day according to the Commandement And when the Sabbath was past writes o St Mark Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Salome had bought sweet spices that they might come and anoint him And very early in the morning the first day of the week they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the Sunne as it began to down saith p Saint Matthew whiles it was yet dark writes q Saint John and they found the stone rolled away from the Sepulchre By all which it appears That the Sabbath begun and concluded at Evening For first Saint Luke saith the Sabbath drew on when Christ was taken down from the Crosse about the Evening implying that it was then almost ready to begin Secondly they took him down them because he should not hang upon the Crosse any part of the Sabbath Thirdly the women shortly after their return from his buriall began their Sabbath dayes rest Fourthly The Sabbath was past the first day begun and our Saviour risen before the women came to his Sepulchre yet they came thither at day-dawning whiles it was dark and their apparelling themselves their buying of spices and coming from their houses or lodgings to the Sepulchre all after the Sabbath was fully ended would take them up some hours time perchance or more It is apparent therefore by all these particulars that the Sabbath even in the Evangelists account both at and after our Saviours Passion and Resurrection commenced and ended at Evening So that Saint r Matthews In the end of the Sabbath as it began to dawn towards the first day of the week which some object to the contrary as if the Sabbath then ended not till the morning must be interpreted by Saint Å¿ Marks after the Sabbath was ended and the other t Evangelists On the first day of the week that being the true sence and scope of his words else Christ in his account did rise again upon the seventh-seventh-day Sabbath not on the first day of the week and so by consequence upon the second not the third day after his Passion which is directly contrary to all the other Evangelists and Scriptures to the Article of our Creed and to Christs own predictions of his rising again the third day recorded thrice by Saint Matthew himself Mat. 12. 40. c. 16. 21. c. 27. 63 64. which he would never contradict in the history of his resurrection Fifthly it is certain by the constant practise of the Jewish Church who both before and since Christs time even to this present day did ever begin and end their Sabbath at Evening Witnesse Josephus that famous Jewish Historian Contra Apionem l 1. c 833. Hierom comment in Jonam c. 2. Tom. 5. p. 137. Eusebius de Praeparat Evangel l. 8. c. 2. Tom. 1. p. 141. S. Augustine de Tempore Serm. 251. Chrysostome Homil. 4. in Genes Tom. 1. Col. 26. B. Hom. 62. in Matth. Tom. 2. Col. 559. B. Anastatius Sinaita Anagogicarum Contemplationum Heâ—am l 2 Questio 152. 153. Eibl. Patrum Tom. 6. pars 1. p. 634. E. 794 795. Hospinian de Oâ—igine Festorum fol. 31. 72. b. 68 69. 161 162. Marlorat in Matth. 28. v. 1. Joseph Scaliger de Emendatione temporis l. 92. 6. p 119. 532 533. God win his Jewish Antiquities â— 3. c. c. 3. p. 131. Ainsworth his Annotations on Genesis 1. v. 5. Levit. 22 32. together with most ancient and modern Commentators upon Gen. 1. 5. 9. 13. Levit. 23. 32. Exod. 12. 18. Matth. 12. 40. c. 16. 21. c. 28. 1. Mark 16. 1 2 9. Luke 23 54 55 56. c. 24. 1. John 20. 1. Acts 10. 40. 1 Cor. 15. 5. with those Authours quoted in my Histriomastrix p. 643 644. and u others in the margent who all subscribe with one consent that the seventh day Sabbath and all other dayes else in the Scripture and Jewish account did ever begin and determine at Evening This second Conclusion therefore is past all question For the third That the same first day of the week on which our Saviour rose again began at Evening in divine computation it is most certain 1. Because all dayes in Scripture account did then begin as the Premises evidence Therefore this day too Secondly because that seventh day Sabbath on which our Saviour rested in his grave began and endâ—d at Evening as is clear by Matthew 28. 1. compared with Levit. 23 32. and other fore quoted Scriptures by the joynt attestation of all divines and Expositors on these Scriptures and by the second Conclusion Therefore it must necessarily begin at Evening when this Sabbath ended else the Evening may and night between the end of the Sabbath and our Sâ—viours resurrection should be part of no day at all like that of Job Job 3. 3 6. being no parcell of the Sabbath nor yet of that first day of the week on which Christ arose which can-not be Thirdly All the Evangelists with one consent record that our Saviour rose again upon the first day of the week very early in the morning whiles it was dark before the women came to his sepulchre and after the Sabbath was past Mark 16. 1 2 9. Matth. 28. 1 2. Luke 23 56 c. 24. 1 2. John 20. 1 2. the chief reason alledged by all especiaâ—ly by our opposites in this Controversie why Christians solemnize this day as their Sabbath If then he arose upon the first day the day was certainly begun some space before his resurrection else he must rise with it or before it not upon it Neither did or could this day-begin at Morning day-dawning or Sun-rising in divine compute because our Savior was risen and the women were come to the grave before that time as these Texts affirm and yet then the x Sabbath was past and this first day begun which could not be if the day commenced not before the morning begining but at break of day or Sun-rising nâ—ither did it begin at midnight because the Scripture Jews and Ecclesiasticall Writers know no such naturall or divine incepâ—ion of the day therefore questionlesse it began at Evening as the generality of Expositors on these Texts acknowledge it being the true time of the dayes Inchoation in divine accompt Fourthly Mat. 12. 4 c. 16. 21. c. 27. 63. Mark 8. 31. c. 14 58. Luke 13. 32. Hosea 6. 2. Acts 10. 40. 1 Cor. 15. 4. and all our Creeds assure us that our Saviour rose again the third day from his Passion which he predicting to his Disciples useth this expression Matth 27. 63. and Mark 8. 31. After three dayes that is after the beginning of three dayes or of the third day from my Passion not after three dayes ended for then he had risen again upon the fourth day not the third I will rise again which Phrase being all one in sense with upon the third day I will rise again as appears by Matth. 16. 21. implies that a good part
other On the seventh day he shall purifie himself and shall be clean at Even witnesse Deut. 23. 11. Num. 19. 7 8 11 12 16 19 21 22. Letit 11. 24. to 40. c. 15. 5. to 27. c. 17. 15. c. 22. 6. All dayes therefore in divine computation began and concluded at Even since all the dayes of mens ceremoniall uncleannesse did so which uncleannesse might befall them upon any day whatsoever Fifthly it iâ— perspicuous by the Israelites solemne Easting-dayes which commenced and ended at Even For they usually fasted untill Even Judges 20. 23. 26. 2 Sam. 1. 12. Their dayes therefore bâ—ing but the limits of their Fasts for they fasted sometimes h one day sometimes two dayes sometimes three or more did question lesse begin and determine at Even in their own and Scripture computation Sixthly it is apparent by Deul 21. 22 23. If a man be pâ—â— to death and thou hang him on a tree his body shall not remain all night upon the tree but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day compared with Joshua 8. 29. and cap. 10 26. 27. And the King of Ai he hanged on a tree untill eventide and assoon as the Sunne was down Joshua commanded that they shouldtake his careasse down from the tree c. And he smote the five Kings and hanged them on five trees and they were hanging upon the trees untill the Evening and at the time of the going down of the Sun Joshua commanded and they took them down off the trees and cast them into the Cave wherein they had been hid c. compared with Joh. 19. 31 38. Mat. 27. 57. 58. Mar. 15 42 43. The Jeâ—s therefore because it was the preparation that the bodies should nâ—â— remain upon the Crosse the Sabbath day for that Sabbath day was an high day besought Pilate that their legs might be broken and that they might be taken away And when the i Even was come that is the Evening of the Day about Sunne-setting or Evening tide Joseph of Arimathea went to Pilate and begged the body of Jesus then Pilate commanded the body to be given him And he took it down and wrapped it in linnen and laid it in his own tomb Which Texts paralell'd with Ephes. 4. 26. Let not the Sun go down upon your wrath do fully evidence that the day in divine resolution begins and ends at Even because the bodies of Malefactors which were to bâ— buried the same day and might not remain on the tree all night were then taken down and interred Seventhly That speech of David to Jonathan 1 Sam. 20. 5. Let me go that I may hide my self in the fields unto the third day at Evening annexed to that of 1 Sam. 30. 