defendant there said if they commanded nothing contrary to the will and Word of God that he for his part out of the reverence duty and loyalty to his Prince would obey it The Words in the Originall are these Verum de Episcoporum autoritate locutus à bonis bene intelligi cupio Non enim litis litem moveo quatenus ab Imperatoribus Regibus Principibus Terrae quorum interest salutem civium tueri potestate Ius Imperiii in socios totumque Dei gregem adepti sunt Nam si Romani Episcopi immensam illam nullus limitibus circumscriptā autoritatē indulgentiae Principū acceptā ferrem voluntati Episcopali nihil voluntati divinae inimicum jubenti obtemperandū putem ob reverentiam Principi si volenti debitam c. So that the Defendant having thus plainly set down his minde before and knowing that all the jurisdiction that the Bishops in England now exercise over others is from the King he thought himself not onely secure from danger but expected favour at least from the Bishops and their helping hand especially when the opposing the Popes Authority in England is a thing that the King and State have ever so well allowed of And that this honourable Court may yet be farther informed of the speciall cause for which the Prelates are so displeased with the Defendant it was for the truely and narrowly disputing and discussing of the second question to wit whether the Pope of Rome if he be a Bishop as he is a Bishop have Authority and Jurisdiction not onely over his fellow brethren but over Kings and Emperours which the Defendant there denyed for many warrantable Arguments the summe of which he desireth here to relate unto this honourable Court for his just and necessary defence and justification For by the very light of nature and unanswerable reason it is evident and manifest that where there is an equality parity amongst men there the one doth not exceed the other in power or Dominion Paris enim in Parem non esse imperium inter Naturae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est Now Divine constitution hath made Bishops and Presbyters or Elders a like and equall which that it might the better appeare the Defendant propounded three things to be proved The first was that Bishops and Presbyters were by the Word of God one and the same Secondly That Presbyters had equall Authority of Government Ordination Excommunication with Bishops wherein only consists their preheminency and Authority above their brethren which things being proved it will necessarily follow That the Pope of Rome as he is Bishop doth no way exceed other Bishops and Presbyters they being in all things alike and equall unto him much lesse hath any Authority and power over Kings and Emperours And for the proofe of the first position the words Presbyter and Bishop do sufficiently evince it which is holy Scripture though diverse in sound signifie one and the same thing as not to cite the words themselves which would be large The Apostle Paul to Titus in the first Chapter doth sufficiently shew where the words Bishop and Presbyter are confounded And likewise in the first Epistle of Peter and the fift Chapter there Presbyter and Bishop signifie one and the same thing And the Epistle to the Philippians the first Chapter and the first verse doth apparently demonstrate it and divers other places might be produced dilucidating the same thing But the 20. of the Acts puts all out of controversie where Presbyter and Bishop signifie one and the same thing for office honour and function so that the idenity of their office is signifyed by those two expressions Neither is there a confusion of their names with a difference still of their functions and administrations as some would cavill for in these places where Presbyters are called Bishops the disputation is not about the title but about the office signified and specified by the title For when Saint Paul exhorts the Presbyters to have an eye to their duty and charge he useth this reason that the Holy Ghost hath made them Bishops and the truth of this is so evident that the Rhemists themselves as learned men as any Bishops in England and as able to maintaine an error are forced ingeniously to confesse it saying in expresse words in their Notes upon the 28. vers of that Chapter That in the Apostles times there was no difference between Presbyter and Bishop so that for the first position it is not onely by the Word of God clearly evident but by the very confession of the adversaries of the truth granted as a thing without controversie Now for proofe of the second position that Presbyters as well as the Bishop of Rome have the power and right of Government Ordination and Excommunication by which in these times Bishops onely exceed Presbyters the Defendant will here briefly demonstrate it referring those of this honourable Court that have a desire to search into the full truth of it to his book And for the proofe that the Government was committed unto them and that they exercised the same it is most perspicuous out of the first of Timothie 5. where the Apostle saith the Presbyters that rule well are worthy of double honour especially those that labour in Word and Doctrine By this testimony it is evident that they had rule and government in their hands And that they had power also of Ordination