Manna but when he had ended the worke of creation it followeth that then he sanctified Consider againe that in Exod. 16. mention is made of the sabbath as a time of rest appointed before vers 23. To morrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto the Lord. Vers. 25. To day is a sabbath unto the Lord. Vers. 26. But on the seventh day which is the sabbath They had neglected or were forced to neglect that day in Egypt where they were not suffered to rest on that day and therefore he putteth them in minde of it and exacteth the observation of it which was now neglected of other nations Consider againe that soone after when the decalogue was promulgate upon mount Sinai the reason given for the observation of the sabbath was not that the Lord rained Manna six dayes and desisted the seventh which concerned onely the Iewes but that hee created all in six dayes and rested the seventh which concerned all mankinde Were it not ridiculous to imagine that God spent six dayes in creating the world and rested the seventh onely for the Iewes to whome hee was to intimate the sabbath 2453. yeares after But ye will say what needed Adam a sabbath-day in the state oâ— innocencie I answer because the dressing of the gardâ—n was committed to him and he was to live an animall life which would draw with it some distraction Therefore the Lord would have a day appointed wherein he might be wholy sequestrat from other affaires Further howbeit Adam was in the state of innocencie yet his state was mutable Whereas it is alledged that there was no positive precept given to Adam in paradise but the eating of the forbidden tree I answer none meerly positive but that But this is not meerly positive but determinative of the indefinit time required by the law of nature which urgeth a time for sequestration Some thinke that Adam fell the same day that he was created and therefore that the sabbath was sanctified after his fall But the imposing of the names upon the creatures the precept concerning the forbidden tree the tentation of Adam and Eve c. move others to thinke otherwayes Lyd at agreeth not either with too short time or yet three yeares which were too long but with those who alledge eight moneth wanting a week that hee might be the more sensible of his fall and defection after hee had for a certaine space enjoyed the pleasures of that estate But suppose Adam fell upon the sixt day yet the sanctification of the sabbath after was for all mankinde and not the Iewes onely But yet we have no mention made that the Patriarchs observed it What then It is sufficient that it was instituted howbeit the observation had beene neglected But wee must judge more charitably of the holy Patriarchs that they were observant of the institution receaved by tradition from Adam They receaved the law of sacrifices and other positive lawes by revelation by oracle and by dâ—vine inspiration saith Doctour Francis White in his treatise of the sabbath Is it likely then they observed not a set day or wanted direction what day to observe or that the Lord would havâ— set any other day for ordinarie Some gather the observation from Noahs sending forth the dove the seventh day after her returne and againe the seventh day That it is likely Noah was taken up with holy exercises every seventh day hee sent forth the dove and that he sent it forth rather then then any other time because hee was craving and expecting good successe But I will not stand upon this Junius approveth the opinion of the Hebrew Doctours who all agree that there passed seven dayes betweene the going of the people out of Egypt and the drowning of the Egyptians in the red sea and therefore there were seven dayes appointed for the feast of the passeover He confirmeth their opinion with his owne reckoning in his annot upon Exod. 12. Vpon Deut. 5. he noteth that is was the sabbath that day Pharaohs hoast was drowned and the people of Israel sang that song of triumph Exod. 15. The Apostle in the Epistle to the Hebrewes chap. 4. proveth that there is a sabbatisme me or keeping of a sabbath yet remaining for the people of God and all beleevers whereinto the incredulous were not to enter and to this purpose citeth a passage out of the psalmes There the incredulous are threatned to be excluded from rest which was to come For there were two rests already past in Davids time the one beginning at the rest of God from his workes which were finished from the foundation of the world and the other when Josue brought the people into the land of Canaan The Apostles enumeration had not beene sufficient if the sabbath day had not beene observed from the beginning for he maketh not mention of another sabbatisme past before Davids time but two whereinto man entred There was no othâ—r sabbath then in Davids time beside that rest in Canaan except that which was from the beginning and consequently the sabbath observed in his time was all one with that which was observed from the beginning The rest of the sabbath is called Gods rest or sabbath because God was the instituter of it gave exemple himselfe to man and appointed it for his owne worship Levit. 