it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
Abraham as impatient of delay that God had not yet given him a seed according to his promise is bold to poure out his griefe before God that the Lord would hasten to accomplish his desire Calvin QVEST. IV. Of the divers acceptions of the word Meshek THe steward of my house according to divers interpretations of the word Mesech there are as many expositions 1. The Septuagint take it for a proper name as though Mesech should bee the name of Eleazers mother for so they read the sonne of Mesech borne in my house 2. Some derive it of the word shakah that signifieth to beare or minister the cup and so read the son of my cup-bearer or butler Aquila 3. Some of the word shakak that is to run up and downe and so Eleazer should bee as the steward or bay liffe that run up and downe the house Oleaster Mercer 4. Meshek signifieth an overseer so some read that he was the steward or overseer Chald. or the sonne of the steward Theodoret. Hierome 5. Meshek also signifieth a leaving or dereliction and so Eleazer is called the sonne of the leavings not for that hee only was left of Abrahams ancient familie as Cajetane or because he had left to him the care of his house as Vatablus But that he purposed to leave unto him the inheritance of all Innius And this seemeth to bee the most proper sense QVEST. V. Wherefore Eleazer is called of Damascus ELeazar of Damascus 1. This Damesâ—k or Damascus was not the name of his mother as some think ex Calvin 2. Neither was it his proper name as Hierome and the Septu translate of whom the City Damascus should be named Tostat for Damascus is held to have beene builded by Hus the sonne of Aram and to be a name more ancient than Abraham Genes 14.15 3. But Eleazer by his father was of that countrey though borne in Abrahams house and therefore hee is called Damascenus of Damascus sic Chald. Iun. Calv. QVEST. VI. Whether Abraham saw the starres only in vision 5. HE brought him forth and said looke up now to heaven c. 1. This was not done in vision only as Cajetane thinketh but as the words import Abraham having spent a good part of the day in prayer within now is bid to goe forth in the evening and is shewed the starres for his confirmation Iun. 2. Neither is this an allegory as Philo applieth it who saith that the soule of a wise man should bee like unto heaven But it is an history so verily done as it is rehearsed QVEST. VII What seed of Abraham is understood carnall or spirituall SO shall thy seed be 1. We neither thinke with Augustine that this is meant of Abrahams spirituall seed only magis videtur promissa posteritas falicitate sublimis that posterity seemeth to bee promised which is blessed in heaven 2. Neither with Lyranus that there are here two literall senses the one of his carnall seed the other of his spirituall for of one place there can be but one literall sense 3. Neither with Pererius that the literall sense concerneth Abrahams carnall seed the mysticall his spirituall 4. But these words have one whole and generall sense which comprehendeÌ„th both Abrahams kindreds for that is the proper and literall sense which is intended by the spirit now in these words the spirit intendeth both the carnall off-spring of Abraham as Moses expoundeth the Lord God hath made thee as the starres of heaven in multitude Deut. 10.22 as also the spirituall seed of the faithfull as Saint Paul interpreteth so shall thy seed be Rom. 4.17 and hence concludeth that Abraham is the father of us all that is of the faithfull QVEST. VIII Wherein the Israelites represented the people of God YEt we deny not but that in other places spirituall things are implyed by temporall by way of mystery and allegory as the Apostle saith the law had a shadow of good things to come as Abrahams carnall generation did divers wayes represent the spirituall 1. In their number 2. In their afflictions 3. In their passage thorow the red sea figuring baptisme 4. In being fed with manna a type of Gods word 5. In drinking of the water out of the rocke a figure of Christ. 6. In looking toward the brasen serpent 7. In their pilgrimage in the desert a lively patterne of our pilgrimage in this life 8. In their entrance into the land of Canaan under Iosua which signifieth our conducting by Christ to the heavenly Canaan QVEST. IX Wherein Abrahams faith consisted Vers. 6. ABraham beleeved the Lord c. 1. Hilarie noteth that this was singular in Abrahams faith because he doubted not of his omnipotency 2. Ambrose reputatum est illi ad justitiam quâ—a rationem non quaesivit this was counted to him for righteousnesse because he beleeved and required no reason 3. But there was more in Abrahams faith than onely to beleeve God and his promises to bee true for hee did trust in God Cajetan as the word bajehovah signifieth he beleeved in Iehovah Mercer and embraced God as his father Calvin 4. Abraham therefore did not count this to himselfe as a just thing to beleeve God as some interpret neither is it to be referred to Abraham that he counted it a just thing in God thus to recompence him as R. Levi and Ramban corruptly expound but God counted it to him or as the Septuag it was counted unto him for true justice before God because he stedfastly beleeved Gods promises and thus expoundeth Elias Orientall confuting Ramban QVEST. X. Why faith was imputed for righteousnesse to Abraham IT was counted to him for righteousnesse Not that Abraham beleeved not before or that his former beleefe was not also counted to him for righteousnesse But these reasons may bee alleaged why in this place first mention is made of the imputation of righteousnesse 1. Because in this place first one is promised to come out of Abrahams owne bowels hee considered not his owne body which was now dead as the Apostle saith nor the deadnesse of Saraes wombe Rom. 4.19 2. Because although Abraham had faith before yet it waxed stronger and stronger hee was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4.20 3. At this time first Abraham made answer unto God and so it followeth in the same place he gave glory to God Rom. 4.20 4. The scripture doth not thus testifie of Abraham in the beginning of his conversion but even at that time when Abraham was full of good workes even then notwithstanding his righteousnesse should not be imputed to his workes but to faith Calvin neither this testimony of Abrahams righteousnesse is differred till he had received circumcision left he might have beene thought thereby to have beene justified Thom. Anglic. in cap. 15. Genes and therefore the Apostle of purpose observeth that righteousnesse was imputed to Abraham when he was yet uncircumcised Rom. 4.10 QVEST. XI That the asking of a signe proceeded not of any
onely laid up for him but unto them also which love his appearing 2 Tim. 4.8 where the same certainty of the reward is decreed the like assurance is not denied 4. Bellarmine answereth that hence it is evident that all beleevers are not sure of their justification seeing Abraham that had served God most faithfully before yet never till now was assured of his justification lib. 3. de justif cap. 11. resp ad ration 1. Contra. It followeth not Abraham was not alwayes assured therefore every beleever cannot be assured but it well followeth that as there was a time when Abraham had not such assurance so the faithfull at all times have not such perswasion and that we grant 2. It is untrue that Abraham had not this assurance till now when he offered up Isaack for the Apostle sheweth that then hee had this assurance when faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse Rom. 4.22 23. which was before he was circumcised Gen. 15.6 5. Bellarmine againe answereth that the Scripture commending the righteousnesse of Abraham and other Patriarks doth rather make us certaine and sure of their salvation than themselves ibid. Contra. No mans salvation can be better knowne to another than to himselfe for as the life of the body is more felt where that life is than of others that see the bodies to live so saith which is the life of the soule as the Scripture saith The just shall live by faith is better apprehended of those which have the possession of it than of such as onely behold it 2. Confut. The promises not merited by Abrahams obedience Vers. 16. BEcause thou hast done this thing c. From hence Pererius inferreth that Abraham Egregâ—â— illo facto meruisse Deserved by this worthy act that such promises were made unto him and that the Messiah should be borne of his stocke rather than of any other Contra. 1. The Apostle doth conclude the contrary that because faith was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse he was not justified by works Rom. 4.2 4. 2. These promises were made to Abraham before he had shewed any worthy worke even then when he was first called out of his Countrey Gen 12.2 they then proceeded from Gods mercy not of Abrahams desert or worthinesse 3. The Lord therefore crowneth Abrahams obedience with renewing his promises to shew us that they which are justified by faith ought to proceed and goe forward in good works whereby their faith is approved Muscul. 3. Confut. The assumption of the humane nature to the God-head in Christ not merited 4. BUt to say that Abraham merited that the Messiah should take flesh of his seed is not farre from blasphemy for then he should have merited more than Christ himselfe did as he was man seeing that the hypostaticall union of the humane nature with the God-head in one person was of grace not of merit as Augustine well resolveth Quod Christus est unigenitus aequalis patri non est gratia sed natura quod autem in unitatem personae unigeniti assumptus est homo gratia est non natura That Christ was the onely begotten Son equall to his Father it was not grace but nature but in that mans nature was taken to make one person with the onely begotten it was of grace and not by nature But now if the man Christ deserved not the assumption or taking of the humane nature to the God-head and yet Abraham merited that his seed should in the Messiah be united to the God-head it will follow that he merited more than Christ wherefore that is a sound and Catholike conclusion of Augustine Neque enim illam susceptionem hominis ulla merita praecesserunt sed ab illa susceptione merita ejus cuncta caeperunt before the taking of mans nature there was no merits at all but all Christs merits tooke beginning there 4. Confut. The Chalde Paraphrast corrupt Vers. 18. IN thy seed c. So readeth the Septuagint according to the originall in the singular number and this reading is approved by the Apostle Galath 3.16 Wherefore the Chalde Paraphrast is found here to be corrupt which readeth thus in the plurall number In thy sonnes shall all the people of the earth be blessed 5. Confut. Many in Scripture taken for all ALL the nations of the earth shall be blessed And Gen. 17.5 the Lord saith A father of many nations have I made thee we see then that in the phrase of Scripture sometimes many are taken for all by this place therefore that cavill of the Pelagians may be answered who because the Apostle saith By one mans disobedience many were made sinners Rom. 5.19 would inferre that we became sinners not by originall corruption or propagation of sinne but by imitation for then the Apostle would have said not many but all But the Apostle by many understandeth all as he affirmeth vers 18. That by the offence of one the fault came upon all to condemnation for they which are all may truly be said to bee many The like cavill in another question is urged by Catharinus a popish writer who because it is said in Daniel 12.2 That many of them which sleepe in the dust shall awake some to everlasting life some to shame collecteth that all shall not but that some as namely infants dying without baptisme shall neither be in heaven nor hell But this objection may receive the same answer that as in the promise made to Abraham many is taken for all so also is it in this place of the Prophet as before also is shewed the like use in the Apostle 6. Places of Exhortation 1. Observ. To beare the death of children patiently Vers. 10. ABraham stretching forth his hand tooke the knife c. Origen from this example of Abraham that doubted not to offer up his sonne perswadeth parents to beare patiently the death of their children Laetus offer filium Deo esto sacerdos anima filii tui Chearfully offer thy sonne unto God and be a Priest of his soule This is nothing saith he to Abrahams strength which bound his sonne himselfe and bent his sword Hom. 8. in Gen. 2. Observ. Confidence in Gods providence Vers. 14. IN the mount will the Lord provide c. We are taught with the like confidence when all other meanes faile to cast our care upon God as Abraham did for whom the Lord provided another sacrifice which he thought not upon in stead of his sonne Isaack Calvin Therefore it is said in the Psalm 68.20 To the Lord belong the issues of death he knoweth how to make a way for our deliverance though we at the first see it not 3. Observ. Gods voice must be obeyed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed because thou hast obeyed my voyce Whereupon Ambrose giveth this good note Et nos ergo audiamus vocem Dei nostri si volumus apud eum gratiam invenire Let us therefore heare and obey the voice of God if
offend against this precept Qui Christi cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of
desire to be washed of wantonnesse and pleasure it is not so lawfull upon any day si autem pro necessitaâ—â— corporis c. But if it be for the necessitie of the bodie we doe not forbid it upon the Lords day for no man hateth his owne flesh 2. If it be a sinne to wash upon the Lords day neither is it lawfull so much as to wash the face Si hoc in corporis parte conceditur cur hoc exigente necessitate toti corpori negatur If this be permitted in one part of the bodie why necessitie so requiring should it be denied to the whole bodie So then neither were the Jewes so strictly bound from all corporall labour as they superstitiously observe as may appeare by Ioshuahs and the whole hosts compassing of Jericho seven dayes together Iosh. 7. and by the Macchabees fighting upon the Sabbath 1 Macchab. 2.41 And Christians have more libertie herein than the Jewes had for it is lawfull for them to prepare their food upon the Lords day which it was not lawfull for the Jewes to doe upon their Sabbath for as Thom. Aquinas well resolveth Opus corporale pertinens ad conservandum salutem proprii corporis non violat Sabbatum A corporall worke belonging to the conservation of the health of ones bodie doth not violate the Sabbath and this is grounded upon that saying of our blessed Saviour The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Mark 2.27 God would not have the Sabbath which was made for mans benefit to be used to his hindrance Lyranus yeeldeth this reason betweene the strictnesse imposed upon the Jewes and the libertie of Christians quia illa vacatio figuralis erat because their resting was figurative and therefore was most strictly to be kept à figura quantumcunque modico subtracto mutatur tota significatio and take never so little from a figure the whole signification is changed as if you take l. from lapis or s. from stone that which remaineth signifieth nothing but though somewhat be taken from the substance of a stone it is a stone still 4. Conf. Against the Anabaptists that would have no day kept holy unto the Lord. IN the next place are the Anabaptists to be met withall and who else doe condemne the observation of the Lords day among Christians because the Apostle reproveth the Galathians for observing of dayes and moneths Galath 4. and in other places Contra. 1. The observing of dayes is not simply prohibited by the Apostle sed cum opinione cultus vel necessitatis but with an opinion of religion placed in the day and necessity the Jewes kept their Sabbath as making the observation of the day a part of Gods worship and they held it necessary to keepe that day unchangeable It was also unto them a type and figure of the spirituall rest But the Christians now keepe not the Lords day in any of these respects either as a day more holy in it selfe than others or as of necessitie to be kept but onely for order and decencie sake because it is meet that some certaine day should be set apart for the worship of God Vrsin 2. As in the practice of Physicke and in politike affaires and in the trade of husbandrie there is both a lawfull observation of dayes and an unlawfull for to observe seasons of the yeate for the earth and for ministring unto the bodie of man as also to make choice of the most convenient times for civill businesse is not unlawfull yet the superstitious respect of dayes as making some fortunate some unfortunate and to depend wholly upon the aspects of starres is a vaine and idle thing So likewise in the businesse of religion as dayes may bee superstitiously kept so they may also for order sake and to other good uses bee distinguished 3. Like as then though Christians yeeld a comely reverence unto the publike places of prayer yet not in like sort as the Jewes accounted of their Tabernacle so according to the same rule there is a preeminence given unto the Lords day but not with the like difference of dayes as the Jewes esteemed their Sabbath Simler 5. Conf. Against the Zuincfeldians that hold the preaching of the Word superfluous whereby the Lords day is sanctified THe Zuincfeldians doe also faile in the manner of celebrating the Lords day counting the ministery of the Gospell and preaching of the word of God whereby the Lords day is sanctified a superfluous thing cleaving wholly unto their vaine speculations and phantasticall visions and revelations whereas it is evident out of the Scriptures that both the old Sabbath of the Jewes was solemnized and kept in hearing Moses read and preached Acts 15.21 and the Lords day in like sort was sanctified by the Apostles with preaching Acts 20.7 ex Bastingio Now proceed we on to deale against the Romanists who diversly erre as touching the Lords day 6. Conf. That the Lords day is warranted by Scripture and not by tradition onely FIrst they hold that the keeping of the Lords day in stead of the Jewish Sabbath is not warranted by Scripture but onely by tradition from the Apostles To this purpose the Rhemists Matth. 15. sect 3. And there are other beside in these dayes that make the observation of the Lords day onely an Ecclesiasticall constitution Contra. 1. There are three most evident texts of Scripture usually alleaged which doe make it evident that this change of the Sabbath began in the time of the Apostles and so by their Apostolike authoritie being thereto guided by the Spirit is warranted and so declared and testified in Scripture These are the places Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 Revelat. 1.10 In the first we have the exercises of religion preaching and ministring the Sacraments which were peculiar to the Sabbath transferred to the first day of the weeke In the second publike charitable collections for the poore which was also used upon the Sabbath In the third the very name of the Lords day is set downe 2. And further that this day was consecrated by divine authoritie the great works doe shew wherewith this day from the beginning hath beene honoured as Augustine hath sorted them together Venerabilis est hic dies in quo transgressi sunt filiâ— Israel mare rubrum c. This day is to be reverenced wherein the Israelites passed over the red sea wherein Manna first rained upon the Israelites in the desert our Lord was baptized in Jordan water was turned into wine in Cana of Galile wherein the Lord blessed the five loaves wherewith he fed five thousand men wherein he rose againe from the dead entred into the house the doores being shut wherein the holy Ghost descended upon the Apostles c. Serm. 154. 3. This reason also may perswade it because the Lords day is now sanctified to holy uses as the Sabbath was to the Jewes but it belongeth onely unto God to sanctifie by his word as the Apostle saith Every creature is sanctified by the
