the Members of the holy Church Triumphant or Militant nor yet consists only of them or of men internally though ineffectually called but of them and of others called only vocatione merè externa by vocation meerly external Thus the several societies of Christian men unto every one of which the name of Church is rightfully attributed as the Church of Rome France Spain England and as of old the seven Churches of Asia which certainly hold a nearer resemblance unto National or Provincial Churches than unto the Gathered Congregations for most certainly each of these had certain particular Congregations under them as London hath must be endued with correspondent general properties and powers belonging of right unto them as they are publick Christian Societies And all the powers given by Christ to the Churches Militant or to visible Ministerial Churches are most properly attributed to such Churches and not to those where two or three or some few only in respect of the whole are gathered and such are our Independent Churches here in respect of the Church of England and such like are our several Parishes which more properly and strictly ought to be accounted of as Members or Homogeneal parts of the Church of England than so many several Churches endued with such powers though in common discourses we may allow them the title or appellation of Churches yet in discourses of this nature being disputative they ought to be distinguished § Unto the Attributes or Prerogatives attributed to the Church in the Apostles or Nicene Creed or unto the Promises annexed unto it in the Scriptures the Visible Ministerial Churches have no claim or title save only in reversion or reflection or in expectancy i. e. the Mystical Body of Christ is only instated in the Blessings Prerogatives and Promises made unto the Church yet from this Body or rather from Christ the Head of this Body both Blessings and Powers do immediately and successively like the precious ointment upon the head that ran down upon the beard even Aarons beard that went down to the skirts of his Garments descend though in different Measures unto the several Members of it as unto National Churches more and greater Powers and unto the several Congregations thereof Blessings and Powers though not in the same measure and fullness and indeed by Analogie and Participation unto all and every one that hath put on Christ by profession Thus we are to conceive of the Catholick Church as of one entire Body made up by the Collection and aggregation of all the faithful unto the unity thereof from which union there ariseth unto every one of them such a relation unto and such a dependance upon the Church Catholick as parts use to have in respect of the whole whereupon it followeth that neither particular persons nor particular Churches are to work as several divided Bodies by themselves which is the ground of all Schism but to teach and to be taught and to do all other Christian duties as parts conjoyned unto the whole and Members of the same Common-wealth or Corporation and therefore the Bishops of the Antient Church though they had the government of particular Congregations only committed unto them yet in regard of this Communion which they had with the universal did usually take to themselves the title of Bishops of the Catholick Church which maketh strongly as well against the new Separatists as the old Donatists who either hold it a thing not much material so they profess the Faith of Christ whether they do it in the Catholick Communion or out of it or else which is worse dote so much upon the perfection of their own Party that they refuse to joyn in fellowship with the rest of the body of Christians as if they themselves were the only people of God and all wisdom must live and die with them and their Generation § To prosecute their own simile of Fraternities or Corporations whereby they claim a power over one another by consent or agreement Be it that every Church exceeds an ordinary Assembly or Multitude in that it is a Society of Men incorporated and every Corporation or Society corporate supposeth an unity more than meerly local between the Members thereof an Union by Laws and Statutes or else they were no more significant than so many men meeting at a Play or Whitsun-Ale quod non est aliquid formatum non est aliquid vere unum that which hath no set form or fashion can have no true real unity for it is the form of every thing which giveth it a distinct entity or unity Hence it is that though all men are mortal yet Corporations consisting of such mortal men are yet accounted immortal because their Laws and Ordinances is the life the soul and spirit of every Corporation or Body Civil every Church in what usual sense soever it be taken is a Society or Body Politick though every Society or Body Politick is not a Church And that which differenceth the Church properly so called from a Society or Body meerly Civil is the diversity of Laws and Ordinances and the different manner of union between the Members All this is to fortifie and to make plain their simile and which they will not gainsay Yet withal I shall commit to their consideration that there are no Corporations in England nor in any well governed Commonwealth without a proper Charter from the Crown and Laws of the Kingdom to authorize them to be a Corporation and to make By-laws as they call them or to have power one over another So none of them are independent of the publick Laws of the Kingdom or Nation whereof they are Subjects or have any authority to form or establish themselves by any power of their own but by what is derivative from some other power paramount So also there is no Parish in England nor any Company of Christians that have power of themselves so to confederat or congregat into a Church such a Church as hath all the Powers and Attributes wherewith a National Church is endowed and to meet as an Independent Congregation to make Laws choose Officers censure Offenders make Canons and Orders in circumstantials without authority first obtained from the supreme Powers legislative or without any Supervisors or Superintendents or Laws over them if every particle of the Church hath this power derived unto it from Christ then certainly the same cannot be denied to a whole National Church and whether be more just or equal that a part should govern the whole or the whole the parts judg ye Power to meet to fast and pray to break bread and administer Sacraments which renders them capable of the appellation of a Church cannot reasonably and ordinarily be denied unto them yet this doth no way qualifie them to be Independent The strength and virtue even of the Law of Nations is such that no particular Nation can lawfully prejudice the same by any their several Laws and Ordinances more than a single person by his
and Judicature one of the other is not denied by any Protestant Divines that I know of and it is or ought to be as little gain-said that it could not then be otherwise And why Christ knew that the Messengers which he sent to gather a People to himself out of Saracens and Insidels Jews and Gentiles by perswasive means only were to build up his Church within the Bosom of Kingdoms which were and would continue avowed Enemies to his Gospel every where for a long time then to come And therefore he gave them such Doctrines and such Commissions for Doctrine and Discipline as they might any where publish and exercise in a quiet and peaceable manner the Subjects of no Common-wealth being any where therein concerned in goods or person by vertue of that spiritual regiment whereunto Christian Religion once embraced did make them lyable And indeed if they had not a Government within themselves they could have none at all concerning Christian Religion For Princes and all Nations were then professed and bitter enemies to Christian Religion which Government did also extend it self unto small matters even such as were otherwise impleadable and remediable in the Civil Courts and Judicatures of the Kingdome or State though heathenish wherein and under whom they lived as Subjects Dare any of you saith St. Paul having a matter against another go to law before the unjust and not before the Saints do ye not know that the Saints shall judge the world and if the world shall be judged by you are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters 1 Cor. 6.1 2. So that upon the whole matter the Sum total of Religion that Christ committed to his Apostles and they to their successors consisted in the Doctrin and Discipline thereof viz. to preach him and him crucified and to perswade others to become Christians through the belief of one Lord one Faith and one Baptisme and when once admitted by the door of Baptism into the Christian Church then to become and to be accounted Members of the visible Church Christian As for Discipine that concerns moral righteousness and honesty of life and their contraries unrighteousness and dishonesty and therefore Christ gave them this General Precept viz. to love one another even our neighbours as our selves and if any did transgress the Vertues and Laws which belong unto moral righteousness and honesty of life which are not proper and peculiar unto Christian men as Christians but as Men what then the transgressors were first privatly to be admonished if the offence were private those that sinned openly were to be rebuked openly if they did not then repent and amend then to be admonished by two or three if still they remained incorrigible then to acquaint that Congregation of Christian Brethren of which they were Members and if still they continued refractory after private and publick Admonitions Warnings and Prayers then not to own them as Brethren nor to keep company with them with such no not to eat with them and in the end to pursue them as if Publicans and Heathens as not being worthy of the Name and Profession of Christians which they had put on they not living to the adorning but to the shame of the Gospel And this is the sum of the whol Government or Discipline which Christ after the death of the Apostles who having gifts extraordinary had also powers extraordinary which died with them left to his Church for ought appears by any Scripture extant And what need of more For if the Ministers of the everlasting Gospel have liberty to Instruct break Bread Baptize and Pray the Civil Christian Magistrat hath sufficient power by Gods own Ordinance to order all the rest § To me indeed it seems marvelous nay monstrous that out of so plain so intelligible so easily practicable directions for the Government of Christian Churches that so various so meerly wordly and pompous nay imperious and impious forms of Church Government should be drawn into use as have been hundreds of years practised both in the Eastern and Western Empires and all held forth to be according to the Gospel when in truth they all differ from the true Gospel Discipline as far as the East is from the West they being all degenerated into meer worldly forms set up for meer worldly self-ends and interests If any man can more plainly make out any other form from the Gospel it would be a favour my self I must confess to be Impar Negotio it is past my understanding Indeed to me it seems wonderful whilst I consider that though Histories are ful and plain how and when the several forms crept in and got Accruments partly by the supineness and negligence of the Brethren of their own Rights and Priviledges partly by the craft and subtlety of proud covetous and ambitious Clergy and partly by the carelesness of Princes who not willing to trouble themselves with the care of Religion devolved it upon others that they should yet endeavour to keep us hoodwinkt though they know that our eyes are now open If there be any other Gospel-form of Government let it plainly appear without offering violence to any Texts of Scripture if not why should we be wiser than Christ our Head and Lawgiver God only is truth and all men are subject to errors what remains but that all his Servants and more especially the Priests of the most high God whose lips above others should more especially preserve knowledg do abandon humane errors and fals superstructures and keep the praecepts of God only that they may remain stedfast in the truth only § Some are of opinion that there is no need at all of any Ecclesiastical Government as distinct from the Civil if Christian and Orthodox and if there be that yet the Body of the Church is to govern it self and not the Clergie or Officers the Body they are to teach them their duty but the provisionary coercive and executive power is seated in the Body and not in the Pope or Presbyter I know the grand objection against Independency is that it is destructive to Government and tends to Anarchy a meer slander rather than a just objection for if rightly considered it would be found the least Chagreen to any Civil Government of any Ecclesiastical Government at this very day in use in any Nation and if not mistaken I have Christ who was the Wisdom of the Father and his Apostles to justify me herein For the Government that is herein stated may be exercised under any Government how averse soever to Christianity it self without clashing or interfeering therewith And if Christ left no other Government as for certain he did not why should we pretend to be wiser than Christ himself The same was exercised by the Apostles and long after and how incroachments of power were gained to the Clergy Stories are full Vide Fra Paolo Sarpi his Treatise of Beneficiary Matters § On the contrary how thwarting Popish or Presbyterian Governments are to
