20. it 's said The blood of God It s a sad case that partiality can so much prevail as that they that cry out of some doubtful words as damnable heresies do yet think it tolerable language to say that by Imputation of the very sin itself to Christ as his sin he was the greatest sinner the greatest Murderer Lyer Adulterer c. in the world I beseech you abstain from such words till you find them in the Scripture Christ never was reputed of God a sinner who did so much to shew his hatred of it Nor ever took our sin unto him any further than to suffer for it to expiate it And if this be the similitude by which we must understand how his Holiness and Righteousness is made ours it will make all very plain It is ours or imputed to us so far as to be reputed the true cause of our Justification Adoption Sanctification and Glory as our sin was the cause of his suffering and death Cont. 12. Doth not Christs righteousness cause our Sanctification in the same sort of causality as it causeth our Justification Ans The effects are divers but both from the same meritorious cause But it is more unapt to say that it is the material cause of our Sanctification than that it is the material cause of our righteousness Though it merit both Because our habitual and actual holiness hath a nearer material cause in itself which our pardon and meer adoption have not Cont. 13. When it is said that faith is imputed to us for righteousness is it faith indeed that is meant or Christs Righteousness believed on Ans A strange and bold question What occasion hath the Holy Ghost given us to raise such a suspicion that when it is so often said by him that Faith is imputed or accounted for righteousness men should make a doubt whether it be Faith indeed that he meaneth If it be not the context is so far from relieving our understandings that it contributeth to our unavoidable deceit or ignorance Read over the Texts and put but Christs Righteousness every where instead of the word Faith and see what a scandalous Paraphrase you will make The Scripture is not so audaciously to be Corrected It 's wiser to believe Gods Word than to contradict it on pretence of expounding it Obj. But it is said also that Righteousness is imputed And that must be either Christs Righteousness or our own But not our own therefore Christs Ans We are not now questioning whether Christs Righteousness be imputed to us Though it be not the Phrase of the Scripture I have shewed you that it is true in a sound sence But the question is Whether Faith be imputed for righteousness And what is the meaning of all such Texts To have righteousness imputed to us plainly signifieth to be Reckoned Accounted Reputed or Judged righteous And it 's strange that it must not be our own righteousness that is imputed or reckoned to us as our own If it were never so well proved that the very Habits and Acts of Christ are by Gift or Union made our own in themselves and not only as the causes of their effects yet still our own they would be and the righteousness given by them our own in order of nature before they are imputed accounted or reckoned to us as our own Some way that righteousness which is reckoned to constitute us righteous is surely made our own Psal 106.30 31. Phinehas's executing Judgment it is said to be accounted to him for righteousness And of Abrahams Justification God saith Because thou hast done this c. What man that ever read the Bible can doubt but that every man that will be saved must have a personal faith repentance and holiness which is called righteousness many hundred times in the Scripture besides the righteousness that was or is in Christ And will not God reckon him righteous that is righteous He that doth righteousness is righteous And shall it not be imputed to him if God account not a man a believer can he be justified and saved Christs Righteousness hath made Satisfaction for all our sins and for our unrighteousness as to the Law that doth condemn us But he made us not lawless but put us under a Law of Grace which saith He that believeth shall be saved and he that believeth not shall be damned And must we not be judged by this Law and be justified or condemned as we keep or break it wonderful is the power of prejudice that any good men that read the Scripture can doubt whether Christ himself hath made us a Law of Grace according to which as performers or non-performers we must be justified as righteous in subordination to Christs Righteousness or else be condemned as neglecters of so great Salvation Is any thing plainer in all the Gospel Obj. But it is the Object and not the Act Christs Righteousness and not our Faith the Gold and not the Hand that taketh it that is our Riches and Righteousness Ans 1. No question but the Faith that we talk of is Faith in Christ even the Believing Receiving of a Saviour and his Grace freely given us And therefore Christs Righteousness is ever connoted when we talk of Faith For what is the very Specification of the Act but the Object But it is not the essence of Christ or his Righteousness that constituteth Faith but Christ in esse coâ—nito objectivo even as it is not the essence of Sin that constituteth Repentance but the notion of Sin in esse cognito as an Oâ—ject And there is no doubt but Christ is the Souls Riches which Faith receiveth But if the King by Law should restore all the Rebels in Ireland to their Estates and give them their Lives that lay down Arms and ask Mercy and accept it if it come to the Tryal whether they are Accepters or Refusers their Acceptance must be so far their justifying Righteousness though their Lives and Estates be their Treasure and the Kings Act be their Title to it Faith is reckoned or imputed to be that which by the Redeemer himself is required of the Sinner to make him partaker of Christ and his Benefits Reconciliation and Salvation and it is no other Righteousness Christs Righteousness is not imputed to us instead of our Faith and Repentance and sincere holiness which is made by himself the condition of Life As he died not for the Sins which we were never guilty of and are no sins so his Righteousness is not instead of that Righteousness which by his Grace we have but instead of that which we have not Not instead of our being penitent Believers and sanctified before we die but instead of that perfect innocency which we want Not that we are reputed perfect innocent obeyers because he was such but that our want of it shall not hinder our Justification or Adoption Grace or Glory Christ hath done all his part but he hath appointed us a necessary part
