probable Answer These words of Iohn after eight dayes Paralel places to this are Mark 8. 31. after 3. dayes idâ—est the third day and Ieâ— 25 12. when 70. yeares are accomplished i. e. in the seventieth yeare or as it is in the Geneva eight dayes after what do they intend more then if I should say Eight dayes hence I will doe such a thing Surely according to this propriety of speech the eighth day is the fittest to be understood So here after eight dayes is as much as if he had said after eight dayes were come or after the eighth day was come signifying thereby that it was the first day of the weeke and not the last And M Sprint pag. 138. observes that it is as if he should say The eighth day after by an Hebraisme quoteth further the like speech in Luke 2. 21 and 1. 59. which as I observed before from comparing the 1. and 19 verses of this Chapter he is câ—â—ious and sure not without cause to notifie unto us againe his Disciples were within c. Thus Eâ—tâ—nusâ— pag. 71. saith Parum obstat obiâ—ctioilla 〈…〉 The two Evang. speake of 6. daies and Luke 8. dayes after Six inclusive and eight exclusive non ipsoâ—â—ctavâ— esset sed non sâ—â—bsequente Obiectio inquâ—â— haeo parâ—â—â—alet quia vel Synechdochicè exponenda 〈◊〉 verba illa â—t alibi saepiuâ— in scriptura There are 6. dayes in the week and Sabbath and Sabbath make eight on the former Sabbath he appeared and the next succeeding sic â—t Luk. 2. 21. 〈…〉 Broad 3. 〈…〉 〈…〉 Supper in memory of his Passion and 3. of the Evangelists together with Saint Paul make mention thereof what the least shew of Scripture or reason can be alleadged where fore if Christ would have a day kept in memory of his resurrection he should not command so by word of mouth or commanding so the Evangelists should not commit it so to writing but leave us to picke out his meaning in such a sort Answer So in the instance that you gave even now from the expression of the Evang. Matt. 17. 1. After sixe dayes had it not been as easie for him and the rest to have said the seventh day if they had meant the seventh day as after six dayes But it seemeth had you been in those dayes a follower of Christ you would now and then have stopped before him and have given him occasion to have plucked you back with a Come behind me Or his councellor Then alwaies when the Iewes had asked a Miracle he should have shewed them one and not have suffered them to have gone so farre about as to finde their desire in the miracle of Ionâ—â— nor have bid the man carry his bed on the Sabbath but he should also have given satisfaction to the Iewes in the point nor have turned the water into wine after they had well drunken but withall he should have preached sobriety to them Doe you preach it to your selfe Indeed if there had been no footsteps nor grounds for this in the old Testament or that the Apostles had not had the assistance of the holy Ghost then it had been somwhat which you alleadge But as there is nothing so cleerely expressed but wrangling and perverse spirits will finde some matter of controversie thence so some things are left purposely to try mens spirits whether they delight more in sobriety or disturbance It seemeth you cannot satisfie your selfe with crying downe the fourth Commandement or old Sabbath but you would also perswade that the sanctifying of the Lords-day the day which as the Psalmist saith the Lord hath made for us to rejoyce and be glad in is against Christs will or at least not with his will when you say If Christ would have a day kept in memory of his resurrection c. Broad 2. The Apostles did not command us to sanctifie the Lords-day That the Apostles commanded us to sanctifie the Lords-day some goe about to prove 1. 1 Cor. 16. 2. Because Saint Paul ordained that upon the first day of the weeke collections should be made in the Churches of the Corinthians and the Galathians Answ. If they met usually upon the Lords-day it may seeme strange that Saint Paul had not rather ordained that a collection should have been made in the Congregation then that every one should lay by him in store at home as God had prospered him thus we would thinke that their benevolences would have been in greater readinesse But be it that they met every first day yet by whom this manner began is uncertaine They themselves will have it begun long before Saint Paul tooke this order about the Collection Further See D. Field of the Church booke 4. Chap. 20. Zanch. de red chap. 10. de trad Eccles. let Saint Paul be the author thereof yet every ordinance of an Apostle doth not bind us in these times yea this very ordinance doth not Were there the like collection to be made who would take himselfe to be bound every first day to lay up by him in store as God had prospered him Answer Certainly this Ordinance of Saint Paul doth wonderfully commend this day and argue the point in hand For first they were hereby prompted to give to the poore members of Christ as they had received from him a worke becoming an holy day and conducing to the pious hallowing thereof like as did those charitable cures which Christ wrought on the Sabbath-day If they met usually upon the Lords-day say you it may seeme strange c. Bishop White telleth you page 211 212. That although this Text of Saâ—nt Paul maketh no expresse mention of Church assemblies on this day yet because it was the custome of Christians and likewise it is a thing convenient to give almes upon the Church dayes It cannot well be gain-said but that in 〈◊〉 and Galatâ— the first day of every weeke was appointed to be the day for almes and charitable contributions The same was also the Christians weekely Holy-day for their religious assemblies Secondly it argueth their rest on 〈◊〉 day from the labours of the 〈◊〉 dayes with a recoâ—â—ection and thaâ—kefull calling to minde the blessing of God upon their foregoing week-day labours and what can there be more Sabbath-like D r. Heylyn parr 2. pag. 26. 〈…〉 prove this laying up to be appointed by 〈◊〉 on some Sabbath day or other and to a little before doth he labour to make then meeting at Troâ—â— to be on the Sabbath 〈◊〉 too and not on the first day of the weeke and yet pag. 27. he 〈…〉 Acts. That as concerning the Gentiles which beleeve we have written and determined that they observe no such thing as the Law of Moses whereof the Sabbath was a part saith he Now these things are very inconsistent That Paul should countenance the Sabbath even among the beleeving Gentiles at Troas and command this laying up thereon also to the Corinthians and Galatians and yet be
