use of and pressed at large by one among our selves but improved also by a dangerous comparison between the Writings of the Evangelists and the other Writings of the New Testament For to enforce this Argument that the Histories of the Gospel wherein the Sermons of Christ are recorded do make no mention of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ as in his judgement they do not nor of his Satisfaction or Merit or Expiation of sin or of Redemption by his Death as they do not in the judgment of Socinus it is added by him that for his part he is apt to admire our Saviours Sermons who was the Author of our Religion before the Writings of the Apostles though inspired men Whereunto many dangerous insinuations and reflections on the Writings of St. Paul contrary to the Faith and Sense of the Church in all Ages are subjoined S. pag. 240 241. But this Boldness is not only unwarrantable but to be abhorred What place of Scripture what Ecclesiastical Tradition what single president of any one sober Christian Writer what Theological Reason will countenance a man in making the comparison mentioned and so determining thereon such juvenile boldness such want of a due apprehension and understanding of the Nature of divine Inspirations with the order and design of the writing of the New Testament which are the springs of this precipitate censure ought to be reflected on At present to remove this pretence out of our way it may be observed 1. That what the Lord Christ taught his Disciples in his Personal Ministry on the Earth was suited unto that Oeconomy of the Church which was antecedent unto his Death and Resurrection Nothing did he with-hold from them that was needful to their Faith Obedience and Consolation in that state Many things he instructed them in out of the Scripture many new Revelations he made unto them and many times did he occasionally instruct and rectifie their judgements Howbeit he made no clear distinct Revelation of those sacred mysteries unto them which are peculiar unto the Faith of the New Testament nor were to be distinctly apprehended before his Death and Resurrection 2. What the Lord Christ revealed afterwards by his Spirit unto the Apostles was no less immediately from himself then was the Truth which he spoke unto them with his own mouth in the days of his flesh An Apprehension to the contrary is destructive of Christian Religion The Epistles of the Apostles are no less Christs Sermons then that which he delivered on the Mount Wherefore 3. Neither in the things themselves nor in the way of their Delivery or Revelation is there any Advantage of the one sort of Writings above the other The things written in the Epistles proceed from the same Wisdom the same Grace the same Love with the things which he spoke with his own mouth in the days of his flesh and are of the same divine veracity Authority and Efficacy The Revelation which he made by his Spirit is no less divine and immediate from himself then what he spoke unto his Disciples on the Earth To distinguish between these things on any of these accounts is intolerable folly 4. The Writings of the Evangelists do not contain the whole of all the Instructions which the Lord Christ gave unto his Disciples personally on the Earth For he was seen of them after his Resurrection forty days and spoke with them of the things pertaining to the Kingdom of God Act. 1.3 And yet nothing hereof is recorded in their writings but only some few occasional speeches Nor had he given before unto them a clear and distinct understanding of those things which were delivered concerning his Death and Resurrection in the Old Testament as is plainly declared Luke 24.25 26 27. For it was not necessary for them in that state wherein they were Wherefore 5. As to the extent of Divine Revelations objectively those which he granted by his Spirit unto his Apostles after his Ascension were beyond those which he Personally taught them so far as they are recorded in the Writings of the Evangelists For he told them plainly not long before his death that he had many things to say unto them which then they could not bear Joh. 16.12 And for the knowledge of those things he refers them to the coming of the Spirit to make Revelation of them from himself in the next words Howbeit when he the Spirit of Truth is come he will guide you into all Truth for he shall not speak of himself but whatsoever he shall hear that shall he speak and he will shew you things to come He shall glorifie me for he shall receive of mine and shew it unto you ver 13 14. And on this account he had told them before that it was expedient for them that he should go away that the Holy Spirit might come unto them whom he would send from the Father ver 7. Hereunto he referred the full and clear manifestation of the mysteries of the Gospel So false as well as dangerous and scandalous are those insinuations of Socinus and his followers Secondly The Writings of the Evangelists are full unto their proper Ends and Purposes These were to record the Genealogy Conception Birth Acts Miracles and Teachings of our Saviour so far as to evince him to be the true only promised Messias So he testifieth who wrote the last of them Many other signs truly did Jesus which are not written in this Book But these are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God Joh. 20.30 31. Unto this End every thing is recorded by them that is needful unto the ingenerating and establishment of Faith Upon this confirmation all things declared in the Old Testament concerning him all that was taught in Types and Sacrifices became the object of Faith in that sense wherein they were interpreted in the Accomplishment And that in them this Doctrine was before revealed shall be proved afterwards It is therefore no wonder if some things and those of the highest importance should be declared more fully in other Writings of the New Testament then they are in those of the Evangelists Thirdly The Pretence it self is wholly false For there are as many pregnant Testimonies given unto this Truth in one alone of the Evangelists as in any other Book of the New Testament namely in the Book of John I shall refer to some of them which will be pleaded in their proper place chap. 1.12 17 19. chap. 3.14 15 16 17 18 36. chap. 5.24 But we may pass this by as one of those Inventions concerning which Socinus boasts in his Epistle to Michael Vajoditus that his Writings were esteemed by many for the singularity of the things asserted in them Fourthly The Difference that hath been among Protestant Writers about this Doctrine is pleaded in the prejudice of it Osiander in the entrance of the Reformation fell into a vain imagination that we were Justified or made Righteous with the Essential
the principal cause of all the Oppositions that are made unto it and all the Depravations of it that the Church is pestered withall Hence are the wits of men so fertile in Sophistical Cavils against it so ready to load it with seeming absurdities and I know not what unsuitableness unto their wonderous rational conceptions And no Objection can be made against it be it never so trivial but it is highly applauded by those who look on that Introduction of the mystery of Grace which is above their natural conceptions as unintelligible folly 2. That the necessary Relation of these things one unto the other namely of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and the necessity of our Personal Obedience will not be clearly understood nor duely improved but by and in the exercise of the Wisdom of Faith This we grant also and let who will make what advantage they can of this concession True Faith hath that spiritual Light in it or accompanying of it as that it is able to receive it and to conduct the Soul unto Obedience by it Wherefore reserving the particular consideration hereof unto its proper place I say in general 1. That this Relation is evident unto that spiritual Wisdom whereby we are enabled doctrinally and practically to comprehend the Harmony of the mystery of God and the consistency of all the parts of it one with another 2. That it is made evident by the Scripture wherein both these things Justification through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and the Necessity of our Personal Obedience are plainly asserted and declared And we defie that Rule of the Socinians that seeing these things are inconsistent in their apprehension or unto their Reason therefore we must say that one of them is not taught in the Scripture For whatever it may appear unto their Reason it doth not so to ours and we have at least as Good Reason to trust unto our own Reason as unto theirs Yet we absolutely acquiesce in neither but in the Authority of God in the Scripture rejoycing only in this that we can set our seal unto his Revelations by our own Experience For 3. It is fully evident in the gracious conduct which the minds of them that believe are under even that of the Spirit of Truth and Grace and the Inclinations of that new Principle of the Divine Life whereby they are acted For although from the Remainders of Sin and Darkness that are in them Temptations may arise unto a continuation in sin because Grace hath abounded yet are their minds so formed and framed by the Doctrine of this Grace and the Grace of this Doctrine that the abounding of Grace herein is the principal motive unto their abounding in Holiness as we shall see afterwards And this we aver to be the spring of all those Objections which the Adversaries of this Doctrine do continually endeavour to entangle it withall As 1 If the Passive Righteousness as it is commonly called that is his Death and Suffering be imputed unto us there is no need nor can it be that his Active Righteousness or the Obedience of his Life should be imputed unto us and so on the contrary for both together are inconsistent 2 That if all sin be pardoned there is no need of the Righteousness and so on the contrary if the Righteousness of Christ be imputed unto us there is no room for or need of the pardon of sin 3 If we believe the pardon of our sins then are our sins pardoned before we believe or we are bound to believe that which is not so 4 If the Righteousness of Christ be imputed unto us then are we esteemed to have done and suffered what indeed we never did nor suffered and it is true that if we are esteemed our selves to have done it Imputation is overthrown 5 If Christs Righteousness be imputed unto us then are we as Righteous as was Christ himself 6 If our sins were imputed unto Christ then was he thought to have sinned and was a sinner subjectively 7 If Good Works be excluded from any interest in our Justification before God then are they of no use unto our Salvation 8 That it is ridiculous to think that where there is no sin there is not all the Righteousness that can be required 9 That Righteousness imputed is only a putative or imaginary Righteousness c. Now although all these and the like Objections however subtilly managed as Socinus boasts that he had used more then ordinary subtilty in this cause in quo si subtilius aliquanto quanto opus esse videretur quaedam a nobis disputata sunt De servat par 4. cap. 4. are capable of plain and clear solutions and we shall avoid the examination of none of them yet at present I shall only say that all the shades which they cast on the minds of men do vanish and disappear before the Light of express Scripture Testimonies and the Experience of them that do believe where there is a due comprehension of the mystery of Grace in any tolerable measure Seventhly There are some common prejudices that are usually pleaded against the Doctrine of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ which because they will not orderly fall under a particular consideration in our progress may be briefly examined in these general previous considerations 1. It is usually urged against it that this Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ is no where mentioned expresly in the Scripture This is the first Objection of Bellarmine against it Hactenus saith he nullum omnino locum invenire potuerunt ubi legeretur Christi Justitiam nobis imputari ad justitiam vel nos justos esse per Christi Justitiam nobis imputatam De Justificat lib. 2. cap. 7. An Objection doubtless unreasonably and immodestly urged by men of his perswasion For not only do they make profession of their whole Faith or their belief of all things in matters of Religion in Terms and Expressions no where used in the Scripture but believe many things also as they say with Faith divine not at all revealed or contained in the Scripture but drained by them out of the Traditions of the Church I do not therefore understand how such persons can modestly manage this as an Objection against any Doctrine that the Terms wherein some do express it are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 found in the Scripture just in that order of one word after another as by them they are used For this Rule may be much enlarged and yet be kept strait enough to exclude the principal concerns of their Church out of the confines of Christianity nor can I apprehend much more Equity in others who reflect with severity on this expression of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ as unscriptural as if those who make use thereof were criminal in no small degree when themselves immediately in the Declaration of their own judgment make use of such Terms Distinctions
they found in many who yet do so assent unto the Truth But as we have shewed this is necessary unto Evangelical Justifying Faith and to suppose the contrary is to overthrow the order and use of the Law and Gospel with their mutual Relation unto one another in subserviency unto the design of God in the Salvation of Sinners 4. It is not a way of seeking Relief unto a convinced sinner whose mouth is stopped in that he is become guilty before God Such alone are capable Subjects of Justification and do or can seek after it in a due manner A meer Assent unto Divine Revelation is not peculiarly suited to give such persons Relief For it is that which brings them into that condition from whence they are to be relieved For the knowledge of sin is by the Law But Faith is a peculiar acting of the Soul for Deliverance 5. It is no more then what the Devils themselves may have and have as the Apostle James affirms For that Instance of their Believing one God proves that they believe also whatever this one God who is the first Essential Truth doth reveal to be true And it may consist with all manner of wickedness and without any Obedience and so make God a liar 1 Joh. 2.4 And it is no wonder if men deny us to be justified by Faith who know no other Faith but this 6. It no way answers the Descriptions that are given of justifying Faith in the Scripture Particularly it is by Faith as it is justifying that we are said to receive Christ Joh. 1.12 Col. 2.6 To receive the Promise the Word the Grace of God the Attonement Jam. 1.21 Joh. 3.33 Act. 2.41 chap. 11.1 Rom. 5.11 Heb. 11.17 To cleave unto God Deut. 4.4 Act. 11.23 And so in the Old Testament it is generally expressed by Trust and Hope Now none of these things are contained in a meer Assent unto the Truth but they require other actings of the Soul than what are peculiar unto the understanding only 7. It answers not the Experience of them that truly believe This all our Enquiries and Arguments in this matter must have respect unto For the sum of what we aim at is only to discover what they do who really believe unto the Justification of Life It is not what notions men may have hereof nor how they express their Conceptions how defensible they are against Objections by accuracy of Expressions and subtile Distinctions but only what we our selves do if we truly believe that we enquire after And although our Differences about it do argue the great imperfection of that state wherein we are so as that those who truly believe cannot agree what they do in their so doing which should give us a mutual tenderness and forbearance towards each other yet if men would attend unto their own Experience in the Application of their Souls unto God for the pardon of Sin and Righteousness to Life more than unto the notions which on various occasions their minds are influenced by or prepossessed withall many differences and unnecessary disputations about the nature of Justifying Faith would be prevented or prescinded I deny therefore that this general Assent unto the Truth how firm soever it be or what effects in the way of Duty or Obedience soever it may produce doth answer the Experience of any one true Believer as containing the entire Actings of his Soul towards God for pardon of sin and Justification 8. That Faith alone is Justifying which hath Justification actually accompanying of it For thence alone it hath that denomination To suppose a man to have Justifying Faith and not to be justified is to suppose a Contradiction Nor do we enquire after the nature of any other Faith but that whereby a Believer is actually justified But it is not so with all them in whom this Assent is found nor will those that plead for it allow that upon it alone any are immediately justified Wherefore it is sufficiently evident that there is somewhat more required unto Justifying Faith than a real Assent unto all Divine Revelations although we do give that Assent by the Faith whereby we are justified But on the other side it is supposed that by some the Object of Justifying Faith is so much restrained and the nature of it thereby determined unto such a peculiar Acting of the mind as compriseth not the whole of what is in the Scripture ascribed unto it So some have said that it is the pardon of our sins in particular that is the Object of Justifying Faith Faith therefore they make to be a full perswasion of the forgiveness of our sins through the Mediation of Christ or that what Christ did and suffered as our Mediator he did it for us in particular And a particular Application of especial mercy unto our own Souls and Consciences is hereby made the Essence of Faith Or to believe that our own sins are forgiven seems hereby to be the first and most proper Act of Justifying Faith Hence it would follow that whosoever doth not believe or hath not a firm perswasion of the forgiveness of his own sins in particular hath no saving Faith is no true Believer which is by no means to be admitted And if any have been or are of this Opinion I fear that they were in the asserting of it neglective of their own Experience Or it may be rather that they knew not how in their Experience all the other Actings of Faith wherein its Essence doth consist were included in this perswasion which in an especial manner they aimed at whereof we shall speak afterwards And there is no doubt unto me but that this which they propose Faith is suited unto aimeth at and doth ordinarily effect in true Believers who improve it and grow in its exercise in a due manner Many great Divines at the first Reformation did as the Lutherans generally yet do thus make the mercy of God in Christ and thereby the forgiveness of our own sins to be the proper Object of Justifying Faith as such whose Essence therefore they placed in a fiducial Trust in the Grace of God by Christ declared in the Promises with a certain unwavering Application of them unto our selves And I say with some confidence that those who endeavour not to attain hereunto either understand not the nature of Believing or are very neglective both of the Grace of God and of their own Peace That which enclined those great and holy Persons so to express themselves in this matter and to place the Essence of Faith in the highest Acting of it wherein yet they always included and supposed its other Acts was the state of the Consciences of men with whom they had to do Their Contest in this Article with the Roman Church was about the way and means whereby the Consciences of convinced troubled sinners might come to rest and peace with God For at that time they were no otherwise instructed but that these things were to be obtained not
