Selected quad for the lemma: rest_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
rest_n	aaron_n	authority_n	primate_n	16	3	14.5329	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A27494	Clavi trabales, or, Nailes fastned by some great masters of assemblyes confirming the Kings supremacy, the subjects duty, church government by bishops ... : unto which is added a sermon of regal power, and the novelty of the doctrine of resistance : also a preface by the right Reverend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of Lincolne / published by Nicholas Bernard ...	Bernard, Nicholas, d. 1661.	1661 (1661)	Wing B2007; ESTC R4475	99,985	198

22. IX The Princes of the Levites 1 Chron 15 5 2 Chron 31 12 and 35 9 Nehem 12 22 X. The Head of the Levites Officers The Scribe * 2 Chron 31. 13. * Of the Singers 1 Chron. 16. 5. Nehem. 12. 42. Of the Porters 1 Chron. 9. 17. and 15. 22. Of the Treasurers 1 Chron. 26. 24. 2 Chron. 21. 11. XI The Levites themselves XII The Chief of the Nethinims Nehem. 11. 21. XIII The Nethinims Gibeonites Josua 9. 21. Solomons servants 1 King 9. 21. Nehem. 7. 60. It is not only requisite that things be done but that they be diligently done against sloth and that they be done continually and constantly * not for a time against Schism and if they be not that redress may be had To this end it is that God appointeth Overseers 1. To urge others if they be slack 2 Chron. 24. 5. 34. 12 13. 2. To keep them in course if they be well 2 Chron. 29. 5. 31. 12. 34. 12 13. 3. To punish if any be defective Jerem. 29. 26 For which cause A power of commanding was in the High Priest 2 Chron. 23. 8. 18. 24. 26. 31. 13. A power Judicial if they transgressed Deut. 17 9. Zach. 3. 7. Ezek. 44. 24. Under paine of death Deut. 17. 12. Punishment in prison and in the Stocks Jer. 29. 26. in the Gate of Benjamin Jer. 20. 2. Officers to Cite and Arrest John 7. 32. Acts 5. 18. This Corporal To suspend from the Function Ezra 2. 62. To excommunicate Ezra 10. 8. John 9. 22. 12. 42 16. 2. This Spiritual 1. Why may not the like now be for the Government of the Christian Church There is alledged on only stop That the High Priests was a Figure of Christ who being now come in the flesh the Figure ceaseth and no Argument thence to be drawn Answ. There is no necessity we should press Aaron for Eleazar being Princeps principum that is having a Superior Authority over the Superiors of the Levites in Aarons life time was never by any in this point reputed a Type of Christ so that though Aaron be accounted such yet Eleazar will serve our purpose As also the 2 Chron. 35 8. We read of three at once one only of which was the High-Priest and a Type of Christ the rest were not let them then answer to the other twaine who were Rulers or chief over the House of God Thus we grant that Aaron and the High Priests after him were Types of Christ and that Christ at his death ended that Type yet affirm that Eleazar being Praelatus Praelatorum governing and directing the Ecclesiastical persons under him and being subject to Moses was not any Type of Christ further we say that the Twelve Apostles as so many several Eleazars under Christ were in the Primitive times sent to several Coasts of the world to govern direct and teach Fcclesiastical persons and people in their several Divisions We say also that many Primates now as so many Eleazars under Christ and in several Kingdoms and States of the world to govern direct and teach Ecclesiastical persons and people in their several divisions and yet be under and responsible to Christian Princes and States who have the chief charge of matters both Civil and Ecclesiastical Object If it be further alledged that Eleazar and all Sacrificing Priests quatenus Sacrificers were Types of Christ who sacrificed himself for us and put an end to all Sacrifices typing himself Answ. Answ. This we grant and further say that the Popish sacrificing Priests Office and other performance in this regard is utterly unlawful and sinful But the other Imployments of Eleazar viz. His Governing Directing and teaching both the Ecclesiastical persons and the people were not typical nor ended but are still of use for the Apostles practiced the same so have their Successors to these very days And that this is most true the Presbyterial Classes cannot but grant for this very Authority over Ministers and people they use and therefore judg it not Typical Besides St. Paul appearing before one but a weak resemblance of the old High Priest yielded him obedience and acknowledged him a Governor of the people which had been meerly unlawful if there had not remained in him something not Tipical and not made to cease by Christ. Hence we see