THE JEWS SABBATH ANTIQUATED AND THE LORDS DAY INSTITUTED By DIVINE AUTHORITY OR The Change of the Sabbath from the Last to the First Day of the Week asserted and maintained by Scripture-Arguments and Testimonies of the Best Antiquity with a Refutation of sundry Objections raised against it The Sum of all Comprized in Seven Positions By EDM. WARREN Minister of the Gospel in COLCHESTER REV. 1.10 I was in the Spirit on the Lords Day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athanasius in Hom. de sement ad init Imprimatur EDM. CALAMY LONDON Printed by David Maxwel for W. Weekly of Ipswich and are to be sold by John Rothwel at the Fountain in Cheapside and also by Nath. Web and Will. Grantham at the Black Bear in Pauls Church-yard 1659. To the Right Worshipful JOHN GVRDON Esq Justice of Peace in the County of SUFFOLK HONOURED SIR THe design of this Dedication is not so much to shelter the ensuing Treatise under the protection of your name let it stand or fall at the bar of Scripture and right reason as to shew my real and unfeigned gratitude for the many and much-obliging favours you have been been pleased to heap upon me both while I lived under your roof and since my removal to a more publike station I thought thus with my self It is the first and likely to be the last time of my appearing in Print therefore the best and fittest season to signifie my due resentment of your love and friendship which from first to last since my acquaintance with you I have experienced so firm and constant as also to shew the precions esteem I still have of you and your pious Family which as I found so I left most religiously devoted to the practise of the truth here pleaded for the keeping holy of the Lords day the undoubted Christian Sabbath it is verily no small joy to me in these days of liberty and loosness to find any especially of your rank walking in this truth of Christ Go on dear Sir in this good old way of truth and holiness be you still a friend to this good day the Lords Day and the Lord will be a friend to you in in an evil day yea in that great day of his appearing Concerning which as Paul prayed for Onesiphorus and his houshold the Lord grant that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day so prays for you and yours The Unworthiest of Christs Ministers EDM. WARREN A Word by way of Preface to the Courteous Reader With a Word of Advice to my Christian Friends and Hearers in and about the Town of Colchester Good Reader I Shall not tire thy patience with any tedious Prefatory Discourse only hint a Word or two concerning the occasion of this Treatise with the Method observed in the composure of it about a year and half since or something more amidst that African brood of Erroneous Books which the lawless liberty of the Press has Midwiv'd into the world came forth a Treatise swelling as with a Timpany of vain glorious confidence for the Jews Saturday-Sabbath so no less opprobious contempt of the Lords day our Christian Sabbath The Author of it Mr. Tho. Tillam by Name by Profession an Anabaptist was pleased in Print to found a challenge and provoke me to the combat in answering of it It was some time before I was fully resolved what to do the sense of my own Insufficiency bespake my silence and willed me rather to sit still in obscurity than venture abroad to the view of a captious and quarrelsom World Besides my Pastoral charge and Preaching-work would scarce afford me that leisure which others of more natural promptness and dexterous parts and gifts might well enough spare for such an Imployment But on the other hand the spreading of this Jewish Leaven together with the pressing Importunity of some Christian Friends perswaded me to undertake this work which accordingly I did and after I had spent much time and written many sheets in answering this Author Page by Page I found his Method so confused his excursions so many his eructations of putrid choler and calumny so bitter that I had not the patience to follow him any longer in that wildgoose-chase but laid all aside and resolved upon a new Method namely to assert the Truth thetically in distinct Positions and answer his most material Arguments as Objections against it He would fain perswade silly people That Antichrist changed the Sabbath and goes about to prove it from Dan. 7. where we read of a little horn that thought to change Times and Laws and with this little horn he makes a loud noise up and down his Book But who told him that this horn was Antichrist Our best Expositors take it to be meant of Antiochus Epiphanes and indeed Dan. 8. cleerly proves it But what desperate insolency is this to take the crown of Christ and set it upon the head of Antichrist Is not the change of the Jewish Law attributed to Christ Hebr. 7.12 and did he not also change their times and seasons of worship was their weekly Sabbath exempted I pray where or how not by the fourth Commandement for we have proved that the seventh day from the Creation was never the substance of that precept nor by any clause in the New Testament for there it is rather repealed 'T is true the Moral duty of rest remains still in a holy day of weekly recourse according to the Commandment but the old Sabbath being of a shadowy nature in the after observation if not in the first Institution of it is certainly done away by Christ the substance of all Legal shadows yet not simply but in way of exchange for a new day of the same number though not of the same shadowy nature What I have argued for the change of the day is sufficiently authorized by the Scriptures the Fathers and our own judicious Divines My Arguments are but few in number more might have been added but for oppressing the Reader 's either purse or patience Mr. Cawdrey and Mr. Palmer have largely handled what I have but briefly touched If what I have written be answered with scurrilous gibes and railing Rhetorick as Mr. Jenisons Book was My next answer shall be nothing but silence and contempt which I the rather hint because the Adversary has threatned a Reply before he read my Book right or wrong it seems he is resolved to have the last word for which I purpose never to contend If I know my own heart 't is truth not triumph that I seek and thirst after truth I say grounded upon the Scriptures sealed with the blood of Martyrs attested by the Primitive Fathers and maintained by the pens of the most Reformed Writers such is the truth here asserted and I shall own nothing as an Answer to it but that which fully answers all these Now my Christian Friends and Brethren I beseech you love and live this truth stand to it stand for it and stand in it
to follow our worldly imployments worldly labour and the sweat of the brow has too much of the curse in it to consist with a day of thanksgiving or holy rejoycing in the Lord. The Scripture frequently calls festival dayes Sabbaths and if Sabbath be a sit name for other dayes of the same nature Why not for this And therefore I cannot but wonder that T.T. who grants the Lords day to be a day of rejoycing according to that of the Psalmist Let us rejoyce and be glad therein should deny it to be a Sabbath or a day of holy rest as he wickedly and profanely doth calling a mans Sabbath discovering his enmity against the thing by carping at the name yea condemning of it why has he the face to call the Jewish festivals Sabbaths or dayes of rest as being either fasting dayes or feasting dayes and yet deny the Lords day this titular honour Inenaem Phil. p. 74. Is it a day of less account then the Passeover day Pentecost day Expiation day and other Ceremonial dayes which the Scripture terms Sabbaths How suitable is a name of rest to a day of rest as the Lords day is Nay I have already proved that it is greater then these yea greater then the old Sabbath it self therefore sure its a day of rest as shall be farther proved in the close of this Treatise And if this be a day of holy rest it is as much intended in these words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it as ever the Jewes Sabbath was But the seventh day was Sabbath day when the Law was given Obj. therefore it is to be understood of that day and none but that You may as well say Answ the fifth Commandment Honour thy father and mother is to be understood of such particular parents as were then living and none but them And then the Quakers will have a fine plea for their barbarous rudeness and unmannerly behaviour towards superiours Tell them of honouring their parents that 's a wilderness-duty may they say it intended only the Israelites parents now t is a dead letter and out of date As simple and sottish a plea as this would be yet it is no better to say the fourth Commandment intended only the Jews Sabbath and the old seventh day because that was only in being when the precept was given Alas that was meerly occasional and accidental to the Commmandment not at all of the essence or substance of it True that was the only weekly Sabbath then but it was not alwayes so to be as the event hath proved But the truth is this first clause Remember the Sabath day to keep it holy did directly point at no peculiar day more then another but being the law of nature it only requires a day of rest in general to be sanctified to wit what day soever it fall upon And this is very considerable since in the judgment of all the learned and godly Deut. 5.12 the prime morality and main substance of the Commandment lies in this clause And hence it is observed that Moses in the repetition of the Law inserts this memorable parenthesis when he had said See Mr. Shepheard Thes 122 and Dr. Twiss Sect. 6. Keep the Sabbath day to sanctifie it immediately he addes these words as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee between the preceptive and the following parts intimating that the substance of the command lies mainly though not only here Well a day of rest must be sanctified sometimes * Natura dictat aliquan to vacuam quieti diem Gerson the light of nature teaches it and the law of God requires it But the next question will be in what proportion and number of dayes it must be stated how seldome or how often it must return If this be left to mans determination there will be nothing but confusion superstition or irreligion One man perhaps will contend that one day in a * As the eighth day of every moneth was observed by the Grecians and the ninth day by the Romans Plutarch in vita Thes Macrobius Saturn lib. 1. c. 16. moneth is sufficient another a little more devout will say nay it must be once a fortnight at least a third with T.T. will run into another Ebionitish extreem and exact two dayes in a week though he bear little good will to one of them Well to end the strife we must consult the Divine oracle to the law and to the testimony have recourse to the Commandment in the second part of it 2. The Directive part in these words six dayes shalt thou labour but the seventh day is the Sabbath to the Lord thy God as if the Lord had said Your Sabbath shall be once a week or one day in seven at my appointment this agrees best with the order of the precept The law of nature being setled in the first clause that a day of rest must sometimes be kept and kept holy the very next scruple is about the number how often it must be kept whether once a quarter or once a moneth or once a week The order whether it shall be the first or last day of such a number is not the next inquiry in all reason the number and proportion must first be stated For the order presupposes the number the moneth must be agreed upon before the day of the moneth and the week before such a day of the week And accordingly this positive directory is given us to point out the number principally Six dayes shalt thou labour but a seventh day is the Sabbath that is your Sabbath shall be neither a daily nor a monethly nor a yearly but a weekly Sabbath The Phrase is exclusive as one observes implying thus much thou art not to keep the sixth day or one of six Dies septimus ipse unus est dierum qui omnes septem sunt August de Oen. ad lit l. 4. c. 18. or the tenth day or one of ten but the seventh day that is one of seven or one in a week The terme seventh is opposed to all other numbers either ninth tenth or twentieth as also to the six working-dayes which clearly intend such a number as six in seven and so the seventh day is as much as one in seven Six dayes shalt thou labour but a seventh day is the Sabbath a seventh what seventh pray note it the Lord sayes not the seventh from the Creation he nameth no day if he had the law had been limitted to that day but because the law-giver intended to chuse a new day and not to change his old law you see he has left it in large and general terms neither can it be restrained to one day more then to another To make it plain by a similitude or two Suppose a rich man who has seven Lambs in a way of unusual bounty make such a proposal as this to his poor neighbour I will freely give you six of them upon condition you keep
or perpetual precept unless from the fourth Commandment Gen. 2. is not plain and direct Exod. 16.15 no perpetual precept The Old Testament affords no other but the fourth Commandment for one day in seven as direct Alter Gods proportion which way you will and religion will be substantially damnified by it but no such damage arises from the change of the particular day for another and a better since God and the soul have the same proportion still one day in seven though the old seventh day be displaced Therefore I conclude the proportion and not the particular day is directly determined in this moral and perpetual law for elsewhere it is not As for the particular day whether first or last of seven it falls under the proportion as having a seventh part of time appointed falling upon it and no otherwise But I might have spared this argument for the term seventh day is large enough in it self since it is not said the seventh day from the Creation or any other period or date of time but seventh day in general And what high presumption is it in T.T. to restrain the word seventh where no reason doth constrain What 's this but to limit the holy one of Israel Isalm 119.96 to clip the wings of Gods Commandment and narrow it up to his own notion when the Commandment in it self is exceeding broad but to proceed 3. Let us consult the argumentative part of the precept viz. that which contains the principal argument and reason to inforce the Sabbaths observation and that is Gods example in these words for in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the seventh day as if the Lord had said the reason why I would have you observe the forementioned proportion of weekly time six dayes for labour and a seventh for rest is this because I my self kept this proportion in the beginning of time working six dayes and resting but one in seven Note it well Gods example is not propounded as an argument for the seventh day from Creation directly but more generally for a seventh day in proportion For the example can intend no more then the foregoing clause of which it is brought as a reason and that is no more but one day in seven directly not appropriated to any particular day as we proved before But that special seventh day is intimated in Gods exampie Obj. for God not only rested one day in seven but the last of seven and the seventh from Creation What then Answ Does it therefore unavoidably follow that we must observe the same day the same singular seventh day we cannot observe for that is past and gone therefore it must be such a seventh day in likeness and correspondency to that and why not such a seventh in number or one in seven as well as such as seventh for order or the last of seven If you say the last of seven is intended in the argument of Gods example I answer every circumstance in an argument is not argumentative and although that day be intimated in the example yet it is not so much argumentatively as historically propounded An example is not to be necessarily imitated in every circumstance of it I will make it plain by a parallel and pertinent instance I hope you will grant that we are as much bound to imitate the example of Christ in the celebration of the supper as the example of God the Father in the observation of the Sabbath we have a plain command for it Do this in remembrance of me What then does it therefore follow that we are tyed to the same night in which Christ was betrayed For this is mentioned in the words of institution and that expresly 1 Cor. 11.23 I have received of the Lord that which I also delivered unto you that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed tock bread c. Mark it here is Christs institution and example recommended to us as a rule to guide our practise and in the proposal of his example not only the season in the night but also the punctual circumstance of it the same night in which he was betrayed is set down what followes from hence Is this a good argument for Easter-Communions Haec verba historic am tantummodò relationem nequaquam verò determinatum de tempore mandatum continent Gerar. de S. C Loo Com. p. 536. ot after supper-Sacraments No such matter for these circumstances are but historically in timated not argumentatively propounded yet this I must needs say we may as well argue for sacrament-celebration the same night in which Christ was betrayed and no other as for Sabbath-observation the same day in which God rested and no other However If any one ask why we continue the name of the Lords supper and not the time we answer 1. Because we keep it as the Lords supper not our own supper It retains the name from the first administration 2. Because we celebrate it in the evening though not of the day this is argumentum ad hominem For T.T. is a great stickler for night-celebration of the supper and frequently tells us in his book That Antic hrist changed the Lords supper-time as well as the Lords Sabbath-time And I think as much the one as the other But by the way let me tell him that in arguing for the night from Christs example See Mr. Phil Goodwin Evening Communicant ad finem he runs himself upon an inevitable necessity of concluding for the same night in which Christ was betrayed or else his argument runs a ground and concludes just nothing for the same night as well as the night is put into the words of institution Although I judg that neither the one nor the other is obligatory because both were occasional Christ instituted the supper in the evening indeed because it was immediately to succeed the Passeover which was an evening ordinance and the same evening or night in which he was betrayed because the next day he was to suffer Both these were occasional and therefore neither of them perpetual and besides we may well conceive that our Lord did this in the evening and after the Passeover to signifie the abolishing both of the passeover and the evening and to leave the time free to his Church ever after as a late Writer has judiciously observed Let not the Reader call this a digression Non est ociosum quia non infructuosum loqua citas nulla in aedificatione turpis Tertull. de patientia for there is properly no digression in that which may conduce to edification neither is it impertinent as long as it is not unprofitable But to return to our argument suppose the old seventh day were indirectly and circumstantially commended to the Jews by Gods example yet it followes not that the same day is still in force to us because circumstantials in a moral law as we said before are changeable without any change in the
equal to a A Jove principium begin with God b Supervacua necessariis post-ponenda sunt Senec. ep 49. and give the precedency to things most necessary and grace both not gain-say it but rather approve it for is it not most reasonable that I should serve my gracious Lord in the duties of his worship because I serve my self in the works of my calling But the truth is Gods example is neither directly for first or last of seven but for one in seven perpetually The force of Gods argument lies in this that we should dedicate one day in seven to rest for six working dayes indulged to our selves And herein we imitate Gods example in labouring six dayes and resting one in seven weekly For farther satisfaction in this argument let the ingenuous Reader consult Mr. Cawdrey and Mr. White of Dorch two burning and shining Lights who have gone before me if any little spark be here added let the Father of lights have all the glory 4. And lastly let us come to that which for memories-sake I call the benedictive part of the Commandment wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. observe the phrase not seventh day but Sabbath day or day of rest is blessed The Commandment both opens and shuts begins and ends with the term Sabbath day not seventh day Certainly if the foregoing argument drawn from Gods example had intended only the seventh day from Creation this conclusion flowing from that argument had fallen upon that day also but we see the term is evidently changed that we may not mistake Gods meaning by a supposed strictness in the term seventh day see how the Lord condescends to our weakness writing Sabbath day or day of rest instead of seventh day The Word Abbath like a finger points both forward and backward directiug us how to expound the whole precept in a large and not in a limited sense Doubtless if the Lord God had intended to tye up his Church in all ages to the seventh day from the Creation he would have fixed the command upon that day only especially in the conclusion of it why should not that precise day be mentioned here as well as in the Institution Gen. 2. There he is said to bless and sanctifie the seventh day here only the Sabbath day a more probable reason to me is not imaginable then this the Commandment is of a larger extent then the Institution And besides the Institution of the old day Gen. 2. was but temporary and mutable whereas the precept it self is more and perpetual see then how wisely the Lord our Law-giver has contrived it that it should not be restrained to that particular seventh day To conclude with this conclusion the whole weight and stress of the Commandment you see leans upon large and general terms the Preceptive part is for a day of rest in general the Benedictive part is of the same latitude and although the seventh day be placed in the middle betwixt both yet it is not fixed upon one day more then another unless it be occasionally which indeed is no fixure at all what hinders therefore but the whole substance of the precept may stand in the fall of the day since it was never incorporated into the moral substance of this or any other command It is I must needs say a truth to me as evident as the light it self that the fourth Commandment in all the substantials of it makes as much for the Lords day being one in seven of Gods appointment as ever it did for the old Sabbath And here I cannot sufficiently admire and adore the depth of Divine wisdome that the ever glorious God foreseeing and foreappointing the change of the day took care to contrive and pen the commandment in such expressions as might aptly suite the old day while it lasted and as equally sort with the new now it is substituted in the roome of the old That the Jewes upon the discovery of so happy a change might not loath their old Sabbath the precept was occasionally and circumstantially fitted to that and that we Christians having a new might not be limited to the old it is substantially adapted to this I shall need add no more if men did not wilfully wink I should thinke here were light enough in this Lamp of the Law to convince them As for the adversaries objections scattered here and there in his book they vanish like so many vapours before the Sun being brought forth and tryed by the evidence of this truth To assert the whole Lawes morality T.T. Obj. 1. p. 14. Answ and yet plead the Sabbaths mutability scarce savours of rationality These are fine words but feeble arguments and indeed his book is full of them But to answer his Jingle if by Sabbath he mean the seventh day from Creation what irrationality is it to plead the mutability of that day and yet hold the morality of the Law Since that day was never a tittle of the Lawes morality Neither can he affirm it without gross absurdity prove it I am sure he cannot by all his sophistry If God by a positive moral law bind all men in all ages to such a particular day as himself appointed Obj. 2 p. 119. then either they must prove that God hath made his moral law mutable by appointing some other day or else restore the seventh day-Sabbath What pitiful chopt Logick is this Ans Why can the particular day be no where appointed but in the moral law his not he himself often affirmed that it was instituted elsewhere And must the moral law needs go to wrack when a new day is appointed Let him first prove that the old day was any essential part of the moral law till I see that I may safely affirm that in the change of the day as an occasional circumstance the substance of the law remains unchangeable as a man may change his old clothes for new yea and alter his temperament too and yet be still the same man as long as for substance he has the same soul and body Some do assert but not for want of ignorance that t is not that special seventh day Obj. 3 pa. 47. but a seventh day that is injoyned whereas we have not only the pattern in the mount namely the precise time of Gods rest to point out the day but to end all cavil he points twice in the Commandment to that very day on which he rested by the Emphatical demonstrative particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that 't is not a seventh but Hashebigni the seventh day therefore they had need make sure of a very clear word for the change of the day for fear of being left speechless at the day of Judgment And so he runs on to th end of the page spinning a large web but when all comes to all it is but a cobweb we shall sweep it down by degrees And If by the assertours of the forementioned truth Answ 1 he mean
for that which nature informed by a written word judges most agreeable to moral and religious equity so we may grant it we also affirme that a seventh part of time must be perpetually devoted to God from week to week that is one part of seven Neither did this proportion receive any interruption by the change of the day for the Jewes Sabbath being in use while Christ lay in the grave was the seventh part of time for the week going before the resurrection and the Lords day was the seventh part of time for the weeke following the resurrection what inconvenience in all this Answ 2 If by the seventh part of time simply considered he will needs understend the last of seven in order he must first convince us that this is the morality of the Commandment which if by working miracles in Logick and Divinity he can do yet it will at no hand follow that the altering or adjourning of this proportion from the last to the first day of the week was any violation of the precepts morality In this case as one sayes alteration is no dissolution no more then to adjourn the Parliament to another time is to dissolve the Parliament Besides an extraordinary case can be no violation of an ordinary rule As the Suns standing still in Joshuahs and going back in Hezekiahs time which did undoubtedly alter the setled course of time for man had more then six parts and God had less then simply a seventh part of time for those two weeks yet being extroardinary cases they were no infringment of that ordinary standing rule for a seventh part of time from week to week So here supposing some variation in the ordinary course of time at the first change of the day yet being by a person extraordinary the Lord of glory who made the law and is above the law as also upon an occasion extraordinary his resurrection from the dead who would dare to say as this objectour does that the morality of the law was hereby destroyed Whereas he further suggests That if the Sabbath were translated to the eighth or first day Answ 3 This was T. Brabourns Objection p. 178. then seven dayes must pass without any one Sabbath it is already answered there is not the least necessity of that for as the Paschal supper was in use till the Gospel-supper was instituted so was the old Sabbath till the Lords days was consecrated by the Lords resurrection Hence the holy women are commended for keeping it Luk. 23.56 they were as one sayes commended for keeping the Jews Sabbath before Christs resurrection Note that but never were any commended for keeping it after his resurrection Hitherto therefore it appears what feeble unjoynted unsinnewed shadows of arguments this Author pleases himself and perverts the simple withall Neither Is there any strength in that which comes up in the rear Answ 4 that whoever should keep the old seventh day and the first day of the week at the change of the day he must keep two Sabbaths within the circuit of seven dayes What then as long as these two Sabbaths fell in two several weeks this brake no squares in the morality of the law for the Commandment is only for one day of seven in the circle of every week Levir 23.15 Deut. 16.9 Luk. 18.12 Hence the Sabbath being the boundary of weekly time is sometimes termed week intimating that as it was ever a seventh day Sabbath so also a weekly Sabbath one day in a week and but one in a week ordinarily And this rule was exactly kept in the change of the day for as there were two Sabbaths so two distinct weeks in which the forementioned proportion of six dayes for work and one for rest was punctually observed In a word the supposed disorder objected against the change of the day is but a dart flung against heaven a cavil raised against Christ and his blessed Apostles who were well enough able to answer it and so are we also building upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Ephes 2.20 and Jesus Christ the chief corner-stone who when he was made the head of the corner did crown the Resurrection-day above all other dayes intimating as much by an illustrious Prophet Psalm 118.24 and expounding it by his inspired Apostles both in their doctrine Acts 4.11 and their practise Acts 20.7 so that the Lords day having Christ himself for its corner-stone Prophets and Apostles for its foundation we may look upon all objections of this nature as groundless and graceless cavillations which like proud waves dashing against the rock dissipate themselves with their own fury Mark 2.28 Sure we are that the Lord Jesus being Lord of the Sabbath had power to change it and in the change it was fit the Sabbath should waite upon him who was Lord of it not he upon it And if the order or constituted course of time received some small interruption for once by the change of the day yet it was no more then what had happened twice before viz. upon the standing still and going back of the Sun Joshu 10.13 Isai 38.8 far less events then the glorious shining forth of the Sun of righteousness after a three dayes eclipse in the chambers of death He has but one discharge more against the truth and then all his powder is spent to no purpose He charges our doctrine with a gross absurdity as thus Obj. 6 p. 116. That we render Gods reason of Janctifiing-the Sabbath in this wise for in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the first day Wherefore the Lord blessed the first day for his Sabbath and sanctified it But we answer Answ this pretended absurdity is a meer calumny we are not so destitute of reason as to render Gods reason in such a mishapen form we only argue thus that we must sanctifie one day in seven because God did so As for the particular day whether first or last of seven we ground it not directly either upon the precept or example of God but we say it is instituted elsewhere And when we have found the institution or designation of the Lords day somewhere else as shortly we shall we only go to the Commandment as a rule for the observation of it and accordingly we urge conscience with Gods example not as directly pointing out the day for so it was never intended but as perswading us to such a proportion one day in seven of his own appointment And therefore we reject all his lame consequences That unless we will cast this absurdity upon God we must cast off the fourth Commandment at least the reason of it must be rejected c. These are his own coined suppositions our conclusions are nothing akin to these wild inferences as any man may see that has but half an eye in this controversie As for those popular passages up and down his book That if the day be changed more then a tittle of
the Sabbaths here specified were a shadow of things to come whereas the Lords day as one well observes is only a memorial of something past to wit the glorious resurrection of Jesus Christ So that to argue from hence against all difference of dayes under the Gospel as the old Anabaptists and Familists do is evidently to stretch the Text beyond the stapse But to urge it against all the Jewes Holy-dayes their weekly Sabbath and all is not at all to force it For First The Apostle seemes to speak distinctly and distributively enumerating the several sorts of dayes in observation among the Jewes Holy-day New moons Sabbaths and the gradation from yeerly holy-dayes to monthly new Moons and from them to weekly Sabbaths is visible enough to such as are not blinded with prejudice See Mr. Shepheard Thes 20. part 2. Secondly The plural term Sabbaths is usually put for the singular the Sabbath or seventh day now under dispute Yea I cannot find any one Text in all the new Testament where it is applied in the same number to any other day or Sabbath but the old seventh-day-Sabbath * Math. 12.1.5.10.12 Mark 1.21 ch 2 24. ch 3. v. 2. Lu. 4.31 ch 13 v. 10. Acts 13 14. in all these Texts t is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Seven or eight times the same word as it is here set down in the plural number is used for that old weekly Sabbath and not so much as once for any yearly Sabbath therefore inall reason that precise weekly Sabbath must be here I willnot say in cluded only but principally intended Thirdly * 2 Kin. 4.23 even in the old Testament where ever New Moons and Sabbaths go coupled together unless the phrase be figurative 1 Chro. 23.31 2 Cron. 1.4 ch 8.13 ch 31 v. 3. Nehem. 10.33 Ezek. 45.17 Hos 2.11 Amos 8.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in Isai 66.23 the Jews weekly Sabbath is denoted by it as appears by those several Scriptures cited in the margin in most of which their annual Sabbaths are excepted and distinguished by another name scil Feasts to which answers the words holy-day in this place Colos 2.16 For indeed the word in the original fignifies a feast or festival day Thus let Scripture expound Scripture and truth will be truth in spight of errour take the whole sentence together holy-day new Moon Sabhaths and if it be an Old Testament-phrase it alwayes implies the old seventh day-Sabbath or take the words Sabbaths singly by it self and if it be a New Testament-term as 't is like it is it ever I think I may truely say ever signifies the same seventh day unless when it is put for the week which here it cannot be The conclusion then is undeniable that the Jews seventh day Sabbath was a shadowy Sabbath and therefore it cannot be our Christian Sabbath for what have we to do with shadowes under the Sun-shine of the Gospel under the clear and bright discoveries of Christ 2 Cor. 3.18 when we may with open face as in a glass behold the glory of the Lord. Oh that the spirit of truth would take away that vail that lies upon the hearts of men that vail of errour and darkness which keeps out the light of this truth for a truth it is a plain truth as plain as Scripture can make it that the Sabbaths here mentioned were a shadow of things to come and I have made it evident that the old Sabbath as to the day is here chiefly intended it is not necessary that I should trouble the Reader to tell him my judgment what kind of shadow it was or what was shadowed by it in particular whether Christs rest that day full and whole in the grave or his rest the next day from the grave or a believers rest in Christ a compleat Saviour But this is certain a shadow it was of which something in Christ was the body and the body being come the shadow must be gone And so I might proceed to another argument but I must first remove some objections wherewith the Adversary has indeavoured to block up our way But all in vain First he tells us T.T. Obj. 1. p. 23.24 25. 't is evident at first sight that only such Sabbaths are ceased as were shadows of good things to come but the seventh day was never such a Sabbath A sign indeed of good things past and present it was but never termed a shadow of things to come This proceeds upon his accustomed fallacy Answ petitio principij a begging of the thing in question for he would make us believe that the old seventh day was none of the Sabbaths here intended which if we deny as we do then he has lost his conclusion for in this very Text it is termed a shadow of things to come what if we grant it a sign of something past so were the annual Sabbaths as he calls them Passeover Pentecost c. the one of their preservation in Egypt the other of the giving of Gods law yet both shadowes of things to come or else the Apostle was much mistaken The blessed Spirit by two other terms declares clearly what Sabbaths are ceased Ob. 2 1. Such as were against us 2. Contrary to us and such were those annual Sabbaths requiring great labour and travel in coming three times a year from all parts to Jerusalem the seventh day-Sabbath was never in the least against us nor contrary to us unless so far as we are against God and contrary to him as 't is elsewhere added 'T is very questionable Answ 1 whether these three annual Festivals Passeover Pentecost and the feast of Tabernacles be ever termed Sabbaths in Scripture indeed the Sabbatical years as every seventh year and every fiftieth year ae five or six times termed a Levit. 25.8 c. 26.34 35 43. Sabbaths 2 Chron. 36.21 but the Jews themselves could never say these were against them or contrary tot hem the one being a year of rest to their lands the other a year of release to their servants The weekly Sabbath or seventh day directly intended in the fourth Commandment I grant is nto againt us Answ 2 neither are we against it we own it we observe it and shall do I trust till we enjoy our everlasting Sabbath in Heaven But The seventh-day-Sabbath imposed upon the Jews or rather the hand-writing of Ordinances not Gods hand-writing but Moses hand writing was in some sense against us Gentiles and contrary to us as it was a piece of that old partition-wall which separated the Jewes from the Gentiles and occasioned b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Compare Col. 2.14 with Ephes 2.14 15 16. See the Dutch Annot. enmity between them that such a division or partition-wall there was we read in Ephes 2. whereby the Jews and Gentiles were parted and shut up as it were one from another that there was no correspondency between them and the symboll of this
grave But a word with you Sir did the Lord Jesus indeed enter into that rest of the grave the seventh day of the week why then it seems he rose again from the dead the second day and rested but two dayes and two nights in the grave and had he not need be greater then an Angel that shall take upon him to coine such new Creeds and preach such new Gospels for sear of the Apostles d Gal. 1.7 8. Anathema To salve this he tells us p. 145. that our Saviours body was laid to rest in the Sepulchre in the close of the sixth day Very good Why then does he say in the next page that he entred into this rest on the seventh day Thus at once he contradicts both himself and the Scriptures But to conclude this author has little reason to vaunt and glory as he does in this new invention For to make Christs rest in the grave a ground of the weekly Sabbath is neither proper in respect of the thing nor proportionable in respect of the time For the thing it self how altogether improper and incongruous is it to keep a weekly festival in memory of our Saviours Funeral to make that day a day of rejoycing which was rather a day of mourning For so the Ancients held it and therefore kept it as a Fast ergo not as a Sabbath for the Sabbath was ever reckoned among the solemn c Ier. 23.2 3. Feasts of the Lord which one consideration is sufficient to shew the judgment of antiquity in this controversie For they kept the * Diem Solis laetitiae indulgemus Tertul. Apol. c. 36. Sabbato usque ad galli cantum jejunium producite et illucescente uno Sabbatorum qui est dominicus desinite Constit lib. 5. c. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan lib. â—3 Tom. 3. Haeres 75. Lords day as a day of spiritual joy and gladness and spent the whole Saturday the time of Christs lying in the grave in Fasting and mourning alledging for their practise that speech of our Saviour When the Bride-groom is taken from them then shall they fast Luke 5.35 Again it holds no proportion in respect of the time for our Saviour lay three dayes and three nights in the grave therefore this can be no pattern for a weekly Sabbath I doubt the best of our new Sabbath-keepers would be weary of resting so long at a time But the stress of T. T s Argument is laid upon Christs entring into rest therefore there remaineth the keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God and here I shall lay the stress of my answer having manifestly proved that Christs entrance into rest was not on the seventh day no not in this authors own new notion of rest And whereas he addes that the taking down of our Saviours body from the Cross and laying it in the sepulchre in the close of the sixth day was providentially ordered I answer true providentially indeed for hereby the Holy Ghost has admirably provided against this future error of raising the old seventh-day-seventh-day-Sabbath from the dead and building it up anew upon the grave of Christ where it rather lies buried never to rise again For if the blessed body of Christ were laid in the grave on the sixth day then he entred not into that rest nor indeed any rest at all on the seventh day But on the first day of the week he entred into his true rest and ceased from his work of Redemption as God the Father did the seventh day from his work of Creation therefore there remaineth the keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God upon the day of Christs resting from his work the day of his rising from the dead And we have grand reason to think that Christ had a significant meaning in prolonging his Resurrection to the third day which was the first of the week as the Father had in lengthening out the Creation to the seventh day which was the last of the week For as the Father could have created the world in a moment so could the Son have quickned and raised himself from the grave assoon as he was in it either the same day or the seventh if he had pleased But he purposely and providentially passed over that day and crowned the first of the week with the glory of his resurrection which plainly speakes it his will and pleasure to make that day the day of our weekly rest in which our Lord himself rested from his greatest work Oh! But Christ rested not on the day of his Resurrection Obj. 4 T. T. p. 120. for he journeyed fifteen miles that very day which was no fair president for celebrating a Sabbath And again he travelled fifteen miles upon this supposed new Sabbath and this not to any Church-meeting but from Jerusalem where most of his disciples were purposely joyning with the two disciples that were journeying on foot seven miles and a half into the Countrey He means the disciples going to Emmaus Luke 24.13 14. This is his last refuge and 't is a very sorry one For First This travel was without labour and if he had journeyed that day from earth to Heaven and back again from Heaven to earth it had been no impeachment to his holy rest any more then the motion of an Angel sent upon Gods errand would be a profanation of his Sabbath certainly the body of Christ at his resurrection was a glorious body and able to move from earth to Heaven as some think in a moment And whether he did not locally though not so solemnly as afterwards ascend into Heaven and descend again the very day of his resurrection is disputed by some I shall not positively assert it but modestly propound it to further inquiry whether those words a John 20.17 Touch me not for I am not yet ascended to my Father but go and tell my brethren I ascend do not seem to imply that even now in the morning of the resurrection-day he was about to ascend and whether the same day at night returning again and bidding them touch or b Luke 24.39 handle him do not argue that now he had ascended Again whether those words c Eph. 4.8 11. When he ascended up on high he gave gifts unto men some Apostles some Prophets c. must be necessarily limited to his last ascention or whether they may not be construed of some former ascention Since it seems those gifts were given upon the very day of his resurrection for then d John 20. towards the evening or end of that day the Gospel-Ministry was constituted then the Apostles received their mission and commission e v. 19. As my Father hath sent me even so send I you f v. 21. whose soever sins ye remit they are remitted and whose soever sins ye retain they are retained Yea then they received the g v. 22. Holy Ghost For he breathed on them and saith unto them receive ye the
