hartes by the spirit without either character or inke and keeping diligentlie the old tradition S. Clemens Alexandrinus anno 190 k lib. de Paschate vt est apud Euseb lib 6. cap 11. saith that the Bretheren did wrest from him to put downe in writing and to deliuer to posteritie those thinges that had bine deliuered to him only by the voyce of priestes successours to the Apostles Origen anno 230. saith l in cap. 6. epist ad Rom. The church receaued tradition from the Apostles yea to Baptize children Againe m homil 5. in lib. Num. There are many thinges saith he in Ecclesiasticall tradition or obseruatioÌ„s which all ought to doe notwithstanding the reason of them is not knowne to all Tertullian anno 200. saith n lib. de Corona militis Also thou wilt say that written authoritie ought to be craued in the obteyning of tradition let vs search therfore whether tradition not written ought not to be receaued wee will plainly deny it to be receaued if there be no examples of other obseruations which wee chalenge out of a patronizing hart of custome with the instrument or help of any scripture or title of only tradition Afterward hauing numbred the ceremonies of Baptisme certeine others as the signe of the crosse the yearly sacrifice for the dead and such lyke he addeth saying If thou craue the law of these and such lyke written disciplines thou shalt find none Tradition is giuen thee for an author custome a conformer and saith an obseruer o lib pe praescrupt hâ—eret Also he teacheth that heretiques are to be confuted not by scripture but tradition S Cyprian anno 240. saith p lib 1. epist 12. Also be that is Baptized ought to be annoynted but of this chrisme or oyle there is no mention in scripture but only in tradition Againe q lib. 2. epist 3. know saith he that wee are admonished that in offering vpon the chalice the tradition of our Lord is obserued neither may wee doe any other thinge then that which our Lord hath first done for vs that the Chalice which is offered in his remembraunce be offered mixt with wine S. Eusebius anno 330. saith r lib. 1. de demonst rat Euang cap. â— Moyses did write the lawe in tables not hauing life but Christ writ the documentes and obseruations of the new testament in myndes endued with life but his disciples according to the will of their maister commending their doctrine to the eares or vnderstanding of many whatsoeuer thinges were commaunded by their perfect maister vnto men hauing as it were gone beyoÌ„d their custome those thinges they deliuered vnto them that could take them but such thinges as they thought were agreable vnto men that did as yet carrie soules subiect vnto affectioÌ„s waÌ„ting reason these thinges I say coÌ„forming theÌ„selues to the imbecillitie weaknes of many they did coÌ„maund partlie by writing partlie without writing to be kept obserued as it were by â— certeyne vnwritten law S. Athanasius anno 340. saith Å¿ lib. de decretis Nil Synodi behold wee haue demonstrated and shewed that this senteÌ„ce hath beene deliuered from hand to hand vnto the Fathers each vnto other but you o new Iewes and sons of Gaiphas what progenitours or auncestours of your names can you shew S. Basil an 380 saith t lib. de Spiritu S. cap. 27. The articles which are kept preached in the church wee haue theÌ„ partly out of vnwritteÌ„ doctrine and haue receaued them brought vnto vs in a mysterie partly out of the traditioÌ„ of the Apostles both which haue the same force vnto godlines and no man that hath but any meane experience of ecclesiasticall right doth contradict them S. Gregorie Naz. anno 380. saith u orat 1. in Iulianuru But greater and more excellent for the formes of those Churches which being receaued by tradition wee haue kept vntill this day c. S Chrysostome an 380 saith x in 2. Thess 2. It is manifest that the Apostles haue not deliuered all thinges by their epistles but many thinges with out writing but as well these as them are worthy of the same credit Againe y hom 69. 〈◊〉 Populum â—â—â—tiâ—chenum hom 1. in epist ad â—ly◠〈◊〉 It was not in vayne saith he instituted by the Apostles that of such as had departed this life theire should be memorie made of them in celebrating the venerable mysteries for they did know that from hence their did come much profit and commoditie vnto them S. â—piphamus anno â—90 saith z 〈◊〉 55. quae est MelchisedecianoruÌ„ there are limites prescribed vs and foundations for the edification of saith as the Apostles traditions holy scriptures and successions of doctrine wherby the truth of God is strengthned on euery syde so that no man can be deceaued by fables or tales Againe a 〈◊〉 61. quae est Apostolicorum wee must saith he vse tradition for wee cannot haue all thinges out of holy scripture where for the holy Apostles deliuered some thinges by writing and other some by tradition b lib contra-constanâ—â—um ImperatoreÌ„ S. Hilary anno 350 saith answearing an Arian prince who said I will not haue wordes that are not written This I aske saith S. Hilary what Bishop doth commaund it who doth forbid the manner of Apostolicall preaching speake first if you thinke it well said I will not haue new medicines against new poysons c epist ad Marcellam de erroribus Montani S Hierome saith anno 380. wee at a fit tyme fast one lent according to Apostolicall tradition Againe when an Heretick had said many thinges that are obserued in churches by traditioÌ„ doe vsurpe to themselues the authoritie of the written law The Catholicke answered d in Diologo con 〈◊〉 Lucisctianos indeed I doe deny but that this is the custome of churches but what manner of thinge is that that thou dost transferre or adioyne the lawes of the church vnto heresie S. Augustine anno 400 saith e lib. 10. de Genesi cap. 2â— The custome of our mother the church in Baptizing infants ought not to be despised or in any sort be thought superfluous neither were it to be belieued vnlesse it were Apostolicall tradition Againe f lib. 2. de Baptismo contra Donatistas cap. 7. which custome saith he I belieue proceeded from Apostolicall tradition as many thinges are not found in their writinges nor in latter councels yet because therfore kept and obserued by the whole church they are thought and belieued to haue bine deliuered coÌ„maunded by them Againe g lib. 5. cap. 23. The Apostles indeed commaunded no such thing but that custome which was opposed to Cyprian ought to be belieued to haue takeÌ„ his beginning from their tradition as there are many thinges which the whole church doth hold and for this are rightly belieued to be commaunded by the Apostles although they are not found
by the testimonies of Fathers concerning which that I may answere freely and briefly what I think one little sentence of scripture is of more force with me then a thousand Fathers without scripture therfore you shall not expect that I do in particuler confute these errours M. Barlovv saith n in his defence of the aâ—â—icies of he Protestant relig on pag. 17â— This passeth most ryse amongst the Fathers who taking in inferis for Abraham bosome expound it that Christ went thither to conuey the Fathers deceased before his resurrection into the place where now they are LVTHERS DOCTRINE Luther at the first permitted and approued of intercession and prayer for the dead saying o Sermo in festo omnium sanctorum if it please thee to pray for the soules of thy parentes thou mayst doe this at whome c. praying in this manner Ah. God if the state of this soule be such that it may be succurred by our prayers O God be mercifull vnto it and help it Againe p Serm. super Euang. de diuite Laâ—aro the fourth question saith he is whether wee ought to pray for the Dead because there is no mention in the Ghospell of a middle state betweene Abrahames bosome and Hell for as much as being in Abrahames bosome they neede no prayers but being in Hell they can receaue no fruite from thence to which question wee must answere wee haue no precept from God that wee should pray for the Dead wherfore he doth not sinne that doth not pray for them no mortall man can offend in that which God neither hath nor would commaund But for as much as God hath not made knowne to vs what is the state of soules and wee are vncertayne how God dealeth with them so that wee neither can nor will make them sinners that pray for them for wee are certaine out of the Ghospell that many haue risen from the Dead whoe wee are forced to confesse that they haue not as yet receiued their last iudgment Ibid. it is no offence if thou pray for that soule yet let it be after that manner that thou leaue it vncertayne and say most mercifull God if the soule be in that state that it may be succurred holpen vouchsafe to be mercifull vnto it Againe q in exposit Euang in die Epiphâ—cy matth 3. hence is it that those fained soules did craue help by masses and such manner of trifles so that it is now come to passe that the Masse is growne to that abuse and so many masses and vigiles are said for the dead as this misery and abomination cannot be sufficiently deplored and lamented CALVINS DOCTRINE r lib. 3. cap. 5 ¶ 10. When saith he the aduersaries obiect to me that to pray for the dead was an vse receaued one thousand and three hundred yeeres since certaynly any man but of meane wit may easily know that whatsoeuer is read concerning this in the auncient Fathers is attributed to publick custome and the foolishnes of the common people they were I confesse also led into errour to wit in so much that in considerate beliefe is wont to depriue mens myndes of iudgment c. Augustine relateth in his bookes of confession that Monica his mother did earnestly intreat him that shee might be remembred at the aulrer in celebrating the mysteries forsooth an old wiues desire which the sonne doth performe not according to the rule of Scripture but for affection will haue it approued of by others but his booke written by him of the care of the dead hath so many doubtinges as through it owne couldnes it ought worthily to extinguish the heat of foolish zeal in any one that shall desire to be a patrone of the dead Againe Å¿ Ibid. ¶ â— That which they alleadge out of the history of the Machabees concerning Iudas Machabeus I think it not worth answeare least I seeme to account that worke in the Catalogue of holy bookes althouh Austine receaued it for canonicall And a little after he saith That fact of Iudas Machabeus was not without superstition and a preposterous zeal An old condemned Heresie â— Epiph. haeresi 75. August li. de haeresibus c. â—â— The Aerian Heretickes taught that wee ought neither to pray nor offer Sacrifice for the dead witnes THE 28. ARTICLE Ecclesiasticall Tradition THE CATHOLICKE DOCTRINE Concerning the word of God parte of it is written and parte is not written the written is called the holy Scripture or commonly the Bible The not written is called Apostolicall or ecclesiasticall tradition because it coÌ„temneth Scripture in it selfe doth deliuer it by voice also because the church the piller and foundation of truth doth deliuer it to posteritie from hand to hand SCRIPTVRE a Ecclesiasticâ—â— 8.11 Let not the narration of the auncients escape thee for they learned of their Fathers because of them thou shalt learne vnderstanding and in tyme of necessitie to giue answeare b Deut. 32. v. 7. Remember the old dayes thinke vpon euery generation aske thy Father and he will declare to thee thy elders and they will tell thee c 1. Cor. 11.34 cap. 10 v. 16. And the rest I will dispose when I shall come which catholickes vnderstand to be certayne ceremonies that he ordayned in the church which are no where written d 2. Thessa 2.15 Therfore Brethren stand and hold the tradictioÌ„s which you haue learned whether it be by word or by our epistle Hebr. 13. v. 7. Remember your prelates whoe haue spoken the word of God to you the end of whose conuersation beholding imitate their faith f 2. Iohn v. 12 See also 3. Iohn v. 13.14 Haueing moe thinges to write vnto you I would not by paper and inke for I hope that I shal be with you and speake mouth to mouth See also Io. cap. 16. v. 12. FATHERS g apud Eusebium lib. 3. hist c. 36. S Ignatius anno 100. doth exhort all to sticke to the traditions of the Apostles which traditions saith Eusebius he doth affirme that he himselfe hath lest behind for the more securitie h cap. 1 Eccl. Hierarch S. Dionysius Areopagita anno 80. saith these our first captaynes of the priestly office did deliuer the chiefest and substantiall thinges by their institutions partly written and partly not written S Ireneus anno 106. saith i lib. 3. cap 4. what if there should ryse a contention about some smale question ought wee not to haue recourse vnto the most auncient churches wherin the Apostles were conuersant and receaue from them concerning this present questioÌ„ what is certayne and playne But what if the Apostles had not left vs the Scriptures should wee not follow the order of tradition which they deliuered to them to whom they committed the churches to vvhich order of tradition many nations of the Barbarians doe assent and agree and some of them that doe beleeue in Christ hauing their saluation written in their
