Believe their Infallibilitie most infallibly it could be no Rule of Faith but might be rejected till we see it evidently proved whereas they contend it should be the Rule of Faith unto all and by their own confession a main Article of their Creed but according to their Positions as we shall hereafter prove the onely Article of Christian Faith How destitute these their Assertions are of all Grounds of Reason or Rules of Nature hath been made evident There remain onely Two Pillars possibly imaginable for supporting this pretended Infallibilitie Tradition and Scripture Against Tradition all the Arguments they can heap against the Certainty of Scriptures stand good as shall hereafter God willing be shewed That no Argument can be drawn from Scripture to their succour albeit the later Jesuites have earnestly sought to scrape a many for better then Scrapings are not the very best they bring we are now to prove 7 That our Belief of Scriptures Truth and their true Sense by what Means soever we attain thereto must be infallible Both agree The Means that must infalliblie ascertain or prove their Divine Truth and true Meaning unto us say our Adversaries is the Churches Infallibilitie which likewise must be infallibly Beleeved otherwise it could not be the Rule of Faith or Belief infallible It shall suffice here once for all to admonish the Reader That as often as we mention Belief of Scriptures or the Churches infallibility in this Dispute we mean not any kind of Belief but that only which is infallible so likewise whiles we mention the Means or Proofs of either we understand onely Means or Proofs infallible whereon Faith may immediately relie as upon a Rule most sure and certain In all these we demand nothing but what our Adversaries most willingly grant From their grant we argue thus 8 If either the Scriptures can thus ascertain or prove the Churches Infalibilitie or It the infallible Truth of Scriptures to our Souls we must of necessity either Believe the one of these before the other The Churches Infalibility before Scriptures or Scriptures before It or both together without all prioritie of Belief or praeexistent knowledge of the one whence the Belief or knowledge of the other must spring The members of the Division are in the Proposal actually two but in the Disquisition will prove three To begin with the first 9 If they say we must believe the Scriptures to be the Word of God before we 〈◊〉 believe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of their Church they overthrow their own and est ablish 〈◊〉 Postions For thus they make the Scripture a Rule of our Faith at the least In this one Article of the Catholick Churches Infallibilitie which by this Assertion we may and ought infallibly to believe because the Scriptures which we first infallibly believe do teach and prove it Hence private men should be taught by the Holy Ghost first to believe the Truth of Scriptures and for it the Churches Infallibilitie Wherefore the Scripture must be the immediate Rule of their Belief in the Article of the Churches Infallibility which to them is the generall Rule of Faith and so by consequence the Scriptures which to us are onely the Rule of Earth must be more then so to them even the Rule of their Rule of Faith But if the Scriptures may be the immediate and insallible Rule of their Belief in this one Article of the Churches Infallibility what reason possibly can be imagined why they should not be the infallible and immediate Rule of their Faith in all other parts or Articles of their Creed For I call Heaven and Earth Men and Angels to witnesse bâ—…xt ours and the Romish Church whether the Articles of Christs Incarnation his Death his Passion his Burial his Resurrection his Aseension his Intercession for us the Resurrection of the dead and Life everlasting c. be not to any mans Capacitie in the World much more plainly set down in sundry places of Scripture then the Infallibilitie of the present Romish Church in these words Peter feed my sheep Peter to thee 〈◊〉 give the â—…s of Heaven Thou art Peter and upon this Rock will I build my Church It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and us or in any place her sonnes can challenge for it Wherefore if the Holy Ghost teach us this Article of the Churches Infallibilitie immediately without the Churches infallible Authoritie which as we now suppose must be proved from the Scriptures first infallibly Believed then questionlesse he may and will immediately teach us the other Articles of our Creed and whatsoever necessary to Salvation which are more plainly and perspicuously set down in Scriptures without the help or assistance of the Churches infallible Authority which it is supposed to teach by places more doubtfull 10 Or if our Adversaries will hold it no Absurdity to say that the Holy Ghost may teach us the true Sense and Meaning of the fore-mentioned places of Scripture which seem to make for the Infallibility of the Romish Church as Petre pasce oves c. immediately without the help or assistance of the Churches Infallibilitie which is here the lesson supposed to be taught and refers all other Points of Faith or matters of Doctrine unto the Churches teaching immediately they are bound in Reason to shew a Scripture for this Assertion And besides they must perforce make the same comparison betwixt the Holy Ghosts immediate teaching and the Church or Popes immediat teaching which our Saviour Christ made between the Holy Ghosts extraordinary teaching which was to ensue his Glorification and his own immediate teaching before his Passion and as soon as the Holy Ghost hath once taught us the Meaning of these places which make for the Churches Infallibilitie that may be applied unto him in respect of the Popes Supereminencie in teaching which our Saviour Christ spake of himself and his own personall Instructions in the dayes of his Humility in respect of that 〈◊〉 â—ed Comforters Illuminations to be bestowed in abundant measure upon his Apostles immediately upon his Ascention For thus by their Assertions that Holy Comforter after that Lesson once taught Tues Petrâ—… should take his leave of faithfull hearts in the same termes our Saviour there did of his Disciples I tell you the Truth it is expedient for you that I go away For if I go not away the Comforter that Infallible Teacher on whose Authority your Souls must rest will not come unto you but if I depart I will send him unto you and again I have many things to say unto you but ye cannot hear â—oem now howâ—eit when He is come that hath the Spirit of Truth your infallible Teacher whose Tongue while he speaks ex Cathedra I must attend he will lead you unto all Truth for he shall not speak of himself but whatsoever he shall hear be shall speak he shall glorifie me for he shall receive of me and shew it unto you These words I say might be
The â—esuits unwillingnesse to acknowledge the Churches proposal for the True Cause of his faith Of differences and agreements about the final Resolution of faith either amongst the adversaries themselves or betwixt us and them 464 27 That the Churches proposal is the true immediate and prime cause of all absolute Belief my Romanist can have concerning any determinate divine revelation 468 28 Discovering either the grosse ignorance or notorious craft of the Iesuite in denying his faith is finally resolved into the Churches veracitie or infallibility that possibly it cannot be resolved into any branch of the First Truth 471 29 What manner of causal dependance Romish belief hath on the Church that the Romanist truely and properly believes the Church onely not God or his Word 478 30 Declaring how the first main ground of Romish faith leads directly unto Atheisâ— the second unto preposterous Heathenism or Idolatry 484 31 Proving the last assertion or generally the imputations laid upon the Papacie by that authority the â—esuites expreslie give unto the Pope in matters of particular Fact as in the Canonizing of Saints 495 32 What danger by this blasphemous doctrine may accrew to Christian States that of all heresies blasphemies or idolatries which have been since the world began or can be imagined 〈◊〉 Christ come to judgement this Apostasie of the Iesuites is the most abominable and conâ—…ous against the blessed Trinity 499 BLASPHEMOUS POSITIONS OF JESUITES And other Later ROMANISTS Concerning the Authority of their CHURCH The Third Book of Comments upon the CREED SECT I. Containing the Assertions of the Romish Church whence her threefold Blasphemy springs HAving in the former dispute clearly acquitted as well Gods Word for breeding as our Church from nursing Contentions Schisms and Heresies we may in this by course of common equity more freely accuse their injurious calumniators And because our purpose is not to charge them with forgery of any particular though grossest Heresies or Blasphemies though most hideous but for erecting an Intire Frame capacious of all Villanies imaginable far surpassing the Hugest Mathematical Form human fancy could have conceived of such matters but only from inspection of this real and material patern which by degrees insensible hath grown up with the Mysterie of Iniquity as the Bark doth with the Tree Such inconsiderate passionate speeches as heat of contention in personal quarrels hath extracted from some one or few of their private Writers shall not be produced to give evidence against the Church their Mother whose trial shall be as far as may be by her Peers either by her own publick determinations in this controversie or joynt consent of her authorized best approved Advocates in opening the Title or unfolding the contents of that Prerogative which they challenge for her 2 Our accusations are grounded upon their Positions before set down when we explicated the differences betwixt us The Position in brief is This That the infallible authority of the present Church is the most sure most safe undoubted rule in all doubts or controversies of faith or in all points concerning the Oracles of God by which we may certainly know both without which we cannot possibly know either which are the Oracles of God which not or what is the true sense and meaning of such as are received for his Oracles whether written or unwritten 3 The extent of divine Oracles or number of Canonical books hath been as our Adversaries pretend very questionable amongst the Ancient though such of the Fathers as for their skil in antiquity were in all unpartial judgments most competent Judges in this cause were altogether for us against the Romanists and such as were for their opinion were but for it upon an errour as thinking the Jews had acknowledged all those books of the old Testament for Canonical Scripture which the Churches wherein they lived received for such or that the Christian Church did acknowledg all for Canonical which they allowed to be publickly read Safe it was our adversaries cannot deny for the Ancient to dissent one from another in this question or to suspend their assent till new probabilities might sway them one way or other No reasons have been produced since sufficient to move any ingenious mind unto more peremptory resolutions yet doth the Councel of Trent bind all to an absolute acknowledgement of those Books for Canonical which by their own confession were rejected by S. Hierom and other Fathers If any shall not receive the whole Books with all their parts usually read in the Church and as they are extant in the old vulgar for sacred and Canonical Let him be accursed So are all by the same decree that wil not acknowledg such unwritten traditions as the Romish Church pretends to have come from Christ and his Apostles for divine and of authority equal with the written word 4 So generally is this opinion received so fully believed in that Church That many of her Sons even whilest they write against us forgetting with whom they have to deal take it as granted That the Scriptures cannot be known to be Gods word but by the Infallible authority of the present Church And from this supposition as from a truth sufficiently known though never proved they labour in the next place to infer That without submission of our faith to the Churches publick spirit we cannot infallibly distinguish the orthodoxal or divine sense of Gods Oracles whether written or unwritten from heretical or human 5 Should we admit written Traditions and the Church withal as absolute Judge to determin which are Apostolical which not little would it boot us to question with them about their meaning For when the point should come to trial we might be sure to have the very words framed to whatsoever sense should be most favourable for justifying Romish practises And even of Gods written Oracles whose words or characters as he in his wisdom hath provided cannot now be altered by an Index Expurgatorius at their pleasure That such a sense as shall be most serviceable for their Turn may as time shall minister occasion be more commodiously gathered the Trent Fathers immediately after the former decree for establishing unwritten Traditions and amplifying the extent of divine written Oracles have in great wisdom authorized the old and vulgar translation of the whole Canon Which though it were not purposely framed to maintain Popery as some of our writers say they have as frivolously as maliciously objected yet certainly as well the escapes and errors of those unskilful or ill-furnished interpreters as the negligence of transcribers or other defects incident to that work from the simplicitie of most ancient the injuries or calamities of insuing times were amongst others as the first heads or petty springs of that raging sloud of impiety which had well nigh drowned the whole Christian world in perdition by continually receiving into its chanel once thus wrought the dregs and filth of every other error under heaven
Ariadna's thread as now it is thought to guide us through the Labyrinth of errors Such was S. Peters love to truth that he would have so fastned it to all faithful hearts as none should ever have failed to follow it in following which he could not erre Doubtlesse had any such conceit lodged in his breast this discourse had drawn it out his usual form of exhortation had been too mild his ordinary stile too low This doctrine had been proclaimed to all the world with Anathema's as loud and terrible as the Canons of any Papistical Councel report 2 But he followed no such deceitful Fables when he opened unto them the power and coming of Christ whose Majesty as he had seen with his own eyes so would he have others to see him too But by what light By Scriptures What Scriptures Peter feed my sheep Nay but by the Light of Prophesie That is a Light indeed in it self but unto private spirits it is no better saith Valentian then a light put under a bushel unlesse the visible Church do hold it out Where did the visible Church keep residence in those dayes In S. Peter I trow How chances it then he saith not fix your eyes on mine that have seen the glory of the Lord and the Prophets light shal shine unto you If by his commendation and proposal it were to shine he had said better thus Ye do well in that you give heed unto me as to your only infallible teacher that must confirm you in the truth of Prophetical Writings and cause them shine in your hearts but now he saith 2 Pet 1. 19. Ye do well in that ye take beed unto the Prophets as unto a light that shineth in a dark place until the day-star arise in your hearts This light of Prophets illuminated the eyes of Peters faith albeit with his bodily eyes he had seen Christs glory For speaking comparatively of that testimony which he had heard in the Mount he adds We have also a surer word of the Prophets That the Lord hath been glorified in the Mount his Auditors were to take upon his Credit and Authority nor could he make them to see this particular as he himself had done but that Christ Jesus whom he saw glorified in the Mount was the Lord of Glory he had 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a surer testimony then his bodily sense the light of Prophets This then was the commendations of his flock that they looked upon it which shined as wel unto them as him to all without respect of persons that take heed unto it able to bring them not to acknowledg Peters infallibility but to the day-star it self whole light would further ascertain them even of the truth the Prophets and the Apostles taught For Christ is in a peculiar manner the first and the last in the edifice of faith the lowest and the highest stone in the corner refused by the master builders or visible pillars of the Jewish Church their faith was not grounded up on the Prophets whose words they knew not and not knowing them they knew not him but unto such as raise their faith by this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the true square and line Chist is both the Fundamental Rock which supporteth and the chief corner stone that binds the whole house of God and preserves it from clefts and ruptures 3 But lest his followers might look amisse upon this prophetical light rightly esteemed in the general S. Peter thought it necessary to advertise them not to content themselves with every interpretation or accustomary acknowledgment of their truth grounded on others relations reports or skill in expounding them or multitude of voices that way swaying This had been as if a man that hath eyes of his own should believe there was a Moon or stars because a great many of his honest neighbours had told him so A thousand witnesses in such a case as this were but private testimonies in respect of that distinct knowledge which every one may have that list That the Lord should preserve light in Coshen when darknesse had covered the whole face of Egypt besides seems unto me lesse strange but more sensibly true then before whilest I consider how in this age wherein the light of his countenance hath so clearly shined throughout those parts of Europe whence the Gospel came to us Ingolstade should still sit in darknesse environed with the shadow of death That her great professor Valentian born I take it within these fourscore years should grope at noon day as if he had been brought forth in the very midnight of Popery or died welnigh three hundred years ago Scarce Scotus himself not Ockam questionlesse though shut up in a prison where no light of any expositor had ever come could have made a more dunstical collection of the Apostles words then he hath done Saint Peter meant one of these Three First that there can be no certain or probable way of expounding Scriptures by our proper wit or industry or Secondly that one or other place of Scripture cannot be rightly expounded by human wit or industry but so compared they rightly may or Thirdly that the Scriptures cannot certainly and infallibly be expounded every where without the sentence of some other common infallible authority which in this respect is to be held as judge of faith in the Church The Apostle he infers did not mean the first or second ergo the third So as the force and wisdom of the Apostolical admonition is this No man by his private industry or study howsoever imploied either he thought not of the holy Ghosts direction or assistance or did not except it no not by any search of Scripture it self can certainly and infallibly understand the doctrine of Scriptures in controversies of which S. Peter in that place speaks not one word but it is necessary he learn this of some other publick authority in the church by which the Holy Ghost speaks publickly and teacheth all His reason follows more dunsticall then the collection it self For the Apostle straight subjoyns As the holy men of God did speak in Scriptures not by human authority but divine so likewise cannot the Scriptures be possibly understood by any human or private industry of this or that man but by some other authority likewise divine by which the holy spirit which is the Author of Scriptures may be likewise the most certain interpreter of Scriptures 4 Had another read thus much unto me and bid me read the Author or his works wherein it was found I should presently have named either Erasmus Moriae Encomium Frishlins Priscianus Vapulans or some such like Comedian disposed in merriment to pen some old Dunces part Cannot the Sun of righteousnesse infuse his heavenly influence by the immediate operation of his spirit or doth his influence want force without conjunction with this blazing Comet or falling star Was it not the authority of this spirit which made S. Peter himself to
