Laws nor made by the principles of Catholick Doctrine The Arrians were the first introducers of persecution they were not I say enacted by Ecclesiasticks but by civil Governours only We know that by the Canons of the Church ever in force their Clergy under the penalty of irregularity are forbidden to have any hand in blood And whatsoever civil Laws have been made by Catholick civil Governours were but as prudent means to prevent Sedition or Rebellions justly apprehended And though for some later ages civil Magistrates in some Countries exercise greater severities than anciently were used must England imitate the rigidest of other Countries Neither can our hatred or persecution against Catholicks be any more excused by the proceedings of the Spanish or Italian Inquisitions than our penal Statutes have been by the Laws of ancient Kings and Emperours against Hereticks First Because the Inquisition proceeds according to the rules and forms of justice none is declared an Heretick or guilty by any new Law or Oath made only to the end that by them men may be entrapped both in Soul in Body and Estate It was no crime in England to be a Roman Catholick before the penal Laws were enacted but it was a crime to be an Heretick or an Apostate or broacher of new Doctrines before the ancient Emperors and Kings made penal Laws against Heresie The Law supposed and did not make the crime As penal Statutes do in England making a crime of Christian Religion Secondly Hereticks are never condemned by the Inquisition without the testimony of many lawful witnesses both living and dead All the ancient Fathers Councils and the Christian Church of former ages testifie their errors are new and contrary to the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles No Rebel was ever more evidently convicted of Rebellion against his Prince then Hereticks are by the Inquisition of Heresie against God and the old Apostolical Church Catholicks cannot obtain so fair a Plea they are condemned by a new Law because they are not Hereticks and separate from the ancient Faith Thirdly The Inquisition practiceth all imaginary means towards the accused to reduce his judgment Fourthly The Inquisition it self is permitted in no Kingdome where Heresie is numerous nor can it be in justice they strive to keep out Sects and new Opinions in Countries totally of one Belief We do not morally blame the very Moors in Africa being of one profession for keeping out the Gospel it self In England where all fell not from the Papacy there is not the same just motive for severity as if it brought an upstart Religion never heard of or spread over the Nation Fifthly The Inquisition medleth not with those who never were Catholicks but the penal Statutes comprehend them who never were of their Church or Communion Sixthly The Inquisition condemns no Hereticks to death but only declares their heresie to the end the faithful may avoid their conversation its true the Secular power executes the sentence of death against them notwithstanding the Inquisition doth protest against the rigour and desireth that Hereticks may not be punished with death Seventhly Though the Inquisition were rigorous and unjust as adversaries pretend it is not a blemish to Catholick Religion because it is not an universal practice but limited to Spain and Italy at the instance of secular Princes looked upon as a necessary means to keep their Subjects in awe of their 〈◊〉 Eighthly The Inquisition â—oth seriously wish and endeavour the conâ—ersion and amendment of Hereticks imploâ—ing learned Divines to convince them and by fair ways and reason to win them Neither can the Muthers or Massacres in Ireland so much and so often exaggerated in Protestant Pamphlets and Pulpits be any pretext of rigour or austerity to English Catholicks What hath an English Catholick to do with an Irish Massacre Can we our selves excuse all the extravagancies by some of our natives and party Doth Catholick Religion either incline him to or teach murther or rebellion Have they not a setled sense of Scripture for loyalty and obedience Which none can alter without breach of his Catholick Faith And they are not their own interpreters and and judges in points controverted that 's the priviledge of others I only say and wish from my soul that some indiscreet Zealots had not a greater hand in them than Catholick Religion whose tenets are contrary to cruelty and murther on any pretence whatsoever Is it not notorious that the Reformed Zealots in Ireland signed a bloody Petition offered to the Parliament in England that all Irish that would not go to Church might be extirpated or banished This was done before the Irish Catholicks did stir Suppose that in Vlster some of the rascality or Kerns being exasperated by so many and continual injuries had murthered some persons must that reflect upon the English Catholicks and all the Irish Nation or what is the Irish Râ—â—ellion to English Catholicks who detest it more than the Amboyna to Reformists it is too much ascertained that the Murthers and Massacres done in Ireland by Reformists furious zeal against Catholicks exceeded those committed by Catholicks witness their murthers about Dublin the County of Wicko and Fingcole by the transplantation of them into Canaught and by the transporting them into the Plantations of America forcing them to the Oath of Abjuration and almost starving them in those places contrary to the Publick Faith given them by printed Declarations in the Name of the English Parliament to Irish Catholicks Anno 1649. 1652. that the Oath of Abjuration shall not be administred to any in Ireland Baxter in his Cure of Church-Division confesseth and saith they put the Irish to death that went to defend themselves and stand for the King and Country yet they who seemed so godly themselves Massacred millions of their own Country that were for the Country and King and gave God many humiliation days and thanks for their success killing after so many Scots in cold blood after they were taken at Worcester Fight See Baxter But whosoever desires to be better satisfied in this of Ireland let him read the printed Remonstrance of the Irish Confederate Catholicks delivered by their Commissioners the Lord Vicount Preston and Sir Robert Talbot the seventeenth of March 1642. to his Majesties Commissioners at Trim. There he will see how the Irish desired the murthers on both sides might be punished and how they were forced to take up arms by the wicked practices of Sir William Persons Sir Charls Coot and other fiery Protestants who governed the Kingdom Therefore whatsoever may be said in passion of the Irish war its evident that the Calvinistical Zealot had great influence upon their injurious provocations murthering seven or eight hundred women children Ploughmen and labourers in a day in the Kings Land whensoever the Army went abroad the poor Country-people did betake themselves to the Firrs where the Parliament Officers did besiege them and set the Fâ—rrs on fire and such as escaped that element were
and dust as every one hath received a several external figure of Face and every one a diverse internal form of mind every one a Cogitation and fancy distant from whence it cometh that there is so great diversity of Opinions so strange a contrariety of inclinations so different affections and passions in mortal men that no ordinary means is forcible enough to perswade them to any thing to which their private Spirits or imaginations are not inclined Hence so many Scripture interpretations so many quarrels and divisions in Religion even to Massacres Evils unknown to the very Heathens Hence we have often seen good by false representations may pass for abominable in the sight of sober men Hence the inconsiderate multitude prejudiced by education passion interest or false Teachers representing the Roman Church to them as a Monster composed of all sort of abomination having their Ears perpetually beaten with seven Hills Antichrist Idolatry Superstition by many unchristian aspersions false pretences by private forgeries and publick impressions wounding most Christian and innocent men How can they otherwise but hate them they know no better and even suck from their first Milk such an ill Opinion or odium of them as if they were Turks or Jews and had principles destructive to common Society Peace and Concord What a Wonder and what a Lamentation is it that those men who cry out so much for forbearance to Magistrates should themselves be so rigid and can less forbear dissenters or see the same sin in themselves So justifie all their Cruelties and think persecution to be their Duty Whence is persecution but from thinking ill of others abhorring and not loving them condemning them without hearing bearing them down not with sincere and plain dealing becoming Christians with inveterate malice filling Books with trivial Stories and Fables pickt up out of Authors without discretion make it their business to seek calumnies and reproaches in the Sepulchres and Common-shores of Schismaticks with untrue reporting of Doctrins false and unjust Criminations and other indirect wayes unseemly and unworthy the Cause of Truth to the dishonour of God and disparagement of Christian Religion Reading a Treatise lately Printed against Toleration by an university Schollar Had this Dilemma if Liberty or Toleration may be granted either an universal Toleration or particular not an universal for then saith he Papists may be tolerated which is against all As if all the Monsters of Aegypt may be admitted so the Papists be excluded Yet we must know if there had been no Papists in the World no other Sect among us had ever heard of Christianity If we knew all the Evils may ensue we should then be forced to Check the People from railing and let them feel our anger who would deceive us with Lies Nor can we look on those men as either of wit or honesty who are ever promoting the harassing of a faithful party needlesly to disoblige their fellow Subjects and Sufferers Wherefore to undeceive the so long abused and deluded multitude I will endeavour in the ensuing discourse to wipe of the Paint and Fucus that so things may appear in their true complexion unadulterated with the slights and subtilties of deluders I have chosen rather to expose these lines to Censure than to forbear to speak or be silent in the Cause and Defence of the Innocent Silui a bonis saith the Prophet dolor meus renovatus est in the following lines shall be shewed that the Law of God Christian Religion nature reason and our own principles doth oblige us to more charitable censures of the Roman Religion And that they are as highly if not more entitled to the true Christian Liberty of Conscience than any other Sect or Religion whatsoever all objections to the contrary cleared and evinced to any rational or impartial Reader If it remains as a Probatum est that no Christian ought to be compelled in matters of Faith or Religion provided it broacheth forth no new Sects or Schisms or that it be not in Case of Scandal or open blasphemy And if the Fundamental Laws and Government were established as a Defence and Protection to all sober peaceable Christians that immunity and freedom of Conscience ought to be indulged to Dissenters in this sense it being their due right and not only granted in policy to some persons or to oblige a party or to be enjoyed by the