wheresoever he heard there was a Treaty to hold a Council And after a certain time he took the power to himself which the Roman Emperors used to convocate a Council of the whole Empire and to be President himself if present if absent to send Legates to be Presidents But a little more than one Age being past it was very necessary that every Nation should Assemble by it self and resolve according to the Number of Voices and that the general decision should be established not by the suffrages of particular men but by the plurality of the voices of the Nations so it was observed in the Council of Constance and Basil which use as it is good where the Government is free as it was when the world had no Pope so it ill befits the Pope who desires all Councils to be subject to him § Having thus summarily given a short prospect of the state of the Church in the first and purer times and how in succeeding times it came by degrees to be altered I proceed and say again to the Independents that be it as they would have it that the gathered Churches by one Apostle were not subject to the inspection and subordination of an other or of all the Apostles the cause of such Independency being then and in them reasonable for that each Apostle was guided by an infallible Spirit and so not absolutely necessary and yet even in their times it was thought fit to call a Council for setling of some differences yet it doth not therefore follow nor cannot demonstratively be proved that every individual Pastor after the times of the Apostles had their select Congregations seperate and distinct from others or that those Congregations were Independent free and exempt from all inspection or superintendency of Magistrates or Bishops or other Presbiters The conjectures and probabilities and they have no Arguments of an other nature seem strong for the contrary for Religion did first take place in Cities which had their Ecclesiastical Colledges consisting of Presbiters and Deacons whom first the Apostles and their Deligats the Evangelists did both ordain and govern such were the Colledges of Jerusalem Antioch Ephesus Rome Corinth aâ—â— the rest where the Apostles are known to have planted our Faith and Religion Now Religion in those days and places and the cure of Souls was their general charge in common over all that were about them neither had any one Presbyter for ought that appears by any ecclesiastical History his several cure or seperate title distinct and apart until the division of Parishes which was first made by the People when a certain number of Inhabitants having received the true Faith built a Temple for the exercising of their Religion hired a Priest and did constitute a Church which by them was called a Parish and when the number was increased if one Church and Priest were not sufficient they who were most remote did build another and sit themselves better And in process of time for the sake of good Order and concord custom began to have the Bishops consent also and †Hic Titulos in urbe Roma divisit presbiteris Evaristus Bishop in the Sea of Rome about the year 112. began to assign precincts to ever Church or Title which the Christians held and to appoint unto each Presbyter a certain compass whereof himself should take charge alone him †Hic Presbiteris ecclesias divisit coemiteria parochias dio diaeceses constituit Dionisius papa 24. followed Ao. 268. which was found so commodious that all parts of Christendom followed the example and among the rest our Churches in the reign of Ercombert the 7th King of Kent †Hoc de Honorio maxime memo rabile Godwins Episc p. 59. Honorius also being then Arch-Bishop of Canterbury about the year 636. became divided in like manner and have so continued ever since Other distinction of the Churches there doth not appear any in the Writings of the Apostles save those according to Cities only 15. Acts 36.1 Apocal. 20. wherein they planted the Gospel of Christ and erected ecclesiastical Colledges of Presbyters and Deacons ordained by the Apostles to exercise ecclesiastical functions promiscuously and at large till the said Evaristus did about 100 years after Christ distinguish the Church of Rome into Parishes tying each one to his proper station so that indesinite care of souls and indefinite ordination do approach nearer the Apostles times and example And prescription for the congregational way may be more justly grounded on the example of the People who are the Brethren who are the Church and of Evaristus then of any Apostle of Christ Moreover this the Independents will hardly evade each Church in the Apostles days had many Presbyters that laboured in the Word the Scriptures do plainly witness it In the Church of Jerusalem 15. Acts 6.23 of Antioch 13. Acts 1. of Ephesus 20. Acts 17.28 of whom 16. Rom. of Corinth 1 Corinth 14.29 of Phillippi 1. Phil. 1. of Thessalonica 1. Thes 5.12 of other Churches the like is affirmed 13. Heb. 7. James 5.14 1. Pet. 5.1 Now if each Church had more Presbiters and Pastors than one in the days of the Apostles as it is manifest they had then can it be hardly made out by right reason that every individual Presbyter or Pastor had his particular and circumscribed gathered Church free of all subordination they seem contradictory in themselves On the contrary in the more pure times no man was ever ordained for some hundred of years to whom there was not appointed both his proper and special Office and Charge and Antiquity knew no distinction between Ordination and Benefice and ordaining was the same thing as to give an Office and the right of having ones livelyhood from the common goods of the Church § The Independents do farther aver for their own justification and that most truly that it is a thing natural that all free and Independent Societies should themselves make their own Laws of which sort they take their gathered Churches to be which is the thing questioned and denyed and say they are not Independent for the reasons shewed But be it so yet then it is averred that it is as true and as natural that the Legislative-Christian-Power should and doth belong to the whole England for example and not to any certain Parish City or Country as to London York c. of a Politick Body though happily some one part may have a greater share therein than some others And as this right doth naturally belong to a Commonwealth so it must needs belong to the Church of God which in the truest understanding is the Commonwealth if Christian and the Peopele thereof do publickly embrace the true Religion As this very thing doth make it the Church so the whole England not any certain part as St. Paul in London St. Peter at Westminster or at York hath the power of making Laws and constitutions ecclesiastical A Law is the deed of
acquiesce till then we are justly to be excused and I hope you will not blame us if we prefer the universal judgment of the Primitive Church touching the Church Government by Bishops before particular and late dreams They were nearer the Apostles times than Calvin whom for his other great pains and Abilities for the good of Christ's Flock I do much honour who broached not his new Church Polity until about Anno 1500. Was it possible I appeal to your selves that all the Churches of Christ dispersed far and near over the face of the Earth should at one time and that immediately after the last surviving Apostle and as it were Momento temporis joyn or jump in one and the self same Government Episcopal had it not been delivered and setled by the Apostles and their Disciples that converted the World We construe the Apostles Writings by their doings others measure the Scriptures by their own humours first framing Churches to their fancies and then conceit that the Scriptures answer and favour their Chimaera's and by their so doing come within the Verge of the Paroenesis If Bishops claim or usurp more than is their due or abuse the power which Gods Law or the favour of Princes justly alloweth to them and Pastors in Nomine Dei spare them not let the world know it but do not attempt to put out the lights of our Firmament because Phanatics and Men intoxicated stumble or miss their way whilst they shine § Gods promise to his People is Dabo vobis Pastores juxta cor meum 3 Jer. 41. pascent vos scientia doctrina It is evident that the firm of all Pastoral charge consisteth in preaching of the Gospel in administration of Sacraments and by mistake according to some in the punishment of such offences as absolutely exclude us out of the Kingdom of God These being the main things which Christ recommended to his Apostles committing them to their charge the which things only were practised by them as also by their immediate Successors and I hope our Bishops will not be found insufficient for these great Mysteries nor will be found to have warped or swerved from them though we have not wanted Coblers of Glocester the vanity of the present Churches and many other Ichabods heavily complaining § Besides for great and just reasons of State Concerning Innovators in general prudent Magistrates ought to be very circumspect and jealous and to fear the sequels of Church Innovations and Combinations even beyond all apparent cause of fear for that they who believe the Attempts for new Discipline without the licence of Civil Powers are lawful as most Innovators and Men given to change do and that not without some design as well to remove some persons out of the Saddle that themselves might be therein seated as to reform some errors will easily dispute what may be attempted against Superiors which will not have the Scepter of their new Discipline to rule over them For they that will not stick to affirm Amat â—ai ranam ranam nuit else Dianam That the Discipline which they say they have and we want is one of the essential parts of Gods Worship and therefore the better to introduce a good opinion of their own Diana they have not stuck andaciter calumniari and to style Episcopal Regiment Antichristian will as little scruple to affirm withal That the People themselves upon peril of Salvation without staying for the Magistrate may gather themselves into it always having in a readiness to say that they never found that God ever made any Precept or Command which to perform we must needs have leave of another § Moreover as every order of Religious men so every Form of Church-Government that only excepted which Christ instituted besits not every Civil Government nor Kingdom nor every State and therefore the Kingdom of France and renowned State of Venice for great reasons of State banished the Jesuits And we have an excellent example of this in the famous Government of the Kings of Castilia where without the Kings licence no new Religious Order and of such nature is every differing Church-Discipline from the Discipline by Law established could have entrance into those Kingdoms and therefore the Capuchin Friers could not be admitted thither The Foundations of these and the like Decrees are no less equal reasonable and lawful than most necessary and most antient For Cicero in oratione pro domo sua sheweth that no man could consecrate an Altar injussu populi so that the equity of such Laws hath time out of mind been apparently known unto the World And Mecoenas his counsel to Augustus in Dione was very prudent Eos qui in divinis aliquid innovant odio habe coerce non Deorum solum causa sed quia nova numina hi tales introducentes multos impellunt ad mutationem rerum unde conjurationes seditiones conciliabula existunt res profecto minime conducibilis-principatui legibus quoque expressum est quod in religionem committitur in omnium sertur injuriam For it would not in any wise be permitted to a great Number of a strange State and such are all Papists having sworn obedience to another Head contrary to their customs of life and divers ends from those of the present Governments to enter into the state of such a Common-wealth Gather themselves together into one or divers places to make amongst them one or more Heads or Governors and in secret to practise with the Princes Subjects seeing this would be presently accounted as one or more Conventicles of very dangerous consequence and accordingly would be prohibited and interrupted so under the pretext of some new Church Polity be it Popish Presbyterian or Quaking all alike as to the thing in question not by that State established many very many not only of the same but of other Nations also may frequently assemble and gather together under one or more Heads Presbyters or Teachers contrary in Customs and Affections to the established Church-Discipline and perhaps unto true Doctrine also and the many opportunities they have through Confessions Meetings Sermons and other spiritual Conferences insinuating with the Princes Subjects they may by such secret vast diffused scarcely to be discerned and powerful means and opportunities corrupt them in their sidelity and withdraw them from their Allegiances of which we are not without sad experience of elder and later days both from Papists and others not a few of several perswasions And the danger of union in an united confederacy or conspiracy is to be avoided for that it prevails more than number besides discontented minds in the beginning of tumults when any happen occasioned by themselves or others will easily agree though their ends be divers each one hoping thereby to get uppermost or to turn up that Trump that they have most mind to follow and so endanger the State For these many excellent causes all Church Congregations ought very diligently and narrowly to be
it was miraculous and therefore it might be of use then when the Keys of Church-men could not err and when a Temporal Sword was wanting yet now it is utterly useless and abolished § For any other Excommunication of present or perpetual necessity in Ecclesiastical Regiment there is very little indeed no plain proof in Scripture if any at all it is the spiritual Scepter of the Pope and Presbyter without which their Empire would appear meerly Imaginary and therefore their Zeal is fierce and strong for it though their reasons be weak It seems to me a very obscure and lame deduction that the Keys of Heaven in the Gospel must needs import real Power and jurisdiction in Clergy men and in them only and that that Sword is as miraculous as it was or as useful as if it were miraculous and that the stroak of it is meerly Spiritual and not to be supplied by the Temporal Sword and that Princes are as well liable to it as other Laymen § In case of utter impenitency of open and obstinate perverseness Heaven is shut without the Pope or Presbyters Power and in case of feigned penitence neither the Popes nor Presbyters Keys can open effectually though they discern or discern not the hypocricy and in case of true penitence if Pope or Presbyter be mistaken yet Heaven will not remain shut § Some excellent writers against the usurped power of the Romish Church in use or exercise of St. Peters Keys as well before Luther as since have been of opinion that the visible Church hath only power to declare who are separated or excommunicated ipso facto from the holy Catholick Church and that she hath no power so to separate or excommunicate any unless they have first excommunicated themselves or voided their hopes or interests in the holy Catholick Church by heretical positions or opinions or by lewd and scandalous misdemeanors Of this opinion was that famous Wesselius which was intituled Lux Mundi before Luther arose or the so pure Light of the Gospel which we now enjoy Besides Divines themselves have not hitherto agreed nor are ever like to agree what this excommunication is or what the extent of it is or whether the Presbyter alone or joyned with the Laity or Lait without the Presbyter have power to execute it or whether it be so spiritually inherent in the Pope or Presbyter as that they can or cannot depute the execution thereof to Deligates or Proxies In these great straights and uncertainties concerning excommunication held out to be of such high concern as to make the excommunicated as it were accursed and cut off from the Church what shall poor Laicks do who are well assured that be their Commission what it will that it extends not to impower them to teach and much less to impose any Doctrines but what are undoubtedly and meerly true the Apostles themselves pretending to no other § Some endeavour to support this feigned pillar of their discipline by Arguments drawn from the Jewish manner of excommunication which according to some was twofold 1º called Niddui and was only a temporary separation commonly for 30 dayes from all commerce or society with any man within a certain distance This is it which is thought to be that which is called in the New Testament a