Selected quad for the lemma: rest_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
rest_n creation_n day_n rest_v 4,116 5 9.5419 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A44280 An essay concerning the Sabbath, or, The Sabbath-days rest from controversie wherein is asserted that our Christian Sabbath, Lords-day, or Sunday is the very same day of the week which was anciently observed by the Jews and Gentiles for the solemn day of their solemn weekly worship, before Israels coming out of Ægypt and after that by gentiles : prefaced, with an introduction thereunto touching the true meaning of Gen. 2 v, 2, 3 / by N. Homes. Homes, Nathanael, 1599-1678. 1673 (1673) Wing H2564; ESTC R28681 38,857 162

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

was finished is such a thing was in Gen. 2. Is neither expresly asserted nor is by any circumstances of that Scripture evinced Therefore out of that place of Scripture it cannot be proved 1. Rivet's Reply The truth of the Proposition we grant as clearer then the Sun But the truth of the Assumption we deny And those things that are brought by Gomarus for the contrary do not at all eradicate our Assertions but are meer suppositions without proof Namely That these things Gen. 2. are not inserted by Moses as if at that very time they had been done but to shew that this History of the finishing of the World and of the Divine rest on the Seventh day might be kept in perpetual Memory by the Israelites So he As if both may not be viz. The thing done and the memory of it kept in mind also For subordinate things are not contrary This for a tast of the First Argument CAP. III. Rivet's Second Argument for us That the Sabbath was Instituted from the Beginning of the World and by him defended 1. The Argument from Heb. 4.1 c. 2. Gomarus his Answer 3. Rivets's Keply Rivets Argument in a Rhetorical way 1. THE Argument is from the Epistle to the Heb. Chap. 4. v. 1. c. And is this When the Apostle would describe the Spiritual Rest promised by God and would shew it was another Rest different from the Sabbatisme which the Jews observed according to the Law And also different from the Rest in the Land of Canaan into which Joshua conducted the People he saith those words in Psal 95. v. 11. ●●sware IF THEY SHALL ENTER INTO MY REST were pronounced by David although the works of God were finished from the Foundations of the World where he citeth that place in Gen. 2. And sheweth That the promise of Rest made to the Believers included in the threatning made to the Vnbelievers of excluding them from the Rest cannot be understood of the Rest of the SABBATH because now the works of God having been finished from the Foundations of the World God had rested the Seventh day from all his Works From all which follows That the Rest of the the SABBATH day began according to the Apostle from the finishing of God's Works after the Sixth day For it shews that men even then entred into that Rest from the time the World was finished For in vain he had said these words From the finishing of the works of God from the Foundation of the World if THAT SABBATH began after Two thousand years and more 2. Gomarus in answer to this Argument saith That it nothing moves him not through forgetfulness of that place of Scripture nor for want of a solid answer but because he could not observe in it any mention at all concerning the Sabbath for Rest and the Worship of God And adds further No Argument he believes could be thence drawn but such as would be absurd and void of any colour of an Argument 3. To this Rivet replies These words saith he of Extenuation and contempt Gomarus opposeth to our words which we objected as of great moment to the matter in hand The Apostles Argument appears to be this Rivet's Argument in a Syllogistical way God by the mouth of David excludes Unbelievers from his Rest But he doth not exclude them from that Rest with which he rested from the Foundations of the World after the finishing of the Works of Creation because that Rest was now long since past Nor doth he exclude them from the Rest in the Land of Canaan because many Unbelievers entred into it Therefore There remains a Third Sabbatisme into which they shall not enter The force of our Argument in that consisteth That no reason can be given why the Apostle should except that Rest from the Foundations of the World If it no ways appertained to men and if under the rest of God he did not understand that which he prescribed to men by his own example that he might shew that Rest not to be it of which David speaks because David could not promise that Rest which from the Beginning of the World was by Gods Example Instituted by or in the Sanctification thereof Amd thus ye have a touch of Rivets 2 Argum. CAP. IV. Rivet's Third Argument for us by him defended 1. The Argument from the Piety of the Patriachs 2. Gomarus his Answer 3. Rivet's Reply 1. THE Third Argum. taken from Reason was this The Patriarchs and other Believers before Moses according to their Piety towards God had their set