strongest and subtilest only to curb and subiect the rest as is shewed before there can be no ground able to convince any rational man why Papists should be excluded this priviledge unless we infringe the Laws and Government by not distributing equal and impartial justice nay the truth of this assertion is more evident and convincing for them then any Primo It is against reason and all examples of antiquity for men to be punished for adhering to the Religion of their Fore-fathers Now the Roman-Catholick Religion was the first Christian Religion planted in our native Country from whom we had and have our very Christianity the first universally spread and preached by Government permitted and encouraged by Counsels and Parliaments confirmed and approved a thousand years there continued even by our deceased kindred and parents not long since professed by our Universities established and defended against all Adversaries From whence we derive even the Scripture â—t self our ordinations most of our material Churches Colledges Inns of Court Hospitals c. and shall Charity ever be so buried in Oblivion in England that the Posterity of those from whom we must confess to have received these and other great advantages never be remembred and used with equity and common Justice They are linked in Religion to all Catholick Princes and Countries about us who will be more loving Neighbours if they see their Brethren find favour from us To persecute this Religion is to War against our Progenitors It is this Church in which so many Martyrs have dyed so many Doctors have taught and preached so many Virgins have lived in flesh like Angels so many Saints wrought wonders and miracles so many Councils called so many Ecclesiastical Laws enacted so many Nations converted so many Kings and Emperors lived and died and hope to be saved against which so many persecutors Machiavels and Tyrants in vain have used torments and contrived all imaginable force wicked policy or cruelty could invent This Faith hath the best evidence as taught and instituted by Christ his Apostles and Successors in an uninterrupted series and delivery down to us Set before your eyes those glorious Champions of Christs Church Constantines Theodos Pepines Charles all sirnamed Great more Glorious for Victories over Heresies and Idolatries than for conquests of Countries more renowned for propagating Catholick Religion than enlarging their Dominions See the Catologue of noble Kings of England Lucius Ethelbert Egbert Oswald Oswine Alfred Edgar before the conquest William the Conqueror and so many Henries Edwards Richards after the Conquest mighty of force rich of
Soveraign in Allegiance Though not secured in those that pretend Gods Spirit Besides Recusants being for the most part of the good Families of the Nation will take it for a part of their Nobility freely to profess themselves in Religion whereas the Sectaries are People of mean quality cannot be presumed to stand so much on their reputation And in another place he saith to proceed to divide the Church more and more with Persecutions is more destructive to the substance of Christianity than all that corruption Reformation pretendeth to cure Osborne a Protestant Hist mem Q. E. p. 17. 〈◊〉 that against the poor Catholicks nothing in relation to the generality remaineth upon due proof sufficient to justifie the severity of Laws dayly enacted and put in execution against them All other Sects saith he oppose the Roman with more spleen and animosity then ordinary yet they defend themselves and prevail against all still continue and have been the most grand and principal Body of all Christian Societies and the greatest force and Forâ—ress of Christianity against Turks and Heathenish impieties and chiefest Propagators of the Gospel in all Nations c. I see no reason saith another Doctor of our English Church why Papists in England should not as well deserve hope and enjoy as any other order or rank of men freedome to their Consciences Nor can I think but those men who are so hardned in their Malice and persecution against them do often hear a voice secretly call within them O ye Souls why do ye persecute me in my Servants It s a kind of injustice and an uncharitable course as I conceive saith he when we spare them that have no Religion at all and censure those that can give an account of somewhat tending to that purpose Shall Atheists and Socinians Enemies of the blessed Trinity be not looked after And shall others following the Heresie of Aerius directly opposing the order of Bishops and their Jurisdiction that is the whole frame of the Church of God assembled in the first four general Councils asserted and affirmed to be of divine right by Scripture and the Church of England be winked at And must we only incite our Governours against Papists Force them upon Banishments Prisons Persecutions Pressures and Calamities and use such severity against that Religion we our selves hold Salvation to be acquired in who hold all the positive Articles with us I may loudly proclaim saith Bishop Gauden with Samuel 12. 3. this Protestation in their behalf Behold the Servants of the Lord and his Church O Christians causless Enemies witness against them and before the Lord and before the People Whose Oxe or Ass have they taken Whom have they defrauded or oppressed Whose hurt or damage have they procured Whose evil of sin or misery have they not pitied What is the injury for which so desolating a vengeance must pass upon them and their whole Profession What is the Blasphemy against God or man for which these Naboths must loose their lives liberties and liveâ—â—hoods Wherein have they deserved so ill of former and later Ages that they should be so used as Ahab commanded of Miâ—heas and the Jews did to Hieremias to be cast into Prisons to â—ordid and â—bsâ—ure restraints or to be exposed to Mendicant liberty to be fed only with Bread and water of Affliction What necessary Truths of God or righteousness have they detained What error have they broached revived or maintained What true Christian liberty have they impeached A little after They have not light conjectures not partial Customes not bare Profession not uncertain Tradition not blind Antiquity but evident grounds Scripture Succession Conversion of Nations planting of Churches all over the known World crowning their Doctrine with Martyrdome Authors of best credit undeniable famous in Church through all the first Ages shewing us Catholick Religion And uncontradicted consent constant and uninterrupted Succession their great abilities Add those Credential letters the testimonies and seals which God hath given of his holy Spirit Lastly the Civil rights and priviledges the piety of the Nation and the Laws of this Land have always given to them by the fullest and freest consent of all Estates in Parliament these ought to be regarded much of men of Justice honour and conscience as not to break all these Sanctions and Laws asunder by which their forefathers have bound to God c. Whence Doctor Taylor in his Book concerning the unreasonableness of prescribing to other mens Faith in liberty of prophecying § 2. 249. that Considerations to a charitable Toleration concerning the Roman Church which saith he may easily perswade persons of much reason and more piety to retain that which they know to have been the Religion of their forefathers which had actual possession and seizure of men's understanding before the opposite Profession had a name Another learned Protestant Doctor saith the humble peaceable and discreet carriage of them may justly plead for favour and protection against this calumny of proneness to Sedition Faction or illegal disturbance in civil affairs Even in all the unhappy troubles of the late years have generally behaved themselves and shewed they had no other design than to live a quiet life in all godliness and honesty If they could not help in fair ways to steer the Ship as they desired they did not seem to set it on fire and overwhelm it If at any time relating to publick variations and tossings they could not act with satisfied and good Consciences they humbly bear with silence and suffer with patience Intentive chiefly and fearful to offend God tender of Conscience and their own Religion Whence The late Bishop of Exeter saith in these christian bounds of peaceable subjection humility and holiness if the Papists in England may but obtain so much declared favour and publick countenance which all other fraternities and Professions have as to be sure to enjoy their callings liberties and properties which seem to be so many times in great uncertainties under the protection and obedience of the Laws it would encourage them and redeem them from those menaces insolencies and oppressions of unreasonable men who look upon them like publick Enemies and perdue because they have little of publick favour and encouragement Christian usage will no doubt win more upon them than those rough storms and winds wherewith they are dayly threatened and are still distressed Which makes them wrap themselves up as Elias in his hairy Mantle when they think their lives liberties and livelyhoods are sought after and no such protection like to continue over them they thought in a Christian State and Church they might have obtained and deserved through their quiet conversation As a just protection infers our due subjection so no men pay more willingly then they who besides the Iron-rod of fear have softer cords of love and favour upon them How can we with justice honour or humanity inflict severe penalties upon Papists as refusing to conform to our Church
Title of Constantinople was but intruded and usurped and when the Council of Nice gave such honour to the Church of Rome there was not so much as mention made of Constantinople Doctor Sutcliffe subver p. 51. is witness Irenaeus saith that every Church ought to have respect to the Church of Rome for hâ—â— eminent principality and Subvers 19. telleth how Saint Gregory commanded in England instituting Saint Augustine Archbishop of Canterbury a See of that preeminency Downam lib. Antich c. 3. doth not deny but that Justinian the Emperor and the general Council of Chalcedon did attribute to the Pope of Rome to be head of the Church For the real presence Jacobus Accontius a learned Protestant saith though one part err yet both are in the way of Salvation Whitaker Bucer and Hooker say the Body is really given to the Mouth of the faithful So Doctor Reynolds in his Conference 722. Prayer for the dead and free will Cartwright Fulke and Sparke say are not so necessary Worship of Images is indifferent saith Master Bunny and Bilney and is defended by Protestants in Germany as Beza relates Bowing at the Name of Jesus is affirmed and commanded by Queen Elizabeths Injunctions By Doctor Whitgift in defence Musâ—â—lus in loc com Zanchius in Epist ad Ephes c. But if bowing at thâ— Name of Jesus being read or heard be lawful it followeth the honouing of Christs Image is also lawful since the Name of Jesus is to the Ear as his Image is to the Eye Communion in one kind Luther in Epist ad Bohem. saith is of indifferency That the present Roman Church and Religon continued and flourished during the whole time of the primitive Church in the first six hundred years after Christ from Christ and his Apostles to Constantine the great and from Constantine to