and imposition of hands it is likewise apparent out of the first Epistle of Paul to Timothy the first Chapter For the Apostle speaking to Timothy saith Do not neglect the gift that is in thee which is given thee for prophesie by the imposition of the hands of the Presbytery Here also the Presbyters had the right of imposition of hands And that they had the power of Excommunication and Absolution it is likewise manifest from the fifth of the 1. of the Corinthians and the second Chapter of the second Epistle where the Apostle gives them the power of casting the incestrous person out and upon his repentance receiving of him in againe By all which Authorities of Sacred Writ it is sufficiently cleare and evident That the Presbyters had the Authority and power of Government and rule in the Church with the faculty also and ability of Ordination and Excommunication and all this by Divine institution and expresse words of holy Scripture howsoever this right and their due was through the fraud and deceit of the Bishop of Rome and Romish Bishops afterwards taken away from the Presbyters Wherefore the Defendant concluded That if there were any difference between Presbyters and the Bishop of Rome which he denied that then the Presbyters in dignity and honour exceeded and that greatly the Bishop of Rome and Romish Bishops for all these Priviledges of government Ordination and Excommunication are in formall words given unto the Presbyters and no where granted unto the Bishops And for farther illustration and proofe of this the Defendant
they censured him onely for his Booke and in their censure they unanimously agreed that the Defendant should pay the costs of suit a thousand pounds unto the King for a fine be debarred of his Practice that his Booke should be burnt and that the Defendant should lie in prison till recantation and in the meane time be delivered unto Satan And thus did the Sublime Court deale with the Defendant for doing his duty But here the Defendant craveth favour againe of the honourable Court that he may briefly letting the puny Judges and their nonsense die in silence say something of the Prelates haranges because they onely were the men that found themselves agrieved at his writing and to say the truth all the other are Officiers under them and are the Prelates hang-byes he meanes the Doctors to do what they would have them as hourly experience teacheth all men And so much the more earnestly he desireth this liberty because it wil make much for the demonstration of the justice of his accusation against the Prelates both in respect of the dishonour they have done unto God by it the dishonour of the King their Master and King James of precious memory and the wrong done to himself in particular Now the first that entred this combat was Francis White Bishop of Ely who in the first place most blasphemously and with many contumelyes reproached the holy Scriptures making nothing of their divine Authority as all the standers by can witnesse for he revising the Defendant said That he had nothing in his book but Scripture which was as he tearmed it the refuge of all Heriticks and Schismaticks openly averring withall That the Scriptures could not be known to be the Word of God but by the Fathers and Saint Augustine would not have beleeved the Scriptures to be the Word of God had not the Church told him so Further he said That the Scripture could not be known and distinguished from the Apocrypha but by the Fathers nor the meaning of the Scripture found out but by the Fathers and that all the Fathers from all antiquity which is most false as the Defendant in a speciall book hath sufficiently shewed made and proved a vast difference between Bishops and Presbyters and that there was ever a greater excellency and Authority in the Bishop then in Presbyters and this with an unaminous consent they all agreed in till a base fellow Calvin for so he tearmed that ever to be honoured Divine rose up in an obscure corner of the world and violated and overthrew all order and authority in the Church and would also have demolished the authority of the Magistrates And then turning his speech to the Defendant unhumanely he called him base fellow brasen faced fellow base Dunce and said in the face of the Court that if he could not maintaine his Episcopall Authority to be Iure Divino he would sling away his Rotchet And so concluding with those that had gone before him in his censure he sat down in a very great fury and passion After him came forth the Bishop of Yorke and in that numerous Assembly proclaimes That Jesus Christ made him a Bishop and the holy Ghost consecrated him and that he had not his authority from the King for Bishops were before Kings and that Bishops held the Crownes of Kings upon their heads and so peremptorily averring that the Defendant ought to be knockt down with club-Law for his ignorance assenting with the rest in their Censure he fell asleep In the third place the Bishop of London advanced forwards speaking very loud and temerarious words against the holy Scriptures saying that he had thought to have found some great matters in the Defendants book seeing him so confident and so peremptory but diligently reading of it he met with nothing in it but Scripture which as he