Selected quad for the lemma: rest_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
rest_n	creation_n	day_n	week_n	2,218	5	10.3550	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B09144	An explanation of the solemn advice, recommended by the Council in Connecticut Colony, to the inhabitants of that jurisdiction, respecting the reformation of those evils, which have been the procuring cause of the late judgments upon New-England. By Mr. James Fitch ...	Fitch, James, 1622-1702.; Mather, Increase, 1639-1723.; Fitch, James, 1622-1702. Brief discourse proving that the first day of the week is the Christian Sabbath.; Connecticut. Council.	1683 (1683)	Wing F1063; ESTC W24614	58,047	146

remaineth John 9 41. Bot to help the mind and memory of those who are sensible of their weakness but are willing to hear and see Let us gather up briefly that which hath been said out of Rev. 1.10 as followeth The day called the Lords Day is some particular day well known to the Churches of Christ otherwise it was in vain and to no purpose for the Apostles to have spoken a word of the Day And this day called the Lords day was a Holy Day otherwise it could not have the holy name proper unto holy things and holy time And that the day called the Lords Day is the first day of the week this hath been proved both by the Testimonies of all Churches in all ages though cavelled against by some in late times yet this their Testimony may well pass for legal Testimony in any Court of Justice upon Earth and they who oppose it must be legally condemned for Liars And more then all this it hath been infallably proved by the Word of God and his Works that the first day of the Week is the very day which the Lord by his Prophets foretold he would make to be the day in which above all other dayes we should rejoyce Psal 118 24. And with his Almighty hand he hath performed it by the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Christ Jesus when he raised him from the dead Eph. 1.20 And in this very day revealing himself to his Disciples as the exalted head of his Church and People And in this very day Commissioning his Apostles and breathing the Holy Ghost in the same day upon them to impower and enable them in all things respecting their work as Apostles of Christ and particularly by the Holy Ghost guiding the Apostles to settle the first day of the Week in all the Churches of Christ as it is the Lords day and our Christian Sabbath but more of this in that which followeth And thus that which the Lord hath wrought according to his Word may well pass or divine Testimony in the Court of Consecience that the first day of the week is by Divine Institution the Lords Day and our Christian Sabbath And now let us proceed in the second place to prove that the first day of the week which the Lord hath made by his word and works to be the Lords Day and our Christian Sabbath was settled by the Apostles in all the Churches in the primitive time First By their Doctrine Secondly By their Practice 1. By their Doctrine for for the clearing of this let us consider Heb. 4.8.9 Where the Apostle doth by his Doctrine inform us of a Rest which remaineth to the People of God and another day of Rest and to make way for the Argument let us open that Scripture 1. First he speaks of a Sabbatism so the Word in the Original is a Rest resembled by the seventh day Rest spoken of in the third and fourth verses and by the Rest in the Land of Canaan mentioned in the seventh and eighth verses 2. This is another Rest and therefore another day for this Rest thus in 8 9 verses and I shall at present content my self with Pareus his Exposition until I meet with a better that 〈◊〉 in the Psalms to which the Apostle had respect did speak of another Rest and a day of Rest which is neither the seventh day Rest nor the Rest in the Land of Canaan but signified and exemplified by the one and shadowed out by the other and the Apostles demonstration of this Doctrine may be expounded by ad sjunctive Syllogisme Arg. Either it is of the first rest of God in which he ceased from the Works of Creation or of that rest in Canaan or of some other rest and of another day of rest but not of the two former and therefore the conclusion of the Apostle is in the 8th and 9th verses of another Sabbath of rest 3. This rest and day of rest spoken of by the Apostle remaineth so it is express in the words of the 9th verse which remaining properly belongs to this rest intimating by this his Doctrine that the other rest the seventh day rest is removed for the remaining signifieth the stability and permanency of this Gospel rest and the day of that rest but the removing of the thing shaken that those things which cannot be shaken may remain Heb. 12.27 The rest on the seventh day and that day of rest was miserably shaken by the sin and fall of man which brought the Curse not only upon himself and his Posterity but upon the works of Creation and therefore the Lord