Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	apostle_n	church_n	tradition_n	9,173	5	9.2350	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A76988	The arraignment of errour: or, A discourse serving as a curb to restrain the wantonnesse of mens spirits in the entertainment of opinions; and as a compasse, whereby we may sail in the search and finding of truth; distributed into six main questions. Quest. 1. How it may stand with Gods, with Satans, with a mans own ends, that there should be erroneous opinions? Quest. 2. What are the grounds of abounding errours? Quest. 3. Why so many are carried away with errour? Quest. 4. Who those are that are in danger? Quest. 5. What are the examens, or the trials of opinions, and characters of truth? Quest. 6. What waies God hath left in his Word for the suppressing of errour, and reducing of erroneous persons? Under which generall questions, many other necessary and profitable queries are comprized, discussed, and resolved. And in conclusion of all; some motives, and means, conducing to an happy accommodation of our present differences, are subjoyned. / By Samuel Bolton minister of the Word of God at Saviours-Southwark.	Bolton, Samuel, 1606-1654.	1646 (1646)	Wing B3517; Thomason E318_1; ESTC R200547	325,527	388

the sword of the Spirit the power of Excommunication John Bapt. 63 p. Another also who writes for the same We grant it evident that the power of redressing emerging enormities in a Church in every kinde is committed by Christ to every particular Church respectively within it self and so they ought to be cut off by that particular Church that is troubled by them if there be no remedy otherwise By all which you see it is evident upon the confession of all That God hath not left his Church without some means for the suppressing of errour and the reducing of erroneous persons That if a man be obstinate in his opinion and will not be reclaimed he may he ought to be cast out of the Church whereof he is a member And thus we have finished the first judiciall means for the suppressing of errour 2. Means to suppres errour viz. Synodicall we are now come to the second judiciall or authoritative means for the suppressing of errour and the reducing of erroneous persons which I told you was Synodicall if fraternall if pastorall if Congregationall means have been used and those found insufficient and too short there is yet another means which God hath ordain'd and set up in his Churches more powerfull and effectuall then the former and that we call a Synod or combination of Churches which was appointed by Christ practised by the Apostles continued by their successours for 300. years before ever there was any Christian Emperour or any other means and assistances to the Church for th●●e ends And indeed the light of Nature the equity of rules and examples in Scripture do teach That particular Churches may Amos Medul l. 1. c. 39. ib. 17. and ought often to enter into a mutuall confederation and consociation among themselves in Classes and Synods that they may use common consent and mutuall help in those things especially which are of greater moment and beyond the power of particular Congregations to determine and conclude In the Discourse upon which that I may the more avoid all Collaterall and impertinent controversies and disputes and speak to it mainly as it relates to the Question propounded I shall restrain my Discourse to these four particulars 1. I shall shew you what a Synod is 2. That God hath ordain'd and set up this as a means for the suppressing of errour and reducing of erroneous persons 3. That this means hath been blessed of God with power and efficacy for such ends 4. What is the power wherewith God hath endued and enabled it to be subservient to these ends The great burthen of the Discourse will lie upon the last And therefore I shall be briefer upon the rest Quest 1. What a Synod is It is a consociation or combination of Churches in their officers and delegates conveened in the Name and authority of Christ to determine according unto Scripture all controversies of doctrine government manners for the comfort peace and order of the Churches 1. In which description you have 1. What it is It is a consociation or union of Churches One Church cannot make a Synod a Synod is a Collection a combination of Churches There is a two-fold Church 1. Ecclesia prima 2. Ecclesia orta A prime Church and a Church arising out of the prime Churches 1. * Collectio singulorum fidelium in unum congregationē g●neral● nomine e●clesia dicitur The prime Church is a collection of divers faithfull persons into one Congregation and in a generall name is called a Church 2. The Church arising from the prime * Ecclesia o●ta est ●oll●ctio co●binatio Ecclesiarū prima●um plurium in unum coetū appellatur Synodus It is a collection or combination of more Churches into one Assembly and it is called a Synod So there is the nature of a Synod It is a consociation of Churches 2. You have in the definition the persons whereof a Synod is constituted or made and that is not of all the members of every Church but of officers and delegates or persons chosen out and sent by the Churches Indeed no faithfull persons who desire are excluded a liberty or presence of reasoning or speaking provided they doe it orderly and wisely but they are not there as partes constituentes as constituting parts or members of such an Assembly they are there rather by permission then by commission as consenters not determiners and rather spectatours auditours witnesses then as officers Yet it will be easily granted and Act. 15. seems to hold forth some footsteps of it 1. That the brethren by a solemn Church-act should designe and choose their officers and commissioners they send thither So you see they did at Antioch Act. 15.2 they send the whole Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 determined they made a Church-ordinance to send Paul and Barnabas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And certain others of them to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem 2. That the severall Churches should have liberty to convey with them whom they have chosen their burthens doubts scandals and desires and so you see in Act. 15.2 they sent their doubts with the persons they determined they should go up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about this Question not that this was the only end of their going to have the Question resolved or that this was the only subject of the Apostles disputes and determinations In the 6. verse It is said the Apostles and Elders came together for to consider 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of this matter not only of the Question but of the scandall the rent and division among them and how to heal that as well as remove the scandall And their determinations make it plain ver 22 23 24. 