said was the refuge of all Schismaticks and Hereticks and so according with his predecessors in their opinion and censure he concluded his part of speech But last of all came forth the Prelate of Canterbury who with a frontlesse boldnesse avouched his Episcopall authority and preeminency over his brethren to be onely from God very much blaming Calvin for his factions Spirit saying That their Ecclesiasticall Authority and the power they exercised was from Christ Jesus and produced Timothy and Titus to prove the same assertion and that Bishops were before Christian Kings and they held the Crownes of Kings upon their heads For no Bishop no King and those that would have no Bishops sought to overthrow all Government and in his censure he jumped in all things with the rest saving in the Fine which as he said he thought too little and therefore ought of meere conscience as he told the other Judges he fined the Defendant a Thousand pounds more But he had one thing more to speak as he said concerning the Church of Rome and about that he resolved publickly there to declare himself in regard the Defendant had cast Chounyes book unto him in open Court and of the Synagogue of Rome he spake very honourably affirming That she was a true Church and that she did not erre in fundamentall points and all this he spake in that publick Sessions All which the Defendant hath been forced to recite because it makes very much for the justification of what he writ in his Apology and that he had good ground greatly to blame the Prelates aswell for these as for many other of their proceedings as afterwards this honourable Court shall well perceive And now that the Defendant may come to the things that he is charged with the Information as to have accused the Bishops of in his Apology which by the informers is termed a Libell though it conteineth nothing but a true Narration of the passages of the High-Commission Court which he never spake nor writ against but onely against the abuses of the Iudges in it who have turned that Court which was of purpose appointed by the State for the suppressing of Heresy Popery and vice to the beating down of the Religion established by Authority and the promotion and advancement of superstition and the molestation and undoing of the Kings faithfullest Subjects and the deare servants of God as dayly experience teacheth us and the whole Kingdome can witnesse In the writing of which booke he the Defendant thinketh himselfe so far from being a Delinquent as he conceiveth he hath done good service to King Church and State having in it vindicated and maintained regall Authority against the Tyranny of the Pope discovered also the Prelates lawlesse usurpations with their ungratitude to the King and cruelties against their brethren maintained the honour likewise of the Lawes of the Land and the dignity of sacred Writ both which they slight and make nothing of and by innumerable testimonies of learned men proved the assertion for which he is thus traduced and envyed to be neither novell nor hereticall but according to both the Divine Scriptures and
the Saduces saying Ye erre not knowing the Scriptures Matth. 12. verse 24. and indeed from the ignorance of the Scriptures commeth all error they that follow the Scripture for their guide can never stray or straggle from the right way neither have they need to borrow the candle of the Fathers to be directed by so long as the glorious Sun of the word shineth so clearly and it was the eternall praise and commendations of the more Noble Bereans that they did dayly search the Scriptures whether the things the Apostles taught were so or no. Acts 17. verse 11. and Paul is greatly honoured with this applause in the 26. of the Acts verse 22. that he taught no other things then those which the Prophets and Moses did say should come to passe And so Christ taught his Apostles Luke 24. that all things ought to be fulfilled concerning him which were writ in Moses the Prophets and the Psalmes So that the Scriptures alone are the Foundation of all our religion and to say that the meaning of the Scriptures cannot be known without the Fathers is an unsufferable wickednesse done unto that holy booke and an infinite contempt and disgrace of it to say it hath need of the aid of man to support it Christ vanquished the Devill by the Scriptures Matth. 4. drove away the Saduces Matth. 22. and Saint Iames by the Scriptures put an end unto the great controversie of the Churches at Jerusalem and set the Churches of the Gentiles free for ever from all Ceremonies whatsoever but those God himselfe had appointed Acts 15. and onely by the Scriptures did Paul resolve all questions So that according to Gods owne instruction and direction which must ever be obeyed and listened unto the Scriptures onely and solely must be the Judge Law Square and Rule of all our Religion Words and actions Not the authority of the Fathers not the traditions of men not the practice and custome of the ancient and the name of Antiquity For they that shall preferre those things before the Word of God or at least affirme that these holy Oracles divine Records cannot be understood without the Fathers do not onely blasphemously disgrace and contemne the holy Scriptures but neglect the great