Gregory the great Calvin Zuinglius Zâ—nchius Danaeus Beza Brocord Nâ—pper Perkins Whitaker Powel Fulke Reynolds Cartwright Field Willet Whiteguift Midleton Morton the most renowned Protestant Writers acknowledg in their Words and Books as I could easily shew and cite their words and places to that purpose if it were not for brevitys sake you may find it at large in a Treatise dedicated to Dr. Morton of the Progeny of Catholicks and Protestants And the continuance of the Roman Religion those last 1000 years is acknowledged by Oslander Danaeus Magdeburgenses Holinshed Stow Cambden Fox Bale Bilson Whitaker Mason Cartwright Godwine Martin c. it being evident to all that do not stupidly deny whatever was said or done in former ages To conclude I propose this Dilemma either with extream impiety you damn the Souls of the whole race of your Progenitors who till the later end of Henry the Eighth lived and died Roman Catholicks or else with no less cruelty you punish them for professing the Religion of your forefathers in which by your own Concessions Salvation may be attained Whence a learned Protestant saith The wrong which Protestants commit in afflicting Catholicks and unnaturally trampling upon their dejected Estates only for matters of Religion Alas by our own Doctrine they are neither Babylonians nor Egyptians but they and we as we teach being Israelites Why then should Israel thus persecute Israel are we not become a gaze of Christendom thus to fight without an Enemy for kindred to wound his own kindred inciting our Governours to great severity in Religion in which we our selves teach they may be saved I speak sincerely I hold morally it s most improbable that such as have been conversant in Study of Controversies must have a respect to Catholick Religion unless they break with all Authority humane and divine Bishop Gauden in the Sighes of the Church p. 202. saith The Dilemma and distressed choice of Religion is now reduced to this that peaceable and well-minded Christians wise c. so long harassed and wearied with novel Factions and pretended Reformations would rather chuse their posterity should return to the Roman Party which hath something among them setled orderly uniform becoming Religion than to have them ever turning and towring upon Ixius Wheel catching in vain at fanciful reformations as Tantalus at the deceitful waters rowling the reformed Religion like Sysiphus his Stone sometimes asserting it by Law and power otherwise exposing it to popular liberty and loosness then to have them tossed to and fro with every wind of Doctrine with the foedities blasphemies animosities Anarchies danger and confusions attending fanatick fancies and quotidian Reformations which like Botches and Boyls from surfeited and unwholsom bodies so daily break out among those Christians who have made no rule of Religion but their own humour and no bounds of reformation but their own interests The first makes them ridiculous the second pernitious to all sober Christians whereas the Roman Church however tainted with errors yet it cannot be denied without a brutish blindness and injurious slander which only serves to gratifie the gross Antipathies of the gaping vulgar that the Church of Rome amongst its tares and cockles hath many wholesom hearbs and holy Plants growing much more of Reason and Religion of good Learning and sober Industry Order and Polity of Morality and Constancy of Christian Candour and Civility of common Honesty and Humanity becoming grave men and Christians by which to invite after-ages and your posterity to adhere to it and them rather than to be everlastingly exposed to the profane bablings endless janglings miserable wranglings childish confusions atheistical indifferencies and sacrilegious furies of some later spirits which are equally greedy and giddy making both a play and a prey of Religion who have nothing comparable in them to the papal party to deserve yours or your posterities admiration or imitation but rather their greatest caution and prevention CAP. VIII Roman Catholicks are not guilty of Practices or Principles destructive to Government PRotestants have set it down as a Decree against Catholicks and labour to imprint it as an eternal scandal in the hearts of the People that Catholick Doctrine and Religion is dangerous to the State and Soveraignty and therefore not allowable This being a matter of great importance I will endeavour not so much to justifie them as to inform my self in a point which hath made so many stagger Being one that desires to defend the loyalty of innocent men rather than their Opinions or Doctrins which they are best able to defend themselves In this grand charge and Hyperbolical accusation I find the contrary is proved by evidence of Fact that the Treasons Seditions factions tumults which have filled all Christendome with blood and calamity sprung not from the doctrine of Catholicks but from the Opinions and practices of Reformists not from Rome but from Wittenberg Smalcald Geneva c. Was it the Papists that induced them of Geneva to expel their Lord and Bishop That moved them of Swedeland to deprive their lawful King That procured Holland to depose their Soveraign That sollicited Subjects to depose their Emperour King of
so apt to deceive men as Religion which always presents a shew of Divinity and for that Cause it behooved to be very wary in Chastising the professors thereof least any indignation should enter into the peoples minds that somewhat was derogated from the Majesty of God Others More freely have not spared to place Religion I mean that which is ignorantly Zealous amongst the kind of frenzies which cannot be cured otherwise then by time given to divert and qualify the humour of the conceit Whence Levia said to Augustus Visne Muliebre Concilium Let severity sleep a while and try what what alteration the pardonning of Cinna may procure The Emperor hearkned to her Counsel and thereby found his enemies mouths stopped and their Malice abated A soft gale of wind oft allaies a great storm the warm Sun will prevail more with the traveller then cold and boisterous winds The Goats blood will break the Adamant which the hardest hammers cannot do Chronical diseases are not cured by physick and motion but by time and rest It fals out many times that the remedy is worse then the disease and while we go about to cure the State we kill it and instead of purging out the peccant humour of the body politick we cast it into a Calenture or burning feaver This was not unknown to that wise and good Emperor Theodosius who could not be perswaded to extirpate or use violent courses against the Arrians knowing how dangerous it would prove to the state if the quietness thereof should be disturbed Lucretius the Poet when he beheld the act of Agamemnon that could endure the sacrificing of his own daughter exclaimed tantum Religio potuit suadere malorum what would he have said if he had known and seen the Christian Bloodshed and Violence in Religion in these times he would have been ten times more Epicure then he was We read of Sabbacus a Heathen King of Aethiopia who being by dreams admonished that he could not possess himself of the Kingdom but by the slaying of the Priests he chose rather to lay aside the Claim and to refer the government to twelve wise men How much more will it become Christians not to lay the foundation of Religion upon the Carkasses spoils and ruins of their distressed neighbors relations and fellow Subjects It hath been an ancient aphorism of State and Wisdome of the greatest Princes punire raro it was ascribed to Augustus Caesar as a title of honour nunquam Civilem sanguinem fudisse and Seneca who lived under a Tyrant saith frequens vindicta paucorum odium reprimit omnium irritat Aristotle saith those are ever held to be most godly Laws that are least Sanguinary and yet maintain Order The Kingdome of Christ is not carried on after the fashion of this World with arms and engines of War to be erected on the bones and Sepulchres of our Brethren and Fathers The Throne of Christ is not supported as Solomons on both sides with Lyons and Tygres Bears and Wolves instead of Lambs and Doves as if we should change our meek patient crucified Messias and had got some Muzzian a Mahometan God of Forces who is to be served in Buff Coats and Armour It was a great blasqhemy when the Devil said I will ascend and be like to the highest but it is a greater blasphemy to personate God to bring him saying I will descend to be like the Prince of Darkness with furies and persecutions nay what is worse to make the Cause of Religion as is proved by experience this last Century descend to the Cruel and inhumane murthering of Princes butchering of the People racking of Consciences by Oaths and Sequestrations surely this is to bring down the Holy Ghost instead of likeness of a Dove into the shape of a Vulture or Raven and to set out for the Barque of a Christian Church a Flag of a Barque of Pirats and Assasinates or to bring in an armatum Evangelium Christian Religion in Compleat Armour and Christ marching like Alexander Hannibal or Caesar it is hard to pick out Letters of Mart from the Gospel or to have any Commission to kill or slay Jesus Christ in order to reform Whence a learned divine of our English Church saith it is a squalid reformation that is besmeared with the blood of Christians it is against the honour order unity and majesty of a reformed Church to persecute and to be like those canes sepulchrales violating the bones and ashes of the dead Persecution setteth a man as far from a true Christian temper as burning Feavers do from natural heat and health when once a male contented member is grieved then the rest of the body is sensible and secretly arm for opposition all cry pity any should suffer for their conscience and silently say among themselves sors hodierna mihi Cras erit illa tibi there being necessary connexion between Civil Liberty and that which is Spiritual and who would divest any of their spiritual do alarm them with just Causes of loosing their Civil The nature of man however in hot blood it be thirsty of revenge yet in a cooler temper it hath a kind of nausea or distaste of taking the lives even of the most Nocent insomuch that in Assizes or Sessions an Offender can hardly be condemned whom the pity of many will not after a sort excuse with laying of impositions on the Judge part on the Jury and much on the accusers Hence the name of a Serjeant or Pursuivant is odious and the Executioner esteemed no better then an enemy of mankind and if such as are tender of their reputations be very scrupulous personally to arrest men for civil actions of debt they will be more unwilling instruments of drawing their Bodies to the Rack and Gallows especially when any colour of Religion is pretended in defence In Counsels concerning Religion that advise of the Apostle should be prefixed ira hominis non implet justitiam we are to consider we deal with men and not with beasts man is to be treated humanly and a Christian christianly with all reason and charity and of tender Consciences ought to be had a tender respect man is sensible of gentleness may be obliged to quietness by humanity Whereas if you take violent courses and fight against the errors of the times with prisons dungeons fetters oaths c. they will make men the greater hypocrites and be occasion of intestine division and bloodshed experience can speak somewhat in this behalf which hath evidently desâ—ryed within the current of few years that severity in Religion hath years caused the long known and manifest miseries of this Nation Hence one of our late Divines saith it is sufficiently known what the immoderation of a preposterous zeal male contentedness ambition and force hath both machinated and perpetrated to the destraction well nigh destruction of Church and State The impudence and imprudence of inconsiderable rash spirits in their actions passions and pretences for the Gospel
