many others which I haue before in the ninth Chapter shewed not to be ancient and consequently hereticall because they are new and aftercome into the Church 7 Againe The corrupt and rotten fruits of Romish doctrine when I considered further the second way to iudge of false prophets by the Church of Rome as Stapleton teacheth by the proper fruits of their doctrine I found also by this way the fruits of Romane teachers to be most corrupt and rotten issuing forth of their doctrine for what proceedeth from their dogmaticall teaching the lawfulnesse of the Stewes tolleration but too vnrefrained a licence and liberty of sinning to all that are loosely affected What greater incentiue to sin can there be for lasciuious persons then assurance of place and persons where conueniencie and consent may assuredly bee expected Or what greater occasion to yong persons prodigally to spend their temporall substance and ruine their soules then grant of such open passage to si◠What can more encourage poore minds to be dishonest then permission to get themselues liuings by dishonestie As also what can more demonstrate the Popes couetousnes and insatiable auarice then the permission of such offenders paying yearely tribute vnto him for the free exercise of all filthie abominations Againe what proceedeth from the prohibition of Priests marriage but infinite and almost innumerable sinnes against nature as bestialitie Sodomie vnnaturall euacuations Incest adulterie fornication sacriledges and a thousand other abominations which abound in the present Church of Rome whilest that lawfull wedlocke and honorable bed which Saint Paul calleth vndefiled may not be permitted nor commended without imputation of incontinencie sacrilege and filthy pollution which is truely the doctrine of Diuells as Saint Paul termeth it I omit to speake how many virgins haue beene defloured how many matrons dishonoured how many monastcries peruerted how many good husbands wronged how many widdowes abused how many wilfull abortments how many slaughters of children and other foule abominations committed by vnmarried Priests therefore though chastitie and single life are both highly commendable and profitable to him that hath the gift to liue so yet the restraint thereof hath more disgraced the Church of God then almost any one point whatsoeuer making euen sacred things to appeare to the world deformed and full of such blemishes as wil neuer be taken away I haue obserued further also that the doctrine of pardons for the release of temporall paines due to finnes either in this life or in Purgatory annexed vnto graines meddals crosses rings and the like paltry things which is a doctrine most currant in the Church of Rome doth serue for the root offpring of much couetousnes and auarice of much losse of time vnprofitably of simony in selling Masses which are counted sacred things for money of neglecting to pray for the liuing while so many dirges masses funerals trentals and Aniuersaries are said for the dead without fruit or profit nay how farre did Pope Gregorie Lipeloo in vita Greg. Mag. stiled the Great proceed in the vanitie of this doctrine whilest he praied not for deceased Christians only but for a damned Pagan who as it is fabulously writtē in his life and hath passed currant these many hundred years deliuered the soule of Traian the Emperour out of hell fire by his praiers which hath hitherto beene obtruded vnto the Christian world for an especial fauor shewed by God vnto that Pope which shall neuer be shewed vnto any other Be not these goodly illusions of the world most abominable abuses of religion growne vp in the Church of Rome enameled with zealous and charitable pretences whilest such tales must set forth this Popes worth and be beleeued and the holy Scriptures teaching no remission after this life must not be of any credit at all I haue noted many euil branches to rise out also frō another root of their doctrine which cōfisteth in teaching men to pray to Saints how much Gods glory thereby is takē from him is apparent to any man of experience trauel who hath seen obserued how much the outward solemnities of Saints daies do excell the solemnities of Sundaies which are the feasts of the Son of God that hath obserued many more Churches dedicated to thē then to God himself that hath noted the ordinary common praier of lay-men to be called our Ladies office whilest they haue none at all made in honor of the holy Trinity or of the Father or the Son only a short one they haue in honor of the holy ghost another of the crosse yet not free from superstition idolatry whilst they pray Officium sanctae crucis ad Mat. By the signe of the cresse to be deliuered from their enemies whilest they attribute the victory Christ got vpon the crosse to the crosse it self saying O victory of the crosse and admirable signe cause vs to hold our triumph in the heauenly court Againe Antipho By a tree we were made bond-mē by the holy crosse we are set free The fruit of the tree seduced vs the Sonne of God redeemed vs. And againe O blessed crosse c. sweet wood sweet nailes c. Antipho ad noc Againe O venerable crosse which hast brought saluation to wretches by what praise shall I extoll thee for that thou hast prepared vnto vs thy heauenly life Againe speaking to Christ By thy holy crosse thou hast redeemed the world c. Al which in my iudgement seemed very derogatory to Gods glory as tēding to a diuine worship of the creature for the Son of God And thus in their excessiue deuotions to Saints and creatures they haue little feeling or vnderstanding of the true loue and deuotion they should feele and shew to their Creator 8 When moreouer I consider how the Church of Rome freeth the Clergie from true obedience to temporall Princes Other instāces of the corrupt fruits of Romish doctrine by their immunity it pretēdeth they enioy euen by Gods law and great priuiledges freeing frō ciuil courts gouernment I find here an open gap made to al busie heads tumultuous spirits to say thinke do what they list against the sacred authority of Kings and Princes confirmed by God himselfe But withal when I adde the doctrine now so much taught in the Church of Rome by her false prophets viz. that the Pope hath power and ecclesiasticall authoritie from God for the good of the Church to depose Emperours Kings and Princes from their regal dignities kingdomes in the execution whereof the Pope himselfe as the head of Christianity wil be the chiefe iudge commander in his owne cause I find al the wals defences of security for Kings shaken to the ground and doores let open to the wicked intentions designmēts of factious spirits to plot against Kings and to subuert kingdomes with liberty of conscience free from all scruple or remorse Hence and from no other spring ariseth so much contempt in the
some kind of guidance vnto the true Church In the serious contemplation of which point I thought that the most assured course I could take herein was to lay downe such a direction as is approued both by the Church of England and by the Church of Rome and truly to examine some principall points of doctrine in question betweene the English and Romane Church by this meanes of triall whereunto if I should find either the first agreeable or the second disagreeable I resolued that I might haue a strong inducement to conclude which was the true Church of Christ and which the false whose doctrine might be esteemed Christian and whose doctrine Antichristian 2 By which inducement I was the more earnestly moued to make triall then by any other It is approued by Fathers for that I found the ancient Fathers very frequent in giuing of this marke of antiquitie for Tertullian saith By the order it selfe Lib. de praescrip aduers Her that is made manifest to be of our Lord and true which is first deliuered and that externe and false which is sent in afterward And in another place writing against Marcion he saith Lib contra Marcion I affirme that my Gospell is true Marcion saith as much for his who shall determine this controuersie betwixt vs but the difference of time prescribing authoritie to that doctrine which shall be found more ancient and adiudging corruption to that which shall be conuinced to be the later Saint Gregorie Nazianzen vrgeth the Apolinaristes thus Greg. Naz. epist 2. ad Cledonium Hieron epist ad Pamach Ocean de errori bus Origenist Hieron contra Luciferianos If the faith began but thirtie yeares since whereas there be almost foure hundred years from the manifestation of Christ certainly both our Gospell and faith were vaine and void for this long time And Saint Hierome questioneth with the Origenists of his time after this manner Why goest thou about after foure hundred yeares to teach vs that which wee knew not before The Christian world was without this doctrine vntill this day And against the Luciferians he saith I will declare vnto thee my opinion briefly and plainly we must remaine in the Church which being founded by the Apostles hath endured to this day and all others euen in this that they were instituted after shew themselues to be Heretikes Vincent Lyrinens in cap. 26. 27. With which Fathers Vincentius Lyrinensis accordeth when explicating that of Saint Paul O Timothie keep that which hath bin left vnto thee He saith This depositum is that which hath been committed to thee not which hath been inuented by thee that which thou hast receiued not that which thou hast deuised a thing brought vnto thee not vttered by thee in which thou must not be an author but a keeper not an instructer but a follower not a leader but one that is directed Now therefore thus finding so many ancient Fathers making antiquitie a neere adiunct vnto Catholike and Orthodox truth and noueltie to be the vsuall badge of Herretikes I began with great diligence and care to examine two maine points of religion now controuerted and much disputed on as well by the most learned of the English as of the Romane Church viz. of the doctrine of iustification by faith alone and of the imperfection of our good workes that being according to knowledge grounded in religion my zeale therein might be the greater and my assurednesse of a sound ground cause me to stand the more strongly and to labour in others spiritual profit with the greater constancy and courage as since it hath succeeded through Gods especiall grace to the vnspeakable comfort of my soule affording me grace and abilitie of bodie to performe this so profitable a worke begun and ended by him whom I do most humblie desire to be the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of all my endeuours 3 Now as I proceeded on further by degrees Antiquitie a good way of triall to compare the doctrine of the Church of England and that of Rome concerning the two points aboue specified with the doctrine of the ancient Church by this meanes of antiquitie I found the doctrines of iustification by faith only and of the imperfection and demerit of good workes as they are taught in the present Church of England most deseruedly to claime the priuiledge of antiquitie as taught by many both Latine and Creeke Fathers Iustification by faith alone proued by Greeke Fathers Ses 6. Can. 9. Origen lib. 3. Rom. 3. notwithstanding that the Church of Rome accurseth al that hold the contrarie in expresse termes saying If any shall say that a wicked man may be iustified by faith alone c. let him be accursed Against which definitiue sentence of the Councell of Trent I find first of the Greeke Fathers Origen to be most cleare who vpon those words of Saint Paul to the Romans We therefore thinke that man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law writeth thus The Apostle in these words saith that iustification by faith alone sufficeth so that a man onely beseeuing is iustified although he performe no worke And if an example be required who was euer that without good workes was iustified by faith alone I think that thiefe may suffice who crucified with Christ cried vnto him on the crosse Lord Iesus remember me when thou shalt come into thy kingdome Neit her is there any good worke of his described in the Cospell But for this faith alone Iesus saith vnto him Amen I say vnto thee This day thou shalt be with me in Paradise This thiefe therefore is iust fied by faith without the workes of the law because the Lord did not aske what worke hee did first neither did he expect what worke hee had done when he belieued but being iustified by faith alone when he was to enter into Paradise he tooke him for his companion and it is related in the Gospell according to Saint Luke vnto the woman without any worke of the law and for faith alone hee said thy sinnes are forgiuen thee And againe Thy faith hath made thee safe goe in peace And in many places of the Gospell wee reade that our Sauiour vsed this speech to shew that the faith of the beleeuer is the cause of his saluation Hitherto Origen Neither is Saint Basil of other opinion who writeth thus The Apostle saith Basil cōcione dehumilit he that reioyceth let him reioyce in the Lord saying that Christ is made vnto vs from God Wisedome Iustice Sanctification and Redemption that as it is written he that is to reioyce let him reioyce in the Lord for this is perfect and entire reioycing in God when a man is not exalted for his owne righteousnesse but acknowledgeth true righteousnesse to bee wanting in him and to bee iustified by faith alone in Christ And Paul reioyceth in that he despiseth his owne righteousnes and in that by