Prophet whom we ought to heare in all things so that listening unto the voice of men before the words of this great Prophet and accusing the Scriptures of obscurity and saying they are the refuge of all Schismatickes and Heretickes is great impiety against God and most injurious to the holy Scriptures All which the Prelates being so highly guilty of the Defendant will never be afraid to charge them with it that they are disgracers and contemners of holy Scripture withall that they are very ungratefull to the King their Master and invaders of his Prerogative Royall all which he shall make also evidently appeare to this honourable Court and how unworthily yea prophanely they have abused not onely the King their now Soveraign but his Most excellent Father of pious memory And that they are invaders of his Prerogative it is most certaine not onely by the Statutes and Lawes of the Kingdome but by this very information For by the Lawes and Statutes specified before with many others it in solemnly inacted That whatsoever Authority is here exercised under the King in his Dominions whether it be Spirituall or Temporall whether by Archbishops Bishops or any other Ecclesiasticall men it is meerly in by and from the King and so ought to be acknowledged and that all jurisdictions superiorities all priviledges and preeminencies spirituall and Ecclesicall are annexed unto the Imperiall Crowne and so to be acknowledged And whosoever doth not acknowledge that all jurisdicton and Authority both Spirituall and Temporall is derived and doth flow immediately from the Kings Majestie as Supreme head under Christ in these Churches and in his Kingdomes as the Statutes declare at large is ipso facto in a praemunire and under his Majesties high displeasure For it is the Prerogative of Princes and the priviledge that onely agrees to Kings and Potentates to be absolute in their Dominions and that all other jurisdictions and superiorityes exercised by any other in their Kingdoms are derived from them and that of themselves they have none but as from the Kings So that it is arbitrary and in the Princes power to have or not to have such jurisdictions and preeminencies under them And that they may abdicate or annihilate them when they please And whosoever shall deny this or claime any right of Government to themselves in Princes Dominions jure Divino are Delinquents against their Kings and Masters and by our Lawes and Statutes they are proclaimed enemies of the King and his Prerogative Royall and that is true the mouth of the Law hath spake it And therefore the Defendants book cannot be called a Libell without the Lawes first be proclaimed such for the Lawes say That all such persons as shall challenge any Authority to themselves in his Majesties Dominions but from the King are Delinquents against his Majestie and invaders of his prerogative Royall and his Highnesses enemies and so they are Now that the Prelates are such they sufficiently declared it in the censure of the Defendant For he reading the Statutes at the Bar they notwithstanding affirmed that they had not their Authority and jurisdiction from the King but that Jesus Christ made them Bishops and bestowed their Authority upon them and that they were jure Divino and that they were before Christian Kings and held the Crownes of Kings upon their heads for no Bishop no King and all this in a publick Court of Judicature and in a most crouded assembly So that it seemeth the King is beholding to them and not they to his Majestie And if this be not to invade the Prerogative and to be enemies of it and to be ungratefull unto his Highnesse the Defendant knoweth not what it is to be enemies of the prerogative The Lawes say it and therefore if the Defendant hath erred the Lawes have brought him into this error Neither did the Prelates own words at the Bar onely declare their disloyalty to the King and their independency on him but this very information which comes from the Prelates in the name of the Attorney Generall sufficiently demonstrates it For in it the Defendant is accused as guilty of a great crime for writing against the Hierarchy and preferring a Presbyterian parity before the Sacred Orders of Bishops Priests and Deacons What the Defendant hath writ and the occasion of it concerning the Presbytery the honourable Court hath been informed in part and withall if so writing be libellous and the Defendant have erred in it the Holy Scripture is also libellous which were impiety to thinke and hath been the cause of it from which he varied nothing at all in that discourse and further the Defendant resolveth to live and die in that error concerning the parity of Ministers and Presbyters which
