when before Constantinople wrote her selfe the chiefe of all Sigebertus Gemblacensis an other of their monkes writeth in this expresse maner Post quem Bonifacius Romanae ecclesiae praesidet Hic obtinuit apud Phocam imperatorem vt ecclesiae Romana caput esset omnium ecclesiarum quia ecclesia Constantinopolitana scribebat se esse primam omnium ecclesiarum After whom Bonifacius gouerned the church of Rome and he obtained of the emperor Phocas that the church of Rome should be the head of all churches and that because the church of Constantinople wrote it selfe the head of all churches Palmerius hath these words consentiente Phoca institutum fuit vt ecclesia Romanae caput esset ecclesiarum omnium cum prius Constantinopolitana id vsurpare tentasset It was ordained by the consent of Phocas that the Church of Rome should be the head of all churches whereas the church of all Constantinople had before vsurped that dignitie The other writers haue wordes of like force which I omit for breuitie sake Peruse Martinus Polonus and Philippus Bergomensis who both teach the same doctrine The first obiection Phocas did not giue the primacie to the church of Rome but only declared by his decree that authoritie which of right pertaineth to the same The answere I answere that neither Scripture councell nor any authenticall wâ—iter can be alledged who before the said constitution of Phocas did at any time ascribe the headship and vniuersall gouernment of all Churches to the Church of Rome For first S. Policarpus woulde not yeeld to Anicetus bishop of Rome in the coÌ„trouersie about Easter as witnesseth Eusebius Secondly Irenaeus and other bishops of Fraunce reprooued Victor the bishop of Rome very sharply bidding him to haue respect to peace and vnitie of the church Thirdly Polycrates and many bishops of Asia did stoutly withstand Victor in his proceedings touching Easter Fourthly S. Cyprian rouÌ„dly opposed himselfe against Stephanus the bishop of Rome contemned his decree and derided his reasons Fiftly the Apostles at Hierusalem sent Peter and Iohn to confirme the faithfull in Samaria And consequently if the pope be not aboue Peter he may be sent as an inferiour or at least as an equall euen as Peter was Sixtly the fathers of the Affrican councell would not yeeld to Celestine the bishop of Rome in the controuersie of appeales concerning Appiarius And when pope Celestine alledged that the counsell of Nice gaue libertie to appeale to Rome the fathers of the councell answered that the true copies of the decree were otherwise Seuenthly the famous generall councell of Chalcedon gaue the bishop of Constantinople equall authoritie with the bishop of Rome in all ecclesiasticall affaires Eightly the Councel of Nice prescribed limites aswel to the bishop of Rome as to other Patriarkes Hereby then is it euident that the lordly vsurped primacie of the church of Rome was only giuen by the cruell tyrant Phocas Which conclusion is prooued more at large in the sixt chapter of my second booke of Motiues The second obiection You are not able to name the pope and time that first swarâ—ed from the doctrine of his auncestors The answere I say first that many thinges haue bin done in your church which your selues can neuer proue when where by whoÌ„ they were done this is euident by the 2. Prelude and 1. chapter of this third and last part I say secondly that Pope Boniface the third of that name did degenerate from Gregorie his predecessor as is alreadie proued I say thirdly that the absurditie of this obiection shal be discouered throughout the chapters following The third obiection You confesse in your Motiues that in the church of Rome for many yeares together were sundrie learned and godly bishops who liued orderly preached the word of God sincerely and fed their flockes carefully but wee are able to shew a lawfull succession of our Bishops euen from saint Peter to him that now sitteth in his chaire And therefore granting the former you seeme impudent to denie the latter The answere I answer that the succession of your Romish bishops is not so certaine as yee would beare the worlde in hand it is For first many graue and learned writers do varie exceedingly in setting downe that succession wherein you so glory S. Clement whose epistles the papists magnifie when they seeme to make for their purpose testifying for himselfe that S. Peter appointed him to be his successor Irenaeus Epiphanius Eusebius and the canon of the popish masse doe all with vniforme consent place Linus and Cletus before the said Clemens yet Sophronius Metâ—phrastes and the Popish Pontifical that cannot lie affirme roundly that Saint Peter liued after Linus Secondly many schismes haue bin in the church of Rome and amongst our romish bishops euen for many yeares together so that the succession of the latter can neuer bee proued constantly to haue descended without interruption from the former Their owne Onuphrius Panuinius reckoneth vppe thirtie schismes in the church of Rome but I will content my selfe with two onely whereof their owne deare frier Bartholomeus Carranza can instruct them sufficiently The former schisme endured for the space of 64. yeares during which time their godly popedome was at Auinion in France and not one onely day at Rome though at Rome as they prate God placed their holy seate In the latter schisme of the twaine rehearsed three of their holy bishops were popes at one the self same time to wit Iohannes the foure twentie of that name Benedictus the thirteenth and Gregorie the twelfte From which three striuing and grinning as dogs for a bone I wold learne howe they can deriue their holy so supposed succession Thirdly a woman as Saint Paul teacheth vs is not capable of ecclesiasticall function And so the succession deriued from our holy mistris Iohn pope cannot possibly be of force which storie of Pope Iohn the woman if it be true let the Papists for euer holde their peace and bragge no longer of their succession And that the said storie of their woman pope Iohn is true indeede I will proue by the testimonie of such writers as the Papists hitherto haue euer thought well of and reputed for their owne that is by Sigebertus Marianus Scotus Palmerius Martinus Polonus Phillippus Bergomensis Bapt. Platina and Bartholomeus Carranza For all these sing one and the selfe same song that pope Iohn was a woman though not an holy nunne The first replie These writers liued long after Pope Iohn and therefore knew they nothing but by report of others The answere I say first that these seauen writers liued longer one after another then Sigebertus and Scotus liued after Pope Iohn I say secondly that all Historiographers write for the most part by the report of others I say thirdly that so many writers otherwise of good credit with you may well bee credited of vs in a matter
concerning your owne proceedings especially since sundry of them be your owne holy friers I say fourthlie that this storie of Pope Iohn is publikelie painted and this daie to bee seene in your owne Cathedrall churches of Syenna Which painting our newly hatched Iesuites sought earnestly to haue had defaced in the late repairing of that church but the bishop would not suffer them to preuaile I say fiftly that these seuen writers who were all papists and liued so long one after another would neuer haue published one and the selfe same thing to the world if any one of them could in his life time haue learned the contrary to be the trueth The 2. replie They say onely and barely vt ferunt as men say And other graue writers that liued before them all and neerer the time of pope Iohn make no mention thereof The answere I say first that to reason ab auctoritate negatiue is not holden good in schooles and your selues doe often condemne in others that kinde of disputation I say secondly that if these writers had not been perswaded of the trueth of the storie they would neuer haue published it to the worlde because it maketh so much against Romish Religion to which they were addicted whollie I say thirdly that the said authors write of this matter euen as they doe of other thinges Palmerius and Segebertus both haue these expresse wordes Fama est hunc IohanneÌ„ faeminam fuisse vni soli familiaritantum cognitam qui eam complexus est grauis facta peperit papa existens Quare eam inter pontifices non numerant quidam ideo nomini numeruÌ„ non facit The report is that this Iohn was a woman and knowne onely to one that was her familiar friend By whose familiaritie she became with childe and was deliuered euen while she was pope of Rome For which cause some doe not reckon her amongst the popes and so shee maketh not vp the number Marianus Polonus Bergomensis Platina and Carranza alreadie named teach the same doctrine writing vpon the same Iohn And note wel that M. Scotus affirmeth the storie constantly without al ands or ifs And so doth also M. Polonus who was the popes owne penitentiarie To these I may fitly adde that which your L. Abbot Bernard saith the beast saith he mentioned in the reuelation to whom was giuen a mouth speaking blasphemies and to make warres with the Saintes sitteth in Peters chaire His wordes are cited verbatim in the preface