Holy Ghost I shall not determine where our Saviour had his usual residence during those 40. dayes betwixt his resurrection and last ascention whether in Heauen or on earth curiosity I abhorre in the mysteries of Christ and what I have here offered is in humility and sobriety of spirit with submission to better and riper judgments Let not this digression be counted a transgression or if it be pardon it To return to my answer this is most certain that although the body of Christ after his resurrection remained a real and true body yet it was a h Luke 24.37 spiritual a splendid and glorious body free from that corpulency that lumpishness that subjection to weariness and other infirmities that these vile bodies of ours are clogged and incumbred withall this is manifest by his marvellous apparitions upon earth and his glorious i Acts 1.9 10. 1 Pet. 3.22 assention into Heaven when he mounted himself in the Chariot of that cloud in which he rode in Triumph into glory now motion is no hindrance to the rest of a glorified body such as Christs was when he arose from the dead therefore although he were in action and motion on the resurrection day yet he did not labour His joyning with those two Disciples travelling to Emmaus was a work of Charity and Piety Ans 2 For their hearts were sad and ready to sink under their own fears Luke 24.17 And this blessed Physitian came to comfort them and confirm them in the belief and assurance of his resurrection They were his poor distracted dejected timerous disciples and whom should he visit but such Say they were going from Jerusalem that bloody City suppose they were straying like sheep without a Shepherd yet the Lord Jesus that great Shepherd of the sheep being now brought again from the dead Hebr. 13.20 would not leave them wandering in a wilderness but fetch them home to their fold again And it was no secular imployment but a Sabbath dayes work for he spent the time in opening Scripture preaching and proving his resurrection till their cold and dead hearts were so quickned and warmed that they did even burn within them in a word it was a Sabbath dayes journey But leaving the Adversary to solace himself with these sapless notions and trifling objections we proceed to a fourth Argument From the designation of a new day upon the discharge of the old Arg. 4 we shall couple both together and cast it into this form The old seventh day Sabbath is discharged from obligation or observation under the new Testament and a new day of the same number the first of the week designed deputed and determined for the Christians weekly day of Solemn worship under the Gospel and that by the Lord of the Sabbath Therefore the Sabbath is altered and changed from the last to the first of the week by no less then Divine authority The consequent cannot be denyed if the Antecedent be granted and granted it must be when proved by Scripture as it shall be in each particular I hope to full satisfaction 1. That the old seventh day is discharged disanulled and abolished for ever being a Sabbath more to the people of God in Gospel-times this we have proved in part already from Colos 2.16 to which may be added Gal. 4.10 11. See the new Annotations on this place Ye observe dayes and moneths and times and yees I am afraid of you c. See how zealously this great Apostle and Doctor about dayes decries all legal distinctions of dayes by four distinct phrases he enumerates all the solemn Festivals in use among the Jewes and opposeth the observation of them all in Christian Churches Read the words either backwards or forwards the first clause Ye observe dayes must in all reason referr to their observation of the Jewes weekly Sabbath day For if by years we are to understand either their Sabbaticall years or rather their yearly Sabbath called the day of atonement and by times or seasons their annual Feasts of Passover Pentecost and Tabernacles and by Moneths their monethly Feasts called New-moons what can be meant by dayes in this retrograde order but their weekly seventh day What dayes were in request among the Jewes of quicker return then their monethly dayes besides their weekly Sabbath day That which perswades me that the Apostle does here unquestionably intend the old seventh-seventh-day is 1. The Correspondency of this Text with that Kalendar or Chapter of dayes Levit. 23. where Moses sets down all their solemn Feasts or holy-holy-dayes eight in number reckoning the weekly Sabbath among the rest of those Ceremonial Festivals and putting that first as the Apostle does here then proceeding to speak of the rest much after the same order here observed This Text comprehends all the dayes and times mentioned in that catalogue 2. The plain parallel betwixt this place and Colos 2. which may may be seen in the scope of both Epistles compared together These two Churches it seems were sick of one and the same disease as appears by the same Symptomes in both the disease was Judaism wherewith they were dangerously infected by the breath of false teachers crept in among them who beguiled them with a Colos 2.4 enticing words and sought to b Gal. 1.5 pervert the Gospel namely by perswading them to mingle Law and Gospel together by retaining the customes of Moses together with the commands of Christ Colos 2.12.16 Gal. 4.10 ch 5. 2 3 6 12 13. and that especially in two points viz. Circumcision and Observation of legal dayes and among other dayes the old seventh-day which together with circumcision was cryed up among the Colossians as was shewed above and therefore by good consequence among the Galatians also since they were men of the same gang that had bin tampering here as well as there I mean Jewish false teachers the Doctors of circumcision and their Doctrin was alike yea the dayes for which they contended were alike both here and there dayes or Sabbaths sorted out by themselves The old seventh day is here meant though it be not mentioned expresly and distinguished from new moons and other Festivals therefore undoubtedly the old seventh-day was the maine This together with circumcision were those legal and mosaical customes which the Jewish Zealots laboured tooth and nayl to propagate in all the primitive Churches especially where there were any convert Jewes But St. Paul like a resolute champion of Christs cause opposes himself against these growing errours wherever he came insomuch that he began to be voyc'd and cryed up or rather cryed down as the great stickler against Moses Therefore when he came to Jerusalem St. James tells him that the Judaizing weak brethren were c Acts 21.21 informed of him how that he taught the Jewes who were among the Gentiles that is the Christian Churches to forsake Moses and not to walk after the customes and by and by when to stay the Mouths of these
rise from the dead on the seventh day Did he ever appear to his disciples on that day Did he breath forth the blessed Spirit on that day Did he ever preach a Sermon after his Resurrection on that day But I need go no further here is light enough if men had but eyes I hope by this time the Objector sees the invalidity of his second Argument that which he calls the Sons confirmation He proceeds to a third from the Spirits approbation of the seventh day What ever the blessed Spirit shall approve of Obj. 3 we may rest upon it as an infallible truth T. T. p. 81. to 94. But he has highly approved of the seventh day witness first his high applause of the pious womens resting on the seventh day according to the Commandment Luke 23. ult Which although it were after Christs crucifixion yet St Luke was not inspired to write his Gospel till after his ascention Secondly The Spirits glorious manifestation and mighty operation on the day of Pentecost Acts 2. Which he would fain perswade us to be the seventh day Thirdly The Spirits constant appellation calling the seventh day and none but that the Sabbath day c. Here is a great shew of Argument but it signifies little and concludes nothing when it comes to scanning For Although it seem to be spoken in praise of these holy women Answ 1 that they rested the Sabbath-day according to the Commandment yet as was elswhere noted this was before our Saviours resurrection not after And how ever they are commended for keeping the Sabbath before Christs resurrection yet others are condemned or sharply blamed for observing dayes the seventh day not excepted after Christs assention I mean as the Apostle does Jewish dayes Gal. 4.10 O but St. Luke wrote not his Gospel till after the ascention Answer What then was the old Sabbath therefore in force at that time by the same rule he may conclude the Passeover mentioned by the same Evangelist in the * ch 22 v. 7. foregoing Chapter was then in force too We are to judge of these womens practise according to the date of their act not according to the date of the Evangelists book Besides some take these words to be no commendation but a bare historical narration And if the particular day be here intended as referring to the Commandment they conceive it may be spoken signantèr and according to the original the Text may be rendered thus they returned and prepared spices and ointments * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and rested that Sabbath day indeed according to the Commandment that is they rested indeed that Sabbath day but never after upon that day according to the Commandment Again others expound it thus it was not the particular day on which the Sabbath was then kept so much as their * Mr. Collier against Fisher p. 13 14. manner of keeping it which is looke at in referring to the Commandment and so the commendation pitches rather upon the quomodo then the quando therefore it is not said they rested the seventh day as T.T. prints it but they rested the Sabbath day or day of rest according to the Commandment the most that can be made of it is this that t is a commendable thing to dedicate a day of rest to religious and holy rest The Spirits appellation argues not his divine approbation Answ 2 my meaning is The Holy Ghosts often I cannot say alwayes calling the seventh day Sabbath day proves not his approbation of that day for our Christian weekly holy-day under the Gospel because under the same name and title he has bin pleased to disown that day Colos 2.16 No matter though it be sometimes called Sabbath after it was discharged for so is circumcision called circumcision and the other Festivals of the Jewes Pentecost especially called * 1 Cor. 16.8 Pentecost long after it was degraded from the dignity of a solemn Festival as a man may be called by his proper name afer he is dead and buried And so I might proceed to the refutation of his next notion about the feast of Pentecost viz. That it fell that year on the Saturday or seventh day but this shall receive a more full answer in a more fit and proper place His fourth and last Argument for the seventh day is from the Saints observation which runs chiefly upon the practice of Paul it would be too tedious to transcribe his whole story Take the strength of it as it follower in this plausible Objection As it was Christs constant custome to celebrate the seventh day Sabbath Luke 4.18 So it was Pauls Acts 172. Obj. 4 and such as his custome was such was his commission and we must be followers of Paul as he was of Christ 1 Cor. 11.1 t is his own rule Philip. 4.9 Those things which ye have both learned and received and heard and seen in me do Only it must be understood with these limitations that Pauls practice be plain possible peaceable Evangelicall and unrepealed for we may not follow Paul in his compliance with the Jewes in ceremonials no not to gain the Jewes But his practice in observing the seventh day was truly Evangelical and never in the least tittle repealed nor altered neither was it his single practice but the custome of all his companions and associates Acts 13.13 14. ch 15.40.16 13 17 24. And that not only among the Jewes but the Gentiles also Acts 13.42 ch 18.4 Therefore he did it not to please the Jewes but purposely for a pattern to the Gentiles Hence he exhorts the Corinthians Gentile Churches to follow him as he followed Christ and it was at Corinth that he kept the Sabbath Acts 18. Therefore this was the pattern wherein he would have them be his followers and us also for the Epistle is written to us as well as to them 1 Cor. 1.2 Thus he pleads Pauls custome and addes It was his constant custome and whereas saies he it is made a great Argument for the observation of the first day that Paul preached once that day Acts 20.7 it is as clear Paul preached every Sabbath-day Acts 18.4 Only the Translators have not dealt so clearly upon which account among others he charges them with sin yea with inexcuseable sin p. 139. because Acts 20.7 they render the word preaching for the greater advancement of the first day whereas Acts 18.4 they call it reasoning to obscure the seventh day although the Greek word be the same in both places Then he frames an objection against himself which he can never an swer Obj. Paul only took that opportunity to preach to the people To which he answers 1. They that object thus speak without book 2. They make the Apostle a constant dissembler 3. They may as warrantably lay this crime to Christ himself that he took such opportunities and not in conscience of the Sabbath Thus he words it out and casts seducing glosses upon the sacred Scriptures to beguile unstable
16.8 On the seventh day shall be a solemn Assembly to the Lord thy God thou sahlt do not work therein And as the seventh or last so also the first day of that Feast was to be a day of rest because a day of Convocation On the first day shall be a holy convocation ye shall do no servile work therein saith the Lord. Numb 28.17 18. Now that first day of unleavened bread being a memorial of their Redemption from Egypt was typical of our Christian Sabbath as was noted before And besides there being a moral equity in Gods argument that a day of holy Worship and holy Convocations must be a day of rest it is as applicable to the Lords day as ever it was to any day for we have abundantly proved that this is a holy Convocation-day and 't is a good note that of Mr. Ainsworth on Deut. 16.8 That the Hebrew word Gnat-sereth which we translate solemn Assemblies does also signifie restraint from labour whereby the Holy Ghost would teach us that Holi days set apart for solemn assemblies must be days of holy rest and restraint from work Such is the Lords day to us Christians and no other day but that a day of solemn Assembly it is and has bin from the Apostles days till now yea a day of solemn Worship therfore a day of rest or Sabbath day yea a day of solemn weekly worship therefore the undoubted Sabbath of the fourth Commandment which is the standing rule for a day of weekly worship and but a day ordinarily for the Commandment numbers out six days in the week for worldly business As when a man makes two Wils the last does ipso facto make void the first although there be no express clause to signifie the repeal or revocation and one for religious exercises neither more nor lesse So that supposing there were no repeal of the last day of the week yet the first day being instituted by Divine Authority makes void the last and takes possession of its place by the warrant of the Divine Precept it self Again as the Ministry and the Sacraments appointed by Christ are used by virtue of the second Commandment so the day appointed by Christ must be observed by virtue of the fourth Commandment because this is the general scope both of the second and fourth Commandment that we must observe all the Institutions of God from time to time I might argue further from that prophetical speech of our Saviour Matth. 24.20 where he presignifies to his Disciples that there should be a Sabbath in force long after his death at such time as the old seventh-day-Sabbath was either quite out of doors or out of date at least therefore he spake of the Christian Sabbath which we are obliged both by Law and Gospel to observe The Ancients indeed do seldom apply the title of Sabbath to the Lords day yet sometimes they do They were but too jealous of Judaizing in this particular Orat. in Christi Resurrect Ex illo Sabbato praesens hoc Sabbatum agnosce c. Sic quâ— que ritè sanctificamus Sabbatum Domini Dicente Domino omne â—pus c. Tract de tempore 152. Gregory Nyssen is express for having spoken of the old Sabbath he presently adds from that Sabbath acknowledge thou this present Sabbath the Lords day this day of rest which God hath blessed above other days For in this the only begotten Son of God did truly rest from all his works So also Austin or he that writ the Book De tempore having pleaded the due celebration of the Lords day he concludes with respect to the fourth Commandment concerning the Sabbath so do we rightly sanctifie the Sabbath of the Lord as the Lord hath said In it thou shalt do no work Hence that Royal Edict of Charles the Great published in the year 789. We ordain says he according as it is commanded in the Law of God that no man do servile work on the Lords day To which may be added the decree of King Edgar expresly stiling the Lords day the Sabbath day Diem Sabbati ab ipsa Die Saturni hora pomeridiara tertia usque in Lunaris diei dilaculum festum agitari taking order that the Sabbath should be celebrated from Saturday three a clock in the afternoon till Munday morning at break of day and this was in the year of Christ 959. seven hundred years ago better Antiquity than any can be produced or so much as pretended against this appellation If it be objected That this was in times of Popery I answer That even since the Reformation the Lords day hath been frequently called by the name Sabbath Those precious but persecuted Saints To all these might be added the Church of England Can. 70. So Hom. of time and place of prayer the Waldenses in a Catechism of theirs teach their children to call it by this name And the holy Martyr Bp Hooper in his treatise on the ten Commandements uses the same Dialect some scores more might be reckoned if need were But leaving these Authors I return to the Objector who sets all his wits a work to prove the Lords day a working day most sinfully and shamefully abusing the Scriptures to this purpose I am loth to stain my Paper with his profane Sophisms yet lest his ignorant and erroneous Proselites should take them for unanswerable Arguments I shall briefly sum up all into one Objection and return several answers to it Object T.T. p. 14. of his Pamphlet In stead of that honour put upon the first day of the week First The Father wrought upon it Gen. 1. and therefore we should be his followers as dear children Ephes 5.1 Secondly The son travelled upon it Luke 24.13 15. And he hath given us an example that we should do as he hath done John 13.15 Thirdly The Saints cast their accounts upon it 1 Cor. 16.2 And so may we Thus he quotes Scripture to as good purpose as that Arch Sophister did Matth. 4 But we shall answer him soberly though he deserve it not Answ 1. That which was the Fathers working-day at the Worlds Creation was the Sons Rest day from the work of Redemption and we must not be sollowers of God in contradiction to Christ or oppose the works of God against the Word of God lest in stead of followers as dear children we be found fighters against him as desperate enemies the first day of the week was a common day when it was made at first Gen. 1. but since it is made again and made a solemn day a day of holy worship Psal 118.24 therefore no working day now but to such as have no God to worship or no hearts to worship him God the Father wrought upon the first day of the week yet Israel must not work on this day once a year at least Viz. on the day of unleavened bread as often as it fell on this day Numb 23.18 why because it was a day
so the second third fourth c. This is a meer mistake Answ For we deny that the first darkness Gen. 1. was the evening or night of the first day that darkness upon the face of the deep for ought appears to the contrary lasted not longer than a moment the night of the first day was that which followed the light after God had separated the light which he called day from the darkness which he called night to object the order of the words is vain Moses himself takes off that Objection by inverting that order in the following words for v. 4. he puts light before darkness and day before night The Ceremonial Sabbaths because honoured as Sabbaths were to begin at even as 't is said Obj. 2 Levit. 23.32 From even to even shall ye celebrate your Sabbath This law concerned only the day of atonement Answ which was an extraordinary Sabbath for rest and strictness being their yearly Fast wherein they were to afflict themselves by abstinence from i Joel 1.13 and 2.16 sleep as well as food and this is so far from proving that their weekly Sabbath began at even that to me it is a good Argument to prove the contrary for it looks like a particular exception from a general rule and to specifie the beginning of this extraordinary Sabbath at Even had been needless if their ordinary Sabbaths had begun at the same time Nehemiah caused Jerusalems gates to be shut before the Sabbath even while the declining Sun cast some obscurity on the city gates Obj. 3 Neh. 13. â—9 This was to prevent the profanation of the Sabbath the next day Answ and it were to be wished all Christian Magistrates would have the like care of the Lords day Besides 't is said he caused the gates to be shut when they began to be dark and yet saies the Text this was before the Sabbath which seems rather to intimate that in Nebemiahs time the Sabbath did not begin in the evening otherwise as Mr. C. notes he had done it not before but in the Sabbath The precious women having attended our Saviour to his Sepulchre returned and prepared spices and ointments Obj. 4 and rested the Sabbath according to the Commandment This as we said before was after the sun-set evening besides the holy Women did not forbear to anoint the body of Christ that evening because of the weekly Sabbath Answ but possibly because of the Jews Passeover-Sabbath John 19.31 or rather the Jews preparation to it of which we read John 19.42 We are sure Mark 16.2 they came not to anoint him till the morning of the Resurrection-day and it may be they stayed so long in conscience of the Sabbath which was not ended till the morning after mid-night therefore 't is most likely our Lord had taught them that the Sabbath begins and ends in the morning if it had ended at Sun-set we may rationally think they had visited the Sepulchre before they slept that night and not have put it off till the next morning As for those multiplied Scriptures that call for evening-sacrifices Psal 92 1. Isai 30.29 they make as much for us as for him if not more Since as we count the after-evening from sun-set till mid-night a part of the Sabbath and spend it our waking houres at least in Sabbath-duties repetition meditation prayer and praise so we hold a preparation necessary the evening before Of which in the next Position POSITION VII The Lords Day must be kept holy to the Lord. THe very appellation of it together with the Observation of the Apostles and Primitive Christians is sufficient proof of this 'T is a pious and ponderous speech of a late worthy Writer Dr. Cheynels Treatise of the Blessed Trinity p. 402. The approved practise of the primitive Christians declares the doctrine of the Apostles and the doctrine of the Apostles shews what was the command of Christ the Lord of the Sabbath concerning the sanctification of the first day of the week which is therefore called the Lords day and the Christian Sabbath If it be the Lords day as we have proved then let it be consecrated to the Lord as holy and honourable Isai 58.13 even to that Lord whose name it bears to him I say who hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written Rev. 19.16 King of kings and Lord of Lords even the Lord of glory a Lord as far above the greatest lords on earth as they are above their meanest Subjects 'T is the Lords day and therefore the Lords due let us render to Christ the things that are Christs Why did the Lord make this day but that all his faithful subjects and servants should keep it and keep it holy to him that made it O let the law of the living God over-awe our Consciences which is still in force for a day of weekly worship at his appointment and such we have proved the Lords day to be More Arguments might be produced But those already urged are sufficient to secure this truth from the dread of that downfall threatned by the Adversary The Devil and his agents may puff at the Christian Sabbath but confident I am they shall as soon blow out the Sun with a pair of bellows as totally extinguish this Ordinance of Christ the chief ground of my confidence is the Word of God upon which it is founded and next to that the writings of the antients so many in several Countries and several ages bearing witness as one man to this Christian cause with whom although I would be loth to err in any thing yet do I the less mistrust my self to err while I keep them company and do with more confidence look an adversary in the face when my quiver is full of their Testimonies as a late Author speaks on another occasion To draw to a Conclusion from Doctrinal Positions about the Christian Sabbath we shall descend to some practical Directions I cannot stand to speak fully and largely to the duties of the day neither need I other Treatises have done it already as Mr. Sprints Mr. Shepheards Dr. Gouges but especially Mr. Philip Goodwins only for the help of those that want those excellent helps I shall hint a few things and commit all to the blessing of him whose day and honour I have argued and contended for Briefly the practice of the Christian-Sabbath stands chiefly in two things viz. In preparation to it and sanctification of it 1. There must be solemn and serious preparation the evening before to get our hearts into a Sabbath frame this the Lord calls for in the very front of the Commandement Remember the Sabbath-day to keep it holy remember it before it comes that you may keep it holy when it comes this word Remember should be as a bell to toll us in from our Shops and Farms to our Chambers and Closets there to commune with our own hearts to cast up our spiritual accounts to call over our
wants and if we have hearts to weep over our week day sins and stir up our selves to take hold of Christ that we may make peace with God they that have any acquaintance with heart-work find it hard to have to do with a dusty world full of sins and snares and not be defiled or intangled with it earthly things are apt to leave a tincture upon the most holy and heavenly hearts There must therefore be a rubbing off this rust of the world a washing these dirty hearts and hands before we are fit to draw nigh to God in solemn Worship Exod. 19.14 What were those Ceremonial washings of old but emblematical predictions and documents of preparation to Gospel-worship and if I mistake not something to this purpose is prophesied concerning the purest times and Churches in these later days Rev. 15.2 3. Revel 15. We read of those that had gotten the victory over the Beast and his Image i. e. those that had shaken off the yoke of Anti-Christian Tyranny and Superstition standing upon a sea of glass with the harps of God in their hands those harps in their hands speak them in a posture of publike worship But what means their standing upon a sea of glass Why among other things I conceive it alludes to that Laver or * 1 Kings 7.23 sea in Solomons Temple in which the the Priests were wont to * 2 Chron. 4.6 wash when they went to worship and it may teach us thus much that the people of God under the Gospel as well as they under the Law must wash before they worship there must be some preparation Secondly the sanctification of the Sabbath follows and this also consists in two things Holy rest and holy work First we must keep it as a day of holy rest to the Lord resting from our own works our own words and our own thoughts 1. We are bound upon the Lords day to rest and cease from our own works whether works of labour or works of pleasure if I may so distinguish The Lords day must neither be our working-day nor our play-day both these are prohibited by the letter of the fourth Commandment and the analogy of that Text which seems to be written as a Commentary upon the Commandment Isai 58.13 14. If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on my holy day and call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable and shalt honour him not doing thine own ways nor finding thine own pleasure nor speaking thy own words c. In which words we have the lively Picture and Pourtraiture of a true Sabbath in both parts of it it must be celebrated with rest from our own ways works words pleasures and this rest must be accompanied with a spiritual rejoycing in God and delight in his Sabbath arising from an honourable esteem of the day considering whose day it is namely the Lords Now the scope of this Text is as applicable to our Christian Sabbath as ever it was to the Jews Sabbath ours being first a day of holy rejoycing in the Lord as well as theirs Psal 118.24 Secondly a day which hath the Lord for its author as well as theirs Thirdly a day every whit as honourable as theirs yea a degree above it being instituted upon a more noble account Viz. The most gracious and glorious work of Redemption Fourthly a day in all respects as holy as theirs holy I mean in respect of separation and dedication to holy duties as prayer preaching breaking of bread praise and thanksgiving Acts 2.1 and 20.7 Psal 118.27 28. Therefore it must be kept with rest from accustomed labour and pleasure as well as theirs and that by vertue of the fourth Commandment which requires the sanctifying of one day in seven of divine appointment as a Sabbath with rest from servile works and secular imployments And let it be further considered both the fourth Commandement and the Prophet Isaiah in commenting upon it do first and chiefly call for sanctity Secondarily for rest First Remember the Sabbath to sanctifie it then Thou shalt do no work Sanctification is required as the end cessation from labour as the means the one as principal the other as accessary Now both Prophets and Apostles have markt out the Lords day as a holy day to be spent in holy duties of solemn worship and that weekly therefore by the Law of God and nature we are bound to keep it as a day of weekly rest otherwise we separate the end from the means which cannot be rest from servile work being an inseparable adjunct to a day of solemn worship What then shall we say to those that afterwarning make the Lords day either a common working-day or a sporting day the former I may fitly call the Devils workmen who will one day pay them their wages the other the flesh's Bondmen whose pleasure in the end will prove torment without end The Lord awaken both to repentance better then that of Esau whose sin of the two is greater then his * Hebr. 12.16 there are prophane Esau's under the Gospel and they are the worst of Esau's there is also a sin called * Rom. 2.22 Sacrilege condemned in the Gospel and Sabbath-breaking is very like it when sinners lay sacrilegious hands upon that which is consecrated to the Lord for a sin much like to which Ananias and his wife were once stricken with sudden death and how many such dreadful strokes have been felt and heard in these later days I shall not repeat what has been already committed to record by others Mr. Bernard Mr. Byfield and sundry others have been serious observers of Gods heavy hand in this kind I could say something of what I have seen with my own eyes and heard with my own ears But I shall forbear Numb 10.1 2. when men are struck dead in the very act of their sin as Vzzah in touching the Ark Nadab and Abihu in offering strange fire when the sin and the judgement meet together and do one point at the other surely Gods hand is not to be slighted Mr. Byfield has related many such tremendous strokes upon those that have presumed to work on the Lords day and ended their lives and their work together having no more respit between their sin and their execution or expiration then with trembling lips to tell others the secret reflections of their own guilty Consciences and how many Malefactors have we heard at their execution bewailing their profanation of the Lords day as the leading-cause of all their mischiefs and miseries Now the Conscience of the sinner smarting under Gods revengeful rod is many times like a finger to point out the sin for which God smites as we see in the case of a Judges 1.7 8. Adonibezek To be short the exemplary judgments of God against this sin of Sabbath-breaking falling in so great variety and happening so thick together in many places do call aloud to the
as long as you live Take heed of corrupt Books and broachers of error you may be too credulous too cautelous you cannot be Let neither the pompous Phrases nor proud threats of men either allure you or affright you from the truths of God T. T. abounds in both these Artifices charming some with his Rhetorick scaring others with his Bulls and big words as he does William Sloat by name leaving him as his Printed Book speaks under the unpardonable sin to the judgement of the great day and yet this William Sloat is known to be a man of sober conversation professing Repentance towards God and Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ only he must be expunged out of the Catalogue of Christians for not being able to keep the Jews Sabbath and damned to the fiery furnace of Hell because he could no longer dance after this mans Pipe or bow down to Images that he has set up in his fancy Opinions I mean To conclude I beseech you Christians for the Lords sake and your souls sake hold fast the Good Old Truths of Christ in this hour of Englands temptation and cleave to that Good Old Cause the Christian Sabbath which the rigid Prelatical party sought to subvert by the Book of Sports and many pernicious Pamphlets and practises till the wrath of God brake out upon the land in those late bloody showers the Remembrance whereof methinks should daunt the heart of the most Goliah-like Adversary that shall dare to draw the sword of defiance the second time against this Christian Cause If any will be so fool-hardy as still to fight against God and the Lamb in profaning and teaching others to profane his day by working as formerly some did by sporting yet be exhorted all you that fear God and love the Lord Jesus to keep holy the Lords day making it no otherwise a working-day then by working out your salvation with fear and trembling which is the humble and hearty advice of Yours in all Gospel-Offices EDM. WARREN A TABLE of the Contents Position 1. THe Sabbath made alterable as to the day in the first institution of it evidenced by three Arguments Arg. 1. From the time when it was instituted Viz. after the fall Adam sinned the same day in which he was created proved by five Arguments page 1. to 7. Two Objections answered to p. 17. Arg. 2. From the command by which it was instituted p. 17. to 21. Arg. 3. From the ground or occasion on which it was instituted either Gods providence or promise p. 21. to 32. Seven Considerations premised to clear it p. 33 34 35. Two Scruples resolved p. 37 38 39. Position 2. THat the Old Sabbath was further manifested to be alterable as to the day in the second Edition of the Sabbath For 1. It was never propounded as the substance of any moral Law Here the fourth Commandement is vindicated at large p. 46. to 58. 2. It seems to be pointed at as a sign in the Ceremonial Law p. 70. Sundry Objections answered p. 59. to 70 78. Position 3. THe Old Sabbath was further evidenced to be alterable in the after-Observation of it p. 78 to 83. Position 4. THat the Sabbath was actually altered and changed from the Last to the First day of the Week by the authority of Christ upon the account of his Resurrection c. Four main Arguments to prove it Arg. 1. From the New Creation p. 83 to 90. Arg. 2 From the New Covenant The Covenant changed in a threefold expressure of it in the Mandatory the Promissory and shadowy part p. 90. to 105. The Old Sabbath proved to be of a shadowy nature from Col. 2.16 17. p. 106 107 108. Four Objections answered from p. 109 to 112. Arg. 3. From the Introduction of a new rest Hebr. 4. explained and vindicated to p. 122. Four Objections answered to p. 130. Arg. 4. From the designation of a new day with the discharge of the old The old seventh day Sabbath is discharged from Obligation under the Gospel p. 130. to 138 Four Objections removed The First day of the week is designed for a day of weekly solemn Worship For 1. This is the day above all others on which in the vacancy of the old seventh day God hath set his mind in the Law p. 158 159. 2. This is the day above all days on which Christ has set his special mark in the Gospel A seven-fold mark he has set upon it 1. His resurrection from the dead this day p. 161. to 169. 2. His frequent apparitions on this day p. 169. to 175. Four Objections silenced 3. His gracious speeches and actions at those apparitions 4. The Mission of the Holy Ghost this day The day of Pentecost proved to be the first day of the week p. 179. to 187. Two Objections answered 5. The Inscription of Christs blessed name on this day 't is the Lords day p. 190 191 192. Three Objections answered 6. The Apostles and Apostolical Churches observation of it Acts 20.7 cleared Six Objections satisfied 7. Apostolical prescription about it 1 Cor. 16.1 2. Four Objections answered to p. 214. The Best Antiquity for the Change of the Day TEstimonies of the Antients 1. Ignatius 2. Justin Martyr 3. Dionysius 4. Tertullian 5. Origen 6. Cyprian 7. Athanasius 8. Hilary 9. Ambrose 10. Hierome 11. Chrysostome 12. Augustine 13. Eusebius from p. 216. to 232. Opposite Testimonies answered to p. 245. Position 5. THe Lords day the Christian Sabbath proved and Cavils refuted from p. 236. to 242. Position 6. THe Sabbath begins in the morning Four Objections answered from p. 242. to 246. Position 7. THe Lords day must be kept holy to the Lord. Rules of Direction 1. For Preparation to the Sabbath 2. Sanctification of it 1. By holy rest from our own works words and thoughts 2. By holy work both in private and in publike from p. 246. to the end ERRATA PAge 4. Marg. for John 29. read John 19. p. 54. marg for evening Communicant r. Evangelical Communicant p. 80. for merval r. marvel p. 86. l. 5. for latter r. letter p. 91. marg for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 97. for must with a promise r. meet with a promise p. 107. for â—â—brae and praeterita r. umbra praeteritae p. 109. after it is very questionable add I say p. 126. marg for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 132. for stay r. stop p. 180. l. 1. r. wonderful p. 181. l. 5. for there r. their p. 182. l. 9. r. where ibid. for some r. come for were r. was p. 192. for constitution r. contestation p. 194. l. 31. add the p. 216. marg for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Other false spellings and false pointings there are which the Reader is requested to look upon rather as Errors of the Press then the Pen yet no other then such as are common and ordinary in all Treatises printed in the Authors absence POSITION
circumstances considered it more then probable that this third Chapter is nothing but an history of what was done on the sixth day And so the mention of the Sabbath in the beginning of the second Chapter may well enough in order of things take place at the end of the third and then it will roundly follow That the first sin went before the first Sabbath As to that which is further alledged Exod. 31.17 Ans 3 That on the seventh day God rested and was refreshed I answer It is onely a Metaphorical expression for we may not think that the everlasting God the Lord the Creator of the ends of the earth fainted or was weary in the works of the Creation or that he needed any rest or respiration But when the Holy Ghost speaks to us men he delights to speak after the manner of men respecting more the weakness of our capacity than the exactness and propriety of the Phrase In a word suppose God's resting and being refreshed on the seventh day intimate some delightful satisfaction like that which men take in things that refresh their souls yet it follows not that this satisfaction was taken in the creatures but rather in Christ who had now undertaken God's satisfaction for man's transgression And this indeed is a sweet refreshing as to a guilty creature so to an angry God and in this sense the Scriptures do sweetly harmonize Isai 42.1 Mat. 3.17 Mat. 12.18 unanimously testifying that our blessed Redeemer is the person in whom the eternal God delighteth in whom the Father is well-pleased As for the other Scriptures which T.T. crouds in for company-sake in his Margin as Job 38.7 Luke 2.13 the one speaking of the Angels song at the Creation of the earth the other of their joyful Hymne at the birth of Christ I wonder how they make for his purpose to prove that man had not sinned before the Sabbath But impertinent quotations are no rarities in his book he would make a glorious shew of Scripture to dazle the eies of the simple when the Scriptures he cites are neither in sense nor sound applicable to his purpose which if it be not packing sophistry let the world judg Well his first tripartite argument is weighed and found to light And hitherto for ought appears to the contrary the first Sabbath was not before sin I proceed to the second 2. T. T s Argum. Some time sayes he must be allowed for the sin of Angels and after that for the parley with the woman and it was no little space wherein Adam gave significant names to the creatures For the Angels sin Ans 1 to guesse precisely at the time of it is neither easie nor necessary And in disputes of this nature we must be wise to sobriety not to curiosity a 1 Tim. 3.6 pride was a principal ingredient in their sin and b Job 4.18 God charged them with folly for their pride how much more folly shall sinful man be found guilty of who in the pride of his foolish heart shall presume to be wise above that which is written Some think that place Luke 10.28 may refer to the first fall of the Angels being mentioned as a check to the disciples ready to be lifted up with pride at the success of their ministry Ne factis miraculis superbirent discipuli adduxit Domiuus exemplum Satanae c. Stella in loc However it is most consentaneous to Scripture and Reason to conceive that the Angels being spiritual substances must in their actings whether good or evil be proportionable to their beings And sin being a spiritual evil how quick a progresse it might make in such creatures let any man judg who can but compare things spiritual with spiritual To me it is no great difficulty to apprehend that in a very few moments by an aspiring thought legions of Angels might become legions of Divels Especially being for ought I know linked together in a conjoyned apostasie For Adam's naming the creatures this also might soon be dispatched Answ 2 considering that not every individual creature as T.T. would have it but onely the birds and beasts were made to pass before Adam of which there are not many kinds Primi parentes insignes Philosophi Luther in Gâ—n Cap. 1. and not many of a kind created at first And doubtless it cost Adam no study to impose significant names upon them He had natural Philosophy enough concreated with him to know the properties and qualities of the creaures 1 Kin. 4.33 34 and he needed no dictionary to find out suitable names for them If Solomon after the Fall were so well read in the book of the creatures that he could write a complete Commentary upon it from the Cedar to the Hysop what shall we think of Adam before the Fall But to put all out of doubt Dr. Twisse moral of the Sabbath p. 51. that the naming of the Creatures took up no long time is evident for they were all named before Eve was formed Gen. 2.19 20. So as all this might be done before noon and time enough left before night for the acting of that fatal tragedy the Fall of Man as a judicious Writer concludes For the parley betwixt the Woman and the Serpent Answ 3 we have no reason to judge that long when the Scripture cuts it so short Questionless the Serpent was not onely a subtile but a nimble disputant and it was his policy to be as quick as he could that the woman might be conquered before she had time to recollect her self Besides in the judgment of most Interpreters she began to stagger and give ground at the first assault So that all this Authors conjectures laid together are too weak to bear the weight of that confident conclusion Nothing is more certain then that the Highest himself did both sanctifie and celebrate the first Sabbath and that before sin p. 11. I may well say nothing is more uncertain I have given some Scripture-arguments already to make it more then probable I shall add more in the third branch to make it little less then infallible that man fell on the sixth day For the present I shall onely cast in one Argument against the supposed institution of the Sabbath in Paradise If the Sabbath was instituted in Paradise Argu. then Adam did observe and was bound to observe the first Sabbath in Paradise But neither of these can be proved from Scripture Therefore c. 1. That Adam did unquestionably observe the first Sabbath in Paradise cannot be demonstratively proved from Scripture This is undeniable that whenever or where-ever he kept his first Sabbath he did it in imitation of God's example Now how could he rest a whole day by God's example till God had fully completed the first seventh dayes rest for his example Eph. 5.1 Imitation of God being a subsequent not a concomitant act a following of him as dear children not a fellow-acting with him I can therefore see
