but think it would have been much insisted upon Having now done with this I proceed from the Apostles practice to consider 2. Secondly Their expressions and that which I shall here take special notice of is that in Apoc. 1.10 where John gives this account of himself that he was in the Spirit on the Lords day This I have reason to believe was the first day of the week and pointeth at the institution of it by Christ himself and my reason is this Scripture is to be interpreted by Scripture even about the nature and meaning of a Phrase unless there be something in the Text where it is used why it should not be taken in that Text as in others This is generally acknowledged to be a good and safe rule for interpretation of difficult places why then may not this Phrase prove it was the day instituted by the Authority of Jesus Christ as being parallel with that of the Lords Supper which was instituted by Christ himself The holy Spirit of God directed both Paul and John in their expressions neither of which is used but once a piece and never applyed to any thing else in the New Testament but to the Lords Supper and to the Lords day why should these Ordinances be held forth under the same expressions if these had not the same institution It would seem strange to me if any should say that the Lords Passover in the Old Testament though a Supper Ordinance was the Lords Supper in the New Testament and it seems somewhat strange if the seventh day Sabbath which was indeed the Sabbath of the Lord under the Old Testament should be asserted to be the Lords day in the New Testament without some further proof than to say it is so I could produce Testimonies from Antiquity of some that lived near and of one that lived some considerable time with John himself who have interpreted the Lords day mentioned in the Revelation to be the first day but because you quote no such Testimonies neither will I. I have been careful to observe your order and to proceed in this order only in a Scriptural way Thus much of the Apostles expressions From their practice and expressions I come to the practice of the Primitive Churches as they are recorded in the Scripture as that of the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 16.1 2. and that of Galatia and of Troas formerly mentioned who had their weekly solemn Assemblies on the first day I forbear to say any thing in justification of our Translation because as I said before you touch upon no such thing in your Paper desiring to be dealt withall in a Scriptural not in a Grammatical way only I cannot but add this because I conceive it is according to Scripture that it cannot with any reason be imagined that these Churches would have made such an important change of the day for their solemn Assemblies from what was formerly used by Gods appointment among the Jews without consulting with some at least of the Apostles and most likely with Paul as being best acquainted with him Hardly I think can there be produced any instance that particular Churches ever did determine any thing of this nature by their own Authority without consulting I say with some of the Apostles considering how in other matters not altogether of so great a concernment they consulted with Paul 2 Cor. 7. and as hardly can it be imagined that the Apostles would ever give them any such direction unless they had known the mind of Christ Thus Sir I have given you in as few words as the matter would permit a true account of the Reasons of my dissent from you in the sense that you give of the fourth Commandment and of what formerly hath and still doth satisfie my Conscience that the day is changed and that by divine Authority and that without any prejudice to the Authority of the fourth Commandment That which I have yet to do is to give you my thoughts concerning your Reasons produced for the confirming your Proposition which may be done with a little addition to what hath said done already 1. First You say those weighty reasons which Jehovah the Saviour himself hath given to enforce obedience unto his Commandment in observing a weekly Sabbath day holy to himself do properly belong and are applicable to the seventh day which is the last day in every week in order of time in the weekly returns of it as the weekly Sabbath day and are applicable to no other day and these you say are three 1. First You say God rested only upon the seventh day which is the last day in every week Answ I answer Thus far it is true that God rested on the seventh day the last day from the beginning of the Creation but it seems to me rather as a reason of that limitation six dayes of seven being allowed for labour one of which seven was a day for holy rest and not an argument engaging to observe the last of seven for the weekly Sabbath to the end of the world The reasons that prevail with me so to judge I have given before 2 dly Secondly your second and third Reasons I joyn them together he blest and sanctified the seventh day because you bring one and the same proof for both and besides they are to be looked upon in conjunction together he sanctified the seventh day by separating it from common use to be the day for his solemn Worship and he blessed it appointing it to be a day of blessing to the right observers of it In what sense I understand this I have given you an account before It is true when this Law was first given to Adam being then in the state of innocency