Selected quad for the lemma: saint_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
saint_n church_n militant_a triumphant_a 2,791 5 11.4510 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A89543 An ansvver to a lawless pamphlet entituled, The petition and articles exhibited in Parliament against Doctor Haywood, late chaplain to the Bishop of Canterbury. By R.M. R. M. 1641 (1641) Wing M69; Thomason E172_27; ESTC R13527 9,694 23

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

being then at Croydon by reason of the great sicknesse in London which caused the Doctor to allow the larger time for printing to deliver it to the Translators hands alone But this translator played the knave egregiously For hee kept the Book in his hand after it was licenced caried it not to the Presse till towards the end of February following and in the meane time had opportunity to make what alterations hee pleased And so it appeared he did for when the Book came out in Aprill following diverse grosse passages of Popery were to be seene in it which the Doctor was sure hee had cancelled Whereupon according to his duty the Doctor presently certified the Lord Keeper and the Arch Bishop as their Chaplains can witnesse how much he thought the Church and himselfe abused And the booke was presently called in and the mattter was brought in question before the Lords of the Councell Who required the Kings Atturney to send for the Authour and the Printers and the licencer and to enquire where the abuse lay which he did and finding the whole fault to have beene in Barrows who fled instantly upon the books calling in and was discovered by his Trunk and papers left behind him to be a Romish Priest the Kings Atturney accordingly certified the Counsel Bord. Whereupon a Proclamation went forth immediately for the apprehending of Barrows and the D. and the Printers were dismissed without farther trouble No reason therefore hath the Doctor to stand to any thing in the said corrupted booke which lay so long in the hands of a popish Priest to alter it how hee pleased For this Barrows was afterwards Overseer of the Presse and when the Booke was Printed carried halfe the written coppy away with him And how he might play false by inserting new sheetes and adding new passages who knowes for the Doctor remembers no particulars now but what were turned over before the Kings Atturney and his leisure vvould not serve to look on many One thing the Doctor is sure of The petitioners had little reason to complaine of theo Booke For it gave them no offence they never saw a coppie of it till they sought for it about December last to fill up their charge against the Doctor Nor could they have met with it had they not hapned by chance upon Okes that Printed it Doctor Haywoods supersticious and idolatrouse manner of administration of the Sacrament c. Here are many untruthes couched together The Sanctum Sanctorum and the Subdeacons and the beautifull Gate are all termes or these mens own invention The Doctor never so called them nor any by his aprobation The Skreene a faire Ornament of the Church and great honour to that religious Lady who bestowed it vvas assigned vvhere to stand by the Parishioners nor can it be placed conveniently but vvhere it now is The Doctor neither perswaded the making of the Screene nor contributed a peny towards it nor knew of what fashion it would be nor vvas present in the Parish when it vvas set up The Ornaments of the Holy Table The silke curtaines Carpet Covering Books and much plate are all the pious guift of the same honourable lady which bestowed the Skreene And being for the decencie of Gods servi e and well accepted of by the Parishioners the Doctor had no reason to refuse them As for the Crucifix Organs and Church-musick me tioned in the Petition they were there long before Doctor Haywords coming There is no Deske upon the Lords Table onely a little stay to hold up the plate nor any such pictures on the Books as the Petitioner speake of For the Ceremonies used in administring the scornfull description whereof and his abusive wit that drew it the Doctor much pitties they were none of them invented nor new brought up by Doctor Haywood His pattern he had from his Majesties Chappell not far from that place Neither did any man ever tell him he was offended with the sight of these few Ceremonies Yet since the Petitioners complaint the Doctor as I heard hath laid them downe And professes that for matters of Ceremony he will ever be obedient to the lawfull orders of the Church wherein hee lives nor ever use any hereafter but what authority and generall custome require These Articles were all proved before the grand Committee c. This seemes a stirewd evidence against the Doctor but if well sounded makes rather for him For what doth it prove but that the Doctor beleeved well of his own industry in purging out Popery and credited his owne judgement rather then the Printers objections an argument that he had bestowed good paines in perusing the Booke But why doth not the Printer tell us what were the Popish passages that so much stumbled him They were such as the Doctor denies to be popish Three of them as hee remembers the Printer told him of One that the Church triumphant praid for the Church militant which the Doctor as t is said defended Another that we ought to desire the praiers of the Saints living upon Earth for us A third that before God there is no respect of Prelate Prince or People Not one of these three are objected in the Doctors charge and I beleeve the petitioners objected all they could find But indeed the Doctor heartily wishes either that the Printer had never come to him or that hee had shewed him somewhat truly popish that hee might have had cause to suspect Barrows and to stop the presse For shewing him such slight things which in a translation might well enough be borne with though not so well perhaps in a new book the printer lost the credit of his judgement with the Doctor and increased the Doctors good opinion of Barrows and made Barrows thereupon more bold to put in what popery he listed while the Printers were the slacker to complaine of it As for the Originall Coppy the Printer reports to have been wrested from him the D. wonders what became of the first part of it for before the Kings Atturney there was produced but the latter halfe The rest it was said Barrows had convei'd away with him 'T is well known the Doctor had never sight of the Originall Coppie after it was first delivered to the Presse but onely before the Kings Atturney while the falsifications were turned to For the Coppie was laid up in the Star-chamber office where it is yet At the hearing of the businesse before the Committee The Doctor said not that the Printer had left out the word Mind but that Barrows had falsified that place and strooke out the word Mind so that the printer could read it no otherwise And this the printers examination upon oath confirmed The Doctor instanced in this place because one of the Printers was so impudent as to say before the Committee there was never a blur nor any thing canceld in the originall coppie But it is evident to them that looke on the said Coppie That where
