Verses says My Father which gave them me is greater than all and none is able to pluck them out of my Father's Hand Here Christ asserteth the greatness of his Father's Power that he was greater than All but yet saith I and my Father are One as if Christ should say As my Father is greater than all So also I am greater than all and his being One in Power shews him to be One in Nature with him And thus the Jews understood our Lord when they took up Stones to stone him ver 31. that he being a Man made himself God v. 34 35 36. But Christ reproves their rashness in charging him with Blasphemy looking on it as great Indignity not to allow him any Supremacy above others they called Gods in that they said of him whom the Father had sanctified Thou blasphemest because he said I am the Son of God I question not but ' the Jews would have born it well enough though he should have assumed the Name of God so it were in the Sense of their Law like other Men ver 34 35. or of a Son of God as they themselves being Children of Abraham claimed God to be their Father But their great quarrel with Christ was that he so affirmed Himself to be the Son of God as one and the same with the Father equal to him in Power and therefore he is of the same Nature Sixth Scripture is 1 John 5.20 And we know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an Vnderstanding that we may know him that is True And we are in him that is True even in his Son Jesus Christ This is the true God and eternal Life What can be more plain to prove that the Son of God is the true God than to have it so asserted of him and can he be the true God and not so by Nature the very God and but a Creature If so we must then acknowledg two Gods the One the true God the Creator the other the true God a Creature which is repugnant to the Scripture for there is none other God but One for though there be that are called Gods whether in Heaven or in Earth as there be Gods many and Lords many But to us there is but one God as before was shewed 1 Cor. 8.4 5 6. And Gal. 4.8 there is an Exclusion of all from Divine Worship that are not God by Nature and therefore if our Lord Jesus Christ be the true God he must then be of the One true Natural Godhead Seventh Scripture is Coloss 2.9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead Bodily First To imagine from this or any other Scripture that the Humane Nature of Christ comprehends the Deity is to conceive in our Minds that of God which is inconsistent with his Immensity and Infinity of Nature Or Secondly To say that the three Divine Persons in the Godhead do personally and equally after the same manner tabernacle in the Humane Nature of Christ makes it common to all the three Subsistencies so that the Father and the Holy Spirit as well as the Son would be incarnate But this is contrary to the written Word of God which declares to us the Son of God who is the brightness of his Glory and the express Image of his Person that laid the Foundation of the Earth c. That He it is that took Flesh upon him Heb. 1.1 2 3 8 10. and ch 2.14 16. And all that Christ did by way of Atonement for us and Reconciliation of God to us is ascribed to him as the Person of the Son of God only and not as the Father or the Holy Ghost though in the Unity of Nature they cannot be excluded But Thirdly If we are neither to understand this Scripture as if the Godhead were comprehended in Christ's humane Nature nor that the three Divine Persons were equally incarnate what then can be further proposed as the meaning of it But that the Person of the Son or the Divine Nature of Christ subsisting in the one whole Nature of God hath all the fulness of that Nature dwelling in him for there is no Division of the whole Nature of God with all its Essential Properties and Perfections from the Divine Persons for then neither the Nature nor the Persons could be Infinite or Immensurable but limited and subscribed and therefore there is a necessity that every Divine Person should have the whole Divine Nature with all the Essential Attributes and Perfections of it whether it be Omnipotency Omnipresency Omnisciency Immensity Eternity Goodness c. the fulness of all is in every Divine Person they differ not in Nature but in personal Properties as the Father is not begotten like the Son neither did the Son beget like the Father nor also did either of them proceed like the Holy Spirit and so also in Office they differ the one from the other but in Nature they are the same and have all the same Essential Properties and Perfections as was said before So then all the fulness of the Godhead dwells bodily or substantially in the Person of the Son that is he hath the whole Spiritual Substance or Essence of the Divine Nature and by his hypostatical Union with the Humane Nature the fulness of the Godhead may be said also to dwell Bodily in the Humane Nature of Christ So then if all the Attributes and Perfections of the Nature of God in their fulness dwell in our Lord Jesus Christ it is a sufficient and undeniable Evidence of his Deity But some may say that the