the Anabaptists shifts to be vain and gross when they say we ought to have no Wars for the Jews wars were but Figures of our spiritual battle No Magistrates for the Jews Magistrates were but Figures of our Pastors Doctors and Deacons and as no Magistrates so no Oaths pretending these to be abolished by Christ. Answ. As in the Priests Office there were some things not Typical not ended So Kings Types of Christ in somthing only prefigured and Typed him In many things their Office is still of singular use for they become Nursing Fathers of the Church and provide that we may live a peaceable life in all Godliness and Honesty The lawfull use of Wars and Oaths hath been often vindicated If the Pope here claim authority over all the world as Eleazar over all his brethren his Plea is groundless wicked and insolent For first each chief Bishop in any Kingdom must be subject to the King as Aaron and Eleazar to Moses 2. The Apostles sent into several Kingdoms of the World were all of equal power no one had Authority above the rest in their line or division which shews that no Primate ought to be of Authority over any other Primate under a several Prince But each Primate subject to Christ as Eleazar to Aaron and each Primate subject to his several King As Eleazar to Moses 2. Why it may be I. Out of Dic. Ecclesiae the New Reformers tell us we are to fetch our pattern from the Jewish Sanhedrim therefore it seems they are of opinion that one Form may serve both us and them II. Except there should be such a fashion of government consisting of inequality I see not in the new Testament how any could perish in that contradiction of Core which St Jude affirmeth for his plea was for equalitie and against the preferring of Aaron above the rest III. The Ancient Fathers seem to be of mind that the same Form should serve both So thinketh St. Cyprian lib. 3. epist. 9. ad Rogatianum So St Hierome Epist. 85. Ad Evagrium traditiones Apostolicae sumptae sunt de veteri Testamento ad Nepotianum de vita Clericorum So St. Leo. Ita veteris Testamenti Sacramenta distinxit ut quedam ex iis sicut erant condita Evangelicae cruditioni profutura decerperet ut quae dudum fuerant consuetudines Judaicae fierent obsevantiae Christianae So Rabanus ut de institutione Clericorum lib. 1. c. 6. They ground this their opinion upon that they see I. That the Synogogue is called a Type or Shadow and an image of the Church now Heb. 10. vers 1. II. That God himself

controll See pag. 60. They that betake themselves to these un worthy arts though they may please themselves for a while with an imagination that by this means the people will fall to them apace and thereout they shall suck no smal advantage to their Cause and Party yet as it mostly cometh to pass such their rejoycing is but short For the imposture once discovered nor is it often long before that be done for a lying tongue is but for a moment the Imposters are forced to lye down in sorrow and that if they could be found out with shame enough For such discovery once made wisemen fall off faster from them then ever fools came on concluding the Cause to be desperately crazy that must be beholding to such weak props as these to shore it up and support it How they that are guilty of such foul play will be able to make answer for their insincerity before the tribunal of the great Judge at that his day if yet they that do such things can really believe there is any such thing as a day of Judgment to come I leave to their own Judgments in this their day to consider As for us qui leges colimus severiores as we profess our utter abhorrency of all forgery and other like un worthy unchristian attempts in any person of whatsoever perswasion he be or for what soever end it be done so we hold our selves religiously obliged to use all faithfulness and sincerity in the publishing of other mens works by suffering every Author to speak his own sense in his own words nor taking the boldness to change a phrase or syllable therein at least not without giving the Reader both notice where and some good account also why we have so done Such faithfulness and ingenuity the learned publisher of these Treatises professeth himself to have used in setting them forth neither better nor worse but just as he found them in the Reverend Primate's Paper some perfect and some imperfect according as they were and still are in the Copies which are in his custody and which he is ready upon all occasions to shew if need shall require The Primates two Speeches and Dr. Saravia's Letter are set forth perfect according as they are in the Original Copies to be seen The Treatise of the Form of Church-Government heretofore published and very probably