prophane and defile the Churches where they are used 4. Whosoever shall say That they are incitements of impiety is accursed See Articles 6 th and 34 th The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of Faith. The 2d part Of the Homily concerning the Holy Ghost If ye will compare the Notes of a true Church with the Church of Rome as it is presently and hath been for the space of Nine hundred years and odd you shall well perceive the state thereof to be so far wide from the nature of the true Church that nothing can be more Where is then the Holy-Ghost which they do so stoutly claim to themselves Where is now the Spirit of truth that will not suffer them in any wise to err c. It is but a vain brag and nothing else The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Holy Synod delivering that sound and sincere Doctrine which the Catholick Church being taught by Jesus Christ himself and the Apostles and by the Holy Spirit suggesting all Truth from day to day to her hath retained and will preserve to the end of the World doth straightly charge all the faithful of Christ that they dare not after this believe or teach otherwise concerning the holy Eucharist than is explained and defined in this Decree The Catechism The Church cannot err in delivering the Discipline of Faith and Manners The Rhemists Annotations By this Promise we are assured That no Heresies or other wicked attempts can prevail against the Church builded upon Peter which the Fathers call Peter's See and the Roman Church The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Church of Rome hath erred in matters of Faith. 1. The Church of Rome cannot err in matters of Faith. 2. The pretence of the Church of Rome to Infallibility is nothing but a vain brag 2. The Church of Rome is guided by the Holy Spirit from day to day and cannot err The 20 th Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of the Church It is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written c. wherefore although the Church be a witness and keeper of Holy Writ yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the same so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation The Church of Rome The Council of Constance Altho Christ hath instituted and did Administer the Sacrament of the Eucharist in Bread and Wine yet this nowithstanding the Authority of the sacred Canons and the approved custom of the Church is to be preserved that it be not received after Supper c. And likewise that altho the Sacrament was received in both kinds in the Primitive Church yet the custom is reasonably introduced that the Laicks receive in one kind c. And we do command that no Presbyter doth communicate the People in both The Council of Trent This Holy Synod being taught by the Holy Spirit doth declare and teach That Lay-men are obliged by no Divine Precept to receive in both kinds and that Communion in one is sufficient for Salvation Furthermore she declares That this power hath always been in the Church that in dispensing the Sacraments the substance of them being preserved she might appoint and change those things which she doth judg more expedient for the profit of the Receivers and the reverence of the Sacrament c. Wherefore Holy Mother Church acknowledging avowing this her Authority c. for weighty and just causes doth decree That the Eucharist be communicated in one kind 1. General Council of Lateran We do altogether forbid Presbyters Deacons and Monks to contract Matrimony and we do determine that Marriages so contracted be disjoyned The Creed of Pius 4th In which it 's declared That the Church of Rome is the Mother and Mistriss of all other Churches That the Pope is Successor of St. Peter and Vicar of Christ. That in the Mass is a real Transubstantiation of the Elements into the Body and Blood of Christ c. And that all things professed in that Creed are the Catholick Faith Out of which no man can be saved The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Saith that it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing contrary to God's written Word 1. The Church of Rome hath ordained things contrary to God's written Word as in requiring the Sacrament to be administred in one kind in forbidding and disannulling the Marriage of Priests 2. The Church ought not to enforce any thing besides the written Word to be believed for necessity of Salvation 2. The Church of Rome doth require things at least besides the Word to be believed as necessary to Salvation As that the Pope is vicar of Christ and St. Peter's Successor that there are properly and truly Seven Sacraments instituted by Christ c The 21. Article of the Church of England Of the Authority of General Councils General Councils may not be gathered together without the commandment and will of Princes And when they be gathered together forasmuch as they be an Assembly of Men whereof all be not governed with the Spirit and Word of God they