hath caused the slaughter of 200000 in Germany hath caused at least occasioned most of the wars devastations and bloodshed the great alterations tumults troubles in most places of Christiandom our late Bishop of Exeter saith impositions on mens Consciences and Judgments in matters of Religion to tye them by penal and coercive Statutes which like Persian sheep carry tails of incurious mulcts after them that are heavier then their bodies To come with swords to put Religion into our heads with main force is like the watering of Plants with salt streams or the lighting of a Candle with gun-powder Never was Christian Religion planted or propagated by wars by the civil and martial Sword for God is not pleased with hypocrital and unwilling worshippers forced thereto by outward violence nor are Christian Societies bettered by such force but oft-times the contrary Too much severity maketh men desperate sheweth a will to oppress the offendor rather then cure the offence and nothing sheweth more evidently that authority inclineth to tyranny then the multitude of Promoters continual informations and the name of treason made as a Livery to put upon all offences Unchristian persecution like a violent Chrysis more frequently taketh away the Patient then Contributes to his recovery nourisheth a wrathful devouring spirit one against another makes us transgressors of that Royal law which forbids us to do that one to another we would not have them do to us were we in their condition and by this rule whosoever is not against the cruelty of persecution hath nothing to say against justice of his being a slave for what measure he would mete unto others he deserves himself If to hate our brother is murder as he is man 1 John 3. 16. sure not only to hate but even for Religion sake to kill our brother a Christian and to be destroyers of Christians are rather deicides then homicides and if nothing can have more of Christian then Charity nothing can have more of Antichristian then such uncharitableness which many nourishing for zeal mistake a Cockatrice for a Dove and fiery Serpent for a Phenix Outward violence in Cause of Religion is also condemned by holy Write and dâ—vine authority Christ commanded both the tares and the wheat should remaine togâ—ther in the world Mat. 13. 30. he repâ—oved his Disciples who would have had fiâ—e come down from heaven ro destroy the Sâ—maritans that would not entertain him in these word you know what spirit you are of the son of man came not to destroy Luke 9. 54. the servant of God must not strive but be gentle to all men 2 Rom. 2. 24. as God hath called every one so let him walk 1 Cor. 7. 17. they who now are tares may become wheat who are blind may see some there be that come not till the eleventh hour Mat. 20. 6. let your moderation be known unto all men Phil. 4. 5. who art thou that judgest anothers servant c. Rom. 4. now I shall beseech you by the meekness and gentleness of Christ 2 Corin. 10. Wo unto them that make a man an offender for a word or lay a snare for him Esay The Fathers of the primitive times pleaded against all force in Religion The Christian Church saith Saint Hillary against Auxentius doth not persecute but is persecuted No man is forced against his will by the Christians saith Lactantius S. Hierom in paenit cap. 4. saith that heresie must be cut off by the Sword of the Spirit And Tertullian saith seeing he that wants faith and devotion is unserviceable to God for God being not contentious would not be worshipped by the unwilling The Arrians were the first introducers of persecution Let all the Canons of the Church be examined and searched if one be found that justifies the shedding of blood meerly on the score of Religion S. Augustine complaineth how the Donatists filled with blood and desolation all Africa persecuting the Orthodox under Julian the Apostate Docendo magis quam jubendo monendo quam minando veritatem agnoscant Aug. Epist 63. Fides siquidem suadenda est non imperanda ait S. Bernard The Churches of the East grievously complained of the Arrians persecution Athan. Epist ad Solicar speaketh much of their inhumane cruelty Nil tam voluntarium quam Religio cogi non potestdiversa sunt carnifex charitas non potest veritas cum vi aut justitia cum credulitate conjungi in primitiva Ecclesia saith learned Becanus haeretici non puniebantur morte corporali alius est spiritus legalis saith he qui consistebat in severitate alius est spiritus Evangelicus qui consistit in mansuetudine hunc debetis imitari Et Apost ad Titum 3. haereticum hominem devita post unam secundam correptionem Sciens quia subversus est ubi notantur dixit devita non occide Esay 11. 9. non occiderit in universo monte sancto meo id est in Ecclesia ubi Propheta praedixit doctrinam Evangelii propogandam in Ecclesia sine sanguine caede See Becanus Dominicus a Soto in his 4. Sent. dist 5. saith every man hath a natural right to instruct others in things that are good but cannot compell Strifes about Religion saith Grotius are pernicious and destructive where provision is not made for dissenters Persecution overturns the practice of Religion from Abel to Moses and the Prophets even to the meek example of Jesus Christ The Apostles and their Successors for 300 years confirmed their Religion with their own blood and not with the blood of their opposers External force in matter of Faith and Worship is repugnant to the nature of Christian Religion which is meekness To the practice which is suffering To the promotion of it go teach all Nations Christian Religion intreats all compels none Force never yet made a good Christian or a good Subject It subverts all Religion because men believe not because it is true or false but because they are Commanded for to do their interest and security oblige them rather to obey then dispute It is very unreasonable to force men to declare or swear where their judgments are not fully satisfied to require Faith where they cannot choose but doubt to punish them for disobedience if they go not against their consciences and to be punished hereafter if they do For an erroneous Conscience bindeth a man to follow it according to the learned of all Religions Persecution destroyeth the noble principle of reason for no man can believe before he understands and no man can understand before he is taught for Faith in all acts of Religion is necessary Now to believe we must first will to will we must judge to judge any thing we must understand which cannot be forced How can the leprous disease of the mind be cured with corporal catoplasts or mens judgments be convinced of the truth by tormenting their Bodies the inflictions then of external punishments for meer mental errors not wilful is
without horror observe is the not allowing of a due and regular Liberty of Conscience hath instead of advancing the Cause of Religion propagated Atheism in this Nation It hath been an old Stratagem of Satan to oppose Religion against Religion to leave us none at all It hath been likewise observed as a shuffling hypocritical distinction of Lawyers invented to deceive the innocent pretending none are executed or suffer for Religion or Conscience but for Treason or offending the Laws Who doth not see but by this rule those Bloody Tyrants Nero Dioclesian Maximine c. must be conscientious because they judged according to the Law and those glorious Martyrs must be counted Traitors nay even the cursed Jews who crucified Christ alledged the self-same reason we have a Law and by our Law he ought to die John 19. 7. Treason must alwaies be some action or intention discovered prejudicial to the Soveraign or State not an Opinion or Profession of Religion For this reason Sir John Old-Castle in the Reign of Henry the fifth for his Treason was condemned in one Court and for his Heresie in another So were Cranmer and Ridley in Queen Maries time And therefore also it is by the statute provided 22 and 27 Eliz. that if a Priest conforms he is actually discharged of all imputation of treason no further proceeding can lye against him If Priest-hood be no treason a Priest in that he is a Priest can be no Traytor unless we will account Apostles and all ancient Priests both of England all Countries whom Kings and Emperors have honoured and loved as their faithful friends and subjects So far thought them from being enemies to their Crown that from their hands all Princes received their Crowns Consecrations and Scepters CAP. III. Liberty or Toleration Rightly understood is equitable just or necessary to several Religions I Have viewed most of the Tracts concerning Toleration pro and con Some I find over strict and nice austere and rigid others profane and loose arbitrary and remiss and betwixt them both toleration ever scrapes the imputation of calumnie either of too much restriction or profane relaxation neither of them will know that true liberty is a middle kind of equity indulgency benignity betwixt both extreams not curst and cruel but tender and compassionate hath her commendation for moderative rather than vindicative minding rather to amend than confound not rash and arbitrary dispensing with the Law as if it were but a leaden rule but circumspectly and benignly interpreting it that it might not prove an Iron-Rod We plead then only for such a Liberty of Conscience as preserves the Nation in Trade Peace and Commerce which preserves a fair entercourse and correspondency one with another and with their respective members and would not exempt any man or party of men from not keeping those excellent Laws that tend to sober just and industrious living in a due Christian regulation consistent with the evident Laws of God and quiet Government and that indulging Dissenters in the sense defended is not only most Christian and rational but prudent also and conformable to his Majesties Gracious Declaration It appears of neither pace to drive on furiously with Jehu in matters of Policy nor that he go softly with Ahab in matters of Piety In matters of Scruple or Controversie it likes well of nothing but walking with a Right Conscience Gal. 2. 24. and that also of free choice like the Israelites among the Edomites Numâ— 22. 26. above all it hates to remove the ancient Land-Marks whether of Law or Religion Deut. 19. 14. not thirsting one anothers Blood nor invading anothers rights as Wolves and Tygers but as the Apostle saith sobrie juste pie It being an apt Mediety or mediocrity betwixt the Rigid contention of a furious Zeal or emulation and the Luke-warm disposition of a reachless indifferency or neutrality and though it be tender and compassionate as a mother yet she is far from being over remiss Licentious or irregular whence some wise men take it for a Master-piece of prudence wisely discerning 'twixt what is just and fit and so giving sentence rather congruously then severely School-men and Moralists make it to be a potential part of justice bringing not severely the Fact home to the Law but rather in equity the Law down to the Fact regulating the strict words and rigour for the common good and particular relief of pesons in certain facts times contingencies and circumstances 'T is a part of temperance amiable and amicable 'T is severally translated and hath many Epithets in holy Scripture Modesty equity 2 Cor. 1. 