casting out of the Synagogue 2o. The second more severe and terrible than the former was when a scandalous ossender with curses out of the Law of Moses in the publick audience of the whole Church without any limitation of time was excluded from the Communion of it This is that which is thought to be that which is called in the New Testament a delivering up unto Sathan in Hebrew this is called Cherim and in Greek Anathema which was twofold 1o. Simple when what I have now mentioned was performed 2o. with an addition of Anathema Maranatha or as the Syrian pronounce it Moranetho when besides all other maledictions out of the Law they added this clause Our Lord cometh by which form the excommunicated person as desperate without all hope of pardon or restitution was left unto the Lord to receive from him a heavy doom at his coming In imitation of this Jewish excommunication which generally is defined by almost all to be an exclusion of the Fellowship and Communion of Believers the Popish Divines have also framed 2 kinds of excommunication viz. 1o. A lesser 2o. the greater 1o. the lesser That the excommunicated is to be debarred not from the profession of the same Faith nor from giving his consent to the same Doctrine with the present Church whereof he is a visible Member but from the soel participation of the Sacraments have added also another which they term the greater Excommunication and Anathema and have against the clear sence of Scripture I wish the Presbyterians could herein plead not guilty defined it to be an interdiction of Churches private commerce and all other lawful converse because the Apostle Cor. 14. openly sheweth that neither the heathen nor any person whatsoever were forbidden from hearing of the Divine word from the Reading Thanksgivings and Prayers of Christians And I have not found extant in the Scripture any Precept or Example whereby it is commanded or taught that they who err only in life and manners should be removed from the Sacraments I do not read that any person at any time amongst the Jews was for such causes forbid by the Priests Levites Prophets Scribes or Pharases to come unto the Sacrifices Ceremonies or Sacraments The high Priests esteemed Christ and his Apostles most wicked persons yet we do not find that during Christs life or after his death that ever they went about to debar them of the Sacraments and Sacrifices instituted by God they reprehended indeed Christ for eating and drinking with Publicans and Sinners but not for praying in the Temple with them nor for going up with them and all others to Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover neither did they debar any Publican Jew no nor the most cruel Hereticks the Sadduces from their Temple or Ceremonies but permitted them the honour to ascend the high Priest-hood and I do not indeed well see how the Priests could hinder the Scandalous sinners from eating of the Passover if they would for that they did not eat before the Priests but in their private Houses and I have not observed that the presence of a Priest was absolutely necessary to that matter And certainly if the law had permitted them to debar any from their Sacraments and Sacrifices but the Leprous and unclean they would certainly have debarred Christ and his Apostles such was their desperate and inveterate malice towards him and them presuming his design to have been to destroy their City and Temple their Name and Nation § Upon these and other like reasons and grounds there are some who do not stick to affirm that the Clergy hath not so much power to excommunicate the Laity as the Laity the Clergy all power being
that any should not have explicit knowledge of those Mysteries of Christ which are thus publickly plainly and frequently solemnized in the Church Vsh 25. Furthermore this very Discourse hath furnished me with one very good Quotation for the Justifying the command of Liturgies by the Magistrate and hath not impeached the Reasons thereof by any thing he hath written in derogation thereof though he hath endeavoured it After he hath told us f. 33. That in the Latin Church Ambrose used one Form Gregory another and Isidor a third and that it is not unlikely but that the Liturgies were as many as were the Episcopal Churches of those days Hence saith he in the beginning of the fifth he might have said in the fourth Century in which Ambrose flourished by which it appears ex ore tuo that they are no very Novel Invention and that the wisdom of Ages for the good they have found by them have thought fit to continue them to this day and therefore certainly not temerariously to be disputed against in an African Council Can. 70. which is the 103d in the Codex Canonum Ecclesiae Africanae it is provided that no Prayers be read in the Administration of the Eucharist but such as have been approved in the same Council or have been observed by some prudent Men formerly Ne forte aliquid contra fidem vel per ignorantiam vel per minus studium sit compositum which Canon with some addition is confirmed in the Second Milevitan Council Can. 12. and the Reason given in both is Lest there should any thing contrary to the Faith creep into their way of Worship He farther adds f. 34. That many parts of the World especially the last in those days swarmed with Antitrinitarian and other Hereticks who many of them by unsuspected wiles and dissimulations and subscriptions of Confessions and why may not these be practised again and why may not Princes now use Liturgies a Remedy found out it seems by Prelates and derived to our days attested by many Ages to have been effectual against such and the like evil Machinations of Sathan and his Disciples as well as Prelates did of old endeavoured to creep into the Office of the Ministry of the Church partly out of blind zeal to diffuse the poison of their abominations partly out of carnal policy c. which increased the necessity of composing such Forms of publick Worship as being silled with the Expressions pointing against Errors of those times might be a means to keep Seducers from imposing themselves on Ecclesiastical Administrations Thus there is no Ancient Liturgy but it is full of the Expressions that had been consented upon in the Councils that were convened for the condemnation of those Errors which were in those days most rife and pernitious Though these very Reasons abstract from those relating to the Power of Princes herein prevail very much with me and I am confident will with most rational and most unbiassed Persons for the establishing of Liturgies yet our Author slights them because it doth not appear unto him that these Reasons could possibly be taken from the Word the Practise of the Apostles or the Churches by them planted or those that followed them for some Generations nor from any Council held before their days and so is not much concerned to know what they were If our Author as an unbiassed and disinteressed unconcerned Person had consulted Scripture as much about the Power of Kings in things pertaining to God as he hath done about the Liberties and Priviledges of his own Order he could never have said that these Reasons could not be possibly taken from Scripture for Kings have their Power from Scripture as well as Priests Though I have herein said something of the Kings Power and more I suspect than all of his Profession will cheerfully subscribe unto yet I will say somewhat more here In the Christian Church the Right and Office of the highest Power is not only conversant about the whole Body of Religion but about the single Parts also as Reasons and Examples do evince Indeed it cannot be otherwise for he that hath Right upon the Whole hath Right upon the Parts An Example is Ezekias who that he might suppress the Adorers Superstition took away the Brazen Serpent though set up by Moses and by the same Right against the Decrees of the second Nicene Synod Charles the Great forbade the Adoration of Images Moreover it is most plain that the Supream Powers used their Authority in defining things which the Divine Law hath left undefined The King of Ninevey proclaimed a Fast David commands the Ark to be transported Solomon orders all things for the Ornament of the Temple and after him Josiah who also takes care that the Treasure destined for Sacred Vses be not alienated The Constitutions in Theodosius and Justinians Codes and the Novels and the French Capitulars justifie the same but because not in Scripture I only mention them here It seems very reasonable that if Princes have power to pull down a Brazen Serpent though set up for the healing of the People by a Prophet when once the People commit Idolatry by offering Incense to it that they have also just Power to erect or command an unquestionable Liturgy that may really and effectually conduce to the preventing or suppressing of Idolatry And therefore if the very words of such Liturgy were not commanded precisely to be read but were only in the Nature of a Directory which happily may not be displeasing to our Author what could hinder but that some Popish Priests might again introduce at the time of Baptizing of Infants the use of Spittle the kissing of them the blowing in the face of them to blow away the Devil forsooth to give them the Eucharist and many more such Fopperies now generally difused amongst Protestants and others may baptize in Nomine Patris Filij Spiritus Sancti as we do others in Nomine Patris Majoris Filij Minoris as the Arrians did others in Nomine Patris per Filium in Spiritu Sancto others not in the Name of the Trinity but in the Death of Christ c. and who shall hinder them Other Sacrilegious Priests might also rob Gods dear Children of their Blessed Viands of half their just due in the Eucharist and give them Bread only keeping the Wine to themselves and teach them that the Bread in their Hands is a proper real and propitiatory Sacrifice of Christ for the Living and for the Dead and that which they eat under the shew of Bread to be the very Flesh of Christ whereas in truth they eat only the Substance of Bread and indeed may make them believe that the very Moon is made of Green Cheese infect their Flocks at their pleasure with Arrianisme Socinianisme the Doctrines of Adamites Ranters Quakers and indeed what not And if they did so why were the Prince to be blamed if he did not prevent it if he had no
having no other design herein then to manifest to the World how some kind of Men can take and leave object and refuse at pleasure more I fear to gratifie Humors Parties and Interest then in truth induced thereunto by sound reason Are we bound to these and the like Ceremonies still I say not so but I say that as they are to blame that would oblige us to all Ceremonious Traditions and Practises of Apostles according to the Letter allowing no Church Liberty to swerve therefrom be the Governments or posture of Affairs how different or variable soever So they are to blame and infringers of Church Liberty that will not allow the Church Power to innovate or impose some things in their Judgments necessary and behooful for the better regulating thereof tho there be no express Precept nor Practise of Christ or of his Apostles to Warrant the same Let the Church of God even in the dayes of our Saviour serve us for Example In their Domestical Celebration of the Passover which Supper they divided as it were into two Courses what Scripture did give Command them that between the 1st and the 2d he that was chief should put off the residue of his Garments and keeping on his Feast-Robe only to wash the Feet of them that were with him what Scripture did Command them never to list up their hands unwasht in Prayer unto God which custome Aristaeus de coenatori nuptialio sheweth wherefore they did so religiously observe what Scripture did Command the Jews every Festival day to fast till the sixth hour what Commandment had the Gileadites to erect that Alter which was spoken of in the Book of Joshua what Commandment had the Women of Israel to mourn yearly and lament in the memory of Jephtha's Daughter what Commandment had the Jews to Celebrate their Feast of Dedication never spoken of in the Law yet solemnised even by Christ himself what Commandment had they for the Ceremony of Odours used about the Bodies of the Dead after which Custom Christ was contented that his own precious Body should be Imbalmed In the Church of the Jews is it not granted that That appointment for the hour for daily Sacrifices the building of Synagogues throughout the Land to Pray and Preach in when they came not up to Jerusalem the erecting of Pulpits and Chairs to Preach in the Order of Burial the Rights of Marriage with such like being matters appertaining to the Church yet are not any where prescribed in the Law but were by the Churches discretion instituted The Conclusion § When I Consider through how difficult a Chapter Conclusion through what Contrarieties of Opinions what Contradictions of Men of different Tempers Principles Ends and Interests through how many Enemies both Forreign and Domestick and those of the highest Potency this Reformation did attain its accomplishment I cannot but wonder how any that seemed or thought themselves to have a Beam of Light of equal Lustre c. Should yet to add unto the other difficulties Injicere scrupulum cast in their bones also of Contention by speaking or Writing in derogation of that Reformation and that Liturgy contrary to the very Acts of Parliament made 2 Edw. 6.1 1º Eliz. c. 1. under several penalties which the Wisdom and Zeal to Gods Truth and Glory of that Age was endeavouring to accomplish which could never have been brought to that perfection it was brought unto had not God miraculously Blessed their endeavours by giving them a just ballance and a just weight of all considerations relating both to Church and State and also of moderation For the Parliament conveened in Nov. 1547. consisted of members disagreeing in Religion tho probably they agreed to serve the present time and preserve themselves for tho many both of the Nobility and Gentry stood well affected to the Church of Rome yet consented to all such Acts as were made against it not improbably out of a fear of loosing such Church-Lands and booty as they had got in case that Religion should prevail and get up again and for the rest who were either to make or improve their Fortunes they happily did promote a Reformation for their particular ends and interests § That at the time of Reformation and framing of a Liturgy others besides the Reformers were enlightned with a Beam of Truth of an equal Lustre and Brightness with that which shined in the minds of their Brethren I cannot gainsay nor will deny But by any thing that hath been yet Written it doth not in the least appear that those that then did or since have made the Liturgy a bone of Contention had a more clear beam of Truth in so disparaging that blessed Reformation and Liturgy and therefore more shame for such the Sons of the Church to vilifie and set at nought the Constitution of their Mother who Travailed so long with them and brought them forth with great so very great and exquisite difficulties Probrosa Ales quae Proprium nidum polluit If the Brethren of that Age then had or this Author now hath a new Light a new and clear Beam of Truth it would certainly make evident for the very nature of light is to make manifest 5 Eph. 8.13 But seeing no reasons demonstrative are brought to make good such positions is it not both prudence and duty in us rather to rely on our own Judgments being backt and reinforced with the Judgment of so many Learned Pious Reformers Liturgists that gave Testimony thereunto with their blood and of the Kings Privy Council and also of his great Council of Parliament both of those times and of the succeeding Generations all concurring in the Approbation and Imposition of the Liturgy rather then to follow the Fancy and Opinion of one or of a very few either of that or the Succeeding Ages that pretend indeed more light but in truth have less for ought that hitherto hath been Demonstrated But enough of this Subject I shall only leave all those of the Synagogue of the Libertines seriously to consider if ever such Liberty as is desired by all sorts of men of different perswasions were ever given under any Christian Government and yet if it hath been given if every Sect of them in their several alternate Courses and turns as they have happily got successively the Power and been uppermost have not endeavoured their utmost to depress and keep under all other Sects differing from themselves These things thus premised and well weighed I deem I may conclude without the imputation of much Arrogancy that Christ having Commanded Rem tho not formam Liturgiarum the Subject matter tho not the very Form and Words of our Liturgies that tho neither Christ nor his Apostles did ever Practise or intimate any such thing nor yet the Church of Christ for some Centuries of years next after Christ that they may still be imposed without the least desert of the Scandalous Imputation of being an unwarrantable Abridgment or Infringement of Christian Liberty