AN ANSWER TO A Lawless Pamphlet entituled The Petition and Articles exhibited in Parliament against Doctor Haywood late Chaplain to the Bishop of CANTERBURY By R. M. LONDON Printed by I.N. for Henry Seile at the Tygres head in Fleetstreet over against Saint Dunstans Church 1641. To the honorable the Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the Commons House in Parliament c. Most humbly sheweth THat wee live under the pastorall Charge of one William Haywood Doctor of Divinity who hath lately published in sundry Sermons by him preached in his Parish Church most damnable and erronious Doctrines full of grosse Popish tenents And whilst he was House Chaplaine to the Archbishop of Canterburie did licence a Book intituled An Introduction to a devout Life containing the like Popish Doctrines c. Whose practice in Church Discipline is superstitious and idolatrous manifested by strange antike gestures of cringings and bowings c. In whose Parish Church aforesaid are set up Crucifixes and divers Images of Saints and likewise Organs with other confused Musique hindring Devotion c. I 1 HEE affirmed that a Minister hath power to remit and retaine sinnes and not declaratively or Ministerially onely as he said some would have it but actually and absolutely c. II 2 He affirmed that every man in his natural condition is by the fall of Adam wounded only and but halfe dead c. III 3 He affirmed that the Virgin Mary was free from and without any mortall sins c. IV 4 He affirmed that Confession to the Priest of our particular sins is very necessary to the forgivenesse of sinne c. Particular Erroneous popish Doctrines conteined in a booke Intituled An Introduction to a devout life c. The said Church is divided into three parts the Sanctum Sanctorum being one of them is seperated from the chancell by a large Screene in the figure of a beautifull gate c. Seven or eight foot within this holy place is a raising by three steps and from thence a long Raile from one wall to the other into which place none must enter but the Priests and the subdeacons c. This deske is overlaid with a covering of purple Veivet which hath a great gold and silke fringe round about and on this Deske is placed two great Bookes wrought with needle worke in which are made the pictures of Christ and the Virgin Mary with Christ in her armes c For the preparation of this duty the said Doctor and three Sub-deacons doe all goe from the body of the said Church c. Then they all advance to the beautifull Gate where they stand Then every one bowing to he ground three severall times as they goe They enter into the Sanctum Sanctorum in which place they read their second Service c. It was proved that when that Popish Book was printing the Printer seeing such grosse popery in it commanded his Workman to stay his hand till he spoke with the Licencer so hee tooke his Corrector of his worke being a master of arts with him and shewed the Doctor divers popish passages in the Booke saying he durst not print it c. The printer was troubled and put into the Pursivants hands threatned with Star-chamber except hee would deliver up the originall Coppy by which he printed it which he refused to doe for that it is ever their custome to keep originalls by them for their own safeguards c. But at length hee by promises and threats was constrained to deliver up the coppy wherein the Licence was c. At the hearing of the businesse before the committee the Doctour was asked in what places it was altered from that he licenced Hee answered in page 691. Articie 4. hee allowed it to be read Call to mind the Saints of Heaven c. and the printer had left out the word mind c. It was proved that a Parishioner of his being seduced to Popery the Doctor was intreated to admonish and reclaime her and though he had beene solicited three or four sever all times yet hee refused c. Another woman being perverted her husband got her to go to the Doctor hoping by his counsell and reasons to have reclaimed her instead whereof he confirmed her in saying that Salvation might be had in the Church of Rome c He hath caused the Protestation to bee read and taken in that ridiculous absurd and disdainfull manner c. What was already heard appeared sufficient cause for his removall which this Honourable assembly without all question will doe c. His Altar stands dect continually weeke days and all and me wed up within the Screene and Rayles as before some of the parishioners desiring to receive the Sacrament in their Pewes were denyed it and sent away without it and hee forceth all to come up to the Railes still as before In divers of his Sermons since the hearing of his businesse he hath with much bitternes inveighed against the petitioners and at those that goe from their owne parish Church although he hath so weak a voice that hee cannot be heard by the one halfe of these that come to Church FINIS HApning lately upon a printed Pamphlet entitled The Petition and Articles exhibited in Parliament against Doctor Haywood c. and finding many apparent untruths in it I thought it a deed of charity to vindicate the man lest hee should suffer in the opinion of them that know him not and lest those that are wel-affected to him in his Parish should be too much scandalized by the boldnes of some few malicious ones whose blinde zeale I much pity Knowing therefore the Doctor imploy'd in continuall preaching and having little leisure to answer for himselfe I have endeavoured to give an answer to some particulars such as are notoriously false or scandalous and desire the indifferent Reader by that little here replyed which will be found undoubtedly true to judge of the rest of their accusations against the Doctor First whereas they call it a Petition exhibited by the Parishioners of Saint Giles in the fields it were to be wished they would tell us who they are and how many of them For as the world reports the Petition was at first set on foot by two or three illiterate Trades-men in the Doctors absence having beene fourteene weeks sicke and then scant recovered waiting at Court And whereas in all reason conscience they ought first to have repaired to him taking offence at ceremoniall matters to have tryed whether hee would have yeelded to alter any thing or no they were so far from it that they labourd under hand to procure as many hands as they could against him though they attempted all of al sorts many days together yet they could draw none of any quality not a Nobleman not a Gentleman not a Vestryman not a Citizen of any better breeding but a few such as themselves illiterate and ignorant many of them not able to write their names and scant any