3. The brethren especially such as are most eminent among the brethren and others so farre as the conveniency of the place and other circumstances will admit have a liberty of presence to hear the debates and take notice how things are transacted in the Synod This is seen in the 12. vers of that Chapter 4. These brethren may have liberty of speech in case they d●sire it or if interessed and concerned more especially in the determinations of the Synod There is something of this in the 7. and 12. verses of that Chapter 5. Their approbations and concurrence may be desired to the results and determinations of the Synod and that they might joyn in consent and handing them to the Churches for the more receptive entertainment of them Relique ecclesiae hanc non secus ac matrem colebant Calv in Act. 15.2 Thus you see it was in that Synod vers 22 23. Though indeed there be not so great reason for other Churches concurrence as there was here for Jerusalem because this was the most eminent Church and of great esteem and account among the Churches of Christ consisting of many eminent members able to be teachers to others and therefore there was some more reason why their concurrence might be desired But

God hath not commanded unlearned men to study Divinity that thereby they might be able to maintain the truth God doth not require of them say the Papists that they should understand those things or come to the knowledge of them a Iudicando ex ratione doctrinae by judging of the truth or falsehood of doctrines b Sed pendendo ex authoritate docentium but by depending upon authority of the teachers Ans Briefly to answer this It is not necessary to all and singular persons to judge of all Questions and Controversies arisen touching faith and therefore not necessary they should make it their study But for such as are necessary doctrines without which there is no salvation it is needfull that all that would be saved should both hear them and understand them and judge of them What a fearfull thing if our condition were such as those blinde Papists who know nothing but believe as the Church believes and that they might not know the key of knowledge is taken from them they are interdicted the private use of Scriptures and the publike use of them is rendred unusefull being read to them in an unknown tongue And having thus beasted men they say to them after this manner * Vos rudes est is imperiti nullo modo potestis judicare de quaestionibus fidei ergesi salvi esse velitis nihil jam reliquum est nisi ut coecâ obedientiâ nostro judicio subscribatis Bellar. You are unskilfull and illiterate and therefore are no way able to judge of Questions of faith if therefore you would be saved there is nothing then remaining but that you should with a blind obedience subscribe unto our judgements and determinations Here is the miserable condition of those blinde deluded souls We know better we know it is our worke to study and enquire into the things of heaven It is our worke to learn to be able to judge of things that differ if to prove all things then to judge Indeed if by Divinity be meant Spi●osas Scholasticorum altercationes those thorny disputes of School-divinity or wrangling questions doubtfull disputations such points as doe but nourish contention not edifie the heart and conscience then we say indeed that God hath not tyed all men to the study of such Divinity The Apostle saith Him that is weak in faith receive ye but not to doubtfull disputation But if Divinity be meant the holy Scriptures and those things necessary to salvation then we say that God hath tyed all men upon this bond and obligation of life to study enquire and to be able to judge of these things which concern eternall life One objection more Obj. 5. But you will say It hath been the constant custome of the Church of God in all ages that those who have not rest●d in the judgement of those who were their guides and such set over them were deemed for heretikes therefore it was never lawfull for private men to examine and to judge and reject the doctrines of their Superiours Ans A short answer will serve for this It is one thing to be a Heretike Daven de Jud. norma pag. 159. another thing to be so reputed There is nothing more common then this that they who have gotten publike power and authority to joyn with them to account them for Heretikes who reject their decrees and determinations because they are perswaded they have decreed nothing but what is according to the rule of the Word But if they be deceived as it hath often fallen out and that the other be in the truth those who are called Heretikes are the Orthodox To reject the decrees of Councels doth not make a man an Heretike but to reject the truth the Word of God And therefore it is needfull to examine and to judge of things * Ne dum haberi pro haereticis vitamus esse haeretici incipiamus Daven ib. lest while we would shun to be called Heretikes we begin to be Heretikes And thus we have done with the first grand Query Who are to examine of opinions I told you there was a two-fold examination one publike the other private And I laid downe this position That it was the duty of every Christian not onely to examine private opinions but the sentences determinations of Councels Synods and to reject them or receive them as they shall be evidenced to be consonant or dissonant to the Word of God It is needfull before we passe to the second to make some application of this first the season cals upon it The Position applied Let us then give to Synods and Councels that which is their right It is their right and office to expound Scriptures and to unfold and determine controversall doctrines and to declare their sentences and decrees to the Churches But let us not give to them that which is divine and Gods right to submit to their definitions and determinations of faith without any scrutiny examination and judgement whether they be according to Gods minde or no. It is the speech of a learned Divine a Laicis praecipiamus quod illis ut ●●e est ne temerè superbè rejiciant sanà orthodoxa decreta praepositorum sed ne illis mandemus quod planè servile est ut nullo judicio adhibito faciant quae vis imperata Superiorum Daven Let us charge the people with that which is profitable to them that they doe not rashly headily proudly reject the sound and Orthodox decrees of Councels and of them set over them but let us not prescribe that which is beastly and servile that without any scrutiny and examination they subscribe to the judgement and impositions of them over them this is as one speaks b Homines in belluas transformare to transforme men into beasts to denude them of man of reason this is c Fedibus poti●● quā cordibus ir● in sententiam aliorum rather to goe into anothers opinion with the feet then the heart My Brethren you have now a Councel an Assembly at work about the Reformation of the worship of God We all know it hath been corrupted and blessed be God we have so much hopes it will be reformed we have an Assembly of choice and godly men who I perswade my self look toward God for his direction But they are but men though choice men they doe not claim an unerring priviledge none will say they are infallible and therefore it is our work to examine d Non est satis dicere quod visum est se● oportet etiam probar● quod dictum est non expectamu● testimonium quod datur ab hominibus sed quod voce Domini probatur quaeritur Clem. Alexand Strom. 