to my booke of Motiues The third replie S. Austen auoucheth plainly that the succession of the Bishops of Rome was one of the chiefest motiues that kept him in the catholicke church The answere I answere that succession is of two sorts materiall and formall Materiall is the succession of persons one after another in the same place Formall is the succession of persons one after another in the same doctrine in what place soeuer Now S. Austen in deede writing against the Manichies saith that succession of priestes from S. Peters seate kept him in the vnitie of the church And no maruell because the Bishops of Rome vntill the daies of S. Austen and long after were verie godly men and taught the same doctrine that S. Peter had done before them and so they ioyned succession formall with materiall which if the bishops of Rome would this day performe all godly christians would now ioyne with them as S Austen did in his time For as S. Irene saith wee ought to obey those priestes that with succession keepe the word of trueth The third obiection S. Paule saith plainly that there must be bishops and pastors in the church euen vntill the worlds end Whereupon it followeth that you protestantes haue no church at all For before Luther departed from vs all bishops and priestes for many yeares togither as your selues can neuer denie imbraced our Romish religion This obiection doth so gall you all as ye cannot tell in the world what answere to frame thereunto The answere Gentle wordes I pray you the matter is not so daungerous as ye thinke I therefore say first with saint Paul that pastors and doctors haue euer been in the church since Christs ascension are at this present and shall bee vnto the worldes end I say secondly that albeit the visible church cannot want materiall succession yet cannot that succession without formall yeelde anie sound argument of true faith and religion In regard hereof your owne doctor Nicolaus de Lyra after he hath told vs that many Popes haue swarued from the christian faith and become flat apostataes concludeth in these wordes Propter quod ecclesia consistit in illis personis in quibus est notitia vera confessio fidei veritatis by reason whereof the church consisteth in those persons in whome there is true knâ—wledge and confession of the faith and of veritie So then by the confession of your owne approoued doctor not they that sic in saint Peters chaire at Rome are the true and lawfull successors of Saint Peter but they that confesse and preach saint Peters doctrine I say thirdly that our reformed churches in England are this day able to shew succession both materiall and formal euen from the apostles themselues And therefore our succession is and ought to be reputed farre better then yours The first reply Howsoeuer you wrangle about your formall succession yet is it cleare to all that haue eyes that you haue no materiall succession at all vnlesse you tearme it materiall succession when lay persons possesse the roomes of lawful Bishops For I pray you good sir who ordered your Bishops and Priests in king Edwardes dayes Who sent your Ministers that this day preach and minister your sacraments Can you for shame deny that they were ordered by such as were runnagates from vs in Queene Maries time All the world knoweth yee cannot doe it And yet must you bee sent by ordinary vocation or else confesse that you most shamefully vsurpe that holie function For as saint Paul saith How shall they beleeue in him of whome they haue not heard And how shall they heare without a preacher And how shall they preach except they be sent The answere Our succession is both materiall and formall christian and apostolical as which is consonant to the holy scriptures and to the vsual practise of the primitiue church For first our bishops can proue their doctrine by the scriptures and by the testimonies of best approued writers as I haue alreadie proued in my Motiues and shall by Gods assistance proue more at large in this discourse Secondly our bishops haue mission and imposition of hands according to the practise apostolicall and of all approued antiquitie Thirdly our bishops are made in such forme and order as they haue euer beene accustomed a few popish superstitious and beggerlie ceremonies omitted which of late yeeres had crept into the church that is to say be free election of the Chapiter by
and the people was of no force at all in those dayes vnlesse the Emperours or their lieutenants had confirmed the same This was done 637. yeares after Christs incarnation Concerning the creation of Benedicte Platina hath these words Ad hunc Constantinus imperator sanctionem misit vt deinceps quem clerus populus exercitús que Romanus in pontificem delegisset eundem statim verum Christi vicarium esse omnes crederent nulla aut Constantinopolitani principis aut Italiae exarchi expectata auctoritate vt anteà fieri consueuerat id enim ratum erat in creando pontifice quod princeps confirmasset vel qui eius vices in Italia gerebat The emperour Constantine sent a decree to this Pope that whomsoeuer the clergy people and Romane souldiers should hencefoorth chuse for their bishop all people should by and by beleeue him to be the vicar of Christ scilicet if they would Bartholomeus Carranza a dominican Frier hath the verie same assertion ad verbum Anastasius and Onuphrius haue these expresse words pontifices qui deinde fuerant creati consecrati sunt sine Constantinopolitani imperatoris iussione The Popes that liued afterwards were made and consecrated without the Emperour of Constantinople his commaundement as if they had saide in the olde time and in the auncient Churche no Bishoppe of Rome coulde haue beene admitted at anie time vnlesse hee hadde brought letters patents from the Emperour though now the practise bee farre otherwise Out of which doctrine I gather these three euident and most necessarie corollaries First that the vulgar and common sort of people are grossely deceiued when they terme papistrie the olde religion and repute them for the Catholikes For wee indeede are the true and auncient Catholikes and the Papistes are nothing else but flatte Heretikes For this Benedict coulde not bee made Bishoppe of Rome without the Emperours Letters Patents This primacie of the Emperour ouer the Bishoppe of Rome was sixe hundred foure score and foure yeeres after the incarnation of Christ. For at that time was this Benedict made the Pope So then the Bishop of Rome for the space almost of seuen hundred yeres after the incarnation of Christ Iesus acknowledged the Emperour for his superiour and Lorde as wythout whose Letters Patentes hee coulde haue no Iurisdiction For as in ciuill causes many are debarred from their lawfull inheritance and that by the violent dealing of mightie men euen so we catholikes haue beene many yeares excluded from our own churches our ancient and lawfull possessions and that by the force violence and tyrannie of the bloudy Romish antichrists And as temporall men are in time restored vnto their auncient right by iust and godly magistrates euen so were we and are we by the goodnes of God and most christian princes king Henry the eight and king Edward the sixt of famous memory our most gratious soueraigne Elizabeth restored to the old christian catholike and apostolike religion and placed againe in our owne churches the spirituall birthright of vs and our ancestours I gather secondly that our Bishops in England are made and consecrated according to the ancient christian catholike and Romaine manner that is by the Letters patents of the Prince I gather thirdly that Christian Emperours vppon a certaine zeale not grounded vppon knowledge yeelding vppe their soueraigne rights to the Bishops of Rome opened the window to all antichristian tyrannie For in short time after the Romish Bishops became so arrogant and lordly that they tooke vpon them to depose the Emperours to translate their Empires and to dispose at their pleasures of their royall scepters and regalities The third replie The church of God cannot bee without Bishoppes and priests as you haue already granâ—ed and as I haue proued out of Saint Paul but so it is that when yee first reformed the church as you tearme it yee neither had any Byshoppes nor any priests of your owne neither coulde you find any but with vs and in our church when Martin Luther went out from vs. Our church therefore and none but ours is the true church of god This reason is so strong as it can neuer be truly answered The answere I saie first that this reason seemeth to carrie a maiestie with it and a verie plausible shewe of truth and therefore did it a long time fascinate and seduce my selfe yet I trust by Gods holy assistance so to solue it as no papist shall haue cause any longer to glorie therein I say secondly that if our bishops or our lay-brethren had gone at any time to the greeke and East churches they shoulde haue found as good a materiall succession at the least as that of yours at Rome but there was no neede to take so long and so painefull a iourney in hand I say thirdly that our bishops and priests of late yeares were indeede consecrated by such as were sometimes in your church But thereupon