Object of our Faith unto the Justification of Life Act. 2.39 Act. 26.6 Rom. 4.16 20. chap. 15.8 Gal. 3.16 18. Heb. 4.1 chap. 6.13 chap. 8.6 chap. 10.36 4. The End for which the Lord Christ in the Work of his Mediation is the Ordinance of God and as such proposed in the Promises of the Gospel namely the Recovery and Salvation of lost sinners belongs unto the Object of Faith as Justifying Hence the forgiveness of sin and Eternal Life are proposed in the Scripture as things that are to be believed unto Justification or as the Object of our Faith Math. 9.2 Act. 2.38 39. chap. 5.31 chap. 26.18 Rom. 3.25 chap. 4.7 8. Col. 2.13 Tit. 1.2 c. And whereas the Just is to live by his Faith and every one is to believe for himself or make an Application of the things believed unto his own behoof some from hence have affirmed the pardon of our own sins and our own Salvation to be the proper Object of Faith and indeed it doth belong thereunto when in the way and order of God and the Gospel we can attain unto it 1. Cor. 15.3 4. Gal. 2.20 Ephes. 1.6 7. Wherefore asserting the Lord Jesus Christ in the Work of his Mediation to be the Object of Faith unto Justification I include therein the Grace of God which is the Cause the pardon of sin which is the Effect and the Promises of the Gospel which are the means of communicating Christ and the benefit of his Mediation unto us And all these things are so united so intermixed in their mutual Relations and Respects so concatenated in the purpose of God and the Declaration made of his Will in the Gospel as that the Believing of any one of them doth virtually include the belief of the rest And by whom any one of them is disbelieved they frustrate and make void all the rest and so Faith it self The due Consideration of these things solveth all the Difficulties that arise about the nature of Faith either from the Scripture or from the Experience of them that believe with respect unto its Object Many things in the Scripture are we said to believe with it and by it and that unto Justification But two things are hence evident 1 That no one of them can be asserted to be the compleat adequate Object of our Faith 2 That none of them are so absolutely but as they relate unto the Lord Christ as the Ordinance of God for our Justification and Salvation And this answereth the Experience of all that do truly believe For these things being united and made inseparable in the constitution of God all of them are virtually included in every one of them 1 Some fix their Faith and Trust principally on the Grace Love and Mercy of God especially they did so under the Old Testament before the clear Revelation of Christ and his Mediation So did the Psalmist Psal. 130.34 Psal. 33.18 19. And the Publican Luke 18.13 And these are in places of the Scripture innumerable proposed as the Causes of our Justification See Rom. 3.24 Ephes. 2.4 5 6 7 8. Tit. 3.5 6 7. But this they do not absolutely but with respect unto the Redemption that is in the Blood of Christ Dan. 9.17 Nor doth the Scripture any where propose them unto us but under that consideration See Rom. 3.24 25. Ephes. 1.6 7 8. For this is the cause way and means of the communication of that Grace Love and Mercy unto us 2 Some place and fix them principally on the Lord Christ his Mediation and the Benefits thereof This the Apostle Paul proposeth frequently unto us in his own Example See Gal. 2.20 Phil. 3.8 9 10. But this they do not absolutely but with respect unto the Grace and Love of God whence it is that they are given and communicated unto us Rom. 8.32 Joh. 3.16 Ephes. 1.6 7 8. Nor are they otherwise any where proposed unto us in the Scripture as the Object of our Faith unto Justification 3 Some in a peculiar manner fix their Souls in Believing on the Promises And this is exemplified in the Instance of Abraham Gen. 15.16 Rom. 4.20 And so are they proposed in the Scripture as the Object of our Faith Act. 2.39 Rom. 4.16 Heb. 4.1 2. chap. 6.12 13. But this they do not meerly as they are Divine Revelations but as they contain and propose unto us the Lord Christ and the Benefits of his Mediation from the Grace Love and Mercy of God Hence the Apostle disputes at large in his Epistle unto the Galatians That if Justification be any way but by the Promise both the Grace of God and the death of Christ are evacuated and made of none effect And the Reason is because the Promise is nothing but the way and means of the Communication of them unto us 4 Some fix their Faith on the things themselves which they aim at namely the pardon of sin and Eternal Life And these also in the Scripture are proposed unto us as the Object of our Faith or that which we are to believe unto Justification Psal. 130.4 Act. 26.18 Tit. 1.2 But this is to be done in its proper order especially as unto the Application of them unto our own Souls For we are no where required to believe them or our own Interest in them but as they are effects of Grace and Love of God through Christ and his Mediation proposed in the Promises of the Gospel Wherefore the Belief of them is included in the Belief of these and is in order of nature antecedent thereunto And the Belief of the forgiveness of sins and Eternal Life without the due Exercise of Faith in those Causes of them is but Presumption I have therefore given the entire Object of Faith as Justifying or in its Work and Duty with respect unto our Justification in compliance with the Testimonies of the Scripture and the Experience of them that believe Allowing therefore their proper place unto the Promises and unto the Effect of all in the pardon of sins and Eternal Life that which I shall farther confirm is That the Lord Christ in the Work of his Mediation as the Ordinance of God for the Recovery and Salvation of lost sinners is the proper adequate Object of Justifying Faith And the true nature of Evangelical Faith consisteth in the Respect of the Heart which we shall immediately describe unto the Love Grace and Wisdom of God with the Mediation of Christ in his Obedience with the Sacrifice Satisfaction and Attonement for sin which he made by his Blood These things are impiously opposed by some as inconsistent For the second Head of the Socinian Impiety is That the Grace of God and Satisfaction of Christ are opposite and inconsistent so as that if we allow of the one we must deny the other But as these things are so proposed in the Scripture as that without granting them both neither can be believed so Faith which respects them as subordinate namely the Mediation of
his Priestly Office And therefore is Justification either expresly or virtually assigned unto them also Gen. 3.15 1 Joh. 3.8 Heb. 2.13 14 15 16. Rom. 4.25 Act. 5.31 Heb. 7.27 Rom. 8.34 But yet wherever our Justification is so assigned unto them they are not absolutely considered but with respect unto their relation to his Sacrifice and Satisfaction 3 All the means of the Application of the Sacrifice and Righteousness of the Lord Christ unto us are also included therein Such is the principal Efficient cause thereof which is the Holy Ghost whence we are said to be justified in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God 1 Cor. 6.11 and the instrumental cause thereof on the part of God which is the Promise of the Gospel Rom. 1.17 Gal. 3.22 23. It would therefore be unduly pretended that by this Assertion we do narrow or straiten the Object of Justifying Faith as it Justifies For indeed we assign a respect unto the whole Mediatory Office of Christ not excluding the Kingly and Prophetical parts thereof but only such a notion of them as would not bring in more of Christ but much of our selves into our Justification And the Assertion as laid down may be proved 1. From the Experience of all that are justified or do seek for Justification according unto the Gospel For under this notion of seeking for Justification or a Righteousness unto Justification they were all of them to be considered and do consider themselves as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 guilty before God subject obnoxious liable unto his wrath in the curse of the Law as we declared in the Entrance of this Discourse Rom. 3.19 They were all in the same state that Adam was in after the Fall unto whom God proposed the Relief of the Incarnation and Suffering of Christ Gen. 3.15 And to seek after Justification is to seek after a discharge from this woful state and condition Such persons have and ought to have other designs and desires also For whereas the state wherein they are antecedent unto their Justification is not only a state of Guilt and Wrath but such also as wherein through the Depravation of their Nature the power of sin is prevalent in them and their whole Souls are defiled they design and desire not only to be justified but to be sanctified also But as unto the Guilt of sin and the want of a Righteousness before God from which Justification is their Relief herein I say they have respect unto Christ as set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood In their Design for Sanctification they have respect unto the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ in their especial exercise But as to their freedom from the Guilt of sin and their Acceptance with God or their Justification in his sight that they may be freed from condemnation that they may not come into judgment it is Christ crucified it is Christ lifted up as the brazen Serpent in the Wilderness it is the Blood of Christ it is the Propitiation that he was and the Atonement that he made it is his bearing their sins his being made sin and the curse for them it is his Obedience the End which he put unto sin and the Everlasting Righteousness which he brought in that alone their Faith doth fix upon and acquiesce in If it be otherwise in the Experience of any I acknowledge I am not acquainted with it I do not say that Conviction of sin is the only antecedent Condition of actual Justification But this it is that makes a sinner subjectum capax Justificationis No man therefore is to be considered as a person to be Justified but he who is actually under the power of the Conviction of sin with all the necessary consequents thereof Suppose therefore any sinner in this Condition as it is described by the Apostle Rom. 3. Guilty before God with his mouth stopped as unto any pleas defences or excuses suppose him to seek after a Relief and Deliverance out of this estate that is to be justified according to the Gospel he neither doth nor can wisely take any other course than what he is there directed unto by the same Apostle ver 20 21 22 23 24 25. Therefore by the Deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the Law is the knowledge of sin But now the Righteousness of God without the Law is manifested being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets Even the Righteousness of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe for there is no difference For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Whence I argue That which a Guilty condemned sinner finding no hope nor Relief from the Law of God the sole Rule of all his Obedience doth betake himself unto by Faith that he may be delivered or justified that is the especial Object of Faith as Justifying But this is the Grace of God alone through the Redemption that is in Christ or Christ proposed as a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood Either this is so or the Apostle doth not aright guide the Souls and Consciences of men in that condition wherein he himself doth place them It is the Blood of Christ alone that he directs the Faith unto of all them that would be justified before God Grace Redemption Propitiation all through the Blood of Christ Faith doth peculiarly respect and fix upon This is that if I mistake not which they will confirm by their Experience who have made any distinct observation of the actings of their Faith in their Justification before God 2. The Scripture plainly declares that Faith as Justifying respects the sacerdotal Office and Actings of Christ alone In the great Representation of the Justification of the Church of Old in the Expiatory Sacrifice when all their sins and iniquities were pardoned and their persons accepted with God the acting of their Faith was limited unto the Imposition of all their sins on the head of the Sacrifice by the high Priest Lev. 16. By his knowledge that is Faith in him shall my righteous Servant justifie many for he shall bear their iniquities Isa. 53.11 That alone which Faith respects in Christ as unto the Justification of sinners is his bearing their iniquities Guilty convinced sinners look unto him by Faith as those who were stung with fiery Serpents did to the Brazen Serpent that is as he was lifted up on the Cross Joh. 3.14 15. So did he himself express the nature and actings of Faith in our Justification Rom. 3.24 25. Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set
the Souls and Consciences of them that are justified or others that is the Church and the World And each of these have the name of Justification assigned unto them though our real Justification before God be always one and the same But a man may be really justified before God and yet not have the evidence or assurance of it in his own mind Wherefore that evidence or assurance is not of the nature or essence of that Faith whereby we are Justified nor doth necessarily accompany our Justification But this Manifestation of a mans own Justification unto himself although it depends on many especial causes which are not necessary unto his Justification absolutely before God is not a second Justification when it is attained but only the Application of the former unto his Conscience by the Holy Ghost There is also a Manifestation of it with respect unto others which in like manner depends on other causes then doth our Justification before God absolutely yet is it not a second Justification For it depends wholly on the visible effects of that Faith whereby we are justified as the Apostle James instructs us yet is it only our single Justification before God evidenced and declared unto his Glory the benefit of others and encrease of our own Reward There is also a twofold Justification before God mentioned in the Scripture 1 By the works of the Law Rom. 2.13 chap. 10.5 Matth. 19.15 16 17 18 19. Hereunto is required an absolute conformity unto the whole Law of God in our natures all the faculties of our Souls all the principles of our moral operations with perfect actual Obedience unto all its commands in all instances of Duty both for matter and manner For he is cursed who continueth not in all things that are written in the Law to do them And he that breaks any one Commandment is guilty of the breach of the whole Law Hence the Apostle concludes that none can be Justified by the Law because all have sinned 2 There is a Justification by Grace through Faith in the Blood of Christ whereof we treat And these ways of Justification are contrary proceeding on terms directly contradictory and cannot be made consistent with or subservient one to the other But as we shall manifest afterwards the confounding of them both by mixing them together is that which is aimed at in this distinction of a first and second Justification But whatever respects it may have that Justification which we have before God in his sight through Jesus Christ is but one and at once full and compleat and this distinction is a vain and fond invention For 1. As it is explained by the Papists it is exceedingly derogatory to the merit of Christ. For it leaves it no effect towards us but only the infusion of an habit of Charity When that is done all that remains with respect unto our Salvation is to be wrought by our selves Christ hath only merited the first Grace for us that we therewith and thereby may merit life eternal The merit of Christ being confined in its effect unto the first Justification it hath no immediate influence into any Grace Priviledge Mercy or Glory that follow thereon but they are all effects of that second Justification which is purely by works But this is openly contrary unto the whole tenor of the Scripture For although there be an order of Gods appointment wherein we are to be made partakers of Evangelical Priviledges in Grace and Glory one before another yet are they all of them the immediate effects of the death and obedience of Christ who hath obtained for us eternal Redemption Heb. 9.12 and is the Authour of eternal Salvation unto all that do obey him Chap. 5.9 Having by one offering for ever perfected them that are Sanctified And those who allow of a secondary if not of a second Justification by our own inherent personal Righteousnesses are also guilty hereof though not in the same degree with them For whereas they ascribe unto it our acquitment from all charge of Sin after the first Justification and a Righteousness accepted in Judgment in the Judgment of God as if it were compleat and perfect whereon depends our final Absolution and Reward it is evident that the immediate efficacy of the satisfaction and merit of Christ hath its bounds assigned unto it in the first Justification which whether it be taught in the Scripture or no we shall afterwards enquire 2. More by this distinction is ascribed unto our selves working by vertue of inherent Grace as unto the merit and procurement of spiritual and eternal good than unto the Blood of Christ. For that only procures the first Grace and Justification for us Thereof alone it is the meritorious cause or as others express it we are made partakers of the effects of it in the pardon of Sins past But by vertue of this Grace we do our selves obtain procure or merit another a second a compleat Justification the continuance of the favour of God and all the fruits of it with life eternal and Glory So do our works at least perfect and compleat the merit of Christ without which it is imperfect And those who assign the continuation of our Justification wherein all the effects of Divine Favour and Grace are contained unto our own personal Righteousness as also final Justification before God as the pleadable cause of it do follow their steps unto the best of my understanding But such things as these may be disputed in debates of which kind it is incredible almost what influence on the minds of men Traditions Prejudices Subtilty of Invention and Arguing do obtain to divert them from real thoughts of the things about which they contend with respect unto themselves and their own condition If by any means such persons can be called home unto themselves and find leasure to think how and by what means they shall come to appear before the High God to be freed from the sentence of the Law and the Curse due to Sin to have a pleadable Righteousness at the Judgment Seat of God before which they stand especially if a real sense of these things be implanted on their minds by the convincing power of the Holy Ghost all their subtle Arguments and Pleas for the mighty efficacy of their own personal Righteousness will sink in their minds like Water at the return of the Tide and leave nothing but Mud and Defilement behind them 3. This Distinction of two Justifications as used and improved by those of the Roman Church leaves us indeed no Justification at all Something there is in the branches of it of Sanctification but of Justification nothing at all Their first Justification in the infusion of an habit or principle of Grace unto the expulsion of all habits of Sin is Sanctification and nothing else And we never did contend that our Justification in such a sense if any will take it in such a sense doth consist in the Imputation of the