too dark to ground an institution upon We must have a Law written in God's book And there is no other that I know of but Gen. 2.3 which if I grant the Adversary to be a command for some do stiffly deny it yet I must be bold to tell him it is but a consequential command For although it be said God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it yet it is not said Let man sanctifie it Here is included God's example but no express command And if the New Testament do not afford us as much warrant for the Lord's day as this amounts to I will yield the Cause But of that hereafter Let the Reader onely take notice by the way how mortally T. T. hath wounded his own cause Pa. 36. by exclaiming so bitterly against Consequences He calls it Philosophie and the deceit of men to establish Ordinances by Consequences Why let me ask him Was the Patriarchal Sabbath for above two thousand years together an Ordinance of God for my part I never doubted of it But he can never make it good without a Consequence he must make a new Bible first for express command there is none onely God's example which without a precept is not alwayes binding And so to use his own words the Lord hath disappointed the devices of the crafty and snared him in his own wisdom he digged a pit for the Lord's day and his Saturdays Sabbath is fallen into it help it out how he can For his life he can find no more in Gen. 2. then an implicit command for that old seventh day And now the next question will be Whether it be a temporary or a perpetual precept If perpetual it must be moral But that it cannot be by his own rule for he has fairly granted That a Moral Law is not meerly good because commanded but therefore commanded because it is good understand it of a Moral natural Law Now I beseech you Sir what natural goodness was there in the seventh day more then in the sixth or fifth Is one day in it self any better then another as to God And as to man if any day had been naturally or morally good above the rest Gen. 1.28 Psal 8.56 in all reason it had been the sixth day on which God made man crowned him with his blessings and gave him dominion over his creatures or the first day in which he made the heavens the Angels and the elements Therefore his threefold mystery to the seventh-days morality is but a threefold miserable mistake to make the best of it 1. That it was written in innocent Adam's heart for which he cites Rom. 2. where there is not a word of any such thing â— 10.11 2. That it was afterwards written in Tables of stone for which he quotes Gal. 3.19 as little to his purpose as the other 3. That it is also written in the fleshly tables of renewed hearts which the experience of almost all renewed hearts in heaven and earth does contradict For to speak in the language of Eliphas Job 5.1 S. Paul Col. 2.16 17. Call now if there be any that will answer thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turn either Scripture-Saints Cyprian cp ad Fidum 59. Chryso Tom de Res. or Church Saints Ask S. Paul S. Cyprian S. Chrysostom S. Augustine and they will tell you that your antiquated Sabbath was so far from being written in their hearts that they have written against it with their pens August de lit Spir. c. 14. Turn over the works of the eminent Fathers whose books neither you nor I are worthy to bear and their writings are so voluminous that we are not able to bear them Mr. Cawdrey Mr. Palmer Mr. Sheph. Mr. Byfield Mr. White of Dorch and the whole Assembly of Divines Confe of faith Chap. 21. Add to these the most judicious pious and zealous Ministers and Martyrs of Christ who have lived and died within the compass of these sixteen hundred years and most if not all of them will tell you That they never owned your Saturday-Sabbath they lived without it dyed without it and are I doubt not gone to their everlasting rest in heaven without it Besides how many faithful witnesses of late years has the Lord raised up to bear testimony against it of whom I suppose the greatest part are yet alive though some are fallen asleep In a word God has promised to write his laws in the hearts of all his people Jer. 31.33 Hebr. 8.10 Char. 16. But not one of ten thousand has the Saturday-Sabbath written in his heart therefore it is now none of Gods laws how many precious gracious and pious Christians are yet upon earth men and women redeemed from the earth and crucified to the world of whom the world is not worthy who look upon your Sabbath as a cypher can freely labour and travel upon it buy and sell upon it and that after accurate inquiries about it and to this day their consciences never reproched them their hearts never smote them for it what will you say all these are Hypocrites unrenewed unsanctified ones This were to condemn the generation of Gods Children and Canonize your self with your few misled associates for the only Saints in Christendome which I would hope you dare not do though I know you dare as much as another Well the adversary is brought to this Dilemma Either God has no people in the world but such as are of his perswasion or his moral and immutable Laws are not written in their hearts or the Saturday-Sabbath is none of those Lawes The last is the likeliest in the judgment of any indifferent Reader let his cause be tryed where he pleases either at Natures tribunal or the throne of Grace in the hearts of believers and he will be cast at both Nature is both blind and dumb in the business and if he plead the law of Grace which is rectifyed and refined nature the whole Christian world will give in evidence against him A Sabbath a day of holy rest indeed it will own and one day of seven in proportion but the particularity of the day the seventh from the Creation it utterly disclaims And where he will find advocates for it but either among the unbelieving Jews or a few misbelieving Christians Judaizing I know not Therefore surely it is no ingredient of Gods moral and immutable Lawes The conclusion then is that it was but a temporary precept by which it was established which some call ceremonial others had rather term it positive but none perpetual unless such as are more apt to say anything then able to prove it when then have said it We deny not the fourth Commandement to be a perpetual precept but we are now speaking of Gen. 2. which at most is but a positive Law and positive precepts are alterable at the law-givers pleasure yea though they were given in Paradise as the precept concerning the forbidden fruit though it
among Christians redeemed from the earth Obj 2 T.T. p. 61 62. To this I may easily answer without any great study Answ that the constant celebration of two dayes in a week is more then the Law requires or the Gospel allowes More then the law requires for that calls but for one day in seven Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy not Sabbath-dayes Exod. 20 8. Again six dayes shalt thou labour not five dayes Chrysostomes descant upon it is very pithy Tom. 5. p. 5 23. The week contains seven dayes sayes he Now see how the Lord hath distributed these dayes he hath not taken the greatest part to himself and left us the least neither has he taken half and left half requiring three for himself and leaving us but three no the Lord is more liberal he hath given thee six and taken but one for himself So he And indeed the Law saith the same I know it is disputed whether these words six dayes thou shalt labour be preceptive or permissive only but to me it is past dispute that they carry a preceptive force for the injunction of working six dayes is delivered in the same commanding terms v. 9. with the inhibition of work on the seventh day v. 10. T. T s gloss therefore falls to the ground Exod. 20.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exod. 10.10 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Six dayes shalt thou labour that is God gives thee leave sayes he as if it were but a bare permission Or six dayes thou wilt labour pointing out the creatures earthly inclination as if there were a prediction in the words But let me advise him in the fear of God to read over the Commandement once more not as he would have it but as it is in the Original since he professes skill in the language of Canaan and then I shall ask him whether those words verse 10. On the seventh day thou shalt do no worke be not imperative If so why not also these Six dayes shalt thou labour since the forme of speech is one and the same It nothing helpes him that the word is otherwise translated Exod. 31.15 six dayes may worke be done for whatever the translation be the tense is the same and it may as well be rendred shall as may And so learned Ainsworth reades it And thus his Critical flourish proves but an empty flash For my part I look upon these words Six dayes shalt thou labour as having the force and vertue of a precept and command in them not directly injoyning us to labour upon any day for that belongs rather to the 8th Commandment but injoyning us such a proportion of time Eph. 4.28 Among the Jewes when holy dayes were so frequent there was never any weekly holy day ordained to go cheeke by jole with the Sabbath But their holy dayes were either monethly or yearly Mr. George Abbot p 118. Periculum mortis tollit Sabbathum necessitas non habet ferias six dayes together within the compass of which our labours must be confined 'T is as if the Lord had said Thou shalt not ordinarily labour more nor less then six dayes together nor rest more or less then one in seven ordinarily That God was pleased to appoint the Jews a greater number of holy dayes as Passeover Pentecost c. and so a lesser number of working-working-dayes was only in extraordinary cases as our fasting-dayes and thanksgiving-thanksgiving-dayes are The fourth Commandment was to be the standing rule only for ordinary time both of weekly work and weekly rest And as those words on the seventh day thou shalt doe no work hinder not but souldiers in time of war may fight a battel and Citizens in case of fire breaking out may quench the flames upon the Sabbath day It was never the Apostles meaning nor in their power when God by a perpetual Law had given us six dayes for labour and destined a seventh for rest to turn it into five dayes labour and two dayes rest Idem ibid. the precept interdicting only the servile works of our ordinary callings In like manner these words six dayes shalt thou labour hinder not but in case of extraordinary judgements or unusual mercies we may set apart dayes of prayer and of praise but ordinarily and weekly to keep two dayes of rest and leave but five dayes for labour is utterly inconsistent with the fourth Commandment And here a word with our new Sabbath-keepers at Colchester you are erroneously taught to think you are bound in conscience to rest from labour two dayes every week else you are woful earth-wormes miserable worldlings dunghill drudges and what not Now I beseech you bring conscience to the rule hath not God said six dayes shalt thou labour and will you listen to man contradicting God and telling you nay thou shalt labour but five dayes only What Antichristian usurpation and Tyrannical imposing upon mens consciences is this to tell them in Print as T.T. does It is not one day in seven will serve your turn when the books shall be opened Why p 3. Why what are those books Shall not the book of the law be one of them And what is written there How readest thou Is it not plain six dayes shalt thou labour and do all thy work Blot this clause out of Gods book Deut. 12.32 or alter the figure and write five instead of six And be sure God will blot out thy name out of the book of life Consider this you that suffer your consciences to be mancipated and enslaved to the dictates of Man Either you must make the week longer by a day or confess in limiting conscience to five dayes only for labour you break the Law under a pretence of keeping it yea you totally make void the Commandment of the living God in subverting the equity of it this is one thing The letter of the Law will bear but one day in seven for holy rest yea the liberty of the Gospel will allow no more ordinarily Rom. 3.21 For do we by faith make void the law God forbid Nay rather we establish the law Yet if we allow but five dayes in the week for labour we must unavoidably make void the law in this particular And besides the observation of dayes legal dayes is disputed against by the great Apostle as contrary to Christian liberty It is but a poor evasion to say Col. 2.16 Gal. 4. â—0 compared with Gal. 5.1 The Apostle speaks only of festival dayes Passeover Pentecost and the like for if these were inconsistent with Gospel-liberty as the adversary grants how much more two dayes every week which amount to more at the years end then all those Jewish festivals twice told The Church in the Apostles time had no other holy day besides the Lords day And the fourth Commandment enjoyns the labour of six dayes Mr. Perkins in Galat. Let him therefore sadly consider the dangerous consequences of his errour forcing him at once both
28.4 Abraham the father of the faithful then to David and others in after-ages till at last it was fully accomplished by the most glorious resurrection of Christ from the dead whereby he trode on the Serpents head and all to-bruised it This consideration will out deep in the adversaries cause and to set the better edge upon it let it be further considered 7. And lastly the Holy Ghost has fully assured us that Christ in the promise was of the same antiquity with the confessed ground of the seventh dayes Sabbath c Heb. 3.3 4. The Apostle confesses that one ground or occasion of singling out that precise seventh day was Gods ending his work evidenced by his entring upon his rest And when this was done the same Apostle in the same place informs us the works sayes he were finished from the foundation of the world Now hear another Apostle guided by the same Spirit speaking of Christ in the same terms not differing in a tittle d Revel 13.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Observe the difference between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the one signifies from the other before Joh. 17.24 Eph. 1.4 Thus he styles him the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world he does not say the Lomb slain before the foundation of the world as if it intended Christ in the eternal purpose of God but from the foundation of the world which clearly speaks Christ in the promise of Godfrom the beginning Now by the foot-steps of these two Texts compared how visibly may we trace the Antiquity of Christ in the promise and find a Saviour promised before a Sabbath instituted The seventh day-Sabbath was instituted upon Gods finishing of his works now as the works were finished from the foundation of the world so Christ was slain from the foundation of the world slain I say in respect of his Fathers promise and his own personal beginning to undertake that work which he was to perform in a way of suffering and dying so that when the Father ended his work of Creation the Son entred upon his work of redemption and thereby added a further perfection to the first work Whereupon God rested the seventh day and blessed it That is appointed it for a day of spiritual blessings upon the account of Christ the promised and blessed seed All which particulars premised it will be a truth of unquestionable evidence that the institution of the old seventh day was founded and bottomed upon Christ in the promise And now a dim eye may easily discern mutability lying at the very foundation of the day and thus it may be demonstrated A day founded upon Christ in the promise must necessarily be changed when the promise shall be fully accomplished Argum. But the old seventh day was founded upon Christ in the promise as appears by the premises Therefore c. The proposition needs no confirmation or if it does take it thus If the greatest duty founded upon Christ in the promise was to vary and change with the promise how much more the day For instance the great duty of believing in the Lord Jesus It cannot be denyed but one and the same Christ was the object of saving faith in all ages before the law under the law and under the Gospel Heb. 13.8 Rev. 1.8 Christ Jesus the same yesterday to day and for ever being he which was and which is and which is to come And so the faith of Gods elect which was and is and is to come looks to the same object But yet according to the different state of the object the eye of faith has had a different and various aspect Old Testament-believers who went before looked to him that should come after we that come after in the New Testament look to him that is gone before As long as Christ was in the promise they believed in the Messiah to come now the promise is fulfilled we believe and know that the Son of God is come And though still we look for his second coming to judge the world 1 Joh. 5.20 yet his first coming to save the world by his blessed Incarnation his bitter Passion and glorious resurrection we no longer expect as to come but look upon as already come and gone Well then you see how this great duty of believing circumstantially varies and changes with the promise and why because it was founded upon Christ in the promise And verily if the old Sabbath had the same foundation as we have proved then it must admit of the same variation As long as Christ continued in the promise the seventh day from the Creation was the Sabbath day but now the promise is accomplished the * Note that well day must be altered for the first foundation upon which it stood is removed And as we cannot now call that true faith which looks upon the Messiah as yet to come in the sense above mentioned so neither can we count that the true Sabbath which leans upon the promise of a Messiah to come Look to it if you keep the old seventh day you must keep Christ still in the old promise and together with the Jews Sabbath profess the Jews faith the twelfth Article of whose cursed Creed is this I believe with perfect faith that the Messiah is yet to come Buxtorf Synag c. 1. p. 4. And thus deluded creatures may see what they have gotten by siding with forlorn infidels against the principles and practises of the Christian world But I must here resolve a scruple or two and then I shall put a period to this first part You will say if the old seventh day were founded upon Christ in the promise Scrup. 1. then it must have been changed as soon as Christ was manifested in the flesh It followes not Resol 1. for the promise was not fully accomplished when Christ was manifested in the flesh but when he was justified in the spirit by his resurrection from the dead then indeed it was completely fulfilled as Paul and Barnabas do plainly testifie to the Jews at Antioch Act. 13.32 33. Acts 13. The promise which was made unto our fathers God hath fulfilled the same unto us their Children 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adimpleoit Arius Mont. in that he hath raised up Jesus again So that the day of Christs resurrection was infallibly the day of the old Sabbaths expiration for then the promise upon which it was founded was fully accomplished of which more hereafter But will not this argument overthrow the duty as well as the day the Sabbath it self as the old seventh day Scrup. 2 Not in the least Resol for a Sabbath or day of rest in general is moral-natural and so perpetual but the fixing of it on that precise seventh day was meerly positive if not ceremonial Therefore the particular day may be and is cashiered and yet the duty Sabbath or holy rest still retained as the duty of solemn fasting is still
in force although the particular day in which the Jewes were appointed to fast is abolished viz. f Levit. 16.29 ch 23.27 29. See Dr Downam Christian Sanc. p. 8 9. the tenth day of the seventh moneth And why may not the duty of solemn resting as well as the duty of fasting stand in the fall of the day That which was circumstantial and shadowy is done away but that which was substantial and moral still remaineth And thus we have by Scripture-light found the old Sabbath as to the day alterable and changeable in the first institution of it and have added something by way of overplus for the actual change of the day I shall now conclude this first position with the accommodation of an Historical passage recorded by Ammianus Marcellinus concerning Julian the Apostate Ammian Marâ—â—l Hist lib. 23. it is to this purpose That he the said Julian out of enmity to the Christians projected the rearing up of the Jewish ceremonies that he might supplant the new religion by the old and to that intent he encouraged them to rebuild their Temple at Jerusalem and sent one Alypius into those parts furnished with treasure to forward the work Hocque modo elemento destinatius repellente cessavit inceptum but no sooner had the work-men attempted to lay the foundation then certain balls of fire bursting out from beneath dissolved their work and made them desist from their enterprise I shall personate none in the application of this only this I shall say in general that as the Jews Temple was destroyed on their g Dion fol. 748. Sabbath day so their Sabbath yea their whole Civil and Church-State was dissolved together with their Temple And this grounded confidence I have that whoever shall reare up that antiquated seventh day with a design to supplant the new Sabbath by the old he shall meet with such Sanctuary-fire such Scripture-light and evidence breaking out from under the foundation of the old day as shall either burn his fingers or which is all the hurt I wish him enlighten his conscience that he shall see his error and confesse as h 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys quod Christus fit Deus he said of the Temple that no power or policy of man is able to raise what Christ hath razed POSITION II. That the old Sabbath as to the day was further manifested to be alterable in the second edition of the Sabbath I Am not ignorant that as the Sabbaths First Institution is much disputed so the Second Edition as to time and place may be much controverted also But taking it for granted as I do that the first institution lay neer the worlds foundation then the second Edition of it will be found in the wilderness of Sin at the falling of Mannah or upon mount Sinai at the giving of the Law Nehem. 9.13 And here we meet with a double argument to make it further evident that the old seventh day was alterable or liable to change 1. First Because it was never propounded as the substance of any moral Law 2. Secondly It seems to be pointed at as a sign under the ceremonial Law 1. First That the old seventh day from the Creation was never propounded as the substance of any moral law that is so as the day could not be changed but there must also of necessity be a change of the Law in the substantials of it For the clearing of which let it be premised that whereas the fourth Commandment is the only precept in the Decalogue which concerns the Sabbath First I do most freely grant that the fourth Commandment is a moral and perpetual precept yet not moral natural unless it be in the first clause concerning a day of rest in general but rather moral positive and in the substance of it perpetual I say in the substance of it because it is the judgment of some learned and godly that the whole Decalogue as well as the fourth Commandment was in some circumstances peculiar to the Jewes by reason of the time place and people to whom it was delivered But the substance of it is common to all like as almost all Scripture is for substance common and for circumstance proper and peculiar because much of it was written occasionally as Mr. Abbot observes Now that which is circumstantiall and occasional in a moral Law may be mutable and yet the substance of the Law be perpetual as the preface prefixed to the first Commandment and the promise annexed to the fifth being both circumstantially peculiar to the Jews were in that respect mutable yet the Commandments themselves remain immutable and belong to us as well as to them So in this fourth Commandment that which indirectly and occasionally respected the Jews might admit of a circumstantial alteration and yet the Commandment it self in all the substantials of it be as much in force to us as ever it was to them that is for such a numeral day though not the same individual day for one day in seven though not the old seventh which might be and for ought I can see to the contrary is changed upon a double account in respect of the promise upon which it was instituted as a ceremonial at least a temporary ordinance and in respect of the precept by which it was observed as an occasional circumstance In the substance of it And therefore we need not as some do make the Commandment partly moral and partly ceremonial but grant it wholly moral and hold the day mutable as indirectly and occasionally pointed at as the Land of Canaan was in the fifth commandment And thus the change of the day is no prejudice at all to the morality of the Commandment as not being of the substance of it Indeed to have altered the number from one day of seven to one day of ten or from one of seven to two of seven ordinarily had been to wound the precept in the substantials of it and in plain terms to blot out one of Gods ten Commandments not so to alter the day from one seventh to another seventh which was but a circumstantial variation To those that affirm the fourth Commandment to be temporary in reference to the proportion of one day in seven because in that point we grant it positive I have only this to say that we judg it not to be meerly positive but moral positive and so perpetual as the event hath proved it For although the particular day were changed by the refurrection of Christ yet the proportion of one day in seven has been still preserved inviolable by the practise of the Apostles and Churches ever since And as one well observes no other solid reason can be rendred why the Apostles and primitive Churches should weekly celebrate the day of Christs resurrection if it had not been in reference to the fourth Commandment had not their consciences been under the binding power of this precept why might they not have done by
the resurrection day as after ages have by the Incarnation the Passion or the Assention day have kept it once a year only not once a week as they did and we do But this by the way to illustrate my concession which is this that the fourth Commandment for the substance of it that is for a Sabbath in general yea a seventh day Sabbath and that of Gods appointment is a moral and perpetual precept this I freely grant and firmly believe But 2. That the old seventh day is either in part or in the whole De substautia praecepti non est ut septimum diem precise quo etiam Deus cessavit ab operibus sanctificemus sed dicm quieti consecratum à Deo ipso mediatè vel immediatè Zanch. in praec 4. the moral substance of this Commandment or that the morality of the law-lyes in the particularity of the day this I utterly deny And I shall with the rest of my Brethren affirm and maintain the contrary as an undoubted truth of God Namely that the fourth Commandment doth principally and properly and as the moral substance of it prescribe only such a proportion one day in seven at Gods appointment to be spent in holy rest not this or that particular seventh day unless it be indirectly and occasionally To explicate this the second commandment is usually and aptly alledged as a commentary upon the fourth the form of worship and the time of worship being neerly allyed to each other Now as in the second Commandment we have the rule of solemn worship in general without specifying the particular ordinances of worship whether sacrifices and offerings as under the Law or Prayer Preaching Baptisme and breaking of bread as under the Gospel all which we re consequentially injoyned in the second Commandment but neither of them directly in like manner in this fourth commandment we have a rule for the solemn time of worship a seventh day or one in seven at Gods appointment But whether it should be reckoned from the worlds Creation or from Christ resurrection is not here determined particular duties of worship and the particular day of worship being to vary and change with the different age and state of the Church The wisdome of the Law-giver has so contrived these two Commandments that both the day and the duties as occasionals might be changed without any change of his moral and immutable Lawes But there is native light and evidence enough in the fourth Commandment it self to convince us of this truth Prov. 6.23 For as Solomon sayes the Commandment is a Lamp and the Law is light Only we must look to the sense and not wholly liften to the sound of the letter for in all lawes the meaning of the Law-giver Isai 8.20 Non in verbis sed insensu non in superficie sed in medulla non in foliis sed in radice ratiouis Hieron in Gâ—l 2. Tertull. de Carne Chrsti and the sense of the Law is to be respected not the letter only as he sayes well the mind of God is not so much in letters and syllables as the sense and meaning Not in the out-side but in the pith and marrow not in the leaves of words but in the root of reason for which we must digg deep by serious study and prayer before we can discern it Now if laying aside all prejudice we would thus look into this perfect Law of liberty as those that look to be judged by it another day Jam. 2.12 I doubt not but we shall find one day in seven at Gods choice not the old Seventh day to be the soul and substance of it which that it may the better be demonstrated I shall for methods sake distribute this fourth Commandment into these four parts 1. Exod. 20.8 The preceptive part Remember the Sabbath or day of rest to keep it holy 2. V. 9.10 The directive part Six dayes shalt thou labour but a seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God c. 3. V. 11. The argumentative part For in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the seventh 4. The benedictive part or the conclusion Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and sanctified it Now if all these four parts of the Commandment be directly for a seventh day in number or proportion and but indirectly occasionally and consequentially for a seventh day in order then the substance of the Commandment is for one day of seven not the last of seven But the premises are true and to demonstrate their truth let us come to tryal 1. We shall examine the Preceptive part Remember the Sabbath day or day of rest to keep it holy This I hope is not be restrained to the old seventh day Sabbath and seventh day cannot be terms convertible here for then there were a tautology in the Commandment as Mr. Cawdrey observes It were as if God should say Remember the seventh day Sabbath the seventh day is the Sabbath which is such a flat tautology as the God of Wisdome will never own in so short a summe of words No it s evident that hitherto the precept is comprehensive and large not limitted to one day more then another for Sabbath day if you will hear the Hebrew word speak English is no more but a day of rest and that is any day set apart for solemn worship by divine authority It is applicable to the first day of the week as much as ever it was to the last A judicious Author does piously and pithily illustrate it by that second table precept Honour the King Mr. Bernard late of Batcomb 1 Pet. 2.17 If Saul be King honour him if he be dead or displaced and David be King then honour King David To neither of them directly but successively and consequentially it might be accommodated to both So remember the day of rest to sanctifie it while the old seventh day was the day of rest the Jews were bound to sanctifie that If that be changed and the first day of the week be chosen in its room we are as much bound to sanctifie that and this by the same law for as the change of the person took not away the precept of honouring the King Hac enim ratione nos quoque proeceptum hoc servamus dum sanctificamus diem dominicum quia hic quietis nobis est dies sicut Judaels fuit septimus Zanch. in praec Col. 2. Syg so the change of the day made not void the command of sanctifying the Sabbath And thus as learned Zanchy tells us We Christians keep the Sabbath as much as ever the Jewes did in keeping holy the Lords day which is a day of holy rest as well as their was For if it be a day of holy rejoycing it must needs be a day of holy rest since it is both improper and impossible to keep a set or solemn day as a day of holy rejoycing in Christ and at the same time
the seventh for me not naming which seventh must he necessarily intend one seventh more then another I should rather think no but any one of the seven being left to his own liberty to chuse which he pleases Or thus Suppose a liberal Master who has seven pounds to dispose of indent thus with his Servant I freely give or lend thee six of them provided thou improve the seventh for me What must he needs intend this or that special seventh supposing some piece of gold among the rest Certainly no every man may know his meaning by the seventh pound he intends one pound of seven The accommodation is easie and apposite the bountiful and blessed God freely bestows six dayes in the week upon his creature man reserving the seventh to himself that is one in seven at his own choice and appointment This is the direct and principal intendment of the Law Though I deny not that the old seventh day was indirectly and occasionally here pointed at as a seventh day then under Divine sanction and the Jewes were bound by this Commandment to keep that day as by the fifth commandment they were bound to honour their particular parents then living yet both these being but occasional circumstances might be and were altered without any impeachment to the morality of these Commands The altering of a mutable circumstance either of time place or person is far from abolishing the substance of a law indeed if the Sabbath had been changed as I said before either to the sixth day or the tenth day the whole frame of the Commandment had been broken and shattered but in the change of one seventh day to another upon a sufficient ground and by a sufficient authority the substance of the Law suffers not at all the substance of it is for one day in seven directly and no more the seventh day is the Sabbath To those forementioned vulgar cases I will adde some Scripture-instances for the further clearing of it As thus why may not the seventh part of mans time and the tenth part of his temporals be understood in a parallel sense Levit. 27.30 Deut. 18.21 Now one part of ten is principally intended in the Law of tithes surely when God commandeth the tenth any man will think he hath more respect to the number then the order such a proportion then such a particular in it Although indeed as judicious Mr. Cawdrey notes in one particular there was a law to restrain it to the last of ten of all their Cattel the tenth that came under the rod was holy to the Lord which law as he sayes well Levit. 27.23 need not have been added if the general law for tithes had intended the last of ten And this is the very case here one day in seven is chiefly and directly intended in this law of the Sabbath The seventh day in every week Christ hath now limited by his Apostles to the Lords day Mr. Perkins in Gal. 4.10 neither can any more be well gathered from it unless some other law be produced to restrain it to the last of seven as once it was or to the first of seven as now it is restrained some other law I say for there is no such particular restriction in theh fourth Commandment For I pray observe this the Commandment doth not point out the day by way of institution but only prescribe the observation of it supposing it either as already instituted or to be instituted elsewhere either in the Old Testament or the New Again to that which others have gathered to my hand let me adde one Scripture-instance more why may not that tribute of time which God calls for and that tribute of their lands which Joseph compacted for with the Egyptians be taken in a like sense since the things themselves are not much unlike Gen. 47.24 You shall give the fifth part of your increase to Pharaoh and four parts shall be your own V. 27. And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt unto this day that Pharaoh should have the fifth part that is such a part in proportion one part in five The Gram matical construction of the Commandment will bear this sense and inforce no more then a seventh in proportion and if other arguments must sway the sense what better arguments then the analogy of other Scriptures and the received Principles of religion both which carry it for a seventh day in proportion not the old seventh day Irenaeus Phil. you shall have four and Pharaoh shall have one And truely varying but the circumstances me thinks the Lord speaks much to the same effect in this fourth Commandment Six dayes shalt thou labour but a seventh or the seventh is the Sabbath that is dividing the week into seven parts thou shalt have six of them for thy common work and I will have one in seven for my solemn worship He does not say the seventh day from Creation that was ordered elsewhere Gen. 2. But a seventh in proportion directly this or that seventh indirectly and by consequence only Yea to proceed to demonstration that this is unquestionably the mind of God may be thus made out This proportion is no where directly stated by a perpetual precept unless it be in this fourth Commandment Therefore it must be so determined here That it must be somewhere determined is evident because it is substantially profitable to Religion the glory of God and the good of souls as Mr. Cawdrey has invincibly argued for if men were left to their own liberty to chuse their own proportion in all probability Religion would be substantially prejudiced and damnified by it either it would be starved with too little or surfetted with too much Sabbath-time either Popery would create almost every day in the week a holy day or profaneness would be content with one day in a moneth Let sinful man have liberty to pluck up Gods bounds and alter his proportion either one way or other and experience will soon shew the inconvenience of it Let it be altered from one of seven to one of ten or twenty and what a deadly blow to Religion would that be Yea let the alteration be on the other hand from one of seven to two of seven may we not justly suspect more prejudice then profit by such an alteration Would not one sabbath be able to justle out another and one day disturb the holy rest of another Truly as our Saviour speaks in another case Luke 19.30 No man can serve two masters but either he will have the one and love the other or hold to the one and dispise the other So we may probably think in this case no man can ordinarily observe two Sabbaths in a week but either he will slight the one to keep the other or it may be in a little time slight both and keep neither Whether the Sabbath should be kept once a week or once a moneth cannot be gathered from any plain