times for Religion and Reformation according to their Power Therefore they observed the Seventh day of the week for that purpose Which may be propounded otherwise viz as Wallaeus * Cap. 3. Dissert propounds it Nullo modo saith he c. that is It is no way likely the Patriarchs all that while that Two thousand years and upward ran out had no set times wherein they might remember the benefits of God in the Creation of Heaven and Earth N. B. or that they might give to God a publick Worship or give to themselves and their Generations outward helps or means towards Piety when as concerning the Worship it self which they exhibited there is frequent mention or wherein they might permit a breathing and respit to their Servants Hand-maid and Cattel N. B. If therefore they had any fixed time it is altogether Consentaneous to reason that they would use that day of the Sanctification whereof there was extant so perspicuous a Testimony and not any other days of which there is no footstep to be found in all the Old Testament The same thing did * Com. in 4 Precep Calvin before that insinuate When God saith he delivered to the Saints the Right of Sacrificing it is not Credible That the observation of the Sabbath was omitted But by reason of the pravity of Human disposition that which among the prophane Gentiles was utterly extinct and in the Of-spring of Abraham was almost worn out of use God renewed by his Law that the Sabbath should be honoured with an holy and inviolable Observation 2. Gomarus Answers That which with Calvin was not Credible is with Gomarus not only Credible but also the consequence from Godly mens Worshiping to that day wherein God rested or from God's example is infirm because nothing hinders but that they might convene at some other convenient time for their publick Exercise of Religion 3. Rivets Answer by way of retortion thus It is Manifest then saith he that among all those that Convened for Publick Worship they Convened in a Convenient time The Question now is Qu. what is that time which ordinary day was it We who have known that God rested the Seventh day which the Authors of the contrary Judgment cannot deny who also confess That God prescribed to the People of Israel the Seventh day for Publick Worship because in it he rested doth seem to us not ill to Collect
or set time viz. of the Seventh day or Sabbath To wit God blessed the Seventh day and Sanctified it because in it he rested from all his Works And he puts in the Margin of his Book these Words In the State of Innocency the Seventh day was Sacred John Conrad Pfeilen in his Clar. Theolog pag. 217. The Sanctification of the Sabbath was not long and at last then Instituted in the time of Moses when the Decalogue was promulgated in Mount Sinai But was ordained and ordered presently after the Creation of the World But was indeed afterwards in the Law of Moses severely repeated upon penalty of Death not to be violated Henricus Butingus Chronol Pag. 12. ad annum Mundi primum The Sabbath is Sanctified by God and Celebrated by our first Parents in Paradise whilst our Nature was yet perfect To the same effect Bartafius concerning the Seventh day of the week doth speak in Verse Nor doth Golartius dissent from him writing on the same place I could also add Tilenus whiles he was a Soldier in our Camp on the fourth Command Thes 3. And Marlorat in Thesaur Locor Commun More Authors might be brought But here are produced THIRTY from whose judgment I could not prevail with my self to depart 3. Among the Papists there are some for the Negative That God did not Institute the Sabbath at the beginning of the World as Abulensis and all that follow him Others are with us for the Affirmative That it was Instituted at the Creation of the World as August Stench Eugub in Cosmopoeia on Gen. 2. Who will not only have it that then at the beginning of the World that Day was Sanctified for the use of Divine Worship But also they had it after that in all Ages in all Nations or Gentiles Venerable and Sacred So Gilbertus Genebrandus in Chronolog ad Annum primum Mundi The Sanctification saith he of the Sabbath and that it was observed in all the time of the Law of Nature N. B. the Hebrews deliver it to us And so doth Lyranus Gen. 7. even as he doth some other Legals And the same Opinion doth Jacob. Salianus prosecute in many Words in Annal V. Test ad Annum Mundi 1 Diem 7. ubi Tertullianum who seems to think otherwise he doth explain ☞ concerning the Sabbath as it is Ceremonially and rigidly observed by the Jews Likewise Cornel a Lapide on Gen. 2. It is manifest saith he that the Sabbath was Inistruted a Festival or Holy Day at first not by Moses Ex. 20. v. 3. but LONG BEFORE to wit at the beginning of the World He had said a little before He Sanctified it that is He Instituted it a Holy Day and would have it to be honoured with an high esteem of Adam and his Posterity with a Sacred leisure and Worship of God He addeth That the Fourth Commandement was a Divine Precept not natural but positive As of the same Judgment he cites Catharinus upon the same place And Emanuel Sa consenteth Here saith he it appears that the abbath was Celebrated from the very Beginning Which thing also Ribera asserts N. B. and proves in the Ep. to the Heb. Cap. 4. Number 8. 