23. 1. and 28. 2. Jesa 56. 4. Ezech. 20. 20. Exod. 16. 23. If the words of the Apostle were taken only for Gods owne proper rest or sabbath the Apostles reasoning had not beene pertinent for David maketh mention of a rest whereinto men might enter and were exhorted to enter in but men cannot be said to enter in Gods owne proper rest The sabbatisme which is to come is called Gods rest and yet men are said to enter in it Further if the first rest were so called only because it was Gods owne peculiar rest it would folâ—ow the thy sabbath enjoyned to man had beene omitted and the Apostles induction had beene unsufficient Requies sâ—bâ—ati dicitur â— ei tum foâ— maliter quia in die septimo quiâ— vit Peus à creatione tum exemplaâ—â—ter efficienter quiâ— quies hominum in sabbato cultus sabbati institutus est à Dâ—o ad exemplar quietis Dei in sabbato saith Cornelius a Lapide a professour in Lovaine And a little before after hee hath opened up the three restâ— the rest of the sabbath enjoyned to man the rest of the people of God in the land of Canaan and the eternall rest in heaven hee inferreth that the rest of the sabbath was in use before the law of Moses even from the beginning of the world or else the Apostles reasoning cannot hold Hinc satis clarè elicitur evincitur sabbati cultum requiem in usâ— fâ—isse apud homines ante leâ—em Mosis ab origine 〈…〉 licet id neget Abulensis in c. 23. Levit. 4. 3. ut sâ—â—i eâ—diem septimum homines colerent eoque à laboribus quiâ—sâ—râ—nt in
Exod. 16. 23. was a permission not a command or for preparation onely not for eating the day following Yea they not only might fast but did it usually at lest to the twelft houre as Hooker proveth by testimonies out of Josephus Justinus Suctonius Balsam upon the 66. Canon called the Apostles saith Wee fast not upon the sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lest wee should seeme to imitate the Jewes Augustine saith God spake nothing concerning dining or fasting upon the sabbath when he sanctified the seventh day nor afterward when hee gave precepts concerning it to his people Of these differences the reader may finde more in Altare Damascenum page 667 668 669. The Jewish sabbath which was the seventh day from the creation was abolished at the resurrection of Christ because it had types and ceremonies annexed to it which were shadowes of things to come The ground ceasing the observation of that day ceased also for the shadowes flee away when the body commeth in place Yea further I will yeeld that the abrogation was meant by the Apostle Coloss. 2. 17. and under the name of sabbath there is to bee meant onely the weekly sabbath which is more then White craveth Not that I thinke they answer sufficiently to those who will have the word to be applied to the first and last day of anniversary feasts which were also called sabbaths But because I thinke these to bee comprehended under the name of feasts whereof these sabbaths were the principall and most solemne dayes So that here is a perfite division of all their solemne dayes to wit that they were either feasts to wit anniversarie dayes or new moones which returned monethly or the sabbath which returned weekly I so thinke the rather because we have the like division 1 Chron. 23. 31. where the Levits office is set downe to offer burnt sacrifices unto the Lord in the sabbaths in the new moones and on the set feasts And againe in Esay 1. 13 14. wee have the like As for that that the word Sabbath is in the plurall number it crosseth not this sense for so is the weekly sabbath usually expressed by the Greek translaters of the old testament and in the new testament also Matth. 12. 1 5 10 11 12. Matth. 2â— 1. Mark 1. 12. Mark 2. 23 24. Mark 3. 2 4. Luk. 4. 31. Luke 6. 9. Luke 13. 10. Act. 13. 14. Act. 16. 13. In these places the word is taken either for one sabbath-day onely or for moe And so it may bee taken in this place Coloss. 2. and translated either sabbath or as the late english translation hath sabbath dayes The sabbath-day is expressed in the plurall number for the frequent and often returning By the way observe that the old sabbath was not reckoned among the Jewish festivall dayes Sâ—atiger saith Manifestò sabbata distinguuntur to wit Esay 1. 