1 Pet. 2. 10. Phil. 4. 5. 2 Tim. 2. humanity gentleness clemency courtesie patience of Spirit 'T is the blessing and comfort of peace and unity in the Church of plenty and tranquillity in the Common-wealth of plain satisfaction to the Conscience and of plenary contentation to all sorts and conditions of rational men Nothing can be easie sweet and safe in our lives Religion Consciences or liberties to God or man without it without it we be tedious to our selves and troublesome one to another This virtue is not a little illustrated by its contrary opposit Persecution immoderation austerity rigidness inexorableness compulsion imposition c. which is an extream vitiousness in persons in their judgments opinions passions affections pretences actions and designs of which we have been more pathetically sensible in the effects than in the qualities This medium therefore or middle kind of equity indulgency or liberty betwixt both extremities aforesaid is the most just and reasonable unto which all Christians have a right and title too by virtue and purchase of Christ's Blood Death and Resurrection who is become sole Lord over the Soul unto whom we are to give account only as our proper Judg in matters purely internal and Spiritual for in this the Judicatures of men are not capable to make a clear judgment or declare certainly who are in the right or wrong This Freedome of Conscience is of so high concern to all and not only to be enjoyed by the strongest party as well for the Magistrates sake as the Peoples common good and it consists in the Magistrates forbearing to impose pressures and penalties in matters of Faith and Conscience lest they intrude into the Office of Christ to whose decision such actions are only liable The ancient original Fundamental Laws by which other Laws of less extent are to be regulated were intended as a Defence and Protection to all providing one injure not another and that Common Peace and Safety be secured no other subsequent inferiour Law can therefore debar any peaceable Christian that answers the necessities of Church and State Civil Spiritual and Political in equal justice and in foro Conscientiae from this priviledge originally due to all For they that are contributaries to the peace and maintenance of Government are intitled to a protection from it according to the just nature of government which consists
in a fair and equal retribution Whence a late Presb. Divine confesseth none ever saw any argument yet could clearly evince why any sort of men who would profess a peaceable subjection unto the Civil Government might not in all their Civil Rights be protected by it I conceive it therefore most clear both in right reason and true Religion that Governours ought to move in that middle way between tolerating all differences and none at all in matters of Religion wherein men are variously to be considered according to the profession they own and make of Religion as none are to be tolerated in Blasphemy or any that have cast off all sense of justice order shame and humanity seeing the nature of man is more prone to imbibe noxious things then to eject them so true virtuous liberty is not to be infringed nor any who can give a sober Christian and rational account for their principles and profession to Church and State For the Power among Chrstians should not be a hard and sharp rock dashing presently all in pieces that touch and strike at it in the least kind though never so modestly Christian Religion saith a learned Divine hath moderated the extremity of Servitude as to Civil things in all places where it was received when certainly it is much more consonant to that Religion and especially that form of Religion which hath asserted its Spiritual Liberty from the impositions of others to allow a Spiritual Freedom to others Another of our Divines saith Christian Religion ought not to be made a snare harrow a rack or heavy yoak or an Egyptian bondage to mens minds and consciences this were to turn the sweetest vine into a sharp bramble and fig-tree into a thorn nor is there any thing Christians should be more tender of as the Ephesine Fathers admonish than their own and others true liberty Christ hath purchased with his pretious Blood of which Christian Magistrates should be exact keepers and conscientious defenders lest piety prove an oppression and the bracelets and ornaments of Religion become the chains of hypocrisie and manacles of superstition binding such heavy burdens on mens Consciences which God hath not imposed but exempted from their Commission The best way to convince opposers is by instructing them in meekness in the Spirit of Love by suitable acts of indulgency for our dear Lord that bought us will take nothing more kindly at this time from us saith an ingenious Author as to be pitiful to his Servants who are distressed about your acts in point of Conscience who the more distressed they are and like to our Lord the fitter subjects they are for your Compassion If you had no need of mercy from God it were tolerable then for you to be extream towards others In point of Christianity we should be merciful unto them as our heavenly Father is merciful Luke 6. 36. Mercy is to be preferred before Sacrifice No torture no rack or tyranny so great as when exercised on the conscience forcing to declare or swear where their judgments are not fully satisfied Force may make an hypocrite it is Faith grounded on knowledge and consent that makes a Christian no war so passionate as the war of Conscience in Factions Conventicles Associations and Sects such practises become not the Gospel nor are suitable to Christ's meek Precepts Sufferings and Doctrine True Christian Concord is the consequence only of a favourable benignity or toleration as before circumstantiated For a true Christian following the rules precepts and examples of our Saviour Jesus Christ loveth God above all things and his Neighbour as himself doth injury to no man pardoneth all injuries done to him esteemeth and honoureth every one according to his degree and merit represseth all concupisence unlawful desires obeyeth Magistrates Superiours and laws as the ordinance of God Non propter â—iram Sed propter justitiam Rom. 13. Not for fear but conscience Yeildeth to every one his due to Caesar that which is due to Caesar c. And finally preferreth in all things the publick wealth before his private Commodity hence it followeth that in whatsoever state he liveth he is humble meek peaceable obedient temperate just religious and consequently a good and excellent member of his Common-wealth insomuch that if the precepts of Christian Religion were followed there should need no Political Law which as the Apostle saith posita est injustis non subditis ordained for the disobedient and unjust Christian Religion in respect of the means it giveth for attaining of true perfection and virtue and for the purity and excellency of the doctrine and of rites and ceremonies is truly Political and most necessary for Government of state whence whosoever is a true and perfect Christian is and must needs be Bonus Civis a good Citizen as Aristotle termeth a good member of the Common-Wealth This was evident to the Paynims when they considered Christian Doctrine without Passion and partiality that Pliny the Second being proconsul of Asia under Trajan Emperour acknowledged the same in an Epistle to Trajan written in favour of persecuted Christians in his Jurisdiction testifying of them they were an innocent and harmless people whose custom and exercise was to assemble themselves in the night to sing Hymns and Praises to Jesus Christ and that they promised and vowed to Commit no offence or do any hurt to other men not to steal rob perjury break promise c. upon which testimony Trajan ordained no Christian should be further punished or inquired of for their Religion Euseb l. 3. Ecclesiast c. 27. and his Successor Adrian upon Like suggestion and information given by a noble man Called Serennio Gramiano gave order to Minutius Fundanus his proconsul that Christians should not be punished Euseb l. 4. c. 8. Hist Eccles Thus ordaiâ—ed they knowing only some points of Christian Religion if they had understood how it reforms mens manners how the Canons Codes institutes digests out of the Corpus Civile are congruous consonant with the good of Civil society they would not have held it only tolerable but even necessary for establishment and conservation of Goverment As nothing is more plain and sure then that the tolerating of all Sects errors and faults which conscience may pretend for or of none at all are utterly destructive of Christian and human peace society and safety nor is he well in his wits that holdeth either part universally or unlimitted who thinketh all or none to be tolerated for by the one we should have no government and by the other in time by death banishments persecutions c. we should have no Subjects to be governed nor have any Servant so no Master no Wife so no Husband So seeing an universal unity among Christians is not to be attained a toleration of things tolerable is not only lawful but necessary a Latitude of Liberty is left in such things as are not clearly and positively laid down in Scripture Or in things of private practice