4. As for the Ancient Fathers few of them have touched the Question The Fathers alledged for us Of them that have some are for the Affirmative though some other are cited rather for the Negative whose words may be referred not to the denial of that primaeve Sanctification of the Sabbath but to the renewing of it with addition of Rights and Ceremonies formerly either unknown or obliterated Tertullian al●edged for us Tertullian whose words are chiefly urged although having to do against the Jews refers the Institution of the Sabbath to Moses to shew that it did appertain to the Ceremonies of the Law and therefore to be Antiquated yet nevertheless doth elsewhere acknowledg that the Jews do say That God did from the beginning of the World Sanctifie the Seventh Day in resting from all the Works which he had made And from thence also Moses said to the People REMEMBER THE SABBATH DAY So he Advers Jud. Cap. 4. Neither doth he deny it to be true who in his Fourth Book Chap. 11. against Marcion affirmeth as his own sence That Christ himself made the Sabbath day by his Fathers Blessing to be Holy from the beginning of the World and made it more Holy by his own Benefaction If some others think otherwise in favour of the Negative more and of no less Authority may be produced for our Affirmative as Cl. V. Waleus hath Demonstrated alledging the Testimony of Philo. Lib. 3. de vita Mosis Chrysostom Hom. Philo Chrysostom Theodoret Austin are for us 10. on Gen. Theodoret. in his Questions on Genesis Austin Ep. 86. ad Casul And we shall find anon other of the Fathers of the same mind CAP. 2. Rivets first Argument for us by him defended 1. The Argument from Gen. 2. ver 2 3. 2. Gomarus his answer 3. Rivets reply 1. THE Foundation of the whole Affirmative assertion is laid and that justly in those words Gen. 2. ver 2 3. Which are That the Sabbath was immediately after the finishing of the Creation of the World Instituted for Adam and his Posterity for the Worship of God For from that place of Gen. 2. ver 2 3. It is manifest that God blessed the Seventh Day after the Creation The grand Question Contro verted and Sanctified it Now a Question is moved Whether he did Sanctifie it just then or whether he deferred it till long aft●●●●●e Creation viz. for the sp●●●● of Two thousand four hundred and fifty three years So that the sense of the Mosaical Story should be That God after his finishing his Six days work rested the Seventh And after Two thousand four hundred fifty three years God blessed a like day and Sanctified it to or for sacred use And of Necessity this must be the sense of those men who do so much disjoyn those words He Finished Rested Blessed and Sanctified as that they refer the former words to the time of the beginning of the World the later words to the time of Moses giving the Law But we stand to it That all those words which are conjoyned by a Copulative are not to be torn asunder to so great a distance For seeing Moses discourseth of the Seventh day after the Creation I say the first Seventh that is ●●●●nediatly following after the ●●●st six days It seemed necessary to us that the same day which was the Seventh from the Creation was the day of Rest and of Sanctifing it The Proposition 2. The force of Gomarus his answer he gives us in this Syllogisme that which in Gen. 2. ver 2.3 is neither expresly asserted nor is by any circumstances of that Scripture evinced that cannot be proved by it The Assumption But that the Sabbath was Instituted at that very time when at first the Creation of the World
though servile Subjection came in after Sin yet if Man had not Fallen there should have been degrees of Superiority and Inferiority And there should have been distinction of Sexes and dignities c. Obj. 4 John 7.22 Christ maketh an opposition between two Laws one of Circumcision and another of the Sabbath And he saith Circumcision is kept not because Moses Instituted Circumcision but because it was from the Fathers And because Moses's Law of the Sabbath was given after the Law of Circumcision therefore it is that Infants are Circumcised upon the Sabbath and yet the Sabbath is not broken Answ The Sabbath was given after Circumcision with the rest of the Ceremonies belonging to it which Christ especially meaneth here But the Moral part was given to Adam before his Fall He maketh Opposition here but between the Ceremony of Circumcision and the Ceremony of the Sabbath The less necessary Ceremony to give place to the greater And the Jews say when a Child was to be Circumcised upon the Sabbath yet the morning Sacrifice behoved to be Offered first before the Child was Circumcised and then all the rest of the Ceremonial Worship in the Sabbath gave place to Circumcision Obj. 5 And whereas they urge us That there is no Example of the Patriarches who kept the Sabbath before