may err and sometime have erred in things pertaining unto God. Wherefore things ordained by them as necessary to Salvation have neither strength nor Authority unless it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture The Church of Rome Council of Trent It belongs to the Popes to call and direct General Councils The Holy Vniversal and General Synod of Trent lawfully gathered together in the Holy Ghost taught by the Holy Spirit which is a Spirit of Wisdom and Vnderstanding c. doth declare and teach The Rhemists Annot. To teach all Truth and preserve in Truth and from Error the Holy-Ghost is promised and performed only to the Church and the chief Governor and General Councils thereof The Rhemists Annot. The Holy Councils lawfully kept c. have ever the assistance of God's Spirit and therefore cannot err in their Sentences and Determinations concerning the same because the Holy-Ghost cannot err from whom as you see here jointly with the Council the Resolution proceedeth The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. General Councils may not be gathered without the Command and Will of Princes 1. It belongs to the Pope to call General Councils 2. General Councils have erred and may err 2. General Councils called by the Pope cannot err The 22. Article of the Church of England Of Purgatory The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory Pardons Worshipping and Adoration as well of Images as of Relicks and also Invocation of Saints is a fond Thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to the Word of God. § 1. Purgatory THE Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly
invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture c. 3d part Of the Homily concerning Prayer If we will cleane only unto the Word of God then we must needs grant that we have no Commandment to pray for them that are departed out of this World. For the Scripture doth acknowledg but two places after this Life The one proper to the Elect and blessed of God the other to the Reprobate There is no place for Repentance nor yet for Satisfaction As the Scripture teacheth us let us think that the Soul of Man passing out of the Body goeth straightways to Heaven or else to Hell whereof the one needeth no Prayer the other is without Redemption The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Seeing it hath been lately taught in this Vniversal Synod from Scripture c. That there is a Purgatory and that the Souls there detained are helped by the Suffrages of the Faithful but most of all by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar the Holy Synod doth command the Bishops that they take diligent care that the sound Doctrine concerning Purgatory be believed taught c. If any one shall say That the fault is so remitted to every penitent Sinner that there remains no guilt to be paid for in Purgatory before there be an entrance granted into the Kingdom of Heaven let him be accursed If any one shall say that the Sacrifice of the Mass ought not to be offered for the Dead c. let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly invented 1. The Doctrine of Purgatory is necessary to be believed and whosoever doth not believe it is accursed 2. It 's grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather is repugnant to it 2. It 's taught from Scripture § 2. Pardons THE Romish Doctrine concerning Pardons is a fond thing vainly invented c. The Church of Rome Rhemists Annotations To restore Offenders to the Churches Sacraments and Communion of the Faithful to pardon also either all or part of the Penance enjoyned or what Debts soever Man oweth to God or the Church for the satisfaction of his Sins forgiven is called Indulgence 1. General Council of Lateran We do grant Remission of their Sins to whosoever do go to Jerusalem and shall efficaciously afford their help to oppose the Infidels 4. General Council of Lateran The Catholicks that having taken upon them the Character of the Cross shall address themselves to the destruction of Hereticks enjoy that Indulgence and are armed with the same priviledg which is granted to those that go to the relief of the Holy Land. The Council of Constance The Holy Synod doth grant to every one that goes in the appointed Procession an hundred days of Indulgence c. And to those that once a Day say devoutly a Pater Noster and Ave-Maria for the safety of the Emperor 40 Days of Indulgence in the accustomed form of the Church The Council of Trent Indulgences are the heavenly Treasures of the Church Seeing the power of Indulgences hath been granted by Christ to the Church this Holy Synod doth teach That the use of them is very wholesome to Christian People and doth command that they be retained in the Church and doth condemn them by an Anathema that affirm them to be unprofitable or deny that the Church hath a power to grant them The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The Romish Doctrine concerning Indulgence is grounded upon no warrant of Scripture 1. The Power of Indulgences was granted by Christ. 