Treasure so noble of birth so fortunate in Wars zealous in Religion who builded so many Hospitals founded so many Monasteries enacted such wholsome Laws and Statutes got so many Victories in Fâ—ance c. even to Palestine it Self all professed Roman Catholicks Secundo It deserves one observation that when Christianity became the ruling Religion of the World under the great Constantine and Emperours his immediate Successors the very Heathens themselves were exempt from all manner of severity upon the score of their Religion Because they were in possession of it by discent from Father to Son and not by usurpation or intrusion And we have the like president in our own Country For when King Ethelbert had embraced the Christian Faith by the preaching of Saint Austin he would not force his own Subjects though Pagans to receive it Bedâ— l. 1. c. 260. For this reason it was that the great Apostles treated the Synagogue whose Religion at that time was vacuated and consequently void of Truth with so much respect and condescendency and that afterwards the most primitive Fathers used so often this expression that the Synagogue ought to be buried with honour Whence one of our Protestant Divines saith even by the Law of Seniority Catholicks might exspect some favour For what priviledges or immunities have we but the old Church gave us whence had we our Bible Creed Honors Donations commendable Ceremonies charitable Foundations had not they preserved them faithfully we never had found them The first possession of a man is a good title by the Law of Nature until an elder or the Law of Reason which with mankind is to have pre-eminence dispossesses it The Roman Church had a possession unquestionable for above a thousand years and the Pope enjoyed jurisdiction a longer time than any succession of Princes can pretend to and submitted to by all our Ancestors In Catholick Religion they stand as defenders others as invaders they as possessors others as disseisors they seek to keep what de jure they had Calvin and others what they had not There is a vast difference in these two Cases to oppose by force the introducement of innovations and to attempt by force the extinguishment of an ancient Religion of which the People are universally in a quiet and immemorial possession The one drives others out of possession the other maintains himself the one invades his neighbours rights the other defends his own Apostacy and innovation with some colour of right have been oft in several ages persecuted by rigour of Laws even by Protestants and the reason is because innovation in Religion most commonly breeds disturbance in the Common-wealth Natural reason teaches that no particular man is to be condemned much less deprived of what he stands possessed till his cause be judiciously heard and sentenced Nor ought any man to be Judg in his own Cause But penal Laws and Oaths made in contempt and derogation of that Religion which through all Christendom abounds with learning civility and loyalty whose Doctrin amongst the primitive greatest and most learned societies hath been and is avouched in most Nations and Kingdoms allowed and more freely exercised and permitted established by the Laws in which our Predecessors were born and continued wherein all our Progenitors all the Peers Ecclesiast Nobles and Princes of our Realm in precedent ages thought themselves happy and honourable If they had imagined that in future times their Posterity would revile that Religion with Epithets unbeseeming humane much less Christian Ears what an opinion would they have preconceived of us It was said by King James one of the most learned Princes not in private but in open Parliament represented I acknowlege the Roman Church to be our Mother Church although defiled with infirmities and corruptions Is it not then a kind of Spiritual Parracide in the Daughter not only to revile the Mother or which is worse scratch her by the Face call her Whore Superstitious Idolatrous c. on whose Knees you have been dandled nourished by her Breasts and carried in her Womb Hear O you Heavens and give ear O earth I have nourished and brought up Children and they have rebelled against me Isa 1. 2. Let it be allowed some corruptions be of our aged Mother this should be no warrant for cruelty but rather a motive of compassion especially considering that by confession of all her adversaries those pretended failings are of no modern date but such as they are now such likewise they were when first Christianity was received by English-men under King Ethelbert The Church of England who Glory in their succession of Bishops and in this is singular from other Reformers acknowledge they immediately derive their true and lawful Ordination and mission and from whom their first Mininistry viz. Cranmer Baker c. were Consecrated and consequently that the Roman Church conveyed divine right and authority from Christ to them the very essence and being of Religion Which Church notwithstanding they call Antichristian Idolatrous c. abusing tender Consciences sâ—â—press that which themselves confess to be divine Truth condemn as Trayâ—â—rs and persecute to death with pâ—â—munire loss of fortunes c. those from whom such Apostolical Graces and Functions proceed and were continued and preserved If our succession from the Roman be the glory of the English Church it s our scorn and ignominy to persecute and revile them Tertio Penal Laws and Statutes against the Catholick Religion destroyes the ground and foundation of Justice and the form Judicature Because the Witness can have no evidence for their Testimony the Judges not any for their sentence and the Legislator as little for the Law Primo There must be evidence of lawful Witnesses In matters of Faith we go by hearing Rom. 10. The best evidence then of any Religion is the testimony of our deceased Predecessors and Ancestry whose Faith and Doctrine is fresh in the memories and testimonies of the Christian posterity of the present Church For besides the Authority of the present Church we can have no greater evidence in foro externo for the Law of God and Religion then the testimony of precedent ages confirmed with supernatural Signs v. g. the fourteenth Age delivered to the fifteenth the Roman Faith which now they profess assuring them that it was the true sense and Letter of Scripture which they had learned from the thirteenth age and so forward to the Apostles No reformers can produce one lawful Witness against Catholick Religion and their sense of Scripture yet the Greatest Crimes require at least one lawful Witness For what evidence had the first Reformers to oppose the testimony of all former Ages confirmed with so many miracles and to make Statutes against the known practiced Religion at least for nine hundred years Antiquity affords them none because though in diverse Ages some odd men did testifie sometimes an errour they were in those very times contradicted by the Church and declared impostors and innovators In this
of their corruptions opinions and not considering that like Gehezi the leprosie of those Syrians câ—â—â—ves to most of their own Foreheads Nor taking any notice of the objections standing in force against themselves The Cry against the Papists is but the Prologue it was the Epidemical Frenzy in Germany a hundred years since which turned into smoke and confusion I wish it might not be truly said that those very persons against whom you so bitterly sharpen and pen your invectives as if none were Sinners but they none were more dangerous or their practices less pernicious in the Face of the Sun Such is the general inclination and temper of all English Catholicks that preces and lachrymae are their only weapons an innocent and passive People as experience of their quiet behaviour so many years of hard times have clearly shewn Suffering with that patience humility equanimity and resigned temper of Spirit imitating their grand Exemplar Jesus Christ as if those virtues were innate and most natural â—o them Nor can I think but those men who are so hardned in their malice and persecution against them do often hear a voice secretly calling within them O ye Sauls why do ye persecute me in my Servants Why should you be troubled Papists are not more troubled than your selves Why should you grudge at their peace and protection So long as they are peaceable either actively obey the Laws or else passively ready to submit to the penalties They are objects of pity rather than envy They have formerly lived in their own native Country with less priviledges than Strangers are excluded from all Offices By Laws obnoxious to greater sufferings than Enemies Have suffered loss of Goods and Livings Whose Adversaries have left no Stone unrolled no corner unsearched no Pursuivants uncommissioned to tyrannize over their Consciences burnt their Antiquaries consumed their Monuments violated their Virgins racked even the very Souls of Men with Oaths when in humane prudence there was no fear but God hath shewed his just chastisements and judgments upon the chief Actors contrivers and Abetters Can we be such publick contradictors of our own declared principles whereby we disclaim and profess against Persecution as still to continue our mulcts and penalties upon those whose condition have been such as every one might abuse them in the Streets even with satisfaction to some discredited contemned trodden under every mans foot that listeth to spoil them To lie in prisons dungeons felters to be racked bowelled and boyled alive We have seen their families impoverished their houses invaded by saucy Officers their lives forfeited as Traytors for entertaining those without whom they could not live but as Pagans Have been deprived of performing any Service to God debarred of any civil imployments in the Nation they were otherwise capable of These miseries have they groaned under without any demerit of their own part these sour hearbs have they patiently and quietly tasted Would it not be an unreasonable president and incitement towards our brethren and all Nations abroad if we should begin again in the same Cup at home Some have so blackened and put them in so strange and monstrous a dress by calling them members of Babylon Antichrist Idolaters c. that I dare boldly aver that some of the seduced herd who are ignorant of their meek humble innocent and pious documents of which the whole world is to this time witness do sâ—arce believe them to be Men or if so yet that they are some terrible Cannibals that came out of some strange Lands Be pleased to consider you asperse not one but many and those who have given best evidence of being truly tender Consciences Since they suffered so generally so constantly so deeply If your passion will not at least your charity ought to think better For if you prove not what you say against them you are guilty of the breach of the Mandate of love to your neighbour in as great a height as circumstances can improve a sin to Every Christian will have a Share in the injury and a title to be righted and demand satisfaction Must they carry all our Sins on their backs Must our faults be whipt on them and they made particular oblations for us is not this to act the part of cursed Cham over again or to be conformable to Core and his company by a wilful kind of Sophistry still casting all the odium upon them Can no Ellobore Purge this Frenzie Shall we alwaies like Flies dwell upon some particular Ulcers And for some misdemeanors miscarriages or the loose lives of a few traduce and defame the whole Profession and aggravate their failings We know it were no difficulty to recriminate in this kind and repay you with the same dirt if it were any pleasure to scramble in such a Puddle As great an aversion and Antipathy as you have against them 't is worth your labour herein to make them your own examples in point of obedience and Government and so in respect of publick Peace and Tranquillity It were to be wished by all honest men of what perswasion soever that a just and equal Liberty in matter of Conscience were granted unto all if but for this only respect viz. that so by a free confident and friendly conversation one with another void of suspition and jealousie fear or danger to one party or other and by amicable discourse and debating of things truth might come more clearly to be discovered But this is a work hath so much of God and goodin it as it must exspect many Adversaries Moderation or true Liberty meets with so many enormities exorbitancies and obstacles to resist and retard it Had we but a due latitude of candour and charity towards others or understood our own happiness and took things in the best sense Sure those billows and waves would cease roaring Were men so ingenuous to promote peaceable order as they are watchful to find knots in Bulrushes and torture their brains to find scruples in what is most plain and stood against the tempests and shakings of virulent Tongues and cankered calumnies our heats and animosities from difference in opinion would gradually decay and a foundation would be laid On which to raise a considerable Structure of Peace to Church and State and Prosperity to the Nation CAP. VI. Persecution of Recusants is against our own Principles and Concessions PRotestant Religion doth indemnifie us in the Court of Conscience for believing in matters of Religion according to the Dictates of our own private judgment or rather doth oblige us to do it For as Bishop Gauden a learned Protestant saith If it be not lawful for every one to be guided by his private Spirit and Judgement in Religion it will hardly be possible to acquit our separation from the Roman Church of the guilt of Schism Nor doth it seem worthy of Christ who hath left us a Religion full of Mysteries and not any visible Judg of them to have designed about those any