17. Judicium ministrale is with them they have publike and ministeriall judgement and are to determine define and declare the doctrines of faith and manner of worship unto the Churches of God Judicium discretionis is left to us every one hath

foundation in Scripture Cum habeamus omnium exactissimam perfectissimam regulam ex divinarum Scripturarum assertione ●ro vos omnes ut relinquatis quid huic quid illi videatur de bis a Scripturis haec o●n a in quirite Chrys Nihil sinè nihilixira nihil praeter nihil ultra divinam Scripturam admittendum est Consul Mortō p. 2. l. 3. cap. 25. every heretick will alledge Scriptures but the Scripture will not patronize errours you may cast them upon Scripture but the Scripture will not father these unlawfull births of your owne which are begotten between ignorance and corrupt affections The Scripture it self is a pure fountain without mud an infallible rule without errour or deceit and nothing else is 6 Prop. That which is the rule whereby opinions are to be tryed is to be a just exact measure capable of no addition nor no detraction neither of lengthning nor of lessening But that is only proper to the Word of God Mens judgements of things are capable of addition they are not so full to which nothing more can be or ought to be added nor are they so perfect from which nothing can be taken away Never were the results of men so full that there was place for no addition nor so perfect that they had not after cause to retract in some thing But now the Scripture is such a Rule which is exact compleat and perfect and this is largely handled by our Divines against the Papists in opposition to their supply of unwritten traditions they are able to make the man of God perfect there needs no traditions of men there is a sufficiency a perfection in Scripture Nay and they are not onely compleat perfect but intire in this perfection to which nothing must be added nor from which nothing must be substracted and taken away as you see it Deut. 4.2 Yee shall not add to the Word which I command you nor shall ye diminish ought f●●m it so the 12. Deut. 32. and Deut. 5.32 Yee shall doe whatever the Lord hath commanded you shall not turne aside to the right hand or to the left Neque pastor neque concilium imo neque Argelus in ●ebus fidei recipiendus est non dico solum con●ra scripturas sed etiam obsque scripturis vel praeter scripturas Bil. Con. Apol. p. 2. p. 266. Diabolicum est extra divinarum Scripturarum authoritatem aliquid divinum putare Theoph. Gal. 1.8 If an Angell from Heaven should preach another Gospell let him be accursed And Rev. 22.18 19. which shuts up not onely Johns Prophecy but the whole ●anon of Scripture If any man shall add to this prophecy God shall add to him the plagues that are written in this book and if any man shal take away from the words of this book God shall take away his part out of the book of life and holy City c. and therefore the Scriptures being so exact a rule so compleat and entirely perfect capable of no addition nor diminution it must needs follow that the Scripture is the alone rule whereby we are to try opinions that lapis lydius or touch-stone whereby we are to prove all the doctrines of men And so much for the first Argument Arg. 2. That which is to be our Judge after death is surely to be our Rule in life this is plain if we are to be judged by it surely we are to be ruled by it if it must be our Judge hereafter then our Law here But the Scripture shall be our Judge after death Joh. 12.48 He that rejecteth me and receiveth not my Word hath one that judgeth him Mort. Ap. C at p. 2 l. 1. c. 48 53 c. Cons Park de polit eccl l 2. c. 2. p. 148 149. Non aliter impios haereticos perfrictae frontis poss●mus convincere nisisacros habeamus codices ex quibus clara veritas elucescit Mort. def Apo l. p 1 c. 9. See Reynolds conf p. 97. Cons Park l. 2. c. 2. p. 130. the Word which I have spoken the same shall judge him in the last day So 2 Thess 1.8 He shall come in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ Rom. 2.16 He shall judge men according to my Gospel Arg. 3. That which is the touch-stone to discover truth and to manifest errour is certainly the rule to trie opinions But the Scripture is the touch-stone to discover truth and to manifest errour therefore For the truth of this minor proposition that the Scripture is the touch-stone it is easily made good thus That whereon all truths are founded and by which all truths are confirmed and wherein all errours are convinced and condemned is surely the touch-stone whereby all opinions are to be tryed But in the Scripture are all truths founded and by it are all truths confirmed errours convinced and condemned Ergo. Arg. 4. That unto which God himself doth demit us and send us to try opinions that surely is the rule to try opinions But to the Scripture doth God demit and send us for the tryall of opinions for the finding out of truth from errour and discovering errour from truth therefore surely this is the rule Now that God doth demit and send us thither for the tryall of opinions and for the discovery of truth from errour you shall see Isa 8.20 To the Law and to the testimonies if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them When the Question was to be resolved against the Sadduces concerning this point of the resurrection Christ doth reduce them to the Scripture and tels them if they had searched and enquired there they would have been convinced of their errour Consul Whitak cont 1. q 5 cap. 13. Matth. 22.29 Jesus said unto them Ye erre not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God So when he would prove to the Jews that he was the Messiah for proof of that he reduceth them to the Scriptures Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures for in them ye thinke ye have eternall life and they are they which testifie of me It should be our enquiry in all our opinions what saith the answer of God men say this others say that but what saith the answer of God a De c●●lo quae●●nd●● est judex sed quid p●●sanu● ad coe um cum habe●m●● hi● in Evangelio ●estamentum The Judge is to be sought from heaven but what need we knock at heaven when we have his Word his minde in Scriptures b Coelestis judex non ●u nubibu● sed ex Scripturis quaerendus You are not to seek the heavenly Judge from the clouds but from the Scriptures In ter●●inamlis controversii● Theologicis sacrae divi●●que Scripturae solummodo relinquatur locus So then that unto which God doth demit us and that wherewith we are to consult in all controversies of faith of