13 14. à magnis diebus The sabbaths are â—early dâ—stinguished from the great dayes which were all one with Chaggim The Iewish sabbath then seeing it shadowed things to come behoved to bee abolished Suppose it had not beene a shadow yet even as it was but a circumstantiall point of the fourth precept which is morall positive it might have beene changed for a greater reason then was the occasion of the choice of the former For the resurrection of Christ and beginning of his triumph after he had ended his course of humiliation was a greater reason for making choice of the first day of the weeke then resting from the worke of creation was for the seventh day before The first respect of necessitie required abolition The 〈…〉 congruity The first day of the weeke succeeded in the roome of the last day of the weeke and hath beene observed in the Christian Church from her infancie to this day without any change or contradiction The Apostles were conveened together that day when the holy Ghost descended upon them Act. 2. When Paul had stayed at Troas seven dayes upon the first day of the weeke being the seventh day of his abode the disciples conveened together to break-bread and Paul preached and conferred with them till break of day Act. 20. 7. 11. The originall hath upon one of the sabbath but sabbath is put for weeke because from the sabbath as the principall day they numbred the rest of the dayes of the weeke to the next sabbath in order first second third fourth c. of the sabbath and distinguished them not by the names of the planets As when the pharisie said I fast twice in the sabbath that is twice in the weeke Luke 18. 12. When Jesus was risen early the first day of the sabbath that is of the weeke Mark 16. 9. And Levit 23. 15. seven sabbaths shall bee compleat that is seven weekes Likewise one according to the forme of speach familiar to the Hebrewes is taken for first The evening and morning were one day that is the first day This place cannot bee trâ—â—slated one of the sabbaths for the Apostle stayed but seven dayes in which there was but one sabbath day Nor yet is it likely that the Christians did assemble upon the Iewish sabbath to their exercises Howbeit the Apostle went in to their synagogue Act. 13. upon their sabbath that was not for the observation of their sabbath but because hee could not finde the Iewes assembled together at any other time or place that hee might have occasion to winne them as yee may see at that time hee found occasion to deliver a word of exhortation Wee have the first day of the weeke expressed with the like phrase 1 Corin. 16. 2. where the Corinthians are directed to lay aside some thing for the poore the first day of the sabbath that is of the weeke or every first day of the weeke Now although this text of S. Paul maketh no expresse mention of Church assemblies this day yet because it was the custome of Christians And likewise it is a thing convâ—nient to give almes upon the church-dayes it cannot wâ—ll hee gainsaid but that if in Corinth and Galatia the first day of evâ—ry weeke was appointed to be a day for almes and charitable contributions the same was also the Christians weekly holy day for their religious assemblies saith White and to this purpose citeth Chrysostome in 1 Corin. hom 43. where he sheweth that the time was fit for collections because that day they had receaved many great benefites and the first of the sabbath hee interpreteth the Lords day So do the translations of the Bible expound both the former and this place of the first day of the week the Belgike the French the Italian the Spanish the late English Beza's and Tremellius out of the Syriack With frivolous cavillâ—tion doe some few to their great discredite preasse to another sense which is to the full overthrowne by Walâ—eâ—s and Amesius This first day of the weeke Revel 1. 10. is called not the day of the Lord as sometime in
then to designe a place for the congregation to meet in but a matter belonging to order But there was more required to this day For it was not instituted only for order and policie that the people might know what dayes to conveene to publike exercises howbeit it was one respect Times may bee appointed for preaching and prayer on the weeke dayes by any particular Church But there is more required here a day to be obseved holy by the universall Church not only for publike worship but also for privat not onely for externall but also for internall which could not be done but by divine authoritie which is supreme and onely able to binde the conscience to internall as well as externall to privat as well as to publick worship as I have said before The last point which I am to touch is concerning the strictnesse of the observation Whither we be bound to as strict observation of the Lords day as the Jewes were of their sabbath The superstitious observation of the Iewes wee are not bound unto For they observed that day more precisely then God required They found fault with Christ healing of the sicke man upon the sabbath and the sicke mans carrying home of his bed They have had and have many foolish observations as not to pull to an herb on the sabbath nor to eat an aple which they pluck upon that day nor claw with their nailes in publike nor catch a flea unlesse it bite Let us then see what God hath forbidden them They were bidden â—ake that which they had to bake upon the sixt day and seeth that they had to seeth Exod. 16. 