He is utterly mistaken for the Apostle doth not ascribe Justification partly to Works and partly to Faith but he ascribes Justification in the sense by him intended wholly to Works in opposition to that Faith concerning which he treats For there is a plain Antithesis in the Words between Works and Faith as unto Justification in the sense by him intended A dead Faith a Faith without Works the Faith of Devils is excluded from having any influence into Justification Fourthly He adds that the Apostle compares this Faith without Works unto a rich man that gives nothing unto the poor ver 16. and a Body without a Spirit ver 26. wherefore as that knowledg whereby a rich man knows the wants of the poor is true and real and a dead body is a body so is Faith without Works true Faith also and as such is considered by Saint James Ans. These things do evidently destroy what they are produced in the confirmation of only the Cardinal helps them out with a little Sophistry For whereas the Apostle compares this Faith unto the charity of a man that gives nothing to the poor he suggests in the room thereof his knowledge of their poverty And his knowledge may be true and the more true and certain it is the more false and feigned is the charity which he pretends in these words Go and be fed or cloathed Such is the Faith the Apostle speaks of And although a dead body is a true body that is as unto the matter or substance of it a Carcass yet is it not an essential part of a living man A Carcass is not of the same nature or kind as is the body of a living man And we assert no other difference between the Faith spoken of by the Apostle and that which is justifying than what is between a dead breathless Carcass and a living animated body prepared and fitted for all vital acts Wherefore it is evident beyond all contradiction if we have not a mind to be contentious that what the Apostle James here derogates from Faith as unto our Justification it respects only a dead barren lifeless Faith such as is usually pretended by ungodly godly men to countenance themselves in their sins And herein the Faith asserted by Paul hath no concern The consideration of the present condition of the profession of Faith in the World will direct us unto the best exposition of this place Thirdly They speak not of Justification in the same sense nor unto the same end It is of our absolute Justification before God the Justification of our persons our acceptance with him and the grant of a right unto the Heavenly inheritance that the Apostle Paul doth treat and thereof alone This he declares in all the causes of it all that on the part of God or on our part concurreth thereunto The evidence the knowledge the sense the fruit the manifestation of it in our own Consciences in the Church unto others that profess the Faith he treats not of but speaks of them separately as they occur on other occasions The Justification he treats of is but one and at once accomplished before God changing the relative state of the person justified and is capable of being evidenced various ways unto the glory of God and the consolation of them that truly believe Hereof the Apostle James doth not treat at all for his whole enquiry is after the nature of that Faith whereby we are justified and the only way whereby it may be evidenced to be of the right kind such as a man may safely trust unto Wherefore he treats of Justification only as to the evidence and manifestation of it nor had he any occasion to do otherwise And this is apparent from both the instances whereby he confirms his purpose The first is that of Abraham ver 21.22 23. For he says that by Abrahams being justified by Works in the way and manner wherein he asserts him so to have been the Scripture was fulfilled which says that Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness And if his intention were to prove that we are justified before God by Works and not by Faith because Abraham was so the Testimony produced is contrary yea directly contradictory unto what should be proved by it and accordingly is alledged by Paul to prove that Abraham was justified by Faith without Works as the words do plainly import Nor can any man declare how the Truth of this proposition Abraham was justified by Works intending absolute Justification before God was that wherein that Scripture was fulfilled Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness especially considering the opposition that is made both here and elsewhere between Faith and Works in this matter Besides he asserts that Abraham was justified by Works then when he had offered his Son on the Altar the same we believe also but only enquire in what sense he was so justified For it was Thirty years or thereabout after it was testified concerning him that he believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness and when Righteousness was imputed unto him he was justified And twice justified in the same sense in the same way with the same kind of Justification he was not How then was he Justified by Works when he offered his Son on the Altar He that can conceive it to be any otherwise but that he was by his Work in the offering of his Son evidenced and declared in the sight of God and man to be justified apprehends what I cannot attain unto seeing that he was really justified long before as is unquestionable and confessed by all He was I say then justified in the sight of God in the way declared Gen. 22.12 And gave a signal Testimony unto the sincerity of his Faith and trust in God manifesting the truth of that Scripture he believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness And in the quotation of this Testimony the Apostle openly acknowledgeth that he was really accounted Righteous had Righteousness imputed unto him and was justified before God the reasons and causes whereof he therefore considereth not long before that Justification which he ascribes unto his Works which therefore can be nothing but the evidencing proving and manifestation of it whence also it appears of what nature that Faith is whereby we are justified the Declaration whereof is the principal design of the Apostle In brief the Scripture alledged that Abraham believed and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness was fulfilled when he was justified by Works on the offering of his Son on the Altar either by the Imputation of Righteousness unto him or by a real efficiency or working Righteousness in him or by the manifestation and evidence of his former Justification or some other way must be found out 1 That it was not by Imputation or that Righteousness unto the Justification of life was not then first imputed unto him is plain in the Text
be genuine precious more precious than Gold of the right nature with that whereunto the Gospel promise of Salvation is annexed 2. This trial was made by Works or by one signal Duty of Obedience prescribed unto him for that very end and purpose For Abraham was to be proposed as a Pattern unto all that should afterwards believe And God provided a signal way for the trial of his Faith namely by an act of Obedience which was so far from being enjoyned by the moral Law that it seemed contrary unto it And if he be proposed unto us as a Pattern of Justification by Works in the sight of God it must be by such Works as God hath not required in the moral Law but such as seem to be contrary thereunto Nor can any man receive any incouragement to expect Justification by Works by telling him that Abraham was justified by Works when he offered up his only Son to God for it will be easie for him to say that as no such Work was ever performed by him so none such was ever required of him But 3 upon Abrahams compliance with the command of God given him in the way of Trial God himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 declares the sincerity of his Faith and his Justification thereon or his gracious acceptance of him This is the whole design of the place which the Apostle traduceth unto his purpose And it contains the whole of what he was to prove and no more Plainly it is granted in it that we are not justified by our Works before God seeing he instances only in a Work performed by a justified believer many years after he was absolutely justified before God But this is evidently proved hereby namely that Faith without Works is dead seeing justifying Faith as is evident in the case of Abraham is that and that alone which brings forth Works of Obedience For on such a Faith alone is a man evidenced declared and pronounced to be justified or accepted with God Abraham was not then first justified He was not then said to be justified he was declared to be justified and that by and upon his Works which contains the whole of what the Apostle intends to prove There is therefore no appearance of the least contradiction between this Apostle and Paul who professedly asserts that Abraham was not justified before God by Works For James only declares that by the Works which he performed after he was justified he was manifested and declared so to be And that this was the whole of his design he manifests in the next verses where he declares what he had proved by this instance ver 22. Seest thou how Faith wrought with his Works and by Works was Faith made perfect Two things he inforceth as proved unto the conviction of him with whom he had to do 1 That true Faith will operate by Works so did Abrahams it was effective in Obedience 2 That it was made perfect by Works that is evidenced so to be For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth no where in the Scripture signifie the internal formal perfecting of any thing but only the external complement or perfection of it or the manifestation of it It was compleat as unto its proper effect when he was first justified and it was now manifested so to be See Mat. 5.48 Col. 4.12 2 Cor. 12.9 This saith the Apostle I have proved in the instance of Abraham namely that it is Works of Obedience alone that can evince a man to be justified or to have that Faith whereby he may be so 3 He adds in the confirmation of what he had affirmed ver 23. And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness and he was called the friend of God Two things the Apostle affirms hereâ—â— 1 That the Scripture mentioned was fulfilled It was so in that Justification by Works which he ascribes unto Abraham But how this Scripture was herein fulfilled either as unto the time wherein it was spoken or as unto the thing it self any otherwise but as that which is therein asserted was evidenced and declared no man can explain what the Scripture affirmed so long before of Abraham was then evidenced to be most true by the Works which his Faith produced and so that Scripture was accomplished For otherwise supposing the distinctions made between Faith and Works by himself and the opposition that he puts between them adding thereunto the sense given of this place by the Apostle Paul with the direct importance of the words and nothing can be more contradictory unto his design namely if he intended to prove our Justification before God by Works than the quotation of this Testimony Wherefore this Scripture neither was nor can be otherwise fulfilled by Abrahams Justification by Works but only that by and upon them he was manifested so to be 2 He adds that hereon he was called the friend of God So he is Isa. 41.8 as also 2 Chron. 20.7 This is of the same importance with his being justified by Works For he was not thus called merely as a justified person but as one who had received singular priviledges from God and answered them by an holy walking before him Wherefore his being called the friend of God was Gods approbation of his Faith and Obedience which is the Justification by Works that the Apostle asserts Hereon he makes a double conclusion for the instance of Rahab being of the same nature and spoken unto before I shall not insist again upon it 1 As unto his present argument ver 24. 2 As unto the whole of his design v. 26. The first is that by works a man is justified and not by Faith only Ye see then you whom I design to convince of the vanity of that imagination that you are justified by a dead Faith a breathless Carcass of Faith a mere assent unto the Truth of the Gospel and profession of it consistent with all manner of impiety and wholly destitute of good fruits you may see what Faith it is that is required unto Justification and Salvation For Abraham was declared to be Righteous to be justified on that Faith which wrought by Works and not at all by such a Faith as you pretend unto A man is justified by Works as Abraham was when he had offered up his Son to God That is what he really was by Faith long before as the Scripture testifieth was then and thereby evidenced and declared And therefore let no man suppose that by the Faith which they boasted of any one is or can be justified seeing that whereon Abraham was declared to be so was that which evidenced it self by its fruits 2 He lays down that great conclusion which he had evinced by his whole Disputation and which at first he designed to confirm v. 26. For as the body without the spirit is dead so Faith without Works is dead also A breathless Carcass and an unworking Faith are alike as unto all the ends of natural or spiritual life This was that which the Apostle designed from the beginning to convince vain and barren professors of which accordingly he hath given sufficient Reason and Testimony for FINIS
3.9 2 Cor. 4.6 The nature of Faith thence declared Faith alone ascribes and gives this glory to God Order of the Acts of Faith or the method in believing Convictions previous thereunto Sincere assent unto all Divine Revelations Acts 26.27 The Proposal of the Gospel unto that end Rom. 10.11 12 13 c. 2 Cor. 3.18 State of Persons called to believe Justifying Faith doth not consist in any one single habit or act of the Mind or Will The nature of that assent which is the first Act of Faith Approbation of the Way of Salvation by Christ comprehensive of the special nature of justifying Faith What is included therein 1. A Renuntiation of all other ways Hos. 14.2 3. Jer. 3.23 Psal. 7.16 Rom. 10.3 2. Consent of the Will unto this Way Joh. 14.6 3. Acquiescency of the Heart in God 1 Pet. 1.21 Trust in God Faith described by Trust the Reason of it Nature and Object of this Trust inquired into A double consideration of special Mercy Whether Obedience be included in the nature of Faith or be of the essence of it A sincere purpose of Vniversal Obedience inseparable from Faith How Faith alone justifieth Repentance how required in and unto Justification How a condition of the New Covenant Perseverance in Obedience is so also Definitions of Faith Pag. 125. CHAP. III. Vse of Faith in Justification various Conceptions about it By whom asserted as the Instrument of it by whom denied In what sense it is affirmed so to be The expressions of the Scripture concerning the use of Faith in Justification what they are and how they are best explained By an Instrumental Cause Faith how the Instrument of God in Justification How the Instrument of them that do believe The use of Faith expressed in the Scripture by apprehending receiving declared by an Instrument Faith in what sense the condition of our Justification Signification of that Term whence to be Learned Pag. 146. CHAP. IV. The proper sense of these words Justification and to justifie considered Necessity thereof Latine derivation of Justification Some of the Antients deceived by it From Jus and Justum Justus filius who The Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vse and signification of it Places where it is used examined 2 Sam. 15.4 Deut. 21.5 Prov. 17.15 Isa. 5.23 Chap. 50.8 1 King 8.31 32. 2 Chro. 6.22 23. Psal. 82.3 Exod. 23.7 Isa. 53.11 Jere. 44.16 Dan. 12.3 The constant sense of the word evinced 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vse of it in other Authors to punish What it is in the New Testament Matth. 11.19 Chap. 12.37 Luk. 7.29 Chap. 10.29 Chap. 16.15 Chap. 18.14 Acts 13.38 39. Rom. 2.13 Chap. 3.4 Constantly used in a forensick sense Places seeming dubious vindicated Rom. 8.30 1 Cor. 6.11 Tit. 3.5 6 7. Revel 22.11 How often these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are used in the New Testament Constant sense of this The same evinced from what is opposed unto it Isa. 50.8 Prov. 17.15 Rom. 5.16 18. Rom. 8.33 34. And the Declaration of it in Terms equivalent Rom. 4.6 7. Rom. 5.9 10. 2 Cor. 5.20 21. Matth. 1.21 Acts 13.39 Gal. 2.16 c. Justification in the Scripture proposed under a Juridical Scheam and of a forensick Title The Parts and Progress of it Instances from the whole Pag. 169. c. CHAP. V. Distinction of a First and Second Justification The whole Doctrine of the Roman Church concerning Justification grounded on this Distinction The First Justification the nature and causes of it according unto the Romanists The Second Justification what it is in their sense Solution of the seeming Difference between Paul and James falsly pretended by this Distinction The same Distinction received by the Socinians and others The latter termed by some the continuation of our Justification The Distinction disproved Justification considered either as unto its Essence or its Manifestation The Manifestation of it twofold initial and final Initial is either unto our selves or others No Second Justification hence insues Justification before God Legal and Evangelical Their distinct natures The Distinction mentioned derogatory to the Merit of Christ. More in it ascribed unto our selves then unto the Blood of Christ in our Justification The vanity of Disputations to this purpose All true Justification everthrown by this Distinction No countenance given unto this Justification in the Scripture The Second Justification not intended by the Apostle James Evil of Arbitrary Distinctions Our First Justification so described in the Scripture as to leave no room for a Second Of the Continuation of our Justification Whether it depend on Faith alone or our Personal Righteousness inquired Justification at once compleated in all Causes and Effects of it proved at large Believers upon their Justification obliged unto perfect Obedience The commanding Power of the Law constitutes the nature of Sin in them who are not obnoxious unto its curse Future Sins in what sense remitted at our First Justification The Continuation of Actual Pardon and thereby of a justified Estate on what it doth depend Continuation of Justification the act of God whereon it depends in that sense On our part it depends on Faith alone Nothing required hereunto but the Application of Righteousness imputed The Continuation of our Justification is before God That whereon the Continuation of our Justification depends pleadable before God This not our Personal Obedience proved 1. By the experience of all Believers 2. Testimonies of Scripture 3. Examples The Distinction mentioned rejected Pag. 189. CHAP. VI. Evangelical Personal Righteousness the nature and use of it Whether there be an Evangelical Justification on our Evangelical Righteousness inquired into How this is by some affirmed and applauded Evangelical Personal Righteousness asserted as the condition of our Legal Righteousness or the Pardon of Sin Opinion of the Socinians Personal Righteousness required in the Gospel Believers hence denominated Righteous Not with respect unto Righteousness habitual but actual only Inherent Righteousness the same with Sanctification or Holiness In what sense we may be said to be justified by Inherent Righteousness No Evangelical Justification on our Personal Righteousness The Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ doth not depend thereon None have this Righteousness but they are untecedently justified A charge before God in all Justification before God The Instrument of this charge the Law or the Gospel From neither of them can we be justified by this Personal Righteousness The Justification pretended needless and useless It hath not the nature of any Justification mentioned in the Scripture but is contrary to all that is so called Other Arguments to the same purpose Sentential Justification at the last day Nature of the last Judgment Who shall be then justified A Declaration of Righteousness and an Actual Admission unto Glory the whole of Justification at the last day The Argument that we are justified in this life in the same manner and on the same Grounds as we shall be judged at the last day
