pain and therefore they would pray for increase of their blessedness but the Latines believe they are all in Heaven and gave thanks for them and praied for the increase of their glorie by the resurrection of their bodies and so forth as is said except only Augustine who thought that some of the elect may be in torment And of them Fra. Junius in his Notes on Bellarm. de Purgat lib. 1. cap. 10. observeth That the former ages sought only an increase of good things but the latter ages do pray for relief or ease of torments the first opinion saith he is tolerable and the other is contrarie unto veritie and to the vertue of Christ's death For as Augustine de verb. Dom. ser 37. saith In thy two evils one is a fault and the other is punishment the fault is thou art unjust and the punishment is thou art mortal But he Christ Jesus that he might be thy neighbour took on him thy punishment but not thy fault and if he took it he took it to abolish and not to commit it and by taking on him the punishment and not the fault he hath abolished both the fault and punishment And de temp ser 66. Now is the time of forgiveness to them who repent but the time of vindication to them who have neglected to confess their sins But after this age arose another difference for Pope Innocentius the III. being asked what his judgment was in this matter he answered Some be verie good they need no prayer of the living some are verie bad they cannot be helped some are mid-way good to them prayers are profitable for expiration and some are mid-way bad to them prayers are profitable for propitiation Bellar. de Purg. lib. 2. c. 18. will not approve this judgement of his ghostly father he gives assent unto the first three parts of that distinction and he makes a gloss on the last part saying I suspect that Innocentius hath forgot himself when he thinks that Augustin's division hath four parts which hath only three for they who are mid-way good are the same who are mid-way bad And in the beginning of that 4. chapter he saith It is certain the prayers of the Church are profitaable neither unto the blessed nor the damned but onlie unto them who are in Purgatorie Augustin's division is in Enchir. cap. 110. Praiers avail not unto all who are departed and why not but for the difference of life which everie one hath made in the bodie Therefore when the sacrifices of the Altar or of Alms are offered for all them who were baptized and are defunct for the verie good they are thanksgivings for the not verie bad they are propitiations for the verie bad although they do not help the dead yet they are comfortable to the living but to whom they avail they avail to this end either that there may be a full remission or that their damnation may be the more tolerable and because we know not what is their estate we should pray alike for all that our benefit may be superfluous rather then deficient To conclude this point seeing praier for the dead as it was used in the second age of the Church is now condemned by the Romish Church and such praiers as are now used in the Romish Church are a branch of the opinion of Purgatorie which the Ancients knew not their praiers now for the dead are but a noveltie and as we may say a plant of that third age and unknown unto the Church of Rome in this seventh Centurie For in the Synod at Toledo an 627. when were assembled 62. Bishops it was ordained that the dead should be conveied to the graves with the voices of men singing Psalms onlie in hope of the resurrection they forbid all mourning and they will have no word of praiers for them which they would not have omitted in such a place if they had thought upon any necessitie or utilitie thereof conc Toleta 3. cap. 22. But the Romanists say These oblations are comfortable to the living It is true the Priests and Monks receive no small gain for them but the other people are handsomlie cheated 5. A third question of this age and nature is Whether living Christians Praâ—â—r unto the dead may lawfullie pray unto the departed Saints The Councel at Trent hath discerned That they think wickedlie who denie that Saints should be invocated Sess 25. cap. 2. Therefore it ought to be inquired when and how this honour was given unto the Saints Here we may borrow some help from the Jesuits Salmeron on 1 Tim. 2. disp 8. answereth it was not the custom of the Old-Testament nor was so great honour due unto them Ibid. disp 2. Nothing is found of this matter in the Epistles of Paul or Canonical or Catholick books of others But possiblie somewhat hereof is found in the Evangelists or Revelation No saith he Ibid. disp 7. It is not expressed under the New-Testament in the Scriptures but by tradition for in the primitive Church it had been hard to command such a thing unto the Jews and occasion had been given to the Gentiles to think that instead of manie Gods whom they had left they had received manie other Gods yet saith he without doubt the Apostles delivered this Doctrine unto the Churches But he telleth not unto what Churches whether Jews or Gentils or if there be a third Bellarm. de beat Sanct. lib. 1. cap. 19. saith Before the coming of Christ the Saints entred not into Heaven neither saw they God nor ordinarilie could they know the praiers of them who did invocate them therefore it was not the custom of the Old-Testament to say Holie Abraham pray for me but the men of these times praied onlie unto God I will not quarrell with him that some of his words seem contrarie Io. Eckius in Enchir. loco comm saith more The invocation of Saints was not commanded in the Gospel lest the converted Gentiles would believe that according to their former custom they should worship the Saints not as Patrons but as Gods as the Lycaonians would have sacrificed unto Paul and Barnabas and if the Apostles and Evangelists had taught that Saints should be worshipped it might have been judged their arrogancie as if they had craved such glorie after their death Wherefore the holy Spirit would not by express Scriptures teach the invocation of Saints We see then by the testimonie of Papists that praiers to the departed Saints hath no warrant in Scripture but is grounded on tradition onlie If this tradition was first revealed by the Apostles how was the scandal of Jews and Gentiles taken away by the tradition If it were concealed induring the more general conversion of the Jews and Gentiles then it was not in use for a long time in the Church whereunto the practice of the Reformed Church is agreeable How began it then Eusebius hist lib. 4. cap. 15. hath a large Epistle of the Church of Smirna concerning the
no satisfaction for Pennance onely they shew themselves to the Priests who anoint them with oyl in token of the remission of their sins 15. Onely on Maundy Thursday they do consecrate for the sick and keep it the whole year after and think it more holy that day then any other neither do they fast on any Saturday save onely on Easter-even 16. They have but five Orders as Clerks Deacons Sub-Deacons Priests and Bishops whereas the Romish Church hath nine Orders according to the nine Orders of Angels 17. In their Orders they make no vow of single life alledging the Canon J. N. Priest or Deacon shall not put away my wife as it were for honesties sake 18. Every year on certain days they excommunicate the Church of Rome and all the Latins as Heretiques 19. They excommunicate him who striketh a Priest 20. Their Emperor doth name Patriarchs Bishops and others of the Clergy and deposeth them at his pleasure also he giveth Benefices to whom he listeth and retaineth the Fruits of the same Benefices as it pleaseth him 21. They blame the Latins because they eat not flesh eggs nor cheese on Friday 22. They hold against the Latins for celebrating without consecrated Churches and fasting on the Sabbath days and for permitting menstruous women to enter into Churches before their purifying also for suffering dogs or other beasts to enter into Churches 23. They use not to kneel at their devotion yea not to the body of Christ but one day in the year affirming that the Latins like goats or beasts prostrate themselves on the ground in their prayers 24. They permit not the Latins to celebrate on their Altars and if it chance a Latin Priest celebrate on their Altar by and by they wash it in token of abomination and false sacrifice 25. They condemn the worship of Images as idolatry These are the Articles contained in the said Register But there are many more in the Book of Catholique Traditions published in the French tongue by Th. A. I. C. and translated into English and printed at London ann 1610. out of which I have drawn these Articles 1. All the Apostles were equally universal Pastors and no primacy given to Peter who was never at Rome but when he was martyred 2. To say that the Church is grounded on the stone of Rome is hard and grievous and not far from the Jewish baseness to include the Church within a Town 3. St. John ending his life after Peter had the first place among all Evangelists and Bishops and he never taught that Rome by divine right ought to be the Lady of other Churches 4. But after St. John the Bishop of Rome obtained the first place among the Bishops within the Roman Empire for seeing the Citizens of Rome reigned above other Cities he had been proud and audacious who would have preferred himself before their Bishop especially without Ordinance of a Council 5. The Churches of Italy and others their neighbors by lapse of time gave to the Church of Rome not onely the first place but also superintendence over the Bishops near them in particular to give his advice in matters that happened until a Synod might be held yet never any presidency or power was given to the Church of Rome above other Churches 6. As all the Apostles were equal in Authority so they left behinde them every one diverse Successors of equal Authority 7. He who accuseth the Scriptures accuseth God the Author thereof but God is void of blame and the Scriptures contain the whole matter of faith 8. Those onely are Canonical Books which were contained in the Ark and written in Hebrew before or in Greek after the coming of the Lord. 9. They hold they were the first Nations converted unto Christ and in that regard they are the men who truly and purely maintain the Traditions of the Primitive Church as it was taught them by the Apostles 10. Faith is an assurance of the love of God and he who doubteth cannot approach unto God with confidence 11. The saying of Paul It is not in him who runneth nor in him who willeth prevents two mischiefs One that no man exalt himself for grant that thou runnest or endeavorest yet think not what thou doest well is thine for if thou be not inspired from above all is vain Another that no man deem that he shall be crowned without service 12. Faith is imputed to justification faith sufficeth for all faith absolveth justifieth and maketh partaker of eternal glory for God requireth no other thing but compunction and mourning 13. When we praise good Works we mean not to exalt our selves by them or to put our trust in them but we desire men would give themselves thereunto as to things necessary unto salvation and which every one is bound to exercise according to his power following the commandment of God 14 They communicate under Both elements and they have one fashion for the Communicants in the Church and another for the Sick the Priests with little or no reverence eat the remanent elements which are not eaten by the faithful but for the sick it is kept all the year being consecrate the week before Easter 15. They celebrate the Liturgy in their own Language that the people may understand 16. The Bishop of Rome cannot by his Indulgences deliver any from these temporal punishments which God inflicteth neither ought he to dispense with the fulfilling of all these works of repentance which are possible c. The most part of these last differences are fallen twixt the east and western Churches since the 11. Century and in them all we finde that the differences are either calumnies articulated by the Church of Rome or matters of Discipline or Ceremony or then our Reformed Church agreeth with them 8. The Bishop of Millan had the next place in Italy unto the Bishop of How Millan became subject unto Rome Rome he had eighteen Suffragan Bishops under him twenty two Ordinary Cardinals and divers other Offices of mark he was always named by the King of Lombardie neither he nor any of his Clergy trotted at any time to Rome This was a great moat in the Priests eyes and therefore the Popes ofttimes sought to bring Millan into subjection unto their See but the Millanoyes still kept their liberty At last ann 1059. Ariald Clericus Decumanus conspired with Landulfus Cotta praefatus populi against the Arch-Bishop Wido and made a pretext that married Priests ought to be exautorate Wido assembled all his Bishops and Clergy at Fontanetum with common consent it was denied that Priests should have liberty of marriage Then was great strife in the Town the Nobility defended Wido and the People were for Landulf who sent Ariald to Pope Nicolaus II. accusing the Clergy of Millan and requiring him to send some Judges to try the matter He was glad of the occasion and sent Peter Damian Bishop of Ostia and Anselm Bishop of Luca. So soon as Damian began to talk
Canons that each Presbyter dwelling in a Parish be subject unto the Bishop in whose Parish he dwelleth and alwaies in Lent that he shew and give account of their Ministry whether of Baptism or Catholick Faith and Prayers and order of Masses Then he forbiddeth sacrifice to the dead and other prophane rites of Heathens he appointeth punishment against the fornications and adulteries of Monks In the end it is Dâ—creed that Monks and Nuns should live within their Abbeys and Alms-houses according to the rule of their Father Benedict Concil tom 2. edit Crab. Behold how little mention is here of the Bishop of Rome 2. In the year 747. at Clonesho in England was a frequent Synod where At Clonesho it was Decreed 1. That Bishops should be more diligent in taking heed to their charge and admonishing people of their faults 2. They should maintain the devotion of true peace and love and serve God in the same faith hope and love praying for one another mutually 3. That once in the year each Bishop should visit all the Parishes of his Diocy and restrain the Heathenish observations which as yet were amongst the people 4. That none should be admitted into Orders till his life and conversation and literature were examined 7. That Bishops and Abbots should diligently take heed that all under them be diligent in reading for instruction of souls for it is to be lamented say they that so few are found to be ravished with the love of holy knowiedge but are rather mis-carried with vanities and love of idle glory and trace not the study of holy Scriptures 10. That Presbyters should learn to know all the duties of their Office especially they should learn to interpret in their own language the Creed the Lord's Prayer and the words that are said in the Mass and in Baptism and they should study to know what the words signifie spiritually â—8 That the Fast of the fourth seventh and the tenth months should be observed King Aelfwald and Offa were present and they two with many Dukes and Counts confirm the Decrees with their subscriptions Spelman ad An. 747. 3. Constantine Copronymus assembled a Councel at Constantinople of At Constantinople 338. Bishops out of Asia and Europe An. 755. this they called the seventh General Councel Here was Theodore Bishop of Ephesus Basil Bishop of Pisidia Pastiles Bishop of Pergamenum John of Nicomedia Cosmas of Epiphania in Apamea c. The controversie of Images was discussed Germanus Patriarch of Constantinople Gregory Bishop of Cyprus and John Damascene Patrons of Images were accursed and Constantine Bishop of Salaeum was made Patriarch Images of Christ of Mary and of the Apostles were condemned as having no warrant from Christ nor the Apostles nor the Fathers And if any would say that the Images of Christ only were condemned because they cannot represent his two natures but the Apostles had two natures and therefore they may be tolerated The Synod answereth it is the subtlety of divelish men following the errours of the Gentils but it is said in the Scriptures God is a Spirit and will be worshipped in spirit and truth No man hath seen God at any time but ye heard his voice and Blessed are they who have not seen and believe c. Then they alledge many testimonies of the Fathers against Images They conclude Let none of whatsoever estate henceforth follow so wicked and impure institution who dare from henceforth make any image or worship or set up any image in a Church or private house or have it privily if he be a Bishop or Deacon let him be deposed if he be a Laick let him be accursed and subject to the Emperour's censure because he fighteth against the Scriptures nor observeth the traditions c. Lastly follow the Canons accursing particularly all them who have images of the Trinity or of Christ as he is God or as he is man or as he is both God and Man in the hypostatical union or as if he were two persons to paint on the one side the son of God and on the other the son of Mary And they accurse all who have an image of any Saint 4. In the year 787. by perswasion of Tharasius Patriarch Irene called a Councel at Constantinople Here were Pe. Vicedon a Priest and Pe. Hegumen a Monk Legates of Pope Adrian John Patriarch of Antiochia Thomas of Alexandria c. Augustus made disputation of the worship of Images it was scanned on both sides Tharasius and other Bishops and Monks were for them against them was Basilius Bishop of Ancyra Theodore Bishop of Myri Theodosius Bishop of Amorio with many more Bishops and a great number of Teachers and Lay-men The Patriarch could not prevail by number and went about to exclude the better part from the Synod or disputation whereupon a tumult was like to arise for the people could not be content that so great a part should be debarred when the Patriarch saw that he could not prevail the Synod was dissolved The Image-worshippers report this story as if their adversaries had dealt only by faction and not by reason But thus writeth Pa. Diacon lib. 23. rer Roman Irene retaineth the Legates of Rome and by their advice banished a great number of them whom they called Iconomachi or fighters against Images Then she assembled another Synod at Nice in Septemb. An. 788. where the matter was quickly dispatched as Adrian and Tharasius would when there was no great opposition to wit as it is declared in Act. 3. they Decree that Images should be had embraced saluted kissed and adored but that which is called Latria they reserved unto the Trinity only Their chief pretence is because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to imbrace and to love and the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 addeth unto the signification as in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and what a man loveth or imbraceth that doth he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as David did Jonathan and Christ saith the Pharisees love the first places at Bankets and salutations in the Market-places Also the fore-named Basil Theodore and Theodosius with the Bishops Hippatius of Neece Leo of Rhodos Gregory of Pisidia Gregory of Pessinus Leo of Iconium Nicolaus of Hierapolis and Leo of Carpathe were perswaded to profess repentance and confess an errour in the former Synod So Images were set up and worshipped both in the East and West saith Pa. Diacon loc cit and Zonar lib. 3. Not long after Constantine did annull the Acts of this Convent Platin. which they call the seventh General Councel Baronius in Annal ad An. 794. sheweth that many learned men and of great esteem in those daies as Jonas Aurelianen Walfrid Hincmarus and others writ against the worship of Images and directly did contradict that Councel although it was confirmed by the Pope Yea and 5. In the year 792. Charls the Great summoned a Councel at Franckford At Franckford which he did moderate