visible executioners This premised I argue thus Where there is a liberty of examining and judging there must be a freedome of election upon such judgment but the Church of England v. g. in her Doctrine alloweth men to search the Scriptures and examine whether her Doctrine be agreeable to Scripture or no Therefore the Church of England and other Reformed cannot in reason and equity persecute such men as in foro conscientiae shall upon such due examination of judgment dissent from their Doctrine If this principle pass current amongst us that every one may read judg and interpret Scripture which is by us the judg of Controversies the only rule to guide us to Faith we are bound to give Liberty of Conscience to others Whence one of our own Doctors saith Our Bishops who have declared the Doctrine of giving freedome of Conscience what every one in their private judgments do of discretion hold to be most conformable to Gods Word yet they very inconsequently and disingenuously excite our Governours to force their Conscience to an exterior Conformity Secondly We confess the Church of England and all Churches may erre and for ought we know do erre and lead into error and such an uncertain and fallible guide or ground to rely on is not proportionable to the nature and quality of Faith which must be certain and infallible with an internal consent of the Will and subjection of our understandings to revealed Truths Our Senses may be deluded but Faith not for it must be more firm and certain than any thing we see or feel Supposing then the Reformed Churches fallible will it not be a most unreasonable thing to be still exacting of Recusants by rigorous Sequestratious Oaths and what other penalties they think fit to leave and forsake the Church and Faith which they so groundedly hold to be the infallible guide appointed by God himself as the only means to direct them securely to eternal Salvation And to yield exterior conformity to our own new moulded Church we all profess to be fallible Or to be forced to embrace a Doctrine deduced by fallible interpretations out of Scripture which interpretations the far greater and learneder part of this very age reject as Heretical and which as such were rejected by almost all visible Christianity for these thousand years And which perhaps may shortly be rejected by us We having oft-times rejected that which we cryed up before for verity and the Religion now in vogue not many years ago was cryed down If our Church be not then infallible in what we teach against them but may embrace a lye for a divine Truth they need not to vindicate and justifie their most just recusancy in refusing to submit when we provide them no better security but force them to refuse due submission to that infallible direction appointed by divine Writ to bring them securely to their end To which the most religious the most learned and the major part of Christians ever yet thought and submitted too If I should disobey the sentence of the Church upon what other authority can I more prudently rely What Labyrinths and Abysmes should I fall into How can we force and draw others to our Churches if we cannot agree where and how to lay our Foundation How can we impose upon and restrain others whom we are so far from assuring of Truth as we pretend to be but uncertain of it and are not able to do so much for our selves being liable to change and no ways certain of our own belief to be the most infallible as our multiplied Concessions are pregnant instances What is this but to put certain penalties upon an uncertain Faith And if our Teachers agree not in all points of Religion the Dissenters in controversie are obliged to allow a mâ—tual toleration If we say the Roman Church erred for 900. years till our Reformation we exclude our selves from all possible assurance of true Faith or Salvation And to arrogate to our Selves or to attribute to private persons or Pastors the all-defining Spirit which we deny to the whole Church represented in a general Council is absurd His presumption must needs be vast that builds more on his own tenet then the mature judgment of all successive Fathers While he cryes down others for infallible he lifts himself up to be so as if God revealed more to him than all the Doctors and Propagators of his Church Now let us hear what our own Divines acknowledge Doctor Taylor saith but alas notwithstanding our Religion thus framed by our Divines yet it seems not sufficiently marked or the cognizance of Schism taken away for yet we have no particular positive points among us setled for undoubted Truths those being rather a medley of all Religions and new Sects professed among us or a negation of those tenets of the Church we went out of and which stood a thousand years before us as Histories and Monuments witness which is but a negative Faith in effect for what is positive or of Order and Government is wholly derived and taken from that Religion which not long since we pulled down abominated and so violently persecuted Doctor Gauden saith I see not why Papists may not in reason of State have and enjoy that liberty without perturbing the Publick Peace which Presbyterians and Independents do enjoy in their new ways For nothing will savour more of an imperious or impotent Spirit whose Faith and Charity are Slaves to Secular Interests than for those who have obtained liberty to their Novelties to deny the like freedome to other mens Antiquity which hath Ecclesiastical practise and precedency of a thousand years besides the preponderancy of much reason Scripture and holy examples All which to force godly grave and learned men to renounce or comply with other ways against their judgments must be a crying Self-condemning sin in those men who lately approved the ancient Church way and after dissenting at first desired but a modest toleration And in another place saith To Fleece and depress Popish Recusants by pecuniary mulcts exactions c. is to set Religion to sale and make Merchandize of Conscience and mens errors rather than fairly to perswade and win them by proper and perswasive engines of true Religion Thorndike a learned Divine saith also Cerâ—ainly it may be justiâ—â—able for the secular power to grant Papists exercise of their Religion in private places under such moderate penalties as disobeying the Laws of a mans Country requires For Persecution to Death in that case the whole Reformation condemns the Church of Rome And I conceive there is no reason for that which will not condemn Persecution to Banishment The State may easier be secured of Papists against all such power in the Pope then of our Sectaries against that Dispensation to their allegiance which the pretence of Gods Spirit may import when they please Whereas it is manifest that many Papists hold against those equivocations and reservations which destroy all confidence in the
and Religion when they protest with so much truth to our faces they cannot see any Church any Religion among us as uniform publick authentick Constant We might consider that the enacting of laws penalties and impositions against Papists is but a knotting Whipcord to lash our own posterity Seeing now there be so many Opinions in the World God knows upon whose children it may fall next For the Church of England is not a Manna that relisheth in every mans palate Secondly To use severity against Papists overturns the very ground of our retreat from Rome It is against Protestant sincerity for how can they exclaim against them for persecutors and are now the men themselves Was it an instance of weakness in their Religion and is it become a demonstration in ours Is it Antichristian in them and Christian in us For if men must be restrained upon prudential pretended considerations for their Religious exercise why not the same in France Germany Holland Constantinople c. where matters of State may equally be pleaded And if Protestants who maintain that no Councils or Church without tyranny may require belief or internal consent from their subjects to their definitions or Articles of Religion a practice much exclaimed against in the Church of Rome why then do they of the Church of England so inconsequently exact in practice such consent blamed in the Roman CAP. VII That by our own Concessions true Salvation is acquired in the Roman Church and therefore not to be persecuted THe most eminent Divines of the English Church allow the Church of Rome to be a true Church whence they acknowledge and derive their Orders Ordination Calling Mission Jurisdiction Authority to Preach c. wherein they agree Salvation may be had and all Fundamentals of Faith are profest v. g. Papists hold all positive Articles of Faith setled among Protestants as divine and undoubted Truths Protestants and Catholicks both are Christians Both Baptized in that holy name both lay hold on the promises of the Gospel have the Lords Prayer Belief the same three Creeds Apostolical Nicene Athanasian The first four General Councils They believe with the Roman Church Articles of Doctrine that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son terms of Trinity substantiality virginity of our Blessed Lady Scripture all Laws Canons Ordinances forms of Liturgy Prayer Service Discipline c. And though the Roman Church doth declare many doctrinal points as necessary to be believed being deduced from holy Writ and practice of the primitive times whch the Reformists deny Yet seeing they acknowledge all the necessary articles fundamentally required to Salvation as is by their Adversaries granted What reason or justice is it to condem them to so great cruelties for matters of their Belief I could produce innumerable testimonies from the best Authors and Writings of the English Church who teach the Roman notwithstanding her supposed errors to be the Church of Christ and therein perfect Christianity and hope of Salvation to be found To avoid prolixity I will mention a few Doctor Morton in his Treatise of King of Israel and the Church p. 24 Papists saith he are to be accounted of the Church of God because they hold the Foundation of the Gospel Hooker 5. Book of Eccles Policy saith The Church of Rome is reputed a part of the House of God and of the Family of Jesus Christ Doctor Couel in defence of Hooker p. 17. saith We affirm them of the Church of Rome to be part of the Church of Christ and those that live and dye in that Church may be saved Master White in defence c. 41. in the name of his Brethren saith We profess the Church of Rome it self in all Ages to have been the visible Church of God Field lib. 3. c. 8. saith We most firmly