23. and forbidden to kindle a fire upon the seventh day But that which was baken and seethed upon the sixt day a part of it was not reserved to the seventh day but that which remained over unbaken and unsodden The text importeth no further for if it had beene baken or sodden they would perhaps have attributed the not putrifying upon the seventh day to the baking or seething It was food that might bee eaten without baking like comfites or fruit It seemeth then this injunction was given onely during the time the manna rained If this direction had beene to bee observed afterward they might not have eaten any thing which was baken two dayes before Is it likely that Christ and others bidden to the Pharisees house upon the sabbath-day had no meat dressed for them by baking of seething The kindling of fire was forbidden not simply but for baking or seething the manna as some thinke and therefore endured onely so long as the manna lasted howbeit the most superstitious sort of the Jewes in later times observed it It is noted of the Essens a strict sect of the Jewes as singular in them that they kindled no fire upon the sabbath-day They were commanded Exod. 16. 29. to abide every man in his place and not to goe out of their tents at lest out of the campe This was but temporarie Afterward they might take journey upon the sabbath to the Prophets or synagogues 2 King 4. 23. Levit 23. 3. Yea if they were not to journey for that the Scribes prescrived to them 2000 cubits that is a mile or thereabouts out of a towne or citie which was called the sabbath-dayes-journey But afterward they became more superstitious not taking up the Lords intent in that place of Exodus as the Jew that would not be drawne out of the jackes wherein he had fallen upon the sabbath-day So howbeit the Iewes should be superstitious now in not kindling fire that is no warrant that the direction was not â—â—â—oratie Some thinke this prohibition served onely during the workmanship of the tabernacle But let it bee granted that both the one direction and the other were to endure during the policie of the Iewes I denie that they were forbidden by vertue of the fourth precept of the decalogue They would and might have kindled fire notwithstanding of the fourth precept Their rest upon the sabbath was ceremoniall and figurative And because ceremoniall and figurative therefore saith Bellarmine and Dow after him with others it behoved to be more strict exact and rigid For the more exact the figure is the better it representeth and signifieth So granting that dressing and preparing of meat by fire were not a temporarie precept during the manna yet it depended upon the ceremoniall rest and typicall state of Gods people under the law They abstained from the buriall of the dead upon the sabbath-day 2 Maccab. 12. 39. because if any touched the dead or entred into the house where the dead lay or touched a grave was uncleane seven dayes Numb 19. 14. 16. and consequently they might not enter into the tabernacle Here a duty forbidden for legall uncleannesse which bindeth not us The prophanation of the sabbath was a capitall crime Exod. 31. 14. but this law bindeth not us The workes depending upon the ceremoniall rest or any particular ceremonie bindeth not us but only the workes inhibited in the fourth precept wherein the ceremoniall and iudicall precepts are not included but onely annexed to them as peculiar unto that people which was under the tutorie and paedagogie of the law Aquinas saith that the ceremoniall and judiciall precepts are not contained in the decalogue Ad secundum dicendum quod judicialia praecepta sunt determinationes moralium praeceptorum prout ordinantur ad proximum sicut ceremonialia sunt quaedam determinationes praceptorum moralium prout ordinatur ad Deum unde neutra praecepta continentur in daecalogo If then these workes were not forbidden by vertue of the fourth precept we are not bound to for beare them If our observation of the Lords day praefigure that blessed and glorious life which we expect as some doe hold then our rest should be also as exact and rigid because figurative Dominicus dies qui Christi resurrectione sâ—â—xatâ—â—e â— â—e ernam requiem spiritus corporis praefigurat saith Augustine But wee will not build strictnesse of rest upon such a weake ground It may bee fill drawne to resemble heavenly and spirituall things but that is not any end of the institution It is not â—â—puâ—destinatuâ— instituted for any shadow or signification though â—t may befitly applied unto such an use saith Willet Our rest upon the Christian sabbath is only subservient to the sanctifying of the day The strictnesse required of old by the vertue of the fourth precept is required of us As Whit maketh sunday an holy day only by the ordinance of the Church pag. 109. 150. so the particular forme and circumstances of resting are prescribed unto us saith hee by the Church pag. 135. meaning the Church governours the prelates So doth Bellarmine allow such workes as shall be permitted by the prelats or have beene used by long custome Tertiopera concessa à pralatis Quartò opera quae ex consuetudine sunt licita Our holy fathers the prelats paternes
