Scripture so many as are predestinated unto life are they not called Kings and Priests therefore what God hath conjoyned let no man put asunder but rather what divine Authority hath ordained mans will should endeavor to fulfil and they should joyn in hearts who are conjoyned in ordinances let them cherish one another defend other mutually and bear one anothers burthens The wise man saith A brother aiding a brother both shall be comforted but if they bite one another which God forbid both shall come into desolation Let not my soul come into their counsels which say That either the peace and freedom of the Church is hurtful unto the Crown or the prosperity and exaltation of the Crown is hurtful unto the Church for God the Author of them both hath conjoyned them not to destruction but to edification If ye know this how long will ye dissemble the common contumely and common injury Is not Rome as the Apostolical Seat so also the head of the Empire therefore though I would not speak of the Church is it the honor of the King to have an headless Empire I know not what the wise men and Princes of the Kingdom do advise you herein but though I speak imprudently I will not be silent in what I do judge The Chuch of God from the beginning even till these times hath been oft afflicted and oft delivered it is her voice They have often afflicted me from my youth but they could not prevail against me Be sure O King that neither now will the Lord leave the rod of the wicked upon the back of the righteous the hand of the Lord is not shortned nor become unable to help At this time he will deliver his Spouse which he hath redeemed by his blood endowed with his spirit furnished with heavenly gifts and nevertheless enriched with earthly things He will deliver I say again he will deliver but if by the hand of another let the Princes of the Kingdom consider whether this be to the honor and advantage of the King certainly not Wherefore gird thy sword O most mighty and let Caesar recover unto himself what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's Vtrumque interesse Caesaris constat undoubtedly both these appertain to Caesar to maintain his own Crown and to defend the Church the one becometh the King and the other the Advocate of the Church The victory as we trust in the Lord is at hand the Romans are more arrogant then potent for what did ever any great or mighty Emperor or King presume so vile a thing both against Crown and Priest-hood but this cursed and tumultuous people which cannot measure their strength nor think on the end nor consider the event in their foolishness and fury durst attempt so great sacriledge the temerity of the multitude cannot stand for a moment before the King's face c. I will not here add observations Bellarmin de Ro. Pont. l. 2. c. 31. The original of the title â—icar of Christ alledgeth That Bernard did first give unto the Pope the Title Vicar of Christ It was not from the beginning so but the Cardinal mistaketh it Bernard was not the first if Platina do truly report the words of Gregory VII he used this Title before him and according to the language of the Court at that time Bernard giveth this Title unto all Priests even from whom all iniquity procedeth as he speaketh in festo Convers Pauli ser 1. and giveth unto Eusebius both this and loftier Titles for lib. 2. de Consider he calleth him The Great Priest the Prince of Bishops the Heir of the Apostles Abel in Primacy in Government Noah in Patriarchship Abraham in Order Melchisedek in Dignity Aaron in Authority Moses in Iudging Samuel in Power Peter in Vaction Christ here is a rhapsody of glorious Titles and he addeth these passages of Scripture that are wrested to maintain the ambition of the man of sin but whether he speak so in derision or according to his own minde it may be judged by his words following immediately but first see what he And confuted by Bernard at large said a little before What hath the holy Apostle left in legacy unto thee he saith What I have I give thee What is it One thing I know it is not silver nor gold seeing he said Silver and gold have I not If thou happen to have it use it according to the time and not at thy pleasure so use them as not abusing them seeing these in respect of the souls good are neither good nor ill but the use of them is good the abuse ill the care of them is worse and seeking is filthier by whatsoever way thou may have them certainly thou hast them not by title of the Apostle for he could not give what he had not what he had that he gave the care of all the Churches Gave he Lordly power hear himself Not domineering over the people but being an example of the flock And lest you think he said so in humility onely and not in truth the Lord saith in the Gospel The Kings of the earth have dominion but not ye so It is clear dominion is forbidden unto the Apostles Go then and take if thou darest either Apostleship if thou be a Lord or dominion if thou be Apostolical thou art clearly forbidden to do either of the two if thou wilt have them together thou shalt lose them both or else think not thy self to be excepted from those of whom God complaineth saying They have reigned but not by me they were Princes and I knew them not And if thou wilt reign without God thou hast glory but not with God We see what is forbidden now hear what is commanded Who is the greater among you let him be as the yonger and he that is chief as he that serveth There is the model of an Apostle dominion is forbidden and serving is commanded which is commended also by example of the Law-Giver for it followeth I am in the midst of you as he who serveth Bernard there hath many things to this purpose and after he hath mentioned these former Titles and prerogatives he saith I have spoken of who thou art but forget not what consider what thou wast and now art why wilt thou not behold what thou canst not cease to be Indeed it is one thing what thou wast and art and another who thou art â—ecome the one must not be forgot in searching thy self for thou art what thou wast and thou art not less after thou art become such and perhaps more thou wast born that and changed this but not changed into this the former is not cast off but this is added If thou consider what remember thy nature thou wast born a man if thou ask who thou art a Bishop this thou art made and not born which of these thinkest thou nearest or chiefest unto that thou art made or that thou wast born is not that thou wast born therefore I advise thee to
martyrdom of Polycarpus neer the end they say The envious and malicious enemie of just men seeing the glorie of this Martyr so great procured that his bodie should perish from among us for there were manie that indeavoured and fully purposed to have been partakers of his blessed bodie by burial many pricked forwards Nicetes the father of Herod and his brother Dalces to move the Proconsul not to deliver unto the Christians his bodie lest that say they they leaving Christ fall to worship him This they said when the Jews egged and urged them forward which continuallie watched us lest we snatched him out of the fire being ignorant of this that we cannot forsake Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Translater omitteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and should have translated thus who suffered for the salvation of the whole world of them who are saved that we can worship none other for we worship Christ as the Son of God the Martyrs we love as his Disciples and followers of the Lord and that worthilie for their invincible good love they bear to their King 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is and we wish we may be their companions or communicate with them Out of this Epistle we see Christians did worship Christ and could not worship any other man Origenes contra Celsum lib. 5. holdeth that Saints that are in blessedness do pray for the Church on earth yet saith he we pray not unto them for God willeth it not and he refuteth the similitude taken from the example of Kings Courtiers Cyprian unto Cornelius Bishop of Rome saith If any of us two depart before the other by the mercies of God let our love continue and let not our praier cease with God and the mercie of the Father for our brethren and sisters But in Cyprian was no praier unto Cornelius when he was dead nor to any other that was defunct neverthelesse this opinion of Cyprian made way unto the invocation of Saints afterwards Georgius Trapezuntius the Translatour of Eusebius once made me believe that Eusebius and the Church in his time did worship the Saints for in lib. 13. de prepar Evang. cap. 7. he translateth thus We honour all those who have lived well howsoever they died we do this dailie honouring the servants of true godliness as the friends of God we go also unto their graves and make praiers unto them as to holie men by whose intercession we hope to be helped with God but the original words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is we pray besides their graves and honour their blessed souls Where Eusebius hath nothing for praier to Saints and in lib. 4. cap. 5. he saith We are taught to worship religiouslie God onlie and cap. 10. he saith Worshipping him onlie adoring him onlie in these places Trapezuntius hath omitted the partitie only The first Authours of any note whom the worshippers of Saints can alledge trulie were about an 370. for then some as Basilius Nissen and Nazianzen did pour forth praiers unto the Saints but with this addition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is if you have any feeling and if thou hast any regard of me and mine And at the same time sundrie other Fathers did not onlie abstain from but did impugn this novation Chrysostom in Ps 4. saith At all time thou maiest pray unto God neither needest Porters to bring thee in nor Proctors nor friends but when thou comest by thy self then especially doth he hear thee we do not so well please him when we request by others as we may by our selves for when he awaits our love he doth all things that may make us trust in him for when he seeth that we come by our selves he granteth most c. Epiphanius condemneth this errour in the Collyridians and the Antidicomarionites It were longsom to recite particular Authours we have their testimonies being assembled in Councels at the Councel of Laodicea in Syria an 368. in cap. 35. the worship of Angels and Saints is forbidden as idolatrie and forsaking of Christ Caranza in translating hath put angulos for Angels But Theodoret on the Epistle to Coloss cap. 30. saith expressely the Laodiceans in that Synod forbid the worshipping of Angels And the third Councel at Carthage cap. 23. saith When it is stoodat the Altar let praiers be alwaies made unto God And in that which is called the fourth Councel at Carthage cap. 14. Altars are commanded to be cast down that were erected to the memorie of Martyrs under the pretence of their apparitions and the furiousness of the people is hinted at in that place when they add If it may be done but if it be not permitted by the tumults of the people let the people be admonished that they haunt not those places Whence it is clear that the Fathers were forced to tolerate some things that they could not amend But what need I to bring the orthodox against these doubting Fathers seeing even they do upon other occasions condemn that practice Basilius in Moral reg 80. cap. 22. saith Seeing whatsoever is without the Scriptures is not of faith it is sin and Nazianzen in Oral in Basil saith Seeing I am a creature I cannot adore any creature and although Ambrose called unto his brother Satyrus for help yet in all that Oration he speaketh but passionately and rhetorically as appeareth clearly by these and other words Give me leave and permit unto my sorrow that I may speak a little more largelie of him with whom now I may not speak But behold what he saith without passion de fide ad Gratian. lib. 1. cap. 7. Paul forbiddeth me to serve any creature but commandeth me to serve Christ Christ therefore is not a creature the good servant who acknowledgeth the Lord even he forbiddeth us to serve a creature how then would he have served Christ the Lord if he had thought that Christ was but a creature And in comm in Rom. cap. 1. saith They being confounded with shame do use a miserable excuse saying they go unto God by creatures as we are wont to go unto a King by his Courtiers When he calleth this a miserable excuse he declares that the practice did not please him but he continueth refuting that excuse saying We go unto a King by his Courtiers because he is a man and knoweth not to whom he may concredit the Common-Wealth but to procure Gods favour who surely knows all our works and nothing is hid from him we need not any Intercessour but only a devote mind Bellarm. de Sanctor beat lib. 1. cap. 20. replieth The first part of these words is to be understood of them who give the properhonour of God unto the Saints and the last part meaneth God hath no need of information but we have need saith he This is to use the words of Ambrose a miserable excuse for he speaks of our need of an Intercessour and he saith We need not an Intercessour but a
good purpose what good works did precede whereby that man did deserve to be one person with God yea to be very God To wit God himself even he by whom man began began not to be another then the Son of God and that the only the only begotten and properly and for the Word of God who was made flesh verily God that as every man is one person even a reasonable soul and flesh so Christ is one person the word and flesh Whence is so great glory unto human nature by no preceding merits without doubt by the free and gracious gift but only here the great and only grace of God is evidently shewed unto them who consider faithfully and soberly to the end men may understand that they are justified from their sins by the same free grace by which it was that the man Christ could have no sin Ibid. cap. 12. Certainly no man can have peace with God but by the Mediatour Christ Jesus who is in two natures very God and very man one Christ both Priest and sacrifice he came unto us to offer for us what he had assumed of us that he might take away from us that which he found in us that is our sins Ibid. cap. 21. The Apostle saith of the fire of the day of judgement What each mans work is the fire shall declare It is not to be doubted that he speaketh of a Purgatory fire which fire the ungodly shall feel one way and the godly another way and the righteous another way seeing the ungodly shall from the torment of the fire be thrown into everlasting flames but the godly who shall rise in their bodies without all blot of sin and who have built gold silver and precious stones upon the foundation which is Christ they shall escape that fire with so great facility as with integrity of faith and love of Christ they have kept the commands in this life and that fire of Dooms-day shall be unto them as the Fornace of Babylon was unto the three children who without all harm of that fire shall call upon the beauty of all the creatures unto the praises of God But some just men are subject to some small sins because upon the Foundation which is Christ they have built stones hay and straw which are cleansed by the heat of that fire from which they being cleansed shall be made pertakers of everlasting glory And so by that transitory fire and the whole judgement of that day being compleated two congregations of the godly and the ungodly shall be severed the one of Christ and the other of the Divel So he expoundeth not that Text of a Purgatory before the day of Judgement On the Psalms of degrees at the words of Psal 130. If thou Lord wilt mark iniquity he saith He expoundeth out of what depth he did cry that is from the gulf of his sins which as a deluge had gone over his head understanding that all his life was full of tentations Therefore he saith Who can stand If thou judge only righteousness unto us and shew not mercy none can stand for we are all the children of wrath but we have more hope of thy mercy but not of our merits On John chap. 6. This is to eat his flesh and to drink his blood even to abide in Christ and to have him abiding in us and therefore who abideth not in Christ certainly he eateth not his flesh spiritually although carnally and visibly he do press the Sacrament of his body and blood but rather he eateth the Sacrament of so great a thing for damnation to himself because he being unclean presumeth to come unto the Sacraments of Christ which none taketh worthily but who is clean as it is written Blessed are the pure in heart for Contra Felic Vrgelit lib. 2. Shew us any Nation or Alcwin writeth against the errours of Felix and Elâ—pant Town or Church either Roman which is the head of Churches or Constantinopolitan or of Jerusalem which was dedicated by the presence of the Lord himself or of Antiochia where first the name of Christianity is read to have been or of Alexandria or of any other Church either in Italy or Germany or in France or in Aquitania or in Britan which agrreeth with you in your assertion Here he acknowledgeth all these to be true Churches at that time and distinguis heth them one from another and where he calleth the Roman the Head of Churches certainly he understandeth not that other Churches had their original from Rome seeing he saith the Church of Ierusalem was dedicated by the presence of the Lord himself and Christians had their first name at Antioch both which were before there was any mention of a Church at Rome When Felix came to a Synod at Regensburg where were Priests from all parts of the Christian Empire as Alcwin speaketh contra Elipant lib. 1. his errour was accursed and nevertheless he continued in his errour till at the command of Charls the Great Alcwin writ these books and then he became zealous for the truth and did write a recantation unto the Presbyters and Deacons of his Church that as he had been a scandal unto them so by his means they may be brought again from errour unto the truth as he himself writeth and this recantation is printed among the Works of Alcwin But Elipant Arch-Bishop of Toledo having read these seven books of Alcwin writ very bitterly for maintaining the same errour He professeth to beleeve that Christ is but one person in two natures in one eternal and equal with the Father and the same unity of his person remaining inseparably is also the son of man in respect of his flesh and in respect of his divine nature the Father and He are one unum and in respect of his form of a servant he came not to do his own will but the will of him who sent him But as in respect of the Divine nature He is the natural Son of the Father so in respect of his flesh he is the Son of God adoptive and nuncupative It is to be marked by the way that Felix had said Christ in respect of his flesh was the old man and had need of regeneration but Elipant did not write so For proof of this his last point he alledgeth several testimonies of Scripture of Augustine and other fathers and of the Spanish Missal Against this Epistle of Elipant Alcwin writ four books wherein he sheweth that Elipant held the same heresie with Nestorius who had spoken the same way and yet was judged to have spoken inconsistibly with the unity of Christ's person He retorteth all the restimonies of Scripture and from them proveth that Christ is never called a nuncupative God nor adoptive son but even whilest the Scripture speaketh of his manhood or of him as man calleth him the only begotten of the Father Thirdly he sheweth that Elipant did corrupt the testimonies of the Fathers and did add the words Nuncupative
and Adoptive where they were not and on the contrary he produceth their testimonies where they do expressely deny that Christ is the Son of God by adoption and in this respect distinguish Christ's son-ship and the son-ship of the Elect. As for the testimonies of the Spanish Missal he toucheth them not as if that Missal were nothing Nevertheless hence we see that the Spanish Church at that time had a proper Missal and were not subject unto the Roman Church It is also worth the marking that whereas Elipant had alledged a testimony of the son of Sirach Alcwin lib. 1. saith When the testimonies of God's Prophets have failed unto thy perversness thou feignest a new Prophet speaking according to thy errour In Jesus the son of Sirach is that sentence which book blessed Jerom and Isidore do witness that without doubt it is reckoned amongst the Apocrypha that is dubious witness and it was not in the time of the Prophets but of the Priests when Ptolemeus Evergetes was King In lib. 2. neer the end he saith Holy Father raze raze quickly this opinion out of the Closet of thy heart lest the Lord who hath appointed thee to give Wheat unto his family find that written in the Table of thy heart and say unto thee I acknowledge not these Letters these words were not taught thee by the men to whom I said Go teach all Nations If we join these two testimonies we see that Alcwin did not acknowledge any book for Scripture nor any doctrine for truth which had not a warrant from the Prophets and Apostles In lib. 4. The original of these evils which begets the occasion of all impieties is this While the wisedom of the heavenly Teachers is weighed through the fault of miss-thinking men in their temerarious pride not according to the propriety of their meaning but is turned into other meanings after the will and pleasure of the reader and otherwise then the respect of truth carrieth and it is easie unto any who understandeth the Scripture rightly to find this by the Comments of all Hereticks that they are not afraid in their ungodly temerity and froward blindness to draw the most holy words of the Divine books into the similitude of their errour which kind of impiety and misery if thou Father Elipant hadst considered with a prudent mind and humble searching thou hadst never fallen from the unity of the Catholick peace into the pit of this errour In his book De virtut vitis which he writ at the intreaty of Wido a Count he exhorteth him to read the Scriptures diligently Ca. 5. saying The reading of the Holy Scriptures is the knowledge of divine blessedness for in them as in a glass a man may know himself what he is and whither he goeth Continual reading purifieth the soul breedeth fear of Hell and stirreth up the heart of the reader unto Heavenly joies He who desireth to be with God for ever should frequently read and pray for when we pray we speak with God and when we read God speaks with us The reading of the Holy Scriptures bringeth a twofold benefit because it instructeth the understanding and brinketh a man from the vanities of the World to the love of God Honest is the labour of reading and conduceth much to the purifying of the soul for as the body is nourished by fleshly meat so the inward man is nourished and fed by God's word as the Psalmist saith How sweet unto my tast are thy words O Lord even more then the honey and the honey-comb unto my mouth But he is blessed who reading the Holy Scriptures turneth the words into works Certainly all the Holy Scripture is written for our salvation to the end we may by them grow in the knowledge of the truth A blind man stumbleth oftner then he who seeth so he who knoweth not the Law of God sinneth through ignorance oftner then he who knoweth it Certainly this man would not have consented unto that Canon of the Councel of Trent which forbiddeth people to read the Scriptures But to the end that all should not be thought to be his which goeth under his name it is to be marked that in Par. II. is an Homily in festo omnium Sanctor which Quercitanus hath marked to be amongst the Sermons of Augustine but he had found it in a manuscript under the name of Albin but it can not be either Augustin's nor Albin's seeing that feast was afterwards appointed by Pope Gregory the IV. These books de Trinitate are written so clearly that Sixtus Senens in praefat Biblioth saith They were written by John Calvin and published in the name of Alcvine But Doctor James in The Corruption of the Fathers par 4. pag. 50. testifieth that antient copies thereof were in the Prince's Library at Saint James and they were Printed at Lions An. 1525. when Calvin had not begun to write Rich. Hoveden in The Continuation of Beda writeth That Charls the Great sent over into England the Acts of a Synod sent him from Constantinople for the adoration of images the which the Church of God utterly detesteth Against this adoration saith he Albinus writ an Epistle marvellously grounded on divine Scriptures and carried it with some Synodical Acts in name of the English Bishops and Princes unto the King of France 6. Ecbert King of the West-Saxons vanquished Merceland Kent Essex and Northumberland and then he commanded that land to be called Anglia and the inhabitants Angles or English men Tho. Cooper ad An. 796. CHAP. V. Of COUNCELS 1. FEw Councels were assembled in the beginning of this Century In France Carloman assembleth one which beginneth thus In the A Synod in France Name of our Lord Jesus Christ I Carloman Duke and Prince of France with the advice of the Servants of God and my Nobles in the fear of Christ have assembled An. 742. Febr. 19. the Bishops which are in my Kingdom with the Priests into a Councel and Synod these are Boniface Arch-Bishop of Mentz Burchard Bishop of Wirtzburg Reginfrid Guntharius and the rest of the Bishops with their Priests That they should give me counsel how the Law of God and religion of the Church many be restored Nota which in the daies of former Princes hath been shattered and fallen and how Christian people may attain the salvation of their souls and not perish being deceived by false Priests And by the advice of my Priests and Nobles We have ordained Bishops thorow Cities and set over them the Arch-Bishop Boniface who is the Legate of Saint Peter And we have ordained that Synods should be called every year that in Our presence the Decrees of Canons Rites and Laws of the Church may be restored and We restore unto the Churches the monies which hath been taken from them We have also discharged all the Servants of God from hunting and wandring in woods with Dogs and that they have no Hawks nor Falcons We have also Decrced according to the holy