I find that men of farther reach obseruing the successe of the intended powder-treason following soone after haue obserued that that letter which master Blackwell should haue spread amongst Catholikes was but a cloake of the secret designement of the powder-day to take away all apprehension of danger in the state whereof it is probably thought that both the Pope and father Aquauiua were either expressely or circumstantially made acquainted with that businesse nay moreouer my selfe strongly vrging against one the vnlawfulnes of the powder-designement he wished me to be silent for it was more then probable that the Pope knew well thereof and in speaking against it I should but cause the Iesuites to disaffect me and doe my selfe no good Hereupon I grew silent and thought the more then of such horrible hypocrisie for that some reported that both the Pope and Cardinals had spoken publikely against it which me thought could not hang well together without some intollerable hypocrisie especially considering that Greenway by the Pope was not only suffered to liue in Rome but also exalted euen before the Popes face to the dignitie of being one of his Penitentiaries appointed publikly to heare cōfessions in S. Peters Church in Rome and Gerard likewise suffered to liue quietly in Flanders without checke or controule by any man who made such deep protestations to one master Buckland Priest vpon his saluation that he had no wayes notice of the powder-designement that as I heard the said master Buckland say either he must needs beleeue him to affirme a truth or else that he was as great an hypocrite and dissembler as euer liued in the world So like are the followers of the Romane Church to the first kind of the Pharisies hypocrisie in pretending outward holinesse whilest in their hearts they harbour most detestable vnrighteousnesse Therefore well did Saint Bernard describe Hypocrites saying that they were Mordaces vt canes dolosi vt vulpes superbi vt leones they are biting like dogges they are guilefull like foxes they are proud like lions for such will suffer no mans reputation to be vntoucht but will teare it with their spitefull teeth they are craftie as foxes which teare in peeces the sheepe of the best wooll and as proud as lions for that they contemne all disgrace all without regard to any mans person or dignitie 5 Secondly The second kind of Romish hypocrisie I haue also obserued the second kind of the Pharisies hypocrisie to be very abundant in the Church of Rome which consisteth in a preposterous and defectiue outward holines breeding scrupulosity in trifles and largenes of conscience in matters of more moment As for example I find that for violating their custome obseruation vpon fasting-dayes many will bee exceedingly scandalized but giue no shew of scandale-taking at the most wicked example of the powder-treason or the traytors thereof but rather by their silence seeme willing to approue it to lament only the misfortune of their desired successe Others there are that will controule and checke any rash iudgement euen in trifles in others who themselues without scruple or knowledge or iudgment wil not stick to lay the imputation of the powder-treason vpon Protestants themselues who should by Machiuillian complotments be the first contriuers of it to draw Papists vnto it thereby to make them the more odious to the world Againe the Church of Rome forbiddeth Priests to be married which is lawfull by the law of God and whereas mariages betwixt kindred in the degrees of affinity are prohibited by the law of God they suffer and permit dispencing with mens consciences therein as for example that one brother may marry his brothers wife which was allowed in this kingdom by the Pope that the neece may marry her vncle which hath bin granted but to mean persons euen of late yeeres in Hamp-shire by authoritie granted from the Pope What cā be more preposterous thē to make a law which God neuer made in liew therof to disanull an institution which God hath made Besides the Popes thēselues suffer some of the Clergie to professe external pouertie as the poore Capuchins whilest themselues and others liue in all pompe iollity and pleasure vsing all coulors of holines to enrich thēselues and to draw treasures out of al coūtries to fill the Exchequer of S. Peter withall Who sees not most plainly that many deluded soules whilest for the grant of indulgences yearely to this Church and that Church they pay round summes of money into the Romane offices they grow negligent in seeking pardon from God and so neuer obtain truly pardon for their sins what shall I say of their preposterous zeale in keeping holidaies I often noted that the daies appointed in memory of Saints are much more solemnely kept then Sonday which is the feast of their Lord and Master in stead of one prayer to the Father or to the holy Ghost or the blessed Trinity the childrē of that Church do say many either to the virgin Mary or to S. Francis S. Benet Beatus Ignatius or some other Saint to whom they are most peculiarly addicted By all which examples I obserue the Church of Rome much also to exceed in this preposterous hypocrisie and externall holinesse without any order or rule 6 Thirdly The third kind of Romane hypocrisie I haue further entred into a deepe consideration of the third kind of Pharisaicall hypocrisie which consisteth more in words than in deedes more in shaddow than in truth Which I find without measure to abound likewise in the church of Rome For the Pope himself in words caries the stile of Seruus seruorum Dei the seruant of the seruants of God which is but meerely verball for in effect his actions are all noted with pride carrying the shew of Lord or Emperour rather than of a Seruant Auent Annal. lib. 7. who as one writeth Dominus dominantium perde ac si Deus foret esse contendit he striueth to be the lord of rulers in as if he were God and who seeth not this to be true that considereth his challenge of soueraignetie euen in temporalls ouer all Emperors and Kings of the world that beholdeth him carried vpon mens shoulpers that know how hee maketh all Princes but his vassals to be depriued of their kingdomes and all dignities whensoeuer he thinketh it expedient propter finem spiritualem for a spirituall end that is for the good of the Church that hath seene him attended vpon by the whole Colledge of Cardinalles whose intollerable prie was such that a King of Fraunce finding him inexorable in the cause of Fredericke Math. Paris in Henr. 3. His Maiesties speech in the Parliament Recessit iratus indignans quod humilitatem quam sperauerat in seruo seruorum minimè reperisset hee went away angrie and scorning not to finde the humilitie he hoped for in the seruant of seruants wel therfore may his Maiestie term him for such his pride as he doth That
of the Church of Rome when they came to the Church of England they prooued dissolute of life most licentious in their conuersations whereas such as went from the Church of England to the church of Rome though they were neuer so disorderly before they afterward were reformed in their conuersations and most religiously exemplar in their behauiours Now therefore to shew that this obseruation proueth not alwayes so and that those of the English Church might not bee deceiued with this illusion of the Diuell you may from me take notice that it hath pleased almighty God heretofore to cōuert diuerse who haue liued with good fame in the Church of England and of late one master Richard Sheldon whose both learning vertuous conuersation euen in the Church of Rome hath beene such as is vnimpeachable by any of his Aduersaries as farre forth as euer I could heare and so still manifesteth as much in religious zeale to the Church of England and for mine owne part I can boldly say that I find as good curbes by the Doctrine of the Church of England to keepe men from sinne as in the Church of Rome by vertue whereof I doubt not but with Gods assistance I shall liue to serue him in this Church with lesse sinne than euer I could haue done in the Church of Rome 4 Thirdly I must giue you further notice that it is a thing wel knowne that there are in this realme many dissembling Protestants which outwardly doe all the acts of Religion belonging to this Church of England either to stay in their places in the common-wealth or to anoyde their penall lawes and yet in their hearts are resolued beleeuers of the Roman Faith egregiously dissembling both with God and men and practising most notorious equiuocation aswell in matters of faith as manners who will not sticke to take oathes receiue Sacraments go to Church and commit many a like act directly against their consciences perswasion which according to Saint Paul is sinne Rom. 14. vers 23 nay I dare affirme that it is a hainous mortall sinne approaching neare to that sinne against which Christ himselfe pronounceth a dangerous threatning ful of terror to any considerat heart saying That he that sinneth against the holy Ghost shall neuer be forgiuen Luc. 12. vers 10. neither in this world neither in the world to come Whence it may appeare that such men as they are most treacherous to God so may it be probably thought they cannot be loyall vnto men and therefore are they to bee held the most dangerous men that can be in any Common-wealth preferring the glorie of men before the glorie of God which being a thing much practised by some affected to the Church of Rome I haue beene the more willing both for their better information to publish these my obseruations as also to giue satisfaction to the Church of England concerning my selfe who am I thanke God most free from so hatefull a crime odious both to God and man 5. Fourthly I am further to let you vnderstand that my intention in these my Obseruations being more for the instruction of the Professors of the Church of Rome than for those of the Church of England who stand in no neede of so meane a scholler as my selfe I haue cited often the Authors of that Church euen against themselues thinking no way better to confute their Doctrines than by their owne grounds and their owne Teachers And although I handle not all points controuersed betwixt Rome and the reformed Churches at this day yet doe I so entreat of the chiefest points of Practise and Doctrine that all those being discouered to be but erronious and nouell and such as cannot stand with the true grounds of Christianitie I thinke there is no man of sound iudgement can thinke I had iust cause to stay any longer in that Church or that themselues can be partakers of Saluation remaining in the same 6. Fifthly my further desire is that thou who vouchsafest to be the Reader of these my vnpolished lines wilt with as fauourable a minde entertaine them for thy profit as I out of charitable affection to Gods seruants doe most freely publish them to the world desiring Almightie God to giue thee grace to reade them with due attention and to ruminate vpon them with mature deliberation laying aside all partialitie in thy censures or inordinate desire of any curious nouelties my resolution in the writing of them being more for the profit and spirituall good of others than for any purchase either of praise or estimation to my selfe desiring that the naked truth set forth without any colours of art or elocution may shew it owne power and force to preuaile against falshood And so wishing you all happinesse both temporall and eternall I leaue thee to the protection on of Almightie God Yours zealously affected in Christ Iesus I. C. A table of all the matters contained in this booke of Doctrinall and Morall Obseruations CHAP. I. COntaineth the first obseruation shewing the reasons of this Treatise Fol. 1. Chap. 2. Containeth an obseruation of Gods prouidence in ministring occasions of times places and persons concurring to the Authours conuersion Fol. 15. Chap. 3. Containeth the first fundamentall obseruation of the end of man and his chiefe happinesse Fol. 26. Chap. 4. Containeth the second fundamentall obseruation of the supernaturall and reuealed knowledge which is necessarie to saluation Fol. 30. Chap. 5. Containeth the third fundamentall obseruation about the absolute necessitie of supernaturall faith Fol. 34. Chap. 6. Containeth the fourth fundamentall obseruation about the rule and straight mete-wand of the true Christian Faith Fol. 38. Chap. 7. Containeth the fift fundamentall obseruation how the Ministerie of the true Church of Christ is the meanes of teaching the true sense and vnderstanding of Scriptures where and when it hath a visible externall gouernement Fol. 52. Chap. 8. Containeth the sixt fundamentall obseruation how that conformitie of doctrine with the ancient doctrine of the primitiue Church may be a good meanes in these latter ages to know the true Church of Christ Fol. 55. Chap. 9. Containeth an obseruation of the wonders and supposed Miracles which as Christ hath fore-told the Pseudo-Christs and false Prophets shall doe for the seducing of Gods Elect if it were possible Fol. 72. Chap. 10. Containeth an obseruation of the great hypocrisie of false teachers fore-spoken of in the holy Scriptures Fol. 100. Chap. 11. Containeth an obseruation of the fruits by which false Prophets are to be knowne and discerned Fol. 113. Chap. 12. Containeth an obseruation about the Sacrifice of the Masse which is accompted by the Church of Rome the chiefest act of Religion that can be done to God Fol. 133. Chap. 13. Containeth an obseruation about the doctrine of Transubstantiation which is a principall noueltie taught in the Church of Rome Fol. 160. Chap. 14. Containeth an obseruation about the Sacrament ministred but vnder one kind to Lay-people in the Church
any displeasure of the State then can I now doe no lesse in satisfaction to God and the world being now enlightned with truth it selfe than to shew a more earnest zeale burning charitie towards your conuersions from the former errors laboring to reduce you vnto the same light of Catholike truth whereto I my selfe am called that whereas I haue formerly wronged the soules of many in the time of my blindnesse by diuers labors and exhortations and the wrong ministration of the blessed Sacrament but vnder one forme vnto you quite contrarie to Christs institution and commaundement reioycing therein I may now in the time of better knowledge endeuor to make part of amends by vsing any possible paines to informe you rightly of the same way which it hath pleased God to call me vnto The true motiue of my conuersion the third cause Thirdly that you may haue true notice that not any temporall motiue hath wrought this change in me not persuasion of any worldly friend for till my conuersion I conuersed with none ordinarily but those of the Romane profession not naturall affection to kindred because my neerest and deerest friends of bloud are of that faith and gentlemen of worshipfull qualitie not want for mine owne meanes haue beene able contentedly to maintaine me with such helpes as the practise of my function drew vnto me besides the loue and willingnesse of many good friends most readie to assist me in all my needes not inordinate affection to carnall delights vnapprouable by Gods word for I thanke God I am free from all such or any other as farre as I know who am best able to examine mine owne conscience in this behalfe 8 Accept therefore I beseech you deere Recusants vnto whom I wish as much good as to mine owne soule To Recusants and all happinesse in the most tender bowels of Christ Iesus these my ensuing obseruations grounded vpon the sacred letters and the doctrine of the ancient Church earnestly praying to God they may beare the same sway with your vnderstanding and will as they haue with mine for your inducement to a perfect conuersion of your soules according to my example vnto the true worship of God in the true Catholike English Church whose doctrine you may find agreeable to the true grounds of Christianitie and the doctrine of the primitiue Church as I doubt not but you may most cleerely perceiue if you will vouchsafe without all passion and peruerse affection to peruse my obseruations which as they haue been powerfull to worke my true conuersion so from the truest affections of my soule I wish they may be as profitable vnto you for your reduction vnto the same most true Catholike faith with abundance of Gods blessings to your soules with perfect allegeance to your lawfull Soueraigne with edification to his Church with true contentment and peace to your hearts with quietnesse to your present life and euerlasting glorie to your life to come through the grace and mercie of our Lord Iesus CHAP. II. Containing an obseruation of Gods prouidence in ministring occasions of times