Godhead dwells in Christ after the same manner it dwells in us Answer Tho it 's said that we are the Temple of the Living God and of the Holy Ghost that dwelleth in us and that Jesus Christ is also in us 1 Cor. 6.19 2 Cor. 6.16 Joh. 17.23 Rom. 8.9 10. Yet what is this to that Fulness which dwels in him We indeed have Communion with the Father and the Son through the Spirit and are made partakers of the Divine Nature Eph. 2.22 2 Pet. 1.4 but not after the same manner as Christ is For the Holy Spirit hath his Union with us by way of Fellowship with our Spirits and unites himself in Communion with us Phil. 2.1 2 Cor. 13.14 1 Cor. 2.12 1 Joh. 2.20 whereby we are guided by the teachings of him into all Truth Joh. 16.13 Gal. 5.18 But we have not our existence in the Spirit as the Human Nature of Christ in the Divine Person of the Son for we are distinct human Persons before and after we are regenerated But Christ did not exist but by Conception in the Divine Nature in which he had his Being and thereby a relation by virtue of the Hypostatical Union of the Son of God with his Human Nature to all the Attributes and Perfections of the Divine Nature And tho it 's said that God the Father and Christ and the Holy Spirit dwelleth in us yet I cannot find it was
the Lord God is by the Apostles called Jesus Christ Second Scripture is Zech. 12.10 And I will pour upon the House of David and upon the Inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of Grace and of Supplication and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced and they shall mourn for him c. First The Holy Ghost speaketh of Christ in different Persons viz. Me and Him to betoken his different Natures of God and Man who being both may be differently spoken of as a Person relating to either Nature Secondly This is confirmed by John Rev. 1.7 in apylying the same to Christ only And our Lord himself speaks of this great Mourning When they shall see the sign of the Son of Man in Heaven coming with Power and great Glory Mat. 24.30 So then as it is apparent that the Prophet Zechariah's Jehovah or Lord in ver 1. which stretcheth forth the Heavens and layeth the Foundation of the Earth and formeth the Spirit of Man within him is that Me whom they have pierced and Him they shall look upon and mourn for viz. Jesus Christ in the New Testament we must either admit Christ to be of the Divine Essence or else confound the two Testaments Third Scripture is Isa 8.13 Sanctify the Lord of Hosts himself and let him be your Fear and let him be your Dread Ver. 14. And He shall be for a Sanctuary but for a Stone of Stumbling and for a Rock of Offence to both the Houses of Israel for a Gin and for a Snare to the Inhabitants of Jerusalem This Text is applyed to Jesus Christ in 1 Pet. 2.6 Wherefore also it is contained in the Scriptures Behold I lay in Sion a chief Corner-Stone elect precious and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded And this Corner Stone which is Jesus Christ as the preceding Verses shew is a Stone of Stumbling and a Rock of Offence c. ver 8. So that comparing these two Scriptures together they demonstrate Jesus Christ the Metaphorical Stone of Stumbling and Rock of Offence in the New Testament to be the Lord of Hosts Himself in the Old viz. Jehovah for so is the Word Lord in the Hebrew in all the aforesaid places in the Old Testament which is an Essential Name of God Whose Name alone is Jehovah Psal 83.18 And therefore the Son of God is Co-essential with the Father Thirdly I shall prove the Deity of our Lord Jesus Christ by seven particular Scriptures First is Rev. 22.6 And the Lord God of the Holy Prophets sent his Angel to shew unto his Servants the things which must shortly be done Ver. 16. I Jesus have sent mine Angel to testify unto you these things in the Churches With Chap. 1.1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto him to shew unto his Servants things which must shortly come to pass and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his Servant John God viz. the Father Rev. chap. 4. and chap. 1.5 6 7. with chap. 3.21 gave the Revelation to Jesus Christ and it s said He not the Father sent his Angel to signify it unto his Servant John and this Jesus Christ is the Lord God of the Holy Prophets And therefore he is the true Supream God by Nature The Second Scripture is Acts 20.28 Take heed therefore unto your selves to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood 1st The Blood that purchased or redeemed us is the precious Blood of Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 1.18 19. 