so you acknowledge it was and therein I assent and consent with you the blessing was applicable to no other day but the last of seven because man continuing in that blessed state there was not there could not be supposed a more eminent work than the Creation of the World but now man being fallen the work of Redemption being every way more glorious than the work of Creation the blessing is applicable to the first day the day of Christs Resurrection for then the work of Redemption was manifested to be fully perfected and God blessed for evermore hath blessed that as eminently as ever he did the former day not to mention that which is and hath been done among the Churches of the Gentiles I desire you to look back to the second particular and I think it is there made evident that the Feast of Pentecost was on the first day and then the Disciples being together the Holy Ghost was given to the Disciples then they received those miraculous gifts and began to speak with Tongues which they never understood before and that day three thousand souls were added to the Church by the effectual working of the Spirit of God with the Ministery of the Apostles and these Sermons they Preached that are
Scripture This to me is certain for the Will of God concerning Sacrificing was without doubt revealed unto Abel before the Law for Sacrifices was given for what he did therein he did in Faith and eminently found acceptance with God in what he did therein Heb. 11.4 neither the Light of Nature which is the knowledge of Principles neither the Law of Nature which is the conclusions drawn from these Principles could ever have made known this way of Worship to be a Duty if God had not some way revealed his Will to him therein This I hope will be made evident when I come to speak of the third general Reason If he had imposed this upon himself and that it had been the Product of his own imagination it had been will-worship Therefore certainly he had some word for it but when he received it and where and how that way of Worship was instituted for him to come to the knowledge of I never heard of any that could find it in the Scripture Great use may be made of this if need were for the clearing up of this present Controversie concerning an express word for the institution and observing the first day of the Week to be the Lords-day the day for his Weekly Sabbath we might say that it might be instituted though it be not recorded when and where as it was in the case of Abels Sacrificing but I hope we shall not be driven to this however I cannot but suppose it is of good use for some especially to consider of 6 thly Sixthly I desire that this also may be considered that what was delivered by the Apostles as they were guided by the holy Spirit of Truth ought to be received and believed as delivered and spoken by Christ himself Christ himself was never in person at Ephesus and yet 't is said Eph. 2.17 that he came thither and preached peace unto them we must understand it that he did so in the Ministry of the Apostles which was all one as if he had been there himself None that I know of durst ever undertake to prove that ever they prescribed any thing for all the Churches to observe but what they received in Commission from the Lord Jesus This was their charge Mat. 28.20 Teach what I command you and this was their practice 1 Cor. 11.10 23. What I received from the Lord that I delivered unto you so 1 Cor. 15.3 It is evident Act. 1.3 that Jesus Christ spake many things unto them betwixt his Resurrection and Ascension concerning the Kingdom of God i. e. especially the state of the Gospel-Church of all which we have no knowledge I have not I am sure in particular what they were farther than is found in their precepts and practice recorded in the New Testament And what if I should say that the change of the day from the last in seven to the first in seven was one of these things I know not what could be said against it but of that more hereafter 7 thly Seventhly Though I have declared as above my assent and consent concerning the Ten words to be perpetually obligatory or a standing and unchangeable rule for all Christians in all ages to walk by that so they may walk in all well-pleasing unto God as once I heard very solidly proved by your self in an Exercise wholly upon that subject from Psal 19.6 7 8 9. As I remember though I say and say it again that herein I consent with you yet I say it now and must say it again hereafter that the day of weekly holy Rest is altered and yet that alteration is no dissolution of the Commandment and that no tittle of the Law is broken thereby and that the first day of the week is and ought to be as much the weekly Sabbath for the Christians now as the last day of the week was to the Jews of old and that there is as good ground though perhaps not so clear to every one for the change of the day as there was at first for the choice of the day this is directly contrary to what you asserted in your paper I come now according as you desired me to take your 4th Proposition into consideration and your Reasons in order as they stand whereby you endeavour to confirm it having again and again in some weak measure I praise the Lord prayed for the assistance of the holy spirit of truth to guide and direct me that I may write nothing against the truth but for the truth being at this present under the actual consideration of the dreadful