17. And David smote them from the twilight even to the Evening of the next day is a direct proof that the Scripture begins the day at Even making it part of the subsâ—quent not of the precedent day as these phrases unto the third day at evening and to the evening of the next day import Eighthly and lastly It is clear by the joynt confession of all sorts of Authors of all Commentators on the fore-quoted and the ensuing Texts that the Penmen of the Scriptures who were guided by the Holy Ghost with the whole Jewish Church Nation directed by the same Spirit and the Scripture computation did ever begin and end their daies at evening not at morning or midnight as the Jews k yet doe A truth so evident that our Opposites in this point of the Lordsday's inchoation for the most part grant it without any contradiction having nought else to plead for themselves but this that Christs resurrection in the morning did translate the beginning of days from evening to the morning Therefore it is undoubtedly true that all daves in scripture and divine resolution begin and end at Evening So that this first Conclusion is uncontrolable For he second That the seventh day Sabbath in Scripture account did ever begin and end at Evening and that the Jews did constantly solemnize it from Evening to evening it is most apparent For first All dayes in Scripture and Jewish computation commenced and concluded at Evening as the former Conclusion manifests therefore the seventh day Sabbath too Secondly the Scripture peremptorily commands this beginning and close of the Sabbath Levit. 23. 32. From EVEN to EVEN ye shal celebrate your Sabbath which though it be specially meant of the Sabbath of Attonement yet it is true of the seventh day sabbath too it being the original pattern by which the Sabbath of attonement was squared and thus bounded out Thirdly It is apparent by Nehem. 13. 19. And it came to passe that when the gates of Jerusalem began to be dark before the sabbath that is when the twilight began I commanded that the Gates should be shut and charged that they should not be open till after the Sabbath and some of my servants set I at the gates that there should no burden be brought in on the sabbath day By which it is evident that the seventh day sabbath began at Evening not at morning or midnight For why should Nebemiah command the gates of Jerusalem to be shut just as it began to be dark a little before the l Evening star began to appear when the Evening Sabbath actually begin but to prevent Carriers and others who brought burdens into Jerusalem from prophaning the Sabbath which would have begun before they could have passed to their Innes and unladed their burdens had they admitted them to have entred the gates so late the Sabbath being to begin almost presently after when the day light ceased and the starres began to appear which had it not commenced till midnight or morning following he would not have closed up the gates so early since they might have unladed their Carriages a good space before the Sabbath though they had not entred Jerusalem till the twilight ended His timely shutting up of the gates therfore to prevent this breach of the Sabbath by unlading burdens is a m pregnant evidence that it began at Even soon after or just when the gates were barred Fourthly it is clear by Luke 23. 54 55 56. compared with Luke 24. 1 2. Mark 16. 1 2. c. 15. 42 43. John 19. 31 38. cap. 20. 1. c. Matth. 27. 57. 58. By all which it appears that our Saviours body was taken down from the Crosse and laid in the Sepulchre upon our Friday at Evening a little before night and that they took it down and buried it then that it might not remain on the Crosse upon the Sabbath day to which Saint Luke addes this as a Corollary n And that day was the Preparation and the Sabbath drew on and the women also which came with him from Galilee followed after and beheld the Sepulehre and how his body was laid they returned and prepared Spices and ointments and rested the Sabbath
Apostles and the Primitive Christians for some good space of time did constantly observe the seventh day Sabbath after Christs Passion and Resurrection the Evangelists and Saint Luke in the Acts ever stiling it the Sabbath-day which name it yet retains in * Latine and making mention of its conscionable solemnization by the Apostles and other Christians Mark 16. 1. Luke 23. 56. See Mark 15. 42. and Luke 23. 54. Matth. 24. 20. Acts 1 12. c. 13 14 27. 42. 44. c. 14. 1. c. 15. 20 21. c. 17. 1 2 10. and c. 18. 4. it being still solemnized by many Christians after the Apostles times even till the Council of Laodicea about the year of our Lord 360. as Ecclesiasticall writers and the 29th Canon of this Council testifie which runs thus Å¿ Quod non oportet Christianos Judaizare otiare in Sabbato sed operari in eodem die which many did refuse at that time to do Praeferentes autem in veneratione Dominicum diem there being then a great Controversie among Christians which of these two dayes the seventh day Sabbath or the Lords-day should have precedency t both of them being then observed by some si vacare voluerint ut Christiani hoc faciant Quod si reperti fuerint Judaizare Anathema sint à Christo Since thererefore the seventh day Sabbath was thus solemnized by Christ the Apostles and Primitive Christians after the resurrection till this Laodicean Council did in a manner quite abolish the observation of it it necessarily follows that they began their Lords-day celebration at Evening For the seventh day Sabbath as I have proved in the second Conclusion did ever begin and end at Evening and is so solemnized and begun by the Jews at this day Wherefore they concluding this day at Evening they must necessarily begin the Lords day then because the first day of the week which they celebrated as the Lords-day did then commence the Evening following the seventh day Sabbath being apart of it in their account and one day ever necessarily beginning when the other ends To these five Reasons I might adde those others formerly alledgâ—d to prove that the Lords-day ought to begin at Evening All which being laid together are an infallible proof that admit the Lords-day instituted by Christ and his Apostles yet it was ordained by them from the very first to begin and end at Evening and so to be solemnized and that themselves did thus begin it If it were onely instituted by the primitive Christians * succeeding them no question but they at first concluded that it should be sanctified from Evening to Evening many of them being Jews who kept all their Sabbaths and Festivals from Evening to Evening to whom the other Christians did readily conform in this particular because it was the Scripture computation even from the Creation and for other premised Reasons For the Apostles themselves and other Christians condescending to them for a time in the point of Circumcision Purification and other such Ceremonies quite abrogated by Christs death Acts 21. 20 to 28. 1 Cor. 9. 20. Gal. 2. 14 15. c. 6. 12. would certainly concurre with them in the beginning and ending of their Sabbaths and sacred festivities which were no wayes ceremoniall nor altered nor abrogated by Christs death From which premises I conclude that let the Lords-day be instituted when or by whomsoever yet it was ordained in its primary institution to be solemnized from Evening to Evening and that it was sanctified in this manner by its originall Institutors To put this out of question I shall descend from the alledged reasons to direct Authorities culling out some few of the chiefest in all ages and pretermitting all the rest for brevity sake I shall begin with the ancientest first and so proceed in order to our present times The first Authority I shall insist on is that of Acts 21. 7 8 11. which many object against me though it be most pregnant for me And upon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and continued his speech untill Midnight And there were many lights in the upper chamber where they were gathered together c. When therefore he was come up again and had broken bread and eaten and talked a long while even till break of day so he departed This is the very first and best Scripture Authority properly alledged for the solemnization of the Lords-day by the Apostles and Christians of that age who began the celebration thereof at Evening not at morning or midnight as is plain by this Text 1. Because their solemnizing of it begun no doubt at that time when as they came together to break bread that is to receive the Sacrament as most or to keep their Agape or Love-feasts as others interpret it or rather in truth to do both But the Christians in that time did both celebrate the Sacrament and keep their Love-Feasts at u Evening in imitation of our Saviour who first instituted and kept the Sacrament at Evening after Supper Luke 22 20. John 13. 2 4. c. 21. 20. whence it is called the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 20. See Luke 14. 12 16 17 24. Rev. 19. 9. 17. This is manifest by 1 Cor. 11. 