places and persons concurring to my conuersion SVch is the mercifull prouidence of Almightie God which reacheth from one end to another mightily and sweetly ordereth all things Gods prouidence ordereth all things Sap. 8. vers 1. that as he disposeth all humane actions to happen in fit times so doth he suffer fit accidents and occasions to fall out that the workes which he intendeth by men may haue successe answerable to his will and designements Qui mundum per seipsum regit Greg. lib. 14. Mor. cap. 26. ante medium quem per seipsum condidit who as Gregorie sayth ruleth the world by himselfe which by himselfe he created For his vnderstanding and will being the cause of all thinges as the great Doctor of the Romane Church teacheth Tho. Aq. part 1. q. 19. in corpore Qui operatur omnia secundum consilium voluntatis suae who worketh all things according to the purpose of his will as Saint Paule affirmeth Ephes 1. vers 11. and his will being knowne as the Schoole-men teach by diuers signes as by prohibition permission of euill Thom. Aqu. part 1. q. 19. operation of good and by precepts c. Saint Augustine also saying August enchirid c. 29. in fine Tom. 3. Nihil fit nisi omnipotens fieri velit vel sinendo vt fiat vel faciendo Nothing is done but what the Almightie will haue done eyther by suffering it to be done or by doing it it followeth by necessarie consequence that all occasions helpes and benefits of his creatures subordinately concurring to euerie act of his will proceedeth from his prouidence and wisedome 2 Hence My bond of gratitude to Gods prouidence gentle Reader I obserue in how strong bands of dutifull thankfulnesse I stand obliged vnto God for ministring vnto me at seuerall times and in seuerall places and vpon different occurrences such occasions and meanes to search and examine the controuersies of religion betwixt the Romane and English Church that whilest by my studies and labours my purpose designement was to draw others into the net of Rome I my selfe was led into the sheepefold wherof Christ in heauen is the chiefe Pastor wherein I see truly verified that of King Dauid Psal 13. vers 2. Dominus de coelo prospexit vt videat si est intelligens aut requirens Deū the Lord looked down from heauē vpon the children of men to see if there were any that did vnderstand and seeke God who neuer ceaseth to minister occasions and means concurring to the good of his seruants Matth. 11. ver 1. who numbreth all the haires of their heads in his knowledge and suffereth not any thing to happen without his prouidence vnto them For so we find that Abrahams exile concurred to his greater good Gen. 11. vers 1. Gen. 22. vers 29. Gen 37. vers 18 the commandement of Isaacks Sacrifice gaue occasion to approue Abrahams faith the felling of Ioseph by his brethren and his imprisonment were occasions concurring to his greater glory and to the manifestation of his vertues Exod. 2. vers 3. and Gods more singular prouidence towards him the laying of Moses by the brinke of the riuer 1. Reg. 17. vers 6. the often deliuerie of Dauid from Sauls furie the feeding of Elias with bread and flesh by Rauens the preseruation of Daniel in the denne of Lions Dan. 6. vers 22. Dan. 3.20.24 the protection of the three Children in the Babilonian furnace doe most cleerely shew how by this prouidence of God all occasions and circumstances of mens liues do concurre to the happines of his chosen seruants and therefore most truly singeth the Psalmist Psal 90. vers 1. Qui habitat in adiutorio altissimi in protectione Dei coeli commorabitur he that dwelleth in the secret place of the most high shall abide vnder the shadow of the Almightie
shew in those wordes I answere it is to be said that one thing may be said to be before another two waies Tho. Aq. 22. q. 4. ar 7. one way of it selfe another way by accident and of it selfe faith is the first of all other vertues for as in things agible and to be done the end is the beginning as is abouesaid it is behoofefull that the Theologicall vertues which haue the last end for their obiect be the first and take place of other vertues and for the last end it selfe it is behoofefull that first it be in the vnderstanding then in the will because the will is not carried vpon any thing but as it is apprehended in the vnderstanding therefore for that the last end is in the will by hope and charitie and in the vnderstanding by faith Tho. Aqu. 12. q. 34. art 4. ad princip art q. 13. art 3. it is behoofefull that faith be the first of all vertues because naturall vnderstanding cannot reach vnto God as he is the obiect of blisse in which sort hope and charitie aymeth vnto him yet accidentally another vertue may be before faith for the cause which is accidentally is accidentally the first Now to remoue the impediment appertaineth to that cause which is accidentally as it is manifest by the Philosopher accordingly Aristoteles in 8. Phisuli 8. text 32. to 2. whereunto some vertues may bee said accidentally to be before faith in how much they remoue the impediments of beleeuing as fortitude remoueth inordinate feare hindering faith humilitie pride by which the vnderstanding refuseth to submit it selfe to the truth of faith and the same may be said of some other vertues although they be not truly vertues vnlesse faith be presupposed Augustin contra Iouinianum l. 4. cap. 3 tom 7. as it appeareth by Saint Augustine in his booke against Iouinian Hence it appeareth by this Doctor that if faith be wanting no Christian can haue that reuealed knowledge which necessarily for his saluation hee is bound to haue and therefore I incessantly laboured to finde out the assurednesse of this faith and the more that I thought how I might finde out this faith so necessarie to saluation it pleased God to suffer me to proceede in my search for some infallible rule by which I might measure without danger of mistaking the true faith of Christ and thereby be most comfortably led as with the fierie pillar like the Israelites by night through the wildernesse of this world Exo. 13. vers 22. vnto the most desired land of euerlasting happinesse and securitie where that promise of God made by the mouth of his Prophet may be verified of vs Esay 32. vers 18 My people shall dwell in a peaceable habitation and in sure dwellings and in quiet resting places CHAP. VI. Containing the fourth fundamentall obseruation about the rule and straight mete-wand of the true Christian faith BEing thus arriued by Gods grace to discouer and rightly to obserue how important a thing it is to build vpon this foundation of true faith The true Canonicall Scriptures the chief rule of faith without which all the building of our soules would be but weake and soone fall to ruine I felt my selfe most forcibly moued by Gods Spirit with all humilitie and diligence to search out the most straight rule where no crookednesse should appeare with the which I might so truly measure out the right faith and true Church of God which Saint Paul calleth the Piller and firmament of truth In the desire whereof occurred vnto my memorie the Angell that talked with Saint Iohn Apocal. 21. vers 15. hauing a golden reed in his hand to measure the spirituall Hierusalem with all the gates the walles the foundations and all the parts of that great citie wishing that it would please God to bestow vpon me such a golden reed wherewith I might measure out the true faith and Church of God that all that are crooked in faith and misproportioned in their liues might find out the truth and be in the number of those of whom the Psalmist saith Psalme 32.11 Laetamini in domino exultate insti gloriamini omnes recti corde Be glad ye righteous and reioyce in the Lord and bee ioyfull all yee that are vpright in heart Whereupon I began to reflect vpon the chiefest rules spoken of either by the Church of Rome or other Churches pretending reformation and examining with a great desire of truth whether visibilitie and continuance of personall succession of Bishops in any Church or whether the Popes sole iudgement and definitiue sentence either with a Councell or tanquam ex Cathedra without a Councell or whether vnwritten traditions or whether the written word and facred Scriptures could be vnto me a straight rule of true faith and of the true Church of Christ me thought I found by all probable euidences and allowed testimonies that only and principally the written word of God I meane the true canonicall Scriptures could be the golden rod and straight mete-wand wherewith the true proportion and frame of Christian faith could bee measured in so much that me thought I might well say to my inexplicable comfort and to the honor of God as that high soaring Eagle Saint Iohn said Apoc. 11. vers 1. There was giuen me a reed like vnto a rod and it was said vnto mee rise and mete the Temple of God and the Altar and them that worship therein 2 But heere thou wilt say gentle Reader that this is but an imagined golden reed Obiections against Scripture as the chiefe or certaine rule and that this is but as crooked a measure as any other in respect of the many difficult places of Scripture which tire out the braines of the most learned as also in regard of the diuersitie of iudgements that is found about the sence of Scriptures for that the translations hauing been diuers it is hard for any man to iudge which is the truest but all these mists of but apparent reasons will easily be disperst if thou wilt please but heedily to peruse the proofes and authorities I bring for this my sure and strongest fundamentall obseruation I know onely but three kinds of strong arguments that may be produced for any veritie as namely the sacred Scriptures the authoritie of the learned and the force of natural reasons all which three do proclaime with a loud voice vnto vs that the written word is the most certain sufficient and infallible rule of faith that we can haue in this world and consequently the true golden mete-wand of Gods eternall truth and all Christian reuealed verities 3 This haue I gathered first out of the Scriptures By proofe of Scripture Esay 8.20 for I find in Esay the Prophet that we must repaire to the Law and to the testimonie if any speake not according to that word Prou. 2. vers 1. Prou. 2. vers 9. there is no light in them I
find also the wise Salomon to affirme that Gods words will make a man vnderstand righteousnes and iudgement and equitie and euery good path I find likewise in Saint Luke and other Euangelists Luke 1. vers 4. These things are written that we might haue the certaintie of that whereof we are instructed and that we might beleeue in Iesus and in beleeuing haue life eternall through his name I find further that Christ saith Search the Scriptures Ioh. 20. vers 31. for in them yee thinke to haue eternall life and they are they which testifie of mee as also in another place When one asked Christ what he might do to be saued Luk. 10. vers 26. he referreth him to the Scriptures for his direction saying What is written in the Law So did Abraham answere the rich Glutton They haue Moses and the Prophets Luke 16.29 I find also Saint Paul free from all exception herein saying The Scriptures are able to make vs wise to saluation 2. Tim. 3. vers 15. Vers 16. Vers 17. through the faith that is in Christ Iesus and are profitable to teach to improue to conuert to instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute and perfect to euery good worke And in another place we may not presume aboue that which is written I find likewise Saint Peter to accord with Saint Paul 2. Pet. 1.19 when hee saith Wee haue a more sure word of the Prophets whererunto wee cannot take heed as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place till the day dawne and till the day-starre arise in our hearts Many more proofes would the canonicall Scriptures afford to the same effect therefore since by the premised places of Scripture I see that he that speaketh not according to the word of God hath no light in him since the Scriptures can make vs know righteousnesse iudgement equitie and euery good path since they were written that we might haue certainty in that we are instructed in and beleeuing haue life eternall since we are sent to the Scriptures by Christ since they are able to make vs wise to saluation since they are profitable to make vs perfect to euery good worke since it is presumption to go aboue that which is written since the Prophets be our light in darknesse what better rule can we haue of our faith what can excuse any mans ignorance that knoweth this or what an obstinate wilfulnesse were it for me that knowing these testimonies of Scripture shall not beleeue them or why should I not thinke that the Church of England hath not the best reed or mete-wand to measure the truth of her doctrine by when she teacheth Juel Apol. part 2. cap. 9. diuis 1. That the Scripture comprehended in the canonicall bookes of the old and new Testament is the rule of faith so farre that whatsoeuer is not read therein or cannot be proued thereby is not to be accepted as any point of faith or needfull to be followed 4 Which doctrine cannot be shaken or ouerthrowne By proofes of Fathers if we esteeme the authoritie of the learned who do most plentifully giue witnesse and vnanswerable proofes for the same S. Basil who liued in the fourth centurie after Christ saith Let the holy Scriptures be arbitrators betweene vs Basil opist 80. ad Eustac medicum pag. 334. and whosoeuer hold opinions consonant to those heauenly oracles let the truth be adiudged on their side And Optatus disputing against a Donatist presseth him thus Contra Parmem lib. 5. pag 393. We are saith he to equire out some to be iudges betweene vs in these controuersies The Christians cannot because both sides cannot yeeld them and by parts taking the truth shall be hindered The Iudge must be had from without our selues If a Pagan he knowes not the mysteries of Christianitie if a Iew he is an enemie to Baptisme therefore vpon the earth no iudgement concerning this matter can bee found the Iudge must be had from heauen but to what end should we kocke at heauen when heere we haue one in the Gospell Heere we see Saint Basil appeales for iudgement to the Scriptures and so Optatus likewise to the Gospell no acknowledgement here of other arbitrement vpon earth What shall I speake of Tertullion who is most plaine for me Tertul. contra Hermog calling the Scriptures the rule of faith The golden-mouthed Chrysostome will not heere forsake me who termeth the Scriptures Chrysost hom 13. in 2. Cor. Hom. 3. de Laz. A most exquisite rule and exact squier and ballance to trie all things by And also in another place saith God hath left vs the Scriptures more firme then any miracle And vpon the Acts of the Apostles discourseth very fitly to this purpose Chrysost hom 33. in Act. A Gentile saith hee commeth and saith I would bee a Christian but I know not which side to cleaue vnto many dissensions are among you and I cannot tell which opinion to hold euery one saith I speake the truth and the Scriptures on both sides are pretended so that I know not whom to beleeue to this Chrysostome replieth Truly saith he this maketh much for vs for well might you be troubled if we should say we relie vpon reason but seeing we take the Scriptures which are so true and plaine it will be an easie matter for you to iudge And tel me now hast thou any wit or iudgement Note this for it is not the part of a man barely to receiue whatsoeuer he heareth but if thou marke the meaning thou mayest throughly know that which is good when thou buyest a garment though thou hast no skill in wearing yet thou sayest not I cannot buy it they deceiue me but thou doest all things that thou mayest learne to know it say not then I am no scholler and will be no iudge I can condemne no opinion for this is but a shift and a cauill and let vs not vse it for all these things are easie There is nothing can bee more cleere for this most sufficient rule of faith then that which is written by this ancient Author of the imperfect worke falsely fathered as some thinke vpon Saint Chrysostome whom because he is often alleaged by the learned of the Romane Church I will also alleage against them this Author expounding those of Saint Matthew Chrysost opus imperfect hom 49. Then those that are in Iurie let them flie vnto the mountaines explicateth them thus that is they that are Christians let them repaire vnto the Scriptures The mountaines are the writings of the Apostles and Prophets and wherefore doth he at that time command all Christians to repaire to the Scriptures because in that time heresie hath obtained the Curches there can be no proofe of true Christianity neither can there be other refuge for Christians which shall desire to know the truth of faith but the sacred Scriptures Before it was many wayes shewed which was