I abhor the thoughts of it as will appear hereafter there being a Vast difference between such a Tolleration of Idolatry Superstition crying sins and therefore absolutely unlawful and a Remission only of some few severities in some Acts Canons and Injunctions which relate only to Formalities that tho in construction of Law may be exacted yet may be dispensed withal without prejudice to sound Doctrine or good Conversation and without which the Worship of God would be as pure and sincere Indeed all Acts Canons and Injunctions whether they relate unto Uniformity or not ought according to their own Nature to be sincere and free from all Traps and Covert designs to exclude any that Profess the same Faith and Worship tho many cannot perhaps thro meer tenderness of Conscience submit to every thing therein enjoyned In Concerns of this Nature Scripture in a more especial manner ought to be the Rule of Resolutions and that abstractly and purely without mixing and bringing with them Interest Usurpation or Artifices of men else what were it but by Edicts to lay Snares in Mispah and spread Nets upon Tabor to use Laws Menaces and subtleties to keep Gods People from his Court and Sanctuary and Confine them to State-Religion and to Walk after the Mode of the Commands of men Those Non-conformists Non-assenters that have received Order which they could not have had but permissu superiorum by the Licence and under the Authority of the King in our Laws expressed For no Man hath Power to give himself either Orders to be a Priest or Institution to a Pastoral Charge but must depend upon another Power who by Acts Canons and Edicts long since published and extant hath directed the qualifications of the Persons to be Ordained the manner and Form how the Persons who ought to Ordain them c. and they could not be ignorant that the Liturgy and enjoyned Ceremonies were by the Imperative Constitutive Government of this Church and State to be Countenanced and used in publick Churches by the Bishops Presbyters and Pastors either they consulted their Consciences when they entered on the Ministery by taking Holy Orders whether they could Comply and Submit unto the whole Frame of Government and Polity of this Church Constituted by Act of Parliament from whom they were to receive Authority and Licence to Exercise their Function Gifts and Talents or they did not If they did not they are inexcusable for entring on so Sacred a Calling Stamped with an Indelible Character so rashly so unadvisedly without perspect or foresight of Consequences and yet if they were so pur-blind as not to see one step before them yet their neglect herein cannot be Pleaded in their Excuse it being their own Fault in Common Justice no Court will permit any man to take Advantage of his own misdemeanors or failings Besides hath not every Minister that hath receiv'd Pastoral Charge twice or thrice if not oftner witnessed his allowance of all and singular the 39 Articles of our Church once at his Ordination before the Bishop then at his Institution into his Benefice before his Ordinary and both these by Subscription under his own hand and afterwards upon his Induction before his own Flock and that by verbal Approbation he hath not only acknowledged in the Church the Power of Ordaining Rites and Ceremonies 20 Articles But he hath after a sort bound himself openly to rebuke such as willingly and purposely break the Traditions and Ceremonies of the Church as Offenders of the Common Order of the Church and Wounders of the Consciences of the weak Brethren and hurters of the Authority of the Magistrate Artic. 34. and is it not enacted 1º Eliz. c. 2. that they shall be punished pro ut in the Act that shall Preach declare or speak any thing in derogation or depraving our Liturgy c. Are not then such Dissenters obliged both in Conscience and by virtue of their own Voluntary Acts and Subscriptions to be constant to their own Hands and Tongues if they would be accounted Faithful in Gods House as was Moses And is it reasonable then to hearken unto such Pleading against their own Voluntary Acts and Subscriptions their own Hands and Tongues Besides quo jure with what Face or Conscience can they expect Temples maintenance protection and all things requisite for their Ministery from that Law and Government that they will not Protect Countenance nor submit unto § Indeed it seems to me an old piece of Conscientiousness if not Impiety to enter the Holy Ministerial Function to day when they are sure without Conformity to be silenced to morrow Besides it is Nicety and Indiscretion to exact an express Rule of Scripture or Faith for the Cross in Baptism for standing at the Creed Kneeling at the Lords Beard for Habits in Divine Service the usual sear-Crows of scrupulous men In these cases consent of the Church or Tradition may suffice so there be no express Law of Command to the contrary He that exacts in these Points as express Rules of Faith or Warrant of Scripture for his Obedience to Ecclesiastical Government as he would or as every man ought to do for adventuring upon Worshipping of Images Invocation of Saints c. doth make his Brain or Fancy the chief Seat of his Religion which should be seated in the Heart and Intitles God to the Fancies and Chymaeraes of their own Brains Thus to disobey the Church in these Cases wherein it hath Authority to Command Obedience is to disobey those Mandates of God which give the Body of the Church Authority to make Laws to Govern it self by in things indifferent neither expresly Forbidden nor expresly Commanded by the Law of God I know the Apostles Rule is let every man be fully persâ—â—ded in his own mind 14 Rom. 5. And this full perswasion or assurance of Faith is in the Cases there mentioned necessary because whatsoever is not of Faith is Sin v. 23. This last Maxim is undoubtedly true and the former Precept most exactly to be observed in such Causes as the Apostle there speaks of that is where the positive Practise unless our Warrant be Authentick in it self and evident to us is very dangerous or deadly whereas on the contrary the forbearance of such Practise is either safe or not prejudicial to our Souls but to our Bodies only or State temporal such Ceremonies as be neither against Faith nor adverse to good manners in the Judgment of St. Austin ep 11.8 go for indifferent and may be Born in Christian Unity without Offence or Confusion If God hath left things indifferent what Authority can make them necessary Let them be so still and their nature not changed by any Injunction and Unity will necessarily ensue Quodam modo it may be true that in Ordination there is something which they receive thereby from God Independent of the King or any Civil Power viz. Authority to Tâ—â—ch Baptize and Administer Sacraments by Virtue of Ordination And â—â— is as true that
which despiseth these things despiseth not Man but God but our Translation is he therefore that despiseth despiseth not Man but God And this despising God in his Vicar is called 1 Sam. 15.23 a kind of Idolatry Here are two very geat Clerks very opposite each to other How shall we poor Laicks now behave our selves when so great School-men cannot agree the point one accounting it a meritorious Act to resist and the other Rebellion and a kind of Idolatry not to obey Christ's Vicar First Gerson wrote 150 years before Bellarmine's answer came out being in a quiet and sedate temper not ingaged in any disputes and consequently without Bias and void of passion on the other side Bellarmine then living and deeply ingaged in that great Controversie between Rome and Venice about Temporal and Ecclesiastical Power and consequently more subject to passion and Interest very strong Biasses Let us now consider his Texts of Scripture and reasons the first is the part of the same Luke 10.16 as before and must in part receive the same Answer viz. he that despiseth you despiseth me which words were undoubtedly spoken to the Seventy Disciples which represented the Preachers which were to publish Christs Doctrine and not to Peter singly so that what power soever devolves by this Text on Christs Vicar it is but in common with the rest of his Fellow Priests and Bishops so that he can challenge nothing peculiar to himself from this Text. To this Text we will oppose and leave to their consideration Matth. 25.45 that at the day of Judgment Christ will say to the Reprobate Quatenus in as much as ye did it not to one of the least of these ye did it not to me and likewise we shall oppose the 18. Matth. 6. But who so shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me it were better for him that a mill-stone were hanged about his Neck and that he were drowned in the depth of the Sea so that there is Authority of Scripture to shew that Christ takes it for an injury done unto himself that is done unto the least of his Faithful Servants But of Christs Vicar not one word not so much as once named in the whole Bible a term never heard of till about Anno 666. So that he which despiseth c. is alledged out of its natural sence by Bellarmine and in as much ye did it not c. alledged in its proper sence for that admonition or correction is indeed a work of Charity and incumbent on all Christians so it be done with prudence and with due observance of circumstances And on the contrary cum Authoritate imperare cum potentia is against Charity Besides the very construction of the words qui vos spernit c. cannot possibly bear it no more than Dic Ecclesiae can reasonably be understood of the Pope a single person for I never understood that Popes had Pigs in their Bellies tho I will not swear what Pope Joan had in her Weem when she was Delivered of a Son in the open Street as she went to St. John Laterans So that the 10. Luke 16. is to be understood of all Ministers in General among whom I will not deny His Holiness Quatenus a Priest or Bishop to have a right in Common with the rest of his Brethren but no other or greater For in the beginning Bishops and Priests were all one their Institution Commission Imploy and Duties were all one and the same and how when and by whom they came to be differenced and distinguished and an Ecclesiastical Regiment erected and regulated by * Canon Law Laws of their own making whereby they have Metamorphos'd it from a Democracy of all the Brethren together to an absolute Ecclesiastical Monarchy nay Tyranny of a Pope at Rome is not very hard to trace tho very hard to remedy If a Quaker like a bold Britain should Pilgrim it to Rome and there reprove and rebuke the Pope of Popish errors Superstitions and other false Doctrines and that by plain Scripture And the Pope should despise and scorn him not enduring sound Doctrine certainly at the day of Judgment qui vos spernit c. would be laid to the Charge of His Holiness and not unto the despicable Quaker assuredly whoever despiseth the word of truth tho in the mouth of the least of God's little ones despiseth Christ Teachings are not truth because uttered by the Supream Bishop Christ's Vicar the Head of all Christendom but because they are grounded on Scripture the word of Truth and so carry their own awe and warrant with them To the Law and to the Testimony if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Isay 8.20 but they that will not hear Moses and the Prophets as no perverters of Scripture will will not be perswaded tho one arose from the Dead Luke 16.31 If the Apostles or an Angel from Heaven Preach any other Gospel than that which they have preached may not only be despised but accursed Gal. 1.8 then may not the Pope be despised that thus troubles the Church and labors to pervert the Gospel of Christ The next Scripture which he useth at the same rate is Qui haec spernit non hominem spernit sed Deum 1 Thes 4.8 He that despiseth these things despiseth not Man but God who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit How is it possible that this citation can be to the purpose St. Paul assisted with the Holy Spirit applied qui haec spernit to such things there spoken by himself who could not erre v. 2 3 4 5 6 7. viz that ye should abstain from Fornication that every one of you should know how to possess his Vessel in Sanctification and honor not in the lusts of concupiscence even as the Gentiles which know not God c. How then can it now be applied to the Pope who for certain hath no other assistance of the Holy Ghost than the rest of his Brethren Neither yet hath he said himself nor his Sycophants for him that he hath any extraordinary Assistance of the Holy Ghost saving only when he doth determine a matter de Fide ex Cathedra and not when he gives Orders in a Stable How can he then freely and righteously according to their own Doctrine in a Decree or an Extravagant which is not in a matter of Faith say qui haec spernit c. he that despiseth these things c. When the Pope shall teach and command Gods own Indubitable Precepts we will not complain of him if he add with all that he that despiseth c. but to equal Popes to St. Paul and their Decrees and Extravagants to Canonical Scripture and make them subservient to their Dictates and Expositions Is not this to make them lyable to the Plagues denounced against them that add or diminish from Gods word Rev. 22.18 And is it not a strange Phanatick presumption and
