1. Confut. Against the vulgar Latine translation Vers. 18. ANd hee was a Priest c. The Latine text readeth here corruptly for hee was as though the bringing forth of bread and wine had beene an act of his Priesthood Indeed this copulative Vau sometime is used as a causall but then the sense apparantly giveth it as Genes 20.3 Thou art but dead because of the woman which thou hast taken for she is a mans wife in Hebrew and she is But here there is no such cause to annexe this clause as a reason of the former but rather it is to be joyned to that which followeth as the same copulative sheweth And he blessed him saying v. 19. wherefore not the producing of bread wine but the blessing of Abraham was the proper act of Melchisedecks Priesthood 2. Confut. Melchisedeck brought not out the bread and wine to sacrifice them BRought forth bread and wine c. 1. Whether Melchisedeck had before slaine sacrifices and made a feast not only of bread and wine but of flesh as Philo saith mactatis victimis splendidum opulum sâ—ciis omnibus dedit to Abraham and his company the text saith nothing and therefore I leave it as an uncertaine guesse sure I am that mactare victimas to slay sacrifices can in no sense be understood of sacrificing or offering of bread as Pererius goeth about to wrest it disput 5. in 14 Genes 2. Neither did he bring forth bread and wine to represent as Rabbi Moses thinketh sacrificia farmacea the sacrifices in the law of meale and floure 3. Much lesse did he offer them in sacrifice to God as Bellarmine and Pererius doe urge this place for the word jatsah here used is never taken to signifie to offer in sacrifice whereas Bellarmine and Pererius object that place Iud. 6.19 where Gideon is said to bring forth his gift and represent it where the same word is found it is evident that Gideon brought it forth the flesh and broth for the Angell to eat of whom he supposed to be a man for they used not to make pottage or broth to offer and the Angell bid him to offer it upon the stone which sheweth that Gideon had no such purpose before 4. Wherefore as Iosephus well noteth Melchisedeck milites Abraham hospitaliter accepit nihil eis ad victum deesse passus he entertained Abrahams souldiers with great hospitality suffering them to want no victuals Melchisedeck then brought forth the bread and wine for no other end but to refresh Abrahams company 1. For Melchisedeck is set forth both as a King and a Priest the producing of bread and wine was a princely gift the blessing of Abraham a priestly act 2. It was the use and manner to meet them that returned from battell with bread to refresh them therefore Moab and Ammon are accursed because they met not the Israelites with bread and water when they came out of Egypt Deut 23.4 3. Cajetane a chiefe pillar of the popish Church saith Nihil hic scribitur de oblatione sed de prolatione panis vini Nothing is written of the oblation but of the prolation or producing of bread and wine 4. Whereas Lyranus Tostatus and Bellarmine answer that Melchisedeck needed not to have brought forth bread and wine for their refreshing seeing they had sufficient already as Abraham saith vers 24. saving that the young men had eaten Pererius one of their owne friends doth easily remove this answer that this was unknowne to Melchisedeck what provision was in Abrahams campe and though hee had knowne it yet to shew his love and testifie his gladnesse he would notwithstanding have performed this friendly and liberall part Mercerus 3. Confut. Melchisedecks Priesthood consisted not in the sacrificing of bread and wine NOw it followeth to be declared wherein the priesthood of Melchisedeck consisted and in what principallity he represented the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. It consisted not in that Melchisedeck was a perpetuall virgin Perer. for if Sem were Melchisedeck which is most probable as before is declared he had a wife 2. Neither was he a figure of Christ because he sacrificed in bread and wine and so represented as the Papists imagine the unbloudy sacrifice of the Masse for these reasons 1. Because the Scripture maketh no mention of sacrificing but onely bringing forth bread and wine for Abrahams refreshing 2. That wherein Melchisedecks priesthood consisted must bee divers from the offering and sacrifices of Aaron but Aarons priests offered bread and wine Ergo herein consisted not Milchisedecks priesthood 3. There is a great unlikelinesse betweene Melchisedecks offering and the sacrifice of the Masse for he offered bread and wine in substance but the papists imagine that in the Masse there remaineth nothing but the formes not the substance of bread and wine 4. If Melchisedecks priesthood did stand in the oblation of bread and wine then every bald Masse-priest that sacrificeth in the Masse should be a Priest after