will it not follow I assure you that the true church of God was with you and not with vs for no more can be inferred vpon your reason but that there remained a certaine externall face of the visible church still with you that is to say a mingled materiall succession of place and persons without the formall Euangelicall succession of trueth and doctrine The fourth replie How can the pastors of the church be without the doctrine of the church for the church cannot bee without the pastors as I haue proued and you also admitted this is it that I desire to learne The answere The reason hereof is this because God promised to giue alwaies pastors to his visible church but he neuer promised this to put the truth alwaies in their mouthes For this cause saith Saint Paule that God hath giuen pastors and teachers to his church vntil the end but he neuer said that he gaue them his holy spirit alwaies to preach and teach the truth no no he neuer promised any such thing You brag of your succession you say you are the church representatiue that your pope cannot erre but whatsoeuer he defineth iudicially that must be as true as the holy gospel Euen so did the wicked Iewes boast when the Prophet of God reproued them come said they let vs imagine some deuice against Ieremy for the law shall not perish from the priest nor counsell from the wise nor the worde from the prophet Thus did the Iewes boast then and thus doe the papistes boast now But what saith God by his Prophet to these your arrogant and Pharisaical conceites doubtlesse cleane contrary to wit but the law shall perish from the priest and counsell from the elder as if hee had said notwithstanding your great bragges of your priuiledges yet shall ye be infatuated and spoiled of all counsel trueth and doctrine The fift replie The Apostle saith that God gaue pastors and teachers to his church for this end that they shuld not
vnderstand by the rocke Peters faith and the confession which he made Panormitan and Syluester both being great papists are of the same opinion The tenth replie Christ prayed for Peter that his faith should neuer faile therefore the Pope cannot erre The answere I say first that the Popes faith both may faile and hath failed de facto as I haue proued at large in my booke of Motiues I say secondly that the insuffiencie of this consequent is vnfolded in many places of this chapter I say thirdly that as Christ prayed for Peter so did he also for the rest of the Apostles for the whole church And this I do not barely say but I wil proue it by the verdicte of the holy fathers as also of your own doctors first by Christ Iesus his own declaratiō Concerning your Pope all wise men in the world worthily deride you papists for your vaine ridiculous and fabulous conceits of his faith For first the truth enforceth you to grant as I haue proued in my Motiues that your Pope may holde false opinions in matters of faith either sitting in his chaire or walking in his garden or looking about him in his Bel-vidêre or riding on his white palfrey or lying in his bed waking or at the table eating or while he giueth pardons and Iubilees Secondly that hee may vtter the same errour and false faith secretly to his friends Thirdly that he may publish the same in his Extrauagants Epistles and printed bookes Which 3. grants sufficiently ouerthrow your popes supposed priuilege if nothing else could be said against the same Concerning Peters faith it is certaine that Christ prayed as well for al the elect as for Peter and directed his words not to Peter as to one priuat man but as to one representing the whole church and consequently whatsoeuer Christ said or did touching Peters faith must perforce bee vnderstoode of the faith of the whole church which as is proued shall neuer faile indeede This being once made good your mightie obiection wherin ye glorie much wil bee of no force at all My first reason is contained in Christs owne words which are these I pray not for the worlde but for them which thou hast giuen mee for they are thine In which words it is cleare that Christ praieth onely for Peter but for al his disciples as wel as for him and he sheweth the equitie of his petition by sundrie reasons First because hee prayeth for Gods friends Secondly because he prayeth for Gods elect Thirdly because of the vnspeakeable vnion betweene his father and himselfe Fourthly because he is glorified in them so is his father also Fiftly because they are enuironed with many tentations of this wicked world Againe Christ saith I pray not for these only but for them also that shall beleeue in me through their word In which words his former praier which seemed to be made for his disciples only is nowe extended to all the faithfull vntil the worlds ende a sentence doubtlesse replenished with all solace towardes vs and the whole Church of God as which is the onely foundation of our saluation to witte that Christ did no lesse pray for vs then he did for his owne apostles And this reason is confirmed in an other place where Christ promiseth to be among those that are gathered in his name though they be but two in number Which words as our Iesuite Bellarmine doth grant are meant aswel of the Laicall as Ecclesiasticall sort My second reason is grounded vpon the interpretation of the ancient fathers S. Austen hath these expresse words Et Petro dicit Ecce Satanas expostulauit vt vos ventilet sicut triticū ego autem rogaui pro te vt non deficiat fides tua tu tandem conuersus confirma fratres tuos Quid ambigitur pro Petro rogabat pro Iacobo Ioanne non rogabat vt caeteros taceam manifestum est in Petro omnes contineri quia in alio loco dicit ego pro his rogo quos mihi dedisti pater volo vt vbi ego sum ipsi sint mecum And he saith to Peter Behold sathan hath desired to winnow you as wheat but I haue prayed for thee that thy faith faile not therefore thou once conuerted confirme thy brethren What doubt is there Did hee pray for Peter and did he not also pray for Iames and Iohn to say nothing of the rest It is plaine that in Peter all the rest are meant because hee saith in an other place I pray for these O Father which thou hast giuen mee and desire that they may be with mee where I am Origen who liued manie yeeres afore saint Austen affirmeth in a large discourse vpon saint Matthew that all things spoken of Peter touching the church and the keyes are to be vnderstoode of all the rest And the collection of Origen is euident euen by natural reason For if Christ prayed not as well for the rest as for Peter of small credite were a great part of the holy scripture A reason doubtlesse insoluble for all papists in the worlde For if they coulde faile in their faith they could also faile in their writing and yet that they could not so faile was by vertue of Christs prayer My third reason is the flatte opinion and constant doctrine of great learned papists Panormitanus was their skilful Canonist their religious abbot and their renowmed archbishop and consequently his authority must needs gall and confound them all his wordes are these Et pro hac tantùm Christus in euangelio orauit ad patrem ego rogaui prote And for this he meaneth the vniuersall church Christ onely prayed to his father in the gospel when he saide I haue prayed for thee that thy faith faile not Behold here gentle Reader and yeelde thine indifferent censure When Christ saith the great papist Panorm prayed that Peters faith should not faile hee prayed for the faith of the vniuersall church whose faith shal neuer faile indeede And the said Panormitan prooueth his opinion directly by many texts of the popes Canon law de Elect. cap. significasti Alphonsus à Castro a religious popish Carthusian hath these wordes Non dubitamus an haereticum esse papam esse coire in vnum possint infra Non enim credo aliquem esse adeo impudentem papae assentatorem vt ei tribuere hoc velit vt nec errare nec in interpretatione sacrarum literarum hallucinari possit Wee doubt not whether one man may be a pope and an heretike both together For I beleeue there is none so shamelesse a flatterer of the Pope that will ascribe this vnto him that he can neither erre nor be deceiued in the exposition of the scriptures The eleuenth reply All Christs sheepe are committed to Peter and consequently to the pope Ergo The answer I say first that the bishop of Rome is not saint
Peters sucâ—essor and I haue already prooued it effectually I say secondly that all Christs sheepe were committed to all the apostles in like manner For Christ gaue all his apostles charge and authoritie to go into all the worlde and to teach all nations Which answer saint Austen sheweth excellently in the person of saint Peter to be accomplished his owne words are these Ecclesiae catholicae personam sustinet Petrus cùm ei dicitur ad omnes dicitur amas me pasce oues meas Peter representeth the person of the church catholique and when it is said to him it is said to all Louest thou me Feede my sheepe Loe the popish bulwarke is battered downe CHAP. III. Of the marriage of priests and ministers of the church The first Proposition AL Ministers which are not papists nor subiect to the lawes and rules of Poperie may lawfully marry euen by the doctrine of the Church of Rome albeit the vulgar sorte of Papists most bitterly exclaime against the same I proue it because all such ministers are meere lay men by the iudgement of the church of Rome which church for all that onely debarreth persons ecclesiasticall from the freedome of honourable wedlocke This probation is so euident as no learned papist can or will denie the same Peruse the end of the seauenth proposition following and it will satisfie thee in all respects The second Proposition Marriage was lawfull for all priests and other ministers of the church during all the time of the olde Testament This proposition is cleere to all such as diligently reuolue the holie Bibles neither doe I know any learned papist that by worde or writing denyeth the same For the holie prophet Ieremie was the son of Helkiah who was one of the priests that were at Anathoth Hophni and Phinehas were the sonnes of Heli the priest Sephora was the daughter of Iethro the priest of Midian and Saint Iohn Baptist was the sonne of Zacharias the priest to whome the angell of God was sent to bring him glad tidings The tidings were these that Elizabeth his wife should beare him a sonne albeit she was barren and well stricken in age And he receiued the message while he was occupied in prayer and in burning of incense at the right side of the alâ—are Whereby it clearely appeareth how acceptable the marriage of priests was then in Gods sight For first Saint Iohn was a very holie man and the precursor of our Sauiour Christ. Secondly Zacharias and Elizabeth his wife were both iust and walked in Gods commaundements without reproofe Thirdly the angell of God was sent to Zacharias to tell him that his wife should conceiue and beare him a sonne Fourthly this message was brought him euen then when he executed his priestly function All which circumstances well obserued do proue vndoubtedly that the marriages of priests are honourable in Gods sight The third Proposition Marriage is lawfull for priests and other ministers of the church euen now in the time of the new testament Where by the word priests I vnderstand all such as are admitted to preach Gods worde and to administer the holy sacraments This proposition may be prooued by many waightie and important reasons First because no text in the new Testament can be alleadged which debarreth the ministers thereof from the benefite of marriage graunted in the olde If any Papist will say that there is some such text in the new testament let him shew that text and wee will beleeue him In the meane season hee must pardon vs if wee giue not credite to his words Secondly because the apostle prooueth in two seuerall places that all priests may be married Where what I meane by priests is already shewed The first place is that reason which Saint Paule maketh to Timothie and is contained in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Bishop therefore must be vnreproueable the husband of one wife This text of holy scripture if it be throughly marked doeth plainely conuince that it is lawfull for a Bishop to marry Let vs therefore exactly examine the true meaning and sense thereof The Papists to maintaine their diabolicall doctrine of single life would rack this text to those wiues which bishops had before they were admitted to ecclesiasticall function but that is a forced and violent exposition contrary to the true meaning of the apostle For Saint Paule among other vertues conuenient for a Bishoppe requireth this for one that hee bee not coupled to more wiues then one at once Nneither is it possible to imagine any other true sense of this present text For first it is not of necessitie that a bishop haue a wife and yet doth the Apostle say that hee must be the husband of one wife For both they and wee agree in this that one may be a lawfull bishop and yet liue vnmarried Againe the apostle speaketh in the present tence must be the wife and not must haue been the wife so that the glosse of the papistes must needes be false who expound the wordes of the time already past Thirdly the Apostles wordes must needes be verified of mariage in some sense But first it cannot be meant of mariage already past because the verbe is of the time present Again it cannot be meant of the necessitie of marriage because a Bishop may lawfully liue vnmarried Therefore thirdly this must needes be the true meaning thereof to wit that a bishop may marry if he list but yet not haue many wiues at one and the same time as the Iewes and the Gentiles had And to this exposition doe accord not only S. Chrysostome and Theophilact but also their owne deere Cardinall Caietane S. Chrysostome hath these expresse wordes Non hoc veluti sanciens dicit quasi non liceat absque vxore episcopum fieri sed eius rei modum constituens Iudaeis quippe licitum erat etiam secundo matrimonio iungi duas itidem simul habere vxores honorabiles enim nuptiae He saith not this meaning to establish a law as though none could be a bishop who hath not a wife but his purpose is to appoint a measure in that behalfe For the Iewes might not only be twise married but also haue two wiues at once For marriage is an honourable thing The apostle therefore speaketh against Polygamie Yea S. Hierome confesseth that sundry writers expound this place against the Polygamie of the Iewes The same S. Chrysostome in another place hath these golden words Obstruere prorsus intendit haereticorum ora qui nuptias damnant ostendens eam rem culpâ carere imo ita esse pretiosam vt cum ipsa etiam possit quispiam ad sanctum episcopatus solium sâ—buehi The Apostle intendeth to confound the heretiques that condemne marriage declaring that it is faultlesse and a thing so pretious as a man may with it be promoted to the holy function of a bishop Thus saith S. Chrysostome whose wordes are so
that a riche man may dine when he list a poore man when he can get meate The religious fast is abstinence with a penitent heart and true faith not onely from all meates and drinkes but euen from all thinges whatsoeuer that may any way nourishe or delite the bodie The forme of which fast is abstinence the matter is meate drinke and whatsoeuer bringeth corporall oblectation the efficient cause is faith and repentance for our sinnes the end is to appease Gods wrath and either to procure deliuerance from our miseries or some mitigation thereof For which cause fasting in the Scriptures is continually ioyned with praier and being vsed as is said God doth accept it for the merites of Christ Iesus not for anie worthinesse in it selfe The third proposition To fast rightly and christianly is to absteine from al meates all drinkes and from all corporall pleasures vntill the end of the fast and to bestowe the whole time in praying in lamenting our sinnes and in hearing the worde of God especially godly sermons For the externall affliction of our bodies by abstaining from meates and drinkes hath no other end effect or vse but to dispose prepare vs as is already said This proposition is prooued by the vsuall practise of holy people in all ages recorded in holy writ for our instruction holy king Dauid so soone as he vnderstood that his childe shoulde die for his sinnes gaue himselfe to fasting and praier and neuer ate while the childe was aliue 2. Sam. 12.5.17 The Niniuites vnderstanding Gods commynations and wrath for their sinnes sate in ashes put on sackcloth gaue themselues to earnest praier and absteined from all meates and drinkes vntill God shewed mercy towardes them Ion. 3.5.7 Holy queene Hester when she ioyned fasting with praier neither ate nor dranke at all vntil the end of her fast Ester 4. verse 16. Neither can it euer bee prooued by the authoritie of holy writ or by the practise of the primitiue Church or by the testimonie of the auncient fathers that Gods people did in any age at any time in any place or countrey vse either to eate or to drinke before the end of their fast whereby appeareth the absurditie of all popishe fasting which thing is most euident by the story of S. Spiridion handled in the next proposition The fourth proposition Popish choice of meates in their late inuented fastes is wicked and intollerable I say first popish choice because to put merite or religion in abstaining from one meate more then another is the peculiar badge of papistes or at least common to them with the Eucratites with the Tatians with the Catherans with the Manichies or like heretiques I prooue it because the Apostle saith plainly that all thinges are pure to the pure but the papistes and other olde heretiques tell vs that certaine meates at certaine times as in Lent in the imber dayes and Fridaies are vnpure and polluted yea so vnpure that they pollute all the eaters thereof and make them guiltie of eternal death Yet the Apostle auoucheth boldly and expresly that euery creature of God is good and that nothing ought to be refused if it bee receiued with thankesgiuing In the first verse of the same chapter he telleth vs that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith and giue heede to the doctrine of diuels In the third verse he sheweth what doctrine of deuils he meaneth To wit prohibition to abstaine from meates which God