Priest and Festus the Governour that they ever did revile those that were brought before them or give them any ill language And the one was a Jew and the other a Heathen both enemies of Christ and Christians But for Christian Judges and them Spirituall ones for such contumeliously to abuse their brethren as they did the Defendant and daily doe others and to give them over to the Devill and to perpetuall chaines for every triviall thing yea even for a misprision or a very surmise and to make a man an offender for a word and to ruine them their wives and children for such things and that with scoffes reproaches tants and mocks this the Defendant affirmeth in the Prelates is both cruelty injustice intemperance and want of wisdome and so he nothing doubteth but this honourable Court and all rationall men will judge Neither doth his gracious Majestie or this honourable Court as he truly beleeveth know how they abuse his poor Subjects neither will God take this well at their hands for it no way beseemeth those that would be thought the Fathers of the Church so to do For if we look upon Timothy and Titus whose successors they would be thought to be and the rules that they followed and were guided by we shall finde a vast difference between them Saint Paul in his second epistle to Timothy chapter 2. telleth him That the servant of the Lord must not strive but be gentle unto all men apt to teach patient in meeknesse instructing those that oppose themselves if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledgement of the truth c. And in another place the same Apostle saith A Bishop must be patient and no brawler Now when the Prelates so exorbitantly behave themselves trampling all Apostolicall Canons under their feet and so basly revile the good subjects of the King their brethren trampling also the sacred scriptures under their feet hat with as great contempt as the Papists themselves doe advancing Popery every way and the Defenders of it can any deny that these are intemperate imprudent unjust men and furtherers and upholders of Popery and whereas the Defendant is charged in the information That he accuseth the Prelates as upholders of Idolatry superstition and prophanesse and that he defameth the witnesses brought against him and hath causlesly and boldly inveighed against the oath Ex officio The Defendant humbly intreateth the honourable Court that with patience they would hear his answer to these things and then he will come to the last thing that concerneth him the Letany and the occasion of the writing of it What he himself hath done he is ever resolved to seale with his best blood and to justifie and make good whatsoever he shall accuse the Prelates of Amongst the which he acknowledgeth that he chargeth them to be advancers of Popery idolatrie superstition and prophanesse And so they are as hath been already sufficiently evinced and by that which followeth shall yet more illustriously appear For what is it to advance Popery and idolatry if that the Prelates daily do it not without men will think that Popery onely that advanceth the Popes Supremacy and they Protestants onely that go no farther in opposing that Hereticall religion when that is among many Divines counted one of the least controversies in Theology between Papists and us true Catholicks Greater matters I wosse hundreds are there between us And howsoever the King blessed be God and his predecessors by the blood of their Subjects and the sacrificing of themselves have shaken off the yoake of the Pope yet his poor Subjects are under many Popes which deal worse with them then ever Popes did to Kings in the midst of their swellingst pride and arrogancy yea every parish Priest and base fellow that is but a Prelates Servant can ruine and undo the honestest man upon any information So that for the Subjects condition it is worse and they are in a far more deplorable predicament then they were in under the Pope by this change for now they have neither their consciences their liberties their purses their bodies their limbs or lives in any security but as the Prelates and their creatures please are deprived of all who seek continually for their blood and starve many of them in prisons and expose them to infinite miseries and calamityes so that they are as sheep to the slaughter slain all the day long And of their deadly crueltie against those that fear God the whole Kingdome can witnesse and how that they make theâ— every where most odious But now to the matter the Defendant chargeth the Prelates with viz. that they are advancers of Idolatry who can doubt of it that knoweth the very rudiments of Divinity or iâ— the least measure hath been acquainted with the Lawes of God For as God onely is and must be the object of all Divine worship as the first commandment teacheth for him onely we are to serue Matth. 4. as Christ also commandeth and to worship any other or to trust in any thing else is iâ—olatry in a high degree for we must love him with all our hearts and all our Soules and trust onely in him So likewise for the manner of his worship that must also be as he commandeth not as we vainely conceive For he hath said Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven image or the likenesse of any thing in Heaven above or in the earth beneath thou shalt not bow down to it or worship it By which precept for the very manner of his worship it is not left to our disposing that we should after our inventions serve him Neither is he to be served any other way or by any other means then he hath in his Word prescribed which is a large commentary upon that text So that no man that hath eyes can pretend any longer that he seeth not the truth And among all learned and Orthodox Divines this is accorded and assented unto That those that by their own inventions as by Images Crucifixes Altars