Melchisedecks order whereas it is peculiar to Christ onely Psal. 110.4 Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck 5. Neither would the Apostle have omitted this speciall act of Melchisedecks priesthood wherein he represented Christ of purpose setting forth the comparison betweene Melchisedeck and Abraham for neither were thâ— faithfull Hebrewes uncapable of the doctrine of the Eucharist as Bellarmine imagineth seeing he treateth of as high mysteries as of baptisme and the resurrection chap. 6.2 and why should they be more uncapable than the Corinthians among the Gentiles whom Saint Paul instructeth concerning the Eucharist chap. 11. Neither as Pererius answereth was it a thing impertinent to make mention of Melchisedecks sacrifice of bread and wine if there had beene any such thing seeing the Apostle toucheth all other points of similitude and agreement betweene Christ and Melchisedeck and therefore would not have omitted this wherein they were most like 6. Whereas the fathers are objected that doe apply Melchisedecks bringing forth bread and wine to the Eucharist 1. The Apostle herein ought to prevaile more than all the fathers beside who maketh no such application 2. The Fathers doe not thereby shadow forth the Sacrament of the Eucharist as Ambrose saith Constat sacrificium pâ—riisse c. manere Melchisedeki instatutum quod totâ— orbe terrarum in sacramentorum erogatione celebratur c. The sacrifices of beasts are perished and the institution of Melchisedeck remaineth which is celebrated in the dispensation of the Sacraments The Fathers conclude a Sacrament not a sacrifice of bread and wine and so their testimonies make little for the popish sacrifice of the Masse 7. Many things are unlike betweene Melchisedecks producing bread and wine and the Masse Priests sacrificing He 1. presenteth them unto Abraham they offer them to God 2. Abraham and his company eat of Melchisedecks provision in the Masse the Priest doth all there is no eating or drinking 3. Melchisedeck blesseth Abraham
is inserted Vers 14. THese bee the heads of their fathers houses c. Moses setteth downe the genealogie of certaine tribes that it might bee knowne for the more certaintie of the storie of what stocks those two famous Prophets Moses and Aaron came the Lords Ambassadors to Pharaoh and instruments of these great works and wonders wrought in Egypt and of the deliverance of the people Borrh. 2. And Moses setteth downe the generation of Reuben and Simeon which were the two elder that he might orderly proceed to Levi lest hee might have beene thought onely to set downe his owne petigree Simler 3. And these three tribes are specially named because they of all other were most hardly censured by Iacob Reuben for his incest and the other two for their murther lest they might have beene thought utterly to have beene rejected Perer. 4. Moses most insisted upon the genealogie of Levi because that tribe was afterward chosen for the dignitie of the Priesthood Simler QUEST IX How Reuben is said here to be the first borne Vers. 14. THe sonnes of Reuben the first borne 1. He was the first borne by nature but he lost the prerogative of the first borne by his incest unto the which belonged a double preeminence the one of a double part which right was transferred to Ioseph of whom came two tribes the other of dignitie and authoritie over the rest of the brethren which was conveyed to Iudah Perer. 2. Of Reuben and Simeon onely those are rehearsed that came downe with Iacob unto Egypt because Moses doth make haste to set downe at large the offspring of Levi descending even unto Phinehes the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron Iun. 3. Some names are elsewhere otherwise termed as he which is called Iemuel is named in the Chronicles Nemuel and Sahar Zerah Ohad here named is there omitted either because he died in Egypt or else his posteritie was extinct and ceased in the wildernesse Simler QUEST X. Of the age of Levi. Vers. 16. THe yeeres of the life of Levi were 137. Levi was elder than Ioseph by foure yeeres for hee was the third sonne of Lea borne in the third yeere of the second seven of Iacobs service in the end whereof Ioseph was borne hence divers certaine conclusions concerning the Chronologie of the Scripture may be inferred 1. That Levi was 43. yeere old when he came downe with Iacob into Egypt for then was Ioseph 39. 2. That Levi lived 23. yeeres after the death of Ioseph who lived an 110. yeeres for Levi was 4. yeere elder than Ioseph and lived 137. 