of the Sacraments preaching and the like nothing should be received as a price This is against the practise of that time as we have now heard in the testimony of Jo. Vitoduran On chap. 16. He calleth Peter blessed because the confession of true faith leadeth unto blessedness ...... and I say unto thee i. e. for thee and thy companions thou art Peter i. e. a confessor of the rock which is Christ and upon this rock which thou hast confessed i. e. upon Christ will I build my Church and the gates of hell i. e. persecution of tyrants the assaults and tentations of evil spirits shall not prevail against her to turn from the true faith Whence it is clear saith he that the Church consisteth not by men in respect of power or dignity Ecclesiastical or Secular because many Princes and chief high Priests and others inferiors have made apostasie from the faith and therefore the Church consisteth in those persons which continue in true knowledge and confession of the faith and truth By these few words he overthroweth the Popedom as it is taught now And then he saith These keys are not material but are a spiritual power which is two-fold one a power of discerning sin from what is not sin as under the Law the Priests discerned between leprosie and not leprosie But observe that although one cannot discern this without knowledge yet knowledge is not the key but a power of judging by knowledge which he must first have and therefore although knowledge is not the key yet it is necessarily requisite unto the due exercise of the key The other key is the power of receiving into the Kingdom or of shutting out according to true judgement for the unworthy should be excluded and the worthy should be received On Ephes 1. at the words Before the foundation of the world he saith The election is from eternity but the effect thereof is in time which effect is the sanctification of the reasonable creature therefore it followeth that we should be holy ..... according to the pleasure of his will from which dependeth election and predestination and not for our merits not onely in deed or actually but also in the foresight of God 30. The third age of the School-men began from the year 1320. or thereabout The third age of School-men and continued until 1516. of the condition whereof we have had somewhat by the way but because we promised to speak of it here we add more particularly The School-men of this age had a three-fold power teaching in Schools preaching in Pulpits and giving Indulgences of their Inquisition is enough before For the little modesty of former ages was now turned into impudence for because in their Inquisition they had refused the holy Scriptures to be their rule now in their Schools they durst say The Scriptures are the buckler of Hereticks and therefore all Laicks must be discharged from reading the Scriptures under no less pain then to be accounted Hereticks They blamed the Scriptures of obscurity imperfection ambiguity and compared it unto a nose of wax Will. Tindal in his book of obedience Edit at Marlborough in Hesse An. 1528. fol. 16. saith The Scripture say they is so hard that thou couldest never understand it but by the Doctors that is I must measure the measuring yard by the cloth ...... They will say yet more shamefully None can understand the Scriptures without Philautia that is Philosophy a man must be well seen in Aristotle before he can understand the Scripture say they And fol. 62. They pervert the holy Scripture and all Doctors wresting them unto their abominable purpose quite contrary to the meaning of the Text and circumstances going before and after which divellish falshood lest the Lay-men should perceive is the very cause why they will not suffer the Scripture to be in English Then also it began to be doubted among them whether the Pope be a god or a man or neither of the two to be the Vicar of Christ was thought to be a small honor In Prooem Clementin Iohannes Epist the Gloss at the word Papa saith Nec Deus est nec homo sed neuter inter utrumque And in the margin Papa nec Deus est nec homo Pope Pius the V. in his Edition An. 1572. was ashamed of these words and left them out But Pope Gregory the XII in his recognition An. 1580. omitteth the words of the margin and in the Gloss the words are thus Papa id est admirabilis dicitur à Papa quod est interjectio admirantis verè admirabilis quia vices Dei in terris gerit Inde dixit ille Anglicus in poetria nova Papa stupor mundi circa finem Qui maxima rerum Nec Deus es nec homo sed neuter inter utrumque Etymologia vero nominis est pater patrum But the man of sin is yet advanced higher therefore in these extravagants Ioha XXII tit 14. c. Cum inter nonnullos the Gloss saith To believe that the Lord God our Pope cannot ordain otherwise it is heretical Ye may see such other passages in Morn Myster pag. 444 445. and Spalaten de Repub. Eccles lib. 2. cap. 6. § 15. cited out of their books So those times were darkened with clouds of most gross ignorance and divellish illusions And who can any more doubt but the Pope is the Antichrist we The Pope is the Antichrist have heard not onely the profession of their opposites and the confessions of those which were held to be Popes and called Antipopes calling one another the Antichrist but likewise we see the gloriation of the Popes admitting that title The Lord God our Pope and not only laying the Scriptures in their footstool but dispising them and preferring their own Canons and traditions in comparison of the sacred Scriptures But to make more clear what was the order of the Schools in that age hear yet more from Will Tindal in that book and place cited One of you teacheth contrary to another when two of you meet the one disputeth and brawleth with the other as if it were two scolds and for as much as one of you holdeth this doctrine and another that as one followeth Duns another St. Thomas another Boneventure Alexander de Hales Raymond Lyra Brigot Dorbel Holcot Gorran Trumbet Hugo de S. Victor de Monte Tegio de Nova Villa de Media Villa and such like out of number so that if thou hadst but of every Author one book thou couldst not pile them up in any were-house of London and every Author is contrary to another in so great diversity of spirits how shall I know who lieth and who saith truth And fol. 18. speaking of the same School-men he saith Ye drive men from God's word and will let no man come thereunto until he have been two years Master of Art first they nosel them in sophistry and in bene fundatum in the margin he saith The School doctrine as
Richard a Deacon with others upon several occasions of sedition amongst the people When Chetumar was dead so great was the sedition there that no Presbyter did abide untill Walinch being Duke sent again unto Virgilius who sent Hiemo and Reginbald Presbyters and Majoran a Deacon with others and in the year 794. Charls sent Erick to be their Duke who expelled a great number of the Huns and then that land of Pannonia Inferiour continued under obedience of the King and the Christian faith was embraced by the people Catal. test ver lib. 9. In all these is no mention of sending to or from Rome for their Reformation 13. In this Century the Turks came out of Scithia or Tartary into the Province Turks became Mahametans of Alami thence into Colchis out of that into Armenia and then into Asia the less An. 755. Histories do vary concerning their original but the most probable opinion is that they are descended of the Tartars because Pompon Mela who lived in the daies of the Emperour Claudius reckoneth Turcae among the Scythians Lib. 1. Cap. Chalybes and as Io. Lampadius after Mechovius witnesseth the Turks and Tartars have the same manner of Apparel one manner of Riding one manner of Bows and Arrows and in Language they differ only in dialect as the Italian and Spaniard At that time the Turks hindered the Sarazens from conquering in Asia and Europe God raising up one wicked enemy against another that his Church might have breathing except that they prevailed in the Mediterrane Isles and Peloponnesus In the end these two did agree upon conditions 1. That the Turks should be called Sarazens and imbrance Mahumetism 2. They should have the Province of Hircana or Sogdiana 3. They should be subject unto the Calipha of Babylon They continued living by Pastorage without a Prince of their own untill Civil Wars among the Sarazens about the year 1050 and therefore I speak no more of them untill the 11. Century CHAP. IV. Of BRITAN 1. BEda a Presbyter in the Monastery at Weeremouth neer Durham for Beda Venerable and hiâ— doctrines his godliness and modesty was called Venerable and is still accounted worthy of that Title He was credulous in believing of false miracles and slipped into some corruptions of the times as confession and chrism yet even in these he differeth from the latter times for on Jam. 5. at these words Let them pray anointing he saith We read in the Gospel that the Apostles did so and the custom of the Church holdeth that the weak should be anointed with oil by the Presbyters and prayer being conjoined be healed nor only by the Presbyters but as Pope Innocentius writeth even any Christian may anoint in his own necessity or of others Here he speaketh of anointing as a means of healing and not a Sacrament for the dying And on the words Confess your sins one to another and pray one for another that ye may be healed he saith In this sentence should be that discretion that we should confess to one another daily and light sins and beleeve to be healed by their daily prayer And moreover the uncleanness of more grievous leprosie let us according to the Law confess unto the Priest and have a care to be cleansed at his will how and how long time he shall command He seeth in these words no warrant that any should confess unto a Priest but one to another mutually and as he saith coaequaliter and that to the end they may be healed and what he would have done unto the Priest he borroweth it from the Law of Moses And on Mar. chap. 3. when he hath spoken of the miracles that were done by the Apostles he saith Now when the number of Believers is multiplied many within the holy Church have the life or conversation of vertue but have not the signs or miracles of vertue because miracle is in vain shewed outwardly if it fail that should work inwardly for according to the saying of the Apostle of the Gentils Tongues are a sign not to believers but to unbelievers Here he sheweth that miracles were not necessary when the Gospel is confirmed and received As for the articles of positive doctrine he is clear Of the perfection of the Scriptures on 1 Pet. 4. at these words If any speak as the words of God he saith Fearing lest any man speak or command any thing but the will of God or but what is evidently commanded in the Holy Scriptures and be found as a false witness of God or sacrilegious or introducing any thing different from the Lord's doctrine or leaving or passing-by any of these things which are pleasant unto God seeing He most manifestly commandeth Preachers concerning those whom they shall teach saying Teaching them to observe whatsoever I have commanded you For he commandeth to deliver those things to be observed by their hearers which he hath commanded and no other things and those things not in part only but all And on the 2 Pet. 1. neer the end Who giving heed unto the words of the Prophets do well that thereby they may have the light of knowledge these should first know that none of the holy Prophets did preach unto the people through their interpretation but what they had learned from the Lord that did they commend to be done by their hearers and what heavenly mysteries they had perceived in secret these simply either by word or writ did they deliver unto the people of God and not as the Diviners of the Gentils who what they had forged out of their own hearts these things did they deliver unto the deceived people as the Oracles of God Therefore as the Prophets did write not their own but God's words so the reader of these should not follow his own interpretation lest he stray from the true sence but by all means he should attend this how he who writ would have his words understood So far he And how the right sence may be had he teacheth in Philip. 1. from Augustine saying When words make the Scripture ambiguous first we must see that we distinguish or pronounce them not wrong and when after such diligence we find it uncertain how to distinguish or to pronounce them look to the rule of faith which we have from plainer places of the Scripture and from the authority of the Church But if both or all or more parts be dubious then we should consult the Text it self by the following and preceding parts where the ambiguity is to the end we may see unto which of these many senses it will give suffrage and suffer it self to be conjoined Concerning the person and natures of Christ on 2 Pet. 2. he saith Arrius who said that our Redeemer is in respect of divinity inferiour unto the Father and Photinus who said that Christ is Man and not God and Manichaeus who said Christ is God only and not a very man and Hebron who said Christ was not before Mary and took his original
the I that authority is derived from Peter and the other Apostles unto all the Bishops of the Church for the priviledge of Saint Peter is wheresoever according Rome and Rhemes compared to his equity justice is done no less in Rhemes then in Rome and no more in Rome then in Rhemes but is alike unto all every where according as Bishops more or less discharge their office And he expounds these words Thou art Peter ... as Augustine doth in Ser. 13. de verb. Dom. I will build my Church upon that firm and solid confession which thou hast confessed Ph. Morn in Myster in an Epistle to Hincmar Bishop of Laudun saith The seventh general Councel so called by the Greeks indeed a wicked Councel concerning Images which some would have broken into pieces and some would have to be worshipped was kept not long before my time by a number of Bishops gathered together at Nice the Acts thereof the Bishop of Rome did send into Francia in the Reign of Charls the Great the See Apostolick willing it to be so a Synod was held in Germany by the convocation of the same Emperour and there by the path-way of Scriptures and the tradition of the Fathers the false Councel of the Greeks was confuted and utterly rejected of whose consutation there was a good big volumn sent from Charls by some Bishops unto Rome which in my young years I did read in the Palace This testimony is of more credit then a hundred late Writers who deny that Synod at Frankford or that a Synod under Charls did condemn the second Synod at Nice Thereafter in that Epistle he saith We should beleeve that the motion of repentance is from God as the Apostle saith If God will give them repentance .... To have Church is not to have a primacy in Divine things for then all rulers of the Church should have primacy all those wicked men rule not the Church who seem to be within neither is it denied but they give baptism In the same Epistle he rebuketh his Nephew for denying baptism unto Infants Catol test ver lib. 9. 17. At that time was much to do in the doctrine of Predestination Gotteschalk The five Articles of Gotteschalk by birth a Frank or Belgik as Aventin lib. 4. Annal. Boior calleth him was ordained a Priest by Rigbold chorepiscopus in the vacancy of the See of Rhemes The now named Hincmar in an Epistle unto the Church of Lions which is in Biblioth Sixt. Senen part 1. pag. 1053. edit Colon. writes that he held these five Articles First God before all ages and ere he made any thing even from the beginning did predestinate unto the Kingdom whom he would and did predestinate unto destruction whom he would 2. They who are predestinate unto destruction cannot be saved and who are predestinate unto the Kingdom cannot perish 3. God willeth not that all men be saved but only them who be saved and whereas the Apostle saith Who willeth that all men be saved he meaneth only all them who shall be saved 4. Christ came not to save all men nor did he suffer for all men but only for them who shall be saved by the mystery of his Passion 5. Since the first man fell of his free will none of us can use free-will to do good but only to do evil Remigius Bishop of Lions in the name of the Church of Lions are defended and opposed defended these five Articles as is to be seen loc cit Whereupon Hincmar writ unto Pope Nicolaus as Baron Annal. ad An. 948. relates against Gotteschalk and calleth these Articles the heresie of the Predestinatians which was overthrown in Affrick and thereafter in France by authority of Pope Celestine and by the care and vigilancy of Prosper When Gotteschalk returned from Italy Raban Bishop of Mentz summoned him into a Synod and when he could not perswade him to change his mind he did write unto Hincmar and others and did oppugn some conclusions which he had wrested from these five Articles Remigius writes again shewing that all the arguments of Raban did not touch the Articles as it is in the above named Bibliotheca Then Hincmar summoned Gotteschalk unto a Synod of 12 Bishops and some Priests and Abbots in Carisiac on Isara where four Articles were enacted against him he was condemned of heresie and contumacy and he condemned The Articles at Carisiac he was whipped with rods and cast in prison The Church of Lions after sight of these four Articles sent forth their censure of them both which are in Biblioth cit pag. 1082. The Canons are these First God Almighty made man without sin upright with free will and set him in Paradise whom he would to abide in the holiness of righteousness 2. Man using ill his free-will did sin and fall and became the mass of perdition of mankind but the good and just God did chuse of the same mass of perdition according to his fore-knowledge whom by his grace he did predestinate to life and prepared life eternal for them 3. But others whom in the judgement of righteousness he left in the mass of perdition he foreknew them to perish but he did not predestinate that they should perish yet because he is just he did predestinate everlasting punishment unto them and therefore we say there is but one predestination of God which concerneth the gift of grace or the rendring of righteousness Can. II. In the first man we have lost the freedom of will which we have received by Christ and we have free will unto good being prevened and helped by grace and we have free will unto evil being forsaken of grace and we have free-will because it is freed by grace and by grace healed from corruption Can. III. God will have all men without exception to be saved although all men be not saved and that some are saved it is the gift of him who saveth and that some perish it is the merit of them who perish Can. IV. Our Lord Jesus Christ as there was not is nor shall be any man whose nature is not assumed in him so there was is and shall be no man for whom he did not die although all be not redeemed by the mystery of his Passion it concerneth not the greatness and copiousness of the price but it concerneth the part of unbelievers and them who beleeve not with that faith which worketh by love for the cup of man's salvation which was made through human infirmity and divine vertue hath in it self that it may be profitable unto all but if it be not drunken it cureth not Followeth the sum are censured by the Church of Lions Can. I. of the censure of the Church of Lions in the first part of the first Canon is no mention of the grace of God without which no rational creature ever could or now can or shall be able to be or abide or persist in righteousness and holiness as if man had been
Jews so here election is for the Elect who obtain justification by faith On Cap. 15 at these words Whatsoever is written is written for our instruction ... he saith The Apostle joineth himself unto all Beleevers and will shew that all things which are written in Divine books are not written for them whose deeds and works are there reported for they are in rest long ago but for our salvation and of them which are to come that we may have whence we may take example of faith and good works and whence we may know with what works God is pleased and with what he is provoked to punish .... for what did it avail to Abraham that Moses hath written he was obedient and that he commends him to have pleased God But he saith Whatsoever things are written in the Law Prophets Psalms and other Scriptures are written for our instruction that we which are come unto the faith may thence learn Seeing Remigius writeth that the Scriptures are written for the instruction of all Beleevers would he then have consented unto the Act of Trent which forbids the use of the Scriptures unto Beleevers On 1 Cor. 1. at these words That no flesh should glory before him he saith No flesh that is no man The wise and mighty cannot glory because they are not called by him for their wisdom and riches neither had they divine wisdom or spiritual riches of themselves The Apostles could not glory because whatsoever they had of favour they received it from God without their merits and they cannot glory that they were chosen for their wisdom and riches ..... He that glorieth let him glory in the Lord he glorieth in the Lord and not in himself who confesseth that all the good he hath he hath received it from God without his own merit and therefore seeks not his own glory and praise but his glory from whom he hath received whatsoever he hath On Gal. 6. on these words God forbid that I rejoice but in the Cross of Christ he saith that is I will not rejoice in the riches and dignities of this World but in the Cross of Christ i. e. in his suffering which was done on the Cross will I rejoice from whence is my redemption and salvation Or I will rejoice in the Cross of Christ that is in this will I rejoice if I can follow the suffering of Christ what he hath sustained for me I may sustain the like for his name Hence we may see that Remigius did not rejoice in the painted or moulded Cross but in Christ's sufferings for our redemption On Eph. 2. at these words Built on the foundation he saith The foundation of the Prophets Apostles and of all the faithfull is Christ because they are grounded and established in faith of him as he himself said Upon this Rock that is upon me will I build my Church Here Remigius expoundeth the Rock to signifie Peter On Cap. 5. at these words Not having spot or wrinkle he saith In this world the Church may be said to be glorious one way because it hath Kings and Princes subject and it hath many orders and degrees but it cannot be without spot or wrinkle of sin because it hath many penitents in it and if we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us and there is not a man upon earth which doth good and sinneth not wherefore it is better that we refer these words unto the general resurrection On Cap. 6. The sword of the Holy Ghost is the Word of God as the Apostle saith that is the doctrine and knowledge of the Divine Scriptures which is given unto us by the Holy Ghost And it is called a sword because as enemies are put to flight by a sword so by the knowledge of Divine Scriptures we may put to flight all the craft and devices of the Divel by following what the Scripture teacheth and eschewing what it forbiddeth and not only may we overcom the Divels by the knowledge of the word and by the help of God but by authority thereof we may convince all Hereticks and destroy all their errours Reader observe in this testimony the manifold use of the Scriptures and especially that they are a rule wherewith all errours may be destroied On Phil. 2. at these words It is God who worketh in you he saith Lest he seem to exclude God from our salvation or as if without the help of God we could be saved â—e subjoins For it is God who worketh in you therefore every good which we have as well the good will as the good operation is not of us but of God ..... both to will that is to have a good will and to do according to good will that is that we may alwaies will what is good On Cap. 3. at these words If I may comprehend in whom I am comprehended he saith All the Elect which are predestinated for eternal life are comprehended in the Passion of Christ because thereby are redeemed not only those who are saved after his resurrection and who are purged in baptism but all the godly which were before his coming ..... Whosoever are perfect in comparison of others let us think so understand that we are not perfect for whosoever are perfect that is who are thought to be perfect let us understand that this is in comparison of Beleevers and who have less understanding because we are not perfect in respect of what we shall have at the day of judgement On 1 Tim. 2. he saith Seeing the Psalmist saith The Lord doth whatsoever he willeth and the Apostle saith Which will have all men to be saved Why are not all men saved To which I say Because it is true what the Psalmist saith For he hath said and it shall be likewise he will save all men which are saved and which by his mercy seek to be saved for the Apostles have put the whole for a part as in the Gospel the Lord saith When I shall be exalted from the earth I will draw all men unto me for he drew not all men nor draweth all men but all that is the Elect out of all sorts and Nations out of all sex and condition from Kings unto Beggars from the perfect unto the babe of one day yet none can be saved but whom God willeth because he sheweth mercy on whom he will for if all men had continued in perdition just had been the judgment of God but that his mercy and power might be shewed because he is powerfull to save all men in those which do perish he shews his just judgment and his mercy in them which are saved for his grace preveneth us that we have will and our will should accord with his will and then he will give us ability and because we join our will to his will we are worthy to be rewarded and nevertheless it is all to be ascribed unto his grace whatsoever good we do He saith then Which will have