Jews so here election is for the Elect who obtain justification by faith On Cap. 15 at these words Whatsoever is written is written for our instruction ... he saith The Apostle joineth himself unto all Beleevers and will shew that all things which are written in Divine books are not written for them whose deeds and works are there reported for they are in rest long ago but for our salvation and of them which are to come that we may have whence we may take example of faith and good works and whence we may know with what works God is pleased and with what he is provoked to punish .... for what did it avail to Abraham that Moses hath written he was obedient and that he commends him to have pleased God But he saith Whatsoever things are written in the Law Prophets Psalms and other Scriptures are written for our instruction that we which are come unto the faith may thence learn Seeing Remigius writeth that the Scriptures are written for the instruction of all Beleevers would he then have consented unto the Act of Trent which forbids the use of the Scriptures unto Beleevers On 1 Cor. 1. at these words That no flesh should glory before him he saith No flesh that is no man The wise and mighty cannot glory because they are not called by him for their wisdom and riches neither had they divine wisdom or spiritual riches of themselves The Apostles could not glory because whatsoever they had of favour they received it from God without their merits and they cannot glory that they were chosen for their wisdom and riches ..... He that glorieth let him glory in the Lord he glorieth in the Lord and not in himself who confesseth that all the good he hath he hath received it from God without his own merit and therefore seeks not his own glory and praise but his glory from whom he hath received whatsoever he hath On Gal. 6. on these words God forbid that I rejoice but in the Cross of Christ he saith that is I will not rejoice in the riches and dignities of this World but in the Cross of Christ i. e. in his suffering which was done on the Cross will I rejoice from whence is my redemption and salvation Or I will rejoice in the Cross of Christ that is in this will I rejoice if I can follow the suffering of Christ what he hath sustained for me I may sustain the like for his name Hence we may see that Remigius did not rejoice in the painted or moulded Cross but in Christ's sufferings for our redemption On Eph. 2. at these words Built on the foundation he saith The foundation of the Prophets Apostles and of all the faithfull is Christ because they are grounded and established in faith of him as he himself said Upon this Rock that is upon me will I build my Church Here Remigius expoundeth the Rock to signifie Peter On Cap. 5. at these words Not having spot or wrinkle he saith In this world the Church may be said to be glorious one way because it hath Kings and Princes subject and it hath many orders and degrees but it cannot be without spot or wrinkle of sin because it hath many penitents in it and if we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us and there is not a man upon earth which doth good and sinneth not wherefore it is better that we refer these words unto the general resurrection On Cap. 6. The sword of the Holy Ghost is the Word of God as the Apostle saith that is the doctrine and knowledge of the Divine Scriptures which is given unto us by the Holy Ghost And it is called a sword because as enemies are put to flight by a sword so by the knowledge of Divine Scriptures we may put to flight all the craft and devices of the Divel by following what the Scripture teacheth and eschewing what it forbiddeth and not only may we overcom the Divels by the knowledge of the word and by the help of God but by authority thereof we may convince all Hereticks and destroy all their errours Reader observe in this testimony the manifold use of the Scriptures and especially that they are a rule wherewith all errours may be destroied On Phil. 2. at these words It is God who worketh in you he saith Lest he seem to exclude God from our salvation or as if without the help of God we could be saved â—e subjoins For it is God who worketh in you therefore every good which we have as well the good will as the good operation is not of us but of God ..... both to will that is to have a good will and to do according to good will that is that we may alwaies will what is good On Cap. 3. at these words If I may comprehend in whom I am comprehended he saith All the Elect which are predestinated for eternal life are comprehended in the Passion of Christ because thereby are redeemed not only those who are saved after his resurrection and who are purged in baptism but all the godly which were before his coming ..... Whosoever are perfect in comparison of others let us think so understand that we are not perfect for whosoever are perfect that is who are thought to be perfect let us understand that this is in comparison of Beleevers and who have less understanding because we are not perfect in respect of what we shall have at the day of judgement On 1 Tim. 2. he saith Seeing the Psalmist saith The Lord doth whatsoever he willeth and the Apostle saith Which will have all men to be saved Why are not all men saved To which I say Because it is true what the Psalmist saith For he hath said and it shall be likewise he will save all men which are saved and which by his mercy seek to be saved for the Apostles have put the whole for a part as in the Gospel the Lord saith When I shall be exalted from the earth I will draw all men unto me for he drew not all men nor draweth all men but all that is the Elect out of all sorts and Nations out of all sex and condition from Kings unto Beggars from the perfect unto the babe of one day yet none can be saved but whom God willeth because he sheweth mercy on whom he will for if all men had continued in perdition just had been the judgment of God but that his mercy and power might be shewed because he is powerfull to save all men in those which do perish he shews his just judgment and his mercy in them which are saved for his grace preveneth us that we have will and our will should accord with his will and then he will give us ability and because we join our will to his will we are worthy to be rewarded and nevertheless it is all to be ascribed unto his grace whatsoever good we do He saith then Which will have
of virginity be commended so that the humility of marriage be not despised Catal. test ver lib. 9. Trithem in Catal. Illustr saith that he writ of redemption superfluously even to the salvation of Reprobates Here Trithem doth him wrong as appears by the book it self which was Printed lately at Rotterdam with a Preface of the learned Doctor Rivet or Renatus Deviraeus who hath a part of his XXX Epistle written unto Gotteschalk answering unto that question Whether we shall after resurrection behold God with bodily ey Here he commendeth the modesty of Augustine and denieth that God can be seen in his substance which priviledge is reserved unto the Spirit and then he saith Though I pay my debt of love unto thee much respected brother I cannot fully discharge it but I exhort thee that thou spend not thy spirits any more on such questions lest being taken up with them more than is needfull thou be less able to search and teach profitable things ...... In the mean time let us walk in the most large field of holy Scriptures and give our selves wholly unto the meditation of them and seek the Lord's face humbly piously and continually for no good shall be lacking unto them who seek him Then that Preface shews that this Abbot was not Authour of that Book which Trithemius and others do call his but another Lupus who did live at the same time to wit 20. Lupus Servatus a Benedictine in the Abbey of Saint Amand in the Diocy of Tornac writ a Treatise of free-will predestination and of the price of Christ's blood The sum of that Treatise the Authour did collect in an Epistle unto King Charls the Bald who had commanded him to write on that subject His words are God made Adam upright as the holy Scripture teacheth and in him he created us all originally upright this father of mankind forsaking natural uprightness none forcing him did sin so grievously that himself and in him he condemned us all which are begotten of both sexes God therefore made human nature excellently good but man hath corrupted it miserably by his spontaneous fault Adam was then as saith blessed Ambrose and we all were in him but Adam perished and we all perished in him Let us praise God's work and confess that nothing but punishment is due unto our fault But God to whom all things which were are and which are to come are present for he is what he is nor can be any addition or diminution of his knowledge seeing he fore-knew the whole mass of mankind to be corrupted with sin would not hold from it the good of his creation seeing he could use well even evil things and before the foundation of the world he did chuse out of that mass whom by grace he would deliver from deserved punishment as the Apostle saith As he hath chosen us before the foundation of the World But others on whom he vouchsafes not this grace of mercy he in just judgment leaveth them in damnation which they have deserved by sin And thus as the Apostle saith he hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth He shews mercy on such whom he assumeth by grace and he hardneth those whom he doth not mollifie by the same grace but howbeit in hid yet in just judgment he leaveth them Those then on whom he shews mercy are predestinated for glory as the Apostle saith Whom he hath foreknown he hath predestinated and they are called the vessels of honour These do ow unto him what they are and what they have because they are made by his goodness when before they were not and of his bountifulness they are saved when they were lost But those whom he hardneth that is whom he softneth not which are left in damnation which they have originally and actually deserved are called vessels fitted unto contumely and prepared for destruction That those are created it is the good gift of God and that they are punished it is their own evil Blessed Augustine in many of his books and especially in that he writ last doubteth not to say that they ar predestinated to punishment not meaning a fatal necessity on them which shall perish but the unchangeable desertion of them which are forsaken For he had read If God shut up a man who shall open unto him And also consider the works of God that none can correct what he hath despised And that also I have given them over into the desires of their hearts and they shall walk in their own devices And I think he was led into this thought especially by that testimony concerning God Which made what was to come And to whom it is said Thou wilt give to every one according to their works which indeed he will do to each one except whom he blesseth by forgiving their iniquities and hiding their sins which advancing his grace with highest praises can say He deals not with us according to our sins nor rewardeth us according to our iniquities With Augustine do in other words agree Jerom Gregory Beda Isidore ... as I could easily demonstrate Certainly the first man did by sinning lose free-will in good which he did despise and he holds it in evil which he chose But as if a man willeth he can kill himself by with-holding food from himself but when he is killed he cannot make himself to live so man could willingly lose the use of free-will in good by forsaking it but he cannot resume it by his own strength even although he would therefore he shall not have free-will in good unless it be made free by the grace of God Our Lord Jesus which knew as it is written what is in man declareth this soundly when he said Without me ye can do nothing to wit no good thing for he cannot be the Authour nor co-worker of ill who as John Baptist saith is the Lamb of God and takes away the sins of the World to wit both which were and that they be not done And elsewhere If the Son shall make you free ye shall be truly free ..... God's grace preveneth us as it is written My God his mercy shall prevene me that we may both will and begin and his grace followeth us as it is written Thy mercy shall follow me that in vain we will not or begin These then are principally of God as is clear by these testimonies and but consequently ours because they are done by us willingly as it is written Lord thou wilt give us peace for thou workest all our works unto us ....... Lastly whom God hath redeemed by his blood it is learned by the Gospel In Matthew the Lord saith Drink ye all of this for this is my blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for many for remission of sins And in Mark This is my blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for many But in Luke This is the new Testament of my blood which shall be shed for you Then two
be considered as they are in themselves but as they have reference to another thing for a pledge is of that for which it is given and so is an Image the resemblance of that whose similitude it representeth .... wherefore it is the body and blood of Christ which the Church celebrateth but as a pledge and resemblance The conclusion is Wherefore most noble Prince let your wisdom consider that it is most clearly shewed by testimonies of Scripture and words of the holy Fathers that the bread which is called the body of Christ is a figure because it is a mystery and that there is a great difference between the mystery of his body and his body it self .... And we add saith he that the Bread and Cup which are called the Body and Blood of Christ do represent and are in remembrance of the Lord's death as he said Do this in remembrance of me and Paul expounds How oft ye eat this bread ... shew forth the Lord's death Now some Popish Indices have forbidden this book altogether as unlawfull and those of Doway perceiving that the forbidding of it did occasion men to look after it thought it better to let it go abroad but in some places maimed and in others perverted as where it is said visibiliter they will have it invisibiliter and where it is said secundum creaturarum substantiam they bid to expound it secundum externas species sacramenti Likewise Bishop Usser in Histor Gottes cap. 11 writes that he had seen other books of Bertram in manuscripts and containing the same doctrine especially his book De Praedestinatione which he writ in defence of the doctrine for which Gotteschalk did suffer is extant under the name of Ratrannus Monk of Corbey 22. Remigius Bishop of Altisiodor or of Auxerre about the year 880 was called Doctor Sententiosus he writ many works On Psal 10. he saith All my faith is in Christ by him only do I beleeve to be justified and saved he is my mountain and my refuge for he is my Lord which is God by nature but all ye who are men are infirm as I. On Psal 18. The Heavens declare the glory of God to wit that he saveth not by works of righteousness which we have done but of his own righteousness for all men have sinned and stand in need of the glory of God being justified freely This is the declaring of God's glory that is his mercy which is shewed by the Sun wherein God is glorified ...... So long as we are in this body it cannot be but sin is in us then it reigneth when we consent and make our will subject unto it wherefore the Apostle saith Let not sin reign in your mortal bodies therefore O Lord cleanse me and spare me but so that I be not subject to my own thoughts nor the inticement of others On Psal 21. Adam made the old people by conformity unto him to wit he was a servant but the Lord hath made the new people because he justifieth freely without our preceding merits for we made our selves sinners but the only mercy of God makes us righteous ..... The poor shall eat me that is shall receive the Sacrament of my body and blood and they shall be filled by following me and denying themselves because to eat the Lord is to have a will to follow him in all things and to be one with him On Psal 29. Eternal life is not by merit because we could fall of our selves but we could not rise of our selves but through his will that is only of mercy On Psal 33. Truly they only are blessed they only are saved which are justified by grace and not by their merits On Psal 39 When we live well let us ascribe nothing to our merits but all to the grace of God On Psal 55 If we will offer sacrifice to God we need not seek any thing without to offer within us is the Incense of praise and the sacrifice of faith On Psal 64. Propitiation is miseration shewed after sacrifice So Christ willing to shew mercie propitiari on his people became a Priest praying unto the Father with hands lifted up upon the Cross he offered a sacrifice because he offered himself on the Altar of the Cross he is the Priest he is the Sacrifice the Propitiator and the propitiation On Psal 85. God the Father could give no greater gift unto men then that he made his Word by which he made all things to be a head unto them and did fit these men to be as members unto Him so that He is God with the Father and Man with men who both prayeth for us and prayeth in us and is praied unto by us He prayeth for us because he is Priest and Sacrifice interceding daily with the Father for us He prayeth in us because he is our head neither is this any wonder if Christ and the Church be in one voice because they are in one bodie He is prayed unto by us as our God he is prayed unto in the form of God he prayeth in the form of man there the Creator here a creature On Psal 70. It is a great gift of God and a great knowledge of man to observe and understand that whatsoever he is he is nothing without the grace of God and he is nothing of himself for he which will be any thing of himself he tendeth not to be but who studieth to be something by the grace of God abideth in true being in vero esse This is grace by which we were made when we were not of ungodly we were made godlie of slaves free of damned were assumed into the Kingdom On Psal 96 Let them be confounded who glory in Images for Images are not to be adored neither is an Angel to be adored because it is said in the Revelation See thou do it not Catal. testat veri libr. 10. 23. Paschasius Rathbert Abbot of Corbeyen at the same time writ a book De Eucharistia He saith Ca. 1. Christ hath left unto us his Church no greater thing then this Sacrament and Baptism and the holy Scriptures in all which the Holy Ghost who is a pawn unto his Church doth work inwardly the mystical things of our salvation unto immortalitie But in them is nothing wondrous unto unbeleevers and yet unto them who beleeve nothing is better nothing is given more wonderfull in this World Not that these wondrous things lie open unto the eies but by faith and understanding they are savourie with divine mysteries and in them immortalitie and participation of Christ in the unity of body is granted unto mortal men Ca. 5. We drink Christ's blood spiritually and we eat his flesh spiritually wherein eternal life is beleeved to think otherwise according to flesh is death and to eat the flesh of Christ spiritually is eternal life Ca. 6. Unless one abide in Christ and Christ in him he cannot eat of Christ nor drink his blood And what is it that men eat Behold
of his God-head and He is the bread of life not of this natural but of that unchangeable life which fails not by death And who beleeveth in that bread shall not suffer hunger by hearing the Word of God nor suffer spiritual thirst because he hath the water of Baptism and sanctification of the Spirit ... And shewing that faith in Christ is not a common thing but a gift of God and given by the Father to the upright in heart he saith Whomsoever the Father gives unto me he shall come unto me that is they shall beleeve in me whom my Father gives unto me .... And I will not cast him out which comes unto me that is I will not lose him but I will save and I will refresh him with much diligence for I came from Heaven to do no other thing but the will of my Father And near the end of that Chapter he saith When ye hear that his Disciples went away do not think it of his true Disciples but of them who did follow in the order of Disciples and seemed to have the form of Disciples while they were taught by him for there were some among his Disciples who being compared with the other multitude were called his Disciples for they abode longer time then the multitude but being compared with others which were true Disciples they were not to be considered because they beleeved him but for a time and as I might say with a cold heat .... The flesh profiteth nothing ... the flesh that is to expound these words carnally profiteth not but are the occasion of scandal So then they who understood carnally the things spoken by Christ were offended Therefore he addeth The words I speak are spirit that is are spiritual and life having no fleshly thing and bringing eternal life Shewing that it is the excellency of the God-head to reveal these hid things he saith There be some among you who beleeve not when he saith Some he excepteth the Disciples On Cap. 10. He sheweth the sure tokens of a good Shepheard and of a Wolf ... and first of the pernicious Shepheard saying He entreth not by the dore that is by the Scriptures for he useth not the Scriptures and Prophets as witnesses for certainly the Scriptures are the dore by which we are brought unto God and these suffer not Wolves to enter for they forbid Hereticks that we may be secure and they give a reason of every thing therefore he is a theef who entreth not into the fold by the Scriptures and so is found by them .... Because the Scriptures are understood and opened by the Holy Spirit they do shew Christ unto us the Porter is justly expounded the Holy Spirit by whom as the Spirit of wisdom ann knowledge the Scriptures are opened and by them the Lord entreth to have a care of us and by them the Shepheard is known And the Sheep hear the voice of the Shepheard for because they had often called him a deceiver and they would through incredulity confirm this saying Doth any of the rulers beleeve in him Christ shews that they should not think him a deceiver though none of those beleeved in him but rather they should be cast out of the sheep-fold for saith he if I come in by the dore it is clear that I am the true Shepheard and ye which beleeve not in me seem not to be sheep On Cap. 12. speaking of the word Osanna he saith Out of these Texts any man may understand that the Scripture attributes salvation unto God only On Cap. 20. Though many signs of his resurrection were given yet these only are written and that not for ostentation or that the glory of the only begotten may be shewed but that ye may beleeve saith he What is the gain who reapeth it not Christ for what gain hath he that we beleeve But it redounds unto us for he saith That ye beleeving might have life through his name On Rom. 1. What righteousness can we have who are defiled with abomination and filthy deeds but God hath justified us not by our works but by faith On Cap. 3. If the Law had power to justifie what need had we of Christ If thou wilt say By what law is this glorying excluded is it by works seeing the Law commandeth He who doth these things shall live by them for these things did the Law of Moses command He saith Not but by the Law of faith which gives righteousness by grace and not by works You see how he calleth faith a law because this name was in such veneration amongst the Jews On Cap. 6. He calleth life grace and not a reward as if he had said Ye do not receive the reward of works but by grace are all these things given unto you through Christ which worketh and doth them all On Cap. 10. The righteousness of God is by faith which requires nothing glorious or grievous of us but all our hopes is on the grace of God On Cap. 11. If of works then no more of grace or else work were no more work if we be made acceptable unto God through works grace were superfluous but if grace be superfluous then must works also be taken away for where grace is working is not requisite and where working is no grace is required What then .... When he hath shewed what grace is and that it is the gift of God without the works of men he asserteth that the Israelites have not attained justification though they sought it because they sought it not rightly and they thought to have righteousness by works which could not be But saith he the election that is they which are chosen have attained it and by this word election he shews that the excellency of things to come and all other things are bestowed on men by the gift of God On Cap. 13 He the Apostle teacheth that all men whether a Priest or Monk or an Apostle should be subject unto Princes On Cap. 16. The Apostle teacheth that dissensions and scandals that is heresies are brought in by them which bring any doctrine besides the doctrine of the Apostles On 1 Cor. 3. Miracles are done very often for the profit of others and therefore are they done sometimes even by unworthy men Cap. 14. Signs are for unbeleevers for beleevers have no need of them seeing they do already beleeve ... but prophecies are profitable both to beleevers and unbeleevers ...... Behold how by degrees he proveth plainly that he who speaks with his tongue only and understands not doth the less good even to himself and this was the meaning of Basilius on this place ..... What then is more to be sought of God that we may pray in the Spirit that is with grace and with the mind that is with meditation to conceive what we should pray On 2 Cor. 4. That the excellency may be of the power of God and not of us that it may be clear saith the Apostle that the excellency of the
the Bishops to have been more ancient and saith that Amphibal was the first Bishop of the Scots who lived in the Isle of Man where King Cratiliâ—th built a stately Church to the honor why would he not say for the service or worship of our Savior and called it Sodorense Faâ—â—m and that was the Cathedral of the Bishops of the Isles till the Scots were dispossessed of that Isle and from thence the Isle Jona or Icolmkil hath been the seat of the Bishops Then page 7. he telleth of Ninian the first Bishop of Galloway or Candida Casa and of Palladius sent by Eclestin Bishop of Rome and that he ordained Servan Bishop of Orkney and Tervaâ— Bishop of the Northern Picts Page 11. he telleth of a Bishop about Aldham but saith he the story doth not express his name For answer the Histories shew that such men were in Scotland but that they were not Prelates or Bishops in that sâ—nse as of late the name was used is very certain For first All who have written the History of Scotland do testifie that the Church was governed without Bishops and by Teachers who were called Culdees that is The worshippers of God or who taught the worship of God and these were called sometimes Monks for their strictness of life and Priests or Presbyters and sometimes they were called Bishops either in the sense of the Scripture or according to the Custom of other Nations but by that term declaring them to be lawful Teachers or Pastors Boeth li. 6. c. 5. calleth them by these three names Culdees Monks and Priests and Laurentius the second Bishop of Canterbury calleth them Fratres Episcopos Abbates And Bishop Jewel in defense of the Apolo page 122. saith These three names Bishop Priest and Presbyter were all one And it is certain that at Icolmkil was a Colledge of Students and there was one who is sometime called Abbas and sometime Doctor and sometime Episcopus as in that Epistle written by the Clergy of Rome after the death of Pope Severin which is directed unto the Bishops Presbyters Doctors or Abbots These Titles are knit with the particle sive Likewise about the year 600. Columba was the Church-man which was most respected in Scotland and he was the Doctor of Icolmkil for as the King Aidan did use his counsel so when he fought against the Picts Columba did call his Colleagues together and exhorted them to turn their supplications into thanksgiving because the King had got the victory albeit the place of the battel was distant from Jona where Columba lived and was at that time 200. miles at least saith Bishop Spotswood And the same Bishop calleth Convallan Governor of that Monastery after Columba And Buchanan li. 6. in the life of King Kenneth III. saith The ancient Bishops of the Scots were chosen out of the Monasteries and these Monasteries were not for Monks in that sense as they speak afterwards for in li. 7. Buchanan speaking of King Malcolm and the Colledge at Scone saith Malcolm turned the Colledge of Priests that was there into a Monastery of Monks Secondly That the Church of Scotland was not subordinate to Rome and that they loved not the Discipline nor Rites of Rome is most certain by that Contestation which was in Century VII Thirdly That testimony of the Synod at Celicyth in England about the year 816. is without all contradiction that at that time were no Prelates in Scotland seeing they testifie that the Scots gave no honor to Metropolitans nor other Bishops and therefore they forbid the Scots to have any Function in England But in the contrary Bishop Spotswood telleth of Wiro and Plechelm which were consecrate at Rome Bishop of the Scots in the year 632. as it is written saith he in Baron Annal. ad ann 632. and he addeth But by the Cardinals leave our Church had no such Custom before that time nor will it be shewed that before these two any did go to Rome either to be consecrate or confirmed And then he addeth We finde him Wiro shortly thereafter turn Confessor to King Pipin But if he was Confessor to King Pipin he was not Bishop of the Scots nor was Pipin King of France till the year 750. and so Wiro must have been above 160. years old ere he was Confessor I have looked on that place of Baronius and he shews his Author to be Surius ad Maij diem 8. and all both Papists and others hold Surius to be a most fabulous writer as in that particular he writes fabulously for he saith Wiro was Confessor unto Duke Pipin and that Pipin was wont to come unto him with bare feet when he made his Confession This I say is fabulous seeing it is marked as an unmeasureable shew of humility that Justinian II. Emperor made such obedience unto Pope Constantine in falling down at his feet and did not cast off his shoes Nor can it be shewed that any Writer of that Century hath the word Confessor in that sense or that such an Office was at that time In the days of the Emperor Theodosius some such thing had been in use upon a particular occasion but upon a vile scandal it was forbidden Socrat. Hist l. 5. c. 19. And then Baronius ad ann 697. calleth Wiro Episcopum Deirorum when he speaks of the Synod at Utrecht Now it is clear in the life of Pope Gregory I. prefixed before his works that a part of England was at that time called Deira therefore Wiro was not a Bishop of Scotland and therein Baronius Plechelm is called de Candida Massa or Casa But Bishop Spotswood page 4. saith No Bishop in Scotland had any Diocy before King Malcolm III. and so that phrase de candida casa sheweth that Plechelm was born at that place and not that he was Bishop there Likewise Bishop Spotswood page 20. speaks of two Bishops Sedulus and Pergustus who having assisted in a Synod at Rome called by Gregory II. in the year 721. after their return made great disturbance in the Church for erecting of Images It is true in the subscriptions of that Synod such names are there and the one Sedulus is called Episcopus Scotorum and the other is called Episcopus Pictorum And so every Presbyter who went out of Scotland was called a Scotch Bishop but that he was a Prelate of Scotland it is contrary to that testimony of the Synod at Celicyth in Century IX which was near a 100. years after Gregory II. And then see what he did he pressed the worship of Images and the Culdees denied it to be lawful saith Io. Bale Cent. XIV and therefore many of them were deposed such was the fruit of their gading to Rome And Bishop Spotswood page 26. saith expresly that Kellach was the first Bishop of this Kingdom who went to Rome to seek confirmation and that was about the year 904. This instance condemneth what he hath said before of all those others whom he calleth Scotch Bishops Neither