substance of the law I do not say they are abrogable as ceremonies but alterable as circumstances they may be changed for better things and not a tittle of the law annulled but rather fulfilled by it according to that of our Saviour till heaven and earth pass one jot Mat. 5.18 or one tittle shall not pass from the law till all be fulfilled I say the law is not destroyed but rather fulfilled by the varying of some circumstances as by changing their typical deliverance from Egypt into our spiritual deliverance from sin and the land of Canaan meant in the fifth Commandment into England where we dwell And because the fourth Commandment and the fifth are neer neighbours methinks the one may fairly expound the other It cannot be denyed Ephes 6.3 The Apostle in repeating that promise leaves out the words which the Lord thy God giveth thee because they were more appropriate to the Jews and to us the argument is entire without them See Weems Chris Syn. that the promised land intended occasionally in the fifth Commandment was the land of Canaan neither do I deny that the day on which God is said to rest in the fourth Commandment was the seventh day from Creation yet all will grant that the argument or inducement of the fifth Commandment is not to be restrained to that land only for then it were no argument at all to us Now I would ask any rational man why the argument of this fourth Commandment should be limited to that particular day from Creation more then the argument of the fifth Commandment to that particular land of Canaan since both the one and the other are but occasionally insinuated And to limit the inducement of a moral law to an occasional circumstance is the ready way to evacuate and make void the whole law But we shall put it out of all doubt that Gods example here propounded is only for one day in seven directly substantially and properly for the old seventh only consequentially indirectly or occasionally and that by a double consideration 1. Because it is here urged as a reason of what went before 2. Because the reason of this reason is chiefly for one day in seven 1. This example of God in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the seventh day is alleged as a reason of the forementioned clause six dayss shalt thou labour but the seventh is the Sabbath so much is clearly implyed in the connexive or causal particle For six dayes shalt thou labour and rest a seventh For so did Jehovah thy God Now the reason annexed to any rule must if there be any amiguity in it be expounded by the rule the rule must not be interpreted by the reason for the rule is not brought for the reason but that for the rule Therefore as the former receives strength by the latter so the latter must receive light from the fotmer Now the standing rule for the weekly Sabbath is this Six dayes shalt thou labour but a seventh is the Sabbath Here the term seventh is general 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Indifferently signifies a seventh or the seventh a and the being particles proper to the English tongue are defective in the Hebrew and Latine To supply which defect the schooles distinguish of Diet septimus formaliter and Dies septimus materialiter as was noted before 'T is not said this or that seventh but leftat large And where God has left a latitude we may not dare to put a limitation that were to enclose Gods Common and intrench upon his Royalty Well then the Rule being only express for a seventh day in general the reason or argument here brought to perswade to the observation of such a general seventh is taken from Gods example who also rested a seventh day which although it were the last of seven yet being only alledged as a reason of the forementioned rule it can signifie no more then the rule it self of which it is a reason And so it is clear that the sense of this latter clause in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the seventh must be only according to the sense of the former clause six dayes shalt thou labour but a seventh is the Sabbath that is a seventh in proportion directly And thus the first day of the week is as much the Sabbath of the fourth Commandment to Christians as ever the last of the week was to the Jewes being one day in seven as well as that To dispute for the same day on which God rested and infer a necessity of observing that day because we must observe that proportion is to argue à dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter a well known fallacy For the argument is only direct for such a proportion six for labour and a seventh every week for rest not this or that seventh from any prefixed period 2. Let us look into the reason of this reason and then the case will be yet more clear the reason or equity of any law is the life and strength of the law And it is the design of Gods wisdome in imposing laws upon his creatures to propose such reasons in those lawes as shall make them appear congruous and suitable to those common principles of right and equity Psalm 119.18 Rom. 7.12 Deus ideò leges suas judicia vocat quod aequiffima sunt quae praescribit impressed upon the creature And hence Gods lawes are so often styled Judgments because in all things they are just and equal and certainly that sense of the argument which doth most shew the equity of the Commandment is the best and truest sense Now let us consider the equity that Gods example carryes with it in reference to the aforesaid proportion of six dayes for labour and one in seven for rest As thus if the great God who needs not a moment of time either for work or rest as being neither subject to weakness nor weariness if he I say were pleased when he had work to do even a world to make to take six dayes for his work and one in seven for rest how much more should we men still hold to this proportion who by reason of corporal weakness and spiritual wants need such a competency of time both for secular imployments and soul refreshments Thus there is convincing strength of reason and equity in it But now to argue for the particular day God wrought first six dayes and then rested the last of seven therefore we must first work and then rest has no such argumentative force in it especially to us Christians who living under a Covenant of pure grace do rather work by rest then rest by works and therefoe the Sabbath being suitable to the Covenant we may rather judg it equitable to begin the week with a day of rest and work the six dayes after then to work the six first dayes and then rest the last seventh Even dim-eyed nature judges it most
the Law is abrogated I look upon them as words ' of course which in a Controversie weigh no more then a feather yea as beggerly fallacies for they all along begge the question taking that for granted which hath been soundly whipt with a denyal by sundry learned pens viz. that the seventh day from the Creation was ever an express tittle of the Commandment a seventh day in a week indeed is more then a tittle of the Law and this number is still continued in the observation of the Lords day all the Christian world over And I doubt not but it shall continue to the end of the world although the old day be changed as in the celebration of the Passeover the precise order of time was sometimes altered for whereas the fourteenth day of the first moneth was the time appointed at first Exod. 12.18 yet Hezekiahs great passeover was kept on the fourteenth day of the second moneth 2 Chron. 30.5 Where you see the precise individual day altered upon occasion yet the number the fourteenth day still observed See this illustration further cleared by Mr. G. Abbot p. 37. and Mr. Walker p. 49. So upon a greater and better occasion the Sabbath is altered as to the day yet the seventh day in number still kept intire in this as the fourteenth in the other And so the Sabbath now as well as the Passeover then for substance preserved notwithstanding the circumstantial and occasional change of the day And thus through the conduct of my gracious Guide leading me by Scripture light and the foot-steps of my dear companions in the cause of Christ I have safely passed the pikes of opposition and vindicated this royal law from the false glosses and erroneous discants of the adversary carrying this conclusion all along before me as a truth triumphing over all contradiction That the old seventh day was never propounded as the substance or special subject of any moral law I shall but touch upon the second 2. That it seems to be pointed at as a sign under the ceremonial law yea it does more then seem so if the text be impartially viewed Exod. 31. from v. 13. to v. 18. where we find a special charge imposed upon the Jews to observe the Sabbath and that upon sundry considerations 1. From the end of it Verily my Sabbath ye shall keep for it a sign between me and you V. 13. throughout your generations to know that I am Jehovah that sanctifieth you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for so the words run in the Hebrew And this is farther explicated v. V. 14. 14. ye shall keep the Sabbath therefore for it is holy or holiness to you thereby expounding what was meant by his sanctifying of them in the verse before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As if the Lord had said the keeping of my Sabbaths shall be a distinctive badge and cognisance of your Covenant-holiness Sabbathum est signum quod Deus Israclem sanctificat ut Sabbathum sanctifionvit scil segregando eosex Gentibns profanls in peculiarem sibi popnlum Lavat in Exek Hom. 26. a sign that I do sanctifie you and separate you to my self above all the people of the earth for an holy and peculiar people for as the Lord is said to sanctifie the Sabbath so also to sanctifie Israel that is by separating it from all other dayes and them from all other nations to be holiness to himfelf And this is the first special reason why they should keep the Sabbath throughout their generations as a sign or mark of distinction to difference them from the rest of the profane world 2. From the perill of profaning it v. 14.15 Every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death for whosoever doth any work therein that soul shall be cut off from amongst his people c. A law shortly after executed in the letter of it by stoning to death one that gathered sticks on the Sabbath day Numb 15.36 which rigour for ought I can find to the contrary lasted no longer then the Israelites peregrination in the wilderness where as one sayes an extraordinary strict rest was imposed upon them because they were extraordinarily accommodated for it Being as the Saints in heaven are immediately at Gods finding having Mannah without means daily provided for them and hence it is said Numb 15.32 While the children of Israel were in the wilderness they found a man that gathered sticks on the Sabbath day and stoned him to death Note the Phrase while they wore in the wilderness not elsewhere for when they were out of the wilderness we never read of the like punishment inflicted It seems then that this strict kind of rest and rigour was restrained to that time and place only 3. Another argument to inforce their observation of the Sabbath is taken from the moral equity of it verse 15. Six dayes may work be done but the seventhis the Sabbath As if the Lord had said ye may well afford me one day in seven since I have given you six in seven And this again is reinforced by Gods example in the latter part of v. 17. For in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and rested the seventh day Now it concerns us to inquire in this context what was proper to the Jews and what common with them to us What is moral and perpetual what judicial or ceremonial and temporary For that morals and judicials are here mingled together none can deny and the difficulty will be how to sever the one from the other and to shew in what sense the Sabbath was made a sign what the significancy of it was and especially what kind of sign whether a permanent sign as the Rain bow or a transient sign as the cloudly pillar in the wilderness There are sundry sorts of signs spoken of in Scripture I shall onely instance in those that are of prime note and pertinency to resolve the case in hand 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Josh 4.6 7. So also the Passeover was and the Lords supper is a sign being both memorative Exod. 12.26 Mat. 26.26 1 Cor. 11.24 There are remembrancing signs as the twelve stones taken out of Jordan for every tribe one were set up as a sign to after-ages for a memorial to the childen of Israel that the waters of Jordan were cut off before the ark And such a kind of sign it is commonly thought the Sabbath was a memorial of the Creation But that it is so propounded or intended here cannot easily be proved since the Lord does not say I have given you my Sabbaths as a sign that I created the world but for a sign that I the Lord do sanctifie you And although it be added v. 17. It is a sign betwixt me and the Children of Israel for ever Ainach majoris distinctionis pausae est accentus Buxtorf Thes Gram. for in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth c. Yet it
is not said it shall be a sign that in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth For there is a notable pause in the middle which divides the sentence and the sense also The seventeenth verse containes two distinct arguments or reasons why they should keep the Sabbath 1. Because it was a sign 2. Because it was set apart upon the occasion of Gods work and rest in the beginning 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Joh. 2.3 1 Joh. 3.18 There are indicating or evidencing signes such are the Characters of saving grace But neither can this be the sense of the word sign in this place It is a sign that I the Lord do sanctifie you What savingly why then all were Israel that were of Israel for the Sabbath was given to all neither was it so much their keeping the Sabbath as Gods giving them a Sabbath to keep which is here made a sign Witness Ezekiel Moses his interpretor I have given them my Sabbath for a sign Ezek. 20.13 to know that I the Lord do sanctifie them Therefore 3. There are distinguishing or differencing signs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as do visibly mark out a people for Gods peculiar select and sanctified ones above all other people of the earth And in this sense the Sabbath is here given the Jews as a sign a sign of his sanctifying them that is in one word as Calvin speaks a sign of his segregating and singling them out from the rest of the nations as his peculiar people Siquis un◠verbo reddere vellet sanctificare est segregare Cal. Praelec in Ezek. 20. Ita Simler in Exo Levit. 21.8 ch 2.32 So also Simlerus and to the same effect is that of Lavater aforementioned The Sabbath was a sign of Gods sanctifying them as the Sabbath it self was sanctified that is separated from other common dayes and set a part for holy ends and uses And so the Word sanctifie is usually if not only taken in Scripture when it is applyed to the whole bulk or body of a people as here it is Well the Sabbath was given to the people of Israel as a sign of Gods sanctifying them but how long throughout their generations That is during the Oeconomy of the Law as long as the people of Israel should be the only peculiar people of God Exod. 12.14 The very same Phrase is used concerning the Passeover ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord throughout your generations by an ordinance or ever which clearly speaks it a temporary ordinance But Secondly We must distinguish of Sabbaths as well as of signes very briefly the Word Sabbath signifies one of these three things either 1. The moral duty holy rest or 2. The penal rigour of that rest or 3. The precise day of rest Now 1. It cannot be meant of the moral duty simply considered since that extends beyond their generations for there remaineth a rest Heb. 4.9 10. or keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God still neither 2. Can itwell be understood of that penal rigour resting from all work upon pain of corporal death for this in all likelihood lasted not out half their generations being calculated chiefly for their wilderness estate as was saidbefore Therefore 3. It must be the precise day of rest the old seventh-day-seventh-day-Sabbath or nothing which is here set as a sign throughout their generations and this I take to be the true intent of the Holy-Ghost both here and Ezek. 20. The case seems clearly to me to be stated in this wise The old seventh day was at first given to Adam and his posterity as the only true Sabbath during the pre-eminency of the Creation and Christ in the promise and that it was conscientiously kept by the holy Patriarchs for some ages after I doubt not though some of the Ancients seem to deny it but to be sure in tract of time the sinful race of Adam forsaking the true God did also forget the true Sabbath Now when it pleased God out of that degenerate lump of mankind to form Israel or the seed of Abraham a peculiar people to himself he gave them his old Sabbath again in a new Edition That among other ends it might be a visible sign to distinguish them from the rest of the world Other nations no doubt had their Sabbaths as well as their gods but as Israel must serve the only true God so they must also observe the then only true Sabbath Ezod 31.13 So much is implyed in the text Verily my Sabbath ye shall keep saith the Lord. The Word my is Emphatical 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it points at the precise day of Gods appointment the seventh and last day of the week therefore this and mainly this was made a sign of Gods sanctifying the Jews throughout their generations which being so how evidently doth it follow that the day was design'd for change and that now it is certainly changed by the will and appointment of God For if the Jews generation be extinct and they that were once the people of God have now a Lo-ammi written upon them Ho. 11.20 1 Thes 2.15 16. Ye are none of my people how shall that day any longer stand as a Sabbath wich was given them as a sign of their being the peculiar people of God and that for a season only till their generations were expired Maledic domine Nazarais Lord curse the Christians is one of their daily imprecations vid Trapp in Hosea Either let the adversay say the blaspheming Jews who powre out daily curses instead of prayers are still the Covenant-people of God in so much as still they retain that Saturday-Sabbath And then he shall speak like a true Jew indeed or let him confess their saturday-Sabbath which was once the crown of their glory is now no better then the badge of their blasphemy whereby they would make the world believe that they are still the sanctified people of God though they trample underfoot the blood of his Son whereby they should be sanctified I speak not this as insulting over the misery of the Jews but as lamenting the sin of apostate Christians who take up that day as a badge of their Saintship which the infidel Jews wear as a badge of their blasphemy and enmity against Christ and Christians Indeed it was once an illustrious sign of their sanctification but it was limited to their generations as the Passeover was and therefore if the one be expired so is the other upon the same account And in this respect I dare boldly affirm and I doubt not to maintain it that it is every whit as lawful for a Christian to celebrate that old Sacrament the Passeover as to observe the old Sabbath For the one was as well a sign as the other and the one was ordained for a season as well as the other There are a few feeble objections to face this argument but the bare repetion with the premises will be
separation was the old Sabbath whereby the Jewish Nation was distinguished from all other people in the world as we shewed before out of Exod. 31. Now the Lord Jesus came to take down this separation wall and to make up a Union betwixt Jew and Gentile and this he did partly by his death blotting out the hand writing of Ordinances or law of Commandments contained in Ordinances and partly by his e Acts 4.11 Ephes 2.20 resurrection where he was made the corner-stone of his Fathers house to unite both parts of he building together that all might be d Gal. 3.28 one in Christ Jesus This I take to be the sense of the place But the Prelates have perverted the Text Obj. 3 T. T. for unto the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which only signifies Sabbaths they have deceitfully added dayes as though there were no Sabbathe but Sabbath dayes they have destroyed the Apostles scope by their addition of dayes The pious and judicious Translatours have rightly rendered it Sabbath-dayes for so the word is used in all those other texts above mentioned p. 136. Answ yea when there is no 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 joyned with it and the like I have observed in e Dialogue with Trypho Justine Martyr f Hom. de semente Athanasius and other expert Grecians who do generally dispute against the Jews weekly Sabbath under the term which is here used therefore this Author does most unworthily and wrongfully charge those worthy instruments who made the Scriputres speak true English with fraud and deceit God will one day require an account of these hard speeches yea scoffs and impious slanders But he has not done yet Whereas by this bold and absurd addition some would cast off the seventh day as Ceremonial Obj. 4 who yet plead strongly for the morality of the Sabbath it is very considerable that this Text toucheth not the day at al but the duty that is the Sabbath for the Apostle mentions not the day or time as a shadow but Sabbaths None but a bold and absurd Anabaptist would call this an absurd addition Answ 1 for it is the usual and proper Translation of the word elsewhere and if he should read it thus let no man judg you in meat or drink or in respect of a festival day or a new Moon or the Sabbath day it were no wrong to the Text for so we read the same word Mat. 12.1 Understanding it of the old Sabbath day Answ 2 The duty of holy rest in general is not here intended at all for that is usually intimated in a word of the singular number and stands firm in the fourth Commandment as also g 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 24.20 'T is only the particular day or the respective limitation of the duty to that day that is here reckoned among the shadows of things to come look how their festival dayes are called shadowes so is their Sabbath not the moral duties required on those dayes as solemn h 2 Chron. 30 21 22. Neh. 8.6 worship praise and thanksgiving for then it were a sin to keep a day of thanksgiving but the set dayes together with the ceremonial duties which they were accustomed to a re here discharged and the like I may say of their weekly Sabbath And therefore his conclusion will not hold That we may as warrantably reject the moral law upon that expression of the law being changed as the seventh day upon this word of Sabbaths being a shadow The distinction of moral and ceremonial may as well be applied to Sabbaths as lawes and till he can prove that the old seventh day is excepted from these shadowy Sabbaths as we can prove the moral law to be from that which was mutable he must confess it was but a shadow and so either abrogated or altered or both as the ceremonial i H. br 7.12 law and the priest-hoods were and if so let him judg whether the Apostles rule ought not to be regarded Let no man judg you in respect of shadowy Sabbaths and let T. T. timely bethink himself how he will answer the breach of this rule at the Barre of Christ when his own book shall without repentance be brought in as a bill of indictment against him for judging censuring condemning not only faithful Ministers and Christian-people but Magistrates Princes Parliaments charging them with little less then the sin against the Holy-Ghost because forsooth they disown the brat of his brain p. 50. and reject the Saturday-Sabbath let this unjust judg take heed he be not judged with a witness I shall ere long read him a sharp sentence out of Justin Martyr But first I shall endeavour to convince him by two or three Arguments more That the Sabbath is certainly changed from the last to the first of the week and that by Divine Authority Christ ending his work Arg. 3 ad hominem and entring into his rest layes the foundation of a new Sabbath upon the day of his rest But he ended his work and entred into his rest upon the first day of the week by his resurrection from the dead Therefore then and thereby he laid the foundation of a new Sabbath upon that day of his rest Both feet of this argument stand upon Scriputre-ground or the grant of the adversary as shall appear in the prosecution of it First That our blessed Redeemers ending his work and entring into his rest laid the foundation of a new Sabbath seemes to be the Apostles conclusion Hebr. 4.9.10 There remaineth therefore the keeping of a Sabbath as the Tranlators render it in the Margin to the people of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for he that hath entred into his rest that is Christ hath ceafed from his workes as God did from his own workes That it is spoken of Christ T. T. plainly grants p. 141. yea peremptorily determines in these words It is Christ only whose intrance into rest is here intended and therefore there remaineth the keeping of the Sabbath to the people of God A Sabbath I should rather say I may lawfully proceed upon his own grant and so wound him with his own weapon For however he wrests this Scripture and uses it as a sheild to defend his Saturday-Sabbath I believe upon trial it will be found a sword to destroy it Which will the better appear if we look into the contents of the third and fourth Chapters and withall have an eye to the scope of the whole Epistle which will be an excellent key to unlock this intricate Text. Breifly to touch upon the general scope it is very probable that these Christian Hebrews were about casting off the Ordinances and worship of the New Testament and revolting from Christ to Moses for the prevention and cure of which Apostacy St. * For if the cloth may be known by the lâ—st as M. Ward was wont to say the Epistle is most likely to be his the phrase and
style being very agreeable to his other Epistles Paul is inspired by the Holy Ghost to write this Epistle wherein his main design is to disswade them from this sin as appeares by several passages sparsed here and there as ch 4.14 Where he exhorts them to hold fast their profession and observe it well ch 7 8 9. When he had argued that upon the coming of Christ there was to be change of the Priesthood and Law of old-Testament worship-hereupon he concludes ch 10. Let us hold fast the professio of our faith without wavering and verse 38. If any man draw back my soul shall have no pleasure in him That is if any man draw back from Gospel-ordinances to abrogated Legal rites therfore again ch 12. v. 25. 26 27. See that ye refuse not him that speaketh whose voice shakes not only earth but Heaven also Which shaking signifies the removing of things that are made that is Old-Testament-Ordinances such as were alterable that the things which cannot be shaken may remain that is Gospel-institutions Having found out his main mark which he aimes at namely to disswade them from Apostatizing to legal worship and perswade them to persevere in Gospel-worship let us consider in the next place See Mr. Carter on Heb. 6. what arguments he uses to prevaile with them herein First Inasmuch as the Ordinances of the Old Testament were given by Angels and by the hand of Moses a Typical Mediator therefore in the two first ch he sets forth the excellency and dignity of Christ above Angels proving him to be the very Son of God and then ch 3. he prefers him before Moses inasmuch as Moses was but a Servant in Gods house but Christ a Son yea the ownet and builder of the house and such a builder as made not only the little house the Church but the great house the world also ch 3. v. 4. therefore they had little reason to return from Christ to Moses Secondly Having thusprepared them he fals upon his intended subject viz. A serious disswasive from Apostacy And because they were about to cast off the Solemn worship of the new Testament for t is expresly said ch 10. v. 25. That the manner of some was to forsake the assembling of themselves together which assemblies in the Churches of Christ were alwayes upon the first day of the week therefore to Preach down this sin among others the Apostle takes a Text out of Psalm 95. and spends the best part of two chapters in the opening and applying of it The words you have at large ch 3. v. 7 8 9. Wherefore as the Holy Ghost saith to day if ye will hear his voice harden not your hearts c. His voice that is the voice of Christ our great Prophet spoken of before and that upon his own day his day of grace in generall and his day of Solemn worship in particular for so it followes in that Psalm Let us how down and worship before him And let it be noted the words cited out of the Psalm are not so much Davids exhortation to the people of his time as a prophetical prediction of Gospel-times Plalm 95. 6 7. Isaiah 2.3 wherein he brings in the people of God as also the Prophet Isaiah does mutually inviing and calling upon one another to hear the voice of Christ yea to come and worship before him else how could the Apostle apply it to these Christians Further oh 3. v. 12. he advises them to take heed of an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God i. e. by forsaking his Ordinances and worship and in particular his day of solemn worship of which David here seemes to spea lest they should provoke God by their Apostacy as Israel did by their infidelity till he sware against them in his wrath that they should not enter into his rest whose sin and punishment is further exemplified to the end of that chapter Now because it might be thought that Gods oath did only concern the Israelites exclusion out of Canaan the Holy Ghost informs us that there was a Prophecy in that History and a promise in that Threatning Therefore we are admonished ch 4.1 To fear lest a promise being left us of entring into rest any of us should seem to come short of it But how does the Apostle ground his admonition What need Christians fear Yes good reason for v. 2. To us was the Gospel preached as well as unto them Therefore having the like priviledges we may expect the like punishment if we pervert those priviledges or Apostatize from them through unbelief for that was Israels undoing the word Preached did not profit them not being mixed with faith in them that heard it v. 2. hence they fell short of Gods rest in Canaan which was a type of our eternal rest in Heaven into which none but believers do enter v. 3. For unbelievers are out off by Gods oath as it followes I have sworn in my wrath * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nota jurantis 1 Sam. 14.45 Psalm 89.35 Jer. 38.16 if they shall enter that is they shall not enter the sense must be supplied thus if ere they come there let me not be reputed a God of truth Thus far we have traced the Apostles argument and found it mainly tending to this to caution these Hebrews against Apostacy and against infidelity as the root of that Apostacy against Apostacy I say not from Moses fot they were * Acts. 21.20 They were all zealous of the law tenacious enough that way but from Christ and his institutions and probably from the Christian Sabbath which some conceive to be the day pointed at by David But because they were apt to think that the day and the rest of which David spake was the old seventh day and the rest of Canaan which they were but too much devoted to to root out this conceit in the following verses the Apostle removes these two supposed rests and plainly shews that neither the one nor the other could be intended either by David or himself First It could not be * Exod. 35 2. meant of the old seventh day which is sometimes styled a Sabbath of rest For although the works were finished from the foundation of the world and God did rest the seventh day from all his works yet in this place again he saith if they shall enter into my rest v. 4 5. His argument stands thus David expresly mentions a day and a rest to some so much the word shall implies if they shall enter but the rest of the old seventh day was already entred into three thousand years before Davids time even from the foundation of the world See dr Gouge Comment on the Hebr. Therefore that could not be this The force of the argument lies in this that things spoken of different times whereof the one is of time past the other of time to come cannot be the same for instance that * Ezek. 34.24
ch 37.25 David who dyed many hundred years before Christ cannot be the same David who is promised to be a Prince amongst Christians So here the day or rest of which David speaks being to come and not then entred into could not be the rest of the old seventh day since that was entred into long before even from the foundation of the world This is the true and genuine sense of those words although and again Although is a discretive term * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a note of distinction importing thus much that albeit there is mention made of a day of rest in the beginning of the world yet it is as another distinct day and rest that is here intended So also this Adverb again is to be taken of another rest-rest-day then that which is mentioned in the former verse for although the old seveuth day were spoken of by Moses as the first and most famons rest in the beginning yet now again so many thousand years after that David speaks of another rest if not another rest-rest-day and if any Sabbath or day of rest be here intended either by David or Paul it will certainly prove fatal to the old Sabbath for I would humbly propose this quere to the consideration of the learned Whether the Psalmists intimation that there should be a day of solemn worship under the Gospel and the Apostles assumption that it could not be meant of the old seventh day will not amount to this conclusion that the old seventh-day-seventh-day-Sabbath is to be no day of rest or solemn worship under the Gospel If T.T. quarrel at this conclusion let him thank himself for the premises one of them at least for he grants a moral rest or Sabbath to be here meant and I will thank the Holy-Ghost and S. Paul for the other for they have assured me that the seventh day from the Creation could not be meant by David no nor Secondly The rest of Canaan neither in the sense above mentioned for although that be sometimes termed the * Deut. 12.9 Josh 1.15 rest which God gave Israel under the conduct of Jesus or Joshua yet sayes the Apostle v. 8. If Jesus had given them rest that is if he had given them the rest of which David here speaks then would he not afterward have spoken of another day where note by the way t is a day of rest which the Psalmist seems to scope at else why should the Apostle thus interweave the one with the other If Joshuah or Jesus had given them rest then would he not afterwards have spoken of another day Note again the same Argument is here used against the supposed place of rest that was urged before against their conceived time of rest the old seventh day both these were entred into long before Davids time whereas he spake by the spirit of prophecy concerning things to come a long time after and hereupon the Apostle concludes There remaineth therefore a rest or the keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God distinct and different from the old Sabbath yet not much unlike it in respect of the ground of it for he that hath entred into his rest hath ceased from his works as God did from his own works And this is spoken only of Christ sayes T.T. Be it so then I hope our proposition will not offend him that when our blessed Lord Jesus ended his work and entred into his rest he laid the foundation of a new Sabbath on that day of his rest only t is like this word new Sabbath will stick in his stomach yet it needs not for we cannot put the old Sabbath into the Apostles conclusion because he himself puts it out of the premises But we shall not wrangle about words by new Sabbath I mean only a new sabbath-Sabbath-day and for peace-sake I am content the proposition should pass in these terms The day on which Christ ended his works and entred into his rest must be our Christian Sabbath day The assumption followes Secondly That Christ ended his work and entred into his rest by his resurrection from the dead on the first day of the week for proof whereof we may proceed upon another of the Adversaries Principles for thus he argue Christs entring into his rest on the seventh day T.T. p. 144 145. Our dear Redeemers soul was no sooner separated from his body but his better part immediately entred into glory and soon after his blessed body was laid to rest in the grave Where although I cannot but mind him of his gross mistake about the cricumstance of time for t is evident that as our blessed Redeemers soul entred into Paradise on the sixth day the same day that he dyed witness his words to the dying theef this day thou shalt be with me in Paradise so also his sacred body was interr'd the same day even a Mark 16.42 Luke 23.53 54. the day before the Sabbath not on the seventh day as this sophister would make silly people believ e yet I shall take him at his word in the main of his argument namely that when our Saviour entred into his glory he entred into his rest But I assume By his resurrection from the dead on the first day of the week our Lord entred into his glory and for this I have his own word more then once or twice in the 24 of Luke he overtakes the two Disciples going to Emmaus and as they were talking together with sad hearts about the sufferings and the death of Christ and also relating what they had heard but could hardly believe concerning his resurrection he takes them up with a sharp rebuke b Luke 24.25 26. O fools and slow of heart to believe all that the Prophets have spoken Ought not Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into his glory to enter into his glory you will say that is to be understood of his ascention into Heaven nay verily he spake it of his resurrection from the dead where their chief doubt lay and so himself expounds it for the same day at night he appears to the rest of his Disciples and these among them preaching the same Doctrine and saying c V. 46. Thus it is written and thus it behoved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day this was that he had so often inculcated before his death d Math. 16.21 ch 17. 23. Mark 9.31 ch 10. 34. Luke 9.22 ch 18. 31 32 33. That he must go up to Jerusalem and suffer and die that all things which were written in the prophets concerning him should be accomplished that he should be delivered up to the gentiles that they should crucifie and kill him and that the third day he should rise again according to the Scriptures so that what one Text speaks of his suffering and entring into glory others interpret of his dying and rising again the third day and that Christ by his resurrection entred into his glory
it agrees not with the scope of the context which is to disswade them from unbelief as the root of Apostasie ch 3. 12. Take heed Brethren of an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God where the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 18.19 word doth properly and without all question signifie unbelief And the Apostles rendring of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies either unbeliefe or disobedience by another word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies unbelief only v. 18.19 does evidently speak his meaning namely that we should take heed of falling by Israels example of unbelief which is the mother of all * John 16.8 9 vice as faith is the mother of grace And therefore ch 4. v. 1. he cautions us to fear lest a promise being left any of us should seem to come short Now the promise is the ground of Faith as the precept is of obedience I conclude therefore it is not so much Israels disobedience as Israels unbelief upon which the stress of the argument is laid To take the Apostles admonition as a caution against the neglect of the old Sabbath is utterly to mistake his main mark and scope For his grand design is to prevent their Apostasie from Christ and his Gospel not from Moses and his law And I am perswaded if any Sabbath-breaking be here intended it is to deterre them from the breach of the Christian Sabbath To understand this Scripture there remaineth the keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God of the old seventh-day-Sabbath Answ 3 is utterly to invalidate the Apostles argument because it confounds that distinction of rests on which he grounds his argument For 't is evident See Mr. White of Dutch in this Tex p. 230 the Apostle speaks of several and distinct rests and insists most strongly upon the opposition between Moses words Gen. 2. and the words of David Psalm 95. not Psalm 45. as T.T. misquotes it and makes it most manifest that David could not mean the rest of the Sabbath of which Moses speakes Gen. 2. for Hebr. 4.3 thus he reasons David speaks of a rest to come but Moses speakes of a rest past therefore David cannot mean the rest of the old Sabbath of which Moses speaks which was entred into so long before And verse 5. he takes up the same opposition again and in this place i. e. of David again if they shall enter who sees not a manifest opposition betwixt these two have entred and shall enter That word although v. 3. relates not to the sin of Israel but the saying of David And thus this Authors first fancy is battered There remaineth therefore the keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God but no the old Sabbath T is set down in the Margin of our Bibles the keeping of a Sabbath whence they would evade the seventh-day Sabbath Obj. 2 T.T. although the Dictionaries and Lexicons render ib plainly the keeping of the Sabbath The Greek word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Answ without an Article and therefore this is a meer causless cavil and as for Lexicons that render the Greek into Latin I suppose be will find neither a nor the in any of them for these are English particles and as for Latin Dictionaries he may look long enough before he will find the word in any of them for t is a pure Grecism And thus I think he has shewed his Scholarship with a witness No wonder such an accurate Critick casts odium upon the Translatours t is much he does not give us a Bible of his own making The Scripture gives full evidence Obj. 3 p. 144. that Christ entred into his rest the true seventh day he means the old seventh day when he had finished his great work of Redemption and for this he cites Acts 2.26 where t is said his flesh did rest in hope The* word signifies only thus much Answ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his flesh did remain in hope and it may be as well rendred remain as rest It implyes no such thing as Sabbatical rest He cites Job 17.3 for Job 3.17 an argument he is not infallable As for Job 3.17 which he misquotes again it makes nothing for his purpose All that it speaks is this There the wicked cease from troubling and there the weary are at rest Teaching us that the grave is a place of rest from external impressions of violence and cruelty as also from trouble labour and sorrow to the people of God They shall rest in their beds sayes the Prophet Yet I hope he will grant the grave is a softer bed to Saints then it was to our Saviour for as he took away the sting of death by dying and rising again so also the horror of the grave by being buried Certain it is that Christs burial was a part of his humiliation and while he lay in the grave he lay under the sorrowes paines or chains of death as the Holy Ghost witnesseth Acts 2.24 And who ever doubted but our Saviours durance in the Sepulchre was penal Even the Lutherans who attribute more then is meet to the buriall of Christ as they do to his body do confess that it was a part of his humiliation and that hereby he underwent that penalty Gen. 3.19 vide Gerh. Supplem ad Chem. Harm p. 230. as well as his death upon the Crosse How then did he rest from the work of Redemption as long as he lay under the arrest of death in the prison of the grave Certainly all his humiliation work was Redemption-work from his Birth to his burial and setting aside his Crucifixion we have reason to think our Redeemer was not so much humbled all the three and thirty years of his life as the three dayes and three nights after his death while he lodged in the heart of the earth Before he was but as the Sun in a cloud but now as the Sun under a total Eclipse as to the view of the world And doubtless for the blessed Son of God and Lord of Glory to lie down in the a Psalm 22.15 Ephes 4 9. dust of death and suffer himself to be trampled under the feet of that Tyrant was no small degree of abasement But to be sure whatever our blessed Redeemers rest were before his Resurrection either that of his Soul in glory or the other of his body in the grave it could make nothing for the Saturday-Sabbath for neither of these rests were entred into on the seventh day but both on the sixth day The b John 19. v. 14 31.42 day before the Sabbath he was crucified and the same day he was buried otherwise how is it said That he rose again the third day c 1 Cor. 15.4 according to the Scriptures Methinks this should make the Objector blush to look back upon his anti-scriptural conclusion That Christ entred into his rest on the true seventh-day-seventh-day-Sabbath expounding it of his rest in the