sentence Deut. 12.31 for my case being like to that of Moyses I dare say with Moyses and our very enemies are iudges It is agreed vpon betwixt vs both how necessarie a poynt our saluation is being for all eternity and therefore I will saue labour to cite scripture in proofe of that which is by neither part denied but in vaine is the scope and end of a thing granted if wee differre in the meanes to attayne it the meanes I assure my selfe you will say is the word of God which I deny not but let vs not thinke the Ghospell to be in the wordes of the scripture but in the sense not in the out side but in the inside or marrow not in the leaues of the wordes but in the sapp pith or root of reason other wyse euen the Deuill himselfe speaketh Scripture cap 1â— 1â— and all heresies according to that of Ezechiel make vnto them selues pillowes which they may lae vnder the elbow of euerie age and to guâ—y you a tast hereof for this matter concerning my soule nerely I haue bestowed some diligent search herein consider with me I pray you how of auncient tyme the old hereticke Marcion found meanes to reiect both Moyses and all the Prophets and what did he pretend cap. 10.7 Surelie Scripture to witt that of Sainct Iohn hovv many soeuer haue come before me are theeues and robbers the Armenians also taught that the whole femal sex of women should be wholy extinct and that vvee should all ryse in the last iudgment in the state of man and what vvas their ground cap. â— 13 Scripture also to witt that to the Ephesians vntill vvee all meet in the vnitie of faith and knovvledge of the sonn of God into a perfect man The Mainchers also proued our Sauiour to be this materiall sunne vvhich vvee dayly see with our eyes and what colour had they scripture also Iohn 8.12 to vvitt where our Sauiour saith I am the light of the vvorld how did the Waldenses proue that euen a lavvfull iudge or Magistrate could not put to death the greatest Malefactour that vvas Exod. 20.13 by scripture Thou shalt not Kill by Scripture also the Circumcellians held that euery Christian might not only murther his fellovv but lay violent hands vpon himselfe for say they it is vvritten Iohn 12.25 he that hateth his life in this vvorld doth keepe it to lyfe euer lasting Thus out of these few to omitt many moe wee see how all heretiques like serpentes in imitation of that old serpent the Deuill who came with scripture euen to our Sauiour himselfe do lurks vnder the tree of knowledge I mean the scripture that so they may more cunningly conueigh their deadly poyson and surely though these examples of auncient tymes were sufficient to teach euery man humility seeing as a prudent man doth well obserue he that will need be his ovvne Scholler hath commonly a fooll to his master yet wantes there not neither sufficient occasion euen in our tymes to be carefull in this so waighty a businesse for how shall I thinke the protestantes in these dayes to agree vpon the true sense of scripture when they cannot a gree about the translation it selfe which must be the grownd where vpon they worke by which dissention also they shew themselues to haue descended in doctrine from these old heretiques in the primitiue church For doth the protestant beleeue the scriptures not to be receaued so fully and wholy as the Catholicke or as it pleaseth him papist doth but rather certayne chapters and bookes which seeme to him or rather indeed to this braine sicke phansie not so a greable to the purity of the ghospell to be cutt of and excluded the number of holy writt the same did the Carpocratians Seuerians and Manichees who condemned all the old testament as a thing fayned from an euill beginning aâ—d yet certainlie not without scripture as you may set in the example of Marcion first produced In lyke manner Cerdon denyed all the Euangelistes except S. Luke Cerinthus all except S. Mathevv the Seuerians also tooke away the Actes of the Apostles and with the Ebionites all the epistles of S. Paul the Alogians likewise esteemed the Apocalypse of S. Iohn for an inuention of Cerinthas Now that you are one with these at least in this point of mayming scripture is manifest for do not the most excellent of your whole clergy and first publishers of your ghospell Zuinglius Oecolampadius Illiricus and the Magdeburgenses exclude many of the Apostles epistles from all communione of holy scripture vnder pretence of examining it by the rule of the deuyne worde Certainly they can by no meanes dissemble it in the epistles of S. Iohn Iude Iames and S. Paul to the Hebrevves which in this my compendium were to longe to proue at large but to come yet more nere you Do not also your later Doctoures in this especially imitate these their predecessours yes most exactly as heere is sufficiently confirmed In the fourth disputation had with F. Campian the Iesuit in the tower of London your Doctoures did expresly censure these bookes by the authority only of fower or siue to be Apocriphall to witt the booke of vvisdome Syrach Iudith Toby the 4. bookes of Esdras Baruch Ecclesiasticus Hester and the Machabees in the new testament the ghospell of S. Luke S. Paul to the Hebrevves the second epistle of S. Peter the tvvoe last epistles of S. Iohn S. Iames and the Apocalypse Luther also calls the epistle of S. Iames a strawen epistle and of no truth and not worthy the spirit of an Apostle All which compared together your Doctours in this opinion of paring scripture cannot but drinke of the same cuppe with those old condemned heretiques But after seeing their folly and that they could by no means defend what thus rashly they had enterprized by often mutation and change they came to that text which you now haue but yet euen to this day with what dubitation this is done and correction or rather to speake truth corruption their often impressions doe manifestly testifie and I thinke you are not ignorant how many seuerall translations there haue beene within these few yeeres I can remember thee since my first acquaintance with London which mutabilitie plainly argueth they are those fond builders of whome our Sauiour maketh mention are shaken with euery blast because they build not vpon the rocke which is the church The piller and firmament of truth 1. Tim. 3.15 But vpon the shallow sandes of their owne vnsetled braines and this I speake not of my selfe but by the testimony of themselues which you may see more conuenient and at large hereafter yet it shall not be discomodious if in the meane tyme wee examine one of their chiefest linguists in England M. Broughton therfore in his epistle to the Lordes of the councell desireth them to procure speedily a new translation because that saith he vvhich is
shall fall there it will a bide you haue serued the world hitherto in sin and heresie to leaue it novv is not so much to leaue it as to preuent it for shortlie it vvill leaue you for the vnexpected coming of death you vvant not of your neerest knired whose suddayne departure may be sufficient examples yea the only death of our father nosmale griefe to me may suffice vs in this To haue erred hitherto is humane to perseuere as I may tearme it is beastly you haue giuen your life past to heresie and her accomplices giue at least the remnant and surplus to God and his Church you haue giuen as one saith the maine croppe io the enimie of mankind the redeemer let at least glean the reproofe of your haruest and he will requite you as he promiseth a hundreth fold and with life euer lasting O Mother Pardon yet once more I earnestly beseech you my bouldnes and rough manner of writing 2. Cor. 116. I confesse with S. Paul I am rude in speach yet tolerable in opening to you the meane how to escape so great a daunger as the eternall perdition both of body and soule in which perill as I said you dayly sleepe in your tyme therefore is but short and you haue a great account to render your conscience vpon the vnderstanding of these cannot but vrge you your sinnes call vpon you the iudge expecteth you imbrace then the Roman Catholicke church for your mother and God will euer be your father accuse your self and God will excuse you be sorrie for your sinnes and they shall not be imputed vnto you permitt the priestes sentence to passe on you and Gods wrathfull sentence shall not touch you If you will mount the hills of Armenia enter the arke of Christes Church if you will ascend the higher heauen enter this lower yea this is the way and only meane To haue liued hitherto in sin and heresie is daunger to dye in this estate as our Sauiour and his Apostles witnes is certayne damnation But I haue beene to longe and therfor must rather abruptly conclude then any way finish this my present discourse wherfor as my last greeting and farewell I humbly beseech you for the tender good of your owne soule and so many which depend vpon you a great account to answere for to wouchsafe the reading or at least relating by some other these my paynes and trauells taken in your be halfe that so at length all poyntes and doubtes clearly proued you may with the people in Esdras say â— Esdras 4. â—2 truth is great and preuaileth and that I as S. Ambrose at the conuersion of S. Austine may sing Wee prayse thee God c you assuming the part of S. Austine with a cheerefull countenance and heauenly responsorie answere wee confesse thee our Lord c. and finally be incorporate a member of Christes mysticall body heere on earth his church in which an obedient child concluding your last daye as the soule of poore Lazarus was by his good Angel conueighed into Abrahams bosome so your guarden or good Angel with a triumphant victorie from that roaring Lyon enemye to man kind the Diuell may present your glorious soule a sweet smelling odor to our Lord Iesus Christ and there with the whole court of heauen his fellow Angels Luc. 15.7.10 as our Sauiour saith reioyce at so glorious a conquest which that it may sort according to my desire and that I may as Iob saith Iob 19.27 see you with these my eyes in that eternall glorie I most earnestly and humbly beseech our Sauiour who hath so long expected you to mercy that you may make your chiefe commoditie of this exhortation and some vse also of this my no lesse painfull then long admonition that in this life you may so purchase is grace as in the next eternall glorie Amen Your obedient sonne to the vtter most that he may I. P. AN INDEX Of the common places treated off 1 IMprimis the English were conuerted aboue a 1000. yeares since to the Catholicke faith fol 1. 2 The same faith was vniuersally professed for sundry ages before and was also agreable to that first faith where vnto the Brittans of wales were conuerted in the Apostles tymes fol 3. 3 Our aduersaries good opinion of the fathers fol. 6. 4 Our aduersaries appeale vnto the fathers fol. 8. 5 Scripture is not easie to vnderstand fol. 10. 6 Scripture is not for euery one to read and interpret fol. 16. 7 Scripture neuer doubted off amongst Catholickes fol. 21. 8 Scripture some tyme in Question fol Ibid. 9 Scripture neuer admitted by the Catholicke church fol. 22. 10 The Protestantes pretence of only scripture is friuolous and Idle fol. 10. 11 Protestantes disagreeing translations and Acknowledg c. fol. 27. 12 The church cannot nor ought not to haue erred fol. 31. 13 The church doth consist of good and bad fol. 33. 14 The church is ought to haue beene alwayes visible Ibid. 34. 15 Of this churches visible head c. fol. 46. 16 Of Free will fol 58. 17 Of the cooperation of Freewill with grace fol. 66. 18 Faith alone doth not iustifie fol 72. 19 Of good workes fol. 78. 20 Of Fastinges fol 87. 21 The lawes and precepts of Christ are not impossible 95. 22 To beseech the prayers of the righteous heere on earth is no derogation to our Sauiour fol 100. 67. 23 The Saintes and Angels in heauen know our doinges and wantes better then men fol. 101. 24 Of Saintes Reliques fol. 112. 25 Of the holy crosse and Images fol. 118. 26 Of Purgatorie and Lymbus Patrum fol. 125. 27 Prayer for the Dead fol. 131. 28 Of Ecclesiasticall tradition fol. 140. 29 Of the Seuen Sacraments fol. 149. 30 Of the efficacle of Sacraments fol. 16. 31 Of Baptisme and the necessitie thereof fol 166. 32 Of the venerable Sacra of the Eucharist as the form Consecration Real presence great care obserued had more thereof then of the water of Baptisme lest any part therof should fall to the ground mixture of water with wine in the Chalice and the receauing therof Fasting and Chast fol. 172. 33 Of the Sacrifice of the Masse fol. 102. 34 Of Communion vnder both kindes fol. 210. 35 Of Confession fol 215. 36 Of Satisfaction 225. 37 Of the single life of Priestes and Clergie men fol. 235. 38 Vowes of perpetuall chastitie were allowed by the Fathers affirming them to be obligatory fol. 245. 39 Of Antichrist and the Aulters and Sacrifice which he is fore told to take a way Daniel 12.11 fol. 247. 40 The Roman faith proued to be the true Catholicke faith by Dionysius Areopagita and Hermes most auncient and Apostolicke fol. 248. 41 To shew no beginning of a Doctrine is an infallible token that it is and proceedeth from the Apostles 249. 42 True Miracles make a stronge argument for the true faith and that the foresaid faith wherevnto the English were conuerted was confirmed by