Hexapla in Genesin Exodum THAT IS A sixfold commentary upon the two first Bookes of Moses being GENESIS and EXODVS WHEREIN THESE TRANSLATIONS are compared together 1. The Chalde 2. The Septuagint 3. The vulgar Latine 4. Pagnine 5. Montanus 6. Iunius 7. Vatablus 8. The great English Bible 9. The Geneva edition And 10. The Hebrew originall Together with a sixfold Vse of every Chapter shewing 1. The Method or Argument 2. The divers readings 3. The explanation of difficult questions and doubtfull places 4. The places of doctrine 5. Places of confutation 6. Morall observations In which worke about three thousand Theologicall questions are discussed above forty Authors old and new abridged and together comprised whatsoever worthy of note either Mercerus out of the Rabbines Pererius out of the Fathers or Marlorat out of the new Writers have in their learned Commentaries collected Now the fourth time imprinted with the Authors corrections before his death By ANDREW WILLET Minister of the Gospell of Iesus Christ. IOHN 5.46 47. Moses wrote of mee but if you beleeve not his writings how shall yee beleeve my words LONDON ¶ Printed by Iohn Haviland and are sold by Iames Boler at the signe of the Marigold in Pauls Church-yard 1633. Hexapla in Genesin THAT IS A SIXFOLD COMMENTARIE UPON GENESIS Wherein six severall Translations that is the Septuagint and the Chalde two Latine of Hierome and Tremelius two English the Great Bible and the Geneva Edition are compared where they differ with the Originall Hebrew and Pagnine and Montanus interlinearie interpretation TOGETHER WITH A SIXFOLD USE of every Chapter shewing 1. The Method or Argument 2. the divers readings 3. the explanation of difficult questions and doubtfull places 4. the places of doctrine 5. places of confutation 6. Morall observations WHEREIN ABOVE A THOVSAND THEOLOGICALL questions are discussed and is comprised together whatsoever worthy of note either Mercerus out of the Rabbines Pererius out of the Fathers Marlorat out of the new Writers have in their learned Commentaries collected Divided into two Tomes and published to the glory of God and the furtherance of all those that desire to read the Scripture with profit Now the third time revised corrected and with divers additions enlarged By ANDREW WILLET Minister of the Gospell of Iesus Christ. IOHN 5.46 47. Moses wrote of me but if you beleeve not his writings how shall ye beleeve my words AMBROS EPIST. 41. Deambulabat Deus in Paradiso c. nunc deambulat in Paradiso Deus quando Scripturas lego Paradisus Genesis in quo virtutes pullulant Patriarcharum Paradisus Deuteronomium in quo germinant legis praecepta God sometime walked in Paradise c. and now God walketh in Paradise when I read the Scriptures Genesis is a Paradise wherein the vertues of the Patriakes doe branch forth Deuteronomie is a Paradise wherein the precepts of the Law doe sprout forth LONDON ¶ Printed by the Assignes of THOMAS MAN PAVL MAN and IONAH MAN 1632. TO THE HIGH AND MIGHTIE RIGHT VERTVOVS AND MOST CHRISTIAN PRINCE King IAMES our dread Soveraigne by the grace of God King of Great Britaine of France and Ireland Defender of the Christian faith MOST gracious Soveraigne as under the shadow of your Highnesse great and mighty tree I meane your Princely and peaceable government the goodly beasts of the field honourable and great persons doe solace themselves so the fowles of heaven and the little birds doe sit and sing in the branches thereof and there build their neasts and lay their young and I among the rest have brought forth my implumed and unfeathered birds those imperfect workes which heretofore I have dedicated to your excellent Majestie and now this which wanteth but the wings of your Highnesse favour to flie abroad To your pious and sacred Majestie therefore I here present this absolute Tractate upon Genesis such as hath not beene yet in respect of the order matter and manner set forth vpon this booke wherein whatsoever questions of weight are discussed and other necessarie matters added as the short preface following sheweth This my third work to your highnesse I here in all humility exhibite and offer as an unfained pledge of our hearty joy for the joyfull entrance of this third yeare of your Majesties happy reigne This divine booke of Genesis as Ambrose advised Augustine to read the Prophesie of Isaias Augustine sendeth Volusianus to the Apostles writings I would commend in the first place as it is in order first to be read of all the Scriptures wherein are declared and set forth the beginning of the world and the progresse thereof the punishment of the wicked and rewards of the righteous so many examples and enticements to vertue such judgements and dehortations from sin and the same so lively and effectuall â—s if they were now presently done before our eyes as Augustine saith of this historie of Genesis I know not how but as often as it is read the hearer is so affected as though the thing were even now effected This worthy history containeth the space of 2368. yeares above halfe the age of the world from the first to the second Adam It insisteth principally in setting forth the life and acts of six honourable Fathers as starres among the rest Adam Noah Abraham Isaack Iacob Ioseph from all these your Majestie may receive somewhat with Adam who in Enos time when religion decayed taught his sonnes apart from the wicked to call upon the name of God your princely care must bee that you and your people as separated from the superstition of the world should worship the Lord more purely with Noah God hath raised you up to bring rest and comfort to his Church as another Abram the Lord hath made you an high Father as Isaack to procure joy and laughter to the Church as Iacob a supplanter of Popish superstition as Ioseph to adde what is wanting in the Church or Common-wealth Much bound unto God is this Church and Common-wealth for your Highnesse peaceable and religious government that whereas we for our sins had deserved with Israel neither to have King nor Church as the Prophet Hoshea saith We have no King because we feared not the Lord and againe in the same place the thorne and thistle shall grow upon their Altars yet the Lord in mercy hath blessed us with both We praise God for your princely vertues your worthy clemencie equity bountie piety which doe shine in your Majestie as the pretious stones in the King of Tyrus garment your gracious clemencie is as a cordiall unto this land which having remitted some great offences must needs passe by smaller trespasses If David pardoned Shemeis rayling he could not but forgive Mephiboseths negligence Your princely peace made abroad doth give us hope of a peaceable state at home as Davids favour toward Abner a reconciled enemie was a signe of grace to Barzillai an ancient friend what would we have
inquired when this sentence began to take place that in what day soever Adam did eat of the tree he should dye the death 1. Some thinke that a day is not here to bee taken according to mans account of dayes but as it is before God with whom a thousand yeares are but as a day and so Adam died within a thousand yeares after so Iustinus dialog cum Triph. but this sense seemeth to bee strained 2. Neither doe we refer these words in what day soever to the first clause only thou shalt eat and not to the second thou shalt dye the death as though the meaning should not bee they should dye the same day wherein they did eat but at any time after for this seemeth also to be but a forced sense 3. But we rather allow Hieromes interpretation that Adam began in the same day to dye not actually but because then he became mortall and subject to death lib. tradit in Gen. so Symmachus readeth thou shalt bee mortall 4. And beside that then actualâ—y Adam entred into misery and sorrow labour hunger thirst which are the forerunners of death 5. Adde unto this also that in the same day death entred by sinne into the soule of Adam in the very same day of his transgression QVEST. XXX Whether God made death THirdly seeing that by Gods sentence death seased upon Adam the question is whether God made death and whether this corporall death be a punishment of sin We answer 1. that as death is a defect of nature beside the first intention of the Creator brought in by sinne into the world that God is not the â—uthor of it but it is so only the fruit and effect of sinne 2. But as death is a just punishment inflicted for sinne so it is of God who though hee first made not death yet now hee disposeth of it thereby shewing his justice upon mans transgression so that as Augustine saith speaking of the beginning of darkenesse Deus non fâ—â—â—t tenebras sâ—dâ—rdinavit God made not darknesse but ordered them so may it bee said of death 3. Eugubiâ—us objecteth that death is not properly a punishment of sinne because it remaineth in the faithfull and it is not taken away by Christ. in Cosmopeia To which we answer 1. That death also at the last shal be destroyed by Christ 1 Cor. 15.26 The last enemy that shal be destroied is death 2. That although the death of the body remaine yet in the members of Christ in them it is not now as a punishment but as a consequent of their corruptible nature because all flesh is now as grasse Isa. 40.6 and death now unto them is not a curse but turned to a blessing in Christ being both a cessation from labâ—ur and an entrance into rest Rev. 14.13 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord they rest from their labours and their workes follow them QVEST. XXXI Why it was not good for man to be alone Vers. 18. IT is not good for man to be alone 1. not as R. Sâ—l left if man would have beene alone hee might be thought to be chiefe Lord in earth as God was in heaven for if man had beene alone who should have so thought or spoken 2. Neither was it not good in respect of God who by his infinite power and wisdome could otherwayes have multiplyed and increased man but in respect of that order and course of generation which God appointed for other creatures 3. Neither is this so said as though no man could live without a woman as the Hebrewes have these sayings nothing is good but a woman â—e that hath not a wife is not a man for God hath given unto some a speciall gift which may supply this want 4. Neither is S. Paul contrary to Moses where he saith it is not good to touch a woman for he speaketh in respect of those present times of persecution wherein their wives might have beene a let unto them Mercer 5. But this is so said 1. in respect of mutuall society and comfort 2. in respect of the propagation of the world 3. especially for the generation and increase of the Church of God 4. but most of all it was meet that woman should bee joyned to man because of the promised seed of the woman of whom came our Saviour Christ after the flesh QVEST. XXXII Wherein woman was a meet helpe for him Vers. 18. LEt us make an helpe meet for him The word cenâ—gdâ— signifieth as one before him or against him But we neither allow the conceit of some Hebrewes as R. Sâ—lamon that the woman is said to be against man because she is contrary to him 2. Nor yet doe wee like of Tostatus conjecture because the male and female in respect of their naturall parts are contrary 3. Nor yet doe wee approve David Kimchi his collection that the woman is said to bee as before man that is as a servant to attend vpon him for shee is appointed to bee his fellow-helper not his servant neither is it like that if shee had beene ordained to any base use or service that she should have beene framed out of Adams side 4. Therefore shee is called a helpe like to man as Hierome readeth or according to him as the Septuagint or as before him as the Hebrew both because shee was made like unto man as well in proportion of body as in the qualities of the mind being created according to the image of God as also for that she was meet for man necessary for the procreation education of children and profitable for the disposing of houshold affaires 5. This maketh a manifest difference betweene woman which is alwayes before man cohabiting and conversing with him and other females which after their copulation forsake their males Luther QVEST. XXXIII When the woman was formed A Further doubt is moved by some at what time the woman was made where 1. wee reject the conceit of Cajetanus who making an allegory of this story of the framing of the woman out of Adams side is forced to affirme that God made man and woman together upon the sixth day and not the woman out of the man for thus the history of Moses is called into question and as well may the whole discourse of the creation of the world be allegorised as this narration of the making of woman And again it is contrary to the Apostle who saith that the woman was of the man 1 Cor. 11.9 2. We likewise refuse the opinion of Catharinus who thinketh the woman to have been made the seventh day for this also is contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 In six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is 3. So then we hold that the woman was made of a rib out of Adams side as Moses setteth it downe neither made together with him out of the earth nor yet made so long after him upon the seventh day but she was formed upon the sixâ—h day