Oracles of God Observation does imply obligation And how can this stand with the soveraignty of God But I suppose his meaning is that God rested the seventh day what then Therefore it was no rudiment had nothing Typical or ceremonial in it It followes not Psam 132.8 2 Chron. 6 41. How often is God said to rest in Types of Christ is not the Tabernacle stiled Gods rest And the Temple and the Temple Worship are not t Gen. 8.21 Exod. 29.18 Numb 15.3 Sacrifices and oblations called a Savour of rest unto God not that Gods soul rested in any of these rests properly nor the people of God neither But he rested in Christ and so did they in these things only as Types or prefigurations of Christ to come And thus he is said to rest on the seventh day We have proved before that man sinned and fell the sixth day and that Christ was promised and actually invested in the office of Mediatorship before the Sabbath was instituted And hereupon God rested the seventh day not only from the work of Creation but from the weight and burthen of Adams sin For God complains of sin as a heavy u Isai 1.14 Amos 5.2.13 burthen and as the sins of the old world are said to * Gen. 6.6 grieve him at his heart so no doubt did the sin of Adam But Christ interposing to make reconcilation God rested the seventh day and was refreshed Exod. 31.17 That the old Sabbath was instituted after the fall besides what has bin formerly alledged appears plainly from that of our Saviour x Mark 2.28 The Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath For man that is for man in misery not man in innocency for the context speaks of necessitous indigent man man subject to hunger and thirst and want T is spoken upon the occasion of the hungry disciples plucking the ears of Corn and eating out of pure necessity on the Sabbath day The Pharisees presently censure them as Sabbath breakers Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath day having power to dispose of it at his pleasure but sayes the Lord of the Sabbath you quarrel without cause For the Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath That is the Sabbath was made for the good and benefit of man in misery Principally for the good of his sick and sinfull soul but partly for the support of his weak and frail body also that it might rest and be refreshed with convenient food Physick and the like which clearly argues that the Sabbath was made ordained and instituted after man was in necessity and misery namely after Adams fall and therefore t is said That God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Gen. 2.3 Blessed it how not with natural blessings that the Sun should shine brighter or the weather be fairer that day then another No the blessings of the Sabbath were of another nature spiritual blessings such as were suitable to the state of fain man such as God has pronounced Fallen man blessed withall otherwise the institution had never concerned any one man since the fall How could it if the blessings contained in it had bin nothing but Paradise blessings But we shall not inculcate former arguments only add one consideration more to make it further manifest that Gods rest on the seventh day was partly if not chiefly in relation to Christ the promised Messiah T is a saying of the Hebrew Doctors and it agrees well with the a Heb. 2.10 Rev. 5.11 12 13. Scriptures that the world it self had not bin made but for the Messiah For all things were made by him and for him and he is the b Heb. 1.2 heir of all things and that as Mediatour and we have reason to think that Gods heart were more set upon Christ when he set up this visible frame of Heaven and earth then upon all the world besides How unlikely therefore is it that the glorious Creator should set apart a day of rest till the grand design upon which his thoughts had run from all eternity and which was chiefly in his eye when he made the world the glorifying of himself in his Son by investing him with the government of the world and putting him as heir of all things into actuall possession of his hereditary Dominions had some actual inchoate existence 'T is cleare that God did not rest from his other works of Creation till he had made man because till then he had not attained his subordinate end of making the rest of his creatures and t is credible that he would not rest after he had made man till he had made Christ Mediatour and put the government of all upon his shoulders because till then he had not attained his ultimate end for which he made man and all the rest of the world besides Certain it is that the Creation was made but mutably perfect at first and therefore it cannot be conceived how God could keep a setled rest the seventh day till he had setled and established the Creation on Christ the rock c Deut. 32.4 whose work is perfect And this I conceive to be the true and undoubted sense of that saying Gen. 22. On the seventh day God ended Finished or perfected his work namely by establishing it upon Christ that sure foundation 1 Peter 4.18 hence he is styled a faithfull Creator in that he did not leave his work of Creation in a mutable estate as Masons and Carpenters when they have built their houses leave them without any further care what becomes of them but as a faithful Creator * God was not the author or approver of mans falbut only the orderer and over ruler of it to bring good out of evill he over ruled the Fall of Adam for a greater good namely for the establishment of his mutable work by bringing in Christ the right heir setting him as e Ps 8.6 He. 2.8 1 Cor. 15.24 Lord over all the works of his hands puting all things under his feet making him f Josh 3.11 Neb. 9.6 Dan. 10.14 15. Acts 10.36 Lord of the whole world and of all things therein to whom doth appertain the Dominion of the Heavens and the Heaven of Heavens the earth and all that is therein Thus on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made or perfected his work which he had made That which he had made perfect at first with mutable perfection he now perfected again by a further degree of supperadded perfection namely by the promise of Christ and his personall undertaking as Mediatour by whom all things g Col. 1.16 consist And accordingly God rested the seventh day not in the changeable Creature but in Christ the rock and so the Sabbath was stated on the seventh day upon the account of Christ in the promise upon the performance of which promise the seventh day ceases to be any longer a day of rest But
enough is said to shew the discharge of the old seventh day from obligation under the new Testament We shall only remove some of the Adversaries chief objections and then lay down our grounds for the Christian Sabbath He objects Obj. 1 The Fathers institution of the seventh day which makes it as perpetual as the Ordinance of marriage But This is fully answered in the first Position Answ where we have proved that the Fathers institution of the old seventh day was upon such grounds as exposed it to alteration Thither I referr the Reader and shall follow the objector to his next Argument From the Sons confirmation of the seventh day Obj. 2 Christ has confirmed it sayes he 1. T. T. p. 72. to p. 79. By his words 2. By his works By his words more generally among the rest of his royal Lawes which he hath ratified even to a point or Tittle Math. 5.18 Teaching his Apostles to do the like Rom 3. James 2.10 More particularly by proclaiming himself Lord of the Sabbath day Mark 2.28 As if he had said the Sabbath is mine I am Lord of it I made it for Man and having given him a precept and pattern to sanctifie it I shall not make my self a president to profane it Now that which Christ layes claim to as Lord must needs be confessed his Therefore do we celebrate the holy Supper because t is the Lords Supper Again Math. 24.20 He instructs his disciples to pray that their flight might not be on the Sabbath day namely forty years after his death at what time all Ceremonies were abolished by Apostolical proclamation And as thus he has owned the seventh day Sabbath by his words so he has also crowned it by his workt c. This is the main strength and force of his Argument But alas it is to feeble to fetch life into a dead Sabbath that has lain sixteen hundred years in the grave we shall discuss every particular in it and return several answers to it We grant indeed that the Lord our Lawgiver has ratified his royal Moral Law even to a point or a tittle Answ 1 inasmuch as he came to fulfil the Law not to dissolve and destroy it But how is every tittle to be taken Not strictly and graphically for every vowel point and prick of a letter in the Law but for the substance and least matter of it the least Commandment in it so our Saviour expounds himself Matth. 5.19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least Commandments and teach men so shall be least in the Kingdome of God teaching us that by jot or tittle of the Law verse 18. he meant the least Commandment of the Moral Law v. 19. Thus also St. James ch 2.10 He that shall offend in one point is guilty of all By one point he means any one precept or Commandment in the Decalogue He explains himself by the reason rendred verse 11. For he that said Do not commit adultery said also Do not kill As if he had said the same God that gave one Commandment gave all therefore when any one point or precept is violated the contempt reflects upon the whole Law the least sin being an affront to Gods soveraignty So then the sense of both places is the same the least point or precept of the Moral Law is in force under the Gospel and if the least much more the fourth Commandment which indeed is none of the least But what of all this The fourth Commandment is established by Christ therefore the seventh day in weekly succession from the Creation the Consequence is infirm For that day was never directly stated in the Commandment the fourth Commmandement sayes not Thou shalt keep holy the last day of the week and not the first but a seventh day Sabbath or one in seven the old seventh day may be and is repealed and yet the Commandement ratyfied to a tittle in the matter yea in the very letter of it evangelically considered to wit as it is explained by Christ according to the will of God though not the carnal reasonings of men But of this formerly That Text Mark 2.28 rightly interpreted makes nothing for the old Sabbath but much against it For these words The Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath day do speak Christs power to alter and change it not his purpose to establish confirm it under the Gospel 't is a title much like that Math. 21. where he stiles himself Lord of the vineyard as having power to let and lease it out to other Husbandmen Mark 12.9 Dominus rectè dicitur alicujus rei qui in illam jua potestatem habet extollendi immutandi Aretius in Luc. 6. Christ was Lord of the Sabbath that is had power to change the day Engl. Annot. in Mar. 2. Luke 20.15.16 And thus he was Lord of the Sabbath having authority to alter and adjourn it to another day the Sabbath was the vineyards Land-mark or the Churches distinctive limit he that had power to transplant the vineyard had no less power to transpose the Sabbath He was Lord of the vineyard and Lord of the Sabbath in a like notion Suppose it spake as the objector speaks I am Lord of the Sabbath the Sabbath is mine yet still the same sense recurres is it not lawful for me to do what I will with my own As our Lord speaks in another case Math. 20.15 The Temple was his as well as the Sabbath Mal. 3.1 and styled his a Ps 132.14 rest forever and his b Isai 56.7 house of prayer for all people more then I remember was ever said of the seventh day Sabbath yet the Temple is destroyed and as Christ never meant to tye up his Gospel worshippers to that typical place of worship so neither to that typical time of worship He was Lord of both while they lasted that he might dissolve both when their season was expired that he might legally and ex officio give his people a discharge from both As for the Authors crafty collation of these two expressions Lord of the Sabbath day and Lords Supper whereby he would insinuate the equall authority and perpetuity of that Legal Sabbath with this Evangelical Sacrament it savours of more sophistry then solidity of Argumentation let the unlearned know that as the terms are different in the Greek so the phrase in our English Dialect imports different things 't is one thing to call Christ Lord of this or that another thing to say t is the Lords to say he was Lord of the Sabbath and that before his death is nothing so much as to to say this is the Lords Supper and that after his resurrection The former imports the office or authority of Christ the latter implyes his Ordinance And let the objector know that this Epithet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is never used but twice in the new Testament namely for the Lords Supper the Lords day Rev. 1.10 The Holy Ghost
the first day of the week not directly indeed but by very good consequence as Mr. Cawdrey and Mr. Byfield do convincingly argue it For sayes the one our Saviour does here speak of a Sabbath indefinitely and a Sabbath to be observed long after his death even at the destruction of Jerusalem and this was spoken to his disciples apart from the multitude sayes the other v. 3. and the period of time here pointed at was forty years after his death when the Jewish Sabbath was gone and the Gospel sufficiently published whereby the ceremonial Law was evacuated and become not only dead but deadly Not that the old Law of a Sabbath the fourth Commandment was then out of force but the Law of the old Sabbath And then the conclusion is this Christ shewes a Sabbath to continue and a religious respect due to a Sabbath still after his death yet not the Jewes Sabbath therefore he intended the Christian Sabbath to be observed according to the fourth Commandment As for the Jewes Sabbath t is certain that it was void at this point of time yea long before this forewarned flight the Apostles and Christians had their assemblies apart from the other Jewes and kept the Lords day the first day of the week as on the Great day of Pentecost Acts 2. and at Troas Acts 20.7 And although sometimes the Apostles did preach on the seventh day yet as Mr. C. notes it was only before the time mentioned Acts 20 never after and only in other Cities abroad not at Jerusalem for there we never read a word of the Sabbath in all the story of the Acts. I conclude therefore with that reverend Author that no reason can be given why our Saviour in this prophetical caution should regard the Jewish Sabbath but altogether the contrary in regard the Christians inhabiting in Jerusalem and the Coasts about Judea preferred the Lords day before it and it would be grievous to gracious hearts to have their holy rest interrupted with the noise of warlike tumults and the hurry of a tumultuous flight well might the disciples be taught to pray Lord when ever we be driven from the place of our Residence let it not be on a day of holy rest for that would be as uncomfortable to our souls as a winters flight would be cumbersome to our bodies Not that it would be sinful or unlawful when life lay at stake to flye on the Sabbath for to save a mans life is a Sabbath-dayes duty and a matter of far greater moment then to leade a beast to the water or pull an oxe out of a pit both which are allowable it may therefore be scored down among the rest of T. T 's errors and oversights that he makes it a sin to flye on the Sabbath day when peril of life puts a man upon it for hâ— terms it a dishonor to God and prophaning his sacred season p. 77. and yet he sayes in the next page That had their flight bin on the Sabbath as long as they carried nothing they could not be counted Transgressors Which may pass for another of his contradictions But for a closure to this answer we have deliberately weighed our Saviours words and sayings concerning the Sabbath but cannot find that ever he spake one word or one syllable in countenance of the old seventh day as the Sabbath of Christians his words prove no such thing And lastly Whereas his workes are pleaded as the crown of that day Answ 4 I am content if the author think good to venture the whole weight of the cause in this bottom That day which Christ has crowned with his greatest wonders is to be most highly esteemed among Christians 'T is his own grant p. 78. and 't is a truth now let him have but a little patience and we shall prove by undeniable Arguments that in this respect the first day of the week carries away the Crown from all other dayes old Sabbath and all If Christs resurrection his often apparitions the mission of his Spirit the inspiration of his Apostles the conversion of three thousand souls ot once be worthy the name of wonders surely the first day of the week is a day of wonder a day of honor and renown above all the dayes that ever the Sun shone upon The most glorious day that ever God created the most solemn day that ever the Church celebrated a day that has crowned Christ and a day that Christ himself has crowned with the greatest glory of any day that ever dawned upon the world Rom. 1.4 I speak but the words of truth and soberness Luke 13.32 Psalm 118.24 Joh. 20.22 23. Cant. 3.11 the Lords day is no day of small things 't is the day of the Lords power the day of his perfection the day of his praise and glory the day of his bounty and blessing the day of his espousals and of the gladness of his heart which can be understood so properly of no day as of this the Resurrection day Let prophane Esaus despise it and proud Notionists oppose it at their peril Behold King Solomon with the crown wherewith his mother crowned him in the day of his espousals and in the day of the gladness of his heart never was Christ more visibly Crowned by his Church then on the Lords day which also was the day of his espousals when he was made sure to his Church by a sure Covenant even the sure mercies of David Hos 2.19 20. Acts 13.34 but let neither of them blame me if I honor and esteem it above all dayes till they can shew me another day which the Saviour of the world has honored and exalted above it Never tell me of one or two miracles wrought on the seventh day yet I desire to adore Christ in all his miracles but shew me such a confluence of wonders and wonderful transactions wrought by him whose name is wonderful on that day as on this and I will confess I have lost the day Alas It cannot be that one transcendent act the Resurrection of the Lord Jesus from the dead the finishing act of our Redemption weighs down all the honor of the seventh day with advantage 'T is objected that our Saviour was pleased to put forth his Divine vertue on the seventh day in sundry miracles miracles of healing and the like I answer 'T is very true and to him be all the glory But if it were an honor to that day that our Heavenly physitian healed the sick what a Crown of glory was it to his own day that he raised the dead Yea that being dead he raised himself from the dead so also if he dignified the seventh day by casting out unclean Spirits how much more the first day by sending his holy Spirit If his preaching in the Synagogues were an honor to the seventh day how much more his presenting himself in that great Assembly of Divines twice at least on the first day of the week Did Christ ever
first day of the week here the practice being Evangelical the consequence is the more Logical But to the objection is nothing to be esteemed of divine institution and so of obligation to conscience but what ha's a clear command in Scripture Mat. 21.25 26. with verse 32. Mark 11.30 31. Luke 20.5 6. what then will he say to Sacrificing before the Law Where do we find any Commandment to sacrifice before we find Abel sacrificing Or to look to the Gospel in the first dawning of it What express command was there for the baptism of John Yet the poore Publicans and the people generally held it to be from Heaven although the cheif Priests and Elders beleeved him not because they held John as a Prophet yet which is remarkable they had no precept but only Johns practice to warrant it and which is yet more remarkable our blessed Saviour approves this their belief of John and his baptism and condemns those that rejected it as a human institution In like manner we may safely imitate those contemned Publicans in beleeving the Lords day to be from Heaven by divine institution and not of men by human ordination suffering Pauls practice as an Apostle to over-rule us herein See Mr. Abbot p. 66. Math. 11.11 as John Baptist as a Prophet did them the least Apostle of Christ being greater than John the Baptist and in so doing we need not question Christs approbation Express precept indeed we have none in the new Testament but that which is better than a precept sayes Dr. T wiss viz. the practice of the Apostles and Churches For had the Apostles commanded it and the Churches not practised it their Commandment had been obnoxious to various interpretations whereas their establishing it de facto in practice among the Churches is less liable to contradiction if men were not given up to a Spirit of contradiction Yet this must be added and cannot well be denyed Divino Spiritu agebantur Apostoli non minus in sacris institutionibus quà m in ipsa Doctrinâ Evangelij Ames Medul p. 359. Acts 1.2 so the Prophets were commanded Zech. 1.6 Joh. 10.22 that the Apostles and Apostolical Churches practice other arguments concurring supposes and argues that there was a command although there be no specification of it in Scripture for the Apostles did nothing in ordering the Church but from and by Christ either by precept or example or divine inspiration and their very inspiration was virtually preceptive For 't is said That through the Holy Ghost Christ gave Commandments to his Apostles whom he had chosen That is he gave them Commandments by inspiring and breathing the Holy Ghost upon them which was upon the day of his Resurrection Yea 't is more than probable that they had a special warrant from Christ in express charge concerning the celebration of this day For Acts 1.3 of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God Christ spake unto them namely by way of Commandment after his Resurrection but the Lords day and the worship therein performed as it was in the Apostles dayes and ever since is one of those things which appertain to the kingdom of God therefore of this Christ spake by way of Commandment to his Apostles If it be said that the Lords day is not there expressed I answer no more are any other of those particulars appertaining to the kingdom of God which he spake See Mr. Bernard of the Christian Sab. p. 134. therefore it cannot be excluded till it can be proved that the keeping of this day to the honour of Christ is none of the things which pertain to the kingdom of God Again The Commandments Acts 1.2 are such as Christ would have his disciples teach his people to observe Math. 28.18 20. now we find the Churches of Christ observing this day Acts 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 and the Apostle observing it with them yea prescribing duties to them on this day 1 Cor. 5.4 11 20. which was on the Lords day according to the Syriack but 1 Cor. 16.1 2. is express and the Apostle telleth the Corinthians 1 Cor. 14.37 That the things he wrote unto them were the Commandments of God therefore the practice of the Apostles and Churches planted by them implies a command Yea All Scripture-examples in moral or religious actions fall under the Government of the Ten Commandments Answ 3 Now the fourth Commandment having the government of time for weekly solemn worship and the Apostle Paul tarrying a whole week at Troas and observing the first day of the week only for solemn worship it cannot be imagined but this observance was in obedience to the fourth Commandment and so of the exigency of the Apostles Commission not of the Liberty consequently it is the Saints duty not their liberty The remainders of the Objection about community of goods and Love-Feasts are meer impertinencies to plead for these in the peace settlement of the Church is to put a plea in the mouths of Levellers Libertines and Epicures Community of goods was never the Saints Liberty but in the Church's a Act. 4.34 35 36 37 compared with Act. 8.3 4. extreme poverty and persecution and then it was rather duty than liberty and if ever the Church of God should be in the like state of extremity she is bound to follow that Original Copy but this can hardly be supposed And as for Love-feasts I suppose the Author is to seek for Apostolical president to warrant them whatever he sayes 'T is true they were practised in the Apostles times but never approved nay they were sharply b 1 Cor. 11.21 Jude ver 12. reproved as also the Jewes Sabbath and observation of other Legal days were Gal. 4.10 Thus we have made good the sixth Mark for the Lords day namely the Apostles and Apostolical Churches observation of it 7. Seventhly and lastly we shall adde this to all the rest The Apostles Prescription about it Et quae non prosunt singula juncta juvant Though either or these particulars singly considered may be thought too weak yet I am assured that all of them jointly combined will be too strong for the gates of hell to prevaile against this last will adde some strength to all the rest I shall ground it upon that noted Text 1 Cor. 16.1 2. Now concerning the Collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye Vpon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store as God hath prospered him that there be no gatherings when I come Here we have to observe 1. An Apostolical Ordinance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As I have ordained so do ye He does not counsel them to do it but commands them and by his power Apostolical he enjoyns them to do it and if Paul ordained it certainly he had it from Christ for he tells them 1 Cor. 11.23 That what he delivered to them he received from the
Lord and the things that he wrote to them were the Commandments of the Lord 1 Cor. 14.37 2. The thing enacted by this Ordinance and that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 collecta See Dr. Day his Sermons on this Text. Collection for the Saints The word seems to be a metaphor taken from gathering of fruits or gleanings in harvest or rather as Beza notes from gathering of a shot at a banquet or friendly meeting as men invited to a Feast or Banquet use to make a purse and cast in every one his shot to gratifie the poor servants that belong to the house So the Apostle requires these Corinthians when they meet together at the Feast of the Gospel especially that heavenly Banquet of the Lords Supper the Feast of the great King that then they cast in something to make a purse for the poor servants of Christ in testimony of their thankfulness to the Master of the Feast This some take to be the sense of the word it signifies such a Collection or Contribution as men use to make when they meet at a Feast and it suites well with the next Particular 3. The time stated for such Collection The first day of the work Diem caetus designat P. Matt. ad loc Tum solitos fuisse convenire apparet Act. 20 7. Beza the day designed for their solemn Assemblies and that solemn Ordinance of the Lords Supper as was proved before Acts 20.7 Hence in Justin Martyr's time and ever since the Churches of Christ have walked according to this rule annexing their charitable contributions to the celebration of the Lords Supper But still the great Question is unresolved will some say namely Why the Apostle should limit this duty or work of mercy to the first day of the week Some answer it thus The Apostle therefore mentions the day S. M. Cawdrey because there is a special motive in it to stir up their charity being a day wherein they had received such inestimable bounties from the hands of God as the resurrection of our Saviour Jesus Christ and the like Now I confesse there is much weight in this answer 'T is the fittest time to expresse our thankfulnesse to God wherein we commemorate his greatest loving kindness to us Chrysostom is very clear in his Commentary upon this Scripture Vpon the first day of the week let every one lay by him in store 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost Orat. 43. in 1 Cor. 11. c. See how he exhorts from the very time sayes he for that very day were sufficient to induce them to charity for call to mind saith he what you got on that day for unutterable good things even the root and rise of our life arose on that day Nor in that respect only is the time proper to quicken charity but because it hath rest also and relaxation from labour or abruption of business for the soul being discharged from labors becomes in a better frame and preparation to take pity and more than all this the communicating on this day in the Sacraments so dreadful and immortal puts the mind in great forwardness c. This exposition of Chrysostoms as it may deservedly challenge respect for the antiquity of it being above twelve hundred years old so much more for the truth of it being so agreeable to the Text it self For observe it well 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. First He calls the first day of the week Christs Resurrection day and a little before the Lords day Secondly He concludes it was a Sabbath day or day of rest from labor and worki-day business And to my apprehension this is clearly imployed in the Text. For upon this day the Apostle would have them contribute to the poor members of Christ as God had prospered them to wit in the six foregoing work-dayes which argues a recollection and thankfull calling to mind the blessing of God upon their week-day labours and what can be more Sabbath like Besides the Greek word is emphatical as God hath prospered so we read it but it may be rendred thus as God hath given a good journey or a good voyage plainly intimating that upon every first day of the week they had rest and respit from their worldly imployments 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 1.10 something like that of a travellour at his journey's end or a mariner when his voyage is over and he 's at rest in his harbour Thirdly He counts the first day of the week their Sacrament-day as indeed it was and the collection here injoined speaks as much And doubtless this was a powerfull argument to prompt them to liberality It were sordid ingratitude to spare a penny from the poor when a man considers that God hath not spared the precious blood of his Son Besides all this the first day of the week was the day of their solemn assemblies for prayer preaching prophesying singing of Psalms and other religious exercises all which were as fire to kindle their compassions towards their distressed brethren every word of God every Sermon every prayer every Psalm that was sung might add some fuel to that Heavenly flame of their brotherly love and Charity and for these causes the Apostle chose that time as the most select and choice opportunity to put them upon the practice of that duty But here we are way-laid with Objections If any can discern the Sts. assembling 1 Cor. 16. it must be by some other light than Gods word Obj. 1 T. T. I hope he will grant this text to be Gods word Answ and then if he have but eyes here is light enough For let him look upon the words once again What does Paul prescribe here Collections or contibutions to the poor Saints But who must contribute every one how must they contribute by way of casting into the common treasury so much the * Bucan concludes from hence that the Apostle gave order there should be commune aerarium a common treasury in the Church Loc. 42. de Ministerio word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 implies verse 2. and why so That there might be no gatherings when Paul came Which there must needs have been if every man had kept his contribution at home in his own Coffer So that it must be both a general and a publick contribution Therefore it must be in a publick congregation And why all this upon the first day of the week Why not upon some other day but to mark out this day above others for the weekly season of solemn assemblies as also to move them by the day to the duty What need there any mention of the first day of the week if they had not held their meetings on that day and if there had not been some special argument in the day to perswade them to the duty Paul does not enjoin them to lay it before the Deacons Obj. 2 but let every one of you lay by himself in store as God hath prospered him That is
at his own house in the poores box c. At his own house Answ How then could it be avoided but there must have been gatherings at Pauls coming Which the Text forbiddeth The Apostles care was to have their collections ready i. e. in a publick stock or bank against his coming lest haply they of Macedonid coming along with him to whom it seems he had boasted of the Corinthians forwardness should find them unprepared * 2 Cor. 9.3 4. and so both he and they should be ashamed of his boasting That phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is translated by himself may as well be rendred of himself that is Answ 2 sponte sua of his own accord And so Musculus interprets it when t is said Puta illud in Graco 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non esse positum pro apud se seponat sed hoc sensu quisque vestrûm suapta sponte i. e. in caetu sacro thesaurizans cui proposito nonsatisfecisset si quisque aqud se domi reposuisset etjusmodi namque reposita tum demum collidenda essent cum ipse ad eos venisset quod vitari volehat Wolph Museul ad Loe. let every one lay by treasuring up in store t is not meant let every one lay by himself apart and privately but at your publick meetings casting it into the publick treasury of the Church and that freely of his own good will That there may be no gatherings when I come whereas if every one had laid by in private onely at his own house there would have been need of gatherings at his coming the thing which he takes special care to prevent it seems the Apostle came but seldom and could not tarry long when he came for he had the care of all the Churches upon him especially the Gentiles the world through 2 Cor. 11.28 His work was to gather and govern Churches he must not therefore spend his time in gathering moneyes or going from house to house to call for every mans weekly contribution this had been a leaving the word of God to serve tables as the other Apostles said in a like case Acts 6.2 The survey the Apostle exhorts every man to take of his own estate that he might give thereafter Obj. 3 does notably overthrow the conceit of a first-day-Sabbath for he orders every man to lay by in store as God hath prospered him that is according as his yearly revenue increaseth or his weekly trade proves more or lesse gainful If the first day had been a Sabbath the Apostle knowing the proneness of our nature to mind earthly things would never have put them upon the consideration of their outward estates That the first day of the week is a Sabbath Ans 1 or day of rest is no conceit but a Scripture-truth as it shall ere long appear to the shame of such reviling adversaries 2. That upon this day they must take a survey of their estates because they must give according to their estates and incomes is a conceit indeed there is no colour of consequence in it for I hope they might take their survey on the Saturday night no necessity of deferring it to the Lords day Suppose a Minister of Christ should urge this Apostolical ordinance still as I am informed Mr. White of Dorchester did pressing his people to contribute and lay up something in a common stock every first day of the week for the releif of the poore and that according as God should blesse and prosper them in their callings the week before Does it follow that therefore when the people are assembled together on the Lords day they must make the Church their Counting-house or before they come there turn over their shop-bookes in stead of their Bibles What a ridiculous inference were this Good huâ—â—ands I should think would end the week and their work together good Christians to be sure will do so and not make the Lords day their counting-day a recounting-day indeed they may and must make it to recount the blessings of providence in a way of praise and thankfulness and this is a Sabbath-day duty as appeares by that * Psalm 92. Psalm for the Sabbath But further to dash this dream of the adversary let him consider that in effect as much is * Ez. 46.5 6. said of the Sabbath in the old Testament as here of the Lords day and it may be t is meant of the Lords day-Sabbath T is further objected That Pauls Epistle was read in these Churches on the Sabbath-day Saturday he means and then the Apostle exhorted them to Charity and would have it to be their first work the next day while the sweet sense of the Epistle was upon their Spirits c. But This is frivolous For Gal. 4.10 The Apostle had utterly condemned the saturday-Saturday-Sabbath among the rest of those legal dayes and that he should build again the things he had destroyed we are not so much as to suppose Now take the sum of all On the first day of the week our Saviour was raised from the dead on this day he often appeared after his resurrection sent his holy Spirit on this day after his ascension and stampt his own blessed name upon it on this day the Saints assembled the Apostles preached the Sacraments were administred Charities Collected and concerning this day the Holy Prophets prophecyed what day was ever markt out with more shining and illustrious Characters The Best Antiquity for the Change of the day TO this Scripture-evidence for the change of the day we shall now add something by way of Testimony from the Records of Antiquity I may truly say 't is the glory of this truth that besides Scripture authority it ha's the most luculent Testimony in the writings of the Antients of any paralel-truth controverted in these disputeing times we may trace it all along from age to age ever since the Apostles times and with much contentment behold how providentially it hath pleased the Lord to guide the pens of his faithfull Martyrs and Ministers in their witness-bearing to this sacred truth especially in the first five hundred yeares after Christ wherein we shall find enough to silence the vain glorious vapourings of the adversary who affirms That the spotless spouse of Christ in her primitive purity and while she was decked with the Diadem of infallibility T. T. p. 62. and 106. namely during the first three Centuries did constantly observe both the seventh day and the first day of the week yea for the first 400. years if he may be beleeved By the way let the reader take notice of two considerable grants here First That the Church was decked with the Diadem of infallibility as he calls it for the first three hundred years Secondly That the Lords day was constantly observed during this state of the Church's infabllility For both dayes were observed saies he The Lords day was indeed besides his bare word I will bring sufficient witness for it But the
volo comparare Dominicam nostram cum Sabbato Judaeorum Ex divinis namque apparet Scripturis quod in die Dominica primo in terris datum est Manna Sienim ut Scriptura dicit sex diebus continuis collectum est septima autem die quae est Sabbati cessatum est sine dubid initium ejus a die prima quae est dies Dominica fuit quod si ex divinis Scripturis boc constat quod Die Dominica Deus pluit Manna de Coelo in Sabbato non pluit intelligant Judaei jam tunc praelatam esse Dominicam nostram Judaico Sabbato c. I demand saies he when the Manna began to fall from heaven and it is apparent from the Holy scriptures that Manna was first given upon the Lord's day For if as the Scripture says they gathered it six days together and ceased the seventh being the Sabbath day without controversie it began to fall on the first day which is is the Lord's day which being manifest from the Divine Scriptures that upon the Lords day God rained Manna from Heaven and upon the Sabbath none let the Jews understand that even then our Lords day was preferred before the Jewish Sabbath And presently after he adds Vpon our Lords day the Lord always rains Manna from heaven and what he means by Manna he tells them Viz. The heavenly Oracles the Word read and preacht to the people Where note First That he calls the seventh day the Jews Sabbath In nostra enim Dominica die semper pluit Domnius Manua de coelo Caelestia namque sunt eloquia ista c. Orlg. in Exod. 16. Hom. 7. not the the Christians Sabbath Secondly He titles the first day of the week the Lords day and our Lords day Thirdly he testifies that on this day the Church in his time had always Manna from Heaven in the publike Ministry of the Word and all this in opposition to the Jews Sabbath which what else can it signifie but the change of the day I might also allege that 23. Homily upon Humbers where this Antient Father calls the Lords day our Christian Sabbath and that in a literal sense as being a day of rest or cessation ab omnibus secularibus operibus from all secular works 6. Cyptian Hier. Cat. log Nam quia octavus dies i. e. post Sabbatum primus dies futurus erat quo Dominus resurgeret nos vivificaret spiritualem nobis daret circumcisionem hic dies octavus i.e. post Sabbatum primus Dominicus praecessit in imagine Câ—pr ep 59. ad Fid. which could not be meant of an every days Sabbath But I pass on to the next Witness namely Cyprian who flourished about the year of Christ 250 or 54. and received the crown of Martyrdom under Valerianus His words to our purpose are these For because the eighth day that is the first after the Sabbath was to be the day in which the Lord should arise and quicken us and give us the spiritual Circumcision this eighth day that is the first after the Sabbath and the Lords day went before in the shadow c. Where observe That he calls the first day of the week the Lords day and that in reference to Christ's resurrection secretly hinting the change of the day prefigured by Circumcision which was tied to the eighth day upon which the Infant being circumcised was accounted as a new creature as if it were risen again from death to life and this did typifie our first Resurrection from the death of sin to the life of grace by virtue of Christ's Refurrection whose Resurrection-day is called the eighth day John 20.26 Justin Martyr also insists upon this in his Dialogue with Trypho and it was the judgment of the Fathers generally that the change of the Sabbath was lapped up in that Sacrament of Circumcision About the year of our Lord 326. Anhanasius shone like a star in the eastern Church And his Testimony is clear as the light p 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Homil de Sement ad init Of old saies he the Sabbath was in great esteem among the anients but the Lord hath changed the Sabbath-day into the Lord's day The Lord himself did it sayes Athanasius And again Not we by our authority haue slighted the old Sabbath but in regard it did belong to the Pedagogy of the Law when Christ the great master came in place it became useless 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the candle is put out when the Sun shines What can be more plain T is true he seems to intimate that they did then occasionally meet upon the Jewes Sabbath but he gives a good account of it q 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not saies he as if we were infected with Judaism but therefore we meet upon the Sabbath that we may worship the Lord of the Sabbath not out of any religious respect to that false Sabbath as he calls it but meerly in Devotion to Christ whereas on the contrary they celebrated the Lord's day with an honourable esteem of the day as it followes r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. p. 839. Therefore we honony the Lord's day because of the Lord's Resurrection Thus far famous Athanasius whose next neighbour was Hilary a French divine who livedi n the year 355. Hilarius 8. and left a most memorable record behind him of the Church's practice in his time r Nos ectava die quae ipsa prima est per fecti Sabbati festivi tate laetamur plolog in Isalm explan p. 335. Vpon the eighth day saith he which also is the first day we rejoyce in the Festivity of a perfect Sabbath Where we have enough to answer the imputation of Novelty for calling the Lord's day Sabbath however it was called it seem it was kept as a Sabbath in Hilarie's time yea long before t is true he calls it the 8th day also though it have a weekly return in the number of seven because counting on beyond the Jewish tale of weekly dayes comming next after their seventh it made the eighth See Mr. Ley. Sunday a Sabbath About the year 374. Ambrose 9 Ambrose was Bishop of Millain and he also ha's set his hand and seal to this sacred truth in sundry of his writings in his commentary upon the Colossians Or 377. acord to Chytraeus Chronol he expounds Ch. 2.17 Of the weekly Sabbath of the Jewes and paralels that place with Math. 12. The Son of man is Lord of the Sabbath day And indeed the change of the Sabbath does most powerfully preach Christ's Lordship and dominion over it Again to shew the high esteem that he and other Saints in his time had of the Lords day he Rhetoricates thus upon it Å¿ Dominica nobis ideo venerabilis atque solennis quia in co Salvator velut Sol exoriens discussis infernorum tenebris luce Resurrectionis emicuit de rat Fest Pent. Tom. 5. To us the Lords day is therefore