did not only threaten to destroy Man but likewise to destroy the Beasts the Creeping things and the Fowls of the Air for saith the Lord it repenteth me that I have made them Gen. 6.7 Thus was the seventh dayes Sabbath which was a memorial of Gods resting from and complacency in his works of Creation shaken by Mans sin and Gods curse upon the Creatures because of Man and the Commandment for the sanctifying the seventh dayes Sabbath did remain as a hand-writing against sinful and fallen Man as other Ordinances and Hand-writings did until Christ comes and brings in better Ordinances and a better day of rest which remaineth as the Apostle by his Doctrine instructeth us 4. The Rest and day of Rest which remaineth is that into which Christ first entred and at length did perfectly possess and into which he leadeth his People but Christ entred into his rest the first day of the week when he rose from the dead and at length he passed into the full possession of the Mansions and resting places ver 14. and he that entred into his rest ceased from his Works as God did from his ver 10. 5. The remaining of this day of Rest is spoken of in the present tense it is said therefore there remaineth a Rest so that it is that which at present the people of God do possess although the perfection of it is reserved for them when they shall come to the Mansions prepared by Christ for them Joh. 14.2 2 Pet. 1.11 the words being thus opened the Argument now follows Arg. That if the People of God have another day of Rest which is not the seventh day rest but that which Christ doth lead them into by his own Example and by way of communion with him who entred into his rest in the first day of the week then the first day of the week is the day of our Gospel Rest and of our Christian Sabbath and consequently a cessation of the seventh dayes Sabbath but the proof of all these particulars we have in the former and concerning Christs entring into his Rest on the first day of the Week I shall yet speak more fully concerning that as I shall meet with it in some of the Objections of John Rogers In the second place to prove that the Apostles by their Doctrine did settle the first day of the week

and the Scripture doth not say it then we are like the Papists Reply The Reply is that we have already proved that the Scripture saith that the first day of the Week is the Lords day and therefore Iohn R. doth falsely Reproach us and I might say that he that will hold to the letter of a Scripture although contrary to the spiritual scope of that and other Scriptures is like the Papists in their defence of Transubstantiation from those words this is my Body But Iohn R. doth hold to the letter of the fourth Command respecting the seventh dayes Sabbath contrary to the command of Christ in the Gospel and that which is most spirituall and proper scope of that command as appears by the former arguments and more shall appeare in that which follows therefore in this John R. is like the Papists Qu. 2. Is not Rest meerly due and proper to succeed Labour Ans John R. granteth that Rest necessarily follows Labour and that God rested on the seventh day after his six dayes work was ended Qu. 3. Was not Jesus Christ as he was God equall with the Father and as he was God Man was Lord of the Sabbath he himself declareth in the fourth Command and requireth Man to do the like by the Command Ans John R. his Answer is that Jesus Christ as he was God was equal with the Father all things was created for him and by him But John R. saith the next part is an assertion yet not a solid one in this case for as Jesus Christ was God he was commander of the Sabbath yea the whole Law but as he was Man he was made of a Woman under the Law And further Iohn R. saith but if thou hast reference to the Scripture Mar. 2.28 which saith Therefore is the Son of Man Lord of the Sabbath Day he doth not say God Man but the Son of Man Reply The Reply to Iohn Rogers is 1. First He grants that Christ as God is the Commander and Lord of the Sabbath 2. Secondly He denies him to be the Lord of the Sabbath as he is God Man to which the Reply is Reply By God-Man is meant God and Man personally united that is the Son of God having assumed a humane nature into personal union with his Divine nature is both God and Man and if he be not Lord of the Sabbath as he is God and Man then he is not head over all things as he is God and Man Eph. 1.21.22 then not Mediator as God and Man 1 Tim. 2.5 And the Argument he gives now follows For saith Iohn Rogers as he was Man he was made of a Woman and made under the Law hence his Argument is if Christ as a M●n was made of a Woman under the Law then as God-Man he is not Lord of the Sabbath If this be good Divinity then let Iohn R. proceed to say that because he was Man made under the Law therefore as God Man he is not head of his Church and is not the Mediatour and as God Man he shall not return to be the Judge of the World this is so