was this the Custom of Scotland onely to Govern the Church by common consent of Culdees or Presbyters which in Scripture are called Bishops see § 11. but in the primitive times it was the Custom every where For first They had an Ecclesiastial assembly which Origenes contra Celsum li. 3. calleth a Church Senate for when he compareth the Christian Churches at Corinth Athens and Alexandria with the multitude of other People there he addeth also If you compare the Church Senate unto the Senates of those Cities you shall finde some Senators of the Church worthy to govern any place any Commonwealth established by God but these Senators who now every where do govern have nothing excellent in their maners beyond the common multitude and in like maner if the Church-Magistrates be compared with the Political Magistrates c. And after eight pages he saith Christians do so much as they can first examine the minde of them which desire to be their hearers ere they receive them into their number they try them first privately and when they appear to have made such progress that they are desirous to live honestly then they bring them in by distinct degrees and some are appointed to watch over their lives and maners that if any of them do things unlawful they debar them from the Society and others they embrace heartily if they by dayly progress become better and how severe is our discipline against them which are faulty especially who are defiled with uncleanness our Church casteth them out of our Common-wealth and again when they repent we receive them no other way then as if they were raised from death but after a longer trial then when they were at first received to learn the Religion but upon this condition that because they have fallen they shall thereafter be uncapable of all Dignities and Church-Magistracy So far Origen Hence we see the primitive Churches had their Judicatories and their Rulers and how they did censure the scandalous persons Secondly Who were these Rulers Ambrose teacheth on 1 Tim. 5. saying Among all Nations old age is honorable whence the Synagogue and then the Church had their Elders without whose Counsel nothing was done in the Church which form by what negligence it hath failed I know not unless by the laziness or rather the pride of Teachers while they onely will seem to be something Therefore the Rulers of the Church were not onely Teachers but with them were Elders which were not Teachers and these were out of use in Italy before the days of Ambrose about the year 400. But see whether they were in the days of Cyprian who lived about the year 250. In lib. 3. epist 10. he directeth it unto the Presbyters and Deacons in the beginning he lamenteth that many of the Presbyters were dispersed in time of the persecution and near the end he saith I am sorry when I hear that some walk disorderly and wickedly and jarring with discord even the members of Christ which have openly confessed Christ to be defiled with unlawful lust nor can be governed by the Deacons and Presbyters or Elders that by the bad maners of some few the honest credit of many and good confessors is stained they should fear lest being condemned by their own testimony and judgement they be deprived of the Society of the godly for he is a true and famous confessor of whom the Church afterwards hath not cause to be ashamed but to rejoyce As for that particular which our Com-Presbyters Donate Novate and Curdius have written unto me I being alone can write nothing seeing from the begining of my Episcopacy I have resolved to do nothing by my private judgment for sentence without your counsel and without consent of the people but when by the grace of God I shall come unto you then as common honor requires we shall together treat of these things which are done or are to be done Hence it is clear that though Cyprian was a renowned Bishop yet he never did any thing in point of government by himself or without counsel of Elders and Deacons and without consent of the Church no not to give advice in that that they did require of him and these Elders and Deacons did rule and censure when he was absent and he was sory that the people did not obey their Sentence Whatsoever exception may be taken against the word Presbyter certainly Deacons had place in giving Counsel and the Bishop had not the sole power of Censure This is put out of doubt in the life of Augustine when c. 4. Possidonius Arch-Bishop at the same time shews that he was chosen one of the Presbyters for ruling the Church of Hippon and then c. 5. the Bishop Valerius having experience of Augustin's gifts gave him power to preach and saith Possedo this was contrary to the use and custom of the Affrican Churches and therefore other Bishops did revile him that he had given an Elder leave to preach but the good man was content that the people were instructed seeing he could not deliver his mind so freely as Augustine could because he was a Greek and he knew that the Eastern Churches had that custom at that time Behold a Church with one Bishop no Elders and the Bishop was the only Preacher and Augustine was the first Preaching Elder in the Affrican Churches 3. That the Bishops had not the whole power it is clear as the light if we will believe the writings of the Ancients as is easie to be shewed by many testimonies I will name but a few Basilius surnamed the Great about the year 380 in Moral summ 71. c. 1. expounds the texts 1. Tim. 3. and Tit. 1. Conjuctly of Bishops and Presbyters as having the same office Sedulius when Hen. Oraeus in Nomenclator calleth Presbyter Scotus about the year 440 on Tit. 1. saith Before that factions by instinct of the Devil were in Religion and it was said among the people I am Paul's and I am Apollo's the Churches were governed by the common counsel of the Presbyters then he brings testimonies of Scripture proving as he concludes that among the Ancients was no difference twixt Bishops and Presbyters To the same purpose writes Ierom. on Tit. 1. At greater length and concludes thus let Presbyters know that by custom of the Church they are subject unto him who is their Prelate and let Bishops know that by custom rather then by the Lords appointment they are greater then Presbyters that the Church should be governed in community in Epist ad Evan. 1. he saith Whereas one was chosen to preside among others it was done in remedie of Schism lest each one drawing the Church unto himself it were rent asunder for in Alexandria from Mark the Evangelist unto Heraclas Dionisius Bishops these were in the daies of Ierome the Presbyters do alwaies chuse one of themselves call him Bishop when he is set in a higher degree for except ordination what doth a
Book Castigatio in Ecclesiasticum Ordinem he distinguisheth Church-men into Bishops or Priests as he speaketh and the Clerks of the first sort he expoundeth the first part of the third Chapter of 1 Tim. and he expoundeth the second part of the Clerks and from that Chapter he convinceth them both He nameth no other degree of Church-men but certainly he had named them if any other had been among them because he speaketh so distinctly of the several ranks of men both in State and Church He calleth the first sort oftest Sacerdotes simply but never Episcopos unless he add sive Sacerdotes The book is in Bibliotheca Patrum de la Bigne We may conclude then the ancient Britans had no Church-men above the degree of Priest-hood Now if that were added which followeth in this Chapter concerning Ireland we have found four National Churches that have been governed without Prelates to wit the Affrican ancient Britan the Scots and Irish some for the space of 500. years yea untill the Britans were subdued by the English and some for the space of 1000. or 1100. years And we have found that there was a Church-Council consisting partly of Rulers who were not Teachers besides that Ambrose and others testifie that such were every where Yea and in Rome it is most probable that the first Teachers Of the first Bishops of Rome were of equal Authority I say probable because Histories are not clear in this point Epiphanius Haeres 27. saith Peter and Paul were the first Bishops there but whether Linus and Cletus were Bishops there while the Apostles were alive I cannot well say It may be saith he because the Apostles went into other Nations to preach and Rome could not be without a Bishop for Paul went into Spain and Peter did oft visit Pontus and Bithynia and possibly when Clemens had refused I cannot say it certainly and Linus and Cletus were dead he was compelled to take the Bishoprick So conjunctuarily writeth Epiphanius Jerome in Catalog Scriptor saith Clemens was the fourth Bishop and he nameth Peter but not Paul Linus and Cletus but saith he many Latins say Clemens was next unto Peter Theodoret on 1 Tim. 4. saith They say Linus did succeed unto great Peter Io. Naucler in vol. 2. Generat 3. saith In the year of our Lord 70. Linus succeeded unto blessed Peter although blessed Peter had ordained that Clemens should succeed but Clemens considering that it was an ill example that one should succeed his Successor he renounced the Papacy and Linus was chosen then Cletus and fourthly Clemens Rufinus in praefa before Clemen Rocognit saith Some do ask seeing Linus and Cletus were Bishops of Rome before Clemens how could Clemens writing unto James say that Peter had given unto him the Chair of Teaching we have this reason of it Linus and Cletus were Bishops of Rome before Clemens but while Peter was alive they had the charge of the Bishoprick and Peter fulfilled the Office of Apostleship Dion Petavius a Jesuit in Rationa par 1. lib. 5. cap. 5. saith When Peter was killed by Nero Linus governed the Church of Rome as ancient writers affirm and they assign unto him eleven years two moneths and some days so that he died in the year 78. Unto him succeeded Cletus whom Irenaeus calleth Anacletus and he sat twelve years and seven moneths and suffered martyrdom ann 91. and Clemens was his Successor The Jesuit Io. Hart in Collog cum Io. Reynold c. 6. se 4. affirmeth That Peter before his death ordained onely Clemens to be his Successor Others have other opinions as it is in Collog ca. cit se 3. therefore I said Histories are uncertain in this point albeit a great part of the Romish faith is grounded upon it but it is most probable that Clemens Linus Cletus and Anacletus were Sympresbyters and the writers in following Ages speaking conformable to their own practice do name some one and some another But it is more certain that others were the first preachers of equal Authority at Rome then that any of these four were the first preachers there That Peter or Paul were Bishops of Rome it is not probable because they were Apostles and did the work of their Apostleship and the Scripture sheweth their diligence from time to time and it is certain that in the mean while other preachers were at Rome whom Paul saluteth Rom. 16. Aquila Epenaetus Andronicus Junias c. these he calleth of note among the Apostles and his fellow-laborers in the Lord. Sedulius saith Whom he calleth fellow-laborers he meaneth in the work of teaching and it is not without reason thought that the Romans believed by their teaching Ambrose or whoever was the Author of the Commentaries saith Those were not idle at Rome for they were zealous in devotion And it is understood that all those whom Paul saluteth came for confirmation of the Romans for which cause he saith that not onely he but all the Churches of the Gentiles give them thanks and he admonisheth the Romans to obey them In 2 Tim. 4. Paul mentioneth Linus to have been at Rome at that time and in the same verse he nameth others before him to wit Eubulus and Pudens which he would not have done if Linus had been their Prelate Wherefore there was a Church at Rome before Peter or Paul came thither as Paul writeth unto them as a constituted Church and testifieth that their faith was spoken of throughout the world c. 1. 8. and their obedience was come abroad unto all men It is certain also that they had many Preachers and other Officers to whom he directeth chap. 12 6 7 8. nor can any man prove that those Preachers had superiority one over another therefore it deserveth consideration Whether the Roman Church was not once constituted with purity of Teachers and Whether the Church of Antioch was not of the like constitution See and consider Acts 13. 1. and many Elders or Bishops were at Ephesus Acts. 20. 17 28. and so at Thessalonica 1 Thess 5. 12. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Revel 2. will not prove any imparity seeing it is attributed unto all Priests generally Mat. 2. 7. and the the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is too weak a foundation for such a building seeing it implieth not always a singularity but often an indefinite thing and answereth unto our particle a or an oftner then unto the particle the and so it may well be translated there To an Angel seeing many Bishops were at Ephesus And this putteth the question out of all doubt to me that as the Scripture is the first and main foundation commanding to Ordain Elders or Bishops these are one in Scripture-language in every Church Acts 14. 23. or in every Town Tit. 1. 5. Or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Clemens Bishop of Rome in his Epistle ad Corinth So for Practice and History it cannot be shewed that when the constant Moderators were appointed under the name of
defended by the Canonical Scriptures and the sayings of blessed Augustine Observe here he whom the Pope calleth his Father and Master dependeth upon the Canonical Scriptures and upon Augustine and not upon the Pope nor thinketh upon that which now they call The casket of the Pope's breast I have also observed in his Epistles written unto the Popes Urban and Paschalis that he calleth them the Reverend high Priest of the Catholique Church and he saith your Highness your Majesty but he never saith your Holiness he calleth them the Vicar of St. Peter but never the Vicar of Christ nor in any place can I finde that he speaketh of any priviledge of Peter above the other Apostles and in the contrary in Comment on Mat. 16. he saith It is to be noted that this power was not given to Peter alone but as Peter answered one for all so in Peter he gave this power unto them all On Rom. 9. Seeing by the free-will of the first man all men fell into condemnation certainly it is not to be ascribed unto mans righteousness which is not before grace but unto the onely mercy of God that any of them are made vessels of honor but that any of them are vessels of wrath it should not be imputed unto the iniquity of God which is not but unto his justice He is Potter which of the same lump altogether corrupt in Adam maketh at his own pleasure some vessels unto honor in his mercy and others unto shame in his justice On 1 Cor. 1. The grace of God is given unto us through our Lord Jesus Christ and not through Peter or Paul grace is given by Jesus Christ because it is so appointed by God that whosoever believeth in Jesus Christ shall be saved not by works but by faith onely and freely receive the forgiveness of his sins On Rom. 10. Seeing hearing is of grace another grace is also necessary which may move the heart because the word of the Teacher outwardly availeth nothing if God do not inwardly touch the hearers heart On Chap. 14. He shall stand because God is able to make him stand for not he himself but God is able to make him stand for he who falleth falleth by his own will but by the will of God he standeth who standeth and riseth who riseth On 1 Cor. 4. Who hath discerned thee he saith this because of the mass of corruption which was by Adam none but God discerneth man that he is made a vessel unto honor But a man who is carnal and vainly puft up when he heareth Who hath discerned thee might answer by voice or thought and say My faith or my prayer or my righteousness hath discerned me The Apostle preveeneth such thoughts and saith What hast thou that thou hast not received God was the cause why thou wast and art thou the cause why thou art good Away for if God hath been the cause why thou wast and another hath been the cause why thou art good he is better which hath made thee good then he who made thee But none is better then God therefore thou hast received from God both that thou art and that thou art good On Hebr. 10. This true Priest did not offer often or many sacrifices but one offering which alone is sufficient for the sins of all believers after that he had fulfilled the obedience of his suffering sitteth his sacrifice was of such perfection and efficacy that it is needless to be offered again for the sins of any and albeit we offer it dayly that is but the remembrance of his suffering The Iesuit Raynaud denieth these Commentaries to be Anselm's albeit he cannot deny that in many Editions they go under his name nor can he bring any argument out of the Commentaries to prove what he saith and once he alledgeth that the Commentary on Matthew is Anselm's Bishop of Laudun and again he guesseth it to be Willielm Parisiens but this is an easie way to reject any Book But these testimonies agree with his other works which the Jesuit acknowledgeth and hath published That on Matth. 16. I finde not in them yet whereas he hath said in li. 1. ep 68. that he accordeth with the Canonical Books and with Augustine see then what Augustine saith on Ioh. Tract 124. As for Peter himself properly he was but one man by nature one Christian by grace one and the first Apostle by more abounding grace but when it was said I will give unto thee the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt binde on he did signifie the whole Church which is founded upon the rock from which Peter had his name for the rock was not named from Peter but Peter from the rock as Christ was not named from a Christian but a Christian from Christ therefore the Church which is founded on Christ received from him the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven that is the power of binding and loosing sins for what the Church is in Christ by propriety Peter is in the rock by signification And ibi Tract 7. In the name of Peter the Church was signified In many other places doth Augustine speak in that maner denying that power to have been given to Peter but as a member of the Church and at that time speaking in the name of all the Apostles or Church as that Commentary saith Concerning free-will and grace Anselm speaketh often and copiously I shall name but one in Tractat. de Concordia grat lib. arbi c. 13. Without doubt the will willeth not rightly unless it be right for as the sight is not quick or sharp because it seeth sharply but therefore it seeth sharply because it is sharp so the will is not right because it willeth rightly but it willeth rightly because it is right Now when it willeth righteousness certainly it willeth rightly Therefore it willeth not righteousness but because it is right I deny not that a right will willeth righteousness which it hath not when it willeth more then it hath but this I say it cannot will that righteousness if it have not righteousness by which it may will it Let us now consider whether any not having this righteousness can in any way have it of himself Certainly he cannot have it of himself but either by willing or not willing but by willing no man is able to attain it of himself because he cannot will it unless he have it and that any not having the righteousness of will can by himself attain it by not willing no mans minde can conceive therefore a creature can by no means have it of it self but neither can a creature have it from another creature for as a creature cannot save another creature so it cannot give that by which it may save it It followeth then that no creature hath that righteousness of will but by the grace of God But I have proved before that this righteousness may be kept by free-will therefore by the gift of God we have
they are letcherous in such a maner that they have not broken any bond of marriage Ibid. cap. 3. It is not possible that any of these whom God hath predestinated unto the Crown can lose their Crown it may be and it hath come to pass that some lose the Crown whom God hath called by a visible calling or which might have been heard by man Ibid. lib. 6. cap. 11. Excepting the Apostles whatsoever other thing afterwards is said let it be cut off neither have any authority therefore albeit after the Apostles there be any holy man how wise soever he be let him not have that authority seeing the Lord speaketh in the Scriptures Ibid. lib. 11. cap. 20. Possibly one will say Since Christ overcame death and ascended into the heavens doth he descend thence again surely he descendeth but invisibly all the world hath heard his descending when a sound was heard from heaven as of the Spirit coming and filled the house where they were sitting did not Christ then descend from heaven Is the substance or Majesty of the Son separated from the Spirit that when the holy Ghost descendeth the Son of God descendeth not also certainly he descendeth not in the form of his manhood yet undoubtedly he descendeth in his uncircumscribed Deity or in the Spirit that he giveth and he descendeth to visit the Nations by his Messengers whom he inspireth 9. Bernard in Epist 56. ad Gaufrid Episco Carnot writeth that Notbert Praemonstratensis did teach that Antichrist was before the doors and to be revealed in the same age Within these few days saith Bernard there I obtained to see this mans face and I learned many things from an heavenly fistule to wit from his mouth Behold what account this Author made of him who spake thus Hen. Oraeus in Nomenclat saith this Notbert was the beginner of the Order of Monks in the Diocy of Magdeburgh Pol. Vergil de inven rer lib. 7. cap. 3. calleth him a Priest of Lorrain and saith that he began that most exact Order after the rule of Augustinians as also in that Chapter and the preceeding he sheweth that sundry others seeing about that time that the Monastical institutions were not observed men becoming always worse and worse and godliness was corrupted by riches quae pietas ut mater illas à principio Ordini pepererat quotidie sunt qui ignaviae suae potius quà m religioni consulant therefore they would reform the Order and added some new Rites for distinction from others of the same Order who were become looser and by these means the number of Orders were multiplied 10. Theodoricus Abbot of St. Trudo at Leodium about the year 1120. said Simon Magus now reigneth at Rome and not Simon Peter and Simony is in place of the Gospel what may we not have if we have money In Catal. test verit lib. 14. are some of his verses concerning the Government of the Church he saith Vt Mopso Nisa corvo datur ecâ—e columba Qualis pullus erit quem fert commixtio talis Hence it appeareth that good men at that time bewailed the wretched condition of the Church 11. Hugo de S. Victore by Nation a Saxon and Abbot of S. Victor at Paris was in great account about the year 1130. His works are extant in three Tomes In one place he saith The Clerks of our time know not the Law nor learn they it but they study vanity ease surfeiting and drunkenness they are often in the streets seldom in the Churches slow to search the faults of sinners and ready to follow the trace of hares they give more bread to dogs then to the poor their beds are better arayed then the altars the barking of dogs and lowing of oxen is more pleasant unto God then the singing of such Clerks their preaching may be dispised whose life is contemned Of our communion with Christ he saith on Iohn 6. The Lord shewing a difference betwixt the bread he gave and which they did eat in the wilderness saith I am the bread of life for he is the bread wherewith an hungry soul is refreshed which is when true faith embraceth him for by faith we love him and by love we are united unto Christ which is our life therefore this spiritual bread is eaten by faith even without Sacramental eating and is profitable unto salvation dayly we have need of this bread while this present life endureth and so said Augustine Why preparest thou thy teeth and stomach believe and thou hast eaten On Chapter 20. he saith Whose sins ye forgive i. e. whose sins are forgiven by you God also forgiveth them this is spoken generally not onely unto the Apostles as some say this is the prerogative of the Apostles but it is spoken and granted unto all their successors On Rom. 3. The written Law is called the Law of works because men under the Law thought that all their righteousness was in the works of the Law but the Law of Faith and Grace is so called because men under Grace set the sum and efficacy of their salvation on Grace onely knowing that as no man is saved by righteousness of his works so none is justified by works of his righteousness for righteousness is not of good works but good works are of righteousness On Chapter 4. If man had not sinned he should have had perfect righteousness which consisteth in the perfect fulfilling of God's commands so that he should have had no lust against reason and he might have loved God with all his heart but after sin and for sin man cannot have this perfect righteousness unto which eternal life is justly due but God of his grace giveth faith unto man and of the same grace reputeth it for that perfection as if he had the perfection of righteousness De Scriptura Scriptor Sacris cap. 1. he saith That Scripture onely is truly called Divine which was from the Spirit of God and written by those who spoke by God's Spirit that maketh a man divine and reformeth him according to the image of God by teaching to know him and by exhorting to love him whatsoever is taught therein is truth whatsoever is commanded is good and whatsoever is promised is blessedness for God is truth without falshood goodness without wickedness and blessedness without misery In cap. 6 7. All Divine Scripture is contained in the Old and New Testaments and when he hath divided the Old Testament into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa and hath reckoned the Books that are in the Hebrew Canon he addeth There be also other Books as Wisdom the Books of Syracides Judith Tobias and the Maccabees that are read indeed but are not rolled in the Canon Catol test ver lib. 15. Likewise De Sacramentis fidei lib. 1. cap. 28. If it be asked What is original sin in us It is a corruption or vice by which in our birth we draw ignorance in our minde and concupiscence in the flesh And cap. 19. In the