sentence that I may be called to an account I know not how soon before the great and glorious God for what I think for what I write as well as for what I speak or what I do I bless God I am willing that truth should be truth and appear to be truth Your fourth Proposition though I have repeated it already yet I think it meet to repeat it here again is this The seventh day which is the last day in every week in the weekly returns of it c. And for the proof of this you produce Exod. 20.8 9 10 11. Deut. 5.12 15. I conceive you lay the whole stress of your Arguments upon that in Exod. and that you do not so much as imagine that Deut. the 5th affords you any more help than what you have from the other alone This is that which is to be taken into serious considerations whether your Proposition takes in or be agreeable unto the full sense of the Commandment and that the Commandment speaks the same thing that the Proposition doth it seems as yet far otherwise to me and that the Commandment requires only the observation of one day in seven and doth not institute any particular day either the last or the first The last of seven had its institution as you seem to acknowledge which I was glad to find in your paper in Gen. 2.3 where and when the first day had its institution will be enquired into when this Proposition is cleared viz. That the fourth Commandment requires only the observation of one whole day in seven for the weekly Sabbath not instituting either the first or the last for any such intent or purpose And because as Solomon saith Prov. 6.23 that the Commandment is a Lamp and the Law is a Light I desire therefore in the strength of the Lord Jesus depending upon him for light and direction to look into the sense and meaning of this Law But first I shall premise this That As the second so the fourth Commandment comes in some things under a difrferent consideration from most if not from all the rest my meaning is this There is something in each of them is morral natural and something which is only positive In the second Commandment this is moral natural that God ought to be worshipped not as men will themselves but as God himself wills and describes but in what ordinances or acts of worship this
is only positive So in the fourth Commandment this is moral natural that there be a time a sufficient time for the solemn worship of God and yet such a sufficient time as leaves sufficiency of time for our worldly business and affairs This the light of nature will teach but without some revelation of the will of God nature cannot determine the time as to the frequency of its revolution or if that not the particular day that ought to be the time which is the matter under debate betwixt us but of this I shall have occasion to speak more hereafter only I mention it here because this is that which I have now to do to give you my reasons why I conceive that what the substance of the fourth Commandment requires either as naturally moral or positively moral or Gods manner of resting or his blessing and sanctifying the day of his rest or the revolution of time in which the day ought to be observed whatever it be reacheth no farther than the observation of one whole day in seven not directly pointing out any particular day but only by consequence at the last of seven because it was enjoyned before Now I cannot better nor in fewer words give you my reason of this than to give you an account of my Faith what I understand to be the sence and meaning of the Commandment and it is this 1. First I observe as it were the opening and giving forth of the Commandments vers 8. Remember the Sabbath day that is the day of holy rest of Gods appointing to keep it holy to the Lord In Deut. 5.12 A text quoted in your paper we have this which is the moral substance of the Commandment not given as in some other places it is by it self alone but together with all the ten words in its proper place and order and which is to me very observable the reason from Gods resting is omitted neither is it at all enforced from the Creation but from a Type of our Redemption their deliverance from the Egyptian bondage Such a material omission or alteration seemeth to be significant of something whereof more hereafter 2 dly Secondly in the shutting up or Conclusion of the Commandment vers 11. Wherefore the Lord blessed and sanctified not the seventh day of which more hereafter but the Sabbath day of holy rest this is evident yet neither in the opening nor shutting up of the Commandment where we have the moral substance of the Commandment there is no mention of any particular day at all 3 dly I observe what intervenes and comes in by way of explication or inforcement of obedience between the opening and shutting up of the Commandment and therefore comes in to be observed 1. First In what revolution of time God had appointed this day of holy rest to be observed and that is one whole day of seven of every seven days six for labour one for rest vers 9. and former part of ver 10. Thus far we have a comely order in the Commandment suitable to the infinite wisdom of God first settling a day that ought to be observed and then the revolution of time in which that day ought to be observed how often not one in twenty days nor one in ten days but one in seven days one day in every week which is well observed by your self in the third Reason 2 dly Secondly I observe the enforcement of obedience