2. It 's a fond thing and vainly invented 2. They are wholsome to Christian People and whosoever shall affirm them to be unprofitable is accursed § 3. Of Images and Relicks THE Romish Doctrine concerning the Adoration as well of Images as of Relicks is a fond thing vainly invented c. 2d part Of the Homily against Idolatry Images and Image worship were in the Primitive Church which was most pure and uncorrupt abhorred and detested as abominable and contrary to all true Christian Religion 3d part Of the Homily against Images c. Let such as fall down before Images of Saints know and confess that they exhibit that honour to dead Stocks and Stones which the Saints themselves Peter Paul and Barnabas would not be given to them when alive c. In this they pass the folly and wickedness of the Gentiles that they honour and worship the Relicks and the Bones of our Saints which prove that they be mortal men and dead and therefore no Gods to be worshipped which the Gentiles would never confess of their Gods for very shame but the Relicks we must kiss and offer to especially on Relicks Sunday The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Holy Synod doth command all Bishops and others whose office it is to teach That they instruct the Faithful according to the use of the Catholick and Apostolick Church received from the first times of the Christian Religion concerning the honour of Relicks and the lawful use of Images The Synod doth decree That the Images of Christ the Virgin Mother of God and other Saints are to be had and retained especially in Churches and that due Honour and Veneration be given to them c. and when we kiss them uncover the Head and fall down before them we do adore Christ and venerate the Saints whose Similitude they bear They are altogether to be condemned and the Church doth condemn them that do deny the Bodies of the Saints and Martyrs are to be venerated by the Faithful and that affirm that Veneration and Honour is not due to their Relicks or are unprofitably honoured c. Whosoever shall teach or think any thing contrary to those Decrees let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Image-worship was abhorred in the Primitive Church 1. Image-worship was received from the first Times of Christianity 2. The Romish Doctrine of worshipping Images and Relicks is a fond thing c. 2. The Relicks of the Saints are to be venerated such as affirm they are not profitably honoured are to be condemned 3. It 's grounded upon no Scripture but is repugnant thereto 3. Whosoever shall teach or think they are not to be venerated is accursed § 4. Invocation of Saints INvocation of Saints is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture c. 2d part Of the Homily concerning Prayer There are certain Conditions most requisite to be found in every one that must be called upon which if not found our Prayer doth avail us nothing As 1. That he to whom we pray be able to help us 2. That he will. 3. That he hear our Prayer 4. That he understand better than we our selves what we lack If these things be to be found in any other saving only in God then may
The Church of England teacheth The Church tho a Witness and Keeper of the Holy Writ yet ought not to decree any thing against the same nor to enforce any thing besides the same to be believed for necessity of Salvation p. 37. The Church of Rome holdeth It belongs to the Church of Rome to judg of the Sence of the Scripture and it 's in her Power to forbid receiving the Sacrament in both kinds tho Christ so instituted and delivered it The Fallibility of the Church The Church of England teacheth As the Church of Jerusalem Alexandria and Antioch have erred So also the Church of Rome hath erred not only in their Living and manner of Ceremonies but also in matters of Faith So that their claim of Infallibility is but a vain brag and nothing else p. 31 35. The Church of Rome holdeth The Church of Rome cannot err being taught by the Holy Spirit suggesting all Truth from day to day General Councils The Church of England teacheth General Councils may not be gathered together without the Commandment and will of Princes And when gathered may err and sometimes have erred in things pertaining to God p. 39. The Church of Rome holdeth It belongs to the Pope to call and direct General Councils and being so gathered they have ever the assistance of Gods Spirit and so cannot err Christ the only Mediator The Church of England teacheth Christ is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man in whom alone the Conditions requisite in an object of Worship are to be found whence it followeth that we must call neither upon Angel nor Saint but solely upon him as our Mediator And to make them Intercessors to God is after the Gentiles Idolatrous usage p. 19 41 46. The Church of Rome holdeth There