supposed to have been some Collections of the most Learned and Reverend Bishop Andrews but whereunto the Author had not put to his last hand is a piece though little in bulk yet of huge industry and such as neither could the materials thereof have been gathered without very frequent reading and attent observing of the sacred Text nor being gathered could they have been easily contrived or digested into any handsome Form so compendiously without the help of a methodical and mature judgment which doubtless had the Author polished and finished according to his own mind abilities and exactness in other things would have given very much satisfaction to the impartial Reader and done good service to the Church of God Yet rather then a Tract of so much usefulness should not be publickly known to the World the Publisher in order to the publick good thought fit notwithstanding whatsoever defects it may have for want of the Authors last hand thereunto to joyn it with the rest in this Edition especially the Learned Primate having had it under his File as by the Notes and other Additions written with the Primates own hand which I have seen and can testifie doth plainly appear The same also is to be said of the three pieces of the renowned Hooker and of what is written with the same hand in the Margent of the Manuscript Copie whereof some account is given pag. 47. Great pity it is if it could be holpen that any thing which fell from the Pen of any of these Four Worthies should be lost But where the entire Work cannot be retrived it is pity but as in a Shipwrack at Sea or Scath-fire by land so much of it should be saved as can be saved be it more or lesse Those men have been always thought to have deserved well of the Commonwealth of Learning that have bestowed their pains in collecting out of the Scholiasts Grammarians Lexicons and other antient Authors the Fragments of Ennius Lucilius Cicero the Dramatike Poets and of other learned though but Heathen Writers whether Greek or Latine How much more then ought the very imperfest Fragments and Relikes so they be genuine of such excellent persons that tend so much to the advancement not of the knowledge only but of the Power also of Christianity and of Godliness as well as Truth be acceptable to all those that are true Lovers of either Of Gold quaevis bracteola the very smalest filings are precious and our Blessed Saviour when there was no want of provision yet gave it in charge to his Disciples the off-fall should not be lost The more commendable therefore is and the more acceptable to the men of this Generation should be the care of the Reverend Preserver and Publisher of these small but precious Relikes of so many eminent persons men of exquisite learning sober understandings and of exemplary piety and gravity all concurring in the same judgment as concerning those points Factious Spirits in these latter times so much opposed of Regal Soveraignty Episcopal Government and Obedience in Ceremonialls What the Reverend Doctor hath added of his own as touching the Learned Primates Judgment in the Premises and confirmed the same by instancing in sundry particulars under those three Generall Heads and that from his own personal knowledge and long experience having for divers years lived under or near him is in the general very well known to my self and many others who have sundry times heard him as occasion was given deliver his opinion clearly in every of the aforesaid points which were then grown to be the whole Subject in a manner of the common discourse of the times But one particular I shall mention which above the rest I perfectly remember as taking more special notice of it when it was spoken then of the rest because I had never heard it observed by any before and having my self oftentimes since spoken of it to others upon several occasions which for that it hath given satisfaction to some I think it my duty to make it known to as many others as I can by acquainting the Reader with it and it concerneth the Ceremony of the Cross after Baptisme as it is enjoyned by Law and practised in the Church of England The use of this Ceremony had been so fully declared and as to the point of Superstition where with some had charged it so abundantly vindicated both in the Canons of the Church and other writings of Learned men that before the beginning of the Long Parliament and the unhappy Divisions that followed thereupon there were very few in the whole Nation scarce here and there