the furtherance of Piety and Godliness in perpetuam Eleemosynam for a perpetual deed of Charity which I hope the Reader will advance to the utmost improvement He that reads this will find his Learning Christening him The Divine and his Life witnessing him a man of God a Preacher of Righteousness and I might add a Prophet of things to come They that read those Qualifications which he in his Second and Third Book requires in them which hope to understand the Scriptures aright and see how great an insight he had into them and how many hid Mysteries he hath unfolded to this Age will say his Life was good Superlatively good The Reader may easily perceive that he had no design in his opinions no hopes but that blessed One proposed in the beginning that no preferment nor desire of Wealth nor affectation of Popularity should ever draw him from writing upon this Subject for which no man so fit as he because to use his own Divine and high Apothegme No man could properly write of Justifying Faith but he that was equally affected to Death and Honour Thus have I presented you with a Memorial of that Excellent Man but with infinite disadvantage from the unskilfulness of the Relator and some likewise from the very disposition of the Party himself The humble man conceals his perfections with as much pains as the proud covers his defects and avoids observation as industriously as the Ambitious provoke it He that would draw a face to the Life commands the Party to sit down in the Chair in a constant and unremoved Posture and a Countenance composed that he may have the full view of every line colour and dimension whereas he that will not yield to these Ceremonies must be surprized at unawares by Artificial stealth and unsuspected glances like the Divine who was drawn at distance from the Pulpit or an ancient man in our daies whose Statue being to be erected the Artificer that carved it was enforced to take him sleeping That which I have here designed next to the Glory of God which is to be praised in all his Saints is the benefit of the Christian Reader that he may learn by his Example as well as by his writings by his Life as well as by his Works which is the earnest desire of him who unfaignedly wishes the health and Salvation of your Souls E. V. THE ETERNAL TRVTH OF Scriptures AND CHRISTIAN BELIEF Thereon wholly depending Manifested by it own light Delivered in two Books of COMMENTARIES upon the Apostles Creed The former Containing the positive grounds of Christian Religion in general cleared from all exceptions of Atheists or Infidels The later Manifesting the Grounds of Reformed Religion to be so firm and sure that the Romanists cannot oppugne them but with the utter overthrow of the Romish Church Religion and Faith By THOMAS JACKSON D. D. LONDON Printed by R. Norton for T. Garthwait 1653. TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE RALPH Lord EVRE Baron of MALTON and WILTON Lord President of his Majesties Court established in the Principalitie and Marches of Wales My singular good LORD RIGHT HONORABLE THough few others would I trust Your Lordship will vouchsafe countenance to these Commentaries rude and imperfect I must confesse but whose untimely or too hastie birth if so it prove and must be censured hath not been caused by any inordinate appetite but onely from a longing desire of testifying that love and duty which I owe unto your Honourable Familie and Person as in many other respects so chiefly in this That being ingaged unto a more gainfull but not so good a course of life and well-nigh rooted in another soil I was by your Lordships favourable advice and countenance transplanted to this famous Nursery of good learning Wherein by his blessing who onely gives increase to what his servants plant or water I have grown to such a degree of maturity as these raw Meditations argue or so wild a graft was capable of Course and unpleasant my fruit may prove but whiles it shall please the Lord to continue his wonted blessings of health and other opportunities altogether unfruitfull by his assistance I will not altogether idle I cannot be Such as these first fruits are much better I dare not promise the whole after-crop I trust shall be both for the sincerity of my intention acceptable I doubt not to my God the later I hope more ripe in the judgement of men then can in reason be expected the first fruits of the same mans labours should be Thus humbly beseeching your Honour to accept these as they are and to esteem of them howsoever otherwise as an undoubted pledge of a minde indeavouring to shew it self thankfull for benefits already received and much desiring the continuance of your honourable favours I continue my prayers unto the Almighty that he would multiply his best favors and blessings upon you Corpus-Christi Colledge in Oxford October 5. Your Lordships much devoted Chaplain THOMAS JACKSON TO THE CHRISTIAN READER IGnorant altogether I am not of the disposition though not much acquainted with the practises of this present age wherein to have meditated upon so many several matters as I here present unto thy Christian view will unto some I know seem but an effect of melancholie as to have taken the pains to pen them will argue my want of other imployments or forlorn hopes of worldly thriving Unto others and those more to be regarded so soon in print to publish what had been not so well concocted and more rawly penned will be censured as a spice of that vanity which usually haunts smatterers in good learning but wherewith judicious Clerks are seldom infected To the former I onely wish mindes more setled or lesse conscience of their own extravagancies and carelesse mispence of choicest time faults apt to breed a mislike of others industrie in such courses as will approve themselves in his sight that sits as Judge and trier of all our wayes howsoever such as desire to be meer By-standers as well in Church as Common-wealths affairs may upon sinister respects mutually misinform themselves For many of the later I am afraid lest being partly such and so esteemed they preposterously affect not to be taken for more judicious scholers then indeed they are for the fostering of which conceit in others their unwillingnesse to publish what they have conceived aright may well be apprehended as a means not improbable Not to expose their Meditations to publick censure is and hath been as the Christian world too well can witnesse a resolution incident to men of greatest judgement though no such essential propertie as necessarily argues either all so minded to be or all otherwise minded not to be alike judicious Certain it is the more excellent the internall feature of mens minds is the greater disparagement to them will an ordinary representation of it be and to adorn their their choice conceits with such outward attire as best beseems them would require too great costs
145 CAP. 33. A brief direction for preventing scruples and resolving doubts concerning particular sentences or passages in the Canon of Scripture 148 CAP. 34. Concluding the first Book with some brief admonition to the Reader 149 The Second Book How far the ministery of Men is necessary for planting Christian Faith and retaining the unity of it planted SECT I. What obedience is due to Gods Word what to his Messengers Pag. 154 CAP. 1. The sum of the Romanists exceptions against the Scriptures 155 CAP. 2. The former objection as far as it concerns illiterate and Lay-men retorted and answered 156 CAP. 3. The general heads of Agreements or differences betwixt us and the Papists in this argument 162 CAP. 4. Of the two contrary extremities the one in excesse proper to the Papists transferring all obedience from Scriptures to the Church the other in defect proper to the Anti-papist defrauding the Church of all spiritual authority That there is some peculiar obedience due unto the Clergie 165 CAP. 5 Of the diversitie of humane actions the Original of their lawfulnesse unlawfulnesse or indifferencie which without question belong to the proper subject of Obedience which not 168 CAP. 6. That sincere obedience unto lawful authority makes sundry actions lawful and good which without it would be altogether unlawful and evil pag. 170 CAP. 7. That the Apostles rule Whatsoever is not of faith is Sin doth no way prejudice the former resolution What actions are properly said to be not of faith In what case or subject doubt or scruple make them such 177 CAP. 8. That such as most pretend liberty of conscience from our Apostles rule do most transgresse it with general directions for squaring our actions unto it or other rules of faith That by it the flock stands bound to such conditional assent as was mentioned Chap. 4. 185 CAP. 9. Of the nature use conditions or properties of conditional assent or obedience 189 CAP. 10. Wherein this conditional belief differeth from the Romans implicit faith That the one is the other not subordinate to Gods Word or Rule of faith 196 CAP. 11. In what sence we hold the Scriptures to to be The Rule of Faith 198 SECT II. That the pretended obscurity of Scriptures is no just exception why they should not be acknowledged the Absolute Rule of Faith which is the Mother-objection of the Romanist 201 CAP. 12. How far it may be granted the Scriptures are obscure with some premonitions for the right state of the question 201 CAP. 13. The true state of the question about the Scriptures obscuritie or perspicuity unto what men and for what causes they are obscure 206 CAP. 14. How men must be qualified ere they can understand Scriptures aright that the Pope is not so qualified 210 CAP. 15. The Romanists objections against the Scriptures for being obscure do more directly impeach their first Authour and his Messengers their Pen-men then us and the cause in hand 220 CAP. 16. That all the pretences of Scriptures obscurity are but mists and vapours arising from the corruption of the flesh and may by the pure light of Scriptures rightly applied easily be dispelled 223 CAP. 17. That the Mosaical writings were a most perfect rule plain and easie to the ancient Israelites 229 CAP. 18. Concluding this controversie about the obscurity of Scriptures according to the state proposed with the testimony of Saint Paul 233 SECT III. That the continuall practise of Hereticks in urging Scriptures for to establish Heresie and the diversity of opinions amongst the learned about the sence of them is no just exception why they should not be acknowledged as the sole entire and compleat Rule of Faith 235 CAP. 19. Containing the true state of the question with the adversaries generall objections against the truth 236 CAP. 20. That the former objections and all of like kind drawn from the cunning practise of Hereticks in colouring false opinions by Scriptures are most pregnant to confirm ours and most forcible to confute the adversaries doctrine 239 CAP. 21. The pretended excellencie of the supposed Roman rule for composing controversies impeached by the frequencie of Heresies in the Primitive Church and the imperfection of that union whereof since that time they so much boast Page 242 CAP. 22. That our Adversaries objections do not so much infringe as their practise confirms the sufficiencie of Scriptures for composing the greatest controversies in Religion 247 CAP. 23. The sufficiencie of Scriptures for final determination of controversies in Religion proved by our Saviours and his Apostles authority and practise 254 CAP. 24. That all their objections drawn from dissentions amongst the learned or the uncertainty of private spirits either conclude nothing of what they intend against us or else more then they mean or at the least dare avouch against Gods Prophets and faithfull people of old 260 CAP. 25. How farre upon what termes or grounds we may with modesty dissent from the Ancient or others of more excellent gifts than our selves That our adversaries arguments impeach as much the certainty of human sciences as of private spirits 266 SECT IIII. The last of the three main Objections before proposed which was concerning our supposed defective means for composing controversies or retaining the unity of faith fully answered and retorted That the Roman faith hath no foundation 271 CAP. 26. Containing the true state of the question or a comparison betwixt the Romish Church and ours for their means of preventing or composing controversies 272 CAP. 27. That the Romish Church hath most need of some excellent means for taking up of contentions because it necessarily breeds so many and so grievous 275 CAP. 28. Of two sences in which the excellencie of the Romish Churches pretended means for retaining the unity of faith can onely possibly be defended the one from the former discourse proved apparently false the other in it self as palpably ridiculous 278 CAP. 29. That their arguments drawn from conveniencie of reason or pretended correspondencie between Civil and Ecclesiastical Regiment do prejudice themselves not us 282 CAP. 30. That the finall triall of this controversie must be by Scriptures that the Jesuites and modern Papists fierce oppugning all certainty of private spirits in discerning the divine truth of Scriptures or their true sence hath made the Church their mother utterly uncapable of any Plea by Scriptures for establishing her pretended infallibility 285 CAP. 31. The insufficiencie of the Roman Rule of faith for effecting what it aims at albeit we grant all they demand in this controversie The ridiculous use thereof amongst such as acknowledge it The sufficiencie of Scriptures for composing all contentions further illustrated 297 CAP. 32. Brieflie collecting the summe of the second Book 306 THE ETERNAL TRUTH OF SCRIPTURES AND CHRISTIAN BELIEF thereon wholly Depending manifested by its own LIGHT The first Book of Comments upon the Creed First Generall Part. SECT I. I believe in God the Father c. IF in any at all most of
3 Lastly the experiments which are related by Authors of this profession men in any reasonable mans judgement as much to be Believed herein as any other Writers in theirs are far more notable and apt to produce belief and hope of attaining the truth in this profession than any others can have in theirs The experiments of others were but ordinary and natural these are extraordinary and supernatural If the Atheist should impudently deny the truth of their report we may convince him with S. Augustines acute Dilemma If the Miracles related by our Writers be true they give evident experiment of the truth of Scripture if there were no such particular miracles but all feigned then this was a miracle above all miracles that Christian Religion should prevail against all other Arts Power or Policy without any extraordinary event or miracle It was not so easie a matter to cozen all the Roman Emperours and their Deputies with feigned Tales the World which hated Christians so much was inquisitive enough to know the truth of their reports I may conclude Nisi veritas magna fuisset non praevaluisset It was miraculous doubtless that it should so enrease without arms without any promise of carnal pleasure or security but even against their natural inclination that did profess it and all the Worlds opposition against it It had enemies both private and publick domestick and forraign even the flesh and sense of those which followed it fought against it 4 Mahomet since that time hath found a multitude of followers but all either enforced to follow him by threats of shame disgrace and tortures in this life or else allured thereto by fair promises of carnal pleasures to be perpetual without interruption in the life to come He hath set his followers such a course as they might be sure both of wind and tide And if the Haven whereat they arrive were as safe as their course is easie they were of all men the most happy But Christianity from its first beginning was to row against the stream of flesh and blood and to bear out sail against all the blasts that the Devil World or Flesh could oppose against it In a word the increase of Mahumetism hath followed the barbarous Turkish monarchies advancement as moisture in bodies doth the increasing fulness of the Moon And it had been an extraordinary Miracle if a barbarous multitude never acquainted with any civil pleasures should not have composed their mindes unto their Emperours in following a Religion framed as it were to court the senses and wooe the flesh But Christianitie then flourished most when the scorching heat of persecution was at the height When the countenance of Emperours as terrible to their foes for their Heroical valour as plausible to their friends for their lovely carriage were most fiercely set against it What Princes either more terrible to their enemies or more amiable to their friends than Trajan Dioclesian or others of the Christians persecutors were What man living is there of civil education that would not have lothed Mahomet and the whole succession of the Ottoman Familie in respect of these Roman Princes And yet a great part of their native Subjects men as otherwise excellently qualified so of a quiet and peaceable disposition yet readie alwaies to venture their lives for these Heathen Princes in most dangerous service against the enemies of the Roman Empire but most readie to follow the Crucisied Christ through fire and sword against their Emperors command dearer to them than this mortal life and all the Worlds threats or allurements It were sottish to think that such men had not perfect notice of some Higher Powers Commandment to the contrarie whom they thought it safer to obey when they contradicted the commandments or fair allurements of these supream Earthly Powers And it were as silly a perswasion to think that if the great Turk would change his religion for any other that might yeeld like hopes of carnal pleasure after this life any great number of his Subjects would lose their dignities for refusing subscription 5 The brief of what hath been or may be said concerning the grounds or motives of our Assent unto Objects supernatural may be comprised in these four Propositions following of which the first two are Axiomes evident in nature and received by all The two latter undoubted Axiomes amongst true Believers but suppositions onely to meer natural men or Novices in Christianity 6 The first The Stile or Title of these Sacred Books pretending divine Authority binde all men to make trial of their truth commended to us by our Ancestors confirmed to them by the Blood of Martyrs their Predecessors to use the means which they prescribed for this trial that is Abstinence from things forbidden and Alacrity in doing things commanded by them 7 The second Ordinary Apprehension or natural Belief of matters contained in Scriptures or the Christian Creed are of more force to cause men to undertake any good or abstain from any evil than the most firm Belief of any ordinary matters or any points of meer Natural consequence 8 The third Objects and grounds of Christian Belief have in them greater stability of truth and are in themselves more apt to found most strong and firm Belief then any other things whatsoever meerly credible 9 For as the most noble Essences and first Principles of every Art are most intelligible so are divine Truths of all other most Credible Not that they are more easie to be Assented to of any at their first proposal But that they have a greater measure of credibilitie in them and as their credibilitie and truth is inexhaustible so Belief of them once planted can never grow to such fulnesse of certaintie as not to receive daily increase if we applie our mindes diligently unto them so that true Christian Belief admits no stint of growth in this life but still comes nearer and nearer to that evidence of Knowledge which shall swallow it up in the life to come For the conceit of impossibilities or repugnances in nature objected by the obdurate Atheists to make the Principles of Christian religion seem incredible that they might like old Truants have the companie of Novices in Christianitie to loiter or mis-spend good hours with them we shall by Gods assistance dispel them and all other Clouds of like Errours in unfolding the truth of those Articles which they most concern 10 The fourth The means of apprehending the truth of Scriptures and experiments confirming their divine Authority are both for variety of kindes and number of Individual in every kinde far more and more certain than the means of apprehending the grounds of any other Belief or the experiments of any other teachers Authority 11 Some Particulars of every kinde with the General Heads or Common places whence like Observations may be drawn we are now to present so far as they concern the confirmation of the truth of Scriptures in general For the experiments which confirm the truth