are other Mediators of Intercession in Heaven besides Christ such as Angels and Saints and more especially the Virgin Mary who is the Mother of Mercy and Advocatress of the Faithful and it is good and profitable to invoke them and to have recourse to their prayers aid and help And those that deny they are to be invocated or affirm the Invocation of them is Idolatry are accursed Original Sin. The Church of England teacheth Original Sin is the Corruption of the nature of every man naturally ingendred of the off-spring of Adam And all offend in many things Christ only excepted p. 20 30. The Church of Rome holdeth The blessed Virgin is not comprehended in the decree of Original Sin and never sinned so much as Venially in all her Life Images The Church of England teacheth Image-worship was abhorred in the Primitive Church as abominable and contrary to all true Christian Religion And to fall down before Images c. is to give that honour to Stocks and Stones which the Saints themselves refused when alive p. 44. The Church of Rome holdeth The Images of Christ the Virgin Mary and other Saints are to have due honour given to them by kissing them uncovering the head falling down before them lighting up Candles to them c. by which Christ is adored and the Saints are venerated Relicks The Church of England teacheth To worship and honour the Relicks of Saints is to pass the folly and wickedness of the Gentiles The Romish Doctrine concerning Worshipping and Adoration of Images and Relicks is a fond thing grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to it p. 44. The Church of Rome holdeth The Relicks of the Saints are to be venerated And all that hold the contrary are accursed Purgatory The Church of England teacheth There are two places only in the other World the one proper to the elect and the blessed of God the other to the reprobate And the souls of men passing out of the body go to Heaven or Hell. And the Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded upon no Warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to it p. 41. The Church of Rome holdeth There is a Purgatory or place of Torment in which the Souls of good Persons not sufficiently purged have their Sins expiated and they thereby are prepared for the Kingdom of Heaven And the Souls there detained are helped by the Masses Prayers Alms and other good Works of the Living And if any one shall say there is not such a place or that there remains no guilt to be expiated by penitent Persons in Purgatory or that those that are there are not helped by Masses c. he is accursed Merits The Church of England teacheth The good works are pleasing unto God yet to put any confidence in them as by merit and deserving of them to purchase to our selves or others remission of Sin and everlasting Life is meer Blasphemy and great derogation to the blood-shedding of our Saviour Jesus Christ p. 24 25. The Church of Rome holdeth Justified Persons truly deserve eternal Life and the good Works of such are truly and properly Meritorious and are fully worthy of Eternal Life And whosoever thinketh otherwise is Accursed Supererogation The Church of England teacheth Works of Supererogation or such as are over and above God's Commandment cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety and it 's an ungodly practice to make sale of them and to perswade the people that thereby the Sins of other men might have satisfaction made for 〈◊〉 p. 27 28. The Church of Rome holdeth There are Works of Supererogation which are done more than Precept and a Person endued with Divine Grace may satisfie for another and pay in the name of another what is due to God and the value of such Works is to be so disposed of for that purpose by such as Christ hath made dispensers of his Treasures Indulgences The Church of England teacheth The Romish Doctrine concerning Pardons is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture but is rather repugnant to it p. 41 42. The Church of Rome holdeth The Church hath a power from Christ to pardon Offenders and whatever Debts here or hereafter in Purgatory a man oweth to God for the satisfaction of his Sins may be remitted by the Indulgence of the Church and whosoever saith that the Church hath no such Power or that such Indulgences are unprofitable is Accursed Prayers in a known Tongue The Church of England teacheth It 's a thing plainly repugnant to the word of God and the Custom of the Primitive Church to have publick Prayers in the Church or to minister the Sacraments in a Tongue not understood of the People p. 49. The Church of Rome holdeth It 's fittest every where to have the Mass Celebrated in Latin or a Tongue not understood by the People and it 's for that reason so injoyned And whosoever saith it ought to be otherwise is Accursed Sacraments The Church of England teacheth There are only Two Sacraments Ordained of Christ viz. Baptism and the Supper of the Lord and the other Five commonly called Sacraments in the