are baptized for the dead if the dead ryse not againe at all And o ibid ca. 3 v 15. But himself shal be saued yet so as by sier And p Rom. cap. 10.6 But the iustice which is of faith saith thus say not in thy hart who shall asceÌ„d into heaueÌ„ that is to bring Christ downe or who descendeth into the depth that is to call Christ againe from the dead but what saith the scripture the word is nigh in thy mouth and in thy hart The Eunuch when Phillip the Deacon said vnto him q Act. 8 3â— trowest thou that thou vnderstandest the thinges which thou readest answeared and said how can I vnlesse some manshew me r Psal 118 Dauid a King and Prophet after Gods owne hart durst not read the law of God before he had craued the vnderstanding of it from God s Luc. c. 24 v. 17 2â— Also the Apostles did not vnderstand the holy Scriptures before that our Sauiour had openned their eies Ephes c. 3. v. 10. How obscure also is this Place of Scripture that the manifold wisdom of God may be notified to Princes Potentates in the celestials by the church according to the prefinitio of worlds which he had in Christ Iesu our Lord Finally if our common lawes handling nothing but selling buying barganing and such commoÌ„ and vsuall matters as are dayly practised by men be so hard and difficult as they require great studie to be well vnderstood and clients will giue greate fees for lawyers couÌ„cell vpon them what shall wee thinke of Gods Lawes when as S. Basil saith v hom 1â— in Hexameton the Scripture is heauenly inspired and nothing a bounding in it no there cannot be fouÌ„d so much as one idle word which also treat of deuyne supernatural thinges farr aboue mans teach capacity as of the trinitie incarnation of the word heauenly Sacraments the nature of Angels of the operation of God in mens mynds of eternall Predestination reprobation with many others of this kinde Also who dare take vpoÌ„ him the explicatioÌ„ of S. Iohns Apocalypse which as S. Hierome saith hath as many mysteries as wordes or of Dauids psalmes so obscure that all haue bene astonished at theÌ„ I speake not of your new inflamed Doctors who are so â—ot of the spirit that they will not only out strip S. Hierome but all others nor limite themselues to the difficulties of S Iohns Apocalipse or psalmes only but euen from Alpha to Omega the first word of Genesis to the last of the whole scriptures for they boldly affirme and assure thee who euer thou art if thou hast but saith and the spirit that thou shalt be as sure of the true seÌ„se of scripture as thou art sure thou liuest for what saith Caluin x lib. 4. instit cap. 17 g. 25. truly that after diligent and serious meditation about the vnder standing of these wordes This is my body he did imbrace that sense which the spirit did suggest The same doth Luther alleadge against Caluin Zuinglius against them both wherfore certainty it was a very soul and wicked spirit that would not inculcate one and the same doctrine but thus grosly delude three such pillers of your Church as these setting them together by the eares but indeed I rather think it to be a Hebgobling then any spirit to interpret the holy ghost and so if you please for this present wee will take it as by all liklihood most probable But to our purpose from which perchance wee haue to farre digressed for your better satisfaction therfore receaue the consent of the primitiue Church in these few Doctors at least concerning this one poynt especially when as your owne confesse that they y Hooker l. 1. de eccles politia sect 4 p. 86 l. 2. s â—4 pag. 102. See tradition cannot determine by Scripture what is Scripture This I say we must doe vnlesse wee should imitate you in England reiecting what mislykes vs and admitt only the rest which makes not Scripture but only in concept S Augustine saith z tom 6. de vtil cred cap. 7 he that hath no skill in Poetrie dare not meddle with Terentian Mauruâ— with out a master Asper Cornutus Donatus and infinite others are requisite to vnderstand any Poet and doest thou without a guide rush vpon holy bookes full of deuyne matters O exceding boldnes or rather madnes And againe If euery art though base and easie require a teacher or master to obteyn it what is more foolish heady pride then not to learne the booke of deuyne Sacraments of their interpreters a lib. de fide bonis operiduâ— ca. 15 16. Also in another place he affirmeth that place of S. Paule And if any man build vpon this foundation c. to be one of the most difficult places in the epistles of S Paul Moreover as b hom 1. Cantica Origen vvriteth and S. c in proemio EZechielis Hierome the auncient fathers had such an opinion of the obscuritie of Scripture that they vvould permitt no man to read the begining of Genesis end of EZechiel before he vvere thirtie yeares of age S Austine whome our Aduersaries so much extoll was of such admirable witt that not yet twenty yeares of age with out any interpreter or any man teaching him did vnderstande Aristotles Categories as he confesseth himself This best witnes I say according te Caluin a man of so rare witt did neither thinke so highly of him self nor basely of Scripture that he would of his owne mother witt giue the true sense of Scripture for thus he speaketh d epist ad velusianuÌ„ such is the profunditie saith he of the Christian Doctrine that I should profit in it euery day if I would guâ—e my self vnto it with all diligence chiefest studie and best witt euen from my childhood vnto decrepit old age And in an other place he saith e lib. 3. confessionum cap. 5. wherfore I purposed seriously with my self to read the holy Scriptures there by to see of what nature they were and loe I behold a thing neither euidently conuicted to the proud nor yet naked or manifest to children but in stile lowly in successe loftie and vailed with mysteries Againe f lib. 2 doctrin Christi cap. 6. But saith he they are deceaued with diuers manifold obscurities and ambiguities who rashily read the Scriptures taking one thing for an other in certayne places they doe not find what they falsely suspect for some thynges are spoken so obscurely that they cast amost thick darknes all which I nothing doubt but that it is done by diuine prouidence to tame pride with labour and to keepe the vnderstanding from lothing which thinges that are easily vnderstood doe offen tymes basly esteeme of And a gaine g lib. 12. confessionum cap. 14. wounderfull saith he is the profounditie of the Scriptures or speeches whose outward apparence doth seeme
vnto vs to flatter the simple but wouÌ„derfull is the profunditie ô God wouÌ„derfull is the profounditie it is a horror to looke into it a horror of honour a feare of Loue. To conclude last of all he saith h Epi. 119 cap. 21. in the holy Scriptures are farre more thinges which â— know not then which I know hitherto for Learning sanctity and Fidelity euen according to our Aduersaries peerelesse Saint Augustine S i Ruffinus lib. 2. hist. cap. 9. Basil and S Gregory Nazianzen both noble men both broughtt vp at Athens both companions for thirteen yeeres together in one monasterie did bestow their whole endeauours in reading the holy Scriptures and gathering the vnderstanding of them not out of their owne presumption but out of the writinges and authorities of their elderes whoe as is manifest had the rule of their vnderstanding from Apostolical tradition S. Ambrose saith the devine Scripture is a k Epist 44 ad constaÌ„tinum sea hauing in it deepe senteÌ„ces and obscuritie of Prophetical riddles S. Hierome that miracle of vnderstanding in the greeke and Hebrew tongue saith of himself l Epist ad I neuer ceased Saith hee euen from my tender ago either to read or to aske learned men such thinges as I did not know neither did I euer take my self to be my master Finally not long since for this only cause I went to Alexandria to see Diâ—â—ymus and to be resolued by him of all such doubtes m epist ad Aâ—gâ—sâ—â—â—n quaest 8. as I had in the holy Scriptures Againe The whole epistle vnto the Romanes saith he is ouerwhelmed with to many obscurities But now I know you are not with outsome euasions and amoÌ„gst many this is a Chief one that although Scripture be obscure in many places yet you w ll haue all required vnto saluation plain to euery man But I proue the Contrarie for Baptisme is necessarie vnto saluation and not with standing that place in S. Iohn n cap. 3. v 5. vnlesse a man be borne againe c is so obscure and doth breed such cauil coÌ„tentioÌ„ betwen Caluin and Breniâ—â—s that o lib. 4. instit cap. 16. v. 15. Caluin doth confound the spirit with the water but p in cap. 3. Matt. Brâ—â—â—ius coÌ„fouÌ„deth both with penauÌ„ce Moreover the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist which you call the Lords q Iohn c. 6 v. 51. supper is necessarie to saluation and not with standing it is a wouÌ„der to see how many and diuers expositions their are vpon these sower wordes r Matt. 26 v. 26. This is my body S Claudius Sainctes saith that there are fowescore fower interpretatioÌ„s inuented by heretiques vpoÌ„ them sower wordes only Å¿ Repet 1. cap. 10. Also iustification is necessarie and yet Luke Osiander a chief protestant in Germanie saith that there are tweÌ„tie seuerall opinions of it where of euery one doth challeng Scripture for that which it holdeth Finally at least the belief of the Trinitie and incarnatioÌ„ of our Sauiour is necessarie vnto Saluation and yet notwithstaÌ„ding who doth not see how the â—bionites Arians NestoriaÌ„s Eutychias valentinians do fight and coÌ„tend aboâ—nt it and â—ast of all the new Arians and Eutychians of this our age which certenly they would neuer doe if places of scripture which they haue haÌ„dled necessarie to â—â—â—ation had bene plaine and easie to be vnderstood To coâ—clude the oÌ„ly disobedieÌ„s in not bilieuing the Catholiâ— Church were sufficieÌ„t to condeÌ„ne vs if wee did credit our Sauiours wordes who saith t Matt. 18. v. 17. yf he will not heare the Church let him be to thee as the heatheÌ„ and publicaÌ„ And that wee might not doubt of the doctrine of this Church he saith u ibid. ca. 16 v 18. c. 28. vers 20. The gates of hell shall not preuaile against her and that he will remaine wiâ—h theÌ„ the Doctors of the Church vnto the end of the world But if you will yet obiect and say that you caÌ„ alleage as firme and forceable places of scripture in your behalfe as I haue done in myne or shall doe heate after not with staÌ„ding you may not presently coÌ„clud against vs but rather let vs assure our selues that the scripture cannot nor must not be coÌ„trarie to it self which to affirme and maintayne is blasphemie against the holy ghost certeÌ„ly our sauiour saith x Matth. 