of such particular places of Scripture as teach the Articles of our Creed expresly will come more fitly into the unfolding of the Articles themselves The second general part of the first Book SECT I. Of Observations internal or incident unto Scriptures without Reference to any relations or events other then are specified in themselves ALthough the Experiments confirming the truth of Scriptures be as I have said many and divers yet all may be reduced into these general heads or kindes They may be found either in the Stile or Character of these writings themselves the Affections or dispositions of their Writers or in Events or Experiments whatsoever the course of times affords answerable to the Rules set down in Scriptures CAP. IV. Of Historical Characters of Sacred Writings TO any man indued with reason not perverted the Books of Moses give more perfect proof of matters done and acted then any other Historie in the World can possibly do albeit we set aside the secret Characters of Gods Spirit speaking in them which we suppose can be discerned of none but such as have the mark of the Lamb answerable to it engraven upon their hearts But now we seek such inducements to Belief as may perswade the natural unregenerate man of the Historical truth of these sacred Volumes 2 The prejudices arising from the strangeness of matters related by him the Reader shall finde mitigated in the next discourse In the mean time I must request him to suspend his judgement of them and onely to intend the lively Characters of Historical truth in other relations of matters neither strange nor incredible in themselves Either Moses wrote a true Historie or else his words are but a Fiction either Poetical to delight others or Political to advantage himself or his successors Let such as doubt of their Historical truth duly examine whether many things related by him can possibly be referred to any of these two ends As for example if these relations Gen. 4. 1. and the 25. had not been either real Adjuncts of some Famous Truth then sufficiently known or else appointed by God to be notified for some special purpose to posteritie how could it possibly have come into any mans thought or to what end should it have gon thence into his Pen to shew the reason why Evah should call her first son Cain or her third Seth 3 He that would set himself to contradict might reply Moses his invention was so copious as to forecast that those insertions might make his History seem more probable or that he spake unawares according to the Custom of the times wherein he lived But why then should he omit the like in all the generations from Cain and Seth unto Noah the reason of whose name given him by his father he likewise specifies Genesis 5. 29. Genesis 5. 29. Then Lamech begat a son and called his name Noah saying This same shall comfort us concerning our work and sorrow of our hands as touching the earth which the Lord hath cursed It was doubtless from some diversity in the matter presupposed unto this work not from the workmans choice or invention why the reason of these three mens names should be specified as afterwards will more plainly appear For the positive notes or sure tokens of a true Historie they are most plentiful in the stories of Abraham Jacob and Joseph Each part of which the Divine Providence whereof these are the most Ancient most perfect and most lively patterns would have set out with such perspicuitie of all circumstances that the Reader might be an eye-witness of their Historical Truth The subject and issue whereof is in it self so pleasant as will ravish sober and attentive mindes and allure them to follow the main current of Divine Mysteries which flow from these Histories mentioned as from their first Heads or Fountains To point at some few rather than handle any particulars 4 If we may judge of the truth of mens writings by their outward form or Character as we do of mens honestie by their looks speech or behaviour what Historie in the World bears so perfect resemblance of things done and acted or yeelds without further testimonie then its own so full assurance of a true narration as the stories of Abrahams departure out of his Land his answers to God Sarahs distrust upon misconceit of Gods promises her seeking to fulfil it by giving her Maid to Abraham the manner of her speech upon her Maids contemning her the debate and issue of her controversie the Dialogue between the Angels of God and Abraham with Sarahs Apology for laughing at their Message Abrahams journey to Mount Moriah his servants expedition to Aram Naharim with his Commission to provide his young Master a Wife There appears not in any of these the least surmise of any Political respect not any signe of affected delight or Poetical representations seeing this Author falls immediately into other matters and relates every thing though many of most diverse natures with such natural specification of every circumstance as unless our hearts were prepossest with Belief that he had writ them by his direction who perfectly knoweth all things as well sore-past as present or to come we would be perswaded that most of them were relations of such as acted them uttered to their familiar friends immediately upon the fact whilest all circumstances were fresh in memory 5 How others are affected I cannot tell me thinks when I reade that story Genesis 34. I am transformed into a Man of the Old World and become a neighbour of old Jacob over-hearing him and his sons debating the slaughter of the Sichemites The old man complains Ye have troubled me and made me stink among the inhabitants of the land as well the Canaanites as the Perizzites and I being few in number they shall gather themselves together against me and so shall I and mine house be destroyed and they answered and said Shall he abuse our Sister as a Whore 6 Or if this description though issuing as naturally out of the real disposition of the true no fained parties described as brightness out of the body of the Sun yet because but short may seem more imitable by Art I will propose a longer Dialogue betwixt this old man and his sons for a pattern of which fairest colours that Art or Invention can put upon any fained Subject will come as far short as Solomons gawdy but artificial attire did of the native beauty of wild Lillies or any dy that Art can give of the natural splendor of finest Pearls the Onix or other more precious stone The storie is is Genesis 42. from the 29. unto the 15 verse of the 43 Chapter The circumstances which I would especially commend unto the Readers consideration are first The old mans jealousie v. 36. upon his sons relation what had befallen them in their journey and the Governours desire of seeing Benjamin v. 31 32 33 34 35. His peremptorie reply v. 33. to Reubens answer
contrite heart for their disobedience past but rather adding thirst to drunkenness Blesse themselves when they hear the words of that Curse promising peace unto themselves though they walk on according to the stubbornness of their Forefathers hearts Their own desires they will not break But Christian Children they can be well content to Sacrifice kill and mangle throughout all ages wheresoever they come as their often practises in England France and Germany witnesse and the Jews of Lincoln executed at London for this crime did confesse to be a solemn practise as oft as they could conveniently come by their prey Thus out of the mouthes of Infants and Children will God have his praise erected still Their Bloud hath sealed and their Cries proclaimed the truth of our Saviours words that these Jews are of their Father the Devil and the lusts of their Father they will do John 8. 44. He was a murtherer from the beginning and alwayes delighted much in such Sacrifices as were most displeasing unto God 5 If Christian Sobrietie did not teach us to acknowledge Gods judgements alwayes just although the manner of his Justice can not be apprehended much lesse exemplified to ordinary capacities by the wisest of the Sons of men the consideration of these Jews perpetual temper would half perswade us that the souls of such as had either procured consented unto or approved our Saviours and his Apostles death had been Sent from Hell by course into the bodies of these Jews here scattered in these Western parts as so many Messengers from the dead to shew the malignant heat of those Everlasting flames by their unquenchable thirst of innocent bloud But neither doth Scripture warrant nor natural Reason enforce such suppositions either for acquitting Gods Severity upon this people from injustice or His Goodness from suspition of being the Author of their villainous minds though he be the sole Creatour as well of theirs as their godly forefathers souls For these their wicked posterities plagues are just because their souls which he hath made will not receive correction by their own or their fathers plagues continually inflicted upon them since our Saviours death but still as it were Hunt out Gods judgements which lie perpetually in wait for them by treading in their Ungratious predecessours steps In one word Though the God of their Fathers have made their souls yet they make Pride of heart Inveterate custome Examples of their progenitors Their God For us Christians let us admire the wisdom of our gracious God that so disposeth our enemies mischievous minds unto our good rather then enquire how their villanies can stand with his justice This their unsatiable desire of Crucifying them unto whom the Kingdom of heaven belongs doth confirm our Faith in that Main Article of their Fathers crucifying The Lord of Glory And no doubt but God in his All-seeing wisdom hath permitted the like hellish temper to remain in all Generations of these Jews that the former most Horrible and otherwise almost Incredible Act with the Actors Devilish Malice might be more lively and sensibly represented to all posterities which had not seen or known them by Experience And Gods Judgements upon these Modern Jews for their Forefathers sins hereby may appear most just in that they make them their won by Imitation plainly testifying to the world that They would do as their Forefathers had done if the same Tragedie of Christs Passion were to be acted our again yea in as much as they practize the like upon his living members They are guilty as wel as their Forefathers of His Death 6 Generally the outward carriage and inward temper of these modern Jews are such as all that have any Experience of them may perceive the Excellent qualities of their worthy Progenitours and the extraordinary Prerogatives whence they are fallen as sensibly and undoubtedly as we can know by the Lees or corrupt remainder of any Liquor what the vertue and strength thereof was in its Prime The present Depression of this People below all others amongst whom they live rightly taken doth give us the true Excesse of their Exaltation in former times above the Nations as perfectly as the Elevation of the Pole which we see doth give us the degrees of the others Occultation Finally if we compare the Estate of such as lived in Tullies times with these Modern Jews estate lately mentioned the great prosperitie of their Ancestors under Joshuah Judges David and Solomon may be gathered from these differences as exactly and as clearly as the third proportionable number out of two others already known This is that Golden Rule whose practise I would commend to all young Students For from the known differences of their Estate from time to time we may be led unto the perfect knowledge of Gods Power and Providence of his Mercy and Bounty to such as love him of his Judgements upon such as Hate him and transgresse his Laws Finally nothing in Scripture can seem Incredible if men would consider the wonderful exaltation and depression of this People 7 This admirable difference between the true Israelites of old and these Modern perfidious Jews is most lively represented unto us in that Parable of divers Figs which Jeremiah saw Jerem. 24. 1 2. The Lord shewed me and behold two baskets of Figs were set before the Temple of the Lord one basket very good Figs like the Figs that are first ripe and the other very naughty Figs which could not be eaten they were so evil No man I hope will challenge me for extending this Text beyond its literal sense One part of which by the Prophets own exposition is to be understood of such as were led captive by Nebuchadnezzar signified by the good figs the other of Zedechiah with the residue of Hierusalem and them that dwelt in the Land of Egypt represented by the bad figs. My Prophet indeed applies it only unto them of his own time of whom I confesse it was Literally meant but not only of them but more principally more fully and directly of the Jews about or since our Saviours time and his Apostles or their followers The parable with the consequence thereof is true of both in as much as both are particulars contained under that general division which Moses had made of Blessings and Cursings to befall this people in divers measures according to their constancy in good or stubbornnesse in evil Unto this General Prediction the Prophets do still frame their prophecies as Corollaries or Appendices and so must they be applied by us not only to the present times wherein they wrote but to the times of the Messiah in which both Moses his general and the Prophets particular prophecies were more fully accomplished then in any age before That which Jeremy in the third Verse of that same Chapter said of the Figs. was true of this people in all Ages The good amongst them were very good the naughty alwayes very naughty but the difference greater
Infallibility might prove as a Powder-plot to blow up the whole Edifice of Christian Faith as it certainly will if men suffer it to be once planted in their Hearts and Consciences The Jesuites speculative Positions of their Churches transcendent Authority are as the Train the Popes Thunderbolts as the Match to set the whole World on Combustion unlesse his Lordly Designes though in matters of Faith and greatest moment be put in execution without Question or demur as shall God prospering these proceedings most clearly appear in the sequel of this discourse Wherein are to be discussed 1 Their Objections against us the Points of Difference betwixt us with the Positive Grounds of Truth maintained by us 2 The Inconveniences of their Positions Erection of tripple Blasphemy by the overthrow of Christianitie 3 The Original Causes of their Errour in this and such erroncous Perswasions as held by them in other Points not descried by us prove secret Temptations for others to follow them or serve as previal Dispositions for their Agents to work upon 4 The possible Means and particular Manner how Orthodoxal may be distinguished from Heretical Doctrine or the Life-working Sense of Scriptures from Artificial Glosses These Points discussed and the Positive Grounds of Christian Faith cleared as well against the open Assaults of the professed Atheists as the secret Attempts of undermining Papists we may with better security proceed to raise the Foundation laid in the first general Part of the first Book to the height intended SECT I. What Obedience is due to Gods Word what to his Messengers THe whole Scripture saith the Apostle is given by inspiration of God and is profitable to Teach to Reprove to Correct and to Instruct in Righteousnesse that the Man of God may be absolute being made perfect unto all good works What or whom he means by The Man of God is not agreed upon by all that acknowledge his words in the sense he meant them most Infallible and Authentick Some hereby understand onely such men as Timothy was Ministers of Gods word or Prophets of the new Testament and so briefly elude all Arguments hence drawn to prove the sufficiency of Scriptures for being the Absolute rule of Faith at least to All as well unlearned as learned Yet should they in all reason might Gods Word rule their Reason grant them to be such unto all such as Timothy was publick Teachers men conversant in or consecrated unto Sacred Studies but even This they deny as well as the Former the former in their opinion be more absurd for us to affirm especially holding the Hebrew text only Authentick Briefly they charge us with debasing Peter for advancing Paul or rather for colouring or adorning our pretended sense of Pauls Words that is for giving too little to Peters Successors or the Church too much to Scriptures too little to Spiritual too much to Lay men 2 These are plausible Pretences and sweet Baits to stop the mouthes and mussle the pens of Clergy-men in reformed Churches unto most of whom as they object besides the Spiritual Sword little or nothing is left for their just defence against the Insolencies of rude illiterate profane Laicks And yet who more earnest then they in this Cause against the Church against themselves yet certain it is that no man can be truly for himself unlesse he be first of all for Truth it self of which he that gains the greatest share what other detriment or disparagement soever in the mean time he sustain in the end speeds alwayes best And seeing To Lie or teach amisse is a matter altogether impossible to Omnipotencie it self to be able and willing withall to defend a Falshood or set fair colours on foul Causes is rather Impotencie then Abilitie Hence was that quicquid possumus pro veritate possumus Seeing by Truth we live our Spiritual Life to weaken it for strengthning our Temporal Hopes can never rightly be accounted any true effect of Power but an infallible Argument of great and desperate Imbecillitie 3 For these Reasons since I consecrated my labours to the search of Divine Truth my mind hath been most set to find it out in this present Controversie whereon most others of Moment chiefly depend And as unto the Romanist it is though falsly termed the Catholick so should it be unto us to all that love the Name of Christ The very Christian Cause a Cause with which the Adversaries Fortunes our Faith their Temporal our Spiritual Estate and Hopes must stand or fall a Cause whose Truth and Strength on our part will evidently appear If we first examine what the Antichristian Adversary can oppose against it CAP. I. The Sum of the Romanists Exceptions against the Scriptures 1 THeir Objections against Scriptures spring from this double Root The One that They are no sufficient Rule of Faith but Many Things are to be Believed which are not taught in Them The Second that albeit they were the compleat Rule of Faith yet could they not be known of us but by the Authority of the Church so that all the former Directions for establishing our Assent unto the Scriptures as unto the Words of God Himself were vain seeing this cannot be attained unto but by relying upon Christs visible Church The former of these two Fountains or Roots of Errour I am not here to meddle with elsewhere we shall That the Scriptures teach All Points of Faith set down in this Creed they cannot denie or if they would it shall appear in their several Explications So that the Scripture rightly understood is a competent Rule for the Articles herein contained Let us then see whether the Sense or Meaning of these Scriptures which both They and We hold for Canonical may not be Known Understood and fully Assented unto Immediately and in themselves without relying upon any visible Church or Congregation of men from whose Doctrine we must frame our Belief without distrust of Errour or Examination of their Decrees with any intention to reform them or swarve from them 2 That the Scripture is not the Rule whereon Private Men especially Unlearned ought to rely in matters of Faith from these general Reasons or Topicks they seek to perswade us First admitting the Scriptures to be Infallible in themselves and so consequently to all such as can perfectly understand them in the Language wherin they were written yet to such as understand not that Language they can be no Infallible Rule because they are to them a Rule only as they are Translated but no Unlearned man can be sure that they are translated aright according to the true Intent and meaning of the Holy Ghost for if any man do infallibly Believe this and build his Faith hereupon then is his Faith grounded upon the Infallibilitie of This or That mans Skill in Translating whereof he that is Unlearned can have no sufficient Argument neither out of Scripture nor from Reason Nay Reason teacheth us that in matters of ordinarie capacitie most men are