the true Church of Christ and which was Gentilisme but now it is no way knowne vnto those which desire to know which is the true Church but onely by Scriptures wherefore because all these things which belongs so properly to Christ in truth heresies haue the same also in schisme Churches likewise holy Scriptures likewise Bishops likewise and other orders of Clerkes Baptisme likewise the Eucharist and all the rest lastly Christ himselfe One therefore that desireth to know which is the true Church whence shall he know it in the confusion of such likenesse but only by the Scriptures Note this likewise heretofore they were knowne by miracles who were true Christians who false How false Christians either could not do miracles as true Christians did or else they could not do such as true Christians did But now the working of miracles is altogether taken away and it is more found that false miracles are wrought by those who are false Christians as Peter according to Clement expouÌ„deth also power is to be also giuen of doing ful miracles vnto Antichrist Likewise heretofore the Church of Christ was vnderstood by their maners when the conuersation of al or most Christians was holy which was not among the wicked But now either such or worse Christians are become then Heretikes or Gentiles And moreouer greater continencie is found amongst those who liue in scisme then among Christians He therfore that will know which is the true Church of Christ whence shall he know it but only the Scriptures Note this The Lord therefore knowing that such a confusion of things should come in the last dayes he therefore commandeth that Christians who are in the Christianitie being desirous to obtaine firmenesse of the true faith should flie vnto nothing but vnto the Scriptures Note againe For otherwise if they haue regard to other things they shall be scandalized and shall perish not vnderstanding which is the true Church and by this they shall fall into the abomination of desolation which shall stand in the holy places of the Church Whereby it appeareth that the only means to find out the true Church is the canonicall Scriptures especially in these latter times to which we are now arriued 5 To our purpose also Gregorie Nissen calleth the Scriptures Other fathers Orat. de eis qui adeunt Hierosolimam A straight and inflexible rule I obserue also Saint Augustine to ioyne with the former who saith The Scripture pitcheth downe the rule of our faith De bono vid. cap. 1. And againe hee saith This controuersie depending betweene vs requireth a Iudge and let the Apostle Paul iudge with him because Christ also speaketh in his Apostle De nupt cencup ad Vater lib. 2. cap. 33. Epist 112. ad Paulin. In another place If a matter be grounded on the cleere authoritie of the holy Scripture such I meane as the Church calleth canonicall it is to be beleeued without all doubt but as for other witnesses and testimonies vpon whose credit any thing may be vrged vnto vs to belieue it it is lawful for thee either to credit or not to credit them according as thou shalt perceiue them of waight to deserue or not to deserue credit He saith besides De doctrin Christiau lib 2. cap 9. Ibid. cap. 42. All points which concerne faith and good life are found in those things which are plainly set downe in Scripture And againe in another place Whatsoeuer it be that a man learnes out of the Scripture if it be hurtfull there it is condemned if it bee profitable there it is found Tract 3. in 1. epist Ioh. Contra lit Petilian Dâ—â—at lib. 3 cap. 6 de vnit Eccles cap. 11. Againe hee saith The Church is our mother her breasts are the two Testaments of the Scripture whence she giueth her children milke Againe further If we or an Angell from heauen declare vnto you either concerning Christ or his Church any other matter or any thing belonging to our faith or life but what you haue receiued in the Legal and Euangelicall Scriptures let him be accursed The same famous Doctor likewise reuoketh from miracles to Scriptures De vnit Eccles cap. 16. saying Say not these things are so because such a one did such and such marualles but let them proue their Church by the canonicall bookes of Scripture and by nothing else These are the demonstrations of our cause these are our foundations these are our grounds whereupon we build And againe Our faith shal reele totter if the authoritie of the Scriptures stand not fast By all which according to this famous Doctor who is termed malleus haereticorum the hammer of heretikes you see this rule of faith most cleerely approued and iustified 6 Neither doe other auncient Writers swarue from the same doctrine Other fathers De error prophan relig p. 61. for Iulius Firminus sayth Let the venerable mysteries of the Prophets be opened let the credit of the holy Oracles stand by vs. Origen further sayth Hom. 1. in Ierem We must of necessitie call the Scriptures to witnesse for our sences and interpretations without them are of no credit Cyrill the Bishop of Hierusalem sayth Concerning the holy and heauenly mysteries of faith Catech. 4. pag. 15. we must not deliuer any thing though neuer so small Note this without the holy Scripture neither may we be led away with probabilities and shew of words neither yet beleeue me barely saying these things vnto you vnlesse thou also beleeue the demonstration thereof from the Scripture for the securitie of our faith ariseth from the demonstration of the holy Scripture The Emperour Constantine in his speech to the Bishops of the Nicene Councell hath this memorable saying Theod Hist li. 1. c. 7. pag. 284. We haue the teaching of the holy Ghost written for the Enangelicall and Apostolike bookes and the Decrees of the old Prophets doe euidently teach vs the things that are needfull to be knowne concerning God Therefore laying aside all contention let vs out of the dinine inspired Scripture take the rersolution of those things we secke for Neither will I let my penne paste another notable saying of Saint Augustine which is diligently to bee noted saying In Io. tract 21. Some may obiect we doe rashly in discussing and searching out the wordes of God but way are they vttered if they may not be knowne Why haue they sounded if they may not be heard and why are they heard but that we should vnderstand them Thus the Ancient resolued me in the securitie of this rule 7 And not onely these Proofes of late Writers but also the moderne Writers of the Church of Rome forgetting themselues as it seemeth in their writings euen against their owne grounds about the rule of faith haue giuen me no lesse euidence for this most straight and sufficient rule of the sacred letters and Canonical bookes than the former For first their great
medio tom 4. That when Sorcerers doe those thinges which Saints doe they are don for a different end and by a different power for Sorcerers doe them seeking their owne glorie Saints doe them seeking the glorie of God Sorcerers doe them by certaine priuate contracts Saints doe them by publique administration and commaund of God vnto whom all things created are subiect 3 Now therefore since seeming miracles done by the Diuell The true Catholike church the approuer of true miracles exceeding the ordinarie power of Nature may deceiue many if they iudge their Doctrine by them and for that it is hard for a man to bee able to say whether a miracle bee done by the power of almighty God or by the power of the Diuell because both exceede our vnderstanding and the ordinarie course of Nature it stoode mee vppon to search out some infallible meanes by which I might bee assured that they were true miracles and such as I might confidently relie vppon In which scrutinie I could finde no better rule than to obserue whether they bee done in the Catholique Church or no which I doe learne out of Saint Augustine Aug. de vnit Eccles ca. 16. saying Whatsoeuer things of this quality are done in the Catholicke Church Therefore they are to bee approued because they are done in the Catholicke Church Therefore shee is not manifested Catholicke because those thinges are done in her Whereby it is cleere that miracles absolutely are not a proofe of the Catholicke Church but the Catholicke Church an approouer of true miracles whence it followeth That the miracles of the Primitiue Church were not so much a confirmation of her truth as her truth a confirmation of them Whence I obserue further That the present Church of Rome not beeing the true Catholicke Church because shee teacheth not the true Catholicke ancient Faith without mixture of many nouelties doth in vaine all eadge miracles in her behalfe which for that they are done out of the true Church are to bee reckoned amongst Antichrists lying signes prodigies Therefore I may pronounce confidently with S. Aug. vnto the Papists I say not that these things are so Aug. de vnit Eccles ca. 16. because such a one did such and such maruailes but let them proue their Church by the Canonicall bookes of the Scripture and by nothing else these are the demonstrations of our cause Note this these are our foundations these are our grounds whereupon we build Whereby wee see Miracles excluded from beeing a marke of the Church as the Cardinall Bellarmine would faine perswade the world that so his Romaine Church might bee approued for the true Church of God Vnapproueable therefore is the assertion of master D. Hill who chalengeth much vnto the Roman Church by her glorie of miracles wrought by her Saints his words are these The tenth reason of this quarterne Now it is so manifest that there haue beene an infinite number of miracles wrought by those who were of the Catholicke Romaine Religion and neuer any by them who were not of that Church since Christs time as he who shall deny it may bee prooued no lesse impudent and shamlesse than bee who shall denie that euer there was any Masse said in times past in England or that euer there were any warres betweene Turkes and Christians or that there bee any such countries as the East and West-Indies which thing if a man should denie would hee not of all men be deemed not only impudent but madde drunken or afoole In which words because Master Doctor Hill seemeth much to forget himselfe I must needs refresh his memorie with some few interrogatories What master Doctor I pray since Christs time did not Simmon Magus worke miracles who as Baronius saith Baron an 68. nu 22. made images to walke and would lie in the fire without hurt and flie in the ayre and make bread of stones hee could open doores fast shut and vnloose bands of iron and had many shadowes following him as it had been men Will you say he was a Roman Catholike Tacit. lib. 4. did not Vespasian the Emperour at Alexandria restore a blind man to sight will you say hee was a Roman Catholike Who be they Christ spake of when he said Matth. 7 22. Many will say to me in that day Lord haue we not by thy name prophesied and by thy name cast out diuels and by thy name done many great workes and then will I professe to them I neuer knew you depart from me yee that worke iniquitie What will you say that these workers of miracles and also of iniquity were of your Catholike Romane religion What think you of those Saint Augustine speaketh of August de vnit Eccles cap. 16. saying If there be done some miracles of heretikes we ought the more to take heed because when the Lord had said that there should be some deceiuers who by doing many signes should deceiue the very Elect if it were possible he did adde commending it vehemently said behold I haue foretold it vnto you What will you grant all these were of the Catholike Romane religion August tract 13. in loan What will you say vnto the same ancient Doctor in another place where he saith Against these miracle-mongers as I may so call them my God hath made mee warie saying In the last times there shall arise false Prophets doing signes and wonders What will you grant none of these to be yet come or will you grant them all to be of your religion What will you say to your Country-man Prompt mor. part aestiu pag. 627. dom 24. nu 4. Master Doctor Stapleton publike professor of Diuinitie in Louaine and if I mistake not your acquaintance in Doway who saith For the more triall of the godly not onely Antichrist himselfe and his nearest forerunners but all heretikes also may do true miracles by the permission of God as the sorcerers may doe Will you grant such forerunners and Heretikes to be of your Catholike Romane religion or will you say Doctor Stapleton erreth in calling them true miracles or will you recant your former assertion acknowledging your former mistaking and then shall I be as glad as now I haue commiseration of your error beseeching God in the meane time of his infinit mercie that you may see both your owne error and the errors of others of the present Romane religion and how different it is from the ancient Roman religion which in Saint Pauls dayes was famous through the world For my part I could not but vpon these and other considerations obserue the Church of England to be free from such false Prophets and Pseudochrists that they miracles as Christ fore told should deceiue the very Elect if it were possible for neither doe they pretend themselues to worke miracles and so to hunt after their owne estimation and applause for their holines as the teachers of the Roman Church do neither do they hold