we lawfully call upon some other besides God. But what Man is so gross but that he well understandeth that those things are only proper to him which is Omnipotent and knoweth all things That is to say only to God alone whereof it followeth that we must call neither upon Angel nor yet upon Saint but only and solely upon God. 3d part Of the Homily against Idolatry If answer be made that they make such Saints but Intercessors to God c. That is after the Gentiles Idolatrous usage to make them of Saints Gods called Dii medioximi c. The Church of Rome The Council of Trent The Holy Synod doth command Bishops and others that have the office of teaching that they teach the faithful that the Saints reigning with Christ do offer Prayers to God for Men and that it is good and profitable to invoke them and for the obtaining of benefits to have recourse by Jesus Christ our only Redeemer to their Prayers aid and help But those that deny that they are to be invocated or affirm that they do not pray for us or that the Invocation of them that they may pray for every one of us is Idolatry and is contrary to the Word of God and the Honour of one Mediator Jesus Christ do think wickedly If any one doth think or teach contrary to these Decrees let him be accursed The Catechism of Trent We do flye to the most Holy Mother of God that by her Intercession she may reconcile God to Sinners We ought to call upon her the Mother of Mercy and Advocatress of faithful People that she may pray for us Sinners c. of which no one can unless impiously and cursedly doubt The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Invocation of Saints is a fond thing 1. Invocation of Saints is good and profitable 2. It 's repugnant to the Word of God. 2. They who say it is contrary to the Word of God think wickedly 3. To make them Intercessors is Idolatrous 3. Whosoever shall say it is Idolatry thinks wickedly and is accursed The 23. Article of the Church of England Of Ministring in the Congregation The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome It is not lawful for any Man to take upon himself the Office c. of ministring the Sacraments in the Congregation before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the same And those we ought to judg lawfully called and sent which be chosen and called to this work by Men who have publick Authority c. In necessity any of the People may baptize whether Men or Women of whatsoever Sect Jews Infidels and Hereticks if they intend thereby to do that which the Catholic Church intends to do Cathechism of Trent par 2. cap. 11. Sect. 24. The 24. Article of the Church of England Of speaking in the Congregation in such a Tongue as the People understandeth The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome It is a thing plainly repugnant to the Word of God and the Custom of the Primitive Church to have publick Prayer in the Church or to minister the Sacraments in a Tongue not understood of the People It seemed not fit to the Fathers that the Mass be every where celebrated in the Vulgar Tongue Wherefore the Ancient Rite is every where to be retained Whosoever shall say That the Mass ought to be celebrated only in the Vulgar Tongue let him be accarsed Council of Trent Sess. 22. Cap. 8. and Can. 9. See the Homily of Common-Prayer and the Sacraments The 25. Article of the Church of England Of the Sacraments There are two Sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Gospel that is to say Baptism and the Supper of the Lord. Those five commonly called Sacraments that is to say Confirmation Penance Orders Matrimony and Extreme Auction are not to be counted for Sacraments of the Gospel being such as have grown partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles partly are states of Life allowed in the Scriptures but yet have not like nature of Sacraments with Baptism and the Lord's Supper for that they have not any visible Sign or Ceremony ordained of God. The Sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed upon or to be carried about but that we should duly use them And in such only as worthily receive the same they have a wholesome effect or operation c. There shall be no Celebration of the Lord's Supper except there be a convenient number to Communicate with the Priest c. The Church of Rome The Council of Trent If any one shall say That the Sacraments of the new Law have not been all instituted by Christ or that they are more or fewer than seven viz. Baptism Confirmation the Eucharist Penance Extreme Vnction Orders and Matrimony or that any of these seven is not truly and properly a Sacrament let him be accursed If any one shall say That Grace is not confer'd ex opere operato by the work done in the Sacraments of the new Law but that only Faith in the Divine Promise is sufficient to obtain Grace let him be accursed The Synod doth approve and commend those Masses in which the Priest doth communicate alone forasmuch as they ought to be esteemed truly common partly because the People do spiritually communicate and partly they are celebrated for all the Faithful by a publick Minister of the Church If any one shall say That the Masses in which the Priest alone doth sacramentally communicate are unlawful and so to be abrogated let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. There are but two Sacraments ordained of Christ. 