3. That Levi lived after he came into Egypt 94. yeeres unto the which if we adde 43. yeeres which was his age before he went into Egypt we shall have the whole life of Levi 137. yeeres 4. Levi died 121. yeeres before the going of the Israelites out of Egypt for all the time of their aboad in Egypt was 215. whereof Levi lived 94. in Egypt which summe being deducted from 215. the residue is 121. yeeres 5. It is gathered that Levi died before Moses birth 41. yeeres for Moses was 80. yeeres old when Israel was delivered out of Egypt but Levi died 121. yeeres before that then it will follow that he died 41. yeeres before Moses ex Perer. QUEST XI Of the age of Kohath Vers. 18. KOhath lived 133. yeeres 1. Thus read both the Latine Septuagint and Chalde agreeable to the Hebrew So that Eugubinus is deceived that saith Kohath according to the Septuagint lived but 130. yeeres 2. Hence it is evident that Kohath died 2. yeere before Moses birth and 82. yeeres before the deliverance of Israel for Kohath comming downe with Levi into Egypt may be supposed to be borne the same yeere from whence to Moses birth are 135. yeeres unto which adde 80. yeeres of the life of Moses and we have the whole summe of 215. yeeres the whole time of the Israelites being in Egypt But hee lived onely 133. yeeres then he must be dead two yeeres before Moses birth 3. Hence Alexander Polyhistor is found to be in error who holdeth as Eusebius reporteth Kohath to bee but 40. yeere old when Levi died who was rather than 94. yeere old but 43 yeere younger than his father being borne the same yeere when Levi went downe into Egypt QUEST XII Of the age of Amram Vers. 20. ANd Amram lived 137. yeeres If Amram were borne 14. yeeres before Ioseph died and begat Moses in the 77. yeere of his age as Alexander Polyhistor in Eusebius accompteth then it is evident that he died 21. yeeres before the departing of Israel out of Egypt and in the 60 yeere of Moses age as may bee thus gathered Ioseph lived after Iacob came downe into Egypt 71. yeeres being then 39. and his whole age was 110. so Ioseph died 144. yeeres before the departure of Israel for the foresaid numbers of 71. and 144. put together make the above said summe of 215. yeeres it will then follow that Amram borne 14. yeeres before Iosephs death and living 137. yeeres died 121. yeeres before the going forth of Israel ex Perer. QUEST XIII Why the sonnes of Korah and Aaron are set downe Vers. 21. ALso the sonnes of Izhar 1. Moses in the rest of Levi his posteritie descendeth but to the fourth degree saving in Aaron and Korah because of the one came famous Phinehes and the sonnes of the other are expressed because they died not in their fathers rebellion Numb 16.11 2. Hebron or Chebron his posteritie is not set downe it may be he was obscure and therefore not mentioned Borrh. 3. The rest here also are expressed because elsewhere they are spoken of for the manifestation of the history as Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.1 Mishael and Elzaphan Levit. 10.4 Eleazar Numb 20. and Ithamar Exod. 38.21 Iun. QUEST XIV Why Aaron tooke a wife of the tribe of Iudah Vers. 23. ANd Aaron tooke Elishebah daughter of Aminadab 1. These two Aminadab and Nahashon his sonne were Princes of Judah 2. Thus Levi and Iudah doe match in marriage together to signifie the conjunction and affinity that should bee betweene the regall and priestly office Simler 3. Hitherto the positive law of not confounding the tribes by marriage was not made and yet afterward notwithstanding it was lawfull for the Priests of Levi to take unto them wives of other tribes for because the Levites had no inheritance given them by such marriages there could follow no inconvenience by confusion of their inheritance So Iehoiadah the high Priest married the King of Judahs sister and Elizabeth wife to Zacharie the Priest was Cousin to Mary the blessed Virgin of Judah Simler QUEST XV. How Moses without ostentation setteth forth his owne commendation Vers. 27. THese are that Moses and Aaron c. 1. Some thinke that these words should be inserted by Ezra who digested the Scriptures into order because it seemeth not to stand with the modestie of Moses and Aaron to set forth such a
called gods c. 4. by way of similitude as Princes and Magistrates in respect of their authoritie wherein they represent God in earth are called gods so also Prophets in respect of their divine knowledge holy men for their sanctitie and Angels for the excellencie of creation and the ministers in regard of their divine function and calling have that name and title given them Perer. 2. To this agreeth also the distinction of Gregorie that some are called gods nuncupativè that is by a kinde of title and appellation as Moses is here called Pharaohs God but the Lord is called God essentially The God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob Exod. 3. Gregor hom 8. in Ezechiel 3. QUEST II. In what sense Moses is called Pharaohs God MOses is called Pharaohs God 1. not onely for that from God and in Gods name he declared his will unto him for the delivering of his people as Vatab. 