the Apostle liable to be abused Answers of the Apostle unto this Objection He never once attempts to answer it by declaring the necessity of Personal Righteousness or good Works unto Justification before God He confines the cogency of Evangelical Motives unto Obedience only unto Believers Grounds of Evangelical Holiness asserted by him in compliance with his Doctrine of Justification 1. Divine Ordination Exceptions unto this Ground removed 2. Answer of the Apostle vindicated The Obligation of the Law unto Obedience Nature of it and consistency with Grace This Answer of the Apostle vindicated Heads of other Principles that might be pleaded to the same purpose Pag. 539. CHAP. XX. Seeming Difference no real contradiction between the Apostles Paul and James concerning Justification This granted by all Reasons of the seeming Difference The best Rule of the Interpretation of places of Scripture wherein there is an appearing repugnancy The Doctrine of Justification according unto that Rule principally to be learned from the Writings of Paul The Reasons of his fulness and accuracy in the teaching of that Doctrine The Importance of the Truth the opposition made unto it and abuse of it The design of the Apostle James Exceptions of some against the Writings of S. Paul scandalous and unreasonable Not in this matter to be interpreted by the passage in James insisted on Chap. 2. That there is no repugnancy between the Doctrine of the two Apostles demonstrated Heads and Grounds of the Demonstration Their scope design and end not the same That of Paul the only case stated and determined by him The designs of the Apostle James the case proposed by him quite of another nature The occasion of the case proposed and stated him No appearance of difference between the Apostles because of the several cases they speak unto Not the same Faith intended by them Description of the Faith spoken of by the one and the other Bellarmines Arguments to prove true justifying Faith to be intended by James answered Justification not treated of by the Apostles in the same manner nor used in the same sense nor to the same end The one treats of Justification as unto its nature and causes the other as unto its signs and evidence proved by the instances insisted on Pag. 557. How the Scripture was fulfilled that Abraham believed in God and it was counted unto him for Righteousness when he offered his Son on the Altar Works the same and of the same kind in both the Apostles Observations on the Discourse of James No Conjunction made by him between Faith and Works in our Justification but an opposition No distinction of a First and Second Justification in him Justification ascribed by him wholly unto Works in what sense Does not determine how a sinner may be justified before God but how a Professor may evidence himself so to be The Context opened from Ver. 14. to the end of the Chapter Pag. 569. Some of the Mistakes that have escaped in the Press may be thus corrected PAg. 10. Line 2. a fine read other p. 11. l. 24. none r. nothing p. 41. l. 30. r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 33. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 42. l. 22. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 53. l. 6. r. this Author l. 25. man r. men l. 26. them p. 64. l. 4. a fine that it is p. 71. l. 21. and r. add p. 72. l. 12. r. For an p. 172. l. 17. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l 28. Hithpaol p. 174. l. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 175. l. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 176. l. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 4. a fine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 3. a fine affects p. 180. l. 22. vocation that is intended p. 199. l. 1. which was r. whereas p. 208.23 such r. Faith p. 234. l. 2. dele 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 266. l. 8. Curcellaeus p. 283. l. 23. suffered r. offered p. 311. l. 30. of him p. 362. l. 11. r. as if we p. 392. l. 20. r. more colour p. 412. l. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 436. l. 2. a fine r. other men p. 444. l. 10. proofs r. process p. 465. l. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sundry other literal Mistakes and Mispointings are referred unto the candor of the Reader which I chuse rather than to trouble many with the rehearsal of what it may be few will take notice of General Considerations previously necessary unto the Explanation of the Doctrine of Justification THat we may treat of the Doctrine of Justification usefully unto its proper Ends which are the Glory of God in Christ with the peace and furtherance of the Obedience of Believers some things are previously to be considered which we must have respect unto in the whole process of our Discourse And among others that might be insisted on to the same purpose these that ensue are not to be omitted 1. The first Enquiry in this matter in a way of Duty is after the proper Relief of the Conscience of a sinner pressed and perplexed with a sense of the Guilt of sin For Justification is the way and means whereby such a person doth obtain acceptance before God with a Right and Title unto an heavenly Inheritance And nothing is pleadable in this cause but what a man would speak unto his own Conscience in that state or unto the Conscience of another when he is anxious under that Enquiry Wherefore The Person under consideration that is who is to be Justified is one who in himself is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 4.5 Vngodly and thereon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 3.19 guilty before God that is obnoxious subject liable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 1.32 to the righteous sentential Judgment of God that he who committeth sin who is in any way guilty of it is worthy of Death Hereupon such a person finds himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 3.10 under the curse and the wrath of God therein abiding on him Joh. 3.18 36. In this condition he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without plea without excuse by any thing in and from himself for his own relief His mouth is stopped Rom. 3.19 For he is in the Judgment of God declared in the Scripture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 3.22 every way shut up under sin and all the consequents of it Many Evils in this condition are men subject unto which may be reduced unto those two of our first Parents wherein they were represented For first they thought foolishly to hide themselves from God and then more foolishly would have charged him as the cause of their sin And such naturally are the thoughts of men under their convictions But whoever is the subject of the Justification enquired after is by various means brought into his
by the deeds of the Law shall no flesh be justified in his sight Rom. 3.20 However any may be justified in the sight of Men or Angels by their own Obedience or Deeds of the Law yet in His Sight none can be so Necessary it is unto any man who is to come unto a Trial in the sentence whereof he is greatly concern'd duely to consider the Judge before whom he is to appear and by whom his cause is finally to be determined And if we manage our Disputes about Justification without a continual regard unto Him by whom we must be cast or acquitted we shall not rightly apprehend what our Plea ought to be Wherefore the Greatness the Majesty the Holiness and Soveraign Authority of God are always to be present with us in a due sense of them when we enquire how we may be justified before him Yet is it hard to discern how the minds of some men are influenced by the consideration of these things in their fierce contests for the Interest of their own works in their Justification precibus aut precio ut in aliqua parte haereant But the Scripture doth represent unto us what thoughts of him and of themselves not only Sinners but Saints also have had and cannot but have upon near Discoveries and effectual Conceptions of God and his Greatness Thoughts hereof ensuing on a sense of the guilt of sin filled our first Parents with fear and shame and put them on that foolish attempt of hiding themselves from him Nor is the wisdom of their posterity one jot better under their Convictions without a discovery of the Promise That alone makes sinners wise which tenders them relief At present the Generality of men are secure and do not much question but that they shall come off well enough one way or other in the Trial they are to undergo And as such persons are altogether indifferent what Doctrine concerning Justification is taught and received so for the most part for themselves they encline unto that Declaration of it which best suits their own Reason as influenced with self-conceit and corrupt Affections The sum hereof is that what they cannot do themselves what is wanting that they may be saved be it more or less shall one way or other be made up by Christ either the use or the abuse of which perswasion is the greatest fountain of sin in the world next unto the Depravation of our nature And whatever be or may be pretended unto the contrary Persons not convinced of sin not humbled for it are in all their Ratiocinations about spiritual things under the conduct of Principles so vitiated and corrupted See Mat. 18.3 4. But when God is pleased by any means to manifest his Glory unto sinners all their presidences and contrivances do issue in dreadful horrour and distress An account of their Temper is given us Isa. 33.14 The sinners in Sion are afraid fearfulness hath surprized the Hypocrites who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire who among us shall dwell with Everlasting burnings Nor is it thus only with some peculiar sort of sinners The same will be the Thoughts of all guilty persons at some time or another For those who through sensuality security or superstition do hide themselves from the vexation of them in this world will not fail to meet with them when their Terrour shall be encreased and become remediless Our God is a consuming fire and men will one day find how vain it is to set their Briars and Thorns against him in battle array And we may see what extravagant contrivances convinced sinners will put themselves upon under any real view of the Majesty and Holiness of God Micah 6.6 7. Wherewith saith one of them shall I come before the Lord and bow my self before the high God shall I come before him with Burnt-offerings with Calves of a year old will the Lord be pleased with thousands of Rams or with ten thousands of Rivers of Oyl shall I give my first born for my transgression the fruit of my body for the sin of my Soul Neither shall I ever think them meet to be contended withall about the Doctrine of Justification who take no notice of these things but rather despise them This is the proper effect of the Conviction of sin strengthened and sharpened with the consideration of the Terrour of the Lord who is to judge concerning it And this is that which in the Papacy meeting with an Ignorance of the Righteousness of God hath produced innumerable superstitious Inventions for the appeasing of the Consciences of men who by any means fall under the Disquietments of such Convictions For they quickly see that none of the Obedience which God requireth of them as it is performed by them will justifie them before this high and holy God Wherefore they seek for shelter in contrivances about things that he hath not commanded to try if they can put a cheat upon their Consciences and find relief in Diversions Nor is it thus only with profligate sinners upon their Convictions but the best of men when they have had near and efficacious Representations of the Greatness Holiness and Glory of God have been cast into the deepest self-abasement and most serious Renunciations of all trust or confidence in themselves So the Prophet Isaiah upon his vision of the Glory of the Holy One cried out Woe is me I am undone because I am a man of unclean lips chap. 6.5 nor was he relieved but by an Evidence of the free pardon of sin ver 7. So Holy Job in all his contests with his Friends who charged him with Hypocrisie and his being a sinner guilty in a peculiar manner above other men with assured confidence and perseverance therein justified his sincerity his Faith and Trust in God against their whole charge and every parcel of it And this he doth with such a full satisfaction of his own Integrity as that not only he insists at large on his vindication but frequently appeals unto God himself as unto the Truth of his Plea For he directly pursues that counsel with great Assurance which the Apostle James so long after gives unto all Believers nor is the Doctrine of that Apostle more eminently exemplified in any one instance throughout the whole Scripture then in him For he sheweth his Faith by his works and pleads his Justification thereby As Job Justified himself and was Justified by his works so we allow it the Duty of every Believer to be His plea for Justification by works in the sense wherein it is so was the most noble that ever was in the world nor was ever any controversie managed upon a greater occasion At length this Job is called into the immediate presence of God to plead his own cause not now as stated between him and his Friends whether he were an Hypocrite or no or whether his Faith or Trust in God was sincere but as it was stated between God and him wherein he seemed to
but also the manner of our Participation of it or its Communication unto us from Faith to Faith the Faith of God in the Revelation and our Faith in the Acceptation of it being only here concerned is an eminent Revelation Righteousness of all things should rather seem to be from Works unto Works from the Work of Grace in us to the Works of Obedience done by us as the Papists affirm No saith the Apostle it is from Faith to Faith whereof afterwards This is the general Thesis the Apostle proposeth unto Confirmation and he seems therein to exclude from Justification every thing but the Righteousness of God and the Faith of Believers And to this purpose he considers all Persons that did or might pretend unto Righteousness or seek after it and all ways and means whereby they hoped to attain unto it or whereby it might most probably be obtained declaring the failing of all persons and the insufficiency of all means as unto them for the obtaining a Righteousness of our own before God And as unto Persons 1. He considers the Gentiles with all their notions of God their Practice in Religious Worship with their Conversation thereon And from the whole of what might be observed amongst them he concludes that they neither were nor could be justified before God but that they were all and that most deservedly obnoxious unto the sentence of Death And whatever men may discourse concerning the Justification and Salvation of any without the Revelation of the Righteousness of God by the Gospel from Faith to Faith it is expresly contradictory to his whole Discourse chap. 1. from ver 19. to the End 2. He considers the Jews who enjoyed the written Law and the Priviledges wherewith it was accompanied especially that of Circumcision which was the outward Seal of Gods Covenant And on many Considerations with many Arguments he excludes them also from any possibility of attaining Justification before God by any of the Priviledges they enjoyed or their own compliance therewithall chap. 2. And both sorts he excludes distinctly from this priviledge of Righteousness before God with this one Argument That both of them sinned openly against that which they took for the Rule of their Righteousness namely the Gentiles against the Light of Nature and the Jews against the Law whence it inevitably follows that none of them could attain unto the Righteousness of their own Rule But he proceeds farther unto that which is common to them all And 3. He proves the same against all sorts of Persons whether Jews or Gentiles from the consideration of the universal depravation of nature in them all and the horrible effects that necessarily ensue thereon in the Hearts and Lives of men chap. 3. So evidencing That as they all were so it could not fall out but that all must be shut up under sin and come short of Righteousness So from Persons he proceeds to Things or Means of Righteousness And 4. Because the Law was given of God immediately as the whole and only Rule of our Obedience unto him and the works of the Law are therefore all that is required of us these may be pleaded with some pretence as those whereby we may be justified Wherefore in particular he considers the Nature Use and End of the Law manifesting its utter insufficiency to be a means of our Justification before God chap. 3.19 20. 