words of Adam as Epiphanius thinketh or immediatly uttered by the Lord to Adam but of Moses directed by the spirit of God who inserteth here a perpetuall law concerning marriage 2. The man is said to leave father and mother either comparatively and in degree that he is rather to leave them than his wife Oecolamp or conditionally if they shall seeke to dissolve the knot of marriage therein the sonne is to leave them Muscul. as also the leaving of the father and mother signifieth the erecting of a new family as the Chalde readeth hee shall leave his father and mothers bed for the ancient use was for children unmarried to lye in their parents chambers Mercer 3. They shall be one flesh not only in respect of carnall copulation as R. Sel. for so bruit beasts may be said to bee one flesh but in respect of their perpetuall society the conjunction both of their bodies and minds Now whereas the Apostle saith that he which is joyned to an harlot is one flesh the Apostle there applieth not that which is proper to marriage to fornication but sheweth what injury they doe to marriage which commit fornication yeelding that to harlots which is peculiar to wives to be made one flâ—sh with them And yet this difference there is that the man and wife are joyned together both in flesh and spirit as it followeth in the same place he that is joyned to the Lord is one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 but the harlot though joyned in body is severed in heart and affection QVEST. XLV How man was not ashamed of his nakednesse Vers. 25. THey were both naked and were not ashamed 1. Adam was not ashamed not as some Hebrewes say because Heva was of his owne flesh for afterward they were one ashamed to behold the nakednesse of another neither doth Moses set them forth as impudent and unshamefast persons such as the Adamites are pretending this example companying together like bruit beasts but this nakednesse of their bodies sheweth the nakednesse and simplicity of their minds for shame is the fruit of sin and therefore before sinne entred they were not ashamed 2. Some thinke that there remaineth yet in children that are not ashamed of their nakednesse some shadow of our first estate but children are therein unshamefast for want of reason as the like is to be seene in bruit beasts But in the kingdome of heaven we shall be all naked and without shame as Adam was and without feare or danger of sinne which Adam was not 3. Further notwithstanding their nakednesse they should not have beene offended with the weather either heat or cold not that their skin was like unto the nailes of the fingers as R. Eliezer thinketh which waâ— taken away after their fall but God would have so tempered the elements and the quality of their bodies as that all things should have beene serviceable unto them 4. The places of doctrine 1. Doct. The Dominicall or Lords day is grounded not upon tradition or Ecclesiasticall institution but upon the scriptures IN that the Lord sanctified the seventh day and made it a day of rest we inserre that as the Sabbath kept then upon the seventh day in remembrance of the creation was of the Lords institution so the Lords day is now observed by he same authority in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ and our redemption by the same contrary to the Rhemists who count the observation of the Lords day but a tradition of the Church and Ecclesiasticall institution Rhemist Matth. 15. sect 3. Our reasons are these 1. The observation of a Sabbath or day of rest unto the Lord is commanded in the moral law which is perpetuall and not to be abrogated if this bee denied it will follow that there are but nine commandemets if that of sanctifying the Sabbath doe not binde now And although wee observe not now the same day for our Sabbath which the Jewes did yet the seventh day we keepe still retaining the substance of the law which is to keepe one day holy of seven The manner of computation and account of seven where to begin where to end and to bee tied to the very same prescript of the day was ceremoniall and a circumstance of the law and in that behalfe doth not conclude us 2. That which was by the holy Apostles by precept enjoyned and by example observed was of a divine institution thus the Lords day is prescribed by Saint Paul 1 Cor. 16.2 where the Apostle enjoyneth them to make collection for the poore in their meetings upon the first day of the weeke which then began to be observed for the Lords day he himselfe also Act. 20.7 observeth the same day and preacheth in it Saint Iohn calleth it the Lords day Revel 1.10 3. Every symbole significative or representing signe mentioned in scripture had a divine institution but so is the Sabbath a symbole or type of our everlasting rest Heb. 4.9 There remaineth therefore sabbatismus a sabbath rest to the people of God which words doe conclude that both the type remaineth that is a sabbatisme and the signification of the type everlasting rest 4. No constitution of the Church doth simply bind in conscience for Gods commandements only do so bind Iam. 1.12 There is one law giver which is able to save and destroy but the keeping of the Lords day bindeth in conscience for therein we are commanded not to doe our owne wayes nor to seeke our owne will nor to speake a vaine word Isay 38.13 which duties are alwayes commanded so especially upon the Lords day but these precepts the observation whereof is properly incident to the Lords day doe bind in conscience Ergo. c. 5. If the Lords day were but a tradition of the Church there should be no difference betweene that and other festivall dayes but all of the like necessity and with as great strictnesse are to be observed and kept these as the other But that were very absurd seeing we find the Lords day by the Apostles to have beene observed whereas no mention at all is made of the other in the scriptures and the Church of God in her practice hath alwayes made a difference betweene the observation of the Lords day and other festivals enjoyning that with greater devotion alwayes to be celebrated than the rest 6. This also hath beene the constant doctrine of the Church of God and the judgement of the fathers that the Lords day is of the Lords institution as may appeare by this sentence of Augustine Dominicum diem apostoli apostoliâ—i virâ—religiosa sanctitate habendum sanxerunt c. The Lords day the Apostles and Apostolicall men have ordained with religious holinesse to bee kept because in the same our Redeemer rose from the dead and therefore it is called the Dominicall or Lords day that in it we onely may attend upon the divine service this is the first day in the world in it were created the elements
and the Angels upon this day Christ rose the holy Ghost was given and Manna descended from heaven first on this day serm detempor 251. Wherefore I cannot wholly condescend to Mercerus judgement who saith politiae causa retinuerunt Apostols diem dominicum Sabbato subrogatum that the Apostles for policy sake have retained the Lords day in stead of the Sabbath in 2 Gen. vers 3. A policy I grant in the use of the Lords day but that is neither the only nor chiefe reason of the institution thereof There are three causes of the observation of the Lords day a religious and holy use for the Lord to this end did consecrate this day by his owne example and commandement to bee spent in holy exercises the Civill or politicall use of the Lords day is for the rest of our selves our servants and catteâ—ls the ceremoniall or symbolicall end was to shadow forth our spirituall rest in Christ in this last respect I confesse the ceremony of the Sabbath in part to be abolished for it is a symbole still of our everlasting rest in heaven Heb. 4.9 But in the other two respects the law of the Lords day is perpetuall for that as Philo saith it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 festum populare a popular or generall festivall to be observed of all people for ever I doe wonder then this doctrine of the Sabbath and day of rest now called the Lords day having such evident demonstration out of the scriptures and being confirmed by the constant and continuall practice of the Church in all ages that any professing the Gospell specially being exercised in the study of the scriptures should gainsay and impugne these positions following as erronious 1. That the commandement of sanctifying the Sabbath is naturall morall and perpetuall for if it be not so then all the commandements contained in the decalogue are not morall so should we have nine only and not ten commandements and then Christ should come to destroy the Law not to fulfill it contrary to our Saviours owne words Matth. 5.17 2. That all other things in the law were so changed that they were cleane taken away as the priesthood the sacrifices and the sacraments this day namely the Sabbath was so changed that it yet remaineth for it is evident by the Apostles practice Acts 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 Apocal. 1.10 that the day of rest called the Sabbath was changed from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke and so was observed and kept holy under the name of the Lords day 3. That it is not lawfull for us to use the seventh day to any other end but to the holy and sanctified end for which God in the beginning created it for this were presumption to alter Gods appointment and the will and ordinance of the Creator must stand in the use of the creature otherwise the Apostle had not reasoned well for the use of meats from the end of the creation which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving 4. As the Sabbath came in with the first man so must it not goe out but with the last for if the keeping of a day of rest holy unto the Lord bee a part of the morall law as it cannot bee denyed then must it continue as long as the Lord hath his Church on earth and the morall Sabbath must stand till the everlasting Sabbath succeed in place thereof 5. That we are restrained upon the Sabbath from work both hand and foot as the Jewes were though not in such strict particular manner as they were for whom it was not lawful to kindle a fire upon the Sabbath Exod. 35.2 yet in generall wee are forbidden all kind of worke upon the Lords day as they were which may hinder the service of God saving such workes as either charity commandeth or necessity compelleth for it is a part of the morall precept in it thou shalt doe no manner of worke 6. That the Lord would have every Sabbath to be sanctâ—fied by the Minister and the people and that in the Church he ought to preach the word and they to heare it every Sabbath day but not each of these under paine of condemnation as the place is misconstrued is confirmed by the practice of our blessed Saviour Luke 4.16 and of S. Paul Act. 13.14 and 20.7 And hereunto are the Canons of our Church agreeable which require that every Minister preach every Lords day and likewise catechise the youth 7. That the Lord hath commanded so precise a rest unto all sorts of men that it may not by any fraud deceit or circumvention whatsoever be broken under the paine of his everlasting displeasure who doubteth of this but that every breach of any part of the morall law especially by deceit and circumvention deserveth in it selfe Gods curse and everlasting dâ—spleasure as the Apostle saith the wages of sinne is death and the Law saith Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law to doe them as the Apostle citeth this text This doctrine of the Sabbath first grounded upon the authority of scripture hath accordingly beene ratified by the constant and perpetuall practice of the Church Origen saith In nostro Dominico die semper pluit Dominus Manna de coelo in our Lords day the Lord alwayes raineth Manna from heaven Hierome Dominicus dâ—es orationi tantum lectionibus vacat upon the Lords dayes they onely give themselves to prayer and reading Ambrose tota diâ— sit vobis oratio vellectio c. nulle actus seculi actus divinitatis impedâ—ant c. Let us all the day be conversant in prayer or reading let no secular acts hinder divine acts let no table play carry away the mind Augustine quomâ—do Maria mater Domini c. As Mary the mother of our Lord is the chiefe among women so among other 〈◊〉 this is the mother of the rest the whole grace of the Sabbath and the ancient festiâ—ity of the people of the Iewes is changed into the solemnity of this day Concil Tullen cap. 19. Oportet eos qui praesunt Ecclesiis c it behoveth those which are set over the Churches upon all dayes but especially upon the Lords dayes to teach the people c. Matisconens 2. cap. 1. Exhibeamus Deo liberam servitutem c. Let us exhibite unto God our free service not because the Lord requireth this of us to celebrate the Lords day by corporall abstinence but he looketh for obedience whereby we treading downe all terrene rites might be raised up to heaven But these allegations are here superfluous seeing there is a learned Treatise of the Sabbath already published of this argument which containeth a most sound doctrine of the Sabbath as is laid downe in the former positions which shall be able to abide the triall of the word of God and stand warranted thereby when other humane fantasies shall
come but trusting to Gods long suffering hoped that it should not be so for it is evident Genes 6. that beside this speciall point of incredulity the old world was in many other sinnes outragious the earth was filled with cruelty vers 11. and in that they gave no credit to Noah Gods Prophet therein they were incredulous against God as our Saviour saith of his Apostles he that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Luk. 10.16 4. Their opinion also is to be refused which thinke that though the wicked of the old world were condemned to hell yet they might be redeemed from thence by the descension of Christ who is said by S. Peter to have preached to the spirits in prison which sometime were disobedient at which time also some have fabled that Plato at the preaching of Christ in hell beleeved and that divers others have been delivered from hell as the soule of Falconilla by the prayer of S. Tacla and of Trajanus the Emperour at the intercession of Gregory But these imaginations are contrary to the Scriptures for out of hell is no redemption as Abraham said to the rich man They which would goe from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to us Luk. 16.26 And hell is thus described Where their worme dieth not and the fire never goeth out Mark 9.46 the worme of the conscience in everlasting fire shall torment the wicked that oration which goeth under the name of Damascene is confessed by Bellarmine to be none of his and that place of S. Peter hath no such meaning as even now shall appeare 5. Neither is their conceit any thing worth who thinke that some of them which perished in the floud did repent them before they died and so went not to hell but to purgatory from whence they were delivered by Christs descending thither according to that saying of Peter but was quickned in the spirit by the which he went and preached to the spirits in prison which were in time passed disobedient c. But this place in Augustines opinion cannot be understood of the descending of Christs soule into hell 1. Augustine objecteth that Christ cannot be said to be quickned or made alive in his spirit that is his soule because it was not subject to death And therefore by the spirit he truly understandeth the divine power of Christ whereby hee preached in Noah 2. If there be preaching in hell then it will follow that there is a Church there and repentance and conversion of soules 3. The Apostle speaketh onely of such as were disobedient but they were not delivered by Christ. 4. It cannot be shewed in all the Scripture where the receptacle of the soules of the faithfull and beleevers is called a prison 6. Wherefore our opinion is that all those which were disobedient and incredulous in the dayes of Noah were first destroyed in their bodies in the floud and after in their soules perished everlastingly but from this number both infants must be excepted such as were of the sonnes of God who are not capable of faith and obedience and therefore were neither unfaithfull nor disobedient and such also as were ignorant of the preaching of Noah and framing of the Arke Of these God might have mercy The rest continuing still in unbeleefe everlastingly perished For it is not like that they which by the space of an hundred and twenty yeares would not repent but remained obstinate would relent in the instant of the floud Herein therefore we refuse not the judgement and reason of Rupertus Primo ulâ—imo judicio soli reprobi condemnantur soli electi servantur isto medio nec soli elects conservantur nec soli reprobi suffocantur In the first judgement when the Angels fell and the last onely the reprobates shall be censâ—red the elect saved but in this judgement comming betweene neither the Elect onely were prâ—served in the Arke for there was Cham accursed of his father nor the reprobate onely suffocated in the waters And hereunto agreeth S. Peters comparison that resembleth baptisme to the Arke 1 Pet. 3.21 but all dying without baptisme are not damned neither is it to be supposed they were all reprobates which died without the Arke QVEST. XVI Of what manner the Arke was made Vers. 14. MAke an Arke of Pine trees 1. Some thinke that no certaine kinde of wood is expressed but generally the matter whereof the whole Arke should be made which was not one kinde of wood but divers Perer. 2. But some take it for squared wood as the 70. 3. Some for wood pitched pro lignis bituminatis Hierom. tradit in Genes 4. Some for the Pine or Pitch tree because from the word gopher here used seemeth to be derived gaphrith taken for brimstone Gen. 19. sic Oleaster for gaphrith brimstone is digged out of the earth pitch which commeth from the tree hath another name it is called copher 5. Some thinke the Arke was made of the Firre tree which is the highest and straitest of all other or the Cypresse tree because of the continuance 6. But it is most like to be the Cedar as the Thargum readeth which is commended in Scripture for the height and therefore is called the Cedars of God Psal. 104.16 and beside it is most durable Plinie maketh mention of Cedar beames in the Temple of Apollo at Utica which continued from the first foundation untill his time almost 1200. yeares 7. Neither need it be doubted where Noah should have timber of sufficient length to serve for the breadth of the Arke for Plinie reporteth of a beame of the Larix tree in Tiberius reigne seene at Rome an 120. foot long and of a Cyprus tree 120. foot long He maketh mention also of the Indian trees to be so high that unneath an arrow cannot be shot over them Ex Perer. QVEST. XVII Of the measure of the Arke Vers. 15. THis length of the Arke shall be 300. cubits The Arke was six times so long as broad and ten times so long as high after the proportion of mans body as Augustine well writeth for the length of mans body from the crowne to the foot is six times the breadth from one side to another and ten times the thicknesse from the backe to the chest But many have doubted that the Arke being described to be no larger was not sufficient to containe all the beasts with their severall food and Apelles the disciple of wicked Marcion tooke occasion hereby to cavill at the whole story But this doubt may easily be removed 1. Yet we are neither forced with Origen to make of one cubit six which he calleth a Geometricall cubit for neither is there any such cubit in use which in length containeth six ordinary cubits neither doth the Scripture in other places reckon according to such cubits for whereas the Altar is prescribed to be made five cubits long three cubits high Exod.