an opposer of the Sabbath and therefore it must needs be upon the first day of the weeke or Lords-day Again in the same place he quarrels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the 1 Cor. 16. 1. to intend the first day of the weeke under some authorities quoted to countenance his acceptation But Bishop White being in print before him might have given him better satisfaction saving that it seemeth he loves to vary who pag. 196. saith In the holy Gospel this day is styled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first day of the weeke following Matth. 28. 1. Mark 16. 2. Iohn 20. 1. likewise Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. Besides his quotation of sundry authors to confirme this translation which phrase is an Hebraisme thus to expresse the first day by one day and so used in the 1. Gen. and the word Sabbath for weeke Levit. 25. 8. Luke 18. 12. as M r. Sprint affirmeth pag. 101. And sure I am the same phrase is used by the Evangelists to signifie the day of Christs resurrection to be on the first day of the weeke Moreover pag. 211. Bishop White in positive tearmes upon the argument in hand saith That the Apostles themselves at some times observed the Lords-day and brings with a for it is written these very places to prove it Acts 20. 7. The first day of the weeke c. and 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. Concerning the gathering for this Saints even as I have ordained in the Churches of Galatia so do ye Every first day of the weeke c. In that you say Every Apostolicall Ordinance doth not bind I grant it if the Ordinance be circumstantiall proper either to times or persons it cannot be properly said to be cominon but if it have for substance a Morall Law for order a Prophecy for confirmation an Apostolique ordinance and example me thinks this might be very well allowed to be binding And all this is as hath been proved true of the Christian Sabbath Some ordinances I confesse there are of the Apostles that are not of perpetuall obligation for that they were done only occasionally and to an exemplary end for to authorize their successours the Governours of the Church to order things of an indifferent nature to the benefit of the Church all which things the Church had and hath authoritie as well occasionally to abolish as occasionally to institute but this Ordinance of the Sabbath is beyond the authoritie of the Church to abolish or alter as much as it is to adde or detract from the new Testament And therefore is it not of those sorts of Apostolique Ordinances which bind not in perpetuum For the foundation of it is so laid in Scripture as aforesaid as neither time nor authoritie can expire nor alter it Broad 2. Because the Disciples at Troas being come together to breake bread on the first day of the weeke Saint Paul preached to them Answ. Granting that the Disciples assembled every first day and also by Pauls own ordinance neither of which can be proved yet doth it not follow that they kept it Holy-day and abstained altogether from works of their Callings Saint Augustine saith Tom. 2. Epist. 118. that in some places they communicated every day and in others on the Sabbath and Lords-day Socrates saith Hist lib. 1. cap. 21. that in all Churches of Christians two excepted they communicated every Sabbath-day Sozomenus saith Lib. 7. cap. 19. that at Constantinople and almost in all other places they came together on the Sabbath and the day following that is the Lords-day yet no man I trust will hence inferre Certainly such as communicated every day did not keep every day Holy-day that these who met and received the Communion both on the Sabbath-day and the Lords-day kept them both Holy-dayes and forbare worke altogether Adâ—e that in likelyhood they came together at Troas late in the Evening about that time of the day Consider that many Christian servants had heathens to their Masters who would not suffer them to keep the Lord-day Holy-day Againe this had beene 2 meanes to bewray Christian Masters wherein Christ did institute the Sacrament otherwise Saint Pauls preaching till midnight should have been very long and this they might well doe though they kept it not Holy-day The Disciples at Troas assembled on the first day to breake bread ergo Saint Paul ordained that all Christians should assemble on that day to breake bread is a likelier inference then this ergo Saint Paul ordained that all Christians should keep that day Holy-day If any thing may be inforced from their meeting at Troas this may as well or rather better that the Lords Supper must be celebrated every first day Answer That on that day the Disciples abstained from the workes of their callings exercised on the other sixe I have even now more then probably proved by a just and proper deduction or collection from 1 Cor. 2. 