words but they have done it wickedly as will appear hereafter 29. Gratian an Hetrurian and Monk of Bononia did out of the Canons The Canon Law of ancient Synods and decrees of Popes and sentences of Fathers and some forged writings of late Monks compile and amass the volume of the Canon Law which they call Decreta and Causae These were afterwards augmented by the Popes adding the Decretals and Extravagants and they are commented by the School-men Gratian took this work in hand in imitation of Lotharius the Emperor who had caused the Civil Laws to be digested into a method and he gathered these books so that by addition substraction or changing of a word or letter one or more he made all to serve the present times For example whereas Augustin de Doctr. Christ l. 2. c. 8. saith In Canonicis Scripturis Ecclesiarum Catholicarum quamplurium authoritatem sequatur inter quas sane illae sunt quas Apostolicae sedes habere epistolas accipere meruerunt Gratian Dist 19. c. In Canonicis hath them thus Inter quas Scriptur as Canonitas sane illae sunt quas Apostolica sedes ab ea aliae accipere meruerunt epistolas 2. In the sixth Councel at Carthage the Can. 165. saith Ad transmarina qui putaverit appellandum à nullo intra Africam in communione recipiatur This Canon speaketh absolutely and was made especially against appeals unto Rome But Gratian repeating it Caus 2. qu. 6. c. Placuit addeth Nisi forte Romanam sedem appellaverit 3. Pope Gregory lib. 9. epist 41. saith Scripsit mihi tua dilectio piissimum dominum nostrum speaking of the Emperor reverendissimo fratri meo Iohanni primae Iustinianae Episcopo pro agritudine capitis quam patitur praecipere succedi But Gratian Caus 7. qu. 1. c. Scripsit repeateth it thus Scripsit tua dilectio me reverendissimo fratri Iohanni pi Iust epis praecipere succedi 4. That common saying Petri successionem non habent qui Petri fidem non habent Gratian considering that hereby the succession of Peter might be called into question De poenit dist 1. c. potest saith Qui Petri sedem non habent Hear what a Papist judgeth of these Decrees Corn. Agrippa sometime Doctor utriusque Iuris in his Book De vanitat scient cap. 92. saith From the Civil Law hath flowed the Canon Law which may seem unto many to be very holy it doth so cover the precepts of covetousness and forms of robbing with the shew of godliness albeit very few things in it belong unto godliness religion or the worship of God besides that some things are contrary and fight against the word of God and all the rest are nothing but chidings pleas prides pomps gain or lucre and the pleasures of Popes which are not content with the Canons prescribed by the Fathers unless they do heap up Decrees Extravagants that there is no end of making Canons such is the ambition meer pleasure of Popes The School of Paris did openly detest and reprove this erroneous intolerable temerity I will not say heresie Out of these Canons and Decrees we have learned that the patrimony of Christ is Kingdoms donations foundations riches and possessions and that the Priesthood of Christ and primacy of the Church is Empire and Kingdom and that the sword of Christ is temporal jurisdiction and power and that the rock which is the foundation of the Church is the person of the Pope and that Bishops are not servants or Ministers of the Church but heads thereof and the goods of the Church are not the doctrine of the Gospel zeal of faith contempt of the world but tributes tithes offerings collects purples mitres gold silver jewels lands beasts authority it belongeth unto the Popes to manage battels break covenants loose oaths absolve from obedience and to make the house of prayer become a den of thieves so that a Pope may depose a Bishop without a cause he may dispose of other mens goods he cannot commit simony he may dispense against a vow against an oath and the law of nature nor may any man say unto him What doest thou yea and they say that for a weighty cause he may dispense against all the new Testament he may thrust down to hell a third part or more of Christian souls Agrippa in that place hath more of the matter and scope of the Canon Law and for instance I will name Dist 40. c. Si Papa If the Pope be found to neglect either his own salvation or his brethrens be unprofitable and slack in his office silent in that which is good hurtful to himself and all others yea though he lead with him innumerable people in troops to the first slave of hell yet let no mortal presume to finde fault with his doings And nevertheless in these Decrees we may finde not a few stops of Antiquity and some part of the doctrine and practise of the primitive Church even then remaining as I have touched in some places and more may be added as Dist 39. cap. 8. If as the Apostle saith Christ be the power of God and the wisdom of God and he which knoweth not the Scriptures knoweth not the wisdom and power of God then the ignorance of the Scriptures is the ignorance of Christ Dist 9. c. he saith from Augustine I have learned to give such fear and honor unto these books of the Scripture onely which now are called Canonical that I believe certainly none of their Authors could err in writing and if I finde any thing in them that seemeth contrary unto truth I doubt not but there is an escape in the Book or the Translator hath not attained the right meaning or that I do not understand it but I do read other books so that whatsoever was their holiness or learning yet I think it not true because they have thought so but because they could perswade me by other Authors or by the Canonical Scriptures or by probable reasons And Dist 8. cap. Si consuetudinem If you do object custom it is to be observed that the Lord saith I am the way the truth and life he saith not I am custom but I am truth and truly to use the words of blessed Cyprian whatsoever be the custom how old soever or common it be it must not in any respect be preferred unto truth and use which is contrary unto truth must be abolished Dist 16. c. Canones These that are called the Canons of the Apostles are known to be forged in the name of the Apostles by Hereticks although some good things be in them yet it is certain that they are not from Canonical or Apostolical Authority And c. Clementis All the Fathers do reckon the book of Clemens that is the travels of Peter and the Canons of the Apostles among the Apocrypha Dist 36. c. Si quis These be the two works of the high Priest to learn from God by reading the Scriptures and by frequent meditation
the beloved children of their Mother the Church they have made a book not of instruction but derogation not admonishing but biting and because the book is a seminary of great scandal and hath bred much trouble and dammage to souls and hath hindred believers from former devotion and their wonted giving of alms and from entering into that Religion therefore that book which beareth the title Tractatus brevis de periculis novissimorum temporum we condemn as wicked and execrable commanding that whosoever shall have that book he shall burn it within eight days after sight of this our Sentence and pronouncing the sentence of excommunication against all that shall dispise this our command c. That book was burnt quickly at Anagnia 15. Hugo Barchinonensis Cardinal S. Sabinae wrote many books at that time In his preface before Joshua he reckoneth the Canonical Books as they be in the Hebrew and Greek Testaments among the Apocrypha he putteth Ecclesiasticus Wisdom Maccabees Judith because saith he they are doubtful On the Prologue of Jerome before the books of the Kings he saith The Church receiveth the Apocrypha books not for proof of faith but instruction of maners Here it may be marked that as yet yea and until the Councel of Trent the books of Maccabees and such others were not accounted Canonical as also witnesseth Pererius in Daniel lib. 16. and others whom I have named elsewhere As for the 47. Canon of the third Councel at Carthage from which Bellarm. de verbo Dei lib. 1. would derive the Authority of the Divine Canon Baronius ad An. 397. testifieth It was not a Canon of that Synod so saith Binius Annotat. in Conc. Carthag 3. I return to Hugo on Psal 77. he saith Many Clerks are the geâ—eration of vipers they persecute their Mother the Church and so far as they can they slay Christ their Father On Matth. 16. Upon this rock i. e. upon this foundation and that rock is Christ 1 Cor. 10. none can lay another foundation but that which is laid even Christ Jesus On 2 Tim. 3. All Scripture that is the holy Scripture which containeth all things necessary unto salvation is perfect therefore it hath the priviledge to be called The Scripture by an antonomasia Catalog test ver lib. 16. Pope Alexander deposed him Naucler gener 42. 16. Humbert de Romania fifth General of the Dominicans about the year 1250. wrote a book De ratione tollendi schisma inter Graecos Latinos In par 2. cap. 11. he saith The cause of the Schism was the intolerable burthens of Popes in exactions excommunications and statutes Catalog test ibid. 17. Pope Honorius the IV. sent John Bishop of Tusculo into Germany Germany against the Pope to exact from all Bishops Priests and Abbots the fourth part of all their substance for five years unto the maintenance of his Soldiers against Peter King of Aragon For this cause a frequent Assembly conveened at Wirtzburgh the Emperor Rodulph came there When the petition was propounded the Elector of Colein refusing did appeal unto a general Councel when he was alledging his reasons the Legate interrupted and threatened him with the Pope's curse Then all the Priests and Monks scoffed at the Legate and began to buffet him that if the Legate had not commanded his Marshal to convey him away he had not escaped with his life Then Probus Bishop of Tull. said How long most dear Colleagues shall those vultures of Romulus abuse our patience I will not say our foolishness how long shall we endure their wickedness avarice pride and luxury this most wicked sort of Masters of Synagogues will not cease till they bring us all into poverty and wretched slavery By our jars this malady waxeth by our differences these rogues are safe so long as they command we shall never have peace nor piety Lately they raised the Saxons and Suevians one against the other those instruments of Satan or Antichrists have sown the seeds of discord in Germany When Conradin a yong man of very good hope was seeking according to the Law of nature the inheritance of his Fathers they circumvented him with fraud and killed him most cruelly He rehearseth many such tricks done by the Popes then he saith As twelve years ago Gregory the X. dealt with the tenths the same will Honorius the IV. do with the fourths That he might strip us of our gold he armed the Turks against us and this Pope is more desirous of tribute then of our welfare Those Satans speak of light and intend darkness to deceive the people and that they regard not Christ our Lord and God their aims and works unless we be blinde do prove the issue sheweth and the holy Scriptures describeth Wherefore Fathers devoted to Christ awaken provide against these calamities I am not ignorant what this Tusculan is I know the man he is gold thirsty a false usurer a vile slave of money I fear not his menaces I appeal unto the Senate of Christendom c. All the Assembly approved what he had said and nothing was done for the Pope Wherefore Probus was accursed at Rome but in the greater estimation at home and with all good men Ph. Mornay in Myster ex Aventin lib. 7. 18. Nicolaus de Biberach General of the Carmelites lived about the Against the Carmelites year 1270. he bewailed with tears the corrupt estate of his Order Whereas in the wilderness they did attend constantly on prayer reading and handy works now said he since they dwell in Cities under their mother hypocrisie their study is ease idleness lust and luxury When he had bestowed his time five years in that charge and with grief saw no amendment he wrote a book against them which he called Ignea sagitta and returned into a Desart about the mount Ewatrof In that book he calleth them step-sons reprobates cauterised vagabonds pratlers unhappy counsellors wicked discoursers Citizens of Sodom despisers of the best Testament the tail of the dragon drawing down the third part of the stars from heaven and casting them on the earth Revel 12. In chap. 5. he saith Tell me what new religion is this in your Cities from morning until even ye run two and two thorow the streets and he is your leader which goeth about roaring and seeking whom he may devour and so that prophesie The wicked walk in a compass is most true of you for the chief purpose of your gading is not to visit the fatherless but yong women not widows in heaviness but wanton maids Nuns and Mistresses and each cast their eyes on another and words of lustfulness corrupting good maners enflaming the hearts c. That is not pure religion Wo is me my dear friends seeing ye are wrapped in the clay of the world why think ye that ye are not defiled I. Bale Cent. 4. § 42. in Appe 2. In another Treatise that he calleth Occultus he writeth that he had been at Rome and had seen their feigned
more contrary unto the Apostles or more hateful unto Christ Jesus then to destroy souls by defrauding them of the Ministry ..... In a word the holiness of the Apostolical seat cannot do any thing but unto edification and not to destruction for this is the fulness of power to edification But those things which they call Provisions are not to edification but most manifest destruction The Pope hearing this Letter foamed as in a rage and sware by Peter and Paul that he would hurl such a phrenetick wretch into confusion which durst so boldly controle his command and make him a fable unto the world Is not the King of England our vassal yea and slave whom I at my nod may thrust into prison The Cardinals namely Aegidius a Spaniard and some others touched in conscience could scarcely appease his fury and among other words they said To confess the truth unto your Holiness it is true what he saith and we cannot condemn him for it he is a Catholick man more holy and religious then we our selves are and as it is judged amongst all the Prelates there is none better nor his equal this is not unknown universally nor can our contradiction avail against him wherefore we think best to pass by such a thing lest perhaps some tumult arise thereupon especially seeing it is manifest unto all men that once must come a defection and departure from the Church of Rome When Robert lay on his death bed he said unto the brethren coming to visit him Heresid is an opinion taken up by human sense contrary Heresie white unto the holy Scriptures openly avowed and pertinaciously maintained Is not Innocentius therefore an Heretick and since Christ came into the The Pope an Heretick and Antichrist World to save souls may not the Pope be justly called the Antichrist who feareth not to destroy souls The Pope doth impudently annul the priviledges of his Ancestours .... and therefore the contemner should be contemned according to that saying of Esay Wo to thee who despisest ..... Matth. Parisien 9. In the year 1240. a Carthusian Monk at Cambridge said openly before Otho the Legate Gregory is not the head of the Chutch but there is another head thereof Satan is loosed the Pope is an Heretick Gregory which is called Pope defileth the Church and the World The Legate said unto him Is not power given from above unto the Pope to loose and bind souls and to exerce the charge of Peter on earth The Monk replied How can I think that such power as was given unto Peter is given to a Simoniack and Usurer yea and who is defiled with greater crimes The Legate did blush for shame and said We may not strive in words with a fool Idem 10. Seval Arch-Bishop of York followed in the same footsteps when he saw the pride of the Pope usurping and tyrannizing above the Kings he was astonished and in the grief of his heart he intreated Pope Alexander the IV. by Letters that he would leave off from such daily enormities or at least refrain himself and follow the example of good men that he would feed Christ's Lambs as Peter did and not pull the skins off them and devour them like an hungry Wolf The Pope had given the fattest of his Benefices unto some wanton young men and ignorant of the language as he made Jordanus Dean of York c. Seval would admit none of them wherefore the Pope excommunicated him with bells and candles He could suffer these ceremonies but he could not suffer strangers to be set over the people and the more he was cursed by the Pope he was the more beloved of the people and they did bless him yet quietly for fear of the Romans Although he was not murthered yet for his sufferings he was called a Martyr Idem ad An. 1257. 11. Matthew of Paris whom I have often named was a Benedictine of Saint Alban he wrote the History of England from the days of William the Conqueror until the year of his own death 1260. where he describeth how others spoke against the abomination of Antichrist to the end that posterity might know and abhor it and thereby he giveth us to understand what were his own thoughts as here and there he expresseth himself e. g. ad An. 1237. he saith It is manifestly known that the Church of Rome alas hath deserved the wrath of God for the guides thereof seek not the devotion of people but their full purses not to gain souls unto God but to collect revenues to themselves to oppress the religious and many ways impudently to catch other mens goods ...... hence ariseth grumbling among men and the wrath of God is provoked dayly Ad An. 1238. he calleth the Pope the Successor but not the imitator of Peter Ad An. 1245. he saith The Pope sent unto the King of Arragon and then unto the King of England craving that he may come and abide in their Kingdoms and the Nobility did refuse because the Papal Court was so infamous that the strength thereof went up unto the clouds Ad An. 1251. he saith The threatning of the Apostle may be thought to be fulfilled Vnless there be a departing the son of perdition shall not be revealed Behold that mens hearts depart and not their bodies from the Pope who is enraged like a step-father and from the Church of Rome which is cruel in persecuting like a step-mother 12. John Russel an English Gentleman who married the Widow of Walter Cumin Earl of Lenox about the year 1262. afterwards he purchased Letters from the Pope to summon a number of Scots to appear in England before the Legate for slandering his wife of witchcraft and poisoning her first husband The Scots dispised the citation alledging their ancient priviledge that Scotch men cannot be charged to answer without their own Country and so the summons turned to nothing saith Buchan Hist lib. 7. 13. Within some few years King Alexander the III. was encombred with The Lords and Bishops strive for precedency the pride of Priests and Monks saith the same Author there he understandeth certainly Bishops and Abbots which being enriched saith he by former Kings and enjoying long prosperity began to grow rank and would go before the Nobility as in wealth so in all other things or at least be equal with them The Noble men took this in ill part and dealt roughly with them wherefore they complain unto the King Whether he thought these injuries not to be so hainous as the Priests called them or if he thought that they were not without cause yet he made no account of them therefore the Bishops did excommunicate all the Noble men excepting the King only and with many threats do prepare themselves to go unto Rome Then the King calling to minde what broils Tho. Becket had raised in England by his ambition called the Bishops from their journey and compelled the Nobility to yeild unto their pride Thus the spiritual
words If it be lawful to celebrate for a penny it were far better and precious to celebrate without pennies this they say thinking that simony is committed in these exactions Oh how great a wickedness and madness to exact forty fifty or sixty florens for the absolution of a City and relaxation of a Church-yard I am silent of other things simple and secular people do abhor all these things 28. Jagielo Duke of Lituania was married to Heduigis Queen of Poland The conversion of Lituania An. 1386. with condition that he should embrace the Christian faith and annex that Dukedom to the Crown of Poland he and his three Brothers Borissus Suidrigielo and Vidold were baptized at Cracow Febr. 14. The next year he called a general convention of all the people of Lituania at Vilna in the beginning of Lent and took with him the Bishop of Gesna and some Priests There he propoundeth unto them the forsaking of their Idolatry and the embracing the Christian Religion he allured them with exhortations and promises but the Priests being ignorant of the language could teach them nothing at all The barbarous people were loath to leave the customs of their Ancestors but when they saw that at commandment of the King the fire in the Temple of Vilna to be extinguished and the Altar broken and the Serpents which they had worshipped to be killed and dead and their holy groves destroyed without the hurt of any man the people wondered and said How is it that our gods do not revenge themselves on these wicked Christians if any of us had done the like we had perished by the wrath of the gods Then were they willing to follow the Religion of their Prince and because it had been wearisome to baptize them all this honor was given to some of the Nobles to baptize them severally and the vulgar sort were set in companies and the Priests cast water upon them and gave unto every company a name saying I baptize ye in the name c. and so in one day 30000 barbarous people were baptized Ale Guaguin in Rer. Polon To. 1. 29. Nicolaus de Lyra a Jew by birth and then a converted Christian wrote Annotations on all the Bible which were in great account among the School-men but in many Articles of faith he differeth from the Papists now as appeareth clearly by these passages When Jerome had written in Prologin lib. Tobiae The book of Tobiah which the Jews following the catalogue of divine Scriptures have reckoned among those which they call Hagiographa de Lyra saith He should rather have said among the Apocrypha or he taketh the Hagiographa largely And in his Postilla he saith When I have written as God hath helped upon all the Canonical books of the holy Scriptures ..... trusting in his help I intend to write of the other books which are not of the Canon to wit the book of Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Judith Tobias and the books of Maccabees ...... We must know that the books of the sacred Scriptures which are called Canonical are of such authority that whatever is written there it is held true without controversie and consequential also what is manifestly concluded thereupon for as in the writings of Philosophers truth is known by reducing unto the first principles that are known in themselves so in the Scriptures of Catholick Doctors truth is known in so far as things to be believed can be reduced unto the Canonical writings of the sacred Scripture which we have by revelation from God who cannot lye therfore the knowledg of these writings is necessary unto the Church for which cause of the exposition of them it may be said what is written Eccles 24. All these are the book of life that is all the books that are expounded in the preceding work are contained in the book of life that is in the books of truth revealed by God who is life for as divine predestination is called the book of life so this Scripture revealed by God is called the book of life both because it is from him which is life essentially as is said and it leadeth unto the blessed life And next it is to be considered that the books which are not of the Canon are received to be read by the Church for information of manners but their authority is not such that they are thought sufficient to prove things in controversie as Jerome teacheth in the Prologue on Judith c. On Deut. 17. at the words Thou shalt not decline he saith Here an Hebrew Glossa saith If he say unto thee The right hand is the left hand or the left is the right thou must receive such a sentence But this is manifestly false since the sentence of no man of whatsoever authority is to be received if it be manifestly false or erroneous and this is clear by what is said in the text They shall judge unto thee the truth of judgement and they shall teach thee according to his law Hence it is clear that if they speak false or decline from God's Law manifestly they should not be heard On Psal 124. or rather 125. on these words Like mount Sion he saith because as mount Sion is unmoveable so they who trust in the Lord are not moved from the stability of faith therefore it followeth shall not be moved for ever to wit who dwell in the spiritual Jerusalem by faith formed by love And the cause of this stability followeth The mountains are about it that is the Angels are deputed to keep the Church and the Lord is round about his people as he saith in Matth. ult Behold I am with you unto the end of the world On Daniel at the last words he saith The last two Chapters to wit of Susanna and the History of Bell and Dragon are not of the Canon therefore now I leave them and intend to take in hand the other books which are Canonical On Matth. 1. at the words Iudah begot Phares he rehearseth an opinion of Jerome which he confuteth and he addeth a general reason saying The sayings of Saints are not of such authority but we may think the contrary in those things which are not determined by the sacred Scripture therefore Augustine in Epist ad Vincent saith of the writings of the Saints This sort of writings is to be distinguished from the Canonical Scriptures and testimonies are not brought from them so that we may not think the contrary On chap. 10. at the words He gave them power over unclean spirits he saith If it be asked Why Preachers do not such miracles now Gregory answereth Because when the Catholick faith is sufficiently proved by the miracles of Christ and his Apostles it is needless to reiterate such proof any more And a little after Ye have received freely to wit grace which God hath bestowed on you whether grace making acceptable or grace which is freely given Give it freely even as ye have received for for spiritual acts as for administration
they call it and there they corrupt their judgements with apparent arguments and with alledging unto them texts of Logick of natural Philautia Metaphysick moral Philosophy and all manner of books of Aristotle and of all manner of Doctors One holdeth this another that one is a real another a nominal What wonderful dreams have they of their predicaments universals second intentions quiddities hecceities and relatives and whether this proposition be true Non ens est aliquid whether ens be aequivocum or univocum Ens is a voice only say some ens is univocum saith another and descendeth into ens creatum increatum per modos intrinsecos When they have this way brawled 8 10 or 12. years or more and after that their judgements are utterly corrupt then they begin their Divinity not at the Scripture but every man taketh a sundry Doctor which Doctors are as sundry and divers the one contrary unto the other as there be divers fashions and monstrous shapes none like another among our Sects of Religion every Religion every University and almost every man hath a sundry Divinity Whatsoever opinions every man findeth with his Doctor that is his Gospel and that only is true with him and that he holdeth all his life long and every man to maintain his Doctor corrupteth the Scripture and fashioneth it after his own imagination as a Potter doth his clay And in the margin Yet in this they all agree That no man is saved by Christ but by holy works and that Christ hath given up his God-head unto the Pope and all his power and that the Pope may give Christ's merits to whom he will and take them from whom he will Of what Text thou provest Hell another will prove Purgatory another Lymbus patrum and another the Assumption of our Lady and another will prove out of the same Text that an Ape hath a tail and of what Text the Gray-Frier proveth that our Lady was without original sin out of the same shall the Black-Frier prove that she was conceived in original sin and all this they do with apparent reasons with false similitudes and with arguments and perswasions of mans wisdom ..... The wisdom of one is that a white coat is best to serve God in another a black another a gray another a blew and while one saith God will hear your prayer in this place another saith in that place and while one saith this place is holier another saith that place is holier this Religion is holier then that this Saint is greater with God then that and an hundred thousand such things c. And if ye will hear a Papist writing of those times Corn. Agrip. De triplici ratione cognoscendi Deum c. 4. de vanitat scien c. 97. describes them thus Scholastical Divinity by little and little is turned into Sophistry while the latter Theosophists and huksters of God's word which are Divines but by a bought title of so sublime a faculty have made a kind of Logomachy moving questions forging opinions and doing violence unto the Scriptures by intricate words putting a strange sense upon them readier to winnow then examine presuming to device many seminaries of contentions whereby they furnish matter of strife unto the wrangling Sophists when they abstract forms call the words genera species some cleave to the things and others to the names and what they take from one they adscribe unto another and some take it indifferently and every one studies how to prove his own heresie and they turn the sacred faith into sport and infidelity whereof Tho. Aquin. did complain among the wise of this age while they dispise the Canonical Scriptures of the holy Ghost and chose unto themselves many questions of divine things to foster brawlings wherein exercising their wits and wasting their time they will have all the doctrine of Divinity to consist in such things If any will oppose unto them the authority of the holy Scriptures he shall hear anon The letter killeth it is pernitious it is unprofitable but say they we must search what is hid in the letter and then turning to their interpretations glosses and syllogisms they allow any sense rather then the proper sense of the words If you do urge them instantly you shalt receive reproaches and be called an ass which understands not what is hid in the letter but as a serpent eatest the earth only so that among them none are thought to be Divines but who can contend to purpose and give an instance in every matter and quickly devise new meanings making a noise with so monstrous words that he be understood by none and then are they called Subtle Angelical Seraphical and divine Doctors when they talk so that no man understands them These wicked Hypocrites and presumptuous Sophists which as Paul saith teach not Christ of good will but for strife have brought in so many heresies that the Philosophers shall sooner accord then these Divines which have killed all that glory of ancient Divinity with opinions of men and new errors and labyrinrhs of infinite expositions which they have devised under disguised titles they profess detestable doctrine and falsly usurp the name of sacred Divinity and abusing the names and doctrine of the holy Doctors they introduce Sects as it was said in the Church I am Apollo's I am Pauls I am Cephas's pretending regard of them by whose means they began to know and swearing to the words of their Master they dispise all others not regarding what is said but who hath said it And no Divine is thought to be truly learned which hath not addicted himself unto some Sect and maintains it stoutly and covets to be named and advanced by the title thereof as a Thomist Albertist Scotist Occamist for it is no credit unto such Masters to be called Christians since that name is common to Butchers Cooks Bakers and every body and these Sectators are divided again many ways .... Moreover they do forge so many strange things of God so many forms of the God-head and so many Idols of phantasies concerning divine things and they pull Christ our Savior into pieces with the wickedness of their opinions and clothe him with so many vizards of sophisms and as an Idol of wax they forge and reforge him into any shape they please by their absurd suppositions that their doctrine may be called meer Idolatry I pass over the debates and heresies concerning the Sacraments Purgatory Primacy the commandments of Popes and obligations thereunto concerning Indulgences Antichrist to come and many such things wherein they shew mad wisdom with the presumption whereof they are puft up like the Giants in the Fables Then coming to the Preachers he saith They make stories of the Saints with pious lyes they counterfeit reliques they devise miracles and which they call examples plausible and terrible fables they number prayers weigh merits measure ceremonies sell indulgences distribute pardons make merchandise of good works and by begging they
