know you not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you except you be Reprobates 2 Cor. 13.5 This Proof the Quakers also give and that with reason for the publick Spirit of God privately working in the Hearts of Men is only able to give those in whom it does so Work evidences of its proper effects The Apostle is positive to the same purpose 1 Cor. 2.11 The things of God knoweth no Man but by the Spirit of God And all Inspiration of the holy Spirit will I doubt not be owned to be some things of God and of these no Man can make a right Judgment but by the Spirit of God Which who want it is no wonder that by such this be call'd as by the Snake no Proof but a confident averring of it Though I doubt not but the Sober Reader will have another sense of this Matter Ibid. p. 5. Now I would beseech Mr. Penn who has more Wit than all the rest of his Party to let us know what ground he had for leaving the Church of England more than Muggleton What Muggleton's ground was is not now our Business to examine and what W. Penn's was he hath often declared many Years ago which yet if I should here repeat the Snake might possibly mistake in Judging of it as it is possible he may also in the judgment he pretends to have of Wit Nay supposing it true that W. P. hath more Wit than all the rest of the Quakers yet this Snake not having had distinct Knowledge of every Quaker and of every Degree of their Wit was not capable of more herein than to give some Testimony of his Confidence not Judgment Ibid. p. 5. Why should we trust the Light within him or G. Fox rather than the Light within Lodowick Muggleton W. P. and G. F. did never direct or desire Men to trust the Light within them but have constantly directed Men to trust in the Light of Jesus Christ which is given to each Man for himself and is a sufficient Guide to the true Knowledge and Worship of God notwithstanding all that Men may speak against it Ibid. p. 5. Has Lodowick wrought no Miracles to prove his Mission No more hath G. Fox or W. Penn. To which I may add No more hath the Church of England nor the Snake in the Grass unless we account that for one Miracle in the Snake when he at Billingsgate run away from the Messenger Of which more in its place Are they G. F. W. P. very sure that they are in the right So is Muggleton If the Snake be not very sure that he is in the right he hath but an intention to deceive when he calls others into Communion with him Are they Schismaticks So is he And so is the Snake and by the Snake's Doctrine so is the Church of England as I have shewn p. 15 16 17. foregoing Are they above Ordinances If they be I know not but that we the Quakers are not I know For we own and use Preaching and Praying which the Snake owns to be Ordinances Is he against distinct Persons in the Godhead So are they Distinction in the Godhead we own according to Scripture but think the word Person too Gross to express it Is he against all Creeds So are they It it false we own the Matter contain'd in the Creed called the Apostles Does Muggleton deny all Church Authority So do they So does the Snake that does not please him But that we do not the Snake hath disprov'd himself as see Pag● 61. Yet does he require the most absolute Submission to what himself Teaches So does th● Snake But we do not so but like the Apostles commend our Testimony to the Conscience c. 2 Cor. 4.2 Does he Damn all the World and all since the Apostles So do they So does the Snake counting all others as the Spawn of the Viper Does he make a dead Letter of the Holy Scripture and resolve all into his own private Spirit So do they 'T is false we reject all private Spirits acknowledge the Scriptures to have been writ by Divine Inspiration and to contain a Declaraion of the Will of God and do refer to the publick Spirit of God for the understanding of them Ibid. p. 6. These are Twin

be true Prophets still His Fourth and last Instance here is of whom in Scorn he calls the Great Edw. Burroughs p. 57. quoted from p. 540 535 536 537. of his Works the words he quotes are these and stand in this order The time is come their Church meaning Rome cannot stand long And as sure as the Lord lives so shall it come to pass Here the Snake is himself to some purpose having in as deceitful and false manner as well can be represented the words of E. Burroughs in the pages quoted I will give thee Reader the several Instances from the several pages quoted by the the Snake The first page he here quotes it 540. where the Snake says he advises the Army to carry their Arms to the Gates of Rome But minds not that he there tells the Army That might be a work honourable in its day and season And that there is a Victory more honourable to wit the Victory over Sin and Death and the Devil in your selves and that you are to mind And at the bottom of p. 535. speaking of the Romish Church But their Weapons are Carnal and Devilish and by Murders Oppressions and Tyrannies they do defend themselves and when these things are broken down then their Church cannot stand long He continues p. 536. And as sure as the Lord lives so shall it come to pass a Generation shall accomplish it and in the Generation of the Righteous it shall be finished And in p. 537. E. B. saith thus Whether the Lord will revenge the grievous blood-guiltiness that lies upon them by himself without an Instrument or whether by you speaking to the Army or others as an Instrument Whether this way or another that God will do it I determine not But this I know that the time is not long that he will one way or other avenge and revenge the Blood of the Just upon the Murderers Head By all this Reader it abundantly appears that