but to the people also and is made common to the whole meeting In the one place â—â—is said they continued in breaking of bread and in the other place yet more clearly the Disciples conveened to break bread which is clearer then if Luke had said they conveened to the breaking of bread Bellarmine saith that Luke descriveth what the people did not what the Apostles did Hee might have said both the Apostles and the people Estius a popish professor in â—â—way acknowledgeth the same and sayeth Fiebat autem â—ujus panis fractio Tempore primitive Ecclesiae primum quidem 〈◊〉 sbyter is diaconis deinde verò magisque particulatim à singulis fidelibus quibus eucharstia dabatur in manus ut ea nâ— si porro â—nter se vel domi inter fuos distribuerent In the primitive church saith hee they had the breaking of bread which was first done by the presbyters and deacons and after them in smaller pieces by the faithfull to whom it was given that they might distribute the same among themselfes or at home among theirowne For Luke meaneth so much when hee attributeth this breaking to the faithfull in generall Act. 2. For their distributing in the convention he alleadgeth Act. 20. For distributing at home hee alleadgeth Act. 2. 46. whereas the meaning is that the faithfull conveened sometime in one house sometime in another for fear of persecution or not having yet appointed and certain places for meeting The Apostle 1 Cor. 10. 16. sayeth The bread which wee break is it not the communion of the body of Christ that is the bread which we break distribute and eat For the breaking alone by the Minister is not the communion of the bodie of Christ Pâ—nis queÌ„ frangimus 1 Cor. 10. idem est atque inter nos dividimus The bread which wee break that is the bread which wee divide amongst us saith Robertus Stephanus Whereas the Apostle saith the cuppe which wee blesse the words may bee spoken generally in the persons of all the faithfull who are present Qui quidem omnes â—alici benedicunt eo modo sensu quo omnes ibidem praesentes dicuntur unà cum sacerdote offerre videlicet animi consensu devotioone saith Estius The Minister blesseth in name of the rest as their mouth so the blessing may bee attributed to the people likewise The Apostle rehearsing the words of the institution said 〈…〉 but in the plurall number Takâ— yeâ— eat ye 〈◊〉 saith that the Apostles celebrated as Christ did eâ—ndem 〈…〉 teriam in rebus formam in verbis It appeareth not then that the Apostles gave to everie one severally saying to each one Take thou eat thou but that speaking in the plurall number to all at once the Communicants brack and distributed among themselfes Now that rite from which the Apostolicall Church denominate the whole action is sacramentall and necessarie saith Paraeus in 1 Cor. 11. When the holy supper is called breaking of bread it is not to be imagined that there was only communicating in bread but the whole is denominated from a part according to a custome of speech usuall among the Jewes who used the phrase of breaking of bread to expresse their full meals or common civill feasts as Ierem. 1â— 7. As the Grecians on the contrarie tooke the denomination sometime from the drinking and called their feast symposium a drinking together Yea one of the names which of old was given to this holy feast was synaxis Now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Hâ—sychius is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to drinke with other The breaking of the bread served for two uses First for representation of Christs sufferings If their powring of the wine out of the cuppe into the mouth be a mysticall representation of the effusion of his bloud their breaking may have the like use Wee can well allow of a mysticall shedding of Christs bloud in the supper faith Master Cartwright for when the wine is powred out of the cuppe into the mouth thereby mystically and sacramentally is shed the bloud of Christ out of his blessed body into the earth that is the shedding of it is 〈◊〉 So saith Prosper in his book of sentences Dum sanguâ—◠〈◊〉 sidelium sunditur sanguinu de latere effusio defignatur Lanfranous and Aâ—gerus say the like Solenne 〈◊〉 est cum frangitur panis 〈◊〉 calix inâ—â— fidelium funditu tunc significari sacrificium illud quod in cruce immolatun est saith Chamierus The Communicants taking eating drinking are mysticall why may not also his breaking of the bread Bullinger saith Ac nos ipsi quidem panem Domini proprits frangiâ—us manibus Nos enim ipsi in culpa sumus quod ille aitâ—itus That is Wee breake the bread of the Lord with our own hands for we ouâ—selfes are to be blamed that he was bruifed Our sinnes wounded him we crucified him We reach not only the bread and cuppe to other but partake our selfes For we beleeve not only that he suffered for others but in speciall for our selfes Gualter in his Homilies upon Matth. Vt vero Christus panem accepit fregit postquam gratias egisset ita eundem discipulos quoque accipere frangere voluit ut ita singuli admonerentur