it absolutely necessary that God should continue that faith by miracles which was formerly planted by them but rest themselues contented with the former of the Primitiue Church lest otherwise they should be subiect to seduction whence I concluded to my selfe that vnlesse the Church of Rome could proue her selfe to be true Catholike and ancient Primitiue I ought not to be led by her pretended miracles in regard that Doctor Stapleton saith Heretikes and the forerunners of Antichrist may do true miracles by Gods permission for the triall of the good which neither my selfe nor any manelse ought to beleeue because Christ hath armed vs with a warning caueat against them saying Nolite eis credere 4 Which Pretence of miracles a signe of false teachers Matth. â—4 24 how true it is I appeale to the holy Scriptures themselues our Sauiours words are most plaine There shall arise false Christs and false Prophets shall shew great signes and wondes so that if it were possible they should deceiue the verie Elect behold I haue told you before but beleeue them not by which warning aduice is giuen to beware of them to discerne them and not to giue credit vnto their teaching notwithstanding all their miracles Neither is Saint Pauls prediction lesse significant of them who remembreth vs 2. Thess 2.9 That the comming of that sonne of perdition is by the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders and in all deceiue ablenesse of vnrighteousnes among them that perish because they receiued not the loue of the truth Apocal cap. 13.13.14 that they might bee saued Saint Iohn also in his Reuelations speaking of the second beast saith He did great wonders so that he made fire to come downe from heauen on the earth in the fight of men and deceiued them that dwellon the earth by the signes which ae permitted to him to do in the sight of the beast Apocal. cap. 16.13 Afterwards we heare also againe that three vncleane spirits like frogs came out of the mouth of the Dragon and out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false Prophet for they are the spirits of diuels working miracles And moreouer lastly we find in the same booke That the beast was taken and with him that false Prophet Apocal. cap. 19.20 that wrought miracles before him whereby he deceiued them that receiued the beasts marke Now what is to bee vnderstood by powers signes and wonders I will cite the words of Ioannes Vignerius Institut Christ cap. 9. §. 2. vers 3. Hebr. 2. Matth. 24.24 who saith That miracles in the sacred Scriptures are tearmed powers signes wonders and portentes for Hebrewes the second it is said God witnessing in signes and portents and diuers powers and Matthew the foure and twentieth they are called prodigies which differ thus in that because they exceed the facultie of nature they are termed powers but in that they are ordained to the manifestation of grace they are called signes and for their excellencie they are termed wonders and prodigies as it were shewing things far off So that putting all these places together I could not conclude otherwise then vnlesse I would beleeue these false Prophets vnlesse I were willing to be an Entertenido to the son of Perdition and bee deluded most notoriously by lying wonders vnlesse I would be a perpetuall consort vnto the frogs vamped forth of the Dragons mouth vnlesse I would bee wilfully deceiued as one that had receiued the beasts marke then to shake hands with the present Church of Rome boasting so much in her miraculous powers signes wonders and prodigies for in the reformed Churches I find no such illusions pretended nor the least danger thereof nor any where else but in the present Romane Church 5 By which obseruation Miracles not to be expected in the latter times I was the rather induced to this conclusion for that I finde diuers inclining to thinke it too much curiositie now that the faith is planted and after so long continuance to seeke it out by more miracles Therefore first I will set downe the Doctrine of an old Dominican Friar distinguishing the times of doing miracles whose words are these The Church hath a three-fold state viz. Iacob de Vorag de sanctis in die ascensio ser 6. The Primitiue the moderne and the last In the Primitiue state miracles were wrought often but now seldom and in the last state that is of Antichrist they shall be done most seldome In the Primitiue state they were done often because according to Saint Chrysostome the ancient miraracles haue admiration profit and necessitie Therefore then according to Saint Chrysostome miracles were done as well for admiration because men being then accustomed to their senses were therefore to be lifted vp as for profit because then many were infirme and oppressed of diuels and for necessitie because they were infidels and wrapped vp in errors But in the moderne state they are seldome done because necessitie requireth them not men being now beleeuers yet sometimes they are wrought because profit and vtilitie exalteth them for that sometimes men are found weake and to stand in need of them And why miracles are not done now so frequently as they were in the Primitiue Church there is a threefold reason one is for the strength of faith because now the Church is strengthened and established in faith This reason Bernard assigneth putting an example of the plant into which we power water till we see it fastened in the earth secondly for the profitable example of the world De ciuit Dei lib. 22. This reason Augustine assigneth saying whosoeuer requireth yet wonders that he may beleeue he is a great wonder himself who beleeueth not when the world beleeueth Thirdly for the greater merit of faith because according to Saint Gregory faith hath no merit where humane reason prouoketh it but in the end they shall bee wrought but seldome for three reasons that Isidorus teacheth either that the hand of the persecutors may become more bould or that the patience of the Saints may be the more proued or that the lightnes may be the more shewed of those which shall fall Who speaking heere of the miracles of Saints in these three states of time she weth they shall be scanty in the middle ages after Christ and very raw in the last ages which if it be true what can I do but suspect the pretended miracles of the Church of Rome which swarmeth with so many bookes replenished with their narrations in such strange and vnheard manner as there were neuer the like and therefore they easilie seeme to surmount all beliefe and I may more largely presse those words against those of the Church of Rome which this Authour pointeth at saying to all her followers out of Saint Augustine De ciuit Dei lib. 22. Why say they are not the miracles now done which you doe preach to haue beene done I might
say that before the world did beleeue they were necessrie to this end that the world might beleeue but whosoeuer doth enquire after wonders that hee may beleeue hee himselfe is a great wonderment who beleeueth not now the world doth beleeue By which words I obserue a necessitie why men should look for miracles in the Primitiue Church but none why wee should expect them now but rather why wee should feare to bee deceiued by beleeiuing false ones for true ones and therefore Saint Augustine giueth another stronger reason to hold him in the Church than the continuance of miracles saying Contra Epi. fundamenti The consent of people and nations doth holde me there doth hold mee an authoritie which was begunne with miracles nourished by hope encreased by charitie confirmed by antiquitie by which I obserue though hee shew the authoritie of that sacred doctrine confirmed in the beginning by miracles as a menes to hold him yet hee speaketh of no continuance of them but leaueth confirmation to the authoritie of sacred doctrine it selfe which must bee the strongest hold of the Churches claime De vera relig cap. 25. Saint AuguStine also in another place saith Since the Catholike Church is diffused through the whole world and grounded neither are these miraculous things permitted to endure vntill our times lest the mind should alwayes seeke visible things and by the custome of them man-kind should waxe cold at the new appearance whereof it was all on fire Mor. lib. 27.11 And Saint Gregorie saith most plainely What maruaile is it if the faith being propagated miracles be not oft done since euen the very Apostles in many which were alreadie faithfull did not doe them Neither is Isidorus any whit discordant from Saint Augustine aboue recited who seemeth to insinuate as much in these words Miracles are a signe Isidor lib. 1. de summo bono not necessarie for the faithfull who now haue beleeued but to the vnfaithfull that they may bee conuerted for Paul for the infidelitie of not beleeuers cureth the father of Publius by miracles from the infirmitie of an ague but sicke Timothie who was a faithfull not by prayer but medicinally that thou mayest know miracles to be done not for the vnfaithfull but for the faithfull So I find Didacus de la Vega not to swarue much from this doctrine Conc. quadrag feria 4. post primam dominicam quadrag Matth. 12. vers 39. who vpon these words Generatio male adultera signum quaerit signum non dabitur ei nisi signum Ionae Prophetae An euill and adulterous generation seeketh a signe but no signe shall be giuen vnto it saue the signe of the Prophet Ionas saith The Scribes and Pharisies approach vnto Christ to require signes and wonders from heauen by the which hee should shew himselfe the true Messias promised in the Law whome hee reprehendeth with sharpe wordes and confoundeth them calling them an euill and adulterous generation and their demaund required no milder wordes but was worthie of such an answere For the comming of the Sonne of God into the world was not so hidden but that it was preuented many ages before and announced by the heauenly Oracles of the Prophets Whereupon I obserued that if the Scribes and Pharsies were reprehended so seuerely for requiring signes from heauen because they had Christ foretold by the Prophets then could I not but assure my selfe that the followers of the Church of Rome are worthie of as great a reprehension euen of the same nature of adulterous generation that after the faith so long planted and begunne with miracles and confirmed by antiquitie boast so much on their owne miracles and strange wonders Doctor Stapleton vpon these words of Christ Iob. 4. Prompt mor. Dom. 20. post Pent. soco 5. Nisi signa prodigia viderit is not creditis Vnlesse you see signes and wonders you beleeue not hath these words worthie of note and obseruation The ruler is checked because that being brought vp amongst the Iewes and instructed in the Law hee would not beleeue by the authoritie of the Scriptures but by signes but expect the extreame daunger of his Sonne that hee might see a signe This was an incredultie almost common to all the Iewes which in another place Christ taxeth most sharpely for certaine of the Scribes and Pharisies comming vnto him and saying Master wee will see a signe of thee Matth. 12. answering hee said vnto them Matth. 16. a wicked and adulterous generation asketh a signe Which words againe hee answered at another time when the Sadduces empted him in like manner and calleth them a wicked and an adulterous generation which seeketh signes because they did euill in tempting God and such an euill was this that they shewed their soules not to bee the true spouses of God by faith but adulterous friends of transitorie things For euen as a wife which truely loueth her husband desireth not to see any extraordinarie signes of her husbands loue towards her as that her husband should as it were cast himselfe into the fire or water for his wiues sake but resteth contented with that true internall loue which hee carrieth her and the common externall signes of a husbands loue towards her So the faithfull soule which by faith and charitie is espoused vnto her God if shee bee such a one doth see so many signes in her selfe the loue of God so vehement and sincere so many embracings of Gods loue towards her so many and frequent sweetnesses from aboue so many daily graces fauours and benefits lastly that peace of her God which passeth all vnderstanding that to seeke other signes for confirmation of her faith in God or the charitie of God towards her she esteemeth it not onely idle but also most impious For as it is an argument of chast loue to cleaue only to God so is it the signe of an adulterous soule in slipperie things to seeke externall signes Further as the ancient Iewes were contented with the signes of their Elders done in the desert in the red sea on mount Sina Deut. 32. in the passage of Iordan according to that Interroga patres tuos dicent tibi Aske thy Fathers and they will tell thee So the Iewes when Christ teacheth and all Christians at this day must be cōtented with the old signes either typically done before Christs comming of which it was not fit the Iewes should be ignorant and chiefely the Scribes and Pharisies and the Princes of the people amongst which this Ruler seemeth to be one or performed by Christ himselfe which are sufficient for our faith Therefore all this curiositie and shew of incredulitie and fornication from God is worthily taxed by Christ either in this Ruler or in the standers by or in both whose hearts he saw By which Lobserued how worthie of reprehension of the Church of Rome is which for confirmation of her doctrine euen vntill his day standeth still vpon miracles as