16. I have also quoted the authority of Ignat ad Mag. and Aug. serm de temp 251. And is it probable that the lewes were to abstaine from workes on their remissest Holy-dayes and that we must make a worke-day or a mixed day of our Caâ—itallest And as for the time of the day when they metâ— though it might bee in the Morning for ought the Scripture saith to the contrary it is not so materiall to us to know considering the Natures of those Times It sufficeth that that was the only day being also paralel with consonant places of Scripture of the same nature that they imployed solemnely in their sacred affaires And if there were diverse observed as you say it was because for a time Christians were diverse consisting of Iewes and Gentiles As touching your conclusions whereby you argue hence rather the practice of the Sacrament then the Sabbath I answer That if it was an ordinance yet it was but temporary for from those words of Christ So often as ye shall â—at it the times of celebrating the Sacrament are at the disposition of the Church and it was in the Churches then occasionally celebrated for the Christian Sabbaths sake as a means of its sanctifying and not the Sabbath for its sake whereas the time of the Sabbath and Lords-day is by Precept and practise determined Broad 3. Because Saint Iohn telleth us that he was in the spirit on the Lords-day Answ. I acknowledge that whereas Christians in many places used to assemble on the first day of the weeke Christ hereby may seeme to approve of their meetings on this day and this is the most that can be gathered from Saint Iohns being in the spirit Now whereas from the name Lords-day some would inferre that therefore the Lord himselfe enjoyned it Let them consider that this name might well be given because that upon occasion of Christs Resurrection the Churches held their meetings therein Psal. 74. 8. The Synagogues in Canaan are called the Synagogues of God and yet we finde not that God
needfull for our instruction Seeing then we finde not mention of any such matter I cannot beleeve that Christ or his Apostles gave Commandement to sanctifie the Lords-day Obiect Every thing to be done by us is not mentioned in Scripture Answ. No marvell though some particulars be not mentioned but consider that were it â—ods expresse Commandement we should sanctifie a day this were a matter of great moment concerning all men and very often and therefore it may well seeme a wonder that Christ and his Apostles should be so silent herein as never to exhort any man to sanctifie the Sabbath or Lords-day nor to reprove any for the prophaning of either of them We see how often Moses and the Prophets called upon the Israelites to sanctifie the Sabbath and how often and earnestly many now cry out for the sanctifying of the Lords-day no man can be ignorant Obiect The Precept of the Sabbath was in force during Christs time yet Christ never moved the people to sanctifie the Sabbath nor reproved any for prophaning thereof Answ. Though it were then in force yet its strength began to weare a pace from the dayes of Iohn Baptist and therefore no marvell seeing the Sabbath and other Ceremonies were shortly to give up the ghost though Christ passeth them over as he doth contenting himselfe to preach the Kingdome of God which is not meat nor drinke nor times nor places but righteousnesse and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost Rom. 14. 2. Saint Luke taketh upon him to write the Acts of the Apostles and it were very strange that if any thing had been done by the Apostles concerning the changing of the Sabbath into the Lords-day he should wittingly omit such a weightie matter In the 15 Acts he giveth us to understand that after the Gospel was preached to the Gentiles some would have them to be circumcised and and keepe the Law of Moses one part of which Law was the sanctifying of the Sabbath or seventh day Hereupon the Apostles and Elders came together to consult at which meeting there was not one word that we find of changing or observing any day whatsoever although no doubt they which urged Circumoiâ—ion urged the Sabbath in like manner For Baptisme might serve In stead of Circumcision as well as the Lords-day in stead of the 〈◊〉 Had they befoâ—e made a Decâ—ee concerning the changing of the Sabbath into the Lords-day 〈…〉 just occasion was 〈…〉 same To handle the point and not to inâ—â—mate so much as any difference between daies if any there were had not beene wisdome in Paul especially writing to strangers the Romanes must needs have thought him contrary to their former teachers or if they had 〈…〉 something concerning this matter After this time it is not likely that the Apostles 〈◊〉 met together in Councellâ—gain 3. Had the 〈…〉 would have charged all men to observe the same Decrâ—ee 〈…〉 one man to esteeme of dayes one way and to another another way as he doth Rom. 14. 5. One man esteemeth one day above another another esteem th everyday alike Let every man be fully perswaded in his minde The Apostles I know used to beare for a time with the weake but they would not have born with those who held new and ungodly opinions as he did that esteemed every day alike if every day had not been alike He that esteemed every day alike no doubt used every day alike and had this been tolerable in any sort were it Gods Commandement to sanctifie any day This Chapter doth much trouble some in these dayes and they feare not to tearme him weake there after Saint Paul that esteemeth every day alike howsoever he be strong that esteemeth every meat alike But is he to be tearmed weake that esteemeth a day sanctified by God like unto all other dayes rather ignorant and ungodly would not Saint Paul presently have such an one instructed in this matter The weake brother esteemed one meat above another and one day above another the strong brother beleeved that he might eate all things and so esteemed every day alike according to Paul and it is good holding of Paul herein 4. Saint Paul alone by way of Doctrine teacheth of dayes Rom. 14. Col. 2. Gal. 4. he teacheth of