2dly If Jesus Christ were but a Man tho only made of a Woman yet being the Seed the Off-spring of the Flesh of David Acts 2.30 Rev. 22.16 the Person of a Man his Blood would be the own proper Blood of that Person and so it could not have such a special Relation unto God but as he was no Person but by the assumption of the Divine Nature so his Blood hath a special Relation tho not natural unto that Nature as it is part of Christ's Person and without which he did not exist Now this Blood which is the Blood of Christ being the own Blood of God shews the assumption of Humanity by his own Nature and the like may be said of the Life which God laid down for us 1 John 3.16 Third Scripture is Phil. 2.5 6 7 8. Let this Mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus who being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal with God But made himself of no Reputation and took upon him the form of a Servant and was made in the likeness of Men. And being found in fashion as a Man he humbled himself and became obedient unto Death even the Death of the Cross First In this Scripture Christ is said to be in the form of God which is not only as Man by Creation who beareth something of his Image in the natural Qualities of the Soul but in equality with God so that in Nature he is not inferior to him and therefore he can be no Creature For there is no Creature that hath its being from God can be equal to God Secondly the Divine Nature of Jesus Christ must be understood by his being in the Form of God because he did pre-exist his Incarnation in that Form his Condescention of mind and his Power in that form to take the form of a Servant went before his actual Condescention in taking our Nature Let this Mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus Who being in the form of God made Himself of no Reputation Which must be understood of our Lord Jesus Christ's subsisting in his Divine Nature before his Incarnation in the form of God and equal to Him 4th Scripture is John 5.26 For as the Father hath Life in Himself so hath he given to the Son to have Life in Himself First For the Son to have Life in Himself is not to receive it from an higher Nature for then he would have it in another as Fellow-Creature with us whose Nature and Personality have their Life and Being in God But to have Life in Himself is to have it in his own Nature which cannot be if he were only Humane Acts 17.28 Secondly For the Son to have Life in Himself given or communicated to Him by the Father denoteth the great Mystery of his eternal Generation in the Divine Nature for else the manner of Speech would be absurd and contradictory in it self for if it were given Him as a Creature he could not have it in Himself and if he have it in Himself though it be given of the Father he cannot be a Creature for that Nature which hath Life in it self must needs be the Nature of God and this is the Nature of the Son Fifthly John 10.30 I and my Father are One. This Text cannot simply be understood as if Christ and the Father were One only even as we are one in Them for Christ speaking of his Sheep in the 27 28 and 29
Glory of the Lord by whom we are changed into the same Image from Glory to Glory even as by the Spirit of the Lord or the Lord the Spirit Which whither it be meant of our being more and more renewed in the Spirits of our Minds in this World or as I rather take it from the Glory of the Lord which we behold in the Glass of the Gospel to our eternal Glory yet it is by the Lord the Spirit the efficient Cause of this change and therefore it is not the Effect or Grace of the Spirit only but his Person 4ly The Dutch Translators read ver 17. The Lord is the Spirit and not that Spirit and so it does not point to Spirit before-named but is to be understood as the Words lie in themselves and thus it cuts off the Relation and is not governed by what is meant by Spirit going before So that I see no reason wherefore these Objections should weaken the Proof of the Deity of the Holy Spirit from this Scripture Objection to 1 John 5.7 For there are three that bear Record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one The Sum of what is objected against this Scripture being laid down and learnedly as well as largely confuted by Mr. Francis Chinell in his Book of the Divine Trinunity I shall make a Recital of his Words so far as it is needful to our purpose from page 251 to Page 256. It is objected by some that the words These three are one 1 John 5.7 are not to be found in some ancient Copies and therefore it will not be safe to build a Point of such Weight and Consequence upon such a weak Foundation Answer It is true that these Words are not to be * Si Syrum ceterosque sequimur vel hiatus admittitur vel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quae imprimis elegans turbatur Mihi qui talem primò usurparunt in sacris licentiam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 videntur Heinsius in locum found in the Syriac Edition but they who speak most modestly do acknowledg that the Syriac Edition is not authentick Learned Heinsius is much offended with that Edition as appears by his Annotations upon 1 John 5.7 And if we consult the Scriptures and compare this Text with the following Verses and with some other places of Scripture which are more plain and then add the Testimony and Interpretations of the ancient and reverend Doctors of the Church concerning the Words in question we shall beable to pass a right Judgment upon the point in hand First The Equality of the number of Witnesses sutes very right three