far from being solid that it is contrary to the frame of Gospel Scriptures 2. Secondly He argues from Mark 2.28 his Expositions are these but if thou hast reference to that Scripture which saith the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath he doth not say God Man but the Son of Man whence his Argument is if the Scripture saith that the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath then Iohn Rogers judgeth it is not a solid assertion to say Christ as God Man is Lord of the Sabbath Reply My Reply is that if Christ the Son of Man be Lord of the Sabbath it s either as he is the Son of God or as the Son of Man or as he is God and Man not as the Son of God considered without being the Son of Man for the words are express that the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath 2. Secondly Not as the Son of Man this Iohn Rogers granteth to be too low because thus he was under the Law and therefore it must be as he is God Man that he was Lord of the Sabbath and yet Iohn Rogers saith this is not a solid assertion but he hath given no solid Argument to the contrary but that which fights against it self Only a Question from hence he doth propound I find it to be so long winded and yet so short spirited as to any reason belonging to the Question in hand that I can hardly spare Pen Ink and Paper to Transcribe it but we must have it as it is These are Iohn Rogers his words I shall propose a Question in this matter if in Scripture it is said That the Man was not made for the Woman but the Woman for the Man and in Scripture the Man is called the Lord of the Woman why then if the Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath is not Man Lord even of the Sabbath day for though a Man be Lord of his Wife yet he ought not to put her away in respect of the Law of God that hath made those two one so likewise the Sabbath though man be Lord of it in respect it was made for him and not him for it yet by virtue of Gods command ought not to prophane it yet if in case it was so that Man must either omit the deed of mercy to Man or prophane the Sabbath by doing the deed of mercy to the Man he ought to prophane the Sabbath and do the deed of mercy in respect the Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath for God hath preferred the Man above his Sabbath not making him for the Sabbath but the Sabbath for him for in this respect God hath made him Lord even of the Sabbath day Reply The Reply to all this is That all this is nothing to the Question stated and who knows not but God wi●l have Mercy rather than Sacrifice whether on the Sabbath day or any other t●me Qu. 4. Was not the work of Redemption as great and Godlike as the work of Creation and so worthy of Rest and a memorial upon its finishing Ans Iohn R. his Answer is the work of Creation was the greatest work that ever was for it was the Creating of all things and the work of Redemption the mercifullest work that ever was to Gods Elect for by it they were redeemed And forasmuch as the God and Father of all things ought to be obeyed as that one Law giver who created all things and commanded all that the seventh day should be kept holy in respect of Creation ought to be obser●e● by resting from Labour as he did and that because he comman●ed it And forasmuch as our Lord Jesus Christ hath redeemed Gods Elect by his body and blood and appointed for a Memorial of the same Baptism and the Lords Supper to be observed by the Redeemed ones he ought to be

obeyed in the same as God the Father in the other so that both these works have some thing to keep them in memory by the appointment of the Workmen Reply The Reply to John R. his Answer is First He saith the work of Creation is the greatest work and his reason is because God made all things The Reply is That if the work of Creation be the greatest then the work of Redemption is not so great as the work of Creation but a work is greater or lesser according to the greatness of wisdom power and goodness manifest in it but the wisdom of God shining in the work of Redemption excels the wisdom shining in the work of Creation 1 Cor. 2.7 wisdom in a mystery and the power made manifest in Redemption is greater than in Creation called the exceeding greatness of his power towards them that do believe Eph. 1.19 And for goodness to finners John R. cannot but confess it is the mercifullest work and yet he denieth that a day shall be appointed for a memorial of this greatest work but as it is worthy of a Day so the Lord hath appointed the first day of the week for that end as hath been proved by the Scriptures abovementioned and therefore it is in vain for John R. to deny it Qu. 5. The fifth Question is Was not the work finished at the Resurrection of Christ on the first day of the week when he entred into his rest as God did into his Ans John R. his Answer is The price was paid as soon as the Sacrifice was offered and the dead raised but the work of Redemption