Kirke There is another reason to proue that there were no other dayes appoynted in the Apostles times The Apostle had occasions to treat of holy dayes reasoning against the observation of Iewish dayes they direct them to no other as the purpose required The Apostle condemneth not onely the observation of the Iewish daies nor the Iewish observation of the Iewish daies to a typicall use For the converted Iewes did not obserue them as shadowes of things to come for then they had denied Christ but he condemneth observation of dayes as a Iewish custome and rite as a pedagogicall and rudimentary instruction not beseeming the Christian Kirke Zanchius speaketh to this purpose after this manner Magis consentaneum est cum prima institutione cum scriptis Apostolicis ut unus tantum dies in septimana sanctisicetur It is more agreeable to the first institution and the writings of the Apostles that one day of the weeke onely be sanctified Against this Argument is first alledged that the Apostle compareth with the observation of dayes Rom. 14.5.6 Answ. The Apostle beareth with the infirmity of the weake Iewes who understood not the fulnesse of the Christian liberty And the ceremoniall law was as yet not buried But the same Apostle reproveth the Galatians who had attained to this libertie and had once left off the observation of daies Next the Iudaicall dayes had once that honour as to be appointed by God himselfe but the anniversary dayes appointed by men haue not the like honour It is secondly obiected that seeing the Lords day was instituted in remembrance of Christs resurrection the other notable acts of Christ ought likewise to be remembred with their severall festivities Answer It followeth not that because Christ did institute in remembrance of one benefite therefore men may institute for other benefites 2. Christs resurrection was a benefite including the rest as an accomplishment of the worke of redemption and answered anagogically to the common benefit of creation by the beginning of a new creation 3. We deny that the Lords day was appointed to celebrate the memory onely of Christs resurrection For then the Lords resurrection the proper subiect of all Homilies Sermons Gospels Epistles Collects Hymnes and Psalmes belonging to the Paschall seruice should be the proper subject of deuine seruice euery Lords day Then the Lords day shovld be a festivall day and it were vnlawfull to fast on it It was instituted for the remembrance of all his actions and generalie for his worship Athanasius sayth In Sabathâ— conuenimus ut Dominum Sabathi Iesum adoremus Wee conuene on the Sabboth that wee may adore Iesus the Lord of the Sabboth Augustin sayth Domineus hic dies idâ—irco dicitur quia eo die Dominus resurrexit vel ut ipso nomine doceret illuÌ„ Domino consecratum esse debere It is called the Lords day because the Lord rose that day or that the name might teach us that it ought to be consecrate to the Lord. It is called the Lords day either becase the Lord did institute it as the dayes of Purim are called Mordecaies dayes in the second of the Maccabees and the communion is called the Lords Supper Or els because it was instituted to the Lords honour and worship The Iewish Sabboth was the Sabboth of the Lord our God The Christian sabboth is the Sabboth of Christ our Lord God and Man The name of Lord was more frequent in the mouths of Christians in the Apostlick times then the name of Christ as Rhenanus hath obserued When it is called commonly the Lords day it is all one as if it were commonly called Christs day Changeing the title but not the purpose If the ordinary sabboth be Christs day appointed by himselfe or his Apostles at his direction for the remembrance of all his actions and for his worship in generall to diuide his actions and appoint anniversary and mysticall dayes for their remembrance is superstitious wil-worship and a Iudaicall addition to Christs institution Christs day answereth analogicallie to the morall sabboth It may be applied to the remembrance of Christs resurrection seeing he rose that day and in some sort to bâ— a signe of the heavenly rest But that is typus communis factus A common type fitted to resemble such things But not typus distinâ—â—us appointed by God for that end It resteth then that Christs day or the Lords day is the Christian sabboth a continuation of the morall sabboth and to be obserued in a morall maner for all the paise of Gods worship in and through Christ and not in a misticall maner for the joyfull remembrance of Christ resurrection onely It is thirdly objected that Paul kept the feast of Pentecost Act. 20. 