to the Commandment from Gods example of resting the seventh day verse 11. Here I do acknowledg the last of seven is mentioned but not as any branch of the unchangeable moral substance of the Commandment nor the observation of it directly required but onely consequently being instituted before as is acknowledged by your self and it must be acknowledged by all that the last of seven here mentioned had first of all the honor to be the day of Gods appointing and accordingly it was observed and no other till the time came that another day the first of seven was to succeed in the room of it These are the Particulars of the Commandment which as far as I can apprehend are most observable in those four Verses quoted in your Paper and in none of them all can I find any thing that seems to give any Testimony to the Truth of your Proposition 1. Nothing as was said before either in the giving forth or shutting up of the Commandment there is no mention of any particular day one or other 2. Nothing in what intervenes between 3. Nothing in what expresseth the revolution of time wherein the day of holy rest is to be observed Six days shalt thou labour Thus I understand this limitation or rule for direction 1. Six days shalt thou labour unless God otherwise appoint and he did appoint in the old Administration other days to be kept holy which though not alway yet sometimes fell out on some or other of the six working days This I think none will deny 2. Further Six days shalt thou labour not excluding the solemn worship of God out of those six days as is well observed by our self as if it were a sin for a man to hear a Sermon or to set some hours a part for prayer any of these six days as it is for a man to work upon that day of seven which God sets apart for himself 3. And yet further which is most to be taken notice of Six days c. rest one not enjoyning the last of seven that was instituted before but onely thus Six parts of the time shall be for your selves the seventh shall be mine as Gen. 47.14 you shall have four parts saith Joseph the fifth shall be Pharaohs Let all be divided into five parts four shall be for your selves the fifth shall be for the King not telling them which fifth but only one of five So Lev. 23. 27. Let all be divided into ten you shall have nine the tenth shall be the Lords not appointing them which ten but only one of ten Thus I understand the word six days of the week shall be for your selves one shall be mine Thus I finde not one word for the last of seven and which I must remember again in the third Reason you plead the equity onely for one of seven I have heard that you alledged the Hebrew particle ×” verse 10. as emphatical but because you do not mention it in your paper I shall say nothing to it now but when you form your Argument from it I shall give that which satisfies me for the present in Answer to it 2. As nothing is here where the revolution of time is fixed which speaks in behalf of your Proposition so I find nothing at all in Gods exemple for it nothing there but one day of seven from the beginning of the Creation but it doth not therefore follow that it was the mind of God that the same day must be observed for ever I shall give you my reason why I conceive so when first
I have given you the sence wherein I conceive the words are to be understood Thus We must not understand this properly according to the Letter for the infinite glorious divine essence ceaseth no more to work than he ceaseth to be God neither doth he rest as man doth because he is weary Isa 40.28 We are therefore to understand his ceasing to Create from the works of providence ordering and disposing all thing that he hath made he never resteth according to that Joh. 5.17 Having thus given you the sense now I shall give you my Reasons why I conceive that this example of Gods resting is not alledged here to lay an obligation upon the Conscience that the same day wherein he rested which was the last of seven ought to be observed for ever 1. First It seems to me to relate to what God himself did rather then any way propounded as an argument to prove that for which you urge it I will give you a parallel Scripture wherein the Example of the Lord Jesus is thus to be understood 1. Cor. 11.23 We have there the institution of the Lords Supper when and how it was instituted repeated out of the Evangelists and Christs example is related as to the time when that it was not only in the night but in that particular night in which he was betrayed now this is not recorded as a binding rule for our imitation for then night Administrations should not onely of absolute necessity be observed but that particular night in which he was betrayed which is commonly called with us Thursday night which is more then ever I heard that any one practised as a necessary duty I am sure the Apostle Paul did not Acts 20.7 This example of Christ then seems to be historically related and whether the like may not be said of Gods example in the Commandment let it be considered But 2. Secondly though Gods exemple be historically related yet it must be acknowledged to be related for some special end and purpose As the example of Christ in the forementioned Scripture was without all doubt mentioned upon the highest ground of reason which to speak of here though it might be of good use yet it would be a digression from the matter in hand And the special end and purpose why