in regard their ignorance of thus much might still occasion it is one cause of my enlargement upon it but so much in relation to his Loyalty whereof he was an eminent Patterne His Judgment and Practice in point of Episcopacy FOr Episcopacy first in his Judgment he was a full assertor of it which appears in those Learned Tractates of the Original of Bishops and that of the Lydian Asia where he doth not only deduce Episcopacy from the Apostolique times but also the Metropolitans or Arch-Bishops to have been accordingly from the superscription of St. John to the Seven Churches each of which Citys being Metropolitical and the rest of the Citys of Asia as daughters under them for the confirmation of which he hath given such strong probabilities that 't will be hard to gainsay them Secondly for his Practice I can witness his constant exercise of the Jurisdiction of it or his causing it so to be exercised throughout his Diocess and Province while those quiet times in Ireland did permit it In all which a Learned and Prudent Divine was his Chancellor or Vicar-General and afterwards a Bishop Bishop SINe one known to have been as much for the Government and Constitutions of the Church of England as any person whatsoever As for that of his Reduction of Episcopacy to the form of Synodical Government c. presented to his late Majeof Blessed Memory Anno 1641. It is to be considered how it was occasioned by the present Tempestuous Violence of the Times as an accommodation by way of Prevention of a totall Shipwrack threatned by the Adversaries of it as appears sufficiently by the Title before it viz. Proposed in the year 1641. as an expedient for the prevention of those troubles which afterwards did arise in matter of Church Government c. Now what can this in the sense of any prudent unbiassed person prejudice him in his Judgment or Affection to Episcopacy it self which rather confirms it The Marchant parts with that in a Storme that he would not have done in a Calme and at shore recruits himself with the like goods again St. Paul in that Wracke Acts 27. consented not only to the lightning of the Ship of the lading but of the Tackling also We cast them out saith he or St. Luke with our own hands and all for the saving if it were possible of the Ship and the Passengers in it That of the same Apostle in another case I think it fit for the present necessity might in some measure in this particular be the Primates Application wherein he was not singular neither Unto which I can add this further confirmation that for those many years I had the happines to be known unto him in those serene times before these troubles arose to the disturbance of Episcopacy I never heard him mentioning any thing by way of alteration that way in those Proposals there specified so that the sole occasion and end of them must be as afore-said And for these 4. Propositions they were only present prudentiall representations left to the Judgment and correction of others without any Magisterial Imposition of them as a Copy to be writ after and as they were not published till an imperfect Copy invited unto it so the real intent of it was by that Conjunction of both parties in Ecclesiasticall Government to have the easier way prepared to their union in the civil even an unanimous endeavour for his Majesties happy Restauration now through Gods great goodness wonderfully accomplished for which as none prayed more zealously so none could have exceeded the Primates in the joy for it had he lived to see it For the form of words used by the Bishop in the ordination of the Church of England he did much approve thereof viz. Receive the Holy Ghost Whose sins thou remittest are remitted and whose sins thou retainest are retained and be thou a faithfull dispenser of the Word and Sacraments c. And the delivering of the Bible into the hands of the person ordained saying Take thou authority to preach the word of God and administer the Sacraments c. Which being wholly omitted in that of the Presbyterian way and no other words to that sense used in their room and thereupon no express transmission of ministeriall Power he was wont to say that such an Imposition of hands by some called the Seal of Ordination without a Commision annexed seemed to him to be as the putting of a seal to a blank That the scruple was not only in the instrumentall cause but in the formall and that if a Bishop had been present and done no more the same query might have been of the validity of it And in his letter to me which hath been published he hath declared the Ordination made by such Presbyters as have severed themselves from their Bishops unto whom they had sworn Canonicall obedience cannot be excused from being Schismaticall For that of a gradual superiority of a Bishop above a Presbyter which some have been offended at 1. It is the language of Archbishop Whitgift in the defence of the Answer to the