20 21. When ye come together therefore into one place this is not to eat the Lords-Supper for in eating every one taketh his own supper and one is hungry and another is drunken Now this Text styling the Sacrament the Lords Supper and informing us that the Corinthians did usually receive it after they had eaten their own Suppers and that some were drunk when they came to receive it and in those times They that were drunk were drunk in the night 1 Thes. 5. 7. ascertains us that this their coming to receive the * Sacrament and keep their Love-feasts was at Evening or candletining when it was Supper time 2. Because the Text saith There were many lights in the upper room where they were gathered together and that Paul preached from the time of their coming together till midnight Both which do manifestly declare their Assemblies begun at Evening as they anciently did because there were many lights in the room where they met which were lightted as the Text insinuates before or so soon as they assembled in it and because it is not probable that Paul who begun his Sermon when they came together as the words imply did preach from Midnight or the morning before till midnight following there being never such a Sermon heard of but onely from Candle tining till midnight the space of four or five hours 3. Because the Christians in the next succeeding ages as is manifest by y Plinie and z Tertullian did begin their Christian meetings and Love-feasts at Evening whence they likewise stiled them a Supper which Tertullian thus describes Coena nostra de nomine rationem suam
â—stendit Vocatur enim Agape id quod penes Graecos dilectio est Non prius discumbitur quam oratio ad Deum praegustetur Editur quantum convenientes capiunt bibitur quantum pudiâ—is est utile ita saturautur ut qui meminerint etiam PER NOCTEM adorandum sibi Deum esse which shews that they began their Feasts and Christian exercises which he here conjoyns at Evening and continued them all night as Saint Paul and the Disciples at Troas did Which meetings Theophilus Alexandrinus in his Epist. Paschalis 3. 3. Bibl. Patrum Tom. 4. p. 723. calls Vespertina congregatio Post aquam manualem ac LVMINA which manifests they kept their Assemblies by Candle light and so begun them at Evening ut quisquis de scripturis sanctis vel de proprio ingenio potest provocatur in medio Deo canere which a Plinie the second stiles carmenque Christo quasi dicere secum invicem hinc probatur quomodo bibent Aâ—què oratio convivium diâ—imit Inde lis disceditur non in catervas caesionum neque in Classes discursationum nec in â—ruptiones laseivorum sed ad eandem â—uram modestiae pudicitiae ut qui non tam coenam coenaverint quam disciplinam Which usage well explains this place of the Acts It being apparent then as the subsequent Antiquities will more abundantly manifest that this meeting of the Disciples at Troas and Pauls preaching to them began at Evening The sole doubt will be what evening this was whether that which we call Sunday night as many erroneously mistake or Saturday night which is the Lords-day night if any For my own part I conceive clearly that it was upon Saturday night as we falsely call it not the ensuing Sunday night For admitting the Lords-day was then instituted for a Sabbath which those of the opposite opinions grant and I consent to there will be no great question of it 1. Because if the Christians at Troas observed this first day of the week as their Sabbath no doubt but this their meeting to solemnize it and receive the Sacrament on it was rather that Evening which began than that which ended the Lords-day in their account else they should have begun its solemnization onely when it ended whiâ—h is improbable But our Sunday Evening on which some affirm this meeting ended not commenced the Lords-day in their account they ever beginning their dayes the Evening before as the premises manifest Therefore this Assembly was on our Saturday Evening there being no mention of any meeting the day or Evening before 2. Because the Christians in the next succeeding ages as I shall prove by the following testimonies did ever begin their Lords-day assemblies and solemnities on Saturday Evening solemnizing it from Evening to Evening because the first observers of it did so Therefore it is more than probable that these Christians at Troas did so too 3. Because Saint Luke records that it was upon the first day of the week when this Meeting was and this Sermon of Pauls made therefore it must needs be on the Saturday not on our Sunday Evening since the Sunday Evenning in S. Lukes and Scripture account was no part of the first but of the second day the day ever beginning and ending at Evening in their computation as the premises evidence 4. All my opposites confesse that the Disciples met at this time upon the first day of purpose to sanctifie it for a-Sabbath and can they then think that they would defer their meeting till our Sunday Evening when all the day in their accompt and the best the chiefest part of it in their compute who begin it at midnight or morning was expired Certainly this had been to make the Lords-day no Festivall day at all or at most not so much as an half-holy day which we cannot presume these Disciples and S. Paul would dodid they observe it as their Sabbath From all which reasons I may more then probably conclude that it was the Saturday Evening when the Lords-day began not the Sunday night when it ended when this Divine Assembly was kept the rather because they received not the Sacrament nor brake this bread till after midnight as the Text affirms and so after the Lords-day ended even in the accompt of such who affirm it ends at midnight And because this beginning of their Assembly when the day begins makes most for the Apostolical divine Institution and sanctification of the Lords day for the which this Text will little avail if this Assembly on it were on our Sunday night when the day was either wholly or for the most part expired and so this meeting no warrant for its totall sanctification But against this it will be objected First that Saint Paul departed from Troâ— the very next morning at day-break which he would not have done had it been part of the Lords-day for he would not have taken this journey then lâ—st he should have prophaned it Besides the Text saith That he was ready to depart on the morrow which signifieth another day not the same therefore this night must needs be our Sunday night his departure being on the morrow to wit on our Monday the next day after it To this I answer First that it is clear by Acts 20. 6. that Saint Paul â—ame to Troas upon the Lords-day For he stayed there seven dayes And upon the first day of the week he thus preacheth till midnight ready to depart in the morning so that the first day was the last of those seven dayes and the first day of the week preceding it the day on which he came to Troas Paul therefore might as well depart on this day from Troas as he came unto it thereon And that without prophanation of the day for he came and went by ship verse 6. 13 14. and so might sanctifie the rest of the day a ship board as our marriners and passengers who sail on the Lords-day as well as other dayes use to do because the wind and â—ide then serving and the ship in which he was to sail being to depart that morning there was a necessity for him then to go a ship board else he might have lost his passage which necessity and circumstance of saiâ—ing away that day made this his departure on it no violation of the day works of necessity being no breach of the Sabbath as a Christ himself and all Divines resolve the rather here because he might preach and spend the rest of the day in the ship as profitably as on the shore and the Mariners might likewise now set sail the wind and weather serving without prophanation of the day as they still usually do in all places 2. I answer that the Morrow hath a double signification in Scripture Sometimes it is taken for the next b Evening or naturall day Other times it is taken for the next morning or day-light or that which we usually call day in opposition to the