them purposely in three severall Epistles in these he delivereth as much as is needfull to be taught about this matter And now all that can be gathered by his Doctrine is that there is no more account to be made of one day then of another Saint Pauls Doctrine saith M r. Fâ—x putteth no difference nor observation in times and dayes In the summe of Saint Pauls doctrine before Acts and Monuments It is a true saying and worthy of all men to be received In a word Christ and his Apostles never commanded to observe a day they never reproved for not observing Saint Paul reproved the Galathians for observing dayes and writing to the Romanes and Colossians he sheweth the indifferency of dayes as of meats speaking of one as of the other among these he had never been The Galathians turned from the Gospel he had preached to them so that he had diverse times just occasion to shew his minde fully in this point Yet doth he never so much as intimate the least difference between dayes or between dayes and meats Now what Christ or his Apostles could doe more to make us know that Religion is not placed in the observation of dayes I cannot imagine Answer I have in the introduction of this Treatise shewne you M r. Calvins opinion of the fourth Commandement Com. on Gen. 2. to be universall and perpetuall and how but by the succession of the first day of the weeke to the last Zanchy saith In 4. Pracept Morale est mandatum quatenus praecepit ut è septem diebus unum consecremus c. quatenus tale nunquam fuit abrogatum nec abrogari potest And yet if the fourth Commandement be not observed in the Lords-day it is abrogated The Book of Homilies maketh this good likewise of the divinum ius of the Lords-day as it is the seventh day from the fourth Commandement as hath been shewed before and so hath your objection been answered in respect of the peoples choosing the Lords-day by a reference to M r. Cleaver his Moralitie of the Law pag. 137. And now of this opinion am I. I have ever granted you that the Christian Sabbath is not by any expresse precept from Christ or his Apostles enjoyned nor is it needfull * Nay it had been prejudiciall as Eatonus observâ—th pag. 69. Novum praeceptum ferre dere illâ quae vâ—teri praecepâ—o stabilitâ— fuâ—rat esset vâ—tus praecâ—â—tum abolere quod â—â—ristus venit implâ—re to be due jure divino but forsooth the Sabbath must be jure humano for if upon this ground you will conclude it to be an arbitrary practise and not de iure divino * They can allow Tithes you may as well cry
down the writings of the Apostles and turne Anabaptist in point of baptizing of Infants For as for the Scriptures what expresse precept of Christs have we to his Apostles for writing of them and 〈◊〉 the Epistles were most of them occasionally written by the Apostles and yet who of us for these reasons denyeth them to be the work of God universall and 〈◊〉 diviâ—o Fâ—urth Poâ—ke Church châ—p 〈◊〉 For as Feild saith in answer to the Papists 〈◊〉 the imperfection of the Scriptures because they were written by the Apostles and Apostolicall men of their own motions and not by Commandement from Christ which is a paralel argument to this of the Christian Sabbath and the answer equall to both who knoweth not saith he that the Scriptures are not of any private motion but that the holy 〈◊〉 of God were moved impelled and carryed by the Spirit of truth thâ— the performance of this worke doing nothing without the instinct of the Spirit which was 〈◊〉 theâ— a Commandement And why may not all these reasons and grounds warrant and give equall force to their practice in the point of our Christian Sabbath or Lords-day as well as to their writing of Scripture So speaketh D r. Ames med pag. 359. Si dies bac dominica concedâ—â—ur fuisse Apostoâ—â—◠〈◊〉 author it as 〈…〉 est divina quia divino Spiritâ— agebantur Apostoli non minus in Sacris institutionibus quam in ipsa doctrina Evâ—ngelii vel verbo vel script is proponenda Especially seeing that the same things that accompanied the Gospel did accompany the Sabbath the better to approve it to be of God to wit The gift of the holy Ghost And now we know there is nothing more ordinary in Scripture then for God to grace the first institutions of his Ordinances with extraordinary tokens of his savour which are of an argumentative nature and of an establishing and instituting force As at the first setting up of the Sanâ—drin among the Iewes Numb 11. 25. Every one of the seventy Elders prophecyed for a while to testifie that their calling was from heaven And though divers others besides these have had the Spirit of Prophecy bestowed on them that yet nothing detracts from Gods sealing the ordination of this Councell or Sanedrin by the Seventies prophecying So though Christ appeared to his Disciples on other dayes besides the first day of the weeke yet it detracteth not from his instituting and authorizing that day by his remarkable apparitions and operations thereon as D r. Heylyn would insinuate part 2. pag. 13. Againe at the instituting of the Leviticall priesthood and sacrifices there came a fire from the Lord and consumed the burnt offering also at Christs baptizing we see how extraordinarily the Spirit came down in likenesse of a Dove and so at Peters first preaching to the Gentiles what an extraordinary worke was there wrought Acts 10. 44. And may not we well conclude the divinity of the Lords-day from these manifold rare occurrences which fell out in the practice or usage of it * We have Davids example in a like case for in the 1 Chron. 