Ceremonies or Syllables and letters or whatsoever other meanes serve him without expresse command from God go about to worship him are Idolaters and such worship is idolatry and of this kinde of service and adoration are the Samaritans guilty of whom it is said that they worshipped the true God and so they did in many things according to the Law of Moses and had Circumcision and the Passeover and looked for the Messias to come But because they added their own inventions to that worship and brought in their own devices with it and set up a will worship therefore they were esteemed the enemies of God and proclaimed idolaters Ye worship saith Christ you know not what So that they that according to their own pretences and inventions serve God worship they know not what and therefore are idolaters and all such Divine worship as is not prescribed by God such service is idolatry Of which kinde and nature is altar-worship crucifix-worship table-worship place-worship ceremony-worship bread-worship Syllable-worship and all such like-worship and indeed all will-worship and whether or no the Prelates be not advancers of Altars and Crucifixes and place-worship ceremony and bread-worship and such trash let all the Kingdome judge And all these are Popery saving the worshipping of altars for the Defendant yet never saw the Papists so basly idolatrous as to worship a naked altar indeed where there is a Crucifix upon an altar they bow but never to the altar or table alone as he is most confident the Papists themselves wil acknowledge therefore so grosse the Prelats are in their Popish performances that they exceed them in idolatry And so it is that those that are most vainly superstitious amongst them they are in the readiest way to preferment and others of a contrary minde most contemned and vilipended which sheweth sufficiently what favourers of Popery the Prelates are Yea for all manner of Popery they affect it and defend it and maintaine it and the Authours and Abetters of it And as to all other the residue of the offences and misdemeanours complained of in the said Information and examinable in this Honourable Court this Defendant saith that he is not guilty of them or any of them in manner and form as by the said Information is supposed All which matters this Defendant is ready to averre and prove as this Honourable Court shall award And humbly prayeth to be dismissed out of the same with his costs and charges against the Prelates by vexation in this and his former suit in the High Commission most wrongfully sustained FJNJS
honour Neither did ever the Jews account of them as Scripture yea to this day they reject them Neither for these reasons onely are they distinguished from the Apocrypha but for many others the divinity purity sublimity appears in the Canonicall Scriptures the futility folly and falsity in the Apocrypha are too too manifest and is there any man so stupid and blockish to think that this age wherein we live cannot distinguish or discerne gold from lead without the Authority of the Fathers There is a vaster difference between the Apocrypha and the Canonicall Scriptures then is between gold and lead Every mans reason will tell him an apparant difference between brasse and beanes But if any be desirous of Authority to distinguish them will not Christs and the Apostles suffice The very Papists that have not abjured all honesty and goodnesse do freely acknowledge and confesse that those onely are Canonicall Scriptures which the Apostles did either write or approve of But they did never approve of the Apocrypha The Canonicall Scriptures of the old Testament did in shadows and figures set forth that which the new Testament clearly speaks They did adumbrate the new Testament expresseth in lively colours one and the same thing They consent one with another and yeeld each other mutuall aid and help Now the Apocrypha do neither foretell the new nor are by their authority and approbation illustrated and declared Christ commends Moses the Prophets and the Psalmes as books without all exception Luke 24. and grounds his doctrine upon them but never honours nor graceth the Apocrypha with his commendations or witnesse How then can the Prelates without great contumely unto the sacred Scriptures say they cannot be distinguished and knowne from the Apocrypha but by the Fathers especially after the judgement of Christ himself is given and hath passed upon the Scriptures for the authorizing of them to be the word and will of God The Fathers as the learned acknowledge were for their times many of them worthy of honour but yet they were subject not to a few errors and often agreed not with themselves and are ever at variance with others and have been indeed the originall and cause of almost all the controversies with which the Churches are now tormented And therefore to conclude this point the Defendant saith that the Prelates are disgracers and contemners of holy Scripture when against so much light of reason and Divine authority they say they cannot be distinguished and knowne from the Apocrypha but by the Fathers Neither is the third Thesis and Position freer from impudency and outrage against the Scriptures then the two former In that they say the meaning of the Scripture could not be knowne