as yet not perfected in us for we are yet under the bondage of corruption Rom. 8.23 but to say that Christ entred into his Rest on the first day of the week I cannot for he did assemble himself with his Disciples after his Resurrection being seen of them forty dayes before he ascended up into Heaven and upon the day of his Resurrection did eat with his Disciples and did travail with them which was Labour Reply The Reply is that Iohn R. denieth that the work of Redemption was finished because it is not finished in us Whence his Argument is That if Redemption be not perfected in Believers then not finished by Christ but this is false reasoning for want of distinguishing between the work of Redemption and the work of Application Christs work of Redemption may be finished although the work of the Holy Ghost as sent from the Father and the Son to apply Redemption may not be finished and is not in this life perfected to the Elect. Obj. The second Objection is That Christ was not entred into rest on the first day of the week and his reason is because he assembled with his Disciples did eat and travail c. Reply The Reply is Either Christ was on the first day of the Week in a state of Humiliation or a state of Exaltation if in a state of Humiliation then his Resurrection was no degree of his Exaltation contrary to Rom 1.3 4 Eph. 1.20 21. if he were in a state of Exaltation then in a state of blessed and glorious Rest And although there are divers degrees of his Exaltation as his Resurrection Ascention Session at the right hand of the Father and his return at the last Day to be the Judge but Resurrection is one degree of his Exaltation and of his Rest and therefore he was entred into Rest although for the conviction and confirmation of His Disciples he did shew himself and by some sensible signs make it manifest that it was himself that very humane nature which had suffered death was raised that he that descended was raised and is the same also that ascended into Heaven Eph. 4.10 Qu. 6. Did not Christ allow this to be called his Day as the Sacrament is called his or the Loras Supper Ans Iohn R. his Answer is I cannot say that ever the first day of the week was called the Lords Day and therefore cannot say whether he allowed it or no I know that the Cup which our Lord communicated to his Disciples they called it the Lords Cup and the Table at which they sa●e to communicate of the Bread and Wine they called the Lords Table and the Apostle Iohn calleth that Day in which the Lord communicated to him those Visions in the Revelations the Lords Day but what day of the Year or of the Week I cannot tell Reply The Reply to this is there hath been Arguments given of all forts to prove both from humane and divine Testimony the word and works of the Lord the Doctrine and Examples of the Apostles of Christ that the first day of the Week was that very day called the Lords day Rev. 1.10 and if John Rogers was asked who his Father was he would be ashamed to say he could not tell and yet he cannot but know that as to humane Test mony there is more clear and infallible proof that the first day of the week was called the Lords Day than he can have who his Father was this being the Testimony of all the Churches in all Ages from the primitive time to this very day until of late some few ha●e risen up and raised the Objection But besides all these Arguments from the Scripture have been given to prove it and if yet Iohn R. will say he cannot sell we must leave him to his ●gnorance and he ought not to be off●nded with us and revile us because we do know Qu. 7. Did not Christ countenance and allow his Apostles in the practice and solemnization of that day in proper Sabbath Ordinances Ans His Answer is before saying not that I know the Ordinance of the Sabbath is rest to Man and Beast for so God ordained in the fourth Command after the six dayes work to rest Qu. 8 Are not Christ and his Apostles therein to be a pattern for Christians to follow and so vertually a divine Institution Ans Iohn Rogers his Answer is that the eighth Question is answered by the Answer to the seventh and the answer to the seventh was the same with the Answer to the sixth viz. that he could not tell that he did not know and thus he makes a quick dispatch of Answers to the Governours Questions But in this he is like those who when the Question was asked them concerning the Baptisme of John whence was it from Heaven or of Men they reasoned with themselves saying if we shall say from Heaven he will say unto us why did you not then believe him but if we shall say of Men we fear the People for all hold John as a Prophet Mat. 21.25 26. and therefore they concluded it was safest for them to say we cannot tell ver 17. Thus likewise if Iohn R. should say that the Patern and the Examples of the Apostles respecting Worship and particularly concerning the Sabbath ought to be followed then he knows it would be said why do you not follow