12. v. 32 he that shall speake against the holy ghost it shall not be forgiueÌ„ him neither in this world nor in the world to come whereby the way wee may obserue that there is a place after this life where sins are forgiuen for hell I think you expect no absolution there Purgatory you abhorâ—e the name of it so foolist you thinke that opinion but into heaueÌ„ S. Iohn saith There Sâ—â—ll enter no polluted thing not that doth abomination and maketh â—ye To close vp this matter therfore with these few sentences the first is Luthers who seeing that these wordes This is my body doe stand vmnoueable for the Catholicke vnder no colour may be wrested to any other seÌ„se he calleth the deuine scripture the booke of heretiques y lib. 3. cont BreÌ„tium Alanus Copuâ— dialogo 6. cap. 19. as Hosius writeth And in an other place he saith z lib cent ZuingliuÌ„ Ooec olampaducem â—f this world Saith he should loÌ„g eÌ„dure it must needs be for the diuers interpretations of scripture that now are extant that for the conseruation of the vnitie of faith that wee doe receaue againe the decrees of councells and fly vnto them for refuge The other sentence is of Vincentius Lirinensis who saith a lib cont prefanas haereâ—â—m nouitateâ— cap. 37. as ofteÌ„ as heretiques doe alleadge the senteÌ„ces of diuine Law by which being euill interpreted they labour to coÌ„firme their errours there is no doubt but they follow the craftie inuentions of theire author the diuell Again when wee see heretiques vse the Catholicke faith Let vs not doubt but it is the diuell that speaketh in them Now seing the Scripture must haue one true sense let vs be resolued by the most probable authoritie whether by the warrant of the primitiue Church with her doctors or of Luther Caluin vpon their priuate spirit and some few sectaries THE 6. ARTICLE Scripture is not for euery one to read and interpret a Mal. 2.7 THe lipps of the priest shall keepe knowledge the Law they sc Lattie shall require at his mouth b Deut. 24. v. 8. Thou shalt doe what soeuer the priest of the Leuiticall Law shall teach thee c Luke 10 3. Goe behold I send you d Make. 16. v. 15. Preach the ghospell to all creatures e Luke 10 16. He that heareth you heareth me f Iohn 14. v. 26. The holy ghost whome the father wil send in my name hee shall teach you all things g Matt. 28 v. 20. And behold
350. saith e in Thesauro vt D. thocitat in opusculo de erroribus Grec wee ougth to stick to our head the Pope of Rome it perteineth vnto all to aske of him what to belieue what to hold S. Chrysostome anno 380. saith f homil vlt. in Ioannem S. Peter is a master placed over the whole world by our Sauiour Tertullian anno 200 saith g lib de praescript haeret That wee ought not to dispute with heretiques out of the Scripture because the true vnderstanding of Scripture is froÌ„ the Catholicke church therefore it ought first to be manifest what is the true doctrine of the Catholick Church but this can by no means be better knowne then in the Churches of the Apostles the chiefest where of is the Roman Church S. Cyprian anno 240. saith h lib. 1. epist 1. that heresies and schismes spring from nother cause then because the priest of God is not obeyed nor one priest for the tyme in the church iudge in the place of Christ is thought on S Ambrose anno 380. i Epist 10 writing to the Eemperour ValeÌ„t ne the younger who being corrupted by the ArriaÌ„s would iudg of matters of faith saith But certenly if wee obserue either the order of devyne scripture or the course of auncient tymes who can deny but that Bishops in matters of faith I say in matters of faith were wont to iudge of Christian Emperours that is of their faith and not Emperours of Bishops that is of their faith thy Father a man of riper age said it be longeth not vnto me to iudge of Bishops now thy clemencie saith I ought to iudge Et infra if there be-any thing to be handled concerning faith that conference doth belong vnto priestes as it was done vnder ConstaÌ„tine a prince of famous memory heire of thy fathers dignitie but what hath bene well begunne is other wise coÌ„summated For Bisthops did first giue the true and syncere faith but when some would iudge of faith with in theire palaces they did effect by circumuensioÌ„ that the iudgmeÌ„t of Bishops might be chaÌ„ged S. Hierome anno 380. saith k in epist ad Damasum I beseech your holynes the Pope by Christ crucified the saluation of the world by the holy trinitie that there be authoritie giuen me by your letters either that I councell or affirme three Hypostases And in an other place he saith l lib. 1. coÌ„t Iouin out of Twelue one is chosen that a head being constituted occasion of Schisme might be taken away S. Augustine anno 400 saith m lib. 1. cont Crescouium cap. 23. whosoeuer doth feare to be deceaued through the obscuritie of this question let him aske councell of the Church which the holy scripture doth demonstrate with out any ambiguitie or doubting And againe n cont epist fundamenti cap. 5. But I saith he would not belieue the ghospell if the authority of the church did not compell me There be many moe of this kind which for breuities sake I omitt not doubting but these may suffice only receaue this testimonie from S. Austine that these fathers do not teach any new opinion or doctrine of their owne but what they haue receaued from the Apostles and primitiue Church it self o lib. 2. cont IulianuÌ„ Pelagianum The auncient Fathers saith he sought not frindship with vs or you nor yet were at enmity with either of vs with vs or you they were not offended neither did they pittie either of vs but what they found in the Church that they held what they had Learned that they taught what themselues had Learned of their forefathers the same they deliuered to their children For heretickes alleadging of authoritie or Scripture for the most parte the saying of S. Cyprian may suffice p de vnitate ecclesiae cap. 9. O corruptor of the Apostle and false interpreter the first wordes thou puttest downe but omittest that which followeth as thou thy self art cutt of from the church so thou cuttest away one sentence froÌ„ one little chapter THE 7. ARTICLE Scripture neuer called in Question amongst Catholickes a The fiue bookes of Moyses Iosue Ruth 4. bookes of kinges Paralapomenon 2. bookes of Esdras Nehemias sob the psalter of 150. psalmes prouerbes Ecclesiastes canticles 4. greater Prophets 12 lesser 4 Euangelistes the Actes of the Apostles 13. epistles of S. Paul besides that to the Hebrewes to other epistles one of S. Peter the other of S. Iohn THE 8. ARTICLE Scripture some tyme called in Question b Hester Baruch part of Daniel Toby Iudith wisdome Ecclesiasticus first secund of machabees certaine partes of S Marke Luke Iohn the epistle to the Hebrewes the epistle of S. Iames the last of S Peter the epistle of Iude part of the first of S. Iohn 2. 3. of S Iohn and the Apocalipse But now all proued to to cannonical THE 9. ARTICLE Scripture neuer admitted by the Catholicke church THe prayer of Manasses 3. 4. of Esdras 3. 4 of Machabees psalme 151 the appendix of the booke of Iob. the booke of Hermes called the pastor Now to omitt all out Aduersaries idle obiections without any proofe the Catholick thus proueth his scripture S. Austine saith a de Doctrâ—nâ— Christiana l. 2 c. 8. the whose cannon of Scripture is coÌ„teyned in these bookes The fiue bookes of Moyses c. Iob Toby Hester â—â—…h and the 2. bookes of Machabees twoe bookes of Esâ—â—…as c and these 2. bookes wherof the one is called wisdom the other Ecclesiasticus for a certaine similitude called the bookes of Salomon for it is most certenly affirmed that â—eâ—us the son of Syrach did write them which not withstanding because they are thought worthy of Authoritie they are to be numbred amongst the Prophets the rest are c. these S. Austine Also the third councell of Charthage at which S. Austine was present saith b Cinou 47. See the lyke accompt by InnoceÌ„t in epist ad Ex â—pâ—rum and Selasius tom 1 concil in decret with 7â— Bâ—sâ—â—â— by Ischâ— l â— â—â—â—â—olog c 1 by Rabâ—nus l. 2. instit clericorum by Cassiodâ—â— l 2. dâ—â—m lâ—ctâ—oneÌ„ See it is thought good that nothing be read in the Church vnder the name of deuyne Scripture besides the Canonicall Scriptures the Canonicall scriptures are Genesis Exodus Leuiticus c the fiue bookes of Salomon c. Toby Iudith Hester 2. bookes of Esdras 2 bookes of Machabees c. Wheras out Aduersaties obiect that c OrigeÌ„ in eo ad IuliuÌ„ ArticanuÌ„ Origen d hom 1. in leuiticum Epiphamus c S. Hierome affirme the Machabees Ecclesiasticus Toby and other bookes of the old Testament to be Apocryphall it is answered ther vnto first that the Fathers in those places do not speake of there owne opinion but do only repeat what was the opinion of the Hebrewes and what bookes they thought Canonicall these three Fathers do defend
these bookes to be canonicall CoÌ„cerning e Apol. 2. adu Ruffinum in Prolog S. Hierome lie answereth and explaineth himself saying truly I did not set downe what I thought but what the Hebrewes are accustomed to say against vs heerein calling there further Ruffinus e Apol. 2. adu Ruffinum in Prolog a foolish Sycophant for mistaking and charging him with the Hebrewes opinion Also in another place he most expresly placeth the f in Machab in praefat in bookes of Machabees reiected by the Hebrewes amonge the stories of Deuyne Scripture And in another place he saieth of g Iudith Iudith the booke of Iudith among the Hebrewes is read among holy writinge whole authoritie is not iudged so sit to confirme things that are in contention c. but because the councell of Nice is said to haue reckoned this booke in the number of holy Scripture I rest content c. Secondly it is euident that in the primitiue Church the canonicall Scriptures were not generally receaued all at once but in so great varietie of pretended Scriptures sundry bookes were for the tyme misdoubted or by some Fathers and Councels omitted or not receaued which yet afterwardes vpon better search and consideration they were generally acknowledged To conclude this point heare M. Bilson Lord Bishop of Wâ—nchester saying h in his Suruey of Châ—ists sufferings c. anno 1604. pag. 664. the Scriptures were not fully receaued in all places no not in Eusebius tyme. he saith that the epistles of Iames Iude the 2. Peter and 2. Iohn are contradicted as not writen by the Apostles the epistle to the Hebrewes was for a while contradicted c. the Churches of Syria did not receaue the 2 Peter nor 2. Iohn the epistle of Iude nor the Apocalypse c. the like might be said for the Churches of Arabia will you hence therefore conclude that these parts of scripture were not Apostolicall or that wee need not receaue them now because they were formerly doubted off c so fully doth M. Bilson answere our Aduersaries like vsuall obiections against the Machabees and the other bookes of the old testament now in question But the authoritie of the Church only as is by our Aduersaries confessed might satisfie vs at least in this poynt for M. Iewel saith defence 1. of his Apolog pag. 201. edition an 1571. pag. 241. the church of God had the spirit of wisdome wherby to discerne true scripture from false the protestant author of the scripture and the church whome Bullinger so greatly coÌ„mendeth in his preface thereof to the reader doth affirme k Cap. 15. fol. 71 71. cap. 16 fol. 74. 