Admonition Tract 8. p. 383. that Episcopus is commonly used for that Priest that is in degree over and above the rest c. But secondly howsoever if so that the gradus be granted to be of Apostolicall constitution which is the Primats sense I do not see how it any more takes off from the Preheminence and Authority of Episcopacy then the denomination of Lights given in common by Moses to all in the Firmament detracts from the Sun whom he call only the greater from whom the rest derive theirs and is the Ruler of the day Or that of the first-born among his brethren who by his Primogeniture had the supremacy of Dignity and Power to whom the rest must bow and he was to rule over them The distinction in both is but gradual The Primate hath also elsewere derived the form of Church Government under the New Testament from the Pattern prescribed by God in the Old and shews how it was from the Imitation thereof brought in by the Apostles Now though the Distinction of the Chief or High-Priest and the other inferiour Priests was but gradual yet there being so great a distance between them the Chief-Priest having rule over the rest called by the 70. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there shall not need any further instance to illustrate it And whereas there hath been a learned tractate some years agone published entitled the form of Church government before and after Christ as it is expressed in the Old and New Testament which then went under the name of Bishop Andrews I found a Manuscript of it among the Primates Papers wherein the Author upon a review hath ordered some things to be altered added or taken away and some to be further inquired into according as the marks make reference unto several Pages of it This I found accordingly

Quod me um est i. e. sundum meum non refragarer si co pus petit occu●ram vultis in unicula rapere vultis in mortem voluptati est mihi non ego me vallabo circumfusione populorum nec altaria teneb● vitam obsecrans sed pro altaribus gratis immolabor ibid. q Bern Ep. 221. ad Ludon Reg. pro matre nostra Ecclesia Propugnabimus sed quibus armis non scutis non glad●s sed precibus fl●ctibusque ad deum r Religioni quam profi ebatur putavit magis consen●a neum patientia quam injusta seditione conjuriam imperatoris superare Apol. a Haec sola novitas ne dicam haeresi● nec dum in mundo emenserat Sigeb Chronol Ann. 1088. Object Necessita●i magic quam vi t●●● valun●ati ●a●ctorum Pat●um c. b Julianus Tyranide sua vi res omnes praeciderit quibus alids its contra Apostatam uti fas fuisses c Lib. 6 de regn c. 26. depo●est Papae d In Apol. B●ll a n. 249. usque ad u. 267. Answer e Fere om●e● mortales ●un● denrum cultu reli to Christianorum genit c. Euseb. l b. 9. c. 9. f Apol. Exter●●●umus vestra omnia in p●cvimus urbes insulas ca●●ella m●●n●ci p●a conciliaba la. castra ipsa decarias p●la ita sorum Se nals●● cui bello non 〈◊〉 non prem ●● suissexiu● ●●i tam 〈…〉 si nan apud discipliam nostram magis ctcid li●●re● quam 〈…〉 g Theod. lib. 3. cap. 17. Cum multi militum qui exer●ore thus adoleverunt imposturis Juliani decepti peregiam discurrences non tantum manus sed corpor a ad ignam offerent ut igne polluti igne repurgarentur h lib. 5. de Pontifice c. 7. i Helmold histor Sclau cap. 28 29 30. lib. 1. Spectate manum meam dextram de vulneie cauciam haec ego iuravi Domino Henrico ut non nocerem et nec insidtarer gloriae ejus sed jussio Apostolica Po●tificamus mandatum me ad id dedu●i● ut juramenti transgressor honorem mihi 〈◊〉 usorparem Videtis quod in manu unde jura menta violavi mortale hoc vi●lnus accepi Viderint ii qui nos ad 〈◊〉 instigave●unt qualiter nos duxerint ne forte deducti simus in praecipitium aeier●ae damnationis Praesat Apol. Apol. Occasion of writing that Book of the Power of the Princes c. His Speech of the Oath of Supremacy His Speech of supplying the Kings Necessiries Mr. Hookers judgment of Regal Power confirmed by the Primate His sufferings for it His Prayers joy and sorrow according to the success of his Majesties affairs His compassionate affection to such as had suffered for his Majesty His judgment His Practice The reduction of Episcopacy c. The occasion and end oft it Ordination of the Church of England Episcopal superiority over Presbyters As the Sun to the other Lights The dignity and power of the first-born A● the distance beween the High-Priest and the other inferiour Priests His approbation of books tending to the preheminence of Episcopacy The Liturgy The Service Song The Ceremonies His reducing the scrupulous 〈…〉 The falshood of some Pamphlets put out in his name since his death Some particulars observed by him The Articles of Religion of England The Canons of Ireland 1614. taken out of Q. Eliz. Injunct and Can of Engl. The Common Prayer Book of Ordination His Subscription Canons of Ireland Anno 1634. taken out of those of England The Festivals Good Friday Confirmation of Children Catechism Apparrel of the Clergy Consecration of Churches * This is wanting in the common books of Mr. Hookers M. S. Cor. 3. 