22. he there concludeth Ieruselem to be the place that God had chosen for his more solemne worship by that speciall token of Gods favour to it in delivering it from the destroying Angell and such as are most remarkably and eminently recorded in Scripture mentioning the Time as well as the things themselves As That Christ appeared to them on the first day of the weeke and the first day of the weeke they had the gifts of the Holy Ghost given them and on the Lords day Saint Iohn was ravished in the Spirit not any other day in the weeke having the honour to be denominated the day of his appearance in all the New Testament though no doubt he did appeare to them on other dayes of the weeke besides the first in those other times of his appearances And why is all this But to give the better authority and estimate to that day Which we may the rather judge because that since then God hath shewne extraordinary judgements upon the breakers and prophaners of it which being frequently and remarkably instanced I will referre you for them to the Martyr-booke Practice of Piety and M r. Richard Byfeild pag. 99. 100. 101. As also if we consider the benefits which nationally we have enjoyed therby above all other Protestant Churches of Peace Plenty and also powerfull Preaching and Professing * Which now begin to leave us and to decline together with the Sabbaths declension For as one piously observeth The Ark shaketh through the old Sinnes and new Doctrines of our land for a long season and which doe experimentally and personally redound to the due observers of it how extraordinarily and feelingly they delight themselves in the Lord according to that promise Isai. 58. ult So that then beleeve it for the works sake as Christ saith in another case And indeed Argumentum ab effectis is an argument of no small evidence and power with those that professe Christianity in the power of it The want of which medium in the experiences of men either not at all wrought in them or else not taken notice of by them is the cause of so many false conclusions in these dayes as well as it was amongst the Galathians till Paul a man of spirit put them in minde Gal. 3. 2. And observe it as a maine argument in this way of experience That at the first beginning of mens conversions when God enlighteneth and convinceth the Conscience commonly the first thing the Conscience fastens on is the mispending the Sabbath and the first duty that he conscionably putteth in practice upon his conversion is commonly the better sanctifying and keeping the Sabbath Now as touching the baptizing of Infants there is neither an expresse precept for it nor yet an example of expresse practise delivered in Scripture and yet the grounds causes and reasons of the necessity of that practice and the benefit or good that followeth on it are evidently contained in the Scripture and for this respect it is named a tradition But yet the grounds of it being in Scripture as Feild in the fore-quoted place observes it is not therefore a bare tradition but is therefore of Divine authority and unalterable in the Church of God The same in all respects holdeth good concerning the Sabbath and with some advantage for that there is the expresse practice of the Apostle Paul in this point mentioned in the Scripture which is not so in the baptizing of Children And this is apparant that those things which had their grounds and reasons in Scripture the Apostles were not curious or exact in commanding them expressely nor intreating of them largely except they were then controverted and scrupled at which it seemeth the Lords-day was not but was currantly received and practised among the Gentile converts the Infant Iewes being born withall for on that day they ordinarily were wont
Supposing that the number of seaven bee mysticall it followeth that wee are freed from it and not from the seaventh day onely for what have wee to doe with the Iewish darke mysteries in this cleare Sun-shine of the Gospell The weeke by this Doctrine should rather bee a mystery or shadow then the Sabbath for the Sabbath was but one day of the seaven as the first was or any other Indeed the Sabbath was the last of the seaven but what of that Saint Paul tearming the Sabbath a shadow joyneth it with the Holy-dayes and new Moones if now they will have the Sabbath be a shadow in regard it was the last of the weeke the New-moone maysome say was a shadow in regard it was the first of the Month and the holy-dayes in regard they fell at other times 3. If the number of seaven or last of seaven bee mysticall must it not bee so from the beginning And thus must the Sabbath bee a mystery or shadow from the first institution as all other shadowes were Secondly in respect of their strict rest but I know nothing of any moment God himselfe rested strictly for hee rested from all his works Gen. 2. 2. unlesse Gods example teacheth us to rest strictly it teacheth us nothing which they bring for proofe hereof and why of the strict rest and not of the whole Certainely wee shall rest wholly in Heaven And if the Sabbath was ceremoniall in respect of the strict rest then it seemeth hee that laboured all day or a good part thereof brake the morall part and so sinned Moreover the holy-dayes joyned with the Sabbath Col. 2. may seeme to want the ceremony seeing no such strict rest was in joyned in them as was shewed before Chap. 2. 