E. B. doth not assign Time or Means by or in which it shall be accomplished and so much any Good Man may warrantably speak concerning the finishing and putting an end to those Carnal and Devilish Church-Weapons of Murder Oppression and Tyranny Which tho' this Adversary would hug yet thanks be to God they are out of his power So that this Prophecy if the Snake will have it one must doubtless in its season be accomplished I come now to his Ninth Head of Distinction which is little else than one vehement Invective against the Authority of the Reformation I will briefly consider its parts p. 58. Extraordinary Inspirations are not to be credited unless vouched by Miracles which God always sent to attest his Extraordiry Commissions The Inspirations of the Prophets Joel Amos Obediah Micha and others mentioned in the Old Testament and of Agabus Acts 21.11 were all of them Extraordinary Inspirations But I find no Miracles that these their Extraordinary Inspirations were vouched by John the Baptist the Greatest Prophet born of a Woman his Mission was very extraordinary yet not attested by Miracles Now let us see where the Doctrine of the Snake will lead us Why he says Extraordinary Inspirations are not to be credited unless vouched by Miracles These Inspirations I have now spoken of are not to us so vouched are they therefore not to be credited This will break an Article of the Snake's pretended Faith and make imperfect the Scriptures which he says are a perfect Rule of Faith and Manners Ibid. p. 58. Let us take this one mark more to judge when such Inspirations are from God or from the Devil Yes we will Those from the Devil generally tend to Schism and Rebellion as in that of Jeroboam and the Ten Tribes who broke off from the Priesthood of Aaron as well as from the House of David and set up opposite Altars to that at Jerusalem This does deserve to be mark'd in that it First gives the Lie to the Scriptures and then kicks against the Reformation It gives the Lie to the Scripture for that God by his Prophet Shemiah 2 Cron. 11.4 when Rehoboam would have fought against Israel that he might have brought the Kingdom from Jeroboam to himself and that they were ready to fight they were of God forbid and the reason God by his Prophet gives is For this thing is done of me But the Snake says it 's done of the Devil Thus much for the Kingdom now for the Priestood That they broke off from the Priesthood of Aaron and set up opposite Altars is a mark applicable at this day or to what purpose does the Snake make it And say that separation from the Priesthood at this day is from the Devil And now if the Snake please let him prove how many of these separations which have been made within three hundred years from the Priesthood of the Roman Pontiff have been made by the Devil and let him not forget the Reformation in England But of this kind of arguing we have more Ibid. p. 58. But as they paid all Dutiful Obedience to their persecuting Kings and suffered Martyrdom under them without Resistance So did they always keep in the Communion of those same Priests whom they had provoked and reproved c. That Dutiful Obedience was paid by the Holy Prophets to persecuting Kings in their Days and hath been paid by us to persecuting Kings in our Days is very true But as for the Doctrine of Resistance if that be it the Snake quarrels at he may find Opponents enough in the Communion of that Church he pretends Membership in as he also may have the Voice of the Church of England against him Justifying themselves in that they did not keep the Communion of the Roman Priesthood but did set up a Separate Communion and Opposite Altars See Reader this Doughty Champion as he pretends for the Church of England under the false pretences of esteeming and valuing her Communion does in truth and reality as much as in him lies scandalize the Reformation by putting upon it very gross imputations as if it were from the Devil But worse yet Ibid. p. 59. And when our Saviour himself came into the World he did not separate from the publick Worship and Communion of the Jewish Church And to shew that the receiving of Christianity it self was no exemption from paying all Obedience to them he commands his own Disciples as well as the Multitude to pay them all manner of Obedience Our Saviour is declar'd Rom. 10.4 the end of the Law Then he must of necessity be the end of that Worship and Communion which was grounded on the Law And that the receiving of Christianity was an exemption to Obedience in that Worship and Communion The Apostle Paul is positive Gal. 5.2 for Christianity was not to be blended with Judaisims And when our Saviour said Matt. 23.3 Whatsoever they bid you observe that observe and do He did not thereby continue the observance of the Ceremonial Law beyond the date of

of the Fathers first Book p. 194. Whilst they beat down one Error they seem to run into the contrary Error In like manner as those who would streighten a crooked Plant are wont to bow it as much the contrary way that so having been worked out of its former bent it may at length rest in a middle posture Now if our Friends have formerly met with those in the Priesthood whose crooked expressions did need streightning they are not to be wondred at or condemned in their Christian endeavours for that end And whether there were such or not I will now joyn Issue with the Snake and shew from a much narrower compass than the extents of the Snake's Challenge which is That there never were in any place such Priests I shall at present only give some few instances out of the Book Great Mystery which the Snake does so often quote which take as follows P. 16. John Timson did