75. that wee could not belieue the ghospell were it not that the church taught vs and witnessed that this doctrine was deliuered by the Apostles THE X ARTICLE The protestantes pretence of only Scripture is friuolous and idle a In his Suruey c pag 219. It hath euer bene the coÌ„mon practice and deceipt of almost all Nouellistes to pretend only scripture vsinge it as theire laste and only refuge thereby to continue theire contentions and to exempt themselues from all other finall iudgmentes whatsoeuer In this sorte Beza himselfe is noted to euade witnes M. Bancroft Sayinge a How Beza discrediteth himselfe sayinge if any man shall oppose against my exposition the authoritie of certaine fathers I appeale to the word of God whereuppon M. Bancroft inferreth sayinge how cranke is Beza wth the auncient fathers The Brownists of Amsterdam saye to M. Balsons allegations from the fathers b Apologie print 1604. pag 103. Let M. Bilson wth these Doctors know that vnles they can proue by the word of God their Prelacie c. all the colour they bring oute of former times and writers is of no moment in this case M. Hooker saieth of the c Eccl policie in his preface page 38. Anabaptiste the booke of God they for the most part so admired that other disputation against their opinions then only by allegatioÌ„ of scripture they would not heare d â—b de Christe natura pag. 2. In this sort doth Socinus a protestant against volanus his protestant aduersarie giue the stipp in defence of his errour against the diuinitie of Christe saying To what purpose should I answere that wich thou borrowest from the Papistes c. especially where thou opposest to vs the perpetuall Consent of the Church very exellently doubtlese in this behalfe hath Hosius the Papist discoursed against you wounding you with your owne sword and therefore you are no lesse saf in vrging against me the Churches perpetuall consent then are the Papistes in their vrging thereof both against you and vs And alitle further he saith e Pag. 222. wee set before vs in this QuestioÌ„ concerning the diuinitie of Christ none for Master or interpreter but only the holy Ghost c. for wee do not thinke that wee are to stande to the iudgment of any man though neuer so learned of any CouÌ„cell though in shew neuer so holy lawfully assembled of any visible Church though neueuer so perfect and vniuersall Euen Volanus him selfe disputing against the Iesuites is forced to make vse of the examples sayinges and deedes of Athanasius Hierome Augustine Theodoret other fathers whose authoritie he now opposeth against vs as sacred Thus much haue I thought good to remember that Volanus may rereaue answere from him selfe wheÌ„ he so often inferreth against vs the authoritie of learned meÌ„ CoÌ„sent of the Churche Thus farr Socinus Insomuch that A certaine Englih protestaÌ„t author of the treatise entituled A briefe answere to certaine obiections against the descentioÌ„ of Christ into hell printed at Oxford by Ioseph Barnes where he saieth reproueth this other protestaÌ„t brother sayinge where you saywe must build our faith one the word of faith tyinge vs to the scripture only you giue iust occasioÌ„ to think that you neither haue the auntict fathers of Christes Churche not their sonnes succeding theÌ„ agreeing whith you in this point which implieth a defeÌ„ce of some strange Paradox these likewise he This kind of tergiuersation vnder pretense of only scripture is and hath bene so infinitly tedious to protestantes them selues so euidently the only meanes wherby to vpholde all theire dissentions yet daylie renewinge and vprisinge that M. Hooker faieth M. f preface of his Ec. po icie lect 6. pag. 28. 29. â—era in his laste booke but one professeth him selfe to be now wearie of such Combates and encounters whether by word or writing in so much that he findeth that Controuersies are therby made but braules therefore wisheth that in some comoÌ„ lawfull asseÌ„bly of Churches all these thyftes may be at once decreed Luther himselfe calleth the scripture g Hosias â—ib 3 coÌ„tra Râ—cutud see it also 〈◊〉 A booke for heretikes And others of his coÌ„federates h A Ianus Cope Dialog b. c. 19 1. A Nose of wax a phrase
the yeare of our Lord 430 the Catholickes of our tyme against the Syrene inchantments of all perswading nouelists notwithstanding their colourable reuerence of Scripture so frequently by them alledged in defence of their innouations to the contrary This auncient father then saith of nouellistes n lib. aduer haer Paulo post initium after the edition thereof with Dionysius Areopagita his workes printed at LyoÌ„s 1572. pag. 660. 661. 662. what doe they promise but a new and vnknowne doctrine for thou maist heere some say come yee foolish and miserable whoe are commonly called Catholickes learne yet the true faith which no man vnderstandeth but wee which hath lien hid this many ages but now of late is reuealed and made manifest c. are not these the wordes of that harlote And a little after he premonisheth to the contrarie saying keepe the depositum or pledge what deposituÌ„ that is that which is committed vnto thee not what is inuented by thee what thou hast receaued not what thou hast excogitated a thing not of witt but of learning not of priuate vsurpation but of publicke tradition And againe o this is as it were solemne and lawfull withal heresies alwayes to reioyce at Prophane nouelties and abhorre knowne antiquitie but on the contrary this is almost proper to Catholikes to keepe the sayinges and writinges of the holy fathers to condemne prophane nouelties c Also hee saith p Ibidem heere perchaunce some man will ask whether heretiques doe vse the diuine testimonies of scripture yea certeinly they vse them and that vehemently for thou maist see them fly through euery leaf of the holy law c. they doe neuer almost bring any thing of their owne but they labour to shadowe it with the wordes of scripture but they are so much the more to be feared and taken heede of And againe but if some man should â—â—tean q Ibidem pag. 975. and after the other edition c. 37. heretique which do h persuade him to such thinges how dust thou proue it vpon what grounde doe you teach it that I ought to foresake the vniuersall and auncient faith of the catholicke Church presentlie he answereth it is written and forthwith bringeth a thousand testimonies a thousand examples and a thousand authorities from the law the Apostles Prophets c. THE 15. ARTICLE The visible head of the Church c. SCRIPTVRE a Deut. 17.12 HEe that will not obey the commaund of the priest let him dy by the decree of the iudge b Matt. 16.18.19 Thou arte Peter and vpon this rocke will I build my church c. and I will giue vnto thee the keyes of the kingdome of heauen c. c Luc. 22 2â— I haue prayed for thee that thy faith faill not and thou being conuerted confirme thy brethren d Iohn 21 1â— Feed my lambes feed my sheepe e Act. 2.14 Peter standing with the eleuen lifted vp his voice and said vnto them c. vpon this place S. Chrysostomo saith thus how doth hee regard the flocke committed vnto him by Christ what a prince is he in this societie euery where he beginneth first the speake and Iohn euery where holdeth his peace But Peter giueth account for him also FATHERS The first therfore of the Greekes is Origen for Dionysius Clement Anacletus and such like Bishops of Rome I omitt because our aduersaries do not admit them who liued anno 230. and saith f in cap. 6. ad Rom. Although the whole care of feeding the sheepe was committed to Peter and the church was founded vpon him as vpon the ground yet there was no confession of any vertue exacted of him saue only of charitie Eusebius anno 330. saith g M. Chronico 44 yeare of the birth of our Sauiour The Apostle Peter borne in the countrey of Galile And first high priest of the Christians where wee are to obserue the difference which Eusebius putteth betweene Peter and the Bishops of other Citties for of Peter he doth not say the first Bishop of the Romans as he saith in the same place of Iames The first Bishop of Hierusalem ordayned by the Apostles was Iames the brother of our Lord. And of Euodius he saith Euodius was ordayned first Bishope of Antioch Hee speaketh not so of Peter but cals him the first high priest of the Christians And againe he calleth Peter h lib. 2. hist c. 14. the most approued and greatest of all the Apostles prince of the chiefe Apostles and captaine and and Master of the armie of God What other meaning can it beare to be captaine of the army of God then to be heade of the church militant S. Basil anno 380. speaking of Peter saith i Serm. de iudicio Del. he is blessed what was placed in authoritie ouer the rest of the Disciples and to whome the keyes of the kingdome of heauen were committed c. k de moderatione in disputationibus seruanda S. Gregory Nazianzen shewing that there must be an order in all thinges taketh an argument from the Apostles whoe although they were all great yet they had one chief ouer all saith he you see how amongst the disciples of Christ all of theÌ„ indeed being great and of high degree and worthy election this maÌ„ was called the Rocke and had the foundations of the church committed to his charge and the rest of the disciples were content to be his inferiours S. Epiphamus Anno 390 saith k he res 51. He chose Peter to be the captayne of his Disciples And againe l in Ancorato this is he to whome it was said feed thou my lambes to whome the sheepfold was committed Cyrillus Hierosom anno 350. m Catech. 2. calleth Peter the most excellent Prince of the Apostles n lib. 12 in Ioannem cap 64 in Thesâ—â—ro si D Thomae credimus â—â—n opusculo conâ—rra Graecos Cyrillus Alexand. anno 4â—0 saith how the Prince and head of the rest first crieth out thou arte Christ the sonne of the liuing God And againe As Christ saith he receaued the scepter of the Gentiles church from his father going forth leader of Israel ouer all principallitie and power ouer all whatsoeuer it be that a uery thing might be subiect vnto him so did he committ fully and wholy vnto Peter and his successours Christ gaue that which was his owne to no other but to Peter himself only S. Chrysostome saith o hom 11. in matth he ordayned Peter to be the Pastour of the church which was to be And a little beneath God can only graunt that the Church which is to be notwithstandnig so many so great waues rushing out with their force one auery side do remaine immoueablâ— whose pastour and head behold the name of head vnheard of with Caluin is a fishermaÌ„ of meane degree And a little beneath The father did put Hieremie over one people p hom vlt. in IoaÌ„nem but Christ
the whole church was committed to blessed S. Peter prince of all the Apostles And a little beneath Behold he hath receaued the keyes of the kingdome of heauen power of binding and losing is giuen to him the care of the whole church and principality is committed to him S. Bede saith m homil in vigilla S. Andreâ— in illud intuitus eum c Ioan. 142. He saw the simplicitie of his hart he saw the courage of his mynd by whose merit he was to be placed ouer euery church And againe n And homil in sâ—â—â—o Petri Pauli anno 720. therfore saith he S. Peter who confessed Christ with true faith affected him with true loue and receaued especially the keyes of the kingdome of heauen and principallitie of iudiciall power that all belieuers in the world may vnderstand that whosoeuer doth separate himself after any manner from that vnitie of faith and societie of his he can neither be absolued from the bonds of his sinnes nor enter the gate of the kingdome of heauen S. Bernard saith o epist â—â—7 ad Eugenium The place wherin thou standest is holy ground it is Peters place the place of the prince of the Apostles where his feete stood it is his place whome our Lord coÌ„stituted master of his howse and prince of all his possession And againe p lib 2 de consideret speaking of Peter Ano. 1140. going like our Lord vpon the sea he did manifest himself the only vicar of Christ who ought not to be ouer one people but ouer all eueÌ„ as there are many waters many people These sower and twentie testimonies of the fathers as the sower and twentie voices of the elders in the Apocalypse do euidently demonstrate the consent of the primatiue Church as wel the Greeke as the Latine to which nothing certenly can be answeared other wise theÌ„ Luther and Caluin say of Leo Pope they suffered humane thinges were deceaued werfore to make it if possible yet more plaine seâ— heere the Aduersaire THE ADVERSARIE Caluin alledged in M. vvhitgiftes defence saith q pag. 173. The twelue Apostles had one amongst them to gouerne the rest Musculus saith r Ibid. 469. Peter is said in many places to haue bene chiefe a monge the rest which wee deny not M. vvhitgift saith Å¿ Ibid pag. 375. Amonge the Apostles them selues there was one chief c. that had chiefe authoritie ouer the rest c. that schismes might be composed t pag. 595. pag. 62. 63. 65. 68. 