of Corp. Christi Jo. Naucler He multiplied the number of canonized Saints adding Edmund an English Minorite and Vincentius a Spanish Minorite c. When the before named Bessarion heard of this enrolling he said These new Saints make me doubt of the old He ordained a general Letany and procession the first Sunday of every moneth and that every one observing it shall have indulgence for seven years He added unto the Mass a prayer for victory against the Infidels which whosoever shall say shall have three years indulgence If he had minded sincerely to aid the Christians he had a fair occasion for at the same time John Hunniades or Vaivoda overcame Mahumet at Alba saith Naucler or as others write Belgrad and was not able to pursue his victory his Army was so sore weakened Antonin par 3. tit 22. cap. 14. Shortly thereafter the valiant Hunniades died at Zemplen An. 1456. But Callistus was more desirous to have his Son or Nephew Lignius Borgias to attain the Crown of Sicilies for Alfonso King of Arragon died and his base Son Ferdinand succeeded in all his Kingdoms but the Pope proclaimed the Kingdom of Sicilies to be vacant and fallen again unto St. Peter and so the Pope may dispose of it at his pleasure he commanded Ferdinand under pain of his curse that he call not himself King of Sicilies but if any can pretend any right unto it it should be examined at Rome and he dissolved all oath of obedience unto Ferdinand Anton. ibid. cap. 16. They were levying on both sides and in the mean time Callistus died when he had sate three years 9. PIUS the II. was before Aeneas Sylvius with the change of his name he changed his manners He had been Scribe at the Councel of Basil and was one of the twelve Censores Concilii when any thing was done by Deputies of Nations Aeneas was one for Italy when Eugenius was deposed and Felix was chosen Aeneas was sent by the Councel unto the Emperour to declare the equity of the election and the Emperour admiring the dexterity of his wit chose him to be his Secretary In his first book Degestis Conc. Basil he hath a large discourse proving that the Pope is subject unto the Councel there he saith The Church is the Spouse of Christ and the Pope is but his Vicar now saith he the Spouse is above a Vicar neither will will any man subject his Wife unto his Vicar There he proves that these passages of Scripture Thou shalt be called Cephas and I will give thee the keys and I have praied for thee and feed my sheep give no priviledge unto Peter but are wrested by flatterers contrary to the mind of Christ and exposition of the Fathers There also he saith Christ is the head of the Church and the Pope is not the head unless one will say that he is the Ministerial head or Vicar of the Head for edification and not the harm of the Church and therefore as an offending member may be cut off so the Pope may be deposed And that a Councel may be assembled without the consent of the Pope he proves both by reason and practice But when Aeneas was made Pope he sent abroad a Bull with the Title of Retractations revoking what he had written against other Popes and praising them In another beginning Execrabilis and dated in the second year of his Papacy he condemneth all appellations unto a future Councel as execrable and pestiferous and he condemns all Universities and favourers of such appellations In another that beginneth In minoribus agentes and directed unto the University of Colen An. 1463. he professeth repentance for writing the Dialogue and other books for authority of a Councel and saith He had persecuted the Church ignorantly as Paul did and he would prove the authority of a Pope above a Councel from the same passages of Scripture which he had brought to the contrary In the end he saith he doth reverence the Councel of Constance and yet that Councel had decreed that a Councel is above the Pope And so Pius verifieth what Pope Gregory on Iob lib. 11. cap. 10. saith A Doctor neglecting to practice what he hath taught and will not do the good that he hath averred beginneth to teach the lewd things that he loveth and in the just judgment of God now he shall not have for good who refuseth a good conversation because when the heart is inflamed with the love of earthly things it speaks alwaies of earthly things as truth saith in the Gospel Out of the aboundance of the heart the mouth speaketh This Pope absolved Ferdinand King of Arragon from the curse of Pope Callistus yet so that he gave his wifes sister in marriage unto the Pope's Nephew and also gave him the Dutchy of Maldeburg and Celan Platina saith This Pope's sister had four sons and the King made the two youngest both Knights and unto one of them he gave his daughter with the Dutchy of Amalphis Pius was an enemy to Lewis the II. King of France because he confirmed the Pragmatica Sanctio and he caused him to annul it He menaced Borsius Duke of Mutina because he favoured the affairs of France He pursued with most grievous censures Sigismund Duke of Austria because he had imprisoned Card. Nicol. Cusanus unto whom the Pope had given a Bishoprick in Tirolis without the Duke's consent He deprived Diether Bishop of Mentz because he would not consent that the Pope should exact the Annats in Germany nor give his Oath that he would never sollicite for a Councel and Pius gave that See unto Adolph of Nassow Crantz in Saxon. lib. 12. cap. 1. saith The Pope's confirmation was not regarded therefore Adolph levied an Army and by the aid of the Palatine of Rhine he prevailed against Diether and spoiled the City pitifully and brought it into miserable bondage and all trading decaied there Fascic rer expeten fol. 164. Edit An. 1535. saith Pius sighed so oft as he heard the name of Mentz because he had done so great harm unto that City and thereafter he restored Diether Pius brought unto the Patrimony of the Church Tarracino Benevento Sora Arpino and a great part of Campania and was alwaies carefull to inlarge the Papal authority He was so intangled with wars that he seemed not to favour learning saith Platina In the year 1460. he assembled a Councel at Mantua for levying an Army against the Turks The Orator of France came thither and complained that the Kingdom of Naples was taken from the right heir and given unto the King of Arragon but the Pope pleaded for Arragon and would have no business to be treated there but only preparation against the Turk and he sent Bessurion into Germany and Hungary for the same effect But their private jars hindred the common cause saith Laon. Chalcocon lib. 8. Io. Naucler saith Many Souldiers came from Germany France and Spain unto Ancona the Pope gave them all his blessing and
Lewis who died in a battel against the Turks An. 1528. and then the covenant was accomplished and the house of Austria are Kings of Hungary After the death of Ladislaus was strife also for the Dutchy of Austria three Brethren the Emperor Albert and Sigismund contend for it they did name some Umpires to decide the controversie but it is hard to judge against the mighty Frederick carried it But in the year 1463. Albert besieged his brother in the Castle of Vienna so streightly that the Emperour sent for relief unto George King of Bohemia whom he was wont to despise as an Heretick and he sent unto Pope Pius intreating him that he would not accurse George with his Thunder the Pope yeelded because of that necessity saith Naucler And the Bohemians delivered the Emperour but so warily that he neither did perish nor was victorious In the year 1466. Frederick went to Rome some say to perform a vow others say to treat with the Pope concerning Wars against the Turk whatsoever was his purpose he returned in peace and by his means peace continued in Italy and Germany At that time Charls surnamed The Hardy Duke of Burgundy Flanders Gelderland Holland c. durst hold all the World for his enemies and spared not to invade and take Towns where he pleased He had a conference with the Emperour at Lutzemburg and amongst other purposes he demanded the Title of the Kingdom of Naples because it sometime had belonged unto the Empire and now he intended to make Conquest of Italy The Emperour knowing and misliking his ambition gave him fair words and departed the City in the night Wherefore the Duke besieged Colein The Emperour came against him with a great Army yet desirous of peace They were both induced to agree and Charls left the bounds of the Empire But he could not live in peace he intended to march into Italy and to molest the Switzers in his way but he was killed by them in the year 1476. Then the French the Switzers and others repossessed themselves of what Charls had taken from them and Maximilian the Emperour's son married the only daughter of Charls and kept his inheritance not without troubles In the year 1480. Mahumet having conquered the Islands of Archipelagus invaded Italy his Bassa Acomath took Otranto and some other places all Italy was in fear Mahumet died and his son Bajazeth was molested with Civil wars so Italy was freed In the year 1486. Frederick caused his son Maximilian to be chosen King of the Romans and made several Statutes under great penalties against all that should disturb the peace of Germany The year 1492. is remarkable first for the death of Pope Innocentius and election of Alexander the VI Next for expelling the Moors out of Spain by Ferdinand King of Castile above 700. years after their first arrival it is written that 224000. families of the Jews were banished Thirdly under the name of the same Ferdinand Christopher Columbus sailing Westward discovered the Isles Azores as Americus Vespusius in the year 1499. discovered the West-Indies which after him was called America Pope Alexander gave that Kingdom unto Ferdinand When this gift was reported unto Artabaliba King of Peru he said That Pope must be a fool who gave unto another what he never had or certainly he is impudent and unjust who gives another man's Lands unto strangers and stirreth up men to the shedding of innocent blood as Benzo Lopez do record When all the Empire was in peace Frederick died An. 1493. The Reign of his son was for the most part in the next Century CHAP. III. Of Divers Countries 1. IT were tedious to repeat all the strange Eclipses of the Sun and Moon Ominous signs which are recorded to have been in this Century portending the wondrous darkness of the ignorance of these times as indeed it surpassed all others since no age had seen more ungodly Popes nor greater ignorance of the Clergy The inundations of waters the frequent pestilence and famine did also proclaim the wrath of God against the iniquity of men but the more God did strike the stithies of their hearts they became the harder except a small number in respect of the ungodly multitude who therefore were had in reproach and were persecuted 2. In the beginning of this Century God made some preparation for a Helps of knowledge Reformation of the Western Church and in the midst of it more which were two mighty helps of knowledge First some Greeks came into Italy to wit Emanuel Chrysoloras and Argyropulus two Byzantines Musurus Cretensis John Laicaris Theodor Gaza George Trapezuntius c. The Greek language had scarcely been heard in Italy the space of 700. years but then both Greek and Latine Schools were multiplied and they translated some Greek Fathers into Latine as Trapezuntius translated some works of â—yril Alexandrin of Eusebius c. Their Disciples were Leonard Aretin Guarin Veronen Pogius Florentin Philelphus c. In emulation of them were famous in the Latine language Laurentius Valla Flavius Blondus Donatus Acciaiolus a Florentine and many more And the year 1450. is famous First printing for the excellent invention of Printing in Strawsburg by a Gold-Smith John Gutenberg whom some do call Johannes Faustus This Art as it was wondrous for invention so it was and is singularly profitable for store of books then the Scriptures were seen and read the writings of the Fathers came to light Histories were made known times were compared truth was discerned falsehood was detected c. Before that time the rich-poor Monks gathered all the books into their Cloisters and few read them but others could not have them This was a great occasion of ignorance which thereafter was removed by use of Printing 3. Several Homilies and Treatiâ—es came forth against the covetousness luxury and ignorance of the Clarks and Monks Herman Ried in a book De vita honestate Clericorum saith In these dangerous times are many Clarks whio make no account of the authority of the Fathers nor of reason they admit not the Holy Scriptures and they despise the ancient Canons as Bernard had written unto Eugenius they do hate and deride men of understanding and Catholicks because they espy the grievous vices of the Clergy and in zeal speak against their unfaithfulness the Clarks call such men fantastick disturbers of peace and men of erroneous consciences Who are zealous to root out the vices of the Clergy and who alledge the truth as it is written in the Canonical Scriptures these I say are checked and reviled by their own and other Prelates so that at last they must even against their wills be silent and dissemble So it is verified what St. Jerom said in lib. 1. de norma vivendi cap. 5. There is not so cruel a beast as a wicked Priest for he cannot indure to be corrected or hear the truth in a word they are full of wickedness Then he complains that the
Christ that one and the same work of Indulgence shall have vertue sometimes for six years sometimes for seven sometimes for seven hundred sometimes for seven thousand and sometimes full and absolute Then answering unto that position The Church is ruled by the Spirit of God he saith It is true in so far as the Church is holy but not in these particulars whereof she is ignorant and in which she erreth as alas we lament that she erreth grievously as appears by the unsavoury salt the delated Husband-man and the unfaithfull Steward whom Bernard expoundeth to be Mercenaries in place of Shepheards yea and Wolves for hirelings and Devils for Wolves In his Book De subditis superioribus he averreth That the Pope may err and when he erreth he should be resisted Pius the II. did usurp all the Kingdoms of the earth and Sixtus the IV. dispensed with all maner of oaths in causes temporal not only that were already made but that shall be made which is nothing else but to give unto men licence to forswear themselves and deceive others Because the Pope and his Cardinals are contrary unto Christ they are the Antichrist John Ostendorp a Canon of St. Levin in Daventry went once to visit him and Wesselus said unto him O diligent youth thou shalt live until that time when the doctrine of these late Divines and contentious School-men shall be forsaken Wesselus died in the year 1490. and Ostendorp lived until the year 1520. Gerhard Gelderhavrius writeth that he heard his Master Ostendorp report this Prophesie Ja. Triglandius in his Church History against â—tenboga par 3. writeth of him that when Pope Sixtus the IV. was chosen Wesselus went to visit him because he had been his good friend in Paris The Pope bade him ask what he would and it should not be denied unto him He answered I wish that since now you are universal Pope you would demean your self in your office according to your name that in due time you may hear that approbation Come thou good and faithful Servant enter into thy Master's joy The Pope said Why seekest thou not somewhat for thy self He said I crave no more but an Hebrew and Greek Bible out of the Vatican The Pope answered That you shall have but fool thou mightest have sought a Bishoprick or some such thing Wesselus answered Because I have not need of so great things When he died some Friers burnt all his books and papers but he had given sundry books unto others which were collected and printed at Wittemberg in the year 1522. When Luther saw them he spake of the Prophet Elias who thought that he was left alone and yet the Lord had preserved seven thousand that had hot bowed the knee to Baal so said he hath God preserved many thousands from the Idolatry of the Pope And he wrote of him as followeth There is one Wesselus come forth whom they call Basilius a Friselander of Groning a man of wonderful understanding and of an excellent spirit who hath been taught of God as Isaiah hath prophesied of Christians for it cannot be thought or said that he hath learned such things from men as neither I have If I had read those books before mine enemies might have said Luther hath taken all this out of Wesselus we do so agree But by these my joy and courage increaseth and I doubt not but I have learned the truth since he and I do agree in so constant unity and almost in the same words although differing in place and time and occasions And I admire by what mishap it is come that so Christian works were not published by another 37. Among the lights of that time Rodulph Agricola may justly be reckoned he was born in Friseland Ph. Melanchthon writing his life saith Josquin Groningensis had reported unto him that when he was young he heard Vesselus and Agricola often lamenting in their Sermons the darkness of the Church the abuses of the Mass the single life of Priests and that they both taught that men are not justified by works but by faith as Paul oft teacheth and they condemned the multitude of traditions He died An. 1489. Buxtorf Ind. 38. Paul Scriptor teaching on Scotus in Tubing when he came to the fourth Book Dist 10. did speak against transubstantiation and said All things should be tried by the Word of God as a true touch-stone all Scholastical teaching shall shortly be abolished and the doctrine of the primitive Church shall be restored according to the holy Scriptures Conradine Pelicanus was his Auditor and testifieth that he heard him reprove many errors and abuses of the Roman Church therefore the Minorites caused him to be banished and as Rud. Gualter in his Epistle before his Homiles on Matthew testifieth he was put to death as many did suspect being not moved with uncertain conjectures He died at Keiserberg in the year 1499. 39. Nicolaus Rus a Batchelor of Divinity preached at Rome and wrote The Pope hath not such power as is commonly believed the Pope should not be heard when he strayeth from the Scripture his Indulgences are but fraud those only are true pardons which God giveth of his free grace in Christ Saints should not be adored and far less their bones they who are called the Spiritualty to wit the Roman Clergy have packed up all Religion in mens traditions and vain superstitions and they are careless of their office and are Ministers of Antichrist These things are written in his Threefold Cord where he expoundeth the Lord's Prayer the Creed and the ten Commandments which he wrote in the Saxon Languauge that the common people might understand he left Rome and abode there and had many Auditors The Pastors of the Waldenses in Bohemia came and visited him At last he was forced to flee into Liveland where he died 40. Jerome Savonorola a Dominican in Florence taught these Articles 1. Men are justified freely by faith 2. The Communion should be administred in both kindes 3. The Pope's Indulgences are frivolous 4. The keys were given unto the Church and not to Peter alone 5. The Pope hath not from Christ any primacy above other Bishops 6. The Pope followeth neither the life nor doctrine of Christ and therefore he is the Antichrist 7. He who feareth the Pope's excommunication is excommunicated of God 8. He preached against the vices of the Clergy Io. Fox in Act. Mon. Philip Cominaeus did confer with him and testifieth that he was a man of most upright life He foretold that God would raise up a King to punish the Tyrants of Italy and that God would shortly reform the Church therefore some did hâ—te him and some believed him namely the Senate of Florence was perswaded by his preaching to give way unto Charls the VIII King of France When the league was made in Italy against the French he foretold that Charls should return in safety of his person maugre all the power of his adversaries Charls returning from Naples sent for
Court that they did violate all Concordata they reserve all the fattest Benefices unto the Cardinalls they without all order dispense expectative graces exact Annates without pitty measure indulgences according to their luxury multiply the exaction of tiths under pretense of Turkish war sell benefices and priesthoods indifferently to unable persons even to ignorants and draw all causes unto Rome Whole volums of such things are extant and were presented unto Emperours and Kings and they adjoined the necessary temedies especially in the years 1516 and 1517 as P. Mornay testifieth in Myster pa. 629 edit Salmu in fol. and when Orth. Gratious had declared the 109 Grievances of Germany he saith O if there were not more hundreds of such that are here mentioned by the Princes CAP. IV. Of BRITANNE 1. John Colet had learned humane sciences at home and went to France and Italy for love of the sacred Scriptures When he returned he set himself especially to the meditation of Paul's epistles and expounded them publickly and freely at Oxford Henry 7 promoted him to the Deanry of Paul's He professed to distaste many things that he had heard in Sorbone he called the Scotists men without judgement and the Thomists arrogant he said he reaped more fruit by the books which the Rabbies called hereticall than by their books that were full of divisions and definitions and weremost approved by them He never marryed and yet regarded not monks without learning he said he found no where lesse corrupt manners than among married persons because the care of a family and other affections suffered them not to deboard so much as others are wont He spoke zealously against bishops who professing religion were greatest worldlings and in stead of shepheards were wolves In his Sermons he said Images should not be worshipped and clerks should not be covetous Nor Christians willingly be warriours Two Friers Bricote and Standice accused him for heresy unto B. Richard Fiziames and he unto the archb first and then unto King Henry VIII but these two knowing the godliness of the man became his Patrones Erasm in epist ad Jod Jon. dated Andrelac Idi Jun. An. 1521. He died of a consumption An. 1519 in the 53 year of his age the clergy would have taken his body out of the grave and burned it if they had not been hindred by the King Foxe in acts mon. 2. Arthur the eldest son of King Henry I. married Catharine the Infanta of Spain and died without issue then his father being desirous to continue the alliance with Spain and to keep her rich dowry within the realme devised to marry this young widow to his other son Henry and for this end he purchased a dispensation from the Pope The King thought to have made his second son Archbishop of Canterbury and for this end was the more solicitous to have him well instructed but he was crowned after his fathers death An. 1509. 3. In the beginning of this Century was litle stirre in matters of religion in Scotland After that infortunate battel of Flowdon where King James 4 and his base son Alexander Archbishop of Saintandrews were slain fell great strife for that See Gawin douglas Bishop of Dunkell and brother to the Earle of Anguise was presented by the Queen as Regent Patrick hepburn Priour of Saintandrews was elected by the Chanons and Forman Bishop of Murray and Pope Julius his Legate would have it by his power of Eegation This strife was so hot and continued so long a time that the mouths of many were opened to speak against the corruptions in the Church 4. Hector Boece was borne at Dundy brought up in learning at Paris and at this time was professour of philosophy and afterward Principall of the Colledge at Aberdien In his Chronicle of Scotland he cometh not nearer than King Iames 2 but by the by he shewes the estate of the Church in his own time in Lib. 13. c. 11 he saith Now we will make a digression and see how farr the Prelats and Church men in antient times were above the Prelats of our times in vertues and integrity of conversation of which the Prelats now but have the name and follow not their manners at all for the antient fathers were given to the imitation of Christ in poverty piety humility and righteousnes alluring the people by their fervent charity and continuall preaching in the Service of God with equall affections to rich and poore not araying themselves with gold silver or costly ornaments not haunting the Court nor accompanied with women or seen in bordels not contending to exceed Princes in pleasure and insolency nor doing any thing by deceit but living in pure conscience and verity But the Prelats in our dayes and the Church-men are led with more vices than are seen in any other people such enormities have rung perpetually since riches were apprised by Church-men So farr he If the opposition be marked which is his aime we may understand what prelats or clergy were then CAP. V. Of COVNCELS 1. When Pope Julius 2 was crowned he promised by solemn oath to call a Generall Councell for Reformation of the Church but afterward no thing was lesse in his mind and while he made war now against Venice and then against France nothing regarding the estate of the Church nine Cardinals departed from him and having the concurrence of the Emperour and the King of France with their clergy a Councell was summoned on May 19 to conveen at Pisa Septemb. 1. An. 1511 because the Pope had violated his oath concerning the calling of a Councell and the condition of the Christian Commonwealth admitted no longer delay and they summoned the Pope to appear before them and all Princes Doctours and Prelats that had or might pretend any in terest through Italy France and Germany On August I. the Pope published his answer that when he was a Cardinal he was most desirous of a councell but now because of the warrs a councell can not be assembled in Italy and far lesse in the wasted and defaced City of Pisa nor had they authority to call a councell and therefore he commanded all men not to obey that citation under pain of excommunication Jo. Sleidan Comment Lib. 1. Three Cardinals returned unto the Pope and were accepted saith Nic. Basel in Addit but the others with the bb of Lombardy and France did meet at Pisa and because they were not safe there they removed to Millan where Barnardin Card. S. Crucis was chosen president and then fearing that Millain was not safe enough they removed to Lions Because they continued in their purpose the Pope in his Consistory at Rome condemned them as hereticks schismaticks and rebellious and depriveed them of their titles dignities voice bishopriks monasteries and whatsoever Benefices they had by Commenda or whatsoever other title and declareth them uncapable for al times to come Basel ib. In the mean time the Emperour was persuaded by the Pope to forsake that councell