apparent vertue comes not from us but from God or lest it be thought that we can do any thing worthy of praise as of our selves let us ascribe all unto God and let us acknowledge that is of his gift whatsoever we do well On Gal. 2. Paul demonstrates in this place that he was equal unto Peter for saith he he who wrought by Peter in the Apostleship of circumcision wrought also by me amongst the Gentiles ...... Some say It was not Peter the excellent follower of Christ which was rebuked by Paul but another Cephas ... But hear most wise man for neither do we say that Peter as ignorant what he should have done was rebuked by Paul but we say that he willingly did admit reproof that he might give unto others an example of patience On Eph. 1. at these words The exceeding greatness of his power in us he saith Nor is it easie to be understood how great is that power and vertue which changeth a man's mind from the wonted custom and to pull it out of errours from which to draw a man sticking in them so great power is requisite that so great power scarcely appears in raising the dead for the Lord did raise the dead with one word and yet he converted not the Jews to him by perswading with multitudes of words and miraculous works He saith therefore the revelation of the Spirit is necessary that we may learn the same faith which we have received that we have received it by the greatest power and working of God for as he raised Christ from the dead so hath he brought us unto light when we were dead and hath drawn us from infidelity and therefore he saith it was done by the exceeding greatness of his power and the power of his vertue On Cap. 2. Yea it is to be thought a greater power to bring into the right way straying souls and addicted to sin then to raise up the dead And at these words By whose grace ye are saved he saith He puts in this as being strucken with astonishment wondring at the unspeakable gift of God for he saith Ye are not saved by your travel or work but only by grace as for your works certainly ye were worthy of wrath and punishment On Cap. 6. The Apostle sheweth how Parents may bring their children into obedience if ye will saith he have your children obedient unto you bring them unto and acquaint them with the word of God and say not let Monks study the holy Scripture for it is the duty of every Christian and especially of him who converseth in worldly affairs and the rather that he hath need of more help as who is driven among the waves of the World therefore it is most profitable for thee that thy children both hear and read the holy Scripture and out of them they shall learn Honour thy father and thy mother but if thou breed thy children in the books of Heathens they will learn very bad things out of them which shall not be if they be acquainted with the word of God On 1 Thess 1. It is manifest that souls are brought unto faith and salvation not by perswasion of man but by the power of God On 2 Thess 2. The Lord will not come unless there come first a departing that is the Antichrist whom he calleth a departing because in very deed he will cause many to depart from Christ .... So that he sits in the Temple of God as a God not in the Church of Jerusalem only but he will sit in all Churches every where Shewing himself that he is God he saith not Saying but Shewing that is he will attempt to prove that he is God for he will make such great works and signs that he may deceive all men .... What with-holds that is hindreth but what is that some have said it is the grace of the Spirit some say the Roman Empire to which opinion John Chrysostom agreeth for unless the Roman Empire be destroied Antichrist can have no way to do as he willeth Paul hath expressed this darkly for he would not rashly take upon him the malice of the Romans nor cast himself into danger in vain for if he had said the Roman Empire will be taken away shortly they presently would have buried him quick as threatning the ruine of the Empire and they would have killed all the Beleevers that followed him as if they wished the overthrow of so great an Empire .... Only he that with holds shall with-hold .... that is when the Roman Empire shall be taken away then shall he come for so long as they are under the fear of this no man will easily submit himself unto another but when this is overthrown he will begin another dominion and as if all were his he will pervert the things that concern both God and man for as other Monarchies were taken away one by another before the height of the Romans .... so this Kingdom of the Romans shall be destroied by the Antichrist and Daniel hath prophecied that it shall be so Some understand otherwise but I would have thee to think as we have said with blessed Chrysostom On 1 Tim. 1. at the last words he saith Thou seest how to search curiously into divine things turned into blasphemy for it is injurious against God when we indeavour to comprehend in our mind and thought the things that are done by his will and dispensation On Cap. 3. One may ask why the Apostle omitteth the Priests because what things are spoken of Bishops belong unto Priests for these are commanded to instruct others and to govern the Churches and are inferiours unto them by the only ceremony of consecration On 2 Tim. 3. That the man of God may be perfect amendment saith he must be sought from the Scriptures that nothing may be lacking to him which walks according to God if therefore thou desirest to be perfect and wishest neither to be cast down with adversity nor puft up with prosperity for that is perfection seek advice of the holy Scriptures when thou wantest me And since he writ of such reading unto Timothy being filled with the holy Spirit how much more are we to be exhorted thereunto which have need of this Spirit And observe how we cannot be upright and perfect unless the holy Scriptures do help us On Heb. 9. so And Christ was once offered by whom was he offered by himself and not by another man for though he was the High-Priest he was also the sacrifice and the oblation To take away the sins of many .... Why saith he of many and not of all men Because all men beleeve not but Christ's death is equal to the perdition of all men that is it is sufficient that all men perish not and and it was paied for the salvation of all men and he died for all men so far as was in him and nevertheless he hath not taken the sin of all men because they fight against him and so they
assured that this is the mind of Theophylact because for confirmation he adds The Lord said The bread that I will give you is my flesh and on these words in Ioh. 6. he saith Note well that the bread which is eaten by us in the Sacrament is not only some figuration of the Lord's flesh but the same flesh of the Lord for he said not The bread that I will give is a figure of my flesh but it is my flesh for by mysterious words it is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost into the Lord's flesh And at the words Vnless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man he addeth When we hear unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man ye shall not have life we must in taking the Divine mysteries or Sacrament hold undoubted faith and not ask what way for the natural man that is who follows human and natural thoughts is not capable of spiritual things which are above nature and so he understandeth not the spiritual eating of the Lord's flesh of which they who are not partakers are not partakers of eternal life because they have not received Iesus who is eternal life for it is not the flesh of a meer man but of God and is able to Deifie us to wit being united unto the God-head That flesh is also verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted as corruptible food but it is a help unto eternal life In these his words we see that he speaks not absolutely as he did seem to speak on Matthew but as he spoke on Mark The bread is not only some figuration and then he saith It is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost And then he saith In taking the Divine mysteries we must hold undoubted faith then they who have not faith undoubted cannot eat that mysterious Sacrament And we must not ask what way to wit as they do now whether the substance of the bread be turned into the substance of Christ's body or whether the substance of the bread is turned to nothing and Christ's body comes into the form of the bread or c. Theophylact is far from asserting any of these waies And when he saith That flesh is verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted he speaks not of the visible bread which experience teacheth to be corruptible but he speaks of the Lord's flesh which we receive by faith In a word then Theophylact speaks nothing of transubstantiation but rather against it and the Papists delude themselves and abuse his words A fourth thing they object out of Theophylact that he asserts the Primacy of Peter when he saith on Joh. 21 He who durst not ask concerning the Traitour but did commit the question unto another now the government of all is concredited unto him And on the margine Porsena addeth Praefectura omnium Petro tributa and it follows as if Christ were saying unto Peter Now I bring thee forth that thou mayest govern the world and follow me and on the margine Praeest Petrus orbi But to expound these words as if Peter were the only governour of the World and the government of the World were wholly concredited unto Peter alone is far contrary unto the words and mind of Theophylact as we have heard from him on Gal. 2. where he asserteth that Paul was equal unto him and on Matth. 16 where he asserteth that all the Apostles were of equal authority Peter therefore was a governour of the world but not the only governour for all the Apostles were as much governours as he in respect of power since the power was given unto them all with one and the same words as Theophylact asserts and whatsoever power they had yet they had no civil power because as we have heard from Theophylact on Rom. 13. all souls even Apostles must be subject unto the Civil Magistrate Neither do the words of Porsena insinuate so much as they would have for Praefectura and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is but a subordinate power and a little jurisdiction yea and for the most part a conjunct power as Praefectus urbis which at Rome were two conjunct and subordinate unto the power of the former So this is all the power which they can bring unto Peter from the words of Theophylact and we may see how in many particulars he differeth from the Tenets of the Romish Church and favoureth them not in the main things wherein they pretend to have his consent 4. Radulph a Benedictine of Flaviak in this Century writ 20 books on Leviticus and 14 books on the Epistles of Paul as witnesseth Gesner In the Preface on Levit. he saith Although it should move us not a little to beleeve that the world was contrary unto the faith and now is subject unto the faith and that the faith was declared by so many miracles and testified by the blood of so many Martyrs yet the singular ground of faith is in the Scriptures when it is clearly seen to be fulfilled in our daies which we know was prefigured and foretold so many years by the Sacraments of the Fathers and Oracles of the Prophets Here by the way note that not only Radulph but many others of the more ancient Fathers do use the word Sacrament for the rites of religion yea and for mysteries and very largely or homonymously Lib. 1. cap. 1. Our Lord Jesus Christ is our Altar because we lay our oblation on him for if we do any good thing we hope that by him it shall be accepted of the Father and therefore the Apostle Peter saith Offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable unto God through Jesus Christ ..... The authority of the Holy Scripture doth furnish unto us matter of holy thoughts Ibid. Scarcely can any good work be perfected without admission of some sin it is therefore to be feared lest when the reward of perfect devotion is expected the punishment of our guiltiness be required of us Lib. 2. cap. 2. That Angel is none other but our greatest High-Priest of whom we speak to wit he was sent by the Father unto men and sent again from men unto the Father to plead the causes of men before the Father he being the Mediatour of God and men Ibid. cap. 4 Whatsoever man can do for himself were no way sufficient to obtain forgiveness unless the immaculate sacrifice of that Just one did commend the repentance of sinners Lib. 5. cap. 3 When ye do any good thing ascribe not the very affection of godliness unto you as if ye could do it of your self for it is God which worketh in us at his good pleasure both to will and to perfect ..... he who ascribeth grace unto himself must necessarily lose grace for which he was not thankfull Lib. 6. cap. 3. He dieth who discovereth his head because while he expects salvation another way then by the grace of Christ he doth
Book Castigatio in Ecclesiasticum Ordinem he distinguisheth Church-men into Bishops or Priests as he speaketh and the Clerks of the first sort he expoundeth the first part of the third Chapter of 1 Tim. and he expoundeth the second part of the Clerks and from that Chapter he convinceth them both He nameth no other degree of Church-men but certainly he had named them if any other had been among them because he speaketh so distinctly of the several ranks of men both in State and Church He calleth the first sort oftest Sacerdotes simply but never Episcopos unless he add sive Sacerdotes The book is in Bibliotheca Patrum de la Bigne We may conclude then the ancient Britans had no Church-men above the degree of Priest-hood Now if that were added which followeth in this Chapter concerning Ireland we have found four National Churches that have been governed without Prelates to wit the Affrican ancient Britan the Scots and Irish some for the space of 500. years yea untill the Britans were subdued by the English and some for the space of 1000. or 1100. years And we have found that there was a Church-Council consisting partly of Rulers who were not Teachers besides that Ambrose and others testifie that such were every where Yea and in Rome it is most probable that the first Teachers Of the first Bishops of Rome were of equal Authority I say probable because Histories are not clear in this point Epiphanius Haeres 27. saith Peter and Paul were the first Bishops there but whether Linus and Cletus were Bishops there while the Apostles were alive I cannot well say It may be saith he because the Apostles went into other Nations to preach and Rome could not be without a Bishop for Paul went into Spain and Peter did oft visit Pontus and Bithynia and possibly when Clemens had refused I cannot say it certainly and Linus and Cletus were dead he was compelled to take the Bishoprick So conjunctuarily writeth Epiphanius Jerome in Catalog Scriptor saith Clemens was the fourth Bishop and he nameth Peter but not Paul Linus and Cletus but saith he many Latins say Clemens was next unto Peter Theodoret on 1 Tim. 4. saith They say Linus did succeed unto great Peter Io. Naucler in vol. 2. Generat 3. saith In the year of our Lord 70. Linus succeeded unto blessed Peter although blessed Peter had ordained that Clemens should succeed but Clemens considering that it was an ill example that one should succeed his Successor he renounced the Papacy and Linus was chosen then Cletus and fourthly Clemens Rufinus in praefa before Clemen Rocognit saith Some do ask seeing Linus and Cletus were Bishops of Rome before Clemens how could Clemens writing unto James say that Peter had given unto him the Chair of Teaching we have this reason of it Linus and Cletus were Bishops of Rome before Clemens but while Peter was alive they had the charge of the Bishoprick and Peter fulfilled the Office of Apostleship Dion Petavius a Jesuit in Rationa par 1. lib. 5. cap. 5. saith When Peter was killed by Nero Linus governed the Church of Rome as ancient writers affirm and they assign unto him eleven years two moneths and some days so that he died in the year 78. Unto him succeeded Cletus whom Irenaeus calleth Anacletus and he sat twelve years and seven moneths and suffered martyrdom ann 91. and Clemens was his Successor The Jesuit Io. Hart in Collog cum Io. Reynold c. 6. se 4. affirmeth That Peter before his death ordained onely Clemens to be his Successor Others have other opinions as it is in Collog ca. cit se 3. therefore I said Histories are uncertain in this point albeit a great part of the Romish faith is grounded upon it but it is most probable that Clemens Linus Cletus and Anacletus were Sympresbyters and the writers in following Ages speaking conformable to their own practice do name some one and some another But it is more certain that others were the first preachers of equal Authority at Rome then that any of these four were the first preachers there That Peter or Paul were Bishops of Rome it is not probable because they were Apostles and did the work of their Apostleship and the Scripture sheweth their diligence from time to time and it is certain that in the mean while other preachers were at Rome whom Paul saluteth Rom. 16. Aquila Epenaetus Andronicus Junias c. these he calleth of note among the Apostles and his fellow-laborers in the Lord. Sedulius saith Whom he calleth fellow-laborers he meaneth in the work of teaching and it is not without reason thought that the Romans believed by their teaching Ambrose or whoever was the Author of the Commentaries saith Those were not idle at Rome for they were zealous in devotion And it is understood that all those whom Paul saluteth came for confirmation of the Romans for which cause he saith that not onely he but all the Churches of the Gentiles give them thanks and he admonisheth the Romans to obey them In 2 Tim. 4. Paul mentioneth Linus to have been at Rome at that time and in the same verse he nameth others before him to wit Eubulus and Pudens which he would not have done if Linus had been their Prelate Wherefore there was a Church at Rome before Peter or Paul came thither as Paul writeth unto them as a constituted Church and testifieth that their faith was spoken of throughout the world c. 1. 8. and their obedience was come abroad unto all men It is certain also that they had many Preachers and other Officers to whom he directeth chap. 12 6 7 8. nor can any man prove that those Preachers had superiority one over another therefore it deserveth consideration Whether the Roman Church was not once constituted with purity of Teachers and Whether the Church of Antioch was not of the like constitution See and consider Acts 13. 1. and many Elders or Bishops were at Ephesus Acts. 20. 17 28. and so at Thessalonica 1 Thess 5. 12. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Revel 2. will not prove any imparity seeing it is attributed unto all Priests generally Mat. 2. 7. and the the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is too weak a foundation for such a building seeing it implieth not always a singularity but often an indefinite thing and answereth unto our particle a or an oftner then unto the particle the and so it may well be translated there To an Angel seeing many Bishops were at Ephesus And this putteth the question out of all doubt to me that as the Scripture is the first and main foundation commanding to Ordain Elders or Bishops these are one in Scripture-language in every Church Acts 14. 23. or in every Town Tit. 1. 5. Or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Clemens Bishop of Rome in his Epistle ad Corinth So for Practice and History it cannot be shewed that when the constant Moderators were appointed under the name of