doth the Pope challenge to himself the gift of Prophecie but only of legal Decisions which are no otherwise written then many write and contain no deeper nor more Supernatural Matter then many may invent most of them usually penned in a base and barbarous Logick Phrase his Stile at the best is not peculiar his Character easie to be counterfeited by any man that can pen a Proclamation or frame an Instrument in Civil Courts 7 To recollect what hath been said First seeing God is more to be Believed then Men secondly seeing we have better Arguments to perswade the People that these Scriptures daily read in our Church are Gods own Words then the Priests and Jesuites have that the Tidings which they bring from beyond Sea are the Popes or Churches Decrees or Sentence we may and ought Teach them to relie immediately upon Gods Word preached or read unto them as the surest and most Infallible Rule of Faith the most lively most effectual and most forcible Means of their Salvation Or if the Jesuites will teach them to Believe the Popes Decrees given ex Cathedra or the Churches Opinion indefinitely taken Fide divina by Infallible Faith but the Jesuites or Priests Expositions or Translations of them only Conditionally and with this Limitation If so they be the Pope or Churches Decrees we may in like sort with far greater Reason teach the People to Believe the Scriptures or the Word of God absolutely and our Translations or Expositions of it but Conditionally or with Limitation so far as they are Consonant to the Word of God Seeing it is as probable that we may expound Gods Word as rightly and sincerely as the other can the Church or Popes Edicts we have better Reason to exact this conditional Obedience and Assent in the Vertue and Authoritie of Gods Word which we make the Rule of Faith then they can have to exact the like Obedience by Vertue of the Pope or Churches Edict which is to them the Mistresse of Faith For it is more certain to any man living that Gods Word is most Infallibly True then that the Pope cannot Erre Wherefore if the Absolute Belief of the Popes Infallibilitie and Conditional Belief of the Jesuites or Priests his Messengers Fidelitie or Skill be sufficient to Salvation much more may the Absolute Belief or Assent unto the Infallibility of Gods Word and such Conditional and limited Belief of his Ministers Fidelitie be sufficient for the Salvation of his People who as hath been proved cannot be more certain that the Romish Church saith This or That then we can be of Gods Word For they never hear the Church or Pope speak but in Jesuites or Priests Mouthes And although they knew he said just so as those say yet may a man doubt in Modestie whether the Popes Words be alwayes Infallible but of the Infallibilitie of Gods Word can no man doubt 8 And Here I cannot but much wonder at the preposterous courses of these Romanists who holding an Implicite Faith of Believing as the Church Believes in many Points to be sufficient unto Salvation will yet fasten this implicite Faith upon the present Church of Rome and not refer it rather unto that Church as it was under S. Peters Jurisdiction and Government For if Universalitie be as they contend a sure Note of undoubted Truth then must it needs be more undoubtedly True that S. Peter could not Erre in Matters of Faith then that this present Romish Pope and his Cardinals cannot so Erre For all Papists hold this as True of S. Peter as of this present Pope and all Protestants hold it True of S. Peter not in the present Pope and so did all the Fathers without controversie hold it most True that S. Peter did not teach amisse in his Apostolical Writings So that Universalitie is much greater for S. Peter then for this Pope that now is or the next that shall be 9 For these Reasons fully consonant to their own Positions all Papists me-thinks in Reason should make the same Difference in their Estimate of S. Peter and later Popes which a French Cardinal as the Tradition is at Durham once made betwixt S. Cuthbert and venerable Bede Abeit S. Cuthbert was accounted the greater Saint amongst them whose greater Benefactour he had been in which respect they brought the Cardinal first unto S. Cuthberts Tomb yet because he knew him not so well but only by their Report he praies very warily Sancte Cuthberte si Sanctus es or a pro me But afterwards brought unto Bedes Tomb then in the Consistory because he had been Famous in Forrain Nations from the Commendations of lesse partial Antiquitie he fell to his prayers without Ifs and And 's Vener abilis Beda quia tu Sanctus es or a pro me 10 Proprotional to this Caution in this French-mans Prayers should every modern Papist limit his Belief of the present Popes Infallibilitie in respect of S. Peters And say thus in his heart As for S. Peter I know he Believed and Taught aright And I beseech God I may Believe as he Believed and that my Soul may come whither his is gone as for this present Pope if he believe as S. Peter did be likely to follow him in LIfe and Death I pray God I may Believe as he Believes and do as he Teacheth but otherwise believe me I would be very loath to pin my Belief upon his Sleeve lest happily he run Headlong to Hell to that which should have drawn me up to Heaven For in this Life I walk by Faith and by Faith I must ascend Thither if I ever come There and therefore I dare not fasten my Belief upon any Man whom I would be loath to follow in his Course of Life But most surely might this Implicite Faith be fastned upon Gods written Word contained in the Writings of Moses the Prophets Apostles and Evangelists We know O Lord that Thou hast Taught them All Truth that is Necessary for thy Church to know And our Adversaries confess that thy Word uttered by Them rightly understood is the most sure Rule of Faith for by This they seek to establish the Infallibilitie of the Church and Pope They themselves speak aright by their own Confession where they speak consonantly unto it Wherefore the safest Course for us must be to search out the True Sense and Meaning of it which is as easie for us as them to find as in the Processe of these Meditations God willing shall appear 11 Unto the main Objection concerning the Means of knowing Scripture to be Scripture we have partly answered or rather prevented it in the first Treatise and throughout this whole intended discourse we shall God willing explicate the former general Means or Motives as also bring other peculiar Inducements for the establishing of True Faith unto the particular Articles in this Creed contained For the present Difficultie concerning the Rule of Illiterate Lay-mens Faith or such as understand not those Languages in which
concerning this Point That happily may be yet Objected which hath alwayes bred greatest Scruple for yeelding Obedience in doubtfull Cases For our Apostle saith Whatsoever is not of faith is sin But whilest men Obey Spiritual Governours in those particulars for which they shew no Scripture This Obedience is not of faith for Faith is alwayes Ruled by the Word Ergo this Obedience is sinfull even in this respect alone that it hath not the Word for its Warrant but much more if we doubt whether the things enjoyned be Good or Bad for Doubting breeds Condemnation as our Apostle in the same place gathereth He that Doubteth is condemned if he eat because he eateth not of faith 2 Unto the former part of this Objection the Answer is easie and brief Seeing Gods Word Commands Obedience in general unto Spiritual Pastors and that in most expresse termes It doth warrant our Obedience in particulars which are not forbidden by the same Word But for clearing of the later Objection because this place of Saint Paul is as often urged to as little purpose as any other in the whole Book of God besides it shall not be amisse to consider First in what Sense it is true Whatsoever is not of faith is sin Secondly what manner of Doâ—bt it is that makes a thing to be not of faith in that sense which our Apostle means 3 A thing may be said to be of Faith three wayes First strictly and properly That is said to be ex Fide of faith which is an Act or exercise of the Habit or Vertue of faith as to beleeve in God in Christ or to Assent unto any Article in the Creed In this Sense no man I think doth urge this place of our Apostle Whatsoever is not of faith is sin For then all Deeds of Charity should be sinfull seeing they are no Acts or exercises of the Habit of Faith but of Charity which is a distinct Habit from Faith according to best Divines nor can we properly say that such works flow from Faith as the fruit doth from the root seeing Charitie is no branch of faith but a Coaeval stemme of infused sanctifying Grace the common Root to both Such Acts then may be said to be of Faith onely because the Doctrine of Faith enjoyns them and the Habit or Vertue of Faith inclines the Soul unto them and moves Charity unto the exercise of them And this is the second Sense or Meaning of the speech ex fide of faith that is those things are said to be of faith or to proceed from faith which are commanded by the Doctrine of faith or unto which we are inclined or moved by the Habit or Vertue of Faith But neither is it alwayes true Whatsoever is not of faith in this sense is sinne For so no Recreation no Merriment not Eating and Drinking with many other Works both of Reason and Nature generally nothing meerly Indifferent could be truly of faith at the least at this or that Time How then are not all these sinfull seeing they are not of faith in none of the former Senses being neither Acts of Faith nor enjoyned by the Doctrine of Faith This necessarily enforceth us to seek a third Signification of the former words 4 Thirdly then that is said to be not of Faith whatsoever is not warrantable by the Doctrine of faith whatsoever Conscience or the Vertue of faith being consultâ—… countenance or allow but rather disswade And in this Sense all that may be said to be ex file of faith whatsoever is warrantable by the Doctrine of Faith whatsoever Faith Conscience or the Law of Reason and Nature can approve or allow of either Absolutely or at that Present whilest they are undertaken albeit they do not enjoyn them or impell us unto them at the least for that Season As for example If a man free from necessary Imployments of his Calling should ride half a score of miles to be merry with his honest friend this were neither an act of faith nor an exercise enjoynea by faith and yet truely of faith in our Apostles Sense and no way Sinfull because warrantable by the Doctrine of faith Neither Faith nor Conscience nor Law of Nature would condemn him for so doing But if his dearest Friend lay on his Death-bed and did expect some comfort by his Presence his Absence upon such light Occasions would be sinfull because it could not be of Faith Neither the doctrine of Faith nor the Law of Reason could countenance such an Action Such resolutions may properly be said Not of Faith because they cannot proceed but from some Inclination or disposition opposite to the Habit of true Faith and the dictates of Natural well disposed much more of sanctified Conscience Suppose some mans Conscience were so scrupulous as to doubt whether he might ride so farre to be merrie with his friend when he had no urgent Occasions to withdraw him and another so confident and fully persvvaded in his mind as to make no question whether he should meet his friend in a Plaguie house or when his own Father lay a dying The Question is whether of these two doth sinne the more or if both do not sin whether of them is freed from sin and by what means The former as is supposed doubts of the Action and yet doth it the other doth the like but worse and doubteth not If that Journey which in it self is Lawfull supposing the former Case becomes unlawfull to the one because he doubts it is Unlawfull then may the others confident Perswasion make his expedition Lavvfull unto him although in it self supposing the Case above mentioned it were Unlawfull For who can give any Reason why Confidence of Perswasion may not as well legitimate what otherwise is Unlawfull as Doubt or Scruple illegitimate that which otherwise were Lawfull and Warrantable So that according to these Grounds the former party above mentioned should Sin not the Later And our Apostles Speeches unlesse they admit some restraint will infer thus much I Know and am Perswaded through the Lord Jesus that there is nothing Unclean of it self but unto him that Jâ—ageth 〈◊〉 anything to be unclean to him it is unclean And again This man esteemeth one day above another day another man counteth every day alike let every man be fully persuadâ—…d in his Mind as if he added and then there is no danger And yet if we should but consult natural reason who could deny that he that made an idle Journey whereby he might endanger his own or neglect his Fathers life did â—n most grievously albeit he were most fully Perswaded to the contrary yea the stronger his Perswasion were the greater his Sin On the contrary he that should undertake the like Journey having no serious Occasions to withdraw him if the Truth be rightly scanned did not Sin at all unlesse perhaps in Doubting whether he Sinned or no. For every Doubt of what we do doth not make our Action sinful
or not of Faith which is now to be discussed 5 If that Speech of our Apostle He that doubteth is condemned if he eat were to be universally understood of all Doubts or all Actions we should never have an End of Doubting nor any Beginning of many good and most necessary Works This very Persuasion were it throughly and generally planted in all mens Hearts were enough to bring all States to utter Anarchie and to set the whole World in combustion For what Enterprise is there of greater moment but divers Men will be of divers Minds concerning the Lawfulnesse or Unlawfulnesse of it Who could not by this Exception excuse himself from performance of necessary Allegeance or Service If the Kings Majestie should wage Warre against the Spaniard he that were addicted to their Religion might reply I should be as willing as another to do my King and Countrey any Service but I Doubt whether I may afford him my goods to the hurt and dammage of Roman Catholicks the Cause I am afraid is most Unlawfull and will bring Gods Plague upon this Land therefore I may not hazard my Life in it nor adventure to shed the innocent bloud of our Holy Mother the Churches Children The like might a Lutheran say if War should fall out betwixt our State and the Saxons or if with some other reformed Churches the like might be said by most in our Land Finally there would be continuall Distraction in the mannaging of all publick Affairs But such scrupulous demurs in Civil Matters are either seldom made or quickly answered by the Temporall Sword And are they lesse dangerous in Cases as little doubtfull wherein the Consequents feared are of no lesse moment when they are given to the chief Mannagers of our spiritual Warfare in times wherein Disobedience threatens dissolution of Christs Armie that must fight his Battels against Sathan and the Man of Sin Is the Authoritie of Binding and Loosing Opening and Shutting the Kingdom of Heaven lesse than the Authority of Life and Death or the disposing Powers of Temporal Goods What should be the Reason then that every Scruple should be held sufficient to denie Obedience in matters of greatest Consequence unto Spiritual more than Temporal Authoritie Out of doubt that Rule of Saint Paul doth no more Warrant the one than the other The true Reason is most men fear Temporal Censures more than either Gods or His an ordinary Goal more than Hell and had rather be Door-keepers in great Mens Houses than glorified Saints in Heaven but of this hereafter To proceed then with our Apostles Rule Were it universally to be understood it would bring all Christian Souls into such perpetual miserable inextricable Perplexities as they should alwayes live in suspence and scarce Resolve upon any thing For his Rule holds as true in the Omission of what should be done as in the Commission of what we think should not be done Suppose then thy Pastor Commands thee to Obey in this or that Particular which he verily thinks either necessary to be undertaken by all Christiane at all or most times or else most Expedient for thy Souls health the setting forth of Gods Glory or the Good of others at this present But thou art contrary-minded and doubtest whether thou mayest do it Lawfully or no. Why because thou hast no Warrant for it out of Scripture or because he brings no necessary Reasons why thou shouldest do it but bare Probabilities which cannot oversway that Doubt which thou hast framed unto thy Conscience But he can shew thee expresse Commandment out of Scripture that thou shouldest Obey Him Thou wilt say in things Lawful only This he avoucheth to be such Thou deniest it He can shew thee again expresse words of Scripture that thou shouldest not be wise in thine own conceit but be willing to learn of thy Pastor Who is the Messenger of the Lord of hostes at whose mouth thou shouldest seek the Law and on whom as our Apostle saith thou dost depend Tell me then first by what Place of Scripture thy Disobedience in this particular can be Warranted How canst thou chuse but Doubt whether thy denial of Obedience be of Faith or no seeing Gods Word Commands thee in general tearms to Obey and no where wils thee to Disobey in this particular Or if thou thinkest thou hast some general Warrant for Disobedience because thou supposest this particular to be Unlawful yet how canst thou but doubt whether thou hast learned the Precepts of Christian Modestie as thou shouldest Whether thou hast learned to deny thy Self and thy Assections whether thou hast learned to reverence thy Pastor as Gods Messenger not taking any offence at his Person Finally whether thou hast abandoned all such delights and desires as usually are the Grounds of false Perswasion and Impediments of sincere Obedience If thou canst not be fully and truly resolved in these then must thou doubt whether thou wilt or no whether thy doubt or scruple it self be of Faith or Conscience or of Humour only And if thou canst not but doubt herein then maist thou assure thy self that thy denial of Obedience is not of Faith and therefore Sinful if the Apostles Rule as thou supposest were universally true that whosoever doth any thing of whose Lawfulnesse he doubts doth Sin because he doth it not of Faith But I dare not deny but that sundry of Christs Flock may sometimes either deny or perform Obedience unto their Pastors not without doubt or scruple whether they should do so or no and yet not Sin in either In performing Obedience they Sin not unlesse the doubt be very great or probable and the Evil which they conceive in the Action Extraordinary Again in denying Obedience they Sin not albeit they doubt whether they should do so or no if the Evil which upon mature deliberation and serious forecast they much suspect be Extraordinary such as cannot be recompensed by the Goodnesse which appears in the Act of Obedience nor in the Fruits of the Action it self which their Pastor proposeth as a Motive to undertake it According to those Grounds must our Apostles speech be limited He that Doubteth is Condemned if he eat because he eateth not of Faith 6 What then Is every man that eateth any thing which he Doubts whether it were better for him not to eat straight Condemned God forbid He that hath such a tender Infants squeamish Conscience as to think thus had need to have a very ancient grave wise and moderate Stomack and it were sit he never came at any Feast or Table furnished with varietie of dishes 7 But for a direct Answer to our Apostles Speech It must be granted ‖ that they of whom he speaks did Sin in eating when they Doubted For if they had been as fully perswaded in their Minds as the Apostle himself and sunchie others of their Brethren were they had not Sinned in eating the self same meat yet for all this they sinned not in