Brethren and did conferre in the doctrin of faith of them he writes unto Nicol. Hausman to 2. epist pag. 167. saying Pighardi judge so of the sacrament that Christ is not bodily under the bread as some say they have seen blood and the babe there ..... but spritually or sacramentally that is he that receives the bread visibly verily receives naturally the blood of him which is at the right hand of the Father but receives it invisibly I can not blame them more for this And that they do not worship the bread they say it is for the same cause that he is not there visibly as we speak of seeing but invisibly and he is at the right hand of the Fathet Here is the Bohemians their judgement and Luthers approbation thereof Then Ab. Schultet in Annal. ad Ann. 1524. shewes that when Andrew Carolstad was still at Wittembergh he was scandalised at some words of Luther who said Christ is in the bread of the Supper tantus quantus in cruce pependisset so bigg as he did hang up on the cross and that this was an occasion of alienation of their minds We have seen other causes of their schisme On August 22. Luther preached at Jena against the fanaticall spirits of Anabaptists pretending revelations and at that time he said Of the same Spirit are the breakers of images and Sacramentaries Carolstad was present and took these words as spoken against him because he had noted and challenged Luther upon these former words After Sermon they meet in an Inn and in end Luther provoketh Carolstad to writ concerning that question of the Supper and so began that Sacramentary strife Luther hath written of that Conference at Jena one way Scultetus saith falsly and Martin Rheinhard preacher at Jena at that time hath writen of it another way Within two dayes Luther went to Orlamund where Carolstad was preacher at that time but he would not speak with Carolstad yet some of his hearers disputed with Luther and did maintain that what they had done in breaking down images was warranted by the word of God so that Luther went away being almost ashamed Not long after by the means of Luther and at command of John Frederik Duke of Saxony Carolstad was exiled out of Thuringia and so was Rheinhard who had written the Conferences at Jena and Orlamund Carolstad wrot Letters unto Orlamund these were read in a publick meeting and all the people did weep at the reading of them the subscription of the two Letters was this Andrew bodeynstein neither heard nor convicted yet exiled by Luther Bodenstein was his fathers sirname When Luther heares of this subscription he writes to Amsdorfius saying you see how I which should have been a Martyr am come so far to make martyres you can scarcely believe how largely this doctrine of Carolstad concerning the Sacrament hath spread Carolstad went to Basile and there he converseth with the Anabaptists only and set forth sixe little books concerning the Lords Supper Upon which occasion Erasmus wrote unto Henry Stromer 4 id Decembr saying Carolstad hath been here and scarcely did visite Oecolampade he hath set forth sixe little books the printers were imprisoned on the third day after at the command of the Magistrate especially because as I heare he teaches that in the sacrament the very body of Christ is not None can endure this for the vulgare sort are offended that God is taken from them as if God were in no place unless he be under that signe and the learned are moved by the words of holy Scripture and decrees of the Church This business will breed a huge tragedy when we have too many tragedies So far he The sum of Carolstad's doctrin concerning the Supper is The body of Christ neither is nor can bee eaten with the mouth but there is a celebration of the remembrance of his body broken for us and of his blood shed for us So he acknowledges a figurative speach in the words of institution and the word This he expoundes not of the bread but of the body as if the meaning must bee Take eat this bread in remembrance of mee for here is the body that was given for you He addeth there must be a trope necessarily lest we be forced to maintaine that the bread was crucified for us and that the Scripture commandeth us to eat his flesh which is false and that flesh profiteth which is also false and that his body is given and broken for us in the use of the Supper which is also false In the book which he called Of the un-Christian abuse of the bread and cup of the Lord he pleadeth against their errour which bid men seek remission of sin in the sacrament and he asserts that the Sacrament should be often celebrat to declare the Lords death and the annunciation of his death to flow from the remembrance of Christ and this remembrance to flow from the discerning of his broken body and shed blood and that the body is discerned and not the bread or the sacrament when we distinguish his body and blood from other bodies and bloods and that we then discern the body and blood of Christ when we consider that his body was broken for us and his blood was shed for us they who consider not these things are guilty of the body of the Lord even as the wicked men which killed him because such do eat of the bread of the Lord and drink of his cup Therefore a man should examin himself to wit whether he thinkes rightly upon the death of Christ and whether he be such as Christ would have him to bee He denieth also that the sacrament can be called an earnest or pledge of redemption by Christ because what is proper unto Christ and his Spirit should not be attributed unto the bread and wine and the Scripture saith not that consciences are quieted by the bread and wine but rather the Apostle commandeth that a man should first examin himself and then eat of that bread which examination were superfluous if one were made more sure of the remission of his sin by the Supper The Senate of Zurik were offended at the newness of this doctrine and therefore had forbidden the selling of these books But both Zuinglius and Oecolampade had spoken of a trope in the words of institution long before they knew how to make it cleare and thereupon Zuinglius in a Sermon exhorts the Magistrat to let the books pass and be read that so the victory of truth may be the more ingenuous and he said Carolstad was lyke unto a souldier which hath arms and a good mind to fight but hath not skill of arms and puts his helmet on his shoulder and takes his brestplate as a buckler in his hand .... so Carolstad is sensible of the truth but because he knowes not throughly the proper nature of tropes hee disposeth and places the words not in a right ordet Likewise Oecomlapade wrote unto severall friends
that they would not judge amisse of Carolstad for albeit he had not attained what he would yet in the substance of the matter he hath not erred much And albeit the Anabaptists knew what difference was between Zuinglius and Carolstad in this particulare yet they follow Carolstade and spread his books far and wide After the divulging of these books Zuinglius wrote unto Matt. Alber Pastor at Reutlinga saying Hitherto we have erred from the But or mark neither Leo Juda nor other brethren nor I do altogether disallow the judgement of Carolstad but many are offended at the obscurity of his words and his immoderat scoffs especially our Tigurines because he hath a little departed from the way wherein he should have walked And then he teaches that to eat the body of Christ is no other but to believe that Christs body was broken and died for us and he proves this from John VI. where it is written of Spirituall eating whereof the signe is in the sacrament 2. from the words of the institution where he expounds Is by Signifieth as the following words do evince Do this in remembrance of me 3. from the words of Luke This is the new Testament in my blood therefore it is not the very blood c. Likewise the Diuines at Strawsburg to wit Wolfgang Capito in October and Mart. Bucer with whom all the other Ministers did subscribe in December of the same yeare did by their published papers exhort all men to leave strife and think upon the right use of the holy Supper that is as Bucerspeakes we should eat the bread drink the wine and then come to that which is spirituall the remembrance of Christs death for we should so eat the bread and drink the wine that we remember how Christs body blood was once offered for us and so we eat his flesh and drink his blood spiritually Luther was vexed with the successe of Carolstad's doctrin and in wrath writes in the same December unto Amsdorf saying We have no other cause but to be humbled for Carolstad's venom spreades very wide and unto his opinion is joined Zuinglius of Zurik Leo Judaeus and many others affirming constantly that in the sacrament is only bread as in the market c. The next year this contest grew hoter betwixt Luther and Jo. Bugenhagius in Pomer on the one side and Zuinglius and Oecolampade on the other In a third piece which Zuinglius wrote in October answering to Bugenhagius he proves that his doctrin was not new as the other had called it but the very mind of Christ of the Apostles and the Fathers and that they have not expounded the tropes albeit they have spoken with tropes and he professeth he knew there is a trope in the words of the institution but he knew not in what word the trope is untill he had read an epistle of a Batavian teaching that the words of Christ The flesh profiteth nothing speak not of a carnall understanding because the text presseth another thing and who will say that The flesh profiteth he makes two wayes of salvation c. The same Abr. Schultet testifieth that when Carolstade saw the books of Zuinglius and Oecolampade he forsook his interpretation of the particle This. Afterwards more oile was added unto this flamme when Brentius heard of the Ubiquity which Faber Stapulensis had imagined I do not intend to handle controversies but of this purpose for clearing the history I add two passages one from Ab. Schultet Annal ad An. 1525 Oecolampad at Basile with his Collegues teaches the same with Zuinglius when it was reported that he was a Carolstadian his friends did entreat him to declare his mind concerning the Sacrament and the same year he publishes a book Of the genuine exposition of the Lord's words THIS IS MY BODY Therein he shewes that orall eating had its beginning from Pe. Lombard or Gratian or if it be more antient from Damascen the later that Lombard in condemning them of heresy who say that Christ useth the same phrase in these words This is my body as Paul had used in these The rock is Christ did condemne all the antient Teachers which were of the same judgement Then he answereth the objection What things are above our capacity men should not search iherefore we should not search into the sacrament And he proves that the sacraments are not of the sort of incomprehensible things seing in the Lords Supper is no miracle nor any thing exceeding mans capacity Thirdly he wipeth-off the calumnies of some preachers who clamorously said that the Gospell was denied and Christ's God head and all Christianity was overthrown by them who deny orall eating of Christs flesh and he affirmes that the Holy Ghost hath spoken in such a way lest any take occasion of errour and he would have some passages a little darkly to the end that some seeing shall not see and knowledge or revelation should be acknowledged to be a gift of Gods Mercy Then he comes to the point and proves the words This is my body to be spoken with the same trope as these of Paul Therock was Christ This is not a strange exposition nor is the phrase seldom used in the Scripture as nothing is more inconvenient than the exposition of the Synusiasts a trope certainly is in the words and many absurdities follow otherwise all the Fathers were for a trope in these words he confirmes the same and refutes the contrary by many reasons according to Scripture The Senate of Basile ask Erasmus his judgement of that book he answereth He had read it and in his judgement it is learnedly and well written and I would say sayd he very Christian if any thing can be called Christian which is contrary unto the decrees of the Church from whose judgement it is dangerous to decline The other passage that I add is in Osiander Cent. 16. Lib. 1. Cap. 36. where speaking of these three Carolstade Zuinglius and Oecolampade he saith The judgement of all these three Divines was the same to wit that Christs body is not given in the holy Supper with the bread and wine but are present above only in the highest heaven and no where els before the last day In after times saith he Caluin did seem to reject their expositions but indeed was of the same mind with them for in his agreement with the Divines of Zurik he writtes that the body of Christ is as far distant from us as the heaven is distant from the earth but deceitfully did Calvin teach the same impiety in other smoother words so that he blinded the eyes of many learned and good men and drew them into Zuinglianisme So far he I marke these two that the Reader may see how these do prevaricate or wrangle which have been for consubstantiation they will not understand any thing to be spoken against them and as if blew green and purple were all white because they are not all black so how beit
Councel for a long time and many things are to be reformed both in the clergy and laity the Emperour will deal with the high Bishop that a Councel shal be summoned within a half year and begin within a year after Unto this decree the Duke and his collegues after consultation reply by his Lawier Pontan They do not acknowledge that their Confession was refuted by testimonies of the Scriptures as they would have demonstrated if a copy of that which is called a refutation had been given them and so far as they could remember by their hearing of it read they have written a reply which if the Emperour will be pleased to read he shall finde that their religion is sure and unmovable And where as they are commanded to print nothing nor change any more they will do nothing whereof they may be justly accused As for Anabaptists and such as despise the sacrament of the altar none such have place within their jurisdiction And because the decree containes sundry things of weight they crave copies of it that at the time they may give the more advised answer They do present the Apology but Caesar would not accept it and the next day he threateneth them sharply if they do not obey the decree So these Princes went away leaving their Deputies behind them and having craved and obtained leave When they began to treat in the Diet concerning the warrs these Deputies do in name of their Principals promise to contribute their aid against the Turks if peace shall be granted unto religion About the first of October a sharper decree was read against the Cities which had given-in the other Confession Finally a third decree concerning religion was read to this sense Caesar ordaineth that they shall not be tolerated which teach of the Lords Supper otherwise than hath been received heretofore Let nothing be changed in private or publick Masse Let children be confirmed with oil and the sick be anointed with consecrate oil Images statues should not be removed and where they have been taken away they shall be set up again Their opinion which deny the free-will of man may not be received for it is beastly and contumelious against God Let nothing be taught which doth any way empaire the authority of the Magistrate That opinion of justification by faith only shall not be received Keep the sacraments in their place number as before Keep still all the cetemonies of the Church all the rites the manner of buriall and such others Priesthoods Vacant shall be bestowed on qualified persons the priests and Church-men that are married shall be deprived of their Benefices which shall be bestowed on others and if any will put away his wife and crave absolution at the will of the Pope the bb may restore such and all others shall have no refuge but be exiled or suffer other deserved punishment Let the life of priests be honest their cloaths comely and eschue all offense ..... Briefly in the matters of faith and worship of God let nothing be changed whoever doth contrarily shall underly the danger of body life and goods Jo. Sleida Lib. 7. These decrees were grievous unto many namely Melanthon gave himself to weeping being pensive not so much as he professed for himself for he knew what he believed as for the posterity When Luther understood this he conforts Luther's Consolatory unto Melanthon him by Letters That seing it is not the cause of man but of God all the burden should be cast on him why then doest thou said he afflict and torment thyself feing God hath given his Son for us why do we tremble or feare why do we sigh is Satan stronger then God will he who hath given so great a benefite forsake us in lighter matters why should we fear the world which Christ hath ouercome if we defend an ill cause why do we not change if the cause be just and pious why do we not trust to Gods promise certainly Satan can take no more from us but our life but Christ reigneth for ever under whose protection Verity consists he will not faile to be with us untill the end If he be not with us I beseech where shall he be found if we be not of his Church do yee think that the Bishop of Rome our adversaries are of it we are sinners indeed many waies but Christ is not a liar whose cause we have in hand Let Kings and Nations â—reat foame as they please he that sits in heaven shall laugh them to scorn God had maintained his cause hithertils without our Counsell and so he will do unto the end ..... As for any agreement it is vain to look for it for neither can we deprive the Bishop of Rome nor can the true doctrine be in security while Popery shall endure If they condemn our doctrin why seek we an uniformity if they allow it why maintain they their old errours But they condemne it openly where fore it is but dissimulation falsehood whatsoever they go about In that you will have the Lords Supper communicated wholly and give no place to them which hold in indifferent you do well for ..... They cry that we condemn all the Church but we shew how the Church was violently oppressed by tyranny and therefore is to be excused as the Synagogue was to be excused when under the captivity of Babylon they keeped not the law of Moses seing they were prohibited by force Ibid. XXVIII When the Protestants understood that the Pope had written The prostants writ to forrein Kings 1531. against them unto severall Kings they in Febr. 1531. assemble at Smalcald and send their Letters unto the same Kings shewing that it was an old complaint of good men that they were traduced by their enemies as Nic. Clemangis in France Jo. Colet in England c and where as now they are traduced by their enemies and they declare what was done at Ausburg they are guilty of none of these crimes that are layd unto their charge as they doubt not to cleare themselves if there were a free general Councel and especially it is grievous unto them that they are said to condemn Magistracy and lawes ..... and they entreat them that they would not believe such calumnies and to entreat Caesar that for the good of the Church he would call a godly and free Councel in Germany where such controversies may be lawfully debated and defined rather than put them to fire and sword The King of France returnes them answer thanking them for emparting such a business rejoicing that they did purge themselves of the objected crimes and allowing their demand of a Councel as necessary for the good not of Germany only but of the whole Church To the same purpose writes the King of England and addeth that he earnestly wishes there were a councel and that he will interceed with Caesar for peace At that time many Protestants were summoned to appear before the Chamber of
he thought to set them and the Germans by the ears and if they consented he hoped to triumph over them Beza answered He and his collegues were come to defend the Confession of their own Church and to this end should the Conference be directed The Cardinal with vehemency did press that point The Ministers fearing that the Conference might be broken off and the blame be layd on them crave leave to consider the Confession forwhich the Prelates seemed absolutly to proclaim The Cardinal nameth one article We confess that the very body and blood of Jesus Christ is truly really and sacramentaly in the Supper of the Lord and is so given and received by them who communicate He alledged also the testimonies of the Saxon Ministers concerning it So the Conference was dismissed The next day Beza was bid to speak and he spake to this purpose We have declared our mind concerning the articles propounded unto us namely of the Church we trust none hath occasion to complain of us and these things that have been handled should have been approved or disproved by the Scriptures But we were demanded By what authority we preach the Word of God they think to make our cause odious by this demand This questioning seemes superfluous seeing we were called hether not to give account of our calling but to confer of our doctrine otherwise it may seem we are brought into judgement Or if it was done only for disputation consider that when two parties are brought into Conference if the one demande Why do you this and the other mutually ask the same this is but caâ—illation and dissention But omitting the Prelates of this realm whom we will not offend let us suppose a certain Bishop were here demanding us By what authority we do preach and we like wise would demand him By what authority he were a Bishop that is whether he was elected by the Seniours of his Church whether the people had desired to have him and whether his life manners and doctrine had been examined and he would answer that he was so and so called but the contrary is manifestly known we call the consciences of those who hear us and know the matter to bear witness If he say We are not Ministers because we have not imposition of hands we might answer Thou hast but one thing the imposition of hands and if the want of that as thou thinkest make us to be no Ministers the want of the other two which are more principal make thee to be no Bishop We speak also another thing albeit beyond our purpose and against our will but that this assembly may see how this question is full of enuy If one were demanding that Bishop From whom had he received imposition of hands and for how much he had bought his title he would answer I had imposition of hands from Bishops and I bought not imposition of hands but only for my place I gave two or three 1000 Crouns which is as if one would say I have not bought the bread but I bought the wheat I say If this contest were judged by the Councels and decrees of the Church it would make many Bishops and Curats ashamed And we speak thus not of intention to bring Quid pro Quo but that yee may see how unwillingly we touch the matter and would have other things handled lest the work of peace be hindred We would have spoken of the article of the Lords Supper because the Cardinal of Lorrain promised to satisfy us in this point of doctrine which is a principal one by the proper words of the Fathers this we do eagerly desire And to satisfy this desire one article was culled from so many and necessary articles of the faith and it was said unto us Either subscribe unto this or we will proceed no further If they were our Judges and sitting upon out lifes they would not say Subscribe but We condemn you Their office leades them into another manner of speach and they should shew if there be any errours in our doctrine We are here before you to give an account of our doctrine unto God and unto all the world and to obey God and the King and you ô Queen so far as lyeth in us to the pacisying of those troubles about Religion If yee had to do with us only who now are here ye might easily have your wills but we represent a greater number not only of this kingdom but in Helvetia Poland and other parts who think long to hear whether this Conference will turn but when they shall understand that in stead of a free Conference the tenth part of an article was exhibited unto us with these words Either subscribe or no more Albeit we would subscribe what were ye the better Others will know whether we have subscribed by force of argument or by constraint Wherefore ô Queen we most humbly beseech that so good and profitable a work be not broken off and that you will vouchsafe to grant such men which will not disdain to dispute soberly Nevertheless lest they say We have not an answer we receive all those passages which Espencaeus brought out of Caluine but in that bit of an article out of the Augustan Confession many things are to he considered 1. the whol Confession should have been propounded and not a line only 2 we would know whether the Cardinal propoundeth it in his own name or of the Prelates and then we would give thanks that they confess themselves overcome in the article of transsubstantiation which is justly condemned by all the Reformed Churches 3. if we should subscribe they also should subscribe that our Churches may understand what we have dene 4. and if they will come to the whol Confession of the Germans we trust that we are come unto a very good way of concord and unity In the mean while we affirm that the Lord Jesus is present in the use of the Supper where he offereth exhibits and truly gives unto us his body and blood by the operation of the Holy Ghost we eat the same body that was broken for us but we eat spiritually and by faith that we become bone of his bones And if this be not sufficient it is hard to speak of so great a mystery in few words if it seem good unto the Cardinal let us consider and confer the Scriptures and writings of the Fathers as he hath promised and if it please you ô Queen to appoint a convenient form of collection and to appoint Notaries to receive our disputations We trust yee understand that we came not to bring disorder and trouble but would dedicate ourselves unto God unto your Majesties and the whole Christian common-wealth and specially unto the tranquillity of this Realm The Prelates were angry that he had spoken of their Vocation and Lorrain said He had dishonoured the Queen into whose hands the right and liberty of election was given So there was bragging of the Cardinall and Prelates and