Grace made with Adam and Noah the Covenant of Preculianity with Aâ—rahâ—m the Political Law of Mosâ—s to the Jews and the Law or Covenant of Christ of Grace of Faith by which Christ doth Govern and will Judge his visible Church Get unstudied dull heads but to understand these four distinctions and you cure them without a new regeneration And doth not this prove that they are Godly To instance no more but in the first an Antecedent Surety is either 1. A party in the Bond 2. Or an Instrument of the party Bound 1. If two persons be bound disjunâ—tively this or that to a Duty or a Penalty the bond is answered if either of them perform it If the Law to Adam had either said thou or Christ for thee shalt perfectly Obey shalt dress the Garden shalt take Eve for thy Wife or that thou or Christ shall suffer for not doing it then Christ's performance had antecedently freed us from Guilt and Punishment 2. Or if the Law had said or meant thou shalt Obey or Suffer by thy self or by thy substitute or pâ—r alium as a man may pay his debt by his Servant or appear by his Attourney then Christ's Righteousness or Suffering would have proved us guiltless But a subsequent Surety who after the guilt doth voluntarily as a Mediator undertake the discharge of the guilty is no strict or absolute Representative but as a Mediator purchaseth the Captive to receive his Grace on the terms and to the ends which by a Law or Covenant of Grace the Mediator shall appoint CHAP. IV. My Reasons against a tedious needlâ—ss Câ—nfutâ—tiâ—n Sect. 1. THE chief thing that I intended next to be done that is To Confute the Hundred Errors before named I am on further thoughts discouraged from performing 1. Because upon perusal I find that I have already done it so oft and largly in many Books unanswered that repetition is like to be disgracefully nauseous 2. And they that will neither answer nor read what I have written 34 years ago or 20 are not like to read what I shall write now In my Confession of Fâ—ith Printed 1655. I have so largely opened this Controversy about Justification Faith and Works in necessary distinctions and many score self-evident Propositions and many score Arguments and abundance of express Texts of Scripture and above an hundred Testimonies of Protestant Churches Confessions and eminent Divines that I find very little needful to be added And why should I think they will read more that will not read that In my Apologies I have Answered them that have opposed and have had no reply In my Treatise of Justification I have done it over again In my Catholick Theology I have thrice over-done the same by Explication and Confutation distinctly In my Treatise of Justifying Righteousness in a Disputation and an Answer to Dr. Tully and to Mr. Cartwright I have done the same perhaps too largly In my Methodus Theologiae I have opened the Case methodically and briefly In my Life of Faith I have clearly explained it And must I expect no Answer and yet do all again 2. But my great disswasive is that it will swell the Book to so great a magnitude that few will read it should I cite all or moâ—â— of the plain Texts of Scripture that confute them how great a part of the Bible must I Transcribe Yet do they lay Salvation on points that no one Text of Scripture mentioneth Sect. 2. 1. If I should cite all the Texts that prove that we are truly Sinners though Christ hath been a Sacrifice for our sin and that the guilt of Fact and Fault on us is not taken off by Christ's taking the penalty but we are verily sinners still How great a part of the Bible may I recite to prove it Sect. 3. 2. If I must prove that Christ is and was no sinner by true imputation of our sin as to the guilt of Fact or Fault but only as a Sacrifice bear the Penalty it would be a reproach to the Adversaries to need a Confutation of their Blasphemy and all the Gospel would confute them Sect. 4. 3. Should I cite all the Texts that prove us to need and have an Inherent and Acted Righteousness by Grace besides Christs Personal Righteousness Meriting for us above six hundred Texts of Scripture expresly prove it and how tedious and needless a work is this Sect. 5. 4. Should I prove that All Righteousness so far maketh Righteous and that making Righteous is a Justifying which goeth before Judging us Righteous and that it is a putid contradiction to say that any Righteousness doth not make Righteous in tantum School-boys would turn it into a derision of the opposers Sect. 6. 5. Should I prove by Argument that no Accident can by ye same numerically in divers Subjects nor traâ—siâ—â— a Subjecto in Suâ—jectum and so the Habit Act and Relation of Righteousness in Christ's Person cannot â—n it self be our Habit Act or Relation unless our Persons and Christ's be really the same every novice in Logick would be too much occasioned to insult over the ignorant gain-sayer Sect. 7. 6. Should I prove that to Justify Efficiently by making Righteous and to Justify Constitutively being our Righteousness and to Justify by Plea or by Witness or by Evidence and to Justify in Estimation or Account and to Justify by decisive Sentence of a Judge and to Justify Executively and to Justify privately in Conscience and to Justify publickly before Rulers or the World or more publickly at the Bar of God are several sences of the Word Justification and several sorts what man of sense would not pity the Confounder that denyeth it and talk as if the Word had but one sence Sect. 8. 7. Should I prove that by Imputing Paul meaneth truly accounting a man Just that is so reckoning that to him which he hath and not feigning him to have what he hath not even Dr. Crispe hath spared me that labour venturing to say that the contrary sence of Imputing maketh God a Lyar or deceived God never judged a man Righteous that was not first made so Sect. 9. 8. Should I prove that by Works Paul meaneth those that make not the Reward of Grace but of Debt and James meaneth those that are â—he effects of Free Grace and purely subordinate to Christ as commanded by him the express Texts do make it needless Sect. 10. 9. Should I prove that Christ is our King and Ruleth and Judgeth by his own Law and hath not made us Lawless and all Judgment on Rule is now committed to him and that the very Law of Nature is now his Law and also the Law of Sâ—pernatural Revelation called by Paul the Law oâ— Christ the Law of Faith and of Grâ—â—â— and by James the Law of Liberty the whole scope of the Gospel sâ—veth me that labour Sect. 11. 10. Should I prove that Christ in â—sse objectivo as the Object of Faith is the very specifying form of that Faith
worketh Righteousness is accepted of him Rev. 22.14 Blessed are they that do his Commandments that they â—ay have right to the Tree of Life and may enter in by the Gate into the City John 3.18 He that believeth not is condemned already because c. Rom. 8.9 If any man have not the Spirit of Christ the same is none of his See also verse 4.5.7.14 2 Cor. 13.15 Jesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobates Col. 1.27 Christ in you the hope of glory See Eph. 2. What the Elect are before Conversion 1 Cor. 6.9 10 11. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God Be not deceived neither fornicators And such were some of you But ye are washed ye are Sanctified but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God 1 Thes 6.10 God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of Love Phil. 2.13 Work out your Salvation with fear and trembling For it is God that worketh c. Rev. 2 3. Read the promises to him that overcometh Mat. 6.19 20. Lay up for your selves a treasure in heaven Luke 16.9 Make you friends of the Mammon of unrighteousness that when you faâ—l they may receive you into the everlâ—sting habitations Gen. 4.7 If thou dost well shalt thou not be accepted But if thou c. Luke 13.3.5 Except ye repent ye shall all perish Mat. 18.3 Except ye be converted and become as little Children ye shall not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Heb. 5.9 He is become the Author of Eternal Salvation to all them that obey him Luke 19.27 These mine Enemies that would not I should reign over them Heb. 10.33 Cast not away your confidence which hath great recompense of reward 39. We are not of them that draw back to perdition but of them that believe to the saving of the Soul Mat. 18.32 35. O thou wicked Servant I forgave thee all that dâ—bt because c. so shall my heavenly Father do also to you if you from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses The Answer to all this by the Adversaries I. By the Infidels The Scripture is not the Word of God II. By the Mahometans in special The followers of Christ altered it III. By Papists Scripture is to us but what the Church declareth of it 1. The reading of it and rejecting supplemental Tradition by the Vulgar causeth heresies IV. By the Quaker It is the light within us that is our Rule V. The Enthusiasts or Fanaticks We must try Scripture by the Spirit and not the Spirit by the Scripture the Apostles Spirit by ours and not our low measure by theirs VI. The seekers The Scripture must first be recovered by a true Ministry VII The Cabbalist and Familist It is not to be understood Literally but Mystically VIII The Antinomian Libertine The written word or at least all that prescribeth duty and hath conditional promises is but a Covenant of works The Covenant of Grace is only the Spirits Effectual work I will and you shall A Breviate of the Doctrine of Justification Dilivered in many Books By RICHARD BAXTER In many Propositions And the Solution of 50 Controversies about it Written 1. To end such Controversies 2. To confute Rash Censurers and Errours 3. To inform the Ignorant 4. To procure Correction from wiser men if I mistake Occasioned by some mens Accusation of me to others that will not vouchsafe their Instruction to my self And by the Erroneous and dangerous Writings and Preachings of some well-meaning men such as Mr. Troughton c. who at once mistake and misreport God's Word and ours and fight in the dark against Christian Faith and Love LONDON Printed for Tho. Parkhurst at the Bible and Three Crowns at the lower end of Cheapside 1690. The Preface long ago written Reader IT was the Army and Sectarian Antinomians more fitly called Libertines who first called me in the year 1645. and 1646. to study better than I had done the Doctrine of the Covenants and Laws of God of Redemption and Justification I fetcht my first resolving thoughts from no Book but the Bible specially Mat. 5 and 6 and 25. Grotius de Satisfactione next gave me more light While I was considering many mens friendly Animadversions on my Apâ—orisms and answering some that more differed from each other than from me it increased light especially the Animadversions of Mr. George Lawson My Writings against the Antinomians had success beyond my expecâ—ations though some good men of the Party called Independent having more heat than light deceived by the notions of some that had spoken injudiciously before them cast out suspicions and contradictions in a jealousie that I encroached on the honour of Free Grace I mean such men as prefaced the Book called The Marrow of Modern Divinity which on pretence of Moderation is Antinomian or Libertine and very injudicious and unsound And others Books such as Paul Hobsons Mr. Saltmarshes Bunyan on the Covenants c. which ignorantly subverted the Gospel of Christ came out on the same business and revealed mens mistakes on pretence of revealing the Mystery of Free Grace John Goodwin was then and before publishing his Judgment of Justification and Mr. Walker and Mr. Roborough wrote against him with great disparity of light and strength But because J.G. turned to the Arminians prejudice cryed down his Doctrine of Justification and it was not all to be approved Mr. Gataker published many things to the like purpose and among the rest the Narrative of Mr. Wottons Case referred to many London Divines and decided by them Of my suspension of my Aphorisms and of my Contests with Mr. Craudon Mr. Eyres Mr. Warner and afterwards with Dr. Tully I need not here make particular mention The most that I converst with seemed of my Judgment The rest beside the Animadverters on my Aphorisms who freeliest spake of me behâ—â—d my back would none of them speak to me Vavasor Powel and Mr. Ed. Bagshaw were two of the chief Many worthy men published the same Doctrine which I assâ—rted especially Mr. Gibbons of Black-fryars in his Sermon in the Morning Lectures at St. Giâ—â—s Mr. Benjamin Woodbridge Mr. Hotchkâ—â— Mr. Thomas Warren Mr. Graile and Mr. Jeâ—â—op laboured to prove that Dr. Twisse meant the same who seems to speak for Eternal Immanent Justification And Mr. Truman and Lud. Le Blankes Theses at last came out after the Theâ—es Salmurienses and the Breme Divines Lud. Crocius Conrad Bergius and the Berlin Johan Bergius as clear as any But the practice of some who wanted the humility and â—iliâ—ence which were necessary to learn the Truths which they knew not was just the same with that of the Prelates in Councils for a thousand years even to put it to the Vote of mâ—n of their own mind or to lean on the names of some of their Predecessors who were men of note and especially to cry down those that heard them not
when yet sincerity of Obedience is necessary and those Acts if done have their place with the rest as means of Salvation so here But Saving Faith is denominated from the essential part The nature of Faith is in order of nature antecedent to its Office The nature of it in genere is to believe all that God saith The nature of it in specie is to believe in Christ and consent to his Covenant The integrity of it is to believe all that we find revealed The Office of it as the Means of Justification is to be the condition of the Justifying Covenant or Law That which some call the Instrumentality is the very nature of the Act the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere in specie Believing in Christ is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere and that 's it that they call an Instrument of receiving him as such But the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere even in specie Faith in Christ doth not justifie quâ talis as that Faith but as it is that qualifying Condition which the Promise annexeth Justification to without which it would not have done it Had the Promise been absolute it had pardoned us before and without Faith The nature of the Act is like the metal of Gold or Silver and the tenor of the Justifying Covenant is as the Kings Stamp that maketh it currant Coin It is Faith in order of nature before it is the Justifying Condition The quâ justificans therefore should speak not a distinct Act from the other Acts of the Christian Faith as such but the relation of the same Acts to the benefit Omnis fidei actus qui justificat considerari potest quatenus justificat Contr. 19. Whether we are justified by the Law of Innocency saying Obey perfectly and live Ans This is one of the chief points of all our difference Some say that because Christ fulfilled it for us we are justified by that Law as fulfillers of it This is it that Mr. Anthony Wotton hath bestowed most of his Learned Treatise de Reconciliatione to confute The Law justified Christ but not us for it never said Thou or another for thee shalt obey Nor doth it know a Vicarius obedientiae aut poenae nor take Christs Person and ours for the same Therefore we are not justified by that Law but condemned by it And it cannot condemn and justifie the same man But we are justified by another Law Covenant or Promise by Christs fulfilling the Law of Innocency and making over to us the benefits Contr. 