Sectaries so he terms us contend about and for proof of this Blasphemous Assertion to bring the forecited place Ere their allegations of this or like places brought to prove the Scriptures Difficultie or Obscurity can be pertinent they must according to the state of the Question already proposed first prove this Obscurity or Difficultie to be perpetuall and ordinarie not inflicted as a punishment upon Hypocrites or such as love Darknesse more than Light And this they never shall be able this one place alledged by Valentian most evidently proves the contrarie For this was an extraordinarie and miraculous Judgement vpon these Jews for their Hypocrisie as appears Verses the thirteen and fourteen And unto such as they were weacknowledge the Scriptures by the just Judgement of God to be most Difficult still but denie such Difficulties to be any Bar why they should not be the complete Rule of Faith If the Jesuites will avouch the contrarie Let them tell us whether any other Rule could in this case supply their defect be it unwritten Tradition or viva vox infallibilis authoritatis the infallible teaching or preaching of the visible Church or Pope This I presume they will be ashamed to affirm For this Prophecie was fulfilled of the Pharisees which lived in our Saviours time and heard him preach the Doctrine of Salvation as plainly as the Pope can do yet neither could his Doctrine nor Miracles win them to his Father Why could they not Because they had as the Papists now have though not so openly disclaimed the Scriptures for the Rule of their Faith and did follow the Precepts or Traditions of Men and God as we said before hath so de reed that such as neglect the Truth known or love Darknesse more than Light should be given over to this reprobate sense that the more evident the Truth is the more hatefull it should be to them as the hate of these Scribe and Pharisees to our Saviour was greater then their fore-elders had been to the Prophets because the light of his Doctrine was greater his Reprehensions more sharp and their deeds and Hypocrisie worse than their Fathers No marvail then if it be so hard a matter to recover a learned Papist or make a Jesuite recant his errour in this Point seeing they are farther gone in this Jewish disease of contemning Gods Word following Traditions and Precepts of Men for the Rule of their Faith than these Jews themselves were not likely therefore they would have yeelded to our Saviour himself if they had lived in his time Nor should the ingenious Reader think we Hyperbolize or over-lash when we charge them with deeper Blasphemie in this Point than these Jews were guiltie of as if this were strange seeing they are such great Scholers and professe that they love Christ as well as we for so would these Jews boast of their Antiquitie and skill in Scriptures and thought that they loved God and his Servant Moses as well as Christ and his Apostles did But it was Gods purpose to confound the Wisdom of the worldly-wise of the Scribes and Pharisees then and of the learned Priests and Jesuites now CAP. XIV How men must be Qualified ere they can understand Scriptures aright that the Pope is not so Qualified 1 OUt of the forementioned places it is Evident that Gods Word otherwise plain and perspicuous was hidden from this Peoples eyes for their Hypocrisie and the same Blindnesse continues still in their Posteritie for continuing in like sin But can it be proved as evidently by any other place of Scripture that unto such as do the Will of God and Practise according to his Precepts the same Word shall be plain and easie so far as is necessarie for their Salvation Yes Infinite places may be brought to this Purpose And lest any man should except against the Extent of such bountifull promises as if they included some condition of Learning great dexteritie of Wit or the like whereof many men are not capable Our Saviour Christ addes the universall Note If any man will do his Will he shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God or whether I speak of my self If Any Man will do his Will Not if any man will learn the learned Tongues or studie the Scribes and Pharisees Comments which this people supposed to have been the onely as they were good Means for understanding Scriptures aright whilest subordinate to this principall Condition here mentioned by our Saviour The occasion of the Multitudes admiring his Doctrine was that He who had never been Scholar to their Rabbins should be so expert in Scriptures as it is Verse the fifteenth Our Saviours replie to this their Doubt conceived by way of admiration in the sixteenth Verse is that he had his Learning from God and not from Man My Doctrine is not mine but his that sent me And as he was taught by his Father to deliver and teach the heavenly Doctrine so might the simplest and most unlearned amongst them be likewise taught of God to discern whether his Doctrine were of God or whether he spake of himself If they would do the Will of God and seek his Glory not their own as Christ did not seek his own Glory but his that sent him Yet might these Jews have brought the same Exceptions against our Saviours Rule for discerning Doctrines which the Papists now bring against the Scriptures why they should not be the infallible Rule of Faith as shall appear hereafter In the mean time whom shall we beleeve the Modern Jesuite who will swear one thing sitting and the contrary standing or Christ Jesus whose Word as he himself remains yesterday to day the same for ever Even at this day as well as at that time when he spake this Oracle if any man will do the Will of God which sent him he amidst the Varietie of mens Opinions concerning matters of Faith shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God or whether Men speak of themselves without recourse unto the infallible Authority of such as sit in Peters Chair who are to Peter but as unto Moses the Scribes and Pharisees were unto whom Gods Church in Jewrie about our Saviours time was not much beholden for Doctrines of Faith or Decisions of Doubts concerning the Truth of Scriptures or principal Mysteries taught by Moses 2 Will you hear what Bellarmine the only Champion that ever Rome had for eluding evident Authorities of Scripture could answer unto this place Our Lord and Saviour did not intena in this speech to shew us that all honest minded men might understand every place of Scripture by themselves but to teach us that good men are free from diverse such Impediments as dis-enable others for understanding the true Doctrine of Faith either by themselves or by others help For some became uncapable of true Faith by pride and desire of worldly honour others by covetousnesse All these things heard the Pharisees also which were covetous and they
intreat the Christian Reader to consider well upon whom their usual Objections of Scriptures Obscurity are most likely to fall Upon us for whose good they were given Or upon God the Father who gave them his Son that partly spake them his Holy Spirit who only taught them his Prophets Apostles Evangelists or other his blessed Ministers which wrote them CAP. XV. The Romanisis Objections against the Scriptures for being Obscure do more directly impeach their first Author and his Messengers their Pen-men then us or the Cause in hand 1 THat these Scriptures which our Church holds Canonical and we now maintain to be the Rule of Faith were given for the good of Christs Church or Multitude of faithful men throughout the World our Adversaries wil not deny or if they would the Scriptures which expresly to deny they dare not bear evident Testimony hereof Infinite places are brought to this purpose by such as handle that Question Whether the written Word contain all Points necessary to Salvation 2 Saint John saith he wrote his Gospel that we might Believe By what Authority did he undertake by whose Assistance did he perform this Work Undertaken it was by Gods appointment effected by the assistance of his Eternal Spirit to the end we might Believe the Truth what Truth That which he wrote concerning the Mysteries of mans Salvation But how far did he intend this our Belief of such Mysteries should be set forward by his pen Unto the first Rudiments only or unto the midway of our Course to Heaven Questionlesse unto the utmost Period of all our Hopes for he wrote these things that we might Believe yea so believe in Christ as by Believing we might have Life through his Name Was he assisted by the Eternal Spirit who then perfectly knew the several tempers and capacities of evey Age And did he by his direction aim at the perfect Belief of succeeding Ages as the end and scope of all his Writings And yet did he write so obscurely that he could not be understood of them for whose good he wrote Out of Controversie his desire was to be understood of all for he envied no man Knowledg nor taught he the Faith of our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons He wished that not the great Agrippa's or some few choice ones only but all that should hear or read his Writings to the Worlds end might be not almost but altogether such as he was Faithful Believers From his fervent desire of so happy an end as the Salvation of all he so earnestly sought the only correspondent Means to wit Posterities ful instruction in the Mysteries thereto belonging And for better Symbolizing with the ignorant or men as most of us are of duller capacity in such profound Mysteries his Paraphrase upon our Saviours speeches is oft-times so copious as would be censured for polixity or Tautology in an Artist But seeing the common salvation of others not his own Applause was the thing he sought he disdains not to repeat the same thing sometimes in the same otherwhiles in different words becoming in speech as his fellow Apostle was in Carriage All unto all that he might at leastwise of every sort gain some oft-times solicitous to prevent all occasion of mistaking our Saviours Meaning though in matters wherein Ignorance could not be deadly nor Errour so easie or dangerous as in those other Profundities of greatest moment which he so dilates and works upon as if he would have them transparent to all Christian eyes 2 Do not all the Evangelists aim at the same end do they not in as plain 〈◊〉 as they could devise or we would wish divulge to all the world the true Sense and Meaning of our Saviours Parables which neither the promiscuous Multitude to whom he spake nor his select Disciples or Apostles themselves until they were privately instructed understood aright as they themselves testifie so little ashamed are they to confesse their own so they may hereby expel or prevent like ignorance in others Tell me were not our Saviours Parables expounded by his blessed mouth as plain Rules of Life as may without prejudice to his all sufficiency be expected from any other mans Are not his similitudes wherein notwithstanding are wrapt the greatest Mysteries of the Kingdom drawn from such matters of common Use as cannot change whilest Nature remains the same for the most part so plain and easie as wil apply themselves to the attentive or wel-exercised in Moralities Strange it seemed unto our Saviour that his Disciples should not at the first proposal understand them Perceive ye not this Parable how should you then understand all other Parables Yet happy were they that they were not ashamed to bewray their Ignorance by asking when they doubted though in a point of little Difficulty This good desire of progresse in their course begun brought them within the Hemisphere of that glorious light whereby they were enabled afterward to discern the greatest Mysteries of the Kingdom And unto their Question concerning the meaning of that great Parable of the Sower which is one of the Fundamental Rules of Life Our Saviour immediately replies To you it is given to know the Mysteries of the Kingdom of God but unto them that are without all thing are done in Parables that they hearing may hear and not understand lest at any time they should turn and their sins should be forgiven them 4 Had our Evangelists only set out the Text and concealed the Comment it might have ministred matter of suspicion whether all Christians throughout all generations whilest this Gospel shal endure should be taught of God from the greatest to the least of them or whether Christ had not appointed some great infallible Teacher as his Vicar general to supply the same place successively in the Church that he himself had born amongst his Disciples One on whose living Voice all the Flock besides were in all Doubts or Difficulties to rely as the Apostles did on Christs in the unfolding of this Parable But seeing they have plainly revealed to us in writing what was revealed to them concerning the Meaning of this and other Parables of greatest Use from our blessed Saviours Mouth Their written Relations of these mysteries with their Expositions must be of the same Use and Authority unto us as Christs living Words were unto them And as they were not to repair unto any other but their Master alone for the Word of Eternal Life not to omit any other infallible Teacher for declaration of his Meaning so may not any Christian to this day infallibly rely upon any mans Expositions of his Words already expounded by himself and related by his Apostles these laid up like precious seed in our hearts the diligent labours of Gods ordinary Ministers only supposed would bring forth the true and perfect Knowledge of other Precepts of life in abundance competent to every man in his rank and order 5 For seeing what
our Saviour imparted to his Disciples in private is now by Gods Providence plainly communicate unto us This is an Argument beyond exception that we are not in their Case who in that Parable are said to be Without but of their Number to whom it is given to know the Mysteries of the Kingdom of God unlesse we wil in Life and manners imitate Hypocrites rather then Christs Disciples And lest we should prove like these Jews which having ears to hear would not hear though invited thereto by our Saviour our Evangelists inculcate again and again the Causes of this Dulnesse in hearing or conceiving what is heard or Aversnesse from the Truth in some sort conceived They tell us the Jews sometimes for Ambition sometimes for Convetousnesse generally for Presumption Pride and Hypocrisie in saying they had Abraham for their Father did make themselves uncapable of saving Knowledge To what purpose do men guided by the Spirit of God inclucate these or like Admonitions so oft That the growth of such carnal Assections might in all succeeding Ages be prevented That Christian Parents fore warned by the lamentable Issue of this stubbornnesse in Abrahams Seed might teach their Children these heavenly Lessons which had been so distastfull to the Jews before these or other inveterate Humours had brought them to the same or like Distemper For as I observed before and this Parable directly proves might celestiall Seed take root in Childrens hearts before these Secular Weeds sprung up their Souls should continually receive Blessing from God and daily drink in these Streams of Life which found no entrance into such Jewish barren Soyl as did bear nothing but Thorns and Brambles whose end was to be burned as altogether unworthy of more watering 6 Shall either the World Devil or Flesh be able to breed the least Suspition in any Christian Heart whether God who enabled the Apostles and Evangelists to speak so plainly to the Capacitie of all sorts of men in every Nation cannot either by increasing internal Docilitie in succeeding Ages or sublevating their dull Capacitie by facilitie and plenty of external Means repair whatsoever the Injuries of time might detract from the Perspicuitie of Writings Apostolical or Evangelical So that although the decay of Dialects absolutenesse of Phrase or Alterations of Customes whereunto they allude as well known then because in use might breed some difficultie unto Posteritie yet unlesse true Faith be decayed with them or all Characters of Gods Providence worn out of our hearts how can we distrust whether He by whose Wisdom as well Divine Mysteries unheard before as skill to utter them in every Language were extraordinarily and immediately infused into illiterate Souls without the help or Ministery of Man cannot or will not by his good Blessing upon our endeavours in the ordinary Course of attaining skill in Sacred Tongues continue the use of Tongues and all other good Means whatsoever necessarie or expedient either for our right understanding or communicating the infallible Truth alreadie taught without any others infallible Assistance besides his who can teach us as infallibly by Means in themselves not infallible as he hath done others without any Means at all To doubt of Gods Providence in this Point were to doubt whether he were the same God still and if the same he will albeit by other Means perform the same Effects still unlesse the sins of the Christian World deserve the contrary and pull that Blindnesse which in our Saviours time reigned in those Jews upon themselves by like Hardnesse of heart Pride or Hypocrisie And if so they do what shall this supposed Infallibilitie of the Pope avail Is his Teaching more infallible then Christs was shall he Loose where God hath Bound shall he disanull what the Almighty hath ratisied shall he make the Scriptures clear to them before whose hearts the Lord hath laid a Veil Or shall he give Sight where he that made the eye hath called for Blindnesse Oh that they could remember this who have forgotten their God and cannot see that whosoever accuseth the Scriptures of Disheultie or Obscurity doth indict the Omnipotent of Impotencie in not being able to perform what by his Apostles he intended CAP. XVI That all the Pretences of Scriptures Obscuritie are but Mists and Vapours rising from the Corruption of the flesh and may by the pure Light of Scriptures rightly applied easilie be dispelled 1 UNto this and all Demands of like nature if the Scriptures be not Obscure how chanceth it that so many find such Difficulties in them even in those places which seem to contain in them matters of Faith The Answer is already given It was the Almighties good pleasure to Decree that the Scriptures should be plain and easie to such as faithfully practise their most plain and easie Precepts but hard and difficult to be understood aright of such as Wilfully transgresse them or knowing them to be Gods Word do not glorifie them as his Word Most difficult most impossible to be understood of such as acknowledging by what Spirit they were written yet renounce their Authority or disclaim them for the Rule of their Faith All such though for the clearnesse of their understanding in other Speculations they may seem to have Angelicall Heads yet for Divine Mysteries have but Jewish or obscure Hearts and being Blinded in their mindes they imagine the Scripture wheron they look to be Obscure This Answer notwithstanding though most true will not satisfie all For seeing this Blindnesse in most men is not Voluntary at the least not Wilfull or affected the Captions will yet demand How shall they help it The Scriptures plainly teach how they may be holpen What can be more plain then that Rule If any man want Wisdom let him ask of God Yea many do so and yet go without it So they must as the Scripture telleth us if they ask amisse Doth the Scripture then serve as a streight Rule to direct them how they should ask aright Yes For what Rule can be more plain then that of Saint John Whatsoever we ask we receive of him because we keep his Commandements and do those things which are pleasing in his sight The Promise indeed is plain but the Condition hard for the first thing we would ask of God is Grace to keep his Commandements But what hope have sinners to receive this seeing he heareth onely such as keep his Commandements Will this or any other Rule of Scripture help us out of this Labyrinth It will not fail us nor forsake us For if we have but a desire to amend our lives Christs words are as plain as forcible He quencheth not smoaking flix a bruised reed he will not break And this is his Commandement that we trie the Truth of this and other like Sayings of Comfort by relying upon his mercy or if we do but seek after Repentance we do that which is pleasing in his sight For he is not pleased in the
have acknowledged as much had be been in their place For why should he Any other might say he had the Spirit of God and that he was the Messias and what if Peter one of his Fellows late a Fisher-man did confesse him The Scribes and Pharisees principal Members of the visible Church deny him to be their Messias And how should they know his Words to be the Word of God unlesse the Church had confirmed them If Christ himself should have said in their hearing as he did to the Jews John 5. 46. Moses wrote of me consider his Doctrine and lay it to your hearts A Jesuite would have replied You say Moses wrote of you But how shal we know that he meant you Moses is dead and saies nothing and they that sit in his Chair say otherwise And verily the Scribes and Pharisees had far greater Probabilities to plead for the Infallibility of that Chair then the Jesuites can have for their Popes who had they been in the others place could have coyned more matter out of that one saying of our Saviour Mat. 23. 2. Sedent in Cathedra Mosis for the Scribes and Pharisees infallible Authority then all the Papists in the world have been able to extract out of all the Scriptures that are or can be urged for the Pope or Church of Romes Infallibilitie 4 The Scribes and Pharisees though no way comparable to the â—esuites for cunning in painting rotten or subtilty in oppugning Causes true and â—…nd could urge for themselves against such as confessed Christ that none of the Rulers nor of the Pharisees did Believe in him but only a Cursed Crew of such as knew not the Law John 7. 48. They could Object the Law was obscure and the interpretation of it did belong to them But could these pretences excuse the people for not obeying Christs Doctrine You will say perhaps they could not be excused because Christs Miracles were so many and manifest These were somewhat indeed if Christ had been their Accuser But our Saviour saith plainly that he would not accuse them to his Father And for this cause he would not work many Miracles amongst such as were not moved with the like already wrought lest he should increase their Sins If Christ did not who then had reason to accuse them Moses as it is in the same place did Moses in whom they trusted and on whom they fastened their Implicite Faith Moses of whom they thought and said We will Believe as he Believed Moses whose Doctrine they to their seeming stood as stifly for against Christs new Doctrine as they supposed as the Jesuites do for the Catholick Church as they think against Hereticks and Sectaries as they term us Why then is Moses whom thus they honoured become their chief Accuser because while they did Believe on him only for Tradition or from pretence of Succession or for the dignity of their Temple Church or Nation they did not indeed Believe Him nor his Doctrine For had they Believed his Doctrine they had Believed Christ For he wrote of Christ So he might thinks the Jesuite and yet write so obscurely of him as his Writings could be no Rule of Faith to the Jews without the Visible Churches Authority Yea rather they should and might have been a Rule unto them for their good against the Visible Churches Authority and now remain a Rule or Law against both to their just condemnation because the Doctrine of Christ was so plainly and clearly set down in these writings had they set their hearts unto them Even the Knowledg of Christ the Word of life it self was in their mouthes and in their hearts For that Commandment which Moses there gave them was That Word of Faith which S. Paul the infallible Teacher of the Gentiles did preach as he himself testifies Rom. 10. 8. If any man ask how this Place was so easie to be understood of Christ or how by the doctrine of Moses Law the doctrine of the Gospel might have been manifested to their Consciences my Answer is already set down in our Saviours Words Had they done Gods Will revealed unto them in that Law they should have known Christs Doctrine to have been of God 5 Had they according to the prescript of Moses Law repented them of their Sins from the bottom of their Hearts the Lord had blotted all their Wickedness out of His remembrance And their hearts once purged of Wickednesse would have exulted in his presence that had made them whole Faith would have fastened upon his Person though never seen before Not the Moon more apt to receive the Sun-beams cast upon it then these Jews hearts to have shined with the Glory of Christ had they cast away all Pride and Self-conceit or the Glory of their Nation but unto them as now they are and long time have been swollen with Pride and full of Hypocrisie Christs Glory is but as clear Light to sore or dim-sighted eyes They wink with their eyes lest they should be offended with the Splendor of it This Doctrine of Christ and Knowledge of Scriptures in points of Faith shall be most obscure to us if we follow them in their foolish pretences of their Visible Church most clear perspicuous and easie if we lay Moses Commandments to our hearts For Truth Inherent must be as the eye-sight to discern all other things of like nature CAP. XVIII Concluding this Controversie according to the state proposed with the testimony of Saint Paul 1 WE may conclude this Point with our Apostle Si Evangelium nostrum tectum est iis qui pereunt tectum est in quibus Deus hujus saeculi excaecavit mentes id est infidelibus ne irradiat eos lumen Evangelii gloriae Christi qui est imago Dei If the Gospel be Obscure or rather hid For it is a Light obscure it cannot be God forgive me if I used that speech save only in our Adversaries persons It is hid only to such as have the eyes of their mind Blinded by Satan the God of this World Of which Number may we not without breach of Charity think he was one who seeing the light and evidence of this place would not see it but thought it a sufficient Answer to say Aposiolus non loquitur de intelligentia Scripturarum sed de cognitione side in Christum The Apostle speaks not of understanding Scriptures but of Knowing and Believing in Christ It is well the Jesuite had so much Modestie in him as to grant this later that he spake at the least of Knowing Christ For if the knowledg of Christ be so clear to the godly and elect then are the Scriptures clear too so far as concerns their Faith For S. Paul wrote this and all his Epistles only to this end that men might truly come to the Knowledge of Christ But he meant of a perfect and true Knowledge not such as Bellarmine when he gave this Answer dreamed of ut neque sit puer neque