100. 1 2 3 4. Psalm 148. Job 36. and 39. Eccles. 12. 1. 1. Isa. 37. 16. c. 40. 28. c. 43. 1. c. 44. 4. c. 45. 12. 18. c. 51. 13. Jer. 10. 11 12. c. 14. 22. c. 27. 5. c. 32. 17 18 19. c. 51. 15 16. Jonah 1. 9. John 1. 3. 10. Acts 2. 24. c. 14 15. c. 17. 24 25 26. Rom. 1. 19 20. Col. 1. 16 17 18. Heb. 1. 1 2. 1 Pet. 4. 19. Rev. 4. 11. cap. 10 6. and the fourth Commandement it self Exod. 20. 8 to 12. seem to prefer the work of Creation before the work of Redemption as most of all manifesting declaring magnifying the infinite power wisdome greatnesse glory majesy providence bounty soveraignty Deity of God and as the strongest motive and obligation to all his Creatures and redeemed Saints likewise to adore worship love fear serve reverence obey God as their Creator and to depend rest trust commit themselves to him alone 4. These reasons seem to advance the work of Creation before the work of Redemption First it is the First and most ancient of all Gods visible works Gen. 1. 1. Deut. 4. 32. Mark 13. 19. Rev. 3. 14. 2 Pet. 3. 4. far antienter than Christs Resurrection or work of Redemption And that which is Antientest is usually best and honourablest Psal. 77. 5. Isa. 3. 2. c. 9. 15. c. 44. 7. c. 24. 23. c. 51. 19. Jer. 18. 15. Dan. 7. 9. 13. 22. John 1. 2 3. 1 Kings 12. 6. Jer. 6. 16. Acts 22. 16. 1 Joh. 2. 7. Rev. 3 14. Secondly the work of a Creation is the very greatest of all Gods works and more universall generall extensive than the work of Redemption extending to all the Glorious angels Sun Moon Starres Heavens Aire Earth Sea with all the severall creatures in them whatsoever and to all mankind Gen. 1. and 2. Psalm 83. Psalm 104. Psalm 148. 4. 5 6. Isa. 40. 26. c. 42. 5 c. 45. 12 18. John 1. 3. Ephes. 3. 9. Col. 1. 14. Rev. 4. 11. c. 10. 6. yea to Jesus Christ himself stiled the beginning of the Creation of God Rev. 3. 14. Therefore more excellent greater glorious than the work of Redemption b peculiar onely to Gods elect the smallest part of men not universall to all Mankind much lesse to Angels and all other Creatures Now it is a received Maxime in Divinity Morality Policy Reason Bonum quo communius eo melius See Psalm 145. 9 10 14 15 16. whence Philo the Jew de Opificio Mundi stiles the Sabbath in memory of it Festum non unius populi Regionisve sed in universum omnium quae sola digna est ut dieatur Popularis Festivitas Thirdly God himself created all things at fiâ—st very good perfect pure excellent and man himself after his own image in Holinesse true Righteousnesse Integrity â—erfection without Sinne Corruption Imperfection or obliquity Gen. 1. 18. 25. to the end c. 5. 1. c. 9. 6. Eccles. 7. 27. 1 Cor. 11. 7. Ephef. 4. 24. Col. 3. 10. Man being depraved corrupted by Adams sin and fall which brought a c curse upon Mankind and all other creatures too Christs Redemption though it hath freed all his Elected called justified sanctified ones from Hell death and damnation the condemning ruling power of sin and curse of the Law yâ—t it hath not redeemed them much lesse the generality of mankind and other Creatures from the pollution corruption of Sinne lâ—st and â—ll those temporall miseries curses plagues Judgements imperfections in this life which sinne hath brought upon them nor yet restored them to such a glorious happy perfect condition here as that wherin man was first created the best of Saints on earth having many remainders of sinne corruptions defects and infirmities in them till they come to heaven 1 Kings 8. 46. Eccles. 7. 20. Rom. 7. 7. to the end James 3. 2. 1 John 1. 8 10. c. 2. 1. 2. Therefore in this respect the work of Creation excells that of Redemption in relation to all the creatures corrupted vitiated by mans fall and of the redeemed themselves whiles they continue on earth and have cause to celebrate Sabbaths and lords-Lords-Dayes to sanctifie and make them holier 4. Some of the creatures as the Angels Christ himself as man and a creature if not the Sun Moon Stars heavens the works of Gods creation are more excellent and gloious than man or any Saints on earth the â—ubject of Christs Redemption Psalm 8. Heb. 1. Rev. 3. 14. 2 Thess. 1. 7. Psalm 103. 20. Mat. 25. 31. Heb. 2. 7 9. c. 12. 22. Rev. 14. 10. Luke 20. 36. compared together Therefore the work of Creation is more exellent than that of Redemption Fifthly without the work of Creation there could be no work of redemption the chief end whereof is to restore us to that felicity a Happinesse in the enjoyment of God and his creatures which man in his innocency had hâ— pâ—rsevered in that estate should have enjoyed by the work of creation Therefore the work of Creation is at least as excellent as glorious as the work of redemption if not more eminent than it Sixthly the excellency and glory of the work of redemption consists principally in this that it was wrought by Jesus Christ himself the onely beloved Sonne of God Luke 1. 6. 8. 99. Rev. 3. 24. Gal. 3. 17 Col. 1. 14. Heb. 9. 12 1 Pet. 1. 18 19. Rev. 5. 9. But this cannot advance it above the work of creation God created all things by Jesus Christ as well as redeemed his elect Ephes. 3. 9. Col. 1. 16. and that onely as he was God and the word Heb. 1. 2. John 1. 1 2 3. Gen. 1. 1 3 26. not as God and man Seventhly all accord that it is a work of b greater excellency omniâ—otâ—nâ—y power love to create and make all things out of nothing then to repair restore rectifie things already created when depravâ—d defiled capâ—ivated or impaired See Basil and Ambâ—ose in their Hexamerons most Commentators on Gen. 1. and Isa. 45. 5. to 20. c. 40. 48. Re. 4. 11. Acts 17. 24. Heb. 3. 4. Therefore I may safer concludâ— that the work of Creation is c greater and more excellent than the work of Redemption from these Texts and Reasons then my Antagonists averre the work of Redemption to transcend the work of Creation in excellency and greatnesse without Scriptures or solid reasons grounded on it 5. Admit the whole work of Redemption wrought by Christ to be better greater excellenter than the work of Creation Yet none can prove or demonstrate that Chrstsi Resurrection one part onely of his work of redemption on the first day of the week is greater than the whole work of Creation Therefore they cannot conclude from it alone that this his bare Resurrection should alter the beginning end limits nature of times and dayes settled by God at the very Creation as they here argue 6. Admit Christs Resurrection and work of Redemption to be greater
ending with the twiliâ—â—t or Sun â—eâ— or when the Evening stâ—â— begins to shine wch Evening is a part of the preceding day both in our 〈◊〉 usuall and the Scripture a Computation the day Evening when this morning determines Of which b Evening we mâ—y read Prov. 7. 9. Mark 1. 32. Exod 29 39. â—â—â—t 23. 11. Judges 9. 9 11 14 16. Josh. 8. 29. c. 10. 26 27. 2 〈◊〉 3. 37. Maâ—th 25. 57. Mark 15. 42. Luke 23. 43 44. Fâ—xâ—d 12. 6. Num. 9. 3. c. 28. 4. and Deut. 21. 23. compared together which is sometimes stiled Evening tide Josh. 8. 29 Gen. 24. Gen. 24. 63. Josh 7. 6. 2 Sam. 11. 2. Isa. 17. 14. Judges 19 9. The other is the Evening of the night beinning after Sun set or just with the Star-light just when the twiâ—lâ—ht endeth and the night and naturall day in the Scripture and Jâ—ws accompt begin which Evening is a part the very beginning of the ensuing day of which we may read Gen. 1 5 8. 13. to 24 31. Exod 3â— 8 Levit. 11. 24. 40. c. 14. 46. c. 15. 5 â—o 27. c. 17. 15. to 3â— c. 32. 6. c. 23. 32. Numb. 19. 8 10. Deut. 28. 67. Judges 20. 23 26 2 Sam. 1. 12. 1 Sam. 30 17. Prov. 7. 9. Psal. 104. 23. Jer. 6. 4. Hab. 1. 18 Zeph. 2. 7. c. 3. 3. Jer. 5. 6 Neh. 13. 19. Deut. 16. 4. Exod. 12. 6. Levit. 23. 5. Mark 13. 35. compared one with the other Of both these Evenings we find expresse mention Exod. 12. 6 Num. 9. 3. and 28. 4. Where the Jews are commanded to kill the Passeover BETWEEN the TWO EVENINGS that is as most accord between the Evening of the day and Evening of the night Which space between these two Evenings both we ouâ— selves and the c Scriptures call Twilight that is the space between two lights to wit the Light of the Sunne and the Light of the Starres or Candle-light or the space between Sun setting and Star-shining which space most hold belongs to the precedent day the Evening which begins the night and following day really commencing when the Evening d star begins to appear which Star called e VESPER both denominates and begins the Evening of the night and the ensuing naturall day There being therefore these two Evenings both in the Scripture computation and our own the sole Question will be on which of the Evenings it was that Christ thus appeared to his Disâ—iples and what Evening it is Saint John here speaks of Questionlesle it was the Evening of the day noâ— of the night First because the Text is expresse that it was the same day at Even being the first day of the week that is whiles the first day was yet in being and before it was quite ended therefore it was it must be the Evening of the day which in the Scripture and Jewish accompt which Saint John follows was a part of the precâ—ding first day not the Evening of the night which was in their compute a parcell of the second day not of the first as I have proved 2. All Divines accord that this very first day on which Christ arose and thus appeared to his Disciples began and ended at Evening as the third and fifth Conclusions manifest Therefore this Euening can be no other but the Evening of the first day not of the night since this day both began and ended when the Evening of the night began 3. This Text informs us that when Christ thus appeared unto his Disciples at Evening he shewed them his hands and his feet and that they saw and knew him perfectly Now neither Saint John nor any other Evangelist make a mention of any lights in the room where they were by which they might see him therefore it is most probable that they saw him by day light or Sunshine by which they could best of all discern him And if by day light there being nothing in Scripture to controll it this Evening was questionlesse the Evening of the day before Sunset as soon as ever the Disciples came all together 4. Christs love to his Disciples who would not absent himself from them long nor leave them in suspence of the truth of his â—esurrection which they heard of before by relation onely and other evidences may induce us to believe that it was the first * of these two Evenings to wit the Evening of the day and Saint Peters speech to Cornelius Acts 10. 