affirm that the Holy Scriptures alone is to be the object of Faith P. 38. Tho. Collier did affirm that the Scriptures shall be our Judge one day which we call the Letter P. 111. Jeremy Ives did affirm it to be an Error to say the Letter of the Scriptures was Carnal P. 247. Christopher Wade affirmed The Written Word is the Sword of the Spirit P. 261. Roger Atkinson affirmed That the Letter of the Scripture was God Ibid. Richard Stoakes affirmed That the Scripture is God P. 280. Edw. Price affirmed The Scriptures is the Power of God and that all Men shall be Iudged by them Now Reader upon the Issue joyned in this little space whether appears the Arrant Lyar G. Whitehead in saying There were in the North where most of these did live Priests who had so affirmed of the Letter of the Scriptures or the Snake in saying That neither there nor any where else were such Priests For it cannot be allowed I suppose That the Written Word and Letter of the Scripture as above affirmed is either God or the Power of God or the Iudge of the World or Spiritual or the Sword of the Spirit These and the like crooked Expressions of some in the Priesthood it was the necessary work of our Friends to oppose and straiten according to the Authority of Holy Writ not that we then did or now do charge all the Men with whom these so affirming have held fellowship to have the same Sentiments tho' this be the Practice of the Snake against us notwithstanding his distinction in the Title page of his Libel Ibid. p. 88. How comes it that since they are such bitter Enemies to the Letter they yet make a Conscience of saying Thee and Thou instead of You in the Singular because these were old English words in the first Translations I need not ask How comes it That envy and prejudice is Blind and Ignorant We are not bitter Enemies to the Letters of which the Books of Scripture are composed No Sober Reader that which we have opposed and for our so doing have the Authority of the Scriptures is that Men should only from them gather some account of the dealings of God with the Holy Men in past Ages and from their Declarations therein nay sometimes contrary to them make to themselves Creeds and herein Copy after those to whom our Saviour says Ye search the Scriptures in them ye think to have Eternal Life but ye will not come unto me that ye may have Life This we have opposed and directed Men to the Spirit of God in them to which as they are obedient they will find it to open the Scriptures to them and give comfort in the reading of them Thee and Thou instead of You in the Singular are as well Modern English Words as Old from the Essential difference that there is between the Signification of One and Many and upon this account it is according to the best Information I can get that there is hardly any Nation whose Language does not differently express that different Signification And that which engages us Conscientiously to this Practice is not that they are Old English Words but that the same Holy Spirit in us at this day leads to that same Simplicity of Language which it did lead the Servants of God into in former Ages And in all Ages of the World it hath been the Language of the Holy Spirit to Man And accordingly before our day at the beginning of the Reformation Erasmus and others whose Language was not Old or Modern English did reprove that Vanity of Mind which did practice and acccept the contrary Ibid. p. 88. Is there any Immorality or Iniquity in these Letters Y. o. u. more than in T. h. o. u Foolish Question Which may serve to please and tickle the Wanton But Sober Reader I doubt not thou wilt perceive the Vanity of the Querist The Alphabet which with us according to its various joynings does serve to express the thoughts of our Minds cannot have Immorality or Iniquity in the Letters Yet whosoever in evil Mind by joyning them does express words either Blasphemous Profane Hypocritical Unjust as this Snake or any other way bad in their Signification of these Men do pronounce accordingly And thus it is if any to shun the Cross of our Lord Jesus tho' in this small matter of the plain Language and to please the vain Mind contrary to the Convictions of the Spirit of Truth in themselves shall say You instead of Thee and Thou such will find that disobedience their Burden In p. 89 90. Snake has gathered many instances from G. F's Writings wherein he saith This is the Word of the Lord which the Snake puts in opposition to G. F's Answer to Christopher Wade Great Mystery p. 246. They the Scriptures are not the Word of God But this soon vanishes for upon Examination of Christopher Wade's words they seem to imply as if he affirmed of the Scriptures that they were the Eternal and In-dwelling Word of God and therefore and thereupon G. Fox opposed him and asserted Christ to be the Word of God p. 247. Great Mystery which is true and from him the Eternal Word the Servants of God have often said to the People Hear the Word of the Lord. And the meaning of it both in the Prophets and since is only this Hear from the Eternal Word a Declaration of his Will Ibid. p. 91. They knew that the Holy Scriptures could not be discarded openly and above-board nor all at once That the World has been long in the possession of them and of a just Veneration of them and therefore would not part with them nor accept of any Fox 's Inspirations instead of them That the World hath been long in the possession of the Books of Scriptures we well know but for want of being in possession of the Holy Spi-the Power of God they have erred not knowing the Scriptures and therefore could not have a just Value or Esteem for them And God who knoweth the Sincerity of