Witnesses on Earth and three in Heaven Secondly The opposition between the Quality of the Witnesses on Earth and Witnesses in Heaven and yet their sweet Harmony and Agreement in one Testimony all six bear Witness to one and the same Truth Thirdly The Diversity of the very Nature of those three who bear Witness on Earth and the Unity of their Divine Nature who bear Witness in Heaven is very considerable and it is excellently expressed in the Variation of the Phrase These three are one ver 7. and these three agree in one namely in one Testimony ver 8. Though their Nature be different yet their Testimony is the same But it is objected that the Complutensian Bible saith of the Heavenly Witnesses that these three agree in one ver 7. I humbly offer this Satisfaction to pious and learned Men That we have good reason to believe that there is an imprudent Addition in the Complutensian Bible rather than an Omission of so many ancient and approved Bibles and therefore it is fit that that Addition should be expunged out of that one Copy by the concurrent Testimony of so many Copies Moreover it is clear by the joint Testimony of other Copies that the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are omitted in ver 7. and the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 belong to ver 8. and therefore there is an inexcusable Omission and an imprudent Transposition in that corrupt †Merces satis fallaces vendit officina Chr. Plantini Antverpiae in editione 1584. excusa cum Bib. Ar. Mont. Vulgat Joh. 8.17 18. Edition But then it is further objected that these Words These three are one are wanting in some other Greek Copies For Answer I proceed in my Observations Fourthly If we look upon the Scripture-Account in other places we shall find it exactly agreeable to the Account in this place 1 John 5.7 In John 8. our Saviour pleads that two Witnesses in Law were sufficient for the Proof of any Point John 8.17 and in ver 10. saith he I am one and my Father that sent me is another they are two Witnesses and yet but one God I and my Father are one John 10.30 One in Power and therefore one in Nature He speaks not of the Spirit because Christ was not yet glorified nor was the Spirit yet manifested by that eminent and glorious Mission and Effusion which was to follow after the Ascension of our blessed Lord. But he did foretel that the third Witness was to be sent from the Father by the Son John 15.26 But when the Comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirits of Truth which proceedeth from the Father He shall testify of me I might add to these Testimonies all other places of Scripture wherein all the three Witnesses are named together and then produce all the places which have been formerly cited in this Book to prove the coessential Trinunity of those Heavenly Witnesses Fifthly The Copulative and in the beginning of the verse 1 John 5.8 doth very fitly connect the whole seventh Verse with the eight as they are printed in our ordinary Translation Sixthly Hierom doth assure us that the Words in question were expunged by the Arians because the few Words do hold forth an undeniable Proof of the Divine and Coessential Trinunity of those Heavenly Witnesses And divers other learned and judicious Men conceive that these Words were blotted out in the time of Constantius and Valens the Emperors who were sworn Enemies of the blessed Trinity and professed Patrons of Arianism Seventhly The Hereticks did blot out those Words ‖ Vide Ambros lib. 3. de spiritu sancto cap. 11. jurati veritatis hostes lucem banc non tulerunt ideoque eraserunt Vide Heinsium in 1 Job 5.7 John 4.24 God is a Spirit as Ambrose assures us and therefore this Practice of repugning such Words in the Scripture as did refute their Errors was too common amongst the Hereticks of old as we might prove by Witnesses enough if that were our Business Eighthly These Words 1 John 5.7 are to be found in Copies of great Antiquity and best Credit * Athanas Tom. 1. Pag. 91 92 93. Ninthly This Text is cited by the ancient Fathers by Athanasius in his Dispute with Arius at the Council of Nice and Arius never denied it for
the Spirit from his self Revelation to us seeing all Revelation is by the Spirit then surely there is no reason to exclude our Knowledg of the Holy Spirit as essential to Salvation and consequently his Deity though he is not named with the Father and the Son Besides if this should be allowed to disprove the Deity of the Holy Spirit by the same Rule the Deity of the Father would be disproved when eternal Life is appropriated to the Knowledg of the Son only which is more the current of the New Testament 1 John 5.11 12 20. John 3.36 And therefore as all saving-Revelation both of the Father and the Son is by the Holy Spirit who proceedeth from them and is coessential with them both and as we cannot be ignorant of him who is so necessarily included in our Knowledg of the other two Divine Persons so it was not so necessary that he should be named as it was for the Father and the Son secing he is included with them as the Revealer of them