anus Christiana quae non sciat Christum natum incarnatum fuisse Saint Pauls Cospel was sufficiently known in this mans Sense of his words because there is neither Christian childe nor old wife but knows that Christ was incarnate and born Too many I fear of his and his fellows catechizing know Christ no otherwise then old Wives or little Children know ordinary matters or Stories past that is only by old Wives Tales lying Legends or Tradition And on this fashion and better did the Jews Know Moses and Believed on him yet did they neither Know Him nor his Doctrine as they should have done nor in such a Sense as the Scripture useth this word Knowledge Such as he would have us content our selves withall is rather blindnesse then Knowledg and makes a man never a whit the better Christian but a greater Hypocrite 2 Let Bellarmines Answer stand thus far for true that the Knowing of Christ and Belief of the Gospel are manifest to all that are not given over to Jewish Blindnesse And what it is to Know Christ or believe the Gospel in Saint Pauls Phrase by Gods assistance we shall further explicate in the Articles following To Know Christ was all Saint Paul desired because it contained all Knowledge of Scriptures and whether Saint Paul did not desire to Know Scriptures or whether he had not his Desire herein 〈◊〉 Christian Consciences judge 3 And because I must conclude this Point as I promised with this Testimony of Saint Paul Beloved Christian whosoever thou art that shalt read these Meditations ask Counsel of thine own Heart Consult with thy Conscience consider well and give Sentence betwixt me and this Romish Doctor what kind of Knowledge Saint Paul here meant whether an Implicite or Hear 〈◊〉 Knowledge of Christ and his Kingdom in grosse or an expresse distinct true Knowledge raised from Moses and the Prophets consonancy with the Gospel of Scriptures necessary to Mens Salvation in their several Courses of life I 〈◊〉 not wrong thy Judgement so much as to seek Arguments or Authorities of Expositors for thy information in this plain undoubted caâ—e It shall sussice to rehearse the Words of that Law about whose Sence we now contend and by which we must be tried from the twelfth verse of the third to the sixth verse of the fourth Chapter of the second to the Corinthians 4 Seeing then we have such trust we use great Boldnesse of Speech and we are not as Moses which put a Veil upon his face that the Children of Israel should not look unto the end of that which should be abolished Therefore their minds are hardened For until this day remaineth the same Covering untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament Yet was the Old Testament the only Scripture in those times easie to be understood but for this Veil And this Veil as the Apostle adds verse the fourteenth put away these Scriptures then which were so difficult to the Jew are Easie to all that are in Christ by whose death the Veil was rent and that Light which shone on Moses face as the Sun upon the Eastern skie in the dawning was fully manifested to the Inhabitants of the earth since the Sun of righteousnesse did appear For the publishing of the Gospel is the putting away of the former Veil But for the Jewes even until this day saith the Apostle When Moses is read the Veil is laid over their hearts Neverthelesse when their hearts shall be turned unto the Lord the Veil shall be taken away For this Doctrine of Saint Paul as often hath been said was in their Hearts and in their mouthes Deut. 30. 14. The Apostle concludes Now the Lord is the Spirit and where the Spirit of the Lord is there is Liberty Liberty indeed in respect of that Servitude which was under the Law then they were Servants because they knew not their Masters will John 15. 15. but since the Ministry of the New Testament We all behold as in a Mirrour the Glory of the Lord with open face Verse 18. Out of our Apostles discourse this is most evident that it was the Glory of his Ministry and Evidence of Doctrine which made him so consident in the execution of this Function God saith he hath made us able Ministers of the New Testament not of the Letter but of the Spirit 2 Cor. 3. 6. And this compared with the Ministry of the Old did far exceed it in Glory and Perspicuity as he proves from the sixth verse to the eighteenth 5 The judicious Reader though not admonished would of his own accord observe how the Apostle takes Clearnesse and Perspicuity as an Adjunct of the New Testament's Glory the Jesuites quite contrary would make the Scriptures Dignity and Majesty Mother of Difficulty and Obscurity But because it was so much more glorious and perspicuous then the Ministery of the Old Testament was The Apostle infers 2 Cor. 4. 1 2. Therefore seeing we have this Ministery of the New Testament so glorious and perspiâ—uous as we have received mercy we faint not but have cast off the cloak of shame and walk not in craftinesse neither handle we the Word of God deceitfully for why should any when it will approve it self but in declaration of the Truth approve our selves to every mans Conscience in the sight of God What Proof could he make to their Consciences but only from the Evidence of that Truth which he taught and his Sincerity in teaching it These two would bind all such as made any conscience of their wayes to admit his Doctrine Whence he infers in the very next words verse 3. If then our Gospel be bid c. Briefly refuting all the Romanists Objections in this Argument before they were conceived punctim even to an hairs breadth For this would have been their common place had they lived in Saint Pauls time You may boast and say your Doctrine of the New Testament is evident and manifest but what wise man will believe you when a great many as good Schollers as your self think the contrary most true Unto this Objection of the Jews then of the Jesuites now of Satan both now and then and alwayes frequent in the mouth of Hell our Apostle answers directly as from his Doctrine we have done all the Jesuites Arguments If the Gospel be hid as indeed to some too many it is Yet it is hid only to them that perish whose Minds the God of this World hath blinded that the glorious Gospel of Christ which is the Image of God should not shine unto them 6 The Gospel then did shine yet not to Blinded eyes to whom then only to such as were indued with the Spirit of Liberty seeing the New Testament as he said was the Ministry of the Spirit of which these Jews were not partakers because they followed the Letter or Outside of the Law and had Moses Writings as children Lessons they understand not at their Tongues end not in their Hearts SECT
did not or would not know what our Church in this Point doth hold fall headlong in the very first entrance of this dispute 7 But in this as in the former Question it shall not be amisse to propose our Adversaries principall Arguments and Exceptions against our Churches Doctrine in admitting the Scripture for the Rule of Faith And I would request any man that is able to judge of the force and strength of an Argument to read the best learned and most esteemed of our Adversaries for the further confirmation of this Truth which we teach Against which some who have not sought into their Writings may happily imagine that much more hath or might be said by any of them then can be found in all their Writings Whereas Bellarmine and Valentia two excellent Schollars and most judicious Divines where their wits were their own and all other good Writers of their side whom I could hitherto meet with by reason of the Barrennesse of their matter and shallow unsetled Foundation of their Infallible Church have performed as good service to our Cause in this present Controversie as that Roman Orator famous for his Unskilfulnesse in Augustus his time did to the Parties whom he accused I would to God said the Emperour this foâ—lish Fellow had accused my gallerie which had been long in building for then it had been absolved that is according to the use of this word in Latin finished long ere this In this Case we have his wish And for the edification of mine own Faith in this Point I must out of the sincerity of a good Conscience professe I would not for any good on earth but Bellarmine Valentian and other grand Patrones or plausible Advocates of the Popes Cause especially Valentian had taken such earnest pains in accusing our Churches Doctrine for they have most clearly acquitted it in that we may justly presume there can be no more said against it And whether all they have said or can say be ought I leave it to the judicious Readers judgement I will set down some of their Objections and then prosecute their general Topick or forms of their Arguments whence all particulars which in this Case they can bring must receive their whole strength 8 All Hereticks saith Saint Augustin which admit the Authority of Scriptures for some rejected all or most parts of the Sacred Canon seemâ—… themselves to follow the Scriptures when as indeed they follow their own Errours Nor do Heresies saith the same Father in another place and other naughtyâ— Opinions which ensnare mens Souls spring from any other Root then this That the right sense of Scripture conceivea amisse and yet so conceived is boldly and rashly avouched 9 And in another book of Augustin it is said Valentian would have the saying well observed as it shall be to his shame That Hereticks do not cor-rupt onely the obscure and difficult but even the plain and easie places of Scriptures and our Saviour Christ as this Writer addeth did intimate how obnoxious the Evangelical Doctrine was to this corruption by Hereticks when he forewarned us to beware of false Prophets Hereticks saith he seem to be Prophets because they make a fair shew of Scripture-phrases which are as the Character or external shaâ—e of heavenly Doctrine But Prophets they are not because under the out â—ard shew of heavenly words they manifest not the native sense and meaning of the Holy Ghost but their own adulterate corrupt Opinions sacrilegiously invested by them in sacrea phrase as it were the abomination of desolation standing in the Holy place as Origen clâ—gantly notes Hom. 29. in Matt. By the same Analogie are they called ravening Wolves being arayed in sheeps cloathing c. 10 These and like places are brought by Valentian as the title and conclusion of that Paragraph shew to this purpose That seeing all Hereticks may and do easily pervert the Scriptures as Saint Peter saith to their own dâ—struction We should hence be instructed that this universal Authority and most behoâ—â—vefull for the Salvation of all which we seek as the common Judge in all Points of Faith cannot 〈◊〉 seated in the Scripture alone 11 Another Mark whereat these fiery Darts do usuall aim is to fasten the conceipt of Heresie upon our Church seeing it hath alwayes been the practise of Hereticks to cover their wicked imaginations with sacred phrase and as Lyrinensis saith to inter sperse or straw their depraved Opinions with the 〈◊〉 and fragrant Sentences of Scripture as with some precious spice lest the exhaâ—…ation of their native smell might bewray their corruption to the Reader This is a Common place trodden almost bare by the English pamphleting Papist who learns the Articles of his Roman Creed and general heads of Controversies betwixt us with their usuall Arguments or Exceptions against our Doctrine no otherwise then the Fidler doth his Song holding it sufficient for his part to afford a Mimicks face scurrilous stile or Apish gesture unto the â—nventions of Bellarmin Valentian or some forrain Jesuites Brain And as it is hard for us to speak though in general termes against any Sin in a Countrey Parish but one or other will perswade himself that we aim at his overthwart-Neighbour unto whom perhaps our reproofs are lesse appliable then unto him that thus applies them so is it very easie for this Mimical crue to perswade the ignorant or discontented People that every Minister whose person or behaviour upon what respect soever they dislike is the very man meant by the Ancient Father and our Saviour in the former general Allegations if he use but the phrase of Scripture not the Character of that forrain Beast Whereas their Objections duly examined can hurt none but the Objectors CAP. XX. That the former Objections and all of like kind drawn from the Cunning Practise of Hereticks in colouring false Opinions by Scripture are most forcible to confirm ours and confound the Adversaries Doctrine 1 MUster they as many Authorities or Experiments of this Rank as they list we know the strength and nature of their weapons They are dangerous indeed to such as have not put on the Brest-plate of Righteousnesse or Shield of Faith but yet God be praised as sharp at the one end as at the other and they had need to be wary how and against whom they use them For beaten back directly by the Defendants they may be as fair to kill the Thrower at the rebound as Them against whom they were first intended For proof hereof look how easily we can retort all they have thrown at us upon themselves It hath been the practise of Hereticks say they to misinterpret Scriptures and pretend their Authoritie for countenancing errours This wounds not us except we were naked of all Syllogistical Armour of proof For they should prove if they will conclude ought to our prejudice that none but Hereticks have used Scriptures Authoritie to confirm their Opinions For if Orthodox
in all Points necessary to salvation without any such infallible Authority For it is a matter of far lesse Difficulty for any man of sense and reason to deduce particular Conclusions from general and evident Principles then to finde out the general and fundamental Principles by natural Notions or other Principles And therefore more easie for any such man to resolve his Conscience in particular Points of Faith or Christian Obedience after he hath found out the Foundation of Christian Faith to wit Chrâ—… Jesus crucified raised from the dead and other general Dictates of Faith in the Apostolical Writings then to come unto the acknowledgement and Belief of these fundamental Points themselves from the broken knowledge such as the Jews have of the Old Testament And thus it evidently follows that if the Old Testament be a Rule unto the Jews for finding out the Truth of the New much more may the New once acknowledged by them and admitted of equal Authority with the Old be a perfect Rule for them in matters of Salvation And if these Scriptures are or may be a Rule to the Jews if they will believe them then must they be a Rule to all Christians that Believe them No Christian I hope wil deny but that the Old Testament is the Rule of the Jews For the unbelieving Jews shal be condemned in what part of the world soever for not following this Rule which God hath commended and made known unto them not for not acknowledging the Popes Infallibility of which many of them never heard And if the Old Testament be such to them much more must the whole Canon be unto us such a Rule and if we die in misbelief or infidelity we shall be judged by this Rule of Gods Law and Gospel which we transgressed not by the Popes Decrees or Expositions of it That many Christians by profession erre in Points of Faith or mistake the true Sense and Meaning of it or pervert it to their Destruction proceeds from their Ingratitude towards God that gave it and for their delight in Falshood Which is the reason why these Jews mistake the true Meaning of the Old Testament 9 If any of our Adversaries here demand how chanceth it so many Jews erre in the Foundation of Faith if the Scripture be such an infallible Rule he must be content to resolve me in the like Question How chanceth it so many Jews live unconverted in Spain and Italy and other places either in the Popes Dominions or where his Authority is established if the Infallibility of his Authority or their Church be such an excellent Rule If they reply the Jews might believe all Points of Roman-Catholick Faith aright so they would admit their Church as Judge or Mistresse of Faith the Jews might with as good reason rejoyn so might the Romans believe all Points of Judaism would they acknowledge this supposed Infallibility of Doctrine to be in their Rabbinical Expositions not in the Popes Determinations But the Romanist I suppose would desire a Sign ere he believed them herein and are we lesse bound by the Rule of Faith to desire some tolerable satisfaction to these reasons following ere we believe them in this Point as prejudicial in our judgement to Religion in general as Subscription to Rabbinical Doctrine is unto Chistian Verity 10 The Jews admit the Old Testaments Authority as undoubtedly as the Jesuites do the Popes yet it enlightens not their hearts What is the Reason Because that Part of Scripture is so obscure So Valentian and such as follow him in all congruity must say yea he hath said it That Veil which Saint Paul saith is put before the hearts of Jews that they cannot behold the Glory of the Gospel as the Apostle there argues is woven for the most part of the Difficulties of Scriptures Nor do the Jews only deny the New Testament to be infallible but bitterly inveigh against it as erroneous and contradictory to the Old What is the Cause Is it not that which Valentian elsewhere assigns The Scripture alone that is in his language without the infallible Avouchment of their Church is so far from ending all Controversies of Faith that it rather occasions Controversies and Dissentions in Doctrines of Faith If to the Jew through his default the Writings of Moses and the Prophets be so obscure adde your infallible Key to open his heart to them or them to it If by this obscurity they minister matter of Contentation or their Sense mistaken exasperate Jewish malice against Christians Interpose your Humane Authority inspired from above to allay the fervency of their distempered Zeal 11 You acknowledge this Obscurity and other objected Insufficiencies disinabling the Scripture for ruling or judging mens Faith to arise from the frailty or viciousnesse of Humane Nature and hence you plead your Churches Infallibility as necessary and al-sufficient to supply these defects incident unto Scripture not in it self but in respect of us Your Churches Authority then at the least adjoyned to Scripture should make men otherwise subject to the former Infirmities or vitious Dispositions capable of Heavenly Doctrine Tell us then distinctly Can it or can it not make all or most or such as the Scriptures do not Believe aright If this it cannot do adjoyning to Scriptures it is by your own Objections against them a Rule as unsufficient as you would make them without it If it can make all or most or such as Scripture alone doth not Believe aright this it must effect either by removing or not removing those Diseases or Infirmities of Humane Nature which Scriptures without it cannot cure 12 First if it could remove that Temper which makes the Jew a more unprofitable Hearer of Scripture then young Gallants are of stoical moral discipline your Church is guilty of wilful malice and murther of souls that will not apply this infallible Key able of it self to open that Veil of Adamant wherewith the Jews hearts are so masked that neither the light of Mosaical Prophetical Apostolical or Evangelical Writings can find entrance unto them Secondly albeit this supposed infallible Authority could remove the former Veil yet were it not in this respect to be acknowledged an infallible Rule of Faith but rather an ordinary necessary Means such as we acknowledge the lawful Magistracy or Ministry to be for squaring or proportioning mens frail or exorbitant Affections the better to parallel with Gods word the most exact inerrable and al-sufficient Rule of Faith even by your consent were it not for this Infirmitie or vitious Disposition of mans Nature which as you likewise acknowledge is the sole Cause why the Scriptures are Obscure and minister matter of Contention 13 But our Adversaries attribute not any such vertue to their infallible Rule as to make a fool wise the lascivious chaste the drunkard sober a knave honest the impudent modest or ambitious lowly for even the Pope himself in whose bosome this Rule lodgeth may harbour these and like vices in his