venerable and solemn because thereon our Saviour as the rising Sun having dispellea the darkness of death shone forth by the light of his resurrection And elswhere t Dies Sabbati evat dierum Ordine posterior sanctificatione legis anierior sea ubi finis legis advenit qui est Christus Jesus Rom. 10.4 resurrectione sua octavam sanctificavit caepit eadem prima esse quae octava est habens ex numeriordine praerogativam ex resurrectione Domini sanctitatem The Sabbath day was the last in order of dayes but the first in sanctification under the Law but when the end of the Law was come to wit Jesus Christ Rom. 10.4 and by his Resurrection had consecrated the eighth day that which is the eighth began to be the first being dignified by the precedency of the number and sanctified by the Resurrection of the Lord. Then speaking further by way of allusion to Luke 6. he addes u Vbi Dies Dominica â—aepit praecellere qua Dominus Resurrexerit Sabbatum quod primum erat secundum haberi caepit a primo prima enim requies Cessavit secunda successit unde ad Hebr. scribens Apostolus ait post hac die restat ergo requies populo Deim requies ergo vera non in operis cessatione sed in Kesurrectionis est tempore Ambr. Enar. in Tit. Psalm 47. When the Lords day on which our Lord arose began to excel the Sabbath which was the first began to be accounted the Second from the first For the first rest ceased and the second succeeded Whence the Apostle writing to the Hebrewes Ch. 4. speaks of another day there remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God Therefore the true rest is not now in the cessation of the work meaning the work of Creation but in the time of the Resurrection 'T is as much as if he had said the true Sabbath is not now the seventh day or last day of the week but the first day of the week this is that other day mentioned Heb. 4. this is the rest or Sabbatism that remaineth to the people of God I do the rather cite these sayings of the two worthy Father Ambrose because T.T. quotes him also for the Saturday-Sabbath which he was a zealous disputer against And although he preacht on that day it was but in preparation to the Lords day Hierom 10. Anno 385. Hierom is the next writer of note and eminency in the Church of God and he also speaks very honourably of the of the Lords day In his book against Vigilantius (w) Per unam Sabbati hoc est in die Dominico omnes conferre quae Hierosolymam in solatium dirigerentur praecipit Paulus Item ad Hedib quaestio 4. the Apostle Paul saith he commanded almost all Churches that there should be collections for the poor upon the first day of the week which is the Lords day And elsewhere he informs us how it was observed by the religious in his time x Dominicos dies orationi tantum lectioni vacant Ad Eustoch namely That they designed the Lords day wholly unto prayer and reading of the holy Scriptures For which he commends them and by commending approves their practice But of observing the Jewes Sabbath he speaks not a word only he interprets Gal. 4.10 as a repeal of the Saturday Sabbath and so does Tertullian also Libr. 1. Contr. Marc. Ch. 20. After Hierom comes Chrysostom Chrysostom 11. Anno 398. a painful and powerful preacher in his time and her how he thunders against Judaizing Christians y 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will close my Sermon saies he with the words of Moses I call heaven and earth to witness against you that if any of us present or those that are absent shall go to look upon the Trumpets or meet in the Synagogues or go up to Matrona a Synagogue of the Jewes two or three miles from Antiochia in Daphne a pleasant village as himself describes it elswhere or joy in their Fasts or partake of their Sabbaths or perform any other Jewish custom great or small I am clear from the blood of you all these words shall stand up in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ between me and you and if you obey they shall give you great boldness but if you disobey or conceal any of them that presume to commit such like things they shall rife up as vehement witnesses against you c. See how zealous this holy man was against Jewish rites and customes and amongst the rest against their Sabbaths Neither was it blind zeal but zeal according to knowledge for he knew and ha's told us z 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That Paul perswaded the Churches of Christ to leave off Circumcision to slight the Sabbaths and dayes legal dayes he means and all other ceremonials And again a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christ ha's freed us from these Jewish observances neither was his practice in these things intended for ouru pattern for as he kept the passeover with the Jewes not that we should keep it with them but that he might introduce the truth in stead of the shadow in like manner he also endured Circumcision and observed Sabbaths and celebrated their Festivals and did all these things at Jerusalem but to none of these are we subject Yet lest we should think Chrysostom an enemy to the Christian as well as the Jewes Sabbath consider what he sayes in another place treating of almes where he occasionally touches that Text 1 Cor. 16.1 2. concerning the collection for the Saints on the first day of the week and asks this question what reason the Apostle had to command this day for the oblation of their alms And answers it thus b Hom. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Item 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ubi supre Because this day they did abstain from all workes and the Soul was more cheerful by the rest of the day besides the good things received this day for on this day death was destroyed the curse was dissolved sin vanquished the gates of Hell broken in peices therefore saies he if we so honour our Birth-dayes how much more ought we to honour this day which may well be called the Birth-day of all Mankind and how often does this Father call the First day of the week the c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In John 20. 1 Cor. 16.2 Lords day a royal day a day of rest and the like so others extol it Ignatius calls it the Queen of days the first day of the week and the first day of the world as truly the chiefest as it is undoubtedly the first of dayes saies Eusebius a most Holy day sayes Athanasius higher than the highest saith Nazianzen So sincerely were the Antients devoted to the solemnity of this day that in honour of Christ the Author of it they thought they could never sufficiently grace and garnish it
with titles of preheminence To perfect this Catalogue Let us take in the Testimony of that renowned Austin yea his judgement too Augustine 12. 't is worth the while to take a view of each his testimony touching the Lords day is plain d Vos in dic quem dicunt Solis solem colitis ficut autem nos cundem diom Dominicum dicimus in eo quòd non solem sed Resurrectionem Domini veneramur Contra Faust Manich. lib. 18. cap. 5. You saith he speaking to the Manichees on the day called Sunday worship the Sun but we call the same day the Lords day because therein we honour not the Sun but the Lords Resurrection and how sound his judgement was in the Doctrine of the Christian Sabbath appears by that which he speaks of the divine Authority of it he assigns this as the reason why it is called the Lords day c Per Christum Factus est Dies Dominicus Ep. 86. because as it is in the Psalm the Lord hath made it and it was made the Lords day by Christ Jesus the Lord And that upon the occasion of his Resurrection as he telleth us twice over f Dies Dominicus Christi Resurrectione sacratus est De Cir. Dei Ep. 119. ad Januar The Lords day was consecrated saies he by the Lords Resurrection and concerning the Jews Sabbath he is as plain and peremptory quisque illus diem observat tanquam litera sonat carnaliter sapit who ever keeps that day as the letter soundeth he savoureth of the flesh And again Christs doctrine is the same with Moses's concerning the Sabbath but the time or day is different It were easie if it were not needless to add any more here is a complete Jury already yet let it not be thought superfluous if one Witness more be called in Eusebius by name Eusebius 13. whose Testimony concerning the universal observation of the Lords day all the Christian world over is worthy to be filed We have it towards the end of his Oration of the praises of Constantine where magnifying Christ above all the gods and grandees of the Heathens he speaks thus g 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Who of all the gods or Heroes of the Gentiles hath prescribed to all the Inhabitants of the world by sea and land that coming together into one place every week they should celebrate as Festival the Lords day and appointed that as they feed their bodies with food so they should refresh their soules with divine instruction Thus he testifies the Observation of the Lords day all the world over and that by theh appointment of Christ But does he not also tell us of some as the Ebionites who had a religious esteem of the Saturday-Sabbath still and accordingly kept both days Yes but he writes them down in the black Book among the Hereticks of that age and so does Epiphanius too Haeres 30. Let us a little attend Eusebius in his Historical description of these Hereticks he observes that their name was given them from the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies poor Lib 3. c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of the poverty of their understandings h 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the men being very silly and their Heresie very senceless for they did saith he entertain very mean and poor thoughts and opinions of Christ holding that he was but a meer i 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and a common man Observe it well The high opinion they had of the Saturday-Sabbath was founded upon a low opinion of Jesus Christ I wish the new Ebionites of this age do not still build upon the same foundation Could men but see the Godhead and glory of Christ through the veil of his flesh me thinks the change of the Sabbath should be no such paradox to them especially to such as have felt his divine power in the change of their hearts But to close all let us briefly examine the opposite authorities produced in favour of this Ebionitish errour The first is Clemens Romanus or he that writ the constitutions called Apostolicall who is thus presented in great pomp by our Antagonist That blessed Clement saies he whose name is written in the book of life that elect vessel speaks thus Let us keep holy the Sabbath in memory of the Creation and the Lords day in memory of Christs Resurrection lib. 7. c. 24. Answ 1 The Author of those Constitutions was not that blessed Clement mentioned by Paul but some bastard Clement of a later extraction as our learned Dr. Fulk tells the Remish Annotators 'T is true the Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians is generally repoted the Legitimate issue of that elect vessel But let not this Author be angry if I let the reader see his Legal-demain in ascribing the book of Constitutions to the same Clement which none but Papists do our * Vide Chmenis de lectione patrum Perkins to Demont Praep. of the ptobl Protestant writers I am sure are of another mind 'T is a pitifull forlorn cause that flies so often for sanctuary to the Bulwarks of Popery But If he will needs build upon the authority of these constitutions let him take what followes in the same book Answ 2 Hebdomas una est insignis annus septimus mensis septimus Sabbatum c. iis omnibus praestat Dies Dominious Const lib. 7 c. 36. and much good may it do him Por ch 36. this elect vessel as he calls him prefers the Lords day before the Jewes Sabbath and all other Jewish Festivities whatsoever and herein he concurred with the rest of the antients whereas his Doctrine about the seventh day was but one Doctors opinion The next Testimony objected against us is that of Eusebius who reports a decree of Constantine the Emperour to establish the Lords day as the great holy-day Obj. 2 which the objector calls a presumptuous decree Year Anti-Christ prevailed with Constamine as he would make silly people beleive to change the Sabbath time into the first day Page 113. The Lord rebuke thee thou false tongue Answ That the day was changed by a greater than Constantine even Christ himself and his holy Apostles we have I think made good by Scripture-Argument and that this change was visible in the Church's practice long before Constuntine was born we have manifestly proved by the testimony of the most antient Fathers and eminent Martyrs What if the renowned Emperour Constantine made a decree to establish the Lords day Was he therefore the Author of the day or of the change Sozomen tells us that this Christian Emperour as a tender Nursing Father to the Church of Christ did also by a publick Edict establish the Christian religion in all his dominions Sozomen ib. 1. ch 7. But will any man in his right wits draw such a crack-braind Conclusion from hence viz. That therefore Constantine was the Author of the Christian Religion Understand presumptuous
man that as the Christian religion was professed so the Christian Sabbath was practised when there was no Christian Magistrate in the world and that all the Christian world over long before Constantines time Which one would think were enough to put to silence lying lips O Obj. 3 but Merator and Dr. Hen in tell us that in the Aethiopick Churches both dayes are still observed True Answ but they tell us also Dr. Heylin I am sure does that both dayes are observed as Sabbaths and accordingly called For they call the Saturday the Jewes Sabbath and the Lords day the Christian Sabbath so that what ever their practice be 'T is none of their pinciples that the Saturday-Sabbath is the Christian Sabbath And as for their practice 't is little to be regarded considering their corruption For together with the Saturday-Sabbath they observe * Mr. Breerwoods inquiries circumcision too on the eighth day with many other Jewish and Anti-Christian customes Blessed be God for that better light which shines in the Churches of Europe The testimonies taken out of Socrates do only prove that in his time namely 400 years after Christ some Churches did meet together and break bread on the old Sabbath Which we deny not only we say that the Lords day had stil the preheminence and that in four things as learned Dr. Young ha's observed 1. That the Saturday-Sabbath was never the day of solemn assemblies in all Churches for the constom of holding assemblies on that day never obtained in the Churches of Rome and Alexandria as Sozomon testifies lib. 7. c. 19. Whereas all Churches had their Church-meetings on the Lords day not one excepted 2. The Saturday or old Sabbath was never kept as a solemn Festival for in many Churches it was a weekly Fasting-day and once a year in all Churches namely Easter-Eve Constit lib. 7. c. 24. and lib. 5. c. 15. being the day of Christs greatest abasement while he lay in the grave and under the sorrowes of death whereas every Lords day throughout the year was held a solemn Festival Constit lib. 7. c. 31. 3. All Ordinances were never administred with that uniformity on the old Sabbath as on the Lords day August ep 118. Socrates lib 5. c. 22. as the Ordinance of the Lords Supper which in the purest Churches was appropriate to the Lords day which was therefore called the day of bread as we noted before Athan. Apol. 2. Hence that memorable passage of Athanasius who being accused for Breaking a Communion-cup clears himself thus That time instanced by his accusers was no Communion-time for it was not the Lords day 4. Their conventions on the old Sabbath were ever arbitrary not urged as of necessity unless by Ebion and his followers who were therefore condemned as Hereticks But the observation of the Lords day was ever held a Christian duty and never were any stigmatized with that black brand of Heresie for observing of it nay it was the badge of Christianity I am a Christian I dare not intermit it to all these I may add 5. The old Sabbath was never the Christian Sabbath or day of rest but a working-day So in Ignatius's time Anno 314. he counselled Christians to work upon it and the Council of Laodicea made a decree to this purpose That Christians ought not to Judaize and to rest from work on the Sabbath-day but to prefer the Lords day before it and to rest thereon from labour In which words as Mr. Cawdrey well observes this Synod did but expound the sentence of of holy Ignatius I might instance also the Council at Eliberis Carthage Arragon Mascon Chalons and other both Fathers Councills and Christian Emperours but others have prevented me in this kind of Antiquity So much for the fourth Position POSITION V. That the Lords day or first day of the week commonly called Sunday is the Christian Sabbath or day of holy rest THis does naturally result from the premises For the day being changed and yet the law concerning the Sabbath continued and established the new day must needs be a day of rest as it rests on the authority and morality of the fourth Commandment and as it succeeds the old day in Sabbath-solemnity Yet it is not so much the name as the thing that I contend for For although I am fully convinced that as our spirituall exercises are called Sacrifices because they succeed in the place of the Jewes Sacrifices so and much more significantly may our Lords day be termed Sabbath because it * Succeeds I mean not in any ceremonious respect but in relation to the fourth Commandment succeeds in the place of the Jewes Sabbath yet I had rather insist upon the thing than the name because the one being proved the other cannot well be denyed No rational man will stick at nominal respect where there is a real right to it A name of rest will be easily granted due to a day of rest now that the Lords day is without dispute a day of rest appears thus Cum de re constat propier quam vorba dicuntur de verbis non debore contendi c. August cont Acad. l. 3. c. 13. First As it is the day of our Redeemers rest from his painful work of Redemption his rising from the dead was his resting from his work By his Resurrection this day he entred into his rest for hereby as was said before he entred into his glory which will further appear by comparing two texts together viz. John 7.39 with John 20.22 The first tells us That the spirit was not yet given because Jesus was not yet glorified therefore when the Spirit was given surely then Christ was glorified Now the other Text informs us That upon the day of Christs Resurrection the Spirit was given For he breathed on them and said Receive the Holy Ghost Now therefore undoubtedly the Lord of glory was crowned with glory not that he entred into the place of rest and glory upon the day of his Resurrection but into the state of rest and glory the place is but accidental to the state that which I modestly propounded to further inquiry page 128. Namely Whether Christ did not locally ascend into Heaven on the very day of his Resurrection has been since concluded and resolved in the Negative by a Reverend Brother from that Text of Scripture Hebr. 9 12. by his own blood he entred once into the Holy place Which seems to a gue strongly that our blessed High Priest entred once and but once into Heaven To which I do now freely subscribe Errare possum Haereticus esse nolo Secondly The Lords day is a day of Religious Assemblies for solemn weekly worship therefore also a day of religious rest from civil and secular imployments Since 't is impossible for men to meet together about solemn Worship and at the same time to follow their worldly occasions observed as Sabbaths as the Feast of unleavened bread * Deut.
day of the Lord will be as a day of refreshing to some so a stormy day of tempests and terrors to others and a great part of the tempest of that day will fall upon the thoughts and hearts of men for * Eccles 12. ult God will bring every secret thing into judgement we must be accountable not only for idle words but vain thoughts And thus much of the first thing we must keep the Sabbath as a day of rest but we must not rest in this rest we must not make it a Sabbath of idleness but a Sabbath of holiness we must not so much cease from working as change our work servile work for soul work worldly imployments for spiritual exercises That is the next thing 2. To our holy rest we must join holy work and this is either publike or private something indeed must be done in private before the publike our closet-devotions and Family duties common to other dayes must not he omitted this day but rather augmented their Sacrifices under the Law were * Numb 28.9 doubled upon the Sabbath-day and observe it Exod. 3.7 their first service was the burning of Incense before the Lord. Matth. 28.1 Mark 16.2 John 20.1 Now prayer is our Incense let this be our morning exercise in private Seek the Lord O my soul seek him early do as Mary Magdalen did she was early up to seek him whom her soul loved she was last at the Cross and first at the Sepulchre in the dawning while it was yet dark very early in the morning say the Evangelists Oh that our love to Christ could keep pace with hers Shall we love the world better than Christ if we have a journey to go about worldly concernments we can set out betimes oh that we were as wise for our souls as we are for our bodies let not sleep that devourer of time beguile us of our golden hours in the morning in which we are freshest and fittest for converse with God let the sluggard that sleeps with the Sun-beams in his face remember that saying of Austin If the Sun could speak how roundly might it salute thee with this reproof I laboured more then thou yesterday and yet I am risen before thee to day But this is too low an Argument behold the Sun of righteousness is risen and he rose early this day therefore let us not sleep as do others but say and sing with the Church f Isai 26. â— With my soul have I desired thee in the night yea with my spirit within me will I seek thee early Having performed our morning exercises in private how cheerfully should we repair to the publike Assemblies and draw nigh to God in publike Ordinances on this acceptable day this season of grace when Christ sits in State as one speaks scattering treasures of grace amongst hungry and thirsty Saints that are poor in Spirit and wait for spiritual alms at the Throne of grace g Psal 84.1 2. How amiable are thy Tabernacles O Lord of Hosts My soul longeth yea even fainteth for the courts of the Lord My heart and my flesh cryeth out for the living God And again h Psal 122.1 I was glad when they said unto me let us go into the house of the Lord. For the i Psal 87.2 Lord loveth the gates of Zion more then all the dwellings of Jacob and most sweetly the Prophet Isaiah speaking of Gospel-times k Isai 2 1 2. Many people shall go and say Come and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord to the house of the God of Jacob and he will teach us of his ways and we will walk in his paths A most lively prediction of our Christian solemn Assemblies the select season of which is signified by t he practice of the Apostles and Primitive Saints to be the first day of the week on this day they met to break bread and Paul preached to them Acts 20.7 on this day they were all together with one accord in prayer Acts 2.1 with chap. 1.2 4. and at these meetings the Scriptures were read by the Apostles command Tertul. Apol. cap. 39. Col. 4.16 1 Thes 5.27 to which may be added singing of Psalms usual at their solemn Assemblies 1 Cor. 14. an Ordinance by which God is much glorified and the souls of his people sweetly cheered and refreshed what greater act of honour can we do to the great God here on earth then publikely to praise him in the great Congregation especially on the Lords day Psal 111.1 when all the Churches of Christ in the world joyn consort with us in this melodious duty Hebr. 10.25 Let us not therefore forsake the assembling of our selves together as the manner of some is while we enjoy publike Liberties and Ordinances let us improve them we know not how soon the songs of the Temple may be turned into howlings and Ichabod may be written upon all our Church-doors the glory is departed from Israel Lam. 1.4 16. the ways of Sion de mourn because none come to her solemn assemblies The Lord forbid that ever we should live to see that woful day wherein we shall desire to see one of the dayes of the Son of man but shall not see it Let not our neglect of the Lords day provoke the Lord to deprive us of it let us conscienciously wait upon God in Sabbath-Assemblies and publick Ordinances lest we be forced for contempt of the publike to seek our bread in secret wandring up and down in caves and dens of the earth destitute afflicted tormented as we read of some better than our selves Heb. 11.38 39. Lastly The publike solemnities of the day being ended what remains but that we return again to our private exercises searching the Scriptures concerning the truths taught in publike as the * Acts 17.11 noble Bereans did to which we may joyn Repetition and Conference to whet the Word upon one anothers hearts let not our souls be weary of Sabbath-work only take heed as of resting in the rest so also in the work of the day for what one truly speaks of duties and actings of grace they are good duties and good graces but bad Christs the like may I say of Sabbaths never so well kept they are good Sabbaths but bad Saviours let our rest and confidence be only in Christ and to such as take him for their rest his work is but recreation and so indeed we should esteem it in a spiritual sense not looking upon it as a sowr task or a rigid exaction but calling the Sabbath a delight we should keep it accordingly even the whole day with the whole man as a day of delights to the Lord being transported beyond flesh and the world and having our conversation in heaven as much as is possible for creatures cloathed with flesh To come to a closure There is a double duty to be performed in private on the Lords day which I seriously advise Christians
no congruity in that passage of T.T. where he reasons thus against reason p. 54. Certainly if Adam were a follower of God as a dear child he must needs keep the Sabbath with his Father With his Father how then could he follow him Certainly God went before if Adam followed him as a dear child I cannot conceive how he could possibly keep a Sabbath that God himself had not first blessed and sanctified to that end I may upon better grounds suppose with a late renowned Champion in this controversie that God alone kept the first Sabbath as Christ alone the first Lord's day that he might afford Adam an example Mr. Cawdrey's Sab. rediv. p. 3. cap. 1. as of working six daies by his being exercised six daies in the work of creation so of resting the seventh in it's next weekly return and so successively week after week But it will be said if Adam were bound to keep the first Sabbath we are bound to believe he did keep it Therefore a word or two of that 2. If he were bound I demand quo jure by what Law By the Law written in his heart why then was he bound to keep a Sabbath before there was a Sabbath to keep for the Law was graven in his heart on the sixth day as a branch of that * Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 divine image of God concreated with him Whereas the Sabbath to be sure was not instituted till the seventh day if then Besides the Law written in the table of Adam's heart was the same in this Authors judgment which was afterwards written in Tables of Stone that is the fourth Commandement which if we take his and Mr. Brabournes Comment upon it prescribes six daies for labour before a seventh of rest Now this order Adam could not possibly observe for the first week being created but on the sixth day He must therefore look out some other Law and where he will find it I cannot see unless in Gen. 2.3 and he must be very sharp-sighted to find any thing there that looks like a Law binding our first Parents to observe the first Sabbath For let the words be well pondered And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Gen. 2.3 Opened becase in it he had rested from all his works which he had created and made Whence we may clearly gather 'T is not said because he should rest but had rested that God's resting on the seventh day was in order of time before his blessing and sanctifying of the day as those words ver 2. On the seventh day God rested from all his works which he had made See Mr. White of Dorchester Gen. 2. imply the making of the works before God's resting so ver 3. He blessed and sanctified the seventh day because in it he had rested must needs intimate that God's resting on the seventh day went before his sanctifying of the day or setting it apart for a Sabbath Not long before I grant As Chap. 1. where Moses relates God's six daies works as finished by him then followeth the blessing upon them So in the 2. Chap. he makes the blessing to follow upon Gods resting as before upon his working but evidently long enough to discharge our first parents by virtue of those words from any obligation to keep the first Sabbath And whereas T.T. argues that the Sabbath was made for man and if Adam were a man the Sabbath was made for him I grant the whole argument onely with this distinction That although it was made for man yet it follows not that it was made for man as soon as man was made Neither has he alledged any one text of Scripture Valeat quantum valere potest of sufficient evidence to support his grand conclusion That the seventh-day-Sabbath was instituted and observed in pure Paradise Which if it b Yet I grant it not should be granted him yet his feeble cause would receive no invincible strength by it For although it would prove a Sabbath and a weekly Sabbath one day in seven to be moral and perpetual which I deny not and herein I could joyn issue with the contrary-minded yet what is this to the perpetuity and immutability of that old seventh day since in the judgment of all Interpreters both antient and modern except Jews onely one day in seven or a seventh part of weekly time is here perpetually established that old seventh day onely temporarily and during the state of the old world So Chrysostome Here saies he from the beginning God has intimated to us this doctrine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost Hom. 19. in Gen. 2. instructing us to set apart one day in the circle of every week for spiritual exercises Note by the way he saies not it is expresly determined here that is left for the fourth Commandement but it is intimated and implied here And the like saies Junius But to draw to a conclusion I suppose it is more then probably demonstrative If I may so speak without a Soloecism that the old Sabbath was instituted though in the beginning yet after the Fall in man's corrupt estate when he had put off his publick capacity as the representative of mankind and was looked upon as a single person yea a sinful person and one that stood in need of a Redeemer and so the day must needs be alterable as shall be shortly argued and evinced However if we should suppose the date of the Sabbaths institution to be utterly uncertain as the institution of Sacrifices is I see not but this may argue as to the day mutability stamped upon it It is true the solemne worship of God is unalterable as long as there is a God to be worshipped but the old way of worship by Sacrifices was mutable from the very first original of it Thus I grant the time of worship Rom. 12.1 Chrys in Hebr. Hom. 11. Basil in Isai c. 20. the Sabbath it self being an inseparable adjunct of solemne worship is perpetual but the old day the seventh from the Creation was made mutable in the first institution of it Indeed in some sense we have sacrifices still spiritual sacrifices and we have a Sabbath still yea * Mat. 24.20 a literal Sabbath But old Sabbaths and old Sacrifices being twins though both honorable and serviceable in their generations yet like Hippocrates twins they lived together and died together and let both together in God's name be buried in the grave of Christ so as never to rise again 2 Cor. 5.15 17. But let our Gospel-worship and Gospel-Sabbath take life from our Saviour's Resurrection which brought with it a new Creation a new World making all things new as the Apostle speaks 2. That the old seventh day was made alterable in the first institution will further appear if we consider the Law or command by which it was instituted which is no where to be found but in Gen. 2.3 As for the Law written in Adam's breast it is
were given before the fall and should undoubtedly have bound Adam and all his posterity if he had not fallen Gen. 2.17 yet now it binds none neither should it if the tree were known So also that positive law of keeping and dressing the Garden Mr. â—â— Strange which to Adam was a binding precept yet now it is wholly abrogated in the letter of it or else as one sayes we must all tag and rag turn gardeners True there was something moral and of the law of nature in that precept Yates Model of Divin Haec lex naturalis est conjunctam habens designationem diei ceremonialem quia verò partim naturalis partimque ut loquuntur Scholae positiva est Propterea discrimen oportet in eo ordine adhiberi quod enim naturale est puta diem septimum quemque Deo sacrum esse illud permanet quod positivum nempe illum diem qui septimus est creationis esse Diem Sabbathi hoc mutatum est Juni prae'ec in Gen. 2. p. 27. man must alwayes be exercised and imployed the earth his store-house must also be his work-house Idleness and happiness could never consist together But that his imployment must be limited to the culture of a Garden that was meerly positive The like may be said for the Law of the Sabbath supposing not granting it had been given in paradise that man should celebrate a Sabbath was moral and perpetual but that it must be on the seventh day from the Creation was meerly positive temporary and alterable at the law-givers pleasure And this may serve as a proper Engine to undermine that grand argument founded on the institution of marriage P. 155. The Sabbath is a precept saith he as ancient as Vniversal as marriage both were instituted in paradise for Adam and all his posterity Ans We grant that the institution of marriage was made in pure paradise which ever since has made it honorable amongst all men Heb. 13.4 And thus far we also grant the first institution is a perpetual obligation viz. That one man is bound to one woman yet I hope no man is tyed by that first institution to make choice of this or that particular woman but he is at liberty to marry whom he lists provided it be in the Lord so also admitting the Sabbath to be instituted in paradise yet I can see no reason why it should limit us to that particular day but that notwithstanding we may observe any other day that shall appear to be of the Lords appointment as the first day of the week infallibly is and therefore it bears the Lords name being styled the Lords Day by way of eminency Indeed now the day is fixed and we cannot chuse another nor change it to another Psa 118.29 Rev. 1.10 for reasons hereafter to be rendered But enough is said to prove the command whatever it was whereby the old Sabbath was instituted to be but temporary though it had been given in Innocency A positive precept given in innocency might suffer much alteration by mans apostasie Mr. Sheph. Thes 17.19 For to borrow the words of a reverend Author the sin of man made the Lord repent that ever he had made man and consequently that ever he made the world for man which might be a sufficient ground of the Law-givers pleasure to alter and change the day stated upon the worlds Creation to another day stated upon the worlds Redemption of which the Lord will never repent Now if a precept or institution given before the fall might be mutable at the Law givers pleasure how much more this of the seventh day which was rather imposed since the fall as the institution of Sacrifices the prohibition of blood c. Gen. 9.4 3. That the old seventh day was made alterable in the first institution of the Sabbath is most of all evident from the ground or occasion upon which it was instituted and this is hinted unto us in those words Gen. 2.2 See Ainsworth annot in Gen. 2.2 On the seventh day God ended his works which he had made and rested the seventh day wherefore he blessed and sanctified it Now it much concerns us to enquire in what sense the Lord is said to have ended his works on the seventh day since we must not imagine with Hierome and Catharinus that God made any new creatures on the seventh day for doubtless the creation was finished on the sixth day How then it is said on the seventh day God ended his works Why without resting and torturing the words as some do we may understand it in one or both of these two respects either 1. In respect of Providence or 2. In respect of the Promise 1. In respect of Providence So judicious Mr. White in Gen. 2. and why may not this be the meaning of the holy Ghost That on the seventh day God was pleased by a signal hand of Providence to perfect his works of Creations either by establishing them to continue as they do this day or at least by manifesting their accomplishment in his rest and cessation from Creating-work Take the word Ended in this sense and so it informs us that the ground of Gods sanctifying the seventh day was not simply his rest upon that day but also the reason of that rest Heb. 4. v. 3.4 namely the finishing of his works witnessed by his resting as the Author to the Hebrews plainly intimates And not only that but also the result and consequent of both namely the dignifying and honouring of that day above all other dayes for the time being by crowning it with the accomplishment of the greatest work then made or manifested to be made perfect Isa 58.3 Hence the seventh day was styled The Honorable of the Lord not that in it self one day is more honorable and observable then another but that which differences the one from the other and dignifies one above another is Gods casting honour upon it by some memorable work of Providence either begun or finished upon that day Upon which account most of the Jewes Festivals were instituted as their Passeover in the 14th of Abib Lev. 23.5 Esth 9.21 the Feast of Purim on the 14th of Adar like our Gunpowder-treason-day on the 5. of November because the noble acts of God have been done upon these dayes And this was a main ground of their weekly Sabbath upon the seventh day being a day crowned with the greatest work then visible a work manifested to be finished on the seventh day by Gods resting on that day Yet this must be noted that the finishing of Gods work did not make the day more honorable then others by any natural necessity but only by positive right and equity There was no necessary and natural cause why the seventh day on which the work was declaratively ended should be more honorable then the sixth day on which it was really ended and finished only it was Gods will and pleasure to have
to break the bonds of Christian unity and the bounds of Christian liberty yea to render the golden yoke of Christs Gospel heavier then the Iron yoke of Moses Law But his wretched design is visible in pressing two dayes in a week he would suppresse one The old seventh day must be kept as a Sabbath the Lords day only as a Church holy-day or State holy-day rather for he calls it mans Sabbath But I beseech you what has man to do to appoint a weekly holy-day contrary to Gods expresse command of six dayes for labour If the Lords day be of mans making you sin in keeping of it Psalm 118.24 But if it be a day of Gods making as the Scripture sayes then you sin in keeping any other weekly day besides it And to close all let me adde this which will not easily be answered To keep the old seventh day as a Sabbath in memory of the Creation and the Lords day only as a lesser holy-day in memory of Redemption is to place the greater honour upon the lesser work and to professe that we are lesse ingaged to Christ for shedding his blood to redeem the world then to God the Father for speaking the word to create the world which how it can stand with that Gospel-precept of honouring the Son as we honour the Father John 5.23 let any sober Christian judg Thus we have considered the ground of the Sabbaths institution in the first sense as Gods ending his work may be understood in respect of Providence But 2. Secondly and chiefly God may be said to have ended his work on the seventh day in respect of the promise then manifested to have been given by Christs actual undertaking the work of his Mediatorship and the Fathers rest or complacency in that blessed undertaking of the Son And here I doubt not but we shall make it appear by the light of Gods candle shining in the Scriptures that the first institution of the seventh day was founded not so much upon the memory of the Creation as upon the first publication of Christ in the promise and then it will undeniably follow that the day was made mutable in the first foundation of it For a day fixed upon the making of a promise must needs be changed upon the making good of that promise To make way for the framing of my argument I shall premise these seven considerations 1. That man sinned and fell the same day on which he was created as has been already argued and shall be further proved in the close of this position neither should it seem improbable or incredible to any that so goodly a building should be raised and ruinated both in one day considering the foundation of it stood upon the tottering Sands of free-will not the impregnable rock of free-grace and Christs righteousness 2. As man fell suddenly so Christ was promised seasonably and early The merciful Lord would not let the Sun go down upon his wrath but in the cool of the day while the wound of mans fall was yet fresh and bleeding he gave him that soveraign plaster in the promise Gen. 3.15 The seed of the woman shall bruise the Serpents head 3. That the fall of man brought corruption and confusion upon the whole Creation Gen. 3.17 18. Rom. 8.21 22. subjecting it to the curse of God the consequences whereof are misery and vanity 4. That therefore when it is said Gen. 2.2 On the seventh day God ended or perfected his work for so the word may be rendered and so it is Ezek. 16.14 it may well bear this construction that upon the seventh day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the actual undertaking of Christ newly promised to bring about mans redemption So 2 Chron. 4 12. and the worlds restauration the creatures were brought into a better state then they were in before See more of this in that learned Treatise of Mr. G Walker intituled the Doctrine of the Sabbath as corrupted and defaced by the sin of man This is certain that upon the sixth day the creation was dispatched and fully perfected as to natural perfection Therefore when it is said on the seventh day God perfected his works it may well be understood of a further and higher degree of perfection even that which was supernatural shewing a higher and more excellent end of all things created then that which at first they were created unto At least it implyes such a perfection as consisted in the creatures restauration by the mediation of Christ which made way for the setting of all to rights again A most blessed and seasonable transaction for a sin-shattered world which had certainly been demolished and laine buried in its own ruines had not the blessed Son of God put to his gracious helping-hand These are no humane fancies for a Colos 1.17 Heb. 1.3 Psal 75.3 the Scriptures do abundantly testifie that the Lord Christ is the great supporter and repairer of the Creation without whom we have reason to think that the Sun would not shine one day nor the world stand one moment Hence 5. It followes that God rested on the seventh day That is not only ceased from his work but found rest in his Son he rested and was refreshed Exod. 31.17 that is with a rest full of sweetness and delight such as he finds only in Christ in whom his soul delighteth Isai 42.2 And hence again it is said 6. That God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it how did he blesse it but by ordaining it as a day of Grace and spiritual blessings to the souls of his people during the Old Testament Now this kind of blessing was utterly inconsistent with that covenant of works made with Adam in the state of innocency there was no Grace no Christ in that Covenant But all spiritual blessings flow from Christ that fountain of the Gardens Eph. 1.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore blessed be God sayes that blessed Apostle who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly things in Christ Jesns Did the Lord then ordain the seventh day to be a day of spiritual blessings to the souls of his people Why still this strongly argues that Christ in the promise lay at the bottom of that day in the first designation of it for he was that blessed seed in whom it was all along promised that the nations and families of the earth should be blessed I would ask T.T. and his followers whether the blessings which they expect by vertue of the old Sabbaths Institution be new Covenant-blessings If so then they cannot deny but the day thus blessed was bottomed upon Christ The foundation of the new Covenant a Isai 42.6 I say upon Christ in the promise that renowned promise of blessed memory the seed of the woman shall bruise the Serpents head which promise was first made to Adam the father of men Gen. 3.15 and afterwards renewed to b Gen. 12.3 c. 18.22 c.