20. Whether by Works be meant Acts in general or â—nly such Acts as are adverse to Faith in Christ and make the reward to be of debt and not of grace Ans The last is the Apostles Exposition of them Christ saith we are justified by our words James by our works and all the Scripture that speaketh of Justification ascribeth it to some Acts It is according to our works And Faith is an Act yea many Acts. Obj. But it justifieth not as an Act but as an Instrument Ans That is not as an Act or good Act in genere but as this Act in specie viz. Believing on Christs Righteousness But that is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere that is As this Act But it is not so unless you add As it is this congruous Act or Acts authorized by Gods Covenant to this Office So we will grant that no Act justifieth as an Act or as a good Act but as a congruous good Act appointed thereto As is said before To believe in God and in Christ as Christ and in the Promise of Salvation and to believe the evil of sin and the need of a Saviour and to desire him and be thankful for him and pray for pardon are not the works that Paul speaketh against but some belong to the Essence and some to the Integrity and Accidents of that Faith by which we are justified Yet a foolish person may contradict himself and hold his own Faith as well as his Love or Desire or Prayer to be meritorious as making the reward not of grace Such mad contradiction may suppose Faith to be the works which it denieth Cont. 21. Are any works of man meritorious Ans Not in point of Commutative Justice that giveth one thing for another to the commodity of each as in buying and selling 2. Nor yet in distributive Governing Justice as making any good due to us by the Law of Innocency or Works 3. But as God hath freely given us Christ and Life by a Law of Grace on condition of suitable acceptance and use so he that performeth this condition is called worthy and the contrary unworthy in the Gospel and did not men abuse it they might with all the ancient Chuâ—ches use the word merit in the same sense â—s 〈◊〉 As a good natured Child that humbly and thâ—nkfully taketh money or meat when his Father giâ—eth it him is said to deserve it of him better than he that scorneth it and him So â—ur merit is but of â—aternal â—overning Justice in the Kingdom of Love according to Gods Law of Grace in Christ Cont. 12. â—hâ—ther oâ—edience be a part of Faith or we aâ—e justifiâ—d by obedience Ans 1. To beliâ—ve in Christ at first is an act of obedience to God who commandeth us so to do But it is but Subjectiâ—n to Christ which that act includeth that is taking him for our Lord and Saviour to be obeyed which iâ— virtually all future obedience as its root but not actually 2. Actual obedience to Christ is not faith but the fruit of faith and part of our performâ—nce of the Covenant which we made with him and necessary to the câ—ntinuance of our â—ustification and to our Salvation as all the Scripture fully sheweth Cont. 23. Whether any 〈◊〉 bâ—â—â—cessâ—ry t◠〈◊〉 continuance or not losiâ—g our jusâ—ifâ—catioâ— than to 〈◊〉 bâ—ginning of it Ans Yes 1. More acts of the same faith 2. Praying for pardon 3 Forgiving others as Christ expresly tells us 4. Sincere Love and Obedience to Christ unto the end Cont. 24. Is Pardon and Justification perfect the first moment Ans No. 1. All the punishment is not yet taken off We have yet much penal want of Grace and the Spirits Operations and Communion with God 2. We have not right to the present removal of all the punishment 3. Many more sins hereafter must be pardoned 4. Much means is yet to be used for final Justification 5. That final Justification only is perfect Cont. 25 〈◊〉 nolle punire or non punire a pardoning of sin It 's Dr. Tâ—isses Controversy Ans Yes In some degree to a capable person that iâ— to a sinner But not to one that is no sinner 〈◊〉 before one hath a being Cont. 26. Is future sin pardoned before hand Ans Fuâ—ure sin is not sin and therefore not capabâ—e of pardon nor the person for it But it may be pardoned virtually though not actually A general grant of pardon may be
personality that is the question for so Christ himself had many Persons as one and the same man may have the Person of a Father of a Husband of a Master of a King c. But it is Physical or Substantial Personality which Mr. Crispe saith is more than natural we being one Spirit and Bone of his Bone and Flesh of his Flesh And if this be so I shall grant that we are as righteous as Christ and Christ now in Heaven and nâ—t on the Cross only is guilty of all our sins and was indeed as they call him the greatest blasphemer hater of God adulterer c. in the World But 1. If all the Elect be really many distinct Persons tâ—en either Christ must be also as many distâ—nct Persons or not be the same Person with them aâ—l or any of them But the Elect are many distinct Persons and shall be so for ever Peter was not Paul or John They do not the same Acts They be not guilty of the same numerical sins Every man shall answer for all that he hath done in the Body and not for all that all others of the Elect have done All the Elect shall not sit on the twelve Thrones as Apâ—stles All did not Preach the Gospel as Paul did nor Persecute as Paul did Overthrow distinct iâ—dividuation here or in Heaven and how dismal will be the consequence And here will not each man have right to anothers House Wife Food Goods if they are but one Person To be one in Spirit is no more to be one Person than seeing by the same Sun-light maketh all Lyes to be one Eye For the Spirit is not our personality And if you make Christ to be many Millions of Persons where is his Vnity in himself or with any 2. If Christ and the Elect be all one and the same Person then the Elect are really God himself For the Person of Christ is God These men are unfit to confute the Schools who have long maintained that the very human nature of Christ is not a part of his Person but an accident of it because he is but one Person which is the second in Trinity from Eternity and is God of which see Derodon de Supposito And if we are all one God then God suffers when we suffer and God judgeth himself when he judgeth us May not Men pray to such then and Worship them as Gods and Trust in them as Gods Is not this Idolatry worse than Image-Worship or than Anti-christianity 3. If Christ and the Elect be one and the same Person then Christ sinneth when ever they sin And Christ suffered for his own sin even that which he by them committed And then he pardoneth his own sin or who pardoneth him But all this is false 4. And it would follow that all the Elect are Mediators to themselves and dyed for their own sins and pardon their own sins and justify themselves and believe in themselves and save themselves 5. And are all Christ's threatnings against himself which are against us Doth Satan overcome him when ever he overcometh us Is his Law made for himself that is made for us Doth he command a Father to correct Christ when he commandeth him to correct his Children Doth the Magistrate hang Christ when he hangeth a Malefactor tho' Elect that sinneth by surprize 6. Where there are divers Bodies