2. nor yet that he was as a Prince onely to Pharaoh as being mightier than he and of greater power as the Chalde readeth and Simlerus consenteth 3. but he is so called in respect of the divine authoritie given unto him in bringing those great plagues upon Egypt which made Pharaoh to feare him as God and the Magitians afterward acknowledged that he wrought by the finger of God Perer. 4. Augustines note also is not here to be omitted that otherwise Moses is said to be in Gods stead to Aaron Exod. 4. that is a director of him in things belonging to God otherwise here he is said to be Pharaohs God that is to execute judgement upon him Augustine much to his purpose quaest 17. in Exod. QUEST III. In what sense Aaron is called Moses Prophet AAron thy brother shall be thy Prophet 1. This word Prophet is taken five wayes First it signified such as did prophesie and foretell things to come which in old time were called Seers and in this sense this name also was given unto false Prophets that tooke upon them to declare things to come as also S. Paul calleth Epimenides the Cretensian Prophet because he truly prophesied of the manners of the people Tit. 1. 2. They are said to prophesie which had a speciall gift to sing and play upon instruments as Asaph and Heman are said to prophesie upon their harpes 1 Chron. 25. 3. They also had the name of prophesying given them which onely in the outward behaviour were like unto Prophets that is as men ravished for the time and beside themselves as Saul is said to prophesie when the evill spirit came upon him 1. Sam. 18.10 that is he was as a man beside himselfe 4. To prophesie is taken for the doing of any strange and miraculous worke as the dead body of Elisha is said to prophesie Eccl. 48. because by the vertue thereof one was restored to life 5. To prophesie is to expound and interpret as S. Paul useth this word 1. Cor. 14. comparing prophesying and the gift of tongues together and in this sense is Aaron Moses Prophet that is his interpreter and spokesman to Pharaoh Pererius QUEST IV. Why the tribes of Israel are called armies Vers. 4. ANd bring forth mine armies 1. The Israelites are so called in respect of their numbers because every tribe of them by it selfe was able to make an army for if the summe of 600000. be divided into 12. partes each part will make 50000. Simler 2. Beside this sheweth that they should goe forth of Egypt not as men afraid or fleeing but with courage and strength as chap. 13.18 it is said they went up armed or well appointed out of Egypt 3. Hereby mystically is signified the great numbers of servants and people of God Borrh. 4. They came up by their armies that is by troupes and companies for as yet their commonwealth was not constituted nor distributed into tribes Iunius QUEST V Of Moses age Vers. 7. NOw Moses was 80. yeere old 1. To this agreeth S. Stephens narration that Moses was forty yeere old when he fled out of Egypt and that forty yeere more was expired before he returned into Egypt Act. 7.23.30 2. This is inserted concerning Moses and Aarons age for the further evidence of the story and to serve for the chronology of the Scripture and computations of times 3. And in that Moses and Aaron were called to place of governement being now aged it sheweth that it is not safe that the publike administration of offices should be committed to young men especially such as are but young in gifts necessary for governement QUEST VI. Whether Pharaoh asked a signe and whether a signe may be required Vers. 9 IF Pharaoh speake unto you saying shew a miracle c. 1. Though it be not expressed afterward that Pharaoh asked a miracle yet it is not to be doubted but that according to Gods direction to Moses he first shewed not this signe till Pharaoh had called for it because it is said vers 10. that they did as the Lord commanded 2. But to aske a miracle is not alwayes peculiar to the wicked sometime the godly may require a miracle for the confirmation of their faith as Gedion did But Pharaoh here asketh a signe of a captious minde that if Moses could not have warranted his calling by a signe hee might 〈◊〉 have rejected him and yet after that the signe was shewed he would not give place but seeketh 〈◊〉 evasions 3. This is the third time that this signe was shewed once in mount Horeb where the Lord gâ—ve this signe to Moses and afterward before the people to assure them of Moses calling Exod. 4. and now here before Pharaoh Ex Simler QUEST VII Of the divers names of the Egyptian Magicians here used Vers. 10. THen Pharaoh called for the Wisemen and Sorcerers 1. Here are foure words used to describe the Magicians of Egypt the first is chacamim or chacam to be wise which Simlerus taketh to be a generall name of that superstitious sect of Magicians that challenged unto themselves the onely opinion of wisdome being full of sophistry and