40. 41. Him God raised up the third day and shewed him openly thereâ—ore at day time as is likelyest by 1 Sam. 12. 11 12. c. 16. 22. Psal. 98. 2. Isa. 52. 10. Col. 2. 15. not to all the people but unto witnesses chosen before of God even to us who did eat and drinke with him after he rose from the dead implies as much This therefore being the Evening of the day and so a part of that fiâ—st day in the Scripture and Jâ—ws compute makes nothing at all against me Secondly This Text mentions not at all this day as a Lords-day but onely as the first day of the Week whereon Christ rose neither doth it or any other Scripture inform us that Christ made any translation of this dayes beginning to the morning Nor doth it follow that the day must begin at morning or midnight because it did not end at that time of the Evening when Christ appeared to his Disciples for it might determine soon after his appearance as the words being the first day of the week subjoyned to the premises seem to infinuâ—te and so not begin at morning or midnight This Objection therefore no wayes impairs the truth of my assertion The fourth Objection upon which some much rely is that of Acts 20. 7. to 12. where Paul and the Disciples at Troas continued their Assembly on the first day of the week till day-breaking and Paul himself then preached untill Midnight Ergo The Lords-day begins and ends not at Evening but at Morning say some at Midnight say others To this I answer First that this Assâ—mbly of theirs on this day began our Saturday nighâ— not our Sunday and continued till our Sunday not our Mâ—nday morning as I have formerly proved at large and therefore it makes wholly for not against me Secondly admit this meeting was upon our Sunday at night which I would have the Objectors prove as wâ—ll as affirm yet it concludes nought against my assâ—rtion First Because this Sermon of Pauls continuing till midnight and this their continuance all night together till the morning was extraordinary upon an extraordinary occasion to wit Pauls departuâ—e from them the next morning v. 7. Therefore no Argument to prove the ordinary beginning or end of the Lords-day 2. As this Sermon and Assembly was extraordinary so is it singular without any paâ—alâ—â— example to second it either in Sâ—â—ipture or antiquiâ—y which make no mention of any such Sermons or Assemblies used on
to reply to one grand Exception against that place of Levit. 23. 32. From Evening to Evening yâ—u shall celebrate your Sabbath a principall Text to prove that the seventh day Sabbath and so our Christian Lords-day or Sabbath as it is called ought to begin and end at Evening To which some reply that this Text speaks onely of the Sabbath of attonement which was but Ceremoniall not of the seventh day Sabbath therefore it is no Argument or Proof at all that the seventh day Sabbath or Lords-day succeeding it should begin and end at Evening To which I reply First that it is true this Text is meant more particularly of the Sabbath of attonement to which it is here specially applyed but yet it extends withall to the seventh day Sabbath which all confesse did ever begin and end at Evening from whence it received both its name of Sabbath and its limitation too both for the manner and time of its sanctification as is clear by verse 27 28 29 30. 31 32. compared together For 1. This Sabbath of Attonement was to be a Sabbath and so the same in appellation as the seventh day Sabbath verse 27 28 32. 2. It was to be but a Sabbath of one dayes space and no more to wit the tenth day of the seventh moneth verse 27. as the seventh day Sabbath was 3. It was to be sanctified and solemnized in the same manner as the seventh day Sabbath For 1. It was to be an holy Cnnvocation unto them v. 27. that is they must meet and keep publick religious holy Assemblies on it do holy duties as the seventh day Sabbath was verse 2 3. 2. They must rest and do no manner of work upon it verse 28 30 31 32. as they were commanded to do on the seventh day Sabbath Exod. 20. 9. 10 c 23. 12. c. 31. 15. c. 35. 2. Dâ—ut. 5. 13 14 15. neither might themselves or the strangers within their gates do any work thereon Levit. 16 29. as they might nâ—t do on the seventh day Sabbath Exod. 20. 10 11. 3. They must offer a burnt offering to the Lord on this Sabbath verse 27. as they were to do every seventh day Sabbath Numb. 2â— 9 10. 4. This Sabbath of Attonement was to cleanse them from all their sins before the Lord and make them holy Levit 16. 31. as the seventh dâ—y Sabbath was both a means and sign of Gods fanctifying them Exod. 31. 13. Ez. ch. 20. 22. 5. He that did any work on this Sabbath of Attonement was to be cut off from his people verse 30 as he was to be that did any work on the seventh day Sabbath Exod. 31. 14 15. Num. 15. 32 35 36. 6. On this Sabbath of Attonement they must afflict their souls v. 27. 32. as on thâ—seventh day Sabbath they were to do though not so solemnly as on this by confessing their sinnes and by not doing their own wayes nor finding or doing their own pleasure thereon Isa. 58. 13. By all which particulars it is manifest that this Sabbath of Attonement was in most things most exactly squared regulated by the seventh day Sabbath as the Sampler by the Copy or the picture by the person drawen participating with it both in its name use sanctification The sole Querie or doubt remaining to be cleared is when all this is to be done or at what time of the day this Sabbath of Attonement should begin and end God therefore resolves this scruple in the words alledged From Even to Even shall ye rest or celebrate your Sabbath that is in effâ—ct you shall keep it from Evening to Evening as vou do the seventh day Sabbath which begins and ends at Evening so that the seventh day Sabbath being here propounded for the onely pattern by which this Sabbath of Attonement was squared and this being to begin and end at Even because the seventh day Sabbath did as all acknowledge and I have provâ—d this Text in my conceit is a pregnant unavoidable Argument for the seventh day Sabbaths solemnization from Evening to Evening as well as for the Sabbath of Attonements beginning and concluding at Evening whence Saint Augustine with sundry Councels and Authorities forequoted apply this Text to the seventh day Sabbath and Lords-day as setting out bounds to them as well as to the Sabbath of Attonement 2. I answer that this Sabbath of Attonement was confined to the tenth day of the seventh moneth verse 27. and to be kept upon that day since therefore it was confined to that very day and to be solemnized from Evening to Evening it is apparant that that day as a naturall day began and ended at Even in Divine accompt and if that day as a naturall day began and ended at Even then by consequence all other dayes being all of one proportion and one ever beginning when the other ends began and ended at Evening Therefore the seventh day Sabbath too appropriated to the seventh day So that take it which way you please it is an unavoidable proof that all Sabbath dayes and the seventh day Sabbath begin and end at Evening in Divine Computation therefore the Lords-day must do so too being a Sabbath of sacred rest as all our Opposites resolve and confined to the first dayes limits which as a naturall day commenceth and determines onely at Even in naturall divine and true accompt and as a sacred day of Pâ—est â— denoted to Gods service I have now as succinctly and perspicuously as I could waded through this present Controversie At what time the Lords-day ought to begin and end and if my Judgement fail me not I conceive I have sufficiently manifested it to commence and conclude at Evening immediately after Sunset or so soon as the Evening-star begins to appear not at morning or midnight If the Truth shall prove on my side upon the debate I desire it may captivate the contrary mistakes and certifie both the judgement and practise of all such zealous Christians who are yet differently minded If the error be on my side as I am yet fully resolved it is not I shall be glad to be first informed then reformed by men of graver judgements desiring a to do nothing against but for the truth for which I shall ever contend to which I shall ever subscribe reputing it my greatest felicity to conquer with it or to be conquered by it and if occasion require to suffer chearfully gladly for it FINIS Errata PAge 2. l. 3 4. at Evening in pag. 10. l. 34. dele may pag. 12. l. 10. dele but part pag. 21. l. 6. r. is l. 36. read quality pag. 23. l. 29. dele the l. 36. naturall pag. 25. l. 36. r. of p. 26. l. 13. applicas l. 21. r. Summa l. 33. Cordubiensis l. 36. Covarravias p. 27. l. 21. pauper l. 26. totaliter l. 31. r. assert p. 28. l. 3. r. commanding p. 31. l. 11. ages p. 37. l. 24 r. eiâ— p. 44. l. 12. r. noctem p. 50.