3. in respect of the sacrifices offered therein Ans. First If sacrifices offered on such a day made the day a shadow then every day of the weeke was a shadow as well as the Sabbath for sacrifices were by the Law to bee offered every day Secondly Then shall wee have three Sacraments for the administration of the Lords supper is as well a part of sanctifying the Lords day as the offering of sacrifices was a part of sanctifying the Sabbath If then the sacrifices made the Sabbath a ceremony like to themselves the Lords supper maketh the Lords day a Sacrament like to it selfe also Thirdly If a ceremoniall duty enjoyned on the Sabbath made it partly ceremoniall a morall duty enjoyned on the holy-dayes made them partly morall And thus should the feast of Passeover bee partly morall as well as the Sabbath Answer I grant you that the Sabbath was a shadow or signification of the blessed rest to come and that not as it was a seaventh day * In respect of any mystery contained therein but as the seaventh day was a Sabbath But hence you would deduce a wrong conclusion that therefore it is as was the Iewish shadowes abrogative in the comming of Christ and that wee are not bound to darke mysteries say you in this cleare sun-shine Ans. Wee are not bound indeed to any mystery but to the duty contained in the number of seaven Yet to the signification of the Sabbath wee are bound which is not darke but cleare for so the Scripture hath made it to bee in the fourth Hebr. And although this Sabbath was shadowish yet was it neither of like nature with their other Sabbaths nor yet with other things whose signification reached to Heaven as well as it First I say it differed from other Sabbaths because it properly signified our rest in Heaven as wee see in the fourth Hebr. where it alone is mentioned and they properly our rest on earth by Christ and therefore were they so many and it but one and the same from the beginning to signifie that our rest here was to bee with manifold intermissions and in great variety Secondly I say it also differed from other things whose signification reached to Heaven as well as it For mostly they had a double signification the one proper and proximate as Iewish types signifying the rest and flourishing prosperity that the Church should have in the time of the Gospell the other Analogicall and remote intimating that in the end Heaven should bee the accomplishment of our Gospell graces and benefits like as in the mid way they were the accomplishment of their types and shadowes * For all the Iewish types being ordained for Christ must bee fulfilled in and by Christ in the time of grace which is his time of regiment by administring grace as now hee doth being our high Priest entered into the holy of holies with blood to make intercession for us and by compleating grace which hee shall doe hereafter when asking hee shall come in glory to set us at liberty from all our enemies in that great Iubilee when the day of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord and then after that wee have done our part and Christ his wee shall a compleate Adam in soule and body and cloathed with perfect innocency enter into our Masters everlasting rest and joy But the Sabbath had precedency of these having for its signification properly and adequately one rest in Heaven and the other abrogative Sabbaths subservient to it for the abrogative part as appeares by the significant difference of rest that was imposed upon them in the wildernes as I have else where observed more at large it being Catholicall and the Churches inheritance beginning with it and ending with it and they being that Churches inheritance in like manner receiving their beginning and ending with it If it bee objected that the Sabbath is as much fulfilled on earth as many other Iewish types for many of them have not their perfect signification accomplished here but in Heaven as the Iewish circumcision shall not bee perfected till wee bee in the Kingdome of Heaven and our everlasting rest hath its inchoation here in the soules of Gods elect what difference then Ans. The difference consisteth in the immediate object which the types primarily and principally eyed For the Iewish types primarily eyed the happy estate of the Church on Earth under the time of the Gospell thereby to invite and bring their soules into a Gospell state by beleeving so that though they are perfectly fulfilled in Heaven yet they are properly fulfilled on earth and secondarily or remotely its perfection in Heaven For the time of the Gospell was as I may say properly their Heaven as it may appeare in that it is said the Prophets and righteous men have desired to see to wit looking through their types and shadowes the things that you see c. Matth. 13. 17 these being their primary and proper object and as may appeare in the second place by the faultines of their covenant Hebr. 8. 7. and the faultlesnes of the Gospell covenant But this type of the Sabbath contrarywise primarily and principally eyed the happy estate of the Church in Heaven Hebr.
the Parliament sedente curia should alter the law or the King by a non obstante should for this cause publish an alteration or by his and the Courts example should change the day from Friday to Saturday in memory of that Deliverance Friday being made thereby rather a Day of Feasting then Fasting I thinke no wise man will say that the law was repealed or suffered any detriment by this So c. Christ came not to give new lawes but to renew the old upon a new condition and in this sense was it a new Commandement to love one another And thus is the Lords Day a renewed Sabbath not given as a new law but altered by example For ours is a new Sabbath as the Covenant is said to be a new Covenant which is only in exhibition not in substance For there was nothing but by the coming of Christ it was ground under one of these two wheeles either it suffered abrogation or qualification But the Sabbath suffered not abrogation Therefore Qualification And which was proper to Christ who though he came not to give new lawes yet he was to qualifie and renew the old upon Evangelicall tearmes Broad 2. Opinion By this first opinion though the fourth Commandement bindeth to keep the Sabbath yet not the seventh Day but others teach that it bindeth to keep the seventh day as heretofore it did Those have then to prove that the Lords-day is the seventh or last of the weeke Now how can they prove this They deale wisely herein for they have not the least shew of proofe Nay I know not any that hath so much as gone about it hitherto and to save their pains hereafter I would have them know that the Scriptures Fathers and Reason are against them in this matter 1. The Scriptures are against them for they terme the Lords-day the first of the weeke in two places Act. 20. 