deceit as the Septuagint read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rather than of true wisdome Vatablus saith the next word Sorcerers is an exposition of the former But I thinke rather it was a peculiar kinde of Magicke whereof there are set downe 8. severall professions Deut. 18.10 and the same that is there called jidghoni a wisard of jadagh to know the Septuagint readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a marker or observer of signes such as by the intrals of beasts and such other observations gave conjecture as Gen 41.8 they are taken for those which were cunning in the interpreting of dreames The next word is mecasphim praestigiatores whom we call Juglers which deceived mens senses the Septuagint read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 veneficos or as the Latine maleficos such as by sorcery bewitched men or beasts The third sort are chartumim which are taken to be the Genethliaci the casters of mens nativities The Septuagint call them
no concupiscence is mortall 2. There can be no reasonable coveting of another mans things for reason is grounded upon the law of nature against the which such concupiscence is therefore the coveting of our neighbours goods being a transgression of this morall precept is in it owne nature mortall but through Gods mercie in Christ both it and all other sinnes to the faithfull are veniall and pardonable and not otherwise 4. Confut. That Marie was not void of originall sinne and concupiscence FUrther Thomas Aquin hath another position Post peccatum propter corruptionem nullus evadit concupiscentiam praeter Christus virgo gloriosa c. After sinne entred because of corruption none can escape concupiscence beside Christ and the glorious Virgin Thom. in opuscul So the Rhemists All men are borne in sinne Christ onely excepted and his mother for his honour Annotat. Rom. 5. sect 9. Contra. 1. The Apostle saith Rom. 3.19 Whatsoever the law saith it saith to them which are under the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world be culpable before God But Mary was under the law and culpable before God as others were Ergo the law also saith to her Thou shalt not covet 2. Againe the same Apostle saith The law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ that we might be made righteous by faith Galath 3.24 But Mary was made righteous by faith for shee calleth Christ her Saviour in her song Luk. 1.47 Therefore the law also was a schoolmaster to her to bring her to Christ. 3. S. Paul further saith Ephes. 2.3 We were by nature the children of wrath as well as others He speaketh generally of all the faithfull therefore even Mary was by nature the childe of wrath and consequently borne in originall sinne 4. Divers infirmities are discovered in Scripture in the Virgin Mary as Luk. 2.48 her finding fault with Christ Matth. 12.46 her interrupting of Christ in his sermon Ioh. 2.2 her prescribing of the time to Christ to shew a miracle in turning the water into wine when Christ rebuked her saying Woman what have I to doe with thee All these infirmities doe shew that Mary was not void of originall sinne And therefore upon these reasons and testimonies of Scripture we inferre that Mary was conceived and borne in sinne as others are and Christ onely is excepted of whom onely the Apostle saith He was in all things tempted in like sort yet without sinne Heb. 4.15 As Origen also well saith Solus Christus sine macula Onely Christ was without spot Homil. 1. in Levit. See more also of this question Synops. Centur. 2. err 79. 5. Confut. Against the Romanists that it is impossible in this life to keepe the law of God NOw whereas the law restraineth the very inward concupiscence and corrupt desire herein appeareth the perfection of the law and how impossible it is for any in this life to keepe the law of God perfectly as the Apostle saith Rom. 7.14 We know that the law is spirituall but I am carnall sold under sinne There are two reasons why it is not possible to keepe the law both because it is spirituall not restraining onely the externall act but the internall spirituall motions and so is a most perfect rule of righteousnesse and for that we are on the other side imperfect full of weaknesse and corruption and carnall Here then is discovered another error of the Romanists That the precepts and commandements of God unto a man justified and in the state of grace are not impossible to be kept Concil Trident. sess 6. can 18. First then the truth concerning this point shall briefly be opened and then their objections answered First here we are to consider a fourefold state and condition of man 1. As he was created in a perfit state before his fall when it was possible for man to have kept the law and to have conformed himselfe in perfit obedience to the will of his Creator 2. But man