Scripture so many as are predestinated unto life are they not called Kings and Priests therefore what God hath conjoyned let no man put asunder but rather what divine Authority hath ordained mans will should endeavor to fulfil and they should joyn in hearts who are conjoyned in ordinances let them cherish one another defend other mutually and bear one anothers burthens The wise man saith A brother aiding a brother both shall be comforted but if they bite one another which God forbid both shall come into desolation Let not my soul come into their counsels which say That either the peace and freedom of the Church is hurtful unto the Crown or the prosperity and exaltation of the Crown is hurtful unto the Church for God the Author of them both hath conjoyned them not to destruction but to edification If ye know this how long will ye dissemble the common contumely and common injury Is not Rome as the Apostolical Seat so also the head of the Empire therefore though I would not speak of the Church is it the honor of the King to have an headless Empire I know not what the wise men and Princes of the Kingdom do advise you herein but though I speak imprudently I will not be silent in what I do judge The Chuch of God from the beginning even till these times hath been oft afflicted and oft delivered it is her voice They have often afflicted me from my youth but they could not prevail against me Be sure O King that neither now will the Lord leave the rod of the wicked upon the back of the righteous the hand of the Lord is not shortned nor become unable to help At this time he will deliver his Spouse which he hath redeemed by his blood endowed with his spirit furnished with heavenly gifts and nevertheless enriched with earthly things He will deliver I say again he will deliver but if by the hand of another let the Princes of the Kingdom consider whether this be to the honor and advantage of the King certainly not Wherefore gird thy sword O most mighty and let Caesar recover unto himself what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's Vtrumque interesse Caesaris constat undoubtedly both these appertain to Caesar to maintain his own Crown and to defend the Church the one becometh the King and the other the Advocate of the Church The victory as we trust in the Lord is at hand the Romans are more arrogant then potent for what did ever any great or mighty Emperor or King presume so vile a thing both against Crown and Priest-hood but this cursed and tumultuous people which cannot measure their strength nor think on the end nor consider the event in their foolishness and fury durst attempt so great sacriledge the temerity of the multitude cannot stand for a moment before the King's face c. I will not here add observations Bellarmin de Ro. Pont. l. 2. c. 31. The original of the title â—icar of Christ alledgeth That Bernard did first give unto the Pope the Title Vicar of Christ It was not from the beginning so but the Cardinal mistaketh it Bernard was not the first if Platina do truly report the words of Gregory VII he used this Title before him and according to the language of the Court at that time Bernard giveth this Title unto all Priests even from whom all iniquity procedeth as he speaketh in festo Convers Pauli ser 1. and giveth unto Eusebius both this and loftier Titles for lib. 2. de Consider he calleth him The Great Priest the Prince of Bishops the Heir of the Apostles Abel in Primacy in Government Noah in Patriarchship Abraham in Order Melchisedek in Dignity Aaron in Authority Moses in Iudging Samuel in Power Peter in Vaction Christ here is a rhapsody of glorious Titles and he addeth these passages of Scripture that are wrested to maintain the ambition of the man of sin but whether he speak so in derision or according to his own minde it may be judged by his words following immediately but first see what he And confuted by Bernard at large said a little before What hath the holy Apostle left in legacy unto thee he saith What I have I give thee What is it One thing I know it is not silver nor gold seeing he said Silver and gold have I not If thou happen to have it use it according to the time and not at thy pleasure so use them as not abusing them seeing these in respect of the souls good are neither good nor ill but the use of them is good the abuse ill the care of them is worse and seeking is filthier by whatsoever way thou may have them certainly thou hast them not by title of the Apostle for he could not give what he had not what he had that he gave the care of all the Churches Gave he Lordly power hear himself Not domineering over the people but being an example of the flock And lest you think he said so in humility onely and not in truth the Lord saith in the Gospel The Kings of the earth have dominion but not ye so It is clear dominion is forbidden unto the Apostles Go then and take if thou darest either Apostleship if thou be a Lord or dominion if thou be Apostolical thou art clearly forbidden to do either of the two if thou wilt have them together thou shalt lose them both or else think not thy self to be excepted from those of whom God complaineth saying They have reigned but not by me they were Princes and I knew them not And if thou wilt reign without God thou hast glory but not with God We see what is forbidden now hear what is commanded Who is the greater among you let him be as the yonger and he that is chief as he that serveth There is the model of an Apostle dominion is forbidden and serving is commanded which is commended also by example of the Law-Giver for it followeth I am in the midst of you as he who serveth Bernard there hath many things to this purpose and after he hath mentioned these former Titles and prerogatives he saith I have spoken of who thou art but forget not what consider what thou wast and now art why wilt thou not behold what thou canst not cease to be Indeed it is one thing what thou wast and art and another who thou art â—ecome the one must not be forgot in searching thy self for thou art what thou wast and thou art not less after thou art become such and perhaps more thou wast born that and changed this but not changed into this the former is not cast off but this is added If thou consider what remember thy nature thou wast born a man if thou ask who thou art a Bishop this thou art made and not born which of these thinkest thou nearest or chiefest unto that thou art made or that thou wast born is not that thou wast born therefore I advise thee to
they are letcherous in such a maner that they have not broken any bond of marriage Ibid. cap. 3. It is not possible that any of these whom God hath predestinated unto the Crown can lose their Crown it may be and it hath come to pass that some lose the Crown whom God hath called by a visible calling or which might have been heard by man Ibid. lib. 6. cap. 11. Excepting the Apostles whatsoever other thing afterwards is said let it be cut off neither have any authority therefore albeit after the Apostles there be any holy man how wise soever he be let him not have that authority seeing the Lord speaketh in the Scriptures Ibid. lib. 11. cap. 20. Possibly one will say Since Christ overcame death and ascended into the heavens doth he descend thence again surely he descendeth but invisibly all the world hath heard his descending when a sound was heard from heaven as of the Spirit coming and filled the house where they were sitting did not Christ then descend from heaven Is the substance or Majesty of the Son separated from the Spirit that when the holy Ghost descendeth the Son of God descendeth not also certainly he descendeth not in the form of his manhood yet undoubtedly he descendeth in his uncircumscribed Deity or in the Spirit that he giveth and he descendeth to visit the Nations by his Messengers whom he inspireth 9. Bernard in Epist 56. ad Gaufrid Episco Carnot writeth that Notbert Praemonstratensis did teach that Antichrist was before the doors and to be revealed in the same age Within these few days saith Bernard there I obtained to see this mans face and I learned many things from an heavenly fistule to wit from his mouth Behold what account this Author made of him who spake thus Hen. Oraeus in Nomenclat saith this Notbert was the beginner of the Order of Monks in the Diocy of Magdeburgh Pol. Vergil de inven rer lib. 7. cap. 3. calleth him a Priest of Lorrain and saith that he began that most exact Order after the rule of Augustinians as also in that Chapter and the preceeding he sheweth that sundry others seeing about that time that the Monastical institutions were not observed men becoming always worse and worse and godliness was corrupted by riches quae pietas ut mater illas à principio Ordini pepererat quotidie sunt qui ignaviae suae potius quà m religioni consulant therefore they would reform the Order and added some new Rites for distinction from others of the same Order who were become looser and by these means the number of Orders were multiplied 10. Theodoricus Abbot of St. Trudo at Leodium about the year 1120. said Simon Magus now reigneth at Rome and not Simon Peter and Simony is in place of the Gospel what may we not have if we have money In Catal. test verit lib. 14. are some of his verses concerning the Government of the Church he saith Vt Mopso Nisa corvo datur ecâ—e columba Qualis pullus erit quem fert commixtio talis Hence it appeareth that good men at that time bewailed the wretched condition of the Church 11. Hugo de S. Victore by Nation a Saxon and Abbot of S. Victor at Paris was in great account about the year 1130. His works are extant in three Tomes In one place he saith The Clerks of our time know not the Law nor learn they it but they study vanity ease surfeiting and drunkenness they are often in the streets seldom in the Churches slow to search the faults of sinners and ready to follow the trace of hares they give more bread to dogs then to the poor their beds are better arayed then the altars the barking of dogs and lowing of oxen is more pleasant unto God then the singing of such Clerks their preaching may be dispised whose life is contemned Of our communion with Christ he saith on Iohn 6. The Lord shewing a difference betwixt the bread he gave and which they did eat in the wilderness saith I am the bread of life for he is the bread wherewith an hungry soul is refreshed which is when true faith embraceth him for by faith we love him and by love we are united unto Christ which is our life therefore this spiritual bread is eaten by faith even without Sacramental eating and is profitable unto salvation dayly we have need of this bread while this present life endureth and so said Augustine Why preparest thou thy teeth and stomach believe and thou hast eaten On Chapter 20. he saith Whose sins ye forgive i. e. whose sins are forgiven by you God also forgiveth them this is spoken generally not onely unto the Apostles as some say this is the prerogative of the Apostles but it is spoken and granted unto all their successors On Rom. 3. The written Law is called the Law of works because men under the Law thought that all their righteousness was in the works of the Law but the Law of Faith and Grace is so called because men under Grace set the sum and efficacy of their salvation on Grace onely knowing that as no man is saved by righteousness of his works so none is justified by works of his righteousness for righteousness is not of good works but good works are of righteousness On Chapter 4. If man had not sinned he should have had perfect righteousness which consisteth in the perfect fulfilling of God's commands so that he should have had no lust against reason and he might have loved God with all his heart but after sin and for sin man cannot have this perfect righteousness unto which eternal life is justly due but God of his grace giveth faith unto man and of the same grace reputeth it for that perfection as if he had the perfection of righteousness De Scriptura Scriptor Sacris cap. 1. he saith That Scripture onely is truly called Divine which was from the Spirit of God and written by those who spoke by God's Spirit that maketh a man divine and reformeth him according to the image of God by teaching to know him and by exhorting to love him whatsoever is taught therein is truth whatsoever is commanded is good and whatsoever is promised is blessedness for God is truth without falshood goodness without wickedness and blessedness without misery In cap. 6 7. All Divine Scripture is contained in the Old and New Testaments and when he hath divided the Old Testament into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa and hath reckoned the Books that are in the Hebrew Canon he addeth There be also other Books as Wisdom the Books of Syracides Judith Tobias and the Maccabees that are read indeed but are not rolled in the Canon Catol test ver lib. 15. Likewise De Sacramentis fidei lib. 1. cap. 28. If it be asked What is original sin in us It is a corruption or vice by which in our birth we draw ignorance in our minde and concupiscence in the flesh And cap. 19. In the
words but they have done it wickedly as will appear hereafter 29. Gratian an Hetrurian and Monk of Bononia did out of the Canons The Canon Law of ancient Synods and decrees of Popes and sentences of Fathers and some forged writings of late Monks compile and amass the volume of the Canon Law which they call Decreta and Causae These were afterwards augmented by the Popes adding the Decretals and Extravagants and they are commented by the School-men Gratian took this work in hand in imitation of Lotharius the Emperor who had caused the Civil Laws to be digested into a method and he gathered these books so that by addition substraction or changing of a word or letter one or more he made all to serve the present times For example whereas Augustin de Doctr. Christ l. 2. c. 8. saith In Canonicis Scripturis Ecclesiarum Catholicarum quamplurium authoritatem sequatur inter quas sane illae sunt quas Apostolicae sedes habere epistolas accipere meruerunt Gratian Dist 19. c. In Canonicis hath them thus Inter quas Scriptur as Canonitas sane illae sunt quas Apostolica sedes ab ea aliae accipere meruerunt epistolas 2. In the sixth Councel at Carthage the Can. 165. saith Ad transmarina qui putaverit appellandum à nullo intra Africam in communione recipiatur This Canon speaketh absolutely and was made especially against appeals unto Rome But Gratian repeating it Caus 2. qu. 6. c. Placuit addeth Nisi forte Romanam sedem appellaverit 3. Pope Gregory lib. 9. epist 41. saith Scripsit mihi tua dilectio piissimum dominum nostrum speaking of the Emperor reverendissimo fratri meo Iohanni primae Iustinianae Episcopo pro agritudine capitis quam patitur praecipere succedi But Gratian Caus 7. qu. 1. c. Scripsit repeateth it thus Scripsit tua dilectio me reverendissimo fratri Iohanni pi Iust epis praecipere succedi 4. That common saying Petri successionem non habent qui Petri fidem non habent Gratian considering that hereby the succession of Peter might be called into question De poenit dist 1. c. potest saith Qui Petri sedem non habent Hear what a Papist judgeth of these Decrees Corn. Agrippa sometime Doctor utriusque Iuris in his Book De vanitat scient cap. 92. saith From the Civil Law hath flowed the Canon Law which may seem unto many to be very holy it doth so cover the precepts of covetousness and forms of robbing with the shew of godliness albeit very few things in it belong unto godliness religion or the worship of God besides that some things are contrary and fight against the word of God and all the rest are nothing but chidings pleas prides pomps gain or lucre and the pleasures of Popes which are not content with the Canons prescribed by the Fathers unless they do heap up Decrees Extravagants that there is no end of making Canons such is the ambition meer pleasure of Popes The School of Paris did openly detest and reprove this erroneous intolerable temerity I will not say heresie Out of these Canons and Decrees we have learned that the patrimony of Christ is Kingdoms donations foundations riches and possessions and that the Priesthood of Christ and primacy of the Church is Empire and Kingdom and that the sword of Christ is temporal jurisdiction and power and that the rock which is the foundation of the Church is the person of the Pope and that Bishops are not servants or Ministers of the Church but heads thereof and the goods of the Church are not the doctrine of the Gospel zeal of faith contempt of the world but tributes tithes offerings collects purples mitres gold silver jewels lands beasts authority it belongeth unto the Popes to manage battels break covenants loose oaths absolve from obedience and to make the house of prayer become a den of thieves so that a Pope may depose a Bishop without a cause he may dispose of other mens goods he cannot commit simony he may dispense against a vow against an oath and the law of nature nor may any man say unto him What doest thou yea and they say that for a weighty cause he may dispense against all the new Testament he may thrust down to hell a third part or more of Christian souls Agrippa in that place hath more of the matter and scope of the Canon Law and for instance I will name Dist 40. c. Si Papa If the Pope be found to neglect either his own salvation or his brethrens be unprofitable and slack in his office silent in that which is good hurtful to himself and all others yea though he lead with him innumerable people in troops to the first slave of hell yet let no mortal presume to finde fault with his doings And nevertheless in these Decrees we may finde not a few stops of Antiquity and some part of the doctrine and practise of the primitive Church even then remaining as I have touched in some places and more may be added as Dist 39. cap. 8. If as the Apostle saith Christ be the power of God and the wisdom of God and he which knoweth not the Scriptures knoweth not the wisdom and power of God then the ignorance of the Scriptures is the ignorance of Christ Dist 9. c. he saith from Augustine I have learned to give such fear and honor unto these books of the Scripture onely which now are called Canonical that I believe certainly none of their Authors could err in writing and if I finde any thing in them that seemeth contrary unto truth I doubt not but there is an escape in the Book or the Translator hath not attained the right meaning or that I do not understand it but I do read other books so that whatsoever was their holiness or learning yet I think it not true because they have thought so but because they could perswade me by other Authors or by the Canonical Scriptures or by probable reasons And Dist 8. cap. Si consuetudinem If you do object custom it is to be observed that the Lord saith I am the way the truth and life he saith not I am custom but I am truth and truly to use the words of blessed Cyprian whatsoever be the custom how old soever or common it be it must not in any respect be preferred unto truth and use which is contrary unto truth must be abolished Dist 16. c. Canones These that are called the Canons of the Apostles are known to be forged in the name of the Apostles by Hereticks although some good things be in them yet it is certain that they are not from Canonical or Apostolical Authority And c. Clementis All the Fathers do reckon the book of Clemens that is the travels of Peter and the Canons of the Apostles among the Apocrypha Dist 36. c. Si quis These be the two works of the high Priest to learn from God by reading the Scriptures and by frequent meditation