both John 16.15 1 Cor. 2.10 11 c. So that from John 17.3 there is no reason to exclude either Jesus Christ or the Holy Spirit from the Unity of the Supream Godhead There are other Objections urged against this Doctrine by our Adversaries which may seem to be very plausible to those that have not weighed them in the Ballance of the Sanctuary Say they how can three be one and one be three This is so absurd and contrary to their Reason as if one should say that three Men are one Man and one Man is three And how can the Son be begotten of the Father and the Holy Spirit proceed from both and yet both of them co-essential and co-eternal with the Father To these and divers others of the like nature I shall give a general Answer May we not say that these Men do savour of a Nicodemus Spirit and therefore the Words of Christ to him may be alluded to them John 3.9 10. Nicodemus said how can these things be Jesus answered If I have told you Earthly things and ye believe not how shall ye believe if I tell you of Heavenly things For those would far more have exceeded his carnal Reason And if we know not what is the way of the Spirit nor how the Bones do grow in the Womb of her that is with Child even so we know not the Works of God who maketh all Eccles 11.5 and if our Faith be limited to carnal Reason we cannot believe the Resurrection of the Body and if the Works of God are too high for us and his Ways are past finding out Rom. 11.33 how much more impossible is it for finite Creatures to conceive the perfect manner of Existence and mysterious Subsistence of an infinite Being We cannot by searching find out God nor the Almighty unto Perfection Job 11.7 God hath been graciously pleased to make known himself unto us in such a manner as that we may rightly worship him and as is sufficient for our Support and Comfort in all our Afflictions here below and perseverance to Salvation And there we must rest for as for those secret things which belong to God we are not capable to comprehend them Deut. 29.29 And therefore we do imbrace this mysterious Doctrine because it is revealed to us in the written Word of God But they reject it as inconsistent with natural Reason foreing the Scriptures to comply with that whereby they make it the Rule of Faith rather than to admit of that as a Mystery which God hath declared to be a Mystery 1 Tim. 3.1 6. Col. 2.2 Moreover we cannot conceive that it could consist with the faithful discharge of that great Trust which God had committed to his own Son and Christ to his Holy Apostles If while they were asserting so many things that might give us to understand the supream Deity of the Son and Holy Spirit that they did not intend nor believe the same themselves nor can it be imagined that if they had taught the contrary Doctrine to the Deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit that they should deliver it in such words as that the Common use and sense of them should oppose and destroy their true meaning intended by those Words But to conclude my Discourse on this Subject four Things are necessary to be considered in order to a right Judgment in this point of Doctrine First Consider how firm a Foundation this Doctrine hath in the Holy Scriptures what Number of sacred Texts there are that plainly assert the Deity of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit 2dly Consider what monsterous work the Socinians make to escape the force of those clear Scripture-Testimonies that assert the Deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit how absurd they are in their Expositions and the violence they use to defend their Heresy by wresting denying and abusing the Holy Scriptures may easily be perceived and what pains they take to squeez out of some few Texts that which is not contained in them and is repugnant to the current of sacred Scripture 3dly Consider how fairly those very Scriptures on which they build are reconciled to this Doctrine of the Holy Trinunity and how our Expositions of them are coherent with it and in themselves as is apparently manifest from what hath been said in answer to them So that their Doctrine is inconsistent with the Infallibility of the Word of God for while they are not able to reconcile so great numbers of sacred Texts that assert the Deity of Christ and the Holy Ghost to their Opinion they render it exceeding ambiguous and full of Discords And therefore there is a necessity that we acknowledg the Holy Trinunity otherwise in effect we reject the Scriptures as insufficient to guide us into Truth and Righteousness and therefore seeing the Authority and the sweet Harmony of the Holy Scriptures depends on the truth of this Doctrine and that the contrary Opinion destroys both and leaves us destitute of a Rule of Faith and Obedience it is the indispensible Duty of every Christian to discard so great an Error and to believe that there are three Divine Subsistencies in the Deity and that these three the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit are but one God To whom be Glory and Praise now and for evermore Amen FINIS