hunc ad se privatim pertinere se item necis illius authores esse ad hac debitores omnibus ut eos in Christi atque salutis que in eo habetur societatem adducant That is As Christ had taken the bread and after thanksgiving brack so he would have his disciples to doe the like that thereby every one might be admonished that he belongeth to every one of them particularly that they were the authours of his death that they are debtours to all to bring them to the fellowship of Christ and the salvation which is to be found in him And in his 118. homil upon Mark he saith Fractio panis Christi passionem mortem representat dum singuli panem ipsi frangunt se ex corum numero esse fatentur qui Christo mortis authores fuerunt id quod peccatorum 〈…〉 servit animum ad punitentiam extimulat The other use is for distribution and reaching to other to testifie mutuall love and amitie which dutie is expressed in a more lively manner then if they should drinke only of one cuppe together Therefore L. his reason page 60. that it appertaineth only to the minister be cause it is mysticall is naught for it serveth both for repraesentation and distribution Fractio non solum ad distribuendum sedetiam ad significandum ordinatur Bellarmine de missa lib. 2. cap. 10. For the representation ye have heard already sundrie Divines If two should drinke out of one cup and yet not reach it to other it might well be thought there were no great kindnesse betwixt them Communion in one common benefite is one thing and the communication of
the time or to serve God because it is a holy time After I had finished this worke of reexamination there came to my hands some unsound tractats upon the sabbath Whereupon I thought good to insert in this place as the most pertinent this short disconrse following OF THE SABBATH THe light of nature leadeth a man acknowledging that there is a God and to be worshipped to acknowledge also that timâ—s should be set a part for his worship and not onely that but also competent and sufficient times But nature cannot lead us without further direction to setle upon one of the seven dayes more then upon one of eight ten or twelve The Lord set downe one in the circle of seven to bee observed perpetually and universally by all that were to worship him In his wisedome he could best discerne what time might be spared In respect of this perpetuity and universality this determination participateth of the nature of a law morall For this cause it was placed in the decalogue among the precepts purely morall and participated with them of the same prerogatives It was delivered by God himselfe written in tables of stone and preserved in the arke as the rest were The determination of such a seventh day in particular was made also by the Lord. Both the determinations are divine positive the first unchangeable the second changeable but yet only by divine authoritie The ten precepts of the decalogue are called ten words Deut. 4. 13. that is as one expoundeth ten sentences or as Vossius addeth Soultentiae praecipientes preceptive sentences And yet there are fourteene sentences for precepts in the decalogue How then are there but ten words hee answereth there are ten chiefe and principall the rest are secundarie and like appendicles Primum istud in confesso est quamâ—is quatuiordeâ—im inveniantur sententâ—â— in decalogo quibus aliquid praecipiatur tamen decâ—m esse duntaxat primarias principes Caeteras secundarias altarum quasi appendices Vnde Moses decem verba Graci 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 appellarunt In the fourth commandement there are three preceptive sentences The first is the principall Some reason after this manner The Lord saith not Remember thou keepe holy the seventh day but Remember thou keepe holy the sabbath-day and in the end he sanctified the sabbath-day hee saith not that seventh day from the creation howbeit it was so for the time But that seventh was to be changed and the sabbath was to be fixed upon another seventh day But to come nearer to the purpose that this commandement requireth not directly the seventh day from the creation but the seventh day in generall appeareth by the reason which enforceth not necessarly the seventh day from the creation that wee should rest the same day that the Lord rested but that wee should rest from our workes the seventh day as hee rested from his Which seventh as under the law he appointed to be saturday so under the Gospell sunday the substance of the commandement remaining See Master Cartwrights Catechisme But to come yet nearer The Lord might have created the world in six houres as easily as in six dayes Hee might have done it in a moment or have taken eight ten or twelve dayes The Lord would do neither the one nor the other but conformed himselfe to that space of time which in his wisedome he thought sufficient for man to doe all manner of workes of his owne This paterne doth not concerne his peculiar people of the Jewes onely but both Jew and Gentile and not