Gods example is here related seems to be this even to shew that what is required in the Commandment is equal and reasonable and for mans good The holy Laws of God are often called Judgments as for other Reasons so specially I think for this to shew that God requires nothing but what is just and equal Thus God reasons the case with those Ezek. 18 25. Hear ye me O house of Israel are not my waies equal and therefore certainly the sence of the Argument from Gods example which doth best shew the equity of the Commandment and to be for the good of those that observe it is the best and truest sence Now to argue that because God wrought the six first days of seven and then rested the last of seven this carries no convincing reason with it that therefore we ought first to work six days of the week and then to rest the last day of the week and to keep it holy to the Lord. Reason right Reason if that alone were to judge would rather judge it fit to keep the first of seven holy to the Lord and seeing by Divine allowance we have six for one take the six last to our selves In reason we may hope that the work on Earth will speed best when our work for Heaven is done first But now to argue from Gods example that it bindeth neither to the first of seven nor to the last of seven but to one of seven carries very great reason in it For if the great God who needs not one moment either for rest or for work who never fainteth who never is weary wrought six days and rested one how much more should poor frail man hold that proportion who by reason both of bodily weakness and spiritual wants needs such a competency of time both for his worldly imployment and Soul refreshments and thus much you say your self hath been already noted Thus you have my reason why I conceive there is nothing in Gods example that affords any help to afford your Proposition 3. Thirdly I find as little in Gods blessing and sanctifying the Sabbath-day for that which you alledge it 1. First To give the sence he sanctified it i. e. separated it from common use to be filled up with such duties as he appoints and then blessed it i. e. appointed it to be a day of blessing A day naturally considered is capable of no other blessing but only to be a means of blessing according to Divine appointment but his blessing and sanctifying it secures the blessing to the right observers of it Now for my reason why herein I dissent from you 't is this He blessed and sanctified it but not as it was the last day of seven but as it was the day of his Rest declaring thereby Creation-work to be perfected Neither was his resting so far as I can see the ground of his blessing and sanctifying it but as considered in conjunction with the reason of his Rest his finishing the Creation and also with the result and consequence of his Rest viz. his magnifying and honouring that day for the time being above all other dayes for the greatest work then in being Whether this blessing be applicable to no other day but this as you say it is not in the third Branch of the first Reason for the confirming your Proposition shall be considered of when it comes to be spoken to in order as it stands in your Paper and I hope to make the contrary to appear at least it appears so to me 4. Fourthly To mention it once again though it was hinted before in the very conclusion of the Commandment vers 11. though the last of seven is mentioned in the same verse in the words immediately foregoing it is not said I mean in that place that he blessed and sanctified the seventh day though it be said that he did bless it Gen. 2. in the sence that is given above but he blessed and sanctified the Sabbath day What should be the reason of the suddain change of the expression I conceive it may be this and I think it may not be unworthy of your serious consideration it may be this I say Because the Command for the Sabbath-day was to be of a larger extent than the last day of seven I cannot but think that if God had intended to bind his Church in all ages to the end of the world to the last day of seven as you conceive he hath done he would have fixed upon that day in the conclusion of the Commandment Thus Sir I have given you my reasons why I dissent from you in that sence which you give of the Commandment in your Proposition And why I
of the seventh year the Sabbath of the fiftieth year the year of Jubile and not the weekly Sabbath By way of Answer I desire that the words of the Apostle may be duely weighed Ye observe Days and Months and Times and Years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed on you my labour in vain By Years we understand their yearly Sabbath called the Sabbath of Attonement and their Sabbatical years as above mentioned by Seasons their Annual Feasts of the Passover Penticost and Tabernacles and by Months their Monthly Feasts called their New Moons all this is clear now I confess I cannot see what can possibly be meant by Days but their weekly Sabbath days especially finding in Levit. 