1. There are seven Sacraments truly and properly 2. The other called Sacraments are either Corruptions or States of Life but have not the nature of Sacraments 2. Whosoever shall say That any of the seven are not properly and truly Sacraments is accursed 3. The Sacraments in such only as worthily receive the same have a wholesome Effect and Operation 3. The Sacraments do confer Grace Ex opere operato and whosoever denies it is accursed 4. The Sacraments were not ordained to be gazed upon but to be used 4. Masses in which the Priest alone Sacramentally Communicates to be approved And whosoever doth say They are unlawful is accursed The 28. Article of the Church of England Of the Lord's Supper Transubstantiation or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine in the Supper of the Lord cannot be proved by Holy Writ but it is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament and hath given occasion to many Superstitions The Body of Christ is given taken and eaten in the Supper only after an heavenly and spiritual manner And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is Faith. The Sacrament of the Lord's Supper was not by
THE DIFFERENCE Between the CHURCH of ENGLAND AND THE Church of Rome IN Opposition to a late BOOK INTITULED An Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome The Second Edition LONDON Printed for Ric. Chiswell at the Rose and Crow n in St. Paul's Church-Yard MDCLXXXVII Imprimatur October 6th 1687. H. MAVRICE THE DIFFERENCE Between the CHURCH of ENGLAND AND THE CHURCH of ROME THE Author of a Book newly published called The Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome saith There has been of late a great cry That the Clergy of the Church of England are now the chief if not the only Opposers of Popery and Defenders of the Protestant Religion And therefore to put a Check to the insulting talk of our Clergy who would be thought the only Champions against Popery 't is become necessary in the present Juncture to emit such an Essay as this To shew an Agreement between the Church of England and Rome and that the Controversy lies only between the Church of Rome and the Protestant Dissenter This I confess is an Expedient of Expedients and as it 's necessary for the relief of those who are so successfully beaten out of their late Pleas of Misrepresentation that they sullenly declare Vntil that be yielded they 'l not dispute So it may be necessary in this present Juncture for the charming that Adder which has yet been deaf to all the Arguments of Flattery Interest and Fear and to put an end to that Answering Replying Rejoyning and Sur-rejoyning which for some Months he saith both sides have been employ'd in For if there be an Agreement in Opinion between both Churches there will be no further occasion for Disputing between them and if the only Opposers of Popery the Clergy of the Church of England are convinced of it there will be no further Disputing nor Opposition Since those between whom the Controversy then only lies viz. the Church of Rome and Protestant Dissenter are it seems upon terms of mutual Cessation But now left those of the Church of England that after all the Complaints made against them for Misrepresentation will not grant any such thing properly and in a strict sence and 't is likely not in any sence should be as obstinate and hard to be convinced in this case Therefore to put it out of dispute if he be to be credited he has with some clearness demonstrated the Agreement of Opinion between the Church of England and Rome to be exact and full And if Demonstration and clearness of Demonstration will not do it nothing will. But it 's some mens way to talk most of Infallibility Self-evidence and clearness of Demonstration when they are farthest from it and I began presently to suspect our Author's credit when I found him to shift his Ground as if he did distrust his own Demonstrations As for instance 1. He had no sooner began to demonstrate this exact and full Agreement of Opinion but by way of Prevention he declares He would not incumber his Discourse with a Catalogue of Agreements in the great Doctrines of Christian Religion and Matters of Opinion but would confine himself to Matters of Government and Worship which chiefly concerns mens Practices How demonstrate the Agreement of Opinion and yet forbear medling with Matters of Opinion to undertake it and then to except the thing he undertakes And then to confine himself to Matters