as needs he must those that maintain the fourth Commandment to be moral for one day in seven not the old seventh day then let me tell him his charging them with no want of ignorance argues in himself no want of impudence for upon whom does this arrogant censure fall but upon all the Learned Zealous and pious servants of God called Puritans who have encountred the rigid prelatical party in this controversie as a p 73. Dr. Bownd b Hexap in Gen p 43. Dr. Willet c Sect. 6. Dr. Twiss d Dies Domin l. 1. c. 10 Dr. Young e Mosaic Sab. p. 70. Mr. Bernard of Batcomb f in Gen. 2. moral of the fourth Co. Mr. White of Dorch g Doctr. of the Sab. vind p. 236 Mr. Byfield h of the Sab. p. 78. Mr. Fenner i Declar. the Sab. p. 101. Mr. Cleaver k p. 6. 36. Mr. Sprint l part 2. c. 7. throughout Mr. Cawdrey and Mr. Palmer and whom not of savory name in the Church of Christ do they not all affirm the same thing That the Comandment is substantially moral for one day in seven not that old seventh day and must all these modern worthies be branded for meer ignoramus's And not only these but all the Ancients too whose testimony they have all along cited Surely this man is very wise in his own conceit that he can thus look upon the greatest lights of these latter dayes as fools and dunces But I shall not answer him in his folly therefore to proceed Whereas he objects that we have Gods pattern in the mount the precise time of his rest to point out the day Answ 2 As in the first Institution of the supper Christ made use of unleavened bread yet his example binds us only to the use of bread not that which is unleavened So for the first Institution of the Sabbath God rested on the seventh day from Creation yet his example binds us only to a day of that number not that particular day See the new Annot. in Exod. 20. Attersolls new Cov. I answer as before that Gods pattern or example is directly propounded in the Commandment to point out the proportion not the particular day The proportion I say of one day in seven for rest in opposition to six working dayes And therefore the number of Gods working dayes is specified in the example as well as the day of his rest for in six dayes the Lord made Heaven Earth and Sea and rested the seventh day plainly intimating that the main force of the example is to bind us to such a number of dayes six for labour and one in a week for rest not such an order as first or last of seven Or admit there were some thing else in it namely that indirectly and occasionally it did lead the Jews to that old seventh day that is during the significancy of that day and the supereminency of the first Creation yet when a new Creation is finished and a new rest from a greater work manifested upon another day that indirect and occasional force of the example for the old day must needs be out of force to us being subordinated and swallowed up by the glory of a greater work and a better rest upon another day And that without any violation of the precept at all yea or the example either in the direct scope of it for one day in seven A new day might be and is instituted and yet the main scope both of the precept and example still observed in our labouring six dayes and resting every seventh Only that which was circumstantial and occasional is altered upon the account of the new Creatio or Redemption which comparatively was to put out the memory of the old Creation as it is plain Isai 65.17 And that thus it should be that the occasional force of Gods example as to the old day should be out of force to us and yet a weekly Sabbath to be still observed by the moral and direct force of the command me thinks it is not obscurely signified in the Commandment it self if we do but compare two places together Exod. 20. with Deut. 5. at the first giving of the Law in thunder and terrour Exod. 20.11 compared with Deut. 5.15 the Sabbath is wholly inforced from the Creation and Gods example in resting from that work as was said before but in the repetition or second-giving of the law by the hand of Moses a typical mediatour Deut. 5. you see the reason from the Creation is quite left out and the Sabbath is altogether inforced by a type of our Redemption viz. their deliverance from the Egyptian bondage Remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt Mr. G. Abbot Vindic. Sabb. a most accurate Treatise never yet answered So also see learned Ainsworth in Exod. 20. and the Lord brought thee thence by a mighty hand therefore he commanded thee to keep the Sabbath day lively intimating as a learned Author observes the subsistence of the fourth Commandment under the Gospel and the binding authority of it by the incorporation of a new reason drawn from our Redemption or spiritual deliverance by Christ instead of the old reason drawn from the Creation which is here utterly omitted And as he sayes well it is worthy to be considere whether such a repetition of the fourth Commandment not Seorsim or by it self alone but together with the whole decalogue in its proper place and order with such a material omission or alteration be not very significant and what can it more properly signifie then this that under the second and best dispensation of the Law that is under the Gospel the main argument for our weekly Sabbath should be the work of Redemption Surely their deliverance from Egypt literally considered was not comparable to the work of Creation that it should here be propounded as the reason of the Sabbath and the other left out but as a type of the most glorious and gracious work of Redemption there was much weight in it And if the type it self were thus significant Argum. a minori as to carry the force of a reason for the weekly Sabbath setting aside the Creation how much more should the antitype which excells all types in glory as much as the Su does the shadow It will perhaps be objected That this argues the perpetuity of the old seventh day under the Gospel I answer No it quite overthrowes it for in as much as it signifies the weekly celebration of a Sabbath in memory of Redemption rather then of Creation it evidently implyes that when this greater work should be finished the memory of the Creation upon which the old day was fixed should be swallowed up by the worke of Redemption and then the day it self must unavoidably be changed It s true while the type lasted and Redemption was rather figured then fulfilled the old day was still to be obseved
but when the type should give place to the truth the day also which went along with the type must necessarily expire with it At least our spiritual Redemption by Christ being much more glorious then their typical and temporal deliverance from Egypt must needs eate out the memory of the Creation and so translate the day by antiquating the argument of it viz. the indirect force of Gods example in resting upon that day I do not say the direct and principal force of the example for one day in seven is evacuated But rather that this number and proportion being still observed by the Apostles in a new day strongly argues that the inserting of the forementioned argument instead of Gods example does only make void the circumstantial force of the example for the old seventh day not the substantial and moral equity of it for one day in seven Quod orat respondendum As for the Hebrew Article or Particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with which he makes such a noyse Answ 3 By the same rule we must in the next verse translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Those heavens and that earth as though there were some others Num. 18.26 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who knows not that it is more frequently a cypher then a figure serving rather for ornament then for argument and to fill up the sentence then to form the sense Mr. White of Dorch has given many clear instances where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 prefixed to a numeral notes nothing at all and if need were I could adde twice as many more let these two suffice the tithes or tenth part has ha set before it yet it signifies indefinitely one part of ten b Ezek. 5. v. 2.12 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bp. White p. 183. So Ezek. 5. it is no less then four times prophets hair without any Emphasis at all denoting only one part of three and I see no reason why it might not also signifie one day of seven in the Commandment I wonder T.T. will trouble the world with such common cirtifismes sure he cannot be ignorant that this was Bp. Whites notion long before it was his And the truth is that unhappy proverb may be written upon many of his arguments The Bishops foot hath trodden here yet this is the man that cyres down Bishops as every coward will draw his sword upon a conquered enemy when there is no truth in me if the weapons with which he fights against the truth be not the very same which they formed against their Puritant adversaries What shameful hypocrisie is this But suppose the Particle ha in this place be Emphatical yet why must it needs point out the day on which God rested Why not rather such a day in proportion Therefore instead of ending all cavils this is but a meer cavil Oh but he blessed it and sanctified it says the Objector Ans This is either an ignorant or an impudent cavil for there is but one it in the clause and that refers to the word Sabbath and not the seventh day and so I make bold to retort his own words with a little addition Take heed of adding to the commandement of the living God to serve your own turn or putting seventh day instead of Sabbath day for feare of being left speechlesse at the day of Judgment As for those that suppose a seventh day is the morality of the fourth Commandement T. T. Obj. 4. p. 47. they will never help themselves by it for if it be a seventh it cannot be a sixth or an eighth or any other number This shaft seemes to be taken out of T. Bs. or James Ockfords Quiver who argued at the same rate Answ and are sufficiently answerd by others The summe of what hath been said is this That the Lords day ay in one account be termed the first day of the week or the 8th day As 2 Pet. 2.5 compared with 1 Pet. 3.20 Noah is stiled the 8th person as one that made up the number of eight although in respect of dignity he was the first person and yet in another account the seventh day And it is a pithy saying of Mr. Shepheard If the Lords day may be styled the first day of the week in one respect and yet the eighth day in another respect why may it not in a third respect put on the name sevent day and so Mr. Cawdrey seconds him as Adam says he excepting but the first seventh day might be said to worke the first six dayes and rest the seventh so supposing Christ kept the first Lords day we may be sayd ever after to work six days and rest the seventh And that thus it was says another in the account of the primitive Christians appeareth 1. Cor. 16.2 upon the first day of the weeke let every one of you lay be him in store as God hath prospered him to wit So Mr. Sheph. Octavus dicitur quod cum aliis septem servatus fuit Beze in locum So also Act. 20 6.7 where no day but the first of the week is thus disposed of to be the seventh day G. A. in the six foregoing work dayes In a word although our Christian Sabbath be the first day of the week in order yet it is still the seventh in number having six working dayes going before it in one weeke and following it in another continually and this satisfies the Commandement The like may be sayd for that notion of a seventh part of time which they confess to be purely moral T.T. Ob. 5. p. 47. If so then no other but simply the seventh part must from week to week be devoted to Gods worship for when ever the seventh part of time is altered p. 117. the morality must needs be destroyed Which is thus pieced up in another page The wisest Christian in the world cannot contrive a change of the day but he must destroy the morality of the law This Objection was long ago started by Mr. Primrose in his zeal against the English Puritans part 2. ch 7. p. 162 for let him change it to a sixth day and that cannot be a seventh part of time let him translate it to the eighth day and then seven days passe without any one Sabbath let him keep the seventh or the eighth or first at his change of the day and then he keepes two Sabbaths within the compasse of seven dayes This is his Gordian knot but we need not cut it it is easily untyed For A seventh part of time which here he derides as a notion Answ 1 when as a p. 43. little before it was his own concession we grant indeed to be morall yet not morall natural if he intend that by purely moral but we say it is moral positive And to grant him as much as we can If moral natural be taken for that which is known by the light of nature without revelation so one day in seven is not purely moral But if it be taken
decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away Where among other things the Holy-Ghost seems to imsinuate the shadowy nature of the old Covenant setting forth the deficiency of it by a metaphoricall expression of vanishing or disappearing viz. as the shadow disappears when the substance or body comes in place so that if the old Sabbath were of a shadowy uature 't is clearly gone But here lies the knot of the question which yet in the judgment of the most and best interpreters is dexterously decided in that vulgar Text Coloss 2.16 Let no man therefore judg you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or new Moon or Sabbath dayes which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ In the exposition of which Scripture I conceive there have been two great extremes for some in opposing Judaism from hence have opened a gap to Libertinism by condemning all difference of dayes under the Gospel others in going about to stop that gap have made a Bridge to bring in Judaism again I shall equally shun both extremes hoping to find truth in the middle And therefore First I shall premise this as a sure foundation That the Sabbath indefinitely considered as abstracted from the precise seventh day Isai 56.6 7 8. Is a plain prophecy of a Sabbath under the Gospel So is Mat. 14.20 See both opened and vindicated by Mr. By field p. 220 c. was never a shadowy ceremony but was and is a moral and perpetual duty incumbent upon all the people of God to the end of the world for not only Scripture but even Nature it self teacheth us that as there is a supreme God so this God must be worshipped with solemn worship and that therefore there must be some solemn time set apart for his worship and this time not less then a whole day together yea a day of frequent return and this day a day of rest from worldly labour for worshipping-time and working time are utterly inconsistent All this may be fairly deduced from the dictates of Nature Indeed as to the punctual proportion of time whether it should be one day of six or one of seven Nature which doth not so well discern of numbers cannot so positively determine and therefore in this case where the instinct of nature fails us Praxis sanâ—lorum interpres praeceptorum had wont to passe for a principle and maxime in Divinity the instruction of Discipline as one calls it relieves us By which I understand both the prescript of Gods law and the practise of his Church especially Apostolical practise which is the best and clearest commentary upon the Divine precept Now both these determine the proportion of one day in seven for the ordinary season of solemn worship and the last limits it to the first of seven as shall be seen hereafter That the law of God even the fourth Commandment which was the tenth part of Jehovahs will published at Mount Sinai is directly for one day of seven not the last of seven or the seventh from Creation I have proved before and that in this point it is moral and perpetual although not moral-natural may be briefly hinted here I shall offer but one Argument for it Rom. 7.12 Morale est mandatum quatenus praecipit ut è septem diebus unum consecremus cultui divino proinde quatenustale mandatum est nunquam fuit abrogatum nec abrogari patest Zâ—â—ch in praecept 4. p. 595. Ut aelique dies in septimana fit deo dedicata praetum est stabile aeternum Jac. de Valen. adv Judaeos q. 2. Nobis cum veteri populo quoad hanc partem communis est necessius Calâ— in praec 4. Item Luther Quoad observationem unius dieiiu singulis hebdomadis Sabbatum nonest legis Ceremonialis sed moralis qua immota ao perpetua est Ravanel Bibl. grounded upon that Scripture-aphorism That Commandments is holy just and good these are the uudeniable Characters of a moral and immutable law Now if the proportion of one day in seven for holy rest be holy just and good it must needs be moral and perpetual and so must the precept it self that prescribes it But this proportion is holy just and good Grant it to be just and you cannot deny it to be holy grant it good and you cannot deny it to be just Now let me reason the case with any religious soul yea with any rational man Is it not a point of moral equity to pay tribute out of all our times to the Lord of time who holds our souls in life and in whose hands both our times and our breath are do we owe him a piece of every day and shall we grudg him a day of every week when he has given us six can we in equity deny him one Not that I take upon me to demonstrate the equity of this number by the light of Nature or to the light of Nature for as I said before Nature is blind in these things but I presuppose Nature and Reason informed by divine discovery and acquainted with the written word Surely such as have read and pondered Gods liberal grant of six dayes to man cannot but yield his demand to be very reasonable requiring but one in seven for himself Thus in respect of God Again in respect of Man Is it not just and meet that since Mans life upon earth is a pilgrimage and he has no abiding City here but looks for one above therefore he should not spend all his time and thoughts and studies about the trifles of the world but as some time every day so also some one day every week retire from the world and draw neer to God to seek communion with him with whom he looks to live for ever Again in respect of servants and cattel is there not grand equity and reason that one day in a week they should injoy some relaxation from their painsul servitude and bondage that thy poor drudging servant especially who bears God image as well as thy self should have a breathing-time a day of weekly rest for his wearied body and one holy day in a week for his pretious soul Can we in equity afford them less when we have had six dayes service from them can we find in our wretched hearts to grudge the Lord one True you will say there is much equity in this that some time in general should be set apart for holy rest but what necessity of such an exact proportion why one day of seven more then one of ten or two of seven I answer as before A natural necessity we do not pretend but a Scriptural necessity there is why we should be tyed to this proportion and not to any other and herein lies the moral and religious equity of it as thus The written word informs me that there are but four main divisions of time and these of Gods own making viz. dayes weeks moneths years and I am convinced that
cannot with any colour of reason be denyed surely when he entred into his Kingdome he entred into his glory but by his resurrection from the dead he entred into his Kingdome being solemnly invested with Kingly power and soveraignty c Math. 28.18 Having all power in Heaven and earth put into his hands and f Rev. 3.7 the keys of David the Government of the Kingdom laid upon his shoulders to dispense lawes pronounce pardons pass sentence of life and death g John 20.23 to bind and loose at his princely pleasure In a word it was by his glorious resurrection from the dead that God h Psalm 2.6 7. set him as King upon his holy hill of Sion saying thou art my son this day have I begotten thee Christs resurrection-day was in a special manner his Coronation-day and as earthly Princes are wont on their Coronation-dayes to shew themselves to their subjects in all their royalty casting about their silver and gold so the Lord Jesus delights on this day to manifest himself to the souls of his people scattering his precious gifts and graces in the assemblies of his Saints for as this is the day which the Lord hath made so t is the day in which he himself was made i Rom. 14.9 Lord of the living and the dead k Acts 2.36 ch 3. 15. ch 5. 30 31. Lord and Christ Prince of life King of Heaven and earth a King indeed he was in the l Math. 2.2 cradle a King on the m ch 27. 37. Cross but never so much or so manifestly a King upon earth as when he conquered that King of terrours and carried away n 1 Tim. 6.16 that incomparable Title the blessed and only potentate the King eternal and immortal o Rom. 6.9 who dyeth no more death hath no more dominion over him He that shall deny Christs entring into glory by his resurrection will rob him of much of his glory t is true he entred not into the place of glory in his whole person till his ascention but into the state of glory he entred by his resurrection if the bodies of the Saints shall be raised in p 1 Cor. 15.43 glory how much more was the blessed body of Jesus Christ If the glory of the stars be such what is the glory of the rising Sun But I must not expatiate here a word more and I have done He that hath entred into his rest hath ceased from his works as God did from his whence I gather that it is not only Christs rest but the reason of that rest the consummation of the work of redemption which occasions our Sabbath as Gods finishing the work of Creation did the old Sabbath Hebr. 4.3 4. And this the word Rest implies being a demonstrative proof of the accomplishment of the work for even a wise man if he undertake a work will not rest till it be finished or if he do he is p Luke 14.29.30 laugh'd at for his lost labour and therefore much more when the all-wise God is said to rest may we conclude his work is perfected To speak properly if rest imply only a cessation from work we cannot say that God rested from his work of Creation on the seventh day more then he has done ever since or Christ from his work of redemption therefore we must take in the consummation of each work as the ground of each rest otherwise all the time after should be of equal account with the last day in respect of Creation and with the first day in respect of Redemption Now the question will be when the work of Redemption was consummate and complete Doubtless not till the top-stone was laid till Christ was made the head of the corner which the q Act. 4.10 11. Apostle assures us was by his resurrection from the dead for if this had not been done the work had been all to do again If Christ had suffered dyed and been swallowed up of death and corruption in the grave and never risen again then had we remained still in our sins and all our preaching of Christ and faith in Christ had been vain 1 Cor. 15.17 It was by our Saviours joyful resurrection therefore that the work of our Redemption was manifestly accomplished and hereupon Christ rested from his work as God did from his and as when God rested from the work of Creation he appointed a Sabbath although he did not rest from works of Providence in like manner Christ hath appointted a Sabbath upon his resting from the work of Redemption by price although he doth not rest from the work of Redemption by power till all his enemies by vanquished and all his elect saved as a * Dr. Cheynels Treatise of the blessed Trinity pag. 403. learned Author speaks And so much for this Argument on Hebr. 4. only some objections Treatise of the must be removed for T.T. takes this Text of Scripture and wofully wrests it to his own and others misguidance in countenance of the Saturday-Sabbath I shall briefly answer his several Arguments as objections against what has been spoken The polluting of Gods seventh-day-Sabbath was wofully Israels sin Obj. 1 T.T. p. 141. for which the Lord destroyed them in the wilderness as 't is plain Ezek. 20.13 And this being compared with the Apostles admonition to these Christians plainly points out the Sabbath which remains to the people of God he sets forth Israels sin and sorrow on this wise although God finished his work from the foundation of the world and thereupon speaks Gen. 2. Yet neither the glory of his wonderful Creation or authority of his institution could engage them to follow his Example but so highly did they provoke him especially in polluting his Sabbaths that he sware in is wrath they should not enter into his rest c. Wherefore the Apostle concludes in applying all to believers exhorting them in the use of that means which Israel neglected to enter into the eternal rest lest any should fall after the example of Israels unbelief or disobedience as the Greek signifies and then he concludes Magisterially Christians believe it this is the summe of the Apostles admonition But I must tell him they had need of a very strong faith that can believe such incongruous stuffe as this is For Although it be granted that Sabbath-breaking were one of I sraels sins in the wilderness Answ 1 yet it will not follow that this sin is here intimated by the Apostle as the cause of their ruine but rather the sin of unbelief For so 't is expresly affirmed ch 3. v. 18.19 To whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest but to them that believed not So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief So ch 4. v. 2. v. 6. v. 11. And whereas T.T. tells his Reader that the word signifies disobedience I must tell him it is his mistake to render it so in this place for
weak Christians he goes into the Temple to purifie himself the Jewes which were of Asia make a loud out cry against him V. 28 saying Men of Israel help this is the man that teacheth all men every where against the people and the law and this place By which Testimonies t is evident that St. Paul was a rigid Non-conformist and that he did mightily cry down the customes of Moses in all Christian Churches If you ask me what customes I answer they are not particularly mentioned onely these two Epistles do witness that he had decryed circumcision the old Sabbath and other dayes and rites of legal worship therefore in all likelyhood these were some of those condemned customes And hereupon it seems the old Ebionites rejected Pauls writings rating him as an * Apostatam legis eum dicentes Iren. lib. 1. ch 26. Apostate because he wrote against the customes of Moses chiefly circumcision and the old Sabbath both which the Ebionites eagerly contended for and therefore they were branded for Hereticks to all succeeding generations and well they deserved it But it may be demanded by what warrant did St. Paul cry down these Mosaical customes and upon what ground I answer his warrant was e Gal. 1.1 he that raised Christ from the dead gave him his commission signed in Heaven and his ground was good For the Lord Jesus himself was designed to change these customes so much St. Steven does upon the matter affirm for he was accused for saying That f Acts 6.14 Jesus of Nazareth should change the customes which Moses had delivered Mark the expression the very word change is brought in as an Article against this blessed Martyr The only crime they had to lay to his charge was this that he should say Jesus of Nazareth should change the customes which Moses had desivered 'T is true they accused him for speaking blasphemy against Moses law and therefore they are called g V. 13. false witnesses or false accusers but like enough that which they called blasphemy St. Steven had spoken very like in his dispute with the h V. 9 10. Libertines Cyrenians and Alexandrians he might speak something to this effect that Christ should destroy the Temple and change the law and ordinances which Moses had given them Whether he did affirm it or no the thing it self is a certain truth the Lord Jesus has changed the Traditions of Moses he has changed the i Heb. 7.12 law and the Priesthood the Covenant and the Seales of the Covenant circumcision for Baptism the Passeover for the Lords Supper the typical k Mal. 1.11 John 4.21 place and times of worship all things lyable to change he has certainly changed and among the rest the old Sabbath which was mutable from the beginning as we have shewed elsewhere But I conceive St. Steven had indeed asserted this truth for being charged with it does he deny it No he rather stands to maintain and justifie it ch 7. * V. 47. and accordingly God justifies him by making his face to shine before the Council like the face of an l ch 6. 15. Angel for indeed it was the Doctrine of an m Dan 9.26.27 Angel which he had delivered and to come to some issue that which I would further observe is this St. Paul although at that time neither Saint nor Paul was present at the Martyrdom if not the tryall of Steven and did n Acts 22.20 ch 26. 10. consent to his death and doubtless he could not but know the cause for which he suffered which was partly this Reader note this as a convincing argument that a Sabbath or day joyned with other Jewish holy-dayes yet distinguished from them can be no other then their seventh day Sabbath and this is often condemned never commanded in all the new Testament therefore thou must make a new Gospel if thou wilt maintain that old Sabbath for saying that Jesus of Nazareth should change the customes which Moses had delivered a truth sealed with the blood of this Protomartyr Now I would offer it to further consideration whether this might not be one ground of this great Apostles after zeal against the Ordinances Rites and Customes which Moses had delivered and in particular circumcision and the old Sabbath But I shall not go by guesse and conjectural probability Thus much I infer from the premises as matter of certainty The customes which Paul taught people to cast off were the customes delivered by Moses Acts 21.21 which were destinated to be changed by Christ Acts 6.14 But Paul taught people to cast off circumcision and the old Sabbath Colos 2.12.16 Gal. 4.10 ch 5. 2. Therefore these were the customes delivered by Moses and destinated to change by Christ That circumcision was none Question but the scruple is about the Sabbath for it may be objected the Sabbath was long before Moses time as old as Adam Apostate Adam at least I answer so also circumcision was long before Moses time being given at first to o Gen. 17.9 10 Acts 7.8 Abraham yet circumcision is said to be given by p John 7.22 Moses because he was the first that wrote of it and the like may be said for the old Sabbath which was one of those customes delivered or made known by the hand of Moses Neh. 9.14 and ranked with the rest of those ceremonial festivals Levit. 23. But to be sure whatever St. Steven in his dispute with the Libertines and Cyrenians asserted St. Paul in his Epistles to the Colossians and Galatians hasevidently concluded the discharge of the old seventhday T. T. has little to say to Gal. 4. only this * p. 23. That Paul does not here condemn the observation of all dayes c. onely beggarly seasons and elements Neither do we say that all dayes are here condemned or disallowed The Lords day the first day of the week we are sure is not for this was established by this very Apostle in these very Churches of q 1 Cor. 16.1 2. Galatia and to condemn this had been to crosse his own Ordinance But we say all Judaicall dayes for dayes months years do all referr to that specialty Jewish solemnities are here discharged and condemned and among the rest the old seventh day And as for the objectors Minatory charge If any man be so bold to call this a beggarly element at his peril be it Let the Holy Apostle answer it He had best tell St. Paul at your peril be it Paul if you dare call the old Sabbath a shadow of things to come or a * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 poore Rudiment for so he may qualifie the termes if he please but where lies the peril Why not the old Sabbath a poore rudiment he hints this as his reason Because God instituted and observed it Observed it how did God observe it Take heed of unbeseeming termes When we speak of the glorious God we had need speak as the
souls but I shall indeavour to undeceive him and others by sundry answers to his specious Argument The proposition upon which he argues that we must follow Paul as he followed Christ is true in a Scripture sense Ans 1 but his exposition and application of it is false for if he take Pauls following of Christ materially for his doing the same things that Christ did as it seems he does and then argue universally from it as he must if he will make any thing of it his conclusion will contradict himself for he has granted some exempt cases wherein Pauls practice does not bind us and yet his practice therein was materially the same with Christs and I will give him some instances to put it out of question that in some cases Paul did what Christ did and yet we are not bound to do as Paul did Luke 2.42 John 2.13 ch 5.1 ch 7.10 For example our Saviour Christ used at the solemn festivals of the Jewes to go up to Jerusalem as at the feast of Passeover Pentecost and the rest and Paul did the like He hasted to be at Jerusalem at the Feast of Pentecost Acts 18.21 ch 20.16 and I must by all means saies he keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem So that if to practice the same things in any kind that Christ did be to follow Christ herein Paul was a follower of Christ yet I hope it followes not that herein we must be followers of Paul unless he would have us all turn Jewes The like I may say concerning the Jewes Sabbath if he object against the parallel and say it will not hold because those other Festivals are repealed but so is not the seventh day I reply let him shew me a repeal for the one and I suppose I can shew him as good a repeal for the other His grand objection is That the seventh day was never expresly repealed I answer no more was Pentecost Where does the Holy Ghost say in expresse termes Pentecost is abrogated if he say it is included among the rest of those holidayes Gal. 4. Colos 2. I will ask him how can he tell that as long as it is not expresly named If he say it is implyed I answer so is the seventh day and then we are agreed Nothing can be objected against this answer for the instance I have given is plain and pertinent And although I am fully convinced that Pentecost is abrogated as well as the Saturday Sabbath and that as well as this yet I am perswaded if a man listed to be contentious he might make as much ado about the Feast of Pentecost and have as much to say for it from the practice of the Apostle as can be said for the Saturday Sabbath yea more for whoever heard St. Paul say of the Sabbath as he sayes of Pentecost I must needs keep the Feast If he had said as much of the seventh day I should have thought he had made conscience of keeping it which doubtless he did not or he would never have omitted it at Troas as it seems he did Acts 20.7 where he tarried seven dayes and not a syllable of keeping the seventh day but the first day of the week But sayes the Objector it was Christs custome to celebrate the seventh day Sabbath and so it was Pauls Christ as his custome was went into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day Luke 4.16 And Paul as his manner was did the same thing Christs custom herein was the very same with Pauls Answer T is not said that Paul observed their Sabbaths but he went into their Synagogues and reasoned with them three Sabbaths If we should grant him his Argument he would get nothing by it For it makes as much for the Jewes Synagogues as the Jewes Sabbath And what would follow from hence Suppose there were a Synagogue of the Jewes in Colchester as there is at Amsterdam will he say that Christians are bound in conscience to frequent it because Christ as his custome and Paul as his manner was frequented their Synagogues If Paul did it from a principle of conscience or obedience to the Law as Christ did I see not how he can avoid it but if Paul did it only in a way of Christian prudence to win the Jewes he has lost his Argument for the like I say of the Sabbath Whereas he further dictates Ans 2 That it was both Christs and Pauls constant custom to observe the seventh day I answer if by constant he mean continual I deny both for however our blessed Saviour during his state of humiliation observed that day while he lived yet he never owned it after his resurrection from the dead no not once that we can find during all those forty dayes between his Resurrection and Ascention which made up almost six weeks In which space he often appeared to his disciples on the first day of the week instructing them in the things pertaining to the kingdom of God But not once did he shew his blessed face or ever open his mouth all that while on the seventh day that we read of which doubtless he would have done and we should have heard of it had it bin his pleasure to have the Sabbath continued on that day after his resurrection as it was before And as for St. Paul whatever his custom was among the Jewes t is certain that among the Christian Gentiles separated from the Jewes he kept the first day of the week Acts 20. and taught others to keep it 1 Cor. 16.1 2. But not a word of keeping the seventh day in all his Epistles T is as falsly as boldly asserted Ans 3 That Paul did constantly observe the seventh day both among Jewes and Gentiles The places alledged prove no such thing t is said indeed Acts 13.42 that the Gentiles besought Paul to preach the next Sabbath day when almost the whole City came together to hear the word of God and Acts 18.4 He reasoned in the Synagogue every Sabbath and perswaded the Jewes and the Greeks But what Gentiles were these Not Gentile-Churches distinguished from the Jewes but either Jewish proselytes Acts 13.43 Or Pagan Gentiles mingled among the Jewes and admitting some Christian converts among them yet still they were such as had no Church-assemblies by themselves but frequented the Synagogue-assemblies where the Jewes observed no other Sabbath but the seventh day Acts 13. ch 17. ch 18. And therefore as long as the Jewes were tractable Paul and others frequented their Synagogues on their Sabbaths not out of any religious respect on his part at least to the Jewes Sabbath but meerly for the opportunity of their assemblies upon which account he also went up to Jerusalem at their other Festivals as t is said ch 18. He hasted to be at Jerusalem at the Feast of Pentecost What meant Pauls hasting thither sayes Chrysostome Why 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hom. 43. in Act. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idem it was not for the Feasts sake
but for the multitudes sake then met together he hasted thither to preach the word So here it was not out of any devotion either to the Jewes Sabbath or their Synagogue that he reasoned with them everly Sabbath-day as long as they would hear reason but because of the concourse of people then and there assembled As if there were a Synagogue of the Iewes in London a Minister of Christ might occasionally visit it on their Saturday-Sabbath to dispute with those infidels and convince them that Jesus is the Christ yet be far enough from owning either their Synagogue or their Sabbath and that Pauls practice among the Jewes and such Gentiles as the Text speaks of amounts to no more then this 1 Cor. 9.20 namely an occasional act or at most a prudentiall act Whereby to the Jewes he became as a Jew that he might win the Jewes and to them under the law as though he were under the Law is evident because when he saw no hope of winning them to the faith of Christ but they grew obstinate and refractory contradicting blaspheming and openly opposing the Gospel yea persecuting those that embraced it Paul and his converts now no longer frequent their Synagogues but separate themselves and joyn in Christian assemblies by themselves Acts 17.4 5. Acts 19 9. ch 18.17 Thus the beleeving Jewes and Proselytes of Thessalonica so also those at Ephesus and at Corinth when they opposed themselves and blasphemed Paul shook his rayment against them to signifie that God had now shaken them off and he would have no more to do with them and after this Acts 18.6 we hear no more of his preaching on the Jewes Sabbath For when the Churches of Christ were separated from the Synagogues they kept the first day of the week passing by the Jewish Sabbath The converted Gentiles we are sure did so Acts 20.7 And whereas t is objected That this was but once whereas t is clear that Paul preached every Sabbath day I answer if this were true yet the consequence that therefore the Jewes Sabbath was more respected by Paul then the Lords day is utterly false For one single instance of Apostolical practice in a Gentile Church will weigh down a hundred in a Jewish Synagogue since among the Jewes the Apostle became all to all that he might win some Whereas among the Gentiles his practice was purely Evangelical And to turn the point of the Argument against the Objector we must be followers of Paul as he was of Christ Now Christ celebrated the first day of the week in a pure Gospel Church John 20.26 And never the seventh day after his resurrection and as Christ did so did Paul Acts 20. and as he did so must we Himself grants that we must follow Paul only in such practices as were Evangelical and unrepealed Now the first day of the week is such Purely Evangelical and never yet repealed therefore he must eat his words or yield his cause As for the old seventh day it was both legal according to his principles it must be an appendix to the Covenant of works being instituted before the fall when there was no Gospel therefore purely legal and according to my principles partly legal as circumcision was therefore repealed among the rest of those legal dayes of worship Colos 2. for though he cannot read the repeal there yet through mercy I and others can Or if it be not repealed it is expired and was never revived by Apostolical practice or precept in any one Christian Church I have given him one instance of a Christian Church meeting on the first day of the week to worship Christ let him shew me but such another for the Jewes Sabbath among the Gentiles erit mihi magnus Apollo Ans 4 Pauls practice among the Jewes in things temporary is no pattern for the Gentiles a Acts 21.25 St. James telles him that whatever they did among the Jewes in respect of legal customes to win upon their weakness yet as toucking the Gentiles which beleeved they had written and concluded that they should observe no such thing And what if Paul did observe the seventh day among the Jewes must this needs conclude against the change of the Sabbath from the last to the first day of the week he may as well say the Apostles b Acts 16.3 circumcising of Timothy to gratifie the Jewes disproves the changing of circumcision into baptism If it be Objected that the consequence is not good because however Paul circumcised Timothy the better to win upon the Synagogue Jewes who c Acts 10 28. would have no familiar converse with uncircumcised Gentiles yet he would by no means yeild to have d Gal. 2.3 4 5. Titus circumcised in compliance with the Jewes in Christian Churches I answer the very same may I affirm touching the Jewes Sabbath which however it might be tollerated for a while in the Synagogues yet it was never allowed in the Churches of Christ among the Gentiles nor ever practiced without reproof as in Gal. 4. or if it were I desire to see the place and the proof which I confesse I am yet to seek T is no lesse notorious an untruth that not only Paul Answ 5 but all his companions kept the seventh day Some of them might possibly attend him to the Synagogue but few of that train which accompanyed him to Troas Acts 20.5 Where he celebrated the Lords day and Lords Supper among the disciples As for the women which on the Sabbath day resorted to the rivers side where prayer was wont to be made they were Jewish proselytesses witness their meeting on the Jewish Sabbath Lydia to be sure was so for she was a worshipper of God before Paul came there but unbaptized if not unconverted till then What he would make of this meeting by the rivers side I know not unless it be to furnish his Sabbath-keepers with meditations as he seems to speak in the close of his book p. 144. which shewes his high esteem of Rivers and ponds and such like watry places De bello Jud. lib. 7. ch 24. T is a wonder he forgot Josephus his story concerning that River in Palestina called the Sabbatical River which being dry six dayes used to fill up its channel and run very swiftly the seventh day from whence the Jewish Rabbins plead stoutly for their Saturday Sabbath But as one answers them wittily out of Galatinus in case that River whiles it was in being was a good Argument that the Jewes Sabbath was to be observed now since there is no such River to be found it is a better Argument that their Sabbath is not any where to be regarded Mr. Brabourn and he had best go on Pilgrimage to find out that famous river I dare say it would be a more taking Argument among simple people for the Saturday Sabbath then any they have yet alledged For his quarrell with the reverend Translators Ans 6 I tell him again t