have any propriety but they may have the use of utensils of books and other moveables that they shall get lawfully and the Friers may use such things as their General or Provincials shall think good reserving the dominion of the houses and places unto such as is known it belongeth unto neither may they sell their moveables or give them away from their Order unless a Cardinal of the Roman Church who shall be Governor of the Order shall give power and consent unto their General or Provincials Innocentius the IV. declared that the propriety of the Minorites goods belongeth unto the Apostolical See and he gave them power to appoint Procurators who might sell or any way change their goods for their use and to change the Procurators as they thought good And so though they had vowed simple poverty yet they devised ways of possession yea they sought the possessions of other Monks and as Matth. Paris saith ad An. 1235. it was told them It is a shame unto them and scandal unto others to change their rule and profession so soon Their way of purchasing was thus They had liberty to hear confessions as the Dominicans had to preach and they did ask persons of whatsoever quality Hast thou made thy confession If it were answered Yea they said To whom if it were answered To our Priest the Frier said What an idiot is that he never learned Divinity nor hath he read the Decrees nor hath he learned to solve a question those Priests are blinde guides of the blinde come unto us we can distinguish between leprosie and leprosie unto us are the mysteries and secrets of God revealed confess unto us to whom so great priviledges are granted by the Apostolical See Therefore many Nobles and others left their Bishops and Priests and made their confessions unto the Friers and gave them their tithes and offerings as is manifest by the querulous Letters that were collected by Petrus de Vineis Epist lib. 1. And then the Friers began to rear up georgeous buildings for themselves and the Priests were for the most part but contemned and poor Some Popes made Decree in favor of the Friers for the benefit of the Church and some made contrary Decrees for them Honorius the IV. Gregory the IX Alexander the IV. Clemens the IV. and V. against them and for the Curates was especially John the XXII who made himself Pope and others after him In his time some that were called pauperes de paupere vita and Beguini separated themselves from their Order and returned to their Institution Pope John condemned them and their constitution but these were zealous of their first rule even so zealous that at Massiles four of them were condemned by their own Order the Inquisitors and were burnt because they would not consent unto the dispensation that was granted unto them Others in many places of France called these four Martyrs and said If the Pope hath consented unto their death he is an Heretick Such doings and speeches provoked Pope John the XXII first to suspend and then to condemn the Decrees of his Predecessors that had confirmed the Institution of that Order as commanded and practised by Christ Geo. Calixtus in his book De nova arte hath those things at more length ex Nic. Eimer the Author of Directori Inquisitor and Alvar. Pelagius de Planctu Eccles After Pope John were many Bulls both for and against the Friers Then starteth up a new controversie between the Friers and the Priests The Priests said Of Tithes The Tithes being the proper patrimony of the Church should be paid unto them who serve in the Church and not unto idle bellies who have not charge in the Church The Friers move other two questions 1. By what Law should Tithes be paid 2. Unto whom they should be paid For the first they say It was the uniform consent of the Church that God commandeth the payment of Tithes under the Gospel as under the Law So Origen on Numer cap. 18. August de temp Ser. 219 48. and such was the practise in many ages saith Concil Matiscon 2. cap. 5. But at that time the Friers held It was a judicial Law binding the Jews only yet so as it may be continued by Princes and the Church hath enjoyned the payment of the tenth part of the increase neither may any refuse to pay the Tithe and more also if the Church shall enjoyn more as she hath power indeed Tho. Aquin. in Sum. 2. 2. qu. 87. The other question was before without scruple that Tithes should be paid unto Church-men and a division should be of them as of all other Church-goods one unto the Bishop another for the Curate and a third for the fabrick of the Church and the fourth for the poor and strangers But the Friers made a new distinction saying In Tithes two things are to be considered to wit the power of receiving them and the Tithes themselve the power is spiritual and belongeth unto them that serve at the altar for their service but the things called Tithes are corporal and therefore may be given unto Laicks Tho. Aquin. ib. By this distinction the Priests were cheated and afterwards the Tithes were given to Abbeys and Monasteries By the way note that the Frier Thomas calleth the Friers Laicks as they were never reckoned among the Clergy unless they were promoted and received Orders And we may Their subdivisions see how the Franciscans were subdivided as also other Orders into Sects some kept the first Institution and go coursely apparelled living onely by begging and others want not their ease nor abundance they say They have nothing and yet enjoy plenty and they excuse their practise which is contrary unto their profession with a distinction They have riches in common but nothing in propriety This cause why Friers are so many ways subdivided is marked by Bellarmin de Monach. l. 2. c. 2. Every Sect saith he is hot at the beginning and then they become colder then ariseth some one or other who reduceth the Sect to the first Institution with some particular Rite in remembrance of himself and this is called a new Religion Until this day these two Orders kept the Office of Inquisition wheresoever the Pope commandeth Their office saith Francis Pegna in Directo Inquisitor but principally the Fransciscans exercise it How they discharge this Office Agrippa de vanitat scien cap. 96. sheweth saying Whereas their jurisdiction should be grounded upon Theological traditions and holy Scriptures they exercise it according to the Canon-Law and Papal Decrees as if it were impossible the Pope can err and they throw away the holy Scriptures as a dead letter or but a shadow of truth yea and they say as a buckler and fortress of Hereticks neither admit they the ancient traditions of Fathers and Doctors saying Those might be deceived and deceive but the holy Church of Rome cannot err nor the Pope the head thereof and they set before
small like a tree Then the Spirit of the Lord said unto me It signifieth the condition of the Roman Church Again he saith As I was the same way exercised I saw in the Spirit and behold a man walking in the same habit carrying sweet bread on his shoulders and very good wine by his side and he held in his hands a round stone biting it with his teeth as an hungry man biteth bread but he did nothing then two heads of Serpents came out of the stone and the Spirit of the Lord instructing me said This stone is unprofitable and curious questions wherewith the hungry souls are turmoiled when they leave substantial things And I said What meaneth those two heads He said The name of the one is Vain Glory and the other is Overthrow of Religion It is to be observed that about that time the chief questions in the Schools were Whether the bread of the Mass be turned into the body of Christ or whether the substance of it evacuateth what eateth a mouse when she eateth the Sacrament wherein subsisteth the accidents of the bread whether in Christ's body or by themselves c. Again he saith I saw a clear Cross of Silver like to the Cross of Tolouse but the twelve apples of it were like to vile apples that are cast out of the sea What is this Lord Jesus The Spirit said The Cross is the Church which shall be clear with pureness of life and shril with the clear voice of the truth preached Then I said What meaneth those rotten apples The humiliation of the Church-men which shall come to pass Here he prophecied of the Reformation Possevin in Apparto 2. calleth this Robert An excellent Preacher of the Word Mornay in Myster pag. 427. 6. Marsilius Paravinus wrote the book Defensor pacis about the year 1324. there he debateth the question between the Emperor and the Pope and by the holy Scriptures Laws Canons and Histories Ecclesiastical and Civil he maintaineth these positions Christ is the only head and foundation of Rare Theses in those days the Church He made none of the Apostles to be universal Vicar of the Church nor made he the other Apostles subject unto Peter It is more probable that Peter was never at Rome far less had he his seat there who had no fixed seat as also not any of the Apostles The fulness of power in any man is a manifest lye an execrable title the beginning of many evils and the use thereof should be discharged in a good Councel The authority of the keys is that judiciary power that consisteth in dispensing the Word the Sacraments and Discipline Christ whose Vicar the Pope calleth himself did never exercise temporal authority on earth he was subject unto the Magistrate and so were his Apostles after his ascension and they taught others to obey Princes If a Pope usurp temporal authority Princes should by the Law of God resist by word and deed or they are unjust and sin against God and those who fight for the Pope should be accounted the Soldiers of Satan Unto the Pope belongeth not the election nor confirmation of the Emperor but contrarily the Christian Prince with consent of Clergy and People should name the Pope or if one be chosen in his absence he should confirm him If the Pope go astray or be accursed the Emperor should reduce him into the way and judge him in a Councel When Peter lived he might have fallen and erred neither hath the Pope any priviledge against error That that Christ said to Peter I have prayed for thee is to be extended unto the other Apostles Only the Canon of the Bible is the fountain of truth against which Canon we may not believe either Pope or Church Concerning the sense of Scripture or any Article of the faith we may not believe the Pope and his Cardinals seeing not once have they seduced silly souls into hell The Christian Church is the universality of believers and not the Pope and his Cardinals she is represented in a lawful and general Councel A Councel should be assembled by the Emperor with consent of Christian Princes as anciently it was always The Word of God should be the only rule and chief judge in deciding causes Ecclesiastical Not only the Clergy by Lay men also if they be godly and learned should have voice in general Councels The Clergy and Synagogue of the Pope is a den of thieves c. This book was printed at Basil An. 1522. In another Treatise he saith Good works are not the efficient cause of salvation but causa sine quanon Mornay ibid. pag. 452. He was condemned as an Heretick by Pope John the XXIII Catal. test ver lib. 18. Consider what a Modern could say more of this matter and whether they shew not themselves to be ignorant of antiquity who accuse us of novelty 7. The same positions were held by John de Janduno or Gandanensis at the same time as is manifest by his books printed at Venice and Florence So wrote also Luitpold Bishop of Bamberg namely in a Treatise De Translatione Imperii printed Lutet An. 1540. he saith The Authority of governing the Empire belongeth unto the Emperor so soon as he is chosen and the Coronation by the Pope addeth nothing since Caesar is not his vassal nor feudatory The donation of Constantine is but a fable He was also condemned by Pope John Catal. test ibid. Michael Cesenas General of the Franciscans was bolder saying expresly The Pope is the Antichrist and Rome is Babylon drunk with the blood of the Saints Therefore Antonin par 3. tit 21. cap. 5. reckoneth him among the poor men of Lions For the Valdenses still suffered persecution in sundry Countries and under divers names as the adversaries pleased to brand them Many errors are imputed unto them by the writers of those times but because they did abhor the Pope and his Court they were reviled as we have heard from Arnold de Villanova and sought out to the fire as An. 1302. Nogaret the Father of him who took Pope Boniface the VIII was burnt in Aquitania Clemens the V. caused it to be proclaimed to take up the flag of the Cross against them and destroyed 4000 near the Alps whether they had sled Platin. Others went higher unto the mountains of whom some remained in his days saith Antonin par 3. tit 22. cap. 10. From them were the in-dwellers of Angronia and adjacent parts continuing until the Councel at Trent Trithemius testifieth of many that were burnt in Austria about that time howbeit he believing the reports of malice imputeth many errors unto them yet he testifieth that they abhorred the Mass calling the Hosty a god invented by man the Church of Rome a Synagogue of unbelievers and not the flock of Christ they denied all mens merits intercession of Saints the difference of days and meats c. He witnesseth also that the professore of the same doctrine were innumerable in Bohemia Austria
enemy of the most Christian Nation c. Morn in Myster pag. 451 465. In Dialog par 2. tract 1. lib. 3. cap. 16. he saith The books of Judith Tobias and the Maccabees Ecclesiasticus and the book of Wisdom are not for confirmation of any matter of faith the Church readeth these two Ecclesiasticus and Wisdom for edification of the people in manners but not for confirmation of points of faith Ibid. par 1. lib. 5. cap. 25. he saith A general Councel is a part of the universal Church but is not the Church universal therefore it is vain to say that a general Councel cannot er against the faith And cap. 28. If a general Councel shaller yet some Catholicks shall remain which either privately or publickly as shall be expedient shall be bold to defend the Orthodox faith ..... for God is able of stones that is of the unlearned Laicks despised poor ones and distressed Catholicks to raise up children of Abraham And lib. 6. cap. 84. Councels are not called general because they are called by the Pope ..... if Princes and Lay-men will they may be present in the general Councel and deal of matters treated therein In Prolog compend error he saith Alas the time of which the blessed Apostle prophesied when men will not suffer wholesome doctrine ..... this prophesie is altogether fulfilled in our days for behold many pervert the holy Scriptures deny the sayings of the holy Fathers reject the Canon of the Church molest persecute and bring into bondage and without mercy torment and afflict even unto death them that defend the truth so that we may rightly say of our times which Daniel long since pronounced Iniquity hath gone from Babylon from the Elders and Iudges which seemed to govern and rule the people for many that should be pillars in the Church of God and defend the truth of God even unto blood cast themselves headlong into the pit of Heresies In the same Prologue he submitteth his writings unto the censure and correction of the Church but he addeth of the Catholick Church and not of the malignant Church 8. Brigida or Brigitta was descended of the blood royal of Scotland Ph. Morn in Myster pa. 480. another then she which was in the days of S. Patrick about the year 520. she was married unto the King of Sweden a most devout woman saith Platin. and canonized as a Saint and Prophetess Being perswaded by the Friers with the same of Rome she went thither in the days of Pope Urban the V. hoping to finde great comfort there but in her revelations she calleth the Pope a murtherer of souls a destroyer of Christ's flock more abominable then the Jews more odious then Judas more unjust then Pilate worse then Lucifer She saith His seat is to be drowned like an heavy stone and his assessors were to burn in fire and brimstone unquenchable She rebuked the Bishops and Priests that through their default the doctrine of Christ was not preached yea it was abolished and they had changed all the commandments of God into two words Give money In the end she saith she heard the Virgin saying to her Son Rome is a fertile Land and Christ answered It is so but of tares she saith also that her coming to Rome was to cast away rather then confirm the opinion that she had conceived of it These revelations have been often printed 9. Thomas Bradwardin was a Fellow in Merton Colledge of Oxford and afterwards Chancellor of London and commonly called The profound Doctor about the year 1330. he had many disputes with the School-men against the errors of Pelagius and reduced all his Lessons into three Books which he entituled De causa Dei He beginneth thus I have been solicited earnestly by the petitions of great and many men that what I had spoken only by voice in disputes concerning the cause of God against Pelagius and concerning the power of causes I would tie it unto durable writ but here are two things as the lovers of God do provoke and encourage me into the cause of God so the friends of Pelagius being far more in number do hinder and terrifie me for which I speak not without inward sorrow of heart as of old eight hundred and fifty Prophets of Baal were against the one Prophet of God and innumerable people did cleave unto them so it is now in this cause How many O Lord fight now with Pelagius for free will against thy free grace and against Paul the spiritual Soldier of grace how many do to day despise free grace and proudly think that free will is sufficient to salvation or if they do use the word of grace they do but perfunctoriously feign it to be necessary but they boast that they deserve by the power of free-will to be what they are salvation seemeth unto them to be not a free gift but a bought good because O God Almighty these wilde men presuming of the power of their free will refuse the aid of thy working in their workings and say with those Depart thou from us Moreover Lord how many advance the liberty of their own will and will not serve thee or if they confess with their lips that thou workest with them yet with these thy proud and hateful subjects they will not have thee to reign over them yea and prouder then Lucifer they are not content to be equal with thee King of Kings but most impudently they would reign above thee for they fear not to say that their own will goeth first in action as the Lady and thou followest as the Servant ...... O Lord my God I cannot think it without sighs how many and great Judges endeavor carefully to absolve and reconcile the Pelagian errors that were condemned in ancient times and banished out of the bounds of all the Church how many presumptuous advocates plead for them how many damnable proctors they procure on their side how many not having two arguments of any art do turn to killing arguments and at least to advance the cause of Pelagius attempt to cast down thy cause with their cries horrors reproaches vice laughter and gesture how many and how innumerable people favor them for almost all the world goeth after Pelagius arise Lord judge thine own cause Then he sheweth how he was comforted in a vision or dream that by the grace of God he should prevail against Pelagius And a little after he addeth With how many martyrdoms with The beginning and progress of Pelagianisin how many wounds did the holy Fathers cut down the wood of the Pelagian heresies and how many venomous branches do still spring and wax out of these old roots As it was so it is yet for first when their Arch-Heretick Lucifer would not be under and with God Michael threw him down then arose Cain thinking that a sinner is not justified of God freely by grace given freely but by his antecedent merit when he in the just judgement of God was