the Manna was sent down Answ It may seem out of Job That they kept the Sabbath in his time which was before the Law was given It is said Job had Seven Sons N. B. and they went and Feasted in their Houses every one his day Job 1.4 And then it is subjoyned Job 1.6 That there was a day when the Sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord. Now who were the Sons of God here but Job's Children N. B. who Assembled themselves to worship God upon the Seventh day Obj. They say that these words God rested the Seventh day and Sanctified the Sabbath a●● set down 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by way 〈◊〉 Anticipation because God promised to Sanctifie that day afterwards Answ This carries no probability with it that God is said to Sanctifie it because he was purposed to Sactifie it afterwards For then he might be said to Sanctifie Moriah when he Created it because afterwards he was to build the Temple there and to Sanctifie the Pascha and the Pentecost because afterwards he was to appoint them for holy uses FINIS THE Sunday-Sabbath's Rest FROM CONTROVERSIES CHAP. I. Of the Thesis or Position Section I. THE Thesis or Position Our Sunday-Sabbath or Lords-day is the very same day of the week which was anciently observed by Jews and Gentiles for the Solemn day of their Solemn weekly Worship before Israels coming out of Aegypt and after that by the Gentiles Sect. II. The explanation of the Thesis 1. We call it Sunday 1. Because it is vulgarly so called and best known by the generality of the Nation 2. Because the Jews anciently so called it and observed it in memorial of God their Sun * Ps 84.11 Creating the World and that eminentest part thereof the Sun * Exod. ●0 11 If so long after the Creation no don 't but anciently nea●e● the Crea●ion 3. Because the Gentiles of old called it Sunday though upon an ill occasion that they on that day Worshiped the Sun But it is to our purpose to note the number of the day not the iniquity the observation not the misapplication of the day ¶ 2. We call it Sabbath 1. Because many Christians so call it and own it against all Jewish Saturday Sabbatarians 2. Because the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbath signifies rest which rest for Body and Soul we have mostly on this day 3. Because in some way of proportion the time of our Sabbath day answers to that of the Jews both being a Seventh day of the week ¶ 3. We call it The Lord's day 1. Because the Scripture so calls it I was saith St. John the Disciple of Christ in the Spirit on the LORDS DAY * Rev. 1.10 meaning our Sabbath or Sunday which we call the Lord's day For surely if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper doth sufficiently distinguish that Spiritual Supper of the Communion to all ingenuous men from all common Suppers then so doth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord's day sufficiently distinguish to all not willfully blind that special day from all other days For it follows 2ly That we call our Sabbath the Lord's day because it was the day of the Lord Christ's Resurrection from the Dead wherein he rested from his Sufferings and we thereby from our Sins and Condemnation 'T is true That the day of Christ's Resurrection is by the same Apostle called the First day of the week * Joh. 20.1 But 't is as true That this same First day was the Jews and Gentiles Sabbath for Two thousand four hundred fifty four years viz. From the Creation to the reduction of Israel our Aegypt and was the Gentiles Sabbath long after that 3ly We call it the Lord's Day because on that day in every week we solemnly worship the Lord Christ with the Gospel Worship which the Lord himself hath Instituted Sect. 3. The probation or proof of the said Thesis being made good by the orderly succeeding of the following Chapter N. B. the latter strengthning the former it may be hoped that according to the TITLE there will follow a cessation and rest of all Controversies about the Sunday Sabbath or the Lord's day either by the Quotidian or Hemerion Sabbatarians that pretend no one day but every day should be as a Sabbath Or by the Plurian Sabbatarians that would not have all days to be Sabbaths but would have more then one day in Seven Or by the Prosabbatarians that are wholy for the Jewish Sabbath Or by the Antisabbatarians that are against the Jewish Sabbath in the behalf of the Christian Sabbath Or touching the morality of th● Sabbath in general Or touching the warrantrie of Christian Lord's day Sabbath Or touching the Scruple whether to cal● the day of Solemn Worship Sunday or Sabbath day o● Lord's day CHAP. II. Of the Natural and Artificial day Sect. 1. THE Natural day of Twenty four hours as it is vulgarly called is with any people the space of time between Sun-rising and Sun-rising or between Sun-setting and Sun-setting called by the Learned the Horizontal day Sect. 2. The parts of this Natural day are two The one is the Artificial day that is the days Light The other part is by relative consequence the Artificial night that is the Nights darkness belonging to that day So that the Artificial day is the whole space between Sun-rising and Sun-setting CAP. III. Of the ancient beginning of the Natural day Sect. 1. THE Artificial day or Day-light was anciently before Israels going out of Aegypt counted the beginning or former part of the Natural day and the Night the latter part of the said natural day This appears three ways