2 Cor. 16. It is imagined that Christ before his Ascension or the Apostles presently after commanded to keep the Lords-day for Sabbath which if Christ or his Apostles had done and it had been needfull that the Lords-day should be the seventh day Either the Sabbath was not so soone changed into the Lords-day or it was not then needfull that the Lords day should be the seventh day doubtlesse order should have been taken for this also and then Saint Paul would not have tearmed it the first of the weeke well-neere twentie yeeres after this time writing especially unto the Gentiles 2. The Fathers are against them for they tearmed Wednesday the fourth of the weeke Si dies observare non licet Origen Nicephorus have the like saying menses tempora annos nos quoque simile crimâ—n incurrimus quartum Sabbati observantes parascenem diem Dominicum c. Hieron in Gal. 4. 3. Reason is against them for if the Iews Sabbath untill the change were the seventh day how should the next day be the seventh also Consider that the name seventh hath reference to other dayes going before Either there must be once two seventh dayes together or there must be one monstrous weeke consisting of eight dayes or else one day must be in no weeke Answer It is not needfull to prove the Lords-day to be the last day of the weeke It is enough to hold correspondencie with the Commandement if we prove it to be the seventh day not in order but in number For though the Commandement bindeth perpetually to the number it was and is the present condition of the Church in regard of our benefit from God and Gods Covenant to us which bindeth us to the order first or last In which adjournment we as is requisite retain and observe the scope and equitie of the Commandement since God hath afforded us sixe dayes for the dispatch of our own businesses that we should willingly dedicate the seventh to his worship For the altering of the circumstance of time doth not abolish the substance of the Commandement This difference is evident and usuall in other matters as for instance It was one thing to have the Tridentine Councell translated to Bolonia and the ending of it was another thing So there is a difference between the adjourning of the last to the first and the dissolution of the Sabbath day And although the Sabbath be now the first day of the weeke in one respect to wit according to order yet it remaines still the last in another respect to wit as they are seven in number And that it was thus even in the Christians account the last as well as the first appeareth in the 1 Cor. 16. where Paul biddeth them that every first day of the weeke every one should contribute as God had prospered him to wit in the sixe fore-going work-dayes And as touching your reason I answer that every thing must have a time of institution and beginning Had God made Adam the first day then had he kept Gods seventh day Sabbath but God making him the sixth day and he being first to spend sixe dayes in one kinde of imployment and the seventh in another thereupon it is more then likely he was to keepe the thirteenth day from the first day of the Creation as his first Sabbath and not the fourteenth day as his second * Had Adam kept Gods seventh day Sabbath then had he kept a Sabbath in Innocency for it was instituted before his fall Againe if to be God did raine Mannah on the first day according to the computation of the Creation then they kept that seventh day Sabbath But if he did not begin to raine Mannah on that day but on some other in the weeke then was that computation broken and yet the Sabbath rightly kept So had Christ risen on the last day of the weeke but then had not Isaiah his prophecie been fulfilled 65. 17. then had we observed that day but the Sonne of man as you say being Lord of the Sabbath its fit the Sabbath should waite on him and not he on the Sabbath and therefore as he chose the first day to rise on as likewise the morning and not the evening to rise in so have we done well after Saint Pauls rule in imitating him as he imitated Christ in keeping the Lords-day Sabbath ever since which as I have noted before was not darkly prefigured in the keeping the first and seventh day in the time of the Passeover As like wise to being the Sabbath in the morning and not in the evening which yet cannot be done without some losse of time being that the Iewes Sabbath ended at the evening for if we change the day because of Christs resurrection and by Pauls example why not then the terminations of the day according to the time of Christs resurrection and example of Paul in his practice at Troâ—s I speake this as an argument against some that are of opinion the Sabbath still beginneth at evening as in the time of the Iewes and first