7 8. Ad. 2. Ad. 3. Exod. 19. 1 Pet. 2. * Thom. in cum locum Revel 1. 6. * This is also wanting in the common copy * Euseb. l. 4. de vit Constant. * Dib ad Const. * Lib. 5. Epi. 33. * Ep. 166. 162. T. C. l. 1. p 193. This is in the common copies That is in the copies which the Primate then saw but not in that which is now printed Of their power in making Ecclesisticall Laws What Laws may be made for the affairs of the Church to whom the power of making them appettaineth Deut. 12. 32 4. 2. Jos. 1. 7. * Tho. 2. quaest 1 c 8. artic 2. Prov. 6. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Archit de le●e justit * This is wanting in the common books of Mr Hooker's M. S. In vit Cypy Nulla ratio Dist. 63. * Ep. Hono● Imp. ad Bonif. Concil Tom. 1. * 25 Ed. 3. * 25 Ed. 3. * 25 H. 8. c. 20 * C. Nullu● Dist. 63. * Tom. 1. Concil * Onuph in Pelag 2. * ●Rea in Dist. 63. * W●tthramu● Naumburgensis deinvestit Episcoporum per Imperat saciendâ * Cap. General de elect l. 6. * Adver Jovin l. 1. * L. 7. Epist 5. * Theod. lib. 5. cap. 27. * Sozom. lib. 8. cap. 2. * Marcel l. 15. * Socr. 2. c. 27. l. 4. c. 29. * Theod. l. 2. c. 15 16 17. * Sozom. lib. 4. c. 11. l. 6. c. 23. * In vit Cypr. * C. Sacrorum Canon dist 63. * C. Lectis Dist. 63. * This is in the common Copy of Mr. Ho●ke M. S. that is in the copies which the Primate then saw but not in the now printed ones * T. C. lib 3. Pag. 155. * Euseb. de vita Constant. lib. 4. * Epist. 162. 166. * Lib. ad Constant * Lib. 5. Ep 33 * Inclusa desunt in vul●atis exempl● ib. * Doctrin ●iccip lib 5. Cont. 2 cap. 18. * Apud Athanos in Epist. ad solit vit agentes * Suid. in verb. Leontius * Epist. 68. * See the Stature of Edward 1. and Edward 2. and Nat. Bren. touching Prohibition See also in Bract n these sentences l. 5. c. 2. Est jurisdictio quaedā ordinaria quaedam delegata quae pertinet ad Sacerdotium forum Ecclesiasticum sicut in causis spiritualibus spiritualitati annexis Est etiam alia jurisdictio ordinaria vel delegata quae pertinet ad Coronam dignitatem Regis ad Regnum in causis placitis rerum temporalium in so●o seculari Again Cum diversae sint binc inde jurisdictiones diversae judices diversae causae debet quilibet ipsorum inprimis aestimare an sua sit jurisdictio ne falcem videatur ponere in messem alienam Again Non pertinet ad Regem injungere poenitentias nec ad judicem secularem Nec etiam ad eos pertinet cognoscere de iis quae sunt spiritualibus annex asecut de decimis aliis Ecclesiae proventionibus Again Non est laicus conveuiendus coravs judice Ecclesiastico de aliquo quod in soro seculari terminari possit debeat * None of all this which follows is to be found in the common coppy of Mr Hookers MS * Antiquit. l. 4. c. 8. 2 Sam. 2 3. Nehem. 11. 25. All this is writ with the Lord Primat Ushers own hand 2 Sam. 17. 24. 1 Of Priests 2 Of Levites 1 Chron. 24. vers 26. 27. * IBRI The AUTHOR in his review and emendations hath in this place made this Querie Seeing the Courses were but 24. why should IBRI 25. be reckoned Jedeiah was chief Quer. Whether he was not to be connted one of the 24. because of his generall superintendency over the rest This Querie seems to be resolved by the PRIMATE and was the occasion of setting down the bove mentioned Genealogy * It seemeth the first of these Jedeiah is to be omitted in the reckoning as chief over them all in respect of his generall superintendency over the rest 3 Of Judges 4 of Officers 5 Of Singers 6. Of Porters Officers and Judges This answer I find ordered by the Author to be thus put instead of that which had been in a former copy This also the Author hath added to be put unto the former answer Exod. 14. 27. Numb 33. 9. The supposed Author in his advertisments concerning this passage saith This I know not well what way to make more clear The supposed Author in his Advertisments put this out here saying This I thought might better make a chapter of it self See infra the last chapter of all Acts 5. 5. 15. 13. 11. 19. 2. 1. 16. 46 Acts 14. 11. 8. 13. 5. 11. 13. Vid. Hierem. Epist. 4. ad rusticum c. 6. Et Epist. ad Eva● ium * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theodorat a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Tim. 1. 6. This is added by the supposed Author There was one called Vox Hy berntae published in his name for the suppressing of which he had an Order from the House of Pe●rs