70. And againe In somuch as he doubteth not to answere certayne places of scripture obiected by our Aduersaries against Peters Primary M. Fulke speaking of Leo and Gregory Bishops of Rome the first about anno 450. the other about anno 600. saith v in his Retentiue against Bristowes motiues c. pag. 248. the mysterie of iniquitie hauing wrought in that seat of Rome neer fiue or six huÌ„dreth yeares before them so longe before them did the Romane Sea beginne to be Papall and then greatly encreased they were so deceaued with long continuance of errour that they thought the dignity of Peter was much moreouer the rest of his fellow Apostles then the holy scriptures of God do allow x Cent. 4. col 1215. l. 2 col 555 l â—0 col 558. l. 54 Cent. 3. col 84. l. 75 59. Col. 85. l. 3. The fathers for affirming the church to be built vpon Peter namely S. Hierome Hâ—â—ary Nazianzen Tertullian Cyprian OrigeÌ„ are repreheÌ„ded by the Centuristes Caluin saith y Instit l. 4. cap. 6. sect The church is founded in Peter because it is said vpon this Rocke c. as many of the Fathers expound it but the whole scripture is against it c. z Cent. 6. col 58. a line 2. The fathers doubted not publickly to celebrate a yearly festiuall day in honour of S. Peters Sea which respect no other Sea euer had whervnto Danaeus answearing affirmeth the Fathers assertions to be the iudgments and testimonies of the church then corrupted and bewitched or made blynd with this errour b in his exameÌ„ c. against the plea of the innocent printed â— bol pag. 10. b. and 107. M D. Couell hauing spoken of one aboue the a n resp ad Bellar. disp part 1. pag. 275. rest to suppresse the seedes of dissention saith to the Puritanes If this were the principall meanes to preuent schiâ—mes and dissentions in the primitiue church when the graces of God were farre more aboundant and eminent then they now are Nay if the twelue were not like to agree except there had bine one chiese among them for so saith Hierome amoÌ„ge the twelue one was therefore chosen that a chief or head being appoynted occasion of dissention might be preuented c how can they thinke that equallity would keepe all the pastours in the world in peace and vnitie c. for in all societies authoritie which cannot be where all are equall must procure vnitie and obedience Also he saith c pag. 10. b. that it was not to cease with the Apostles these hee Melanchthon saith from the opinion of him self and other his brethren d in the booke intituled Centuria epâ— Theolog c. epist 74. que est Melancthonis â— As certayne Bishops are president ouer many churches so the Bishop of Rome is president ouer all Bishops and this canonicall pollicy no wyse man as I think doth or ought to disallow c. for the monarchy of the Bishop of Rome is in my opinioÌ„ profitable to this end that consent of Doctrine may be retayned wherfore an agreement may easily be established in his article of the Popes Primacy if other pointes could be agreed vpon These hee Luther himself saith e in loc commun class 1. cap. 37. for as much as God would haue one true Catholicke church through the whole world it was necessarie there should be some one people yea some one father of that one people chosen vnto whome and his posteritie the whole world might haue recourse and become one sheepfold so that of all nations and of infinite diuers manners yet there might be made one church f Pag 470. 471. For the confessed gouerment of Bishops and Archbishops in all ages since the Apostles tymes see M. Whitgiftes defence M. Cartwryght saith g in his 2. reply part 1 p. 582. yf an Archbishop be necessarie for the calling of a prounciall councell when Bishops are deuided it is necessarie there be also a Pope which may call a generall councell when diuision is betweene Archbishops for when the churches of one prouince be deuided from others as you aske me so I aske you whoe shall assemble them together whoe shall admonish them of their duties when they are assembled yf you can find away how this may be done without a Pope the way is also found wherby the church may be disburdenned of the Archbishop Likewise the councell of
written Againe h lib. de virit Eccles c. 15. heere peraduenture thou wilt say read how Christ commaunded them to be receaued that would paste from heresie vnto the church this neither doe I nor you manifestly read c. therfore because it is no where read wee must belieue the testimonie of the church which Christ testifieth to be true Againe i epist 111. But those thinges which wee keepe not written but deliuered and which indeed are kept through the whole world are giuen to proceed either from the Apostles or generall councels whose authoritie in the church is most wholsome commauÌ„ded and ordayned to be kept as that the passion of our Lord Resurrection Ascension into heauen and coming of the holy ghost from heauen is celebrated with an yearly solemnity THE ADVERSARIE Wheras S. Chrysostome saith that the Apostles did not deliuer all by writing but many thinges without which are as worthy credit as the rest k M. whitaker de Sacra Scriptura pa. 678. M. Whitaker answeareth no otherwyse thervnto then by saying That it is an inconsiderate speach and not worthy so great a Father Also wheras S. Epiphanius saith wee must vse traditions for the scripture hath not all thinges because the Apostles deliuered certayne thinges by writinge and othersome by tradition with whome agreeth S. Basil as aforesaid to whome l in his conclusions annexed to his conference the 1. conclu pag. 689. M. D. Raynoldis answeareth saying I take not vpon me to coÌ„troll them let the church iudge if they considered with aduise inough c. Concerning the fathers of the Latine Church S. Austine only being most approued by our aduersaries as in the beginning of this treatyse shall serue for all whoe is so playne and euidently confessed by our aduersaries that m See him in M whitgistes defence c. pag. 103. Carthweight saith to allow S. Austines saying is to bring in Popery againe And that if S. Austines iudgment be a good iudgment then there be some thinges commaunded by God which are not in the scriptures and ther vpon no sufficient doctrine is conteyned in the scriptures To that former saying of S. Eusebius n M whitaker de Sacra Scriptura pa. 668. Chem. exament par 1 p. 87. 89. 90 M Folk against Purgatory pag. 62 3â— 97. c. against Mâ—â—â—all pag 17â— 17â— against â—â—ist mot pag. 35. 36 M whitaker vb supra pag. 978 685. 690 695 696. 970. 663. M Whitaker answeareth saying That this testimonie is plaine inough but in no force to be receaued because it is against the scriptures Adde now but heervnto that Chemnitius doth reproue for their lyke testimonie of vnwritten tradition Clemens Alex. Origen Epiphanius Ambrose Hierome Maximus Theophilus Basil Damascen c. That M. Furke also confesseth as much of S. Chrysostome Tertullian Cyprian Augustine Hierome c. And lastly that M. Whitaker acknowledgeth as much of all these Fathers See the 10. article where necessitie of tradition is very plainly confessed which is heere omitted fol. 15. LVTHERS DOCTRINE Luther saith o in comm cap. 1. ad Galat neither ought any other doctrine be taught and heard in the church then the pure worde of God that is the holy scripture for Doctores or other Authors with their doctrine let them be accursed Againe p tom 7. ger fol. 29. heere in this place I will repeat my growne worke or foundation where vpon I rely which ought infallibly be kept of all to wit that all thinges which are done without the scripture specially in thinges perteyning vnto God doe proceed from the Diuell And q lib. de serâ—â— arbitrio wee receaue nothing but the holy scriptures r in locis comm de libertate Christian Melanchthon calleth tradition for the inuocation of Saintes simple life and all such lyke that are not written the doctrine of Diuels Et ibidem more ouer also saith he when tradâ—â—ions speake of thinges of their owne nature yet they becom wicked and the doctrine of Diuells in respect of errours which are also propounded and defended to writ That they merit remission of sinns that workes wherby God sheweth himselfe to be honoured are the worship of God or that Bishops haue power to institute such worships CALVINS DOCTRINE Caluin saith Å¿ lib 4. instit cap 8. ¶ 8. Let this then stand for a maxime or generall ground That no other then the word of God ought to haue place in the Church which word is conteyned first in the law and the Prophets next in the Apostles writinges Agiane t ca. 10. ¶ 8. â— therfore wee accompt all constitutions or decrees wicked in whose obseruation the worship of God is fayned to be placed Agiane v ¶ 9. ordinances which they call ecclesiasticall where with the Pope and his clergie burden the Church wee say they are pernitious and wicked but our Aduersaries defend them to be holy and wholesome Againe x ¶ 18. But now to referre the beginning of traditions to the Apostles wher with hither to the Church hath beene oppressed was a meere forgerie or fals hood y ¶ 19. But they obiect this hath beene an ancient opinion that what was done with one consent in the vniuersall Church hath alwayes beene thought to proceed from the Apostles them selues for which they Cyte Augustine as a witnes who saith that those thinges which are obserued through the whole world may well be thought to haue beene ordayned by the Apostles them selues or Generall Councells whose authoritie in the church is most wholsome z ¶ â—0 but that I may not be troublesome I will produce only one example yf any man aske them from whence they haue theire holy water presently they answer from the Apostles as if histories doe not attribute this inuention to I knowe not what Bishope of Rome c. Ibid. what soeuer it be I will neuer graunt that this came from an Apostolicall Spirit c. nether doe I respect it that else where the same Augustine doth ascribe other thinges also to the Apostles for because it hath nothinge but coniectures they ought not to giue their iudgment of soe great a matter Againe a ¶ â—7 this alwayes is only to be excepted in these obseruations of the Apostle Paul that all thinges be done decently and in order least they be thought either necessarie vnto saluation and so binde consciences with religion or be referred to the worship of God and so there may seeme to be some piety in them An old condemned Heresie August 〈…〉 cap. 〈…〉 con◠〈…〉 The Arian Heretickes would by no means receaue the traditions of the church and vnwritten word of God as Maximinus himself an Arian Bishop teacheth which heresie afterwardes many others imitated as Nestor Dioscorus Eutyches c. as you may see in the seuenth Synode 〈◊〉 THE 29. ARTICLE Of the 7. Sacraments THE CATHOLICKE DOCTRINE All the Sacraments of the new testament