23. where all their Feasts and Holy days eight in number are reckoned up their weekly Sabbath is put in the first place as it were by the Apostle I fore-see two things may be objected against this interpretation Obj. First it may be said the Sabbath of the seventh day cannot be here mentioned for then Paul should condemn his own Practice Answ But this is easily Answered for though we read Acts 16.13 that on the Sabbath day that is I grant on the seventh day Sabbath he went out of the City and preached to women that resorted thither to their publique worship and Acts 17.2 that he preached in the Synagogue of Thessalonica three Sabbath days together yet this was not as observing the seventh day Sabbath but for the opportunity of the Jews assembling together on that day which he could not have upon the first day and so for a while condescending to their weakness some other of the Jewish Rites as may be instanced in Circumcision were born with To conclude from hence that he did this as observing the seventh day Sabbath as they did it may be well concluded that he did and therefore we must observe the Feast Penticost because he went up to Jerusalem at that Feast as we read Acts 18.21 which we may be sure he did not for the Feasts sake but for the Assemblies sake that he might have the greater opportunity to Preach the Gospel unto them But now if we would know what day of the week it was which he observed in obedience to the fourth Commandment look into his practice among the Converted Jews and Gentiles and there we shall find that he observed the first day for the Sabbath day and passed by the seventh day as will be seen by and by in its proper place 2. Object It 's objected by some and those great and learned persons that this Interpretation overthrows the Morality of the first day of the week as well as the last day of the week and for that end they thus interpret this place and frequently urge it But nothing they alledge from hence I do acknowledge could ever make any impression upon me and my reason is this Answ Look what those and the Circumcision that were so zealous for the Law sought to impose upon the Christian Churches that and that only the Apostle opposeth Now it seems to me beyond all question that they never sought to impose the first day Sabbath and therefore that stands and will stand unshaken notwithstanding this Interpretation of the Text and the Interpretation standing firm notwithstanding these Objections it seems yet clear to me that Christians are under no obligation at all to the old Sabbath it is dead having served its time Quest Now I know it will be asked if this be so where have we any express institution either for the first day or for any other day Must we not then if a word of institution cannot be produced observe as some say every day for a Sabbath or take that day those in Authority do appoint be it one of 10 or one of 20 or have no Sabbath at all Answ I answer Neither so nor so every day is not the Sabbath day any more than every Supper is the Lords Supper or every Table the Lords Table Neither may we admit of one day of 10 or 20 for that is against the Morality of the fourth Commandment which requires not onely the observation of a Sabbath but one day of seven for a Sabbath And that we have sufficient ground which I confess can be no less than Divine Authority for the first day of seven I now come to give you my reasons why I so believe Only let me have leave first to ask where is there an express word of institution for the last of seven In the fourth Commandment there is none that only requires the observation of one of seven all the institution there is for it is in Gen. 2.3 which is not express though I acknowledg it sufficient but only imply'd in those words God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it and I hope there is as clear a word though perhaps not altogether found in one place which implies the institution of the first day as that which in Gen. 2. doth of the seventh day Before I proceed to that I desire this may be observed That there is the same reason for the institution of the first of seven that there was for the institution of the last of seven I said before what I thought to be true that the Lord blessed and sanctified the seventh day not only because he rested on the seventh day having perfected the work of Creation but also because of the result and consequence both of his rest and of his perfecting his work namely his honouring and exalting that day above all other dayes thereby now we know that the memorial of those signal works of providence wrought upon the day hath been the occasion of the advancing that day above other So the Jewish Passover Lev. 23. and the Feast of Purim Est 9.21 23 and our 5th of November in memory of the discovery of that Treason plotted and that nothing came to execution but the Traytors themselves Now this being acknowledged to be so hence then it may be argued That what day soever above all other dayes God honours with his most eminent work is to be the day of holy Rest unto God This will clearly carry it and greatly strengthen though but an implyed institution for the first day for that was the day of the Lords rest from the most great and the most glorious of all his works the work of Redemption I hear something hath been alledged against this that the first day of the week was not the day of Christs Resurrection and that the Translators of the Bible have done us wrong in so rendring it It is strange to me if any should say so but I shall say nothing to it now because your Paper speaks nothing of it whenever you think fit to form the Argument from the error you suppose in the Translation there is as I understand one and one that is well able to do it prepared to justifie the Translation and hath done it many moneths ago to him I leave it