night not for the next naturall day which begins at Evening but the next artificiall day of twelve houres day light which begins at Morning In this sense it is used most commonly in Scripture witnes Levit. 22. 30. When ye will offer a sacrifice of thanksgiving to the Lord aâ— your own will on the same day it shall be eaten up ye shall leave none of it untill the morrow compared with Levit. 7. 25. which speaking of the same offering saith He shall not leave any of it till the morning See Exod. 12. 10. c. 16. 19 23 24. where there is the same expression In which Texts the Morrow is nothing else but the morning following for had this offering been at Evening or night when the naturall day begins in Scripture accompt yet they might not have reserved any of it till the Morning for that had been to morrow as morrow is opposed to the night not to the naturall day So in 1 Sam. 19. 11. Saul sent Messengers to Davids house that night to watch and to slay him in the morning and Michall told him saying if thou save not thy life to night to morrow thou shalt bâ— slain Where morrow is not put for another naturall day that morrow in Scripture and the Jews account being part of that naturall day of which this night was the beginning but onely for the day-light or artificiall day being the same naturall day on which these words were spoken Thus it is used in 2 Sam. 11. 9 12 13 14. Esther 2. 14. So Zeph. 3. 3. Her Judges are Evening-wolves they gnaw not the bones till the morrow that is till the morning following And Acts 23. 31. 32. Then the Souldiers took Paul by night and brought him to Anâ—ipatris on the morrow they left the horsemen to go with him In all which places the morrow is put onely in opposition to the preceding night and for the day light following which night and morrow make up the same naturall day not for the beginning of the next enâ—uing naturall day or for another day Hence the Scripture useth this phrase The morrow after that day or after the Sabbath Levit. 23. 11 15. Josh 5. 12. 1 Chron. 29 21. because there is a morrow opposed to the night wherein a thing is done or spoken which is a part of the same naturall day that the night is In this sence morrow must needs be taken here for this meeting beginning but at night and Paul continuing his Preaching untill midnight following ready to depart on the morrow this morrow was nothing but the next morning which was a part of that fiâ—st day on which the disciple met as it was a naturall day consisting of twenty four houres and beginning but that Evening not another day of the week or our Monday morning as some affirm This morrow therefore being but the next morning and opposed to the night onely not to the naturall day on which this Assembly was kept at Troas and this night being part of the fiâ—st day of the wâ—ek which as a natural day in Scripture accompt bâ—gan at Evening could be no other but the Lords-day morning not the Monday following and this meeting â—s the promised Reasons prove could be no timâ— else but our saâ—uâ—Saâ—uâ—day night notwithstanding this Oâ—jâ—ction So that I may safely conclude that Saint Paul and the Christians of Troas the fiâ—st solemnizers of the Lords-day that we â—ead of did begin its solemnization at Evening not at morning or Midnight Wherefore we ought to begin it then This is my first Authority in point of practise to prove that the Primitive Christians began the Lords-dayes sanctification at Evening My next evidence is that of a Plinie the second who writes thus to the Emperour Trajan concerning the time and manner of the Christians solemnization of the Lords day Soliti erant STATO DIE ANTE LUCEM CONVENIRE carmenque Christo quasi Deo dicere secum invicem Seque SACRAMENTO non in scelus aliquod astringere sed ne furta ne latrocinia ne adulteria committerent ne fidem fallerent ne depositum appellati denegarent c. By which it is evident that the Christians in that age a time of persecution and after ages too did b usually meet together to receive the Sacrament and perform their holy Exercises at night when it began to grow dark and concluded them at day-light or about day-break as the disciples did at Troas Acts 20. 7. to 12. which Assemblies some Ecclesiasticall Histories call Antelucani coetus Night-Assemblies or meetings before day light not because they began in the morning about day-break as some would have it but because they both began and ended beâ—ore day-dawning the Christians in that time of persecution not daring to meet publickly in the day time for fear of apprehension Now this set night on which they kept those Assemblies was not our Sunday but our Saturday night on which our Saviour arose whiles it was dark and in Honour of his Resurrection did they begin and keep their Lords-day solemnization on this night not the night ensuing as is evident by Justin Martyrs second Apology with other ensuing testimonies And these their night conventions were the Occasion of those slanderous imputations which the Gentiles cast upon the Christians c that after their Exercises of Religion ended they did use to put out the lights used to expell the darknesse of the night Acts 20. 8. and then couple promiscuously one with another yea murther and eat up children and commit all manner of villany Since therefore they began their Lords-day exercises at Evening before day light began as this Heathen Authour and all Ecclesiasticall Historians writing of this age accord we need not doubt but the day in their accâ—mpt did then begin since they would not begin the exercises of the day till in truth it began My third Authority is that of Tertullian about 200 years after Christ in his Aâ—olâ—gy for the Christians c 38 39. the words whereof I have already alledged and de Corona militis c. 3. where he writes thus Eucharistiae Sacramentum in tempore victus mandatum à Domino ANTELVCANIS CAETILVS nec de aliorum manu quam praesidentium sumimus wch expresly shews that the Christians of that age did begin their publick Lords day meetings and Love feasts in the Evening and spending the Saturday night as we falsly deem it in Gods worship receiving the Sacrament and other holy duties which night assemblies he stiles b Nocturnae Convocationes because they spent the greatest part of that night in them nocturnae properly not morning or early risings and meeâ—ings before day but a watching or fitting up all night without going to bed or taking rest as the common proverb Nocturnae lucubrationes periculosissimae sunt compared with its opposite Adagie Diluculo surgere saluberimum est and Isa. 30. 29. Luke 2. 8. c. 5. 5. c. 6. 12. John 3.