in mens hearts So in later Ages since the Almightie gave his Word in every language and the number of Preachers hath been greatly multiplied the old Serpent permits the Jesuits and his other Instruments to translate expound and Preach the Gospel to the ignorant And in opposition to the practise of Reformed Churches the lay Roman Catholick may now behold yea read the Words of Life What difference then can any make betwixt theirs and our Doctrine in this Point such as in times past was betwixt true Miracles wrought by the singer of God and Diabolical Wonderments all which later were usually wrought to idle purposes and by some apish trick or other bewrayed their Authors sinister intendments So doth the cunning restraint of this Libertie late granted to the Roman Laicks great in shew bewray who was the Authour of this Plot and what his purpose Some merry Devil sure is minded to make Hell sport by putting this gull upon the learned Papist his Instrument to put the like upon the ignorant who now at length may read the Scriptures but with absolute submission of their Interpretation to his Instructors who may not take any receit thence but according to their supreme Infallible Physitians prescripts which may not be examined by any Rule of Gods written or unwritten Word nor may any man call his skill in question much lesse condemn him of Imposture by the lamentable issue and dismal successe of his Practises Should men upon like termes be admitted to read Galen or Hippocrates and yet the Monopoly of Medicines permitted to some one Emperick or Apothecarie not liable to any account whether his confections were made according to the Rules of Physick Art or no They might be in greater danger of poysoning then if these grand Physitians had never written for that might be prescribed them by such an authentick Mountebank as a Cordial which the other had detected for Poyson So should the Christian World might the Jesuites plea prevail be continually at the Popes Curtesie whether they should embrace that Sense of Scriptures which Christ and his Apostles have condemned for the Doctrine of Devils as the Oracles of the living God and food for their Souls 7 But some man more indifferent would here perhaps interpose Though theirs be bad do you prescribe us any better Method of Health Your former counsel to practise the Apostles Rules is as if a man should say to one sick of a dangerous disease Expel the bad humour and you shall be well Yet as we said before Est pars sanitatis velle sanari To desire the exâ—…pation of such Affections as hinder our proficiencie in the School of Christ or knowledge of his precepts is a good step to health The Scriptures are the words of life containing Medicines as well as Meat and must purge our Souls of carnal Affections as Physick doth the body of bad Humours They teach withall what Abstinence must be used ere we can be capable of that spiritual Welfare which they promise to the Soul of such as follow their Prescriptions And because our natural Corruption cannot be asswaged much lesse expelled but by their force or vertue which is not alwayes manifested upon the first Receipt we are to come unto them with such reverence as the Moralist did to Meditations of Vertue Vacua sobria mente in sobrietie of Spirit not in the heat abundance or actual motion of such Affections as hinder their operation upon our Souls as men usually take Physick upon a fasting and quiet stomack although Pestered with bad humours which yet cannot be extirpate but by Physick nor by Physick if ministred in the actual motion heat or raging of such humours If a man have but this desire to be rid of such Affections as breed this distemper in his Soul or work a distast of the Word of Life he is capable of that Promise Habents dabitur and shall in good time see his desire augmented whose encrease will bring forth greater fervencie in prayer and prayers if fervent though in men subject to such infirmities avail much and shall in the end be heard to 〈◊〉 full And as well in thankfull duty to the Redeemer of Mankind for his gracious Promises as in hope of being further partakers of the Blessings promised Every one that heareth Gods Word ought and such as hear it a right will as oft as they seek recovery of their spiritual Health by it or such Means as it prescribes abstain from all occasions and occurrents that may encrease provoke or strengthen such Affections as hinder the operations of it upon their Souls For even Nature taught the Cynick to account surfetting and intemperate diet madnesse in the Heathen whiles they sacrificed for Health If any have erred in hearing Gods Word amisse or in the unseasonable applying of Sacred Prescripts these Errors must be recalled by further consultation with their dispensors by more diligent search and better instruction in other parts of this Method of Life 8 Saint Peter knew many ignorant and unstable Souls had perverted some haâ—d places of S. Pauls Epistles as they had other Scriptures to their own destruction Did he therefore advise them to whom he thus wrote not to seek their Salvation out of Saint Pauls Epistles but with absolute submission of their judgement to his and his successours Prescripts Or doth he not seek to establish them in that Doctrine which Saint Paul had taught according to the wisdom given him in all his Epistles Or can any endued with reason doubt whether Saint Paul himself did not expect his Writings should be a Rule of Faith to all that read them without continuance either of his own or others actual Infallible Proposal of them He had protested once for all Though we or an Angel from Heaven preach unto you otherwise then that we have preached unto you let him be accursed He had said before and yet saith he now again If any man preach unto you otherwise then ye have received let him be accursed For he had taught them as their own Conscience might witnesse the Doctrine of God and not man as he intimateth in the next words 9 Either Saint Paul is not Authentick in this protestation or else all stand accursed by it that dare absolutely admit any Doctrine though from an Angels mouth but upon due examination and sure triall whether consonant or contrary to what Saint Paul hath left in writing His meaning notwithstanding in many places as his fellow-fellow-Apostle witnesseth was much perverted And seeing what was past could not be amended it seemed necessary to Saint Peter to admonish others lest they should be intangled in like errour But what means had he left to prevent this perverting of Scriptures in them Either none besides or none so good as diligent Reading or Hearing the written Word For such was this Epistle which for their Admonition he now wrote and was desirous questionlesse all of them should with attention hear or read
Spirit our Comforter and Instructer have far greater interest in our Souls and Consciences then either Aristotle or Plato or any other Philosopher or Philosophie it self hath in our Opinions or Perswasions 6 But though Gratitude to our God could not move us are those blessed hopes of Immortality so little worth as upon every light or no occasion we should adventure their eternal losse And yet idly desperately and frantickly adventure it we do unlesse such as urge us with solemn subscription to this more then Monarchical Supremacy over our souls enstamped not with any Roman Caesars but Gods own Image Superscription can shew us sufficient Warrant that thus to offer up not only the calves of our lips but even our Faith the best Tribute our hearts can yield wholly into Christs pretended Vicars hands be not a witnesse of our Rebellion against Christ himself the Supream Lord as wel of them that challenge this Authority as of us of whom this servile subjection is exacted All the warrant or Evidence which in this case they can pretend must either be drawn from the Rules of Reason or from the Scriptures the Rule as we contend of Faith which for this reason may justly controul all pretended Rules of Natural Reason And as we have said before if the Pope be as usually he is but homo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a witnesse then both Scripture and Reason teach us that he cannot perceive the things of God nor the Meaning of his Spirit for as our Apostle saith they are foolish unto him And if they be foolish to him then is he as foolish a Judge of them and of all things that must be Spiritually discerned as the meerest natural Idiot would be of natural Philosophie or other secular Arts or Sciences Even to this one place of Scripture uttered by the Spirit of God and the Ministry of that Apostle no sufficient Answer can be given without the evident Testimony of the same Spirit under some Prophets Apostles or Evangelists hand either mitigating or restraining that sense which the words naturally import and we collect whose Probability in it self and Consonancy with other Scriptures are so great that we stand bound by our general Allegiance which we ow unto GODS Spirit to suspect all men for Incompetent Judges or witnesses in matters concerning GOD unlesse we know certainly of what Spirit they are or have great Inducements to presume them of a better Spirit and in more favour with the Spirit of God then they themselves report their Popes to be CAP. XXIX That their Arguments drawn from conveniency of Reason or pretended Correspondency between Civil and Ecclesiastical Regiment do prejudice themselves not us 1 THat this is no general Dictate of common Reason or any part of the Law of Nature Reason and common Sense make evident And we may rest assured hereof in that no Jesuite nor other Stickler for the Popes Authority hath been so impudent hitherto as to avouch thus much That there are some Probabilities or Conveniencies which in Reason might perswade any indifferent man that there must be some one Umpire or Tribunal Seat by whose Authority all Controversies of Religion must be determined BELLARMINE thus goes about to prove GOD was not ignorant that many Difficulties about Faith would arise in the Church What then In Reason then he was to provide his Church of a Judge suppose he were But this Judge cannot be the Scripture nor any private revealing Spirit nor any Secular therefore an Eccesiastical Prince which may determin such matters either of himself alone or at least with the advice and consent of Bishops his Associates Nâ—… hath any yet as nor can any indeed imagin any other to whom the Judgement of these things can possibly appertain 2 That neither the Scripture nor any private man nor secular Prince is this Judge he labours to prove by Arguments whose strength hath been broken in the former Discourses concerning the Obscurity of Scriptures and the Varieties of Interpretations But how cunningly soever his sagacity may seem to have cast about he is at the same default Valentian and Sacroboscus were all of them over-ran the Sent by leaping from one Extream to another without search of the Mean betwixt them for they take it as granted that we deny all living Judges of Controversies because we acknowledge no absolute Infallibility in any Our Assertion is The Scripture is a Law or Rule most infallible whereby every man must judge himself whereby such as are in lawful Authority may judge others for not judging themselves by it but not alwayes infallibly Nor can it stand with the sobriety of Christian Wisdom to expect such a precise determination of all Points disputed much lesse disputable among the learned as might bind all men to an absolute Belief whether explicit or implicit of this or that determinate sense all others excluded Notwithstanding the more conscious any ordinary Judge is of his own or others Fallibility or Facility of erring dangerously if they should take upon them strictly to determin all Religious doubts much more all doubts in matters of Religion that might be moved the more infallibly may he rest assured that many cases of that Quality are very doubtful that in sundry of many Opinions all to his knowledge possible as much may be as probably alledged for any one as for other Now the true and proper Use of an Ecclesiastick Judge or Magistracy is not only to punish Oppugners of Truths either evident in themselves and infallibly Believed of all Christians or generally received by the best and most unpartial Writers in every Age but as wel to moderate mens carriage in Controversies of the former nature sometimes by restraining all peremptory Assertions one way or other all exasperating censures or contumelious contradictions as in difficulties aquipendent betwixt an equality of contrary Probabilities sometimes as in matters not so useful or unto whose search the Signs of times present do not solicit us by enjoyning a general Silence that all may hearken with better attention to GOD alwayes speaking by the ordinary Course of his Providence albeit softly and leasurely yet distinctly and audibly to quiet minds already instructed in that Heavenly knowledge though not simply unto all for many of us can perfectly distinguish mens voices whiles they repeat what in part we know though not whiles they pronounce matters unheard before or altogether unknown to us 3 By this it may appear would our Adversaries make an equal comparison that God hath better provided for his Churches Regiment in matters Spiritual then Common-weales in Temporal First the Scripture is a Rule as al-sufficient for all such Businesses as any Temporal Laws could be for effecting their proper End albeit we should suppose the Lord had dictated them immediately as he did the Scriptures This our Adversaries cannot deny unlesse they doubt whether the eternal Spirit have as great skil in Heavenly matters as
how great soever his Authority was the Pope can have have no pretence to be his successor therein For the edification of the people committed to him by our Saviour was to be finished before Ierusalems destruction since which time Israel hath been perpetually scattered amongst the Nations without a shepherd to gather them And when it shall please the Lord as it is probable it will to reduce them to his fold their Ruler shall be of their own people strangers shall have no more dominion over them 3 Had the Pope derived his right from Saint Thomas Rartholomew or other Apostle which have no writings extant this might have yeelded some surmises not so easie to be disproved that Romish traditions did contain the summe at least of all these Apostles unwritten Doctrine if from Saint Paul the great Doctor of the Gentiles and first planter of faith amongst the Romans as much commended by him as any other of his children in Christ the improbabilitie had been much lesse then now it is in Peters case that the Bishop of Rome if any should have succeeded him But when that people began to grow out of love with the truth fashioning themselves unto this present world the disease whereof Saint Paul forewarned them it was Sathans policie to present unto them longing after such a Monarchical state as their Heathenish Predecessours had such shews of Peters Supremacie and residencie at Rome as by the Divine permission had either crept into some of the Ancients religious cogitations or else in time of darknesse have been shufled by the Predecessors of these cheating mates late discovered into their writings as sit baits to entice them unto this derivation of that absolute power from Peter to their greater condemnation and our good For God no doubt in his providence ordered this their blindnesse to illuminate us as he did the fall of the Jews to confirm the Gentiles in faith seeing of all the Apostles Peters prerogatives as hath been shewed were most evidently personal all to determin with himself unto which observation his own writings also give testimony Even a little before he was to leave the world where he most manifested his earnest desire of preserving his flock found in faith after his death he gives no intimation as shall be shewed more at large hereafter of any Successor unto whom they were to repair His present Epistle he foresaw would be more availeable to this purpose then any Tradition from him I will not be negligent to put you alwayes in remembrance of these things though that he have knowledge and he established 〈◊〉 present truth For I think it meet as long as I am in this Tabernacle to â—… you up by pretting vnto in remembrance seeing I know that the time is at hand that I must lay down this my Tabernacle even as our Lord Jesus Christ hath shewea me I will endeavour therefore alwayes that ye also may be able to have remembrance of those things after my departing 4 As for peculiar direction of later times whence perpetual infallibilitie must be derived it cannot be gathered from his writings that he knew so much as his brother Paul did Albeit in this point these two great pillars of Christs Church more famous then all their fellow Apostles besides for present efficacie of their personal ministerie come far behind the Disciple whom Jesus loved whose written Ambassage was in a peculiar sence to tarry till Christs last coming unto judgement as he himself did unto Christ first coming to destroy Jerusalem and forewarn the Nations Besides the Doctrine of common salvation necessarie for all to know plentifully set down in this Disciples Epistle his Revelations contain infallible directions peculiar to every age And as in some one gift or other every Apostle almost exceeds his fellowes so if amongst all any one was to have this prerogative of being the ordinary Pastor or to have ordinary succeslours as Aaron though inferiour to Moses in personal prerogatives during his life had after his death this doubtlesse was Saint John who ascribes that unto the diligent Expositors hearers or Readers of his Books which the Romanist appropriates to such as relie upon the visible Churches determinations never questioning whether it be that Babylon which Saint John deciphers or no Blessed is he saith Saint John that readeth and they that hear the words of this prophesie and keep those things which are written therein for the time is at hand Blessed they are that read it with fear and reverence or so affected as this Disciple was for unto such the Lord will by means ordinary by sober observation of the event reveal his secret intent as he did it unto him by the extraordinary gift of Prophesie for the testimoâ— of Jesus is the spirit of Prophesie Revel 19. 10. 5 It is evident the Spirit of God intended to shew Iohn and Iohn to shew the faithfull all the Eclipses that should befall the Church until the worlds end His prophesies since his death were so to instruct the world of all principal events present or to come as Histories do of matters forepast Now as he in our times wherein God inspires not men with Moses spirit is accounted the best Antiquary that is most conversant and best seen in the faithfull Records of time not he that can take upon him to divine as Moses did of the worlds state in former Ages so since the gift of prophesie ceased he is to be esteemed the most infallible teacher the safest guide to conduct others against the forces of hell chiefly heresies or doctrines of Devils that can best interpret him who first descried them and in his life time forewarned the Churches of Asia planted by Saint Paul and watered by him of the abominations that threatned shortly to overspread them and after them the whole visible Church until these later times Doth the Pope then professe more skill in Saint Iohns Revelations then any other If he do let him make proof of his Profession by the evidence of his Expositions But from this Apostle he pretends none at all and we demand but any tolerable proof of succession from S. Peter 6 A supreme oecumenical Head say the Parasites to the Sea Apostolique is as necessary now as in Saint Peters time therefore he must jure civino have a Successour But neither doth Scripture or Reason admit any such Head as they have moulded in their brains either then or now As hath been abundantly proved and their own instances brought to illustrate the probabilitie of such a device contradict them For admit that Christ and earthly Princes stood in like need of Deputie-Governours in their absence would the King of Spain were he to go on Pilgrimage unto his Kingdom of Jerusalem leave but one Deputie over all the Dominions of Spain and Portugal the West Indies Sicilie Naples and Millain Or leaving but one would indue him with such absolute power over all his Subjects in these