be deferred like as the eating of the Passeover might bee put off to the second moneth upon extraordinary occasion as if a man were uncleane or in his journey Num. 9.10 This also appeareth in that for the space of forty yeares all the while that the Israelites sojourned in the wildernesse their children were not circumcised till Iosua his time Iosua 5.5 and the reason is given vers 7. They did not circumcise them by the way they were continually in their journey to remove from place to place and therefore could not conveniently be circumcised But if Moses example be objected whom God would have killed because his sonne was not circumcised the answer is ready that the case is not alike for Moses might either have circumcised his childe before he came forth or he had not such great haste of his way but might have stayed to performe so necessary a worke 6. But whereas the Lord prescribeth the eighth day both some Hebrewes are deceived that thinke the sonnes of bond-servants might be circumcised before and the Ismaelites that circumcised at the age of thirteene yeares QVEST. IX Circumcision found among those which belonged not to the covenant Vers. 13. HE that is borne in thy house and bought with thy money c. All which belonged to the covenant or would have any part among the people of God were circumcised but on the other part it followeth not that all which were circumcised did belong to the covenant as the Ismaelites Egyptians Ammonites Moabites and other people inhabiting neare to Palestina were circumcised as Hierome sheweth upon the 9. chap. of Ieremie vers 26. These people retained circumcision as a rite and tradition of their fathers but not as a signe of the covenant or profession of their faith and obedience QVEST. X. Circumcision not imposed upon strangers FUrther it is here questioned whether the Hebrewes were to compell their servants that were strangers to take upon them the profession of their faith and to be circumcised 1. Tostatus thinketh that their servants might be compelled but not other strangers that dwelt among them but that it is not like for seeing he that was circumcised was a debter of the whole Law Galat. 5. and circumcision was a badge of their profession it was not fit to force any man to take upon him a profession of religion against his desire 2. Cajetane thinketh that servants might be forced to take the outward marke of circumcision though not the spirituall profession thereunto annexed in 12. chap. Exod. But these two cannot be severed as whosoever is now baptized must needs also enter into the profession of Christianity 3. Pererius thinketh aright that the necessity of circumcision was not imposed upon any beside the posterity of Abraham neither that the Hebrewes might force their servants to take circumcision yet he saith that it was lawfull for them to use the ministery of servants uncircumcised as now Christians have Moores and Turks to serve them Perer. disput 5. But herein Pererius is deceived and I preferre the opinion of Thomas Anglicus which he misliketh that it was dangerous for the Hebrewes to be served with men of a divers religion lest they also by them might have beene corrupted 5. Wherefore the resolution is this that as no stranger servant or other was to be forced to circumcision but it must come from his owne desire as it may be gathered Exod. 12.48 so neither were they to receive any uncircumsed person into their house that would not be circumcised this is evident by Abrahams practice that circumcised all his servants both borne and bought with money who no doubt would not have served him if they had not submitted themselves to Gods ordinance againe seeing every one in the house must eat the Passeover Exod. 12.4.19 neither stranger nor borne in the house must eat any leavened bread for the space of seven dayes and yet none could eat the Passeover that was not circumcised vers 48. it followeth that no uncircumcised persons were to bee entertained unlesse they were contented to be circumcised QVEST. XI The penalty for the neglect of circumcision afflicted onely upon the adulti Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male shall be cut off c. Saint Augustine following the reading of the Septuagint in this place who adde the man childe which is uncircumcised the eighth day which addition is not in the originall doth understand this place of infants and their cutting off he interpreteth of everlasting death to be cut off from the society of the Saints and by the breaking of the covenant would have signified the transgression of Gods commandement in paradise for the not being circumcised saith he Nulla culpa in parvulis Is no fault in little ones and therefore not worthy of so great a punishment and so he urgeth this place against the Pelagians to prove that infants are guilty of originall sinne and therefore have need of remission Lib. 16. de Civit. Dei cap. 27. 1. In that Augustine expoundeth this cutting off of separation from the society of the Saints he interpreteth right some take it for the corporall death some for the extraordinary shortning of their dayes some for excommunication but it is better taken for the cutting off from the society of Gods people now and the fellowship of the Saints afterward for he that should contemne circumcision being Gods ordinance doth consequently refuse the covenant and grace of God whereof it is a seale and pledge 2. But that exposition of Augustine seemeth to be wrested to referre the breaking of the covenant to Adams transgression 1. The Apostle saith that they sinne not after the like manner of the transgression of Adam Rom. 5.14 2. The Scripture calleth not that prohibition given to Adam a covenant 3. The Lord calleth circumcision his covenant vers 20. what other covenant then is broken but that which the Scripture treateth of here 3. Neither can this place be understood of infants that are uncircumcised 1. That addition the eighth day is used onely by the Septuagint it is not in the Hebrew 2. the words are qui non ciâ—cumciderit hee which shall not circumcise c. so readeth the originall the Chalde paraphrast Iunius c. which sheweth that it must be understood of them that are adulti of yeares of discretion not of infants 3. Abrahams practice sheweth as much who circumcised those that were of yeares 4. Againe to breake the covenant is not incident to children the punishment therefore is not to be inflicted where the offence cannot be committed 5. If Infants be not circumcised it is the parents faults for omitting it not the Infants as may appeare in the example of Moses whom the Lord punished and not the childe for the neglecting of that Sacrament QUEST XII Whether Abraham laughed through incredulitie Vers. 17. ABraham fell upon his face and laughed 1. This was not onely an inward rejoycing of the minde as the Chalde translateth for Abraham indeed
shabangh signifieth both seven and with some little alteration of the points to sweare but here Moses deriveth the word from the oath which was taken betweene them although not without relation to the seven lambes given in exchange Vatab. 2. Moses called the place Beersheba that is the well of the oath before v. 14. but that is by anticipation 3. Of this well the City next adioyning was so called Beersheba which was the utmost bound of the land of promise toward the South as Dan was on the north side 4. This Beersheba was one of those Cities that belonged to Simeons lot Iosua 19.2 but because Simeon had their inheritance in the middest of the inheritance of Iudah Iosu. 19.1 Beersheba also is numbred among the Cities of Iudah Iosu. 15.28 QVEST. XIII Why Abraham made a groave Vers. 33. ANd Abraham planted a groave c. 1. To let passe Rupertus allegory who by this groave planted by Abraham in a strange countrey understandeth the Church planted among the Gentiles professing Abrahams faith 2. Abraham planted this groave that it might bee a quiet and solitary place to the which he might betake himselfe for prayer and contemplation Cajetan 3. Some think that this groave was set with all manner of fruitfull trees whither Abraham did use to carry his guests and by the sight thereof to stirre them up to praise God the giver of all good things Tostat. ex Targ. Hierosol 4. It should seeme that the heathen from this godly use of Abraham derived by a corrupt imitation their consecrating of woods and groaves to their Idols and therefore the Israelites were forbidden afterward to doe the like and that this was the fashion of the heathen Pliny testifieth how that severall trees were proper to severall Idols the escule or oake tree to Iupiter the lawrel to Apollo olive to Minerva myrtle tree to Venus poplar to Hercules which abuse was taken up by the idolatrous Israelites they offered incense under the oakes the poplar trees the olive Hosh. 4.13 5. This superstitious use was afterward forbidden the Israelites not for those reasons alleaged by Philo 1. because the temple of God amoenitates non postulat must not be a place of pleasure 2. or because dung and other filth is applyed to the trees to make them grow 3. God will be worshipped in pateâ—â— and open places not in secret and obscure corners For then Abraham would not have worshipped God in a groave if upon these grounds it were unlawfull 4. But the cause of the prohibition was the superstitious practice of the heathen that had abused these things to Idolatry to whom the Lord would not have his people conforme themselves Deut. 12.3 You shall breake downe their pillars and burne downe their groaves with fire c. you shall not so doe unto the Lord your God QVEST. XIV How long Abraham sojourned in the land of the Philistims Vers. 34. ABraham was a stranger in the Philistims land a long season c. 1. Lyranus thinketh with other Hebrewes that Abraham sojourned in this countrey 25. yeares for so old Isaack is supposed to be when Abraham was bid to offer him up in sacrifice for then Abraham dwelt still in Beersheba and somewhat after 2. It is also not unlike that Abrahams time of abode was longer in Beersheba than it was in Hebron in the plaine of Mamre for it was but 25. yeares from Abrahams first comming into Canaan in the 75. yeare of his age to the birth of Isaack in his 100. yeare Lyran. 3. From this time of Isaacks birth beginneth the account of the 400. yeares mentioned Gen. 15.13 Calvin Now whereas S. Paul doth draw this history of Sarah and Hagar Isaack and Ismael to an allegory this place giveth occasion to intreat of and handle the Apostles words and to gather the summe of Pererius and others commentaries upon that Scripture as it is set forth Galat. 4. v. 21. to v. 27. QVEST. XV. How diversly the word Law is taken in the Scripture Vers. 21. TEll me c. doe ye not heare the Law c. 1. Sometime the law is taken for the Scriptures of the old Testament as Ioh. 15.25 a testimony alleaged out of the Psalmes is said to be written in their law 2. Sometime the old Testament is divided into the law and the Prophets Matth. 7.12 3. Sometime the law is taken for all the bookes beside the Prophets and the Psalmes Luk. 24.44 4. The law is taken for the five bookes of Moses as here for Genesis the first booke Perer. QVEST. XVI What it is to be borne after the flesh Vers. 23. HE which was of the servant was borne after the flesh 1. Sometime flesh is taken for the corruptible and mortall state of man in this life so the Apostle saith flesh and bloud cannot inherit the kingdome of God and expounding himselfe hee addeth neither doth corruption inherit incorruption 1 Cor. 15.50 2. It is taken for the sinfull state and condition of the flesh as Rom. 8.8 They that are in the flesh cannot please God 3. It signifieth the nature and state of the flesh Matth 16.17 Flesh and bloud hath not revealed this unto thee that is nothing in the nature of man so in this place Ismael is said to be borne after the flesh that is after the common order and course of humane birth Isaack also was borne by promise that is beside the usuall strength and course of nature he was borne by the power of Gods word and promise of one whose wombe was in a manner dead in respect of her yeares Beza QVEST. XVII Of divers kinds of allegories Vers. 24. WHich things are spokeÌ„ by way of allegory There are three sorts of allegories parables some are altogether feined applied to the matter in hand such are those parables in the Gospel as Luk 10. of the wise steward Matth. 25. of the ten Virgins some allegories consist altogether in borrowed phrases and metaphoricall speeches such as often doe occurre in the reading of the Prophets A third sort there is which are not in words but in the things as the serpent in the wildernesse set up signified Christ Ioh. 3.14 and here Abrahams family is a figure of the Church QVEST. XVIII How the testaments are said to be two THese are the two Testaments c. 1. That is Sarai and Hagar signifie two Testaments as the rocke is said to be Christ 1 Cor. 10.4 2. They are called two Testaments in respect of the divers times and the divers dispensation which in effect and substance were not two for the law was a schoolemaster to bring unto Christ saving that the false teachers that did strive for the ceremonies of the law against the liberty of the Gospell did make them not only divers but contrary Beza 3. A Testament is properly taken for the will of the dead but here in a more generall sense it signifieth a covenant and so is the Greeke word
of Socrates and Agesilaus and Architas Tarentinus how they used to sport and recreate themselves with children lib. 12. de var. histor 3. Augustine further doth allegorize this sporting of Isaack Quid absurdum si Propheta Dei carnale aliquid lusit ut eum caperet affectus uxoris cùm ipsum Dei verbum caro factum sit ut habitaret in nobis What marvell if the Prophet of God did sport carnally to please his wife seeing the word of God became flesh to dwell with us But we need not so farre to fetch allegories the historicall sense is plaine and full enough QUEST VIII Of the great increase that Isaack had of his seed Vers. 12. AFterward Isaack sowed in the land c. 1. Isaack sowed not in any ground of his owne which he had purchased or bought with his money for vers 17. hee removeth and departeth from thence but he hired ground for his present use Calvin Mercer 2. Hee found an hundred measures not in respect of others or so much more than he expected or than that ground was wont to yeeld but an hundred measures for one which hee had sowed Perer. 3. The Septuagint read an hundred of barley mistaking the word for shegnarim signifieth measures or estimation segnaâ—â—â—â— barley Mercer It was therefore wheat which he did sow for the use and sustentation of his family or he had this increase generally in all the graine which hee did sow 4. Forrein writers doe make mention of greater increase Herodotus saith the countrey of the Euhesperiâ—es yeeldeth 100. fold of the Cynipians 300. fold lib. 4. Pliny writeth that in Byzacium in Africa for one bushell of seed they receive 150. of increase ouâ— of the same place the governour sent to Augustus Caesar 400. stalkes which came of one graine lib. 18. c. 10. But these were most fruitfull soyles that gave this increase in seasonable yeares whereas this countrey was barren where Isaack did sow and in the time of famine and therefore this increase was admirable Perer. QUEST IX Of the valley of Gerar where Isaack pitched his tents Vers. 17. ISaack departed and pitched his tents in the valley of Gerar c. 1. Though the word nachal signifieth a valley or brooke yet it is not fitly here translated a brooke as the Latine Translater readeth and Pererius justifieth the same for there was no need to digge wels where the water ran neither is it like these pits were made to containe the water that came downe as Perer. But in digging they searched for water and at the length found a spring vers 19. 2. Neither yet was it a fruitfull valley where Isaack now pitched his tents for then he needed not to have digged so many wels 3. But it is like to have beene a dale thorow the which the hasty raine that fell did run and so by reason of the sand and gravell which was carried downe it seemeth it was a barren plat neglected of the inhabitants wherein Isaack might dwell without envy Muscul. QUEST X. Of the wels of water first digged by Abraham and after by Isaack Vers. 18. ANd Isaack returned and digged c. The meaning is not that Isaack returned to Gerar to dig the wels againe which his father had digged before as both the English translations read for to returne to dig is nothing else but to dig againe as Iunius translateth 2. Neither were these other wels beside those mentioned vers 15. as Ramban Mercer For wee doe not read that Abraham ever dwelt in this barren dale of Gerar. 3. But as Rasi thinketh these were the same wels before mentioned which Abraham had first digged and the Philistims stopped and Isaack renewed them calling them by the same names vers 33. this was done before he came from Gerar and departing thence he diggeth new wels in the dale and calleth them by new names though some thinke he giveth new names upon new occasions to the old wels Calvin Mercer 4. He digged the wels of Abraham againe both for more certainty to find water and the labour was easier and he had better right unto them seeing his father possessed them before 5. Origen allegorizeth this story comparing the Evangelists and Apostles to Isaack which revived the wels of doctrine which the Patriarkes and Prophets had first digged and by the fountaine of living water he understandeth the true sense of the Scripture which we should dig for hom 12. and 13. in Genes 6. The Hebrewes also have devised here divers allegories some by these three wels understanding the three Temples the one built by Salomon destroyed by the Chaldeans the other reedified after the captivity and demolished by the Romans the third they referre to the time of their Messiah when they promise to their nation rehoboth that is roomth and liberty some by the wels renewed by Isaack understand the Proselytes converted to the knowledge of God by Abraham and corrupted by the Philistims whom Isaack againe restoreth ex Mercer But these fabulous allegories are not much to be regarded QUEST XI How the Lord protecteth his and is their peculiar God Vers. 24. THe Lord appeared unto him the same night c. 1. Whether God appeared unto Isaack being awake as Lippoman or asleepe as Tostatus it is not certaine out of the text Isaack had some infallible signe whereby he was assured of Gods presence Mercer 2. The Lord calleth himselfe the God of Abraham as being his peculiar God in respect of Gods speciall care and protection of Abraham and Abrahams singular faith and obedience toward God like as the heathen had their nationall gods which indeed were no gods the Assyrians worshipped Belus the Egyptians Isis the Tyrians Baal the Athenians Minerva the Samians Iuno the Lemnians Vulcan the Romans Quirinus c. But the Lord Creator of heaven and earth is the peculiar God of Abraham and of the faithfull Pererius 3. The Lord promiseth to be with Isaack that is to protect him God protecteth his foure wayes 1. By giving wisdome to foresee and prevent dangers 2. By preventing the occasions and delivering from the imminent perils 3. By repressing the rage of Satan and his ministers 4. By giving strength and patience to endure trouble Perer. QUEST XII Why Abimelech with the rest came to Isaack Vers. 20. THen came Abimelech c. 1. Some thinke it was not the same Abimelech which made a covenant with Abraham so long before well nigh 80. yeares but his son bearing the same name Abimelech which signifieth my father the King might be a common name to all the Kings of Gerar and so might Phicol which signifieth the mouth of all bee a title proper to the Captaines of the Army Merc. Muscul. But it is rather like that it was the same Abimelech because of the same chiefe Captaine Phicol who might bee now somewhat above 100. yeares old 2. Ahuzzah was a proper name of one of his chiefe friends not a nowne collective betokening the college or company