schismatical side This Cardinal Cusan in his Books De Concordantia Catholica which he directed unto the Councel at Basil maintaineth these positions All the promises which Christ spoke unto Peter as I will give thee the keys I have prayed for thee and such other things should be understood of the Church universally and not particularly of Peter or his Successors especially since many Popes have been Schismaticks and Hereticks Every Prelate hath place in the Church according to the Dignity of his Seat and so the Bishop of Rome hath attained such precedency in the Church as Rome had antiently among the Nations Or if they have place according to the holiness of him which first sate there certainly Jerusalem should have the primacy where the great high Priest did wash his Church with his blood And why should not Ephesus the seat of St. John be preferred to Alexandria the seat of Mark and so of the rest The Councel dependeth not upon the head thereof but upon the consent of all the Assessors although the Bishop of Rome were present there he hath not more power there then a Metropolitan in his Provincial Synod Without all controversie a universal Councel is above the Bishop of Rome whose power is sometimes said to have been from Christ yet in more places we finde that his primacy is from man and dependeth on the Canons wherefore as he may be judged and deposed by a Councel so he cannot abrogate nor change nor destroy the Canons of Councels In lib. 3. cap. 2. ss by many testimonies of Antiquity he proveth it false that Constantine gave or could give the Empire of the West unto the Pope These testimonies are exstracted and subjoyned to the Declamation of Laur. Valla in Fascic rer expetend There also Cusanus saith Neither is it true that the Pope gave it unto Charls or transferred it from the Greeks unto the Germans and it is most false that the Princes Electors were instituted by the Pope and that they discharge the office of Election in his name In the contrary The Emperor dependeth on God alone and it is not necessary that he be confirmed by the Pope nor may the Pope depose him The Emperors in old time called the General Councels as other Princes have taken care of Provincial Synods When he was Legate in Germany he hindred and discharged the carrying of the Sacrament in their Processions Crantz in Metrop He addeth Because the Sacrament was ordained for use and not for ostentation 23. In the year 1442. the Emperor Frederick had a Diet at Mentz where they spoke of casting off the Pope's yoke in time of the schism But in the time of Pope Nicolaus this Neutrality was taken away by the mediation of Aen. Sylvius and therefore he got a red hat Nevertheless because the conditions that he had made in name of the Pope were not fulfilled the Germans assembled again and by advice of Diether Bishop of Mentz they would provide for themselves according to the Pragmatica Sanctio against the tyranny of the Roman Church and they agree upon Decrees concerning the election of Prelates the collation of Benefices the pleading of causes the granting of pardons the exactions of tenths c. And if the Pope shall discern against them they resolve to provide for themselves by an appellation 24. Martin Meyer Chancellor unto this Diether wrote an Epistle unto Cardinal Aen. Sylvius and complaineth in his Master's name that the Canons of Constance and Basil were not observed that Calixtus as if he were not tied to the covenant of his Predecessors did oppress Germany he contemneth the election of their Prelates and reserveth their Benefices of all sorts unto his Cardinals and Secretaries expectative graces are given without number Annates or mid-fruits are exacted rigorously yea more is extorted then is owed the Government of Churches is not given unto them which deserve best but who payeth most new Indulgences are sent dayly for squeezing money ..... a thousand means are devised whereby the See of Rome draweth gold from us as if we were witless Barbarians .... Our Princes being awakened have resolved and decreed to cast off this bondage and to defend their former liberty In the end he congratulateth his late advancement and lamenteth that so many evils hapned in his time But saith he God will have it otherwise and his decree must have place By these words Meyer giveth to understand more then he speaketh This Epistle is printed with Sylvius his description of Germany 25. The Greeks wrote unto the Bohemians in this manner The holy A Letter from Greece unto the Bohemians Church of Constantinople and Mother of all Orthodox Believers unto all the Masters and each of the famous Brethren and Sons beloved in Jesus Christ in Bohemia salvation by the Son of the glorious Virgin and an hundred-fold increase of spiritual fruit The holy Church of the heavenly Bridegroom which is the Head of the whole Church hath not greater pleasure then that she heareth that her Sons walk in the truth therefore when not without most great pleasure and as it were a pledge of common fruit the fertility and growth of them who couragiously suffer persecution for the testimony of true faith came unto the ears of the same godly and bountiful Mother especially by a Brother and Son Constantinus Anglicus the bearer of these presents and a reverend Priest we were more plainly advertised that ye hearken not unto the novelties that are brought by some into the Church of Christ but that ye are constant in the foundation of faith which was given unto us by our Lord and his Disciples The holy Church hath incontinently written unto you and intended to exhort you into concord with her and not according to the forged union of Florence which was separate from the true and lawful Councel which union should rather be called a diremption from the truth for which cause we received not that union but altogether refused it and according to the immoveable decree of truth wherein only we can be truly and safely united for the Church of Christ doubteth not of these things which she heard reported of you as is said Seeing therefore you have judged it expedient to contraveen the perillous novations of Rome ye shall be of one mind with this Church by means of the Holy Scriptures which is the true Judge For although no good report of you came unto us before that ye did not resist the Roman novelties but rather were enemies to the ancient traditions of the Catholick and Christian Church yet now we are informed more surely that ye are revived and returned unto the common religion of Christians and unto true godliness and that you leave not your Mother but being zealous with true love of your true Mother have a singular desire to promove and inlarge her which we understood by the coming of this devout Priest as we have said who hath declared unto us particularly the estate
of your affairs he hath given unto our holy Mother his godly and acceptable confession and hath received the Doctrine of the true Faith from her wherein all men should agree who desire to be saved which also we will declare unto your charity Wherefore beloved Brethren and Sons if it be so as we believe and trust hasten the unity together with us for where can ye be more zealous against tempters then in the bosom of the true Church and under the shield of true salvation and where can ye better refresh your selves then where the fountain of the water of life is open All therefore who are thirsty come unto the waters come buy the wine of sober joy without money and receive milk from the teats of her comfort we trust then that in all things ye agree with us wherefore from henceforth with singular care and love we will provide unto you spiritual Pastors which shall have care of your souls and feed you with the word of truth and example of life and shall not afflict you Moreover concerning the Rites of the Church we will graciously yield unto you with the Apostle in these whatsoever have a good ground and a pure intention the granting of which may tend to your edification and shall not be contrary to the honor of this our holy and true Mother and her communion and obedience for verily we intend to dispense and deal with good will and discretion in the difference of Customs and Rites The Almighty God grant that we may hear as we have heard that many others have likewise received the spirit of true life to the increase and multiplying of the beloved Children of the true Mother and cause you together with us to rejoice in the house of the Church with the same Professions and Rites yea that we may praise him with heart and mouth for ever and ever Amen Given at Constantinople Ianuary 18. An. 1451. Rer. Bohem. autiqui Scriptor pag. 235. Edit Hannoviae An. 1602. 26. George Pogiobratz King of Bohemia was a good Warriour and did not fear the threats of the Pope and Emperour and he restored the ruined estate of the Kingdom Vratislavia and Silesia refused to obey him because he was an Heretick as Cochlaeus speaks Hist Huss lib. 12. But Pius the II. then intending Wars against the Turk did by all means perswade them to yeeld obedience and the King did require the Pope to keep the Compacts of Basil in favours of the Bohemians The Pope refused to grant so much Wherefore the King called the Estates together and protested before that he would live and die in that faith which they did profess and so did the Nobles An. 1462. Cochl ibid. Pope Paul gave that Kingdom unto Matthias King of Hungary and when he was busie against the Turks and had recovered several Towns and had entred into Thracia with good success Rodulph the Pope's Legate drew him back from the Turks to invade the Christians in Bohemia but God protected them against him although he had the aid of the Pope and the Vratislavians and some Cities did accept him yea God defended that Kingdom so that when George died An 1471. and the Pope had stiled Matthias King of Hungary and Bohemia the Estates of Bohemia would not accept him even howbeit he had married the daughter of George before the Wars but hated him for his unnatural usurpation and did chuse Ladislaus the son of Casimire King of Poland And the two sons of Pogiobratz prevailed in Wars against Matthias and the Emperour made them both Dukes This was so offensive unto Matthias that he proclaimed Wars against the Emperour but he was taken away by death Pet. Mexia 27. Stephen Brulifer a Doctor of Sorbone and a Franciscan taught in his lessons and maintained in disputes that neither the Pope nor Councel nor Church can make any Article or Statute to bind the conscience of a Christian that all their authority consists in the urging of obedience unto God's word in preaching it and administring the Sacraments which he hath instituted so that they bring nothing without his command he called justification by merits a Divellish doctrine since the Lamb of God was sacrificed and hath satisfied God's justice for us The Doctours of Sorbone would not suffer him amongst them But he went to Diether Bishop of Mentz which had been deposed for speaking against the avarice of Rome and was restored Fascic rer expet fol. 164. 28. John de Wesalia a Preacher of Worms was delated by the Thomists unto the same Diether he gathered his books and sent them unto the Universities of Colein and Heidleburg to be examined They convened this John before them at Mentz in February An. 1479. After they had viewed his books they found these Articles which they called errours 1. All men are saved freely by the meer grace of Christ through faith 2. We should beleeve the Word of God only and not the glosses of any man 3. God hath from all eternity written in a book all his Elect whosoever is not written there shall never be written in it and whosoever is written in it shall never be blotted out 4. Our Doctours do expound the Scriptures wickedly and falsly 5. Christ never appointed a Fasting nor Festival day neither forbad to eat any meat upon any day 6. When Peter did celebrate the Eucharist he said the Lord's Prayer and the consecration and then did communicate with others but now the Priest must stand an hour and more when he saith Mass 7. They are fools who go in Pilgrimage to Rome for they may find as much good elsewhere 8. The Word of God should be expounded by conferring one Text with another 9. Prelates have no authority to expound Scriptures by any peculiar right given unto one more than to another 10. Mens traditions as Fasts Feasts Pardons set Praiers Pilgrimages and such other things are to be rejected 11. Extream unction confirmation auricular confession and satisfaction are to be contemned They demanded of him several questions as Whether Christ was present bodily in the Sacrament or spiritually He answered Christ's body was there present and the substance of Bread and Wine remain also 2. What he thought of the Procession of the Holy Ghost Ans He beleeved not that he proceeds from the Father and the Son as from one principium because the Scripture speaks not so 3. What he thought of the Vicar of Christ Ans He beleeved not that Christ hath a Vicar for he said Behold I am with you unto the end of the World 4. What he thought of pardons Ans He had written a book wherein he had shewed that the Treasure of the Church cannot be distributed by Popes because it is written Revel 14. Their works follow them After these interrogatories and others of that sort three Doctors were appointed to deal with him privately He said unto them As ye deal with me if Christ were here you would condemn him as an Heretick but he
Christ that one and the same work of Indulgence shall have vertue sometimes for six years sometimes for seven sometimes for seven hundred sometimes for seven thousand and sometimes full and absolute Then answering unto that position The Church is ruled by the Spirit of God he saith It is true in so far as the Church is holy but not in these particulars whereof she is ignorant and in which she erreth as alas we lament that she erreth grievously as appears by the unsavoury salt the delated Husband-man and the unfaithfull Steward whom Bernard expoundeth to be Mercenaries in place of Shepheards yea and Wolves for hirelings and Devils for Wolves In his Book De subditis superioribus he averreth That the Pope may err and when he erreth he should be resisted Pius the II. did usurp all the Kingdoms of the earth and Sixtus the IV. dispensed with all maner of oaths in causes temporal not only that were already made but that shall be made which is nothing else but to give unto men licence to forswear themselves and deceive others Because the Pope and his Cardinals are contrary unto Christ they are the Antichrist John Ostendorp a Canon of St. Levin in Daventry went once to visit him and Wesselus said unto him O diligent youth thou shalt live until that time when the doctrine of these late Divines and contentious School-men shall be forsaken Wesselus died in the year 1490. and Ostendorp lived until the year 1520. Gerhard Gelderhavrius writeth that he heard his Master Ostendorp report this Prophesie Ja. Triglandius in his Church History against â—tenboga par 3. writeth of him that when Pope Sixtus the IV. was chosen Wesselus went to visit him because he had been his good friend in Paris The Pope bade him ask what he would and it should not be denied unto him He answered I wish that since now you are universal Pope you would demean your self in your office according to your name that in due time you may hear that approbation Come thou good and faithful Servant enter into thy Master's joy The Pope said Why seekest thou not somewhat for thy self He said I crave no more but an Hebrew and Greek Bible out of the Vatican The Pope answered That you shall have but fool thou mightest have sought a Bishoprick or some such thing Wesselus answered Because I have not need of so great things When he died some Friers burnt all his books and papers but he had given sundry books unto others which were collected and printed at Wittemberg in the year 1522. When Luther saw them he spake of the Prophet Elias who thought that he was left alone and yet the Lord had preserved seven thousand that had hot bowed the knee to Baal so said he hath God preserved many thousands from the Idolatry of the Pope And he wrote of him as followeth There is one Wesselus come forth whom they call Basilius a Friselander of Groning a man of wonderful understanding and of an excellent spirit who hath been taught of God as Isaiah hath prophesied of Christians for it cannot be thought or said that he hath learned such things from men as neither I have If I had read those books before mine enemies might have said Luther hath taken all this out of Wesselus we do so agree But by these my joy and courage increaseth and I doubt not but I have learned the truth since he and I do agree in so constant unity and almost in the same words although differing in place and time and occasions And I admire by what mishap it is come that so Christian works were not published by another 37. Among the lights of that time Rodulph Agricola may justly be reckoned he was born in Friseland Ph. Melanchthon writing his life saith Josquin Groningensis had reported unto him that when he was young he heard Vesselus and Agricola often lamenting in their Sermons the darkness of the Church the abuses of the Mass the single life of Priests and that they both taught that men are not justified by works but by faith as Paul oft teacheth and they condemned the multitude of traditions He died An. 1489. Buxtorf Ind. 38. Paul Scriptor teaching on Scotus in Tubing when he came to the fourth Book Dist 10. did speak against transubstantiation and said All things should be tried by the Word of God as a true touch-stone all Scholastical teaching shall shortly be abolished and the doctrine of the primitive Church shall be restored according to the holy Scriptures Conradine Pelicanus was his Auditor and testifieth that he heard him reprove many errors and abuses of the Roman Church therefore the Minorites caused him to be banished and as Rud. Gualter in his Epistle before his Homiles on Matthew testifieth he was put to death as many did suspect being not moved with uncertain conjectures He died at Keiserberg in the year 1499. 39. Nicolaus Rus a Batchelor of Divinity preached at Rome and wrote The Pope hath not such power as is commonly believed the Pope should not be heard when he strayeth from the Scripture his Indulgences are but fraud those only are true pardons which God giveth of his free grace in Christ Saints should not be adored and far less their bones they who are called the Spiritualty to wit the Roman Clergy have packed up all Religion in mens traditions and vain superstitions and they are careless of their office and are Ministers of Antichrist These things are written in his Threefold Cord where he expoundeth the Lord's Prayer the Creed and the ten Commandments which he wrote in the Saxon Languauge that the common people might understand he left Rome and abode there and had many Auditors The Pastors of the Waldenses in Bohemia came and visited him At last he was forced to flee into Liveland where he died 40. Jerome Savonorola a Dominican in Florence taught these Articles 1. Men are justified freely by faith 2. The Communion should be administred in both kindes 3. The Pope's Indulgences are frivolous 4. The keys were given unto the Church and not to Peter alone 5. The Pope hath not from Christ any primacy above other Bishops 6. The Pope followeth neither the life nor doctrine of Christ and therefore he is the Antichrist 7. He who feareth the Pope's excommunication is excommunicated of God 8. He preached against the vices of the Clergy Io. Fox in Act. Mon. Philip Cominaeus did confer with him and testifieth that he was a man of most upright life He foretold that God would raise up a King to punish the Tyrants of Italy and that God would shortly reform the Church therefore some did hâ—te him and some believed him namely the Senate of Florence was perswaded by his preaching to give way unto Charls the VIII King of France When the league was made in Italy against the French he foretold that Charls should return in safety of his person maugre all the power of his adversaries Charls returning from Naples sent for
intend to hold unto our last breath wee firmly believe of the Holy Ghost wee believe the Holy Ghost and in the Holy Ghost Of the Holy Ghost that he is the one true God with the Father and the only begotten Sonne distinguished in this only that he proceeds from both by vertue of which faith quickning renewing reforming every one attaineth the participation of Christs meritorions grace justification truth fortitude and perfect salvation by which Spirit also the Holy Church is grounded in the faith of Christ against which the gates of hell are not able to prevaile which also by the same Spirit in the members of true faith he washeth justifieth sanctifieth ordereth governeth gathereth strentheneth fructifieth As also by the same Spirit were the Holy Scriptures inspired and are known by him the members of the Church are vnited from him are the gifts of ruling the Church and many other things which by the same Spirit are made perfect unto the life of glory Wee believe the Holy Ghost when wee fully consent unto the Divine Scriptures or Apostls of God Wee believe in the Holy Ghost when with clear knowledge and unfained faith wee love him and with the members inspired by him wee keep his revealed truth unto eternall glory By the same fulness of formed faith wee believe that the holy Catholick Church in respect of the foundation of lively faith is the number of all the elect from the beginning of the world unto the end thereof whom God the Father in Christ by his Spirit hath chosen justifieth calleth unto the glory of salvation and magnifyeth without which is no salvation unto man But in respect of ministry and dispensations wee believe that the holy Catholick Church is the congregation of all Ministers and people subdued by obediente obeying the will of God from the beginning of the world unto the end of it whom God only sendeth inspired by his Spirit giving them the word of truth peace reconciliation that they may bring forth the fruit of salvation in the unity of the Church and their travell be not disappointed of the saving reward whose names and number He only knoweth because he hath writen them in the book of life That first Church hath none that shal be damned and the other is mixed untill the appointed time of the last judgement But the Church of malignants seekes them that are of that evil one whom Satan sendeth in this time of mortall life to the perdition of the world and tryall of the elect On this Church all the curses and sad things that Christ his Apostls have foretold shall be heaped to wit that they who are unworthy of ecclesiastical honour may rule over them by their power The promises also of renovation are fulfilled in her And yet wee arrogate not so much unto us as that we would be called or bee the only Catholick Church as if salvation were to be found with us only but wee endeavour with all diligence to be partakers of the ecclesiasticall truth and wee are afraied to be subject unto orobey evill workers whom wee find to be enmies of the Church and its truth for fear of everlasting damnation and for obedience unto Christ and because they doe minde speak and doe unto his Church things contrary unto his law Wherefore wee willingly endure oppression tauntings and calumnies for the salvation of our souls for un less Holy fear and the horrour of hell did withhold us we would embrace the liberty of the world with it's vanities wherin one may live as he listeth But wee would rather choose the strait derided and sad way in which our Redeemer Christ and the Church his spouse condemned by the world and despised yet following the example of Christ have walked than to taste and follow the momentany pleasures of the world The first and chief ministry of the Church is the Gospell of Christ whereby grace and truth that were painfully purchased by the torment of the cross is revealed which grace is given for salvation by the Holy Ghost and God the Father unto the Elect which are called by the gift of faith Another necessary ministry of the Church wee declare to be the word of teaching by which the saving truth is known in the sense of faith through which knowledge the life of grace and glory is administred unto the men of good desire Likewise wee declare that the seven sacraments are useful unto the Church of Christ by which Sacraments the promises of God are signified to be fulfilled unto believing people and by them entrance into the Church of God for keeping unity among them that walk unto glory is ministred Faith which God gives causeth us think of baptisme the first Sacrament these things whosoever of ripe age by hearing Gods word believeth and believing is renewed in soul and is enlightened such by outward washing for argument of inward cleanness attained by faith should be baptized in the name of the Father Sonne and Holy Ghost into the vnity of the holy Church Our profession is also extended unto children which by the decree of the Apostles as Dionysius writes should be baptized and then by the guidance of their God-fathers being instructed in the law of Christ should be invited unto and accustomed with the life of faith By faith received out of the Holy Scriptures wee professe that in the dayes of the Apostls this was observed whoesover in their young years had not received the promises of the gifts of the Holy Ghost such did receive them by prayer and imposition of hands for confirmation of aith Wee thinke the same of infants Whosoever being baptized shall come to the true faith which he purposeth to follow through adversities and reproaches so that new birth appeareth in his spirit and life of grace such a one should be brought unto the Bishop or priest and being demanded of the truths of faith and of Gods commandements and of his good will and constant purpose and works of truth and shall testify by confession that all these things are so such a one is to be confirmed in the hope of attained truth and he is to be helped by the prayers of the Church that the gifts of the Holy Spirit may be increased in him for the constancy and warrefare of faith and finally for confirming the promises of God and the truth that he hath he may be associated into the Church by laying on of hands in vertue of the name of the Father of the Word and of the Holy Spirit By this faith which we have drunk from the Holy Scriptures we believe and confesse with our mouth Wheresoever a worthy priest with believing people according to the mind and purpose of Christ and order of the Church shall shew forth his prayer with these words This is my bodie and This is my blood immediatly the present bread is the body of Christ which was offered unto death for us and so the present wine is his blood shed