5. It may be yet objected That the Law and its works may be thus insufficient as it is obeyed by Vnbelievers in the state of Nature without the Aids of Grace administred in the Promise but with respect unto them who are Regenerate and do believe whose Faith and Works are accepted with God it may be otherwise To obviate this Objection he giveth an Instance in two of the most eminent Believers under the Old Testament namely Abraham and David declaring that all Works whatever were excluded in and from their Justification chap. 4. On these Principles and by this Gradation he peremptorily concludes That all and every one of the Sons of men as unto any thing that is in themselves or can be done by them or be wrought in them are guilty before God obnoxious unto Death shut up under sin and have their mouths so stopped as to be deprived of all pleas in their own excuse that they had no Righteousness wherewith to appear before God and that all the ways and means whence they expected it were insufficient unto that purpose Hereon he proceeds with his Enquiry how men may be delivered from this condition and come to be justified in the sight of God And in the Resolution hereof he makes no mention of any thing in themselves but only Faith whereby we receive the Attonement That whereby we are justified he saith is the Righteousness of God which is by the Faith of Christ Jesus or that we are justified freely by Grace through the Redemption that is in him chap. 3.22 23 24 25. And not content here with this answer unto the enquiry how lost convinced sinners may come to be justified before God namely That it is by the Righteousness of God revealed from Faith to Faith by Grace by the blood of Christ as he is set forth for a Propitiation He immediately proceeds unto a positive exclusion of every thing in and of our selves that might pretend unto an Interest herein as that which is inconsistent with the Righteousness of God as revealed in the Gospel and witnessed unto by the Law and the Prophets How contrary their Scheme of Divinity is unto this Design of the Apostle and his management of it who affirm that before the Law men were justified by Obedience unto the Light of Nature and some particular Revelations made unto them in things of their own especial private concernment and that after the giving of the Law they were so by Obedience unto God according to the Directions thereof as also that the Heathen might obtain the same benefit in compliance with the Dictates of Reason cannot be contradicted by any who have not a mind to be contentious Answerable unto this Declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost herein by the Apostle is the constant Tenour of the Scripture speaking to the same purpose The Grace of God the Promise of Mercy the free pardon of Sin the Blood of Christ his Obedience and the Righteousness of God in him rested in and received by Faith are every where asserted as the causes and means of our Justification in opposition unto any thing in our selves so expressed as it useth to express the best of our Obedience and the utmost of our personal Righteousness Wherever mention is made of the Duties Obedience and personal Righteousness of the best of men with respect unto their Justification they are all renounced by them and they betake themselves unto Soveraign Grace and Mercy alone Some places to this purpose may be recounted The Foundation of the whole is laid in the first Promise wherein the Destruction of
there is no Relief or Deliverance to be expected from any of those ways of sorrow or duty that he hath put himself upon 3 In this condition it is a meer Act of Soveraign Grace without any respect unto these things foregoing to call the sinner unto Believing or Faith in the Promise unto the Justification of Life This is Gods order yet so as that what precedeth his call unto Faith hath no causality thereof 3. The next thing to be enquired into is the proper Object of Justifying Faith or of true Faith in its office work and duty with respect unto our Justification And herein we must first consider what we cannot so well close withall For besides other Differences that seem to be about it which indeed are but different Explanations of the same thing for the substance there are two Opinions which are looked on as Extreams the one in an Excess and the other in Defect The first is that of the Roman Church and those who comply with them therein And this is That the Object of Justifying Faith as such is all Divine Verity all Divine Revelation whether written in the Scripture or delivered by Tradition represented unto us by the Authority of the Church In the latter part of this Description we are not at present concerned That the whole Scripture and all the parts of it and all the Truths of what sort soever they be that are contained in it are equally the Object of Faith in the discharge of its Office in our Justification is that which they maintain Hence as to the nature of it they cannot allow it to consist in any thing but an Assent of the mind For supposing the whole Scripture and all contained in it Laws Precepts Promises Threatnings Stories Prophesies and the like to be the Object of it and these not as containing in them things Good or Evil unto us but under this formal consideration as divinely revealed they cannot assign or allow any other Act of the mind to be required hereunto but Assent only And so confident are they herein namely That Faith is no more then an Assent unto divine Revelation as that Bellarmin in opposition unto Calvin who placed knowledge in the description of Justifying Faith affirms that it is better defined by Ignorance than by Knowledge This Description of Justifying Faith and its Object hath been so discussed and on such evident Grounds of Scripture and Reason rejected by Protestant Writers of all sorts as that it is needless to insist much upon it again Some things I shall observe in relation unto it whereby we may discover what is of Truth in what they assert and wherein it falls short thereof Neither shall I respect only them of the Roman Church who require no more to Faith or Believing but only a bare Assent of the mind unto divine Revelations but them also who place it wholly in such a firm Assent as produceth Obedience unto all divine Commands For as it doth both these as both these are included in it so unto the especial nature of it more is required It is as justifying neither a meer Assent nor any such firm degree of it as should produce such effects 1. All Faith whatever is an Act of that power of our Souls in general whereby we are able firmly to assent unto the Truth upon Testimony in things not evident unto us by Sense or Reason It is the Evidence of things not seen And all divine Faith is in general an Assent unto the Truth that is proposed unto us upon divine Testimony And hereby as it is commonly agreed it is distinguished from Opinion and moral certainty on the one hand and Science or Demonstration on the other 2. Wherefore in Justifying Faith there is an Assent unto all divine Revelation upon the Testimony of God the Revealer By no other Act of our mind wherein this is not included or supposed can we be justified not because it is not justifying but because it is not Faith This Assent I say is included in Justifying Faith And therefore we find it often spoken of in the Scripture the Instances whereof are gathered up by Bellarmin and others with respect unto other things and not restrained unto the especial promise of Grace in Christ which is that which they oppose But besides that in most places of that kind the proper Object of Faith as Justifying is included and referred ultimately unto though diversly expressed by some of its Causes or concomitant Adjuncts it is granted that we believe all divine Truth with that very Faith whereby we are justified so as that other things may well be ascribed unto it 3. On these Concessions we yet say two things 1 That the whole nature of Justifying Faith doth not consist meerly in an Assent of the mind be it never so firm and stedfast nor whatever Effects of Obedience it may produce 2 That in its Duty and Office in Justification whence it hath that especial denomination which alone we are in the Explanation of it doth not equally respect all divine Revelation as such but hath a peculiar Object proposed unto it in the Scripture And whereas both these will be immediately evinced in our description of the proper Object and Nature of Faith I shall at present oppose some few things unto this Description of them sufficient to manifest how aliene it is from the Truth 1. This Assent is an Act of the understanding only An Act of the mind with respect unto Truth evidenced unto it be it of what nature it will So we believe the worst of things and the most grievous unto us as well as the best and the most useful But Believing is an Act of the Heart which in the Scripture comprizeth all the Faculties of the Soul as one entire principle of moral and spiritual Duties With the Heart Man believeth unto Righteousness Rom. 10.10 And it is frequently described by an Act of the Will though it be not so alone But without an Act of the Will no man can believe as he ought See Joh. 5.40 Joh. 1.12 chap. 6.35 We come to Christ in an Act of the Will and let whosoever will come And to be willing is taken for to believe Psal. 110.3 and Unbelief is Disobedience Heb. 3.18 19. 2. All Divine Truth is equally the Object of this Assent It respects not the especial nature or use of any one Truth be it of what kind it will more than another nor can it do so since it regards only Divine Revelation Hence that Judas was the Traytor must have as great an influence into our Justification as that Christ died for our sins But how contrary this is unto the Scripture the Analogy of Faith and the Experience of all that believe needs neither Declaration nor Confirmation 3. This Assent unto all Divine Revelation may be true and sincere where there hath been no previous work of the Law nor any Conviction of sin No such thing is required thereunto nor are
33.24 Psal. 32.1 2. Rom. 3.23 24 25. Chap. 8.1 33 34. 2 Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3.13 14. Of what use the Declaration of this Process in the Justification of a Sinner may be hath been in some measure before declared And if many did seriously consider that all these things do concur and are required unto the Justification of every one that shall be saved it may be they would not have such slight thoughts of sin and the way of Deliverance from the guilt of it as they seem to have From this Consideration did the Apostle learn that Terror of the Lord which made him so earnest with men to seek after Reconciliation 2 Cor. 5.10 11. I had not so long insisted on the signification of the words in the Scripture but that a right understanding of it doth not only exclude the pretences of the Romanists about the infusion of an habit of Charity from being the formal cause of our Justification before God but may also give occasion unto some to take advice into what place or consideration they can dispose their own personal inherent Righteousness in their Justification before him CHAP. V. The Distinction of a first and second Justification Examined The Continuation of Justification whereon it doth depend BEfore we enquire immediately into the nature and causes of Justification there are some things yet previously to be considered that we may prevent all Ambiguity and misunderstanding about the Subject to be treated of I say therefore that the Evangelical Justification which alone we plead about is but one and is at once compleated About any other Justification before God but one we will not contend with any Those who can find out another may as they please ascribe what they will unto it or ascribe it unto what they will Let us therefore consider what is offered of this nature Those of the Roman Church do ground their whole Doctrine of Justification upon a distinction of a double Justification which they call the first and the second The first Justification they say is the infusion or the Communication unto us of an inherent principle or habit of Grace or Charity Hereby they say Original sin is extinguished and all habits of sin are expelled This Justification they say is by Faith the Obedience and Satisfaction of Christ being the only meritorious cause thereof Only they dispute many things about preparations for it and dispositions unto it Under those terms the Council of Trent included the Doctrine of the Schoolmen about meritum de congruo as both Hosius and Andradius confess in the defence of that Council And as they are explained they come much to one however the Council warily avoided the name of merit with respect unto this their first Justification And the use of Faith herein which with them is no more but a general assent unto Divine Revelation is to bear the principal part in these preparations So that to be Justified by Faith according unto them is to have the mind prepared by this kind of believing to receive Gratiam gratum facientem an habit of Grace expelling sin and making us acceptable unto God For upon this believing with those other Duties of Contrition and Repentance which must accompany it it is meet and congruous unto Divine Wisdom Goodness and Faithfulness to give us that Grace whereby we are justified And this according unto them is that Justification whereof the Apostle Paul treats in his Epistles from the procurement whereof he excludes all the Works of the Lavv. The second Justification is an effect or consequent hereof And the proper formal cause thereof is Good Works proceeding from this Principle of Grace and Love Hence are they the Righteousness wherewith Believers are Righteous before God Whereby they merit eternal life The Righteousness of Works they call it and suppose it taught by the Apostle James This they constantly affirm to make us justos ex injustis wherein they are followed by others For this is the way that most of them take to salve the seeming repugnancy between the Apostle Paul and James Paul they say treats of the first Justification only whence he excludes all Works for it is by Faith in the manner before described But James treats of the second Justification which is by good Works So Bellar. lib. 2. cap. 16. and lib. 4. cap. 18. And it is the express Determination of those at Trent Sess. 6. cap. 10. This distinction was coyned unto no other end but to bring in Confusion into the whole Doctrine of the Gospel Justification through the free Grace of God by Faith in the Blood of Christ is evacuated by it Sanctification is turned into a Justification and corrupted by making the fruits of it meritorious The whole nature of Evangelical Justification consisting in the gratuitous pardon of Sin and the Imputation of Righteousness as the Apostle expresly affirms and the declaration of a Believing Sinner to be Righteous thereon as the Word alone signifies is utterly defeated by it Howbeit others have embraced this distinction also though not absolutely in their sense So do the Socinians Yea it must be allowed in some sense by all that hold our inherent Righteousness to be the cause of or to have any influence into our Justification before God For they do allow of a Justification which in order of nature is antecedent unto Works truly Gracious and Evangelical But consequential unto such Works there is a Justification differing at least in degree if not in nature and kind upon the difference of its formal cause which is our new Obedience from the former But they mostly say it is only the continuation of our Justification and the encrease of it as to degrees that they intend by it And if they may be allowed to turn Sanctification into Justification and to make a progress therein or an encrease thereof either in the root or fruit to be a new Justification they may make twenty Justifications as well as two for ought I know For therein the inward man is renewed day by day 2 Cor. 4.16 and Believers go from strength to strength are changed from Glory to Glory 2 Cor. 3.18 by the Addition of one Grace unto another in their exercise 2 Pet. 1.5 6 7 8. and increasing with the encrease of God Col. 2.19 do in all things grow up into him who is the Head Ephes. 4.15 And if their Justification consist herein they are justified anew every day I shall therefore do these two things 1 Shew that this distinction is both unscriptural and irrational 2 Declare what is the continuation of our Justification and whereon it doth depend Justification by Faith in the Blood of Christ may be considered either as to the nature and essence of it or as unto its Manifestation and Declaration The Manifestation of it is twofold 1 Initial in this life 2 Solemn and compleat at the day of Judgment whereof we shall treat afterwards The Manifestation of it in this life respects either