to wit Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penaunce Extreame vnction Order and Matrimonie in number Seuen are instituted by God himself and conteyned written in his worde SCRIPTVRE Baptisme a Iohn 3.5 VNles a man be borne againe of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God Confirmation b Actes c. 8.17 read also cap. 19.6 Then did they impose their handes vpon them and they receaued the holy ghost Eucharist c Iohn 6.51 If a man eat of this Bread he shall liue for euer Penaunce d Iohn 20. v. 22. â—â— And he saith to them receaue yee the holy ghost whose sins you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and whose you shall reteyne they are reteyned Extreame Vnction e Marke 6.13 And they did annoynt many sicke with oyle and they were healed f Iames 5. v. â—4 15 Is any man sicke amonge you Let him bring in the priestes of the Church and let them pray ouer him annoynting him with oyle in the name of our lord Order g 2. Tim. 1. v. 6. Resuscitate or stirre vp the grace of God which is in thee by the imposition of my handes Matrimonie h Matth. 19. v 6. Which God hath ioyned to gether let noe man separate· i Ephes 5.6.12 This is a great Sacrament FATHERS But because Baptisme and the Eucharist or as you tearme it the lords Supper are acknowledged and receaued by all Heretickes of these latter tymes for Sacraments there shall need no further labour in proofe of them wherefore wee come vnto the rest Confirmation k lib de resurrection câ—â—â—â—s Tertullian anno 200. rancketh Confirmation in the same Order with Baptisme and the Eucharist saying The flesh is washed that the soule may be cleansed the flesh is annoynted that the soule may be sanctified the flesh is signed that the soule may be fenced the flesh is shadowed by the imposition of handes that the soule may bee nlightned with the spirit the flesh doth feed vpon the body of Christ that the soule may be fatted with God Againe l lib de praescriptor haereticor he doth Baptize certeyne to witt belieuers and his faithfull there he doth signe his souldiers in the forhead Againe m lib. de Baptismo after the hand is imposed with benediction calling and inuiting the holy ghost S. Cyprian anno 240. saith n lib. 1. epist vlt. he that is baptized must of necessitie be annoynted Also speaking of Baptisme and Confirmation he saith o lib. 2. epist 1. Then they may be sanctified and be the sons of God if they be borne in both Sacramentes The Author of the Sermons of Christes Cardinall workes saith p Sermo de vnct Chrismatis By the benefit of this annoynting both diuine wysdome and vnderstanding is giuen vs Councell and strength doth come froÌ„ heauen knowledg pietie and feare is infused by supernall inspirations being annoynted with this oyle wee contend with spirituall wickedneses S. Pacianus anno 350. saith q lib. de Baptismo sins are purged by the font the holy ghost is infused from aboue by Chrisme But wee obteyne both by the hand and mouth of the prelate S. Ambrose anno 380. saith r lib. 3. de Sacramentis ca. 2. The spirituall signe followeth because it followeth vpon the forehead that their may be perfection when the holy ghost is infused at the inuocation of the priest Againe Å¿ lib. de initiandis mysterijs cap. 7. keepe what thou hast receaued God the Father hath signed thee our lord Iesus Christ hath confirmed thee S. Hierome anno 380. after he had said t Dialog contra luciferianos that Bishops doe giue the holy ghost to the baptized by imposition of hands he addeth Doest thou aske where it is written in the Actes of the Apostles but although there were no authoritie of Scripture the consent of the whole world in this matter might be for a praecept S. Augustine anno 400. speaking of confirmation and the chrisme which is accustomed to be vsed in it saith u lib. 2. cont lit Petil. cap. 104. In this oyntment Petilianus will interpret the Sacrament of crisme which in respect of visible signes is holy as Baptisme it self is but it may be in the most wicked men Et infra discerne therfore the holy visible Sacrament which may be both in the good and in the bad to these for a rewarde to them vnto iudgment c. Penaunce Tertullian anno 200. saith x lib de paenit In the entrance God placed the second penaunce which lyeth open to all that knocke S. Cyrill anno â—50 saith y lib. 12. in Ioan c. 56. sins are for giuen two wayes by the priestes as the ministers of God and by Baptisme and pennaunce S. Cyprian anno 240. saith z S. Cyp. vel quicumque author est Ser. de ablutione pedum after Baptisme which for it reuerence doth not permit to be iterated thou hast renewed an other font S. Ambrose anno 380. saith a 5. Ambr. lib. 1. de paeâ—â—â— cap. 7. why doe you baptize If sins be not for giuen by a man for as in Baptisme theire is remission of all sinns neither doth it make any thing whether this right be giuen them by pennaunce or the font Let priestes chalenge it for one and the same is in both mysteries S. Victor Viscensis anno 486. saith b lib. 2 de persecut wandal To whome do you leaue vs wretches whilst you goe to your crownes whoe shall baptise these little ones in the euer lasting waters whoe shall giue vs the office of pennaunce and loose vs being bound from the bonds of our sins by the mercy of reconciliation because vnto you it is said c Matt. 18 12 What soeuer you shall loose vpoÌ„ earth c. S. Chrysostme anno 380. saith d lib. 3. de Sacerdotio Neither only when they regenerate you but alsoe afterwardes they haue power to for giue your sins S. Leo anno 440. saith e Epist 9â— ad Theodor. The manifould mercy of God doth so help such as fall that not only by the grace of baptisme but also by the medicine of pennaunce the hope of eternall life is repayred S. Hierome anno 380. saith f lib 1. contra Pelagian Let him be redeemed by the blood of our Sauiour either in the howse of Baptisme or in pennaunce which imitateth the grace of Baptisme Againe g lib. 2. That it is written the blood of Christ doth cleanse vs from all sine is to be taken as well in confession of baptisme as in the clemencie of pennaunce Againe h Epist ad Heliodorum God for bide that I should speake any euell of them whoe succeeding the degree of the Apostles doe consecrate the Bodie of Christ with a holy mouth by whome also wee are made Christians who hauing the keyes of the kingdome of heauen doe iudge after a sort before
of the Donatistes that whersoeuer they came they were accustomed to ouerthrowe and break downe aulters sel the holy Chalices c. wherby it is manifest that the Donatistes who also in tymes past did boast that they were the true reformers of Gods church and proclaymed themselues euery where to be the true auncient and orthodoxall Catholickes did notwithstanding also take away the sacrifice of the masse THE 34. ARTICLE Communion vnder both Kindes THE CATHOLICKE DOCTRINE It sufficeth the laytie or common people to communicate vnder one forme to witt of bread for by this they fullfil the precept to witt that they eat the body and blood of our Sauiour this also our Sauiour and his Apostles haue practysed and that not without good reasons SCRIPTVRE a Iohn 6 51.5â— YF any man eat of this bread he shall liue foreuer and the bread which I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world And he that eateth this bread shall liue foreuer b Act. 242. And they were perseuering in the Doctrine of the Apostles and in the communication of the breaking of bread and prayers c Act. 207 And in the first of the Sabboth when wee were assembled to break bread Iesus going to Emaus vvith his Tvvo Disciples d Luke 24 30 And he entred with them and it came to passe whilst he satte with them he tooke bread and blessed and brake and gaue to them and their eyes were openned and they knew him S. Austine and Theophylactus anno 400. doe explicate this place to be of the Eucharist as heere following is manifest FATHERS S. Austine saith e lib. de consensu Euang. cap. 25 vpon thâ—se wordes their eies were opeÌ„ned and they knew him and the same also sa th S. Chrysostome hom 17. oper imper c alij vpon the same place when he gaue the blessed bread vnto them their eies were openned and they knew him Et infra wee vndoubtedly belieue this impediment to be cast vpoÌ„ their eies by Sathan to the end they might not know Iesus but notwithstanding Christ permitted it euen to the Sacrament of bread that the vnitie of his body being receaued the impediment of the enimie might be knowne to be remoued that Christ might be knowne Theophylactus saith There is another thing reported to witt that their eies who receaued the blessed bread were openned and they knew him for the flesh of our Lord hath great and incredible force and virtue Receaue also this history which may proue the receauing vnder one kind to be practised in the primitiue church it beginneth thus Å¿ Sozomenus lib 8 cap 5. Nicephorus lib. 1â— cap. 7. A certayn man of Macedony being sick had a wyfe infected with the same disease this man when on a certayne tyme he chaunced vpon that excellent man S. Chrysostome disputing what wee ought to thinke of God forthwith hauing chaunged his former opinion he praysed his speeches and was earnest inforcing his wyfe that shee should lykewise chaunge her opinion But when she through the custome and dayly conference with her fellow tatlers did not accept his admonition nor her husband avayle any thing by all his perswasioÌ„s at length in plaine termes he told her that vnlesse shee would hold the commoÌ„ and same opinion of God with him shee should remayne with him no longer the woman afterward by simulatioÌ„ grauÌ„ted his request but revealed to one of her mayds which she thought to be very faithfull what shee intended that shee might deceaue her husband wherfore vpoÌ„ a tyme approching she receaued the Sacrament as the maÌ„ner was reteyning it as if shee head bine earnest in prayer bowing her self shee secretly conueyed it away and hid the holy mysterie or Sacrament and the mayde that stood by gaue her a peece of common bread for it brought from their howse which shee puting to her mouth endeuouring to breake it with her teeth perceiued it to be turned into the hard nature of a stone wherfore strucken with feare least God would reueÌ„g himself grieuously vpon her for this miracle which happenned thus vnlooked for with all speed shee hastenned to that reuerend and learned Father and opening the matter vnto him shewed him the stone which did as yet giue certeÌ„ manifest testimonie of the byting which stone had now lost his former substance and gotten an other new and straung colour But shee afterward hauing obteyned pardon for that fault continued and so remayned in the same opinion with her husband That stone was reserued a long tyme amonge the giftes of the church for a witnes of this miracle to all spectatours These Nicephorus Last of all S. Thomas of Aquine anno 1260. writeth thus It is the custome of many churches to giue the body of Christ to be receaued of the people but not the wine Againe because the multitude of Christian people increased wherin are comprehended both old and young men and children wherof some ar not of so great discretion as to haue due respect and care concerning the vse of this Sacrament as they ought therfore it is prouidently obserued in some churches that the blood be not giuen to be receaued of the people but only of the priest Againe the body may be receaued by the people without the blood neither doth any detrement thence follow because whole Christ is conteyned vnder both formes These S. Thomas Moreouer Tertul. lib. 3. ad vx Clemens Alexabdrinus lib 1 strom Origenes hom 13. in leuit Cyprian Serm. 5 de lap Basil Ad Cas Pat Hieron Approli adu lou epist ad Theo. contr if in the primitiue church in tyme of persecution as these Fathers in the margent witnes they did carry the sacred body of our Lord whome with them vnto their howses vnder the forme of bread only and not of wine it is manifest that the church neuer thought but that the whole Sacrament might be receaued vnder one forme without any offence or violation of the diuine precept which also Luther Melanchthon and Bucer doe acknowledg in their seuerall writinges saying that the communion vnder one or both formes is a thinge indifferent Ioan Hierosol Euseb Caesarien lib 6. hist Eccl cap. 22. August Serm. 152. ad temp Ambros de obi Sac. Bede lib. 4. hist Aug. cap. 24 Luth. lib. ad Boh. l. decl euch li. de form Mâ—ssae Melanch in recognitis hypot Bucerâ—â— colloq Râ—tispen See Fricius in Modcenius lib 2. de Ecclesia ca 2 BreÌ„tius in polog cons wirtem cap de concilijs pag. 900. de formula Missae tom Germ fol. â—74 THE ADVERSARIE Fricius a Chief protestant in Polonia saith That Christ in the last supper did ioyne drinke with the meat therfore saith he if the church separate these shee ought not to be heard Let it be or admitt that the church of Hierusalem hath separated these and that S. Iames which certenly many affirme hath giuen but one only forme to them of