entertainers of an opinion it is a probable signe that the opinion is truth Indeed God doth not honour wicked men or men of corrupt hearts with the first discoveries of truth what they have they have from others A man may well suspect that opinion which a corrupt heart is the revealer of God reveals his hidden things to his hidden ones The secrets of the Lord are with them that fear him and the humble he will teach and guide in all truth as he tels us Psal 25.14 Psa 25.14 Other men have no promise of Gods making known his minde unto them nor are they under any condition for God to doe it But now the godly they are under a promise he hath said He will lead us into the way of all truth he hath told us we shall be taught of God and we are under the condition of such revelation for we are in Covenant with him and that 's one condition Jer. 31.33 Jer. 31.33 34. Isa 54.13 Joh. 15.15 Hos 6.3 34. We are his children that 's another Isa 54.13 We are his friends Joh. 15.15 We are such as seek him Hos 6.3 Then shall we know if we follow on to know he will reveal his minde to them that seek him And being under these gracious conditions we may expect that God should reveal his minde and truth to us So that is the third Answer Reall holinesse in the publishers and receivers of an opinion is a probable signe that the opinion is a truth I would not give too much to holinesse in this kinde for I am not to be led by any mans practice but Gods precepts but this I would say in doubtfull cases where there is not a clear rule in the Word though I would not submit my judgement nor give up my understanding to the opinion of any yet holinesse should prevail much with my affections and I should conclude it is either a truth or certainly it is no dangerous errour that these hold And if I should see two contrary opinions held by godly and holy men I would not goe about to dispute and debate which of them are most holy nor can I conclude that both are truths But this I would conclude that certainly neither of them are dangerous errours both of them are but circumstantiall truths This is a maxime God is never wanting to his Church and people in necessary truths nor doth he leave them to undoing errours And that 's the third Answer That reall holinesse is a probable signe the opinion such hold forth is a truth Conclus 4. Though a reall holinesse be a probable signe Concl. 4 that the opinion is a truth yet it is not an infallible evidence 1. The best men are but men and therefore not infallible not unerring what Whitaker said of the ancient Bishops a Etiam illi Episcopi qui martyres fuerunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 passi sunt Whit. cont 4. so I may say of all even the best of men they have their failings they have need of some grains of allowance Another speaking of the Fathers saith b Sancti quidem fuerunt sed tamen homi nei affectus suos habuerunt They were holy men but yet were but men and had humane affections and humane frailties Origen Tertullian Cyprian they were holy men c At qui isti in errores multos inciderunt but they fell into many errours d Qui verò pertinaciter eorum sententias desenderiit haeretici habiti sunt Tertullianistae Origenistae appellati Reynold cens Apoc. praelect 4. Jude v 16. And those who took them up and maintained them were called heretikes Tertullianists and Origenists The best men are but men and imperfect in knowledge the Apostle tels us we know but in part we have many corruptions which are too apt to byas us and lead us aside The best men the most godly may be led aside 1. Either from weaknesse of judgement for we know but in part 2. Or from partiality of affections 3. Or from over-weening the maintainers of an opinion It is a dangerous thing for us to have mens persons in admiration men are apt to take things upon trust from honest men 4. Or from the benigne and fair aspects which an opinion may carry thus the affections sometime work upon the understanding and gain the understanding not by demonstration but by allurement this is to bribe us and inveagle our judgements into an opinion not to reason and perswade us Certainly the lesse the understanding hath to deal with the affections and the affections with the understanding in the finding out truth and errour as I said before the safer and clearer is your way 5. Or from over-credulousnesse Or 6. From fear of denying a truth all which I spake to at large in the fore-going Discourse Certainly the best men may be led aside as men they are incident to errour as corruption in them inclinable Nay the Apostle tels us Rom. 16.18 By good words and fair speeches they deceive the hearts of the simple Ro. 16 1● 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the hearts of them not evil as the word is As many followed Absolom in the simplicity of their hearts So there are many who may follow an errour not out of corrupt affections for by-ends or for advantage but even out of the simplicity of their hearts Men may have corrupt hearts in a truth and honest hearts in an errour that is honest ends and honest aims And so much for the fourth answer Though reall holinesse in the maintainers be a probable signe yet it is not an infallible evidence of the truth of an opinion And so much for the fourth Question we now come to the fift Qu. 5. Whether this be not sufficient to evidence an opinion to be true that it is held up and maintained by learned men and on the contrary to discover it an errour that it is maintained by illiterate and unlearned men It hath been the great argument the Papists have had all must needs be truth which such learned Doctours have held and again that must needs be an errour which is upheld and maintained by a sort of unlearn'd and illiterate men and we have had the same note sung to us Cons Park Polit. Eccl. l. 2. c. 20. c. And there are some places of Scripture which seem to favour it that the want of learning is a great cause that men run into many errours as you see 2 Pet. 3 16. where the Apostle speaking of Pauls Epistles he tels us That there are some things hard to be understood which they that are unlearned and unstable doe wrest as they doe also other Scriptures unto their own destruction By which the Apostle seems to inferre that the want of learning is the cause that many doe run into errour And yet if this place be conferr'd with other places it will appear not to make so much for that purpose but on the contrary