of Government and Worship as if there were not as much Reason to shew an Agreement in Doctrine as Practices or that Matters of Government and Worship were not also Matters of Doctrine 2. When he seems to come to the Point he confines himself to viz. Government and Worship yet he fails again for it 's only in some parts of Worship which he ventures to say that the Agreement will be found exact and full As one sensible that tho there is nothing in the Liturgy and Prayers of the Church of England which he instances in as to the matter of them but what every Christian may allow and so what the Pope may as well as he saith did approve yet that their Missal and Breviary contain such Prayers to the Saints and for Souls departed c. as can be by no other Figure made to agree with the Worship and Prayers used in the Church of England than one part of a Contradiction can be reconciled to the other 3. It 's further worthy of our Observation That the Agreement he pretends to prove is not from the avowed Doctrine of either Church but by some Quotations he produces from two or three particular Authors on the part of the Church of England and from such as on their own side are rejected by the governing part of their Church So for instance he saith of the Church of England They are the avowed Principles of some of the Clergy and late Writers And when he undertakes for the Romish Church he tells us That a great if not the greatest part grant to the Pope but a Primacy for the sake of Catholick Concord c. For Proof of which he appeals to the Councils of Constance and Basil and the Priviledges of the Gallican Church And yet the Acts of those Councils were reprobated in succeeding Councils and so far as concerns this case were utterly disallowed as Bellarmin saith And of what little Authority the Gallick Priviledges have been accounted at Rome there needs no more evidence than the case of De Marca as it 's represented by this Author So that let his Quotations which he pretends to be very just in be admitted yet his Argument from thence for an exact and full Agreement as to this matter amounts to this only Some of the Church of England are for a Primacy for Concord-sake and some of the Church of Rome are for no more therefore the Agreement betwixt the Church of England and Rome is very exact and full in those points And if this be his way of Demonstration it might to as good purpose be shewed That there is also in several Points this kind of Agreement between those that he saith the Controversy only lies between viz. the Church of Rome and the Protestant Dissenter 4. When he offers at a Demonstration from these particular Authors he attempts not to prove it so much from what they say as from what he himself infers from it So much he acknowledges for when he had charged Dr. Sherlock to have found out a Divine Institution for the Popes Primacy This being so gross as he could not father it upon him but he should soon be detected he brings himself off with this This I confess the Doctor doth not expresly carry any further than the Combinations of a National Church and Primacy that is he says no such thing 5. When he doth find out some things in which the Churches are agreed they are such things as the Church of England agrees with the
of Prohibited Books with the Rules made by the Fathers of the Tridentine Synod approved by the Authority of Pius IV. Anno 1564. Seeing it is manifest by experience if the Holy Bible be permitted to be read every where without difference in the Vulgar Tongue that more prejudice than benefit doth redound from thence through the rashness of men let it therefore be at the pleasure of the Bishop or Inquisitor that with the advice of the Parish-Priest or Confessor they may grant the reading of the Bible translated by Catholick Authors to such as they shall understand will by such reading receive no prejudice but an increase of Faith and Piety which License let them have in writing But whosoever shall without such License presume to read or have such Bibles he may not have the Absolution of his Sins before he has returned them to the Ordinary The same Index being enlarged by Sixtus V. and reviewed and published by order of Clement VIII Anno 1595. there is added the following Observation about the foresaid Rule It is to be considered about the above written fourth Rule of Pope Pius IV. that there is no new power given by this Impression and Edition to the Bishops or Inquisitors or Superiors of Regulars of granting a License to buy read or keep the Bible published in the Vulgar Tongue seeing the power of granting such Licenses of reading or keeping Vulgar Bibles or any parts of them hath been taken away by the command and use of the Holy Roman Church and the whole Inquisition as also all Summaries and Historical Compendiums of the said Bibles and Books of Holy Scripture written in any Vulgar Tongue which truly is inviolable to be observed So that