Bessarion being a wretched Clerk in Trapezus became a gloriou Cardinal and almost Pope Luthet answered He seeth not what more affinity is between Christ and the Pope than there is between light and darknes nothing in all his life had hapned unto him more happily than the severity of Leo by the gracious providence of God for at that time he had only seen the abuses of indulgences and the Pope might have easily commanded him if his adversaries in that matter had been subject unto the lawes of equity but being provoked by the writings of the Master of the holy palace by the reproaches of Cajetan and severity of Pope Leo he took the whole matter into more diligent consideration and had espied more intolerable errours which he could not in conscience dissemble nor hide from others-and whereas he the Legate professeth himself not to be a Divine and that appeares by his reasons that he accuseth his doctrine of novelty yet he can not be ignorant that Christ and his Apostles and the antient fathers lived not as the Pope and his cardd and bb do now Nor can these arguments taken from the broiles in Germany strick against his doctrine but in the conceit of men which know not the Scriptures seing where ever the word of God is preached truly such stirres arise that the father is against the son but this is the power of the worde that who believes it he shall live and who spurneth against it is the more guilty And this is a most known errour of the Romane Church that they will underprop with humane reasons the Church of Christ as if it were a seculare Estate but such reasons are foolishness with God and that the councel may go well and bring good unto the Church it is not in the power of him who is but a mean man but rather of the Pope if he will let it be free that Gods Spirit may only preside and rule and laying aside all interests and usurpations and crafts of men let controversies be judged according to the Canon of the sacred Scripture If it were so he for his part will promise all Christian sincerity and charity and not to gain the favour of the Pope or of any mortal but only for the glory of Christ and for establishing the peace and liberty of the Church Nor can so great good be expected unless God be reconciled by casting away hypocrisy and by earnest repentance for our sinns .... Nor doth he regard the examples of Sylvius Bessarion these darke shewes can not move him .... yea the Legate and the Pope shall embrace his faith rather than he will forsake it Histo Concil Tride lib. 1. The same Vergerius dealt with other Preachers in Wittembergh and other places where he came he found no acceptance among them and where any did speake submissely he made no great account of them they were but few and he thought they could do little The same year Charles Duke of Savoy was persuaded by the exiled Bishop of Geneve to take arms against that City they had aid from the Swisers especially from Berne and gave the repulse the Swisers conquered all the land between them and the lake of Geneve Jo. Sleida Ibid. XXXI In the year 1536. the Preachers of the Cities which had The agreement in the question of the Ls Supper Ann. 1536. presented their Confession differing from the Augustane in the question of the Sacrament considering that the Pope might make his advantage upon that difference if the Councell shall hold at Mantua thought good to seek agreement with Luther and others So Capito Bucer went from Stawsburgh and others from Essling Memming Frankford Ausburgh Furfeld and Reutling and made accord with the Divines of Wittembergh On these articles following 1. We believe according to the words of Irenaeus that the Eucharist consists of two parts an earthly and an heavenly and we think and teach that the body blood of Christ is truly and substantially present with and given taken with the bread wine 2 albeit we deny transsubstantiation nor think that there is any locall inclusion in the bread or any durable conjunction with out the use of the sacrament yet we grant that the bread is the body of Christ by a sacramental union that is we think when the bread is given the body of Christ is also present and is truly given for without the use extra usum when it is keept in a boxe or is shewed in processions as a mong the Papists we thinke Christs body is not present 3. We think that the Institution of Christ is powerfull in the Church and that it dependeth not upon the dignity of the Minister or receiver Wherefore as Paul saith even the unworthy do eat the Sacrament so we think that the body and blood of Christ is truly reached unto the unworthy and the unworthy receive it where the words institution of Christ are keept but such do receive to their judgement as Paul saith because they abuse the sacrament when they use it without repentance and faith for it is institute for this end that he may testify that grace and the benefites of Christ are applied unto them and that they are ingrasted into Christ and washed in his blood who do repent and lift up themselves by faith in Christ If followes Because few of us are conveened at this time and this business belongeth unto other preachers and Magistrats of both parties we can not yet conclude the matter of concord before it be reported unto others also but seeing all the Divines here present do professe that in all the Articles of the Confession and of the Apology we would think and teach wholly the same we wish and earnestly crave that the Concord may be made and begun and if other Divines of both parties shall approve this article concerning the Lords supper we hope that a firme Concord may be made among us The above named Divines eleven in number did subscribe so did Luther Cas Cruciger Melanthon Jo. Bogenhagius Justus Menius and Frid. Myconius Hence it is cleare that then was no other difference in the articles of Confession and who hath made the difference after that time Osiander calleth this Formula Concordiae Wittebergensis others calleth it Concordia Smalcaldica But in the year 1537. was a solemn meeting of the Protestants at Smalcald by the advice of the Princes and Divines Luther wrote The meeting at Smalcald 1537. the Heads of Doctrin to be propounded and defended in the Councel which were approved and subscribed by the Ministers The article concerning the sacrament of the altare as they called it was thus Of the sacrament of the altare we judge that the bread and wine in the Supper are the very body and blood of Christ and not only given unto and received by the godly but also by the evill and wicked Christians and that not one kinde only should be given for we have not need of
diverse men some of them are seditious and some are good and honest Men zealous and loyal unto God and their King and would in nothing offend the one nor the other in living and dying they shew their desire to enioy salvation and to find the way thereunto and when they have that way they fear not losse of life nor goods nor any manner of punishment As yet we see it plainly enough that the punishments which have been devised against them have done no good but rather their patience in the midst of firy flames hath stirred up many to love their cause whence it hath been that many who never knew of their doctrine were desirous to know it for which those had suffered and did embrace the same doctrine with no less affection and zeal Therefore look upon the examples of the Bishops in the first general Councels who never used any other weapons but the word of God against the Arrians and other heretiks And the Christian and good Emperours did use no severer punishment against the authours of these sects but bannishment As for those privy meetings they were alwaies forbidden and the king hath sufficiently provided against them by Edicts yet so that according to equity consideration may be of the time manner purpose and number of them who do meet lest the innocent be afflicted Then Charles Marillac Bishop of Vienna was bidden to speak and his advice was to this purpose There be two as it were main pillars of a kingdom exercise of Religion and the good will of the people The controversies of Religion in antient times were determined in general Councels but now there is no hope of a general Councel for two causes first it is not in our power that the Pope the Emperour and Kings will agree on the time place and manner of a Councell seeing there be so many questions for those circumstances And next as when a man is grieved by some dangerous sicknes he can not tarry for remote Physicians because of the uncertainty of their comeing So the present malady is grievous unto every part of the kingdom and there is small hope of forreign cure therefore we must have a Councel of our own Nation as it was before concluded and the King did promise the necessity of the miserable Church requires it as also the Kings credite and the decrees yet extant shew that our ancestours were wont to assemble every fifth year in a general Councel and the histories of this Nation shew that Councels were called in every kings time some from the whole Realm and some from the half or a Province one or more and it was seldome seen but from these some good ensued to the Reformation of doctrine or manners Let us not stick in this matter nor fear to be accused We have many sorrowfull examples to set before us which are forewarnings of sad desolations ensuing as the miserable condition of the Jewes Greeks Egyptians and Africans where the Church hath flourished but now scarcely have the name of a Church For those causes I think that we can delay no longer to call a Councell notwithstanding these things which the Pope objecteth as letts thereof And while this Councel or Parliament of the Church is in preparation I think three or four remedies may be provided 1. that Prelates abide in their Diocies and here he inveighes against the Italians who reap the gain or thrids of Benefices and have no care of the office 2. that nothing be done in the Church through Simony or bribes 3. to confesse out own faults unto God and make this manifest by publick fasts which was alwayes the custom of the Church in time of publick calamities and what greater danger can there be then that which slayeth mens souls 4. to stay seditious persons that they hinder not the common tranquillity and let it not be permitted upon any occasion whatsoever to rise in arms without the kings leave seing hereby have been many enormities on the one part we have seen the tumult of Amboife and on the other certain preachers have stirr'd up the people violently to destroy and bannish the Protestants Under pretence of godly Zeal so grievous offences followed on both sides ..... The other main point is to keep the people in due obedience and reverent estimation of their Soverain whereof I judge this to be the way If the complaints of the people be hearkned unto and convenient remedies be applied There is a great difference between privat and general grievances publick complaints should be heard in a publick assembly of the Estates and at this time the people complain of many things and when common complaints are not heard the hearts of people are commoved c. Thuan. hist lib. 25. The judgements of others were heard namely the Cardinals said Nothing can be done concerning a Councel without the Popes advice The Bishop of Valence said If the Parisians have need of water may they not bring it from Sene more easily then from Tiber. It was concluded Seing the present maladies require present remedies there should be a National Councel and on Aprile 11. it shall be called to assemble September 10 and an Oratour was sent with all possible speed to declare unto the Pope their necessity of a Councel and to entreat that he would take in good part what they had concluded But his travell was in vain-Soave in Conc. Triden lib. 5. At that time it was decreed also that the Estates should conveen at Orleance or where the King will please to appoint to advise of things to be propounded in the Councel and to the same end particular meetings should be in every Province and the Bishops should prepare themselves and in the mean while none should be troubled for religion unless they be found to take up arms seditiously and the punishment of such men to be reserved unto the King French Commentar lib. 2. Afterwards the Guises suggest unto the king that Antony king of Navar and his Brother the Prince of Condee had plotted a new couspiracy The king sent for them both and resolved to satisfy the Guises with their blood These two being guilty of nothing obey The Prince of Condee was imprisoned and a guard was set to attend the king of Navar. The Pope promiseth to call a general Councel therefore the National Councel was left off king Francis died Decemb. 15. in the 17. year of his age An. 1560. and so the Guises were disappointed In this kings time Emanuel Duke of VValdenses are persecuted in Savoy Savoy commanded the Waldenses of Lucern Angronia Perossa and Sanmartius to receive the Masse c. or he would punish them as rebels They sent a supplication and Confession of their faith professing that they believe all things contained in the old and new Testament and the faith in the Creed of the Apostles and of Nice and of Athahasius and the doctrine of the antient fathers so far as they agree with the Scriptures
were instant to begin and the most part condescend to treat of doctrin and Reformation jointly so that also a Letter was sent unto the Pope craving to further the Synod and to solicite the Princes for continuing peace among themselves as also other Letters were written unto the Emperour unto the French Roman Portugal Kings and other Princes requiring them to conserve peace to send Ambassadors to secure the high-wayes and to cause their Prelats resort unto the Synod Those Letters should have been read and sealed in the ensuing congregation but they could not agree what seal to use In a word before the next Session they could agree only that they should begin with heresy and because they were informed of more prelats a coming they delay the next Session untill Aprile 8. Again the Legats send for their oft demanded instructions and they advise to begin at the controversies between them and the Lutherans concerning the holy Scriptures and the abuses brought into the Church in that matter About that time the Conference in Germany was dissolved and the Pope thought it scandalous to delay any more so he gave information to begin according to the advice but so that they be slow in the Reformation Accordingly on February 22. 1546. it was ordained to read Luthers books and frame articles concerning the Scripture to be censured by the Divines and so matter to be prepared for Decrees As for abuses every one should call to mind what he thought needfull to be Reformed and what remedy is fittest The articles of doctrine were propounded of the sufficiency of the Scriptures 2. Of the number of the books 3. of the Latin Translation 4. Of the perspicuity of the Scriptures In the first article all did agree to make Traditions Of the Scriptures equal with the Scriptures excep Antonius Marinarus a Carmelite whose discourse was called Lutheran They all agree to canonize the Apocrypha on these two they spend sixe congregations In the third article was difference between them who were ignorant of the languages and a few having a taste of Greek Frier Aloisius de Catanea did prove by authority of Jerom and Cardi. Caietan that the Hebrew edition of the old Test and the Greek of the New are the pure fountains and all Latine translations are but impure brooks and so have been accounted in all time by past The greater number said This opinion openeth a door unto Lutherans the doctrin of the Roman Church is by Popes and Divines founded upon the Latine Bible and if it be lawfull to scan whether it be rightly translated the base Grammarians shall be preferred unto the Bishops and Cardinals and the Inquisitors shall have no place if they be ignorant of Hebrew and Greek Do Isidorus Clarus a Brescian and Benedict an Abbot discourse historically of the old and later Translations and of their account at the first and how at last that which is called vulgata was patched of them both Andreas Vega a Franciscan commends that Latine but preferreth the Hebrew and Greek In the end sixe Divines were deputed to correct the Vulgata to be printed by auhority of the Councel There was no less difference concerning the expounding of Scripture some alledging the authority of Car. Caietan said The Spirit of God is tied to no age and all men should be encouraged unto the diligent and sober study of Gods Worde Others said Vnbridled spirits must be curbed or else can be no hope to see an end of the late pretences neither do the Lutherans gain upon any but such who study the Scriptures the study of Aristotle is safer and the Word of God should be kept in due reverence from it is much derogated when it is too common Dominicus Soto a Dominican said In matter of faith every one should be tied to the exposition of the Church but in manners let every one abound in his own sense so that piety and charity be preserved otherwise men may fall into inconvenients by contrariety of expositions among the antient Fathers who never required that they should be absolutely followed The opinion prevailed which held that the Scriptures are already so well expounded that there is not hope of any more good and if any man will not be content with the Antients let him not trouble the world with his whimsies The Divines had discoursed so irresolutely that the Prelats who scarcely understood the discourses and yet have the power of suffrage doubted what to say in the canons and anathema's therefore overture was found to add anathema unto the Decree concerning the number and species of the books but the other canons should have no anathema lest they accuse their own Divines They talk of many abuses and a Decree was made against the pettiest for hast because the Session was approaching There the Decrees were read and the fifth Session was appointed to be Juny 17. Five Cardinals were present and 48 Bishops and none of them saith my author remarkable for learning The canons were sent to Rome The Court after information how particulares were debated began to think they must attend the Synod more narrowly therefore the Pope sendeth moe Cardinals and admonishes the Legats that the Decrees should not be published before they be advised at Rome he admonishes also to avoid too much flowness but bewar of celerity lest there be not time to receive order from him what to propound deliberat and conclude and spend not time in points not controverted as they had done now in some undoubted points finally take heed that the Papl authority be not permitted unto disputation At that time the Pope had deposed Herman Bishop of Colein for heresy as was pretended and ordained Adolph Count of Scavenburgh into his place and he wrote unto the Emperour for this effect Charles loved not Herman for the same heresy yet fearing that he would joyn with the ptotesâ—ants would not consent Hence arose a new jealousy between the Pope and the Empetour The Protestants complain that they were condemned not only being not heard but without the Councel by the Pope alone and therefore it is needless for them to go unto Trent IV. In the first congregation the Prelats urge two points of Reformation Sess V that were propounded and left-of in the former Session The Legats would treat of original sin Because they could not agree Letters were sent to Rome and in the mean while another order was prescribed for dispatching affaires to wit there must be a congregation of Divines to treat of doctrin and Canonists must be joyned with them when they come to Reformation yet so that Prelats might be present if they please And another Congregation of Prelats to frame the Heads of doctrin and Reformation which being examined and digested according to the most common opinion should be brought unto the generall congregation and there the voice of every one being known decrees may be framed by the determination of the greater part and then