by avowing that the spirit of the Prophets must be subject only to the Prophets What Rule have these Presbyters to judg by what Logick what way of Ratiocination that the Laity have not and know not and understand not as well as they what Infallibility above Kings and other the Laity have these men I must confess I never found them writing in terminis for this Infallibility But if we may guess at their meaning by their mumping their Actions and their Arguments are premisses which to some may seem to yield such conclusions that they would fain have their Doctrines though treasonable to be embraced as Oracles Are not these Doctrines purely Romish surely yes St. Paul was certainly more infallible than they and yet he submitted his Preachments to his Auditory in general not exclusive the Laity Judg ye what I say Nay the Layity as well as Priests are commanded to search the Scriptures and try Spirits and shall not the King and his Sages Judg of Doctrines because delivered in a Pulpit which may concern the bene esse nay perhaps the very esse quiet state and weal of a Kingdom If I were put to it I should not doubt but to make it out that there is as good warrant in Scripture for the infallibility of Kings as there is for either Pope or Presbyter though I must profess there is no sound ground no nor yet probable appearance for either If the Presbiter will have his Doctrines received without controulment and contradiction he must shew better warrant than the Pope because he pretends to judg what I think the Pope doth not even Affections Spotsw Hist Mr. Andrew Melvil in his form of Church Policy presented by him to the Parliament sitting in Striveling Anno 1578. hath this head The Magistrate commands in external things only and actions done before Men But the Spiritual Ruler such as Mr. Melvil and his fellow Presbyters are judgeth both the Assections and the external Actions in respect of conscience by the word of God In which form there are other dangerous heads sutable to what Mr. Blake and the Presbyteries so sharply contended for in his cause and what tumults c. ensued thereupon in the Contest for that desperate form Histories do abundantly shew but I forbear But seeing they make so desperate ill use of 1 Cor. 14.32 by perverting very plain texts I am resolved though no Presbyter to try if I can hit the true and natural sense and meaning thereof seeing they have not and perhaps will not it not being for their interest and prerogatives § It s true the Spirit of the Prophets is subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14.32 but what doth this avail Pope or Presbyters surely they will not say that the Prophets of the New Testament since the Apostles days are so authentick and infallible as those of the Old Besides what if the terms Prophet and Prophesying are in some senses and places and happily in this as applicable to the Laity as to the Clergy nay what if in this very Text by Prophets is meant in general all Believers those within the Pale of the Church excluding those only without as unfit to judg such matters Mark the Contest First Prophesying in general serveth not for them that believe not but for them which believe v. 22. Secondly If therefore the whole Church not Priests only come together in one place and all speak c. v. 23. and All prophesy v. 24. And every one of you hath a Psalm hath a Doctrine c. 26. If any man speak v. 27. Let the Prophets speak two or three and let the other judg v. 29. If any thing be revealed to Another that sitteth by let the first hold his peace v. 30. For ye may all prophesie one by one that all may learn and all may be comforted v. 31. And the spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets v. 32. Let the Women keep silence c. v. 31. wherefore Brethren covet to prophesy v. 39. Now if the words or terms of Whole Church All Every one Any man The other Another Brethren be words and terms of universality and differencing then certainly the words Prophets and Prophesying are in this Chapter more especially applicable to the Auditory the Brethren than to the Presbyters themselves and is an admonition and warrant to the faithful to assemble and speak to edification besides the commanding of the Women silence is a pregnant presumption if not an affirmation That all the Brethren might speak so likewise is the command to the Brethren to covet to prophesy But be it as they would have it that by Prophets are meant Presbyters only which is impossible in true construction but the contrary yet those Presbyters by the command of the same Apostle v. 29. are to be judged by the other that are not Presbyters which is a better warrant to the King and his Council and Judges to judg them than they can shew to Judg King and Council and to usurp Judgment to themselves only Besides the very command in the very first verse is to all to follow Charity to desire Spiritual gifts but rather that they may prophesy and by prophesying by the scope of this Chapter is clearly meant speaking to edification and exhortation and comfort that our words might minister Grace to the Hearers which certainly is the duty of every man and which if Mr. Blake had observed he had never been called in question Now tell me how much less doth the Presbyter claim than the Pope who pretends that every Clergy or Church-man both they and their Family nay the very Concubines of Priests are exempt from all Jurisdiction Temporal and that jure divino and that from the same Apostle Paul 2 Cor. 2.15 He that is spiritual judgeth all things yet he himself is judged of no man The same Scripture is as strong for the Presbyter as the Pope and it is to be feared that if he were as fast in the Saddle as the Pope is that he would claim it as peremptorily and therefore sit to be prevented by the wisdom of Princes But were the Allegations true and pertinent either there should be no Spiritual man besides the Pope or Presbyter and so the subject of the Proposition should be homo singularis one man only or if there be more Spiritual men they should all of them be Popes or Presbyters to judg all others and be judged of none no not of the Pope of Rome himself unless he be no body For those are convertible he that saith all excepteth none and he that saith none excepteth all Touching the Prophesy we hold saith J. Robinson f. 45 46. the very same that the Synod held at Embden 1571. hath declared Harm Synod Belg. p. 21 22. viz. 1o. In all Churches whether but springing up or grown to some ripeness let the order of Prophesy be observed according to Pauls institution 2.o. Into the Fellowship of this work are to be admitted not
other Two according to common acceptation rather respect the governing and cleansing of Christs Church and therefore in the opinion of some no reason they should be committed to the power of every Presbyter as the Word and Sacraments are as Independents and Presbyters would have it For as there can be no order but confusion in a Common-wealth where every man ruleth so would there be no peace but confusion in the Church of Christ if every Presbyter might impose hands and use the Keys at his pleasure Though the Presbyter of each Church had charge of the Word and Sacraments even in the Apostles times yet might they not impose hands nor use the Keys without the Apostles or such as the Apostles departing or dying left to be their Substitutes and Successors in the Churches which they had planted At Samaria Philip preached and baptized 8 Acts 5.12 and albeit he dispensed the Word and Sacraments yet could he not impose hands on them but Peter and John came from Hierusalem and laid their hands on them and so they received the Holy Ghost 8. Acts 14.17 The Churches of Lystra 14. Acts 20. Iconium and Antioch were planted before yet were Paul and Barnabas forced at their return to increase the number of Presbyters in each of those places by Imposition of their hands v. 23. The Churches of Ephesus and Crete were erected by Paul and had their Presbyters yet could they not create others but Timothy and Titus were left there to impose hands and ordain Elders in every City as occasion required Tim. 1.5 Tit. 1.5 § Having thus briefly seen what Powers Christ left unto his Ministers to continue in the Church let us now consider to whom he committed them To whom were committed the Powers Christ left to continue in the Church I find several persons under several Names and Titles to whom these powers were committed and by them shared as Apostles Prophets Evangelists Teachers Pastors and Deacons § Touching the Apostles whom the Bishops did succeed they probably had a superior Vocation and Jurisdiction above Prophets and Evangelists Pastors Teachers Deacons and the 70 Disciples in the Church of God and had the government and oversight of them which will soon appear If we consider what Paul writeth of himself and unto them directing and appointing what to do and how to be conversant in the Church of God what to refrain in themselves what to rebuke in others In which cases it is not to be said that the Apostle presumed above his calling or had a several Commission distinct from the rest of the Apostles But in his doings and Writings we may perceive the height and strength of Apostolic Authority so guided by the spirit of wisdom that it displeased none in the Church but the proud and contentious troublers of the Church such as drew Disciples after them to reign over their Brethren or seduced the simple to serve their own turns as Diotrephes 3 John 9. These Prerogatives were so proper to the Apostles that no Evangelist nor Prophet in the New Testament came near it § Touching Prophets Prophets they were such as having otherwise learned the Gospel had a special gift of expounding Scriptures bestowed on them from above and of foreshewing things to come of this sort was Agabus and sundry others in Jerusalem Acts 11.27 Acts 21.10 who notwithstanding are not therefore to be reckoned with the Clergy because no mans gifts or qualities can make a Minister of Holy things unless Ordination do give him power And we no where find Prophets to have been made by Ordination but all whom the Church did ordain were to serve either as Presbyters or Deacons § Touching Evangelists they were Presbyters of principal sufficiency Evangelists whom the Apostles sent abroad and used as Agents in Ecclesiastical affairs wheresoever they saw need such were Annanias Acts 9.18 Apollos Acts 18.27 Timothy 2 Tim. 3.15.5.14.28 and others and were thus employed In Trajans days according to Eusebius many of the Apostles Disciples and Scholars to shew their willing minds in execution of that which Christ first of all required at the hands of Men they sold their Possessions gave them to the poor and undertook the labour of * Evangelista 1º qui Evangelium scripsit ut Matcus Luca c. 2º qui annunciat missus vel primo a Christo ante mortem sio 70 discipuli 10 Luke Vel 2º ab Apostolis sic Timotheus dicitur Evangelista a Paulo constitutus Presbyter Episcopus 3º A Christo post resurrectionem sic Annanias Acts 9.18 Evangelists they painfully preached Christ and delivered the Gospel to them who as yet had never heard the Doctrine of Faith § Touching Pastors and Teachers Pastors Teachers they were no other than Presbyters howbeit setled in some certain charge and thereby differing from Evangelists which title the Apostles likewise gave themselves 1 Pet. 1.5 The Elders which are among you I exhort who am also an Elder Albeit that Name was not proper but common unto them with others for of Presbyters some were greater some less in power and that by our Saviours own appointment the greater they which received fulness of spiritual power the less they to whom less was granted § Unto these 2 degrees appointed by Christ the Apostles soon after his Ascension annexed Deacons by Ordination Deacons whose office at first was to distribute the Churches Goods to provide therewith for the Poor and to see that all things of expence might be faithfully disposed of and they were also to attend upon the Presbyters at the time of Divine Service § By all which it appears that Churches Apostolic did know but 3 degrees in the power of Ecclesiastical order 1. Apostles 2. Presbyters 3. Deacons and afterwards instead of Apostles Bishops whether Bishops and Presbyters were two distinct Orders or one and the same I will not here enquire into only this is plain and beyond all contradiction viz. they have one and the same Ordination and Commission and not different and distinct and thereby become more essentially Officers of the Church § Many Errors have been broached and maintained and not without some more than ordinary warmth among the Ecclesiasties meerly through inadvertency through confounding and want of right distinguishing Services Offices and Orders Ecclesiastical the first of which three and in part the second may be executed by the Laity during which execution only they differ from others of the Laity which works and services they also may give over at any time and are no more of the Essence of the Church than Widows or indeed any other Laicks now are or were of old for that they are not admitted into the Church nor tyed by irrevocable Ordination as Bishops Presbyters and Deacons are which makes them to be of the Essence or more especially Officers of the Church These things considered there is no reason we should alter the Apostles Discipline without the Apostles warrant Produce that and we