Christs resurrection which the Angels reporting appeared in white garments The girdle Explicat myst sacr Miss The Girdle wherewith the largenesse of the Albe is tyed about signifieth according to Michael Suffragan of Mets that Christ often tyed his most high and perfect conuersation and so tempered it according to our infirmities and accommodated himselfe vnto our manners that by his actions we might be the better instructed vnto the knowledge of saluation And in another place sayth That it designes how wee ought to restraine the limbes of our minde least chastitie be dissolued with the prouocations of concupiscence Lib. 5. in Leuit. Isychius by the Girdle vnderstandeth fortitude therefore God said vnto Iob. comforting him in his afflictions Accinge vt vir lumbos tuos Girt thy loynes like a man The Manuplo Ibid. The Manuple sayth Michael the Suffragan signifieth the fruit of good workes wherewith we must be comforted when we are exercised with the calamities of this world And in another place hee sayth That it signifieth Christs immunitie from all peruerse and sinister actions But Iacobus de Voragine otherwise sayth De celebrat Missae it signifieth the buckler of faith And Bonauenture sayth The Manuple on the left hand signifieth the humilitie of Christ in this life In exposit myst sacr Miss or else the Manuple on the left hand noteth the combat of Christ for iustice sake The Stole Ibidem The Stole signifieth the voluntarie obedience of Christ as Michael the Suffragan of Mets sayth but Iacobus de Voragine will haue it meane a double-edged sword Iacob de Vor. de celebrat Missae lib. de sacra Altar cap. 10. In exposit myst sacr Missae The Vestment In exposit myst to out both with word and example And Stephanus Eduensis sayth That the Stole signifieth the obedience of the sonne of God but otherwise Bonaventure saith it signifieth the passion of Christ The Vestement saith Michael Suffragan of Mets hath two parts the first part which is the lesser signifieth the Church before Christs Passion the hinder part which is the greater signifieth the people of the Church vnited together after his Passion or otherwise he sayth that it designeth the charitie wherewith all the members of Christ must be conioyned to one the other But Innocentius sayth That the Vestement euery whit entire signifieth the vnitie of Faith Lib. 1. myst Missae c. 58. Germanus sayth it signifieth the Purple Garment which the wicked mocking Iesus put vpon him By these varieties of coniectures about the onely apparell of the Priests that must offer the sacrifice of the masse therein I obserued that there was no one true meaning appoynted by the Church for those ceremonies and that euery man may frame what symbolicall conceits they list vpon them therefore are they vnporofitable and rather to please the simple withshews than with any other assured sense so doth it appeare to be in other the ceremonies of the masse which as they are different in sense so are they ridiculous to practise or to behold The Introite signifieth the Fathers expectation of Christ as Michael Suffragane telleth vs Introite in explic mister mis or if we will beleeue Ioannes de Combis it signifieth the beginning of a good worke and it is doubled because in our beginning we must doe good and decline from euill or if we will giue credite to Germanus it signifieth the comming and entrance of the Sonne of God into this world The nine times repeating Kyrie Eleyson and Christè Eleyson is to the three Persons in Trinity as the chiefest of all prayers for the imploration of Gods mercy as Michael the suffragane of Metz noteth In explic myst sacr mis In comp Theol. verit li. 9. ca. 18. But Iohannes de Combis saith more that is That it signifieth the inuocation of Gods mercy whereof wee stand in neede many wayes the first three for remission of sinnes committed in heart tongue or worke concerning contrition confession satisfaction the second three waies for the grace of faith hope and charitie the third three wayes for glorification whereby wee shall reioyce in God aboue vs in our selues of our selues and for our neighbors about vs. Yet if wee may beleeue Iacobus de Voragine he teacheth that the 9. repetitions are in honor of the nine Orders of Angells In celeb Miss serm 2. which wee honor in such maner that we may attain vnto their societie which are distinguished into three Ternaries or Tertians and are sung 9. times because the Angells are distinguished into 3. Hierarchies or 9. orders Lib. 2. myst mis cap. 19. 4 part q. 37. offic mis 2. but otherwise teacheth Innocentius tertius and Alexander de Ales saying That they are said 9. times against 9. kinds of sins as appeares there at large Part 3. q. 83. art 4. yet if we please to credit Th. Aquinas saying thrice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is for the person of the Father thrice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is for the person of the Son then is added again thrice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the person of the holy ghost against the threefold misery of ignorance Fraction of sin of penalty Now as for the fraction of the hoast into 3. parts Iacobus de Voragine teacheth that this ceremony was ordained by Pope Sergius as Albert. Magnus also thought De celeb mis ser 2. De ritibus eccle cap. lib. 1. de frac sacr Host. De sacra alt cap. 18. but Steph. Durant affirmes that it was instituted long before now wherfore it is thus thrice brokē Steph. Eduensis saith That the heast dedicated to the holy Trinity is diuided into 3. parts wherof the one is put into the chalice and drownd in the bloud for that part of the Church being tossed in the storme of this world which is crossed with many afflictions the other two without the challice are for those whereof the one is of the faithfull which is in purgatorie tried with fire the other of Saints which raigne euerlastingly with Christ But Th. Aquin. otherwise teacheth Part. 3 q. 83. artic 5. that the fraction of the hoast signifies 3. things 1. the diuision of Christs body in his passion 2. the distinction of his mystical body according vnto their diuers estates 3 the distribution of graces proceeding from the passion of Christ Cap 3 eccles Hier. teacheth Yet otherwise may it be vnderstood if we wil beleeue Iac. de Voragine who teacheth that it is broken into 3. parts to shew it is offred to honour the B. Trinity or to shew that in Christ there were 3. substances he flesh the soule and his godhead or to shew that it is offred for the mysticall body of Christ which is diuided into 3. parts of those that are to be saued virgins continent persons and those that are maried Now it is here to be noted how this Author contradicteth himselfe
and wine passe into the substance of the body and bloud of Christ yet so as the nature of bread and wine ceaseth not and they are turned into the diuine substance yet the bread and wine still remaine in the propertie of their nature If this be true that the nature of bread and wine ceaseth not and that the bread and wine still remaine in the propertie of their nature then can not transubstantiation stand For hereby Gelasius confuted Eutiches the Heretike holding that Christ had but one nature and that in regard of the vnion the humanitie was turned into the Deitie against which error he opposed the doctrine of the Eucharist shewing that as therein bread and wine after consecration were honoured with the name of his body and bloud and receiued grace to their nature to bee a holy Sacrament though still they remained in their former nature and propertie So the humanitie of Christ receiued grace by the hypostaticall vniting it to the God-head and yet still retained the former propertie to be humane flesh Therefore had Gelasius beliefe beene answerable to the present Church of Rome concerning Transubstantiation he not only could not thereby haue confuted Eutiches but Eutiches might by that very doctrine most probably haue confuted him Who might right well haue argued thus Thou Gelasius thinkest the Sacrament a resemblance of the incarnation of Christ and the vnion of his two natures but in the Sacrament the bread and wine after consecration remaine no more but are turned into the flesh and bloud of Christ and so there is but one substance After this manner may I likewise say in the Incarnation after the vnion the humanitie remaineth no more but is changed into the Diuinitie and the Nature is but one What could Gelasius haue answered to this Argument if hee had held the doctrine of Transubstantiation Hence it is euident both by his wordes and the scope of his disputation that he held it not Not vnlike to Gelasius is the doctrine of Theodoret Dial. immuta fol. 8. writing thus Our Sauiour in deliuering the Sacrament called his body bread and that which is in the cup he called his bloud he changed the names and gaue his body that name which belonged to the signe and to the signe that name which belonged to his body The reason why he thus changed the names was because he would haue such as partake the diuine Sacraments not to heede the nature of those thinges which are seene but for the change sake of the names to beleeue the change that is made by grace For he called it wheat and bread which by nature is his body and againe on the other side he called himselfe a Vine Thus honoring the simbols and signes which are seen with the name of his body bâ—oud not by changing their nature but by adding grace to nature And further the same Author in an other place reprehending the Eutichian heretike saith Dialog 2. Inconfusus You are caught in your owne net for the mysticall signes after consecration do not depart from their nature but they abide in their former substance form and figure and may be seen touched as before If they depart not from their nature if they abide in their former substance figure and forme if Christ changed not the natures but the names adding grace to nature how can the doctrine of transubstantiation in the iudgement of this writer stand free from the impeachment of an erroneous innouation 7. How moderne Authors of the Church of Rome shew the doctrine of transubstantiation to be nouell De verit corp sang p. 46. And so I find euen by the confession of the learnedst moderne Writers this doctrine is but nouell and of small antiquitie and hath not been beleeued as a matter of faith in the purest ages of the Primitiue Church for it is well knowne that before the Councell of Laterane no man was bound to beleeue Transubstantiation as themselues confesse Tonstal sayth It was free for all men till that time to follow their owne coniecture as concerning the manner of the Presence Scotus and Biel are reported by the later Schoolemen to haue been of minde That the opinion is very new and lately brought into the Church Soto 4. d 9. q. 2. art 2. 4. Suar. tom 3. d. 5.4 d. 10. q. 2. ad arg pro prima sect 1. and beleeued only vpon the authoritie of the Laterance Councell And Scotus himselfe saith We must say the Church in the Creede of the Laterane Councell vnder Innocent the third which begins with the words Firmiter credimus declared this sense concerning transubstantiation to belong to the verity of our faith Besides Scotus Bellarmine confesse Scot. d. 11. q. 3. Bellar. Euchar. lib. 3. cap. 23. Turrec tract 13. q. 49. There is no Scripture to conuince it vnlesse yee bring the Church of Romes exposition that is to say the Popes authoritie in whom they thinke the power of the vniuersall Church in determining matters of faith principally resides Now therefore if this doctrine bee no more ancient than the Councell of Laterane as it is cleare I oppose against the accurse of the Councell of Trent the malediction of blessed Saint Paul a better man than any in the Councell of Trent who pronounceth a direfull Anathema against any that shall teach other doctrine than what he taught how fearefull a state then doe all Popish Priests stand in that teach this noueltie of Transubstantiation diametrally contrarie to the places of S. Paul before cited 1. Cor. 10.16 1. Cor. 11.26 Vers 27. Vers 28. Euagrius 4. lib. Hist c. 35. Niceph. lib. 17. cap. 25. Hiesich l 2. super Leuit. cap. 8. Euseb lib. 7. c. 8. August cont lit Petil. lib. 9. c. 30. It is well knowne that it was an vsuall thing in former ages in diuers places to giue the residues of the Sacrament to little children as Euagrius and Nicephorus haue left recorded to posteritie Yea and in other places of the Christian world as Hesichius teacheth neither hath it beene thought much in former times to giue the bread of the Sacrament into the peoples handes and sometimes permitted them to carry it home which is a signe that they conceipted not then the doctrine of Transubstantiation which hath caused it since to be adored and haue made it a sinnefull act for Lay people to touch the Sacrament yea and haue brought it to such a fond esteeme that if a Flie or a Spider fall into the wine or any like thing which can not without vomit or danger of death be taken downe the Flie or Spider or what else must be taken out and washed as warily as may be in a Chalice and the Priest must take the ablution but the Flie or Spider must be burnt Ibidem eodem cap. Or if a sick man vomit vp the body of the Lord it must bee taken vp againe as diligently as may be and taken by a
hold of the Popes Indulgences grounded vppon the couetousnesse of Popes and drew them to employ their studies more in gathering together temporall wealth than the riches of Gods graces and true knowledge of the Scriptures For hence and from this source only hath flowed diuers points of doctrine now currant in Rome more tending to the amplification and enlarging of his temporall Kingdome than the Kingdome of Christs Church amongst which the doctrine of Pardons and Indulgences is not the least profitable for the filling vp of the Popes cofers and giuing contentment to his auaricious desires arguing the great spirituall blindnesse God hath permitted him to fall into in punishment of the detestable sinne 2. Indulgences disproued by their definitions Now this obseruation hauing auerted my minde from the Church of Rome with diuers others and laied open vnto my soule the most foule abhominations of that Church for the better explication of her erroneous doctrine concerning Indulgences and Pardons I must shew thee curteous Reader how this auersion grew in mee by the examination and studie of truth First I beganne to examine the true nature of these Romish Indulgences and Pardons by the definition of them which I found in Cardinall Bellarmine to be thus expressed Lib. 5. de poenit cap. 2. Indulgences saith he are the remissions of paines which are to be endured after the remission of faults granted vnto the faithfull for a reasonable cause by the high Bishops out of a Fatherly lenitie and condescention Ioannes Viguerius the great Scholler of Spaine calleth Indulgence Ioan. Viguer Instit Christi cap. 16. vers 29. A distribution of the treasure or an application of the penalties of the supererogation of Christ or of his Saints for the remission of paines due for passed sinnes made by him that ruleth the Vniuersall Church with iudgement of discretion Siluester their best Summist for cases of conscience defineth it thus The Ecclesiasticall Indulgence Siluest verb. Jndulgentia num 3. is a donation of some thing taken out of the spirituall treasure of the Church made vnto a sinner that hee may satisfie God the creditour of his paines Thus these learned men of Rome write of the nature of Indulgences Whereupon first I note out of Bellarmine that these pardons are not to bee granted without a reasonable cause and according to Viguerius with iudgement of discretion yet notwithstanding this is contradicted by Emanuel Sa the Iesuite who saith That some say an Indulgence giuen without cause is of value Verbo Indulgen num 1. Bonauent 4. d. 20.2 part q. vlt. Solu 4. d. 21. q. 2. art 2. others doe not onely require a iust cause but such a cause as is proportionable to the Indulgence I but Sa himselfe peremptorily affirmeth I thinke no doubt to be made of an Indulgence giuen from the Pope Where I note this man to be more the Popes Friend than the rest who whether the Pope with iust cause or without iust cause graunt an Indulgence hee approues it and further I obserue a great difference amongst the Romish Writers in this point and therefore no credit to bee giuen to those that so much disagree in the cause why Indulgences should bee graunted Secondly I note out of Siluester that the subiect of Indulgences is a sinner I meane as hee saith it is graunted to a sinner and yet this seemeth to bee contradicted by him and others who saith Hee that is not in Gods grace obtaineth not Indulgence Sil. Lerb Indulg 5. Tho. 3. p. q. 27. art 1. Solu 4. d. 21. q. 2. a. 3. Adrian 4. de Indulgent col 13. Concl. 