Selected quad for the lemma: rest_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
rest_n day_n know_v sabbath_n 2,321 5 9.5023 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A58946 A seasonable treatise for this age occasioned by a letter written by one Mr. Woolsey prisoner in Norwich, to the then-exiled Church at Amsterdam; in which he endeavours to prove it unlawful to eat blood, things strangled, and things offered to idols, now in the times of the Gospel. Which letter is by the consent of the said Church answered; the grounds and reasons therein, examined and refuted; and the contrary thereunto proved from scripture: by Francis Johnson pastor Henry Ainsworth teacher Daniel Studley Stanshal Mercer elders of the same church. Written long since, but never published till now. Johnson, Francis, 1562-1618.; Ainsworth, Henry, 1571-1622? 1657 (1657) Wing S2245; ESTC R220970 16,657 24

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

require your blood wherein your lives are at the hand of every Beast c. Whereby he sheweth how precious the blood of men was in his eyes that would punish the shedding thereof both on men and Beasts and therefore to the end they might forbeare the spilling of each others life he withheld them from eating the life that is the blood of Beasts It might seeme a kinde of cruelty to eat Beasts blood and want of humane clemencie wherefore Solomon noteth a righteous man even by this that he regardeth the life of his Beast and addeth on the contrary But the mercies of the wicked are cruel By which opposition it appeareth that God in restrayning the life or blood of Beasts intended hereby to restrain men from cruelty 3. We hold the abstinence from blood to be figurative and temporarie upon that which is written Col. 2.16,17 Let no man condemn you in meat and in drink or in respect of an holy day or new moon or sabbaths which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ Where he plainly reckoneth meat and drink among other shaddows and excepteth not any meat no not blood nor any feast no not the Sabbath If it be said Paul speaketh of meats and drinks under Moses law onely and not of blood which was forbidden long before to Noah wee answer 1. that blood was also forbidden in Moses law amongst other meats therefore is here also abrogated among other meats 2. Again as much may be said for the Sabbath of the seventh day as for blood yea more both in regard of the antiquitie and of the use and end For the prohibition of blood began but in Noahs time but the seventh day was sanctified from the beginning of the world so that if blood may be exempted from the Apostles general abrogating of meats because that edict was more ancient then the Law then much more may the seventh day be exempted from amongst the other sabbaths because it was of farre greater antiquitie The use and end also of the seventh day was more excellent then that of blood for blood was forbidden as you alledge because it was the life of the Beast but worke on the seventh day was forbidden for a rememberance of the creation of the world and rest of God and for a signe that we might know that the Lord doth sanctifie us so that the end of the sabbath in this respect excelleth the end of blood And if further it be said as afterwards in your Letter you urge that blood was forbidden because it was the life and seeing it is the life to this day therefore to this day it may not be eaten we answer As much may be said for the Sabbaths that to this day and always a rememberance is to be kept of the creation of the world and rest of God now and always it is the Lord that sanctifieth us Wherefore we conclude from this Testimonie of Pauls that if none may condemn us in respect of the seventh day more then of the other feasts and sabbaths so neither may any condemne us for blood more then other meats or drinks which were shaddows of things to come whose body wee have in Christ 4. That the prohibition of eating blood in Gen. 9. was figurative appeareth by the punishment of murther there presently annexed the Lord saying Whoso sheddeth mans blood by man shall his blood be shed Yea at the hand of every Beast as well as of every man God required the blood of man And of the beast he required it thus as at the publishing of the law appeareth that the oxe which goared to death man or woman should be stoned to death and the flesh thereof not eaten Exod. 21.28 And that this was figurative your self we think will not deny for you mention no scruple thereof in your Letter But if any would make conscience of suffering such a beast to live or eating the flesh thereof he might fetch his ground from Noahs time as well as you that will eat no blood 5. It may be shewed to be a Type or shadow and now abrogated by the same reason that Paul alledgeth for eating all other meats saying Every thing that is sold in the Shambles eat ye making no question for conscience sake for the earth is the Lords and the plenty thereof which testimonie of David if it be of weight to settle the conscience touching other meats then of blood also seeing it is a part of the plenty of the earth and the Lords as well as any other thing which now he hath given us free use of by Christ according as it is written that this world and all other things are ours we Christs and Christ Gods 1 Cor. 3 21,22-23 Thus have we shewed you something of that which may be said against the perpetuity of that law in Gen. 9. which is the ground of your erronious building The next reason by you alleadged from the law of Moses falleth with the former and by all the arguments which we have brought is shewed to be Typical and you may aswel deny any other of Moses ordinances to be shaddows as this Yet you say that Levit. 17.11 is misalledged where God saith For the soul of the flesh it is in the blood and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls If this be misalledged as you write and proveth it not to be a shaddow then we must believe it is the substance and truth Then atonement for mens sins is wrought by the blood of Beasts in deed and truth not in Type and figure See whither your error leadeth you The Holy-Ghost saith It is unpossible that the Bloud of Bulls and goats should take away sins Heb. 10.4 but it is the blood of Christ that cleanseth us from all sins 2 Joh. 1.7 Whereas therefore the Law saith I have given Beasts blood upon the altar to make atonement for your souls it must needs be figuratively spoken And you are greatly to blame to write as you have done that this Scripture is misalledged Yet to qualifie the matter and help your self you write that you confesse as the truth is that the sacrificial blood had two causes why it might not be eaten the one general because it was the life the other particular because it was the atonement But this is not to confesse as the truth is for you confesse not at all that it was typical which you must do except you will renounce Christ who is the truth Nay afterward you write very peremptorily that It was not is not nor ever shall be proved that the not eating of all blood was typical Yea that it had not any foot of type or ceremony in it And further from the truth is that which followeth in your Letter that the cause of forbidding common blood was one onely to wit because it is the life which remaineth still the cause before the