the Scripture requires This was by and by reported to the Bishop in words varying a little that a Bishop must be a preacher or els he is a dumbe dog He is sent for and said The reporters are manifest liars The reporters are called and they affirm that he had said so and they profer to bring more witnesses He still saith They are lyaâ—â— More witnesses are brought and many come to heare Then said Seton My Lord you may consider what eares these asses have they can not discern betwixt Paul Esaie Zacharie and Malachie and Frier Alex. Seton I said indeed Paul saith A Bishop should be a teacher Esaâ—e saith shepherds not feeding their flocks are dumbeâ— oggs Zacharie saith they are idle pastours and I declared what those have said and my Lord if you be not offended at them you can not be offended at mee therefore I say again these men are manifest lyaâ—s which have reported that I called you or any other Bishop no Bishops but belly gods The Bishop was offended but durst not at that time proceed against him because he was learned bold and in favour with the King and his Confessour But he and his complices did judge it not expedient such a man to bee with the King and so they endeavoure to make him odious unto the King and call him an heretick The King did remember how in private confession the Frier had admonished him for his lusts of the flesh and loved noâ— such advice and said He knew more of that man than any of them and then subscribes their accusation and promiseth to follow their advice in punishing him and all of that sect Seton is informed of these things and fleeth to Berwick whence he wrote unto the King in this manner Most Gracious Soverain Lord under the Lord and King of all of whom only thy Highness and Majesty hath power and authority to exercize justice within thy realme under God who is King Lord of all realms and thy Seatons letter against the iniquity impiety usurpation of bb and his advice to the King Ma. and all mortall Kings are but servants unto that only immortall Prince Chr. Jesus .... It 's not unknown to thy gracious Highness how thy Mas. somtime servant Oratour and ever shall be to my lifes end is departed out of thy realme ..... but I believe the cause of my departing is unknown which only is Because the bb and churchmen of thy realme have heertofore had such authority over thy subjects that apparently they were rather King and thou the Subject which unjust regiment is of it self false and contrary to holy Scripture Thou art the King Master and they are thy subjects which is true and testified by the word of God And also because they will give no man of whatsoever degree whom they once call hereticks audience time nor place to speak and use defence which is against all lawe .... So that if I might have had audience and shewd my just defence .... I should never have fled .... albeit it had cost mee my life But because I believed that I could have no audience they are so great with thy Ma. I have departed not doubting but moved of God untill a better time that God illuminate thy Ma. even to give every man audience as thou shouldst mayst and art bound by the law of God who are accused to death And to certify thy Highness that these are not vain words here I offer me to come into thy realm again if thy Ma. will give mee audience and hear what I have for mee according to the word of God and cause any Bishop abbot frier or Secular which is most cunning some of them can not read their Matins who are made Judges of heresy to impugne mee by the law of God and if my part be found wrong thy Ma. being present and judge I refuse no pain .... and if I convince them by the law of God and that they have nothing to lay to my charge but the law of man and their own inuentions to uphold their own glory and pridefull life and dayly scourging thy poor subjects I refer myself unto thy Ma. as judge Whether he hath the victory that holds him at the law of God which can not fail nor be false or they that hold themselves at the law of man which is very oft plain contrary and therefore of necessity false for all thing contrary to verity which is Christ and his law is of necessity a ly And to witness that this comes of all my heart I shall remain at Berwick whil I shall have thy Mas. answer and shall without fail return having thy hand writing that I shall have audience and place to speak I desire no more whereof if I had been sure I should never have departed .... Pardon mee to say that which lieth to thy Mas. charge Thou art bound by the law of God albeit they ly and say It appertaines not to thy Ma. to intermedle with such matters to cause every man who in any case is accused of his life to have their just defense and their accusers produced according to their own law They do blinde thy Ma. eies that knowest nothing of thy law but if I prove not this out of their own law I offer mee to the death Thy Ma. therefore may learn by dayly experience seing they neither feare the King of heaven as their lives testifie neither Thee their natural Prince as their vsurped power in their actions shewes why thy Highness should be no longer blinded Thou mayst consider that they intend nothing else but only the upholding of their barded mules augmenting their insatiable avarice and continually overthrowing swallowing up thy poore subiects never preaching nor teaching out of the law of God as they should the ignorant people but contend who may be most high most rich and nearest thy Ma to put thy temporall Lords and Lieges out of thy Counsell favour who should bee and are most tender servants to thy Ma. in all time of need to the defense of Thee and thy Crown ...... Let thy Ma. take boldness and authority which thou hast of God and suffer not their cruell persecution to proceed without audience given to him who is accused ... and then no doubt thou shalt have thy subiects hearts and all that they can do in time of need tranquillity justice and policy and finally the kingdom of heaven May it please you to give a copy of this to the Clergy and keep the originall and thy Ma. shall have experience if I go against one word that I have spoken c. This Letter was delivered unto the King and it was read by many but no answer was returned and the man went into England and preached some years the gospell to the comfort of his hearers The histo of Reformat Others spoke also against the licenciousness of the Clergy that a new resolution was taken to burne moe A
licence nor enact constitutions without his consent Item that all cases that were before reserved from the power of the bb unto the Pope were declared to appertain unto the King and his commissioners as to dispense with Canons to divide or unite bishopricks Item all annats or first year's fruits and tyths of Benefices were forbidden to be carried out of the Country and An. 26 c. 3. they were ordained to be payd unto the King as before unto the Pope Item no appellation should be made to Rome Item Peter-pence pensions all such exactions shall cease With express provision that the King nor his subjects shall not intend to vary from the articles of the Catholick faith of Christendom Item the degrees of consanguinity affinity that are prohibited by the law of God were explained published The Kings marriage with Catherin was declared unlawfull and his marriage with Anna daughter to the Earle of Wiltshire was approved The excommunication of the King was affixed on the church-doors of Dunkirk because the Nuntio durst not come into England But the King proceeds in parliament An. 26. c. 1. renouncing and causing the subjects to renounce the Pope and establishing the Papal authority in his own person The oath of the clergy unto the Pope is made void and they are ordained to give their oath unto the king The bb and Doctours of Divinity and of both lawes do both by word write and in their Convocations confirme all that the king had done in Parliament Jo Fisher Bishop of Rochester and Thomas Moore refuse to subscribe therefore they were committed Pope Paul hearing of Fisher's constancy as they called it there creates him a Cardinall for he said The King will not put hands in a Cardinal but ere the Bull came the king had intelligence of it and caused to execute the Bishop and Thomas Moore An. 1535. It was the just judgement of God on them for they had incensed the king against many Martyrs namely Fisher caused his Dean Do. Parker to take up and burn the body of William Tracy an Esquire in Rochester-shire after it had lyen in the grave three years because he said in his latter Will he would have no pompe at his buriall and he trusted in Christ only hoping to be saved by Him and by no Saint Tho cooper at An. 1532. Likewise lest the Pope did provoke other Princes against king Henry he sent Ambassadors with Letters and informations unto the Emperour the kk of France .... entreating them to keep amity The summe of his Letter unto James V. king of Scotland was Forasmuch as the Pope without the knowledge of the Emperour or French king or Germane Princes hath excommunicated King Henriâ—â— Letter uâ—â—o king Iamâ—â— V. against the Pope and Card. mee and now the Popes Nâ—ntio the Cardinal of Scotland is arrived with commission as I hear it brooted but have no intelligence to practâ—ze some anoisance by his pretended censures against mee thy uncle Therefore I premonish and require thy Grace and most heartily pray thee to consider 1. the Supremacy of Princes granted by the holy Scriptures unto mee and other Princes in their Churches 2. to weigh what Gods word calleth a Church 3. what superstitions idolatries and blind abuses have crept into all realmes to the high displeasure of God 4. what is to be understood by the censure excommunication of the Church and how no such censure can be in the power of the Bishop of Rome or of any other man against mee or any other Prince having so just ground to avoide from the root and to abolish so execrable authority which the Bishop of Rome hath vsurped and vsurpes upon all Princes to their great dammage My request therefore to my nephew is to consider of what moment it should bee unto yourself having your subiects evill instructed in the premisses if you agree unto such censures and by such example give upper-hand over yourself and other Princes unto that vsurper of Rome as is like to happen in other places of Christendom where the true declaration of the word of God shall have free course to scourge them unless they will adore and kiâ—â—e the foot of that corrupt holiness which desireth nothing but pride and the vniversall thrall of Christendom under Rome's yoke I aâ—so premonish your Grace that you would not receive the Popes Cardinal into your Countrie for he will not be content to be next unto you but assuredly he will be equall yea and usurp over you and be a heavie burden unto your conntrie as experience teaches in England c. After this Henry enioyeth peace notwitstanding all that the Pope wrought against him Jo. Fox Act. moni But upon this occasion the King of France was persuaded by the Pope not to pay as he was wont yearly 95000 Crowns and other 10000. crowns as a Treatie of peace betwixt the kingdoms did specifie In the year 1536. Q. Catherin died Q. Anna and her brother were beheaded with Henry Norreys and Francis Weston and other two gentle men of the bedchamber for what cause it is not known â—aith Jo. Foxe but within three Dayes the king married Lady Jane Seimer First by a Convocation and then by Parlament An. 32. Henry VIII his marriage with Lady Anna was declared unlawfull no reason is alledged in the Act and he excludes his daughters Mary and Elisabet from succession and declareth the Crown to appertain uâ—to the heirs to be begotten In the next year prince Edward was borne and within 12. dayes his mother died Then by determination of Synods and Sentence of both Universities it was acknowledged that unto the king did belong the title The Supream head of the Church that is as they expounded it under Christ the Supream member of the Church within his own dominions to commande for trueth and not against trueth Fran. Mason lib. 3. c. 3. According to this title he began Steps of Reformation to consider the estate of the Church by advice and prudence of the godly Lord Cromwell and others of his Counsell he understood that the corrupt estate of the Church had need of Reformation in many things yet because so many superstitious persons were to be turned from their olde customs he procures an Act of Parlament An. 32. of his reigne that whatsoever article of faith and declaration of other expedient points the Archbb. Bishops and a great number of the learned Doctors with consent of the King shall think needfull expedient together with their determination of other points and ceremonies in Divine Service shall have the strength of an Act of paâ—liament Then he would not Reforme all at once but purposing to lead them softly he intendeth to proceed by degrees First he publisheth a litle book bearing the inscription Articles deuised by his Highness to estable Christian quietnes vnity In this were 1. the articles of the Creed necessary to be believed by all men 2. the doctrine of
that the Masse and the opinions which they teach the people concerning it be laid to the square of the first institution that the world may know whither their teachers had offended or not in that which they have affirmed whither the action of the Masse be not expressely repugnant unto the last Supper of the Lord Jesus whither the sayer of it commit not horrible blasphemy in vsurping The sayer of Masse is a blasphemer upon the offices of Christ Al. Anderson denied that the Priest takes upon him Christs office A masse-book was brought and it wat read out of the beginning of the Canon Suscipe Sancta Trinitas hanc oblationem quam ego indignus peccator offero tibi vivo Deo et vero pro peccatis toâ—ius Ecclesiae vivorum et mortuorum Then said the Minister If to offer for the sins of the whole Church be not the proper office of Christ only let the Scripture judge and if a vile man whom ye call priest proudly takes the same upon him let your own books witnes Al. Anderson said Christ offered the propitiatory and none can do that but we offer the remembrance It was answered We praise God that yee deny a sacrifice propitiatory in the Masse and we offer to prove that in moe than an hundred places of your Papisticall Doctors it is affirmed that the Masse is a sacrifice propitiatory But whereas ye alledge that yee offer Christ in remembrance we aske first Unto whom do yee offer him and next By what authority are ye assured of well-doing In God the Father falleth no oblivion and if ye will shift and say that ye offer not as if God were forgetfull but as willing to apply Christs merits to his Church we demand of you What power and commandement have ye to do so We know that our Master commanded his Apostles to do what He did in remembrance of him and plain it is that Christ took bread gave thanks brak the bread and gave it to his disciples saying Take eat ..... here is a command to take and eat to take and to drink but to offer Christs body either for remembrance or application we find not and therefore we say To take upon you an office which is not given unto you is uniust vsurpation and not lawfull power Then Alexander vseth some words of shifting but the Lords require him to answer directly Then said he I am better acquainted with philosophy than with Theology Then John Lesley then Parson of Vne and immediatly was sent by the Bishops and their faction to be agent in their business with the Queen and thereafter was called Bishop of Rosse was demanded to answer unto that argument After some litle pause he said If our Master hath nothing to say unto it I have nothing for I know nothing but the Canon-law and the greatest reason that ever I could find there is Volumus and Nolumus The Nobility seeing that neither the one nor the other would answer directly say Wee have been miserably deceived for if the Masse may not obtain remission of sin to the quick and to the dead wherefore were all the Abbeys so richly doted and endowed with our lands Hereby it is clear as also by what is written of the Parliament that the Papists had liberty to plead for their Religion and were required to say what they could not only with safety and assurance of protection but they did appeare and shew their weakness At that time the book of Discipline was not allowed nor reiected but delayd and thereafter it was approved by the Counsell for their own part but not authorised and some additions were noted and this provision expressely added That the Bishops Abbots Priors and other Beneficed men who had already adioined them unto the Religion shall enioy their benefices during their lives they upholding and sustaining the Ministery and Ministers for their part The issue of this provision was many Church-men gave away and sold their Manses gleebs tyths and other things to the prejudice of the Church so that the entertainment of Ministers was very small in many places nothing at all and the gleebs could hardly be recovered XIII At Edinburgh December 20. An. 1560. was the first Nationall assembly where conveened the Ministers and Commissionares from Shires The first assembly of the Church and Burghs about the number of 44. persons 1. They designe Ministers and Readers unto severall parishes throughout the Countrie 2. It was appointed that in time coming the election of Minister Elders and deacons shall be in the publick church and premonition to be on the sunday preceeding 3. It is found by the law of God marriages may be solemnized betwixt parties of the second or third degrees of consanguinity and others that are not prohibited by the word of God and therefore to desire the Lords and Estates to interpose their authority and make lawes thereupon 4. It is appointed that for punishment of fornication the law of God be observed and these shall make publick repentance which vse carnall copulation betwixt the promise and solemnization of their marriage 5. that earnest supplication be made unto the Estates of the realm and to the Lords of Secret counsell that all Judges ordinary and Judiciall Officers as Lords of the Session Shireffs Stewarts Balives and other ordinary Judges be professours of the trueth according to the word of God and all Ministers of the word to be removed from such Offices according to the Civill law 6. To supplicate the Parliament and Secret Counsell that for eschuing the wrath of the Eternall and removing the plagues threatned in His law Sharp punishment be ordained against idolaters and mantainers thereof in contempt of Gods true Religion and Acts of Parliament namely which say Masse or cause it to be said or are present thereat And a catalogue of their names is writen They appoint Comissioners to attend the Parliament if any shall be called with these supplications It is to be observed from the fift Act that Ministers of the word were forbbidden to be Judges in Civil causes which is against the former practise when Bishops and other prelats were Lords of Parliament and sat in Civill Courts No Parliament was called as was expected but a Convention of Estates was appointed to be in May before which time Papists resort to Edinburgh in great numbers and began to brag of their power The Commissioners which were appointed In a Convention of the Estates An. 1561. Papistry is again forbidden by the Assembly of the Church conveen May 17. An 1561. and draw up these articles to be presented unto the Convention that idolatry and all monuments thereof should be suppressed throughout the realm that the sayers maintainers and heareâ—s of the Masse should be punished according to the Act of Parliament 2. That câ—rtain provision be made for maintenance of the Superintendents Ministers and Readers that Superintendents be planted where none are That punishment be appointed for
were instant to begin and the most part condescend to treat of doctrin and Reformation jointly so that also a Letter was sent unto the Pope craving to further the Synod and to solicite the Princes for continuing peace among themselves as also other Letters were written unto the Emperour unto the French Roman Portugal Kings and other Princes requiring them to conserve peace to send Ambassadors to secure the high-wayes and to cause their Prelats resort unto the Synod Those Letters should have been read and sealed in the ensuing congregation but they could not agree what seal to use In a word before the next Session they could agree only that they should begin with heresy and because they were informed of more prelats a coming they delay the next Session untill Aprile 8. Again the Legats send for their oft demanded instructions and they advise to begin at the controversies between them and the Lutherans concerning the holy Scriptures and the abuses brought into the Church in that matter About that time the Conference in Germany was dissolved and the Pope thought it scandalous to delay any more so he gave information to begin according to the advice but so that they be slow in the Reformation Accordingly on February 22. 1546. it was ordained to read Luthers books and frame articles concerning the Scripture to be censured by the Divines and so matter to be prepared for Decrees As for abuses every one should call to mind what he thought needfull to be Reformed and what remedy is fittest The articles of doctrine were propounded of the sufficiency of the Scriptures 2. Of the number of the books 3. of the Latin Translation 4. Of the perspicuity of the Scriptures In the first article all did agree to make Traditions Of the Scriptures equal with the Scriptures excep Antonius Marinarus a Carmelite whose discourse was called Lutheran They all agree to canonize the Apocrypha on these two they spend sixe congregations In the third article was difference between them who were ignorant of the languages and a few having a taste of Greek Frier Aloisius de Catanea did prove by authority of Jerom and Cardi. Caietan that the Hebrew edition of the old Test and the Greek of the New are the pure fountains and all Latine translations are but impure brooks and so have been accounted in all time by past The greater number said This opinion openeth a door unto Lutherans the doctrin of the Roman Church is by Popes and Divines founded upon the Latine Bible and if it be lawfull to scan whether it be rightly translated the base Grammarians shall be preferred unto the Bishops and Cardinals and the Inquisitors shall have no place if they be ignorant of Hebrew and Greek Do Isidorus Clarus a Brescian and Benedict an Abbot discourse historically of the old and later Translations and of their account at the first and how at last that which is called vulgata was patched of them both Andreas Vega a Franciscan commends that Latine but preferreth the Hebrew and Greek In the end sixe Divines were deputed to correct the Vulgata to be printed by auhority of the Councel There was no less difference concerning the expounding of Scripture some alledging the authority of Car. Caietan said The Spirit of God is tied to no age and all men should be encouraged unto the diligent and sober study of Gods Worde Others said Vnbridled spirits must be curbed or else can be no hope to see an end of the late pretences neither do the Lutherans gain upon any but such who study the Scriptures the study of Aristotle is safer and the Word of God should be kept in due reverence from it is much derogated when it is too common Dominicus Soto a Dominican said In matter of faith every one should be tied to the exposition of the Church but in manners let every one abound in his own sense so that piety and charity be preserved otherwise men may fall into inconvenients by contrariety of expositions among the antient Fathers who never required that they should be absolutely followed The opinion prevailed which held that the Scriptures are already so well expounded that there is not hope of any more good and if any man will not be content with the Antients let him not trouble the world with his whimsies The Divines had discoursed so irresolutely that the Prelats who scarcely understood the discourses and yet have the power of suffrage doubted what to say in the canons and anathema's therefore overture was found to add anathema unto the Decree concerning the number and species of the books but the other canons should have no anathema lest they accuse their own Divines They talk of many abuses and a Decree was made against the pettiest for hast because the Session was approaching There the Decrees were read and the fifth Session was appointed to be Juny 17. Five Cardinals were present and 48 Bishops and none of them saith my author remarkable for learning The canons were sent to Rome The Court after information how particulares were debated began to think they must attend the Synod more narrowly therefore the Pope sendeth moe Cardinals and admonishes the Legats that the Decrees should not be published before they be advised at Rome he admonishes also to avoid too much flowness but bewar of celerity lest there be not time to receive order from him what to propound deliberat and conclude and spend not time in points not controverted as they had done now in some undoubted points finally take heed that the Papl authority be not permitted unto disputation At that time the Pope had deposed Herman Bishop of Colein for heresy as was pretended and ordained Adolph Count of Scavenburgh into his place and he wrote unto the Emperour for this effect Charles loved not Herman for the same heresy yet fearing that he would joyn with the ptotesâ—ants would not consent Hence arose a new jealousy between the Pope and the Empetour The Protestants complain that they were condemned not only being not heard but without the Councel by the Pope alone and therefore it is needless for them to go unto Trent IV. In the first congregation the Prelats urge two points of Reformation Sess V that were propounded and left-of in the former Session The Legats would treat of original sin Because they could not agree Letters were sent to Rome and in the mean while another order was prescribed for dispatching affaires to wit there must be a congregation of Divines to treat of doctrin and Canonists must be joyned with them when they come to Reformation yet so that Prelats might be present if they please And another Congregation of Prelats to frame the Heads of doctrin and Reformation which being examined and digested according to the most common opinion should be brought unto the generall congregation and there the voice of every one being known decrees may be framed by the determination of the greater part and then
equal in the thing signified or diverse in visible signes and the same in the intelligible signification those were promissory and these are demonstrative or as others speak the old were prenuntiative and the new are contestative Therefore it is not expedient to put that in a Decree Others said The opinion of the Lutherans and Zuinglians must be condemned without descending into particulares seing they say there is no difference but in rites and no other difference hath been shewed Article 6 Immediatly after the sin of Adam the sacraments were instituted by God and by means of them grace was given The Dominicans would have this absolutly condemned The Scotists said It is probable because of the sacrifices and circumcision and if as Thomas saith children were saved before Christ by faith of their parents children now are in a worse estate seing the faith of parents availes not their children without baptism for Augustin holds if a parent were carrying his child to be baptised and the infant to die on the way this infant were condemned They all condemned the 7. and 8. articles In the sacrament grace is given unto him only who believes that his sins are remitted Grace is not alwayes given in the sacraments nor unto all in respect of the sacrament itself but when and where and to whom it pleaseth God The 9. article denying a character in a sacrament gave occasion of more talking Soto said It is grounded on holy Scripture and was ever held as an Apostolical Of the character of the sacrament tradition albeit the word character was not vsed by the Fathers Others said Gratian makes no mention of it and Scotus saith It is not necessary by the words of Scripture nor Fathers but only by authority of the Church this is vsual unto that Doctor by a kind of courtsy Then it was questioned What is a character where is it Some called it a quality and those were of four several opinions as there be so many sorts of qualities Some called it a spiritual power some an habite others a spiritual figure and others called it a metaphorical quality Others called it a relation Some said It is ensrationis No less variety was for the subiect of it some placed it in the essence of the soul some in the understanding some in the will and some in the tongue or hands Then how many sacraments have a character Some said Only three which are not iterated Others said That is probable but not necessary Others said It is a necessary article of faith because Innocentius 3. mentioneth it and it was so defined by the councell of Florence Article 10. All Christians of what soever sexe have equal power in the ministration of word and sacraments Albeit none VVho may administer hold this article so much as the Romish Church doth especially in baptism yet they condemned it as contrary unto Scripture to tradition and the use of the Church As also they condemned article 11. A bad Minister conferreth not a sacrament Article 10. Every pastor hath power at his pleasure to protract or contract or change the forms of the sacraments It was distinguished as having a double sense by formes may be understood the essential words as it is said A sacrament hath a sensible element for the matter and a word for form or may be understood the rites which include some things not necessary but decent In the first sense they made a canon condemning the article and for the other they made another canon that albeit accidental things admit mutation yet when a rite is received by publick authority or confirmed by common custom it should not be in every mans power to change it excep the Pope only Concerning article 3. of the Minister's intention they would not change from the councel of Florence holding the Minister's intention necessary But what Of the ministers intention intention The common opinion was Intention to do as the Church doth is sufficient Here arose a difficulty Because mens opinions are different in that What the Church is their intention to do as the Church doth might also be different Some said It might rather be said It is not different when one hath the same aime to do what was instituted by Christ and observed by the Church though a false Church be taken for the true if the rite be the same The Bishop of Minori said It is no difficulty among the Lutherans for the Minister's intention but it is otherwise amongst us holding that the sacrament gives grace and it seldom happeneth that grace is obtained by any other means surely little babes and many having but small understanding are saved no other way If a priest having the charge of 4. or 5000. souls were an infidel or hid hypocrite and had intention not to do as the Church doth it must follow that the children are damned and all penitents and communicants were without fruit Neither is it sufficient to say Faith suppleeth the defect because faith suppleeth nothing to the children according to our doctrine neither availeth it unto others so much as the sacrament and to attribute so much unto faith were to take it from the sacraments as the Lutherans do He nameth other in convenients and then said He who saith God suppleeth by his omnipotency will sooner make one believe that God hath provided that such accidents should not happen by ordaining that to be a sacrament which is administred according to the instituted rite albeit the Minister hath another intention This doth not cross the common doctrine or Florentin counsel because that intention is only to be understood which is manifested by external work tho inwardly it may be contrary He confirmed this by example of Athanasius being a child and the censure of his fact by the famous Alexander Bishop of Alexandria The Divines abode still for the intention either actual or virtual as if without it a sacrament can be of no force And to speak by anticipation this Bishop wrote a little book of this question the year following and said The determination of the Synod is understood and should be expounded in this his sense The 14 article was readily condemned Sacraments were ordained only to cherish faith There was not much debate of baptism or confirmation some of them were calumnies and others were contradictory to all their Divines They agreed â—asily in framing the anathematismes Difficulty in framing the decreeâ— but no way could they agree in the positives of doctrine nor of reformation In the doctrine every sect was stieve for their own opinions wherefore some said Positive articles are not necessary lest one party be condemned Others said The order that is begun can not be left and diligence may be used to satisfy all parties Some said Albeit the factions were contentious in delivering their opinions yet all submit unto the determination of the Synod Others said Such protestations of submission are terms of reverence and should be ansvered with
