Selected quad for the lemma: rest_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
rest_n	ceremonial_a	day_n	sabbath_n	2,227	5	9.7835	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A68659	A vievv of the civile and ecclesiasticall law and wherein the practice of them is streitned, and may be releeved within this land. VVritten by Sr Thomas Ridley Knight, and Doctor of the Civile Law.	Ridley, Thomas, Sir, 1550?-1629.; Gregory, John, 1607-1646.	1634 (1634)	STC 21055.5; ESTC S115990	285,847	357

Idem part 22. q. 87. art 1. who was figured by the tenth number All which that we may grant to be true betweene Christ and all mankinde as it is true indeed and that ten is the perfection of the other numbers under ten for that all the rest of the Digits when they come to ten returne back againe to ten and are multiplied by the coupling of themselves with ten yet where is this proportion betweene Christ and ten in the Scripture that should make this Ceremonie which if it cannot be found any where nor any consent of the primitive Church shewed for it as I thinke it cannot be then may it with as good authoritie be rejected as it is received For albeit Thomas Aquinas himselfe was tearmed a Seraphicall Doctor that is such a one as had a sense in the understanding of the holy Scripture above all others of his age and that he did much profit the studie of Divinity with his wittie distinctions yet is not his authoritie such that it must prevaile in cases of Divinitie without the authoritie of the Scripture and the consent of the ancient Fathers of the primitive Church interpreting this peece of Scripture in that sense as he doth which would make a sweet harmony if it might be had And therefore as to my poore sense better said a learned man of our time to this point writing upon the Sabbath day Iunius in 2. c. 3. Geneseo● in the second of Genesis which may be also proportionably understood of the tenth for that they were both before the Law in their very number and were but repeated by Moses under the Law because they had beene approved by God before the Law in the selfe same numbers and that which hee saith of the Sabbath is this that albeit it hath a Ceremoniall designation of the day that is that it doth figure unto us our perpetuall rest which we shall have in heaven after that there is a new heaven and a new earth yet there is therein two parts the one naturall the other positive as that God should have a seventh day of worship this is Naturall and therefore doth remaine because it is perpetuall but that this seventh day of the Lords worship should bee the seventh after the Creation of the world this was positive and therefore was changed by the Apostles and blessed men of the primitive Church into the seventh day after the Resurrection of our Saviour Jesus Christ which as it is verified by him in the Sabbath so may it be in like sort vouched by like reason in the tenth wherein also by like semblance there are two parts the one naturall the other positive The naturall is this that God our of all the fruits of the earth the increase of cattell that are worthy of him and fit for mans use should have a tenth both in the acknowledgement of his universall government over us and also for the provision of his ministers and therefore this remaineth in that sence immediately after the disolution of the Jews policie the good Christians of the Primitive Church as soone as they could get any outward forme of a Church peace from persecution received it in the very quotitie as a thing no lesse belonging to their Ministers than it did appertaine to the Priests Levites of the Law But that the Lord annexed these Tythes by Moses to the Priest Levites for their maintenance during the time of the dispensing of the mysteries under the Law this is positive and therefore changed by the good Christians in the Primitive Church frō the Jewes Ecclesiastiques to the Christian Ecclesiastiques Neither can it be thought that this number came frō the Judiciall part of the Law as a fit proportion to maintain one Tribe out of the revenues of the other eleven Tribes for that this number or quotitie was revealed to be Gods long before the Law and before there were any such division of Tribes among the people of Israell which then were not but were parted afterward by Moses into families according to the number of the twelve sonnes of Jacob. And therefore it is not to be presumed that the Law which came long after imprinted a forme upon that which was so long in beeing before there was any Law or Ceremony But as the Apostles or prime Christians vvhen as they did first change the day of the Sabbath by divine inspiration or otherwise from the day of the Creation to the day of the Resurrection durst not substitute any other day into the place of the first day than a seaventh for that the Lord had revealed his pleasure in many places of the Scripture as concerning that number for his day of vvorship so that no other day could be appointed for his day of worship than a seaventh So neither durst the good Christians of the Primitive Church moved no doubt with no other instinct then the other were when they translated this provision of Tythes for their ministery from the Jewish Church unto their owne Church change the number of ten into another number besides more or lesse For that God had no lesse manifested his will in sundry parts of the Scripture as concerning this number to be a number for the maintenance of his ministrie than he had declared his pleasure as concerning that other number to be a day for his honour challenging it every where in the Scripture in the very quotitie for his owne right and counting it robberie if it were at any time with-holden from him And therfore it may be well thought the School-men herein did great wrong to the Church who by their quaint distinctions brought this certaintie into an uncertaintie which is no where to be found in the Scripture Which I am more bold to speake for that I see some have trod this path before me and shewed by good demonstration that the turning of this quotitie into a competencie is a thing nothing warrantable by the word of God but that the quotitie ought still to stand as a perpetuall right due to God and his Church But hereof hitherto CHAP. V. SECT 1. That a Bishop being Lord of a manor and prime Founder of a Benefice could not in the first erection thereof by his own capacitie retaine any Tythes in his hand and passe the same after in Lay fee to his Tenant and so give cause to his Tenants of prescriptions against the Parson ANd so having passed over this whole proviso of Law Statute Priviledge Prescription and Composition I might well leave the turning of this stone any more but that yet there remaineth one Prohibition of prescription to be handled which in my fancie is worse then all therest for that it draweth away from the Parochian Church her maintenance transferreth it upon Lay and that which is worse it makes Bishops to be instruments hereof who are to be patrons and defenders of Churches and not pillers or powlers of the same And yet the authors thereof do