there is no shadow nor Resemblance in any other works of God either of Creation Providence or Grace which his nature was filled withal Full of Grace and Truth And all his personal Glory Power Authority and Majesty as Mediator in his Exaltation at the right hand of God which is expressive of them all doth belong hereunto These things were peculiar unto him and all of them effects of his eternal Predestination But 2 He was not thus predestinated absolutely but also with respect unto that Grace and Glory which in him and by him was to be communicated unto the Church And he was so 1. As the Pattern and Exemplary cause of our Predestination For we are predestinated to be conformed unto the Image of the Son of God that he might be the first born among many Brethren Rom. 8.29 Hence he shall even change our vile Body that it may be fashioned like unto his Glorious Body Phil. 3.21 That when he appears we may be every way like him 1 Joh. 3.2 2. As the means and cause of Communicating all Grace and Glory unto us For we are chosen in him before the foundation of the World that we should be Holy and predestinated unto the Adoption of Children by him Ephes. 1.3 4 5. He was designed as the only procuring cause of all spiritual Blessings in Heavenly things unto those who are chosen in him Wherefore 3. He was thus fore-ordained as the Head of the Church it being the design of God to gather all things into an Head in him Ephes. 1.10 4. All the Elect of God were in his eternal purpose and design and in the everlasting Covenant between the Father and the Son committed unto him to be delivered from Sin the Law and Death and to be brought into the enjoyment of God Thine they were and thou gavest them unto me Joh. 17.6 Hence was that love of his unto them wherewith he loved them and gave himself for them antecedently unto any good or love in them Ephes. 5.25 26. Gal. 2.20 Rev. 1.5 6. 5. In the prosecution of this design of God and in the accomplishment of the everlasting Covenant in the fulness of Time he took upon him our Nature or took it into personal subsistence with himself The especial Relation that ensued hereon between him and the Elect Children the Apostle declares at large Heb. 2.10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. And I refer the Reader unto our exposition of that place 6. On these Foundations he undertook to be the Surety of the new Covenant Heb. 7.22 Jesus was made a Surety of a better Testament This alone of all the fundamental considerations of the Imputation of our sins unto Christ I shall insist upon on purpose to obviate or remove some mistakes about the Nature of his Suretiship and the respect of it unto the Covenant whereof he was the Surety And I shall borrow what I shall offer hereon from our exposition of this passage of the Apostle on the seventh Chapter of this Epistle not yet published with very little variation from what I have discoursed on that occasion without the least respect unto or prospect of any treating on our present subject The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is no where found in the Scripture but in this place only But the advantage which some would make from thence namely that it being but one place wherein the Lord Christ is called a Surety it is not of much force or much to be insisted on is both unreasonable and absurd For 1 this one place is of Divine Revelation and therefore is of the same Authority with twenty Testimonies unto the same purpose One Divine Testimony makes our Faith no less necessary nor doth one less secure it from being deceived then an hundred 2. The signification of the word is known from the use of it and what it signifies among men that no question can be made of its sense and importance though it be but once used And this on any occasion removes the Difficulty and Danger 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3 The thing it self intended is so fully declared by the Apostle in this place and so plentifully taught in other places of the Scripture as that the single use of this word may add light but can be no prejudice unto it Something may be spoken unto the signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which will give light into the thing intended by it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Vola manus the palm of the hand Thence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to deliver into the hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the same signification Hence being a Surety is interpreted by striking the hand Prov. 6.1 My Son if thou be Surety for thy friend if thou hast stricken thy hand with a Stranger So it answers the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Lxx render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prov. 6.1 Chap. 17.18 Chap. 20.19 and by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nehem. 5.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Originally signifies to mingle or a mixture of any things or persons And thence from the conjunction and mixture that is between a Surety and him for whom he is a Surety whereby they coalesce into one person as unto the ends of that Suretiship it is used for a Surety or to give Surety And he that was or did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Surety or become a Surety was to answer for him for whom he was so whatsoever befell him So is it described Gen. 43.9 in the words of Judah unto his Father Jacob concerning Benjamin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will be Surety for him of my hand shalt thou require him In undertaking to be Surety for him as unto his safety and preservation he engageth himself to answer for all that should befall him for so he adds if I bring him not unto the and set him before the let me be guilty for ever And on this ground he entreats Joseph that he might be a Servant and a Bondman in his stead that he might go free and return unto his Father Gen. 44.32 33. This is required unto such a Surety that he undergo and answer all that he for whom he is a Surety is liable unto whether in things criminal or civil so far as the Suretiship doth extend A Surety is an undertaker for another or others who thereon is justly and legally to answer what is due to them or from them Nor is the Word otherwise used See Job 17.3 Prov. 6.1 Chap. 11.15 Chap. 17.11 Chap. 20.16 Chap. 27.13 So Paul became a Surety unto Philemon for Onesimus ver 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Sponsio Expromissio Fidejussio an undertaking or giving Security for any thing or Person unto another whereon an Agreement did ensue This in some cases was by Pledges or an Earnest Isa. 36.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Give Surety Pledges Hostages for the true performance of conditions Hence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
grant what is the proper Work and Duty of a surety and who the Lord Jesus was a surety for and it is evident that nothing more proper or pertinent could be mentioned by him when he was in the Declaration of that office 2 He confesseth that by his Exposition of this suretiship of Christ as making him a surety for God he contradicteth the nature and only notion of a surety among men For such a one he acknowledgeth doth nothing but in the defect and unability of them for whom he is ingaged and doth undertake He is to pay that which they owe and to do what is to be done by them which they cannot perform And if this be not the notion of a surety in this place the Apostle makes use of a word no where else used in the whole Scripture to teach us that which it doth never signifie among men which is improbable and absurd For the sole Reason why he did make use of it was that from the nature and notion of it amongst men in others cases we may understand the signification of it what he intends by it and what under that name he ascribes unto the Lord Jesus 3 He hath no way to solve the Apostles mention of Christ being a surety in the description of his Priestly Office but by overthrowing the Nature of that Office also For to confirm this absurd notion that Christ as a Priest was a surety for God he would have us believe that the Priesthood of Christ consists in his making effectual unto us the Promises of God or his effectual communicating of the Good things promised unto us the falshood of which notion really destructive of the Priesthood of Christ I have elsewhere at large detected and confuted Wherefore seeing the Lord Christ is a surety of the Covenant as a Priest and all the sacerdotal Actings of Christ have God for their immediate Object and are performed with him on our behalf he was a surety for us also A Surety Sponsor Vas Praes Fidejussor for us the Lord Christ was by his voluntary undertaking out of his rich Grace and Love to do answer and perform all that is required on our parts that we may enjoy the Benefits of the Covenant the Grace and Glory prepared proposed and promised in it in the way and manner determined on by Divine Wisdom And this may be reduced unto two Heads 1. His answering for our Transgressions against the first Covenant 2. His purchase and procurement of the Grace of the New He was made a Curse for us that the Blessing of Abraham might come upon us Gal. 3.13 1 15. 1. He undertook as they surety of the Covenant to answer for all the sins of those who are to be and are made partakers of the Benefits of it That is to undergo the punishment due unto their sins to make atonement for them by offering himself a propitiatory sacrifice for the Expiation of their sins redeeming them by the Price of his Blood from their state of misery and bondage under the Law and the Curse of it Isa. 53.4 5 6 10 Math. 20.28 1 Tim. 2.6 1 Cor. 6.20 Rom. 3.25 26. Heb. 10.5 6 7 8. Rom. 8.2 3. 2 Cor. 5.19 20 21. Gal. 3.13 And this was absolutely necessary that the Grace and Glory prepared in the Covenant might be communicated unto us Without this undertaking of his and performance of it the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God would not permit that sinners such as had Apostatized from him despised his Authority and rebelled against him falling thereby under the sentence and curse of the Law should again be received into his Favour and made Partakers of Grace and Glory This therefore the Lord Christ took upon himself as the surety of the Covenant 2. That those who were to be taken into this Covenant should receive Grace enabling them to comply with the Terms of it fulfill its Conditions and yield the Obedience which God required therein For by the Ordination of God he was to procure and did merit and procure for them the Holy Spirit and all needful supplies of Grace to make them new Creatures and enable them to yield Obedience unto God from a new principle of spiritual Life and that faithfully unto the End So was he the surety of this better Testament But all things belonging hereunto will be handled at large in the place from whence as I said these are taken as suitable unto our present occasion But some have other notions of these things For they say that Christ by his Death and his Obedience therein whereby he offered himself a sacrifice of sweet smelling savour unto God procured for us the New Covenant or as one speaks all that we have by the Death of Christ is that thereunto we owe the Covenant of Grace For herein he did and suffered what God required and freely appointed him to do and suffer Not that the Justice of God required any such thing with respect unto their sins for whom he died and in whose stead or to bestead whom he suffered but what by a free Constitution of Divine Wisdom and Soveraignty was appointed unto him Hereon God was pleased to remit the Terms of the Old Covenant and to enter into a New Covenant with mankind upon Terms suited unto our Reason possible unto our Abilities and every way advantageous unto us For these Terms are Faith and sincere Obedience or such an Assent unto the Truth of Divine Revelations as is effectual in Obedience unto the Will of God contained in them upon the encouragement given thereunto in the Promises of Eternal Life or a future Reward made therein On the performance of these Conditions our Justification Adoption and future Glory do depend For they are that Righteousness before God whereon he pardons our sins and accepts our persons as if we were perfectly Righteous Wherefore by this procuring the New Covenant for us which they ascribe unto the death of Christ they intend the abrogation of the old Covenant or of the Law or at least such a Derogation from it that it shall no more oblige us either unto sinless Obedience or Punishment nor require a perfect Righteousness unto our Justification before God and the Constitution of a new Law of Obedience accommodated unto our present state and condition on whose observance all the Promises of the Gospel do depend Others say that in the death of Christ there was real satisfaction made unto God not to the Law or unto God according to what the Law required but unto God absolutely That is He did what God was well pleased and satisfied withall without any respect unto his Justice or the Curse of the Law And they add that hereon the whole Righteousness of Christ is imputed unto us so far as that we are made Partakers of the Benefits thereof And moreover that the way of the Communication of them unto us is by the New Covenant which by his Death the Lord Christ procured For the Conditions
which stops the mouth of all sinners and makes all the World obnoxious unto the judgment of God Chap. 3.19 Which none can do but the Law written in the heart of men at their Creation Chap. 2.14 15. That Law which if a man do the works of it he shall live in them Gal. 3.12 Rom. 10.5 and which brings all men under the Curse for sin Gal. 3.10 The Law that is established by Faith and not made void Rom. 3.31 which the Ceremonial Law is not nor the Covenant of Sinai The Law whose Righteousness is to be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.4 And the instance which the Apostle gives of Justification without the Works of that Law which he intends namely that of Abraham was some hundreds of years before the giving of the Ceremonial Law Neither yet do I say that the Ceremonial Law and the Works of it are excluded from the Intention of the Apostle For when that Law was given the Observation of it was an especial Instance of that Obedience we owed unto the first Table of the Decalogue and the exclusion of the Works thereof from our Justification in as much as the performance of them was part of that Moral Obedience which we owed unto God is exclusive of all other works also But that it is alone here intended or that Law which could never justifie any by its observation although it was observed in due manner is a fond Imagination and contradictory to the express Assertion of the Apostle And whatever is pretended to the contrary this opinion is expresly rejected by Augustine lib. de Spirit liter cap. 8. Ne quisquam putaret hic Apostolum dixisse ea lege neminem justificari quae in Sacramentis veteribus multa continet figurata praecepta unde etiam est ista circumcisio carnis continuo subjungit quam dixerit legem addit per legem Cognitio peccati And to the same purpose he speaks again Epist. 200. Non solum illa opera legis quae sunt in veteribus Sacramentis nunc revelato Testamento novo non observantur a Christianis sicut est Circumcisio praeputii Sabbati carnalis vacatio a quibusdam escis abstinentia pecorum in Sacrificiis immolatio neomenia azymum caetera hujusmodi verum etiam illud quod in lege dictum est non concupisces quod ubique Christianus nullus ambigit esse dicendum non justificat hominem nisi per fidem Jesu Christi gratiam Dei per Jesum Christum dominum nostrum 2. Some say the Apostle only excludes the perfect Works required by the Law of Innocency which is a sense diametrically opposite unto that foregoing But this best pleaseth the Socinians Paulus agit de Operibus perfectis in hoc dicto ideo enim adjecit sine operibus legis ut indicaretur loqui eum de operibus a lege requisitis sic de perpetua perfectissima divinorum praeceptorum obedientia sicut lex requirit Cum autem talem obedientiam qualem lex requirit nemo praestare possit ideo subjecit Apostolus nos justificari fide id est fiducia obedientia ea quantum quisque praestare potest quotidie quam maximum praestare studet connititur Sine operibus legis id est etsi interim perfecte totam legem sicut debebat complere nequit saith Socinus himself But 1. We have herein the whole granted of what we plead for namely that it is the moral indispensible Law of God that is intended by the Apostle and that by the works of it no man can be justified yea that all the works of it are excluded from our Justification for it is saith the Apostle without Works The works of this Law being performed according unto it will justifie them that perform them as he affirms Chap. 2.13 and the Scripture elsewhere witnesseth that he that doth them shall live in them But because this can never be done by any Sinner therefore all consideration of them is excluded from our Justification 2. It is a wild Imagination that the dispute of the Apostle is to this purpose that the perfect works of the Law will not justifie us but imperfect works which answer not the Law will do so 3. Granting the Law intended to be the Moral Law of God the Law of our Creation there is no such distinction intimated in the least by the Apostle that we are not justified by the perfect Works of it which we cannot perform but by some imperfect Works that we can perform and labour so to do Nothing is more foreign unto the design and express words of his whole discourse 4. The Evasion which they betake themselves unto that the Apostle opposeth Justification by faith unto that of works which he excludes is altogether vain in this sense For they would have this faith to be our Obedience unto the Divine Commands in that imperfect manner which we can attain unto For when the Apostle hath excluded all such Justification by the Law and the works thereof he doth not advance in opposition unto them and in their room our own Faith and Obedience but adds being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through Faith in his blood 3. Some of late among our selves and they want not them who have gone before them affirm that the Works which the Apostle excludes from Justification are only the Outward Works of the Law performed without an inward Principle of Faith fear or the Love of God Servile Works attended unto from a respect unto the Threatning of the Law are those which will not justifie us But this Opinion is not only false but impious For 1. The Apostle excludes the Works of Abraham which were not such outward servile Works as are imagined 2. The Works excluded are those which the Law requires and the Law is holy just and good But a Law that requires only outward Works without internal Love to God is neither holy just nor Good 3. The Law Condemns all such Works as are separated from the internal Principle of Faith Fear and Love for it requires that in all our Obedience we should love the Lord our God with all our hearts And the Apostle saith that we are not justified by the Works which the Law condemns but not by them which the Law commands 4. It is highly reflexive on the honour of God that he unto whose Divine Prerogative it belongs to know the Hearts of men alone and therefore regards them alone in all the duties of their Obedience should give a Law requiring outward servile Works only for if the Law intended require more then are not those the only Works excluded 4. Some say in general it is the Jewish Law that is intended and think thereby to cast off the whole Difficulty But if by the Jewish Law they intend only the Ceremonial Law or the Law absolutely as