1. Cor. 16. I answer It was the Iewish Pentecost whereof mention is made in these places Paul needed not to haue travelled to Ierusalem for he might haue observed the Christian Pentecost euery where Bellarmin himself wil not be so bold as to affirme that it was the Christian Pentecost Francolinus putteth it out of doubt and sayth it is against the common exposition of the interpreters for sayeth he Tune temporis non erant celebres christianorum festivitates cum Euangelium non esset ad huc plenè promulgatum the festiuities of Christians were not as yet celebrated for the Gospell was not yet fully published It is fourthly objected out of the Epistles of Policarpus Pollycrates extant in the history of Eusebius and out of Beda following Eusebius that the Apostles kept the feast of Easter Answer Beda was but a fabler and a follower of fabulous reports Eusebius was little better treading vnknowne foot-steps as himself confesseth in the beginning of his storie The Epistles alledged are counterfeit for it is said in these Epistles that Iohn was a Priest and bare on his forehead the Patalum that is the golden plate like that of the high Priests Exod. 37.36 But no man will graunt sayth Scaliger Neutrum concedit quisciverit nullam Christi Apostolum sacerdotem fuisse nulli preterquam Summo Sacerdoti Petalon gestare licuisse That either Iohn or Iames bare it who vnderstand that none of Christs Apostles was a priest and that it was lawfull to none but the hie priest to beare the golden plate And yet these Epistles are the eldest records that Eusebius can ground vpon The Bishop of Elie in his sermon taketh needlesse pains to prove the antiquity of Ester But when he proveth it to be Apostolicall he shooteth short His eldest antiquity is the counterfeit Epistles before alledged His proofe out of scripture Psalm 118.8 1. Cor. 5.7.8 are very weake For the first testimonie is applyed to euery Lords day and is not to be restrained to Pasche day Christ crucified and refused of the builders was demonstrate to be the corner stone For that day he was demonstrate to be the son of God by his resurrection according to Dauids Prophesie To
to keepe their Station there was no intermission of the daily sacrifice no interruption of the courses till the destruction of the Temple as Scaliger proveth in the end of his booke By the calculation from the 22. of November at the dedication made by Maccabeus he maketh Iohn the Baptist to be conceived after the 28. day of Iuly and consequently Christs birth to fall out about the end of September an hot time of the yeare when the Shepheards were watching in the field Casaubon saith That the custome of the Kirke of Alexandria doth wonderfully confirme the calculation of Scaliger The day of the weeke when Christ was borne can no mortall man know sayth the same Scaliger They who were of one family diuided the services among themselues as it fell by lot some fell to offer Incense some to dresse the lampes some to order the wood on the Altar 1. Chron. 23.28.29.30.31 And the booke of the Iewish Liturgies testifies the same So you see how it fell Zachary to offer up incense and that he was not high Priest If antiquitie erred so grossely in the matter it selfe that is in taking the 25. day of December for the day of Christs nativity might they not haue erred as grossely in appointing any day at all Nay let us utter the truth December-Christmas is a iust imitation of the December-Saturnall of the Ethnicke Romans and so used as if Bacchus and not Christ were the God of Christians It is commonly obiected that we may as well keepe a day for the nativity as for the resurrection of Christ. We haue answered already that Christs day or the Lords day is the day appoynted for remembrance of his nativity and all his actions and benefites as well as for the resurrection Next the one is morall and weekly the other is mysticall and anniversary The Lords day it selfe is no longer to us mysticall but morall sayth Willet and therefore Pasâ—h-day is a mysticall Sabboth and anniversary whereas the Lords Sabboth should be onely morall It is still objected the benefits of God ought to be remembred specially Christs notable benefits Answ. It is one thing to remember another thing to remember with solemne festivities To remember is a morall duety and perpetuall for we ought to keepe not onely an anniuersary but also a weekly and dayly remembrance But to celebrate an anniversary solemnity and to keep a sabboth of rest in remembrance it is a pedagogicall ceremonie of the Iewes The Lord helped there vnderstanding with types and figures their affections with instruments of Musick Their memories with frontelets and Phylacteries to put them in mynd of Gods Law But wee are to keepe sayeth lerome not a literall by outward signes but a spirituall memorie of Gods law Euery thing set vp for remembrance of God is not acceptable to him for so the Lutheran shall defend his images As oft as the Gospell is preached Christ is remembred When the word is preached Christ is crucified and by the same reason hee may be said to be borne to rise againe to ascend c. When the sacrament is ministred Christs death and Passion is remembred and that with solemnity Wee cannot worship Christ privatly or publickly but we must remember his birth and his passion Pope Alexander 3. gaue this reason wherefore the Romane Kirk kept not a holy day to the Trinity Quoniam Ecclesia Romana in usu non habet quod in aliquo tempore buiusmodi celebret specialiter festivitatem cum singulis diebus gloria Patri fâ—â—io Spiritui Sancto coetera simitia dicantur