3. Thirdly I obserue moreouer that whereas the Pope graunteth Indulgences oftentimes both from sinne and paine which now is growne ordinarie hee crosseth the Doctrine of these Authours who in the definition of an Indulgence make mention onely of remission of paine and not of the sinne for according to their owne Doctrine else where both mortall and veniall sinnes are taken away by the Sacrament of Penance as the proper subiect and matter of their Sacramentall absolution 3. Now for the establishment of this doctrine of Indulgences The Scripture abused about Indulgences they haue no Scripture as farre as I can perceiue of any force which hath made the Reformed Churches to tearme these Papall Indulgences pious frauds of the faithfull inuentions and impostures and his Maiestie discouering as much iustly to reckon them amongst the trash depending vpon Purgatorie To Christ. Mon. f. 43. not worth the talking of yet doe they not sticke to bee so presumptuous as to alleage Scriptures most indiscreetly for their doctrine as namely Ioannes Viguerius doeth as if hee had got a great victorie against the Reformed Churches in this point prouing the name of Indulgence to bee found in the Prophet Esay his wordes which he citeth are these Notwithstanding to conuince their ignorance Instit Christ c 6. § 6. vers 19. and vnbridled boldnesse wee must shewe the name Indulgence expresly to bee found in the sacred Letters in the same sense the Church vseth And this chiefly in Esay the Prophet where in the Person of Christ hee saith The Spirit of the Lord vpon mee in that hee hath annointed mee Hee sent mee to announce vnto the meeke to heale the contrite of heart to Preach Indulgence vnto Captiues releasement to those that are shut vp and so it can not bee denyed that the name of Indulgence in the sacred Letters is not to bee found And that Esay wrote according to the intention which the Church vseth Christ the Lord hath declared in S. Luke where it is said Luc. 4. that when vpon the Sabaoth hee entred the Synagogue of Nazareth hee rose vp to reade and the Booke of the Prophet Esay was deliucred vnto him and turning the Booke he found the place where it was written the Spirit of the Lord vpon me for that he hath annointed me hee hath sent mee to Euangelize to the poore to heale the contrite of heart to Preach remission to Captiues behold how the name Indulgence Christ interpreteth remission But of what Indulgence spake Esay truly of sinnes for the pardoning and remitting of which Christ was sent by God the Father and because in sinne there are two thinges to wit the fault and the paine the remission of the fault and also the remission of the paine is rightly called Indulgence But the Church as is said taketh Indulgence for the application of penalties of supererogations of Christ and his Saints by which paines are remitted therefore nothing is more manifest than that the name of Indulgence is found in the sacred Letters according to the intention which the Church vseth Here I see a braue proofe of a vaunting Spaniard who with his Spanish Brauadoes thinks to haue conquered but I beleeue when hee shall haue found the strength and truth of his encounterers whom hee termeth Heretiques if he were now aliue he would say as I
ground of them in all rpobabilitie than that the Popes being desirous to enrich themselues with money haue deuised them for the emptying of mens purses throughout all Kingdomes subiected to his vsurping authority like Boniface the ninth of whom it is written That he sent into diuers Kingdomes his Treasurors with Pardons Theod. a mem de scismat lib. 1. ca. 68. pag. 20. who extoried thereby very great summes of money from the simple people that in some one Pronince they would get together aboue an hundred thousand florens and released all sinnes to them that confessed vnto them without anie penaunce Therefore as I said in the beginning anarice caused spirituall blindenesse in Popes and blindenesse as a punishment confirmeth them more and more in their errors 6 Is it not strange considering all reason to bee against this doctrine of Indulgences that the Church of Rome will by her comminations still curse those that embrace it not as the Councell or Trent doth all those That affirme them to bee vnprofitable Ses 25. decret de Indulgentijs or denie anie power to be in the Church to graunt them What shall not as I said before the bloud of Christ as well take away the temporall paine due vnto sinne as the eternall or is not his satisfaction infinite what neede then the superfluous satisfaction of Saints 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Did the auncient Church euer speake of other Pardons than of the Pardons of outward penances which ere enioyned for publique satisfaction of the Church Hath not Christ fatisfied for the whole world what neede then of the satisfactions of Saints what more than Indulgences instilleth a vaine securitie into the soules of men and ouerthroweth the foundations of all true contrition is not Gods forgiuesse and remission expressed with an Omne debitum dimisi tibi Matth. 18.32 I haue forgiuen thee all thy debt if euerie debt why not aso the debt of temporall paine if an exception can be shewed why is it not made manifest Now iudge beloued Reader whether heere bee not sufficient reason to make mee or anie other say farewell vnto the Romish Church that thus enthralleth soules prophaneth the bloud of Christ disableth the Sacraments and picketh mens purses by the deuised doctrine of her Ecclesiasticall Indulgences Deere Iesu pardon my former fault make mee see better heereafter let mee with true compunction for this errour say with the holy Prophet Dauid Erraui sicut ouis quae perijt quaere seruum tuum I haue gone astray like a lost sheepe seeke thy seruant O Lord Psalme 119. verse 176. CHAP. XVI Containing an obseruation about the number of seuen Sacraments admitted by the Church of Rome IN my trauels in the Low-countries I haue often smiled to see how the people in those parts Vaine is the terrors of Romish curses against the truth in a faire corne-field to driue away crowes and other birds from the corne will most artificially frame the reprefentation of a terribleman standing ouer the corne with a grimme countenance and with bow and arrowes drawne vp to the head to the great terror of all birds that none may approach as if forthwith he would hit all that came neare So likewise when I confider how the Church of Rome vseth the shew of terrors and comminations to keepe Christians from feeding vpon the wholesome truthes and verities growing in the spacious fields of Gods word I find much cause of laughter to see shee should thinke men endued with reasonable soules should haue so little sense as not to discouer her vaine scare-crowes of curses and excommunications which are only terrible in words and iust nothing in effect but counterfeit terrors without hurt or harme as for example she makes a great shew in words concerning the number of seuen Sacraments as if she would shoot euery one to the quicke that will be so venterous as to approach vnto the field of Scriptures to know the truth thereof her threatning shew is this Concil trid sess 7. desacra in genere Can. 1. If any shall say that all the sacraments of the new Law were not instituted by Iesus Christ our Lord or that there are more or fewer then seuen viz. Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extreame-unction Order and Matrimonie or also any one of these seuen not to be truly and properly a Sacrament be hee accursed Heere is the definitiue sentence of the Church of Rome casting you out of her Synagogue if you gainesay her decree it is curiositie with her and great presumption to examine her doctrine you must not be so hold as to taste of the sweet and most pleasant fruits of Gods word the arrow is drawne vp to the head against you the terror of Anathema must put you to flight Christs doctrine must be no longer the little graine of mustard-seed growne vp aboue all hearbs for his faithfull birds to sit vpon the boughs therof this scar-crow Anathema must put all to flight 2 But those that are wise and iu siciall doe discouer the vanity of this frightful spectacle Those that are wise discouer the vanitie of them with the Berraeans they will examine the Popes doctrine by the Scriptures as they did Saint Pauls they will follow the directions of Doctor Stapleton who appointeth also a meane to trie the doctrine of false teachers by antiquitie euen for all the common sort of people They will as a great Doctor and Champion of the Popes said to me once find that it had been better that the Pope had left many of the doctrines of the Councell of Trent vndefined because so many new Anathemaes makes the world begin to suspect that the Popes labour more to subiect people vnto them by terrors then by truth as men doe children who to keepe them in awe will tell them of Hobgoblins and Robin-good-fellowes such like that wil fetch them away if they bee vnruly and leaue not their crying Which policie my selfe partly obseruing to be vsed by the Church of Rome euen in a moderne example of Paul the fifth his Breue against the oath of alleageance thinking only by the bare words declaratiue without any one reason alleaged for the vnlawfulnes in taking it other then his owne plaine assertion to strike such a terror both into his owne children and into the King and State as if none would dare to gain-say it but blessed be almightie God who hath so communicated the beames of his vnspeakable wisdome vnto him and his loyall subiects yea and vnto many of the Popes owne children who were long seduced by his pretended inerrable power that they dare not onely beleeue the contrarie but also openly auouch it to the world and ioyne foot to foot in defence thereof both with pen and sword if need be howsoeuer the Iesuites would thinke themselues aduantaged if both sides should come to this latter encounter but I trust God out of his mercie will dispose of milder courses more manife sting therein his
confession to the elder of the two and chiefly in respect of his authoritie The next morning shee went to him desiring him to heare her confession who being willing bad his companion to withdraw himselfe a little a side which he did yet sometimes casting his eies towardes them he perceiued that at euery sinne the Lady confessed a Toade went out of her mouth but being at last neare the point of confessing her most odious and detestable sinne where with her soule was charged for feare and shame shee durst not expresse it whereupon the yong religious Frier who stood at the end of the Chappell saw all the mentioned Toades returne againe into her mouth Soone after these two religious men departed and being vpon the way the yongest beganne to tell the elder that which hee had scene when the Lady was at confession with him wherby the elder vnderstood that the same Lady A strange tale about a Ladie not confessing all her sinnes willingly and to her knowledge had concealed some sinne which shee had not confessed who forthwith returned backe againe vnto her to admonish her to looke well to her conscience but alas hee found her dead And as hee praied to God for her three daies together at length shee appeared vnto him with a chaine of redde hot yron about her necke with two Serpents embracing her and sucking her breasts with two Toades in her cies from her mouth and nostrills issued forth fire and brimstone and about the haire of her head there were a great number of Lizardes who said vnto him O Father I am that accursed and miserable woman that two daies since made a confession vnto you but because I did willingly conceale the sinne of Adulterie and Incest behold I am damned for euer With that the Confessarius adiured her by the liuing God to declare two thinges vnto him first the signification and meaning of these diuers paines Vnto whom shee answered that the Lizards crawling about her head were for the punishment of the dressings shee wore about her head the two Toades which couered hereies were the punishment of her wanton and lasciuious lookes the flaming darts were for punishment of her detractions defamations foule and dishonest songs and speeches The two Serpents which sucke my breasts signifie the foule touchings which haue beene committed vpon mee The crueltie of the Dogges that deuoure my handes are punishments for mine owne vnchast touchings of my selfe and for that I haue giuen presents vnto my Louers out of the goodes wherewith I might haue relecued the poore Seruants of CHRIST IESVS I am seated vpon this Dragon that putteth mee to vnspeakable paine and torment burning my legges and thighes in punishment of all my wicked deedes Then the Penitentiarius willed her to expound his other doubt namely for what sinnes men of these times were principally damned Shee answered that men went downe to Hell for all manner of sinnes but women chiefly for foure sorts of sinnes for the sinne of luxurie for their sinnes of vaine apparell and painting for witch-craft and for their shame to confesse their sinnes And so when shee had said thus much the Dragon with a wonderfull great noise raised vp himselfe and carried her to hell where shee remaineth in endlesse torments If this were a true storie no doubt it would make much for auricular confession but the cause of suspition is that there is no place named where this should happen or where this Ladie dwelt besides it standeth onely vpon the bare relation of a Frier which kinde of people are by many much suspected of forgerie in such deuises and lying miracles which often the very circumstances of them doe discouer to be false Is it likely that she who had long concealed her sinnes would haue gone at all to confession vnlesse shee had purposed to open them he being a stranger and vnknowne But the storie may serue in Friers iudgements to terrifie poore women withall as the Popes Anathemaes doe terrifie many men who stand more in feare of them than of Gods threatnings But sweet Iesus keepe men from beleeuing such lying wonders and giue them grace not to giue eare to any thing not warranted in Scriptures or iustified by antiquitie and as thou hast mercifully led me from beleeuing such lyes so of the same goodnesse impart also the shining beames of truth vnto others and graunt that thy onely two Sacraments Baptisme and the holy Eucharist iustituted by thy selfe may haue their due esteeme and other institutions to be esteemed not as Sacraments but as matters profitable for vse and fit to be practised in the Church CHAP. XVII Containing an obseruation about the doctrine of the Virgine Maries conception in originall sinne ALbeit I finde that God is to be glorified for the great vertues and priuiledges he bestoweth vpon his Saints and chiefest seruants The doctrine of the Virgine Maries immunitie from originall sinne doth derogate from the honor of God yet it is to be done with such moderation and carefull discretion that whilest wee glorifie him in them we be warie not to attribute more vnto the Saints than will stand with the condition of seruants in giuing that glorie which is due to the master vnto his inferiors for although God himselfe haue said Whosoeuer shall honor me 1. Reg. I will glorifie him so hath he also left it recorded from his owne mouth I will not giue my glorie vnto any other Whence it followeth that although God haue bestowed such rare and singular priuiledges and prerogatiues vpon the virgine Marie the mother of Christ as he hath not done the like to any creature whatsoeuer insomuch that she her selfe knowing and feeling the happinesse of them said All generations shall call me blessed 1. Luc. 47. because he hath done me great fauors who is powerfull and holy be his name which is to be fulfilled amongst all good Christians regarding the word of God because she was blessed indeed aboue all women for the blessed fruit of her womb as S. Elizabeth said who being the Redeemer of the world brought benediction and ouercame the diuell the anthor of all malediction Yet ought not any be so much transported with an ouer-deeming affection and iudgement to this virgin as to giue her such glory as surpasseth the nature of a creature descended from Adam and onely may be giuen to Christ Iesus greater in glorie than his mother who being God and man was her Sauior because he came to saue all which benefit she acknowledged her selfe most thankfully in her Canticle saying My spirit hath exulted in God my Sauior 2 And I doe most plainely obserue by the Scriptures And it is most repuguant to Gods word Rom. 8. Tho. 12. q. 81. that she was to be conceiued as well as others in originall sinne for all mankind sinned in Adam S. Paule saying Death passed to all in whom all sinned And Thomas Aquinas sayth According to the Catholike faith it is firmely to be