equal in the thing signified or diverse in visible signes and the same in the intelligible signification those were promissory and these are demonstrative or as others speak the old were prenuntiative and the new are contestative Therefore it is not expedient to put that in a Decree Others said The opinion of the Lutherans and Zuinglians must be condemned without descending into particulares seing they say there is no difference but in rites and no other difference hath been shewed Article 6 Immediatly after the sin of Adam the sacraments were instituted by God and by means of them grace was given The Dominicans would have this absolutly condemned The Scotists said It is probable because of the sacrifices and circumcision and if as Thomas saith children were saved before Christ by faith of their parents children now are in a worse estate seing the faith of parents availes not their children without baptism for Augustin holds if a parent were carrying his child to be baptised and the infant to die on the way this infant were condemned They all condemned the 7. and 8. articles In the sacrament grace is given unto him only who believes that his sins are remitted Grace is not alwayes given in the sacraments nor unto all in respect of the sacrament itself but when and where and to whom it pleaseth God The 9. article denying a character in a sacrament gave occasion of more talking Soto said It is grounded on holy Scripture and was ever held as an Apostolical Of the character of the sacrament tradition albeit the word character was not vsed by the Fathers Others said Gratian makes no mention of it and Scotus saith It is not necessary by the words of Scripture nor Fathers but only by authority of the Church this is vsual unto that Doctor by a kind of courtsy Then it was questioned What is a character where is it Some called it a quality and those were of four several opinions as there be so many sorts of qualities Some called it a spiritual power some an habite others a spiritual figure and others called it a metaphorical quality Others called it a relation Some said It is ensrationis No less variety was for the subiect of it some placed it in the essence of the soul some in the understanding some in the will and some in the tongue or hands Then how many sacraments have a character Some said Only three which are not iterated Others said That is probable but not necessary Others said It is a necessary article of faith because Innocentius 3. mentioneth it and it was so defined by the councell of Florence Article 10. All Christians of what soever sexe have equal power in the ministration of word and sacraments Albeit none VVho may administer hold this article so much as the Romish Church doth especially in baptism yet they condemned it as contrary unto Scripture to tradition and the use of the Church As also they condemned article 11. A bad Minister conferreth not a sacrament Article 10. Every pastor hath power at his pleasure to protract or contract or change the forms of the sacraments It was distinguished as having a double sense by formes may be understood the essential words as it is said A sacrament hath a sensible element for the matter and a word for form or may be understood the rites which include some things not necessary but decent In the first sense they made a canon condemning the article and for the other they made another canon that albeit accidental things admit mutation yet when a rite is received by publick authority or confirmed by common custom it should not be in every mans power to change it excep the Pope only Concerning article 3. of the Minister's intention they would not change from the councel of Florence holding the Minister's intention necessary But what Of the ministers intention intention The common opinion was Intention to do as the Church doth is sufficient Here arose a difficulty Because mens opinions are different in that What the Church is their intention to do as the Church doth might also be different Some said It might rather be said It is not different when one hath the same aime to do what was instituted by Christ and observed by the Church though a false Church be taken for the true if the rite be the same The Bishop of Minori said It is no difficulty among the Lutherans for the Minister's intention but it is otherwise amongst us holding that the sacrament gives grace and it seldom happeneth that grace is obtained by any other means surely little babes and many having but small understanding are saved no other way If a priest having the charge of 4. or 5000. souls were an infidel or hid hypocrite and had intention not to do as the Church doth it must follow that the children are damned and all penitents and communicants were without fruit Neither is it sufficient to say Faith suppleeth the defect because faith suppleeth nothing to the children according to our doctrine neither availeth it unto others so much as the sacrament and to attribute so much unto faith were to take it from the sacraments as the Lutherans do He nameth other in convenients and then said He who saith God suppleeth by his omnipotency will sooner make one believe that God hath provided that such accidents should not happen by ordaining that to be a sacrament which is administred according to the instituted rite albeit the Minister hath another intention This doth not cross the common doctrine or Florentin counsel because that intention is only to be understood which is manifested by external work tho inwardly it may be contrary He confirmed this by example of Athanasius being a child and the censure of his fact by the famous Alexander Bishop of Alexandria The Divines abode still for the intention either actual or virtual as if without it a sacrament can be of no force And to speak by anticipation this Bishop wrote a little book of this question the year following and said The determination of the Synod is understood and should be expounded in this his sense The 14 article was readily condemned Sacraments were ordained only to cherish faith There was not much debate of baptism or confirmation some of them were calumnies and others were contradictory to all their Divines They agreed â—asily in framing the anathematismes Difficulty in framing the decreeâ— but no way could they agree in the positives of doctrine nor of reformation In the doctrine every sect was stieve for their own opinions wherefore some said Positive articles are not necessary lest one party be condemned Others said The order that is begun can not be left and diligence may be used to satisfy all parties Some said Albeit the factions were contentious in delivering their opinions yet all submit unto the determination of the Synod Others said Such protestations of submission are terms of reverence and should be ansvered with
articles collected as they said out of the books of Zuinglius and Luther and they commanded the Divines to confirm their opinions by holy Scripture by Apostolicall traditions and approved Councels by authorities of the holy Fathers to use brevity and avoid superfluous questions they who were sent by the Pope should speak first then they who were sent by the Emperour and in the third place the Secular Divines after the order of their promotion and lastly the Regulars after the precedence of their Orders This method pleased not the Italian Divines and they said It is a novelty condemning all School-Divinity which in all difficuities vseth reasouning in the first place as Thomas and others have done and the collecting of Sentences out of the Fathers and Scriptures is a faculty of the memory and full of toil in writting it was used in old times but it is known to be insufficient and unprofitable as appeares by those Doctors who in these 350. years have defended the Church yea it is to grant the victory unto the Lutherans who do alwayes overcom by those weapons for they know many tongues and read many Authors But those reasons had no place IX In sundry congregations they censured ten articles of the Eâ—charist little is noted worthy of memory untill they came to the framing of the Decrees Some would had anathematisms only condemning the contrary doctrine as they had done in the other sacraments Others said The first order was better decerning the positiues with the anathematisms as was done in Justification The Italians cherished this opinion because they thought it to be some mean of regaining their former reputation The Cownt of Montfort Ambassade of the Emperour and the Orator of King Ferdinand dissuade to make any Decree concerning the communion with both kindes because it would offend the Protestants who certainly shall not be brought unto the Synod if that be put in Decree and so both the Emperour and Councel have laboured in vain These shew also that the Of a Safe-conduct Emperour had given a safe-conduct unto the Protestants and they are not content with it alledging that it was decreed in the Councel at Constance and also executed that a Councel is not tied to the Safe-conduct of any man and therefore they demand a Safe-conduct from the Synod and the Emperour hath promised it unto them as also he hath commanded them to crave and purchase it The Presidents referred the answer unto the next Session or rather unto the Pope and the Ambassade said It is not fit that the points of the Eucharist be debated before their coming especially seing they want not matter of reformation where is no controversy The Legate answered This method is already decerned An account of all those is sent to Rome where the Safe-conduct found variety of opinions Some said It should not be granted because the like was never done but at Basile and that should not be followed because it is a prejudice unto the Synod to tie themselves unto rebels especially when there is no hope to gain them Others said Not for hope to gain them but to take from them all excuse it were not amiss to give them all probable satisfaction seing the Emperour is so earnest for it As for prejudices it may be so framed that it shall tie little or nothing for if it be conceived generally of Ecclesiastical and Secular persons in the German Nation and of every condition it may be said afterward that the Protestants are not comprehended or that it is meaned only of the Catholiks and a special mention is necessary for the Protestants Or the Synod may give a Safe-conduct and the Pop's authority shall be safe According to this opinion a form of a Safe-conduct was sent to Trent and a direction to omit the question of the cup and to expect the Protestants but not beyond three months neither to be idle in the mean while but hold a Session within 40. dayes and treat of pennance While this consulation was a Rome they were proceeding at Trent as is before but when they came to declare the manner how Christ is in the sacrament and of transsubstantiation a contention arose between the Dominicans and Franciscans The Dominicans said All the Contention for transsubstanâ—â—ation substance of the bread is turned into Christs body and the body is in the place where the bread was and because the whole bread is turned that is the matter of the bread is turned into the matter of his body and the form of the bread into the form of his body therefore it is called transsubstantiation and so there be two sorts of Christ's existence both real and substantial the one natural as he conversed on earth or is now in heaven and the other as he is in the sacrament which is a proper manner of his existence and can not be called natural nor sacramental as if yee would say He is not there really but as in a signe seing a sacrament is but a signe Vnless by sacramental yee understand a real existence proper unto this sacrament The Franciscans would have it said One body by Gods omnipotency may be truly and substantially in many places at once and when it comes into a new place it is in it because it goeth thether not by a successive mutation aâ—leaving the first place but in an instant it getreth the second without losing the first and God hath so ordained that where the body of Christ is no other substance â—hall abide there but by annihilation because the body of Christ succeeds in steed of it so it is truly called transsubstantiation not because the one substance is made of the other but because the one succeeds unto the other The manner of Christs being in heaven and iâ— the sacrament differ not in substance but in quantity only because in heaven the magnitude of the body possesseth a place proportionable unto it and it is substantially in the sacrament not possessing a place therefore both sorts are substantial and natural in regard of the substance but in respect of the quantity the existence in heaven is natural and in the sacrament is miraculous differing only in that in heaven the quantity is truly a quantity and in the sacrament it hath the condition of substance Much dispute was for hearing and understanding this matter but none could give satisfaction namely unto the Nuntio de Verona who for the time had the place of moderating October 11. was the Session the decrees of faith with the anathematisms and of reformation were read with express reserving some points of faith untill the coming of the Protestants and the Safe-conduct was framed according to the direction from Rome yet so that the Presidents caused all the same things be first concluded in the congregations The French Orators appeared not to receive answer to their protestation for they had received order not to contest nevertheless the Councel framed an answer denying that they were
other his works I therefore subjoyn a taste of it and because some poison is in it I add a litle antidot which may be usefull unto some In his preface unto the Emperour he shewes his Rule of judging the evangelical and Apostolical Scripture which being Divine and a most sure rule the antients had used in judging of controversies after the departure of the Apostles and because in such contentions ariseth controversy about the interpretation and sense of some passages of the Scriptures it is necessary to have recourse unto the Universall consent of Writers chiefly of those who lived in the time of the Emperour Constantin untill the time of Leo I. or of Gregory yet so that it is not necessary to produce the testimonies of them all nor of the most part which were an infinite work but it is sufficient to bring one or two by whom the judgement of the whol Church may be known and with this caution that every testimony of those Fathers may not be rashly received seing in many places they speak according to their privat judgement and wherein even the most learned and best maintainers of the Apostolical and Catholick doctrine have not agreed with the safe unity of faith but only such things as belong unto the confirmation of the Apostolical and Catholick tradition and have the weight of irrefragable and undoubted testimony wherein they declare constantly the publick and common faith of the whole Church His method is conform unto the Articles of the Augustan Confession His principal scope seemes to be contained in the seventh Article de vera Ecclesia where he holdes that the true Church is always manifest and though the present Roman Church hath departed from the primitive not a little in integrity of manners and discipline yea and in sincerity of doctrine yet she standes on the same foundation and professeth communion with the antient Church and therefore is one and the same albeit different in many particulares Neither should we separate from her as Christ did not separat from the Jewish Church albeit corrupt neither did the Prophets nor Apostles violate the union but only spake against her and came out of her but by dissenting from the errors neither did Cyprian and some others violat the union with the Roman Church how beit they did complain of the envy of the Roman clergy and the pride of the Pope This may be called his privat judgement as he spake of others in his preface and not the constant faith of the whole Church that the Church should be manifest always was not the judgement of Eliah 1. King 19. 14. nor of John who prophecied of the woman fleeing into the wilderness Revel 12 and it is without all doubt in the general that in the dayes of the Antichrist the Church shall not be manifest 2. he grantes that the Roman Church hath departed not a litle in manners and doctrine but how far she hath departed may be in some measure known by the history 3. his advice that we should not have departed from her is a main question but certainly his reason is not sufficient for though our Saviour made not separation from the Jewish Church yet he foretold that when these labourers of the vine-yard shall have killed the heir the vineyard shal be taken from them and not a stone of their temple should be left upon another Where was their Church then if they had no place for their Religion As for the Pophets and Apostles distinguish the times before the time was come which God had appointed they had no reason to depart but when the appointed time was come then they departed and for this very point Steeven was Martyred Act. 6. 14. The same distinction serveth for the Roman Church Cyprian and Paulin had no reason to violat the vnion when she had not departed from the true faith but when she became the whoore and all nations had drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication then was the time to obey the commande Come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sins and that ye receive not of her plagues Gods people was with her and in her and they must not only protest against their adulterous mother but come out from her Then for reconciliation of the Church he seemes to despair that ever they will accept of his Overture to wit that those who have given the cause of distraction that is saith he the governors of the Church would remit some what of their too much rigor and yeeld a little for the peace of the Church and following the wishes and admonitions of many good people would reform the manifest abuses according to the rule of Divine Scripture and of the antient Church from which they have departed And next that those who eschuing those vices have fallen into the other extremity would confess their faults and return into the right way In other Articles that differ from the Popish Church he puts often a blame upon the Reformed if not for their Tenet yet for their practise For example of justification he saith What is said in the fourth article that men can not be justified before God by their own strength merits or works but are justified freely by faith it was evermore allowed by the Church and untill this day it is approved by all the writers of the Church So that I wonder why the Apology saith that they are condemned in this article as if it were taught that men obtain remission of sins for their own merits and not freely for Christ's sake Afterwards he cites the testimony of Bernard saying I consider three things whereupon all my hope stands the love of adoption the truth of the promise and the power of performing And saith he the Doctors of this age say not that they teach doubting whereby men should doubt of Gods mercy and mistrust but such fear of God whereby a diligence of living well and of keeping the received grace may be stirred up and increased in us as the Apostle saith Work forth your salvation with fear and trembling And they call this sear chast and filial which perfect love casts not forth but retaines and cherishes Which fear hath always adjoyned confidence and hope of Gods fatherly good-pleasure And seing those things are taught tooday in the Catholick Church the Protestants do not rightly in accusing the present Church that she bidds and teaches to doubt of Gods favor and of eternal life and put this blasphemous doctrin as they speak among the chief causes for which they should depart from her Of free will he saith on the 18. Artick The sum of this controversy which had been formerly and now is consists in this What the will of man can do to attain righteousness by which we are justified before God is not to be asscribed unto the power of free-will corrupted by sin but unto the singular grace of God which we have not by nature wherein we were