lib. 1. as also such was the use among the Romans as Gellius maketh mention of an Epistle written by Augustus to Caius Celebrasse me sexagesimum quartum natalem meum That he had celebrated the 64. yearely day of his nativitie 2. Yet doe wee not reade of any of the righteous in the Scripture that kept their birth-day but rather cursed it as the beginning of sinne and sorrow as Iob did cap. 3. and Ierem. cap. 20. only we reade of this Pharaoh and Herod the tyrant that kept a memorie of their birth-daies Perer. yet it is not unlawfull to celebrate the memoriall of the nativitie daies of Kings and other worthy men and women so that we take heed of superstition in giving the honour of such daies unto men as the Church of Rome doth and that we abuse not such daies to prophanesse and wantonnesse as the Heathen did but only thereby take occasion to give God thankes for such worthy instruments which he in mercie raised up to the Church or Common-wealth Calvin Mercer 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. 〈…〉 2. Doct. 〈…〉 3. Doct. Ministers that sow spirituall things may reape temporall Vers. 14. HAve me in remembrance Ioseph was worthy to have this kindnesse shewed him that had beene an interpreter and messenger of so good tidings according to the same rule it is lawfull for the Ministers of God the interpreters of the word that sow spirituall things to the people to reape temporall Muscul. 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. The interpretation of Scripture must be taken from the spirit of God 〈…〉 Vers. 8. ARe not interpretations of God As God by the spirit of God did 〈…〉 dreame so the interpretations of the secrets of Gods word proceed from the spirit of God as our Saviour interpreted the Scriptures to the two disciples and opened their 〈…〉 them Luk. 24.45 wherefore we are not to depend upon the tradition of the Church opinion of 〈◊〉 conceit of Pope and Cardinals for the understanding of the word but wee must 〈…〉 God speaking in the Scriptures Muscul. 2. Confut. Against the superstitious festivall of the virgin Marie Vers. 20. PHaraohs birth-day Perer. taketh occasion hereby to justifie the practice of the Church in celebrating the birth-daies of three of our Saviour the virgin Marie and Iohn Baptist in Gen. c. 40. numer 11. Contra. 1. The Nativitie of our Saviour is worthily celebrated because in himselfe he was the rarest birth that ever came into the world being without sinne and in respect of us the most beneficiall by whom our redemption and everlasting salvation was purchased 2. The nativitie of Iohn Baptist is solemnized as a matter indifferent by the Church not to the honour of Iohn but to the praise of Christ whose forerunner he was and we finde mention made in Scripture of his strange and extraordinarie birth 3. But the Nativitie of the virgin Marie is a superstitious solemnitie because they consecrate it to the honour of the virgin it is blasphemous in that they hold her to have beene without sinne which prerogative is onely peculiar to our blessed Saviour it is also vaine false and frivolous because there is no mention made of it in Scripture 6. Places of exhortation 1. Observ. Of the slipperie state of Courtiers Vers. 2. PHaraoh was angrie against his two officers c. These two were principall officers in Pharaohs court yet suddenly cast out of their Princes favour wherein wee see the slipperie state and condition of Courtiers who are to day in favour to morrow in disgrace as Haman was with Akassuerus Muscul. Little doe men consider that ambitiously desire to be great in Court how soone their faire weather may be overcast with clouds 2. Observ. Compassion toward the afflicted Vers. 7. WHerefore looke ye so sadly to day Iosephs humanitie appeareth that first offereth himselfe to these men in miserie to comfort and cheare them up as our Saviour asked the two disciples walking by the way why they were so sad Luk. 24.17 and to Marâ—â— Magdalene he said why weepest thou Iohn 20.15 such ready compassion should we shew to them that are in heavines Marlorat 3. Observ. No man to presume beyond his strength and gifts Vers. 8. TEll me them now c. Daniel having received a greater gift of interpretation was able both to tell the King what he had dreamed which was gone from him and the interpretation of it Dan. 28. Ioseph presumeth not beyond his gift but first desireth these dreames to be rehearsed unto him whereby we learne that every man consider his strength and gift from God and put not himselfe forward beyond that Calvin this is that which the Apostle saith that everie man understandeth according to sobrietie as God hath dealt the measure of faith Rom 12.3 4. Observ. Carnall men heare the word for worldly profit Vers. 16. WHen the chiefe Baker saw that the interpretation was good c. Hee desired an interpretation of his dreame not because hee had a minde to bee instructed thereby but for that he expected some good also So many men make semblance of some love toward the preaching of the word not of any conscience but onely seeking thereby their pleasure and prosperitie which missing of then they depart heavie and fact as the rich young man did goe from Christ Mark 10. Calvin 5. Observ. Ministers must not be afraid to denounce Gods Judgements Vers. 19. WIthin three daies shall Pharaoh take thine head Ioseph sheweth himselfe a faithfull messenger that would not conceale the interpretation from the Baker though he knew it should not bee welcome so it is the dutie of faithfull Ministers not to feare to denounce the judgements of God to his people though they have shall thankes for their labour Calvin 〈◊〉 the Prophet Michâ—â—ah did frankly and freely deliver his message to wicked Ahab 1 King 22. 6. Observ. Courtiers all for themselves Vers. 23. THe chiefe Butler did all remember Ioseph Here wee have a right patterne of a temporizing Courtier who partly for feare to move the King partly being addicted to his profit to serve his owne turne would make no mention of Ioseph Muscul. The like minde was at the first in Esther who fearing the Kings displeasure refused to make sute for her people but Mordrehai roused her up from that court-like sleepe and awaked her Esther 4. CHAP. XLI 1. The Method or Argument IN this chapter wee have set forth 1. The dreames of Pharaoh both tending to one and the same end vers 1. to vers 8. 2. The interpretation of the dreames 1. The occasion of sending for Ioseph by the narration made by the Butler of that which had happened in prison Vers. 9. to Vers. 16. 2. The repetition and rehearsall of Pharaohs dreames to Ioseph Vers. 17. to Vers. 25. 3. The interpretation it selfe together with the counsell and advice of Ioseph Vers. 28. to Vers. 37. 3. The exaltation and prosperitie of Ioseph whereunto belongeth 1. The authoritie committed unto
good effect 3. Doct. To love our enemies Vers. 21. FEare not I will nourish you Thus we are taught by Ioseph to love our enemies to doe good to them that hate us according to the doctrine of our Saviour 〈◊〉 44. For so Ioseph was a foster-father unto them that would have starved him in the pit Muscul. 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against Masses and Trentâ—li for the dead Vers. 3. THe Egyptians bewailed him 70. dayes Petrus Comestâ—r divideth this number into 40 dayes and 30. dayes the first was the time of the Egyptians mourning the other of the Hebrewes whereupon he groundeth the superstitious use of the Christians in mourning and saying Masses 30. dayes for the dead cap. 114. histor scholastic in Genes Contra. 1. The text saith that the Egyptians not the Hebrewes mourned these 70. dayes and that use taken up afterward by the Hebrewes was borrowed from the Egyptians for the stint of mourning used among the faithfull was but for seven dayes so long mourned Ioseph ver 10. 2. Though the Hebrewes mourne 30. dayes yet did they not pray for their soules or offer any sacrifice for them nor yet doe any penance for the dead which seemeth to be directly forbidden that they should not cut their haire or their beard or make any print in their flesh for the dead Levit. 19.28 as though the dead were profited by any such afflicting of themselves 2. Confut. Against the superstitious choice of the place of buriall Vers. 13. THey buried him in the cave of the field c. Thus was it the use among the Hebrewes to bury their dead without the Cities as we may read Luk. 7.12 where our Saviour did meet the people at the gate of the City carrying a young man to be buried This custome of a long time was reteined among the Gentiles as among the Athenians who would by no meanes grant to Servius Sulpitius a place of buriall within the City Cicer. epist. famil lib. 4. Plato also prescribeth that the dead should be buried in the fields and such as were barren and good for nothing else lib. 2. de legib It was also forbidden by the Romane Jewes Hominem mortuum in urbe ne sepelitâ— Bury not a dead man in the Citie The Christians were the first which buried the dead in their Churches not as Tostatus which first buried them within their Cities or houses as Pererius therein confuting him sheweth out of Diodorus that it was the manner of the Egyptians to keepe their dead in coffins at home placing them upright and to give their bodies as pledges to their creditors Diodor. lib. 2. cap. 11. and out of Herodotus how the Egyptians doe inclose their dead in vessels of glasse in their houses and make pictures of them Herod lib. 3. But this use to bury the dead in Churches and neare unto them for more holinesse of the place was first taken up by superstitious Christians which respect of the place if it be onely civilly used wee condemne not as Lycurgus ordained that the dead should be buried neere unto the Temples that others passing by might be stirred up by the sight of their monuments to imitate their vertues Plutar. in Lycurg But to place the dead in Church or Church-yard to be helped by the prayers of the living as Tostatus and Pererius is a superstitious device of fantasticall men without any warrant of Scripture for if they died in the Lord they rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 If otherwise they are in the place of torment from whence is no returne Luk. 16.26 and our prayers can doe them no good 3. Confut. Against traditions and visions Vers. 25. GOd will surely visit you Ioseph though he had received no vision or revelation from God concerning this yet he did verily beleeve the word and promise of God which hee had heard of Iacob which sheweth their errour that as not contented with the Scriptures seeke other helps as the Papists by their blinde traditions the Anabaptists by their fantasticall visions Calvin But wee are taught that the Scriptures are sufficient to lead us into all truth and that they which do teach otherwise though an Angell from heaven are to be held as accursed Galath 1.8 4. Confut. Against prayer for the dead Vers. 25. YE shall carry my bones hence The Patriarkes Iacob and Ioseph desired to be buried in the Land of promise 1. Because that was the place which the Lord did choose for his people to dwell in 2. They did hereby testifie their faith in Gods promises that he would bring their seed thither 3. They desired to be buried with their fathers as having the same hope of the resurrection 4. They foresaw by the spirit of prophecie that the Messiah should be borne there 5. But this was no cause as Bellarmine imagineth that they might receive benefit by the prayers and sacrifices of the dead 1. For at this time and 200. yeeres after Iacobs death there was no worship of God nor publike prayer professed in Canaan till the Israelites returned out of Egypt 2. And if prayer were availeable for the dead it might profit them which were buried in Egypt farre off as well as neere hand 3. No example can be produced out of the Canonicall Scriptures of the old Testament that ever any prayed for the dead 5. Confut. Against the carrying about of relikes Vers. 26. THey put him in a chest in Egypt Ioseph was layed up in a coffin and there kept they did not rake in his ashes and take out his bones and carry them about to worke miracles as they serve the bodies of Saints in the popish Church if they be their bodies Plinie maketh mention of Pyrrhus that his great toe on the right foot could not be burned with his body and that it gave helpe being touched to those which had the swelling of the splene whereupon it was laid up in the Temple Plin. l. 7. This whether it were an imposture of Sathan or one of Plinies fables I cannot say many like tales are current among the Romanists But Iosias practised the contrary who would not suffer the bones of the Prophet of Iudah to be removed that prophesied of him by name 2 King 23.17 6. Places of morall observation 1. Moâ— To mourne moderately for the dead Vers. 3. THe Egyptians bewayled him 70. daies But Ioseph onely mourned for his father seven daies vers 10. wherein appeareth the difference betweene the mourning of the faithfull which have hope and of infidels which have no hope of the resurrection the one is moderate the other excessive So the Apostle teacheth that wee should not mourne for the dead as those that have no hope 1 Thess. 4.13 but with sobriety and in measure 2. Mor. Vnity of religion the bond of peace Vers. 17. FOrgive the trespasse of the servants of thy Fathers God there is nothing which ought more to perswade men to unitie than that they worship one and