for a time onely but to the end of the world as if the Lord would reason after this manner with mankinde What needed me to have spent six dayes in creating the world for I might have done it in one or wherefore stinted I my selfe at six I might have taken ten you may easily then consider wherefore I have done it I did it that thou may doe the like Do all thy workes and businesse in six dayes and rest the seventh The imitation lieth in this then not so much that wee rest upon such a seventh day as upon a seventh There is equitie in it indeed that seeing the Lord hath granted us six dayes to worke wee should rest the seventh but the force of the reason lieth chiefly in this that the Lord purposly tooke six dayes and rested the seventh to be a paterne to men howbeit with all in setting downe that paterne he considered that equity That the precept concerning the sabbath concerned not the Jewes onely but all mankinde appeareth also by this that it was given to Adam in the beginning Gen. 2. 2 3. Whereas some would have here an anticipâ—tion and the words to be referred to the time when the Lord rained Manna and forbad his people to gather upon the seventh day Exod. 16. as if the sabbath had never beene institute or observed before This were a strange anticipation to make mention of the blessing and sanctifying the seventh day without so much as an inckling of the proper time which is assigned by them which fell not forth till 2453 yeares or thereabout after the weake of the creation Next the words are knit together by the same copulative with the present historie Hee ended his worke on the seventh day and herested on the seventh day and he blessed the seventh day and he sanctified it The blessing and sanctifying then were not destinate to bee done 2453 yeares or thereabout afterwards but presently when he had ended all his worke of creation hee blessed and sanctified that is by blessing sanctified that is separate to a holy use as the minister blesseth when he separateth bread and wine from a common to an holy use at the Lords suppeâ— Or he blessed and sanctified that is praised it and sanctified For the originall word signifieth also praising or rejoycing as Gomarus himselfe bringeth exemple of praising out of Psal. â—8 27. And Philo Judaeus expresseth it by praising Every dayes workes had the owne commendation but now looking upon the whole frame the order and harmonie of it he rejoyced and praâ—sed it and sanctified that day After he had perfited the worke in six dayes he added honour to the seventh day following 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Philo â—udaeus that is Which when hee had praised or commended incontinent hee deinzed to call it holy as Gelenius translateth Further there is no mention of blessing the seventh day Exod. 16. Gomarus alledgeth that twice as much Manna fell on the sixt day as upon any other day there is no warrant for it but onely that they were commanded to gather twice as much that day Suppose his conjectute were true that were a blessing of the sixt day and not of the seventh But as I have said there is no mention of blessing in that place But so it is thâ—t when he blessed he sanctified And seeing wee reade not that he blessed it when he ceased from raining
one of the precisest reformers upon Mathew 2. hath these words as I finde him cited by Amesius in his fresh suit pag. 360. I would to God that evâ—ry holy day whatsoever beside the Lords day were abolished That zeal which brought them first in was without all warrant or example of the Scripture and onely followed naturall reason to drive out the holy dayes of the pagans as it were to drive out one nail with another Those holy dayes have beene defiled with so grosse superstitions that I marvell if there be any Christian who doth not shake at their very names Seeing then festivall dayes have no warrant we ought not to hear the sermons delivered on these dayes of purpose for the day for that is the chiefe element of a festivall day to use a peculiar kinde of service proper to it And without divine service it were but an idle day not a holy day The word of God is good of it selfe but may bee abused to charming and to foster superstition whereof we should keepe our selves free that wee be not guiltie of the prophanation of the name of God Our preachers went to rebuke the people when they conâ—eened more frequently to the Church npon any festivall day falling upon an ordinarie day of teaching howbeit neither time nor text was changed But how farre have both preachers and professours degenered without appearance of amendment At the beginning of the late novations they were skar but now many have digested that scruple OF CONFIRMATION OUr act it is true alledgeth that the Papists have made of the triall of young children their education and how they are catechised a sacrament of confirmation as if no such thing were aimed at but the said triall yet in respect that by that act the pretended bishop shall cause them to bee