and divers Souls and divers Vnderstandings and divers Wills there are divers Persons But of all these in Christ and us there is a diversity I believe that the Vnion between Christ and the Glorified will be neerer than we can well now conceive But not such as will make us one and the same Person with Christ I have read in Phanatick Fryers such as Barbanson and Benedictus de Benedictis and in Gibienf the Oratorian of our Deification and being Goded with God and that it is the only perfection to know no being but God And I have read of such Heathen as Worshipped Demon-Gods that once were men And it is the top of the now prevalent Bruitism or Sadducism to believe that all Souls are but one God and as Candles that are individuate by the Oily Matter when extinct are all one in the common Air and that there is nothing but God and Matter But I hope few good Christians will so far lose the knowledge of themselves as to take themselves to be the same Person with him that is God Angels forbad John to Worship them tho' he took them not for God Do those Churches exercise Discipline upon such as are one Person with Christ Do they Excommunicate Christ for sin No wonder that Dr. Crispe chargeth David as speaking untruth for complaining of his sin and Gods displeasure tho' John says He is a Lyar that saith he hath no sin and all God's Saints have profess'd Repentance but I read not that Christ did ever Repent of sin I doubt some will think that I feign Mr. Crispe to say what he doth not his words are these First He accuseth me as saying To say our Union with Christ so makes us Flesh of his Flesh that we are the same PERSON with Christ this is so gross that I will not bestow time to confute it He answers Nor cannot as long as that Text is in our Bibles we are Members of his Body of his Flesh and of his Bones Ephes 5 God saith He that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit which is more than a Political Member or a Natural Member either I believe that it is more than Political but not such as maketh us one Person with Christ Andrew Osiander is condemned by Protestants for feigning that the Essence of God is our Righteousness Nestorius was condemned by General Councils as supposed to feign Christ to have two Persons What would these Councils have judged of them that feign him to have Million of Persons or Millions to be all one Person with him As to Mr. Crispes Epistle it calleth more for Pitty than Confutation He pretendeth out of his Notes to tell what I Preached at Pinners Hall Jan. 17. 1673. and Aug. 11. 1674. so long since And he begins with a gross untruth that I said A mans first believing is by external Arguments not by the Operation of the Spirit but his after believing is by the Spirit I do not believe that the man purposed to lye but trusted hâ—s false Ears and Notes The World knoweth how voluminously I have written to the contrary Never such an Opinion came into my head But contrarily I have copiously proved that even common Faith much more the first justifying Faith is the work of Gods Spirit My Catholick Theology proveth it all at large I doubt not but both first and second Faith is by Scripture Argument but never dream'd that it was not the Work of the Spirit Indeed I find few of his accusing Notes that be not falsificâ—tious by his defective or patcht Recital I am sorry that he hath wronged the Memory of such
justifying is not making Righteous therefore making Righteous is no Justifying nor any part of it It s a shame to stay to cite many â—â—xts â—gaiâ—st these men where the whole Bible but especially all Christ's own Preaching and Parables are so expresly against thâ—m that I admire with what fâ—ce thâ—se men prâ—fess to believe the Scripture And I wâ—nâ—er not that some of them say that all the wâ—â—ttâ—â— Word is a Covenant of Works aâ—d oâ—ly the Spirits iâ—waâ—d Work is the Covenant of Grace And whâ—n they tell us as Crispe p. 242. Vol. 1. Ed. 1. That for any hurt that such sins can do us it is not possible for Christ hath made satisfaction I wonder why they preach against that which doth no hurt and why tâ—ey excommunicate men for sin and why they scruple Perjury Liturgies Parish-Communion or any Point of Conformity yea why some of them will suffer rather than conform when it is impossible for any sin to hurt them Why do your hearers pay you for Preaching against a harmless thing Why make you so much Complaint against Vnreformeâ—ness Sin doth God no hurt it doth not the Elect any hurt by your Doctrine for Christ hath satisfied and born all And the Reprobate are uncapable of good for want of satisfaction for them I pray you do not speak out this Doctrine to the World If you do I shall be glad that you are confined to your seduced ignorant Congregations If you will tell the World If you are elect no sin can possibly hurt you whatever Murders Adulteries Perjuries you commit it is none of your sin but Christs It cannot be his and yours too and if not elect you have no hope and if you be elect you will be never the better for praying considering charity or any Act of Religion or Justice which you do nor must once think to gain any thing by it How many Converts is this like to make And what would such a Nation come to I hope few of the publick Preachers that you call scandalous preach so scandalously as this I have one Request to you that if you or any other be questioned by the judges for Murder Adultery False-witness Perjury or Robbery you will not say as Dr. Crispe hath taught you I am no Murderer Adulterer perjured Robber c. It is Christ that is such a one and not I it cannot be my sin when he hath made it his for I doubt neither the Judges or Jury well believe you If you believe not we ask the Judges whether it be you or Christ that is the sinner I doubt it is you that will be hang'd If you say for what may not ignorance say That it is not at the Bar of man but of God only that Christ is the sinner and not we I Answer Know you not that Judges and Princes are God's Officers and that the Judgment is the Lords and that what they do according to his Will he doth by them He doth not command Rulers to hang men for a sin that is none of theirs All mens Judgments are Nullities that are against the fore-known Judgment of God It is the King that punisheth when the hangman executeth God punisheth men by Rulers and doth it righteously I write all this the rather because Mr. Cokain in his Preface exhorteth Preachers to go on where the Dr. left I humbly beseech them first to read and believe Mat. 5. 