farre as they are witnesses of the truth so I thinke a Protestant by that warrant may borrow of such Interpreters which otherwise favour and savour of superstition where their pen is a minister and handmaid of truth and whereas S. Iames saith Have not the faith of our glorious Lord Iesus Christ in respect of persons they which doe refuse the testimonie of the truth at any mans hand in respect of any schisme sect or profession should seeme to be partiall in discerning of the truth against the Apostles rule wherein Protestant writers are more equall than the Romanists for they thinke scorne to use our writers though of never so excellent parts as appeareth in Pererius Commentaries who sorteth out his collections wholly out of men of his owne sect I speake of the new writers whereas he needed be no more ashamed to have followed the judgement of Luther Calvine Simlerus Iunius and other worthie writers among the Protestants as we doe not refuse the learned observations of Cajetanus Montanus Vatablus with others of their side I have therefore out of their writings taken the best and left the worst where they speake the truth I alleage them where they are found in error I refute them herein following Hieroms president Operis est studii mei multos legere ut ex plurimis diversos flores carperem non tam probaturus omnia quà m quae bona electurus Advers Vigilant I professe this to be my studie to gather varietie of flowers out of divers not to allow all which I finde but to make choice of the best And as Ambrose well saith Legimus aliqua ne legantur legimus ne ignoremus legimus non ut teneamus sed ut repudiemus Something 's we reade that others should not read them we reade them not to be ignorant of them we reade them not to retaine them but to reject them These my labours as your Grace was my great incourager first to undertake them so it is meet that you should with the first reape the fruit of them And this I wish from my heart and humblie crave of God that all domesticall contentions being laid aside wee the Ministers of the Gospell might so spend our time and imploy our paines that the age present might receive comfort by our Ministerie and posteritie profit And I say with Augustine to Hierome Quiescamus ab his contentionibus nostrae vitae salutique parcamus minus certè assequatur illa quae inflat dum non offendatur illa quae aedificat Let us rest from these contentions and favour our life and health let that have lesse which puffeth up so that be not offended which edifieth Mens singularitie should give place to charitie and opinion of knowledge to peace and selfe love to the common good And so I conclude with that saying of Hierome Precor itaque ut pâ—â—em 〈◊〉 nobis reliquit Dominus habeamus in bâ—evi antetribunal ejus reconciliatâ— seâ— sâ—issâ—â—â—â—cordiâ aut praemium recuperabit aut poenam ad Castorinâ—m I pray therefore that 〈◊〉 may injoy that peace which our Lord left unto us shortly before his tribunall seat for concord kept or broken we shall receive reward or punishment Your Graces readie to be commanded in the blessed Lord Iesus Andrew Willet CERTAINE DIRECTIONS TO THE READER I Desire thee courteous Reader to follow these directions in the reading of this worke In the whole Scripture and euery part thereof there are two things generally to be considered the sense and understanding and the use and profit As the Apostle toucheth both first speaking to Timothie of the Knowing that is the understanding of Scripture then of the profitable use 2 Tim. 3.15 16. The sense of the Scripture is either the literall and single sense which is seene in the interpretation of the words or the compound and mixt sense which consisteth either in shewing the coherence of the text with the other parts going before and following or in removing of doubts difficulties and contradictions Now the use and profit of Scripture either concerneth doctrine in confirming the truth and confuting error or manners in reproving vice or exhorting to vertue and thus the Apostle saith The whole Scripture is profitable to teach to improve to correct and instruct in righteousnesse 2 Tim. 3.16 According to this distribution have I observed six points upon every Chapter three belonging to the sense the Argument and method shewing the coherence the divers Readings explaning the literall sense and signification of words and the explication of questions which concerneth the removing of doubts the other three doe shew the use in noting the doctrines for confirmation of the truth or the controversies for the confuting of errors and then follow the Morall observations tending either to the destruction of vice or instruction in righteousnesse In the Divers Readings I. signifieth Junius V. Vatablus C. the Chalde Paraphrast S. the Septuagint L. the vulgar Latine translation A. Arias Montanus P. Pagnine B. the great Bible G. the Geneva edition H. the Hebrew originall And the letters in the margen shew the best reading the starre fixed in the margen noteth the diversitie of reading in some principall place These my labours now I commend unto thy favourable acceptation Christian Reader and both thee and them to the gracious blessing of our glorious Lord Iesus Christ to whom be praise for ever THE SECOND BOOKE OF MOSES CALLED EXODVS GENERALL OBSERVATIONS out of the whole Booke 1. The summe and argument AS in the former booke Moses shewed the originall and beginning of thâ— Church so in this hee declareth the progresse and increase thereof Simler wherein both Gods faithfulnesse and truth appeareth in performing his promise made to their fathers in multiplying their seed wonderfully and that under the miserable thraldome and bondage of Egypt Pellican and the Lords glorie and power notably appeared in those mighty signes and wonders whereby Pharaoh was forced to let Israel goe Vatab. his fatherly and tender care also shewed it selfe in sparing his people and not utterly destroying them when they fell into lust murmuring and idolatrie still correcting them as a father by his chastisements to bring them to repentance yet remembring his ancient love still following them with new benefits Genevens and his wonderfull providence is manifested in giving them lawes to be governed by and prescribing unto them a most excellent forme of worship Iunius And the summe of this booke is briefly comprehended in the 105. Psalme from verse 24. to the end wherein the Psalmist sheweth how it fared with Israel in Egypt before their deliverance by what meanes they were delivered and what the Lord did for them after their deliverance Ferus 2. The parts of the booke This booke of Exodus hath two parts 1. The narration and historie of the Israelites deliverance and going out of Egyt A. 2. The constitution and setling of the Church after their deliverance B. A. In their deliverance are to bee
submitted themselves and besought them to be gone as Moses had said before chap. 11.8 Iun. 5. But whereas Moses here told Pharaoh chap. 10.29 from hence will I see thy face no more it is not to be thought that Moses and Aaron were now called into Pharaohs presence he is said to call unto them dâ—um prâ— imperiâ— suo proceres ad cum ablegavit while hee sendeth by his commandement his Nobles unto him Calvin Here follow such questions as concerne the manner of the departure of the Israelites out of Egypt and first of their spoiling of the Egyptians of their Iewels IN this part of the Chapter which containeth the memorable and famous history of the departure of the Hebrewes out of Egypt and their mighty deliverance from their long and grievous captivity there are three things principally to be expounded first touching that act of the Hebrewes in demanding of the Egyptians jewels of gold and silver and detaining of them and carrying them away Secondly of the great numbers of the Israelites and others mingled with them that went out of Egypt Thirdly of the time of their sojourning in Egypt which is here affirmed to be 430. yeeres vers 41. QUEST XLII Whether the Israelites asked to borrow of the Egyptians their jewels Vers. 35. ANd they asked of the Egyptians jewels of silver The first question here is whether the Israelites did aske to borrow these things and in so doing how they can be excused from lying seeing they did not restore them againe 1. One answer is that God only commanded the Israelites to aske these things of the Egyptians but the manner to aske to borrow was not prescribed them yet they were permitted so to doe so Augustine Fortasse secundùm voluntates suas magis permissi sunt ista facere quà m jussi It may be that according to their owne mindes they were rather suffered thus to doe than commanded And so sometime in the Scripture a thing is said to be bid to bee done which is onely permitted as Christ said unto Iudas What thou doest doe quickly Ioh. 13. which was no commandement or bidding of him to doe it but a permission onely and giving of way to his working Perer. But this answer is not fit in this place for the Israelites doe here no other thing than Moses bad them They did according to the saying of Moses vers 35. and Moses said none other thing than God commanded him chap. 11.2 To speake to the people that every one require or aske of his neighbour c. they were not bid then to doe one thing and they did another and to what end should they aske to borrow beeing simply bidden to aske for they needed not to doubt to have their asking seeing God gave them favour in the eyes of the Egyptians 2. Another answer is that they did but aske to borrow but afterward when the Egyptians brake their faith and pursued after the Hebrewes they did not thinke themselves bound to restore them Perer. But it is evident that the Israelites when they carried these things out of Egypt had no minde to restore them againe for the text saith that even then when they went out before the Egyptians set forward after them they spoiled the Egyptians vers 36. 3. Some answer that the Israelites craving these things to borrow them for the service of God and to use in their sacrifices lied not for afterward a great part of them was converted to the use of the Tabernacle Calvin But yet this excuseth not their pretence of borrowing for howsoever after they were imployed they brake their promise in withholding them still and not restoring them 4. Some say further that in their borrowing this condition must be understood that they would restore them at their returne now seeing they returned not most of the Egyptians being drowned in the red sea to whom they should have restored them they were freed of their promise Simler But all this helpeth not the matter for if they promised to restore them at their returne and never purposed or thought to come againe into Egypt as they did then was it a fraude in them neither is it like that all those Egyptians of the meaner sort of whom they borrowed perished in the sea and though all had there died yet they had children or friends remaining to whom they might have made restitution 5. Ferus thinketh that they did not borrow them at that very instant of their departure but had asked them before for it is not like that they would have lent them at their going away But there need no question be made of the Egyptians willingnesse to lend them seeing the text saith that God gave the people favour now if they had borrowed them before which is not like yet at their going away not to restore them had beene no faithfull dealing 6. Therefore to put this matter out of doubt the Israelites did not aske to borrow of the Egyptians but simply asked of them to give such things as they required for both the word here used shaal signifieth to aske not to borrow or to aske to borrow and beside whereas the Egyptians as most doe translate commodabant eis are said to have lent unto them yet the word properly signifieth petitum dare to give the thing asked as Vatab. or petentibus dare to give to them that aske Iun. And the same word is used 1. Sam. 1.18 where Annah saith she had given or lent Samuel unto God she did not give him to require him againe but absolutely bequeathed him unto God during his life Piscator And so here the Egyptians doe frankly give unto the Hebrewes those things which they demanded And say that the Egyptians did purpose but to lend them yet the Israelites did simply aske them and they upon their asking gave them Perer. Beside whereas it is said that the Lord gave them favour this speciall grace and favour which the Lord wrought for them is rather seene in franke gifts than in loanes QUEST XLIII Whether the Israelites did any wrong in spoiling the Egyptians of their jewels Vers. 36. SO they spoiled the Egyptians That the Israelites did no wrong unto the Hebrewes in carrying away their ornaments and jewels now it shall be made manifest 1. Iosephus thinketh that the Egyptians did voluntarily give these things unto the Israelites unasked honorabant Hebraeos donis they did honour the Hebrewes with these gifts Some to hasten them to bee gone some because of their acquaintance and neighbourhood But the words of Scripture both in this place and before chap. 3. and chap. 11. doe shew that the Israelites first required and asked them 2. Tertullian lib. 2. contra Marcion maketh mention of a certaine tradition that after the Hebrewes were gone over the red sea the Egyptians sent messengers to the Hebrewes to require of them their jewels and ornaments which they had lent them And that Moses with the Elders of Israel returned this answer that they would
Moses out of the cloud but that was not before the third day 3. Neither is it like that this thicke cloud was the cloudy piller which used to goe before the host as the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the piller of the cloud and so the Chalde also for this cloud was major densiâ—r both greater and thicker for it covered all the mounâ— and by way of distinction it is called a thicke cloud Lippoman 4. In that he calleth it a thicke cloud quadrat patefactionibus veteris testamenti c. it agreeth to the revelations of the old Testament Simler Tunc cum Deus in caligine apparuit id est in umbrae figuriâ— For then the Lord appeared in a darke cloud that is in shadowes and figures Ferus 5. Beside hereby is shewed quod in praesenti non habemus nisi cognitionem anigmaticam in divinis That in this present world wee have but a darke knowledge in divine things as the Apostle saith Now wee see thorow a glasse darkly 1. Cor. 13.12 Lyran. 6. But God is said in Scripture to come metaphorically Sicut sol dicitur intrare domum vel exire As the sunne is said to come into the house or goe out when his beames only enter so God is said to come per influentiam bonitatis by the influence of his goodnesse and by illuminating the minde as here he commeth to Moses Lippom. ex Thoma QUEST XIII Why the Lord talketh with Moses in the hearing of the people THat the people may heare while I talke with thee 1. The Lord then spake not to the people out of the mount but he spake to Moses in the hearing of the people as vers 19. it is said Moses spake and God answered him by voice for God spake to Moses to this end that hee might get him credit and authority with the people which could not have beene if the Lord had spoken to all the people Tostat. 2. Beside here is a difference made betweene the Lords speaking to Moses now and afore time for then hee spake unto him secretly but now in the audience of the people Lippo 3. And whereas before God had confirmed Moses authority with miracles so now hee would by a more certaine way give him authority in speaking to him by his owne voice in the hearing of others for there may bee false miracles as it is said Antichrist shall come with lying signes 2. Thes. 2. But when God himselfe speaketh there can be no errour or doubt Tostat. 4. The makers of lawes among the Heathen to winne credit to their lawes have imagined the Gods to be the authors of them as Minos ascribed the Cretensian lawes to Iupiter Lycurgus the Lacedemonian lawes to Apollo Zoroastres the Bactrian lawes to Cramaeses Zamulxis the Scythian lawes to Vesta But those were onely devices This Law-giver Moses most certainely received his lawes from Iehovah Borrh. 5. And in that it is said that they may beleeve thee for ever God would not ad breve tempus fidem servo suo Mosi adstruere c. God would not for a short time only get credit unto Moses but that they might also beleeve him being dead Calvin QUEST XIV Why Moses is said twice to have reported the peoples words unto God Vers. 9. FOr Moses had told the words of the people to the Lord. Whereas it is said also before That Moses reported the words of the people to the Lord vers 8. 1. Some thinke this to be a repetition of the same thing which is usual in Scripture Tostat. But the Scripture useth no needlesse repetitions such as this should seeme to be if it were a bare iteration of the same thing 2. Some thinke the sentence is transposed and that both these clauses should be put together Moses told the words of the people to the Lord And when Moses had reported the words of the people c. Hug. de S. Victor But this were to teach the spirit of God to speake 3. Cajetan will have the first not to be Moses relation but onely Moses returning or intendment to report unto God the words of the people but that Moses was Praeoccupatus à Deo antequam relationem faceret Moses was prevented of God before he made relation But the words of the text are against this exposition for in the first place it is said that Moses did report their words as it is expressed afterward 4. Therefore the last clause is better thus read in the pleterpluperfect tense for Moses had reported Simler Genevens Or after Moses had reported so that this is the meaning that when Moses had related their words unto God then the Lord thus spake to Moses 5. And Moses declareth the peoples words unto God not as though the Lord was ignorant Sed ut bona voluntas populi tanquam Deo placita praesentetur But that the good mind of the people should bee presented unto God as pleasing unto him Lyran. And herein Moses shewed his good affection Gaudet de profectu populi c. As a good Prince hee rejoyced to see the people profit Ferus QUEST XV. Why they are bidden to wash their garments Vers. 10. SAnctifie them and let them wash their cloathes 1. This washing of the garments though in it selfe it was of no force to sanctification yet it had a double profitable use pertinuit ad disciplinam c. it belonged to the externall discipline to shew their reverence in the presence of God Siml As it is noted for a contempt to come with filthy garments before a great man Tostat. Beside it was Symbâ—lum interna sanctificationis it was A symbole of their inward sanctification Simler Ex his enim intelligere poterant multo magis mentem expurgari debere c. For hereby they might understand that their minde was much more to be purged Theodoret. 2. Beside admonendi erant suae impuritatis They were to be admonished of their impurity Simler That they should remember how they had beene defiled and polluted with the idolatry and other corruptions of Egypt As Iacob being to go up to build an Altar in Bethel doth purge his family and biddeth them cast away their strange Gods and change their garments Tostat. quaest 5. 3. But why they are not bid to change their garments as Iacob spake to his houshold but onely to wash them these two reasons may be yeelded because in Iacobs family there were not many and he was rich and his servants might have change of rayment but the Israelites were many and among them divers poore that had not double rayment Tostat. quaest 6. Beside the Israelites garments did not wax old all the time of their travell in the wildernesse therefore the Lord would not have these garments changed that therein they might have experience of the power and providence of God that watched over them Lyran. quaest 8. QUEST XVI Whether this were the third day of the moneth when the law was given Vers. 11.