presented before him that hee may blesse them with prayer for the increase of their knowledge and continuance of his heavenly grace with every one of them and wee know that they dare and will take upon them the rest of the rites used in the English Church laying of hands c. we reason as before against confirmation as it is used in the English Church Yet two things I perceave in the act as it standeth The one is that the bishop is not â—ound to try by himselfe every one that is to be presented before him but only to try whither the minister hath beene remisse in catechising and yet he must upon the report of others blesse them with prayer for the increase of knowledge and continuance of grace Next that he must blesse who hath not a calling to blesse that hee must blesse as if hee were the pastour of all the souls within the diocie old and young which charge that null and pretended assembly could not give him seeing it hath beene acknowledged before in free assemblies to have no warrant in the word of God and hath beene suppressed by our Church as a damnable office Therefore his blessing is but a prophanation with his fingers But what language is this to say that the bishop shall blesse them with prayer for to blesse is one thing and to pray another For prayer seeketh of God good things for us but to blesse is in Gods name to assure us that the blessing of God is upon us and shall accompanie us But let us come to their paterne That which now the Papists make the sacrament of confirmation was of old a part of the solemnitie of baptisme After the person was baptized they laid on hands that is prayed for increase and continuance of grace to the baptized as we doe now but without laying on of hands because it was a rite indifferent without any use but to designe the person for whom the prayer was made and afterward abused to make up another sacrament Afterward entred a superstitious device to strike Chrisme that is oile of olives tempered with balme in manner of a crosse upon the forehead of the baptized This anointing in the forme of a crosse was called signation or consignation because of the signe of the crosse made upon the forehead This unction or consignation and imposition of hands became in the mindes of superstitious men so necessarie that without them they thought they had not gotten their perfite christendome that the signe of the oily crosse perfited baptisme and conferred the spirit of God upon the baptized Tâ—â—s consignation and imposition of hands at the closure of baptisme was called confirmation like as the giving of the cup to the communicants after they have receaved the bread was called also confirmâ—tion as Cassander hath observed but the 〈◊〉 controued onely with the first The bâ—shops arrogated to themselves the unction or consignation and imposition of hands to advance their estate They doe that part which consummateth baptisme which maketh a fall and peâ—fite Christian. But when it was found that the bishop could not bee present at every baptisme the priest was permitted after baptisme to anoint the baptized in the top of the head with holy Chrisme but he must not crosse the forehead That must bee reserved to the bishops leasure Then they were presented to the bishop to be confirmed and get their perfite Christendome by ritâ—s which were appendicles and câ—remonie of baptâ—sme before Thâ— English at their rude reformation reserved imposition of hands to the bishop and gave their priest power to make the signe of the crosse upon the forehead of the baptized but without chrisme Howbeit there bee no greater antiquitie for the crossing without it then with it they call notwithstanding the bishops imposition of hands onely confirmation and not their priests crossing of the forehead And yet when the priest crosseth he saith Wee receave this childe into the congregation of Christs flock in token that hereafter he shall not be ashamed to confesse the faith of Christ crucified and manfully to fight under his banner against sinne the world and the devill and to continue Christs faithfull souldier unto his lifes end Which words agree according to their doctrine better with confirmation For doe they not say that in baptisme infants 〈◊〉 admitted to live in Gods family but in conf 〈◊〉 they are rabled to fight in the armie of God That in baptisme they beleeve the remission of sinne unto justification in confirmation they are emboldened to make open professon of this beleefe unto salvation And this is just the doctrine of the Papists So they have parted the rits of confirmation or els they must acknowledge that they have two-confirmations which is as absurd But let us come to the last and that which they call confirmation or laying on of hands It is true in their articles set forth anno 1562. they deny confirmation to be a sacrament and acknowledge that it flowed from a naughtie imitation of the Apostles But Doctour Rainolds in the conference holden at Hampton court alledged that that article was contradicted by