that age did solemnize our Saturday night before Easter especially and spâ—nd it all in holy vigils prayers and religious exercises because Christ rose upon it accounting it a part of the Lords-dâ—y and beginning their Lords-day exercises on it not on our Sunday night My ninth Proof is the fourth Council of Toledo in Spâ—in Canon 8. Apud Surium Tom. 2. p 729 Lucerna Cereus in pervigiliis apud quasdam Ecclesias non benedicuntur eur à nobis benedicantur inquirunt Propter GLORIOSVM enim NOCTIS ILLIUS SACRAMENTUM haeâ— sol mniter benedicimus ut SACRAMENTUM SACRAE RESURRECTIONâ—S CHRISTI MYSTERIUM QUOD TEMPORE HUIUS NOCTIS VOTIVE ADVENIT BENEDICTIONEM SUSCIPIAMUS Et quia haec observatio per multarum loca terrarum Regionesque Hispaniae in Ecclesâ—is commendatur dignum est ut propter unitatem pacis Gallicanis Ecclesâ—is conservetur Nulli autem impune erit qui hoc contempserit sed Patrum regulis sub acebit By which Canon it is most apparent that the Christians of this age did solemâ—ize our Saturday night with holy viâ—ils prayers and exercises of Religion beginning their Publick Assemblies and Lords-dayes duties on it because the glorious Sacrament and Mystery of Christs Resuriection hapned on it the blessing whereof they expected to râ—ceive by this nights sanctification Therefore questionlesse they began their Lords-day at Evening and made this night onely not our Sunday night parcell of it because Christ in their accompt did rise again upon it Neither was the celebration of this night the practise onely of some few private Churches but of all Christian Churches in that centurie since this Councell layes it down as a prevailing argument why all Churches should consecrate their Candles and Tapers on it as well as the Spanish Church and Churches in France which had been no motive at all had not the solemnization of this night in memory of Christs Resurrection been universall though the superstitious Ceremonie of Hallowing Lights and Tapers on it was not so Which general received practise of solemnizing this night spending it thus in vigils prayrs even from the apostles time till long after this Councill is a satisfactory argument to me that Saint Pauls and the Disciples meeting at Troas upon the first say of the week where they spent the whole night together in preaching and other Christian exercises Acts 20. 1 9 10 11 was on our Saturday not Sunday night it being no doubt the originall pattern from whence this custome sprung which this Councill mentions My tenth Evidence is the expresse inanswerable Authority of Anastatius Sinaita Anagogicarum Contemplationum lib. 2. Quaest. 86. 152. 153. Bibl. Patrum Tom. 6. pars 1. p. 634. E. 778. 795. Propterea Scriptura tenebras ponit ante lucem quoniam prius eramus in errore deinde transeamus ad lucem Propterea PRIOR EST VESPERA DEINDE DIES LEGE EST CONSTITUTUM it seems there was then some expresse Law and Canon for iâ— in force as these forecited UT INCIPERETUR A VESPERA DOMINICA quoniam à morte objeuâ—a proce â—imus ad lacem Resurrectionis NOS DOMINICAM A VESPERA SABBATI AUSPICAMUR so that â—â— was the constant practise of Christians in that age to begin the Lords day on Saturday at Evening QUEMLIBET Dâ—EM A VESPERA COMPUTARE ET CUM PRAEâ—EDENTE NOCTE SEU UNUM COPUâ—â—RE SOLEMUS which last word implies a constant Custome in that time Sedenim Moyses vaeationem à laboribus in Sabbato it a dâ—scripsit VT ET RAECEDENTE NOCTE ET SEQVENTI DIE OTIVM AGERENT Testes do Judees QVI VSQVE INHODIERNVM DIEM ID OBSRVANT Quiâ—pe qui non illam noctem quae Sabbatum subsequitur SED illaÌ„ QVAE ANTEGREDITVR cessatione ab operibus quiete colunt this therefore was and is the Jewish and Scripture computation ET NOS IN OBSERVATIONE DIEI DOMINICI PRAECEDENTEM NOCTEM TANQUAM CUM DIE COPULATAM ET NON SEQUENTEM NOCTEM VENERAMUR An Evidence so expresse so punctuall as may satisfie all the Opposites and cannot be evaded My eleventh Testimony is the positive Resolution of an whole Generall Council and so by consequence of all Christian Churches in that age to wit the sixth Generall Councill of Constantinople Can. 56 Surius Conciliorum Tom. 2. p. 1052. Dominicis genu flectere à divinis nostris PATRIEVS Christi Resurrectionem honorantibus canonicè accepimus The first generall Councill of Nice Canon 20. having so decreed Ne ergo hujus observationis evidentiam ignoremus fidelibus manifestum faâ—imus QUOD POST VESPERTINUM SACERDOTUM AD ALTARE SABBATO INGRESSUM EX CONSUEâ—UDINE QUAE SERVATUR NEMO GENU FLECTIT USQUE AD SEQUENTEM VESPEâ—AM IN QUA POST INGRESSUM IN VESPERTINO SEU COMPLETORIO GENUA RURSUS FLECTENTES DOMINO PRECES OFFERIMUS Servatoris enim nostri Resurrectionis veluti praecursorem NOCTEM quae suit ante Sabbatum accipientes HYMNIS AB EA SPIRITV ALITER INCIPIMVS Festum ex tenebris in lucem finientes ut in persecto ae integro DIE AC NOTCE nos Resurrectionem celebremus A most full unanswerable Authority if a liâ—tle explained It was the received Custome of the Primitive Church as this Canon all Antiquity witnes to pray standing not kneeling all the whole Lords-day in memory of our Saviouâ—s Resurrection standing up again from the dead Whence these their Lords-day Exercises were called * Stationes à stando in English Stations because they ever stood and never kneeled in them Now this Custome of praying standing used onely on the Lords-day and between Eâ—ster and Ascension day began and ended with the day The question then will be when and at what time of the day this praying standing began and ended This Canon resolves it in plain terms and that by way of Declaration onely not of new Constitution that all the Churches and Christians of this age ex consuetudine quae sâ—rvatur even by an ancient long continued Custome received from the Christians and Churchâ—s of former ages and then observed onely not begun did alwayes begin to pray standing after their Saturday Vespers or Evening prayers were ended to wit at the time of the Evening when the day in divine and naturall accompt begins and concluded them after the Lords-day Vespers or complein ended to wit the Lords-day at Evening when the Lords day doth properly and truly end By which it is most apparent that they began and eâ—dâ—d their Lords-day and Lords-day exercises at Evening not at morning or Midnight and that it was the constant custome of all Christians in former ages so to do Again it assures us that it was the custome of all Churches then and in foregoing times to couple the Saturday night and the Lords-day together and to solemnize them in memory of Christs Resurrection as one intire Lords-day bâ—â—inning and spending all the Saturday night with Hymnes and spirituall
the 〈…〉 it doth and is ever coâ—tanâ—ous with it theâ—â—fâ—â—â— tâ—â— Lâ—â—ds day ought to bâ—gin in the Morning because â—â— Râ—suâ—â—â—ction the cause of it bâ—gan then The fiâ—st â—f thâ—â— Aâ—â—uments is a Non sequitur because thouâ—â— the efâ—â—â—t cannot precede the cause in naturall things as the Son cannot be before the Father was yet it followes not that the effect should ever be as ancient as or contemporany with the cause or the Son be as old as the Fathâ—r or born together with him So it follows not that because the Lords day as a Lords day could not begin to be observed hallowed as such a day before that Morning whereon Christ arose Ergo it must begin at Morning and could not be instituted to begin the Evening of the next or any other first day following it Again the Antecâ—dâ—nt of the latter Argument is falf for although the originall cause or occasion doth usually precede the effect in point of time as Christs Resurrection did the institution of the Lords day yet it follows not that the Lords day must begin at that very point of time when Christ arose So that there is a fallacy in this Argument in arguing from the effect to the Cause that it cannot precede it when as the Proposition ought to be that it is ever contemporary and must begin at the same time with it Thirdly There is a Transitio à genere ad Genus and that in two particulars 1. In making Christs Resurrection the cause of the Lords-day as it is a naiurall day when as it was no cause of it as a day but onely the reason why it was instituted for a Lords-day So that the Argument should be thus propounded Christs Resurrection was the cause why the first day was instituted for a Lords-day but that began at Morning Ergo the Lords-day must then begin because the day must then begin when the occasion of its institution for a Lords-day began which I have proved to be false 2. In applying that to the beginning of the day which is applycable onely to the beginning of its institution for a Lords-day in this maxime that the effect cannot precede the cause that is the Lords-day must not be instituted in memory of Christs Resurrection before Christ was actually risen which yet may be false since the Feast of the Passeover was instituted at Evening and solemnized in part before God actually passed over the Israelites and slew the Egyptians at Midnight following which was the cause of its institution Exod. 12. 