of humane learning Ephes 3.19 Eph. 3.19 That you may know the love of Christ WHICH PASSETH KNOWLEDGE by knowledge there is meant all humane knowledge or the improvement of mans understanding in all kindes of humane learning And so much for the first acceptation 2. Sometimes learning is taken divinely and that either more Strictly Or Largely Also 1. More strictly for the knowledge of the doctrine of Christ the mystery of the Gospel Eph. 5.20 Eph. 5.20 Ye have not so learned Christ 2. More largely for the sound understanding of all divine doctrine 2 Tim. 3.14 15. 2 Tim. 3.14 15. Continue in the things which thou hast learned knowing of whom thou hast learned and that from a childe thou hast known the holy Scriptures which are able to make thee wise to salvation Thus it is said Rom. 15.4 Rom. 15.4 That all Scripture was given for our learning that is for our instruction and information in spirituall and divine things Now this knowledge in divine things which is di●●●e learning it may also be distinguished 1. It is either infused and revealed Or 2. It is meerly acquisite Or 3. It is partly acquisite and partly infused 1. It is either infused or immediately revealed and so was the knowledge of the Apostles and Prophets as the Apostle saith Ephes 3.2 3 4 5. Eph. 3.2 3 4 5. If you have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given to me to you wa●d how that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men but is now revealed unto his holy Apostles and Prophets by the Spirit There the Apostle shews you plainly how they came to their knowledge 2. There is knowledge meerly acquisite by humane industry by education by arts and diligence by conversing with Scripture with the writings of learned and holy men together with the common assistance of the Spirit of God which is called generall and common illumination whereby a man may get a great deal of knowledge in divine things and be able to discourse preach to write to dispute of them and yet know nothing spiritually and savingly as he ought to know The heart is dark under all this light it 's but a dead knowledge it doth but tell the way it doth not inable to walk in it it doth but keep down it doth not mortifie and subdue sin it is but a daring it is no reforming light and what he knows he knows rather as a man then as a Christian rather rationally then spiritually he knows things but the godly know them by another light then he doth The light in an unregenerate man and one renewed it doth not differ in degree only but in kindes they see things different and have different sight of them one sees them by the evidence of reason the other by the demonstration of the Spirit the one is but like the light of the starrs the other of the Sunne as it may be night notwithstanding the Starrs so the heart may be dark notwithstanding all this light 3. There is knowledge partly acquisite partly infused I say partly infused of God and partly gotten by holy and religious diligence First God gives the eye to see and power for the eye to see and our sight is further cleared by the media the means of Gods appointment and ordination as reading hearing discoursing meditating and studying of the deep things of God The first is implanted light the second is improved light Divines distinguish between supernaturall habits of knowledge and such as are acquired by industry and diligence The knowledge God infuseth which is called the supernaturall habit of knowledge is properly a divine light whereby God doth break into and enlighten the soul and comes into a man as the Sunne ariseth upon the earth and dispels those foggs mists vapours of darknesse and ignorance which before clouded and darkned the soul and that which is acquisite is but the improving and using of that light to search out and know the minde and will of God more fully In the first God doth but as it were give man a candle whereby he sees and is able to search It is a candle within him not a light in his hand but in his heart many have the candle in the hand but not in the heart in the second it is but the use of this candle or this light which God hath given to search to know more of the minde of God and where ever he goes he hath a candle with him he hath an eye some measure of knowledge and light to discern of things that differ especially in those things which are essentiall to salvation And this is implied in those phrases you shall be all taught of God you have an unction of the holy One whereby you know all things There is many have the rationall eye that want the spirituall eye they have light in divine things but no divine light all the knowledge they have it is gotten up by industry by arts by common and generall helps they want that spirituall that holy humbling transforming light they have light but it is but the light of the starrs it is night for all this their heart is dark under all this light they have not the light of the Sun no light from Christ who is the Sun of righteousnesse which lightneth all that come into the new world of Saints You shall see a man get more knowledge of God in one half year after God hath come in with this spirituall light after God hath given him this eye then he had nay then others get all their lives Doe you not see it in every daies experience some men it may be your neighbours or kinred that before God worked on them they were dark understood nothing yet after God hath come in with this spirituall light they have in a short time grown up to wonder as farre exceeded thee as thou doest the poorest novice of the Parish and no wond●r they have been taught of God God hath implanted a light into them whereby like the Sun they shine more and more to a perfect day Thus having premised these necessary distinctions we will come to the answer of the Question Whether this be not enough to discover an opinion to be a truth that it is held forth by learned men c. Out of these distinctions laid down I shall frame these answers only 1. For one of these we shall cast it out there is no Question to be made of it That if by learning be meant that light that knowledge which is revealed of God to his Apostles and Prophets it is an infallible character of truth this is most certain All Scripture was given by inspiration of God holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. ult 2 Pet. 1. ult So that there is no Question if learning be taken for knowledge revealed by