is a Sacrament since neither hee nor any other can shew any such institution But it followeth by him notwithstanding that as I my selfe haue cited the afore said place of Genesis it well prooueth the state of marriage to haue beene ordayned by GOD. For which as the Scripture saith a man shall forsake his father and mother Verse 29 and hee shall cleaue vnto his wife and they shall bee two in one flesh 3 Which first institution was renued by Christ when he said Haue yee not read Diuers reasons grounded vppon the Scriptures for the approbation of priests marriages Matth 19. Hebr. 13.14 that hee which did make from the beginning made them male and female and hee said for this cause man shall leaue father and mother and shall cleaue to his wife and they two shall be in one flesh That therefore which God hath ioyned together let no man separate And the same Institution is Declared to be honourable among all men and their bodies vndefiled if therefore among all men then also among Priests if it were honourable for respect of the Author that ordained it which was GOD himselfe why shall it not also bee honourable for his Priests If it were honorable in the time of innocencie before it was decayed why should it not be honorable in the time of grace wherein man is repaired as wel for Priests as others if it were honourable because it was ordained in Paradise the happiest place of the world why shall it not also be honourable in the Church of Christ amongest Church-men who honour God in the happiest places that is in the Churches ordayned to Gods honour besides since God the Sonne honoured the state of mariage with his presence at Canaan of Galilee where hee wrought the first miracle that euer he did turning water into wine with his praiers comparing the kingdome of God to a wedding and holinesse to a wedding garment why should wee thinke that Christ will not be well pleased that his Priests should honor that state with their owne persons is not increase multiplication of children which is one principall end of marriage as honorable a blessing in Priests as in others or is not the inconuenience of solitarinesse signified in these words It is not good for man to bee alone that is without a helpe and comfort which is an other end of marriage as fit for Priests as for Lay peopleâ— or is it not as fit that Priests should haue a remedy for fornication aswel as other men taketh their preshood from them the nature of men or can their dignities in the Church of God giue them leaue to liue lasciuiously in a single life are all Priests assured that during their liues they shall alwayes enioy the gift of continencie or is it absolutely in mans power to haue it or not to haue it why then doth S. Paul say Quipotest capere capiat he that can take it let him take it no no they haue as much neede of such a helpe as any other How comes it that many yea most of the Clergy in the country of Liege and diuers other places keep concubines what is the cause that most of the Priests of Brittaine haue also their bedfellows liuing in the house with them in the state of whoredome but their want of mariage whence so many deâ—â—ourings of virgins so many fornicatioÌ„s so many adulteries so many bestialities recorded by diuers authors amoÌ„g Clergy men in the church of Rome but the want of this remedie instituted by God practised in the old Lawe by the holiest as Henoch Noah Abraham Dauid Ezechiel Aaron and other high Priests approoued by Christ called honourable by S. Paul amongest all men What is not the doctrine of S. Paul to be approoued who alloweth the marriage and the bed vndefiled to all men excluding none when he saith 1. Cor. 7.2 Because of fornication let euerie man haue his owne wife Here we see marriage is prescribed a remedy for euerie man 4 And if wee looke into the practise of the Primitiue Church The new Testament maketh for the marriage of Priests we shall find the same remedy to haue beene vsed without checke or controule May we thinke that S. Paul excluded Priests when hee said 1. Cor. 9. It is better to marry than to burne Doth his Doctrine debarre Priests of marriage when hee saieth If thou takest a wife thou sinnest not 1. Cor. 28. Doth not Saint Paul sharpely reprooue them that shall forbid marriages when hee saieth In the latter dayes some shall depart from the faith and shall giue heede vnto spirites of errour Note this and doctrines of diuells which speake lies through hypocrisie and haue their consciences burned with a hot yron forbidding to marrie 1. Tim. 4.1.2 3. By diuers of my former Chapters I haue shewed the Church of Rome to haue departed from her former faith now it is apparent they teach doctrine of diuells because they forbid Priests to marrie and teach the Doctrine to bee good Is it to bee thought that Saint Paul did not allow Priests to marrie when hee said A Bishoppe must be vnreprooueable the husband of one wife hauing children vnder obedience with all honest 1. Timoth 3.2.4 And when hee said Let Deacons be the husbands of one wife and such as can rule their children well and their owne housholde 1. Timothy 3.12 Can it bee said that Saint Paul doeth not approoue marriage in Priests and Deacons when he alloweth them one wife children and housholde to haue care of What may bee probably inferred vpon the wordes of Saint Paul to the Philippians the last chapter translated by the Rhemists thus I beseech thee my sincere companion By occasion of which words Cardinall Bellarmine saith that it is more probable Saint Paul had no wife Clem. Alexand. 3 stromat Ignatius epist ad Philadelph against Clemens Alexandrinus and Ignatius in some Editions who holde he had a wife which standeth well with the translation of the Church of England saying My faithfull yoake fellow I will not stand much vpon this place leauing the probabilitie thereof to the Reader But sure I am that Saint Peter had a wife for Saint Matthew saith Matth. 8.14 That our Sauiour entred into Saint Peters house and sawe his wifes mother I trow this is plaine enough that he had a wife It is left also recorded That Philip the Euangelist which was one of the sâ—auen Deacons had foure daughters virgins which did prophesie Acts 21.8 9. Ignatius the disciple of Saint Iohn Euangelist writing to the Philadelphians Ignat. ad Philadelph maketh report That Peter Paul and other Apostles were married Clemens Alexandrinus writing against those that reprooued marriage Ecclesiast hist libr. 3 cap. 3â— amongst other things speaketh thus What doe they reprooue the Apostles Peter and Philip had wiues and they gaue also their daughters in marriage to men Neyther doth Saint Paul the Apostle thinke
vncleannesse I haue read also that Gregorie Nazianzen Gregor Nazian Bishop for the funerall of his father who was a Bishop and of his Gorgonia that he made most learned sermons in which it is manifest to be seene with what holinesse the Bishops and Ministers of the Churches liued in the state of wedlocke I find further that Saint Iohn Chrysostome vpon those words of Esay I saw the Lord sitting Chrysost hom 4. speaketh most honorablie of the marriage of the Apostles and Apostolicall men Who also saith in another of Saint Philogonius that he was an aduocate In orat de S. Philogonio but afterward was made a Bishop and in time of his being Bishop had a lawfull wise and a daughter I obserue also that Saint Hierome seemeth to insinuate In 6. cap. Pauli ad Ephesios that till his time Bishops and Priests were married according to the Apostles meaning Let Bishops and Priests reade this saith he who bring vp their children in ecular learning and make them to reade Comedies and to sing the lasciuious writings of Iesters being bred vp perhaps with Ecclesiasticall reuenues And alittle after Heli the Priest himselfe was holy yet because he instructed not his children in all discipline and correction he fell downest it to the ground and so died Distinct 37. Canone legunt Which words are to be seene in the Canon law I find also Saint Ambrose to say that the integrity of the bodie is to be wished for by vs which of counsell I perswade Quaest 32. ca. 1. integritas and not out of power do command For virginitie alone is that which may be perswaded and may not be commanded it is a matter rather of wish then of precept Which words do not a little tâ—xe them that enact lawes to make men liue single liues neither are Saint Chrysostomes words vnlike vnto those of Saint Ambrose Hom. 10. in epist ad Iimoth who treating of the marriage of Priests speaketh most plainly saying It is lawfull for him that will honestly to embrace marriage for as riches doe difficultly lead into the kingdome of heauen yet many rich men haue often entered thither euen so marriages though they haue many difficulties in them yet they may be so vsed as not to be any impediment to perfection of life Who in another place speaketh more plainly vpon those words of Saint Paul Whosoeuer without fault is a man of one wife Chrysost hom 2. in epist ad Tit. saith thus The Apostle intendeth to stop her mouthes of Heretikes that condemne marriage shewing that thing to want fault yea to be soprecious that therewith also any bodie may be promoted vnto the holy seat of a Bishop I find further that Primasius a disciple of Saint Augustine as some hold where the Aostle prescribeth what kind of children Bishops children ought to be doth not obscurely handle this matter Primas super verba Apostoli when he saith He that hath not knowne how to instruct a few children how shall he gouerne so many children of God that is all the people Neither are Histories of antiquitie wanting to proue the marriages of Priests Eusebius hath left recorded that Polycrates Bishop of the Ephesians maketh mention of seuen of his predecessors Euseb eccles Hist lib. 5. c. 24. of whom he was borne who in order were Bishops and himselfe to haue been the eight Whose words also Saint Hierome reporteth who liued in the timne of Seuerus In lib. de scripto eccles Hist eccles lib. 6. cap. 42. The same Author likewise hath left recorded that Cheremon Bishop of Nilus a towne of Egyyt with his aged wife was banished for Christ which Author maketh mention also of diuers other married Bishops I haue found that Spiridion Bishop of Tremithunth a husband-man also in the Bishopricke of the Cyprians Hisotr Tripartit lib. 〈◊〉 cap. cap. 10. and a shepheard of sheepe had wife and children neither for that was he the lesse famous for Diuine matters I haue read also that Eupsychius of Caesaria in Capadocea Priest Histor tripartii lib. 5. cap. 14. when hee was but newly married at that time to haue ended his life with a glorious martyrdome Many others might be alleaged and this was the custome of the ancient Church in the East many out of their owne free will euen Bishops abstained Tripartit hist lib. 9. cap. 38. and many of them also in time of their Bishoprickes by their lawfull wiues had children Neither was it the custome in the East but also in the West Church Hilarie Bishop of Pictauia is well knowne and is reported by many to haue been married The words of Damasus are plaine who saith Exquadam Epist ad diuum Hieron Osâ—us Pope was the sonne of Steuen a Subdeacon Boniface Pope was the sonne of Iucundus Priest de titulo fasciolae Agapetus Pope the sonne of Gordian Priest Theodorus Pope the sonne of Theodorus Bishop of the citie of Hierusalem Siluerius Pope sonne of Hormista Bishop of Rome Deusdedit Pope son of Iucundus Priest Felix the third a Romane sonne of Felix Priest who was his father Gelasius an Africane was borne of his father Valerius Bishop and many other are found who haue gouerned the Apostolicall sea that were borne of Priests Thus much saith Damasus Pope who was Bishop of the Church of Rome about the yeare of our Lord 380. and a little after Gratianus ad canonem Cenomanensem addeth that they were borne in lawfull marriages which then were euery where free for Priests I omit to speake of Nicholas the first who would not trouble the Bulgarian Priests for marriage but suffered them quietly to liue in that estate Rescriptum eius ad Bulgaros dist 28. canone consulendum who liued about the yeare of our Lord 866. And so I ouer-passe many other Popes after his time who were sonnes to Bishops and Priests as might easily be proued out of Platina who writeth their liues By all which proofes both out of holy Fathers and ancient Historiographers I find the state of marriages iustifiable before God and man 7 Now when the law came in that debarred them of this priuiledge and honorable estate it is easily to be discouered The Prohibition of Priests marriages when it came into the Church of Rome to haue bin in the time of Siricius the Bishop of Rome 380. yeares after Christ before which time it was beleeued and practised that Priests might haue wiues as freely as other men and Siricius was the first that forbad it I find first that before his time Priests exercised their functions being married men Aduers haeres verb. Sacerdot haeres 4. asis acknowledged by Alphonsus who writeth that in the Primitiue Church it was obserued that he which was maried might be promoted to Priest-hood though it were not required of him that he should first be married he addeth that this eustome preuailed till the times of the Nycene Councell