that the Apostle Disputes about the exclusion of such Works from our Justification as no man in his Wits would think to have any place therein 9 The Reason why no no man can be justified by the Law is because no man can yield perfect Obedience thereunto For by perfect Obedience the Law will justifie Rom. 2.13 Chap. 10.5 Wherefore all Works are excluded that are not absolutely perfect But this the best Works of Believers are not as we have proved before 10. If there be a Reserve for the Works of Believers performed by the Aid of Grace in our Justification it is that either they may be concauses thereof or be indispensibly subservient unto those things that are so That they are concauses of our Justification is not absolutely affirmed Neither can it be said that they are necessarily subservient unto them that are so They are not so unto the efficient Cause thereof which is the Grace and favour of God alone Rom. 3.24 25. Chap. 4.16 Eph. 2.8 9. Rev. 1.6 Nor are they so unto the Meritorious Cause of it which is Christ alone Acts 13 38. Chap. 26.18 1 Cor. 1.30 2 Cor. 5.18 19 20 21. Nor unto the Material Cause of it which is the Righteousness of Christ alone Rom. 10.3 4. Nor are they so unto Faith in what place soever it be stated For not only is Faith only mentioned wherever we are taught the way how the Righteousness of Christ is derived and communicated unto us without any intimation of the conjunction of Works with it but also as unto our Justification they are placed in Opposition and Contradiction one to the other Rom. 3.28 And sundry other things are pleadable unto the same purpose 7. Some affirm that the Apostle excludes all Works from our first Justification but not from the second or as some speak the continuation of our Justification But we have before examined these Distinctions and found them groundless Evident it is therefore that men put themselves into an uncertain slippery station where they know not what to fix upon nor wherein to find any such appearance of Truth as to give them Countenance in denying the plain and frequently repeated Assertion of the Apostle Wherefore in the Confirmation of the present Argument I shall more particularly enquire into what it is that the Apostle intends by the Law and Works whereof he treats For as unto our Justification whatever they are they are absolutely and universally opposed unto Grace Faith the Righteousness of God and the Blood of Christ as those which are altogether inconsistent with them Neither can this be denied or questioned by any seeing it is the plain design of the Apostle to evince that inconsistency 1. Wherefore in general it is evident that the Apostle by the Law and the Works thereof intended what the Jews with whom he had to do did understand by the Law and their own whole Obedience thereunto I suppose this cannot be denied For without a Concession of it there is nothing proved against them nor are they in any thing instructed by him Suppose those Terms aequivocal and to be taken in one sense by him and by them in another and nothing can be rightly concluded from what is spoken of them Wherefore the meaning of these Terms the Law and Works the Apostle takes for granted as very well known and agreed on between himself and those with whom he had to do 2. The Jews by the Law intended what the Scriptures of the Old Testament meant by that Expression For they are no where blamed for any false Notion concerning the Law or that they esteemed any thing to be so but what was so indeed and what was so called in the Scripture Their present Oral Law was not yet hatched though the Pharisees were brooding of it 3. The Law under the Old Testament doth immediately refer unto the Law given at Mount Sinai nor is there any distinct mention of it before This is commonly called the Law absolutely but most frequently the Law of God the Law of the Lord and sometimes the Law of Moses because of his especial Ministry in the giving of it Remember the Law of Moses my servant which I commanded unto him Mal. 4.4 And this the Jews intended by the Law 4. Of the Law so given at Horeb there was a Distribution into three Parts 1. There was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deut. 4.13 The ten Words So also Chap. 10.4 that is the ten Commandments written in two Tables of Stone This Part of the Law was first given was the Foundation of the whole and contained that perfect Obedience which was required of Mankind by the Law of Creation and was now received into the Church with the highest Attestations of its indispensible Obligation unto Obedience or Punishment 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the LXX render by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is jura Rites or Statutes but the Latine from thence Justificationes Justifications which hath given great Occasion of Mistake in many both Ancient and Modern Divines We call it the Ceremonial Law The Apostle terms this Part of the Law distinctly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes. 2.15 The Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances that is consisting in a Multitude of Arbitrary Commands 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we commonly call the Judicial Law This Distribution of the Law shuts up the Old Testament as it is used in places innumerable before only the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ten Words is expressed by the general Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law Mal. 4.4 5. These being the Parts of the Law given unto the Church in Sinai the the whole of it is constantly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law that is the Instruction as the Word signifies that God gave unto the Church in the Rule of Obedience which he prescribed unto it This is the Constant signification of that Word in Scripture where it is taken absolutely and thereon doth not signifie precisely the Law as given at Horeb but comprehends with it all the Revelations that God made under the Old Testament in the Explanation and Confirmation of that Law in Rules Motives Directions and Enforcements of Obedience 6. Wherefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law is the whole Rule of Obedience which God gave to the Church under the Old Testament with all the Efficacy wherewith it was accompanied by the Ordinances of God including in it all the Promises and Threatnings that might be Motives unto the Obedience that God did require This is that which God and the Church called the Law under the Old Testament and which the Jews so called with whom our Apostle had to do That which we call the Moral Law was the Foundation of the whole and those Parts of it which we call the Judicial and Ceremonial Law were peculiar Instances of the Obedience which the Church under the Old Testament was obliged unto in the especial Politie and divine Worship which at that season
application of them unto all that do believe which may be justly pleaded unto the same purpose with those passages of the Context which we have insisted on But if every Testimony should be pleaded which the Holy Ghost hath given unto this Truth there would be no end of writing One thing more I shall observe and put an end unto our discourse on this Chapter Vers. 6 7 8. The Apostle pursues his Argument to prove the freedom of our Justification by Faith without respect unto Works through the Imputation of Righteousness in the instance of pardon of Sin which essentially belongeth thereunto And this he doth by the Testimony of the Psalmist who placeth the blessedness of a man in the Remission of Sins His design is not thereby to declare the full nature of Justification which he had done before but only to prove the freedom of it from any respect unto Works in the instance of that essential part of it Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth Righteousness without Works which was the only thing he designed to prove by this Testimony saying Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven He describes their blessedness by it not that their whole blessedness doth consist therein but this concurs unto it wherein no respect can possibly be had unto any Works whatever And he may justly from hence describe the blessedness of a man in that the Imputation of Righteousness and the Non-Tmputation of Sin both which the Apostle mentioneth distinctly wherein his whole blessedness as unto justification doth consist are inseparable And because Remission of Sin is the first part of Justification and the principal part of it and hath the Imputation of Righteousness always accompanying it the blessedness of a man may be well described thereby Yea whereas all Spiritual Blessings go together in Christ Eph. 1.3 A mans blessedness may be described by any of them But yet the Imputation of Righteousness and the Remission of Sin are not the same no more than Righteousness imputed and Sin remitted are the same Nor doth the Apostle propose them as the same but mentioneth them distinctly both being equally necessary unto our compleat Justification as hath been proved Chap. 5. Vers. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. Wherefore as by one man Sin entred into the world and death by Sin and so death passed upon all men for that all have sinned For until the Law Sin was in the world But Sin is not imputed when there is no Law Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression who is the figure of him that was to come But not as the offence so also is the free gift For if through the offence of one many be dead much more the grace of God and the gift by Grace which is by one man Jesus Christ hath abounded unto many And not as it was by one that sinned so is the gift For the Judgment was by one to condemnation but the free gift is of many offences unto Justification For if by one mans offence death reigned by one much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the gift of Righteousness shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ. Therefore as by the offence of one Judgment came upon all men to condemnation Even so by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto Justification of life For as by one mans disobedience many were made Sinners So by the obedience of one shall many be made Righteous Moreover the Law entred that the offence might abound But where Sin abounded Grace did much more abound That as Sin hath reigned unto death even so might Grace reign through Righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. The Apostle Chap. 3.27 affirms That in this matter of Justification all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or boasting is excluded But here in the Verse foregoing he grants a boasting or a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And not only so but we also glory in God he excludes boasting in our selves because there is nothing in us to procure or promote our own Justification He allows it us in God because of the eminency and excellency of the way and means of our Justification which in his Grace he hath provided And the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or boasting in God here allowed us hath a peculiar respect unto what the Apostle had in prospect further to discourse of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not only so includes what he had principally treated of before concerning our Justification so far as it consists in the pardon of sin For although he doth suppose yea and mention the imputation of Righteousness also unto us yet principally he declares our Justification by the pardon of sin and our freedom from condemnation whereby all boasting in our selves is excluded But here he designs a further progress as unto that whereon our glorying in God on a right and title freely given us unto eternal life doth depend And this is the Imputation of the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ unto the Justification of life or the reign of Grace through Righteousness unto eternal Life Great complaints have been made by some concerning the obscurity of the discourse of the Apostle in this place by reason of sundry Ellipses Antapodota Hyperbata and other Figures of Speech which either are or are feigned to be therein Howbeit I cannot but think that if Men acquainted with the common principles of Christian Religion and sensible in themselves of the nature and guilt of our original apostasie from God would without prejudice read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this place of the Scripture they will grant that the design of the Apostle is to prove that as the sin of Adam was imputed unto all Men unto condemnation so the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ is imputed unto all that believe unto the Justification of life The sum of it is given by Theodoret Dial. 3. Vide quomodo quae Christi sunt cum iis quae sunt Adami conferantur cum morbo medicina cum vulnere emplastrum cum Peccato justitia cum execratione benedictio cum condemnatione remissio cum transgressione obedientia cum morte vita cum inferis regnum Christus cum Adam homo cum homine The differences that are among Interpreters about the Exposition of these words relate unto the use of some Particles Prepositions and the dependance of one passage upon another on none of which the confirmation of the truth pleaded for doth depend But the plain design of the Apostle and his express Propositions are such as if Men could but acquiesce in them might put an end unto this controversie Socinus acknowledgeth that this place of Scripture doth give as he speaks the greatest occasion unto our opinion in this matter For he cannot deny but at least a great appearance of what we
that Death and Condemnation whereunto we were liable by the Sin of Adam but the Pardon of many Offences that is of all our Personal Sins and a right unto life eternal through the Grace of God for we are justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Christ Jesus And these things are thus plainly and fully delivered by the Apostle unto whose sense and expressions also so far as may be it is our Duty to accommodate ours What is offered in opposition hereunto is so made up of Exceptions and Evasions perplexed Disputes and leadeth us so far off from the plain words of the Scripture that the Conscience of a convinced Sinner knows not what to fix upon to give it rest and saisfaction nor what it is that is to be believed unto Justification Piscator in his Scholia on this Chapter and elsewhere insisteth much on a specious Argument against the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto our Justification But it proceedeth evidently on an open mistake and false supposition as well as it is contradictory unto the plain words of the Text. It is true which he observes and proves that our Redemption Reconciliation Pardon of Sin and Justifiation are often ascribed unto the Death and Blood of Christ in a signal manner The reasons of it have partly been intimated before and a further account of them shall be given immediately But it doth not thence follow that the Obedience of his life wherein he fulfilled the whole Law being made under it for us is excluded from any causality therein or is not imputed unto us But in opposition thereunto he thus argueth Si obedientia vitae Christi nobis ad justitiam imputaretur non fuit opus Christum pro nobis mori mori enim necesse fuit pro nobis injustis 1 Pet. 3.18 Quod si ergo justi effecti sumus per vitam illius causa nulla relicta fuit cur pro nobis moreretur quia justitia Dei non patitur ut puniat justos At punivit nos in Christo seu quod idem valet punivit Christum pro nobis loco nostri posteaquam ille sancte vixisset ut certum est è Scriptura Ergo non sumus justi effecti per sanctam vitam Christi Item Christus mortuus est ut justitiam illam Dei nobis acquireret 2 Cor. 5.21 Non igitur illam acquisiverat ante mortem But this whole Argument I say proceeds upon an evident mistake For it supposeth such an order of things as that the Obedience of Christ or his Righteousness in fulfilling the Law is first imputed unto us and then the Righteousness of his death is afterwards to take place or to be imputed unto us which on that supposition he says would be of no use But no such order or Divine constitution is pleaded or pretended in our Justification It is true the life of Christ and his Obedience unto the Law did precede his Sufferings and undergoing the curse thereof neither could it otherwise be For this order of these things between themselves was made necessary from the Law of Nature But it doth not thence follow that it must be observed in the Imputation or Application of them unto us For this is an effect of Soveraign Wisdom and Grace not respecting the natural order of Christs Obedience and Suffering but the moral order of the things whereunto they are appointed And although we need not assert nor do I so do different acts of the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto the Justification of life or a right and title unto life eternal and of the suffering of Christ unto the pardon of our Sins and freedom from condemnation but by both we have both according unto the Ordinance of God that Christ may be all in all Yet as unto the effects themselves in the Method of Gods bringing Sinners unto the Justification of life the application of the Death of Christ unto them unto the pardon of Sin and freedom from Condemnation is in order of Nature and in the exercise of Faith antecedent unto the application of his Obedience unto us for a right and title unto life eternal The state of the person to be justified is a state of Sin and wrath wherein he is liable unto Death and Condemnation This is that which a convinced Sinner is sensible of and which alone in the first place he seeks for deliverance from What shall we do to be saved This in the first place is presented unto him in the Doctrine and Promise of the Gospel which is the Rule and Instrument of its application And this is the death of Christ. Without this no actual Righteousness imputed unto him not the Obedience of Christ himself will give him relief For he is sensible that he hath sinned and thereby come short of the glory of God and under the Sentence condemnatory of the Law Until he receives a deliverance from hence it to no purpose to propose that unto him which should give him right unto life eternal But upon a supposition hereof he is no less concern'd in what shall yet further give him title thereunto that he may reign in life through Righteousness Herein I say in its order Conscience is no less concern'd than in deliverance from Condemnation And this order is expressed in the declaration of the Fruit and Effects of the Mediation of Christ. Dan. 9.24 To make reconciliation for iniquity and to bring in everlasting Righteousness Neither is there any force in the Objection against it that actually the Obedience of Christ did precede his Suffering For the Method of their application is not prescribed thereby And the state of Sinners to be justified with the nature of their Justification requires it should be otherwise as God also hath ordained But because the Obedience and Sufferings of Christ were concomitant from first to last both equally belonging unto his state of Exinanition and cannot in any act or instance be separated but only in notion or imagination seeing he suffered in all his Obedience and obeyed in all his Suffering Heb. 5.8 And neither part of our Justification in freedom from Condemnation and right unto life eternal can be supposed to be or exist without the other according unto the Ordinance and constitution of God the whole effect is jointly to be ascribed unto the whole Mediation of Christ so far as he acted towards God in our behalf wherein he fulfilled the whole Law both as to the penalty exacted of Sinners and the Righteousness it requires unto life as an eternl reward And there are many reasons why our Justification is in the Scripture by the way of Eminency ascribed unto the death and blood-shedding of Christ. For 1. The Grace and Love of God the principal efficient cause of our Justification are therein made most eminent and conspicuous For this is most frequently in the Scripture proposed unto us as the highest instance and undeniable demonstration of Divine Love