Faith the same Doctrines and Worship and the providence of God having called and sixed them here as if to this great work of Preaching the Gospel designed their Mouths cannot justly be stopt but upon some politick Accounts and reasons of State only Prudence not Conscience is then to be the guide of Councils For Example If a Presbyter hath swallowed a solemn League and Covenant so solemnly that he cannot nor will not renounce it what should the Government do Indulge those that will not protect that It portends a dangerous Reserve a sower Leaven Tinder in the Bosom apt to take sire apt to relapse into the same prodigious mischiefs Is it not much more agreeable to sound reason that the Royal Son should pare the Nails of those that cannot disgorge themselves of that fatal Covenant which introduced those Premises which yielded that sanguinary Conclusion which made the Father a Glorious King by bringing of him to the Block Conscience of factious Priests or of Covenanters in such cases is not adust in any measure Adaequate in the Ballance against the safety peace and quiet of Crowns and Kingdoms for that we have no Lydius lapis no infallible touch-stone to discover whether Consciences are truly weak or only pretended to be so the searcher of hearts only knows that insallibly And if pretence may be a just excuse to warrant disobedience unto established Sanctions Laws would then be no Laws at all for he that would might and he that would not might choose whether he would obey or no for that no Man can distinguish between real and pretended Scrupulosities That some should be indulged and others not ought to be no cause of complaint neither for that every thing is n t convenient for every Body nor for every Sect and State the same Legislators that have power to Indulge some may by the same right forbid others and indeed make any Laws convenient For the Common-wealth ought to be always kept in a quiet and peaceable temper even ad pondus if possible enough This only by way of Hint and Caution that there be great waryness and circumspection in granting and denying Indulgences If Priests otherwise Orthodox and worthy be silenced for such or the like reasons this ariseth not from the discipline of the Church nor from the Nature of Lyturgies but from the Government of the State What Must there then be no relief for scrupulous and tender Consciences that cannot renounce Covenants or comply with Innocent Ceremonies and Commands yes if they are truly so and do not enter-sere with the Established Government of Church and State 1. Consciences really and truly Scrupulous and tender if they break not out into overt act are not within the Magistrates Province but if rashly without consideration of obtaining or foresight of peril or perturbation of the Church or State they will adventure to take Solemn Leagues and Covenants to introduce a separate Mode or Government in Church or State contrary to that already established by the Magistrate then they most properly come within his verge and cognizance 2. Consciences ought generally not to be forced nay cannot whilst they are in their proper circle but are to be gained and reduced by dint of Argument and force of Truth by moderate connivence and by the use of good Instruction and perswasion 3. Consciences when they rove and become excentrick moving beyond their proper circle and bounds and being out of their proper Sphear tend and prove to be matter of Faction loose their proper Nature and forfeit their just Priviledges and Prerogatives then and not till then the civil Magistrate may take notice and justly restrain or punish their undue practises and contempts if such though guilded most speciously with pretences of Conscience and Religion § As happily their opinion is not so infallibly orthodox who affirm that all Church Discipline and Reformation must be after one Platform and that they which will perfectly reform must bring and reduce the form unto the State which it was at in the days of the Apostles A thing in the opinion of Judicious Hooker neither possible nor certain nor yet absolutely convenient For that which was used in their dayes the Scripture he saith doth not fully declare so that making those times the Rule and Canon of Church Government they make a Rule which not being possible to be fully known is as impossible to be fully kept so happily their opinion is as little Orthodox and as little convenient who deem it no good policy to alter or innovate any thing in Church affairs or to endeavour to reduce it to that State wherein it stood in the dayes of the Apostles the one opinion conducing to bring Reformation to Anullity the other to an Impossibility In elder times soon after the dayes of the Apostles and more especially after Constantines dayes there were imperfections no doubt and warpings from the Apostolical Rules and practises and happily in some things greater than in the present Antiquity therefore ought not so to be revered and adored as that something in these latter Ages may not be reputed better and more convenient there being no necessity that the same publick things should be always ordered in one and the self same manner but as times have mutations so it may be sit to alter or change the Government of Church or State It is possible that the Antient manner of Governing may not be profitable except the Antient state of the Church do return also But if Antiquity must be so revered as not to admit of the least Innovation then without all peradventure that Government which Christ and his Apostles instituted and lest unto his Church must necessarily be the most Antient and have the fairest pretence unto Jus divinum for its justification and then for those very reasons ought to remain unto this very day unalterable and all other Modes and Forms can be but Prudential only and at the discretion of the Church rightly so called And there can be no doubt but that Christ left such a Government to his Church as might be exercised in any Kingdom Christian or other without enterfering or clashing with the Civil Government of any Nation or Kingdom wheresoever the Apostles and their Successors in all Ages and Countries should preach the Gospel and gather Churches And that the self-same Government is plainly set down in the new Testament and that it was instituted by the Apostles and that the Antient Fathers after their example did prosecute the same for about 250 years after Christ with great success and increase of Converts unto Christianity And such Government being practicable then notwithstanding the great enmity that all Nations and Governments had even unto Christianity it self there can be no doubt and no reason can evince but it may be as practicable now which is the opinion of very many and those not Phanaticks And then Independents will have very fair and antient Records to shew for their Congregational way if
Policarpus Nicomedes Lucianus Successus Sedatus Fortunatus Januarius Secundinus Pomponius Honoratus Victor Aurelius Satius Petrus Alius Januarius Saturninus Alius Aurelius Venantius Alius Saturninus Vincentius Libosus Geminius Marcellus Jambus Adelphius Victoricus Paulus Faelici Presbitero plebibus consistentibus ad legionem Asturicae c. And certainly all these could not be mistaken in so plain matter of fact Besides it is not this Epistle only that asserts this subject matter but St. Cyprian hath divers others Epistles of the same Purport and Tenor viz. 5.11.13 26.27.28.29.30.41.42 c. Written upon several the like occasions but the Epistle of 36 Bishops to the People of Leon Asturia and Emerita a shrewd argument of its universal practice in those more pure times so near the Apostles And it cannot be collected out of any place of Scripture that Christ instituting pastors in the Church hath exempted them from the Churches obedience she being the common Mother of all Christians as well Ecclesiastical as Secular the practice of those times which were freest from corruption even when the holy Martyrs were Bishops was that Pastors were subject to the Censures of the Church whereof St. Cyprian gives abundant testimony Ibid. ep 68. pag. 113. The same is to be held of Excommunication seeing it behoveth the Christian Multitude to avoid the Fellowship of the Excommunicated not only in the course of Religion but even in common and familiar conversation the rights of Nature Family and Common-wealth ever kept inviolate and that whom yesterday we were to repute a Brother near and dear in Christ to morrow we must hold as an Heathen and Publican and as for destruction to the flesh delivered to Sathan 18. Mat. 1. Cor. 5. who is so unequal a Judg as not to think it a most equal thing that the Multitude should clearly and undoubtedly take knowledge both of the heynousness of the crime and the Incorrigible contumacy of the person after the use of all means and remedies for the reclaiming them If this be not allowed to the Brethren then doth the Church not herein live by her own but by her Officers Faith neither are her Governours to be reputed as Servants but as Lords over her contrary to 2. Cor. 4.5 neither do they exercise their Office for the good of the Brethren in the Church as they ought but tyrannically as they ought not of this opinion is Chrysost in Epist ad Titum and Celestine decreed that no Bishop should be ordained against the Will of the People but that the consent of the Clergy nd the People was requisite In the primitive times all Christians that lived in the Communion of the Catholick Faith were called ecclesiasticks but now it is most though abusively appropriated unto Church-Men both at Rome and elsewhere though no tolerable reason can be given why Princes and their People should be esteemed so inconsiderable and as it were of no value and concern in the esteem of the ecclesiasticks For if the variety of opinions of the vulgar their meanness of knowledge their passions and the like the usual and scornful objections of Papists against the Laicks be urged to render them uncapable and unfit these very objections if allowed for currant may possibly exclude the greatest part of the Clergy also from the Authority which they lay claim unto in this particular For it cannot be denied but that diversities of opinions malice ignorance animosities pride ambition selfconceitedness covetousness excess of exhorbitant passions have generally as great a share amongst the Clergy as the People nay often times many among the ordinary sort of Christians in a Church are more considerable for their Learning Piety Temper and meekn ss than their Pastors St. Ambrose serm 17. T. 4. p. 725. Plerunque clerus erravit Sacerdotum nutavit sententia divites cum seculi istius terreno rege senserunt Populus fidem propriam servavit hath informed us that many times the Clergy have erred the Bishops have wavered in their opinions the Rich men have adhered in their judgment to earthly Princes of the World mean while the People alone preserved the truth intire And it is well known that whole Nations have been converted by Laymen and women Soozm lib. 2. c. 14. Niceph. lib. 14. c. 10. Socrat. lib. 1. c. 19.20 seeing then that what hath happened may happen again that the Clergy hath held erroneous and heretical opinions whilst the People hath held the truth It is very evident that the Opinions and Councils and Advisoes of the Laity ought not so wholly to be neglected and slighted Certainly Divines only are not inspired from God nor only understand holy Mysteries Laicks in all ages have been that wanted neither Learning nor Piety St. Cyprian records that in the Council at Carthage where the question touching the Baptism of Hereticks was debated the greatest part of the People were present Praesente etiam plebis maxima parte f. 282 the like for the real presence confitentur alii quod sides sua qua astruunt quod panis vinum remanent post consecrationem in naturis suis adhue servatur Laicis antiquitus servabatur Jo. Tissington in Confessione cont Jo. Wiclisf quam MSS. habeo Vsher Serm. f. 24. This is no new nor yet strange Doctrine for in the very first Synod which of all others ought to be a rule and a Pattern for that it began in the life time and presence of the Apostles to decide whether the converted Gentiles were bound to observe Moses Law was composed by a meeting in Jerusalem of 4. Apostles and of all the Faithful that were in the City An example which in regard of Antiquity and Divine Authority is of more credit than all those that have succeeded take them all together and by which example the various doubts and differences relating to the Church which afterwards sprang up in every Province for the space of 200. years and more even all St. Cyprians time whom Chronologers have computed to have been created Bishop about Anno. Dom. 248. and longer the Bishops and chiefest of the Churches assembled themselves to qualify and compose them and I do not find that the right of assent and suffrage in elections of Church-men was taken from the People till about the year 870. Distinct. c. 36. § Let us look a little farther and trace matter of fact in point of Election of Priests and Bishops who were chosen either 1o. by Lots 2o. by voices or 3º by the Spirit of Prophesie Of these Three the First and the Third were by God himself which Use ceased with the Apostles who indeed found none fit but qualified them for the Work The Second to wit by Voices of all the Faithful only remaining In Scripture there is no Precept but Example for the same it is manifest that God committed and left this Point among others to the Body of the Church to whom he gave power to govern it self with other general Precepts of
these are executed by the power of the Judge who enforceth submission so those only by the will of the Guilty to receive them who refusing them the Ecclesiastical Judge remaineth without execution and hath no power to enforce but to foreshew the Judgment of God which will follow in this Life or the next This kind of Proceedings and this kind of Judicature was according unto Christ's Institution and would not enterfeer with any Civil Government Christian or not Christian and unto which the Apostles did conform and which lasted some Centuries of years in the Church and was esteemed by the Saints of those more pure times the Judgment of Charity not of Jurisdiction because they did thereby charitably not judicially or magisterially reconcile the persons compose the differences and rebuke the Sins and Vices of the Believing Brethren and did thereby prevent the Scandal and Reproaches that otherwise they and their Religion would have been exposed and liable unto from Unbelievers This kind of Judicature was so far from being essential or peculiar unto the Bishops and Presbyters as that the least esteemed in the Church were as capable of it as the greatest indeed any that were wise and able to judge between the Brethren rather than to suffer them to go to Law before the Vnbelievers 1 Cor. 6.4 5 6. The Apostles who had greater Abilities and understood their Commission better than ever any Pope did refused to take this Charge upon themselves as being not fit for Preachers of the Gospel to take any Civil Employment that might any way impede the main End and Design which was to give themselves continually to Prayer and to the Ministry of the Word and by reason whereof they could not serve God in that whereunto they were chiefly called without distraction and therefore for the same reason would not serve Tables but would have such Duties devolved upon others Acts 6.2 3 4. Nay Paul most solemnly professeth that Christ sent him not to Baptize but to Preach the Gospel 1 Cor. 1.17 So wholly did he devote his Service to the exact performance of his Commission Of the same Opinion was the Bishop of Aiace in the Council of Trent who in the Debate of Residence which he held to be Jure Divino complained that the cause of their Non-Residence was that the Bishops did busie themselves in the Courts of Princes and in the Affairs of the World being Judges Chancellors Secretaries Councellors Treasurers there being few Offices of State into which Bishops have not insinuated themselves though forbid by St. Paul 2 Tim. 2.4 who thought it necessary that a Souldier of the Church should not entangle himself with the Affairs of this Life that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a Souldier therefore he moved that the Council would constitute that it should not be lawful for Bishops or others who have Cure of Souls to exercise any Secular Office or Charge In the Ecclesiastical Laws there is a whole Title to this effect Ne Clerici vel Monachi Secularibus negotiis se immisceant And St. Chrysostom hath a long Discourse In Decretal in Mat. Hom. 26. Consid 1.24 complaining of Clergy-men leaving the Care of Souls become Proctors Economists c. practising things unbeseeming the Ministry Though the Papalins cannot deny these to be great Truths yet in this as in divers