Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	article_n	believe_v	creed_n	2,820	5	10.5298	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A48358	Holy characters containing a miscelany of theolocicall [sic] discovrses that is theology, positiue, scholasticall, polemicall, and morall built upon the foundation of scriptures, traditions, councils, fathers, divided into two books / written by George Leybvrn ...	Leyburn, George, 1593-1677.	1662 (1662)	Wing L1938; ESTC R18553	388,184	688

controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know

Char. XVI Of Holy Order p. 233. Char. XVII Of Matrimony p. 261. Char. XVIII Of Extrem-vnction p. 279. Char. XIX Of the Church Militant p. 291. Char. XX. Of Traditions p. 333. Char. XXI Of the Church Triumphant p. 351. Char. XXII Of Foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith p. 289. THE FIRST BOOK OF HOLY CHARACTERS Containing a Miscelany of Theologicall discourses THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers CHARACTER J. OF GOD THE CONTENTS The necessary being of one God his existence in three distinct persons his omnipotency together with his other divine attributes GOD is a spirituall nature so eminent that nothing can be apprehended by man or Angell * Aug. l. 1. de doct Chr. Deus est quo nihil cogitari potest aut bonitate meliùs aut porsectione matus in goodness better in perfection greater His existence * Si ab altero haberet existentiam non esset ens supremū improductū proinde debet necessariò essentialiter existere is his essence and therefore to him essentiall which euinceth a necessity of his being and all Creatures necessary dependence of him for t' is impossible that there should be more then * Singularitas seu vt loqùitur Tertull solitas id est incommunicabilitas ad extra est essentialis supremo enti quod debet necessariò essentialiter existere quia existentia est rei singularis incommunicabilis ideoque impossibile est vt multipliectur nam essentiae sunt omnino per se incommunicabiles one necessary being and that is properly called God (a) 1. Io. 3. There are three vvhich bear vvitness in Heauen the Father the Word and the-hold Ghost and these three are one This Scripture testimony giues full evidence of personall distinction and essentiall vnity in the blessed Trinity and as S. Austin well observes ouerthrows two heresies at once namely the Arian by saying one which signifies vnity in nature and the Sabellian heresy by faying bear in the plurall number which plainly expresseth distinction as to the divine persons who in essence is one and in persons three one and the same individuall Deity essentially requiring to be invested with a triple personality expressed in the name of Father Son and holy Ghost (b) God sais Isa 66. Shall I cause to trauell and not bring forth from this sacred Text S. Austin infers that it were not equity if God should giue fecundity of generation to his creatures and want it as to himselfe and it were not reason or equity that God within him selfe should be barren wanting production that communicates fecundity of generation to all things without himselfe God the Father is a beginning without a beginning hauing no beginning of his being God the Son hath his beginning and being from his diuine Father who begot him from all eternity the full brightnes of his glory and * Hebr. 1. splendor gloriae figura substantia eius the express resemblance of his diuine substance God (c) The Council of Florence in the decree of Pope Eugenius the 4th defines the procession of the holy Ghost from the Father and the Son In this Council the Grecians renounc'd their heresy as to the same procession though soon after they fell againe into it and so continue obstinate in their pertinacy notwithstanding that God by evident signes manifested his iust wrath against them in regard of that relapse For soon after and euen at Pentecost when the Church celebrates a speciall Feast in honour of the holy Ghost the Turks seizd on the Imperiall towne of Constantinople and therby mastred all Greece Be sides in the same Council the Latin against the Greek Fathers asserted the procession of the holy Ghost from the Father and the Son as from one sole beginning of his being the holy Ghost proceedeth from the diuine Father and the diuine son as from one origen of his procession being the reciprocall loue and vnion of both As in the visible sun three things are obseruable (d) The similitude as to the globe beames and light of the sun Gelasius the Patriarch of Constantinople vsed in a conference with Amurath the Emperour of the Turks vnto illustrating the vnexpressisible mystery of the blessed Trinity the round body or globe thereof the beames and the light and as the beames are deriued from the same body and not from the light and the light from the body and beams and the body from neither of both and as all these three make one only sun without confusion or separation so in God there are three diuine persons and the Son proceedeth only from the Father the holy Ghost from the Father and Son and the Father from neither of both and these three are one sole God without * Symbolū S. Athanasij neque confūaentes personas neque substantiam separantes confusion of persons or separation of fubstance * Exod. 13. Omnipotens nomen eius vnde Aug. ser 12 ait quod nomen Deus est potestatis non proprietatis The name of God is Almighty for soe he calleth himselfe and his works shew what his name speakes him to be namely the world created out of nothing by * Psal 37. Verbo Domini Coeli firmati sunt spiritu oris eius omnis virtus eorū the word of his power the sweet order in the disposition of the fabrick the extraction of man from the dust * Gen. 2. formauit Deus hominem de limo terrae of the ground the vniuersall deluge drowning the whol earth to the destruction of man and beast Noë only with his family preserued (e) Exod. 12. the Children of Israë are said to haue walked vpon drie land through the mids of the sea while the waters were as a wall vnto them on the right and on the lest hand the diuision of the red sea giuing safe passage to the Israëlites as by land and the revnion of its waters to the drowning of king Pharao and his whole army In these marueilous effects of Gods omnipotency as in a clear glass appear his other divine attributes in the creation of the world in time his duration before time * Isaias cap. 51. appellat Dominū habitantem aternitatem which is his eternity in the sweet order of the things created his wisdome in the production of man after his own image and likenes his goodnes in the generall deluge his iustice in the preseruation of the Israëlites his mercy in the destruction of Pharao his fortitude And all his works joynt or separate declare (f) The intent of creation was the Creatours glorification wherfore the Royall Prophet Psal 18 makes the heauens to speake the glory of God his glory which is the end of his working who is aboue all his works a God without circumscription immense without bounds infinite in himselfe inuisible *

likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse quēdam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Pr●xeas omniū primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the Sacramēt of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare thē capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard