prayers been left to the discretion or ability of him that made them assuredly the Bishop or the Presbyters being men of greater gifts and more practised in them than the Deacons were supposed to be would not have left a business of that weight and moment to be discharged by men of the lowest Order themselves attending on the service as if not concerned And so much for and on occasion of the so Celebrated Council of Laodicea one of the ancientest upon true record in the Church of Christ You see by this that in the time of the renowned Constantine and long time before the Church was sorted and disposed into ranks and files and every sort of men had a particular Form of Service fitted and framed thereunto besides those Common-prayers wherein all did joyn We will next see whether they were not in condition as well to amplifie the times and beautifie the places of Gods publick worship as to agree upon the Forms and then we will go forwards in our purposed search till we have set the business above all gain-saying And for the times we shewed before with what a general consent they had transferred the Jewish Sabbath on the which God rested unto the first day of the week on the which Christ rose Nor was it long before they had their daily meetings and thereon their set hours of Prayer Morning and Evening as was proved before from S. Cyprians words To which was after added as appeareth by the Council of Laodicea before remembred an hour of prayer at nine of the Clock Concil Laodicen Can. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Text which hours are still observed at nine of the Clock 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Text which hours are still observed in all the Cathedrals of this Kingdom Besides these as their numbers multiplied and their affairs were crowned by God with peace and happiness they instituted several Annual Festivals to be observed with greater solemnity and concourse of people than any of their ordinary Assemblies in memory of especial blessings which God had given them by his Son or conferred on them by his Saints Of these the Feasts of Easter and Whitsontide as they are most eminent so they are most antient as being instituted in the times of the Lords Apostles to which were added in short time the two days next following that so those seacred Festivals might be solemnized with the greater measure of devotion in which regard Easter is called by Gregory Nyssen Gregor Nyssen Homil. 1. de Paschat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the three days Feast See of this also Augustin de Civitate Dei l. 22. cap. 8. The Feast of Christis Nativity began if not before in the second Age. Theophilus Caesariensis who lived about the times of Commodus and Severus makes mention of it and placeth it on the 25th of December quocunque die 8. Calend. Januar. venerit so his own words are as we still observe it A Festival of so great erninency that Chrysostom entituleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the mother or Metropolis of all other Feasts Chrysost Orat. de Phalagon See for this also in Nicephorus where it will be found to have been universally received before the time of Dioclesians persecution who burnt many eminent Christians at Nicomedia whilst they were Celebrating this great Festival in the House God Niceph. histor Eccl. l. 7. c. 6. That of the Incarnation was ordained in the beginning of the third Century there being an Homily of Gregory surnamed Thaumaturgus who lived An. 230. entituled de Annunciatione B. Virginis another for of this there is made some question writ by Athanasius who lived in the beginning of the following Age whereof there is no doubt amongst Learned men That of the Passion or Good-Friday as we call it now is of the same Antiquity as the other was for we find mention of it in the Books of Origen Origen contra Celsum l. 4. And for the Feasts of the Apostles Evangelists and other blessed Saints of God they took beginning most of them in the time of Constantine who by his Edict gave command to all the Deputies and Lieutenants of the Roman Empire that the memorials of the Martyrs should be duely honoured Euseb de vita Constat l. 4. c. 23 and solemn Feasts to be appointed for that end and purpose most of which brought their Fasts or Vigils along with them The Church lost nothing of that power by our Saviours coming which she enjoyed and practised in the times before but did ordain both Feasts and Fasts too if she saw occasion and as she found it might conduce to the advantage of Gods publique worship Now as the Christians of these two Ages did augment the Times so they increased the places also of Gods publique worship In the first Age they had their meeting or Assemblies in some privage Houses which being separated from all profane and common use were by the Owners dedicated to Religious exercises and therefore honoured in the Scriptures with the name of Churches But as they grew in numbers so they grew in confidence and in these Ages had their Churches visible and obvious to the eyes of all men Witness hereto Ignatius the Apostles Scholar and Successor to St. Peter in the See of Antioch who lived in the beginning of the second Century and writing to the Magnesians an Epistle hitherto unquestioned by our modern Criticks doth exhort them thus Omnes ad orandum in idem loci convenite Ignat. Epist ad Magnes una sit communis precatio una mens una spes in charitate c. That is to say Assemble all together in the same place to pour fourth your prayers unto the Lord let there be one Common-prayer amongst you one mind one onely hope in love and an unblamable faith in Jesus Christ run all together as one man to the Temple of God as to one Altar as to Jesus Christ the High Priest of the uncreated and immortal God Witness hereto for the middle of this second Century two several Epistles of Pope Pius the first and those unquestioned hitherto which we shall have occasion to make use of in the last Chapter of this Tract and the sixth Section of that Chapter And finally witness hereunto for the close thereof these words of Clemens Alexandrinus where speaking of the spiritual Church or the Congregation of Gods Elect he doth phrase it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Clem Alex. Strom. lib. 7. I call not now saith he the place but the Congregation of Gods Elect by the name of the Church By which it is mosT plain and evident that the word Ecclesia or the Church signified in his time as well the place of the Assembly as the general body of the Congregation or Elect of God Now that these Churches mentioned by Ignatius in the first beginning and specially by Clemens in the latter end of this second Century were not only some rooms
Evidence he may the better be enabled to give up his Verdict I close up this Address with these words in the Book of Judges cap. 19. v. 30. Consider of it take advice and then speak your minds THE HISTORY OF EPISCOPACY The First PART From the first Institution of it by our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ until the death of St. John the Apostle CHAP. I. The Christian Church first founded by our Lord and Saviour in an Imparity of Ministers 1. The several Offices of Christ our Saviour in the Administration of his Church 2. The aggregation of Disciples to him 3. The calling of the Apostles and why twelve in number 4. Of the Name and Office of an Apostle 5. What things were specially required unto the making of an Apostle 6. All the Apostles equal amongst themselves 7. The calling and appointing of the Seventy Disciples 8. A reconciliation of some different opinions about the number 9. The twelve Apostles superiour to the Seventy by our Saviours Ordinance 10. What kind of superiority it was that Christ prohibited his Apostles 11. The several Powers and preheminences given to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ 12. That the Apostles were made Bishops by our Lord and Saviour averred by the ancient Fathers 13. And by the Text of holy Scripture OF all the Types in holy Scripture I find not any that did so fully represent the nature of our Saviours Kingdom as those of David Moses and Melchizedech David a Shepherd Psal 78.71 72. Gen. 14.18 and a King Moses a Legislator and a Prince Melchisedech both King of Salem and a Priest also of the living God as that Text hath stiled him Each of these was a type of our Saviour Christ according to his Regal Office he being like Melchisedech Heb. 7.2 Exod. a King of Peace and Righteousness leading his people as did Moses out of the darkness and Idolatries of Egypt to the land of Canaan 2 Sam. and conquering like David all those Enemies which before held them in subjection This Office as it is supreme so it is perpetual That God who tells us in the Psalms that he had set his King on Zion on his holy mountain Psalm 2. Luke 1.33 hath also told us by his Angel that he should reign over the House of Jacob for ever and of his Kingdom there should be no end But if we look upon him in his Sacerdotal and Pastoral Offices if we behold him as a Lawgiver to his Church and people we find him not fore-signified in any one of these but in all together Heb. 5.6 10. A Priest he was after the order of Melchisedech Heb. 3.2 faithful to him that did appoint him as also Moses was faithful in all his house ordering and disposing of the same according to his will and pleasure And as for the discharge of his Pastoral or Prophetical Office God likeneth him to David Ezek. 34.23 by his holy Prophet saying I will set up one Shepheard over them and he shall feed them even my servant David he shall feed them and he shall be their shepheard Which Offices although subordinate to the Regal power are perpetual also He was not made a Priest for a time or season but for ever Tu es Sacerdos in aeternum Heb. 5.6 Thou art a Priest for ever said the Lord unto him A Priest who as he once appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself Heb. 9.26 so by that one offering hath he perfected for ever all them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 and sitting down at the right hand of God Heb. 7.25 he ever liveth and maketh intercession for them Of the same perpetuity also are those other Offices of Christ our Saviour before remembred He had not been sidelis sicut Moses Estius in Heb. 3. v. 2. faithful as Moses was in all his house i. e. as Estius well expounds it in administratione populi sibi credita in the well-ordering of the charge committed to him had he not constituted a set Form of Government and given the same unto his Church as a Rule for ever Nor had he faithfully discharged the part of David had he looked only to his flock whiles himself was present and took no care for the continual feeding of the same after he was returned to his heavenly glories And therefore Eph. 4.8 11 12 13. when he ascended up on high he gave gifts to men and gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ till we all come in the unity of faith and of the knowledg of the son of God unto a perfect man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ He gave them then indeed after his Ascension when he ascended up on high because he then did furnish them with those gifts and graces wherewith they were endued by the Holy Ghost and thereby fitted for the execution of the trust committed to them by their Lord. For otherwise many of them had been given already not only in the way of choice and designation but of commission and employment Ite Matth. 28.19 docete omnes Gentes had been said before It was not long after our Saviours baptism by John in Jordan that some Disciples came unto him That testimony which came down from God the Father when the Heavens were opened and the Spirit of God descended on him like a Dove Matth. 3.16 was of it self sufficient to procure many followers The evidence which was given by John the Baptist added nought to this And yet that evidence prevailed so far John 1.37 that two of his Disciples when they heard him speak forsook their old Master and went after Jesus Nor did it satisfie them that they had found the Christ and had talked with him but they impart the same unto others also Thus Andrew brings in his own Brother Simon Philip invites his friend Nathancel John 1.42 46. One tells another the glad tidings that they had found him of whom Moses in the Law and all the Prophets did write and all of them desire to be his Disciples John 1.45 Afterward as his fame increased so his followers multiplyed and every Miracle that he wrought to confirm his Doctrine did add unto the number of his Proselytes So great his fame was and so great the conflux of all sorts of people that Johns Disciples presently complained I know not whether with more truth or envy John 3.26 Omnes ad eum veniunt that all men came unto him both to hear his preaching and receive his baptism And certainly it was no wonder that it should be so that all men should resort to him who was the way or seek for him who was the truth John 6.86 or follow after him who was the life Lord saith Saint Peter
to the best edifying of the Church For thus we read how Paul disposed of Timothy and Titus who were both Evangelists sending them as the occasions of the Church required from Asia to Greece and then back to Asia and thence to Italy How he sent Crescens to Galatia 2 Tim. 4. Titus to Dalmatia Tychicus to Ephesus commanding Erastus to abide at Corinth and using the Ministery of Luke at Rome 1 Cor. 14. So find we how he ordered those that had the spirit of Prophecy and such as had the gift of tongues that every one might use his talent unto edification how he ordained Bishops in one place Elders or Presbyters in another as we shall se◠hereafter in this following story The like we may affirm of Saint Peter also and of the rest of the Apostles though there be less left upon record of their Acts and Writings than are remaining of Saint Paul whose mouths and pens being guided by the Holy Ghost have been the Canon ever since of all saving truth For howsoever Mark and Luke two of the Evangelists have left behind them no small part of the Book of God of their own enditing yet were not either of their writings reckoned as Canonical in respect of the Authors but as they had been taken from the Apostles mouths and ratified by their Authority as both Saint Luke himself Luk. 1. Hieron in Marc. Clemens apud Euseb l. 2. c. 15. Act. 8.12 v. 14 15 17. and the Fathers testifie And for a further mark of difference between the Apostles and the rest of the Disciples we may take this also that though the rest of the Disciples had all received the Holy Ghost yet none could give the same but the Apostles only Insomuch that when Philip the Evangelist had preached the Gospel in Samaria and converted many and Baptized them in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ yet none of them received the Holy Ghost till Peter and John came down unto them and prayed for them and laid their hands on them as the Scriptures witness That was a priviledge reserved to the Apostles and to none but them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hom. 18. in Act. 8. as it is in Chrysostom And when the two Apostles did it they did it without Philips help or co-operation who joyned not in it nor contributed at all to so great a work for ought we find in holy Scripture In this regard it is no marvel if in the enumerating of those ministrations which did concur in the first founding of the Church the Apostles always have preheminence First 1 Cor. 12.28 Apostles Secondarily Prophets Thirdly Teachers c. as Saint Paul hath ranked them Nor did he rank them so by chance but gave to every one his proper place Hom. 32. in 1. ad Cor. c. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Saint Chrysostom first placing that which was most excellent and afterwards descending unto those of a lower rank Which plainly shews that in the composition of the Church there was a prius and posterius in regard of order a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or more honourable as the Father calls it in regard of power as in the constitution of the body natural to which the Church is there resembled some of the members do direct and some obey some of them being honourable 1 Cor. 12.22 23. some feeble but all necessary The like may also be observed out of the 4. chap. of the same Apostle unto the Ephesians where the Apostles are first placed and ranked above the rest of the ministrations Prophets Evangelists Pastors and Teachers of which some were to be but temporary in the Church of God the others to remain for ever Hom. 11. in Ephes 4. For as Saint Chrysostom doth exceeding well expound that Scripture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 First he doth name Apostles as they in whom all powers and graces were united Secondly Prophets such as was Agabus in the Acts Thirdly Evangelists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as had made no progress into many Countries but preached the Gospel in some certain Regions as Aquila and Priscilla and then Pastors and Teachers who had the government of a Country or Nation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as were setled and employed in a certain place or City as Timothy and Titus If then a question should be made whom S. Paul meaneth here by Pastors and Teachers I answer it is meant of Bishops 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Father hath it such as were placed over some certain Cities and that the Bishops were accounted in the ancient times the only ordinary Pastors of the Church in the room and stead of the Apostles we shall shew hereafter Chap. 6. n. And this I am the rather induced to think because that in the first Epistle to those of Corinth written when as there were but few Bishops of particular Cities S. Paul doth speak of Teachers only but here in this to the Ephesians writ at such time as Timothy and Titus and many others had formerly been ordained Bishops he adds Pastors also Theoph. Oecum in Ephes 4.4.11 Certain I am that both Theophylact and Oecumenius do expound the words by Bishops only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such Bishops as both Timothy and Titus were by them accounted Nay even Saint Hierome seemeth to incline this way Hieron in Ephes 4. making the Prelates of the Church or the Praesides Ecclesiae as he calls them there to be the Pastors and Teachers mentioned by Saint Paul i.e. Pastores ovium magistros hominum Pastors in reference to their Flocks Teachers in reference to their Disciples But to go on unto our story Our Saviour having thus enabled and supplyed his labourers with the gifts and graces of his Spirit it could not be but that the Harvest went on apace Act. 2.41.47 The first day added to the Church 3000 souls And after that God added daily to it such as should be saved The miracle wrought by the hands of the two Apostles at the Beautiful gate Act. 3.2 opened a large door to the further increase thereof For presently upon the same and Peters Sermon made upon that occasion we find that the number of the men which heard the word and believed Act. 4.4 was about five thousand Not that there were so many added to the former number as to make up five thousand in the total but that there were five thousand added to the Church more than had been formerly S. Chrysostom and Oecumenius Chrys hom 10. in Act. 4. hom 25. in Act. 11. both affirming that there were more converted by this second Sermon of Saint Peters than by the first So that the Church increasing daily more and more multitudes both of men and women being continually added to the Lord and their numbers growing dreadful to the Jewish Magistrates Act. 5.14 it seemed good to the Apostles Vers 26 who by the intimation of the
people in the electing of their Bishops it had been ordinary for the Bishop yet in place to consecrate some one or other that should assist him whilst he lived and succeed after his decease only the Church of Alexandria never had that custom And they that had that custom Aug. ep 110. as it seems did not like it well for whereas Valerius Bishop of Hippo out of a vehement desire to have S. Austin his successour did consecrate or ordain him Bishop whilst as himself was yet alive Saint Austin was resolved for his part not to do the like it being a thing prohibited by the Nicene Council Quod ergo reprehensum est in me noli reprehendi in filio meo as he there resolveth So that the place in Epiphanius tendeth unto this alone viz. to shew the reason why Athanasius could not succeed Alexander in that See though by him designed which was that he being yet alive Ep. ad Euag. it was against the custom of that Church to ordain another Saint Hierom secondly observeth that the Presbyters of Alexandria unum ex se electum in excelsiori gradu collocatum Episcopum nominabant did use to chuse one from amongst themselves whom being placed in a more eminent degree than any of the rest they called a Bishop And this saith he continued in that Church à Marco Evangelista ad Heraclam Dionysium Episcopos from the time of Mark the Evangelist until the Bishopricks of Heraclas and Dionysius Smectymn p. 31. Some hereupon infer that the persons who brought in the imparity of Ministers into the Church were not the Apostles but the Presbyters An inference as faulty as was that before All that Saint Hierom means is this that from the time of Mark till the days of Heraclas and Dionysius the Presbyters of Alexandria had no other Bishop than one whom they had chosen out of their own body just as a man may say on the like occasion that from the first foundation till the time of Sir H Savil the Colledg of Eaton never had a Provost but one Euseb hist l. 6. c. 12. â—â— whom they had chosen out of their own society Now Heraclas before he was ordained Bishop was not a Presbyter of that Church although a Reader in the Schools of that famous City and belike Dionysius also was And therefore it is well observed by the Cardinal that Hierom writing to Euagrius relateth quid in ea Ecclesia usque ad haec Dionysii tempora in electione Episcoporum agi consueverit Annal. An. 1248. n. 5. what was the usage of the Church of Alexandria in the election of their Bishops until the times of Dionysus However we have gained thus much by Hierom that from Mark downward till those times and a long time after there wanted not a Bishop properly so called Hier. Comment in ep ad Titum in that famous Church and therefore sure they came not first into the Church Diaboli instinctu by the Devils instinct as he elsewhere saith There is another observation in the Commentaries ascribed to Ambrose which having some resemblance unto that before and a like sinister use being made thereof I shall here lay down and after give some Annotations on it to explain the place Comment in Eph. c. 4. The Author of those Commentaries affirmeth that Timothy whom Paul created Presbyter was by him called a Bishop because the first Presbyters were called Bishops it being the custom of the Church for so I think the sense must be made up ut recedente eo sequens ei succederet that he the first departing the next in order should succeed But being it was found that the following Presbyters were utterly unworthy of so high preferment that course was altered and it was provided by a Council ut non ordo sed meritum crearet Episcopum c. that merit and not seniority should raise a man he being appointed by the suffrages of many Priests to be a Bishop lest an unfit person rashly should usurp the place and so become a publick scandal These are the Authors words Resp ad tract de divers minist gradibus c. 23. be he who he will And from hence Beza doth collect that Bishops differed not from Presbyters in the Apostles times that there was only in every place a President of the Presbytery who called them together and porposed things needful for their consideration that this priority went round by course every one holding it in his turn for a week or more according as the Priests in the Jewish Temple had their weekly courses and finally that this Apostolical and primitive order was after changed upon the motives and inducements before remembred Smectymn p. 31. Some of our modern Writers against Episcopacy have gone more warily to work than so affirming from those words of Ambrose or whosoever was the Author that this Rectorship or priority was devolved at first from one Elder to another by succession when he who was in the place was removed the next in order amongst the Elders succeeded and that this course was after changed the better to keep out unworthy men it being made a matter of election and not a matter of succession These men come neer the point in their Exposition though they keep far enough in the Application inferring hence that the imparity of Ministers came in otherwise than by divine Authority For by comparing this of Ambrose with that before mentioned out of Hierom the meaning of the Author will be only this that as in some places the Presbyters elected one of their own Presbytery to be their Bishop so for preventing of Ambition and avoiding Faction they did agree amongst themselves ut uno recedente that as the place did vaike by death or deprivation by resignation cession banishment or any other means whatever the Senior of the whole Presbytery should succeed therein as the Lord Mayor is chosen for his year in London But after upon sight of those inconveniences which did thence arise it was thought fit in their election of the person rather to look upon his Merit than his Seniority So that for all this place of Ambrose were those Comments his the Bishop may enjoy a fixt preheminence and hold it by divine Authority not by humane Ordinances But to return unto Saint Peter and to the Churches by him planted and founded by him in Episcopacy in these Western parts I shall in part rely on the Authority of the Martyrologie of the Church of Rome though so fat only and no further as it is backed by venerable Bede and Vsuardus ancient Writers both the latest living in the year 800. and besides them in some particulars by other Authors of far more Antiquity Bellarm. de Scriptor And these for better methods sake we will behold according to the several Countries into which S. Peter either went himself or sent forth his Disciples to them to preach the Gospel And first for Italy
Craec in Martii 14. was by him ordained Bishop of Britain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the words there are a region full of fierce and savage people and that having there setled the Church and ordained Presbyters and Deacons in the same he did there also end his life The Reverend Primate of Armagh out of a fragment attributed to Heleca De Britannic Eccl. prim c. 1. sometimes Bishop of Saragossa in Spain doth recite a passage wherein it is affirmed of this Aristobulus missum in Angliam Episcopum that he was sent Bishop into England for so the Author calleth this Countrey according to the name it had when he writ the same But these things which relate to the British Churches I rather shall refer to our learned Antiquaries to be considered of more fully than affirm any thing my self But to look back on Timothy and Titus whom we left lately in their several Churches I hear it said that notwithstanding all those proofs before produced from the ancient yet being Evangelists as they were they could be no Bishops Smectymn p. 48. Bishops being tied to the particular care of that flock or Church over which God had made them Overseers but the Evangelists being Planetary sent up and down from place to place by the Apostles as the necessities of the Church required Besides that moving in an higher sphere than that of Bishops and being Co-partners with Saint Paul in his Apostleship or Apostolical function Unbishopping of Tim. Tit. p. 36. it had been a devesting of themselves of their Apostolical jurisdiction and preheminence to become Bishops at the last and so descend from a superiour to an inferiour Office For answer whereunto we need say but this that the gift of being an Evangelist might and did fall on any rank of ordinary Ministers as might that also of the Prophet Philip one of the seven a Deacon as it is generally conceived but howsoever Ministring unto the Church in an inferiour place or Office was notwithstanding an Evangelist and Agabus though perhaps but a simple Presbyter one of the Seventy past all question was a Prophet too Philip as he was one of the Seven was tied to a particular employment and of necessity sometimes Acts 6.12 must leave the Word of God to serve Tables Yet the same Philip as he was furnished by the Lord with gifts and graces for gaining Souls to God Almighty and doing the work of an Evangelist must leave the serving of those Tables to preach the Word And Agabus Acts 11.27 28. 21.10 if he were a Presbyter whether of Hierusalem from whence he is twice said to come or of some other Church that I will not say might notwithstanding his employment in a particular Church repair to Antioch or Caesarea as the Spirit willed him there to discharge the Office of a Prophet So then both Timothy and Titus might be Bishops as to their ordinary place and calling though in relation unto their extraordinary gifts they were both Evangelists As for their falling from a higher to a lower function from an Evangelist unto a Bishop I cannot possibly perceive where the fall should be They that object this will not say but Timothy at the least was made a Presbyter for wherefore else did the Presbytery which they so much stand on lay hands upon him And certainly if it were no diminution from an Evangelist to become a I resbyter it was a preferment unto the Evangelist from being but a Presbyter to become a Bishop But for the Bishopping of Timothy and Titus as to the quod sit of it that so they were in the opinion of all ancient Writers we have said enough We will next look on the authority committed to them to see what further proof hereof may be brought for that CHAP. V. Of the Authority and Jurisdiction given by the Word of God to Timothy and Titus and in them to all other Bishops 1. The Authority committed to Timothy and Titus was to be perpetual and not personal only 2. The power of Ordination intrusted only unto Bishops by the Word of God according to the judgments of the Fathers 3. Bishops alone both might and did Ordain without their Presbyters 4. That Presbyters might not Ordain without a Bishop proved by the memorable case of Coluthus and Ischyras 5. As by those also of Maximus and a Spanish Bishop 6. In what respects the joint assistance of the Presbyters was required herein 7. The case of the Reformed Churches beyond the Seas declared and qualified 8. The care of ordering Gods Divine Service a work peouliar to the Bishop 9. To whom the Ministration also of the Saoraments doth in chief belong 10. Bishops to have a care that Gods Word be preached and to encourage those that take pains that way 11. Bishops to silence and correct such Presbyters as preach other doctrines 12. As also to reprove and reject the Heretick 13. The censure and correction of inferiour Presbyters doth belong to Bishops 14. And of Lay-people also if they walk unworthy of their Christian calling 15. Conjectural proofs that the description of a Bishop in the first to Timothy is of a Bishop truly and properly so called THEY who object that Timothy and Titus were Evangelists and so by consequence no Bishops Unbishopping of Tim. Tit. p. 60 61 c. have also said and left in writing that the authority committed to them by Saint Paul did not belong to them at all as Bishops but Evangelists only But this if pondered as it ought hath no ground to stand on The calling of Evangelists as it was Extraordinary so it was but temporary to last no longer than the first planting of the Church for which so many signal gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit were at first poured on the Disciples I know not any Orthodox Writer who doth not in this point agree with Calvin Com. in 4. ad Eph. v. 11. who in his Comment on the Epistle to the Ephesians gives us this instruction Deum Apostolis Evangelistis Prophetis Ecclesiam suam non nisi ad tempus ornasse that God adorned his Church with Prophets Evangelists and Apostles for a season only having before observed that of all those holy ministrations there recited Postrema tantum duo perpetua esse the two last viz. Pastors and Teachers which he takes for two were to be perpetual But on the other side power to ordain fit Ministers of what sort soever as also to reprove and censure those that behaved themselves unworthily authority to convent and reject an Heretick to punish by the censures of the Church all such as give offence and scandal to the Congregation by their exhorbitant and unruly living this ought to be perpetual in the Church of Christ This the Apostle seems to intimate when he said to Timothy I charge thee in the sight of God 1 Tim. 6.14 and before Jesus Christ that thou keep this Commandment without spot
neque Diaconus jus habeat baptizandi that without lawful mission from the Bishop neither the Presbyter nor Deacons might Baptize Not that I think there was required in Hieroms time a special Licence from the Bishop for every ministerial act that men in either of those Orders were to execute but that they had no more interest therein than what was specially given them by and from the Bishop in their Ordination As for the Act of Preaching which was at first discharged by the Apostles Prophets and Evangelists according to the gifts that God had given them for the performance of the same when as the Church began to settle it was conferred by the Apostles on the several Presbyters by themselves ordained as doth appear by Saint Pauls exhortation to the Presbyters 2 Tim. 4.5 which he called from Ephesus unto Miletum To this as Timothy had been used before doing the work of an Evangelist so he was still required to ply it being called unto the Office of a Bishop Saint Paul conjuring him before God and Christ that notwithstanding the diversions which might happen to him by reason of his Episcopal place and jurisdiction 2. Tim. 4.2 he should Preach the Word and not to Preach it only in his own particular 2 Tim. 2.15 shewing himself a Workman that needed not to be ashamed dividing the word of truth aright But seeing that others also did the like according to the trust reposed in them whether they had been formerly ordained by the Apostles or might be by himself ordained in times succeeding Those that discharge this duty both with care and conscience 1 Tim. 5.17 guiding and governing that portion of the Church aright wherewith they are intrusted and diligently labouring in the word and doctrine by the Apostle are accounted worthy of double honour Which questionless S. Paul had never represented unto Timothy but that it did belong unto him as a part of his Episcopal power and Office to see that men so painful in their calling and so discreet in point of government should be rewarded and encouraged accordingly By honour in this place the Apostle doth not only mean respect and reverence but support and maintenance as appears plainly by that which is alledged from holy Scripture viz. Thou shalt not muzzle the Oxe that treadeth out the Corn And the Labourer is worthy of his hiâ—e Chrysost hom 15. in 1 Tim. 5. Ambros in locum Calvin in 1 ad Tim. c. 5. Chrysostom so expounds the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By honour here is meant both reverence and a supply of all things necessary with whom agree the Commentaries which pass under the name of Ambrose Calvin affirms the like for our modern Writers Victum praecipue suppeditari jubet Pastoribus qui docendo sunt occupati Paul here commandeth that necessary maintenance be allowed the Pastor who laboureth in the Word and Doctrin And hereto Beza agreeth also in his Annotations on the place Now we know well that in those times wherein Paul wrote to Timothy and a long time after the dispensation of the Churches Treasury was for the most part in the Bishop and at his appointment For as in the beginnings of the Gospel the Faithful sold their Lands and Goods Act. 4. v. ult and laid the money at the Apostles feet by them to be distributed as the necessities of the Church required So in succeeding times all the Oblations of the faithful were returned in unto the Bishop of the place and by him disposed of We need not stand on many Authors in so clear a business Zonaras telling plainly that at the first the Bishop had the absolute and sole disposing of the revenues of the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Zonaras in Concil Chalcedâ—n Ca. 26. no man whoever being privy to their doings in it And that they did accordingly dispose thereof to every man according to his parts and industry doth appear by Cyprian where he informeth us that he having advanced Celerinus a Confessor of great renoun amongst that people and no less eminent indeed for his parts and piety unto the office of a Reader he had allotted unto him Cypr. Ep. 34. vel l. 4. ep 5. and to Aurelius one of equal vertue then a Reader also Vt sportulis iisdem cum Presbyteris honorentur that they should have an equal share in the distribution with the Priests or Presbyters But many times so fell out that those to whom the Ministry of the word was trusted Preached other doctrin to the People than that which had been taught by the Apostles 1 Tim. 1.3 Tit. 1.10 11. Vain talkers and deceivers which subverted whole houses teaching things they should not and that for filthy lucres sake What must the Bishop do to them He must first charge them not to Preach such doctrins which rather minister questions than godly edifying 1 Tim. 1.4 And if they will not hearken to nor obey this charge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tit. 1.9 he must stop their mouths let them be silenced in plain English The silencing of such Ministers as deceive the People and Preach such things they should not even for lucres sake to the subverting of whole Families is no new matter as we see in the Church of God Saint Paul here gives it as in charge to Titus and to all Bishops in his person Certain I am that Chrysostom doth so expound it If thou prevailest not saith he by admonitions Chrysost tom 2. n. Tit. 1. be not afraid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 silentium iis impone the Translator reads it but silence them that others may the better be preserved by it Hierom doth so translate it also quibus oportet silentium indici such men must be commanded silence Hieron in Can. Tit. And for the charge of Paul to Timothy that he should charge those false Apostles which he speaks of not to Preach strange doctrines it carries with it an Authority that must be exercised For this cause I required thee to abide at Ephesus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not that thou shouldst intreat but command such men to Preach no other doctrines than they had from me Theophylact on those words Theophyl in 1. ad Tim. c. 1. puts the question thus in the words of Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it may be asked saith he whether that Timothy were then Bishop when Paul wrote this to him To which he answereth of himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it is most probable giving this reason of the same because he is to charge those men not to teach other doctrines Oecumen in locum Oecumenius is more positive in the point and affirms expresly on these words that Paul had made him Bishop there before that time And Lyra if he may be heard Lyra in 1 Tim. c. 1. make this general use of the Apostles exhortation that the first Act here recommended to a Bishop is falsae doctrinae
do of this In Gen. 6. n. 17. The Jesuit Pererius shall stand up to make good the first and Doctor Cracanthorp to avow the second Pererius first resolves it clearly numerum Septenarium etiam in rebus pessimis execrandis saepenumero positum esse in Scriptura sacra As for example The evil spirit saith St. Luke brought with him seven spirits worse than himself and out of Mary Magdalen did Christ cast out seven Devils as St Mark tells us So in the Revelation St. John informs us of a Dragon that had seven Heads and seven Crowns as also of seven Plagues sent into the Earth and seven Viols of Gods wrath poured out upon it He might have told us had he listed that the purple Beast whereon the great Whore rid had seven Heads also and that she sat upon seven Mountains It 's true saith he which David tells us that he did praise God seven times a day but then as true it is which Solomon hath told us that the just man falleth seven times a day So in the Book of Genesis we have seven lean Kine and seven thin ears of Corn as well as seven fat Kine and seven full Ears To proceed no further Pererius hereupon makes this general resolution of the case Apparet igitur eosdem numeros aeque in bonis malis poni usurpari in sacra scriptura Next whereas those of Rome as before I noted have gone the same way to find out seven Sacraments Contra Spalat cap. 30. our Cracanthorpe to shew the vanity of that Argument doth the like for the proof of two Quod si nobis fas esset c. If it were lawful for us to take this course we could produce more for the number of two than they can for seven As for example God made two great lights in the Firmament and gave to man two Eys two Ears two Feet two Hands two Arms. There were two Nations in the womb of Rebecca two Tables of the Law two Cherubins two Sardonich stones in which were written the names of the sons of Israel Thou shalt offer to the Lord two Rams two Turtles two Lambs of an year old two young Pigeons two Hee-goats two Oxen for a Peace-Offering Let us make two Trumpets two Doors of the wood of Olives two Nets two Pillars There were two Horns of the Lamb two Candlesticks two Olive-branches two Witnesses two Prophets two Testaments and upon two Commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets saith our Saviour Congruentiis facile vinceremus si nobis in hunc campum descendere libet c. We should saith he presume of an easie victory should we thus dally with congruities as do those of Rome Hence we conclude that by the light of Scripture we find not any thing in Nature why either every seventh day should or every second day should not be a Sabbath Not to say any thing of the other Numbers of which the like might be affirmed if we would trouble our selves about it It 's true this Trick of trading in the mysteries of Numbers is of long standing in the Church and of no less danger first borrowed from the Platonists and the Pythagoreans by the ancient Hereticks Marcion Valentinus Basilides and the rest of that damned crew the better to disguise their errours and palliate their impieties Some of the Fathers afterwards took up the device perhaps to foil the Hereticks at their own weapons though many of them purposely declined it Sure I am Chrysostom dislikes it In Gen. hom 24. Who on those words in the 7th of Genesis by seven and by seven which is the Number now debated doth instruct us thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Many saith he do tell strange matters of this fact and taking an occasion hence make many observations out of several Numbers Whereas not observation but only an unseasonable curiosity hath produced those fictions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence so many Heresies had their first original For oftentimes that out of our abundance we may fit their fancies we find the even or equal number no less commemorated in holy Scripture as when God sent out his Disciples by two and two when he chose twelve Apostles and left four Evangelists But these things it were needless to suggest to you who have so many times been lessoned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to stop your Ears against such follies Saint Augustine also though he had descanted a while upon the mysteries of this Number yet he cuts off himself in the very middle De Civit. Dei l. 11. c. 31. as it were Ne scientiolam suam leviter magis quam utiliter jactare velle videatur lest he should seem to shew his reading with more pride than profit And thereupon he gives this excellent Rule which I could wish had been more practised in this case Habenda est itaque ratio moderationis gravitatis ne forte cum de numero multum loquimur mensuram pondus negligere judicemus We must not take saith he so much heed of Numbers that we forget at the last both weight and measure And this we should the rather do because that generally there is no Rule laid down or any reason to be given in Nature why some particular numbers have been set apart for particular uses when other numbers might have served why Hiericho should be rather compassed seven times than six or eight why Abraham rather trained three hundred and eighteen of his servants than three hundred and twenty or why his servant took ten Camels with him into Padan Aram and not more or less with infinite others of this kind in the Law Levitical Yet I deny not but that some reason may be given why in the Scripture things are so often ordered by sevens and sevens Respons ad qu. 69. viz. as Justin Martyr tells 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the better to preserve the memory or the Worlds Creation Another reason may be added which is by this inculcating of the number of seven unto the Jews to make that people who otherwise were at first averse from it as before I noted continually mindful of the Sabbath In Isaia 4. Numerum septenarium propter Sabbatum Judaeis familiarem esse was the observation of S. Hierom. To draw this point unto an end It is apparent by what hath before heen spoken that there is no Sabbath to be found in the beginning of the World or mentioned as a thing done in the second of Genesis either on any strength of the Text it self or by immediate Ordinance and command from God collected from it or by the law and light of nature imprinted in the soul of man at his first Creation much less by any natural fitness in the number of seven whereby it was most capable in it self of so high an honour which first premised we shall the easier see what hath been done in point of practice CHAP. II. That there was no Sabbath
said in holy Scripture that he was seen of them by the space of forty days as much on one as on another His first appearing after the night following his Resurrection which is particularly specified in the Book of God was when he shewed himself to Thomas who before was absent That the Text tells us John 20.26 was after eight days from the time before remembred which some conceive to be the eighth day after or the next first day of the week and thereupon conclude that day to be most proper for the Congregations or publick Meetings of the Church Diem octavum quo Christus Thomae apparuit In Joh. l. 17. cap. 18. Dominicum diem esse necesse est as Saint Cyril hath it Jure igitur sanctae congregationes die octavo in Ecclesia fiunt But where the Greek Text reads it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 post octo dies in the vulgar Latine after eight days according to our English Bibles that should be rather understood of the ninth or tenth than the eighth day after and therefore could not be upon the first day of the week as it is imagined Now as the premisses are untrue so the Conclusion is unfirm For if our Saviours apparition unto his Disciples were of it self sufficient to create a Sabbath then must that day whereon Saint Peter went on fishing John 21.3 be a Sabbath also and so must holy Thursday too it being most evident that Christ appeared on those days unto his Apostles So that as yet from our Redeemers Resurrection unto his Ascension we find not any word or Item of a new Christian Sabbath to be kept amongst them or any evidence for the Lords day in the four Evangelists either in precept or in practice The first particular passage which doth occur in holy Scripture touching the first day of the week is that upon that day the Holy Ghost did first come down on the Apostles and that upon the same Saint Peter Preached his first Sermon unto the Jews and Baptized such of them as believed there being added to the Church that day three thousand souls This hapned on the Feast of Pentecost which fell that year upon the Sunday or first day of the week as elsewhere the Scripture calls it but as it was a special and a casual thing so can it yield but little proof if it yield us any that the Lords Day was then observed or that the Holy Ghost did by selecting of that day for his descent on the Apostles intend to dignifie it for Sabbath For first it was a casual thing that Pentecost should fall that year upon the Sunday It was a moveable Feast as unto the day such as did change and shift it self according to the position of the Feast of Passeover the rule being this that on what day soever the second of the Passeover did fall upon that also fell the great Feast of Pentecost Emend Temp. l. 2. Nam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 semper eadem est feria quae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Scaliger hath rightly noted So that as often as the Passeover did fall upon the Saturday or Sabbath as this year it did then Pentecost fell upon the Sunday But when the Passeover did chance to fall upon the Tuesday the Pentecost fell that year upon the Wednesday sic de caeteris And if the rule be true as I think it is that no sufficient argument can be drawn from a casual fact and that the falling of the Pentecost that year upon the first day of the week be meerly casual the coming of the Holy Ghost upon that day will be no argument nor authority to state the first day of the week in the place and honour of the Jewish Sabbath There may be other reasons given why God made choice of that time rather than of any other As first because about that very time before he had proclaimed the Law upon Mount Sinai And secondly that so he might the better conntenance and grace the Gospel in the sight of men and add the more authority unto the doctrine of the Apostles The Feast of Pentecost was a great and famous Festival at which the Jews all of them were to come unto Hierusalem there to appear before the Lord and amongst others those which had their hands in our Saviours blood And therefore as S. Chrysostom notes it did God send down the Holy Ghost at that time of Pentecost In Act. 2. because those men that did consent to our Saviours death might publickly receive rebuke for that bloody act and so bear record to the power of our Saviours Gospel before all the World 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as that Father hath it So that the thing being casual as unto the day and special as unto the business then by God intended it will afford us little proof as before I said either that the Lords Day was as then observed or that the Holy Ghost did select that day for so great a work to dignifie it for a Sabbath As for Saint Peters Preaching upon that day and the Baptizing of so many as were converted to the faith upon the same it might have been some proof that now at least if nor before the first day of the week was set apart by the Apostles for religious exercises had they not honoured all days with the same performances But if we search the Scriptures we shall easily find that all days were alike to them in that respect no day in which they did not preach the word of life and administer the Sacraments of their Lord and Saviour to such as either wanted it or did desire it Or were it that the Scriptures had not told us of it yet natural reason would inform us that those who were imployed in so great a work as the Conversion of the World could not confine themselves unto times and seasons but must take all advantages whensoever they came But for the Scripture it is said in terms express first generally that the Lord added daily to the Church such as should be saved and therefore without doubt Acts 2.47 the means of their salvation were daily ministred unto them and in the fifth Chapter of the Acts Verse 42 and daily in the Temple and in every house they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ Acts 8. So for particulars when Philip did Baptize the Eunuch either he did it on a working day as we now distinguish them and not upon the first day of the week and so it was no Lords day duty or else it was not held unlawful to take a journey on that day as some think it is Saint Peters Preaching to Cornelius and his Baptizing of that house was a week-days work as may be gathered from Saint Hierom. That Father tells us that the day whereon the vision appeared to Peter was probably the Sabbath Advers Jovinian l. 2. or the Lords Day as we call it now fieri potuit ut
to whom shall we go thou hast the words of life eternal The number of his followers being thus increased he sends them not immediately to preach his Gospel Two years he trained them up in the School of Piety where he himself was both the Teacher and the Lesson before he ventured them abroad upon that employment And when he ventured them abroad he neither sent them all together Luke 6.13 nor with like authority Twelve he selected from the rest whom he named Apostles Mark 3.14 And he ordained them saith Saint Mark that they should be with him and that he might send them forth to preach first to be with him as the constant witnesses of his words and works and afterwards to preach and publish what they saw and heard De Praescript advers haeret In which regard Tertullian calls them not unfitly Legatos à latere sent from Christ to teach the Nations Ex quibus out of his Disciples duodecem praecipuos lateri suo adlegerat destinatos nationibus Magistros as his own words are The same Tertullian gives a reason why Christ made choice of twelve Apostles neither more nor less Contra Marcian l. 4. viz. because there were twelve Fountains in Elim twelve gems or pretious Stones in the Brest-plate of Aaron and twelve stones taken out of Jordan by the hand of Joshua and by him put into the Ark of the Testament And then he adds totidem enim Apostoli praetendebantur that the like number of Apostles was prefigured Other conceits there are of the Ancient Fathers about this number Bede and Sedulius resemble them to the twelve signs of the Zodiack Justin Martyr to the twelve Bells in the high Priests garment Tertullian before named In John 6. Sedulius Dialog cum Tryphone Loco supra citato to the twelve Oxen that did uphold the molten Sea in the Temple of Solomon Others have other fancies to the same effect but whether Christ related unto any of them in this designation as it is no where to be found so is it not material to the present purpose More near unto the point in my opinion is that of Calvin who thinks our Saviour in the choice of his twelve Disciples related to the twelve Patriarchs of the Tribes of Israel to shew that as the Patriarchs were the root and seminary of the Tribes of Israel so the Apostles were to be the Parents or if you will Calvin in Harm Evang. the Patriarchs of the Church of Christ Non ergo frustra Dominus duodecim veluti Patriarchas constituens Ecclesiae renunciationem testatus est Which guess of his though it come nearer to the matter than the other did yet it falls short also of the true intention of our Lord and Saviour For Christ who was best able to assign the reason of his mind herein hath told us that he fitted his Apostles according to the number of the Tribes of Israel that his Apostles in due time might become their Judges For so himself declares it in his holy Gospel Verily saith he I say unto you Matth. 19.28 that ye which have followed me in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory ye shall also sit upon twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel Hieron in locum i. e. as Hierom doth expound it Quia credentibus vobis illi credere noluerunt by reason of their obstinacy and unbelief not giving credit to that Gospel the Apostles preached Twelve then our Saviour pleased to chuse whom he named Apostles and they themselves conceived this number not to want its weight and therefore made it their first care to fill up their number and surrogate some other in the place of Judas Saint Peter very well declared the necessity of it when he came in with his Oportet Acts 1.21 22. Oportet ergo ex his viris c. Wherefore of these men that have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out amongst us must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection So excellently true is that of Austin Adeo numerus ille sacratus est August in Psal 103. ut in locum unius qui exciderat non posset nisi alter nominari As for the name quos Apostolos nominavit as Saint Luke informs us Baronius thinks it was not of our Saviours own divising Luke 6.13 but by him borrowed of the high Priests of the Jewish Nation who had a special kind of Ministers whom they called Apostles imployed by them for the instruction of the Priests Quos etiam ipse legare consueverat ad componendos optimos Sacerdotum mores ipsas Synagogas inspiciendas pravos mores corrigendos c. Annal. A. 32. ss 5. Epiphan haeres 30. n. 5. Quos haec appellatio missos interpretatur Tert. de proscript In Epist ad Gal. c. 2. the visiting of the several Synagogues the rectifying of ill manners and the reforming of those publick Ministers who did not live according to the prescript of the Law Whether that it were so or not or that the Cardinal be not mistaken in the meaning of the Author whom he citeth I will not meddle for the present though I conceive by looking on the place in Epiphanius that the succeeding Patriarchs of the Jewish Nation did rather take this name from Christs Apostles than he from theirs But for the word as now we use it it is meerly Greek signifying in its natural and original sense a Messenger a Legate an Embassadour from whom to whomsoever sent after appropriated and applyed by the Evangelists to signifie those twelve whom our Saviour chose and called his Apostles as by way of excellence yet so that many of those men who saw our Saviour in the flesh and did preach the Gospel are sometimes honoured with that name Quod autem exceptis duodecim quidam vocantur Apostoli illud in causa est omnes qui Dominum viderunt eum postea praedicarunt fuisse Apostolos nominatos as Saint Hierom notes it By which we see that those two things did principally concur unto the making of an Apostle viz. to have been conversant with our Saviour Christ and to preach his Word which being most exactly verified in those twelve Disciples whom he selected for that purpose it was most fit that they should chiefly have the honour of so high a Title But these although they were two special marks of an Apostle yet they were not all Others had seen our Saviour in the flesh and preached his Gospe which notwithstanding never durst assume that Title Ignatius who affirms it of himself Ignat. Epist ad Smyrnem that he had seen the Lord Jesus doth yet disclaim the power and priviledg of an Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he in his Epistle to the Romans So that besides their seeing of our Saviour in the flesh and preaching of those things which
themselves had seen the Twelve had a preheminence above the rest of the Disciples in those three particulars first in their nearness of access unto him when he was alive Secondly in the latitude of their commission when he was to leave them And thirdly in the height of their authority after his departure For first the twelve Apostles and no others were the continual constant and domestical Auditors of all his Sermons the diligent beholders and observers of all his Miracles With them did he discourse familiarly propounding questions answering their demands and satifying all their scruples The Twelve and none but they were present with him when he did institute his holy Supper and they alone participated of those Prayers and Promises which he made to them from himself or for them to his heavenly Father Many there were of his retinue of his Court not few the Twelve were only of his Council and of those too some more especially admitted to his privacies and of his Cabinet-council as it were than others whereof see Matth. 17.1 Mark 14.33 Luke 8.51 And on this ground doth Clemens tell us Clemens Alex. ap Euseb l. 2. c. 1. that Christ imparted many things unto these three after his Ascension which they communicated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto the rest of the Apostles the rest of the Apostles to the 70. As they were nearer in access so were they furnished with a more liberal Commission Mark 16. when he was to leave them Ite in universum mundum He said unto them Go into all the world and preach the Gospel to every creature No such commission granted to any others who had their several precincts and bounds a limited Commission when it was at best To the Eleven for unto them alone did he give that charge the whole World went but for a Diocess Chrys Tom. 8. p. 110. edit Savill For this cause Chrysostom doth honour them with the stile of Princes and Princes of a great command over all the Universe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Apostles were ordained Princes by the hand of God Princes which have not only under them some Towns and Nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but such unto whose care the whole World was trusted So far that Father And if we doubt that their authority fell short in any thing of their Commission the same good Father in the same place will inform us otherwise For making a comparison between Spiritual and Civil Dignities Chrys ibid. he calleth the Office of an Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a spiritual Consulship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the most spiritual of all Powers or Governments and finally 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the head the root nay the foundation of all spiritual Dignities of what sort soever Doubtless the Father had good reason for so high an Eulogie When Christ affirmed Sicut misit me Pater John 20.21 that as his Father sent him so sent he them He said enough to intimate that supreme authority which he had given them in the Church whether it were in preaching of the Gospel in founding Churches constituting and ordaining Pastors or whatsoever else was necessary for the advancement of his Kingdom For by these words as Cyril hath right well observed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he did ordain them for to be Guides and Teachers unto all the World Chrys in Joh. Evang. l. 12. and the dispensers of his holy Mysteries commanding them not only to enlighten the land of Jewrie but all the people of the Universe as also giving them to understand that it was their duty 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to call the sinners to repentance to heal all those that were afflicted either in body or in soul in the dispensing of Gods blessings not to follow their own will but his that sent them and in a word as much as in them was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to save the World by wholsom dictrines for to that purpose was he sent by his Heavenly Father And so we are to understand Saint Chrysostom when he tells us this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hom in Joh. c. 20.21 Calv. in Job that Christ invested his Apostles with the like authority as he received from his Father Calvin affirms as much or more upon those words of our Redeemer Quare non abs re Christus cum Apostolis suis communicat quam à Patre autoritatem acoeperat c. But this authority of theirs will be seen more clearly when we behold it in the practice and execution Five things then of necessity were to concur in the making or constituting of an Apostle truly and properly so called first an immediate Call from Christ himself secondly an Autopsie or Eye-witnessing of those things which they were afterwards to preach or publish of him thirdly their nearness of access fourthly the latitude of their Commission fifthly and finally the eminence of their authority Of these the first were common with them unto the rest of the Disciples save that the calling of the Apostles to that charge and function doth seem to be more solemn and immediate But in the rest which are indeed the special or specifical differences they had no co-partners This made them every way superiour unto the rest of the Disciples although all equal in themselves Though in the calling of those blessed Spirits to that great imployment there was a prius and posterius yet in regard of power and authority there was neither Summum nor Subalternum And howsoever Peter be first named in that sacred Catalogue yet this entitleth him to no more authority above the rest of the Apostles than Stephen might challenge in that regard above the residue of the Seven Saint Cyprian did resolve this cause many hundreds since assigning unto all the twelve a parity of power and honour Cyprian lib. de unitate Eccles Hoc erant utique caeteri Apostoli quod fuit Petrus pari consortio praediti honoris potestatis sed exordium ab unitate proficiscitur Where clearly there is nothing given to Peter but a priority of Order a primacy if you will but no supremacy Neither doth Barlaam give him more though he inscribe his book de Papae Principatu 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Apostles all of them saith he Barlaam de Papae principatu in matter which concerned the Church were of equal honour If Peter had preheminence in any thing it was that in their sacred meetings he first brake the business 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and peradventure also had the upper place in the assemblies of that goodly fellowship But what need Cyprian or Barlaam come in for evidence when as we find this parity so clearly evidenced in holy Scripture In the immediateness of their Calling and their access unto our Lord and Saviour they were all alike He that called Peter from his Nets called also Matthew from the receit of custom If only Peter and the sons of Zebedee
Judaic l. 12. as Josephus hath it which cometh to seventy two in all But both the seventy two Elders are generally called the Seventy as the Translators of the Bible are called the Septuagint both of them ad rotundationem numeri even as the Magistrates in Rome were called Centumviri though being three for every Tribe they came unto an hundred and five in all Calvin in harm Evang. ut supra And this is that which Calvin hath observed in the present business viz. that the Consistory of the Jewish Judges to which the number of the Disciples is by him proportioned consisted of no less than 72 though for the most part ut fieri solet in talibus numeris they are called the Seventy So then to reconcile the Latin with the Greek Original there were in all 72 Disciples according to the truth of the calculation and yet but seventy in account according to the estimation which was then in use And therefore possibly the Church of England the better to comply with both computations though it have seventy in the new Translations yet still retains the number of seventy two in the Gospel appointed for Saint Lukes day in the book of Common-prayer confirmed by Parliament This being the number of the Disciples it will then fall out that as there were six Elders for every Tribes so here will be six Presbyters or Elders for every one of the Apostles For those which have compared the Church of Christ which was first planted by the Apostles with that which was first founded by the Lord himself resemble the Bishops in the Church to the twelve Apostles the Presbyters or Priests unto the Seventy Which parallel how well it holdeth and whether it will hold or not we shall see hereafter Mean while it cannot be denied but that the Apostles were superiour to these Seventy both in place and power The Fathers have so generally affirmed the same that he must needs run cross unto all antiquity that makes question of it The Council of Neocaesarea which was convened some years before that of Nice Leo Ep. 88. declareth that the Chorepiscopi which were but Presbyters in fact though in Title Bishops 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concil Neocasar 1. Can. 13. were instituted according to the pattern of the Seventy Saint Hierom in his Tractate ad Fabiolam speaking of the twelve fountains of Elim and the seventy Psalms that grew thereby doth resolve it thus Nec dubium quin de duodeeim Apostolis sermo sit c. It is not to be doubted but that the Scripture speaketh here of the twelve Apostles the waters issuing from whose fountains have moistned the barren driness of the whole World and that the seventy Psalms that grew thereby are the Teachers of the second rank or order Luca testante duodecim fuisse Apostolos septuaginta Discipulos minoris gradus Saint Luke affirming that there were twelve Apostles and seventy Disciples of a lower order whom the Lord sent two and two before him In this conceit Saint Ambrose led the way before him likening unto those Psalms the Seventy qui secundo ab Apostolis gradu who in a second rank from the Apostles were by the Lord sent forth for the salvation of mankind Serm. 24. Damasus their co-temporary doth affirm as much viz. non amplius quam duos ordines Epist 5. that there were but two Orders amongst the Disciples of Christ viz. that of the twelve Apostles and the Seventy Theophylact concurrs with Hierom in his conceit about the twelve Fountains and the seventy Palm-trees and then concludes Theoph. in Luc. 10. that howsoever they were chosen by Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet were they inferiour to the twelve and afterwards their followers and Scholars Add hereunto the testimony and consent of Calvin who giving the preheminence unto the Apostles Calvin in Institut l. 4. c. 3. § 4. as the chief builders of the Church adds in the next place the Evangelists such as were Timothy and Titus fortassis etiam septuaginta Discipuli quos secundo ab Apostolis loco Dominus designavit and peradventure also the seventy Disciples whom Christ appointed in the second place after his Apostles Besides S. Hierom giveth it for a Maxim Qui provehitur Ep. ad Oceanum de minore ad majus provehitur that he which is promoted is promoted from a lower rank unto an higher Matthias therefore having been formerly of the Seventy and afterwards advanced into the rank and number of the Twelve in the place of Judas it must needs follow that the twelve Apostles shined in an higher sphere than these lesser luminaries Now that Matthias had before been one of the seventy appeareth by the concurrent testimonies of Euseb l. 1. Eccles Hist c. 12. l. 2. cap. 1. and of Epiphanius contr haeres 20. n. 4. to whom for brevity sake I refer the Reader And this the rather because the Scripture is so full and pregnant in it it being a condition or qualification if you will required by S. Peter in those that were the Candidates for so high a Dignity Acts 1. v. 21. that they accompanied the Apostles all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out amongst them And that we know none did but the Seventy only So then it is most clear and manifest both by authority of Scripture and consent of Fathers that our Saviour instituted in his Church two ranks of Ministers the one subordinate unto the other and consequently laid the first foundations of it in such a Fatherly and moderate imparity as bound all following times and ages that would not willingly oppose so Divine an Ordinance to observe the like And yet it is not to be thought that this superiority thus by him established doth contradict those other passages of holy Scripture wherein he doth prohibit all dominion over one another They much mistake the business who conceive it so The Jews in general and all the followers of Christ particularly expected that the promised Messiah should come with power restore again the lustre of the Jewish Kingdom and free them from that yoke and bondage which by the Romans had been laid upon them We thought said Cleophas that this had been he that should have delivered Israel Acts 24.21 And what he thought was solemnly expected by all the rest Acts 1.6 Domine si in tempore hoc restitues regnum Israel Lord say they even in the very moment of his Ascension wilt thou at this time restore again the Kingdom unto Israel Upon which fancy and imagination no marvail if they harboured some ambitious thought every one hoping for the nearest places both of power and trust about his person This was the greatness which they aimed at and this our Saviour laboured to divery them from by interdicting all such power and Empire as Princes and the favourites of Princes have upon their Vassals Ye know saith he that the Princes of the
Gentiles exercise Dominion over them and they that are great exercise auhtority upon them Vobis autem non sic Matth. 20.25 Luke 22.25 But so it shall not be amongst you Where plainly it appears both by the Text and context first that this strife and contestation was only amongst the twelve Apostles and therefore howsoever it may prove that there was to be a parity or equality amongst themselves yet it will never prove but that they were and might be still superiour unto the Seventy And secondly that Christ our Saviour doth not prohibit them the use and exercise of all authority on those who were inferiour and subordinate to them but only such authority as the Princes of the Gentiles and the great Lords and Ministers about them did exercise upon their Subjects The power and government of the Apostles in the Church of Christ was meerly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as a Father beareth unto his children but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Lordly and imperious Rule such as a Master exerciseth on his slaves and servants 1 Pet. 5.3 2 Cor. 2.24 Chrysost in oper imper in Mat. hom 35. Not as Lords over Gods inheritance but as the helpers of their joy say the two Apostles and herein stands the difference according unto that of Chrysostom Principes mundi ideo fiunt ut dominentur minoribus suis The Princes of the Earth were made to this end and purpose that they might Lord it over their inferiours and make them slaves and spoil them and devour them abasing them unto the death for their own profit and glory Principes autem Ecclesiae fiunt c. But the Governours or Princes of the Church were instituted to another end viz. To serve their inferiours and to minister unto them all such things as they have received from the Lord. This eminence and superiority over all the Church which was thus setled in the Apostles by our Lord and Saviour will appear more fully if we consult the several ministrations committed unto them and to them alone For unto them alone it was that Christ committed the whole power of preaching of his holy Word administring his blessed Sacraments retaining and forgiving sins ruling and ordering of his flock giving them also further power of instituting and ordaining such by whom these several Offices were to be performed till his second coming None but the Twelve were present with him when he ordained the blessed Sacrament of his body and blood Luke 22.19 and unto them alone was said Hoc facite do this i. e. take bread and break and bless it and distribute it in remembrance of me To the eleven alone it was that he gave commission to go into all the World and preach the Gospel to all creatures Matth. 28.19 baptizing them in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost They only had that powerful and immediate mission John 20.21 John 20.22 23. Sicut misit me Pater As my Father sent me so send I you and upon them alone he breathed saying Receive the Holy Ghost whose sins ye do remit they are remitted unto them and whose sins you do retain they are retained Finally they and none but they were trusted with the feeding and the governance of the Flock of Christ the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greek doth imply them both for howsoever Pasce oves meas John 21.15 16. was in particular spoken to Saint Peter yet was that charge incumbent on them all as before we noted from Saint Austin By all which passages and Texts of Scripture it is clear and manifest that the Apostles were by Christ ordained to be the sole and ordinary Teachers Bishops and Pastors of the Church next and immediately under his most blessed self Heb. 13.20 1 Pet. 2.25 who still continueth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the great Shepheard of the Sheep as Paul the Shepheard and Bishop of our Souls as Saint Peter calls him The Seventy had no part in this new Commission the dispensation of the Word and Sacraments but at second hand as they were afterwards intrusted with it by the holy Apostles either as Prophets Presbyters or Evangelists according to the measure of the Grace which was given unto them or specially designed to some part therein after the Ascension of our Lord and Saviour by the immediate designation of the Holy Ghost And when they were entrusted with a part thereof yet were they still secundi Ordinis Ministers of a second rank inferiour unto the Apostles both in place and power to whom all latitude of power was given Nay the Apostles took an hint from this different mission to institute two several sorts of Ministers in the Church of Christ the one subordinate unto the other as were the Seventy unto them And this by vertue of these words in their Commission Ita mitto vos i. e. as the Arch-Bishop of Spalato very well applyeth it De Repab Eccl. l. 2. c. 3. n. 7. Sicut ego à Patre habui potestatem eligendi Ministros etiam diversi ordinis ita vos pariter habeatis As I received power from my heavenly Father of instituting Ministers even of divers Orders so I give it you And therefore whatsoever the Apostles did therein they did it after Christs example and by his authority and consequently the imparity of Ministers by them ordained was founded on the Law of God and the original institution of our Saviour Christ by whom the power of Ordination was to them committed and by them unto their Successours in the Church for ever To bring this Chapter to an end our Saviour Christ having thus furnished his Apostles with those several powers faculties and preheminences which before we spake of he thought it best to recommend them to the blessings of Almighty God whose work they were to go about And therefore being to take his fare-well of them Luke 24.50 did in a very solemn manner bestow his benediction on them Elevatis manibus suis benedixit eis he lifted up his hands and blessed them as Saint Luke hath it Which benediction Saint Austin takes to be a consecrating of those holy men unto the power and dignity of Bishops Aug. quaest N. Test qu. 14. Ipse enim priusquam in caelos ascenderet imponens manum Apostolis ordinavit cos Episcopos as the Father hath it Which whether it were so or not I mean so done with such an outward Form and Ceremony and in that very point of time is perhaps uncertain But sure I am that for the thing it self which is here delivered the Fathers many of them do agree with Austin affirming passim in their writings that the Apostles were made Bishops by our blessed Lord. Saint Cyprian voucheth it expresly The Deacons ought to understand Cyp. lib. 3. Ep. 9. quoniam Apostolos i. e. Episcopos Praepositos Dominus elegit that the Lord Christ himself did chuse the Apostles that is the Bishops
and Rulers of the Church and that the Apostles after his ascension did ordain the Deacons to be the Ministers of their Episcopal function and the necessities of the Church Saint Ambrose doth affirm the same Ambros in 1. ad Cor. c. 12. Caput it aque in Ecclesia Apostolos posuit c. Christ saith he made the Apostles the head or supreme Governours of his Church they being the Legats or Ambassadours of Christ according unto that of the Apostle 2 Cor. 5.20 And then he adds Ipsi sunt Episcopi that they were Bishops More plainly in his Comment on the Ephesians Apostoli Episcopi sunt Prophetae explanatores Scripturarum The Apostles saith he In Comment in Ephes 4. are Bishops and Prophets the Expositors of Scripture But because question hath been made whether indeed those Commentaries are the works of Ambrose or of some other ancient Writer he tells us in his Notes on the 43. Psalm that in those words of Christ Pasce oves meas Peter was made a Bishop by our Lord and Saviour De Repub. Eccles l. 2. c. 2. n. 4. Significat Ambrosius Petrum Sacerdotem hoc est Episcopum electum illis verbis Pasce oves meas as the place is cited by the Arch-Bishop of Spalato And thus Saint Chrysostom speaking of the election of the Seven saith plainly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that then there were no Bishops in the Church Chrys hom 14. in Act 6. but only the Apostles But what need more be said in the present business than that which is delivered in the holy Scripture about the surrogation of some other in the place of Judas wherein the place or function of an Apostle is plainly called Episcopatus Acts 1.20 Episcopatum ejus accipiat alter let another take his Bishoprick as the English reads it His Bishoprick i. e. saith Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Principality his Priesthood Chrys hom 3. in Act. 1. the place of government that belonged unto him had he kept his station A Text most plain and pregnant as the Fathers thought to prove that the Episcopal dignity was vested in the persons of the Lords Apostles The Comment under the name of Ambrose which before we spake of having said Ipsi sunt Episcopi Ambros in 1. ad Cor. c. 12 that the Apostles were Bishops adds for the proof thereof these words of Peter Episcopatum ejus accipiat alter And the true Ambrose saying of Judas Id. Serm. 50. that he was a Bishop Episcopus enim Judas fuit adds for the proof thereof the same very Text. Finally to conclude this matter Saint Cyprian shewing that Ordinations were not made without the privity of the people in the Jewish Church Nisi sub populi assistentis conscientia lib. 1. ep 4. adds that the same was afterwards observed by the holy Apostles Quando de ordinando in locum Judae Episcopo when Peter spake unto the people about the ordering of a Bishop in the place of Judas But for a further proof of this that the Apostles were ordained Bishops by our Lord and Saviour we shall see more hereafter in convenient place Vide chap. 6. n. 12. when we are come to shew that in the government of the Church the Bishops were the proper Successors of the Apostles and so esteemed to be by those who otherwise were no great friends unto Episcopacy In the mean time we may take notice of that impudent assertion of Jobannes de Turrecremata viz. Quod solus Petrus à Christo Episcopus est ordinatus Lib. 2. Summae de Eccl. c. 32. ap Bell. de Rom Pont. that Peter only Peter was made Bishop by our Saviour Christ and that the rest of the Apostles received from Peter their Episcopal consecration wherein I find him seconded by Dominicus Jacobatius lib. 10. de Concil Art 7. A Paradox so monstrous and absurd that howsoever Bellarmine doth reckon it amongst other the Prerogatives of that Apostle in his first Book de Romano Pontifice cap. 23. yet upon better thoughts he rejects it utterly in his 4th Book upon that argument Cap. 22. and so I leave it Thus having shewn in what estate the Church was founded by our Saviour and in what terms he left it unto his Apostles we must next see what course was taken by them to promote the same what use they made of that authority which was trusted to them CHAP. II. The foundation of the Church of Hierusalem under the Government of Saint James the Apostle and Simeon one of the Disciples the two first Bishops of the same 1. Matthias chosen into the place of Judas 2. The coming of the Holy Ghost and on whom it fell 3. The greatest measure of the Spirit fell on the Apostles and so by consequence the greatest power 4. The several Ministrations in the Church then given and that in ranking of the same the Bishops are intended in the name of Pastors 5. The sudden growth of the Church of Hierusalem and the making of Saint James the first Bishop there 6. The former point deduced from Scripture 7. And proved by the general consent of Fathers 8. Of the Episcopal Chair or Throne of Saint James and his Successors in Hierusalem 9. Simeon elected by the Apostles to succeed S. James 10. The meaning of the word Episcopus and from whence borrowed by the Church 11. The institution of the Presbyters 12. What interest they had in the common business of the Church whilst S. James was Bishop 13. The Council of Hierusalem and what the Presbyters had to do therein 14. The Institution of the Seven and to what Office they were called 15. The names of Ecclesiastical functions promiscuously used in holy Scripture OUR Saviour Christ having thus Authorized his Apostles to Preach the Gospel over all the World to every Creature and given them power as well of ministring the Sacraments as of retaining and remitting sins as before is said thought fit to leave them to themselves Luk. 24.49 only commanding them to tarry in the City of Hierusalem until they were indued with further power from on high whereby they might be fitted for so great a work Act. 1.9 And when he had spoken those things while they beheld he was taken up and a Cloud received him out of their sight No sooner was he gone to the Heavenly glories but the Apostles with the rest withdrew themselves unto Hierusalem as he had appointed where the first care they took was to fill up their number to surrogate some one or other of the Disciples in the place of Judas that so the Word of God might be fulfilled Psal 69.26 which he had spoken by the Psalmist Episcopatum ejus accipiat alter A business of no small importance and therefore fit to be imparted unto all the Brethren not so much that their suffrage and consent herein was necessary as that they might together joyn in prayer to Almighty God Act. 1.21
to direct the action whose business indeed it was and unto whom alone the whole election properly pertained All that they did was to propose two men unto the Lord their God Et statuerunt duos Act. 1.23 saith the Text such as they thought most fit for so great a charge and so to leave it to his providence to shew and manifest which of the two he pleased to choose In the appointment of which two whether that statuerunt being a Verb of the Plural number be to be referred to all the multitude as Chrysostom is of opinion or only unto the Apostles and the Seventy as some others think it comes all to one For the whole number being but an hundred and twenty Act. 1.15 and being that the Apostles with the Seventy out of which rank the nomination of the two was made made up the number of fourscore it must needs be that the appointment in effect was in them alone And though I rather do incline to Chrysostom in this particular that the appointment of these two was done by all the multitude in general Chrysost in hom 3. in Act. yet I can yield by no means to the next that followeth For shewing some politick and worldly reasons why Peter did permit the people to have an interest in the business he first asked this question 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whether it were not lawful for Saint Peter to have chose the man And then he answereth positively 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it was most lawful but that he did forbear to do it lest he might seem to do it out of partiality In this I must crave leave to dissent from Chrysostom The power of making an Apostle was too high a priviledge to be intrusted unto any of the Sons of Adam 1 Cor. 15. Galat. 1.1 Paul was not made Apostle though an Abortive one as he calls himself either of men or by men but by Jesus Christ and God the Father What priviledge or power soever Peter had as an Apostle of the Lord in making Bishops or as a Bishop of the Church in ordaining Presbyters he had no power to make Apostles The Pope might sing Placebo if it had been otherwise and we should have Apostles more than ten times twelve if nothing were required unto it but Saint Peters Fiat But to proceed This weighty business being thus dispatched Epiphan haeres 20. n. 4. and Matthias who before was of the Seventy being numbred with the eleven Apostles it pleased God to make good his promise of pouring on them in a plentiful and signal manner the gifts and graces of his holy Spirit Not on the Twelve alone or the Seventy only but on the whole body of the Disciples even on the whole 120. which before we spake of I know that Beza and some others would limit this effusion of the Holy Ghost to the Twelve alone Why and to what intent he doth so resolve it though I may guess perhaps yet I will not judge but sure it is he so resolves it Beza in Act. 2. Solis Apostolis propria est haec Spiritus sancti missio sicut proprius fuit Apostolatus as his own words are in his Annotations on the Text. The same he also doth affirm in his Book de Ministrorum Evangelii gradibus cap. 5. But herein Beza leaves the Fathers and the Text to boot Saint Austin tells us that the Holy Ghost came from Heaven Tract 2. in ep Johannis Hom. 4. in Act. c. 2. implevit uno loco sedentes centum viginti and filled one hundred and twenty sitting in one place Saint Chrysostom affirms the same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. what saith he did it come on the twelve alone not upon the rest And then he answereth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not so by no means it fell on all the 120 which were there Assembled Nor doth he only say it but he proves it also alledging in defence of his assertion that very plea and argument which was used by Peter to clear himself and his associates from the imputation of being drunken with new wine Act. 2.16 viz. Hoc est quod dictum fuit per Prophetam Joel This is that which was spoken by the Prophet Joel I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh c. Besides the text and context make it plain enough that this effusion of the Holy Ghost was upon them all Act. 1.14 In the first Chapter of the Acts we find them all together the whole 120. with one accord And in the first verse of the second Chapter we find them all together with the same accord And then it followeth that there appeared cloven tongues like as of fire seditque supra singulos eorum Act. 2.3 4. and sate upon each of them and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost If they were all together as we found before and all were filled with the Holy Ghost No question but there were more filled with it than the twelve Apostles And when as Peter with the eleven stood up making an Apology for the rest and saying These men are not drunken Act. 2.14 15. as ye suppose it must needs be that others besides the twelve and indeed all the company were suspected of it Add as by way of surplusage and ex abundanti that the Seven chosen by the multitude to serve the Tables who questionless were of the number of the Seventy are said to have been full of the Holy Ghost Epiphan haeres 20. n. 4. Act. 6.3 before that the Apostles had laid hands on them So then it is most evident as I conceive it that the Holy Ghost was given to every one of the Disciples the whole number of them to every one according to his place and station according to that service and imployment in which the Lord intended to make use of them For unto one was given by the spirit the word of Wisdom 1 Cor. 12.8 9 10. to another the word of Knowledge and to another the gift of healing by the same spirit to another the working of Miracles to another Prophesie to another discerning of Spirits to another divers kinds of Tongues to another the interpretation of Tongues Every one of them had their several gifts the Apostles all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hom. 32. in 1. ad Cor. c. 12. as we read in Chrysostom Whatever was divided amongst the residue for the advancement of Gods glory and the improvement of his Church that was united in the persons of the holy Apostles whom God had ranked as much above them in their gifts and graces as they were in place By means whereof it came to pass that howsoever the Lord out of these 120 made choice of some to be Evangelists some to be Prophets and others to be Pastors Presbyters and Teachers yet the Apostles still retained their superiority ordering and directing them in their several Ministeries
Spirit found that there would be work enough elsewhere to choose one or other of their sacred number to be the Bishop of that Church and take charge thereof And this they did not now by lots but in the ordinary course and manner of election pitching on James the Son of Alpheus Gal. 1.19 who in regard of consanguinity is sometimes called in Scripture the Lords Brother and in regard of his exceeding piety and uprightness was surnamed the Just Which action I have placed here even in the cradle of the Church upon good Authority For first Eusebius tells us out of Clemens that this was done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eccles Hist l. 2. c. 1. after the Ascension of our Saviour Hierome more plainly statim post passionem Domini immediately upon his passion In Scrip. Eccles We may with good security conclude from both that it was done not long after Christs Ascension as soon almost as the Believers were increased to a considerable number And lastly Ignat. in ep ad Trall that Ignatius hath made S. Stephen to be the Deacon or subservient Minister to this James the Bishop of Hierusalem and then we must needs place it in some middle time between the Feast of Pentecost and the 26. of December when Saint Stephen was Martyred So early did the Lord take care to provide Bishops for his Church and set apart a special Pastor for his holy City 'T is true there is no manifest record hereof in holy Scripture but then withal it is as true that in the Scripture there are many pregnant circumstances whereon the truth hereof may well be grounded Gal. 1.18 19. Saint Paul some three years after his Conversion went up unto Hierusalem to see Peter but found no other of the Apostles there save only James the Lords Brother Ask Hierome who this James was whom S. Paul then saw and he will tell you that it was James the Bishop of Hierusalem Hier. in Gal. 1. Hic autem Jacobus Episcopus Hierosolymorum primus fuit cognomento Justus And then withal we have the reason why Paul should find him at Hierusalem more than the rest of the Apostles viz. because the rest of the Apostles were dispersed abroad according to the exigence of their occasions and James was there residing on his Pastoral or Episcopal charge Fourteen years after his Conversion Gal. 21.1 being the eleventh year after the former interview he went up into Hierusalem again with Barnabas and Titus and was together present with them at the first general Council held by the Apostles In which upon the agitation of the business there proposed the Canon and determination is drawn up positively and expresly in the words of James Act. 15.20 Do you desire the reason of it Peter and others being there Chrysostom on those words of Scripture Act. 15.13 Hom. 33. in Act. c. 15. v. 23. James answered saying doth express it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this James was Bishop of Hierusalem And this no question was the reason why Paul reciting the names of those with whom especially he had conference at his being there puts James in the first place before Peter and John viz. Galat. 2.9 because that he was Bishop there as Estius hath noted on that Text. The Council being ended Paul returneth to Antioch and there by reason of some men that came from James Peter withdrew Vers 12 and separated himself eating no longer with the Gentiles Why takes the Apostle such especial notice that they came from James but because they were sent from him as from their Bishop about some business of the Church this James being then Bishop of Hierusalem Theoph. Oecum in Gal. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as both Theophylact and Oecumenius note upon the place Finally nine years after this being the 58. of Christs Nativity Paul makes his last journey to Hierusalem still he finds James there Act. 21.18 And the day following Paul went in with us unto James c. as the Text informs us Chrysost hom 46. in Act. Chrysostom notes upon the place that James there spoken of was the Lords Brother 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Bishop of Hierusalem So that for 20 years together we have apparent evidence in Scripture of James residing at Hierusalem and that as Bishop there as the Fathers say For that Saint James was Bishop of Hierusalem there is almost no ancient Writer but bears witness of it Ignatius who was made Bishop of Antiochia Ignat. ep ad Trallian within eight years after the Death and Martyrdom of this James in their account who place it latest makes Stephen to be the Deacon of this James as Clemens and Anacletus were to Peter which is an implication that James was Bishop of Hierusalem out of which City we do not find that Stephen ever travelled Egesippus who lived near the Apostles times Hieron in loc Euseb l. 4. c. 21. Apud Euseb hist l. 2. c. 1. Ibid. l. 7. c. 14. makes this James Bishop of Hierusalem as both Saint Hierom and Eusebius have told us from him Clemens of Alexandria not long after him doth confirm the same And out of him and other monuments of antiquity Eusebius doth assure us of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he was the first that held the Episcopal throne or chair in the Church of Hierusalem Saint Cyril Catech. 4. cap. de cibis Catech. 14. Bishop of Hierusalem speaks of him as of his Predecessor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the first Bishop of that Diocess And Epiphanius for his greater credit makes him not only the first Bishop that ever was Haeres 29. n. 3. but Bishop of the Lords own Throne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiph. adv haeres 78. n. 7. and that too by the Lords appointment S. Ambrose doth assign this reason why Paul going unto Hierusalem to see Peter Ambros in Gal. 1. De Scriptor Eccles should find James there quia illic constitutus erat Episcopus ab Apostolis because that by the rest of the Apostles he was made Bishop of that place Saint Hierom doth not only affirm as much as for his being Bishop of Hierusalem but also doth lay down the time of his Creation to be not long after our Redeemers passion as we saw before Saint Chrysostom Hom. ult in Ioh. besides what was alledged from him in the former Section tells in his Homilies on S. Johns Gospel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Saint James had the Bishoprick of Hierusalem Where by the way I cannot but take notice of a lewd forgery or at the best a gross mistake of Baronius who to advance the Soveraignty of the Church of Rome An. 34. n. 291. will have this James to take the Bishoprick of Hierusalem from Saint Peters hands and cites this place of Chrysostom for proof thereof But surely Chrysostom saith no such matter for
the governance of the Church was trusted one who was vested with a constant and fixed preheminence as well over the Clergy as the Laity committed to his charge such as both Timothy and Titus are described to be in S. Pauls Epistles V. Chap. 5. De civ Dei l. 19. c. 19. of whom we shall say more hereafter S. Austin rightly understood the word and the original of it when he told us this Graecum est enim atque inde ductum vocabulum quod ille qui praeficitur eis quibus praeficitur superintendit c. The word saith he is Greek originally and from thence derived shewing that he which is preferred or set over others is bound to take the oversight and care of those whom he is set over And so proceeding unto the Etymology or Grammar of the word he concludes it thus ut intelligat se non esse Episcopum qui praeesse dilexerit non prodesse that he deserves not to be called a Bishop which seeketh rather to prefer himself than to profit others Saint Austin being himself a Bishop knew well the meaning of the word according to the Ecclesiastical notion and sense thereof And in that notion the Scriptures generally and all the Fathers universally have used the same out of which word Episcopus whether Greek or Latine the Germans had their Bischop and we thence our Bishop If sometimes in the holy Scripture the word be used to signifie an ordinary Presbyter it is at such times and such places only when as the Presbyters had the chief governance of the Flocks next and immediately under the Apostles and where there was no Bishop properly so called established over them as we shall see hereafter in the Churches of S. Pauls plantation Having thus seen the sudden and miraculous growth of the Church of God in and about the City of Hierusalem and seen the same confirmed and setled in Episcopal government our next enquiry must be made into the Clergy which were to be subordinate to him and to participate of the charge to him entrusted according to his directions And in this search we first encounter with the Presbyters the first as well in time as they are in dignity The Deacon though exceeding ancient yet comes short in both We shewed you in the former Chapter how our Redeemer having chosen the Twelve Apostles appointed other Seventy also and sent them two and two before him 1 Cor. 12. Eph. 4.8 to prepare his way Of these the Lord made choice of some to be Evangelists and others to be Prophets some to be Pastors and Teachers and others to be helps in Government according to the measure and the purpose of his grace bestowed upon them in the effusion of his Spirit And out of these thus fitted and prepared for the work of God I doubt not but there were some chosen to assist S. James in the discharge of the great trust committed to him by the common Counsel and consent of the Apostles Such as were after added unto them according to the exigences of that Church I take it to be all of Saint James ordaining who being a Bishop and Apostle is not to be denied the priviledg of ordaining Presbyters it being a thing which both the Apostle Paul did do in all the Churches which he planted and all succeeding Bishops since have done in their several Dioceses Certain it is that there were Presbyters in the Church of Hierusalem before the election of the Seven Ignat. ep ad Hieron Ignatius telling us that Stephen did minister 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to James and to the Presbyters which were in Hierusalem And certain also it is that the Apostles first and Bishops afterwards ordained Presbyters to be assistant with them and subservient to them in their several charges and this they did according as the Fathers say in imitation of our Lord and Saviour who having chose his twelve Apostles Hier. ad Fabiolam appointed Seventy others of a lower rank Seciendos Christi Discipulos as S. Hierom calls them Not that the Presbyters of the Church do succeed the Seventy who were not founded in a perpetuity by our Saviour Christ De Rep. Eccles l. 2. c. 2. n. 6. Concil Neo-Caesar Can. 13. as the Arch-Bishop of Spalato hath well observed but only that they had a resemblance to them and were ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Council of Neo-Caesarea affirmed before as secondary and subservient Ministers in the Church of God And this is that which Beda tells us in his Comment on the Gospel of Saint Luke Beda in Luc. 10. that as the Twelve Apostles did premonstrate the Form of Bishops so the Presbyters did bear the figure of the Seventy Another resemblance between the Presbyters and the Seventy may perhaps be this that as our Saviour in the choicing of these Disciples related to the number of the Elders in the state of Jewry so the Apostles thought it fit to give unto the Ministers thus by them ordained though they regarded not the number the name of Elders according to the custom of that State before Presbyters they are called in the Greek originals which being often rendred Seniores in the vulgar Latin occasioned that our first Translators who perhaps looked no farther than the Latin turned it into Elders though I could heartily have wished they had retained the name of Presbyters as the more proper and specifical word of the two by far But for these Presbyters of the Church of Hierusalem from whencesoever they may borrow or derive their name we find thrice mention of them in the Book of the Acts during the time Saint James was Bishop viz. in the 11.15.21 In the first place we read that when the Disciples which dwelt at Antioch Acts 11. ult Cap. 18. in Act. Apostol had made a contribution for the brethren of Judaea they sent it to the Elders there by the hands of Barnabas and Saul Ask Oecumenius who these Elders were and he will tell you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that they were the Apostles And like enough it is that the Apostles may be comprehended in that general name In Act. 11. they being indeed the elder brethren Ask Calvin why this contribution was sent unto the Presbyters or Elders being there were particular Officers appointed to attend the poor as is set down in the 6. Chapter of the Acts and he will tell you that the Deacons were so appointed over that business that notwithstanding they were still inferiour unto the Presbyters nec quicquam sine eorum auctoritate agerent v. 18.19 c. and were not to do any thing therein without their authority So for that passage in the 21. S. Luke relates how Paul at his last going to Hierusalem went in unto James and that all the Elders were present and adds withal what counsel and advice they gave him for his ingratiating with the Jews Here find we James the Bishop
attended by his Presbyters at the reception of Saint Paul Chrys in Act. 21. and they together joyning with him in the consultation then in hand the business being great and weighty And therefore Chrysostom observes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that James determined nothing in it as a Bishop of his sole authority but took Paul into counsel with him and that the Presbyters on the other side carried themselves with great respect and reverence towards him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 giving him an account or reason of their following counsel The Bishop never fist in a firmer Chair than when his Chapter doth support it But that which is indeed the matter of the greatest moment is that which occurs in the 15. Chapter of the Acts touching the Council of Hierusalem wherein the Presbyters are so often mentioned as if without their presence and assistance the Apostles had been able to determine nothing Some would fain have it so perhaps but it will not be Saint Paul was so assured of the Doctrine by him delivered as not to put it to the trial of a mortal man and the Apostles of a spirit so infallible in the things of God as not to need the counsel and assistance of inferiour persons How many points of Doctrine did Saint Paul determine without repairing to the Apostles How many did the Apostles preach and publish without consulting with the Presbyters Somwhat there must be in it more than ordinary which did occasion this conjuncture and is briefly this Some of the Jews which had but newly been initiated in the faith of Christ and were yet very zealous of their ancient Ceremonies came from Hierusalem to Antiochia Acts 15.1 and there delivered Doctrines contrary unto those which Paul taught before It seems there were some Presbyters amongst them for it is said they taught the people and they pretended too that they did teach no other Doctrine than that which had been authorized by the Apostles The Doctrine was that except men would be circumcised after the manner of Moses they could not be saved Paul might have over-ruled this case by his own authority But partly for the satisfaction of the Antiochians and partly for the full conviction of these false Teachers he was content by Revelation of the Spirit Gal. 2.2 to put the matter over to the resolution of such of the Apostles as were then abiding in Hierusalem that by their general attestation they might confirm his doctrine to be sound and true As for the Presbyters it concerned them to be present also as well to clear themselves from authorizing any such false brethren to disturb the Church as to prevent the like disorders in the time to come This is the sum of the proceedings in this business And this doth no way interest the Presbyters in the determination of points of faith further than as they are concerned either in having been a means to pervert the same or for the clearing of themselves from the like suspicions And yet I cannot but affirm withal that pure and primitive antiquity did derive from hence the Form and manner of their Councils in which the Presbyters did oftentimes concur both for voice and hand I mean as well in giving of their suffrages as the subscription of their names Concil Tarracon Can. 13. Certain I am that in the Council held in Arragon Anno 490. or thereabouts it was provided among other things ut non solum à Cathedralibus verum etiam de Diocesanis that certain Presbyters should be chosen as well out of the Diocesan as the Cathedral Churches to attend that service and that the Metropolitan should send out his Letters unto that effect according as is still observed in holding of the Convocation of the Church of England Next to the constituting of the Presbyters in time and order was the election of the Seven and this the Apostles did put over to the people only not intermedling in the same at all further than in commending them to the grace of God that they might faithfully discharge the trust committed to them The Church was then in that condition that the Disciples lived in one place together and had all things common some of them selling their Estates Acts 4.32.34 35. and laying down the price thereof at the Apostles feet that by them it might be distributed as occasion was But being it fell out that some did think themselves neglected in the distribution the Apostles both to free themselves of so great a trouble Acts 6.1 as also to avoid suspicion of being partial in the business required them to make choice of such trusty men as they conceived most fit to be the Stewards of their goods Acts 6.3 and the dispensers of the common stock This was the charge the Seven were called to by the people which being no Ecclesiastical function but a Civil trust no dispensation of the Word and Sacraments but a dispository power of the common Treasure it was most consonant to the Rules of Reason that the election of them should be left to the people only I know these Seven are commonly both called and accounted Deacons but I find no such thing in the Texts or story Neither in that Chapter nor in all the Acts is the word Deacon to be found nor find I either Stephen or Philip of whom the Scripture is most copious to be so entituled Acts 21.8 Philip indeed is called unus de septem but no more one of the Seven but no such stile as Deacon added which makes me think their Office was not such as it is conceived And this I am the rather induced to think because I find Saint Chrysostom Hom. 14. in Act. 6. and others of the same opinion Saint Chrysostom putting it unto the question what dignity or Office these men had what Ordination they received and namely whether that of Deacons makes answer first that in his time the use was otherwise the Presbyters being there intrusted with the distribution of the Churches Treasure and then concludeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it appeared not in his opinion that they were either Presbyters or Deacons The Fathers of the sixth Council in Constantinople building upon those words of Chrysostom Concil in Trullo Can. 16. do affirm the same determining expresly that those Seven mentioned in the Acts were not ordained to any ministration at the Lords Table 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but only to the service and attendance of the Common Tables Hieron in epist ad Euagr. In which regard Saint Hierom looking back unto the Primitive institution doth call the Deacons of his time mensarum viduarum Ministros in his Epistle to Euagrius For howsoever I believe not on my former ground that the Seven spoken of in the Acts had either the Office or the name of Deacons as it was used afterwards in the Church of God yet I deny not but the Church took some hint from hence even in the
times of the Apostles to institute that holy Order and to appoint it to some special ministery in Gods publick service as doth appear both by the Epistles of Saint Paul and the Records of Primitive and pure antiquity That Philip did both preach the Gospel and baptize the Converts or that Stephen did both preach the Gospel and convince the adversary related not to any power or faculty which they received by the addition or access of this new Office For being they and all the residue were of the Seventy Epiph. adv haeres 20. n. 4. Acts 6.3 as the Fathers say and that they had received the Holy Ghost before as the Scriptures tell us their preaching and baptizing must relate to their former Calling And it had been a degradation from their former dignity being Presbyters at the least before to be made Deacons now Thus have we seen the instituting of the several Orders of Bishops Presbyters and Deacons in the holy Hierarchie according to those several names which were in tract of time appropriated to their several functions in the Church of God And certainly it did require some space of time to estrange words from their natural to a borrowed sense to bring them to an Ecclesiastical from a Civil notion So that it is no wonder if at first the names and appellations of these several functions were used promiscuously before that time had limited and restrained them to that express and setled signification which they still retain That glorious name of an Apostle which of it self did signifie a Messenger Graecè Apostoli Tract 54. in Evang Johannis Latinè Missi appellantur as Saint Austin hath it was given by Christ as a peculiar name to his twelve Disciples And yet we find it sometimes given to inferiour persons Rom. 16.7 as to Andronicus and Junias in the 16. Chap. to the Romans sometimes reverting to its primitive and ancient use as where the Messengers of the Churches are called Apostles Cap. 8.23 as in the 2. to those of Corinth Apostoli Ecclesiarum gloria Christi the Messengers of the Churches are the glory of Christ So was it also with that reverend and venerable Title of Episcopus borrowed and restrained from its general use to signifie an Overseer in the Church of God one who was trusted with the Government and superintendency of the flock of Christ committed to him according to the acceptation of the word in the most ancient Authors of the Christian Church Cap. 1. v. 1. And yet sometimes we find it given unto the Presbyters as in the first of the Philippians in which Paul writing to the Bishops and Deacons is thought by Bishops to mean Presbyters partly because the Presbyters had then the government of that Church under the Apostle and partly because it was against the ancient Apostolical constitution that there should be many Bishops properly so called in one City Thus also for the Title Presbyter which by the Church was used to signifie not as before an ancient Man which is the native sense Beza Annot. in 1 Pet. 5.1 Ambros in 1. ad Tim. c. 3. and construction of it but one in holy Orders such as in after times were called by the name of Priests it grew so general for a while as to include both Bishops and Apostles also as Beza notes upon the first Epistle of Saint Peter Chap. 5. And that perhaps upon the reason given by Ambrose Omnis Episcopus Presbyter non tamen omnis Presbyter Episcopus because that every Bishop was Presbyter although not every Presbyter a Bishop And yet sometimes we find in Scripture that it returned unto its primitive and original use as in the first to Tim. Cap. 5. v. 1. in which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used to signifie an ancient Man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an ancient Woman as by the Text and context doth at full appear The like occurreth sometimes also in the ancient Writers Last of all for the word Diaconus which in it self doth signifie any common Minister or domestick servant the Church made use thereof to denote such Men as served in the inferiour ministeries of the Congregation such as according to the Ecclesiastical notion of the word we now call Deacons as in the first of the Philippians and in the ancient Writers passim Phil. 1.1 Yet did it not so easily put off its original nature but that it did sometimes revert to it again as in the 13. of the Romans in which the Magistrate is called Diaconus Rom. 13.4 being the publick Minister of Justice under God Almighty Verse 1 and Phoebe in the 16. of the same Epistle is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a servant of the Church of Cenchrea Indeed the marvel is not much that it should be so long before the Church could fasten and appropriate these particular names to the particular Officers of and in the same considering how long it was before she got a name unto her self The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is used in Scripture to denote the Church doth signifie amongst the ancient learned Writers a meeting or assembly of the people for their common business as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not to omit the Thracians to the common Council In Acharn Act. 1. scen 4. Histor l. 1. So in Aristophanes The like we find also in Thucydides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that having constituted the Assembly they fell upon their altercations The first time that we find it used to denote the Church is Matth. 16.18 and after frequently in holy Scripture yet so that it returned sometimes to its native sense as in the 19. of the Acts wherein we read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the assembly of the Ephesians was confused ver 32. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he dismissed the assembly ver 41. And therefore they which from identity of names in holy Scripture conclude identity of Offices in the Church of Christ and will have Presbyter and Episcopus to be both one Calling because the names are sometimes used promiscuously in the first beginnings may with like equity conclude that every Deacon is a Magistrate and every Presbyter an Apostle or that the Church of Ephesus was nothing else than an assembly of the Citizens in the Town-Hall there for the dispatch of business which concerned the Corporation CHAP. III. The Churches planted by Saint Peter and his Disciples originally founded in Episcopacy 1. The founding of the Church of Antioch by Saint Peter the first Bishop there 2. A reconciliation of the difference about his successors in the same 3. A list of Bishops planted by him in the Churches of the Circumcision 4. Proof thereof from Saint Peters general Epistle to the Jews dispersed 5. And from Saint Pauls unto the Hebrews 6. Saint Pauls Praepositus no other than a Bishop in the opinion of the Fathers 7. Saint Peter the first Bishop of the Church of Rome 8. The difference about his next
for your souls as they that must give account Chrysost in 13. ad Heb. c. If you would know of Chrysostom who these Rulers are he will tell you that they are the Pastors of the Church whom if you take away from the Flock of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 you utterly destroy and lay waste the whole Theophy in 13. ad Heb. Next ask Theophylact than whom none ever better scanned that Fathers writings what he means by Pastors and he will tell you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he speaks of Bishops Oecumen in locum The very same saith Oecumenius noting withal that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we read submit doth signifie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a very punctual and exact obedience But to go higher yet than so Ignatius the Apostles Scholler one that both knew S. Paul and conversed with him will tell us that the Rulers or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Saint Paul here speaketh of were no other than Bishops For laying down this exhortation to the Trallenses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be subject to your Bishop as unto the Lord he gives the self-same reason of it which S. Paul here doth viz. Because he watcheth for your souls as one that is to render an account to Almighty God The like we also find in the Canons commonly ascribed to the Apostles which questionless are very ancient in which the obedience and conformity which is there required of the Presbyters and Deacons to the directions of their Bishop is grounded on that very reason alledged before And for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Saint Paul it is not such a stranger in the writings of the elder times but that they use it for a Bishop as may appear by that of the Historian where he calls Polycarpus Bishop of the Church of Smyrna Eâ—â—eb hist l. 3. cap. 30. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of that Church Ignatius writing as he saith not only to the Church of Smyrna 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but also unto Polycarpus Bishop of the same Where lest it may be thought that the preposition doth add unto the nature of the word Id. l. 14. c. 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we find the same Historian speaking of the same Polycarpus in another place where he gives notice of an Epistle written in the name of the Church of Smyrna 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of which this Polycarpus had the Government and a Bishop doubtless In the which place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is conform most fully to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Saint Paul differing no otherwise than the verb and participle Now those which in the Greek are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in all the old Translations that I have met with are called Praepositi Obedite Praepositis vestris as the Latines read it and amongst them Praepositi are taken generally for the same with Bishops Oprian l. 1. ep 3. S. Cyprian thus Ob hoc Ecclesiae praepositum prosequitur for this cause doth the enemy pursue him that is set over the Church that the Governour thereof being once removed he may with greater violence destroy the same Id. lib. 3. ep 14. More clearly in another place What danger is not to be feared saith he by offending the Lord when some of the Priests not remembring their place neither thinking that they have a Bishop set over them challenge the whole government unto themselves Cum contumeliâ contemptu Praepositi even with the reproach and contempt of the Prelate Id. lib. 3. ep 9. or him that is set over them Most clearly yet where speaking of the insolency of a Deacon towards his Bishop he makes Episcopus and Praepositus to be one same thing willing the Deacon Episcopo Praeposito suo plena humilitate satisfacere with all humility to satisfie his Bishop or Praepositus Saint Austin speaks as fully to this purpose as Saint Cyprian did Ad hoc enim speculatores De civitat Dei l. 1. c. 9. i.e. populorum Praepositi in Ecclesiis constituti sunt c. For this end are Bishops for speculatores and Episcopi are the same Office though in divers words I mean the Prelates or Praepositi ordained in the Churches that they should not spare to rebuke sin In the same work De civitate he speaks plainer yet For speaking of these words of the Divine I saw seats Id. l. 20. c. 9. and some sitting on them and judgment was given he expounds it thus This is not to be understood saith he of the last Judgment Sed sedes praepositorum ipsi Praepositi intelligendi sunt per quos Ecclesia nunc gubernatur but the seats of the Praepositi and the Praepositi themselves by whom the Church is now governed and they were Bishops doubtless in Saint Augustines time must be understood More of this word who list to see may find it in that learned Tract of Bishop Bilson entituled Chap. 9. The perpetual Government of Christs Church who is copious in it Beza indeed the better to bear off this blow hath turned Praepositos into Ductores and instead of Governours hath given us Leaders Where if he mean such Leaders as the word importeth Leaders of Armies such as Command in chief Lieutenants General he will get little by the bargain But if he mean by Leaders only guides and conducts Paraeus Paraeus comment in Heb. 13. though he follow him in his Translation will leave him to himself in his Exposition who by Ductores understandeth Ecclesiae Pastores gubernatores the Pastors and Governours of the Church Neither can Beza possibly deny but that those here are called Ductores Beza Annot. in Heb. 13.17 qui alibi Episcopi vocantur which elsewhere are entituled Bishops But where he doth observe that because the Apostle speaketh of Praepositi in the plural number Ex eo quod loquitur Paulus in plurali mumero Ibid. therefore Episcopal jurisdiction was not then in use it being indeed against the ancient course and Canons to have two Bishops in one Church there could not any thing be spoken to pretermit the incivility of his expression more silly and unworthy of so great a Clerk For who knows not that the Jews being dispersed into many Provinces and Cities must have several Churches and therefore several Bishops or Praepositos to bear Rule over them This business being thus passed over and the Churches of Saint Peters planting in the Eastern parts being thus left unto the care and charge of several Bishops we will next follow him into the West And there we find him taking on himself the care of the Church of Rome or rather of the Church of God in Rome consisting for the most part then of converted Jews The current of antiquity runs so clear this way that he must needs corrupt the Fountains who undertakes to trouble or disturb the stream His being there and founding
last in the line collateral However be this so or not we have three Bishops sitting in the Church of Rome between the martyrdom of Peter and the death of John first Linus who held the same twelve years Cletus or Anacletus who survived and held twelve years more and Clemens finally who suffered martyrdom at Rome the next year after the decease of Saint John at Ephesus I take it then for a most manifest and undoubted truth not only that Saint Peter was at Rome but that he also took upon him the Episcopal charge and was the Bishop of that City The Arguments devised in this later Age to evince the contrary do nothing less in my opinion than prove the point for which they were first devised For first it is objected that the Episcopal charge requiring residence could not consist with that of an Apostle who was to be perpetually in motion Which argument if it be of any force will militate as well against Saint James his being Bishop of Herusalem as against Saint Peters being Bishop of the Church of Rome And then will Calvin come very opportunely in to help us Comment in Act. c. 21. who speaking of S. James his constant residence in Hierusalem doth resolve it thus Quanquam commune illi cum reliquis collegis mandatum erat c. Although saith he the Lords Commandment of preaching to all Nations was common unto him with the residue of the Lords Apostles yet I conceive that they did so divide the charge amongst them as to leave him always at Hierusalem whither such store of strangers did use continually to resort Id enim perinde erat ac si Evangelium longè latéque promulgasset in locis remotis for that saith he was as sufficient as if he had promulgated or preached the Gospel in the parts remote This if it may be used for James will serve for Peter Assuredly there was a greater confluence of all sorts of strangers to the City of Rome than used to be unto Hierusalem and therefore Peter being there might spread abroad the Gospel with the greater speed and with no less success than those others did who did not fix themselves in a certain station But whereas Calvin doth object in another place Institut l 4. c. 6. n. 14.15 that Saint Paul writing to the Romans and saluting many of the Saints there makes no speech of Peter and that writing many of his Epistles from the City of Rome he makes no mention of him neither this may infer indeed that Saint Peter was then absent when those things were done as one that had not so immured himself in the walls of Rome but that he travelled up and down in several quarters of the world doing sometimes the Office of an Apostle discharging otherwhiles the place and function of a Bishop All the Epistles of Saint Paul which bear date from Rome were written in the first two years of his being there and therefore any argument derived from thence must be very weak either to prove that Peter never was at Rome or never Bishop of that place being so many ancient Writers do affirm them both And yet I would not have the Papists think that this makes any more for the Popes supremacy because he sits in Peters seat than it did make for Vibius Rufus to attain Tullies eloquence Dion in Tiber. hist l. 57. or Caesars power because he married Tullies Widow and bought Caesars Chair though the poor Gentleman as the story telleth us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 did presume on both But to go on the Church of Christ being thus setled by Saint Peter both in Rome and Antioch his next great care is for Alexandria the great and most renowned City in the parts of Africa that so there might be no prime City in all the habitable World to which the Gospel was not preached In the discharge of this great business was Saint Mark employed a principal and constant follower of Saint Peters who mentioneth him in his Epistle by the name of Son 1 Pet. 5.13 The Church which is at Babylon saluteth you and so doth Marcus my son The planting of this Church is thus remembred by Eusebius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Euseb hist l. 2. c. 15. It is affirmed saith he that Mark did first of all Christs followers pass into Egypt and there promulge and preach the Gospel which before he writ and that he first did plant the Church of Alexandria in which his undertakings had so good success that on his very first endeavours 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Author hath it great multitudes both of Men and Women did believe in Christ his holiness and strict behaviour gaining much upon them This Church as he first founded in the faith of Christ so did he take upon himself the charge thereof and became Bishop of the same This witnesseth S. Hierom of him Marcus interpres Petri Apostoli Alexandrinae Ecclesiae primus Episeopus Hieron in Proem super Matt. that Mark the interpreter of Saint Peter was the first Bishop of the Church of Alexandria The same he also doth affirm in his Epistle to Euagrius whereof more anon And when Eusebius doth inform us Euseb Eccl. Hist l. 2. c. 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that in the eighth year of the Emperour Nero Anianus a right godly Man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the story calls him succeeded Mark the Evangelist in Alexandria he doth infer ex consequenti that Mark was Bishop there before him So that is seemeth he sat there 19. years by this account For he came hither Anno 45. being the third of Claudins Caesar and finished his course in the eighth of Nero which was the 64. of our Redeemer Finally Anianus having continued Bishop here 23 years died in the 4th Euseb Hist Eccl. l. 3. c. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 year of Domitianus being Anno Chr. 87. and had Abilius to succeed him after whom Cerdo did succeed in the year 100. what time Abilius left this World S. John the Apostle being yet alive So that there were four Bishops of Alexandria succeeding one another in that weighty charge during the lives of the Apostles a pregnant evidence that they both instituted and approved the calling Now for the Church of Alexandria there are some things observed by the Fathers which are worth our noting and may give great light to the present business It is observed by Epiphanius Haeres 66. n. 6. Smectymn p. 53. that Alexandria never had two Bishops 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as had other Cities which words not rightly understood have made some conceive that anciently Bishops were the same with Presbyters it being against the usual custom to have two Bishops in one Church or City But if we look considerately upon Epiphanius there is no such matter all that he drives at being this that whereas in most other Churches for the preventing of schisms and factions amongst the
besides the Church of Rome before remembred We find Epaphroditus not he that is commemorated by S. Paul In Annal. Eccles A. 60. Rom. Martyr Mart. 22. April 3. Jun. 4. Julii 12. Julii 12. Julii 23. Chrys serm 128. in his Epistle to the Philippians as Baronius witnesseth against himself à beato Petro Apostolo Episcopus illius Civitatis ordinatus made Bishop by S. Peter of Tarracina of old called Anxur Pancratius made by S. Peter Bishop of Tauromenium in the Isle of Sicily as the Greeks also do affirm in their Menologia Marcianus Bishop of Syracusa to whom the said Menologies do bear record also Hermagoras a Disciple of S. Mark the first Bishop of Aquileia now in the Signeurie of Venice Panlinus the first Bishop of Luques in Tuscanie Apollinaris created by S. Peter the first Bishop of Ravenna in praise of whom Chrysologus one of his Successors and an holy Father hath composed a Panegyrick Marcus ordained Bishop of Atina at S. Peters first coming into Italy Rom. Martyr Apr. 28. Novemb. 7. Sept. 1. Octob. 25. Jan. 27. Acts. Martyrol Rom. Decem. 29. And last of all Prosdocimus the first Bishop of Padua à Beato Petro ordinatus made Bishop thereof by S. Peter Next to pass over into France we find there Xystus the first Bishop of Rhemes and Fronto Bishop of Perigort Petragorricis ordained both by this Apostle As also Julianus the first Bishop of Mayne Cononiensium in the Latine of his Ordination And besides these we read that Trophimus once one of S. Pauls Disciples was by S. Peter made the first Bishop of Arles And this besides the Martyrologies and other Authors cited by Baronius in his Annotations appeareth by that memorable controversie in the time of Pope Leo before the Bishop of Vienna the chief City of Daulphine and him of Arles for the place and dignity of Metropolitan In prosecution of the which it is affirmed by the Suffragans Epist contr Provinc ad S. Leonem in fine lib. or Com-provincial Bishops of the Province of Arles Quod prima inter Gallias Arelatensis Civitas missum à Beatissimo Petro Apostolo Sauctum Trophimum habere meruit Sacerdotem that first of all the Cities of Gaul that of Arles did obtain the happiness to have Saint Trophimus for their Bishop for so Sacerdos must be read in that whole Epistle sent to them from the most blessed Apostle S. Peter to preach the Gospel For Spain we find this testimony once for all that Ctesiphon Torquatus Secundus Caecilius Judaletius Hesychius Rom. Martyr Maij 15. and Euphrasius Romae à Sanctis Apostolis Episcopi ordinati ad praedicandum verbum Dei in Hispanias directi Having been ordained Bishops at Rome by the Apostles viz. S. Peter and S. Paul were sent unto Spain to preach the Gospel and in most likelihood were Bishops of those Cities in which they suffered the names whereof occur in the Martyrologie If we pass further into Germany we may there see Eucherius one of S. Peters Disciples also by him employed to preach the Gospel to that Nation which having done with good effect in the City of Triers Primus ejusdem Civitatis Episcopus Decemb. 8. he was made the first Bishop of that City And unto this Methodius also doth attest Ap. Mar. Scotum in An. 72.74 as he is cited by Marianus Scotus who tells us that after he had held the Bishoprick 23 years Valerio Trevericae Ecclesiae culmen dereliquit he left the government of that Church unto Valerius who together with Maternus both being Disciples of Saint Peper did attend him thither and that Maternus after fifteen years did succeed Valerius continuing Bishop there 40 years together I should much wrong our part of Britain should I leave out that as if neglected by the Apostle concerning which we are informed by Metaphrastes whose credit hath been elsewhere vindicated that this Apostle coming into Britain Commem Petri Pauli ad diem 29 Junii and tarrying there a certain time and enlightning many with the word of grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 did constitute Churches and ordain Bishops Presbyters and Deacons in the same Which action as he placeth in the twelfth year of Nero being the 67. of our Redeemer so he professeth that he had his information out of some writings of Eusebius which have not come unto our hands but with a great deal more of that Authors works have perished in the ruins and wrack of time Nor is it strange that the Apostle should make so many of his Disciples Bishops before or shortly after they were sent abroad to gain the nations to the Faith Beda hist Eccl. l. 1. c. 27. that being the usual course in the like imployments as may appear by Austins being consecrated Bishop immediately after his first coming into England The reason was as I conceive it that if God prospered their endeavours with desired success they might be furnished with a power of ordaining Presbyters for their assistance in that service And so much for the Churches planted by Saint Peter and by his Disciples CHAP. IV. The Bishoping of Timothy and Titus and others of Saint Pauls Disciples 1. The Conversion of Paul and his ordaining to the place of an Apostle 2. The Presbyters created by Saint Paul Act. 14. of what sort they were 3. Whether the Presbyters or Presbytery did lay on hands with Paul in any of his Ordinations 4. The people had no voice in the Election of their Presbyters in these early times 5. Bishops not founded by S. Paul at first in the particular Churches by him planted and upon what reasons 6. The short time of the Churches of S. Pauls plantation continued without Bishops over them 7. Timothy made Bishop of Ephesus by S. Paul according to the general consent of Fathers 8. The time when Timothy was first made Bishop according to the Holy Scripture 9. Titus made Bishop of the Cretans and the truth verified herein by the ancient Writers 10. An Answer unto such Objections as have been made against the Subscription of the Epistle unto Titus 11. The Bishopping of Dionysius the Areopagite Aristarchus Gaius Epaphroditus Epaphras and Archippus 12. As also of Silus Sosthenes Sosipater Crescens and Aristobulus 13. The Office of a Bishop not incompatible with that of an Evangelist WE are now come unto S. Paul and to the Churches by him planted where we shall meet with clearer evidence from Scripture than before we had A man that did at first most eagerly afflict the poor Church of Christ as if it were the destiny not of David only but also of the Son of David to be persecuted by the hands of Saul Rhemist Testam Act. 15. But as the Rhemists well observe that the contention between Paul and Barnabas fell out unto the great increase of Christianity So did this persecution raised by Saul fall out unto the great improvement of the Gospel For by this means the Disciples being
their hands for none but they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the present business the whole election of these Presbyters must be given to them But indeed it was neither so nor so Neither the Apostle nor the People had any hand in the elections of those times but the Spirit of God which evidently did design and mark out those men whom God intended to imploy in his holy Ministery The words of Paul to Timothy make this clear enough where it is said Neglect not the gift that is in thee which was given thee by Prophesie 1 Tim. 4.14 1 Tim. 1.18 c. and that there went some Prophesies before concerning Timothy the same Saint Paul hath told us in the first Chapter of that first Epistle Hom. 5. in 1. ad Tim. c. 1. Chrysostom notes upon these words that in those times 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Priests and Ministers of God were made by Prophesie that is saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Holy Ghost And this he proves by the selection of Paul and Barnabas to the work of God which was done by Prophesie and by the Spirit And finally glossing on those words Noli negligere gratiam c. he doth thus express it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God saith he did elect thee to this weighty charge he hath committed no small part of his Church unto thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 no mortal man had any hand in that designation and therefore take thou beed that thou disgrace not nor dishonour so Divine a calling More might be said both from Theodoret and Oecumenius to confirm this Truth Theodor. Oecum in locum but that I think it is sufficiently confirmed already So then the Presbyters of these times being of Gods special choice his own designation and those upon the laying on of such holy hands furnished by the Spirit with such gifts and graces as might enable them sufficiently to discharge their calling The marvel is the less if in those early days at the first dawning as it were of Christianity we find so little speech of Bishops In the ordaining of these Presbyters as also of the like in other places the Apostles might and did no question communicate unto them such and so much Authority as might invest them with a power of government during the times of their own necessary absence from those several Churches So that however they were Presbyters in degree and order yet they both were and might be trusted with an Episcopal jurisdiction in their several Cities even as some Deans although but simply Presbyters are with us in England And of this rank I take it were the Presbyters in the Church of Ephesus Act. 20.28 whom the Apostle calleth by the name of Bishops that is to say Presbyters by their Order and Degree but Bishops in regard of their jurisdiction Such also those ordained by Saint Paul in the Church of Philippos Phil. 1.1 whom the Apostle mentioneth in the very entrance of his Epistle to that people Which as it may be some occasion why Bishops properly so called were not ordained by the Apostles in the first planting of some Churches so there are other reasons alledged for it and are briefly these For first although the Presbyters in those times were by the Holy Ghost endued with many excellent gifts and graces requisite to the Preaching of the Word yet the Apostles might not think fit to trust them with the chief government till they had fully seen and perfectly made tryal of their abilities and parts that way Epiphan adv haeres 75. n. 5. And this is that which Epiphanius meaneth in his dispute against Aerius saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that where there were no fit men to discharge that Office the place remained without a Bishop but where necessity required and that there wanted not fit men to supply the place there Bishops forthwith were appointed But that which I conceive to be the principal reason was this that the Apostle did reserve unto himself the chief Authority in all the Churches of his planting so long as he continued in or about those places And this he exercised either by personal Visitations mention whereof is made in the 14.21 and 15.36 of the Book of Acts or else by his rescripts and mandates as in his sentencing of the incestuous Corinthian although absent thence But when he was resolved to take a journey to Hierusalem Act. 19.21 and from thence to Rome not knowing when he should return to those Eastern parts and knowing well that multitude of governours do oft breed confusions and that equality of Ministers did oft end in factions he then resolved to give them Bishops to place a Chief in and above each several Presbytery over every City committing unto them that power aswell of Ordinations as inflicting censures which he had formerly reserved to himself alone This great Apostle as for some space of time he taught the Church without help of Presbyters so for another while he did rule the same without help of Bishops A time there was wherein there were no Bishops but the Apostles only to direct the Church and so there was a time wherein there were no Presbyters but they to instruct the same However it must be confessed that there was a time in which some Churches had no Bishops And this Hieron in Tit. c. 1. if any was the time that Saint Hierom speaks of Cum communi Presbyterorum consilio ecclesiae gubernabantur when as the Churches were governed by the common counsel of the Presbyters But sure it was so short a time that had not the good Father taken a distaste against Episcopacy by reason of some differences which he had with John the Bishop of Hierusalem he could not easily have observed it For whether Bishops were ordained Id. ad Evagrium In Schismatis remedium as he saith elsewhere for the preventing of those Schisms and factions which were then risen in the Church or that they were appointed by the Apostles to supply their absence when they withdrew themselves unto further Countreys This government of the Church in common by the Presbyters will prove of very short continuance For from the first planting of the Church in Corinth Baronius so computes it Annal. Hieron in Titâ—m c. 1. which was in Anno 53. unto the writing of his first Epistle to that Church and people in which he doth complain of the Schisms amongst them was but four whole years And yet it doth appear by that place in Hierom for ought can see that the divisions of the people in Religion some saying I am of Paul and I of Apollo and I of Cephas every one cleaving unto him by whom he had received Baptism were the occasion that it was decreed throughout the world as that Father saith Vt unus de Presbyteris electus superponeretur caeteris that one of the Presbyters should be set over the rest to whom
the care of all the Church should appertain that so the seeds of schism might be rooted up And from the time when Paul ordained those Presbyters in Lystra and Iconium and those other Churches which was in Anno 48. according as Baronius calculates it unto Saint Paul's return unto Hierusalem which was in Anno 58. are but ten whole years Before which time immediately upon his resolution to undertake that journey and from thence to Rome he had appointed Bishops in the Churches of his own plantation so that the government of the Presbyters in the largest and most liberal allowance that can be given them will be too short a time to plead prescription Now that Saint Paul ordained Bishops in many of the Asian Cities or in the Churches of those Cities which himself had planted before his last going thence into Greece and Macedon may well be gathered out of Irenaeus who lived both neer those times and in those parts and possibly might have seen and known some of the Bishops of this first foundation Item l. 3. c. 14. Now Irenaeus his words are these In Mileto enim convocatis Episcopis Presbyteris qui erant ab Epheso reliquis proximis civitatibus c. Paul saith he calling together in Miletum the Bishops and Presbyters which were of Ephesus and other the adjoyning Cities told them what things were like to happen to him in Hierusalem whither he meant to go before the Feast Out of which words of Irenaeus I collect thus much First that those Presbyters whom Paul called to Miletum to meet him there were not all of Ephesus though all called from Ephesus Ephesus being first appointed for the Randevouz or place of meeting and secondly that amongst those Presbyters there were some whom Paul had dignified with the stile and place of Bishops In which regard the Assembly being of a mixt condition they are entituled by both names especially those Presbyters which had as yet no Bishops over them having the charge and jurisdiction of their Churches under the Apostles as before was said And this perhaps may be one reason why the Apostle in his speech to that Assembly makes no words of Timothy who being present with the rest received his charge together with them as also why he gave the Presbyters of Ephesus no particular charge how to behave themselves before their Bishop there being many Bishops there which were not under the command of Timothy However we may gather thus much out of Irenaeus that though we find not in the Scripture the particular names of such as had Episcopal Authority committed to them but Timothy and Titus yet that there were some other Bishops at that time of S. Paul's Ordination who doubtless took as great a care for Thessalonica and Philippos for Lystra and Iconium as for Crete and Ephesus And that these two were by Saint Paul made Bishops of those places will appear most fully by the concurrent testimony of ancient Writers And first for Timothy that he was Bishop of the Church of Ephesus and the first Bishop there appeareth by an ancient Treatise of his death and martyrdom bearing the name of Polycrates who was himself not only Bishop of this Church of Ephesus but born also within six or seven and thirty years after the writing of the Revelation by Saint John Which treatise of Polycrates entituled De martyrio Timothei is extant amongst the lives of Saints printed at Lovaine An. 1585. and cited by the Learned Primate of Armagh in his brief Discourse touching the original of Episcopacy Sigebertus de Eccl. Script Certain I am that Sigebertus doth report Polycrates to be the Author of a Book entituled De passione Sancti Timothei Apostoli but whether that it ever came unto the hands of those of Lovain I am not able to determine More like it is the book is perished and the fragments of the Treatise which remain in Photius Photius in Biblioth n. 254. touching the death and martyrdom of Timothy is all which have escaped that shipwrack And yet in those poor fragments there is proof enough that Timothy was Bishop of the Church of Ephesus in which it is expresly said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Timothy was both Ordained and Inthroned Bishop of the Metropolis of Ephesus by the great Apostle Secondly this appeareth by the testimony of Eusebius who reckning up Saint Pauls assistants his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and coadjutors as it were bringeth in Timothy for one and this adds thus of him Eccles hist l. 3. c. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that as Histories recorded of him he was the first Bishop of the Diocess of Ephesus Thirdly by Epiphanius Epiph. har 75. n. 5. who in a glance gives him the power and stile of Bishop where he relateth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the Apostle speaking unto Timothy being then a Bishop doth advise him thus Rebuke not an Elder c. Fourthly by Ambrose if the work be his Ambr. Praef. in Epist 1. ad Timoth. who in the preface to his Commentaries on the Epistles unto Timothy thus resolves the point Hunc ergo jam creatum Episcopum instruit per Epistolam that being now ordained a Bishop he was instructed by Saint Pauls Epistle how to dispose and order the Church of God Fifthly by Hierom who in his Tract De Eccles Scriptoribus doth affirm of Timothy Hieron de Script Eccles Ephesiorum Episcopum ordinatum à Beato Paulo that he was ordained Bishop of the Ephesians by Saint Paul Sixthly by Chrysostom as in many places so most significantly and expresly in his Comment on the Epistle to the Philippians saying Chrysost Hom. in 1. ad Tim. in Praef. ad eand Paul saith in his Epistle unto Timothy Fulfil thy Ministry 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being then a Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that he was a Bishop appears by Pauls writing thus unto him Lay hands hastily on no man Seventhly by Leontius Bishop of Magnesia Concil Chal. Act. 11. one of the Fathers in the great Council of Chalcedon affirming publickly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that from blessed Timothy unto his times there had been 26 Bishops of the Church of Ephesus Eighthly by Gregory the Great De cura Pastorali pars 2. c. 11. where he saith that Paul admonisheth his Scholar Timothy Praelatum gregi being now made the Prelate of a Flock to attend to reading Com. in 1. ad Tim. c. 1. Ninthly by Sedulius an ancient writer of the Scotish Nation who lived about the middle of the first Century affirming on the credit of old History Timotheum istum fuisse Episcopum in Epheso that Timothy to whom Paul wrote had been Bishop of Ephesus Primas in Tim. 1. Ep. 1. c. 4. Tenthly by Primasius a writer of the first 600 years who in the Preface to his Commentaries on the first to Timothy gives us this short note Timotheus Episcopus fuit Discipulus Pauli that
Timothy was a Bishop and Pauls Disciple and in his Comment on the Text saith that he had the grace or the gift of Prophesie cum ordinatione Episcopatus Subscript ep 2. ad Tim. with his ordination to a Bishoprick 11. By the subscription of the second Epistle where he is called positively 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first that was ordained Bishop of the Ephesians In Praesat in 1. ad Tim. 12. By Theophylact who giveth this reason of Saint Pauls writing unto Timothy because that in a Church new constitute 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. it was not easie to inform a Bishop of all things incident unto his place by word of mouth and further in his Comment on the fourth Chapter of the first Epistle In cap. 4. v. 14 15. Oecum in 1. ad Tim. c. 1. doth twice or thrice give Timothy the name of Bishop 13. By Oecumonius whom on these words of the Epistle I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus gives this gloss or descant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for there or of that place he ordained him Bishop An evidence so clear and full that Beza Beza Annot. in 1. ad Tim. c. 5. v. 19. though he would not call him Bishop confesseth him to be President or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Ephesme Presbytery and that he had authority to receive accusations and complaints against a Presbyter and to judge accordingly Which what it is else than to be a Bishop is beyond my fancy to imagine Now for the time in which he was appointed Bishop of the Church of Ephesus for on the right stating of that point 1 Tim. 1.3 the clearing of many difficulties doth depend it may be best gathered from those words in the first Epistle where Paul relates that he besought him to abide still at Ephesus when he himself went into Macedonia Now S. Pauls journey into Macedonia which is here intended is not that mentioned Act. 16. for then there was no Church of Ephesus to be Bishop of Act. 18 19. 19.1 2 3. c. Paul had not then seen Ephesus at all nor planted any Church there till a good while after Nor could it be when he left Ephesus to go the second time into Macedonia mention whereof is made in the 20 Chapter Act. 19.22 Act. 20.3 for he had sent Timotheus and Erastus before him thither But it was after he had stayed three months in Greece when hearing that the Jews laid wait for him as he went about to sail into Syria he changed his course and purposed to return through Macedonia Then was it as he went that time into Macedonia that he brake the business unto Timothy requiring or besseeching him to go to Ephesus to set up his aboad in that populous City and undertake the government of the Church thereof To which when Timothy had condescended Act. 20.5 he was sent before with Aristarchus and the rest tarrying at Troas in expectation of the Apostles coming And there he was most like to be when the Apostles first Epistle came unto his hands being written not from Laodicea Athan. in Synop Sacrae Script 1 Tim. 3.14 as the subscription doth pretend but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 out of Macedonia as Athanasius doth expresly say in his Synopsis For howsoever the Apostle hoped to come to him shortly and to instruct him more at large for that weighty business yet well considering how many lets and hindrances might intervene he thought it not amiss to prevent the worst and send that letter of instructions in the mean time to him that he might know how to behave himself in the house of God 1 Tim. 1.15 After this time I find not that the Apostle did employ Timothy in any other general service which concerned the Church or that he called him from Ephesus being once got thither save that he sent for him to make hast to Rome immediately on his first coming to that City 2 Tim. 4.21 to be assistant to him there in that dangerous exigency A thing that both the one might crave and the other do without detracting any thing at all from the Episcopal place and power which Timothy had taken on him All the Epistles wherein the name of Timothy is joyned with Pauls being written within the compass of two years which was so short an absence from his Pastoral charge as might be very easily dispensed withal especially when the publique service of the Church was concerned so highly I know that some of eminent note B. Downham in the Sermon at Lambeth p. 76 77 78. and others the better to avoid some appearing difficulties that concern this business will not have Timothy made Bishop of the Church of Ephesus till after the Apostles coming unto Rome But the second of the two Epistles doth very throughly refute that fancy in which Saint Paul acquaints him how he had disposed of his retinue Tim. 4. Taking it as it seemeth in his way to Crete Titus being gone into Dalmatia Crescens to Galatia Erastus taking up his aboad at Corinth and Trophimus left at Miletum sick taking great care to have the Cloak and Parchments which were left at Troas where Timothy stayed for him Act. 20. to be sent speedily unto him Where by the way Miletum where Paul left Trophimus sick was not that Town of lesser Asia unto the which the Elders were called from Ephesus for after that we find him at Hierusalem Act. 21.29 Annal. Eccl. An. 59. n. 1. Conditorem ex Mileto quae in Creta est Sarpedonem accipientes Geogr. l. 2. nor was it at the Island called Mileta as Baronius thinks on which Saint Paul was cast by Shipwrack Act. 28. such alterations or corrections not being easily allowable in holy Scripture For being that there is in the Isle of Crete a Town called Miletus as Strabo testifieth and that Saint Paul in his Voyage from Hierusalem to Rome sailed under Crete and hovered for a while about that coast Act. 27.7 8. c. that is most like to be the place and there I leave him For being thus fallen on the Coast of Crete I think it seasonable to enquire some news of Titus whom the Apostle much about the time that Timothy undertook the charge of Ephesus had made the Bishop of this Island Baronius thinks An. 57. n. 209. Act. 20.2 and not improbably that at Saint Pauls last going out of Asia into Macedonia when he had gone over those parts and given them much exhortation and having so done went into Greece that this his going into Greece was by and through the Aegean sea that in his passage thither he put in at Crete And finally that he left Titus here ad curandam Ecclesiam whom he made Bishop for that purpose This is most like to be the time the circumstances of the Text and story so well agreeing thereunto for till this time Titus was either attendant on S. Paul
in person or sent from place to place on his occasions and dispatches as may appear by looking on the concordances of holy Scripture Now that Titus was ordained the first Bishop of Crete hath been affirmed by several Authors of good both credit and antiquity For first Eccles hist l. 3. c. 4. Eusebius making a Catalogue of Saint Pauls assistants or fellow-labourers and reckoning Timothy amongst them whom he recordeth for the first Bishop of the Church of Ephesus adds presently 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so was Titus also the first Bishop of Crete Ambr. praef in ep ad Titum Saint Ambrose in the Preface to his Commentaries on the Epistle unto Titus doth affirm as much Titum Apostolus consecravit Episcopum the Apostle consecrated Titus a Bishop and therefore doth admonish him to be solicitous for the well ordering of the Church committed to him Saint Hierom writing on these words in that Epistle Hieron in Tit. c. 1. v. 5. For this cause left I thee in Crete c. doth apply them thus Audiant Episcopi qui habent constituendi Presbyteres per singulas urbes potestatem Let Bishops mark this well who have authority to ordain Presbyters in every City on what conditions to what persons for that I take to be his meaning Ecclesiastical orders are to be conferred Which is a strong insinuation that Titus having that authority must be needs a Bishop More evidently in his Catalogue of Writers or in Sophronius at the least Id. de Scrip. Eccles in Tit. if those few names were by him added to that Catalogue Titus Episcopus Cretae Titus the Bishop of Crete did preach the Gospel both in that and the adjacent Islands Apud Oecumen Praef. ad Tim. Theodoret proposing first this question why Paul should rather write to Timothy and Titus than to Luke and Silas returns this answer to the same that Luke and Silas were still with him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but those had entrusted with the government of Churches But more particularly Titus a famous Disciple of Saint Paul Ap. eund in Praef. ad Tit. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was by him ordained Bishop of Crete being a place of great extent with a Commission also to ordain Bishops under him Theoph. in praef ad Tit. Oecum in Tit. c. 1. v. 5. Theophylact in his preface unto this Epistle doth affirm the same using almost his very words And Oecumenius on the Text doth declare as much saying that Paul gave Titus authority of ordaining Bishops Crete being of too large a quantity to be committed unto one alone 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 having first consecrate or made him Bishop Finally the subscription of this Epistle calls Titus the first Bishop of the Church of the Cretians which evidence though questioned now of late is of good Authority For some of late who are not willing that Antiquity should afford such grounds for Titus being Bishop of the Church of Crete have amongst other arguments devised against it found an irreparable flaw as they conceive in this Subscription Beza Annot at in Ep. ad Tit. in fine who herein led the way disproves the whole Subscription as supposititious because it is there said that it was written from Nieopolis of Macedonia A thing saith he which cannot be for the Apostle doth not say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will winter here but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 illic I will winter there and therefore he was somewhere else when he wrote this Epistle But Athanasius who lived neerer the Apostles times In Synopsi sacr script Ad Paulum Eustochium Comment in Ep. ad Tit. affirms it to be written from Nicopolis and so doth Hierome in his Preface unto that Epistle The Syriack translation dates it also thence as is confessed by them that adhere to Beza Theophylact and Oecumenius agree herein with Athanasius and the ancient Copies As for the criticism it is neither here nor there for Saint Paul being still in motion might appoint Titus to repair unto Nicopolis letting him understand that howsoever he disposed of himself in the mean time yet he intended there to Winter and so he might well say though he was at Nicopolis when he writ the same That Titus is there called the first Bishop of Crete Smectym p. 54. or of the Church of the Cretians is another hint that some have taken to vilifie the credit of the said Subscription asking if ever there were such a second Bishop Assuredly the Realm of England is as fair and large a circuit as the Isle of Crete And yet I do not find it used as argument that Austin the Monk had neither any hand in the converting of the English or was not the first Archbishop of the See of Canterbury Beda hist Eccl. l. 1. c. 27. because it is affirmed in Beda's History Archiepiscopus genti Anglorum ordinatus est that he was ordained the Archbishop of the English Nation Hist Eccl. l. 4. c. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And for an answer to the question we need but look into Eusebius where we shall find Pinytus a right godly man called in plain terms Bishop of Crete Cretae Episcopus saith the Latin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Greek Original the self-same stile which is excepted at in Titus Now whereas it is said that Titus was left no otherwise in Crete than as Pauls Vicar General Commissary or Substitute to order those things in such sort as he had appointed which he could not dispatch himself when he was there present this can by no means be admitted the Rules prescribed unto him and Timothy being for the most part of that nature as do agree with the condition of perpetual Governours and not of temporary and removable Substitutes As for the anticipation of the time which I see some use relating that Saint Paul with Titus having passed through Syria and Cilicia to confirm the Churches did from Cilicia pass over into Crete where the Apostle having preached the Gospel left Titus for a while to set things in Order although I cannot easily tell on what Authority the report is built yet I can easily discern that it can hardly stand with Scripture We read indeed in the 15. Chapter of the Acts that he went thorow Syria and Cilicia confirming the Churches ver ult and in the first words of the following Chapter Acts 14.6 Hist Eccl. l. 4. c. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we find him at Derbe and Lystra Cities of Lycaonia the very next Province to Cilicia Northward from which it is divided by a branch of the Mountain Taurus Now whether of the two it be more probable that Paul should pass immediately from Cilicia unto Lycaonia upon the usual common Road or fetch a voyage into Crete Smectymn p. 50. as these men suppose and be transported back again into Lycaonia being an in-land Countrey far from any Sea which could not be without
some Miracle or great hiatus in the story I leave to any man to be imagined Timothy and Titus being thus setled in their Episcopal Sees we must pass on to see if we can meet with any other of Saint Pauls Disciples or his assistants if you will that were entrusted with the like Authority And first we meet with Dionysius the Areopagite ordained by Saint Paul as is most likely the first Bishop of Athens but howsoever questionless ordained the first Bishop there Another Dionysius Bishop of Corinth Ap. Euseb Eccl. hist l. 4. c. 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as also l. 3. c. 4. who in all probability was born whilst Saint John was living doth expresly say it viz. that Dionysius the Areopagite being converted to the Faith by the Apostle Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was first ordained Bishop of the Church of Athens The foresaid Dionysius the Corinthian doth also tell us Ap. Euseb l. c. 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Publius succeeded the Areopagite after him Quadratus both which were Disciples of the Apostles the former of the two being conceived to be the same Acts 28.8 whose Father Paul cured so miraculously in the Isle of Malta Next for the Church of Thessalonica August 4. the Martyrologies inform us that Aristarchus one of Pauls Companions ab eodem Apostolo Thessalonicensium Episcopus ordinatus was by him ordained Bishop of the Thessalonians And after him succeeded Caius whom Saint Paul mentioned in his Epistle to the Romans Rom. 16.23 Comment in Epi. ad Rom. c. 16. by the name of Gaius the Host as he calls him of the whole Church Certain I am that Origen reports him to be Bishop here and that upon the known tradition of his Elders Fertur sane ex traditione majorum quod hic Gaius Episcopus fuerit Thessalonicensis Ecclesiae as his own words are So for the Church of the Philippians Saint Paul hath told us of Epaphroditus one whom he mentioneth oftentimes Phil. 2.29 in his Epistle to that people that he was not only his Brother and Companion in labour and his Fellow-souldier Vestrum autem Apostolum but he was also their Apostle Theodor. in 1. ad Tim. c. 3. Ask of Theodoret what Saint Paul there meaneth and he will tell you that he was their Bishop For in his Comment on the first to Timothy he gives this note Eos qui nunc vocantur Episcopi nominabant Apostolos that in those times in which Saint Paul writ that Epistle those who are now called Bishops were called Apostles And this he proves out of this passage of Saint Paul that so in this respect ita Philippensium Apostolus erat Epaphroditus Epaphroditus is called the Apostle of the Philippians Which clearly sheweth that in his opinion Epaphroditus was Bishop of the Philippians as Titus of the Cretans and Timothy of the Ephesians in whom he afterwards doth instance Beza indeed doth render the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Latin Legatus in which he hath been followed by the latter English who read it Messenger But Calvin doth not only keep himself to the old Translation Calvin in 〈◊〉 lip c. 2. though he take notice of the other but he prefers the old before it Sed prior sensus meliùs convenit as more agreeable unto the meaning of the place For the Colossians next we find the names of Epaphras and Archippus their two first Bishops in the Epistle to that Church And first for Epaphras it is conceived that he first preached the Faith of Christ to the Colossians And this Saint Paul doth seem to intimate in the first Chapter of the same Epistle saying Ver. 7. As ye also learned of Epaphras our dear fellow servant Certain it is that in the Martyrologies he is affirmed to be the Bishop of this Church ab eodem Apostolo ordinatus Julii 19. and that he was ordained Bishop by the hands of Paul But being after Prisoner with Saint Paul at Rome Archippus undertook the Episcopal charge Colos 4.17 whom Paul exhorteth to take heed unto the Ministery which he had received of the Lord and to fulfil it Most sure I am that Ambrose writing on those words doth make Archippus Bishop of Colossi by the name of their Praepositus Ambros in Colos 4. V. cap. 3. n. 5. or Governour of which see before adding withal that after Epaphras had seasoned them in the Truth of God hic accepit regendam eorum Ecclesiam Archippus took the Government of that Church upon him For other of Saint Pauls Disciples we find in Dorotheus if he may be credited that Silas Pauls most individual Companion Dorotheas in Synopsi was Bishop of the Church of Corinth the truth whereof shall be examined more at large in the second Century and that Sosipater mention of whom is made Acts 20 was ordained Bishop of Iconium wherein Hippolitus concurring with him doth make the matter the more probable Of Sosthenes of whom see Acts 18. 1 Cor. 1. the same two Authors do report that he was Bishop of Colophon one of the Cities of the lesser Asia But leaving these more Eastern Countreys let us look homeward towards the West And there we find that Crescens whom Saint Paul at his first coming unto Rome 2 Tim. 4. had sent into Galatia to confirm the Churches was after by him sent on the like occasion into Gaule or Gallia there to preach the Gospel for so I rather chuse to atone the business than correct the Text and read it Crescens in Galliam with Epiphanius Epiphan haeres 51. n. 11. For having with so good success been employed formerly in Galatia he might with better comfort undertake the service of Preaching Christ unto the Gaules whereof the Galatians were a branch or Colony Now that he did indeed Preach Christs Gospel there is affirmed positively both by Epiphanius and Theodoret two very eminent and ancient Writers Epiphan haeres 51. Theodor. in Epl. 2. ad Tim. Ado in Chron. and Ado Viennensis a Writer though of lesser standing yet of good repute affirmeth that he was put upon this employment quo tempore Paulus in Hispà nias pervenisse creditur at such time as it is conceived that the Apostle Paul went into Spain which was in Anno 61. as Baronius thinketh there being left and having planted a Church of Christ in the City of Vienna now in that Province which is called Daulphine he became the first Bishop of the same Primus ejusdem Civitatis Episcopus saith the Martyrologie Decemb. 29. In Chronico And to this Ado one of his successors also doth agree adding withal that after he had sat there some few years he returned back again into Galatia leaving one Zacharias to succeed him Finally not to leave out Britain it is recorded in the Greek Menologies that Aristobulus whom Saint Paul speaks of Rom. 16. being one of the Seventy and afterwards a follower of Saint Paul Menolog
and unreprovable until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ Now Timothy was not like to live till Christs second coming the Apostle past all question never meant it so therefore the power and charge here given to exercise the same according to the Apostles Rules and Precepts was not personal only but such as was to appertain to him and to his successours for ever even till the appearing of our Lord and Saviour The like expression do we find in Saint Matthew when our Redeemer said unto his Apostles Matth. 28. ult Behold I am with you always even unto the end of the world Not always certainly with his Apostles not to the end of the World with those very men to whom he did address himself when he spake these words for they being mortal men have been dead long since Non solis hoc Apostolis dictum esse this was no personal promise then saith Calvin truly Harmon Evangel In Matth. 28. With them and their successours he might always be and to the end of the world give them his assistance Cum vobis successorlbus vestris as Denis the Carthusian very well observeth Saint Paul then gives this charge to Timothy and in him unto all his successors in the Episcopal function which should continue in the Church till Christs second coming And therefore I conceive the annotation of the ordinary gloss to be sound and good in Timotheo omnibus successoribus loquitur Apostolus Glossa Ordinar in 1 Tim. 6. that this was spoke in Timothy unto all his successors And so the Commentaries under the name of Ambrose do inform us also saying that Paul was not so solicitous for Timothy as for his successors ut exemplo Timothei Ecclesiae ordinationem custodirent In 1 Tim. 6. that they might learn by his Example i.e. by practising those directions which were given to him to look unto the ordering of the Church This ground thus laid we must next look on the authority which the Apostle gave to Timothy and Titus and in them to all other Bishops And the best way to look upon it is to divide the same as the School-men do into potestas ordinis and potestas jurisdictionis the power of Order and the power of jurisdiction in each of which there occur divers things to be considered First for the power of Order besides what every Bishop doth and may lawfully perform by vertue of the Orders he received as Presbyter there is a power of Order conferred upon him as a Bishop and that 's indeed the power of Ordination or giving Orders which seems so proper and peculiar to the Bishops Office as not to be communicable to any else Paul gives it as a special charge to Timothy to lay hands hastily on no man Tim. 5.22 which caution doubtless had been given in vain in case the Presbyters of Ephesus might have done it as well as he And Titus seems to have been left in Crete for this purpose chiefly Tit. 1. v. 5. that he might ordain Presbyters in every City which questionless had been unnecessary in case an ordinary Presbyter might have done the same The Fathers have observed from these Texts of Scripture that none but Bishops strictly and properly so called according as the word was used when they lived that said it have any power of Ordination Epiphanius in his dispute against Aerius Haeres 75. n. 4. observes this difference betwixt Bishops and Presbyters whom the Heretick would fain have had to be the same that the Presbyter by administring the Sacrament of Baptism did beget children to the Church but that the Bishop by the power of Ordination 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 did beget Fathers to the same A power from which he utterly excludes the Presbyter and gives good reason for it too for how saith he can he ordain or constitute a Presbyter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in his Ordination did receive no power to impose hands upon another Hom. 11. in 1 Tim. c. 3. Chrysostom speaking of the difference between a Bishop and a Presbyter makes it consist in nothing else but in this power of Ordination 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. only in laying on of hands saith he or in Ordination a Bishop is before or above a Presbyter and have that power only inherent in them Epistola ad Euagr. which the others have not Hierom although a great advancer of the place and Office of the Presbyter excludes him from the power of Ordination or any interest therein Quid enim facit excepta ordinatione Episcopus quod Presbyter non faciat What saith he doth a Bishop saving Ordination more than a Presbyter may do Neither doth Hierom speak de facto and not de jure quid facit not quid debet facere Smectymn p. 37. as I observe the place to be both cited and applyed in some late Discourses Hierom's non faciat is as good as non debet facere and they that look upon him well will find he pleads not of the possession only but the right and Title And we may see his meaning by the passage formerly alledged upon the words of Paul to Titus cap. 1. v. 5. Audiant Episcopi qui habent constituendi Presbyteros per singulas urbes potestatem By which it seems that Bishops only had the power of ordaining Presbyters and that they did both claim and enjoy the same from this grant to Titus For further clearing of this point there are two things to be declared and made evident first that the power of Ordination was so inherent in the person of a Bishop that he alone both might and did sometimes ordain without help of Presbyters and secondly that the Presbyters might not do the same without the Bishop And first that anciently the Bishops of the Church both might and did ordain without the help or co-assistance of the Presbyters Euseb hist Eccl. l. 6. c. 7. n. appeareth by the ordination of Origen unto the Office of a Presbyter by Theoctistus Bishop of Caesarea and Alexander Bishop of Hierusalem who laid hands upon him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as my Author hath it Which act of theirs when it was quarrelled by Demetrius he did not plead in bar that there were no Presbyters assistant in it but that the party had done somewhat and we know what 't was by which he was conceived to be uncapable of holy Orders Id. l. 6. c. 25. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So when the Bishop whosoever he was out of an affectation which he bare unto Novatus not being yet a Separatist from the Church of God desired 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Clergy being all against it to ordain him Presbyter the matter stood upon as the story testifieth was not the Bishops being the sole agent in it but because it was forbidden by the ancient Canons that any one who had been formerly baptized being sick in bed and that had been Novatus case should be
Church with a fit number of Presbyters unless we take them from the Nursery Hence I collect that this description of a Bishop in S. Paul to Timothy is of a Bishop truly and properly so called and that it doth not also include the Presbyter If then it be demanded whether S. Paul hath utterly omitted to speak of Presbyters I answer no but that we have them in the next Paragraph Diaconos similiter which word howsoever in our last translation it be rendred Deacons Yet in our old translation and in that of Coverdale we read it Ministers according to the general and native meaning of the word Calv. in 1. ad Tim. c. 3. v. 8. An Exposition neither new nor forced Not new for Calvin doth acknowledge alios ad Presbyteros referre Episcopo inferiores that some referred those words to Presbyters subordinate or inferior to the Bishop Not forced for if we search the Scripture we shall there perceive that generally Diaconus is rendred Minister and that not only in the Gospels before that Deacons had been instituted in the Church of God but also in S. Pauls Epistles after the planting of the Church when all the Officers therein had their bounds and limits Thus the Apostle speaking of himself and of Apollos 1 Cor. 3.5 faith that they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ministers by whom that People did believe himself he calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Minister of the New Testament 2 Cor. 3.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Minister of God 2 Cor. 6.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Minister of the Gospel Eph. 3.7 Coloss 1.23 Thus Tychicus is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a faithful Minister Ephes 6.26 and again Coloss 4.7 and so is Epaphras entituled Coloss 1.7 Thus Timothy is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Thes 3.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a good Minister in this very Epistle and finally is required in the next to this 2 Tim. 4.5 not only to do the work of an Evangelist but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to fulfil his Ministery Hence I infer that since Diaconus is a word of so large extent as to include Apostles Prophets and Evangelists I see no inconvenience that can follow on it if it include the office of the Presbyter or Elder also And let the Bishop have the former Character to himself alone to whom of right it doth belong But this I only offer to consideration as my private thoughts not being so far wedded to mine own opinions but that on better reasons I may be divorced when ever they are laid before me CHAP. VI. Of the Estate of holy Church particularly of the Asian Churches toward the latter days of S. John the Apoistle 1. The time of S. John's coming into Asia 2. All the Seven Churches except Ephesus of his Plantation 3. That the Angels of those Churches were the Bishops of them in the opinion of the Fathers 4. And of some Protestant Divines of name and eminence 5. Conclusive reasons for the same 6. Who most like to be the Angel of the Church of Ephesus 7. That Polycarpus was the Angel of the Church of Smyrna 8. Touching the Angel of the Church of Pergamus and of Thyatira 9. As also of the Churches of Sardis Philadelphia and Laodicea 10. What Successors these several Angels had in the several Churches 11. Of other Churches founded in Episcopacy by S. John the Apostle 12. S. John deceasing left the government of the Church to Bishops as to the Successors of the Apostles 13. The ordinary Pastors of the Church 14. And the Vicars of Christ 15. A brief view of the estate of holy Church in this first Century WE now proceed unto Saint John and to the Churches of his time those most especially which he did either plant or water who living till the end of this present Century and being the last Surviver of that Glorious company of the Apostles could not but see the Church of Christ in her fullest growth in her perfection both for strength and beauty Of this Apostle we find not any thing in Scripture from his descent unto Samaria when he accompanied Saint Peter thither Acts 8.14 by the appointment of the residue of that goodly fellowship until the writing of the Revelation The intervening passages of his life and preaching we must make up out of such fragments of Antiquity and records of Story as are come safe unto our hands Where first I must needs disallow the conceit of those who carry him I know not how to Ephesus making him an inhabitant there and taking with him to that place the Mother of our Lord and Saviour which must needs be if ever it had been at all about the 44. year after Christs Nativity that being the time wherein the Apostles and Disciples were dispersed abroad upon the persecution raised by Herod Acts 12.1 c. But that it was not then nor a long time after will appear by this that when Paul came to preach and reside at Ephesus which was in Anno 55. above ten years after there was so little knowledg of the faith of Christ that they had not so much as heard there was any Holy Ghost being baptized only as themselves confessed unto John's baptism Acts 19.2 3. A thing which could not possibly be supposed without a great deal of reproach and ignominy to this blessed Apostle had he been here a resiant as by some reported And after this though we are well assured of his being here yet then he could not have in houshold with him the blessed Mother of our Lord who died in their account that put it off until the latest Anno 48. seven years before the coming of Saint Paul to Ephesus And therefore I agree rather unto Epiphanius as to the main and matter of his Negative though not as to the reason of it For where he tells us that when JOHN went down to Asia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan haeres 78. n. 11. he took not the blessed Virgin with him I hold it to be absolutely true past contradiction But where he buildeth his negation upon an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the silence of the Scripture in it I hold that reason to be insufficient there being many things of undoubted verity whereof there is no mention in the Holy Scripture And I agree too unto Epiphanius where he tells us this Epiph. ibid. n. 2. that Saint John's coming into Asia was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when he began to be in years the Holy Ghost then calling of him thither as well to propagate the Gospel where it was not preached as to confirm it where it had been shaken by the force of Heresie Into what parts the Spirit did before command him it is hard to say Some likelyhood there is Acts 2.9 Possidius in Judic operum August that he did preach the Gospel amongst the Parthians some of which Nation had been present at Hierusalem at the first giving
Paraeus in Apocal c. 3. v. did afterwards recover and get strength again instanceth in Anatotius and Stephanus both eminent and learned men and both Bishops there whereas indeed they were not Bishops of this Laodicea but of Laodicea in Syria called antiently Seleucia Tetrapolis as he might easily have seen by a more careful looking on those places of Eusebius which himself hath cited Now in the Nicene Council if we like of that we find the Successors of those several Angels subscribing severally to the Acts thereof Act. Conc. Nic. in subser amongst other Prelates of that time as viz. Menophanes of Ephesus Eutychius B. of Smyrna for the province of Asia Artemidorus B. of Sardis Soron or Serras B. of Thyatira Ethymasius B. of Philadelphia for the Province of Lydia and finally Nunechlus B. of this Laodicea Perpet gover cap. 13. p. 269. for the Province of Phrygia for Theodotus who by Bilson is affirmed to have subscribed as Bishop of this Laodicea was Bishop of Laodicea in the Province of Syria amongst the Bishops of which Province his subscription is which I marvel that most learned and industrious Prelate did not see And though we find not him of Pergamus amongst them there yet after in the Council of Chalcedon doth his name occur In fine by the person that speaketh to the Pastors and those seven Churches and the name he gives them it is plain and evident that their vocation was not only confirmed by the Lord himself but their Commission expressed He speaketh that hath best right to appoint what Pastors he would have to guide his Flock till himself come to judgment The name he giveth them sheweth their power and charge to be delivered them from God and consequently each of them in his several charge and City must have Commission to reform the errors and abuses in their several Churches at whose hands it shall be required by him that shall sit judge to take account of their doings And so much for the Angels of the seven Churches in Asia remembred in the book of the Revelation But to go forwards to S. John the Author of it immediately on his return from Patmos he sets himself unto the reformation of these Churches calling together the Bishops of the same as before we shewed and governing both those and the adjoyning Churches of Asia minor by his Apostolical Authority and preheminence Which having done on the intreaty and request of some godly men he went unto the neighbour Nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Clemens Alex. ap Euseb hist l. 2. c. 17. in some places instituting or ordaining Bishops in others rectifying and reforming the whole Churches and in a word by the direction of the spirit founding a Clergy in the same It seems the journey was not far the places which he visited being said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the neighbouring Nations and indeed the Apostle was now grown too old to endure much travel being near an hundred at this time And therefore I conceive that the Episcopal Sees of Traellis and Magnesia were of his foundation Concil Chal. in subscript being Cities not far off and after reckoned as the Suffragans of the Archb. or Metropolitan of Ephesus Certain I am that they were both of them Sees of Bishops as doth appear by the Epistles of Ignatius in which he nameth Polybius Bishop of Trallis Ignat. Epist ad Magnesi and Damas Bishop of Magnesia and those not titular Bishops only but such as were to be obeyed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without gain-saying and without whose allowance there was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 layed upon the Presbyters who were not to do any thing in their ministrations but by his authority One other Bishop there is said to be of S. John's ordaining viz. the young man which Clemens speaks of Clem. Alex. ap Euseb hist l. 2. c. 17. whose aspect being liked by the Apostle he left him to the care and tutorage of an ancient Bishop of those parts And when the Young man afterwards for want of careful looking to became debauched and made himself the Captain of a crew of Out-laws the blessed Saint with much ado reclaimed him from that wretched course and afterwards having new moulded him and prepared him for it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made him a Bishop in the Church But whether that the word will bear that sense as to the making him a Bishop or that it only doth imply that S. John placed him in some function of the holy Ministery Ecclesiae ministeri◠praefecit as Christophorson reads it I will not contend Only I cannot but observe that where the Bishop to whose care he was committed is in the prosecution of the story called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some have collected from the same Unbishopping of Tim. Tit. p. 126. that Bishops in those times were no more than Presbyters But this will prove if better looked on but a plain mistake the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place noting the Bishops age and not his office as doth appear by that which followeth in the story where he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which certainly doth signifie an ancient man but not a Presbyter The Asian Churches being thus setled and confirmed in the faith of Christ partly by the pains and travel of this blessed man but principally by the Gospel and other pieces of Divine holy Scripture by him written and published about this time Beda de sex aetatibus In Annal. Ecc he went unto the Lord his God in a good old age being then 98 years old as Beda reckoneth in the beginning of the second century Anno 101. according to the computation of Baronius The Church at his departure he left firmly grounded in all the points of faith and doctrine taught by Christ our Saviour as well setled in the outward government the polity and administration of the same which had been framed by the Apostles according to the pattern and example of their Lord and Master For being that the Church was born of Seed immortal and they themselves though excellent and divine yet still mortal men it did concern the Church in an high degree to be provided of a perpetuity or if you will an immortality of Overseers both for the sowing of this Seed and for the ordering of the Church or the field it self This since they could not do in person they were to do it by their Successors who by their Office were to be the ordinary Pastors of the Church and the Vicars of Christ Now if you ask the Fathers who they were that were accounted in their times and ages the Successors of the Apostles they will with one accord make answer that the Bishops were To take them as they lived in order it is affirmed expresly by Irenaeus Iren. l. 3. c. 3. one who conversed familiatly with Polycarpus S. John's Disciple He speaking of those Bishops which were ordained by the Apostles
it not been a graft of his own heavenly planting Which graft what root it took in this present Age in little more than half an hundred years after Christs Ascension we shall best see by looking on this brief Chronologie which I have drawn to that intent The state of Holy Church in this first CENTURY Anno Chr. 34. OVR Saviour Christ suffered and rose again and ascended into glory S. James made Bishop of Hierusalem 35. The conversion of Paul 39. S. Peter takes upon him the Bishoprick or government of the Church of Antioch 41. S. Peter baptizeth Cornelius and his family opening the door of life unto the Gentiles 43. The Disciples first called Christians at Antiochia 44. Bishops ordained by Saint Peter in the Churches of sidon Berytus and Laodicea of Syria and other Cities of the East Saint Peter cometh to Rome and undertaketh the government of the Churches of the Circumcision founded in that City Paul and Barnabas called forth by the holy Ghost to the Apostleship of the Gentiles 45. Euodius made Bishop of Antioch S. Mark ordained Bishop of Alexandria 46. Saint Peter ordaineth many of his Disciples Bishops and sendeth them abroad into France Italy and Spain 49. Saint Paul ordaineth Presbyters in Churches of his Plantation 50. Eucherius one of St. Peters Disciples made Bishop of the Church of Triers in Germany 51. The Jews banished from Rome by Claudius Caesar in which regard Saint Peter leaving Rome committeth the government of his Church to Cletus by birth a Roman The Apostolical Council in Hierusalem Saint Paul maketh his first Journey into Macedonia 52. Saint Paul first Preacheth at Athens Corinth c. 55. Saint Paul taketh up his aboad at Ephesus and from thence writeth to those of Corinth 57. Timothy ordained by Saint Paul the first Bishop of Ephesus Titus ordained Bishop of Crete by the same Apostle Other of Pauls Disciples ordained Bishops for the Eastern Churches 58. Saint Paul calleth the Elders from Ephesus to Miletum 59. Saint Paul brought Prisoner unto Rome takes on himself the Government of the Churches of the Gentiles there 60. Archippus Bishop of the Colossians Epaphroditus ordained Bishep of the Philippians 61. Crescens made Bishop of Vienna in Daulphine Paul passeth into Spain leaving the Church of Rome to the care of Linus 63. Simeon elected Bishop of Hierusalem in the place of James by the joynt consent of the Apostles and Disciples 64. Anianus succeedeth Mark in the Bishoprick of Alexandria 67. Saint Peter planteth Churches and ordaineth Bishops in the Isle of Britain 68. Peter and Paul return to Rome 69. The Martyrdom of Peter and Paul at Rome by command of Nero. 70. Linus and Cletus or Anacletus succeed the two Apostles in the government of their Churches there 71. Ignatius succeedeth Euodius in the See of Antioch 74. Valerius succeeds Eucherius in the Church of Triers 80. Saint John taketh up his abode in Asia planting and confirming the Churches there and ordaining Bishops in the same 81. Linus being dead Clemens succeedeth him in the government of the Church of the Gentiles in Rome 84. Polycarpus made Bishop of Smyrna by Saint John 87. Abilius succeedeth Anianus in the Bishoprick of Alexandria 92. Saint John confined unto Patmos by Domitianus 93. Cletus or Anacletus being dead the Churches of the Circumcision in the City of Rome and parts adjoyning became united with the Gentiles under the Government of Clemens 97. Saint John writeth the Apocalypse to the Seven Churches in Asia 98. Saint John restored to Ephesus foundeth the Churches of Trallis and Magnesia ordaining Bishops in them both as in other places 99. At the intreaty of the Asian Bishops St. John writeth his Gospel 100. Cerdo succeeds Abilius in the Bishoprick of Alexandria 101. Saint John dieth at Ephesus in a good old age leaving the government of the Church in the hands of Bishops as Successors to the Apostles and the Vicars of Christ The End of the first Part. THE HISTORY OF EPISCOPACY The Second Part. From the Death of Saint JOHN the APOSTLE To the beginning of the Empire of CONSTANTINE By PETER HEYLYN D. D. IREN Lib. III. Cap. III. Habemus annumerare eos qui ab Apostolis instituti sunt EPISCOPI in Ecclesiis Successores eorum usque ad nos LONDON Printed by M. Clark to be sold by C. Harper 1681. THE HISTORY OF EPISCOPACY PART II. CHAP. I. What doth occur concerning Bishops and the Government of the Church by them during the first half of the second Century 1. Of the Condition of the Church of Corinth when Clemens wrote unto them his Epistle 2. What that Epistle doth contain in reference to this point in hand 3. That by Episcopi he meaneth Bishops truly and properly so called proved by the scope of the Epistle 4. And by a Text of Scripture therein cited 5. Of the Episcopal succession in the Church of Corinth 6. The Canons of the Apostles ascribed to Clemens what they say of Bishops 7. A Bishop not to be ordained under three or two at least of the same order 8. Bishops not barred by these Canons from any secular affairs as concern their families 9. How far by them restrained from the employments of the Common-wealth 10. The jurisdiction over Presbyters given to the Bishops by those Canons 11. Rome first divided into Parishes or Tituli by Pope Euaristus 12. The reasons why Presbyteries or Colleges of Presbyters were planted at the first in Cities 13. Touching the superiority over all the flock given to the Bishop by Ignatius 14. As also of the Jurisdiction by him allowed them 15. The same exemplified in the works of Justin Martyr FROM the Apostles we proceed unto their Disciples such as conversed with them and lived nearest to them And first of all we meet with Clemens once one of Pauls Disciples and by him remembred afterwards Deacon to Saint Peter Philip. 4.3 Epist ad Trallianos as Ignatius tells us and finally successor to them both in the administration of the Church of Rome as before was shewed Chap. 3. n. 8. Amongst the several Monuments of Piety which he left behind him the most renowned is his Epistle to the Church of Corinth of which Eusebius gives this testimony Euseb Hist Ecc. 1.3 c. 12.16 that it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 famous and very much admired adding withal that as well anciently as in his times it used to be read publickly in the Congregation Tht occasion which induced him to write the same was a sedition or a faction rather raised in the Church which from the first Preaching of the Gospel there had been too much addicted to Divisions But what this faction was about 1 Cor. 3. or what occasion was then taken for the production of new broyls or the reviving of the old we shall best see by looking on this piece of Clemens recovered from the ruins of Antiquity by the care and industry of Patr. Yong Library-keeper to his Majesty Clemen
whereas the later Councils stand on three precisely whereof prehaps this was the reason because in later times there was a greater number of Bishops in the Church of God than had been before and so the number of three Bishops to concur together not so hard to meet with Now they that search into the first occasion of the present Canon fetch it from a Tradition on Record in Clemens viz. that James the Proto-Bishop Philodox ap Masonum de Minist Anglic. l. 1. c. 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Clem. Alex. ap Euseb l. 2. c. 1. the first that ever had a fixt Episcopal See was ordained Bishop of Hierusalem by Peter James and John the sons of Zebedee Peter saith he and James and John being by our Redeemer most esteemed of contended not amongst themselves after his ascension for the highest place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but rather made choice of James the Just to be the Bishop of Hierusalem But this if looked on well was no Ordination for James being one of the Apostles needed no such Ceremony but only an agreement made by that goodly fellowship amongst themselves that whilst the rest did Preach the Gospel in the world abroad Objected by Philodix ap Masonum l. 1. cap. 7. Saint James should take the charge of the Mother-City The Ordination of Saint Paul and Barnabas unto the Apostleship by the hands of Lucius Simeon and Manaen is indeed more pertinent but that being an extraordinary case it can make no precedent But what need any further pedegree be sought to raise the reputation of this Canon It is antiquity enough that it stands in front and leads on all the residue of the Canons ascribed of old to the Apostles And yet we must observe withal that as there is no general rule but hath some exception so the necessities of the Church have many times dispensed with these ancient Canons Anastas in vita Pelagii Synadol Ep. Episcoporum Ponti ap Binium p. 173. Tom. 2. Theodo Hist lib. 5. c. 23. the Ordination of Pelagius the first once a Pope of Rome and of Dioscorus Patriarch of Alexandria being performed by two Bishops only contrary to the Councils of Nice and Arles that of P. Evagrius Patriarch of Antiochia but by one alone contrary to the old Apostolick Canon But then we must observe withal that these exceptions being in extraordinary cases and occasions are rather a confirmation of the Canons than any diminution to them according to the good old rule Exceptio firmat regulam in non exceptis The Bishop being thus admitted to his charge and function by a peculiar Ordination we must next see what is prescribed him in these Canons touching his behaviour whether Domestick in his Family or Publick in the Common-wealth For his Domestick carriage Canon 5. it is ordered thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he do not put away his Wife on pain of Excommunication on any shaddow or pretence of Piety whatever I know my Masters in the Church of Rome would fain shift this off Binius in Annot in Can. 5. by saying that there is nothing else required by the present Canon but that they ought to have a care of them ipsisque de omnibus quae ad vitam honestè degendem requiruntur provideant and to provide them all things necessary for this present life But surely Zonaras gives a fairer and more likely gloss Zonar Com. in can Apo. by whom it is affirmed that if a Bishop or any other person in holy orders for the Canon doth extend to all particularly should under colour of Religion put away his Wife He was to be excluded from the Church by this present Canon till he admitted her again Admitted her again to what Assuredly unto his bed to cohabitation Should he do otherwise saith he it would redound to the reproach of Marriage 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as if that conjugal society did beget uncleanness whereas the Scripture saith that Marriage is honourable and the Bed undefiled adding withal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that lawful Wedlock in those times was left free to Bishops and that it was restrained first by the Synod in Trullo many hundreds after An. 692. Which being so the following Canon must admit of some qualification Can. Apost 6. by which it is decreed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he do not take upon him any worldly cares or secular affairs be it which it will For if he was allowed to have Wife and Children and consequently was necessitated to maintain a family it could not be but he must needs be subject to some worldly cares 1 Tim. 5.8 in making fit provision for them Saint Paul determining that If any man provide not for his own especially for those of his own House he hath denied the faith and is worse than an Infidel So that these being not the worldly cares which are intended as they relate to his domestick carriage in his private family we must next see how far it doth extend to those worldly cares or rather secular affairs if any shall so choose to read it which do concern him in the publick And here we must first know whether that all intermedling in secular affairs or worldly matters be interdicted by this Canon meerly quà tales for themselves or as they were an avocation from the work of the holy Ministery Not of themselves quà tales there 's no doubt of that for then their private and domestick cares must also undergo the same prohibition Zon. Comment in Apost Can. It seems then only as an avocation as they diverted Bishops and the rest in Orders from doing the work of their vocation Zonaras doth conceive it so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the purpose of the Canon is that they should attend the holy Ministery keeping themselves from all disturbances and the tumultuousness of business But then withal we must observe that Zonaras alloweth them to take care of Orphans and to administer their estate to the best advantage which is one secular imployment and no mean one neither In this the Council of Chalcedon Can. 3. doth agree with Zonaras allowing Clergy-men to be Guardians as we call it unto those in Wardship Can. 3. Though the providing for the Fatherless be a work of mercy 〈◊〉 the administration of their estates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it is there called is a work of business And this allowance is affirmed by Zonaras to be consistent with the Canon which is one thing more and such a one as will make way for many others The arbitrating of emergent differences between man and man for the advancement both of peace and justice is a worldly work a secular imployment past all question May not the Canon be persuaded to admit of this and not to have it laid in bar against the Bishop that he hath left his holy calling and made himself a Judge amongst his Neighbours Out of doubt it will And which
is somewhat more out of doubt it must Those Canons which are only fathered on the Apostles will else run cross with those which are theirs indeed When Saint Paul lessoned those of Corinth 1 Cor. 6. that rather than they should profane the Gospel with contentious suits they should refer their differences to their Brethren Think you it was his purpose either to exclude the Clergy then or their Bishop after when they had one No saith Saint Ambrose Ambros Com. in 1 ad Cor. c. 6. if the work be his Melius dicit apud dei ministros causam agere no better way than to refer the business to Gods Ministers who being guided by the fear of God will determin rightly in the same Or is the Bishop only to be barred this Office Not so saith he For if Saint Paul adviseth them to submit themselves unto the judgment of their Brethren it was upon this reason principally quia adhuc Rector in eorum Ecclesia non esset ordinatus because as then there was no Bishop in that Church Saint Austin gives it more exactly makes it a charge imposed upon the Bishop by Saint Pauls command For speaking of the pains he took in the determining of such causes as were brought before him August de Opere Monarch c. 29. he tells us that he underwent the same in obedience only to Saint Paul's injunction quibus nos molestiis idem affixit Apostolus as his words there are and that Saint Paul imposed it not by his own authority sed ejus qui in eo loquebatur but by the authority of the Holy Ghost which did dictate to him adding withal that howsoever it was irksome and laborious to him yet he did patiently discharge his duty in it pro spe aeternae vitae only upon the hope of life eternal And it is worth the observation that venerable Beda making a Comment upon Saint Pauls Epistle collected out of several passages of Saint Austins writings he putteth down this place at large as the most full and proper exposition of the Apostles words Secularia judicia si habueritis c. 1 Cor. 6.4 If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life c. Here then we have the Bishop interessed in the determining of suits and differences a secular imployment surely and yet no violence offered to the sacred Canon May he not go a little further and intermeddle if occasion be in matters of the Common-wealth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Synesius in Ep. 57. I do not blame those Bishops saith Synesius that are so imployed such as are fitted with abilities for the undertaking being by him a strict and rigorous man permitted to employ the same And more than so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it maketh for Gods praise and glory that it should be so that men on whom he hath bestowed abilities to perform both Offices should do accordingly But these I put down here as opinions only the practice of them we shall see in a place more proper If then it be demanded what those 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those worldly cares and secular imployments are which the Canon speaks off Zonar Comment in Conc. Chalced. Can. 3. Zonaras will inform us in another place that the Canon aimeth at the mingling of the Roman Magistracies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with the Episcopal or Priestly function which at that time were questionless incompatible And then the meaning of the Canon will in fine be this that Bishops or inferiour Clergy-men might not be Consuls Praetors Generals or undergoe such publick Offices in the State of Rome as were most sought for and esteemed by the Gentiles there As for their jurisdiction over the inferiour Clergy as far as it is warranted by these Apostolick Canons it doth coâ—â—st especially in these particulars First there is granted and annexed unto them the power of Ordination and to them alone Can. Apost 2. The second Canon tells us so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Presbyter and Deacon and all other Clerks must be ordained by one Bishop And if a Bishop be required though but one in all the Presbyters have no authority at all of conferring Orders But of this before Being ordained they were accomptable in the next place to their Bishop in all things which concerned their Ministration without whose special leave and liking there were not only many things which they might not do but there was nothing in a manner to be done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Can. 38. Ignat. ad Smyrnens Zonar in Can. Apost let them do nothing saith the Canon without the knowledge of the Bishops neither Baptize nor celebrate the Eucharist as Ignatius hath it of whom more anon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not repel any man from the Communion as it is in Zonaras But here the Canons speaking in another place they will tell you more particularly that if a Presbyter neglecting or contemning his own Bishop Can. 31. shall gather the People into a Conventicle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and erect another Altar for divine worship not being able to convict his Bishop of any impiety or injustice he is to be deposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as an ambitious person seeking a preheminence that belonged not to him Finally so obnoxious were the Presbyters to the command and pleasure of their Bishop that they could not be admitted into any other City Can. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without his letters testimonial and this on pain of Excommunication as well unto the Presbyter that should so depart Can. 15. as to the party that received him If any Presbyter or Deacon leaving the charge appointed to him shall go into another Diocess for so I think 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be read in this place and time and there abide without the allowance of his Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he is to be suspended ab officio especially if he return not presently on the Bishops summons More of this kind there is in those ancient Canons touching the Presbyters dependance on and plain subjection to their Bishop But I have instanced in such only as may be clearly justified by succeeding practice And so much of the Apostles Canons ascribed to Clemens From Clemens on to Evaristus his next successor in the government of the Church of Rome I know the Antiquaries of that Church have interloped an Anacletus between these two Iren. l. 3. cap. 3. and let them take him for their labour But when I find in Irenaeus who lived so near the times we speak of as to converse with those which were then alive when both these Bishops sate in the Church of Rome and when I find it in Eusebius Euseb hist Ec. l. 3. c. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who with such care and diligence collected the successions of the Prelates in the greater Churches that Evaristus did immediately succeed this Clemens I shall desire to be excused if I prefer their testimony
four Sees in those early days 7. The use made of this Episcopal succession by Saint Irenaeus 8. As also by Tertullian and some other Ancients 9. Of the Authority enjoyed by Bishops in Tertullians time in the administration of the Sacraments 10. As also in enjoyning Fasts and the disposing of the Churches Treasury 11. And in the dispensation of the Keys 12. Tertullian misalledged in maintenance of the Lay-Presbytery 13. The great extent of Christianity and Episcopacy in Tertullians time concludes this Century HAVING thus setled the affairs of the Church of Britain we will look back again towards Rome where we find Victor sitting as successor unto Eleutherius and the whole Church though free from persecutions yet terribly embroyled with Schisms and Heresies For in the later end of Eleutherius Blastus and Florinus two notorious Hereticks had broached this doctrine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb Eccl. hist l. 5. c. 19. that God was the author of sin and possibly might have spread the venom of their Heresie exceeding far if Irenaeus that great and learned Bishop of Lyons being then at Rome had not prescribed a speedy and a sovereign Antidote in several Tractates and Discourses against the same But Eleutherius being dead and Victor in his place there hapned such a Schism in the Church of Christ by his precipitance and perversness that all the water which Irenaeus and many other godly men could pour into it Id. l. 5. c. 23. 24. was hardly sufficient to quench the flame The business which occasioned it was the feast of Easter or indeed not the Feast it self upon the keeping of the which all Christians had agreed from the first beginnings but for the day in which it was to be observed wherein the Churches of Asia had an old Tradition differing from the rest of Christendom For whereas generally that festival had been solemnized in the Church of Christ on the Lords Day next after the Jewish Passeover as being the day which our Redeemer honoured with his Resurrection the Christians of the Asian Churches kept it upon the 14th day of the month precisely being the very day prescribed for the Jewish Passeover A business of no great importance more than for a general conformity in the Church of Christ yet such as long had exercised the patience of it even from the time of Pius Pope of Rome who first decreed it to be kept on the Lords Day Die Dominico Pascha celebrari as it is in Platina Platina in vita Pii Pont. Euscb Ecc. hist l. 5. c. 24. but followed with most heat and violence by this Victor perhaps upon the Omen of his name Of whom Eusebius thus reporteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that he attempted to cut off the whole Church of Asia together with the Churches adjacent from the Communion of the Catholick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as if they had maintained some heterodox or dangerous Doctrine contrary to the Faith of Christ A matter taken very tenderly not only by the Asian Bishops whom it most concerned but also by some other of the Western parts who more endeavoured the preservation of the Churches peace than the advancement and authority of the See of Rome those of chief note which interessed themselves therein being Irenaeus Polycrates the one Bishop of the Metropolitan Church of Lyons in France the other of the Church of Ephesus the Queen of Asia both honourable in their times and places And first Polycrates begins deriving the occasion and descent of their observation from Philip 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Id. ibid. one of the twelve Apostles not of the seven Deacons as our Christopherson most ridiculously and falsly doth translate it who died at Hierapolis a City of Phrygia and from Saint John 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who rested on the bosom of our Lord and Saviour as also from Polycarpus and Thracias Bishops of Smyrna and both Martyrs Sagaris B. of Laodicea Papyrus and Melito and many others who kept the feast of Easter as the Asians did As for himself he certifieth that following the Traditions of his Elders he had done the like that seven of his kindred had been Bishops 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 himself being the eighth and all which did so observe the feast of Easter when the Jews did prepare the Passeover that having served God 65 years diligently canvassed over the holy Scriptures and held both intercourse and correspondence with many of the brethren over all the World 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he was the least disturbed at those Bruta fulmina Adding withal that he might here commemorate those several Bishops that were assembled at his call to debate the point 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that this bare retital of their names was too great a trouble who though they could not but be sensible of his imperfections yet thinking that he bare not those gray hairs for nought did willingly subscribe unto his Epistle So far Id. ibid. c. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to this purpose he And on the other side Irenaeus writing unto Victor utterly dislikes that his severe and rigid manner of proceeding in cutting off so many Churches from the Communion of our Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only because they did adhere to the Tradition of their Ancestors in a point of Ceremony shewing how much he differed in this business from the temper and moderation of his Predecessours Soter Anicetus Pius Higinus Sixtus and Telesphorus who though they held the same opinions that he did did notwithstanding entertain the Asian Bishops when they came unto them with great affection and humanity sending to those who lived far distant the most blessed Eucharist in testimony of their fellowship and Communion with them Nor did he write thus unto Victor only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but to the Governours or Bishops of many other Churches also And certainly it was but need that such a Moderator should be raised to atone the difference the billows beating very highly and Victor being beset on every side for his stiff perversness by the Prelates of the adverse party 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sharply assaulting him both with words and Writings For the composing of this business before it grew to such a heat there could no better means be thought of than that the Bishops of the Church in their several quarters should meet together to debate and determine of it And so accordingly they did Euseb hist Eccl. l. 5. c. 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and many Synods and assemblies of the Bishops were held about it viz. one in Caesarea of Palestine wherein Theophilus B. of the place and Narcissus B. of Hierusalem did sit as Presidents another at Rome a third of all the Bishops of Pontus in the which Palmas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the chief amongst them of that Order did then preside A fourth there was of the French or Gallick Churches in the which Irenaeus sat
the City Provinces As for the Church of Antiochia it spread its bounds and jurisdiction over those goodly Countries of the Roman Empire from the Mediterranean on the West unto the furthest border of that large dominion where it confined upon the Persian or the Parthian Kingdom together with Cilicia and Isauria in the lesser Asia But whether at this time it was so extended I am not able to determine Certain I am that in the very first beginning of this Age all Syria at the least was under the jurisdiction of this Bishop Ignatius in his said Epistle to those of Rome Ignat. ad Rom. stiling himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not a Bishop in Syria but the Bishop of Syria which sheweth that there being many Bishops in that large Province he had a power and superiority over all the rest Indeed the Bishops of Hierusalem were hedged within a narrower compass being both now and long time after subject unto the Metropolitan of Caesarea as appears plainly by the Nicene Canon though after they enlarged their border and gained the title of a Patriarch as we may see hereafter in convenient time Only I add that howsoever other of the greater Metropolitan Churches such as were absolute and independent as Carthage Cyprus Millain the Church of Britain Concil Ni. c. 7◠and the rest had and enjoyed all manner of Patriarchal rights which these three enjoyed yet only the three Bishops of Rome Antioch and Alexandria had in the Primitive times the names of Patriarches by reason of the greatness of the Cities themselves being the principal both for power and riches in the Roman Empire the one for Europe the other for Asia and the third for Africk This ground thus laid we will behold what use is made of this Episcopal succession by the ancient writers And first Saint Irenaeus a Bishop and a Martyr both derives an argument from hence to convince those Hereticks which broached strange Doctrines in the Church Iren. contr haer lib. 3. cap. 3. Habemus annumerari eos qui ab Apostolis instituti sunt Episcopi in Ecclesiis c. we are able to produce those men which were ordained Bishops by the Apostles in their several Churches and their successors till our times qui nihil tale docuerunt neque cognoverunt quale ab hiis deliratur who neither knew nor taught any such absurdities as these men dream of Which said in general he instanceth in the particular Churches of Rome Ephesus and Smyrna being all founded by the Apostles and all of them hac ordinatione successione by this Episcopal ordination and succession deriving from the Apostles the Preaching and tradition of Gods holy truth till those very times The like we find also in another place where speaking of those Presbyteri so he calleth the Bishops which claimed a succession from the Apostles He tells us this quod cum Episcopatus successione charisma veritatis certum secundum placitum Patris acceperunt that together with the Episcopal succession Ir. adv haeres l. 4. cap. 43. they had received a certain pledge of truth according to the good pleasure of the Father See to this purpose also cap. 63. where the same point is pressed most fully and indeed much unto the honour of this Episcopal succession Where because Irenaeus called Bishops in the former place by the name of Presbyters I would have no man gather Smectym p. 23. as some men have done that he doth use the name of Bishops and Presbyters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a promiscuous sense much less conclude that therefore Presbyters and Bishops were then the same For although Irenaeus doth here call the Bishops either by reason of their age or of that common Ordination which they once received by the name of Presbyters yet he doth no where call the Presbyters by the name of Bishops as he must needs have done if he did use the names 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a promiscuous sense as it is supposed And besides Irenaeus being at this time Bishop if not Archbishop of the Church of Lyons could not but know that he was otherwise advanced both in power and title as well in Dignity as Jurisdiction than when he was a Presbyter of that very Church under Pothinus his Predecessor in that See and therefore not the same man meerly which he was before But to let pass as well the observation as the inference certain I am that by this argument the holy Father did conceive himself to be armed sufficiently against the Hereticks of his time and so much he expresseth plainly saying that by this weapon he was able to confound all those qui quoquo modo vel per sui placentiam malam vel vanam gloriam vel per coecitatem malam sententiam praeter quam oportet Ire adv haeres l. 3. c. 3. colligunt Who any way either out of an evil self complacency or vain-glorious humour or blindness of the mind or a depraved understanding did raise such Doctrins as they ought not So much for blessed Irenaeus a man of peace as well in disposition and affection as he was in name Next let us look upon Tertullian who lived in the same time with Irenaeus beginning first to be of credit about the latter end of this second Century Baron ann eccl anno 196. Pamel in vita Tertull. as Baronius calculates it and being at the height of reputation an 210. as Pamelius noteth about which time Saint Irenaeus suffered Martyrdom And if we look upon him well we find him pressing the same point with greater efficacy than Irenaeus did before him For undertaking to convince the Hereticks of his time as well of falshood as of novelties and to make known the new upstartedness of their Assemblies which they called the Church he doth thus proceed Tertull. de praes adv haeres c. 32. Edant ergo origines ecclesiarum suarum evolvant ordinem Episcoporum suorum c. Let them saith he declare the original of their Churches let them unfold the course or order of their Bishops succeeding so to one another from the first beginning that their first Bishop whosoever he was had some of the Apostles or of the Apostolical men at least who did converse with the Apostles to be their founder and Predecessor For thus the Apostolical Churches do derive their Pedegree Thus doth the Church of Smyrna shew their Polycarpus placed there amongst them by Saint John and Rome her Clement Consecrated or Ordained by Peter even as all other Churches also do exhibit to us the names of those who being Ordained Bishops by the Apostles did sow the Apostolical seed in the field of God This was the challenge that he made And this he had not done assuredly had he not thought that the Episcopal succession in the Church of Christ had been an evident demonstration of the truth thereof which since the Hereticks could not shew in their Congregations or Assemblies it
of the affairs of the Christian Church cannot but be displeasing unto them which are not Christianly affected Our former Book we destinated to the Jewish part of this enquiry wherein though long it was before we found it yet at the last we found a Sabbath A Sabbath which began with that state and Church and ended also when they were no longer to be called a Nation but a dispersed and scattered ruin of what once they were In that which followeth our Enquiry must be more diffused of the same latitude with the Church a Church not limited and confined to some Tribes and Kindreds but generally spreading over all the World We may affirm it of the Gospel what Florus sometimes said of the state of Rome Ita late per orbem terrarum arma circumtulit ut qui res ejus legunt non unius populi sed generis humani facta discunt The history of the Church and of the World are of like extent So that the search herein as unto me it was more painful in the doing so unto thee will it be more pleasing being done because of that variety which it will afford thee And this Part we have called the History of the Sabbath too although the institution of the Lords Day and entertainment of the same in all times and Ages since that institution be the chief thing whereof it treateth For being it is said by some that the Lords Day succeeded by the Lords appointment into the place and rights of the Jewish Sabbath so to be called and so to be observed as the Sabbath was this Book was wholly to be spent in the search thereof whether in all or any Ages of the Church either such doctrine had been preached or such practice pressed upon the Conscience of Gods people And search indeed we did with all care and diligence to see if we could find a Sabbath in any evidence of Scripture or writings of the holy Fathers or Edicts of Emperours or Decrees of Councils or finally in any of the publick Acts and Monuments of the Christian Church But after several searches made upon the alias and the pluries we still return Non est inventus and thereupon resolve in the Poets language Et quod non invenis usquam esse putes nosquam that which is no where to be found may very strongly be concluded not to be at all Buxdorfius in the 11th Chapter of his Synagoga Judaica out of Antonius Margarita tells us of the Jews quod die sabbatino praeter animam consuetam praediti sunt alia that on the Sabbath day they have an extraordinary soul infused into them which doth enlarge their hearts and rouze up their spirits Ut Sabbatum multo honorabilius peragere possint that they may celebrate the Sabbath with the greater bonour And though this sabbatarie soul may by a Pythagorical 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seem to have transmigrated from the Jews into the Bodies of some Christians in these later days yet I am apt to give my self good hopes that by presenting to their view the constant practice of Gods Church in all times before and the consent of all Gods Churches at this present they may be dispossessed thereof without great difficulty It is but anima superflua is Buxdorfius calls it and may be better spared than kept because superfluous However I shall easily persuade my self that by this general representation of the estate and practice of the Church of Christ I may confirm the wavering in a right persuasion and assure such as are already well affected by shewing them the perfect harmony and agreement which is between this Church and the purest times It is our constant prayer to Almighty God as well that he would strengthen such as do stand and confirm the weak as to raise up those men which are fallen into sin and errour As are our prayers such should be also our endeavours as universal to all sorts of men as charitable to them in their several cases and distresses Happy those men who do aright discharge their Duties both in their prayers and their performance The blessing of our labours we must leave to him who is all in all without whom all Pauls planting and Apollo's watering will yield poor encrease In which of these three states soever thou art good Christian Reader let me beseech thee kindly to accept his pains which for thy sake were undertaken that so he might in some poor measure be an instrument to strengthen or confirm or raise thee as thy case requires This is the most that I desire and less than this thou couldst not do did I not desire it And so fare thee well THE HISTORY OF THE SABBATH The Second Book CHAP. I. That there is nothing found in Scripture touching the keeping of the Lords Day 1. The Sabbath not intended for a perpetual Ordinance 2. Preparatives unto the dissolution of the Sabbath by our Saviour Christ 3. The Lords day not enjoyned in the place thereof either by Christ or his Apostles but instituted by the Authority of the Church 4. Our Saviours Resurrection on the first day of the week and apparitions on the same make it not a Sabbath 5. The coming down of the Holy Ghost upon the first day of the week makes it not a Sabbath 6. The first day of the week not made a Sabbath more than others by Saint Peter Saint Paul or any other of the Apostles 7. Saint Paul frequents the Synagogue on the Jewish Sabbath and upon what reasons 8. What was concluded against the Sabbath in the Council holden in Hierusalem 9. The preaching of Saint Paul at Troas upon the first day of the week no argument that then that day was set apart by the Apostles for religious exercises 10. Collections on the first day of the week 1 Cor. 16. conclude as little for that purpose 11. Those places of Saint Paul Galat. 4.10 Colos 2.16 do prove invincibly that there is no Sabbath to be looked for 12. The first day of the week not called the Lords day until the end of this first Age and what that title adds unto it WE shewed you in the former Book what did occur about the Sabbath from the Creation of the World to the destruction of the Temple which comprehended the full time of 4000 years and upwards in the opinion of the most and best Chronologers Now for five parts of eight of the time computed from the Creation to the Law being in all 2540 years and somewhat more there was no Sabbath known at all And for the fifteen hundred being the remainder it was not so observed by the Jews themselves as if it had been any part of the Law of Nature but sometimes kept and sometimes broken either according as mens private businesses or the affairs of the republick would give way unto it Never such conscience made thereof as of Adultery Murder Blasphemy or Idolatry no not when as the Scribes and Pharisees had most made it
being left unto the Prelates of the Church by them to be appointed as occasion was What others of the ancient Writers Cap. 24. v. 20. and what the Protestant Divines have affirmed herein we shall hereafter see in their proper places As for these words of our Redeemer in S. Matthews Gospel Pray that your flight be not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath day they have indeed been much alledged to prove that Christ did intimate at the least unto his Apostles and the rest that there was a particular day by him appointed whereof he willed them to be careful which being not the Jewish Sabbath must of necessity as they think be the Lords day But certainly the Fathers tell us no such matter nay they say the contrary and make these words a part of our Redeemers admonition to the Jews not to the Apostles In Matth. 24. Saint Chrysostom hath it so expresly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Behold saith he how he addresseth his discourse unto the Jews and tells them of the evils which should fall upon them for neither were the Apostles bound to observe the Sabbath nor were they there when those Calamities fell upon the Jewish Nation Not in the Winter nor on the Sabbath and why so saith he Because their flight being so quick and sudden 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither the Jews would dare to flie on the Sabbath for such their superstition was in the later times nor would the Winter but be very troublesome in such distresses In Matth. 24. Theophilact doth affirm expresly that this was spoken unto the Jews and spoken upon the self same reasons adding withal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that before any of those miserles fell upon that Nation the Apostles were all departed from out Jerusalem S. Hierom saith as much as unto the time that those Calamities which by our Saviour were foretold were generally referred unto the Wars of Titus and Vespasian and that both in his Comment on S. Matthew's Gospel and his Epistle to Algasia And for the thing that the Apostles and the rest of the Disciples were all departed from Jerusalem before that heavy war began is no less evident in story Qu. 4. For the Apostles long before that time were either martyred or dispersed in several places for the enlargement of the Gospel not any of them resident in Jerusalem after the Martyrdom of S. James who was Bishop there And for the residue of the Disciples they had forsook the Country also before the Wars being admonished so to do by an Heavenly Vision which warned them to withdraw from thence and repair to Pella beyond Jordan Hist Eccl. l. 3. c. 5. as Eusebius tells us So that these words of our Redeemer could not be spoke as to the Apostles and in them unto all the rest of the Disciples which should follow after but to the People of the Jews To whom our Saviour gave this caution not that he did not think it lawful for them to flie upon the Sabbath day but that as things then were and as their consciences were intangled by the Scribes and Pharisees he found that they would count it a most grievous misery to be put unto it To return then unto our story as the chief reason why the Christians of the Primitive times did set apart this day to religious uses was because Christ that day did rise again from death to life for our justification so there was some Analogy or proportion which this day seemed to hold with the former Sabbath which might more easily induce them to observe the same For as God rested on the Sabbath from all the works which he had done in the Creation so did the Son of God rest also on the day of his Resurrection from all the works which he had done in our Redemption 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Orat. in sanct Pascha as Gregory Nyssen notes it for us Yet so that as the Father rested not on the former Sabbath from the works of preservation so neither doth our Saviour rest at any time from perfecting this work of our redemption by a perpetual application of the benefit and effects thereof This was the cause and these the motives which did induce the Church in some tract of time to solemnize the day of Christs Resurrection as a weekly Festival though not to keep it as a Sabbath I say in tract of time for ab initio non fuit sic it was not so in the beginning The very day it self was not so observed though it was known to the Apostles in the morning early that the Lord was risen We find not on the news that they came together for the performance of divine and religious exercises much less that they intended it for a Sabbath day or that our Saviour came amongst them until late at night as in likelihood he would have done had any such performance been thought necessary as was required unto the making of a Sabbath Nay which is more our blessed Saviour on that day and two of the Disciples whatsoever the others did were otherwise employed than in Sabbath duties Luke 24.13 For from Hierusalem to Emaus whither the two Disciples went was sixty furlongs which is seven miles and an half and so much back again unto Hierusalem which is fifteen miles And Christ who went the journey with them at least part thereof and left them not until they came unto Emaus was back again that night and put himself into the middest of the Apostles Had he intended it for a Sabbath day doubtless he would have rather joyned himself with the Apostles who as it is most likely kept themselves together in expectation of the issue and so were most prepared and fitted to begin the new Christian Sabbath than with those men who contrary to the nature of a Sabbaths rest were now ingaged in a journey and that for ought we know about worldly businesses Nor may we think but that our Saviour would have told them of so great a fault as violating the new Christian Sabbath even in the first beginning of it had any Sabbath been intended As for the being of the eleven in a place together that could not have relation to any Sabbath duties or religious exercises being none such were yet commanded but only to those cares and fears wherewith poor men they were distracted which made them loth to part asunder till they were setled in their hopes or otherwise resolved on somewhat whereunto to trust And where it is conceived by some that our most blessed Saviour shewed himself oftner unto the Apostles upon the first day of the week than on any other and therefore by his own appearings did sanctifie that day instead of the Jewish Sabbath neither the premisses are true nor the sequel necessary The premisses not true for it is no where to be found that he appeared oftner on the First day than any other of the week Acts 1.3 it being
Hierusalem as when the Town was razed by Adrian or after peopled by the Saracens Surely if not before yet then this Duty was to cease and no Collection to be made by those of Corinth and consequently no Lords day to be kept amongst them because no Collection in case Collections for the Saints as some do gather from this place were a sufficient argument to prove the Lords day instituted by divine Authority But let us take the Text with such observations as have been made upon it by the Fathers In locum Vpon the first day of the week i. e. as generally they conceive it on the Lords day And why on that Chrysostom gives this reason of it that so the very day might prompt them to be bountiful to their poor Brethren as being that day whereon they had received such inestimable bounties at the hands of God in the resurrection of our Saviour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as that Father hath it What to be dene on that day Unusquisque apud se reponat Let every man lay by himself saith the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He saith not saith St. Chrysostom let every man bring it to the Church And why 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for fear lest some might be ashamed at the smallness of their offering but let them lay it by saith be and add unto it week by week that at my coming it may grow to a fit proportion That there be no gathering when I come but that the money may be ready to be sent away immediatly upon my coming and being thus raised up by little and little they might not be so sensible thereos In locum as if upon his coming to them it were to be collected all at once and upon the sudden Vt paulatim reservantes non una bora gravari se putent as St. Hierom hath it Now as it is most clear that this makes nothing for the Lords day or the translation of the Sabbath thereunto by any Apostolical Precept so is it not so clear that this was done upon the first day of the week but that some learned men have made doubt thereof Calvin upon the place takes notice how St. Chrysostom expounds the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Apostle by primo sabbati the first day of the week as the English reads it but likes it not Cui ego non assentior as his phrase is conceiving rather this to be the meaning of St. Paul that on some sabbath day or other until his coming every man should lay up somewhat toward the Collection And in the second of his Institutes he affirms expresly Cap. 8. n. 33. that the day destinate by St. Paul to these Collections was the Sabbath day The like do Victorinus Strigelius Hunnius and Aretius Protestant Writers all note upon the place Singulis sabbatis saith Strigelius per singula sabbata so Aretius diebus sabbatorum saith Egidius Hunnius all rendring 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on the Sabbath days More largely yet Hemingius who in his Comment on the place takes it indefinitely for any day in the week so they fixed on one Vult enim ut quilibet certum diem in septimana constituat in quo apud se seponat quod irrogaturus est in pauperes Take which you will either of the Fathers or the Moderns and we shall find no Lords Day instituted by any Apostolical Mandate no Sabbath set on foot by them upon the first day of the week as some would have it much less that any such Ordinance should be hence collected out of these words of the Apostle Indeed it is not probable that he who so opposed himself against the old Sabbath would crect a new This had not been to abrogate the Ceremony but to change the day whereas he laboured what he could to beat down all the difference of days and times which had been formerly observed In his Epistle to the Galatians written in Anno 59 Cap. 4. v. 10. he lays it home unto their charge that they observed days and months and times and years and seems a little to bewail his own misfortune and if he had bestowed his labour in vain amongst them I know it is conceived by some that St. Paul spake it of the observation of those days and times that had been used among the Gentiles and so had no relation to the Jewish Sabbath or any difference of times observed amongst them Saint Ambrose so conceived it and so did St. Augustine Dies observant In locum qui dicunt crastino non est proficiscendum c. They observe days who say I will not go abroad to morrow or begin any work upon such a day because of some unfortunate aspect as St. Ambrose hath it from whom it seems Saint Augustine learnt it who in his 119 Epistle directly falls upon the very same expression Eos inculpat qui dicunt non proficiscor quia posterus dies est aut quia luna sic fertur vel proficiscar ut prospere cedat quia ita se babet positio syderum c. The like conceit he hath in his Encheiridion ad Laurentium cap. 79. But whatsoever St. Ambrose did St. Augustine lived I am sure to correct his errour observing very rightly that his former doctrine could not consist with St. Pauls purpose in that place which was to beat down that esteem which the Jews had amongst them of the Mosaical Ordinances their New moons and Sabbaths I shall report the place at large for the better clearing of the point Vulgatissiâ—nus est Gentilium error ut vel in agendis rebus vel expectandis eventabus vitae ac negotiorum suorum ab Astrologis Chaldeis notatos dies observent This was the ground whereon he built his former errour Then followeth the correction of it Fortasse tamen non opus est ut baec de Gentilium errore intelligamus ne intentionem causae mark that quam ab exordio susceptam ad finem usque perducit subito in alind temere detorquere velle vide imur sed de his potius de quibus cavendis eum agere per totam Epistolam apparet Nam Judaei serviliter observant dies menses annos tempora in carnali observatione sabbati neomeniae c. But yet perhaps saith he it is not necessary that we should understand this of the Gentiles lest so we vary from the scope and purpose of the Apostle but rather of those men of the avoiding of whose Doctrines he seems to treat in all this Epistle which were the Jews who in their carnal keeping of New-moons and Sabbaths did observe days and years and times as he here objecteth Compare this with Saint Hieroms Preface to the Galatians and then the matter will be clear Cap. 8. n. 33. that St. Paul meant not this of any Heathenish but of the Jewish observation of days and times So in the Epistle to the Colossians writ in the sixtieth
Hereticks before remembred had been hardly heard of it was plainly otherwise that day not only not being honoured with their publick meetings but destinate to a setled or a constant fast Some which have looked more nearly into the reasons of this difference conceive that they appointed this day for fasting in memory of Saint Peters conflict with Simon Magus which being to be done on a Sunday following the Church of Rome ordained a solemn fast on the day before the better to obtain Gods blessing in so great a business which falling out as they desired they kept it for a fasting day for ever after Saint Austin so relates it as a general and received opinion but then he adds Quod eam esse falsam perhibeant plerique Romani That very many of the Romans did take it only for a fable As for St. Austin he conceives the reason of it to be the several uses which men made of our Saviours resting in the grave the whole Sabbath day For thence it came to pass saith he that some especially the Eastern people Ad requiem significandam mallent relaxare jejunium to signifie and denote that rest did not use to fast where on the other side those of the Church of Rome and some Western Churches kept it always fasting Propter humilitatem mortis Domini by reason that our Lord that day lay buried in the sleep of Death But as the Father comes not home unto the reason of this usage in the Eastern Countreys so in my mind Pope Innocent gives a likelier reason for the contrary custom in the Western Concil Tom. 1. For in a Decretal by him made touching the keeping of this Fast he gives this reason of it unto Decentius Eugubinus who desired it of him because that day and the day before were spent by the Apostles in grief and heaviness Nam constat Apostolos biduo isto in moerore fuisse propter metum Judaeorum se occuluisse as his words there are The like saith Platina that Innocentius did ordain the Saturday or Sabbath to be always fasted Quod tali die Christus in sepulchro jacuisset quod discipuli ejus jejunassent In Innocent Because our Saviour lay in the grave that day and it was fasted by his Disciples Not that it was not fasted before Innocents time as some vainly think but that being formerly an arbitrary practice only it was by him intended for a binding Law Now as the African and the Western Churches were severally devoted either to the Church of Rome or other Churches in the East so did they follow in this matter of the Sabbaths fast the practice of those parts to which they did most adhere Millain though near to Rome followed the practice of the East which shews how little power the Popes then had even within Italy it self Paulinus tells us also of St. Ambrose that he did never use to dine nisi die sabbati Dominico c. but on the Sabbath the Lords day In vita Ambros and on the Anniversaries of the Saints and Martyrs Yet so that when he was at Rome he used to do as they there did submitting to the Orders of the Church in the which he was Whence that so celebrated speeeh of his Cum hic sum non jejuno sabbato cum Romae sum jejuno sabbato at Rome he did at Millain he did not fast the Sabbath Nay which is more Epist â—6 Saint Augustine tells us that many times in Africa one and the self-same Church at least the several Churches in the self-same Province had some that dined upon the Sabbath and some that fasted And in this difference it stood a long time together till in the end the Roman Church obtained the cause and Saturday became a Fast almost through all the parts of the Western World I say the Western World and of that alone The Eastern Churches being so far from altering their ancient custom that in the sixth Council of Constantinople Anno 692 they did admonish those of Rome to forbear fasting on that day upon pain of Censures Which I have noted here in its proper place that we might know the better how the matter stood between the Lords day and the Sabbath how hard a thing it was for one to get the mastery of the other both days being in themselves indifferent for sacred uses and holding by no other Tenure than by the courtesie of the Church Much of this kind was that great conflict between the East and Western Churches about keeping Easter and much like conduced as it was maintained unto the honour of the Lords Day or neglect thereof The Passeover of the Jews was changed in the Apostles times to the Feast of Easter the anniversary memorial of our Saviours Resurrection and not changed only in their times but by their Authority Certain it is that they observed it for Polycarpus kept it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 both with Saint John and with the rest of the Apostles as Irenaeus tells us in Eusebius's History Lib. 5. c. 26. The like Polycarpus affirms of Saint Philip also whereof see Euseb l. 5. c. 14. Nor was the difference which arose in the times succeeding about the Festival it self but for the time wherein it was to be observed The Eastern Churches following the custom of Hierusalem kept it directly at the same time the Jews did their Passeover and at Hierusalem they so kept it the Bishops there for fifteen several successions being of the Circumcision the better to content the Jews their Brethren and to win upon them But in the Churches of the West they did not celebrate this Feast decima quarta lunae upon what day soever it was as the others did but on some Sunday following after partly in honour of the day and partly to express some difference between Jews and Christians A thing of great importance in the present case For the Christians of the East reflected not upon the Sunday in the Annual return of so great a Feast but kept it on the fourteenth day of the month be it what it will it may be very strongly gathered that they regarded not the Lords Day so highly which was the weekly memory of the Resurrection as to prefer that day before any other in their publick meetings And thereupon Baronius pleads it very well that certainly Saint John was not the Author of the contrary practice Annal. An. 15 9. as some gave it out Nam quaenam potuit esse ratio c. For what saith he might be the reason why in the Revelation he should make mention of the Lords Day as a day of note and of good credit in the Church had it not got that name in reference to the Resurrection And if it were thought fit by the Apostles to celebrate the weekly memory thereof upon the Sunday then to what purpose should they keep the Anniversary on another day And so far questionless we may joyn issue with
second Age. Theophilus Caesariens who lived about the times of Commodus and Severus the Roman Emperors makes mention of it and fixeth it upon the 25 of Decemb. as we now observe it Natalem Domini quocunque die 8. Calend. Januar. venerit celebrare debemus as his own words are And after in the time of Maximinus which was one of the last great Persecutors Nicephorus tells us that In ipso natalis Dominici die l. 7. c. 6. Christianos Nicomediae festivitatem celebrantes succenso templo concremavit even in the very day of the Lords Nativity he caused the Christians to be burnt at Nicomedia whilst they were solemnizing this great Feast within their Temple I say this Great Feast and I call it so on the Authority of Beda Orat. de Philogon who reckoneth Christmas Easter and Whitsontide for majora solennia as they still are counted But before Bede it was so thought over all the Church Chrysostom calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mother or Metropolis of all other Feasts See Binius Conc. T. 1. And before him Pope Fabian whom but now we spake of ordained that all Lay-men should communicate at least thrice a year which was these three Festivals Etsi non frequentius saltemter in Anno Laici homines communicent c. in Pascha Pentecoste Natali Domini So quickly had the Annual got the better of the weekly Festivals According to which ancient Canon the Church of England hath appointed that every man communicate at least thrice a year of which times Easter to be one Before we end this Chapter there is one thing yet to be considered which is the name whereby the Christians of these first Ages did use to call the day of the Resurrection and consequently the other days of the week according as they found the time divided The rather because some are become offended that we retain those names amongst us which were to us commended by our Ancestors and to them by theirs Where first we must take notice that the Jews in honour of their Sabbath used to refer times to that distinguishing their days by Prima Sabbati Secunda Sabbati and so until they came to the Sabbath it self As on the other side the Gentiles following the motions of the Planets gave to each day the name of that particular Planet by which the first hour of the day was governed as their Astrologers had taught them Now the Apostles being Jews retained the custom of the Jews and for that reason called that day on which our Saviour rose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 una sabbati the first day of the week as our English reads it The Fathers many of them followed their example Saint Austin thereupon calls Thursday by the name of quintum sabbati Epist 118. and so doth venerable Beda hist lib. 4. c. 25. Saint Hierom Tuesday tertium sabbati in Epitaph Paulae Tertullian Friday by the old name parasceve l. 4. advers Marcion Saturday they called generally the Sabbath and Sunday sometimes dies solis De invent rerum l. 5 6. and is sometimes Dominicus Pope Silvester as Polydore Virgil is of opinion vanorum deorum memoriam abhorrens hating the name and memory of the Gentile-Gods gave order that the days should be called by the name of Feriae and the distinction to be made by Prima feria secunda feria c. the Sabbath and the Lords day holding their names and places as before they did Hence that of Honorius Augustodunensis Hebraei nominant dies suos De imagine mundi cap. 28. una vel prima sabbati c. Pagani sic dies Solis Lunae c. Christiani vero sic dies nominant viz. Dies Dominicus feria prima c. Sabbatum But by their leaves this is no universal rule the Writers of the Christian Church not tying up their hands so strictly as not to give the days what names they pleased Save that the Saturday is called amongst them by no other name than that which formerly it had the Sabbath So that when ever for a thousand years and upwards we meet with sabbatum in any Writer of what name soever it must be understood of no day but Saturday As for the other day the day of the Resurrection all the Evangelists and Saint Paul take notice of no other name than of the first day of the Week Saint John and after him Ignatius call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day But then again Justin Martyr for the second Century doth in two several passages call it no otherwise than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sunday as then the Gentiles called it and we call it now And so Tertullian for the third who useth both and calls it sometimes diem solis and sometimes Dominicum as before was said Which questionless neither of them would have done on what respect soever had it been either contrary to the Word of God or scandalous unto his Church So for the after Ages in the Edicts of Constantine Valentinian Valens Gratian Honorius Arcadius Theodosius Christian Princes all it hath no other name than Sunday or dies solis and many fair years after them the Synod held at Dingulofinum in the lower Bavaria Anno 772. calls it plainly Sunday Festo die solis prophanis negotiis abstineto of which more hereafter And Aventine for the latter Writers who lived not till the Age last past speaking of the battel fought near Cambray between Charles Martel and Hilpericus King of France saith that it hapned on the thirteenth of the Calends of April Hist l. 3. quae tum dies solis ante Paschalia erat being the Sunday before Easter They therefore are more nice than wise who out of a desire to have all things new would have new names for every day or call them as sometimes they were the first day of the week the second day of the week sic de coeteris and all for fear lest it be thought that we do still adore those Gods whom the Gentiles worshipped Cont. Faust l. 19. c. 5. Saint Augustine as it seems had met with some this way affected and thus disputes the case with Faustus Manichaeus Deorum suorum nomina gentes imposuerunt diebus istis c. The Gentiles saith the Father gave unto every day of the week the name of one or other of their Gods and so they did also unto every month If then we keep the name of March and not think of Mars Why may we not saith he preserve the name of Saturday and not think of Saturn I add why may we not then keep the name of Sunday and not think of Phoebus or Apollo or by what other name soever the old Poets call him This though it satisfied the Manichees will not perhaps now satisfie some curious men who do as much dislike the names of months as of the days To others I presume it may give some reason why we retain the name of Sunday not
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his own Language Catech. orat 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the morrow after the Lords day Cat. 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Catech. Mystag 2. The like is very frequent in Saint Ambrose also Hesterno die de fonte disputavimus De Sacram lib. 3. cap. 1. Hesternus noster sermo ad sancti altaris sacramentum deductus est lib. 5. cap. 1. and in other places The like in Chrysostom as in many other places too many to be pointed at in this place and time so in his 18. Hom. on the 3d of Gen. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. But this perhaps was only in respect of Lectures or Expositions of the Scriptures such as were often used in the greater Cities where there was much people and but little business for I conceive not that they met every day in these times to receive the Sacraments Epl. 289. Of Wednesday and of Friday it is plain they did not to say any thing of the Saturday till the next Section Saint Basil names them all together 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. It is saith he a profitable and pious thing every day to communicate and to participate of the blessed Body and Blood of Christ our Saviour he having told us in plain terms that Whosoever eateth his flesh and drinketh his blood hath eternal life We notwithstanding do communicate but four times weekly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. on the Lords day the Wednesday the Friday and the Saturday unless on any other days the memory of some Martyr be perhaps observed Expos fid Cath. 21.22 Epiphanius goeth a little farther andn he deriveth the Wednesdays and the Fridays Service even from the Apostles ranking them in the same Antiquity and grounding them upon the same Authority that he doth the Sunday 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Only it seems the difference was that whereas formerly it had been the custom not to administer the Sacrament on these two days being both of them fasting-days and so accounted long before until towards Evening It had been changed of late and they did celebrate in the Mornings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as on the Lords day was accustomed Whether the meeting on these days were of such Antiquity as Epiphanius saith they were I will not meddle Certain it is that they were very antient in the Church of God as may appear by that of Origen and Tertullian before remembred So that if we consider either the preaching of the Word the ministration of the Sacraments or the publick Prayers the Sunday in the Eastern Churches had no great prerogative above other days especially above the Wednesday and Friday save that the meetings were more solemn and the concourse of people greater than at other times as it is most likely The footsteps of this ancient custom are yet to be observed in this Church of England by which it is appointed that on Wednesdays and Fridays weekly Can. 15. though they be not holy days the Minister at the accustomed hours of Service shall resort to Church and say the Letany prescribed in the Book of Common-prayer As for the Saturday that retained its wonted credit in the Eastern Church little inferiour to the Lords day if not plainly equal not as a Sabbath think not so but as a day designed unto sacred meetings The Constitutions of the Apostles said to be writ by Clemens one of Saint Peters first successours in the Church of Rome appoint both days to be observed as solemn Festivals both of them to be days of rest that so the servant might have time to repair unto the Church Lib. 8. c. 33. for this Edification 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So the Constitution Not that they should devote them wholly unto rest from labour but only those set times of both which were appointed for the meetings of the Congregation Yet this had an exception too the Saturday before Easter day Lib. 1. cap. 19. whereupon Christ rested in the Grave being exempt from these Assemblies and destinated only unto grief and fasting And though these Constitutions in all likelihood were not writ by Clemens there being many things therein which could not be in use of a long time after yet ancient sure they were as being mentioned in Epiphanius De Scrip. Ecc. in Clemente and as the Cardinal confesseth à Graecis veteribus magni factos much made of by the ancient Grecians though not of such authority in the Church of Rome How their authority in this point is countenanced by Ignatius we have seen already and we shall see the same more fully throughout all this Age. Can. 16. And first beginning with the Synod held in Laodicea a Town of Phrygia Anno 314. there passed a Canon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 touching the reading of the Gospels with the other Scriptures upon the Saturday or Sabbath Canon 49. that in the time of Lent there should be no oblation made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but on the Saturday and the Lords day only neither that any Festival should be then observed in memory of any Martyrs Canon 51. but that their names only should be commemorated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon the Lords day and the Sabbaths Nor was this only the particular will of those two and thirty Prelates that there assembled it was the practice too of the Alexandrians S. Athanasius Patriarch there affirms that they assembled on the Sabbath days not that they were infected any whit with Judaism which was far from them Homil de Semente but that they came together on the Sabbath day to worship Jesus Christ the Lord of the Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Father hath it So for the Church of Millain which as before I said in some certain things followed the Churches of the East it seems the Saturday was held in a fair esteem and joyned together with the Sunday Crastino die Sabbato De Sacrament Lib. 4. cap. 6. dominice de orationis ordine dicemus as S. Ambrose hath it And probably his often mention of hesternus dies remembred in the former Section may have relation to the joynt observance of these two days and so may that which is reported then out of S. Chrysostom and S. Cyril Eastern Doctors both Hist Eccles Lib. 6. cap. 8. Sure I am Socrates counts both days for weekly Festivals 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that on them both the Congregation used to be assembled and the whole Liturgy performed Which plainly shews that in the practice of those Churches they were both regarded both alike observed Gregory Nyssen speaks more home and unto the purpose Some of the People had neglected to come unto the Church upon the Saturday and on the Sunday he thus chides and rebukes them for it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. With what face saith the Father wilt thou look upon the lords day De Castigatione which hast dishonoured the
the general tendry of the Roman Schools that which is publickly avowed and made good amongst them And howsoever Petrus de Anchorana and Nicholas Abbat of Patermo two learned Canonists as also Angelus de Clavasio and Silvester de Prierats two as learned Casuists seem to defend the institution of the Lords day to have its ground and warrant on divine Authority yet did the general current of the Schools and of the Canonists also run the other way And in that current still it holds the Jesuits and most learned men in the Church of Rome following the general and received opinion of the Schoolmen whereof see Bellarm. de cultu Sanct. l. 3. c. 11. Estius in 3. Sent. dist 37. Sect. 13. but especially Agsorius in his Institut Moral part second cap. 2. who gives us an whole Catalogue or them which hold the Lords day to be founded only on the authority of the Church Touching the other power the power of Dispensation there is not any thing more certain than that the Church both may and doth dispense with such as have therein offended against her Canons The Canons in themselves do profess as much there being many casus reservati as before we said expressed particularly in those Laws and constitutions which have been made about the keeping of this day and the other Festivals wherein a dispensation lieth if we disobey them Many of these were specified in the former Ages and some occur in these whereof now we write It pleased Pope Gregory the ninth Decretal l. 2. tit de feriis cap. 5. Anno 1228. to inhibit all contentious Suits on the Lords day and the other Festivals and to inhibit them so far that judgment given on any of them should be counted void Etiam consentientibus partibus although both parties were consenting Yet was it with this clause or reservation nisi vel necessitas urgeat vel pietas suadeat unless necessity inforced or piety persuaded that it should be done So in a Synod holden in Valladolit apud vallem Oleti in the parts of Spain Concil Sabiness deâ—feriis Anno 1322. a general restraint was ratified that had been formerly in force quod nullus in diebus dominicis festivis agros colere audeat aut manualia artificia exercere praesitmat that none should henceforth follow Husbandry or exercise himself in mechanick Trades upon the Lords day or the other Holy days Yet was it with the same Proviso nisi urgente necessitate vel evidentis pietatis causa unless upon necessity or apparent piety or charity in each of which he might have licence from the Priest his own Parish-Priest to attend his business Where still observe that the restraint was no less peremptory on the other Holy days than on the Lords day These Holy days as they were named particularly in Pope Gregories Decretal so was a perfect list made of them in the Synod of Lyons â—e consecrat distinct 3. c. 1. Anno 1244. which being celebrated with a great concourse of people from all parts of Christendom the Canons and decrees thereof began forthwith to find a general admittance The Holy days allowed of there were these that follow viz. the feast of Christs nativity St. Stephen St John the Evangelist the Innocents St. Silvâ—ster the Circumcision of our Lord the Epiphany Easter together with the week precedent and the week succeeding the three days in Rogation week the day of Christs Ascension Whitsunday with the two days after St. John the Baptist the feasts of all the twelve Apostles all the festivities of our Lady St. Lawrence all the Lords days in the year St. Michael the Archangel All Saints St. Martins the Wakes or dedication of particular Churches together with the Feasts of such topical or local Saints which some particular people had been pleased to honour with a day particular amongst themselves On these and every one of them the people were restrained as before was said from many several kinds of work on pain of Ecclesiastical censures to be laid on them which did offend unless on some emergent causes either of charity or necessity they were dispensed with for so doing In other of the Festivals which had not yet attained to so great an height the Council thought not fit perhaps by reason of their numbers that men should be restrained from labour as neither that they should be incouraged to it but left them to themselves to bestow those times as might stand best with their affairs and the Common wealth For so the Synod did determine Reliquis festivitatibus quae per annum sunt non esse plebem cogendam ad feriandum sed nec probibendam And in this state things stood a long time together there being none that proferd opposition in reference to these restraints from labour on the greater Festivals though some there were that thought the Festivals too many on which those burden of restraints had unadvisedly been imposed on the common people Nicholas de Clemangis complained much as of some other abuses in the Church so of the multitude of Holy days Ap. Hospin cap. â— de fest 〈◊〉 which had of late times been brought into it And Pet. de Aliaco Cardinal of Cambray in a Discourse by him exhibited to the Council of Constance made publick suit unto the Fathers there assembled that there might a stop be put in that kind hereafter as also that excepting Sundays and the greater Festivals liceret operari post auditum officium it might be lawful for the people after the end of Divine Service to attend their businesses the poor especially having little time enough on the working days ad vitae necessaria procuranda to get their livings But these were only the expressions of well wishing men The Popes were otherwise resolved and did not only keep the Holy days which they found established in the same state in which they found them but added others daily as they saw occasion At last it came unto that pass by reason of that rigorous and exact kind of rest which by the Canon Law had been fastned on them that both the Lords day and the other Festivals were accounted Holy not in relation to the use made of them or to the holy actions done on them in the honour of God but in and of themselves considered they were avowed to be vere aliis sanctiores Bell arm de cultu S. l. 3. c. 10. truly and properly invested with a greater sanctity than the other days Yea so far did they go at last that it is publickly maintained in the Schools of Rome non sublatam esse sed mutatam tantum in novo Testamento significationem discretionem dierum that the difference of days and times and the mysterious significations of the same which had before been used in the Jewish Church was not abolished but only changed in the Church of Christ Aquinas did first lead this Dance in fitting every legal Festival with some that were observed
to slaves and such as were in service unto other men viz. the twelve days after Christs Nativity dies ille quo Christus subegit diabolum the day wherein our Saviour overcame the Devil the Festival of Saint Gregory seven days before Easter and as many after the Festival day of Saint Peter and Paul the week before our Lady day in Harvest All Hallowtide and the four Wednesdays in the Ember-weeks Where note how many other days were priviledged in the self-same manner as the Lords day was in case that be the day then spoken of wherein our Saviour overcame the Devil as I think it is as also that this priviledg extended unto Freemen only servants and bondmen being left in the same condition as before they were to spend all days alike in their Masters businesses This Alured began his Reign Anno 871. and after him succeeded Edward surnamed the Elder in the year 900. who in a league between himself and Gunthrun King of the Danes in England did publickly on both sides prohibit as well all markettings on the Sunday as other kind of work whatsoever on the other Holy days Dacus si die Dominico quicquam fuerit mercatus reipsa Oris praeterea 12 mulctator Anglus 30 solidos numerato c. If a Dane bought any thing on the Lords day he was to forfeit the thing bought and to pay 12 Oras every Ora being the fifteenth part of a pound an Englishman doing the like to pay 30 shillings A Freeman if he did any work die quocunque festo on any of the Holy days was forthwith to be made a Bondman or to redeem himself with Money a Bondslave to be beaten for it or redeem his beating with his Purse The Master also whether that he were Englishman or Dane if he compelled his servants to work on any of the Holy days was to answer for it So when it had been generally received in other places to begin the Sunday-service on the Eve before it was enacted by King Edgar surnamed the Peaceable who began his Reign An. 959. diem Sabbati ab ipsa die Saturni hora pomeridiana tertia usque in lunaris diei diluculum festum agitari that the Sabbath should begin on Saturday at three of the clock in the afternoon and not as Fox relates it in his Acts and Monuments at nine in the morning and so hold on till day break on Monday Where by the way though it be dies Sabbati in the Latin yet in the Saxon Copy it is only Healde the Holy day After this Edgars death the Danes so plagued this Realm that there was nothing setled in it either in Church or State till finally they had won the Garland and obteined the Kingdom The first of these Canutus an heroick Prince of whom it is affirmed by Malmesbury omnes leges ab antiquis regibus maxime sub Etheldredo latas that he commanded all those Laws to be observed which had been made by any of the former Kings and those before remembred amongst the rest of which see the 42. of his Constitutions especially by Etheldred his predecessour and that upon a grievous mulct to be laid on such who should disobey them These are the Laws which afterwards were called K. Edwards non quòd ille statuerit sed quòd observarit not because he enacted them but that he caused them to be kept Of these more anon Besides which Laws so brought together there were some others made at Winchester by this King Canutus and amongst others this that on the Lords day there should be no markettings no Courts or publick meetings of the people for civil businesses Leg. 14.15 as also that all men abstein from Hunting and from all kind of earthly work Yet was there an exception too nisi flagitante necessitate in cases of necessity wherein it was permitted both to buy and sell and for the people to meet together in their Courts For so it passeth in the Law Die Dominico mercata concelebrari populive conventus agi nisi flagitante necessitate planissime vetamus ipso praeterea die sacrosancto à venatione opere terreno prorsus omni quisque abstineto Not that it is to be supposed as some would have it that he intended Sunday for a Sabbath day for entring on the Crown A. 1017. he did no more than what had formerly been enacted by Charles the Great and several Councils after him Lib. 6. c. 29. none of which dreamed of any Sabbath Besides it is affirmed of this Canutus by Otho Frisingensis that in the year 1027. he did accompany the Emperor Conrade at his Coronation on an Easter day which questionless he would not have done knowing those kind of Pomps to be meerly civil and to have in them much of ostentation had he intended any Sabbath when he restrained some works on Sunday But to make sure work of it without more ado the Laws by him collected which we call St. Edwards make the matter plain where Sunday hath no other priviledg than the other Feasts and which is more is ranked below them The Law is thus entituled Rog. de Hoveden in Henri◠secundo De temporibus diebus pacis Domini Regis the Text as followeth Ab adventu Domini usque ad octavam Epiphaniae pax Dei Ecclesiae per omne regnum c. From Advent to the Octavei of Epiphanie Let no mans Person be molested nor no Suit be pursued the like from Septuagesima to Low-sunday and so from Holy Thursday to the next Sunday after Whitsontide Item omnibus Sabbatis ab hora nona usque ad diem Lunae c. The like on Saturdays from three in the afternoon until Monday morning as also on the Eves of the Virgin Mary S. John the Baptist all the holy Apostles of such particular Saints whose Festivals are published in the Churches on the Sunday mornings the Eve of All Saints in November from three of the clock till the solemnity be ended As also that no Christian be molested going to Church for his Devotions or returning thence or travelling to the dedication of any new erected Church or to the Synods or any publick Chapter meeting Thus was it with the Lords day as with many others in S. Edwards Laws which after were confirmed and ratified by King Henry the second after they had long been neglected Now go we forwards to the Normans and let us see what care they took about the sanctifying of the Lords day whether they either took or meant it for a Sabbath And first beginning with the Reign of the first six Kings we find them times of action and full of troubles as it doth use to be in unsetled States no Law recorded to be made touching the keeping of this day but many actions of great note to be done upon it These we will rank for orders sake under these five Heads 1. Coronations 2. Synods Ecclesiastical 3. Councils of Estate 4. Civil business and 5.
which afterwards in the year 1625. he published to the World with his other Lectures Now in this Speech or Determination he did thus resolve it First that the Sabbath was not instituted in the first Creation of the World nor ever kept by any of the ancient Patriarchs who lived before the Law of Moses therefore no moral and perpetual Precept as the others are Sect. 2. Secondly That the sanctifying of one day in seven is ceremonial only and obliged the Jews not Moral to oblige us Christians to the like Observance Sect. 3. 4. Thirdly That the Lords day is founded only on the Authority of the Church guided therein by the practice of the Apostles not on the fourth Commandment which in the 7. Section he entituleth a seandalous Doctrine nor any other authority in holy Scripture Sect. 6. 7. Fourthly That the Church hath still authority to change the day though such authority be not fit to be put in practice Sect. 7. Fifthly That in the celebration of it there is no such cessation from the works of labour required of us as was exacted of the Jews but that we lawfully may dress Meat proportionable unto every mans estate and do such other things as be no hinderance to the publick Service appointed for the day Sect. 8. Sixthly That on the Lords day all Recreations whatsoever are to be allowed which honestly may refresh the spirits and encrease mutual love and Neighbourhood amongst us and that the Names whereby the Jews did use to call their Festival whereof the Sabbath was the chief were borrowed from an Hebrew word which signifies to Dance and to make merry or rejoyce And lastly that it appertains to the Christian Magistrate to order and appoint what Pastimes on the Lords day are to be permitted and what prohibited not unto every private person much less to every mans rash Zeal as his own words are who out of a schismatical Stoicism debarring men from lawful Pastimes doth incline to Judaisin Sect. 8. This was the sum and substance of his resolution then which as it gave content unto the sounder and the better part of the Assembly so it did infinitely stomack and displease the greater numbers such as were formerly possessed with the other Doctrines though they were wiser than to make it a publick Quarrel Only it pleased Mr. Bifeild of Surrey in his Reply in a Discourse of Mr. Brerewoods of Cresham Colledg Anno 1631. to tax the Doctor as a spreader of wicked Doctrine and much to marvel with himself how either he durst be so hold to say Page 161. or having said it could be suffered to put it forth viz. That to establish the Lords day on the fourth Commandment were to incline too much to Judaism This the said M. Bifeild thinks to be a foul aspertion on this famous Church But in so thinking I conceive that he consulted more his own opinion and his private interest than any publick maintenance of the Churches cause which was not injured by the Doctor but defended rather But to proceed or rather to go back a little About a year before the Doctor thus declared his judgment one Tho. Broad of Gloucestorshire had published something in this kind wherein to speak my mind thereof he rather shewed that he disliked those Sabbath Doctrines than durst disprove them And before either M. Brerewood whom before I named had writ a learned Treatise about the Sabbath on a particular occasion therein mentioned but published it was not till after both Anno 1629. Add here to joyn them altogether that in the Schools at Oxon Anno 1628. it was maintained by Dr. Robinson now Archdeacon of Gloucester viz. Ludos Recreationis gratia in die Dominico non esse prohibitos Divina Lege That Recreations on the Lords day were not at all prohibited by the Word of God As for our neighbour Church of Scotland as they proceeded not at first with that mature deliberation in the reforming of that Church which had been here observed with us so did they run upon a course of Reformation which after was thought fitting to be reformed The Queen was young and absent in the Court of France the Regent was a desolate Widow a Stranger to the Nation and not well obeyed So that the people there possessed by Cnoxe and other of their Teachers took the cause in hand and went that way which came most near unto Geneva where this Cnoxe had lived Among the first things wherewithal they were offended were the Holy days Proceedings at Perth These in their Book of Discipline Anno 1560. they condemned at once particularly the observation of Holy days entituled by the names of Saints the Feasts of Christmas Circumcision Epiphany the Purification and others of the Virgin Mary all which they ranked awongst the abominations of the Roman Religion as having neither Commandment nor assurance in the Word of God But having brought this Book to be subsigned by the Lords of secret Counsel it was first rejected some of them giving it the Title of Devote Imaginations Cnoxe Hist of Scotl. p. 523. whereof Cnoxe complains Yet notwithstanding on they went and at last prevailed for in the middle of the Tumults the Queen Regent died and did not only put down all the Holy days the Lords day excepted but when an uprore had been made in Edenburg about a Robin-hood or a Whitson-Lord they of the Consistory excommunicated the whole multitud Now Proceedings at Perth that the holy days were put down may appear by this That in the year 1566. when the Confession of the Helvetian Churches was proposed unto them they generally approved the same save that they liked not of those Holy days which were there retained But whatsoever they intended and howsoever they had utterly suppressed those days which were entituled by the Names of particular Saints yet they could never so prevail but that the people would retain some memory of the two great and principal Feasts of Christs Nativity and Resurrection For in the year 1575. Complaint was made unto the Regent how in Dunfreis they had conveyed the Reader to the Church with Taber and Whissel to read Prayers all the Holy days of Zule or Christmas Thereupon Anno 1577. it was ordained in an Assembly of the Church That the Visitors should admonish Ministers preaching or ministring the Communion at Pasche or Zule or other like superstitious times under pain of deprivation to desist therefrom Anno 1587. it was complained of to his Majesty That Pasche and Zule were superstitiously observed in Fife and about Dunfreis and in the year 1592. the Act of the Queen Regent granting licence to keep the said two Feasts was by them repealed Yet find we by the Bishop of Brechin in his Discourse of the Proceedings at the Synod of Perth that notwithstanding all the Acts Civil and Ecclesiastick made against the superstitious observation and prophane abuse of Zule day the people could never be induced to labour on
Clergy in the Church of of God hath been or is maintained with less charge to the Subject than the established Clergy of the Church of England Page 167 2. That there is no man in the Kingdom of England who payeth any thing of his own towards the maintenance and support of his Parish-Minister but by his Easter-Offering Page 171 3. That the change of Tithes into Stipends will bring greater trouble to the Clergy than is yet considered and far less profit to the Countrey than is now pretended Page 174 The History of Episcopacy PART I. CHAP. I. The Christian Church first founded by our Lord and Saviour in an imparity of Ministers 1. THE several Offices of Christ our Saviour in the Administration of his Church Page 187 2. The aggregating of Disciples to him Page 188 3. The calling of the Apostles out of them and why twelve in number ibid. 4. Of the Name and Office of an Apostle Page 189 5. What things were specially required unto the making of an Apostle Page 190 6. All the Apostles equal in Authority amongst themselves ibid. 7. The calling and approinting of the 70 Disciples Page 191 8. A reconciliation of some different Opinions about the number Page 192 9. The twelve Apostles superiour to the Seventy by our Saviours Ordinance ibid. 10. What kind of superiority it was that Christ interdicted his Apostles Page 193 11. The several powers faculties and preheminences given to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ Page 194 12. That the Apostles were Bishops averred by the ancient Fathers ibid. 13. And by the text of holy Scripture Page 195 CHAP. II. The foundation of the Church of Hierusalem under the Government of Saint James the Apostle and Simeon one of the Disciples the two first Bishops of the same 1. Matthias chosen in the place of Judas Page 196 2. The coming of the Holy Ghost and on whom it fell Page 197 3. The greatest measure of the Spirit fell on the Apostles and therewithal the greatest power ibid. 4. The several Ministrations in the Church then given and that in ranking of the same the Bishops are intended in the name of Pastors Page 198 5. The sudden growth of the Church of Hierusalem and making Saint James the first Bishop there ibid. 6. The former point deduced from Scripture Page 199 7. And proved by the general consent of Fathers ib. 8. Of the Episcopal Chair or throne of James and his Successors in Hierusalem Page 200 9. Simeon elected by the Apostles to succeed Saint James Page 201 10. The meaning of the word Episcopus and from whence borrowed by the Church ibid. 11. The institution of the Presbyters Page 202 12. What interest they had in the common business of the Church whilst St. James was Bishop ib. 13. The Council of Jerusalem and what the Presbyters had to do therein Page 203 14. The institution of the Seven and to what Office they were called ibid. 15. The names of Ecclesiastical Functions promiscuously used in holy Scripture Page 204 CHAP. III. The Churches planted by Saint Peter and his Disciples originally founded in Episcopacy 1. The founding of the Church of Antioch and that Saint Peter was the first Bishop there Page 205 2. A reconciliation of the difference about his next Successors in the same Page 206 3. A List of Bishops planted by him in the Churches of the Circumcision Page 207 4. Proofs thereof from St. Peters general Epistle to the Jews dispersed according to the exposition of the Ancient Writers ibid. 5. And from Saint Pauls unto the Hebrews Page 208 6. Saint Pauls Praepositus no other than a Bishop in the Opinion of the Fathers ibid. 7. Saint Peter the first Bishop of the Church of Rome Page 209 8. The difference about his next Successors there reconciled also ibid. 9. An Answer unto such Objections as have been made against Saint Peter's being Bishop there Page 210 10. Saint Mark the first Bishop of Alexandria and of his Successors Page 221 11. Notes on the observations of Epiphanius and Saint Hierom about the Church of Alexandria Page 212 12. An observation of Saint Ambrose applyed unto the former business ibid. 13. Of Churches founded by Saint Peter and his Disciples in Italy France Spain Germany and the Isle of Britain and of the Bishops in them instituted Page 213 CHAP. IV. The Bishoping of Timothy and Titus and other of Saint Pauls Disciples 1. The Conversion of Saint Paul and his ordaining to the place of an Apostle Page 214 2. The Presbyters created by Saint Paul Acts 14. of what sort they were Page 215 3. Whether the Presbyters or Presbytery did lay on hands with Paul in any of his Ordinations Page 216 4. The people had no voice in the Election of those Presbyters by Saint Paul ordained Page 217 5. Bishops not founded by Saint Paul at first in the particular Churches by him planted and upon what reasons ibid. 6. The short time that the Churches of Saint Pauls Plantation continued without Bishops over them Page 218 7. Timothy made Bishop of Ephesus by Saint Paul according to the general consent of Fathers Page 219 8. The time when Timothy was made Bishop according to the holy Scripture Page 220 9. Titus made Bishop of Cretans and the truth verified herein by the antient Writers Page 221 10. An Answer unto some Objections against the subscription of the Epistle unto Titus ibid. 11. The Bishoping of Dionysius the Areopagite Aristarchus Gaius Epaphroditus Epaphras and Archippus Page 222 12. As also of Silas Sosthenes Sosipater Crescens and Aristobulus Page 223 13. The Office of a Bishop not incompetible with that of an Evangelist ibid. CHAP. V. Of the Authority and Jurisdiction given unto Timothy and Titus and in them to all other Bishops by the Word of God 1. The authority committed unto Timothy and Titus was to be perpetual and not personal only Page 224 2. The power of Ordination intrusted only unto Bishops by the Word of God according to the exposition of the Fathers Page 225 3. Bishops alone both might and did ordain without their Presbyters Page 226 4. That Presbyters might not ordain without a Bishop proved by the memorable case of Colluthus and Ischyras ibid. 5. As by those also of Maximus and a Spanish Bishop Page 227 6. In what respects the joint assistance of the Presbyters was required herein Page 228 7. The case of the Reformed Churches beyond the Seas objected and declared ibid. 8. The care of ordering Gods Divine Service a work peculiar to the Bishop Page 229 9. To whom the Ministration of the Sacraments also doth in chief belong Page 230 10. Bishops to have a care that Gods Word be preached and to encourage those that take pains therein ibid. 11. Bishops to silence and reprove such Presbyters as preach other Doctrines Page 231 12. As also to correct and reject the Heretick ibid. 13. The censure and correction of inferiour Presbyters in point of life and conversation doth
belong also to Bishops 14. And of Lay-people if they walk unworthy of their Christian calling ibid. 15. Conjectural proofs that the description of a Bishop in the first to Timothy is of a Bishop strictly and properly called Page 233 CHAP. VI. Of the estate of holy Church particularly of the Asian Churces toward the later days of Saint John the Apostle 1. The time of Saint Johns coming into Asia Page 235 2. All the seven Churches except Ephesus of his Plantation ibid. 3. That the Angels of those Churches were the Bishops of them in the opinion of the Fathers Page 236 4. And of some Protestant Divines of name and eminency ibid. 5. Conclusive Reasons for the same Page 237 6. Who is most like to the Angel of the Church of Ephesus ibid. 7. That Polycarpus was the Angel of the Church of Smyrna Page 238 8. Touching the Angel of the Church of Pergamus and of Thiatyra ibid. 9. As also of the Churches of Sardis Philadelphia and Laodicea Page 239 10. What Successors these several Angels had in their several Churches Page 240 11. Of other Churches founded in Episcopacy by Saint John the Apostle ibid. 12. Saint John deceasing left the Government of the Church to Bishops as to the Successours of the Apostles Page 241 13. The ordinary Pastors of the Church Page 242 14. And the Vicars of Christ Page 243 15. A brief Chronologic of the estate of holy Church in this first Century Page 244 PART II. CHAP. I. What doth occur concerning Bishops and the Government of the Church by them during the first half of the second Century 1. OF the condition of the Church of Corinth when Clemens wrote unto them his Epistle Page 249 2. What that Epistle doth contain in reference to this point in hand Page 250 3. That by Episcopi he meaneth Bishops truly and properly so called proved by the scope of the Epistle Page 251 4. And by a text of Scripture therein cited ibid. 5. Of the Episcopal Succession in the Church of Corinth Page 252 6. The Canons of the Apostles ascribed to Clemens what they say of Bishops Page 253 7. A Bishop not to be ordained under three or two at least of the same Order ibid. 8. Bishops not barred by these Canons from any Secular affairs as concern their Families Page 254 9. How far by them restrained from the employments of the Common-wealth ibid. 10. The jurisdiction over Presbyters given to the Bishops by those Canons Page 255 11. Rome divided into Parishes or tituli by Pope Euaristus Page 256 12. The reasons why Presbyteries or Colleges of Presbyters were planted first in Cities ibid. 13. Touching the superiority over all the flock given to the Bishop by Ignatius Page 257 14. As also of the Jurisdiction by him allowed them Page 258 15. The same exemplified in the works of Justin Martyr Page 259 CHAP. II. The setling of Episcopacy together with the Gospel in the Isle of Britain by Pope Eleutherius 1. What Bishops Egesippus met with in his Peregrination and what he testifieth of them Page 260 2. Of Dionysius Bishop of Corinth and of the Bishops by him mentioned ibid. 3. How Bishops came to be ordained where none were left by the Apostles Page 261 4. The setling of the Gospel in the Isle of Britain by Pope Eleutherius Page 262 5. Of the Condition of the Church of Britain from the first preaching of the Gospel there till the time of Lucius Page 263 6. That Lucius was a King in those parts of Britain which we now call England Page 264 7. Of the Episcopal Sees here founded by King Lucius at that time Page 265 8. Touching the Flamines and Arch-flamines which those Stories speak of ibid. 9. What is most like to be the reason of the number of the Arch-bishopricks and Bishopricks here of old established Page 266 10. Of the Successors which the Bishops of this Ordination are found to have on true Record Page 267 11. Which of the British Metropolitans was antiently the Primate of that Nation Page 268 CHAP. III. The Testimony given to Episcopal Authority in the last part of this second Century 1. The difference betwixt Pope Victor and the Asian Bishops about the Feast of Easter Page 269 2. The interpleading of Polycrates and Irenaeus two renowned Prelates in the aforesaid cause Page 270 3. Several Councils called about it by the Bishops of the Church then being with observations on the same ibid. 4. Of the Episcopal Succession in the four prime Sees for this second Century Page 271 5. An Answer to some Objections made against the same Page 272 6. The great authority and esteem of the said four Sees in those early days ibid. 7. The use made of this Episcopal Succession by Saint Irenaeus Page 273 8. As also in Tertullian and some other Antients Page 274 9. Of the authority enjoyed by Bishops in Tertullians time in the administration of the Sacraments Page 275 10. As also in enjoyning Fasts and the disposing of the Churches treasury ibid. 11. And in the dispensation of the Keys Page 276 12. Tertullian misalledged in maintenance of the Lay-Presbytery Page 277 13. The great extent of Christianity and Episcopacy in Tertullians time concludes this Century Page 278 CHAP. IV. Of the Authority in the Government of the Church of Carthage enjoyed and exercised by Saint Cyprian and other Bishops of the same 1. Of the foundation and preheminence of the Church of Carthage Page 279 2. Of Agrippinus and Donatus two of Saint Cyprian's Predecessors ibid. 3. The troublesome condition of that Church at Cyprian's first being Bishop there Page 280 4. Necessitated him to permit some things to the discretion of his Presbyters and consent of the People Page 281 5. Of the Authority ascribed by Cyprian to the People in the Election of their Bishop Page 282 6. What power the People had de facto in the said Elections ibid. 7. How far the testimony rf the People was required in the Ordination of their Presbyters Page 283 8. The power of Excommunication reserved by Saint Cyprian to the Bishop only Page 284 9. No Reconciliation of a Penitent allowed by Cyprian without the Bishops leave and licence Page 285 10. The Bishop's power as well in the encouragement as in the punishment and censure of his Clergy Page 286 11. The memorable case of Geminius Faustinus one of the Presbyters of Carthage Page 287 12. The Bishop's power in regulating and declaring Martyrs Page 288 13. The Divine Right and eminent Authority of Bishops fully asserted by Saint Cyprian Page 289 CHAP. V. Of the condition and affairs of the two Patriarchal Churches of Alexandria and Antiochia 1. Of the foundation and first Professors of the Divinity-School in Alexandria Page 290 2. What is affirmed by Clemens one of those Professors concerning Bishops Page 291 3. Origen the Divinity Reader there permitted to expound the Scriptures in the presence of the Bishop of Caesarea ibid. 4. Contrary to
the Cardinal that either Sunday is not meant in the Revelation or else Saint John was not the Author of keeping Easter with the Jews on what day soever Rather we may conceive that Saint John gave way unto the current of the times which in those places as is said were much intent upon the customs of the Jews most of the Christians of those parts being Jews originally For the composing of this difference and bringing of the Church to an uniformity the Popes of Rome bestirred themselves and so did many others also And first Pope Pius published a Declaration Com. Tom. 1. Pascha domini die dominica annuis solennitatibus celebrandum esse In Chronic. that Easter was to be solemnized on the Lords day only And here although I take the words of the letter decretory yet I rely rather upon Eusebius for the authority of the fact than on the Decretal it self which is neither for the substance probable and the date stark false not to be trusted there being no such Consuls it is Crabbes own note as are there set down But the Authority of Pope Pius did not reach so far as the Asian Churches and therefore it produced an effect accordingly This was 159. and seven years after Polycarpus Bishop of Smyrna a Reverend and an holy man Euseb hist l. 4. c. 13. made away to Rome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then to confer with Anicetus then the Roman Prelate about this business And though one could not wooe the other to desert the cause yet they communicated together and so parted Friends But when that Blastus afterwards had made it necessary which before was arbitrary and taught it to be utterly unlawful to hold this Feast at any other time than the Jewish Passeover becoming so the Author of the Quarto-decimani as they used to call them then did both Eleutherius publish a Decree that it was only to be kept upon the Sunday and Irenaeus though otherwise a peaceable man writ a Discourse entituled De schismate contra Blastum now not extant A little before this time this hapned Anno 180. the controversie had took place in Laodicea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. 4. c. 25. as Eusebius hath it which moved Melito Bishop of Sardis a man of special eminence to write two Books de Pascbate and one de die Dominico 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But to what side he took it is hard to say Were those Discourses extant as they both are lost we might no doubt find much that would conduce to our present business Two years before the close of this second Century Pope Victor Euseb l. 5. c. 23.24 presuming probably on his name sends abroad his Mandate touching the keeping of this Feast on the Lords day only against the which when as Polycrates and other Asian Prelates had set out their Manifests he presently without more ado declares them all for excommunicate But when this rather hindred than advanced the cause the Asian Bishops cared little for those Bruta fulmina and Irenaeus who held the same side with him having persuaded him to milder courses he went another way to work by practising with the Prelates of several Churches to end the matter in particular Councils Of these there was one held at Osroena another by Bachyllus Bishop of Corinth a third in Gaul by Irenaeus a fourth in Pontus a fifth in Rome a sixth in Palestine by Theophilus Bishop of Caesaria the Canons of all which were extant in Eusebius time and in all which it was concluded for the Sunday By means of these Syndical determinations the Asian Prelates by degrees let fall their rigour and yielded to the stronger and the surer side Yet waveringly and with some relapses till the great Council of Nice backed with the Authority of as great an Emperour setled it better than before none but some scattered Schismaticks now and then appearing that durst oppose the resolution of the that famous Synod So that you see that whether you look upon the day appointed for the Jewish sabbath or on the day appointed for the Jewish Passover the Lords day found it no small matter to obtain the victory And when it had prevailed so far that both the Feast of Easter was restrained unto it and that it had the honour of the Publick Meetings of the Congregation yet was not this I mean this last exclusively of all other days the former Sabbath the fourth and sixth days of the week having some share therein for a long time after as we shall see more plainly in the following Centuries But first to make an end of this this Century affords us three particular Writers that have made mention of this day First Justin Martyr who then lived in Rome doth thus relate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Apolog. 2. c. Vpon the Sunday all of us assemble in the Congregation as being that first day wherein God separating the light and darkness did create the World and Jesus Christ our Saviour rose again from the dead This for the day then for the service of the day he describes it thus Vpon the day called Sunday all that abide within the Cities or about the Fields do meet together in some place where the Records of the Apostles and writing of the Prophets as much as is appointed are read unto us The Reader having done the Priest or Prelate ministreth a word of Exhortation that we do imitate those good things which are there repeated Then standing up together we send up our prayers unto the Lord which ended there is delivered unto every one of us Bread and Wine with Water After all this the Priest or Prelate offers up our Prayers and Thanksgiving as much as in him is to God and all the people say Amen those of the richer sort 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every man as he would himself contributing something towards the relief of the poorer Brethren which after the Priest or Prelate was disposed amongst them A Form of service not much different from that in the Church of England save that we make the entrance unto our Liturgy with some preparatory prayers The rest consisting as we know of Psalms and several Readings of the Scriptures out of the Old Testament and the New the Epistles and the holy Gospel that done the Homily or Sermon followeth they offer twice next then Prayers and after that the Sacrament and then Prayers again the people being finally dismissed with a Benediction The second testimony of these times is that of Dionysius Bishop of Corinth who lived about 175 some nine years after Justin Martyr wrote his last Apology who in an Epistle unto Soter Pope of Rome doth relate it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb l. 4. c. 22. c. To day saith he we kept holy the Lords day wherein we read the Epistle which you writ unto us which we do always read for our instruction as also the first Epistle writ by Clemens Where note that not