other Cases they please themselves with false Glosses upon plain Texts of Scripture asserting most Magisterially for their Justification the Popes Authority to dispense not only with Humane but Divine Laws that in Humane Laws his Authority is absolute and unlimited because he is superior to them all and therefore when he doth dispense though without any cause the Dispensation notwithstanding was to be held for good and that in Divine Laws he had power to dispense but not without a Cause alledging St. Paul for their justifications 1 Cor. 4.1 Who saith that the Ministers of Christ are the Dispensers of the Mysteries of God and that to him the Apostle the Dispensation of the Gospel had been committed 1 Cor. 9.17 And that howsoever the Popes Dispensation concerning the Divine Law be not of force yet every one ought to captivate his Vnderstanding and believe that he hath granted it for a lawful Cause and that it is Temerity to call it into question Hist Conc. Trent 675. Bonny Glosses I must confess and well calculated for the Zenith of the Popes Altitudes and Authorities but they are quite contrary to Apostolick Doctrine and the Conclusion drawn hath no warrant at all from the Text for the Text doth not prove a power of Dispensation to be in the Bishop of Rome i.e. a Disobligation from the Law and Commandments of God and the Gospel as the Popes would have us believe but only a power to dispense i.e. to publish and declare the Divine Mysteries and Word of God which is perpetual and remaineth inviolable for ever according to Eph. 3.2 8 9. Eph. 6.19 Col. 1.26 c. 4.3 What is this but to wrest and pervert the very Words and Sense of Scripture and as much as in them lieth to make a new Gospel as they made a new Creed at Trent In Human Laws happily a Dispensation may lie for that the Law-makers are subject to infirmities and fallibility and unable to foresee all Cases and future Accidents and Occurrences which when they come to be discovered and known may justly admit of some Exceptions and Dispensations But where God is the Law-giver from whose all-seeing Eye nothing is concealed and by whom no Accident is not foreseen the Law can have no Exception no Dispensation for that by such Dispensation the strength of all Gods Laws is taken away made null and in truth escheated into the Breast and Power of the Popes Holiness From such corrupt Glosses it is that there are few or no Cardinals without many Bishopricks how incompatible soever they are together Hence also the Use of Commendaes and Vnions for Life Administrations at first invented probably for good ends by which against all Laws many Benesices were given to one person alone really with appearance that he had but one only Therefore the Law of God and Nature ought not to be esteemed as a common written Law which in some Cases happily may be dispensed withal and made more gentle for that all his Laws are even Equity and Justice it self Besides the Pope who takes himself to be the great Dispenser Paramount cannot in any case free him that is bound Paul was obliged to preach the Gospel as being called thereunto and so was Peter and all the rest of the Apostles and all the Bishops and Priests are no otherwise sent and called than to preach the Gospel and feed Christ's Flock as all the Apostles were which includes the Pope himself if he be Peters Successor yea a necessity was laid upon him yea wo unto him if he did not preach the Gospel 1 Cor. 9.16 And therefore he most earnestly desires
because the Apostles Gifted and Spirited in that abundant measure as they were used no Liturgies nor stinted Forms therefore we that are neither infallible as they were nor yet have the Spirit in the same measure as they had should use none May not we rather and with much more Evidence of Reason from the Nature of the thing varied conclude the contrary to be absolutely warranted and for that very reason affirm Liturgies and stinted Forms to be much more justifiable now and rather to be used by us in these days than by them in those days Certainly if they cannot lay most undoubted claim unto the same in-being Principles and unto the same measure which was in them this their Goliah-Argument hath its Head cut off with his own Sword O! but in the Purer Times next and nearest to the days of the Apostles the Fathers who neither were Infallible nor yet had the Spirit in the same measure as the Apostles had never used them whether they did or did not use them we neither certainly know nor yet why they did or did not and if we did yet that could be no infallible demonstration for us to do just as they did without consideration had of the disferent posture of Affairs between these and those times But be it so that they did not use them what then may not a succeeding Generation sind out a necessary remedy or convenient preservative to defend the pure Worship of God from Taint and Infection of Idolatry or Superstition that a former Age two or three have not used Such kind of Negative Allegations Arguments they cannot be may induce to deliberate and consider whether sit to be appointed or used or not but can never rationally conclude that therefore we can use nothing that those Purer Times did not The Condition and Posture of Christian Affairs are now altered In the Primitive Times next unto the days of the Apostles every Pastor had care only of his own gathered Church and every Bishop with his Presbiters of this or that City and so in that respect there being then no Civil Protectors but all professed Enemies of the Gospel no need then of Liturgies though happily as lawful then though not so necessary as now when whole Kingdoms and Common-wealths are become Christian and consequently the care of their Spiritual State is become much more extensive stretching over great Kingdoms is now devolved by Divine Right on the Civil Christian Magistrate who may no doubt impose a wholesom Form of sound Words by way of Lyturgy for that without it or something equivalent to it it is not possible for a Prince to have that due inspection and oversight over his vastly-extended Flock as a Shepherd may have of his Fold in one Parish or one City § But to sum up his Discourse in as narow a compass as I can f. 22. It treats about Christs Institutions of Gospel-Worship in his publick Assemblies The chief Acts whereof he refers to three Heads 1. Preaching of the Word 2. Administration of the Sacraments 3. The Exercise of Discipline of which he says little or nothing all to be performed with Prayer and Thanksgiving For the Administration of these so far as they are purely of his Institution Christ gave Rules to his Disciples and appointed Persons 1. Pastors and Teachers for the regular Administration of them which was to be performed and executed two ways fo 12.1 Either by such Spiritual Abilities for the discharge and performance of this whole Work as will answer the Mind of Christ therein and so serve for the End proposed 2. Or by the Prescription of a Form of Words whose reading and pronuntiation in these Administrations should outwardly serve as to all the Ends of Prayer and Thanksgiving required in them which they do contain Against the second way only he disputes and argues stifly averring 1. That Christ not in any thing or by any Act of his did intimate the necessity or lawful use of any such Liturgies as these which we are inquiring after or prescribed or limited Forms of Prayer or Praises to be used or read in the publick Administration of Evangelical Institutions but made provision rendring all such Prescriptions useless and because they cannot be made use of but by rejection of the Provision by himself made unlawful Fo. 29.2 No Liturgies used or prescribed or their usefulness intimated by the Apostles nor by the Churches of their Plantation Fo. 20 21 38. It 's but reasonable to allow unto the Ministers of the Gospel that liberty in the Worship of God which was confessedly left unto them by Christ and his Apostles fo 24. and therefore unreasonable to impose Forms on others whom they undertake to inform 32. and who desire to stand fast in the Liberty with which Christ hath made them free averring That they must have a great considence in their own wisdom and sufficiency who will undertake to appoint and impose on others the observation of things in the Worship of God which neither the Lord Jesus nor his Apostles did appoint or impose 22. and withal deploring That Liturgies should be made the Hinge whereon the whole exercise of the Ministry must turn Fo. 31 40. All such Imposition being destitute of any Plea or Pretence from Scripture or Antiquity f. 31. in his 7th Ch. he declares That he doth not in especial intend the Liturgy now in use in England any farther than to make it an Instance of such imposed Liturgies whereof we treat and therefore will not at all enquire what footing it hath in the Law how nor when established nor what particular failings are pleaded to be in it nor what conformity it bears with the Roman Offices c. nor doth he oppose the directive part of this Liturgy as to the reading of the Scripture the Administration of the Ordinances by Christ appointed nor the Composition of Forms of Prayer suited to the Nature of Institutions to which they relate so they be not imposed on the Administrators of them to be read precisely as prescribed But the thing alone which he would be thought to oppose is The composing of Forms of Prayer in the Worship of God in all Gospel-Administrations to be used by the Ministers of the Churches in all publick Assemblies by a precise reading of the Words prescribed unto them with Commands for the reading of other things which they are not to omit upon the Penalty contained in the Sanction of the whole Service and the several parts of it fo 42. It is only about its Imposition and the necessity of its observance by vertue of that Imposition that he discourseth f. 44. § If the Author of this Discourse had only pursued what he here intimates in these last words and bent his Force only against the composing and imposing of Forms of Prayer c. i.e. Liturgies in general he had dealt much more candidly and saved himself and me some labour But because he seems to look one way whilst he
Fruit thereof Nostrorum quilibet de legibus interrogatus facilius quam nomen suum recitat they knew the Law as well as their own Names To this agrees Acts 15.21 to after times Stories give witness Socrates of the Church at Alexandria once or twice a-week the Scriptures are read in the Assembly and so necessary they thought it that they ordained an Order of Readers who had to that Function their Solemn Consecration So was Julian afterwards the Apostate ordained a Reader in the Church of Nicomedia Then consider the Power of it 1. For discerning things that differ and trial of Doctrines taught by the Preachers to which End Esay calls to the Law and to the Testimony and Beraeans practised it with commendations 2. The People are thereby better acquainted with the Letter of Scriptures and Language of the Holy Ghost which always carries much more Awe Majesty and Conviction than what is not Scripture the Power of it being exceeding great to work knowledge God having in things necessary condescended even unto the meanest Capacity it confirms Faith and always is a strong Preparative to saving Faith and Conversion as to Austin was the obeying of the Voice from Heaven Tolle lege to Junius the reading of St. Johns Gospel in Josiah what remorse and compunction wrought it 2 Kings 22.20 what Godly Sorrow to Repentance wrought it in the Corinthians 2 Cor. 7.8 9. of such necessity and avail to Gods People is the naked reading of Scriptures in the Congregation These Considerations should and I hope will instruct us to beware how in our Judgment we vilisie this so holy and wholesom an Ordinance of God it being as much Gods Ordinance that the Scriptures be read in the Congregation as that they be interpreted and applied to the People by Preachments Let us not be Monsters in our Worship attributing a Nemis to some Ordinances thereby debasing or derogating from other Ordinances Sathans Policy herein is not inconsiderable that would thereby fain make us prophane Anabaptists or Quakers to contemn all Gods Ordinances by permitting us to over-admire some one that the rest may be despicable in our esteem Prayer amongst Romanists we see half Idolized Preaching too prophanely scoffed at Reading there are that most magnifie There are of another Strain desiring to turn our whole Liturgy after the French or Geneva Schomme into a meer Preachment Know ye not that these all are Holy Ordinances of God necessary useful powerful to their Ends assigned of them all may we not say they are ordained of God they that contemn shall receive condemnation who except prejudice or unpreparedness have forestalled his profiting hath not felt Gods Spirit by reading to enlighten admonish excite mortifie c. or can think God hath in vain with such adjuration enjoyned it to those that are Guides of the Congregation I say as our Saviour of the Commandments Whoso contemns the least of these Ordinances and teacheth Men so he shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven Mat. 5.19.29 Petrus Cunaeus de Repub. Hebr. lib. 2. c. 17. affirms That howsoever the Law was read amongst them in the former times either in publick or private yet the bare Text was only read without gloss or descant Interpretatio Magistrorum nulla Commentatio nulla but in the second Temple when there were no Prophets then did the Scribes and Doctors begin to Comment and make several Expositions on the Holy Text ex quo natae disputationes sententiae contrariae from whence saith he sprang up Debates and doubtful Disputations and most probable it is saith another upon him that from this Liberty of Interpretation sprung up diversity of Judgments from whence arose the several Sects of Pharises Essenes and Saduces who by their difference of Opinions did distract the Multitude and condemn one another even so c. Therefore thrice accursed is that practise of Rome monopolizing Scriptures to the Clergy all Participes Criminis Parties to the Cheat as their Priviledge and Prerogative interdicting the People acquaintance with them without faculty first obtained from the Ordinary to some few but at no hand may be publickly read in a Vulgar Tongue Luke 11.52 Is not this the taking away the Key of Knowledge and hindering those that would enter in what I beseech you was Gods aim in that Gift of Tongues what time he meant to set open to Gentiles the door of Faith but that every one might hear in that Tongue wherein he was born the wonderful Works of God Acts 2.8.11 To what purpose were the Labours of Ancients translating Scriptures into Vulgar Languages as Hierom into the Dalmatian Chrysostome into the Armenian Tongue Vulphilas into the Language of the Goths In Bedes time were extant Translations into six several Languages for the use of the People of this Island Vainly except to the Laity also their use was freely intended This Apostrophe by the By relating only to Romanists who by so doing Amongst Jews under Antiochus 1597. do vilifie the Gift of Tongues and act diametrically contrary to the whole Ch. 14. of the first of the Corinthians thereby making themselves wiser than Christ and his Apostles It can be but a frivolous Cavil for our Anti-liturgists to say that the Intendment of the before-recited Portions of Scripture is for the reading of Scriptures only and not for any thing that is composed by Man whereas St. Pauls Charge to Timothy was general viz. That he should give attendance to Reading to Exhortation to Doctrine 1 Tim. 4.13 If this may be allowed for currant I doubt it may prove as strong against Sermons and where are we then The Sermons of our Priests and of our days are not so the Word of God as the Sermons of the Apostles were nay they are but quodam modo and interpretativè termed Gods Word because his Word is the Subject of which they treat and Liturgies in this sense are or should be as much the Word of God as Sermons for the Wit and Gifts of Man gives equally the Being and Form to them both Will you confine the Spirit and ascribe Vital Operation to Sermons alone or to the Administrations of every Individual Priest only and not unto those composed by Bodies Collective Is that to divide the Word aright nay is it not partial dispensation so to rob Peter to pay Paul to derogate from and to deprive one Gift and Way of Administration of its just Efficacy and Operation and to attribute it wholly to another Gift of the same Stamp Nay is it not imparting the most peculiar Glory of the Word of God unto that which is not properly his Word nor no more his Word than Liturgies are Apostolick Sermons were no doubt unto such as heard them the Word of God and are not their Writings so now to us Sermons are not the only Preaching which doth save Souls Writing or reading of what is written and spoken speaking either extempore or premeditately do differ indeed yet not
