Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
scripture_n according_a believe_v holy_a 2,473 5 4.6085 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A54079 An apostate exposed, or, George Keith contradicting himself and his brother Bradford wherein their testimony to the Christian faith of the people called Quakers, is opposed to G.K.'s late pamphlet, stiled, Gross error and hypocrisie detected / by John Pennington. Penington, John, 1655-1710. 1695 (1695) Wing P1223; ESTC R4585 12,784 30

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Answers given by G. Whitehead and Some of his Brethren and signed by them thirdly the answers I have faithfully and sincerely Collected out of the printed Books of George Whitehead William Penn and John Whitehead that shew the great inconsistency and contradiction of their present late answer to the express words and sentiments of their printed Books The which answers will also give a further account of their vile and pernicious Errors opposite to some Fundamental Articles of the Christian Faith And here I would have the Reader to understand That if these men had by their late answers contradicted their former sayings and sentiments from any sincere conviction and professed acknowledgement of the vile and gross Errors boldly asserted by them in their printed Books I should have been so far from charging them with Hipocrisy for their so doing that I should have commended their Ingenuity But they are so far from any such acknowledgment that in their late answer they refer to the answer given by them in publick to the objections made against them in publick Now it is plain by their answer made in publick they mean their Answer and Doctrine Sayings and Sentiments contained in their printed Books so far are they from professing or owning any real conviction they are under of their former vile Errors Though it is not improbable that some of them and particularly George Whitehead hath some contrary Apprehensions and Sentiments in divers of these weighty matters to what he hath formerly with great confidence asserted in Print as not only being his own Principles but the Quakers Principles Though I thank God those vile Errors c. which he calls the Quakers Principles were never my Principles and in Charity I am to believe nor the Principles of divers others that have with me gone under that Designation They are not so sincere as to own and retract in publick their Errors exposed in publick even lest such Retraction or Correction should lessen and abate their honour and esteem among their too credulous Followers and Admirers who without have all doubt have suffered themselves to be too much influenced and led by them into the same Errors And in the next page And however in some things of weight it is possible that G. Whitehead and some others have changed their Sentiments yet I have no ground or reason to think otherwise but as touching divers weighty Matters of the Christian Doctrine and Faith he and they are still under great Blindness Darkness and Error This is the basis of the Work and gives us Light into the design of his undertaking The vile Errors he ascribes to Friends former Sayings Sentiments and printed Books their Hypocrisie to their not acknowledging them but referring to their Answers made publick and yet allows some Reformation of Judgment but not total but that they are still under great Blindness Darkness and Error This Charge is extensive enough reaching the publick Labourers who have been Conversant in Print without any exception and how wide he will stretch it to fetch in the rest under the notion of credulous Followers and Admirers himself best knows if any That these were not his Sentiments formerly or at least that he hath declared otherwise is what now lieth before me to evince and that out of the Book even now mentioned called The Christian Faith c. for further notice I design not to take at present of him and his mischievous Work he being Debtor to T. E. for not offering himself from the incongrous and absurd Inferences he hath already drawn from those Friends Books than to turn his own and his Friends Weapons upon himself Suo se jugulet gladio In Pag. 3. G. K. and others in order to vindicate the people called Quakers from the Calumnies of Christian Lodowick say Whereas divers of us challenged by him declared sincerely their sincere Faith as concerning the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth and what the Holy Scriptures testifie of him yet he did continue to accuse them still as denying the true Christ alledging they had another Sense than the Scripture-Words did bear and that his Sense was true but their Sense was false G.K. hath done the same since appealing to their Consciences whether it was not so thus making himself Judge over our Secret Thoughts as having a secret Sense in our thoughts of Scripture-words page 4. contrary to the true sense of them though we have not given him or any other occasion to judge so rashly and uncharitably of us and our Consciences bear us witness in the sight of God that we do sincerely believe and think as we speak when we say according to the Holy Scripture that Jesus of Nazareth is the true Christ of God and the only true Saviour and there is no other Name given under Heaven whereby Men must be saved and that this same Jesus was in fulness of Time born of the Virgin called Mary being conceived of the Holy Ghost who dyed for our Sins and rose again for our Justification who is exalted at the Right Hand of God and ever liveth to make Intercession for us and that Christ hath his Body in Heaven a most glorious Body not changed in Being or Substance but in condition and manner of being and that Christ is true and perfect God and true and perfect Man the Son of God begotten of God from everlasting glorified with the Father before the World began and that Christ as Man hath both Soul and Body and his Manhood is most excellently and wonderfully united with his Godhead yet his Manhood is not his Godhead nor is his Body that he had of the Virgin and now hath in Heaven his Godhead but the Temple of it as Christ called his Body the Temple and is the GARMENT or Cloathing ☞ wherewith the Eternal Word did cloath himself who is that New and Living way that he hath consecrated for us through the Vail that is to say his Flesh And we believe that God the Father hath appointed the Man Christ Jesus to be the judge of the quick and the dead page 5. and that he is to come to judge all Mankind with the great and last Judgment at the end of the World the which end of the World we do believe is Not come either within us or without us Therefore hath this Accuser joyned with Tho. Hicks a Baptist Teacher at London and John Faldo an Independent Teacher and divers others to accuse us as denying the true Christ because we believe and confess to Christ's inward and outward appearance This Charge was groundless then how comes it to be true now as if to believe and confess to Christ's inward Coming and Appearance were certainly to deny his outward ☞ or to hold forth two Christ's which is but their great ignorance and unbelief and no just Consequence of our Principle for the true Christ of God is one and the true Christian's Faith receiveth and embraceth him whole