ad laudem pertinentia Trenitalis because faieth hee Glorie to the father and to the Sonne and to the holy Ghost and other such like things belonging to the praise of the trinity are uttered daily The Popes reason is grounded vpon this rule Whatsoeuer is intreated or remembred in the ordinary divine service ought not to haue one speciall holy day to celebrat the memory of the same beside the day already discerned by the Lord. We assume Christs nativity death resurrection c. Are not only the continuall meditation of a Christian in private but also are remembred and intreated in the ordinary and publick service Every communion sunday is a passion holy day Euery sabboth that Christs nativity is preached is a time of remembrance of his Natiuity But to ordain an anniversary day or houre of rest for commemoration of his nativity or passion and specially vpon a weeke day is a Iewish rudiment and a prejudice to Christian libertie As for the 5. day of November it is not an holy day It is not a day of cessation from work which is one of the chiefe elements of an holy day The bonefires set out in token of joy are no part of Christian sanctification of the day Bellarmine telleth vs Ignis accendi solet ad letitiam significandam etiam in rebus prophanis that fire vseth to be kindled even in ciuill and prophane things Scaliger calleth the candels and torches lightned vpon Midsomer even the foote steps of auncient gentility Anniversary commemoration of a benefite with a cessation from worke suppose for a part of a day is Iewish To praise God with publick thankesgeving in the instant tyme of receiueing the benefit was our duetie But to appoint an anniuersary houre of cessation and publicke commemoration is not competent to the times of the new Testament Willet compareth this day to the daies of Purim Be it so But these dayes were of a ceremoniall nature as we haue said The seventh Reason Grant the keeping of holy dayes to haue been at the beginning a matter indiffrent and setting aside all the former reasons yet ought they to be abolished because according to the rule of the Fathers commended to us by Zanchius Non malè igitur fecerunt qui omnia praeter diem Dominicum aboleverunt Things indifferent when they are abused and polluted with superstition ought to be abolished In this ranke he placeth holidayes and therefore inferreth that they haue not done evill who haue abolished all other holidayes but the Lords day When he sayth They haue not done evill it is all one as if he had sayd They had done well for they haue done according to that laudable rule Sure it is that in former times holidayes haue not onely been abused to iâ—lenesse and licentiousnesse but also polluted with the opinion of worship merit necessity and Iudaicall conceit that the Divell did not tempt on these dayes as he did on other dayes Therefore the same Zanchius faith in the place aforesayd If any feasts were celebrate before religiously and holily but thereafter were contaminate with superstition and Idolatry that worthily they were taken away by our Reformers who imitate herein the example of Hezekias brusing to powder the brasen Serpent when it was abused to idolatry And againe he sayth The number the abuses the superstitions the false worships the will-worships
indured after the dayes of Malachi as Drusius afirmeth They had Vrim and Thummim under the first Temple and in place thereof a slender voyce sounding from the heaven called Bathkol under the second Temple as Tremellius hath observed Next the Pharisees and degenerating Iewes filled their Kalendar with fond feasts of their owne invention as the festivities of the Equinoctiall and festivall dayes other wayes called the feasts of the Tekuphas or converted any ancient order into a solemne feast as the day appointed for carying wood to the Temple to maintein the fire of the altar Nehem. 10.34 they turned into a feast called the feast of Xylophoria A holie day is to be observed not by a few but by all but all were not appointed to bring wood but those only who were designed by lot It is no wonder therefore that they took the like course with the dayes of Purim But wee are not to imitate the Pharises and fond Iewes The fourth Reason The observation of anniversarie dayes pertained to the ceremoniall law but so it is that the ceremoniall law is abolished The anniversarie dayes were distinguished from the morall sabboth Many were the preheminences of the ordinary sabboth aboue the anniversary 1. It was more ancient given to Adam in the state of innocencie 2. vttered by Gods owne mouth 3. Written with Gods owne finger in durable stone 4. The Lord himself in a manner rested on it when as he rained not Manna that day 5. It was more strictly observed then the other holy dayes therefore some say it was called Shabbath Shabbathon Therefore likewayes the Iewes measured unto it a sabboth dayes journey 6. Other holy dayes were celebrated either in remembrance of a by-past benefite or to signify somthing to come It excelled them in both faith Bellarmine 7. Other holy dayes gaue place unto it The Iewes made a Canon