though friendly admonished cease henceforth to urge their outworn arguments drawn from antiquity universality from that reverence and allegiance which most Kingdoms of Europe have for these thousand years and more born to the See of Rome or from the bloudy victories over all other inferiour Churches or private spirits that have oppugned her These or like allegations in their judgement abundantly prove their Church to be Christs best beloved the Pope to be his Deputy or rather his corrival here on earth whose words sound as the word of God and not of Man albeit the spirit hath plainly foretold that the beast which had his power from the Dragon and should open his mouth unto blasphemies against God to blaspheme his name and his tabernacle and them that dwell in heaven should have power given withall to make war with the Saints and to overcome them yea over every kindred tongue and nation so as all that dwell upon the earth should worship hint whose names were not written in the Book of life of the Lamb which was slain from the beginning of the world 5 To the Jesuites brags that no visible Church since the world began did either spread it self so far or flourish so long as theirs hath done I only oppose that of our Saviour Ex tuo ipsius ore judicabere serve nequam Thine own confession shall condemn thee thou bond-slave of Satan For if the Romish Hierarchy be or hath been in the worlds eye the most potent and flourishing that ever was This description of the Beasts power cannot agree so wel to any as unto it Nor doth the Scripture any where intimate the true Church militant should dominere over all Nations or be so triumphantly victorious as they boast theirs hath been To think the Antichrist whom they expect should in three years space subdue as many Nations as have been tributary to the See of Rome is a conceit that justifies the Jew as well in his credulity of things to come which are impossible as in his hypocritical partiality towards his present estate which he never suspects of Apostasie Unto this observation the Reader may adde other like descriptions of this scarlet Whore all so fitly agreeing to the Papacy as he that will not acknowledge it for the Kingdom of great Antichrist hath great reason to suspect his heart that if he had lived with our Saviour he would scarce have taken him for his Messias nor can the Jesuites bring any better reasons why the Pope should not be the Antichrist then the Jews did why Christ should not be the great Prophet Yet this I say not to discourage such as doubt whether the Pope be that Man of sin or to bring them out of love with their belief which may be sound without expresse or actual acknowledgement of this truth not as yet revealed unto them as those two Disciples no doubt were neither hypocrites nor infidels albeit they mistrusted the report of Christs resurrection for they were farther from approving the practises of the Jews against him then from actual acknowledgement of it If any man thus doubt whether the Pope be Antichrist so he do not approve his hatred and war against Gods Saints or his other devilish practises Gods peace be upon him and in good time I trust his eyes shal be enlightned to see the truth in this particular as those two Disciples did in the Article of the resurrection 6 Seeing we have proved the Popes authority so far to exceed Christ it may seem needlesse to compare it with the Apostles Yet lest any Jesuite should except that their authority might be greater after their Masters glorification then his was before let us a while examin what they assumed unto themselves what they gave unto the Scriptures before extant CAP. XXIII That the authority attributed to the present Pope and the Romish rule of faith were altogether unknown unto Saint Peter the opposition betwixt Saint Peters and his pretended Successors doctrine 1 TO begin with S. Peter the first supposed to be enstalled in this See of Rome It may be presumed that this Supremacy over his fellow Apostles were it any was in his life time whiles his miracles were fresh and the extraordinary efficacy of his Ministery daily manifested as wel known amongst the faithful as the Popes now amongst Roman Catholicks If necessary it had been to acknowledge him or his successors as a second Rock or foundation the commendation of this doctrine unto posterity had been most requisite at the time he wrote his second Epistle as knowing then the time was at hand he should lay down his Tabernacle when he endeavoured his auditors might have remembrance of his former doctrine to make their calling and election sure If ever there had been a fit season for notifying the necessity of the See Apostolicks infallibility all the circumstances of this place witnesse this was it If any they to whom he wrote were most bound to obey it Their faith had been planted by him his present intent and purpose was more and more to confirm them in the truth wherein they were in some measure established And being thus mindful wil he not make choice of means most effectual to prevent Heresie or Apostasie What are these then absolute reposal in his and his Successors infallibility Had this been the best rule of faith he knew his fault were inexcusable for not prescribing it to such is most willingly would have used it His personal testimony and authority was I confess as great as any mortal mans could be with his own eyes he had beheld the Majesty of our Lord Christ whom he preached unto them If any trust there be in humane senses this Saint of God could not possibly be deceived If any credence to be given unto miracles or sanctity of life his flock might rest assured he would not deceive his works so witnesse the sincerity of his doctrine or if his eye were not in these his auditors judgements sufficient witnesses of this truth he further assures them when his Lord received of God the Father honour and glory there came such a voice unto him from the excellent glory This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased And this voice saith he we heard when it came from heaven being not a far off but with him in the mount If S. Peters seat or chair had been as the Pole-star whereto our Belief as the Mariners needle should be directed lest we float we know not whither in the Ocean of opinions were the Bosome of the visible Church the safest harbour our souls in all storms of temptation could thrust into this Apostle was either an unskilful Pilot or an uncharitable man that would not before his death instruct them in this course for the eternal safety of their souls whose bodily lives he might have commanded to have saved his own Had perpetual succession in his See or Apostolical tradition never interrupted been such an
be certaine whether ever there had been such an Emperour as they plead succession from or at least how far his Dominions extended or where they lay This manner of plea in secular controversies would be a mean to defeat him that made it For albeit the Christian World did acknowledge there had been such an Emperour and that many parts of Europe of right belonged unto his lawfull heir Yet if it were otherwise unknown what parts these were or who this heir should be no Judge would be so mad as finally to determine of either upon such motives Or if the Plaintiffe could by such courses as the World knows oft prevail in judgement or other gracious respects effect his purpose he were worse then mad that could think the finall resolution of his right were into the Emperours last Will and Testament which by his own confession no man knows besides himself and not rather into his own presumed fidelitie or the Judges apparant partiality So in this Controversie whatsoever the Pope may pretend from Christ all in the end comes to his own authority which we may safely believe herein to be most infallible that it will never prove partiall against it self or define ought to his Holinesse disadvantage 10 Here again it shall not be amisse to admonish younger Students of another gull which the Jesuite would put upon us to make their Churches Doctrin seem lesse abominable in this point lest you should think they did equalize the authority of the Church with divine revelations Valentian would perswade you it were no part of the formal object of faith It is true indeed that the Churches authority by their Doctrine is not comprehended in the object of Belief whilest it onely proposeth other Articles to be believed No more is the Sun comprehended under the objects of our actual sight whilest we behold colours or other visibles by the vertue of it But yet as it could not make colours or other things become more visible unto us unlesse it self were the first and principal visible that is unlesse it might be seen more clearly then those things which we see by it so we would direct our sight unto it so would it be impossible the Churches infallible proposal could make a Roman Catholicks Belief of Scriptures or their Orthodoxal sence the stronger unlesse it were the first and principal credible or primary object of his Beliefe or that which must be most clearly most certainly and more stedfastly believed so as all other Articles besides must be believed by the belief or credibility of it This is most evident out of Sacroboscus and Bellarmines resolution or explication of that point how the Churches proposal confirmes a Roman Catholicks belief To give this Doctrine of their Churches infallibility the right title according to the truth it is not an Article of Catholick Belief but a Catholick Axiom of Antichristian unbelief which from the necessary consequences of their assertions more strictly to be examined will easily appear CAP. XXIX What manner of casual dependance Romish Belief hath on the Church that the Romanist truely and properly believes the Church onely not God or his Word 1 THe two main assertions of our Adversaries whence our intended conclusion must be proved are these often mentioned heretofore First that we cannot be infallibly perswaded of the truth of Scriptures but by the Churches proposal Secondly that without the same we cannot be infallibly perswaded of the true sence or meaning of these Scriptures which that Church and we both believe to be Gods Word How we should know the Scriptures to be Gods Word is a Probleme in Divinity which in their judgement cannot be assoiled without admission of Traditions or divine unwritten verities of whose extent and meaning the Church must be infallible Judge It is necessary to salvation saith Bellarmine that we know there be some books divine which questionlesse cannot by any means be known by Scriptures For albeit the Scripture say that the Books of the Prophets or Apostles are divine yet this I shall not certainly believe unlesse I first believe that Scripture which saith thus is divine For so we may read every where in Mahomets Alcoran that the Alcoran it self was sent from heaven but we beliefe it not Therefore this necessary point that some Scripture is divine cannot sufficiently be gathered out of Scriptures alone Consequently seeing faith must rely upon Gods Word unlesse we have Gods word unwritten we can have no faith His meaning is we cannot know the Scriptures to be divine but by Traditions and what Traditions are divine what not we cannot know but by the present visible Church as was expresly taught by the same Authour before And the final resolution of our believing what God hath said or not said must be the Churches Authority To this collection Sacroboscus thus farre accords Some Catholicks rejected divers Canonical Books without any danger and if they had wanted the Churches proposal for others as well as them they might without sin have doubted of the whole Canon This he thinks consonant to that of Saint Austin I would not believe the Gospel unlesse the Churches authority did thereto move me He addes that we of reformed Churches making the visible Churches authority in defining points of faith unsufficient might disclaim all without any greater sin or danger to our souls then we incurre by disobeying some parts of Scripture to wit the Apocryphal books canonized by the Romish Church The Reader I hope observes by these passages How Bellarmine ascribes that to Tradition which is peculiar to Gods providence Sacroboscus that to blind belief which belongs unto the holy Spirit working faith unto the former points by the ordinary observation of Gods Providence and Experiments answerable to the rules of Scriptures 2 Consequently to the Trent Councels Decree concerning the second assertion Bellarmine thus collects It is necessary not onely to be able to read Scriptures but to understand them but the Scripture is often so ambiguous and intruate that it cannot be understood without the exposition of some that cannot erre therefore it alone is not sufficient Examples there be many For the equality of the divine persons the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son as from one joynt original Original sin Christs descension into Hel and many like may indeed be deduced out of Scriptures but not so plainly as to end Controversies with contentious spirits if we should produce onely testimonies of Scriptures And we are to note there be two things in Scripture the Characters or the written words and the sence included in them The Character is as the sheath but the sence is the very sword of the spirit Of the first of these two all are partakers for whosoever knowes the Character may read the Scripture but of the sence all men are not capable nor can we in many places be certain of it unlesse Tradition be assistant It is an offer worth the taking
dico illos â—… suisse Pseudo-prophetas â—… vel ipâ—um Aâ—â—ab qui eos consuleâ—… dicâ—â—et â—â—x 〈◊〉 non â—… Prophâ—ta Domini pâ—â— qâ—â—m 〈◊〉 â—… Râ—spondet Aâ—… Râ—…sit unâ—s â—… quiâ— non pâ—ophetat mihi nili malum â—… in media Saxonia consulâ—â—et 400. â—… de â—ide justificanâ—e posâ—ea â—… non esset mirum si major pars erâ—… nunc non 〈◊〉 toâ—am ecclesiam â—… si 〈◊〉 4â—0 Minisâ—â—â—i Lutherani â—… vicina quaedam loca sunt alia â—… veâ—a â—ides 〈◊〉 iâ—a non sequitur â—… Judâ—… tempore Aâ—hab â—rrasse â—… Propheta qui in Samaria erant â—…â—os Prophetas â—rant in Judaea multi alii â—… est â—rant Sacâ—rdotes in â—… ex 〈◊〉 incumbebâ—â— respondeâ—e â—… lege Dâ—… †a â—… è Pâ—â—udo â—rophâ—tis â—…dium 〈◊〉 â—… 〈◊〉 quâ—d Mâ—… 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enim veri â—um pâ—…e arâ—… pâ—aedixisse 〈◊〉 â—…aelem in Nabuthi suburbano lambendum â—… Nâ—buthi opera ipsius lapidaâ—i à populo 〈◊〉 â—… veâ—eatur conâ—rarium dicere qâ—òd periturus sit rex abhinc die 〈◊〉 c. ‖ Dent. 13. 1 In what cases and peâ—sons pronenesse to bâ—lieve particular truths is â—… in what or in whom suspiâ—ious * 〈◊〉 2. 23. â—… 14. â—… 6. 1â— a Jâ—hn 2. 24 〈◊〉 b c * â— Isâ—â—ah 〈◊〉 20. â—… 18 Statins in fine 12. Thebaid †Petrarch Why the priests or spiritual rulers hated the living Prophets whilst they loved the memory of the deceased * †â—… 9. ‖ Jeâ— 18 18. * Jer. 29. 26. †Jer. 20. 3â— 4. ‖ Jer. 59. 31 32 * Mat. 23 29 30. †Mat. 23. 35. What means the people had to disâ—ern true Prophets from false ‖ Prov 22 3. * * Deut. 〈◊〉 16. * * * †It was a pâ—… the principal end of this Revelation to instruct Saint Peter that Gods graces were to be communicated henceâ—… Geâ—â—iles And this was but a branch of that Precept of loving strangers so often ingeminated by their Law give Had thâ—… 〈◊〉 practised this duty towards Aliens the communication of Gods graces unto the Gentiles could not have seemed â—…â—â—to them * John 5. 45 〈◊〉 believe Christ without examination of his doctrine by Moses had been neither to believe Christ nor Moses Prophetical testimonies did more sufficiently witnesse our Saviour to be the promised Mâ—… then any miracles * Matth. 11. v. 3 â—… Luk. 7. 〈◊〉 18 19 22 See a Treatise called Christs Answer to Johns Disciples * Though in that 61 of Esay no expresse mention be made of restoring blind men to sight yet the Septuagint as elsewhere truly expresse the meaning of the Hebrew phrase there used For in the Hebrew Dialect as sâ—â—e judicious Hebricians observe the deaf or blind are called vincti or ligati †Luke 4. v. 18 19. At that time when Johns Disâ—â—â—les came unto him he cured many of their sicknesses and plagues 〈◊〉 of evil spirits and untâ— many blind men he 〈◊〉 sight And Jesus answered and said unto them Go your wayes and shew John what things ye have seen and â—… that the 〈◊〉 see the halt go c. Luke 7. verse 21 22. ‖ Isaiah 61. ver 1 2 3. cap. 35. ver 5. cap. 53. ver 4 a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 himself from the words immediately precedent had been taught by God himself to discern Christ for the true Messias 〈◊〉 John 1. v. 33. with Esay 61. v. 1. Esa 42. v. 1. Esay 11. v. 2. b Luke 4. v. 16 17 c. * Mark 6. 2. Luke 4. 〈◊〉 †Luke 4. 14. â—… * Mark 13. 21 22. †John 7. 31. ‖ John 6. 30. Expectation of pempous and vain-glorious miracles the original of Jewish 〈◊〉 lity * John 6 68. No man is ever â—… this end only ontward miracles serve †Mark 7. 37 * Deut. 18. 15 16 17 18 19. The law cited 〈◊〉 meant both of Christ and the Prophets ‖ Acts 3. 23. See Parag 21. How far and 〈◊〉 what teâ—nâ—s Israel was bound by the former law to hear all Gods Prophets * Deut. 18. 20 21 22. Miracles in themselves no sure rule of trying Prophets before the Law was given †Mat. 12. 24. The end and 〈…〉 * Mat. 12. 27. ‖ Mark 38. * Ver. 〈◊〉 †Mat. 12. 30. * Mat. 112. 28 ‖ Luk 11. 20. Christ was to be acknowledged for The great Prophet by his supereminency in those gifts of the Spirit whereby former Prophets had been approved †1 King 18. * 1 King 22 ‖ Vers 28. * †* Numb 11 〈◊〉 vid. 8. Luk. 〈◊〉 1 c. †So Exodu 24. God commands Moses to come up to the Lord in the Mount with Aaron Nadab and Abihu and 70. of the Elders of Israel which were to worship a far off while Moses himself alone went near unto the Lord so saith S. Peter God caused Christ to be shewed openly not to all the people but to the witnesses chosen before of God to such as did eat and drink with him after he arose from the dead His Disciples alone were present when God called Christ into heavenly places Exod. 24 10 11. ‖ The excellency of the great Prophet in respect of 〈◊〉 gathered frâ—… the â—… and the â—… * Numb 12. 6 7 8. †John 1. 18. The gift spropheste not labâ—â—ual to 〈◊〉 nary Prophet * Jer. 28. Jer. 28. 10 12. †Ver. 12 15 16. ‖ 2 King 4. 27 John Baptist more then a Prophet from the virmity of the great Prophet * John 1. 28. * John 1. 33. See cap. 20. Parag. 5. †John 10. 40 41 42. ‖ Isaiah 40. 3. The matter of our Saviours predictions compared with the precedent prophesies of him declare his Godhead * Isai 42. 8 9. †John 3. 〈◊〉 Our Saviours arbitrary discovery of secretâ— and predictions of futures contingent fully consonart to the received nations of the Mession ‖ John 1. 49. * * * John 4. 25. * * Vâ—â— 42 * â—â—h 16. 30. Our Saviours Disâ—â—les and Apostles did according to his instâ—… oâ—s mâ—… upon â—… dâ—… then â—…les * â—in 2. 22. * Jâ—h 14. 〈◊〉 * Jâ—h 〈◊〉 4. â—…ling the fuâ—…lling of that Scripture 〈◊〉 He that â—…th â—â—ead â—… up his heel against me in Judas he gave this generall Rule From henceforth tell I you before â—… me to passe ye might believe that I am He. John 13. 19. * John 12. 28. * Mark 9. 1. Matth. 16. 28. Luke 9. 27. 2 Pet. 1. 17. * Mark 9. 7. Luke 9. 35. Matth 17 5. * Joh. 12. 30. Our Saviour in his last conference with the Jews proclaims himself to be the Great Prophet fore-told by Moses * John 12. 44. * John 12. 48. * Deut. 18. 19. * Joh. 12. 49 50 * Deut. 18. 18. Our Saviours Propheticall spirit gave life to his miracles though his miracles were good preparatives to Belief * Joh. 12. 3â— * Joh. 14. 10. * Joh. 12. 32. The peculiar similitude between Christ and Moses in the office of mediation *