As for them they were not instructed out of the word of God M. Whitaker against Duraeus saith what thou canst not ouercome by Scripture thou wilt with out doubt effect by the testimonies of Fathers c. Therfore you shall not expect that I do in particuler confute these theire errours The Century-vvriters and Abraham Scultetus say That Clement did euery where affirme free will and that it appeareth that not only all the Doctours of that age were in this manner of blindnes but also that it grew a mongst pastours c. And that the most auncient Fathers Cyprian Theophilus Tertullian Origen Clemens Alexandr Iustine Irenaeus c. erred in this point Luther calleth S. Hierome Ambrose Augustine and others Iustice-workers of the old Papistry or Papacy Of certayn Fathers in particuler Petrus Alexandrinus Peter Martyr reproueth him saying Petrus Alexandr In his comm places in English part 4 pag. 255. attributheth more to the outwarde Aulter then to the liuely temples of Christ Optatus Peter saith where Optatus against Permenianus saith vbi supra What is the Aulter euen the seat of the body and blood of Christ Cent 4 c. 6 col 409. line 25 But such sayinges as these saith Peter Martyr edified not the People the same say they Century-vvriters S. Ignatius M. Cartvvright saith In his 2. reply vlt part part 264. M wotton in his def of M Parkins c pag. â—39 349. Ignatius calleth the communion table vnproperly an Aulter M. Wotton saith I say plainly saith he this mans testimonie is nothing worth because he was of little iudgment in Diuinity S. Ambrose M. Fulke saith That Ambrose M. Fulk in his confut of Purgat pag. 320. 325. allowed prayer for the dead and that it was the common errour of his tyme. S. Augustine M. Fulke saith Augustine blindly defended it vbi supra Chem examen part 3. pag 211. Musc loc comm pag. 299. Chemnitius saith These Austine doth without the Scripture yeelding to tyme and custome Musculus saith Austine did inconsiderately affirme the Sacramentes of the new testament to giue saluation Iustine Martyr Cent. 2. col 207. lin 40. Century vvriters say Iustine Martyr extolled to much the libertie of mans will or freewill Chrysostome Cent. 5. col 2178. Century-vvriters say Chrysostome handleth impurely the Doctrine of Iustification and attributeth merit to woorkes Luther against Certayne in particuler tom 2. wittemberg lib. lib de seruo arbitrio printed 1603 pag 72 7â— 275. and 3â—7 Alâ—o in Collo 〈◊〉 mensalibâ—â— cap. de Patribus Ecclesiae In the writinges of Hierome saith he there is not a word of true faith in Christ and sound religion Tertullian in very superstitious I haue holden Origen long since occursed Of Chrysostome I make no accounte Basil is of no worth he is wholy a Monke I way him not of a hayre Cyprian is a weake Deuyne c. affirming there yet further that the whole Church did degenerate in the Apostles tyme And that the Apology of Phillippe Melanchthon doth far excell all the Doctours of the Church yea euen Austine himselfe These Luther in his deâ— of M Parkins c. pag 491. To conclude M Wotton saith But the Fathers are not for vs what then is nothing true that cannot be confirmed by their testimony c. But to say that the true Church immediatly after the Apostles tymes became adulterous and corrupt which the most with Luther a boue said affirme it most absurd first because the visible true Church was no more then made hereticall or corrupt by the Churches reuolted Children in those dayes then Luthers like late dispersed Doctrine maketh our now Church to be Lutheran Secundly if other wyse the Church so presently after the Apostles tymes ceased to be a virgin and so became adulterous and corrupt who seeth not then the blasphemy thence ensuing for in what one age from the Apostles tymes to this present may the Church then be thought to be preserued chast Thirdly it is against manifest Scripture as in the tract where the Church cannot erre see more at large Wherfore once more to conclude this controuersie receaue this one senteÌ„ce from that weake deuyne according to Luther S. Cyprian in which you may at least see the opinyon of the Church in his days Lib. de veritate Ecclesiae The spouse of Christ saith he cannot be adulterated shee is vncorrupt and Chast c. By these you may in part vnderstand what esteeme is made of those first Doctors and prelates of Gods Church though in the tract where they appeal to the Fathers and in that where the Church cannot erre freely confessed to be most holy learned and deuynely inspired such is the malapert obstinacie and blind ignorance of heresie that when it hath as to the most infallible interpreter and Doctor of our Sauiours will made appeall and find it thus plaine and absolute that it will by no means beare any colourable glosse then I say it doth thus impudently reiect it with all opprobrious speeches and blasphemous sentences THE 45. ARTICLE The Continuall purity of the Roman Church acknovvledged by our Aduersaries M. D. lib de Antichristo cont Sanderum pag 5. M. Fulke in his confutat of Whitaker acknowledgeth no change in the Roman Church for the first six hundreth yeares after Christ M. Fulk saith The Church of Rome retained by succession vntill Tertullian dayes viz anno 200. that faith which it did first receaue from the Apostles Purgatory pag. 174. Zanchius de vera religione pag. 148. The same affirmeth Hierome Zanchius a Protestant And where one of our Catholicke writers vrgeth the succession of the Roman Bishops according to the example of Irenaeus M. Fulk vbi supra pag. 372. 373. Cyprian Tertullian Optatus Hierome Austine and Vincentius Lyrinensis M. Fulke saith the reason why these men specially named the Church of Rome was because the Church of Rome at that tyme as it was founded by the Apostles so it continued in the Doctrine of the Apostles In his conference which M Hart. pag. 443. M. D. Reynolds being prouoked in the same kind acknowledgeth in lyke manner that the succession of the Roman Bishops was a proofe of the true Church and faith in the tyme of Augustine Epiphamus Optatus Tertullian Irenaeus c. In his retent c. pag. 85 M. Fulk saith yet further The Popish Church is but an hereticall assembly departed from the vniuersall Church of Christ longe since Austines departure out of this life to witt long after they yeare 400. wherin S. Austine liued In his reply to M. Harding pag. 246. M. Ievvell sayth That as well S. Austine as all other holy Fathers did well in yeelding reuerence to the Sea of Rome c. for the purity of religion which was there preserued a long tyme with out spot Instit l. 4. c. â— sâ— This matter being so freely confessed wee will conclude with Caluin who
needs bestrong which is taken from the confession of the aduersaries for the confession of the aduersaries against themselues is effectuall And truly saith he I do acknowledge that the truth inforceth testimony from her enemies contra Donatist post collat cap. 24 in his comm places part 2 pag 329. S. Austine saith That truth is more forceable to wring out confession then any rack or torment Peter Martyr saith doubtlesse amonge all testimonies that testimonie is of greatest accompt which is testifyed by the enemies Heere you see that to th end there be no means left vnsought wherby to make this our so weighty a case cleare Deut. 32.31 Esay 19.2.3 Esdras ca. 4.41 wee haue made euen our ennimies iudges bringe forth as the Prophet saith the Egiptians against the Egiptians for certenly as it is written truth is great and preuaileth THE 48. ARTICLE Of the purity or rather arrogancy of the church of England pag. 146. M. Iacob in his defence of the treatise of Christs sufferings printed 1600. saith This is the profit that comes by ordinary slaunting with the Fathers c if in this case wee were to looke after any man surely wee haue more cause to regarde our late faithfull teachers rather then those of ould who being equall with the best of them in any of the excellent graces of Gods spirit c. M. Whitgift Archbishop of Canterbury in his defence and briefe comparison of the protestant Bishops of our tyme with the Bishops of the primitiue church faith pag 472 The Doctrine taught and professed by our Bishops at this day is much more perfect sound then commonly it was in any age after the Apostles tymes Againe pag 473. surely saith he you are not able to reckoÌ„ in any age since the Apostles tyme any company of Bishops that caught and held so perfect and sound a doctrine in all poynts as the Bishops of England do at this day c. And in the truth of doctrine our Bishops be not only comparable with the old Bishops but in many degrees to be preferred before them Beza saith I haue bene accustomed to say in epist Theolog. epist 1 pag. 5 and not without cause as I take it that whylest I compare those very tymes next vnto the Apostles with our tymes they had theÌ„ more conscience and lesse knowledge and on the other side wee haue now more knowledge and lesse conscience in praefat in nou test dicat principi Condicuâ— This is my opinion saith he c. In so much as he affirmeth that Caluin did far exceed all the auncient and later wryters in interpreting the scriptures with varietie of wordes and alleaging of reasons All which is directly against M. Bancroft Bishop of Canterburie pag. 37â— in the suruey of the pretended holy discipline where he saith for M. Caluin and M. Beza I do thinke of them as their writings deserue but yet I thinke better of the auncient Fathers pag. 64. I must saith he confesse it Also the more aduised See Chemnitius in his examen CoÌ„cil Trident. part pag. 74. 64. and sober protestantes to vse their owne wordes doubt not but that the primitiue church receaued from the Apostles and Apostolicall men not only the text of scripture but also the right and true sense thereof And that wee are greatly confirmed in the true and sound sense of scripture by the testimonie of the auncient church In the confessions of Bohemia in the Harmony of confessions pag. 406. It is confessed that the auncient church is the true and best mistresse of posteritie which going before leadeth vs the way Sarauia saith The holy ghost which doth sit ouer in defenâ— and his president in the church tract de diuersis ministrorum gradibus pag. â— is the true interpreter of the scriptures of him therfore ought the true interpretation be sought and for as much as he cannot be coÌ„trary to himself which is ouer the church and hath gouerned it by Bishops now to reiect them is not a greable to truth in defens Apologiae printed anno 1573. pag. 35. M. Ievvell saith The primitiue church which was vnder the Apostles and Martyrs hath euermore bine accompted the puriest of all others without exception THE 49. ARTICLE Of Heretickes impudencie Imprimis Luther tom 5. ad Gal. cap. 1. fol 299. MArtin Luther hauing a scholler to dispute against his aduersaries in this manner did encourage him The argument saith he of the Papists me thinks is very probable and strong that is the church did thus thinke and teach it so many yeares all the Doctours of the primitiue church most holy men did also iudge it to be thus and so taught it what art thou saith he that dare disagree from all these But afterward heare Luther himself against these when Sathan saith he doth vrge this matter confidently say whether Cyprian Augustine Ambrose or S. Peter Paul Iohn yea an Angel from heauen teach otherwyse not withstanding this I know for certayn that I do not persuade humane but deuyne thinkes for this I may speake with confidence let therbe the church with Austine and other Doctours also S. Peter Paul Iohn yea an Angel from heauen which doth teach a contrary not withstanding my doctrine is such that it doth illustrate the glory of God only Peter was chief of the Apostles and taught with out the word of God These Luther Againe where he bids adew to all fathers lib. de fâ—â— 1â— arbitrio councells deuines Schools Bishops the consent of all ages and Christian people saith in this manner wee receaue all scripture saith he but so that the authority of interpreting it be in our power what wee interpret the holy ghost doth teach what others do bring although they be great although they be many it coms from the spirit of the Diuell and a wicked mynd Againe Luther perceauing that place of S. Paul Rom. â— vvee thinke a man to be iustified by faith and not by the vvorkes of the lavv not sufficient to proue iustification by faith did add this particle only and when he was admonished of it thus he answered tom 5. fol 141. 144. so I will so I commaund it let my will stand for a reason c. Luther will haue it so and saith he is a Doctour aboue all Doctours And a little after he concludeth moreouer saith he this word only ought to remaine in my testament although all Papists runne made at it and it greeueth me saith he that I haue not added these twoe wordes without all workes and lawes Againe in his booke against king Henry 8. he speaketh thus The word of God saith he is aboue althinges the deuyne maiestie maketh for me so that I nothing care if there be a thousand Austines a thousand Cyprians and a thousand Henries against me If I am no Prophet saith he yet I am sure the word of God doth stand for me I