assembled for private ends beseeching the King to send his Prelats unto the Synod where they shall have all liberty adding albeit those shall not come the Synod shall not want it 's own reputation and requiring that he assemble not Nationall Synods which his Ancestors have abrogated and that he be not unthankfull unto God and the Church his mother but rather he should pardon personal offences for the publick good When the Protestants received that Safe-conduct to speak by anticipation they perceived â—he meaning of the Court and demanded one conforme to that which was granted at Basile unto the Bohemians without alteration of any word excep persons place and time The Pope would never grant that therefore the Protestants would never come unto the Synod excep some few as followes After the Session was a publick congregation it was resolved to treat of pennance and extrem unction and to proceed in the Reformation The former Act of their manner in discussing the articles was confirmed because the Divines had contentiously transgressed it Order is taken to hold congregations twice a day that the moe things may be dispatched before the coming of the Protestants Before the School-men were curious and scarcely intelligible Of pennance but then they becam inpertinent and ridiculous for they speaking of pennance for confirming their opinions brought all the places of Scripture where the Latine Translation hath confiteor or confessiâ— they alledge it was prefigured in the old Testament and he was called the most learned who brought manyest types of it they alledge all the signes of humility and out of the Fathers they report many miracles and the prosperous successes of them who were given much unto confession and the bad success of them who had despised it c. After such discourses the Presidents with such Deputies as they pleased to name framed the Decrees and sent them to Rome and when they were canvassed there they were propouâ—ded in the general congregation Sundry Divines spake against sundry parts of them as for example The Divines of Lovan and Colein spake against the reservation of some sins unto the Pope Those of Colein said The words Whose sins yee forgive c. are not meaned of the sacrament and they were not satiâ—fied that publick confession was omitted Of consession and absolution albeit so much mentioned by the Antients and so necessary The Franciscans said Contrition confession and satisfaction are not the parts of the sacrament because they are the acts of the receiver and not applied by the Minister They complained also that it is called heresy to say Sacramental absolution is declarative seeing Jerom Gratian and all the School-Divines have taught absolution is a declaration Many Fathers judged those remostrances considerable But Car. Crescentius said Those things were maturely established and may not be altered for satisfying the fancies of particular persons but if all be not satisfied it may be propounded generally in the congregation Whether the Decrees may be altered and then they may come to particulares And in privat he shew his mind unto some friends that they should not suffer men to speak so freely which were dangerous if the Protestants were come It is sufficient for the liberty of the Synod that men deliver their opinions when the articles are disputed but when all men are heard and the decrees are framed by the Deputies allowed by the Presidents examined and authorized at Rome it is too great licence to call them into question In the article of Reformation concerning episcopal jurisdiction the old contention was renewed the Prelats still aiming to recover their antient power and the Presidents striving to yeeld as little as they could but one thing moved them give way to many articles to wit the Canonists have a law Whatsoever is spoken generally touches not the Pope nor his Court unless they A mistery in forming the Decres be named Therefore the Presidents would never suffer the Pop's name be expressed and the prelates were satisfied hoping that the decrees being framed generally might at least make way for after-times So the Session was held November 25 and the next appointed to January 25. X. November 26. a general congregation gave order to discuss the Masse New projects and the communication of the cup as if nothing had been spoken thereof nevertheless in the ensuing Session nothing was spoken of that matter At Christmes the pope hearing that the Orators of the Duke of Witteberg and of Strawsburg were suiting at Trent for a Safe-conduct and the Emperour was soliciting the Councel for the same created 14. Cardinals under pretence of enemity of the French King and so he might counterpoise the French Cardinals who were many but truly it was to strengthen his own party in the Synod as he wrote unto the Legate he sent thanks unto the Nuntij for their former fidelity and promises if they shall continue for he feared they would take it ill that they had not also received red hats Much adoe was at Trent for purchasing the Safe-conduct but the Pope wrote unto the Presidents to entertain the Protestants with all possible courtesy knowing that it is necessary at some times to suffer indignity and patience brings honor in the end They should abstain from all publick colloquie in matters of Religion either by writ or mouth that they should endeavour to gain some Protestant Doctors and spare no cost But the Pope being peremptory whatsoever might happen not to yeeld and hearing that the Emperour had promised unto the Protestants that he will endeavour to attemper the papal authoâ—ity and that he sought to advance his own honor by debasing Papacy Vpon those motives the Pope enclineth unto the French King and hearkned unto Car. Tournon dealing for a Treaty with him and he considered that if that Treaty shall hold the dissolution of the Synod may follow without any shew of his desire In the mean while the Session was held January 2â— An. 1552 but the decrees were deferred untill the next Session March 6. and they determined to treat of Marriage and prosecute the reformation and publish the definitions of both Sessions together Concerning matrimony 34. articles were propounded in a congregation and after sundry debatings 6 canons were framed Wherefore the protestant Orators complained but the papalins would proceed the faster Vntill the Emperour gave command unto his followers that they proceed not but rather protest against the Papalins if persuasions can not prevail When those things were known at Trent in a generall congregation it was resolved to surcease from all Synodal act during the pleasure of the Synod This was displeasing unto the Pope and he wrote unto the Presidents to suspend the Synod as few dayes as they could and for reputation of the Councel they should resume their Actions without all other respect At this time the Elector Bishop left Trent fearing what was like to befall so did the Orator of Maâ—rice Duke of Saxony
Church of Christ it is also certain that of old so far as the memory of the Church is extant that the chief authority in the whole Church was given unto the Roman Bishop as the Successor of Peter and possessing of his chaire which may be demonstred by innumerable testimonies of the most antient and grave men both Greek and Latine as Irenaeus Tertullian Optatus Jerom Ambrose Basile Chrysostom Augustin unto whom the Ecclesiastical Histories and Decrees of Councels agree and I think there had never been controversy among us for this point unless the Romane Highpriests had abused this authority unto some kind of domineering and had stretched it through ambition and covetousness beyond the bounds that were prescribed by Christ and the Church but this abuse of the Pontifician power which the flatterers did at first enlarge beyond measure gave occasion to think amiss of yea and to fall off altogether from that Pontifician power which he had by universal consent of the whole church which I think may be recovered if he would return unto the bounds that were prescribed by Christ and the antient church c. Here are fair pretences but no less untrue for the Augustan Confession requires no such obedience nor did Christ prescribe it no nor the vniversal Church as the preceeding part of this history shew clearly was not this the main strife betwixt the Greek and the Latines and did not the African church oppose it neither do any of those named antients avouch it as is cleared in many polemicall treatises In some articles he neither blameth the Confession nor can excuse the Roman Church as on the 12. article he saith From the custom of canonical punishments which were publickly enioyned unto the penitents for a prescribed time indulgences were hatched for when the Bishops saw the diligence or weakness of repentants they might deal the more courteously meekly with them and diminish some thing of the time or of the rigor of the punishments which abaiting of the canonical punishments was called Indulgence and now it is brought into privat satisfactions and from the Bishops it is turned unto the Roman highpriest only that he hath the full power of indulgences concerning the use and exercise of which every one of the best sort hath wished that there were a moderation and correction because they have been the main cause of this renting of the Church here saith he it were to be wished that the Roman highpriests would yeeld somewhat for common peace On the 16 article he saith What is spoken of the Magistrat and civill things is every way to be allowed that lawfull civil ordinances are the good works of God that it is lawfull unto Châ—istians to be Magistrats to ordain punishment by law to warre righteously c. The doubt only remaines of the Office power of the Magistrat in Ecclesiastical things here is excess on both hands some asscribing too little and some too much unto Civil power for some exclude Princes and Magistrats from all medling with Ecclesiastical things and others make all ecclesiastical administration subject unto the power of the Magistrat But in this question that should be without controversy that the power of the Emperour and other Christian Princes is no less or inferior in a Christian Republick then was in old times the power of Kings in the commonwealth of Israel and it is manifest by the Divine Scriptures what was their Office in preserving the Divine law and promoving the Divine worship for by a Divine law the reading of Deuteronomy is commended unto them not only that thereby they should order their privat life rightly and holily but likewise to preserve the Divine lawes in vigor and without violation and the examples of the godly Kings who are commended in the Scriptures declare this clearly who finding the will of God in his law commanded the priests and Levites to restore Divine worship as it is prescribed in Divine law c. Of the processions as they are called on the 22 article he saith The custom of carrying the bread of the Eucharist conspicuously in publick pompe is besides the mind and manner of the antients and seemes to have been begun but lately for those had this mystery in such Religion that they would admit none either to the receiving or beholding it but the believers whom they judged to be members of Christ and worthy of the partaking so great a mystery therefore before the consecration Catechumeni energumeni the penitents and all who did not communicate were set forth by the voice of a deacon and ministry of the door-keepers Wherefore it seemes the custom of Circumgestation may well be omitted c. On the 24 article he saith Whereas they complain of privy Masses it is not without reason if thereby they understand the Masses wherein the priest only takes the sacrament and there is no distribution of the mysteries which when it began in some monasteries was forbidden as is clear in a canon of the Nanneten councel c. The Belgick Index expurgatorius hath not spared other of this mans works as his Scholia on the hymns on that which beginneth Nocte surgentes in the edition at Colen An. 1556. it is in page 48 and in the edition at Paris 1616. in Fol. it is Page 179 it is said Cumsuis sanctis mereamur aulam Ingredi coeli the Scholia say The word mereri is one almost among the Ecclesiastical Writers with consequi seu aptum idoneumve fieri ad consequendum which Mereri what it signifieth appeares by one passage of Cyprian besides many more for where Paul saith 1. Tim. 1. I have obtained mercy and it is usually read misericordiam consecutus sum or as Erasmus translates it misericordiam adeptus sum Cyprian in epist ad Iuiaban reades it misericordiam merui and there be many passages in the Offices and prayers of the Church where this word should be taken in this sense if this notion of that word were held many places which seem harsh would appeare more pleasant and usefull In the next Scholi or anotation he saith These words super hanc petram we should understand Peters confession saying Thou art Christ the sonne of the living God This was the exposition of Augustin and Ambrose followes it elsewhere confessing that it is not the person of Peter but his faith on which the Church is builded and against which the gates of hell shall not prevail sor faith saith he is the foundation of the Church seing it is said not of the flesh of Peter but of his faith The gates of death shall not prevail against it but his confession overcomes hell Hereunto agreeth that of Cyrill I think that the Rock is no other but the unmovable and most sure faith of the disciple on which the Church of Christ is so founded and fastened that it can not fail and abides for ever unvincible by the gates of hell And therefore when Ambrose calles Peter
adultery or other crimes and continue in them V. Of the law and the gospell they say Whatsoever in the holy Scripture is against sin belongs unto the law and the gospell properly is the doctrine teaching what man who hath not satisfied the law should believe to wit that Christ hath satisfied for all our sins and hath obtained remission but in a large sense the doctrine of repentance may be called the gospell And they condem it as pernicious and false to say The gospell properly is the doctrine of repentance or that it is not the only preaching of Gods grace VI. concerning the use of the law Albeit believers be free from the curse and coaction of the law yet they are not lawless but the law must be preached both unto the unconverted and converted yet with this different issue that those who obey for fear of the curse are said to do the works of the law and who being regenerat do obey willingly as if there were no curse nor reward are said to obey the law of Christ and the law of the mind neither are they under the law but under grace VII concerning the Lord's Supper they first condem those as crafty and deceiving Sacramentarians who believe the true presence of the very substantial and lively body and blood of Christ and that the presence and eating of it is spiritual by faith next they hold that the body and blood of Christ is truly and substantially there and is truly distributed with the bread and wine and received not only by them who come worthily but by the unworthy albeit by the one sort unto their confort and the other to their judgement and damnation unless they repent And the grounds of this their faith are 1. Jesus Christ is very God and man in one person undivided and inseparable 2. the right hand is every where and Christ in his manhood is set at the right hand of God 3. the words of the institution are not false 4. God knowes many wayes and can be present as he pleaseth neither is he tied to that only way which the philosophers call Local And so the body of Christ is present not only spiritually but also bodily yet not Capernaiticaly but in a spirituall and heavenly manner in respect of the sacramental union Thirdly they condem Popish transsubstantiation the sacrifice the refusing of the cup c. VIII of the person of Christ they say albeit the Godhead and manhood of Christ retain their several properties yet they are vnited personaly not as two planks conioined but as iron and fire or he soul and the body Wherefore among other articles they condem them who hold that only the manhood suffered and only the Godhead is present with us in the sacrament and in all our crosses or that this presence is not in respect of his manhood and the Sone of God doth not all the works of his omnipotency in and with and by his manhood and Christ in respect of his manhood is not capable of omnipotency and other Divine properties IX Concerning Christ's descending into hell they say It should not be curiously disputed but be believed simply that he descended into hell and overcame the power of death and Satan but when and how it can not be known in this life X. concerning Eclesiastical ceremonies which are not commanded nor forbidden in the Worde they say those are not any part of Divine worship and may be changed as the edification of the Church in several times and places shall require yet without levity and scandal and in time of persecution when a constant confession is required nothing should be yielded unto the enemies of the gospell or for their sake XI Concerning eternal predestination first they distinguish between prescience and predestination prescience say they is common to the estate of the godly and ungodly and is not the cause of sin in any man but predestination or election concerneth the godly only this can not be searched among the hid decrees of God but in the reveeled word which teaches that God hath shut up all men under unbelief that he might have mercy on all and willeth not that any man should perish but rather that all men should repent and believe in Christ neither is any saved but who believe in him And where it is said Many are called but few chosen it is not to be so understood as if God would not have allmen to be saved but to shew that the cause of the damnation of the wicked is their not-hearing or contempt of Gods word And they have no mention of reprobation They have a twelth Head against the heresies of Anabaptists Arians and Antitrinitarians This book was the occasion of an open separation The next year the Divines of the Palatinate reply under the name of Admonitio Neostadiana confirming the ortho doxe doctrine concerning the Person of Christ and the Supper shewing the false imputations of errors examining the authority and true sense of the Augustan Confession discovering the indirect means of penning and seeking subscriptions of that book and demonstrating the uniust condemnation of the true doctrine When this book was published some that had subscribed the former book declared that they had subscribed with limitations and not absolutely as the book was published and they recalled their subscriptions and the contrivers of that book replied under the title Apologia Erfurtensis So much was written pro and con The points wherein they insist most were the question of the Lord's Supper the communication of the Divine attributes unto the manhood and vniversal grace Unto those of the Palatinate were joyned the Princes and Ministers of Anhalt and Nassaw the Helvetians and many Cities of Germany besides those of other Nations Untill this day it is cleare that those Vbiquitaries inveigh most bitterly against their adversaries and impute many errors unto them falsely by which two means they a lienate the simpler sort from all reconciliation This difference occasioned the compacting of the Harmony of Confessions After that time there were other Conferences between these parties but all in vain V. In Constantinople the Muffti or highpriest of the Turks dealt with Troubles in the Greek Church Amurathes to take all the churches of the city from the Christians The Greeks Armenians and other Christian Nations did interceed in the contrary alledging the liberty that was granted by Mahomet 2. and others his successors The Muffti answered That liberty was granted when few Turks were in the city but now when there be so many of their own Religion Christians should have no place within the walls Two churches were taken from them and Amurathes turned all his wrath against the Patriarch and caused lead him in an iron-chain through the city and then banished him unto Rhodes Sundry causes were alledged as that he had caused the Christians receive the new Calendare of Rome to the scandal of many he had pronounced a Sentence of divorcement against a Noble
from above from the Father of lights 15. The priest distributing the Sacrament of the Supper speaketh unto every one of the communicants in these words Receive thou grace from the Lord and mercy from God our Saviour 16. Unto these words he who receives the mysteries of the holy Supper answereth Son of God make me partaker to day of thy mystical Supper I shall never deny thee I shall not kiss thee as Judas did but as the thief I will confess thee remember mee Lord in thy Kingdom 17. They sing not in time of communicating but al the spectators do meditate on these holy mysteries with singular devotion 18. When the communion is finished is a thanksgiving and a prayer then the priest turning toward the people blesseth them in this manner The blessing of the Lord be upon you And all the people say Amen Demetrius told mee those things concerning the Masse which is celebrated four times a year as I have said But in their dayly meetings the same Demetrius told mee the Christians have this custom 1. The priest beginneth with a blessing as in the Masse 2. Publick prayers are made a lesson is rehearsed out of the holy Scriptures and there is a short Sermon 3. When the prayer is finished bread is distributed without wine they call not this bread the body of the Lord but it is given in token of mutuall brotherly-love that their mindes being admonished by this sign may be united who eat of the same bread 4. When they have eaten that bread they are dismissed with this blessing The blessing of the Lord be upon you So Heming XIV It may be required here why is not mention made of the tares which the ill man did sowe among the wheat in this Century I intended indeed to have marked those heresies but partly because these are collected already and partly that this Compend hath swelled bigger then I intended I leave them and only will writ a little of a late kind of Monks in the Roman Church these are the Jesuits They had their first hatching Of the Iesuites from Johannes Petrus Carafa a Venetian who became Pope Paul IIII. But because he brought not that Order to an establishment his name is forgot in their genealogy and Ignatius Loyola is called their first father This was a Spanjard and a Captain When the Frenches beseeged Pompejopolis his one leg was broken and the other was wounded with a bâ—llet when his wounds were cured so as might be he saw that he could not follow the warrs as he intended thereupon he took himself unto a reteered life and reades the Legend's of Saints as they are called and went to Jerusalem for devotion after his returning he began to studie in Compluto Salamantica and then at Paris where he became Master of Arts An. 1536. Then he intends to begin a new order and hearing what Carapha had intended he will prosecute that project for upon occasion he lived at Venice He takes with him ten fellowes of his minde and go togeher for confirmation of their Order The Cardinals opposed him because the world was complaining of the multitude of Orders and Monks and indeed there was more need to restrain the number then add new But Loyola said The Franciscans and Dominicans who were wont to be stout Champions for the Apostolical See had failed of their duty but if his Order were confirmed he and all his fellowes will oblige themseves to do what they can for confirming the Papal power Upon this motive Pope Paul III. confirms the Order with this limitation that their number should not exceed sixty but in the year 1543. the Pope understanding of their diligence takes off that restraint of the number What sort of men those are may be wel known by two litle books one under the name Aphorismi Doctrinae Jesuitarum printed An. 1608. another called Anatomia Societatis Jesu printed An. 1643. The first saith They maintain all thearticles determined by the councel at Trent and namely these 1. The Pope hath spiritual and temporal power to command forbid to excommunicat and escheat to set up and cast down Emperours Kings and Princes and who believe not this is an heretick 2. All clergy-men Monks and Nonns and all their priviledges are al together free from obedience censures and taxations of Magistrats all Princes should commit their chief castls and fortresses unto church-men rather then to laicks 3. Unto the pleasure of the Pope belongeth the authority of the Scripture the interpretation and power of changing it and the Pop's Decrees are absolutly necessary unto salvation and they are firm and obligatory 4. Albeit the Pope be a man yet seing he is the Vicar of God on earth and therefore Divin honor should be given unto him he cannot err in matter of faith albeit all other men yea and councels may erre and for this cause appeals may be from Councels unto the Pope but not contra 5. All capitulations constitutions leagues fraternities priviledges of Emperours Kings Princes and States whereby any other religion is permitted excep the Romish religion are of no validity although they had been ratified by solem oaths 6. All Papists every where should endeavour to oppress by fire sword poison powder warre and whatsoever engines all hereticks especially Lutherans and their abbetors even these Politick Catholicks who would rather observe peace then contribute to oppress hereticks 7. But if Papists do fear that enterprices shall be in vain and dammage may befall the Romish religion in this case may be a toleration and they may wait for better occasion 8. When Popish subiects have in an assembly judged an Emperour King or Prince to bea tyrant then they may cast him off and deliver themselfs from all obligation but if they can not assemble then any subject taking the advice of a Jesuit or any such Divine may yea he doth meritoriously to kill that King or Prince 9. If subjects have a Lutheran or Calvinian Prince who would compell them into heresy those subjects are free from all homage and fealty and they may expell or kill him 10. Yea Emperours Kings and Princes may be killed if Jesuites or other grave Divines judge them tyrants 11. The Pope may give unto Catholiks the Kingdoms dominions and territories of all hereticks and infidels and such donations are validâ— 12. Jesuites and other Catholick priests when examined by heretical Magistrats may use equivocations fained names and cloaths and they may deny the truth for insinuating themselves abroad or for bringing their designements to pass 13. Jesuites and other Papists may use equivocations when he who is demanded thinks that that Judge hath not lawfull power to question him or his adversary hath not just cause to plead 14. Neither is every catholick tied to answer according to his mind unto privat catholicks but he may equivocat and deceive his demanders 15. This equivocation is a profitable Art and a new prudence These Aphorisms are proved particularly by