God commanded the Jews to take into their Sabbath the next preceding Evening then either we must say The Jews Sabbath began the Evening next AFORE our Sabbath-day-light began or else that the Jews Sabbath began at the Evening AFTER our Sabbath-day-light began If we say AFTER then one whole day is lost in the computation of time If we say AFORE then we have that we contend for viz. That the Jews Artificial Sabbath-day of Day-light and the Christians Artificial Sabbath of Day-light were Materially as to Day-light the very self same as before at the very first change of the Sabbath Thus of the Second Conclusion ¶ 3. Conclusion to be cleared afore named is That both Sabbaths the Jews and ours in several respects and on several accompts are much the same 1. They are the same Materially as to Day-light not only in the same Horizon of which Jerusalem is the Centre point as was said in the First Conclusion but also in that Horizon which encircleth England and Judaea excepting about four or five hours that Day-light begins in Judaea so much sooner then with us in England as is demonstrable upon the Globe 2. They are the same reputatively that is They are reputed and esteemed the same day of the week in number For what is the Reason that the French and Dutch are said to keep the Twenty fifth day of December for the Feast of the Nativity of Christ and yet we English also are said to keep the same Feast on the Twenty fifth day of December though we keep it Ten days Old Style after them beyond Sea that observe New-Style Ten days before us I say what is the Reason but because the French and Dutch ever since that Pope Gregory altered their Year begin their Months sooner by Ten days then we do Just so it is in the Matter of the Sabbath namely both Jews and Christians all of them keep their Sabbath on the same day of the Week viz. on the SEVENTH day of the Week and that the Reason why the Seventh day of the Week with the Jews comes to be almost a day sooner then it doth with the Christians is because the Jews began their Week near a day sooner this they did formerly before the change of it at their coming out of Aegypt and sooner then the Heathen Gentiles did and the Christians now do 3. Both Sabbath days the Jews and Ours are the same boundarily For as the Six days of Man's Labour do bound out the Jews present Sabbath Six days saith the Fourth Commandement Shalt thou Labour and do all thy Work but the Seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God So all the Six days of our Labour are the boundary of our Christian Sabbath for after our Six days of our Labour we keep our Sabbath not sooner nor later And the natural necessity of the thing constreins For the Sabbath must either relate to the Six days of God's Work of Creation or to the Six days of Man's Labour in his Vocation Now it cannot relate to the Six days of God's Work of Creation and so to the day of God's Rest For then either the day of God's Rest and the Jews Sabbath must be the same beginning in all places at Sun-setting where-ever the Jews did or ought to observe their Sabbath which cannot be except the Earth were all a flatt and not a round Globe as we see by sence both on the Globe and on the Hills and Mountains of the Earth how their roundness makes the day begin successively over the whole Earth Or else the day of Gods Rest did at the first and still doth begin in this computation of a Seventh sooner in some places then in other and so first at one particular place whiles it was no where else the day of God's Rest either of which are so against sence and reason that no understanding man can rationally imagine it Therefore the bounding and measuring out of the Sabbath must relate to the Six days of Man's Labour in his Vocation as 't is directed in the Fourth Commandement immediatly after which Six days of our Labour follows the Seventh day for Rest So that in this respect also the Jews Sabbath and our Sabbath are the same The Close THus have I Laboured in this small Treatise with great Ventilations and Careful thoughts to give rest to others hoping that upon due consideration of what hath been cleared in the precedent Treatise touching the Seniority of our Christian Sabbath before the Law The sameness in several respects of both Sabbaths at this day And that the Crown of Morality is rather Set Worn or to be worn on the head of our Christian Sabbath then on the Jewish Our Christian Brethren of the Saturday Sabbatarians will be brought off from the Errour of their Opinion and out of that discomfort and those encumbrances that attend the Practise thereof Which is the Prayer of their hearty well-wishing Friend N. H. FINIS