6. and 7 8. and 13.18.25 and all the Sermons and Parables of Christ and not downright to give him the Lie and call it exalting him And for them that report that there are no such Words in Dr. Crispe as I report I wonder not while they think that lying can do them no hurt and is not their sin but Christs And they that believe they are under no Law may believe that they have no Transgression nor Christ for them when they had never any And to them that talk of inherent Righteousness as less necessary than God hath made it I desire them but to mark what Christ saith of it and to remember that sin is much of Hell and holiness of Heaven And that Christ came to save his People from their sins as more righteous than the Scribes and Pharisees inhâ—rently and to make them a peculiar People zealous of good Works and holy as God is holy and to bethink them whether to disgrace the Building be to honour the Architect and whether the â—orth or the worthlesness of the Work more honour the Work-men and whether the Cure of the Sick dishonour the Physitian And whether to say that my Clock or Watch will go by artificial means or only no longer than the Work mans-Finger only moveth it do more honour the Artist And whether the Psalms would so much call us to glorifie God for his Works if all that is ascribed to his Works were taken from his Honour The Lord teach us better to understand that Word that maketh the simple wise and not to set Christ against himself and against his own Honours Government and Laws A Defence of Christ AND Free Grace c. Chap. 1. Prefatory Ortho. Sir Having my self and the Congregation which I am Related to been in danger of the Errours called Antinomian I wrote to you to intreat you who have done so much heretofore to Conquer and Extirpate those Errours to get the London Ministers to publish their Judgments against Dr. Crispe 's Book and such others now Re-printed and rising up with re-newed danger Reconcil You did so and I answered you 1. That I thought it not seasonable till the acceptance and success of that Book and such others made our danger so notorious and great as would clearly justify our Confutation I have written on that Subject so much already 1. In my Confession of Faith 2. In my Apologies against Mr. Craudâ—n Mr. Aaires and others 3. In my Disputations of Justification 4. In my Life of Faith 5. In my Justifying Righteousness and there against Dr. Tully and my last Animadversions on Mr. Cartwright 6. In my Catholâ—ck Theolâ—gy especially the five last Chapters 7. And in my Methodus Theologiae All which are unanswered to this day that I know not why I should be forward to write much more For they that will not read this that hath been so long written are not like to read it if I yet write more And I am so fearful of stirring up the hidden spark of this mischief that having written Fourteen Years ago a short Decision of a multitude of these Controversies I suspended it lest it should kindle New Oppositions 2. And I told you that we have now such publick and dangerous Controversies about Royalty Prelacy Conformity c. that it is very unseasonable to make a noise of the Errours and Factions among the Tolerated though they should somewhat increase by advantage of our silence till we see what publick settlement there will be 3. And I confess I have an opinion that accidentally the Books
and it s not proved that any one Devil is guilty of all mens sins they make God guilty of all yea they that lay it on Christ only after his Incarnation lay it on him that is God XXI They that feign Christ to have personated us in his first Covenant of Redemption make us by him to have Covenanted to Redeem our selves and to do the Mediator-work XXII They feign Christ to have made such an Exchange with the Elect as that having taken all their Sins he hath given them all his Righteousness not only the Fruit of it but the Thing in it self So that they are as perfectly Righteous as Christ himself and so esteemed of God But here they differ 1. Some say we have only all his Passive Righteousness Some say also all his Active 3. Others also all his Habitual 4. Others all his Essential Divine Righteousness and so are Goded XXIII This perfect Righteousness they say we have at least from the time of Christ's death before we were born or had any personal Beeing XXIV Hereby they must needs feign Christ and us to be one and the same Subject or else the same Accidents Habits Acts and Relations to be in divers Subjects still the same which is a contradiction XXV Hence they say that the elect have no sin because it is all Christ's and cannot be his and theirs also XXVI They say that Christ having perfectly done the Work of a Saviour we are perfectly saved and want nothing necessary to Salvation XXVII They say all sin past present and to come are pardoned even that not committed that is no sin XXVIII They say that it is not possible that sin can do an elect Person any hurt Christ having been a perfect Saviour from it all so Dr. Crispe XXIX They say that no Prayer or Duty or Act of Man can do us any good or further our Salvation Christ only having done it already for us so Crispe XXX They add that to pray hear read obey or do any Duty as a means to our own Good or Salvation is to sin against the Free Grace of Christ But that we must do it 1. In thankfulness to Christ that hath saved us 2. And for the good of others As if it were not as injurious to Free Graece to seek other mens Salvation as our own or we might not do good in love to our selves as well as to our Neighbours Or as if we ought not to plow sow labour eat drink build c. for our good becaâ—se Christ is all By this it seemeth that Dr. Crispe did not pâ—each or write his Bâ—oks to do any good because he took that to be a denyal of Christs Grace XXXI They say that under Moses Law David and the Elect were not pardoned till they had sacrificed But under the Gospel all the elect are absolutely pardoned without any delay or condition or means on their part as if there had been so vast difference between the Fruits of Christ and the way of his Justification then and now XXXII They say that Pardon and Justification are absolutely perfect at the first and so no more sin to be after forgiven nor any punishment to be remitted or removed XXXIII They say that no elect person suffereth any the least punishment because all is forgiven and Christ suffered all and that no Pain or Correction is now penal or for sin XXXIV They talk of our being freed from the Law in so undistinguishing universal Words as if they knew no Law but that of Innocency to Adam and that of Moses to the Jews and thought it were a priviledge to be lawless or that Christ had no Law and so there were no Transgression XXXV They hold that Christ was no Law-Maker and so must infer that he was no King and had no Laws of his own to Govern or Judge by and so deny a chief Part of his Office and his Kingdom and Government who is King of Kings XXXVI They say If God should punish any sin of the elect it would be injustice because it is all punished already on Christ and the Debt is fully paid by him XXXVII They take God's Covenants and Laws to be things so different as that a Law is not his Covenant nor his Covenant a Law Whereas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth both that is God's Statute-Law containing the determinate Terms of Duty Reward and Punishment Life and Death and both have the same parts his Law having Precepts Prohibitions Promises and Threatnings and his Covenant as his hath the same And when it its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it becometh a mutual Covenant by mans Consent and the Law bindeth Subjects to that Consent XXXVIII They are so much for a Christ without us that they write as if the Work of Christ within us and by us were a Dishonour to Christ that causeth it if we praise it As if the Prâ—â—sâ— of the Structure were a dishonour to the Builder or the Cure were a dishonour to the Physitian or the Glory of the World if praised were a dishonouring of God God praiseth his Servants and their Grace and Works but if we praise them they say we rob Christ of his honour XXXIX They seem to hold that Christ doth all the Work of