together with the fire was seene a thicke and darke cloud but there bright shining flames of fire like cloven tongues shewing the cleare light of the Gospell in respect of the cloudy darknesse of the Law Simler Here onely Moses was suffered to goe up the hill there all which were present received the holy Ghost here the people tremble and are afraid but there they were emboldened by the Spirit to preach the wonderfull works of God 4. Doct. By the preaching of the Word we are joyned unto God by faith Vers. 17. MOses brought the people out of their tents So Ministrorum officium est It is the dutie of Ministers by the preaching of the Gospell to draw men out of the tents of sin to joyne them unto God by faith Lippom. As the Apostle saith Faith is by hearing and hearing by the Word Rom. 10.17 5. Doct. Distinction of offices in the Church Vers. 24. COme up thou and Aaron with thee The people stand below in the campe but Moses and Aaron ascend up into the mount This sheweth the distinction of offices and callings in the Church betweene the Ministers and the people that none should take upon them the office of teaching and delivering the high things of God but they which are thereunto called as the Apostle would have every one to abide in the same vocation wherein he was called 1 Cor. 7.20 Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Cont. Angels carrie not up our prayers unto God as Mediatours Vers. 8. ANd Moses reported the words of the people unto the Lord. Tostatus hereupon inferreth thus that as Moses carried up the peoples answer unto God Sie Angeli coram Deo proponunt orationes nostras So the Angels propound before God our prayers quaest 3. in fine Contra. 1. This followeth not for Moses was a messenger betweene God and his people hee was commanded to propound unto them what the Lord had said so when it can be shewed in Scripture that the Angels have the like charge from God to report our prayers the argument will follow else not 2. If the Angels should returne our prayers and sayings unto God as they doe the rest of our doings they do not as mediatours interpose themselves but onely as reporters returne as they find in the world and it is to this end as Augustine saith Vt super his Domini voluntatem consulant That they may know Gods pleasure further therein in Psal. 67. No doubt they doe observe who are faithfull and devout in prayer and who are otherwise The devill observed Iob as the Lord saith Hast thou not considered my servant Iob how none is like him in the earth Iob. 1.8 But he did it with envie the good Angels were witnesses of his pietie with joy So the Angels which were sent thorow the world returne this answer That all the world sitteth still and is at rest Zachar. 1.11 There was no devotion or exercise of godlinesse but all given to securitie and carelesnesse In this manner Angels may report as mens doings so their sayings unto God but this maketh nothing at all for the invocation of Angels which is by the Romanists hereby intended 2. Cont. That man hath no free will unto good Vers. 5. I◠yee will heare my voyce indeed and keepe my covenant c. From hence Lippoman would gather that man hath free will ad quid enim ita loqueretur c. For to what end should hee so speake if it were not in the peoples power to heare and keepe the covenant Contra. 1. If this were in mans power to keepe Gods covenant which is to observe his law and obey the commandements to what end then came our blessed Saviour to performe the law for us which wee in respect of the weaknesse of our flesh could not doe 2. Therefore these precepts are propounded in Scripture to these two ends that thereby mans drowsie nature should be stirred up to labour unto perfection and that finding himselfe to come farre short of the commandement he might see his owne weaknesse and flee for succour unto Christ. And therefore S. Paul saith that the law is a Shool-master to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3.24 3. Cont. No absolute faith or credit to be given unto teachers but as they agree with Scriptures Vers. 9. LOe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud that the people may heare while I talke with thee It was Moses credit with the people that they heard the Lord speaking with him And Moses desired no further to be beleeved than he had his warrant from God Non alio jure fidem in Ecclesia obtinuit quà m quia Dei mandata pertulit He by no other right obtained credit in the Church but because he brought the commandements of God Calvin It is therefore great presumption for those which take upon them now to bee the Pastors and Doctors of the Church to arrogate and assume more unto themselves than Moses did As the Romanists doe hold that we ought to receive all the decrees and constitutions of the Church without any further discussing We ought to take our faith and all necessary things of our salvation at the hands of our superiours Rhemist Act. 10. sect 8. We must beleeve the Church and trust it in all things 1 Tim. 3. sect 9. Whereas the Apostles themselves required not their doctrine otherwise to bee received then as it was consonant to the Scriptures for the Bereans are commended for conferring those things which they taught with the Scriptures Act. 17.11 4. Cont. Perpetuall abstinence from marriage not required of Ministers Vers. 15. COme not at your wives Bellarmine out of this text would enforce the single life of the Clergie because the people being to appeare before the Lord are commanded to abstaine from their wives Lib. 1. de Clericis cap. 19. Contra. 1. It followeth not the people were commanded abstinence for three dayes Ergo Ministers all their life should abstaine or they had wives and came not at them for three dayes therefore Ministers must have no wives 2. The practice of those times was otherwise for the Priests and Levites were married if this example pressed not them it doth not enforce perpetuall single life now 3. Neither doth the argument follow because then there was in the use of marriage in the naturall issue a legall pollution which made them uncleane untill the even Levit. 15.18 and therefore such abstinence and forbearance was required but such uncleannesse now is taken away as in like manner he that touched a dead corse then was uncleane and yet therein he sinned not there was then a kind of legall uncleannesse which was not sinne Simler 4. But so much as is morall in this precept bindeth now that to make our prayers more fervent as by fasting so by this kind of abstinence for a time is fit agreeable to the Apostles doctrine 1 Cor. 7.5 But as it followeth not it is good to fast sometime to be more earnest in
any attempteth to search and pry into the secrets of God Simler 3. Affiance and confidence followeth which relieth upon the wisdome power and constancy of God which is accompanied with faith and beliefe 2. Chron. 20.20 Put your trust in the Lord your God and yee shall be assured beleeve his Prophets and ye shall prosper A fruit and effect of this confidence is prayer How can they call on him upon whom they have not beleeved Rom. 10.14 Contrary hereunto are 1. Incredulity and want of faith as Christ comming into his countrey marvelled at their unbeliefe Mark 6.6 2. Doubtfulnesse as in Peter when he would have come to Christ walking upon the water to whom our blessed Saviour saith O thou of little faith wherefore diddest thou doubt Matth. 14.13 3. Diffidence and distrust as in the Courtier who said Though God would make windowes in heaven this thing cannot come to passe 2. King 7.2 4. Despaire as in Cain Genes 4. and in Iudas that hanged himselfe 5. Confidence in man in riches strength wisdome or in any thing but God 4. Thankfulnesse for benefits received is also a part of Gods worship as the Prophet David saith Psalm 116.12 What shall I render unto the Lord for all his benefits toward me This thankfulnesse and acknowledgement of Gods bounty bringeth forth these two singular effects First Humility that none ascribe ought to himselfe or his owne worthinesse but all unto Gods mercy as Daniel saith Vnto us appertaineth shame c. but compassion is with the Lord Dan. 9.9 Secondly Patience in adversity to be thankfull as well for adverse things as prosperous as Iob saith to his wife Shall wee receive good at the hands of God and shall we not receive evill Iob. 2.10 Contrary hereunto are 1. Forgetfulnesse of Gods benefits and Ingratitude as in Nabal that considered not who had endued him with riches 2. Pride and vaine glory as in the Pharisie that stood upon his workes Luk. 18. as also the Romanists doe the Pharisies of this age 3. Impatience and murmuring against God as in that wicked messenger sent from the King to take off Elisha his head who said Behold this evill commeth of the Lord should I attend on the Lord any longer Thirdly with all our strength we must love God in the acts and workes of our life referring all to his glory Matth. 5.16 Contrary whereunto is the dishonouring of God by our life and causing the same thereby to be evill spoken of as the Apostle chargeth the Jewes Rom. 2.24 2. Doct. Of the unity of the Godhead NOw out of this first Commandement Thou shalt have no other Gods before mee that excellent doctrine is inferred and concluded concerning the unity of the Godhead And further the Scripture elsewhere doth plentifully beare witnesse hereunto as Deut. 6.4 Heare O Israel the Lord our God is Lord only likewise Isay 44.6 Thus saith the Lord of hosts I am the first and I am the last and beside me there is no God Beside the evident testimony of Scripture Damâ—scen doth thus shew the unity of the Godhead by demonstration of reason against those which beleeve not Scripture 1. Deus perfectus est c. God is perfect Si multos asserimus deos in multis differentiam contemplari oportet If we affirme many gods in many we must needs find a difference Si autem differentia in eis ubi perfectio But if there be a difference among them where is perfection For if there be difference in respect of wisdome goodnesse vertue à perfecto deficit there is a failing in perfection if there be no difference but an identitie there must also needs bee an unitie in the Godhead 2. Deus incircumscriptus est God is incircumscriptible he cannot be circumscribed defined or limited to a place Quomodo si multi diversique sunt incircumscripti erunt c. But if they bee many and divers how can they bee incircumscriptible For wheresoever is one there cannot bee another 3. Differentia contrarietatem inducit c. Difference bringeth contrariety and repugnance if then the world were governed by many how can it be but it should be corrupted and dissolved Attenta in his ipsis gubernantibus pugna considering the strife betweene these governours To this purpose Damascen lib. 1. de fid orthodox cap. 5 6 7. Bernard also thus setteth forth the unity of the Godhead God is one but not as the Sunne or Moone is one because there is not another But he is Vnus sibi idem est semper uno modo But he is one to himselfe the same alwayes and after the same manner so is not the Sunne and Moone Clamat uterque se non esse unum sibi ille motibus esta defectibus suis Both of them proclaime that they are not one and the same with themselves the one by his motions the other by the waine and changes So Bernard lib. 5. de considerat But against the unity of the Godhead it will be thus objected out of the 82. Psal. vers 6. I said yee are Gods and ye are children of the most high Origen thus answereth he calleth them Deos tanquam à Deo detos c. Gods but made Gods by God Verâ— Deus unus est Deus caeteris qui ab ipso creati sunt contulit nomen istud non natura sed gratia The true God is but one God unto the rest which were created not nature but grace hath given this name Origen in mandat primum That place also of the Apostle will be objected 1. Cor. 8.5 Though there be that are called Gods whether in heaven or in earth as there be many Gods and many lords c. To this Cyrillus maketh this answer Nuda appellatione honorantur alterius ab ipso existeâ—â—es naturae c. They are so called only in name being of another and divers nature from God c. that is they are so called of those that ignorantly worship them the Gentiles tearme their Idols Gods which are none therefore it followeth in the same place of the Apostle Yet unto us there is but one God Howsoever the Heathen being blinded have imagined to themselves divers Gods yet the people of God to whom the Lord revealeth the truth acknowledge but one God Cyril also in the same place thus answereth touching the other place Nunquid igitur qui honorati sumus ut vocâ—mur Dâ—â— propterea naturae nostra mensuram ignorabimus Shall we therefore which have received this honour to be called Gods be ignorant of the measure and condition of our nature 3. Doctrin That the beliefe in the Trinity is commanded in the first precept AS this Commandement enjoyneth us to beleeve the unity of the Godhead so therein also is implied a Trinity of persons the Father Sonne and holy Ghost who as one God are of us to be worshipped for thus it may be concluded out of this precept Jehovah the only God is to bee worshipped but nor the Father onely
an inheritance upon him Ferus 2. Posset absque praemii ullius promissione praeciperâ— c. God might if it pleased him command without promise of any reward for he is debter unto none and when we have done all which we can wee doe no more than our duty but God to stirre up our dulnesse propoundeth ample and large promises Marbach 3. And these blessings of plenty health fruitfulnesse long life are here mentioned because they should acknowledge God the Author and giver of all these blessings which the Idolators asked of their Idols Gallas 4. First God promiseth to blesse their increase and store their bread and water both to give them abundance and to blesse the use thereof unto them for otherwise without Gods blessing abundance will soone come to nothing and because plenty is nothing without health Secondly he saith he will take away all sicknesse then because all this would not availe if they had no heires it is added that none should be barren and beside long life is promised for to enjoy these things but a short time were no perfect blessing and lastly victory is promised over their enemies for all these blessings had little helped unlesse they might have had quiet and peaceable possession of the land Ferus QUEST XLVII What is understood by the hornets Vers. 28. I Will send Hornets c. 1. Some doe understand this literally that as God sent frogs and lice upon the Egyptians so against the Canaanites he armed waspes and hornets to shew his power quod per minuta animantia suis auxiliatur that he can helpe his by weake and small beasts Theodoret. So also Procopius giving this note Deum à coelo de improviso suis missurum auxilium That God of a sudden can send helpe unto his out of heaven So also Cajetan Simler Calvin Gallas Pelarg. But Augustines reason may here be urged against this sense Non hoc logimus factum c. Wee doe not reade any such thing to have beene done neither in Moses time under Iosua the Judges or the Kings that hornets were sent against the Canaanites only the booke of Wisdome hoc dicit impleâ—um saith this was fulfilled chap. 12.8 Thou sendedst forerunners of thine host the hornets to destroy them by little and little But this may also be understood of that feare and terrour which God did smite the Canaanites with before the comming of Israel 2. R. Abraham and Aben Ezra by hornets understand a certaine disease which did consume the Canaanites where they hid themselves in their caves But the text saith that these hornets drave them out not that they wasted and consumed them 3. Pellican maketh a metaphoricall sense Ita attonitos eos reddam ut etiam vespae siat â—is superiores I will so astonish them that even flies and waspes shall be able to overcome them c. But Ioshua found the contrary when he was discomfited and fled before the men of Hai that he had not to deale as with flies and waspes 4. Therefore I prefer Augustines sense Vespae istae aculei timoris intelligendae sunt c. These waspes or hornets are to be understood to be those prickes of minde and terrours which made the Canaanites give place to the Israelites So also Lyranus saith they were Anxietates animi eos pungentes tanquam aculei Perplexity of minde which pricked them as sharpe pricks And this to be the meaning the former verse sheweth I will send my feare before thee vers 27. the accomplishment whereof is declared Iosh. 24.12 I sent my hornets before you which cast them out before you the two Kings of the Amorites not with thy sword c. that is the feare which God sent upon them not their sword discomfited them Iunius Piscator As Rahab confesseth When we heard it our heart did faint and there remained no more courage in us Iosh. 2.11 So also Borrhaius 5. Rupertus maketh this allegoricall sense by the hornets Quos scimus de aquino stercore nasci c. Which wee know to be bred out of dung are to be understood those base and contemptible meanes whereby God overcame the power of Satan c. He meaneth the Apostles who were counted as vile and base whereby the Gospell of the kingdome was published and propagated But the former sense is to be insisted upon as the most fit and consonant to the Scripture QUEST XLVIII Why God did not cast out the Canaanites all at once before the Israelites Vers. 29. I Will not cast them out from thy face in one yeere 1. No nor yet in 400. yeeres were they all cast out till the reigne of David and Salomon which the Lord did for divers causes one is here expressed lest the land should have growne to a wildernesse if it had beene dispeopled all at once and so husbandry and tillage would have beene neglected Gallas And the wilde beasts in the solitary places would have increased as Wolves Lions Beares which would have beene a great annoyance to the people Tostat. qu. 84. 