but by the Fathers For in this they doe as much as plainly affirme there is an other way to heaven then by the Scriptures which if it be not a contemning and disgracing of holy Scripture then there never was any Nay if it be not blasphemy the Defendant knoweth not what blasphemy is â—and therefore all those that desire salvation and to go to heaven must come to the Schoole of the Fathers and not to the Doctrine of the Scriptures And how then will the poor people doe to be saved that never knew what a Father was Nay how did all those goe to heaven that dyed before the Fathers For the Prelates say that the meaning of the Scripture cannot be knowen without the Fathers and without the knowledge of the Scripture there is no salvation It is most manifest by these expressions of the Prelates that they with their untempered morter would put out the light of the Scriptures and make them not onely inferiour to all mens writings but a very pack of Non-sense for wheresoever there is any sense there can something be gathered out of it especially if it be so large a Booke And howsoever there be many depths in Scripture there is also great perspicuity so that according to the ancient saying as an Elephant may swim a lamb may wade there also But if it should be so as the Prelates say that without the authority and interpretation of the Fathers the meaning of them could not be known and found out then the Defendant affirmeth they should be inferiour to all other writings yea to every Letter and Epistle that men pen with understanding for they ever carry their own sense end meaning along with them or to what end are they otherwise writ If the letter that discoverd the gunpowder Treason had not had a match and light of understanding in it that Popish plot had never been discovered till by its cruell flames it had declared it self and by the funerall of the whole Kingdome had been made known and left those that survived and lived in perpetuall mourning If every Letter writing and book then that is penned with judgement carry its own sense and meaning in it and the books for which the Defendant is now questioned and if all Proclamations Letters and Edicts of Princes are easily to be understood and carry their own interpretation with them so that none after their publication may pretend ignorance dare any man be so bold and adaciou as to say that the Letters and Proclamations of the King of heaven an God of the whole world cannot be understood when notwithstanding David saith they give light and understanding to the simple and that by reading and meditating in the Law and Testimonies of the Lord he grew wiser then his Teachers and Paul that Timothie knew the Scriptures from his youth 2. Tim. chap. 3 verse 13. and notwithstanding all this dare the Prelates affirme that the meaning of this Scripture cannot be knowne without the interpretation of the Fathers We have great cause to praise and blesse God that hath so graciously afforded us better Masters to be taught by It is good ever therefore to listen unto them Let us hear now then what the Prophets Christ and his Apostles have taught us concerning this weighty matter and of so great consequence and let us follow their example and instruction which lead us into all truth and not to listen to the contemners of holy Scripture They send those that are studious of the wayes to heaven to the Law and to the Testimonies Esai 8. to Moses the Prophets and the Scriptures not to the Traditions of the Elders and custome of Antiquity And they that bring any other doctrine are not to be listened unto neither may we bid them God speed The Word of the Lord is the way light and lanthorne to our Feet which send forth sufficiently the beames of truth and shines so clearly of it self as it may be both knowne proved expounded and unfolden by its own brightnesse They do as it were lend lustre unto the Sun from a smoaking snuffe that from the mist of the Fathers would bring light unto the Scriptures God is the Authour of the Scriptures who is the originall and fountaine of all light and
in whom there is no darknesse For the Prophesie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost 2. Peter chapter 1. verse 21. We have also a more sure word of Prophesie saith the same Apostle whereunto you doe well that you take heed as unto a light that shineth in a darke place verse 19. So that the Scriptures were of purpose penned by holy men inspired by God himselfe for a direction and light to the Saints to be guided by and so they are termed by the holy Ghost So that as Peter said unto Christ in the sixth of Iohn when he asked his twelve Disciples if they also would goe away To whom shall we go saith he Thou hast the Words of eternall life Even so we may truly say whither shall we goe for light and direction to get to heaven but to the Holy Scriptures for they have the Words of eternall life in them and this saith Christ and his Apostles and yet notwithstanding all this excellent light that shineth in the Scripture the Prelates everre they are but blinde guides and preferre humane darknesse before the splendour of these sacred Oracles the Scriptures and say without the interpretation of the Fathers they cannot be knowne which is unsupportable blasphemy and as much as to