Selected quad for the lemma: saint_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
saint_n body_n member_n mystical_a 1,656 5 10.4255 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
B12489 A persvvasion to the English recusants, to reconcile themselues to the Church of England Written for the better satisfaction of those which be ignorant. By Iohn Doue Doctor of Diuinitie. Dove, John, 1560 or 61-1618. 1603 (1603) STC 7085; ESTC S110110 29,134 40

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

man So then as it was not Saint Peters conscience but the errour of his conscience when he refused the meates as vncleane which God had sanctified and made lawfull so it is not their conscience but the error of their conscience that they refuse vs for schisme heresie which indeed are true gospellers and members of the mysticall body of Iesus Christ as by Gods assistance I wil proue And as the Disciples not knowing of Pauls Act. 9. conuersation were afraide to ioyne with him supposing him to be a persecuter when he was a Preacher so they feare to ioyne with vs supposing vs to be in the wrong way whereas indeed we be in the right And because I haue saide it is not vpon conscience that they sequester themselues from vs I will shew them how many wayes a mans conscience may erre and be deceiued and so carried away from the truth and they are these eight following The first is ignorance so the common sort ignorantly alledge we are heretikes that our religion is not warrantable but cannot know what heresie is neither yet rightly conceiue the groundes either of our religion of their owne For they are inhibited to heare our Sermons Vide Cōcil Trid. Pref. in indicem expurg Greg. Mart. de schis to reade our bookes to haue conference with vs or to be catechized by vs. How then should they knowe our religion They are nourished in blindnesse by their owne teachers which hold it as a principle that it is fit they should be ignorant Neither are they permitted to haue the Bible in their mother tongue How then can they know their owne religion They are vnfurnished and vtterly destitute of all meanes and helpes which may bring them to be able to discerne truth from heresie The second is negligence So they which in some measure are learned doo call vs heretikes which can but doo not reade our bookes although they haue them nor examine the groundes which wee hold although they are able and it is permitted vnto them Concerning their owne doctrine they are contented to receiue it for truth vpon the credit of others without further proofe and to see with other mens eyes heare with other mens eares speake with other mens tongues because they will not spend so much time as to search further and what slaunder soeuer they doo heare of vs they are readie to beleeue it For example Edm. Cāp rat 1. Campion slandereth our Church as if we did offer violence to the holy scriptures affirming that Luther wrote contumeliously of Saint Iames his Epistle his disciples blush not to report the same because hee hath written it without further enquirie whether hee writ the truth or not whereas if they would but vouchsafe to examine the place for their owne satisfaction they would finde it a slaunder which they because of their slouthfulnesse do holde for a truth They are contented to buy Campion alone and Gregorie Martine his Preface with the notes of the Seminaries of Rhemes vpon the New Testament and now and then to reade them But as for Doctor Whitaker his answere many of them suffer it not to be in their studies or if it bee in the Catalogue of their liberarie they do not reade it And as for doctor Fulkes answere to Gregorie Martines Preface and the notes of the Seminaries they are so farre from conferring the one with the other that so they might be satisfied and resolued of the truth as they are contented to giue more mony for the Rhemish Testament alone then for the same booke with Doctor Fulkes answer ioyned with it The third is obstinacie For as the first cannot because they be ignorant and vnable to iudge and depriued of all meanes by which they may be enabled and the second do not iudge rightly because they are slouthfull and loth to take so much paines as to trie the spirites to examine doctrine and conferre places So the third sort of men will not vnderstand the truth because they be obstinate they will resist the holy Ghost and stop their eares against the truth as the adder doth against the charmer and as the Iewes did against Saint Stephen Wee shall not perswade Act. 7. them although wee doo perswade them because instruction and Rom. 10. faith commeth by hearing they wil not heare least they should be instructed and beleeue the truth They say their fathers professed that religion and therefore they will rather erre with their fathers Gen. 31. than embrace the truth with vs like Rachel which would not leaue behinde her the gods of her Father but carrie them with her They were brought vp and instructed in this religion from their childhood and now they say they will not alter They 1. Thes 5. forgot the rule of the Apostle which willeth them to make tryall of all and then to hold that which is best For they will heare none they will holde what they haue held and they will not alter for the better And in so doing what do they but as Pharao Exod. 5. did who saide Who is the Lord that I should heare his voice and let Israel goe I know not the Lord neither will I let Israel goe Whereas the Prophet saith To day if ye will heare his voice Psal 95. harden not your hearts The fourth is perplexitie vnstayednesse and trouble of mind like vnto Saule which after he had put away the Sorcerers and 1. Sam. 28. Soothsayers out of the Land yet when he was terrified by the armie of the Philistines seeing it to be very great and could haue no answere from God neither by dreames nor Vrim nor Prophets asked counsell of a Witch at Endor So diuers which haue renounced that religion and imbraced ours yet lying at the point of death in the midst of their conflicts and tentations thinking vpon the arguments which are brought on each side and fearing to halt betweene two opinions and so die vnresolued because they haue not had at that instant conference with such as were able Gen. 19. to resolue them of all their doubts haue suddenly reuolted and not onely followed the example of Lots wife which looked backe vnto Sodome but also of the people which haue saide come let vs goe backe into Aegipt againe The fift is pride and their owne insolencie whereby they are puffed vp and thinke that all men must be subiect vnto them Num. 14. but they neede submit themselues vnto none As Bernardinus Ochinus writ a Booke in defence of Poligamie affirming that numerosum coniugium multitude of wiues was lawfull supposing that after his Maister Peter Martyr was dead no man was able to match him in writing or in disputation like Golias of Gath which 1. Sam. 17 challenged all commers to the combat And this is the speciall cause why Popes and generall Councels doe erre because they hold it as a principle in their Diuinitie that they cannot erre For