3. to 40. and so might the Lords-day too be instituted in this manner before Christs Resurrection Therefore after his Resurrection past it could not be instituted to begin the Evening of that first day of the week on which he arose Which is a meere inconsequent For what though Christ did not rise till the Morning yet that day on which he arose began at Evening and therefore his Resurrection relating to the whole day as his Resurrection day this day of the week if not before yet after his Resurrection past might be well solemnized for a Lords-day even from Evening to Evening without any violation of the true meaning of this Maxime Since we solemnize not the day as the precise minute or houre but as the weekly day of his Resurrection every part whereof may be part of his Resurrection day though not part of that very hour of the day whereon he arofe If then these Fallacies be abandoned the whole summe and Force of the Objection is but this in honest Termes Christs Resurrection in the morning was the originall occasion why the first day of the week whereon he arose was afterwards instituted for the Lords-day and so solemnized Ergo the first day as the Lords-day must begin and end at morning at that moment when Christ arose not at Evening neither could it be instituted to begin at Even Which as all the premises manifest is a grosse inconsequent All that is or can be replied to help out this maimed reason is this That the first day whereon Christ arose had two beginnings One as a Lords day and that was at morning when he arose the other as a meer naturall day viz. at Evening and that Christs Resurrection gave it a new beginning as a Lords-day not as a naturall day To this I answer 1. That this distinction is but a meer Forgery warranted by no Scripture reason or convincing Authority and therefore it ought first to be proved ere received 2. It is but a begging of the Question disputed not an Answer of the Reasons objected 3. It is a meere falshood For 1. That very day whereon Christ arose was not consecrated at his Resurrection for a Lords-day as I have proved therefore it could not begin at morning as a Lords-day seeing it was no Lords-day 2. The Lords-day is nothing else but the first day of the week and the first day of the week is the Lords-day they being terntini convertibiles therefore they have but one and the self-same beginning and end 3. That first day on which Christ arose even as his Resurrection day began at Evening as I have proved therefore it began then as it was the Lords day it being the Lords-day onely as it is his Resurrection day 4. Had that first day as a day â—â—â—un at morning then it must needs be either an half-holy-day â—ut of 12 houres long the Evening and night preceding it being no part of it or else it must be a Lords-day patched up of a piece of the first day and a part of the second day to wit of the day light of the first and the night of second and not that intire first day whereon Christ arose Either of which is an absurdity to averre therefore as a Lords-day it must begin at Evening to avoid these absurdities By all which it is now most clearly evident that this Grand Objection is both false absurâ— and fallacious proving nothing at all against me and no ground to rely upon The third main Argument to prove that the Lords-day begins at morning not at Evening is that of John 20. 19. The same day at Evening being the first day of the Week when the doores were shut where the Disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews came Jesus and stood in the middest c. whence it may be objected That the same first day whereon Christ rose again ended not at Evening as the words The same day at Evening being the first day of the week import that Evening being part of the first day not of the second therefore it began not at Evening in Saint Johns accompt and our Saviours Resurrection in it translated its beginning from Evening to Morning To this I answer first that this Text makes nothing at all against me For the Scripture makes mention of two Evenings one of the artificiall day which we commonly call day beginning when the sund clines somewhatâ—efore sunset
our Sunday nights though of many on our Saturday night as I have proved besides this alone if on it As therefore one Swallow makes no Summer so this one singular example makes no President for the usuall beginning and concluding of the Lords-day at Morning or Midnight Thirdly It is abare example but of one Apostle without any precept to back it therefore it can be no conclusive proof that the Lords-day ought to begin at morning or midnight and heâ— to â—â—d Fourthly The beginning or ending of a Sâ—â—mâ—n or one publick meeting â—ay the coâ—stâ—â— practisâ— of all Churches and places from the beginning and ending their publick Lords day exerâ—iâ—â—â— which is much more is no concluding Argument of it self 〈◊〉 to pâ—â—vâ— the true beginning and end of the Sabbath 〈◊〉 Lords-day For the Jews themselves 〈◊〉 Christ himâ—â—â—â—â—nd the Apostles began their publick Sâ—â—mâ—ns and 〈◊〉 on the Sabbath day about eight or nine of the clock in the morning and concluded them â—â—out four or five in the afternoon as we and all other Churches â—ow use to begin and end our publick Lords-dâ—â—es solemnities can or will any man therâ—foâ—e hence 〈…〉 Eâ—go the seventh days Sabbath and our Lords-day begin not till nine in the morning and conclude at five in the Evening because the publick Assâ—mâ—lâ—s on 〈◊〉 do then usually begin and determine Nâ—â— vâ—â—ily â—or this were to make the Seventh day Sabbath and Lords-day consisting each of them of a naturall day of 24 houres length not above eight or nine hours long and scarce so much as half holy dayes and to abandon all private Sabbath and Lords-dayes duties in allowing no time at all for them If then the customary constant cause of our beginning and concluding publick Sermons with other solemn exercises and Assemblies on the Sabbath or Lords-day are no sufficient Argument that the Sabbath or Lords-day commence or determine when these publick Sermons Exercises and Assemblies do much lesse can this extraordinary singular Sermon of Saint Paul continued untill Midnight or the prorogation of this Assembly at Troas till the morning of themselves alone inferre this Conclusion that the Lords-day begins or ends at Midnight or morning Fifthly it appears not by the Text that Saint Paul preached untill Midnight and continued this Assembly till day breaking for this very reason because the Lords-day ended not till then There is no such thing as this insinuated by Saint Luke but the reason of it is plainly expressed to be Pauls departure from thence the ensuing morning never to see their faces more and Saint Lukes drift in recording this Story is not to signifie when the Lords-day properly begins and determines but onely as an Historian truly to relate the Apostles Actions and to record Pauls industry in preaching upon all occasions with his love to the disciples at Troas and their respects to him and his miraculous restoring Eutychus to life who fell down dead from the third Lâ—ft whiles he was preaching Therefore it can be no infallible Argument to prove that the Lords-day begins or ends at Morning much lesse at Midnight since they brake brend and did eat and communicate together till the morning Sixthly I would demand of the Objectors when this Assembâ—y at Troas began If at Morning or Midnight before that is improbable since we cannot imagine that Paul made a Sermon at that time of 18 or 20 hours long half of which would have tyred both himself and his Auditors If not before our Sunday at Evening as they pretend then it is a stronger Argument to prove that the Lordsday begins not till Sunday evening because St. Paul and the Disciples at Troas met not together to solemnize it till then then that it ends and so by consequence begins at morning or midnight because this Assembly dissolved not till morning and Paul continued his preaching untill midnight Seventhly If this example conclude any thing positively for the Objectors it is onely this That they should continue their ordinary Lordsday Evening Sermons untill Midnight and their Assemblies till day breaking as St. Paul and the Disciples did here This inference following directly from this example without any straining far better then theirs from it doth that the Lordsday begins and ends at Midnight or Morning But this inference I suppose they will all disclaim in words as they do in practice as being a Nonsequitur because this example was but singular and extraordinary upon a speciall occasion Therefore by the self same reason they must disclaim their present Objections too or else subscribe to this my inference which they cannot avoid unlesse they quite renounce their own Lastly its clear St. Paul used to preach both in season and out of season exhorting Timothy and other Ministers to do the like 2 Tim. 4. 2. that is as most interpret it to preach both upon Lordsdayes and all other daies and nights too as he saw occasion Why then might not his Sermon at Troas begin upon the Lordsday at Evening about our Evening Sermon time and yet continue till the Lordsday was past Certainly there is no impossibility nor improbability but it might so Since therefore this text of St. Luke informs us onely that this Meeting and Sermon began upon the First day of the week when the disciples came together to break bread that the Sermon lasted till midnight and the Assembly till day break following without any expression that the Firstday was then continuing or ended admitting this Assembly and Sermon to be on our Sunday night which I absolutly deny yet it follows not that the First day ended not in St. Lukes accompt and theirs at Troas before the Sermon or Assembly concluded So that this example proves nothing at all for the Opponents Thesis nor any thing against mine for which it is a concluding evidence if rightly understood as I have formerly manifested The 5. Objection for the Lordsdayes beginning at morning and against its Evening commencement is this That the beginning of it at Evening would open a wide gap to all licentiousnes Pastimes Disorders on Lordsday after-noons and likewise to secular imployments unsuitable to the day which the beginning of it at morning would prevent To this I answer First that this Objection is a meer Cavill For we see by wofull experience that the Doctrine of the Lordsdays beginning in the Morning which is and hath been generally received of late years in most places of the Kingdome hath no wayes prevented remedied any of the Abuses objected on Lordsday Evenings which dissolute persons who make no consciâ—nce of sanctifying all the day will alike prophane and all godly people equally sanctifie let the day begin and end at Evening at Sunset or Starshining And there are none who out of Conscience sanctifie and forebear to prophane them now but would equally sanctifie those Evenings too did they believe the day to conclude at Evening since they would be sure to sanctifie all the day This objected