their Vocation yet not so tyed as it were by a perpetual and unalterable Law that they may not be at Liberty to alter their Condition when just Cause so requireth and this he makes good by way of instancing the Condition of Servants with words of Consolation that though they are Servants to men yet they being once made partakers of that Grace of Christ may notwithstanding in Spirit and Truth serve the Lord Christ whose Service is perfect Freedom and withall teacheth that Liberty being far more Excellent and Commodious than Bondage is rather to be chosen when opportunely it may be had But in all this not one Syllable towards the making good of his Assertion viz. A Freedom from subjection to the Authority of Men c. He then proceeds to affirm that the same Rule is given out as to our duty and deportment in reference unto both these viz. the two parts of liberty divided by him as before which he endeavours to provo by Gal. 5.1 and 1 Pet. 2.16 but with what success will appear upon their Scanning stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us Free and be not intangled again with the Yoak of Bondage Gal. 5.1 I most willingly confess the force that this place hath for the justifying of his first part of Christian Liberty but as to the Justifying of the second part I conceive with submission to better Judgments that it is of no validity at all The Liberty here mentioned by Paul the Apostle of uncircumcision besides the general Intendment and respect it had to the general Freedom from the Obligation Bondage and Curse of the Law purchased by Jesus Christ it did more particularly respect Circumcision a part of the Mosaical Law which might have been performed in Titus as it had been before in Timothy had not saith Paul false Brethren who came in privily to spy out our Liberty which we have in Christ Jesus that they might bring us into Bondage Gal. 2.4 Bondage What Bondage Subjection to the Authority of Men commanding Lawful things about the Worship of God Nothing less but Bondage by binding them to a necessary observance of the Ceremonial Law by teaching the necessity of Circumcision which before Christ was a Sacrament and a Seal of the righteousness of Faith Rom. 4.11 But after the death of Christ till the destruction of the Temple it was a dead Ceremony yet some time used as a thing indifferent After the Destruction of the Temple when the Church of the New Testament was planted amongst the Gentiles it was a deadly Ceremony and ceased to be indifferent imposing it upon him and Titus making it a meritorious cause of Salvation and teaching Justification and Salvation was partly by Christ and partly by the Law thereby intending to overthrow the Gospel of Christ Gal. 1.7 against this Bondage this Doctrine Paul Preached behold I Paul say unto you that if ye be Circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Gal. 5.2 that is if you be Circumcized believing that Circumcision shall be a Meritorious cause of your Salvation and go back from your Christian profession and Liberty Christ shall profit you nothing And that which Paul saith here of Circumcision in particular he means generally of the whole Law for I testifie again to every Man that is Circumcised that he is a Debtor to do the whole Law Christ is become of no effect to you whosoever of you are Justified by the Law ye are fallen from Grace v. 3 4. Therefore saith Paul stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us Free and be not intangled again with the Yoak of Bondage v. 1. That this is the most natural and genuine if not only sence of this portion of Scripture will not I think be denied by any Protestant but what farther use he can make of this for the Justifying his Second part of Christian Liberty without stretching and wresting the words beyond their meaning is past my understanding I am sure it is not safe nor warrantable to impose any other sence on the Apostles words than what he meant and is clear and evident After such a deceitful way of handling Scripture it would be no hard task to prove by Scripture that there is no God that Prophets are Fools and that Spiritual men are mad Hos 7. But we proceed to his other places of Scripture which are but two more and examine if he hath dealt any more candidly in alledging them viz. 1 Pet. 2.16 and Acts 15. which we will examine as they lye in Order the first of them is that of St. Peter which he hath only quoted as he hath done the rest in Figures and not set down at length without making any Application of them the words are As free and not using your liberty for a Cloak of malitiousness but as the Servants of God But by what construction to make this Text favour or make good his Assertion viz. A freedom from subjection to the Authority of men as to any new Imposition in or about the Worship of God I must confess my Self to be Impar Negotio and I believe it to be past his Skill also without wresting the words beyond their Natural meaning However I will give my Essay by declaring the plain genuine sence of the place and freely leave the Reader to Judge and make out the rest This Verse is relative being the Close or Period of somewhat before prescribed but more especially of the three last Verses immediately going before which relates unto and respect obedience and submission to Government The Text and Context lye thus together Submit your selves to every Ordinance of Man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as Supream or unto Governours as unto them as are sent by him for the punishment of evil doers and for the Praise of them that do well for so is the will of God that with well doing he may put to silence the ignorance of Foolish men as free and not using your liberty for a Cloak of malitiousness but as the Servants of God Honour all Men Love the Brother-hood fear God honour the King 1 Pet. 2.13.17 The Apostles when they Preached the Gospel-Doctrine of Christian Liberty At which false Teachers in those dayes did and some in these our dayes do take advantage from the very name of Liberty to teach the new Converted Christians under that pretence to despise their Governours and Government did take and amongst them our Apostle doth here take occasion from that ground to endeavour to prevent the abuses and misconstructions of the Glorious and wholsome Doctrine of Christian Liberty by teaching that Christian Subjection and obedience under the term of well-doing was very consistent with the Doctrine of Christian Liberty and therefore he shews it to be the will of God that they should submit to every Ordinance of Man that by such submission such well doing they may put to silence the ignorance of Foolish Men viz. false Teachers
or of the Rules which Christ gave to his Pastors and Teachers for the Regular Administration of his Word and Worship or of any spiritual Abilities given or promised to be continued to them for the discharge and performance of the whole Work of the Ministry and will answer the mind of Christ and will much very much conduce unto the main end proposed viz. Edification And that they are but mistaken Averments to affirm that Liturgies or prescribed or limited Forms of Prayer and Praises to be used or Read in the publick Administration of Evangelical Institutions cannot be made use of but by rejection of the Provision made by Christ. And that the Imposition of them doth impose on others the observation of things in the Worship of God which neither the Lord Jesus nor his Apostles did appoint or impose And that all such Imposition is destitute of any Plea or Pretence from Scripture or Antiquity And that Liturgies are an Humane Invention contrary to the mind of Christ I could now wish that this our Author seeing Liturgies do not please would so far have obliged this whole Church and State as to have prescribed us some better and more Adaequate mean for the supplying of the defects of Liturgies and for the more easie and Familiar teaching and keeping our fundamentals pure and clean and for the keeping out of Popery Idolatry Superstition and indeed all kind of Trash and Trumpery that like a Torrent hath overspread this Nation since these dayes of Liberty and decrying Liturgies from Ranters Quakers Adamites Enthusiasts Phanaticks Seekers Antitrinitarians Antisabatarians Famulists and indeed from an Iliad more of others ejusdem farinae 〈…〉 si quid novisti rectius Candidus Imperti si non his utere meâ—um It were done but like a Man in Buss to make here a proud Challenge to all our new and brightest Luminaries to give us any one Machin or Paralel so excellent or equal in all respects to that of Liturgies for the ends mentioned but I forbear and shall only crave Liberty most humbly to recommend unto all parties viz. Prelates Presbiters Independents c. that Admonition which St. Paul gave to the Phillippians which concern these times as much as those wherein he Wrote and the maintainers of true Religion most of all and it were most happy for Christianity if all Christians could in very good earnest embrace it viz. let nothing be done through strife or vain Glory but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better then themselves 2 c. 3. And that other Precept also of the same Apostle viz. to study to be quiet 1 Thes 4.11 Duties without doubt with all our might to be endeavoured and in no Age or Church more necessary to be pressed and urged then our own abounding with so many busie Spirits and rest-less male-contents Athens it self not more mad upon News and Novelties then our English Nation not only in vain things but in matters of far greater concern our love of change and that Israelitish humor revived in us even in Church Government to be like other Nations Tho we have seen Gods blessing on our Ministery to the envy of Adversaries and admiration of neighbour Churches and have demonstrated our Discipline to suit with the Primitive and Apostolick State of the Church this yet seems wanting that we have not experimented Forreign Formes nor shaped our Alter according to the fashion fetcht us from Damascus 2 King 16.10 11. from Geneva or other Forreign Countries I could wish our Tumultuous and almost mutinous stirrings and Sallies in that kind had not made us a Reproach among Papists and a scandal amongst the Enemies of the Gospel my Prayer to God shall be to settle us in unity of mind and affections that we may speak and think one thing Studying the things that concern Peace and wherewith we may edifie one another 1 Cor. 1.10 I shall now conclude the discourse concerning Liturgies with this observation that in using a Liturgy we have followed all the Churches in the World even the most Antientest of St. Chrysostome and Basil that never any Church in the World but had its set Formes of Prayer especially for the Publick And because our Discourser doth so peremptorily aver f. 3. that there were no Liturgies in the purest times next and nearest to the dayes of the Apostles and that the Fathers never used any All Negatives and which he can never prove I shall here give you a small Catalogue of some few of many Liturgies and Rituals which if the Legitimate Issue of their reputed Fathers then without all doubt and Controversie they were in use in the Apostles dayes and purest times But at worst if but Spurious and Illegitimate yet if such in truth they at least prove their own Antiquity and Universality to be very early and very general because used in divers Countries as appears by the divers Languages they are in viz. Hebrew Greek Latine Arabick Syriack Gothick Aethiopick c. viz. Liturgiae Grecae nomen Preferentes Jacobi Petri Marci Clementis Basilij Chrysostomi Gregorij Rom. Liturgia Ecclesiae Constantinopolitan Novum Anthologium Basilij Anaphora Syriaca Missa Angamallencis Christianorum St. Thomae Graecorum Euchologium Menaea Octoechum Anastasimum Pentecostarium Armenor Liturgia Missa Ambrosiana Liturg. Aegyptia Basilij Gregorij Nazianzini Cyrilli Alexandrini Gregorij Antiphonarium Sacramentarium Officium Muzarabum in Hispania Missale Gothicum Ordo Romanus Antiquus Missa Latina Antiqua Liturgia Ecclesiae Graecae lingua Prosica Officia Arabica Consider 1o. That in the Jewish Church they had set Formes 10 Numb 35 36. Moses prescribed a set Form of Prayer for the going out and coming in of the Ark. 68 Psal 1 2. The Lord prescribes 6 Numb 23. A set Form of Blessing Confession is prescribed every time they offered the Oblation they should use this Form 102 Psal was Penned for an afflicted Soul and 92 the Title 1 Chr. 16.7 2 Chr. 7 6. Christ taught his Prayer twice which is both a Prayer and Form of Prayer when we Pray this Prayer it is a most sure and excellent Comfort to us that we know that what we ask it is according to his Will 1 Joh. 22. 2o. In the Christian Church set Forms were used even in the dayes of Christ and his Apostles Christ gave his Disciples a set Form 6 Mat. 9. he uses a set Form himself 26 Mat. 44. The same Word 3o. He and his Apostles had their Hymn 26 Mat. 30. 4º Such Psalms and Hymns perpetually in the Apostles times and by their Command 3 Collossans 16.5 Eph. 19. 3o. Davids Psalms which contain Prayers Praises Thanksgiving c. which are the matter of all Liturgies have been Read and Sung in the Church in all Ages And our Non-Conformists who deny set Forms did in Olivers time when the Liturgy was taken away Sing Psalms in the Church many of which are Prayers and set Forms both as to the matter and Form 4o. For the