hath created to bee receiued with giuing of thankes Out of which wordes I note first that no creature of God is impure at anie time which is appointed for the nourishment of man I note secondly that no meate ought to bee refused in Lent or at other times if it be receiued with thankesgiuing I note thirdly that prohibition from certaine meates was not in the apostles time but inuented by heretiques of latter daies I note fourthly that such prohibition is of the diuell I say secondly late inuented fastes because Spiridion who was not only a bishop but also a man so holy that he wrought myracles and was in his life time reputed a Saint did not refuse to eate flesh in the time of Lent and that in his owne house yea he did not only eate fleshe himselfe but withall he intreated a stranger that lodged with him to doe the same And when the straunger refused to eate fleshe with him saying that hee was a christian and so prohibited to eate flesh at that time S. Spiridion replied vpon him and said that the rather he ought to eat flesh because he was a christian for all thinges were pure to the pure Thus did the blessed bishop and man of God renowmed for his rare gift of working miracles Whom the pope would burne for an hereticke with fire and fagot if he were this day liuing in Rome and woulde not retract his opinion For first hee eate fleshe himselfe contrary to popish doctrine Secondly he vrged the stranger to do the same Thirdly he auouched his fact to be the part of a christian Fourthly he signified y t to make conscience in choice of meates was the badge of an infidell Which fourth obseruation I gather out of the word rather Fiftly the fact of Spiridion prooueth that to make choice of meates was deemed superstitious not onely in the Apostles time but many hundred yeares after their departure hence I say thirdly wicked and intollerable first because popishe choise of meates taketh away christian libertie and maketh christian slaues to mans traditions For to the pure all thinges are pure by the libertie of Christes gospel I am perswaded saith the Apostle that no meate is vncleane And he addeth the reason because the kingdome of God is neither meat nor drinke Wherefore we ought not to destroy the worke of God for meates sake In another place he saith that if he should please men he were not the seruant of Christ. To please men is good and godly so long as their pleasure is measured with the holy will of God but when men would spoile vs of our christian libertie then must we fight against their wicked pleasures So S. Paul expoundeth himselfe in these wordes The false brethren creâ—t in priuily to spy out our liberty which we haue in Christ Iesus y t they might bring vs into bondage And why ye are bought with a price be not the seruauntes of men Christ himself forewarned vs to beware of the hypocriticall doctrine of the Pharisies because they corrupted the pure word of God with the mixture of their owne foolish traditions Secondly because the apostle teacheth vs that nothing ought to be refused if it be receiued with giuing of thankes Thirdly because no power on earth can alter the word of God Which worde telleth vs that all meates are alike lawfull Fourthly because to commaund the choice of meates for religion sake is to appoint a newe God For
same day at Rome and S. Philip that blessed disciple of Christ was about the same time crucified at Hierapolis a citie in Asia Of Andrew and Bartholomew S. Andrew preached the gospel in Scythia Thracia Macedonia Thessalia and Achaia At the length the proconsul Aegaeas caused him to be crucified because he perswaded Maximilla his wife and Stantocles his brother to detest his vnchristian impietie and to embrace the faith of Christ Iesus Hee was buried in Achaia with his auncestors S. Bartholomew after he had preached the gospel to the Indians was at length rewarded with the cruell torture of the crosse and buried in Armenia the great Of Iames the sonne of Zebedee S. Iames the sonne of Zebedeus preached the gospel to the twelue tribes which were in dispersion and for his paines was at the length beheaded of Herod the Tetrarch who was also called Agrippa He was buried in the citie Marmarica and king Herod who beheaded him was eaten vp with wormes Of Iohn S. Iohn his brother preached the gospel in Asia and being driuen into exile in the Ile Pathmos by Domitian the emperour he there both wrote the gospel and had his reuelation He died at Ephesus in the time of Traianus the Emperour Where note by the way to auoid the varietie which seemeth in some of the auncient fathers and historiographers that albeit Domitian banished S. Iohn into Pathmos yet did S. Iohn suruiue Domitian and died in the daies and reigne of Traian Of Thomas S. Thomas called also Didymus after he had preached to the Parthians Medes Persians and Indians was wounded with dartes in his sides and so being buried in Calamina a citie in India came to him whose sides he before had felt Christ Iesus Of Mathew S. Mathew of a publican became an Apostle preached the gospel of Christ zealously and conuerted many to the christian faith Hee wrote the gospel in the Hebrew tongue and was buried in Hierapolis Where note by the way that although many of the old writers affirme S. Mathew to haue written in Hebrew yet some learned do think that he wrote in greeke which opinion I preferre as more probable but how soeuer that be it skilleth not much for the Greeke which now is only exstant is admitted of all as authenticall Yea as Theophilactus recordeth they that holde saint Mathew to haue written in hebrew do not denie but Saint Iohn translated it into greeke and consequently since S. Iohn was no lesse inspired with the holy ghost then Saint Mathew it must needes follow that the greeke copie is as authenticall as the Hebrew if any such could be found Of Iames the sonne of Alphee Saint Iames the son of Alpheus the brother of our Lord surnamed Iustus after he had preached at Gaza Eleutheropolis and other countreyes adiacent was made the Bishop of Hierusalem where he was stoned to death of the Iewes and buried in the temple Of Iudas Thaddaeus Saint Iudas Thaddeus called also Lebbeus preached in Iudea Galilea Samaria Idumea Arabia Syria and Mesopotamia at the length he came to Edessa where preaching the gospel of peace he died in peace Of Symon Zelotes Saint Symon surnamed Zelotes for his great zeale towards his master Christ Iesus called also Cananeus bicause he was borne in Cana Galilea after he had preached the gospell in Egypt Africa Mauritania Lybia and in the occidentall parts and had confirmed the same with many myracles he was crucified vnder Traianus being 120. yeares of age Of Matthias Saint Matthias one of the 70. disciples was reckoned with the eleuen in stead of Iudas Iscarioth He preached in Ethiopia where he suffered many tortures was almost stoned to death and then beheaded An addition for the complement of this chapter Saint Iames the Great and Saint Iohn the Euangelist were the sonnes of Zebedeus the husband of Salome Saint Iames the lesse surnamed Iustus and the brother of our Lord Saint Iudas Thaddeus and Symon Zelotes were the sons of Cleophas the husband of Mary who was sister to the blessed virgin Mary CHAP. IX Of the three sonnes of Constantine COnstantine when he had raigned 38. yeares appointed by his last will and testament that his three sonnes Constantinus Constantius and Constans should rule the Empire in seuerall parts seuerally to wit Constantinus in France Spaine and Germanie Constantius in the East Constans in Italie and Illyricum Constantinus was not content with partiall assigned gouernment but desired to haue the sole and onely administration of the Empire for which cause hauing too much confidence in the power of man specially in an euil cause he made warres against his brother Constans in Italie but by that occasion he was slaine and so his brother Constans possessed al the West Empire CHAP. X Of Iulianus apostata IVlianus Apostata was nephew to Constantius and brother to Gallus he was so excellent wel learned that in his youth he read the scriptures publikely in the church of Nicomedia afterwards he went to the famous vniuersitie of Athens and studied there but after the death of his brother Gallus Constantius sent him into France and Germanie Not farre from Argentoratum hee put to flight 30 thousand Almains for which cause by the fauour of the souldiers he was sodainely at Argentoratum designed Emperour At such time as great dissention arose among christians through diuersitie of opinions in Religion in so much that some dispaired and other some fell to Idolatrie then the new Emperour Iulianus preferring his owne sonne before the true worship of God and thinking that to abandon the christian religion was to aduance his royall and imperiall estate forsooke the Christian faith denied Christ openly and became an Apostata He inhibited christians to serue in warres amongst the Romaines he ouerthrew the schooles of learning and spoyled the churches of their treasures Which thing hee did in derision telling the Christians that hee fauoured them in so doing because through pouertie they might sooner come to heauen CHAP. XI Of the Manichees THe Manichees began their heresie in the dayes of Aurelianus Emperor of Rome whose grand-master was Manes a Persian borne This Manes dispersed his poyson in very large circuits First in Arabia after that in Africa This heresie increased so mightily as it coulde not be quenched by the space of two hundred yeares this was the fundamentall ground of their false and hereticall doctrine that there are two Gods the one good and the other bad and yet both to be eternall This doctrine seemed plausible to mans reason at the first publishing thereof for since God is good of his owne nature and yet euill aboundeth in the worlde it seemeth to followe necessarily that as there is a good God so there must also bee a peculiar euill God equall to the good God in power and eternitie The Manichees will neither eate flesh neither egges neither milke neither doe they drinke wine albeit they will
consecration of the archbishop and other his associates by the admission of the prince The second replie S. Epiphanius inueyeth bitterly against one Zachaeus who being but a â—ay man presumed impudently to handle the holie mysterieâ— And saint Ierome saieth of Hilarius the heretike that he could neither baptize nor administer the eucharist because he was but a deacon when hee went out of the church And therefore the man being dead the sect also died with him And what are you but deacons Nay what are you but meere lay men For you are neither consecrated after the old maner nor confirmed by the Pope but ye are accursed long sithence by his holie anathematismes The answere I say first that if meere lay men should presume in our churches to handle the holie mysteries they could not escape condigne punishment according to their demerites I say secondly that the want of your greasing and other your beggerly ceremonies can not make the consecration of our Bishops vnlawfull I say thirdly that our bishops are consecrated and confirmed according to the auncient maner of the primitiue church For three thinges onely are necessarie all which are this day God be thanked for it practised in the church of England to wit election of the whole congregation confirmation of the Prince and consecration with godly praiers and imposition of handes Of the imposition of handes mention is made to Timothie Of praiers with laying on of handes S. Luke speaketh in the Actes Of election by voyces of the people S. Peter maketh relation but of popish paltry ceremonies I finde no where any word at all That election ought to be by consent of the people S. Augustine shewed plainly in a most godly and prudent epistle wheÌ„ in the presence of Religianus and Martinianus bishops and of Saturninus Leporius Barnabas Fortunatianus Rusticus Lazarus and Eradius priestes he humbly requested of all the people that by their consentes Eradius might be chosen bishop after his death I wishe the reader to peruse the whole epistle as which is replenished with all spirituall sweetnes But S. Cyprian is so plaine and copious in this point of doctrine as who soeuer shal once reade him with iudgement can no longer stand in doubt thereof And that which I say of S. Cyprian in this behalfe must also be vnderstood of Caecilius Primus Polycarpus and other bishops of Africke assembled togither for this purpose For the Bishops and people of Spaine wrote letters by Felix and Sabinus to the African bishops requiring their aduise concerning the factes of Basilides and Martialis The bishops of Africa with S. Cyprian among other things answered to the churches of Spaine in these words Quando ipsa plebs maximè habeat potestatem vel eligendi dignos sacerdotes vel indignos recusandi quod ipsum videmus de diuina authoritate descendere vt sacerdos plebe praesente sub omnium oculis deligatur dignus atque idoneus publicâ— iudicio ac testimonio comprobâ—tur Because the people hath proper power to elect worthy priestes or to reiect the vnworthy which thing we see descendeth from Gods owne authoritie that when the people shal be present then the priest be chosen before all their eies and so be proâ—ued woorthie and fit by their publique iudgement and testimonie Out of these wordes I note first that the people may chuse or refuse him for their bishop whome they like or dislike I note secondly that the people haue this libertie de iure diuino granted from God himselfe and consequently that it cannot be altered by the power of man which is a speciall point wel worthy the obseruation I note thirdly that the people must giue publique testimonie to the election of their bishop I note fourthly that all this freedome is graunted to the people for the due triall of the life and conuersation of that person whome they must haue to be their bishop Yea this case is so cleere that the great Papist Iacobus Pamelius is enforced to graunt that this was the practise of the primitiue church and continued many hundred yeeres to witte vntill saint Gregory the first of that name who liued aboue fiue hundred and ninetie yeeres after the incarnation of our Lorde and Sauiour Iesus Christ and so long by Pamelius his graunt this was the practise of the primitiue church Yea this practise was of force indeede vntill our disholie father Pope Boniface the third inuaded saint Peters chaire from whome proceeded all idolatrie To this Pamelius obiecteth first that though the voyces of the people were required yet did they not subscribe to the election I answere that that skilleth not because the subscription was not anie purpose vnlesse it had the consent of the people But Pamelius replieth that the bishops were not enforced to admit whomsoeuer the people did require To the which I answere that neither were the people enforced to receiue whomsoeuer the Bishops would intrude vpon them This practise of the ancient Church will some men say is not this day obserued in our reformed Churches of England I answere that it is virtually obserued though not formally For after the election is made by the Deane and Chapiter libertie is granted to the whole congregation freely to declare their like or dislike and what exception they can giue against the partie which their freedome and liberty therein is made knowne by letters affixed in publike place Now that the Bishop ought to bee confirmed by the letters patents of the Prince and not of the Pope which is the third and last thing to be proued I will vnfold to the gentle reader by three important and irrefragable reasons grounded in the verie bowels of that selfe same practise which the papists will they nil they must perforce admit for good The practise whereof I speake is euident in the confirmation of these three Popes Pelagius the second Seuerinus and Benedictus the second For al these three and al other Bishops of Rome till the said Benedict inclusiue were euer elected and confirmed by the emperours commandement Which veritie is freely confessed in expresse tearmes by foure famous popish writers who therefore are and ought to be of more credite and force against the papists then any other authours whosoeuer the names of the Popish doctors are these Bapt. Platina Barâ—hol Carranza Anastasius Bibliothecarius and Onuphrius Panuinius Platina writeth thus touching the creation of Pelagius Nilenim tum in eligendo pontifice actum erat nisi eius electionem imperator approbasset For at that time which was after the incarnation of our redeemer 579 nothing was done effectually about the election of the Pope vnlesse the Emperour had confirmed the same Touching the creation of Seuerinus the same Platina writeth in this manner Vana tunc enim habebatur cleri ac populi electio nisi id imperatores auteorum exarchi confirmassent For the election of the cleargie
plaine and pithie as no papist is able to wrest and writhe them to serue his turne For first S. Chrysostome prooueth marriage to be honourable and holy against the heretickes that condemned it and that because a Bishoppes function is honourable and holie who for all that may bee a married man Which argument were vaine and friuolous if Saint Chrysostome should speake of a Bishops marriage while he was a meere lay man For hereupon would it follow necessarily that tyrannie persecution adultery and murder should be honourable aswell as honest wedlocke I prooue it because no disparitie can be giuen betweene S. Chrysostomes reason and this of mine For first as the function of a bishop is honourable so is the function of an Apostle so is the function of a prophet Againe as a married man may be a bishop so may a persecutor of Christes church be an apostle for S. Paul was both so may an adulterer so may a murderer be an holy prophet for good king Dauid was all three Thirdly as tyrannie is a great sin â—lbeit once a tyrant may afterward become an apostle and as adultery and murder be greeuous crimes although once an adulterer and once a murderer may afterward bee an holy prophet euen so doubtlesse marriage may be an vnlawfull thing albeit once a married man may afterward be an holy bishop And so S. Chrysostome coulde not well conclude marriage to be lawful because once a married man may be a Bishop S. Chrysostome saith yet further that euen with it eumeâ with holie wedlocke one may be made a bishop euen while hee is a married man For as the father and the sonne so also the husband and the wife be relatiues and correlatiues whose nature is as all Logicians graunt to place and displace be and not be liue and die all at once For so soone as a man beginneth to be a father so soone hath he a childe and so soone as hee ceaseth to haue a childe so soone ceaseth he to be a father although he still remaine a man And euen so is it with the husband and the wife Adde hereunto that S. Chrysostome should not say with wedlocke but after it if he meant as the papistes woulde haue him to doe I therefore conclude that if S. Chrysostome meane not of a Bishoppes marriage during the very time hee is a bishop his argument is vaine and friuolous And in this argument Theophilactus subscribeth to S. Chrysostome The second place is that reason which S. Paule maketh to the Corinthians and is conteined in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haue we not power to leade about a sister a wife aswel as the rest of the apostles and as the brethren of the Lorde and Cephas By this it appeareth manifestly if it be well marked that S. Peter and other of the apostles were married and that they did leade their wiues about with them when they went abroad preaching the holy gospel For first the Greeke worde in the originall signifieth a wife as well as a woman Secondly the word carrying about argueth a certaine interest and right in the partie that is carried about Thirdly it had been a very scandalous thing that the apostles being single men shoulde carry strange women about with them Fourthly this place cannot be vnderstoode of riche matrones because such women would haue relieued the apostles and not haue suffered them to be chargeable to their auditors and yet doth the apostle here speake of such women as were relieued by the preaching of the Gospel Fiftly if the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be not here taken for a wife but for a woman it must needes be a vain and childish addition because euery sister is a woman Sixtly because S. Clâ—ment and Eusebius Caesariensis expound this place of S. Paules wife and not of any other woman Iohannes Christophorsonus a great papist alledgeth S. Clements wordes out of Eusebius in this maner Clemens deinceps apostolos qui matrimonium contraxisse reperiuntur enâ—merat Ãdque contra eorum sententiam qui nuptias tollere abrogareque instituerent Numinquit sunt apostolos improbaturi Petrus enim Philippus liberos procrearunt Philippus filias viri collocauit in matrimonium Paulus etiam non veretur in quadam epistola contugis suae mentionem facere quam eò minime secum circumduxit quò facilius liberiusque suo fungeretur ministerio Clement afterward reckoneth the apostles who are knowne to haue been married men and that against their opinion who endeuoured to abrogate and take away marriage Will they saith he condemne the apostles for both Peter and Philip begat children and Philip bestowed his daughters vpon husbandes in marriage Paul also blusheth not in one of his Epistles to make mention of his wife whom he woulde not carrie about with him to the end hee might preach the gospel more freely See the first proposition following The first obiection It is cleere that S. Paul would not marry his owne sister and therefore the woman he speaketh of could not be his wife The answere I answere that the names of brother and sister in the primitiue church were proper to the faithfull and true beleeuers Sundrie wiues also in those daies were of a dissonant religion from their husbands S. Paule therefore to shew his wife to be a christian and a true beleeuer calleth her a sister As if he had said the woman I speake of is not only my wife but withall a christian and a true beleeuer The 2. obiection These women that S. Paul speaketh of were not the wiues of the apostles but cerâ—aine deuout women that followed the Apostles for zeale of the gospel as we reade of many women that followed Christ and did not thereby commit any scandall at all The answere I say first that the women S. Paule speaketh of were the wiues of the apostles as I haue proued I say secondly y t it is one thing to follow voluntarily as the women did our sauiour Christ and another thing to be led about as were the women of whom the apostle speaketh I say thirdly that it was an vsual and ordinary thing aswell for women as for men to resort to Hierusalem whither these women followed Christ. I say fourthly that these womâ—n were many togither and went in the company of their husbandes and neighbours and so they could not be subiect to any scandal at al. But if the Apostles were single men and went into seuerall partes of the worlde and led single women about with them so must they then needes be subiect vnto scandall vnlesse they were as is said their lawfull wiues indeed I say fiftly that if they were old women they could not endure the labours of so painfull and long iournies And if they were yong women or vnder threescore they ought to marry according to Paules doctrine The 4. proposition Marriage was deemed lawful for all sortes of people aswel
that that vow which for the obedieÌ„ce of mans law is preiudicial to Gods law is wicked and damnable but such is the vowe annexed in popish priests marke well my words therefore the vow imposed to popish priests is wicked and damnable I say first the vow annexed because the priests do not formally vow single life but the Pope hath annexed it to their orders by his wicked decree I say secondly the vowe imposed because the priestes indeede woulde willingly retaine their libertie stil. I say thirdly that gods law doth not onely graunt libertie to marrie but also chargeth euerie one that hath not the gift of continencie to take a wife to vse holy wedlocke for the auoiding of sinne I say fourthly that mans law onely hath prohibited the marriage of priests which being once proued this fourth assertion wilbe manifest Thus therfore writeth their deare Gratian in expresse words Copula namque sacerdotalis vel consanguineorum nec legali nec euangelica vel apostolica auctoritate prohibetur ecclesiastica tamen lege penitus interdicitur For the marriage of priests or kinsfolks is neither forbiddeÌ„ by the law of Moses nor by the lawe of the gospell nor by the law of the apostles yet is it vtterly interdicted by the lawe of the church of Rome Marke well these wordes for Christes sake gentle christian reader for they are able to confound al obstinate papists in the world Obserue therefore first that this Gratian who vttereth these words was a verie famous popish Canonist brother to Peter Lombard surnamed for his supposed deserts the Maister of Sentences who was sometime bishop of Paris and of such renowme in the popish church as his bookes are this day read publiquely in the diuinitie schooles Obserue secondly that this great learned papist Gratian liued with his brother Lombard about 400. yeeres agoe euen then when the pope was in his greatest pompe and tyrannie Obserue thirdly that this Gratian being so learned and so renowmed among the papists did euen in the altitude of popedome commit that to the publique view of the world which vtterly ouerthroweth al papistrie Obserue fourthly that the pope and his vassalles being iustly infatuated for their manifold sinnes had not power to hinder and keepe backe from the print such bookes as vtterly disclose their tyranny falshood and paltrie dealing Oh sweete Iesus great is thy mercy wonderfull is thy iustice infinite is thy wisedome vnsearchable are thy iudgements Truly saith the Psalmograph Vnles the Lord defend the citie in vaine do they labour that keepe the same Thou O God who causest the red sea to giue place to the Israelites thou who causest Balaams asse to speake thou who causest the fire to suspend it force in the burning furnace thou who causest yron to swimme vpon the water thou who causest lockes and brasen gates to open voluntarily thou thou O mightie God of Israel hast enforced Gratian that learned famous and zealous papist to confesse openly for the battering downe of al popery that the marriage of priests which the Pope enforceth vppon them vnder paine of damnation euerlasting is neither forbidden by the law of Moses nor by the lawe of thy holy gospel nor yet by the law of thine apostles Caietanus their owne deare Cardinall and learned schooleman confirmeth that which Gratian hath already said These are his wordes Nec ratione nec authoritate probari potest quod absolute loquendo sacerdos peccet contrahendo matrimonium Nam nec ordo in quantum ordo nec ordo in quantum sacer est impeditiuus matrimonij siquidem sacerâ—otium non dirimit matrimonium contractum siue ante siue post seclusis omnibus legibus ecclesiasticis stando tantum â—is quae habemus à Christo apostolis It can neither bee proued by reason nor yet by authoritie if we will speake absolutely that a Priest sinneth by marrying a wife For neither the order of priesthood in that it is order neither order in that it is holy is any hindrance vnto matrimonie for priesthood breaketh not marriage whether it be contracted before priesthood or afterward setting al ecclesiastical lawes aparte and standing onely to those things which wee haue of Christ and his Apostles Antoninus is consonant vnto Caietane and writeth in this manner Episcopatus ex natura sua non habet opponi ad matrimonium the office of a bishoppe of his owne nature is not opposite vnto marriage Saint Clement telleth it as a wonder that the Apostle giuing so many rules and precepts touching matrimonie should say nothing of the marriage of Priests if it had beene a thing necessarie these are his words Omnes Apostoli Epistolae quae moderationem docent continentiam cum de matrimonio de liberorum procreatione de domus administratione innumerabilia praecepta contineant nusquam honestum moderatumque matrimonium prohibuerunt All the Epistles of the Apostle which teach sobrietie and continent life whereas they containe innumerable precepts touching matrimonie bringing vp of children and gouernment of house yet did they no where forbidde honest and sober marriage I say fiftly that to take away the christian libertie from man which God hath granted to man is a wicked and damnable sinne and therefore doth the holy vessell of God bid vs to perseuer constantly therein For after that hee hath exhorted euerie one to continue as God hath appointed and withal hath shewed the freedome of marriage to bee granted to all hee forthwith addeth these words Ye are bought with a price be not the seruants of men as if he had said to marrie or not to marrie is in your owne election let therefore neither Iew nor Gentile ouerrule your libertie let none entangle your consciences let none bring you into faithlesse bondage let none impose that heauie yoke vpon your necks which yee are no way able to beare Nowe by due application heereof the vow of single life at the least the vow annexed to priesthood which by the law of man spoileth vs of our christian libertie must needs be a wicked and damnable vowe For as the learned papist Victoria hath wel obserued the gospell is called the law of libertie because christians after the promulgation of the gospel are onely bound to the law of nature And yet our late popes haue made our case more intollerable then euer was the heauie yoke of the Iewes For Saint Paul chargeth vs to stand fast in the libertie wherewith Christ hath made vs free and not to be intangled againe with the yoke of bondage I say sixtly that to abandon Gods holy ordinance is a wicked and damnable sinne and yet is this done as the Pope bluntishly auoucheth by his tyrannically extorted vowes for matrimonie contracted after priesthood is by Gods law true and perfect matrimonie as is alreadie proued by popish grant and yet is such matrimonie become no matrimonie by popish vow as the Pope would enforce vs
answere I say first that in S. Chrysostomes time which was more then 400. yeres after Christ this superstitious inuocation had gotten deepe roote in the heartes of the vulgar sort For which cause S. Chrysostome did zealously in many sermons induce them wholly and solie to inuocate the liuing God One or two places I will alledge for the better satisfaction of the Reader thus therefore doth hee write Dic mihi mulier quemadinodum ausa es cum sis peccatrix iniqua accedere ad eum ego inquit noui quid agam Vide prudentiam mulieris non rogat Iacobum non obsecrat Ioannem neque pergit ad Petrum nec intendit Apostolorum chorum non quaesiuit mediatorem sed pro omnibus illis paenitentiam accepit comitem quae aduocati locum impleuit sic ad summum fontem perrexit Propterea inquit descendit propterea carnem assumpsit homo factus est vt ego ei audeâ—m loqui Tell mee O woman howe thou being a great sinner darest come vnto God I saieth she know what I haue to doe Behold the wisdome of the woman she desires not Iames she praies not Iohn shee goes not to Peter shee neither respected the companie of the Apostles nor sought for a mediatour but in steed of them all shee tooke true repentance for her fellowe which supplied the place of an aduocate and so she came to the chiefe fountaine For this end saith shee did Christ descend for this end did hee take our nature vpon him and was made man that I may boldly speak vnto him Againe in another place the same S. Chrysostome saith thus Sin vero sobrie agemus etiam per nosmetipsos istud valeamus efficere multo magis per nos quam per alios Nam Deus gratiam non tam aliis rogantibus pro nobis quam nobis vult donare quo fruamur libertate Deum compellandi emendemur dum ipsi studemus deum reconciliare sic Chananaeam illam aliquando miseratus est sic etiam meretrici donauit salutem sic latronem nullo patrono nullo mediatore intercedente But if we will deale soberly wee may dispatche that by our owne selues and a great deale better by our selues then by others For God will giue vs his grace not so muche for the praiers of others as for our owne sake that so wee may haue libertie to call vpon God and to amend our liues while wee seeke to bee reconciled to him So had hee mercie on the woman of Chanaan so gaue hee remission of sinnes to the adulteresse so did hee saue the theefe without any patrone without any mediatour Thus saith Saint Chrysostome Out of whose wordes I note first that hee greatly commendeth those who will immediately call vpon God and neither seeke to Peter nor to Paule nor to anie mediatour but Christ Iesus I note secondly that hee greatly reprooueth all such as are afraid to call vpon God by reason of their sins teâ—lâ—â—g theÌ„ that a penitent heart is the chief patron before God Thirdly that Christ Iesus tooke our nature vpon him for this end that sinners may boldly call vpon him I note fourthly that God wil sooner heare our selues theÌ„ other for vs. I note fiftly that wheÌ„ we cal vpon god immediatly we confirm our christian libertie I say secondly that the masse which goeth abroad vnder the name of S. Chrysostome is a meere counterfeit for first there be diuers copies and diuerse translations whereof neuer one agreeth with another Againe if S. Chrysostome had written any such masse he should be contrarie to himselfe in sundrie places of his works Thirdly because if S. Iames S. Basil S. Chrysostome shoulde euerie one of them haue made a masse as popish printed bookes tel vs it must needes follow which the papists will not wel like of that the bishop of Rome hadde in those dayes smal authoritie For now a dayes nothing may be done without the popes consent but then bishops made masses at their pleasure and the pope made none at all Fourthly because in this supposed S. Chrysost. masse there is often repeated this blasphemous prayer Saue vs by the prayers of thy saints Fiftly because prayer is there made for pope Nicholas and for the Empereur Alexius who both liued long after S. Chrysostomes death the one 500. yeares the other 800. yeares I say thirdly that the other places of S. Chrysostom are euen like to his masse and whosoeuer thinketh otherwise must say that he is contrarie to himselfe as is alreadie proued CHAP. VIII Of Popish Pilgrimage GOds people of late yeres haue beene wonderfully seduced and that by the sinister and false perswasion of the papists who taught them to merite their saluation by gadding on pilgrimage to visit stocks stones and dead mens bones The whole summe whereof for perspicuitie sake I shall reduce to certaine briefe conclusions The first conclusion The common people about the yeare of our Lord 420. were so addicted to sundry kinds of superstition partly by the instinct of Satan partly by the negligence of some Bishops and partly by the vndiscreet doctrine of othersome that S. Austen was at his wits end not knowing which way to turne him or what to do because he vtterly condemned many things in his heart which he durst not freely reprooue speake against This conclusion will seeme strange to many a one but S. Austen doth himselfe deliuer it to vs whose expresse words are these Quod autem instituitur praeter consuetudinem vt quasi obseruatto sacramenti sit approbare non possum etiamsi multa huiusmodi propter nonnullarum vel sanctarum vel turbulentarum personarum scandala vitanda liberius improbare non audeo Sed hoc nimis doleo quòd multa quae in diuinis libris saluberrima praecepta sunt minus curantur tam multis praesumptionibus sic plena sunt omnia vt grauius corripiatur qui per octauas suas terram nudo pede tetigerit quam qui mentem vinolentia sepelierit Omnia itaque talia quae neque sanctarum scripturarum authoritatibus contineÌ„tur nec in concilijs episcoporum statuta inueniuntur nec consuetudine vniuersae ecclesiae roborata sunt sed diuersorum locorum diuersis moribus innumerabiliter variantur ita vt vix aut omnino nunquam inueniri possint causae quas in eis instituendis homines secuti sunt vbi facultas tribuitur sine vlla dubitatione resecanda existimo Quamuis enim neque hoc inueniri possit quomodo contra fidem fint ipsam tamen religionem quam paucissimis manifestissimis celebrationum sacramentis misericordia dei esse liberam voluit seruilibus oneribus premunt vt tolerabilior sit conditio Iudaeorum qui etiamsi tempus libertatis non agnouerint legalibus tamen sarcinis non humanis praesumptionibus subijciuntur I can not approue that which beside custome is ordeyned to be obserued as an holy thing albeit