things we may observe in the Apostles assignation of the causes of our deliverance from a state of sin and acceptance with God 1. That he assigns the whole of this work absolutely unto Grace Love and Mercy and that with an exclusion of the consideration of any thing on our part as we shall see immediately Ver. 5 8. 2. He magnifies this Grace in a marvellous manner For 1. He expresseth it by all names and titles whereby it is signified as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mercy Love Grace and Kindness For he would have us to look only unto Grace herein 2. He ascribes such Adjuncts and gives such Epithets unto that Divine Mercy and Grace which is the sole cause of our deliverance in and by Jesus Christ as render it singular and herein solely to be adored 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rich in Mercy Great Love wherewith he loved us The exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness Ver. 4 5 6 7. It cannot reasonably be denied but that the Apostle doth design deeply to affect the Mind and Heart of Believers with a sense of the Grace and Love of God in Christ as the only cause of their Justification before God I think no words can express those conceptions of the Mind which this Representation of Grace doth suggest Whether they think it any part of their duty to be like minded and comply with the Apostle in this design who scarce ever mention the Grace of God unless it be in a way of diminution from its efficacy and unto whom such Ascriptions unto it as are here made by him are a matter of contempt is not hard to judge But it will be said these are good words indeed but they are only general there is nothing of Argument in all this adoring of the Grace of God in the work of our Salvation It may be so it seems to many But yet to speak plainly there is to me more Argument in this one consideration namely of the Ascription made in this cause unto the Grace of God in this place then in an hundred Sophisms suited neither unto the expressions of the Scripture nor the experience of them that do believe He that is possessed with a due apprehension of the Grace of God as here represented and under a sense that it was therein the design of the Holy Ghost to render it glorious and alone to be trusted unto will not easily be induced to concern himself in those additional supplies unto it from our own works and obedience which some would suggest unto him But we may yet look further into the words The case which the Apostle states the inquiry which he hath in hand whereon he determineth as to the Truth wherein he instructs the Ephesians and in them the whole Church of God is How a lost condemned sinner may come to be accepted with God and thereon saved And this is the sole inquiry wherein we are or intend in this controversie to be concerned Further we will not proceed either upon the invitation or provocation of any Concerning this his position and determination is That we are saved by Grace This first he occasionally interposeth in his enumeration of the benefits we receive by Christ Ver. 5. But not content therewith he again directly asserts it Ver. 8. in the same words for he seems to have considered how slow Men would be in the admittance of this Truth which at once deprives them of all boastings in themselves What it is that he intends by our being saved must be inquired into It would not be prejudicial unto but rather advance the truth we plead for if by our being saved eternal Salvation were intended But that cannot be the sense of it in this place otherwise than as that Salvation is included in the causes of it which are effectual in this life Nor do I think that in that expression By Grace ye are saved our Justification only is intended although it be so principally Conversion unto God and Sanctification are also included therein as is evident from Ver. 5 6. And they are no less of sovereign Grace than is our Justification it self But the Apostle speaks of what the Ephesians being now Believers and by vertue of their being so were made partakers of in this life This is manifest in the whole context For having in the beginning of the Chapter described their condition what it was in common with all the Posterity of Adam by nature Ver. 1 2 3. He moreover declares their condition in particular in opposition to that of the Jews as they were Gentiles Idolaters Atheists Ver. 11 12. Their present delivery by Jesus Christ from this whole miserable state and condition that which they were under in common with all mankind and that which was a peculiar aggravation of its misery in themselves is that which he intends by their being saved That which was principally designed in the description of this state is That therein and thereby they were liable unto the wrath of God guilty before him and obnoxious unto his judgment This he expresseth in the declaration of it Ver. 3. Answerable unto that method and those grounds he every where proceeds on in declaring the Doctrine of Justification Rom. 3.19 20 21 22 23 24. Tit. 3.3 4 5. From this state they had deliverance by Faith in Christ Jesus For unto as many as received him power is given to be the sons of God Joh. 1.12 He that believeth on him is not condemned that is he is saved in the sense of the Apostle in this place Joh. 3.15 He that believeth on the Son of God hath everlasting life is saved but he that believeth not the wrath of God abideth on him Ver. 36. And in this sense saved and Salvation are frequently used in the Scripture Besides he gives us so full a description of the Salvation which he intends from Ver. 13. unto the end of the Chapter that there can be no doubt of it It is our being made nigh by the Blood of Christ Ver. 13. Our Peace with God by his death Ver. 14 15. Our Reconciliation by the Blood of the Cross Ver. 16. Our access unto God and all Spiritual priviledges thereon depending Ver. 18 19 20 c. Wherefore the inquiry of the Apostle and his determination thereon is concerning the causes of our Justification before God This he declares and fixeth both Positively and Negatively Positively 1. In the supream moving Cause on the part of God This is that free sovereign Grace and Love of his which he illustrates by its adjuncts and properties before mentioned 2. In the meritorious procuring cause of it which is Jesus Christ in the Work of his Mediation as the Ordinance of God for the rendring this Grace effectual unto his Glory Ver. 7 13 16. 3. In the only means or instrumental cause on our part which is Faith By Grace are ye saved through Faith Ver. 8. And lest he should seem to derogate any thing from the Grace
Protestant Divines that it is altogether needless to insist again upon them unless they had received some new inforcement which of late they have not done That which for the most part we have now to do withal are rather Sophistiacal cavils from supposed absurd consequences then real Theological arguments And some of those who would walk with most wariness between the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and Justification by our own works either are in such a slippery place that they seem sometimes to be on the one side sometimes on the other or else to express themselves with so much caution as it is very difficult to apprehend their minds I shall not therefore for the future dare to say that this or that is any mans opinion though it appear unto me so to be as clear and evident as words can express it but that this or that opinion let it be maintained by whom it will I approve or disapprove this I shall dare to say And I will say also that the declination that hath been from the common Doctrine of Justification before God on the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ doth daily proceed towards a direct assertion of justification by works Nor indeed hath it where to rest until it comes unto that bottome And this is more clearly seen in the objections which they make against the truth then in what they plead in defence of their own opinions For herein they speak as yet warily and with a pretence of accuracy in avoiding extremes But in the other or their objections they make use of none but what are easily resolved into a supposition of Justification by Works in the grossest sense of it To insist on all particulars were endless and as was said most of those of any importance have already occasionally been spoken unto There are therefore only two things which are generally pleaded by all sorts of persons Papists Socinians and others with whom here we have to do that I shall take notice of The first and fountain of all other is that the Doctrine of Justification by the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ doth render our personal Righteousness needless and overthrows all necessity of an Holy life The other is that the Apostle James in his Epistle doth plainly ascribe our Justification unto Works and what he affirms there is inconsistent with that sense of those many other Testimonies of Scripture which we plead for For the first of these although those who oppose the truth we contend for do proceed on various different and contradictory principles among themselves as to what they exalt in opposition unto it yet do they all agree in a vehement urging of it For those of the Church of Rome who renewed this charge invented of old by others it must be acknowledged by all sober men that as managed by them it is an open calumny For the wisest of them and those of whom it is hard to conceive but that they knew the contrary as Bellarmine Vasquez Suarez do openly aver that Protestant Writers deny all inherent Righteousness Bellarmine excepts Bucer and Chemnitius that they maintain that men may be saved although they live in all manner of sin that there is no more required of them but that they believe that their sins are forgiven and that whilest they do so although they give themselves up unto the most sensual Vices and Abominations they may be assured of their Salvation Tantum Relligio potuit suadere malorum So will men out of a perverse zeal to promote their own interest in the Religion they profess wilfully give up themselves unto the worst of evils such as false accusation and open calumny and of no other nature are these assertions which none of the Writings or Preachings of those who are so charged did ever give the least countenance unto Whether the forging and promulgation of such impudent falshoods be an expedient to obtain Justification by Works in the sight of God they who continue in them had best to consider For my part I say again as I suppose I have said already that it is all one to me what Religion men are of who can justifie themselves in such courses and proceedings And for those among our selves who are pleased to make use of this Objection they either know what the Doctrine is which they would oppose or they do not If they do not the wise man tells them that he who answereth a matter before he hear it it is folly and shame unto him If they do understand it it is evident that they use not sincerity but artifices and false pretenses for advantage in their handling of Sacred things which is scandalous to Religion Socinus fiercely manageth this charge against the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches De servat par 4. cap. 1. And he made it the foundation whereon and the reason why he opposeth the Doctrine of the imputation of the satisfaction of Christ if any such satisfaction should be allowed which yet he peremptorily denies And he hath written a Treatise unto the same purpose defended by Schlictingius against Meisnerus And he takes the same honest course herein that others did before him For he chargeth it on the Divines of the Protestant Churches that they taught that God justifieth the ungodly not only those that are so and whilest they are so but although they continue so that they required no inherent Righteousness or Holiness in any nor could do so on their principles seeing the imputed Righteousness of Christ is sufficient for them although they live in sin are not washed nor cleansed nor do give up themselves unto the wayes of Duty and Obedience unto God whereby he may be pleased and so bring in Libertinisme and Antinomianisme into the Church And he thinks it a sufficient confutation of this Doctrine to alledge against it that neither Fornicators nor Idolaters nor Adulterers c. shall inherit the Kingdom of God And these are some of those ways which have rendred the management of controversies in Religion scandalous and abominable such as no wise or good man will meddle withal unless compelled for the necessary service of the Church For these things are openly false and made use of with a shameful dishonesty to promote a corrupt design and end When I find men at this kind of work I have very little concernment in what they say afterwards be it true or false Their rule and measure is what serves their own end or what may promote the design and interest wherein they are ingaged be it right or wrong And as for this man there is not any Article in Religion the principal whereof are rejected by him on whose account he doth with more confidence adjudge us unto eternal ruine than he doth on this of the satisfaction of Christ and the imputation of it unto them that do believe So much darkness is their remaining on the minds of the most of men so many inveterate prejudices on various
whilest we know but in part and Prophesie but in part yet I must say that in my Judgment the usual solution of this appearing difficulty securing the Doctrine of Justification by Faith through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ from any concernment or contradiction in the Discourse of St. James Chap. 2. v. 14. to the end hath not been in the least impeached not hath had any new difficulty put upon it in some late Discourses to that purpose I should therefore utterly forbear to speak any thing hereof but that I suppose it will be expected in a Discourse of this nature and do hope that I also may contribute some light unto the clearing and vindication of the Truth To this purpose it may be observed That 1. It is taken for granted on all hands that there is no real repugnancy or contradiction between what is delivered by these two Apostles For if that were so the writings of one of them must be Pseudepigrapha or falsly ascribed unto them whose names they bear and uncanonical as the Authority of the Epistle of James hath been by some both of old and of late highly but rashly questioned Wherefore their words are certainly capable of a just Reconciliation That we cannot any of us attain thereunto or that we do not agree therein is from the darkness of our own minds the weakness of our understandings and with too many from the power of prejudices 2. It is taken also for granted on all other occasions that when there is an appearance of Repugnancy or contradiction in any places of Scripture if some or any of them do treat directly designedly and largely about the matter concerning which there is a seeming repugnancy or contradiction and others or any other speak of the same things only Obiter occasionally transiently in order unto other ends the truth is to be learned stated and fixed from the former places Or the interpretation of those places where any truth is mentioned only occasionally with reference unto other things or ends is as unto that truth to be taken from and accommodated unto those other places wherein it is the design and purpose of the Holy Penman to declare it for its own sake and to guide the Faith of the Church therein And there is not a more rational and natural Rule of the interpretation of Scripture among all them which are by common consent agreed upon 3. According unto this Rule it is unquestionable that the Doctrine of Justification before God is to be learned from the writings of the Apostle Paul and from them is light to be taken into all other places of Scripture where it is occasionally mentioned Especially it is so considering how exactly this Doctrine represents the whole Scope of the Scripture and is witnessed unto by particular Testimonies occasionally given unto the same truth without number For it must be acknowledged that he wrote of this subject of our Justification before God on purpose to declare it for its own sake and its use in the Church and that he doth it fully largely and frequently in a constant Harmony of expressions And he owns those Reasons that pressed him unto fulness and accuracy herein 1 The importance of the Doctrine it self This he declares to be such as that thereon our Salvation doth immediately depend and that it was the hinge whereon the whole Doctrine of the Gospel did turn Articulus stantis aut cadentis-Ecelesiae Gal. 2.16 21. Chap. 5.4 5. 2 The plausible and dangerous opposition that was then made unto it This was so managed and that with such specious pretences as that very many were prevailed on and turned from the truth by it as it was with the Galatians and many detained from the Faith of the Gospel out of a dislike unto it Rom. 10.3 4. What care and diligence this requireth in the Declaration of any truth is sufficiently known unto them who are acquainted with these things What zeal care and circumspection it stirred up the Apostle unto is manifest in all his writings 3 The Abuse which the corrupt nature of man is apt to put upon this Doctrine of Grace and which some did actually pervert it unto This also himself takes notice of and througly vindicates it from giving the least countenance unto such wrestings and impositions Certainly never was there a greater necessity incumbent on any person fully and plainly to teach and declare a Doctrine of truth than was on him at that time in his circumstances considering the place and duty that he was called unto And no reason can be imagined why we should not principally and in the first place learn the truth herein from his declaration and vindication of it if withal we do indeed believe that he was Divinely inspired and Divinely guided to reveal the truth for the information of the Church As unto what is delivered by the Apostle James so far as our Justification is included therein things are quite otherwise He doth not undertake to declare the Doctrine of our Justification before God but having another design in hand as we shall see immediately he vindicates it from the abuse that some in those days had put it unto as other Doctrines of the Grace of God which they turn'd into licentiousness Wherefore it is from the writings of the Apostle Paul that we are principally to learn the truth in this matter and unto what is by him plainly declared is the interpretation of other places to be accommodated 4. Some of late are not of this mind They contend earnestly that Paul is to be interpreted by James and not on the contrary And unto this end they tell us that the Writings of Paul are obscure that sundry of the antients take notice thereof that many take occasion of errors from them with sundry things of an alike nature indeed scandalous to Christian Religion And that James writing after him is presumed to give an interpretation unto his sayings which are therefore to be expounded and understood according unto that interpretation Ans. 1 As to the vindication of the Writings of St. Paul which begin now to be frequently reflected on with much severity which is one effect of the secret prevalency of the Atheism of these days as there is no need of it so it is designed for a more proper place Only I know not how any person that can pretend the least acquaintance with Antiquity can plead a passage out of Irenaeus wherein he was evidently himself mistaken or a rash word of Origen or the like in derogation from the perspicuity of the Writings of this Apostle when they cannot but know how easie it were to overwhelm them with Testimonies unto the contrary from all the famous Writers of the Church in several ages And as for instance in one Chrysostome in forty places gives an account why some men understood not his Writings which in themselves were so gloriously evident and perspicuous so for their satisfaction I shall refer them only