Apoc prae●ect 4. Origen and Tertullian did greatly excell in learning insomuch that the one was esteemed the chief of the Greeks and the other of the Latines yet they fell into many errours and those who held their opinions were judged Heretikes and called Tertullianists and Origenists c. Yet in this I say thus much that so farre as they have learn'd of the Spirit so farre as their learning is implanted so farre it judgeth truly but that which is ours and the improvement of our knowledge by industry and diligence that improved knowledge is subject to errour and mistake The Father may leave his childe a good stock and well gotten but the childe may fail in his improvement of it his additions to it may be faulty The first stock is Gods and that is light in main things he gives his people an unerring an infallible light in essentiall and fundamentall truths or truths necessary to salvation but now the improvement of this stock is ours the additions and accretions to it in accessory and circumstantiall truths and herein we are subject to fail and erre Thus I have answered this Question Whether it be not enough to discover an opinion to be a truth that it is maintained and upheld by learned men c. But least you may think I have been too abstruse that I may speak plain to all take in these three things Learning then I say cannot be a conclusive evidence of truth 1. Because all learned men are not gracious men 2. Because learning without grace is but the forge of errour such men they are for the most part self-conceited part-proud and the pride of the head is a dangerous engine for errour 3. The most learned and the most gracious men may erre as I shewed before I see this spirit in many men that they are great admirers of learning indeed some give too little to it as well as others too much to it some wildly crie down all learning as if it were a prejudice and utterly disserviceable to the finding out of truth in divine things Indeed learning without grace is a forge for errour and an engine against the truth but if you take learning only as we speak it for the improvement of holy reason by the helps of Arts of Sciences tongues and the writings of men there is no Question to be made of it but that learning viz. holy reason thus improved is a great a mighty advantage to the finding out the minde of God and the want of this is the cause why men run headlong into many errours and for ought I see to the contrary that place of St Peter 2 Pet. 3.16 2 Pet. 3.16 where the Apostle speaks of some things hard and difficult in Pauls Epistles Which unlearned and unstable men doe wrest as they doe other Scriptures to their own perdition I say for ought I see to the contrary unlearned in that place may be taken in this latitude which I speak though it 's true those who have not this learning if they have this inward teaching shall never wrest Scriptures to their perdition they shall never erre and continue to erre damnably yet may they erre dangerously And we see this to be true in every daies experience the knowledge of divine things is exceedingly increased P●●ker de pol●t eccl●● 2. c 18 p 244. the hidden things of God are revealed truths revealed and confirmed errours discovered and condemned and the perusall of godly and learned men together with the study meditation and debate of things may much improve mens holy reason and strengthen men in the truths fence men against errour the want of which may render men lesse able to stand against the Sop●istries of men and more endanger men to be carried away with the stream of errour So that I would not be apprehended to speak against learning under that notion that is the use of any thing which might improve our holy reason and make us able to convince gain-sayers We have to deal with subtill Sophisters and there is need of the utmost of the improvement of reason in divine things But I speak against those who would give too much to it men are all in extreams Is there no middle between too much admiring of it and contemptuous despising of it though it doe not evidence where it is there is truth yet is it of no use to finde out truth Because gold is not good to eat is it not therefore good to buy meat So because learning is not truth is it not therefore serviceable to finde out truth Julian Indeed there are some give too little to it and there are some again which give too much Some that doe not give the least weight to it to cast the balance and others that are ready to resign up their faith and judgement to the learning of others if they see men of learning though they be not able to judge of it they are ready to resign up themselves and yeeld up look and key to them and let them take possession and have full dominion over their faith and consciences Most men are led by blinde obedience and implicite faith in divine things and seeing they will resigne up their understandings they act their reason thus farre that they will resigne up their judgements to those they apprehend most learned they will be of their opinions and of their judgements though they can say no more for it but that such a man saies so it is the opinion of such a learned man I tell you this is as blinde obedience as implicite faith as any is in Rome To conclude this Question there is both danger and folly in this too much admiration of learning 1. There is danger in it you are endangered to resigne up your judgement and faith to them which you are not to doe you are not to make any men the Masters of your faith you see how the Apostle abomina●●d that when he saith 2 Cor. 7. We are not Masters of your faith but helpers of your joy You are not to give up your faith your conscience to the doctrines or opinions of men though the best the holiest the learnedst of men as I have shewed you at large 2. There is great folly in it 1. You are neither able to judge of learning 2. Nor is learning able to judge of truth If you will aske all the learned men in the world out of the Church they will tell you the Gospel is foolishnesse And if you will aske many of them in the Church there are many precious truths which they judge folly and the rest they receive them by tradition or as the received doctrine of the age they live in their knowledge in divine things it is gotten up by industry even as the knowledge in any Art or Science and it is but the improvement of their reason not the revelation of the Spirit If learning alone were a competent Judge of truth and errour and that