our Salvation immediately without Instruments or Means And all that is ascribed to subordinate Causes were derogate from him And so Apostles Miracles â—cripture Writings Preaching were no Means of Good or injured Christ as if Sun and Moon Angels and Men dishonoured God XL. While they say that no Duty must be done for our own good or salvation they destroy natural necessary self love and directly would drive out all true Religion from the World and harden all the wicked in ungodliness by taking away those Motives without which no men are converted or saved and kept from sin XLI They hold that whatever Law or Promise in Scripture hath any condition is part of the Law of Works And that the Law or Covenant of Grace is only of what God will actually and absolutely himself effect or that Efficience it self as if the Gospel were a Law of Works XLII Accordingly they hold that God doth not make any conditional Promise or threatning a means of his Spirit or Christs communicating of Free Grace And so that the Gospel hath no conditional Promises tho' there be conditional Words not understanding that God who is Life Light and Love Power Wisdom and Goodness worketh by all three and printeth the Image of all on his Elect working by efficient Motion sapiental Order and amorous attractive communication XLIII They hold that no mens sins were the cause of Christ's Sufferings but the Elects And that the rest are damned for want of a sufficient Sacrifice offered for them XLIV They hold that all the Mercies that the Non elect have in all the world are given them without the Purchase of Christ XLV Yea many hold that none but the Elect have any Grace or any Mercy because it
They 〈◊〉 thâ—â— to hold that Câ—â—â—sâ— Righteousness and Meâ—iâ— iâ— to make our Fâ—iâ—â— and holy Obedienâ—e 〈…〉 is a Pâ—â—â—sh Dâ—ctrine against Fâ—â—â— Gracâ— Aâ— if Câ—risâ— had 〈◊〉 â—â—me to save his People from their sins and to make them holy and zealous of Lâ—ve and â—ood Works or God were grown so indifferent to his 〈◊〉 and to Christ within us and so forgetful of all his Promises of Reward that he would acâ—ept and reward our Fidelity and Obedience to Christ â—ever the more for all Câ—râ—st's meritorious Sacrifice Righteousness and Intercession which is the only Price that purchaseth our Acceptance and as if Judgment should make no difference between mens rewardableness but only judge Christ to have been a Saviour to the Elect. XCVII They devise a Plea for the justifying of all the wicked damnable Hypocrites in Judgment while they tell them that there will be no need of a Justification against the Charge of Hypocrisie and Unholiness but only against the Charge of being sinners and so they can say that all were sinners as well as they and that Christ was offered them as a Saviour that had made a sufficient Sacrifice for their forgiveness And they professed to believe in him as their Saviour And as to the soundness of their Faith there will be no need of Justification And if Christ say I was hungry and ye fed me not I was naked and ye cloathed me not c. They are taught to say The Righteousness of their own personal Holyness or Obedience is none of the Cause of the day to justifie them or to be tryed and justified XCVIII Some say that Christ Reconciled Man to God but did not Reconcile God to Man because God was at no enmity with the Elect but loved them from Eternity and to the Reprobate he is unreconciled It is true that Christ made no real change on God by his Reconciliation But by his Sacrifice and Merits and Intercession he made it a thing Just and Meet for God to forgive and save us notwithstanding all our Guilt all his Holiness Justice and Truth and so dissolving our obligations to punishment and removing the impediments of our Reconciliation he is by extrinsick denomination said to be Reconciled to us when he is no way bound to Damn us and this without any change in God But the Clouds being thus dispelled that were between God and us his Face as Reconciled shineth on us God was in Christ Reconciling the World to himself by making them capable of personal plenary Reconciliation by purchasing a Free Pardon to be offered to all tho' they have after need to be intreated to be personally and actually Reconciled to God 2 Cor. 5.19 20. Gods Love of Benevolence goeth before his Love of Complacence tho' the change be really in the Object only XCIX Dr. Crispe and all that say that our own Obedience and Duties and personal Righteousness do us no good nor further our Salvation Christ doing all that and that it hindereth Salvation to do any thing for Salvation do plainly make Heavenly Blessedness and God himself as sought loved and enjoyed to be against our Salvation For all our Sanctity is but our Love of God and our Fruition of him And the perfection of this is our Heaven and Happiness and Holiness is here the beginning of it And if it be against the Grace of Christ to seek Heaven and the Fruition of God and to be receptive of it by Holyness and to seek God be the way to keep us from him as not going out of our selves to Christ How then is Christ the way to the Father How doth he bring us to God Why doth he Sanctify us and bid us seek and strive to enter Will Heaven be against Heaven and God against God to us If so then striving to be saved from Sin and Hell is the way to bring us to Sin and Hell which none would hold that knoweth how much of Hell Sin it self is and how much Holiness is of Heaven C. They falsly reproach the Orthodox that erre not with them as Enemies of Free Grace and as not going out of themselves and by odious Words as being for Justificatioâ— by Works When it is thâ—y themselves that overthrow all Justification and tâ—e Gospel as Justifying us and Justiâ—â—cation by Faith it self calling it Tò Creâ—â—re and a Work Ridiculously making Tò Credâ—re and Faith to signify diversly And tell us not when it is the Phrase and when it is the the Meaning that they oppose If it be the Phrase that they oppose they condemn Christ and the Scripture that say Men are Justified by their Words and Works If it be the Sence let them tell what that Sence is which they accuse and not consound the Controversies of the Name and of the Thing Those that they reproach Renounce all Works for Justification or Salvation that arrogate the least part of the Office Merits or Grace of Christ or that make the Reward not of Grace but of Debt Yea all that Honour not Christ and Grace more than if he had not required them and did not as dwelling in us by his Spirit cause them and make them acceptable to God But we will not renounce Christ living in us nor the use and worth of the Image of God CHAP. III. To moderate Mâ—â—s 〈◊〉 Câ—nsâ—riâ—g thâ— Eâ—râ—â—◠〈◊〉 Recâ—â—cil HAving enumerated a Centurâ— of their Errours I shall next tâ—ll â—ou how and why notwithstanding all these gross Corruptions you should mâ—â—erate and regulate your Censure of the Men and of other such Ortho. Yoâ—â—av◠〈◊〉 sufficieâ—tly wâ—at to think of them wheâ— you have told me what they hold I must nâ—ither judge of the Faith by the Man â—or forbear judging â—f the Man by â—is Faith Can any man judge 〈◊〉 hardly of men that overthrâ—w all Religion They sâ—â—m to me to be Atheists Infidels Anti-Christians Prophane and open Enemies of all that is Holy and Good â—ave only the Name of God aâ—d Christ and Frâ—e Grace and that Good which they oppâ—se This Charactâ—r of them I gather from yâ—ur â—wn Words I. They deny the only true God and feign or make us another God The true God is Holy and hateth sin But they feign a God who is the maker of sin yea that 〈◊〉 his own Son the greatest sinner in the World by mâ—king all the sins committed by all the Elect to be really his sins and so making him the worst of men II. Yea whereas Devils can but tempt men to sin they feign God to translate our sins themselves Essentially on Christ and so to make him a sinner that could not be tempted to it III. They make us another pretendeâ— Christ and so deny the true Christ and so are Anti-christs The true Christ had no sin but only became a Sâ—crifice for our sin which were laid upon him no further than to suffer for us But they feign a Christ that was a hater of God an Atheist a Servant of the Devil