considered in his corrupt nature before he be regenerate and restored can by no meanes keepe the law as the Prophet saith Can the blacke moore change his skinne or the Leopard his spots then may yee also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Iere. 13.23 So the Apostle Whatsoever is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 And We are not able of our selves to thinke any thing 2 Cor. 3.5 3. In the restored estate of man by regeneration and new birth the law is partly possible to bee kept partly impossible It is possible two wayes first by the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ who hath fulfilled the law for us for he needed not fulfill it for himselfe as hee suffered not for himselfe for he was perfitly holy and just even from his conception communicatione justitiae divinae by the communication of the divine justice Marbach So the Apostle saith Rom. 10.4 Christ is the end of the law that is the fulfilling of the law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth Secondly the law is possible to be kept of the regenerate Quo ad inchoationem obedientia internae externa in respect of the inchoation or beginning of obedience internall and externall as the Apostle saith This is the love of God that we keepe his commandements 1 Ioh. 5.3 For he which without this beginning of righteousnesse that is without regeneration saith he knoweth and serveth God is a liar Vrsin This regeneration and inchoate obedience being wrought in the faithfull by the Spirit of God though it doe not wolly extirpate and root out sinne yet it keepeth it so under that it reigne not in them and it so renueth them that they labour to resist sinne and to live according to the law of God which obedience though it bee in it selfe imperfect yet is it accepted of God by faith in Christ in whose perfect righteousnesse whatsoever is imperfect in our obedience is perfected and our imperfections pardoned Marbach Yet even in the regenerate the law is impossible to be kept in respect of that perfection which God requireth and therefore the Prophet David saith Psal. 143.3 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for in thy sight shall none that liveth be justified 1. The faithfull doe both imperfectly keepe the law committing many things against it 2. Even in those things wherein they keepe the law they have some imperfections as the Prophet Isay saith 64.6 All our righteousnesse is as a stained clout Vrsin But there is great difference betweene the regenerate and unregenerate even when they sinne 1. Gods purpose standeth to save the Elect though they sometime slip so is it not with the other 2. Their repentance in the end is certaine so is it not in the unregenerate 3. Even in the sinnes of the regenerate there remaineth yet some seed of faith which is not utterly extinguished nor they wholly given over but the wicked and unregenerate are wholly sold over unto sinne and their
was Eleazar but of all the rest of his posteritie which should succeed Aaron in the priesthood and this order of consecration was rather fulfilled in them after they came into the land of Canaan and had a setled State there than in Eleazar in whose initiation and entrance into the Priests office many of these rites and ceremonies were omitted in respect of the necessitie of the time and place for hee is only said to have put on Aarons priestly cloathes there is no mention made of his washing anointing sprinkling 1. Some thinke that those things were done also though they are not there expressed as in Scripture many things belonging to the historie and narration are omitted But the ceremonies here prescribed to be done in Aarons consecration are not only omitted there in the narration but they could not be performed in act for the high Priest was ordinarilie to be brought to the doore of the Tabernacle and there to be first washed and then to put on the priestly garments but Eleazar was in mount Hor when hee put on Aarons cloathes where the Tabernacle was not for this was done in the sight of all the people who could not see what was done in the Tabernacle And if Aaron had died in the Tabernacle it should have been thereby polluted for the tent wherein any died was uncleane Numb 19.15 Againe the high Priest who was anointed in his head and hands was not to come neere any dead bodie Levit. 