Selected quad for the lemma: saint_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
saint_n	act_n	paul_n	word_n	1,173	5	3.9014	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47791	God's Sabbath before, under the law and under the Gospel briefly vindicated from novell and heterodox assertions / by Hamon L'Estrange ...	L'Estrange, Hamon, 1605-1660.	1641 (1641)	Wing L1188; ESTC R14890	92,840	157

d Hence forward he must know his distance Comparisons Gentle Sir the Proverb saith are odious therefore this excursion might no disparagement to your discretion have been spared Yet hath your luxuriancy erred not more in civilitie then moralitie you impute this opinion to Beza as a device of his own which were it true yet your presumption exceedeth your knowledge for how I pray is it possible for you to be assured of this unlesse Beza had either mediately or immediately revealed it to you and if he did not you were very rash very ill advised to father it on him when as I have proved he might probably enough have derived the opinion from Origen or R. Abraham if not from others Junius e God gave Testimony of the Institution of the Sabbath by his own exemplary Rest and by Instituting it in the Church that Adam and Eve then living might acknowledge that day to be holy by the Ordinance of God Pareus f God sanctified the Sabbath in the very prime Creation and doubtlesse that sanctification was observed in the Patriarchall families I could tire both the Reader and my self should I amasse all foreiners whose suffrage hath been given for this Patriarchall Sabbath if any desireth further authorities I transmit him to Rivet or Waleus who can furnish him completely To come home and encounter Tostatus with one of our own in dignitie of Order a Bishop in that his Match and for learning so beyond him as if I might use your libertie of comparison I might say he is but another Didymus a mere scribbler to this man The beginning of the Sabbath saith he was in Paradise before there was any sinne and so before there needed any Saviour and so before there was any ceremony or figure of a Saviour I could produce Perkins Willet Babington Amesius c. all famous lights of our Church and that most incomparable piece the Practice of Pietie but because it will perhaps be thought that their affection was better then their judgement I forbear them and the rather because also our most Rationall adversaries begin to reel towards us Brerewood confesseth it to be instituted in Paradise which is as much as any ever affirmed for according to the Canonists Leges instituuntur cùm promulgantur Laws are then instituted when they are promulgated and though he explaineth himself afterward denying the commandment to be then instituted yet this he acknowledgeth that Gods resting from Creation his Sabbath and resting in himself the sanctification of it might be exemplary though not obligatory to men to observe the Sabbath then Nor doth a Prideaux vary much from him which is enough for if it be granted that Adam or the Patriarchs observed it we shall soon discover a command Having thus laid down the Arguments which support the Prolepsis and to every one fitted the proper solution having also set before you those reasons which most seem to advantage the Grammaticall sense and having with Authoritie encountred Authoritie I desire now nothing more then a neutrall Judge and that this difference may have the same decision which Aristippus b advised in another case Mitte ambas ad ignotos Let disinteressed Arbitratours end it And thus I have finished my first stage Gods Sabbath under the Law THe precedent discourse was spent in the discovery of a Sabbath before the Law a time for so much as concerneth Gods externall worship nearest allied to Varro's {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} or uncertain time before the Ogygian flood Our next station must be under the Law a time more enlightned with the ray of divine Story then the former yet is not the light even of this time so uniform so evenly diffused but that some opake parts are therein discerned For though we are not now as before at a losse for a Sabbath yet doth not the Sabbath we discern shew it self in so perfect lineaments and just proportion as excludeth all diversitie of opinion concerning it The questions indeed which relate to it are neither very numerous nor absolutely necessary to be discussed yet as they are by accident subservient to my ensuing tract an elucidation I must and will afford them according to that order wherein method disposeth them which I take to be this Some result from the precept some again from the practice from the precept Quis Quibus Quid. Quis Who gave the precept Who promulgated it And this question is not peculiar to the fourth precept distinctly taken but onely as it is a member of the decalogue whereof the question is especially made for controverted it is whether the ten Commandments were on mount Sinai promulgated by Gods immediate voyce or the ministery of his Angels or one or more And not unworthily for Moses seemeth to attribute it to God himself but Stephen Acts 7. vers. 38.53 and Paul Gal. 3.19 and Heb. 2.2 to the Angels in regard of which specious opposition eminent and famous men have been diversly inclined some to Moses are propense for these reasons First it is said Dixit Jehova Elohim God spake these words not an Angel create and though the word Elohim is once and but once applied to the Angels in the plurall but never in the singular number as Psalm 8. yet here it can have no such signification for the verb is Dixit and the pronoun Ego both singular Secondly the person speaking saith I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the land of Egypt but an Angel create did not deliver them out of Egypt Lastly Saint Paul himself saith that it was the voyce of Christ which shook the earth Heb. 12 26. Therefore where it is said Acts 7.38 that Moses was with the Angel in the wildernesse the word Angel must not be understood of an Angel create but of Christ who is often called both an Angel and God in similary places as Gen. 31. vers. 11 13. and 48.15 Exod. 3.2 in all which places the word Angel can mean no other person then Christ Thus farre a Zanchy but short still of the full solution For though Acts 7.38 the word is Angel in the singular number yet in the other place it is Angels in the plurall excluding utterly the application of it to Christ or any single person Where Zanchy brake off the explication is continued and supplied by the thrice-excellent b Junius who resolveth it thus At the delivering of the Law on Mount Sinai God was attended with many Millions of Angels so both the state and service of their Lord and the great businesse in hand required and from amidst this glorious host he spake unto the people {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} inter Angelos amidst the c Angels all the Angels being witnesses to the Covenant God proclaimed the Law so he interpreteth it a glosse rather new then absurd Others incline to Stephen and Paul and conceive that God did not utter the