that two Sabbothes should not concurre together propter olera propter mortuoâ— that is because they could not keepe in that hote region their sodden meats two dayes together nor the bodies of the dead unburied for stink and putrifaction Therefore they transferred this sabboth of extraordinary solemnity immediatly proceeding the ordinary sabboth to the ordinary sabboth They were drawne to it it was never drawen to them See Causabonus In a word the Iewes held it in greater estimaton then the rest They called it The Queene of the holy dayes and the secrete of the living God The three solemnities called Regalim were Temple feasts They were bound to celebrate them at the Temple the publick theater of all the Iewish ceremonies The Apostle calleth them Weake and beggerly elements Galat. 4.9.10 The elements of the world Coloss. 2.20 Shadowes of things to come Coloss. 2.16.17 The Apostle saith not the observation of Iudaicall dayes but simpliciter the observation of dayes served to the people of God for a typicall use and a rudiment of religion If the observation of some anniversary dayes was prescribed to the Iewes as elements and rudiments for their instruction it followeth that the observation of anniversarie dayes is of it selfe a rudimentary instruction otherwayes the Apostles reason will not hould The Apostle condemneth difference of dayes as he condemneth difference of meats To esteeme some meats cleane and some uncleane is Iudaicall howbeit we obserue not the same difference that the Iewes did Dayes and meats are parallelled together to esteeme one day holier then another not so discerned by the Lords commandement must be also Iudaicall The Kirk vnder the Gospell hath past the rudiments and therefore the observation of anniversary daies doth not beseeme her To substitute other dayes in place of the Iewish a Christian Pasâ—â—e and Pentecost for the Iewish is but to substitute rudiments and elements ro the Iewish not to chase away but to change the Iewish holy dayes as Bellarmine doth Non est sublata sed mutata significatio â—et discretio dierum The Iewish frankincense was a perfume the Popish is a simple frankincense without any other ingredient The Iewish lights were of oyle the popish of wax and yet wee charge them with Iudaizing The Iewes had no anniversary dayes but such as were abrogate They were abrogate not only as shadowes of things to come but also as memorials of bygone benefites Even as they were dayes of remembrance they belonged to the pedagogy of the law Converted Iewes may not lawfully obserue the Iewish festivities even as remembrances of bygone benefits In every respect all their anniversary dayes are abolished and they had none other but such as were abolished Therefore in every respect they belonged to the ceremoniall Law The observation therefore of anniversary dayes even in respect of remembrance was to the Iewes pedagogicall rudimentary and elementary and counsequently ceremoniall The Bishop of Chester confesseth that all the solemne feasts were of a ceremoniall nature If the Iewes had no anniversary solemnities to indure after Christs comming when they should be converted to Christianisme how can the observation of anniversary dayes be taken up by Christians The fifth Reason The prerogatiue belonging to God in the old Testament was transferred to Christ God and Man the law-giver in the new Testament one that was faihfull in all the house of God But so it is that Christ neither by his own coÌ„mandement nor by direction of his spirit inspiring the Apostles instituted any other day but the Lords day If there had been any other dayes dedicated to Christ the Apostle spoke unproperly and obscurely when he sayd he was ravished in the spirit upon the Lords day If there had been a day for his Nativity another for his passion he should haue sayd he was ravished in the spirit upon one of the Lords dayes Seeing Iohn out-lived the rest of the Apostles It followeth that there was no other holy day observed in the Apostolicall times Neither was the institution of the Lords day so much a new institution as a change of the ordinary Sabboth The extraordinary Sabboths were in every respect ceremoniall The ordinary Sabboth had both substance and ceremony By reason of the substance it was changed into the Lords day answering analogically to it The morall use of the ordinary sabboth was for the service of God in generall both private and publick The mysticall use was to be a memoriall of things by-past and a shadow of things to come The morall use indureth the mysticall uses are evanished Christ appeared the first day of the weeke and every eighth day thereafter untill he ascended saith Iunius And that therefore the Apostles delivered to the Kirke the observation of this day from Christs example and institution which he confirmeth with the iudgement of Cyrillus and Augustine The blessing of the seventh day was translated to this day instituted by Christ because all sanctification floweth to Christians from Christ. But it is sufficient that the Apostles inspired by his Spirit haue recommended this day to the