it self and so that to be Justified by the Object as such and not by that Faith it self is a notorious putid Contradiction or should I stand to prove that Faith it self is said by Paul to be Imputed for Righteousness in meer subordination to the meritorious Sacrifice and Righteousness of Christ and in conjunction with Free Pardon and Adoption purchased by Christ how needless a work is this made by the Text Sect. 12. 11. Should I stand to prove that Elect Infidels Atheists or wicked Men are not Justified while such save as God maketh them Just by Conversion Pardon all the Scripture tell us it is needless and that Eternal Electing to Justification is not Justifying nor yet Christs dying for us till He be given to us as well as for us Sect. 13. 12. Should I stand to prove that men shall be judged according to their Works and that God is the Rewarder of them that diligently seek him and that Christ hath frequently promised Rewards and that the same Salvation which as to Value is no Debt but meerly a Free Gift of Grace through Christ is yet as to the Order of Conveyance given on Condition as a Reward that Fatherly Love may attain its ends by Saptential means and not only by Power Morally producing Moral Effects in conjunction with Love and Power and thus that the pardoning and saving Acts of the Covenant impose Conditions as receptive qualifications which yet are all the Effects of Grace the whole Scripture maketh this a needless task Sect. 14. 13. Should I prove the distinctness 1. Of the Law and Covenant of Innocency 2. And of the Law and Covenant of Mediation And 3. Of the Mediators Law and Covenant of Grace imposed on us and sealed in Sacraments and that the same is both a Law and Covenant and that the Covenant of Grace is the Instrumental Gift of Pardon and Justification How much of the Bible must I transcribe Sect. 15. The like I may say of most of the rest which I doubt I have been too large in proving in all the six or seven or eight Books before named I thought also to have distinctly answered thâ— Printed Pinners-Hall Lecture but he that cannâ—â— find it more than fully answered in the foresaid Books either never read them or Answers to such a man will be vain And I am sorry that the same hand in another Lecture elsewhere publisheth that That any are brought to believe in Jesus is as great a Miracle as the Resurrection of Christ from the dead p. 223. And after There is not a greater Instance of the Power of God in the whole World than this in bringing over the heart of a sinner to believe in Christ It grieveth my Soul to think what Scandals are thus given by good Men to Papists Infidels and prejudiced Scorners and what work they will make with it No doubt but Faith is a great and difficult Work and wrought by Almighty Power For God hath no other Power but Omnipotency omnis Dei Potentia est Omnipotentia quia Infinita Gods Power is his Essence But the Instances and Demonstrations of it are as various as the Effects Your Finger or Tongue moveth not but by Omnipotency But every Motion or Fly is not as great an Instance or Demonstration of Power as Faith is Nor Faith so great an Instance as the making of Angels Men Heaven and Earth Sun Moon and Stars their Natures Motion and Order Divines have hitherto taught that Power is eminently manifested in Creation and Natural Preservation tho' with Wisdom and Lâ—ve and Wisdom Eminently manifested in Government and Love in Glorifying tho' they were conjunct in each Man cannot work Miracles and that so great And I do not believe that God damneth all unbelievers as for want of an Act as great as the motion of the Sun or making the World And if it be a Miracle and as great a one as Christ's Resurrection How can any believer doubt at all Why was Christ's Resurrection Preached by the Apostles so much as the Proof of the Truth of Christianity and not the Faith of every believer Then we need not go far to prove the Christian Vâ—â—ity Every poor Boy or Woman that believeth hath the fullest Proof and as great and miraculous as Christ's Resurrection Why send we not Infidels and Doubters to this Miracle which is about them in all ages in thousands Over-doing is undoing And yet no doubt the Author saith truly that Faith in Christ is so hard a Work that he that never found it hard hath none or hath it but in the seed and yet unrooted or untryed But alas Infidels find it too hard to them To conclude Instead of the larger part of the Proof or Confutations which I intended 1. I shall with this Annex a brief Treatise resolving a multitude of Controversies about Justification which I have laid by about Fifteen Years 2. I refer you to the foresaid former perforformance of it 3. Were I not disabled by Pain and the approaches of Death I would be ready to Answer any sober rational Objector A Post-script Sect. 1. WHereas divers say they were drawn in to prenx their Names to this Drs. Book because they were told that the Errours were expunged Upon perusal I find that it is no such matter but in Vol. 3. Ser. 3 4. c. the Author rather more frequently inculcateth the worst of them viz. That sin cannot hurt any that are Elect or that Christ dyed for And that in 1. Joh. It is a powerful means to kâ—ep thâ—m from sinning to believe that if they sin it can do them no hurt Sect. 2. The Text drew him to use the Name of sinning I write to you that you sin not But did not the Contradiction of it to his Doctrine convince him while he read the Text against sinning judge whether he took not the thing to be impossible He saith Tho' such do Murder commit Adultery Blasphemy Idolatry or any such thing they are no Murderers Adulterers c. or Sinners because it is Christ's sin and not theirs and cannot be his and theirs too so that they may live in the Act but cannot sin Object But it was their sin once before it was Christs sin Answ No He saith that it was Christ's sin if not from Eternity at least above Sixteen Hundred Years before we were born And he that had no being could have no sin And Gods fore-knowledge of future sin maketh not sin Nay he could not fore-know that which would never be so that indeed Christ could not take our sin as his which was not ours nor ever would be at all And if he had yet I hope they will not say that now in Heaven he is the greatest sinner And so there neither was nor is any sin in us or Christ Sect. 3. But as he repeateth this Errour I will repeat my Lamentations and Warning to this tempted Sect. Hear it as Speculatoris Tubam the Watch-mans Trumpet that would