to be the rule of life I come to the second maxime What ever may be collected by way of manifest consequence Max. 2 or made out by evident deductions from the Word is certainly true This is the second maxime Morton Apol. Cat. p 2. l. 5. c 9 Though a Doctrin asserted be not in totidem verbis as we say expressed in Scripture yet if it may bee made out of Scripture by manifest and undeniable consequence this is certainly a truth there are many precious truths which are not yet in distinct words expressed in the Scripture For example if a man hold forth this doctrine that it is possible for a man to come to the knowledge of his renovation or his own condition This is a truth but where do we finde it in these distinct words in Scripture and yet it may be soundly collected from such Scriptures as these Examine prove try your selves know you not your own selves All which imply that upon tryall a man may be able to come to the knowledge of himself and the like may be said of many other points which though in terminis are not contain'd in Scripture yet may be made out by manifest consequence and evident deduction and therefore are truths So that I say what ever may be made out of the Word by evident deduction is to be received as a truth But here I must lay down three Cautions The place of Scripture or that Word from whence the deductions Cau. 1 are made must not be mistaken The Pharisees read in Scripture that Christ should be a King and thence they made these deductions that certainly Jesus was not the Christ here was a mistake of the place The Disciples had read in the Law that Christ should live for ever and thence they made these deductions that Christ should not die We have read in the Law that Christ shall live for ever how saiest thou then that thou must die here was a mistake of the place So the Apostles they preached Christian liberty and had said that Christ had purchased and instated all believers into a blessed freedome which they were to maintain against any who went about to defraud them of it But now if they or others should take this Christian freedom to consist in exemption from all laws both of God and man here were a great mistake farre from the Apostles thoughts and those deductions are a building without a foundation and cannot stand Cau. 2 2. The deductions must be rightly gathered they must naturally arise from the Scripture There are many false deductions made and I may say so many errours founded upon the Word of truth Take an instance or two you have here a Scripture Take heed that no man deceive you for many shall come in my name c. when a man shall gather from thence that the Saints may be seduced and carried away with damnable errours this is a false deduction the 24. verse doth plainly shew us that where it is said They should deceive if it were possible the very elect by which is implyed the elect cannot be deceived So we have another Scripture where it is said Keep me from presumptuous sins and now when from this a man shall gather such a doctrine as this that the Saints may sin presumptuously this is a false collection and contrary to that Scripture in Rom. 6.14 Sinne shall not raign in you for you are not under the Law but grace c. The like may be said of that Scripture Let him that stands take heed lest he fall when a man shall inferre thence that the Saints may fall totally and finally this is a false inference and contrary to the expresse Word of God and his own Covenant which is Jer. 32.40 I will make an everlasting Covenant and I will never depart from you from doing you good but I will put my fear in your heart you shall never depart from me We read also of such a Scripture as this You would not come to mee that you might have life when a man shall draw such conclusions as these from it that it is in the power of man of himself to come over to Christ it is a false deduction So we read such an expression as this Work out your salvation with fear and trembling and when thence we shall gather that no man can be assured of his condition this is a false deduction Many more might be named but these shall suffice by which you see what need we have of adding this caution viz. That the deductions be rightly gathered we will come to the third 3. Those Deductions they must agree with the harmony of Cau. 3 Scripture it may be there may be deductions made and those rightly gathered nay and the place be rightly understood too and yet those deductions may be erroneous Nihil serè in Scripturis obscurū est quod nō alibi planissimè dictum reperiatur Au. Scriptura eam studiosè perscrutantibus est sui interpres Mort. Ap. Cath. p. 2. l. 5. c. 9 10 c. because they agree not with the harmony of Scripture Truth is not ever found by one place what is spoken in one place may be repealed in another and therefore we must consult with the harmony see the agreement how one place doth bear witnesse to another though you look upon some places and see them disagreeing yet there is a sweet harmony and agreement in all like Nathan and Bathsheba they speak the same thing assure your self it is none of the least of the noble works of the Ministers of Christ to study the harmony of Scripture and see how they doe mutually give hands and bear witnesse one to another it is the fault of some the better to strengthen their opinions to set one Scripture at difference with another it is our work to search the agreement and discover how in their disagreements they are yet serviceable one to another and to the purpose of God in the saving them that doe believe It was Pauls course you see in his whole Epistle to the Hebrews Whit. cont 1. q 5. c 9. p. 361. 〈◊〉 medijs inveniendi Scripturae sensum not to decry the old Testament which indeed was but the Gospel vailed but to take the vail off which was upon those places and upon their eyes in the reading of them as he tells them and shewd them that all this was but Christ in figure all this was but Christ in type they were but the figure of those things that were to come I am confident that the want of study and endeavour to seek to preserve the harmony of Scriptures is the great ground of many errours among us those deductions are not safe which overthrow the harmony and agreement of Scriptures the Word of God And those are certainly true with which the whole harmony of Scripture doth agree and so much for the third Caution and second particular Max. 3 What ever may be made evident to be