2. Another cause was for their rebellion and murmuring for the which they were punished to wander up and downe in the wildernesse 40. yeeres Simler 3. Eorum culpae imputandum est c. It is to be imputed to their owne fault that the Canaanites were no sooner cast out because they were slothfull and negligent therein themselves as Ioshua telleth them If yee goe backe and cleave to the rest of these nations c. and shall make marriages with them know for a certaine that the Lord your God will cast ouâ— no more of these nations from before you c. Calvin 4. Neither would God cast them out all at once Vt essent qui peccantes arguerent ut â—rudirit in eis Israel That there might be some which should correct those which sinned and that Israel might be nurtured by them Rabanus For God used those nations as whips and scourges for his people when they fell away from him as he stirred up the King of Canaan against them Iud. 4. 5. Another reason was that the people might have some alwayes to exercise them that they should not be given over to sloth and idlenesse but be trained up in warre this cause is touched Iudg. 3.1 That he might prove Israel by them as many as had not knowne the warres of Canaan Marbach Pellarg But this reason is not mentioned here Ne impatientia defecissent c. Lest they might through their impatience have fainted Lippom. 6. And further God would not Vt citra praelia dominium terrae acquirant That they should without battell get the dominion of the land for those things which are hardly gotten we doe the more set by Pracopius 7. Hoc etiam utile fuit ad cohibendum eorum praceps defiderium This was also profitable to stay their preposterous desire that they should wait the Lords leisure and thinke not all at once to have their desire Like as now many wish
him as he is But yet this must be understood with three conditions the first is touched by Hierome Non solum Divinitutem Patris c. posse oculos carnis aspicere sed mentis That not onely the Divinitie of the Father but neither of the Sonne or holy Ghost can the eyes of the bodie see but of the minde c. So also Athanasius as he is cited by Augustine Deum omnino esse invisibilem c. nisi in quantum Spiritu mente nosci potest That God is altogether invisible but as he may be knowne in the Spirit and minde c. These then at this time saw not with their bodily eyes the essence of God but certaine visible signes onely and demonstrations of his presence Secondly we shall have a more full sight of God in the next world than in this as Augustine saith Nemo potest in hac vita videre sicuti est No man can see him in this life as he is Eâ— promittitur sanctis in alia vita To see God in his nature is promised in the next life c. So also Gregorie Quamdiu hic mortaliter vivitur c. As long as we live in this mortall life God cannot be seene in his nature c. Thirdly yet fully the Divine nature shall not be comprehended of the Saints no not in the next life as Augustine to this purpose citeth Ambrose interpreting that place of the Apostle Who onely hath immortaliter c. whom never man saw neither can see c. Si natura ipsim est invisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas c. If it appertaine to the nature of God to be invisible as well as to be incorruptible that nature shall not be changed in the next world of invisible to become visible because he cannot of incorruptible become corruptible c. And againe upon those words of the same Apostle To the King everlasting immortall invisible c. hee writeth thus Vnde ego non audeo ista distinguere c. Therefore I dare not divide or distinguish these things which the Apostle hath joyned together to say To him that is incorruptible for ever in this world and the next but invisible not in the next world but onely in this Contrarie then to this orthodoxall doctrine of the Fathers agreeable to the Scriptures are these ventrous and bold positions That wee shall in the next life participate with Christs Godhead and be made capable of his Divine substance That there is not any thing of Gods which his Saints shall not see In which assertion Augustine doth directly oppose himselfe to all such Dogmatists and Novelists in these words Non quia Dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed vel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit Not because the fulnesse of God any can comprehend at any time not onely with the eyes of the bodie but with the minde it selfe c. for it is one thing to see another to comprehend the whole in seeing c. Totum comprehenditur videndo quod ita videtur ut nihil ejus lateat videntem c. The whole is comprehended in seeing which it so seene that no part thereof is hid from the seer c. Here Augustine evidently testifieth that God cannot wholly be seene unlesse nothing in the Godhead should be hid unto us which here he manifestly denieth 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Honour in this life no signe of Gods favour Vers. 1. COme up thou and Aaron Nadab and Abihu c. These two which are bidden to come up with Moses and Aaron afterward were slaine with fire from heaven which sheweth that preferment in this life is not alwayes a signe of Gods favour but that the wicked are often exalted and lifted up that they may have the greater fall as the Lord said he 〈◊〉 appointed Pharaoh to shew his power in him Ferus 2. Observ. We must 〈◊〉 upon the Lord 〈◊〉 patience Vers. 16. THe seventh day the Lord called to Moses God would not at the first call unto Moses but maketh him to wait six daye Ne 〈◊〉 familiaritate superâ—iret Lest he should was proud by too much familiaritie Oleaster Vt discamus patienter ferre c. And that we may learne to beare it patiently if God at the first doe not answer to our desire Lippoman As S. Paul therefore be sought the Lord thrice that the temptation of his flesh whereby he was buffered might depart from him 2 Cor. â—â— 8 3. Observ. Sufficient deputies to be left in the Magistrate or Ministers 〈◊〉 absence Vers. 14. IN that Moses leaveth Aaron and Hur in his place It sheweth that the like 〈◊〉 in Ministers God would blesse to leave able deputies in their place when they have just cause to be absent and the contrarie fault he will severely punish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Observ. The 〈◊〉 of fasting and prayer CHAP. XXV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter Moses beginneth to set forth such generall ceremonies as belonged to the Tabernacle then instituted for the publike service of God there are two parts thereof the preparation to vers 10. the description to vers 40. 1. In the preparation these things are expressed in the charge which God giveth to Moses 1. Who shall offer the things required namely the people vers 2. 2. What they shall offer vers 3 4 5 6. 3. To what end vers 8. 4. After what manner vers 9. 2. In the description First the Arke is appointed to be made both the bodie thereof 1. Of what matter vers 10. 2. Of what measure vers 10. 3. With what ornaments it must be overlaid with gold vers 11. 4. What adjuncts and appendants both of rings and barres vers 13 14 15. 5. And of the use thereof vers 16. As also the cover of the Arke 1. The matter vers 18. 2. Measure vers 18. 3. The fashion with Cherubims how to be made vers 19. and how to be placed vers 20. 4. The place of the cover vers 21. 5. The use vers 22. Secondly the Table is described 1. The matter 2. The measure and forme vers 23. 3. The parts thereof the crowne vers 24. The border vers 25. The rings vers 26. 4. The appendants the barres v. 28. 5. The appertenants the dishes cups goblets vers 29. 6. The use to set the Shew-bread upon vers 30. Thirdly the Candlesticke is appointed to bee made 1. The matter and after what manner to bee wrought of gold beaten with the hammer vers 31. 2. The parts six branches three on the one side and three on the other vers 32. 3. The forme and fashion with boules almonds knops and flowers to v. 37. 4. The use thereof vers 37. 5. The appertenances the snuffers and snuffe-dishes vers 37. 6. The quantitie of a talent of gold all this must be made vers 39. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. Fine linnen G. rather than cotten or bombasine I. or silke caeter
speech because of the peoples departure and fleeing from him and that after he had spoken unto them and inquired the cause of their fleeing from him then he covered his face But it is like that the people at the very first sight of Moses were afraid to come neere him and that therby Moses perceiving the reason covered his face And that he had cast the vaile on his face before he began to speake and that the people had fled from him before it is evident because Moses had called them unto him as afraid to come neere 2. Tostatus thinketh that as Moses spake unto the people he sometime uncovered his face that they might see his glory and the more reverence his ministery and sometime he covered it because they were not able continually to behold that brightnesse But it is manifest vers 35. that Moses alwayes kept his face covered till he went in to speake with God 3. Simlerus thinketh that primum aperta facie populum allocutus est at the first time Moses spake unto the people with open face that they might be the more moved and affected with the sight of that glory but after that he used to cover his face But the Apostle sheweth that the people could not behold Moses face for the glory of his countenance c. They did not then behold it first or last while his face shined 4. Some Hebrewes as Lippoman writes doe thinke that Moses spake to God and to the people with uncovered face and at all other times he covered his face but it may be gathered out of the 35. verse that at all times untill Moses went in unto God his face was covered And the difference was in this that Moses uncovered his face before God for there was none to be dazled with that sight but when hee shewed himselfe and spake to the people his face was covered 5. Therefore the truth is this that as soone as Moses perceived by the peoples feare in not comming neere that his face shined he then covered his face and so spake unto the people yet need wee not with Oleaster to transpose the words Hee put a vaile upon his face and so finished to speake unto the people but either wee may reade with Iunius While he had finished to speake unto the people he put a vaile or rather to reade it in the preterpluperfect tense and hee had put a covering upon his face Genevens for as Oleaster reasoneth hee had most need then to put a vaile before his face when he spake unto the people So also Cajetane in speaking unto God his face was uncovered Homines autem alloquebatur facie velaâ—a But he spake unto men with vailed face lest that those shining beames might have hindred their sight QUEST LII What the vailing of Moses face signifieth 6. THe mysticall meaning of this vaile before Moses the Apostle sheweth 1 Corinth 3.13 That the children of Israel should not looke unto the end of that which should be abolished which Augustine understandeth thus Christ is the end of the Law c. Rom. 10.4 Signum erat quia in lege Christum intellecturi non erant It was a signe that they should not understand Christ in the Law 2. And the Apostle also maketh this a propheticall type of the blindnesse of the Jewes unto this day over whose hearts a vaile is still spread in the reading of the Law that they doe not perceive the spirituall sense thereof 3. Origene more generally applieth it that when Moses that is the Scriptures are read velamen super cor eorum there is a vaile over their heart that reade but understand not 4. It signifieth also the vaile of ignorance which is spread upon our hearts by nature which untill it be removed by Christ we cannot understand the truth of God Simler QUEST LIII How long the shining of Moses face continued Vers. 35. THerefore Moses put the covering upon his face c. 1. Some thinke that the glorie of Moses countenance continued no longer than untill he had delivered his message unto the people and declared the Lords commandements unto them But the contrary is convinced out of the text in this place which sheweth that Moses used when he went in to God to uncover his face and when he went out to cover it it seemeth then that more than once or twice Moses did thus And that the shining of his countenance did continue some while after 2. Ambrose saith Quamdiu vixit Moses alloquebatur populum velamen habuit in facie c. As long as Moseâ— lived and spake unto the people he had a covering on his face But Ioshuah after Moses death spake unto them with open face which signified quòd venturus esset verus Iesus that the true Jesus should come who should take away the vaile of their hearts that turned unto him So Ambrose Tostatus would confirme the same by these two reasons 1. Seeing God had given Moses this gift not setting downe any time how long it should continue he would not take it away from him but upon some evill demerite of Moses but he continued in Gods favour so long as he lived 2. Seeing this glory was an honour unto Moses if the Lord had taken it from him it would have beene as great a disgrace and dishonour as it was before an honour Contra. 1. Christ also was transfigured in the mount his face did shine as the Sunne he continued still the beloved Sonne of God yet that glory remained not still in his countenance therefore that argument doth not follow 2. And the ceasing of his glory in Moses was no more disgrace unto him than it was to Christ to have his face shine before his three Apostles in the mount and not afterward when he came downe to the rest of his Disciples 3. That typicall allusion betweene Moses and Ioshuah being not grounded upon the Scripture doth serve only for illustration it proveth not 3. That Moses face then had not his shining brightnesse while he lived it is the more probable opinion upon these reasons 1. Signes were no longer to continue but untill the things signified were confirmed this shining of Moses countenance was a signe of Gods favour and reconciliation with the people this being confirmed and the people thereof perswaded the signe might cease 2. As long as Moses face shined the people were afraid to come neere But afterward they presumed not only to come neere him but Cora Dathan and Abiram resisted him to his face Numb 16.3 It seemeth that then his face shined not 3. The Apostle calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 glory which was to be abolished 2 Cor. 3.7 It was therefore a transient and passing not a permanent glorie 4. Christs glory and shining brightnesse in the mount continued not all his life who was greater than Moses QUEST LIV. Whether Moses face continually shined or only at certaine times BUt it cannot certainly be determined how long Moses held this