the power of granting such Licenses and the Liberty of reading the Scripture in the Vulgar Tongue is wholly taken away and accordingly we are told it is so ordered by the General Inquisition of Spain From all which we may observe The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to Salvation 1. All saving Truth is in Books written and Traditions unwritten 2. Whatsoever is not read in Scripture nor may be proved thereby is not to be required of any Man to be believed as an Article of Faith or be thought requisite or necessary to Salvation 2. The Church doth receive and regard unwritten Traditions with the like Piety Reverence as the Books of the Old and New Testament And if any one shal knowingly contemn those Traditions he is accursed 3. In the name of the Holy Scripture is understood those Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament of whose Authority was never any doubt in the Church And the other the Apochrypha the Church doth not apply to establish any Doctrine 3. The Books of Scripture are the five Books of Moses c. Tobias Judith Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Baruch the two Books of Maccabees c. And if any one shall not receive these whole Books with all their parts for Canonical he is accursed 4. The Scripture were intended for and are to be read by all 4. The Scriptures ought not to be read by the Vulgar 5. The Scriptures are useful for all 5. If the Bible is permitted to be read by all more prejudice than benefit doth arise from it 6. The Church is a Witness and Keeper of Holy Writ 6. It belongs to the Mother Church of Rome to judg of the Sense and Interpretation of Scripture The 7 th Article of the Church of England Of the Old Testament The Old Testament is not contrary to the New for both in the Old and New Testament everlasting life is offered to mankind by Christ who is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man. The Council of Trent The Saints reigning with Christ do offer Prayers to God for Men and it is good and profitable to invoke them The most Holy Mother of God by her Intercession doth reconcile God to Sinners She is the Mother of Mercy and Advocatress of the Faithful The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome Christ is the only Mediator between God and Man. The Virgin Mary and Saints are Mediators in Heaven See more Article 22. The 9 th Article of the Church of England Of Original or Birth Sin. Original Sin standeth not in the following of Adam as the Pelagians do vainly talk but it is the fault and corruption of the nature of every Man that naturally is ingendred of the Off-spring of Adam c. The Church of Rome The Council of Basil. We do define and declare c. the Doctrine that declares the glorious Virgin Mary to have been always free from Original and Actual Sin Holy and Immaculate is to be approved retained and embraced by all Catholicks as pious and consonant to Ecclesiastical Worship the Catholick Faith Right Reason and Holy Scripture and that for the future it shall be lawful for none to Preach or Teach the contrary The Council of Trent This Holy Synod doth declare That it is not its Intention to comprehend in this Decree concerning Original sin the blessed and Immaculate Virgin Mary the Mother of God but that the Constitutions of Pope Xystus IV. of happy memory are to be observed under the Penalties therein contained which it doth inforce Of the Sense of these two Councils in this matter see Joh. Baptistae de Lezana Apol. pro immacul Concept cap. 13. The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome Original Sin is the fault and corruption of the nature of every person naturally ingendred of the Off-spring of Adam So that none is excepted but our B. Saviour The Virgin Mary was free from Original and Actual Sin. The 11 th Article of the Church of England Of the Justification of Man. We are accounted Righteous before God only for the Merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith and not for our own Works and deservings Wherefore that we are justified by Faith only is a most wholesome Doctrine and very full of comfort as is more largely express'd in the homily of Justification The first part of the Homily of Salvation Because all Men be Sinners and therefore can no Man by his own Acts Words and Deeds seem they never so good be justified and made righteous before God but every Man is constrained to seek for another Righteousness or Justification to be received at Gods own Hands that is to say the forgiveness of his Sins And this Justification or Righteousness the forgiveness of our Sins which we so receive of Gods Mercy and Christs Merits embraced by Faith is taken accepted and allowed of God for our perfect and full Justification Faith doth not shut out Repentance Hope Love Dread and the Fear of God to be joyned with Faith in every Man that is justified but it shutteth them out from the office of justifying that is meritously as