Worthies Champions for God in their generations Shall I take the boldnesse to say That I conceive how ever the Apostles in the penning of Scriptures were assisted and directed with an immediate inspired spirit Yet in this Synodicall Convention they did not proceed by their Apostolicall authority nor had they an extraordinary concurrence or immediate inspiration of the Spirit of God I shall give you these reasons and shall then leave it to your thoughts to judge 1. We read vers 2. That Paul and Barnabas were sent from the Church of Antioch to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem about this Question now Paul as an Apostle and a man immediately inspired did need not to goe to Jerusalem for the assistance of the other Apostles for he was able as an Apostle to have determined the Question himself he knew the whole mysterie of the Gospel Gal. 1.16 17. Gal. 1.16 17. Gal. 2.6 and was inferiour to none therefore he went not as an Apostle but as an ordinary Elder One Apostle as an Apostle might have determined the Question without the help of a Synod 2. The persons here assembled together do declare That they were not directed by an immediate inspired Spirit It is said The Apostles and Elders came together to consider of this Question Now if the Apostles were to act as Apostles what light and assistance could the Elders adde to the Apostles as Apostles But you see the Elders as well as the Apostles met together to consider of the matter and in Act. 21.18 25. Act. 21.18 25. All the Elders of Jerusalem with James take upon themselves these acts and decrees as well as the Apostles and in Act. 16.4 they are called the decrees of the Elders as well as the Apostles but now the Elders of ordinary Churches such as these were here conveened in this Synod could not be collaterall actors with the immediately inspired Apostles as in this Synod they were nay the whole Church say our brethren therefore certainly they did not act as Apostles 3. The manner of the Apostles proceeding in this Councel holds forth to us that they did not act as Apostles nor were immediately inspired because they proceeded by way of communication of Counsels It is said They met together to consider that 's one phrase of speech shews it was not acted by an apostolicall spirit where there are inspirations there is no need of considerations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 15.7 And it is said there was dispute nay much dispute great and earnest disputation vers 7. When there had been much disputing Peter stood up So that there was much debating to finde out the truth a great dispute And every one delivers his thoughts in order first Peter speaks vers 7 8. then Barnabas and Paul ver 12. and after James ver 13. So that you see here was a great dispute now immediate inspirations are not gathered up by disputes what the Apostles doe as Apostles they doe not by conferring and debating and seeking light one of another but they are directly and immediately inspired of God Indeed the immediate inspired spirit it may discourse and inferre a conclusion from such and such premisses as Paul doth Rom. 4.4 5 6. and Rom. 3.28 But the immediately inspired spirit of God in arguing doth not take the help of disputing one with another things immediately inspired are not gathered up by disputations but by revelations There is no concurrence of man to them they are done without the help of our own reason and without the help of others also 4. If they had been guided by an immediate inspired spirit then should every of them have rested in the sentence of another for the immediate inspired spirit is a like perfect in all his determinations and so Paul should have subscribed to Peters or Peter to Pauls and James to them all and not all to James especially when he doth for ought the phrase imports but set down his own judgement 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vers 19. I judge and the manner and phrase of speech implies as if it were his private opinion with reverence to what Peter and Paul said to which yet all submitted Now I say if every one were guided by an immediate inspired spirit why should any recede from his own sentence And why should they all submit to the sentence of another seeing they were better able to clear the spirit whereby themselves spake was infallible then the spirit by which another spake 5. If here the Apostles speak by the immediate inspired spirit the Churches had been here left in some doubt which to follow for though one Apostle doth not speak contrary yet they speak divers one to another James speaks of abstaining from bloud and things strangled and things offered to idols which the other Apostles did not speak of and therefore if the other did speak as they were immediately inspired the Churches would have been left in doubt whether to follow what James said or what Paul and Peter said If it be said the occasion of doubt which of them to follow was removed because all of them afterwards agreed to what James said I say 1. Though the occasion of the doubt was thereby removed from them who were willing to be satisfied yet here was a great advantage given to them who would except against these results because the other Apostles who were yet directed say you by the immediate inspired spirit laid no such burthens nor imposed no such commandments of abstinence c. upon the Churches in what they had said and therefore they might say either this ultimate determination was not the minde of the spirit or the spirit was divers from himself in the procedure of these determinations 2. In that they all agree to James it is a plain evidence that they had not spoken by the immediate instinct of the spirit neither had been directed by any extraordinary dictate and assistance of him because they decline if not recede from what themselves had spoken and now as it were upon further and second thoughts do wholly concurre with James 6. And indeed which may be a sixth instance of the thing in proof though that which Peter and Paul said was a truth that the Gentiles should not be pressed to the observation of Moses Law upon necessity of salvation yet they did not so fully speak to the resolution of the Question nor would that they said have satisfied the consciences of the Churches in their present practice if James had seen no further or spake no more in the resolving of the Question then they did For notwithstanding what Peter and Paul said They might have eaten things offered to Idols and blood and things strangled which at that time had been a sinne against the law of nature and a great scandall and offence to the Jews and so notwithstanding this determination the divisions would have been greater the rents wider the scandall more dangerous then before the Jews they should