of his worship consist in the observation of times or places neither did Christ or his Apostles command us Christians to any day whatsoever yet this generall Commandement we have 1 Cor. 14. Let all things be done to edifying decently and in order yea and Nature teacheth that there should be Times and Places set apart for publike meetings as we see the Gentiles had by the very light of nature 2. This order to assemble on the Lords-day had his beginning in the time of the Apostles and was approved by them neither is there the least doubt to be made but that were Saint Paul now alive he would approve of it in like manner onely he would be much more earnest then I have been aâ— or can be to have all superstition cleere weeded out of mens minds After the Apostles time the succeeding churches observed the same order as partly appeareth by these sayings of Iustin Martyr and others before alleadged and thus it hath continued ever since and no doubt shall so continue to the second coming of Christ. Some of late have made it a question whether the Church may change the Lords-day into any other day of the weeke but in my judgement they might well have spared their pains therein for what can be imagined wherefore any Church should attempt such a matter unlesse it be to withdraw some from a superstitious conceit they have of the day Let this errour be reformed and there is no feare of a change Answer To this changing of the Lords-day into another I answer That as the order of the last day in the weeke was significant in the time of the Iewes So is the first day now as I have observed before and as therefore that was commanded so was this prophecyed by Isaiah * I have formerly shewne how both by Isaiah and David this was cleerly foretoâ—dand promised in the old Testament and accordingly practised in the new and therefore can no more be altered now without contradiction of divine authority then the other could in the time of the Iewes Except you can imagine God hereafter to bestow a benefit on us as much greater then our Redemption as our Redemption was then our Creation Besides the Church hath no liberty to alter any day the which hath a cleare ground and warrant in the word which the Christian Sabbath or Lords-day hath And moreover you say Christ is Lord of the Sabbath if so then sure the priviledge and authority of altering belongeth only to him Broad The Apostle Hebrews 13. giveth this charge Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves and againe Rom. 13. Wherefore ye must needs be subject not only for wrath but also for conscience sake Some peradventure hearing that God hath not immediately commanded us Christians to sanctifie the Lords-day as he did the Israelites to sanctifie the Sabbath will be ready to demand what need we then forbeare any worldly businesse on the Sunday for answer unto whom though unworthy of any let me also demand what need you repaire to the Church the place of prayer That you may so doe must we teach that God in expresse termes hath commanded to build Churches and in such places in every Parish Had these men lived in the time of the Law though they had forborne worke on the Sabbath yet certainly they would not have repaired to the Synagogues when they had been called they would have answered with Dathan and Abiram we will not come for God hath not bidden us come to such a place nor at such a time of the day Even in the time of the Law some things were lest to bee ordered by the Magistrate Should thy soâ—â—e being sent of thee into the field thinke with himselfe I need not goe for it is not written in the Scriptures that I should goe plow to day As God in generall termes hath charged thy sonne to obey his father so God in generall tearmes hath charged thee an inferiour to obey thy Governours both spirituall and temporall by whose joynt Commandement thou art bound to sanctifie the Lords-day and if thou wilfully breakest this double bond know that it is by the comming of another spirit upon thee then came upon Sampson heretofore even such a spirit as the man had that brake the yron chaines and setters in pieces Mark 5. Answer Pray you turne the point of this Argument into your owne breast and consider if the same authority which commandeth you to sanctifie the Lords-day doe not likewise in the Liturgy command you to pray for inablement to keep the fourth Commandement * Have a better nion of your 〈◊〉 then to think she wil command you to pray for that which you oâ—ght not to beleeve and practise but it sâ—emeth whosoever is in authority you will be supreme binding that authority that should rather bind you But if the authority be thus as you would make it in the hand of the Magistrate onely to appoint the time of Gods solemne worship and that the fourth Commandement is now of no force nor yet the prophecy or Apostolicke practice to bind us then you may say with Ames in his Medulla pag. 355. ut si ipsis videatur diem 〈◊〉 ex viginti aut triginta huic usui assignare non posint hoc nomine argui alicuius 〈…〉 aut scripturae Nay rather we may hence argue it as a fault in the Apostles and primitive times that they would take upon them of their authority to create so neere a semblance to the Sabbath and not rather an annuall remembrance of the Resuâ—â—ection and by an humane institution to shoulder out a divine one anâ— yet the substance thereof to wit the benefit of the Creation still remaineth to be remembred But it is strange that the Church should either assume this liberty or that we should give it to the Church 1. Seeing the fourth Commandement doth dictate to us both the proportion of time which we are to celebrate to God and the reason of that celebration the Time is the seventh day the reason is Gods resting from or consummating his greatest and beneficiallest worke which Christ the author and actor of the new Creation God and Man hath now fulfilled by his Resurrection and so pointed and appointed us the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the particular seventh day nothing dissenting from the Commandement nor destroying it but fulfilling and establishing it upon better tearmes 2. Seeing God commandeth to labour six dayes and to rest a seventh And Christ hath not exempted us from labouring in our calling to the end of our lives therfore a seventh day is to be kept for Sabbath weekly to the end of the world And it is not left in the power either of the Church or any humane authority doctrinally to shorten or enlarge this proportion of dayes for our labour and holy Rest or any way to abrogate or alter this Commandement Broad  Gal. 5. 13. For brethren ye