is causelesse What if they translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 preaching Acts 20.7 and reasoning Acts 18.4 or disputing as it is rendred Acts 19.9 Sure they saw good ground for this variation Though the word be the same yet the scope of the Texts is not the same for Acts 20. Paul was among Christians and Christians that came together to communicate at the Lords table and that 's no time to dispute but to beleeve to act faith and not reason therefore well is it said there Paul preached to them some quickening Sermon doubtless to excite their Sacramental graces But Acts 18. he was among a company of unbeleeving wrangling Jewes and there they do well to render it reasoning Mark 9.34 Acts 17.17 which unless the context carry it another way is the most apt and usuall signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The very art of reasoning Logick has its name from this compound What rashnesse therefore and sinful saucy boldness is it in this Author to throw dirt in the faces of those eminent instruments the Translators of the Bible charging them with inexcuseable sin because they cross his humours and erroneous conceipts To say Answ 7 as we do that Paul took the opportunity of the old Sabbath to preach to the people is not to render him a constant dissembler as he reproachfully accuseth us but to commend him as a diligent dispenser of the word of truth who for the quicker progress of the Gospel was willing to embrace all opportunities to preach in season and out of season wherever he came Neither is it to speak without book as we shewed above nor does it charge Christ with any criminal imputation he kept the Sabbath while it was in force from a principle of conscience in obedience to the Law Paul from a principle of Christian prudence and indulgence the better to promote the Gospel and so his custom was not formally the same with Christs neither does his custom argue his commission unlesse it be in things Moral and Evangelical and among the Gentiles * Ro. 11.13 ch 15.16 Gal. 2.7 1 Tim. 2.7 to whom he was cheifly sent as a commission-officer of Christ to preach the Gospel of the uncircumcision Lastly Pauls reasoning in the Jewes Synagogue at Corinth and that every Sabbath till he were persecuted and his general precept to the Corinthians and other Christians to be followers of him is as good a plea for the Synagogue as the seventh day and indeed a Jewes Sabbath and a Jewes Synagogue would do well together So that all objections to the contrary notwithstanding it remains a firm and immoveable truth of God that the old seventh day is discharged from being a Sabbath or day of weekly solemn worship to the people of God Now by way of Transition to the second branch of my Argument that the first day of the week is designed for a day of weekly solemn worship under the Gospell I would remind the Reader of what was premised and proved before viz. That the Law of the fourth Commandment for the proportion of six working dayes and a seventh every week for solemn worship ordinarily is still in force under the Gospel Which being made good and the old seventh day manifested to be void one Argument will put it out of all question that the first day of the week is the only day of weekly worship to be observed under the Gospel As thus That day of the week upon which above all others in the vacancy of the old seventh day God has set his mind in the Law and upon which above all other dayes Christ has set his mark in the Gospel must needs be the Christians weekly day of solemn worship or Sabbath day But the first day of the week the old seventh day being void is the day above all others in the week upon which God has set his mind in the Law and upon which above all other dayes Christ has set his mark in the Gospel Therefore The first day of the week must needs be the Christians weekly day of solemn worship or Sabbath day The proposition is undeniable for what better warrant can be pretended for a weekly Sabbath then Gods mind or will in the Law and Christ Mark in the Gospel The Assumption is all that requires proof namely That the seventh day being void the first day of the week is the day above all others upon which God has set his mind in the Law and Christ his mark his signal mark in the Gospel Both which shall be distinctly and demonstratively proved by Scripture-consequence and evidence 1. That the seventh or last day of the week being void as we have proved the first day of the week is the only day upon which it appears that God has set his mind in the Law I mean the Law of the fourth Commandment which may be thus made out It was the mind and pleasure of God that the proportion stated in the Commandment six dayes in the week for civil imployment and one for sacred and religious rest should be observed in all ages Exod. 35.2 Ezek. 46.1 See Mr. Gawdrey p. 1. ch 9. S. 53. and part 3. ch 3. both under the Law and under the Gospel Now the seventh day which was observed under the Law being discharged there is no other day but the first day of the week on which Gods proportion can be preserved and perpetuated without intermission and interruption For take any other day as the second or third or fifth or sixth and there would be losse of time it would not be for once at least one day in seven but one of some other number and besides the six working dayes would not come all together but some of them would go before the day of rest and others would come after it in one and the same week Both which would offer violence to the Holy Commandment which as it requires but one day in a week for religion to six for worldly businesse and allots six for worldly business to one for religion ordinarily so it takes order that the six working dayes must go together and the day of rest not come between them in the same week but either go before or follow them Now in pitching upon the first day of the week both these were punctually observed at the first change of the day for in the revolution of twice seven dayes there were two dayes for religion the last of the first seven and the first of the latter seven and in each revolution the six working dayes are all together And thus it is still successively week after week and thus it shall be perpetually I question not to the last week of the world for I am assured that the old seventh day is void and I am fully convinced that whatever the Lord Christ could have done we cannot make choice of any other weekly day of worship but the first of the week to hold up the morality of
the fourth Commandment which as the above mentioned Author at whose torch I have lighted my candle observes is a thing worthy of special note any may afford a satisfying reason why there is no expresse institution of the first day of the week in the new Testament viz. Because the vertue of the fourth Commandment doth of it self fall upon that day the former being void being the only day capable of keeping up Gods proportion perpetually determined in the Commandment yet I confess as formerly that the Commandment does not directly institute the day but falls upon the observation of it and supposes the institution neither do I urge it directly for the designation of the day for the first day of the week is not expresly mentioned in the fourth Commandment no more is the last day of the week neither but a seventh day is which although as I said before it could not be restrained to one day more then another yet my meaning was and is that it could not be so tyed to the last of seven as not to be applyed to the first of seven if God so pleased Briefly this argument concludes rather for the observation than the designation of the first day day of the week as the only day upon which in the vacancy of the old Sabbath God has set his mind in the Law And good reason For 2. This is the day upon which above all other dayes Christ has set his mark his special signall characteristical mark in the Gospel to mark it out for a day of weekly solemn worship under the new Testament A seven-fold mark he has set upon it which the malice of men and divels shall never be able to obliterate As 1. His glorious Resurrection upon this day 2dly His several veral Apparitions 3dly His gracious actions and speeches at those apparitions 4th The Mission of his Holy Spirit on this day 5th The inscription of his own blessed name upon it 6th His Apostles and Apostolical Churches observation of it 7th Their prescription about it Of which I shall treat in order as they lie answering all objections that oppose themselves against this conquering truth of Christ 1. What a mark of honour yea what a crown of glory is it to this day that it had the favour above all the dayes of the week to be Christs resurrection-day The Sun in the firmament arises and shines upon other dayes as well as this but the Sun of righteousness never arose upon any day but this and if we will beleeve the Holy Ghost the institution of the day had its foundation here Psalm 118.22 23 24. For the discovery whereof I shall once more desire the Reader to turn to that Text Psam 118. The stone which the builders refused is become the head-stone of the corner So 1 Pet. 2.7 this is the Lords doing and it is marvellous in our eyes This is the day which the Lord hath made c. The Apostle Peter expounds this Text and applies it to Christ Acts 4.11 where speak to Caiaphas and the rest of the Councill who went for builders he boldly tells them This is the stone which ye builders refused which is become the head of the corner he speaks it of Christ and of Christs resurrection for v. 10. he had spoken of their refusing him in his Crucifixion and Gods exalting him in his resurrection Whom ye crucified and whom God raised from the dead Thereby making him both a corner-stone and head of the corner Head of all principality and power Coloss 2.10 head or Lord of the living and the dead yeas head of Heaven and earth having all power in Heaven and earth then given to him Matth. 28.18 Thus of Davids prophetical prediction Next let us consider his application of it 1. In respect of the deed done 2. In respect of the day on which it was done 3. In respect of the duty of that day 1. The deed or work done the raising of Christ from the dead he magnifies as the Lords own act his marvelous stupendious act This is the Lords doing and it is marvellous in our eyes v. 23. No wonder for indeed this was the greatest wonder the ever was wrought in the world concerning which we may say as Moses in another case Ask now of the dayes that are past which were before thee Deut. 4.32 since God created man upon the earth and ask from the one side of Heaven to the other whet her there hath been any such things as this great thing is or hath been heard like it That one by his own power should raise himself from the dead no history no chronicle can paralel it So wonderful was our Saviours resurrection that it challenges wonder even from his enemies behold ye despisers and wonder Acts 13.41 Sayes the Apostle wonder at what Why at Gods raising Christ from the dead of which he had treated before verse 36 37. 2. The Psalmist applies it further to the day on which this work of wonder was wrought This is the day which the Lord hath made and mark the connection the day depends upon the deed or work done Factum domini as one sayes facit diem domini The Lords deed makes it the Lords day Here the institution of the day is undeniably founded upon the resurrection of Christ upon this account 't is stiled the day which the Lord hath made because the stone cast aside of the builders Christ crucifyed was made the head of the corner that is raised from the dead as St. Peter expounds and as Christs resurrection was the Lords own doing so the Psalmist foresaw that the resurrection-day would be a day of the Lords own making If it be objected So is every day I answer but not every day alike For look as it was in the works of Creation all were Gods works all of his making but man the master-piece more especially of whom it may be said with an accent this is the creature which God had made so here all the dayes in the week are of Gods making but this in the Text above all the Holy Ghost sets an Emphasis upon it This is the day which the Lord hath made Made 1 How made not by was of Creation so 't was made before Gen. 1. But by way of institution The day which the Lord hath made What has he made it A working-day so it was before if therefore he has made it any thing it must be a holy solemn day a day more solemn and sacred then all the dayes that God ever made before And so the word signifies not only to makes but to magnify 't is equivalent to sanctifie 3. The Psalmist proceeds to the prophetical delineation of the duties of this day Let us be glad and rejoyce therein Yea he brings in the Church shouting and singing Hosanna's to Christ on this day v. 26. a Math. 21.9 Blessed is he that cometh to us in the Name of the Lord As when the b
a day in the world till this day dawned at the rising of the Sun of righteousnesse never such a day T is worthy to be noted what a wonderful concurrence of remarkable periods of time met together at our Saviours resurrection both in respect of the year and the day Is 61.2 ch 63.34 John 4.34 35. Heb. 2.14 15. 1. The year was a Sabbatical year the year of Jubilee as may be gathered from scripture which if it make nothing for the Christian Sabbath yet it makes much against the Jewes Sabbath themselves being witnesses For the Hebrew Doctors have spoken rarely to this purpose even to the admiration of considerate Christians The Divine Majesty say they will be to Israel in a Jubilee Freedom Redemption and finisher of Sabbaths H. Broughtons Sinai-sight 2. The day of our Lords Resurrection was a remarkable day in many respects As 1. It was the eighth day in a continued reckoning of dayes and eight was a number of greater prefection then seven in some respect witness Circumcision which was so strictly tyed to the eighth day John 7.22 Sacramentum hoc suit diei illius octavi quo dominus resurrexit ad justificationem nostram Ep. ad Fid. ita Aug. de Gelebr Pasch that if it had fallen on the weekly Sabbath it must not be omitted for the Sabbaths sake The antients insist much on this Circumcision on the eighth day was a type of that eighth day on which our Lord rose again for our justification sayes Cyprian 2. Christs resurrection was also on the third day after his passion which himself foretold as the day of his perfection For so some expound that saying of his The third day I shall be perfected Luke 13.32 Besides this third day was a day of * Ho. 6.2 Lu. 24.46 note in the Law and the Prophets a day appointed and appropriated to the Messiah signally markt out in the Kalendar of the Prophets and figured by many famous Types as that of Isaac who was virtually a James 2.21 offered and restored again the b Gen. 22.4 third day as it may be computed and that in a kind of c Heb. 11.19 figure as the Apostle intimates So also Hezskiah who was in account a dead man and on the d 2 Kings 20.5 third day miraculously revived again So e Jonah 2.10 Math. 12 40. See Ainsw in Gen. 22. Jonah and others from which instances the Rabbins it serms could conclude Christs Resurrection on the third day There be many a three dayes say they in Scripture of which one is the Resurrection of the Messiah 3. Christs Resurrection was on the first day of the week as the Evangelists unanimously testifie Which although it be termed by the blaspemous Jewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Nazarens day in a way of reproach yet in Scripture-account it is a day of greatest renown being the first in order in the Creation and the first in dignity by our Saviours resurrection The first-fruits of time and the first-born of dayes and accordingly the only day in which our Lord became the f 1 Cor. 15.20 first-fruits of them that slept and the g Col. 1.18 first born from the dead that in all things he might have the preheminence 4. To all these may be added what some have probably argued that this first day of the week was our blessed Redeemers Birth-day as well as his Resurrection day yea the day of his Ascension into Heaven as well as the mission of his Spirit but this I leave to Mr. Aspinwal to make good Only thus much I dare assert that the day of our Saviours resurrection the first day of the week is the fittest for the commemoration of his Nativitie Passion Ascension and all other blessed transactions in the work of our Salvation For the Resurrection of Christ implyes all the rest but is not necessarily of them And if the Lord Jesus had not risen from the dead what benefit had we had either by his birth life death or burial or being dead and buryed how had he ascended and the Spirit the Comforter descended unless he had first bin raised from the dead Besides his Resurrection and Ascension are computed h Luke 24.26 Eph. 4.8 9 10. See Dr. Twisse p. 117. Sect. 5. 1 John 20.17 in Scripture as one compleat motion As his dying and continuing under the power of death for a time were but one entire work of Redemption For however after his resurrection he stayed a sew dayes here upon earth to confirm the faith of his followers and settle the affairs of his Kingdom yet he was no sooner risen but presently he speaks of his ascending and indeed his rising was in reference to his ascending partly if not a part of it It was the first step of his triumphant passage into his kingdom and glory So that in a right sense very Lords day is our Christmass-day Easter-day Ascension-day Whitsunday and all my meaning that in a right celebration of our Christian Sabbath we solemnize the memorial of all these blessed ingredients in the work of our Redemption We need not contend for an annual Solemnization of our Saviours birth-day resurrection-day ascension-day neither need we fear oblivion of these gracious and glorious mysteries if the Lords day were duly observed We cannot better keep alive the memory of these mercies than by keeping a day in commemoration of them once a week and no day so fit as the Lords day in which we have the sum of all A day that brought forth the greatest good to faln man of any day even a compleat Redeemer who on this day redeemed us with triumph from the tyranny of Satan the dominion of death and hell and k John 10.25 ch 14. 19. restored us to life and Salvation yea assured it unto us Therefore I conclude with that renowned father the Lords day was declared by the Lords Resurrection to be the Christians day Dies Dominicus Christi resurrectione declaratus est ex illo caepit habere festivitatem suam August Ep. 119. ad Jan. item de Civitate Dei lib. 22. cap. ult Serm. 15. de verb. Apost and from that very time it began to be celebrated as the Christian mans Festival or rather with that of the Psalmist This is the day which the Lord hath made 'T is no day of mans making if the God of truth may be beleeved 'T is a plant of the Lords own planting therefore the Divel and all his instruments shall never be able to pluck it up Neither can all the men nor all the Churches in the world alter it to another day And how remarkable is it that the Church for sixteen hundred years should no where offer or attempt to alter it but in all places and all ages observe it What does this speak but the Divine authority of it by which mens Spirits have been awed and their hands tied from such presumptuous undertakings the truth is
as I noted before 't is built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Jesus Christ by his resurrection being the chief corner-stone And because nothing can ever fall out in this world comparable to Christs Resurrection in glory and power therefore no day can be set up like unto this neither can it be changed for any other See Dr. Bownd lib. 1. p. 47. No man can translate the work therefore no man can translate the day The like cause can never be offered to change this day which at first occasioned the choice of it Therefore it must and shall remain till the end of all things men do but kick against the pricks in opposing the Lords day they that would raze out the remembrance of this day must first pick out Christs mark which he ha's wrought into it by the work of Redemption and so blot out the testimony of all the four Evangelists concerning Christs Resurrection the first day of the week together with the prophecy of the Psalmist which if they dare do Yet 2. We have another conspicuous mark to note it by above all other dayes in the week namely our Saviours frequent apparitions on this day after his Resurrection from the dead Here let it be observed First That these glorious apparitions of our now glorified Redeemer were no common favours but choice and speciall evidences of his owning providence both as to persons and times For as he appeared not to all sorts of persons but to some select * Acts 10.41 chosen witnesses who were either eminently devoted to his service or designed to teach others so neither did he make his appearance to those persons every day but principally and most usually upon the day designed by the Prophets to his worship and service and now consecrated by his blessed Resurrection mostly vouchsafing his gracious visits to holy men in holy time such at least as were so or should be so Secondly Although it be * Acts 1.20 said that he was seen of his Apostles fourty dayes between his Resurrection and ascension yet it cannot be construed thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophyl that he was seen every day during those fourty dayes but only thus that there were so many dayes between his Resurrection and Ascension in which he was sometimes seen And this is all that the Greek will bear for it is not in fourty dayes but by fourty dayes that is by the space of fourty dayes at times for sometimes he disappeared Thirdly However it may be supposed that our Saviour did appear on other dayes as once he did upon a working day yet no other day of the week ha's the honour to be denominated as the day of his appearing but the first day of the week onely 'T is never said he appeared on the second or third day much less the last day of the week or the seventh day but the first day of the week is expresly and emphatically noted by name * John 20.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 t is not barely said the same day but the same day being the first of the week That same day that first day of the week came Jesus and stood in the midst of his disciples as if he would have it specially noted Fourthly T is evident that our Lord appeared often on this day gracing it with his beatifical presence above all dayes In the a Joh. 20.14 15.16 morning to Mary Magdalen and the rest of the holy b Math. 28.9 women who when they saw him fell at his feet and worshipped him and in the evening of the same day to the eleven disciples and c Lu. 24.33.36 them that were with them gathered together in a way of Church d John 20.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 assembly and this assembly convened it seemes by our Saviours own means who appearing to Mary commanded her to carry tidings to his disciples of his joyful Resurrection However a Christian assembly it was and the first that injoyed the presence of Christ after his death and Resurrection then it followes John 20.26 After eight dayes the disciples were within again and Thomas with them then came Jesus and stood in the midst after eight dayes that is as some would have it after the day-light of the eighth day was past or as the Geneva-translation reads it eight dayes after or after eight dayes were come that is on the eighth day Which reckoning the Resurrection-day inclusively was just that day seven-night or the next first day of the week there are six working-dayes in the week and Sabbath and Sabbath make eight now Christ appeared the first See Mr. L'strange p. 73. and the next succeeding which was the eighth day so the antients generally expound it It is necessary that this should be the Lords day sayes Cyrill and Nazianzen made an oration on purpose for it stiling it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the new Lords day because it was the first Lords day solemnized in the weekly revolution after the Resurrection-day We shall clear it by Scripture when we come to answer the Objections mean while let it be noted that this was the second solemn apparition of our blessed Saviour after he rose from the dead for the next mentioned by this Evangelist is said to be the third time that he shewed himself which what else can it signifie to us John 21.14 but that he appeared not between those two first dayes not on the seventh day nor on any of the other six he was absent all the week and appeared to none except to some single persons as Peter he made no publick apparitions at solemn assemblies but upon his own day Now methinks ingenous Christians should thus reason within themselves certainly 't is written for our instruction that the Lord Jesus rose from the dead on this day that in the morning of the day he shewed himself to the holy women that the same day at evening being the first day of the week the disciples were assembled and Jesus came and stood in the midst and after eight dayes again i.e. that day senven-night for though part of the former and part of the latter day made it eight dayes yet could it be but seven nights if we count it by nights according to the account of natural dayes such as the dayes of the week are surely these things are not written in vain that our Saviour should solemnly shew himself in a Christian assembly on the very day of his Resurrection and that there was no other apparition till that day seven night this no doubt was of purposed providence to give original to that Ordinance of the Lords day which accordingly ha's been observed ever since St. Paul makes it one Argument in conjunction with others of his Apostleship that Christ had appeared to him * 1 Cor. 9.1 ch 15. 8 9. Am not I an Apostle have not I seen Christ Jesus our Lord And may not I in consociation with
of his Kingdom Our Saviour made them a kind of Letter of Atturney as one speaks to speak and act in his Name as if he himself had been personally present c John 20.21 As my Father sent me so send I you and d Luke 10.16 Non minùs ratum est quod Apostoli dictante S.S. P. tradiderunt quà m quod ipse Christus tradidit Cyprian he that heareth you heareth me Neither does this extend only to their Verbal preaching but to their visible preaching also their practice I mean at least in things Evangelical and of moral general perpetual concernment to the Churches of Christ otherwise why is their practice propounded as our Patern e Philip. 3.17 Walk as ye have us for an ensample And f Philip. 4.19 Those things which ye have seen in me do And again Be g 1 Cor. 11.2 followers of me as I am of Christ sayes the great Apostle Yea not only the Apostles themselves but the first Churches planted by them are imitable paterns to other Churches especially in things apperteining to the publick exercise of Gospel-worship h 1 Thes 2.14 we may exemplifie both together in the observation of the Lords day not once but often not by single persons only but by sundry Churches and Church-assemblies met on this day That general Assembly Acts 2.1 when they were all together with one accord we have already proved to have been upon this high and holy day and how they keep it we have seen and how God crowned it with the effusion of his holy Spirit as also the Conversion of souls is further considerable For 't is very probable that not only the three thousand Acts 2.41 but the other five thousand also Acts 4.3 were all converted upon this day of Pentencost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 3.1 notes identity of time as 2 Sam. 21.9 Deut. 25.5 and the ninth hour ch 3. hath reference to the third hour ch 2. See Dr. Lightfoots Harm in Acts. For it was but the third hour of the day or nine a Clock in the morning when the first Sermon was preached which brought in the three thousand Acts 2.15 and at the ninth hour that is about three a clock in the afternoon Peter and John went into the Temple Acts 3.1 wrought a glorious miracle preacht another powerful Sermon which gained five thousand more Ch. 4. such a Spirit of Conversion was never poured out upon any day as this Well might the Holy Ghost call it i Psalm 120.3 the day of the Lords power the adversary acknowledges it was spoken of this very day Again As this Church at Jerusalem so the Churches of Corinth and Galatia kept this day too as shall presently appear from 1 Cor. 16.2 and so the Church of Troas in Phrygia Acts 20.7 which was a neighbour Church to them of Galatia And the like may be said for the seven Churches of Asia for upon the Lords day St. John saw them all in a vision and saw Christ in the midst of them saw him as the Saints have been wont to see him in his glorious goings in the sanctuary walking amidst his golden Candlesticks Psalm 68.14 Isai 30.20 with stars in his hand that is Gospel-Ministers shining like stars in the Firmament of the Church and diffusing the light of the glorious Gospel in the actual exercise of their Ministry on this day especially Yea upon this day John himself was ravished in spirit which made the place of his exile like Pauls third Heaven to him now I demand how this could come to pass that so many several Churches as the Church at Jerusalem Corinth Galatia Troas Ephesus Thyatira and the rest many of which were at a great distance one from another should so unanimously consent and concurr in keeping this day if the Apostles by the authority of Christ had not setled it as an Ordinance in all Christian Churches Let any rational man tell me how all these Apostolical Churches should so early and in the beginning of their plantation consent together to keep the same day unless they had been directed by their first founders the holy Apostles themselves Add to this the joint and uniform practice of all Christian Churches in all succeeding ages since and he ha's hardly the faith of a Christian if the reason of a man that dares so much as question the divine authority of the Lords day for whence came this universal agreement all the Christian world over that all the Churches of Christ should so early so * Even Herericks themselves and such as were for the Jewes Sabbath as Ebion and his followers did alwayes observe the Lords day also Euseb lib. 3. and so do the Ethiorick Churches to this day as Dr. Heiten testifies universally so constantly observe this day not one Church ever attempting to alter it but from some authority superior to the Churches themselves Certainly such customes as were never ordained by Christ or his Apostles were never observed by all Christian Churches throughout the world as the Lords day hath been Such unity of custom in universality of place with perpetuity of practice all meeting together in that which ha's some footing in Scripture must needs argue a divine institution yea if there had been no express Scripture testimony of the Apostles practice and observation of it as our Divines do solidly argue for the baptisme of infants although there be no express precept nor express example of it found in Scripture yet the grounds and reasons of it being found in Scripture with the general practice of the Church concurring we dare not but own it and maintain it How much more the Lords day yea if there had been neither precept nor practice of it in Scripture as long as the grounds of it are laid in Scripture namely a Moral law for the substance of it as one day in seven and a prophesie for the particularity of the Church without any contradiction till these last disputing dayes wherein men are grown so bold as to deny principles I do the rather instance this because I have to deal with an Anabaptist who confidently calls the baptiseing of grown persons * Let him shew me one Scripture for that if he can either precept or president for the baptiseing of such at years of diferetion as were born of Christian parents To tell us of the Apostles baptiseing men and women is no newes but were they such men and such women as are plunged now adaies no verily they were not born of baptized Christian parents as blessed be God we are born of Christian parents a flourishing truth after it ha's been convicted and condemned by the learnedest pens in Christendom for a foolish error But to come to that I aim at let me advise this man in coole blood to ask his own conscience this question namely whether or no if he could find in Scripture expresse Apostolical practice consequential proof satisfies me and others for
of holy Convocation and so is every first day of the week to us which as some conceive the Holy Ghost foretold long since by the Prophet Ezekiel saying Ezek. 43.27 It shall be that upon the eight day and so forward the Priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar and your peace-offerings or thank offerings and I will accept you saith the Lord 't is a clear prophecy of Gospel-times if not the special time of Gospel-worship upon the eighth day i.e. the first day of the week Answ 2. Touching our Saviours travelling this day I have answered before That it was without labour such as is the motion of immortal and glorified bodies and therefore no President for us who dwell in these corruptible houses of clay And I add moreover That Christs walking with his Disciples that day was no more an impeachment to the holy rest of the first day than the Fathers working every day to the Sabbatical rest of the seventh day 'T is our Saviours own Argument in answer to a like objection My Father worketh hitherto and I work John 5.17 That I termed this journey to Emmaus a Sabbath-days journey was in reference to the discourse by the way not the length of the way To which upon second thoughts I add this further answer That 't is very uncertain whether Christ travelled all the way on foot to Emmaus and back again The Scripture is silent and therefore we may not speak The Objector indeed has it often up That Christ travelled fifteen miles on his Resurrection-day but he speaks without Book and can never prove it by Scripture for he might overtake the two Disciples near Emmaus and how he came there we read not neither can we tell how he conveyed himself back again to Jerusalem Guesses and conjectures are no arguments Answ 3. That the Saints cast their accounts on this day I utterly deny we have nothing but the bold and bare word of the Objector to prove it and let him not blame us if we look not upon him as such a Pythagoras that his Ipse dixit should carry it More might be added in pursuance and prosecution of this Thesis that the Lords day is the Christian Sabbath but Mr. Cawdrey Mr. Bernard Mr. Ley and sundry others have spared me this labour POSITION VI. That the Sabbath begins in the Morning THis Position hath been also handled and proved abundantly by others chiefly by Mr. Cawdrey and Mr. Pynchon whose Arguments I judge unanswerable 'T is to me an unquestionable conclusion That the Sabbath being a natural day consisting of 24 hours it must begin and end as the natural day it self does Now in Scripture-account the natural day begins and ends at or about midnight that it begins in the dark night is evident from that fore-mentioned place Mark 1.35 Where we read of our Saviours rising in the morning a great while before day or while it was deep in the night Hence also the evening of the natural day is reckoned from about noon or mid-day Matth. 14.13 When the evening was come the Disciples came to Christ The Scripture speaks of two evenings Exod. 30.8 Chap. 16.12 about sending away the multitude to seek their dinner in the Villages and that this was not the sun-set-evening is clear for after the multitude had dined and were dismissed we read of another evening v. 23. so that the former evening all circumstances considered must needs be about mid-day therefore it must have a morning answerable to it which must necessarily begin about mid-night when the a Jonah 4.7 morning-Sun begins to ascend as it does from mid-night till mid-day or b Prov. 4.18 perfect day and then it declines again and the c Jer. 6.4 shadows begin to be stretched out called the shadows of the evening till they fall into the darkness of the night which is deepest at mid-night Against those that begin the natural day and so the Sabbath at Sun-set evening we may object this which they can never answer That by their reckoning Christ must rise from the dead the second not the third day after his burial For 't is clear that he was not buried or inclosed in the heart of the earth till after the sun-set evening Matth. 27.57 Mark 15.42 For Joseph went not to Pilate to beg the body till the even was come namely the later evening which begins at Sun-set and after this there were many things to be done before the blessed body of Christ was laid in the Sepulchre As the (c) Mark 15.46 buying of fine linnen to wrap it in besides the imbalming or perfuming it with d John 19.40 spices and odours as the manner of the Jews was to bury This together with other Funeral rites took up some time so that it must needs be after Sun-set before this sad Funeral was finished Now if the Sabbath had begun with the Sun-set evening Christs Resurrection-day being the morrow after the Sabbath could be but the second day whereas it is a great Article of our faith grounded upon the e 1 Cor. 15.4 Scriptures That Christ rose from the dead the third day to fulfill the type of Jonas Further however the Jews in later times begun their Sabbath at evening as we grant they did superstitiously reckoning their preparation-time part of their Sabbath-time yet it is very considerable that the Holy Ghost keeps a contrary account stating the end of the Sabbath towards the dawning of the day following as Matth. 28.1 in the end of the Sabbath which dawned towards the first day of the week Now if the Sabbath ended at the dawning towards the next day then it must needs begin about the same time the day before and as the old Sabbath began and ended in Gods account so must the Lords day In a word how preposterous is it and incongruous both to Scripture and nature to begin the day at evening how ill does this agree with those Texts of Scripture that make the morning the first part of the day and evening the last The Angels we know are called f Job 38.7 morning stars not evening start because they were created in the beginning of the Creation and the days of the Gospel are called g Zech. 14.7 evening in the evening it shall be light because they are the last days according to the common Dialect of Scripture h Psal 5.3 Psal 143.8 Gen. 49.27 morning time is first evening last and evening never signifies early but late because it is the later part of the day But others have sufficiently cleared this truth already to add any more were but to light a candle to the Sun A word or two in answer to the Objections and we have done First Object 1 T. T. p. 56. We are told that Gen. 1. the day began at evening for the darkness went before the light and this darkness with the ensuing light saies the Objector made the first day and