tell the everliving God and truth it selfe he lies It is most veritable that they see not the light of the Scripture the eyes of whose mindes are blinded neither do they see the light of the Sun whose eyes are plucked out If our Gospel be hid saith Saint Paul it is hid to them that are lost in whom the god of this world hath blinded their mindes that is in Infidels lest the light of the glorious Gospel of Christ which is the image of God should shine upon them 2 Corinth chap. 4. verse 3 4. every one knoweth the voice of that man with whom he is acquainted as soone as the sound of it commeth to his eares and shall we not know the voice of God so clearly and perspicuously speaking unto us in the Scriptures Those that are taught of God know it the true worshippers of him know and understand it those that have any familiar commerce with heaven and in heavenly things But worldly men and those that are given to the love of the same and are carelesse of heaven and happinesse they understand not the divine language nor heavenly voice Can any heare the voice of God and not assent unto it without the aid and authority of the Fathers What a contumely is this to holy Scripture Shall God have lesse authority and credit among men then the Fathers Shall we not beleeve God speaking unto us and shall we beleeve the Fathers Shall we not give credit to Gods Word and shall we beleeve men Let the dishonour of so great a contumacie against God be farre from Christian obedience Truly the Fathers being conscious of their owne imbecility and weaknesse never thought themselves worthy of so great dignity as to suppose that any honour came unto the Scriptures from their Interpretations and Expositions who in their Writings frequently exhort their Readers not to listen what they say but what the Scriptures of the Prophets and Apostles speake in them and no farther to receive their authority and doctrine then it is grounded upon the holy Scriptures and expressions to this purpose the Defendant saith he could accumulate infinite out of the Fathers which for brevity he omitteth fearing to be over tedious though it be a matter of greatest importance Such was the modestie of the Fathers fearing to be wise above that which was written ever-making the holy Scripture the rule and measure to be guided by And in this moderation the Fathers imitated Christ the Prophets and Apostles who ever fetch the proofe and testimony of their Doctrine from the Scriptures and not as now the Prelates do preposterously bringing authority to the Scriptures from the interpretation of the Fathers according to their owne sense To the Law and to the Prophets saith Esay chapter 8. verse 20. whosoever speaketh not according to that hath no light in him And Iosua that great Commander is injoyned by God to order and governe himselfe and the people and the whole Common-wealth according to the rule of the Scripture Iosua chapter 1. verse 7 8. Onely be thou strong and very couragious that thou mayest observe to do according to all the Law which Moses my servant commanded thee turne not from it to the right hand or to the left that thou mayest prosper whithersoever thou goest This Booke of the Law shall not go out of thy mouth but thou shalt meditate therein day and night that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous and then thou shalt have good successe And in the 23. chapter verse 6. he saith Be ye therefore very couragious to keepe and to do all that is written in the Booke of the Law of Moses that you turne not aside therefrom to the right hand nor to the left And Christ himselfe our great Master saith Iohn 5. verse 38. Search the Scriptures for in them ye thinke to have eternall life and they testifie of me And in the third of the Acts verse 22 23. Saint Peter brings all men unto Christ to be taught by him not in somethings onely but that Prophet must be heard in all things and no other in Gods matters must be listened unto the words are these For Moses truly said unto the Fathers a Prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren like unto me him shall you heare in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you And it shall come to passe that every soule which will not heare that Prophet shall be destroyed from among the people And in the 12. of Iohn verse 48. our Saviour saith He that rejecteth me and receiveth not my Words hath one that judgeth him the Word that I have spake the same shall judge him in the last day And therefore doth it not stand with all good reason that we should guide and square our lives and actions by that word and rule onely by which we shall at the last day be judged Paul in the 2. of the Rom. verse 16. saith That the secrets of mens hearts shall at that day be judged according to his Gospel and shall not all our doctrines yea and our whole Religion be squared and regulated by the same all good reason would dictate so They have Moses and the Prophets saith Abraham let them hear him saith he Luke 16. verse 29. We have Christ and his Apostles we are onely to heare them in all things not the Fathers not the traditions of the Elders not the use and customes of former ages if they dissent from the holy Scriptures and written word of God For the great doctor of his Church telleth