21.10 11. Eleazar then could not be anointed here in the presence of Aaron who died there before his face 2. Some other thinke therefore that Eleazar onely put on Aarons cloathes there the other ceremonies were performed afterward when they were come downe from the mount but Eleazar for the comfort of his father was there bid to put on his cloathes that hee might see his sonne consecrated in his stead before he died But this is not like for the ceremonies could not be kept according to the law of the consecration seeing the high Priest was first to he washed at the doore of the Tabernacle before hee put on the holie garments he was not by the usuall order to put on the Priests apparell first and then to bee washed Againe seeing Aaron by stripping off his cloathes was together with them deprived of his Priesthood Eleazar together with the cloathes received the full right and authoritie of the Priesthood as Vatablus well expoundeth those words of the Lord to Moses Numb 20.26 Cause Aaron to put off his garments and put them upon Eleazar his sonne that is constitues pontificem Eleazarum thou shalt appoint Eleazar Priest for his father 3. Some further may alleage that seeing Eleazar was consecrated to bee a Priest before there needed now no new consecration but onely the putting on of the priestly garments But this answer doth not fully satisfie though Eleazar were now consecrated with his father and in that respect needed not in all respects to bee consecrated as they which had received no such consecration for there were certaine peculiar things used in the consecration of the high Priest whose head and hands were anointed with the holie oyle Levit. 21.10 and so were not the inferiour Priests 4. Therefore Tostatus opinion upon the former reasons is most probable that Eleazar was made high Priest speciali modo after a speciall manner qu. 15. QUEST XXXVIII What services the high Priest was bound to do in the Sanctuarie Vers. 30. TO minister in the Sanctuarie or holy place 1. The holie place or Sanctuarie is taken divers waies 1. For the whole Tabernacle together with the outward court in which sense it is said that Aaron and his sonnes should beare the iniquitie of the Sanctuarie Numb 8.1 2. For the Tabernacle it selfe without the outwart court as Exod. 28.35 His sound shall be heard when he goeth into the holy place that is when he went into the Tabernacle 3. It is sometime taken for the outward court chap. 28.43 when they come to the Altar to minister in the holie place here it is taken for the Tabernacle 2. Aaron had foure services to doe in the Tabernacle 1. To set the bread in order upon the table Levit. 24.6 2. To dresse the lampes morning and evening Levit. 24.3 3. To burne incense upon the golden Altar chap. 30.7 4. To goe into the most holie place once in the yeere to make reconciliation Levit. 16. But the three first services were common unto the inferiour Priests the last was peculiar to the high Priest Tostat. qu. 16. 5. Augustine is here deceived with whom Borrhaius accordeth that the most holy place is here meant into the which the high Priest entred only once in the yeere for the high Priest did not then put on his glorious apparell as he did here at his consecration when he went into the most holie place but the common linen garments Levit. 16.4 QUEST XXXIX Of other rites belonging to the ramme of consecration Vers. 31. ANd seeth his flesh in the holy place Now follow other rites and ceremonies belonging to the ramme of consecration 1. The flesh thereof that is the third part remaining beside that which was offered upon the Altar and that which was due for this time unto Moses Osiand was to be boyled not upon the Altar nor yet in any prophane place but in the outward court here called the holy place 2. They must eat them at the doore of the Tabernacle after they had boyled them in some place of the court further off then they shall come neerer to the Tabernacle and there eat them Tostat. qu. 16. 3. A stranger shall not eat thereof not only they which were strangers from Israel but even the Israelites themselves not of the tribe of Levâ— yea the Levites not of the familie of Aaron could not eat hereof Tostat. Borrhaius Osiander though Simlerus thinketh otherwise understanding by strangers such as were polluted and uncleane because the lay people might eat of their peace offerings But though the people might eat of their ordinarie peace offerings yet here because the Priests were the offerers they only must eat thereof yea here is no exception of their wives or children Lippom. 4. The flesh and bread must be eaten the same day if any remained till the morning it should be burnt with fire this is required lest by reserving any part thereof either they might grow into contempt of the holy things making no difference between them and their ordinarie food which they might reserve at their pleasure or lest that which remained might be abused to superstition Simler And whereas in ordinarie peace offerings they might eat of it the next day but not upon the third day Levit. 7.18 but no part of this must be eaten the second day this was to shew that this ramme of consecration was a more holy thing than their ordinarie peace offerings Tostat. quaest 16. QUEST XL. Whether all these rites were of the necessitie of the