whole Church then at London we have now written briefely what God hath given us to see in this matter hoping that this joynt sentence of our Church confirmed by the Word of the Lord will take effect through his grace for the disswading and reclaiming of you from your Errour otherwise that you may have the less excuse in the day of Christ And God which hath taught us from our youth until now forsake us not even in our old-age and gray heads till we have declared his Gospel unto this generation and the truth thereof to so many of those that are to come as it shall please him The Doctrine which in your Letter you would maintain for the truth of God wherein you are obedient unto him you say as all others must be that truly fear his Name is That you will not willingly eat blood nor things strangled nor things offered to Idols For the abstaining from Bloud you alleadge three Reasons 1. The commandment of God to Noah Gen. 9.4 2. His commandment by Moses to Israel Deut. 12.16 Levit. 17.13,14 And 3. by the whole company of the Apostles Elders and brethren at Jerusalem to the Churches of the Gentiles Acts 15.23,28,29 From which you conclude that it remaineth firm and sure to this day as any other testimonies of holy Scripture to be observed of all the faithful till the coming of Christ After this you make answer to certain mis-alleadgings as you call them of other Scriptures against this truth And first for the commandment given to Noah you write that nothing hath been or can be said against it Whereto we answer that we have cause to doubt of your fidelity when you affirm nothing hath been said and to blame your confidence for avouching nothing can be said against the perpetuity of that commandment And for the first to free your self of suspicion we pray you send us a true and perfect Copie of all that Mr. Barrow to omit others did write unto you for there we are perswaded something hath been said against it For the later we wish you to follow the counsel of the holy Ghost that saith a Vnderstand according to sobriety and be not wise in your self considering that the Word of God b came not out from you neither came it unto you onely The abstinence from blood commanded to Noah we hold to be temporary and was then a figure for the time present but is now disannulled c for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof And that for these Reasons 1. Because the other observations of Religion in those times before the Law was given by Moses were for the outward things figures and shadows d as building of Altars offering of Sacrifices e difference of beasts clean and unclean f paying of Tythes offering of g First-fruits h Circumcision and sundry the like So that it helpeth not to say abstinence from bloud was commanded before the Law of Moses and therefore is now to continue more then it will help a Jew to say Circumcision c. was commanded before Moses Law Yea Christ himself saith i it was not of Moses but of the fathers therefore it is to continue still 2. We understand according to that small measure of light which God hath given us in those dark shadows that abstinence from blood was a figure of our sanctification and that in three respects 1. The first concerning Gods Worship and Service which that it might with the more holiness and reverence be used and regarded he would have some special things not profaned or in common use of men So he forbad the making or using of that holy Oyl wherewith his Sanctuary and Priests were anointed Exod. 30 23,31-33 and the like of that precious Perfume Exod. 30.37 Also he forbad them to eat that fat of beasts which they should burn on the altar to the Lord Levit. 7.25 And that the blood was forbidden also in this regard appeareth by Levit. 17.11 For that the soul of the flesh is in the blood and I have given it to you saith the Lord for an atonement for your souls So that the common eating of any blood might have bred in them a contempt of the price of their atonement which was in figure the blood of beasts but in truth the * blood of Christ And for as much as this sacrificing of Beasts was in Noahs time and † before it was meet in the wisdom of God when he gave them flesh to eat to debar them of the blood for the cause mentioned The second respect concerned thankfulness to God for the use of his creatures which he giveth unto the sons of men Therefore of them all the Lord reserved one principal part from himself that thereby his people might acknowledg his goodness Such was the law of all * first-fruits Deut. 26. which every man was to bring before the Lord acknowledging h his own unworthiness and Gods mercie in giving him the increase of that good land In like sort they were forbidden to do any work with their first-born bullock or sheere their first-born sheep or eat them otherwhere then before the Lord Deut. 15.19 Yea all their own first-born Children they must redeeme and the very unclean beasts they were to redeem or kill Exod. 34.19,20 Every tree that they planted for meat they might not eat thereof the first three yeares in the fourth year all the fruit was to be holy to the praise of the Lord and in the fifth year they did eat Levit. 19.23 When they eat of the bread of the land they must offer a cake of the first of the dough Num. 15.19,20 and sundry the like Accordingly do we understand the Lords minde here that giving them flesh to eat he restrayned the blood as being a thing wherein they had no interest but the Lord for that it was the soul or life that is the Chiefest part of every beast and so their restraint from blood to be an occasion for them to praise the Lord that had permitted them the flesh to eat The third respect concerned the love of men each to other that they should abstain from Cruel affections and salvage fierceness and put on the bowels of meekness gentleness compassion c. not onely towards their friends but also their enemies whereunto they were led by sundry figures and taught their duties to men by their behaviour to brute beasts Of this sort were the abstayning from any bird when they took the eggs or the Yong Deut. 22.6,7 The helping of their neighbours yea their enemies beast when it is strayed or lay under the burthen Exod. 23.4,5 Deut. 22.4 The not muzling of the oxes mouth that trod out the corn Deut. 25.4 The resting of Beasts on the Sabbath day Deut. 5. which such like And that the Lord in sparing the blood of Beasts had regard herein to the blood of men appeareth by the next words in Gen. 9.5 saying And surely I will