believe all the Churches of the World wherein our Fathers lived and died to have been the true Churches of God in which undoubted Salvation was to be had And after in the same Book We never doubted but that in the Churches wherein those holy men St. Bernard and St. Dominick lived were the true Churches of God Osiander witnesseth Bede had all Popish errors yet Dr. Humphrey in his Jesuitism acknowledges him to be in the number of the godly so doth Fulk of St. Bernard Luther the Centurists Tindal and Pantaleon title St. Francis and St. Dominick holy men though they bleieved all Papistical errors therefore Papists may be saved if Protestants may be believed Dove persuas saith in fundamental points of Doctrine the greatest Papists in the world agree with us Prot. rel affirmeth the Roman Church hath still inviolably the foundation of Religion l. 48. Downam l. 2. Antichr granteth it was a note of a good Christian to cleave to the Romish and Apostolical Church and p. 103. l. Antichr he yieldeth to Bellarmine that S. Augustine and Victor Oticensis were of opinion to adhere to the Church of Rome was a mark of a true Catholick in those times Our Stars of the first magnitude as Luther in Epist against Anabap. saith we confess that all Christian good is in the Papacy and from them it came down to us and ibid. I say in the Papacy is the true Christianity yea the true Kernel of Christianity and on the 28 of Genes we confess the Church to be among the Papists for they have Baptism Absolution the Text of the Gospel c. and there are many godly men among them Calvin Instit l. 4. confesseth in the Roman Church in the deepest of her supposed errors there ever remained inviolabile foedus Dei the Covenant of God inviolable Doth not Bunny Whitaker Junius Zanrchius Seravia and almost all Protestants generally hold as much at least that we agree in fundamentals that the Roman Church is a true Church the Mother C-hurch A thousand of learned Reformists confess in general Antiquity and the Fathers are for the Roman Church Whence a learned Writer noteth in some things or other yea in every particular Controversy Protestants grant their Assertions and there is no assertion by the Papists defended but some of the reformed yield too and confess as of great reason and authority Magdeburgenses 4. Cent. dedicated to Queen Elizabeth ad Jacobum Regem that the first purest times of the Church taught Sacramental Confession Tradition Invocation of Saints Purgatory Mass a propitiatory Sacrifice Miracles obtained at the reliques of Saints Images in Churches for the first 200 and 300 years Concerning the Primacy that one must be Cheif in the Church is taught by Melancton Luther in loc com Couel in examen Jacobus Andreas related by Hospiuian Mr. Perkins Prob. p. 237. saith Appeals were often made out of Africa to Popes of Rome in primitive days Middleton Papist p. 39. that the first general Council of Nice taught the Dignity of Rome over the West Provinces and hold p. 200. Papias living in the time of the Apostles taught Peters Supremacy Field lib. Church saith the
Bohemia and Poland That imprisoned Mary Queen of Scots That authorized Mountebank and Rochel to stand in defiauce against their King That begot so many conspiracies against Queen Mary of England as appears in our Chronicles That ravished from their lawful Governours the Low Countries and Transylvania and many Towns now called free Was it from any of their Books you have drawn these vile Maximes viz. that the authority of the Soveraign Magistrate is of humane right That the People are above the King That the People can give Power to the Prince and take it away That Kings are not anointed of the Lord That if a King fail in performing his Oath at Coronation the Subjects are absolved from their allegiance That if Princes fall from the grace of God the people are loosed from their subjection Do not these doctrines proceed from Wickliffe Waldenses and other Sectaries Doth not Belforrest sufficiently prove the like maximes from Luther Calvin Melancton Peter Martir c. What Buchanan and Knox did against Queen Mary their lawful Soveraign is evident in History and Beza in Epist 78. ad Buchanan approves their actions Calvin l. 4. c. 3. Instit from his high Consistorian gives this absolution to all Oaths of that nature Quibuscunque hujus evangelii lux effulgeat ab omnibus laqueis juramentisque absolvitur And the famous Minister Surean called Rosiers writ a Book expresly that it was lawful to kill Charls the ninth and the Queen Mother if they would not obey the Gospel Belforrest is sufficient witness See more in Althusius Politicks c. 35. Dausus l. 6. Polit. c. 3. In all the Councils Synods writings of any Roman Divines no such matters are found and allowed but only such as teach Subjects loyalty humility obedience More Princes have been deposed by Sectaries in sixty years than by Papists in six hundred years and that deposing of Kings is no doctrine nor practice of Catholicks shall be proved hereafter and that others have been more faulty in each of their respective Sects in all kind of disorders at home or abroad History and experience testifie In no Country or City in Christendome but Catholick Religion ever entred by meekness and suffering in no Country of Christendome but other Sects entred by sedition rebellion disobedience or murdering of great Princes or Persons by vast destruction of Cities Countries Kingdomes As in France Holland several States in Germany Scotland twenty years in England c. Consider what was done against France Holland several States in Germany Mary Queen of Scots or the late unparallel'd Rebellion In Catholick Religion I find they learn their duty towards God cannot be complied with without an exact performance of their duty towards their Soveraign to obey him not for advantages or temporal concerns but out of Conscience For no Roman Catholick can be true to his Religion who is not true to his Prince Whom they obey for Conscience sake whose Person they love and honour and whose prosperity they always pray for Though stript of their Estates or loaden with stripes It is in the power of great ones to make them suffer but not to make them guilty Their Religion tells them that Caesar's due ought not to be kept from him be he of what religion he pleaseth This is the will of God in Scripture preached by the Apostles and from them derived to us this doctrine is instilled in their Catechisms confirmed by their Sermons and conferences Insomuch that a Papist that is not truly loyal is not truly a Papist if to believe not what they are taught by the Church makes a man cease to be of it From the Saxons to Edward the sixth to be a Catholick was never taken as a bar to loyalty Nor doth it seem possible a Religion which governed England with glory so many hundred years can teach a doctrine destructive to Princes or infuse Maximes that will breed Commotion in the People They are ready by Oath in the face of Heaven to profess loyalty a divine command and an indispensable duty and any who pretend to know what Catholick doctrine is must know this to be a part of it In matters of fact their actions have given indubitable testimonies even by their Enemies own Concessions If Catholicks had been disloyal either the King or his Council or at least the States-men under Cromwel or the Rump must know it They appeal to the Council in all discoveries of their Treacheries against the King whether ever any constant Catholick was accessary or concurred in any design against his Majesty They appeal and challenge all the black Catalogue of Cromwells favorites and the whole Rumpists to discover if they can any Papist who concurred in any plot or action If Catholicks refuse to go to Protestant Churches in respect of Conscience They will far more refuse for Conscience sake to commit Treason a sin of a higher degree will hardly attempt or consent to any desperate act against their State and Country and commit such Crimes as hazard Body and Soul Nay what other Sectaries will boggle at If the King should be a Heathen and make Laws against them they hold it not lawful to resist but peaceably to endure During the time of the late King of France there was proposed by an Assembly of Catholick Divines and Bishops this question or Probleme If it were supposed the King of France became a Mahometan and by his Power endeavoured to force his Subjects to that infidelity whether they might lawfully according to the Principles of Christianity by arms resist him to which question the unanimous consent of the Assembly was that such a resistance would be unlawful since Christian Religion allowed no other way of maintaining Faith against lawful Soveraigns but prayers tears and sufferings When shall we find such a result from a Synod of Presbyterians Compare these primtive Doctrines with new the Evangelists and we shall find them quite contrary to the rules of Wiâ—liffians Waldenses Paraeus Knox and Buchanan c. who teach that Subjects may not only defend by Arms their Religion but offend also And lately Baxter in lib. of Rest p. 258. saith we may fight against Kings if it were for cause of Religion to purge the Church from Idolatry and Superstition The Genova Notes of the Bible 2 Chron. c. 5. allow the deposing of Queen Macha See more in Belforrest On the contrary the Doctors and Casuists of the Roman Church hold it as an Article of Faith that neither Heresie nor Turcism can be opposed by Rebellion Belloy in Apol. part 2. plainly saith Arms against Princes have no warrant Orationibus tantum pugnandum Navar Cunerus and all other Catholick Doctors agree in the same as most conformable to the doctrine and practice of the Primitive Fathers The General Council of Constance Sess 5. concludes it an error in Faith to maintain Subjects may kill their Kings being Tyants nuper accepit Synodus c. Cardinal Tolet in his Summolies l. 3. c. 6. affirms
effects in his gentle protection to us of the Laws Lives and Liberties Every one quietly living under and possessing his own Vine without the least suspicion of being harrassed or disturbed as they were in the late times of Anarchie and Democracy And most Nations daily feel more heavy Yokes and exactions under their though moderate Governours In this where there is so much truth and justice to own it cannot be esteemed any Adulation but rather our duty to acknowledg Let 's study then to be quiet to fear God and honour the King and not spend our selves in national and trifling Disputes be so pragmatical econtrical and magisterail as to meddle with things above us by lying in lurking places watching and meditating Ambuscadoes for the downfall of those we ought to pray for It looks like a studied piece of malice to be so angry one with another for Religion our own Nation and Natives as Hypocrates was with the Persians who refused to give them Physick or heal their Maladies when they sent for him Gold is the best mettal and 't is also most ductile and malleable If you are Englishmen of generous dispositions and of a golden nature you will be pliable to be advised and aim at nothing but your own and the Nations happiness What though every pin in the Sanctuary doth not stand point size as you would have it must all Europe eccho with your bellowings must an unwarrantable Covenant or pretence of Spirit hinder our cementing and soddering together do you think like Sea-Pies to rise by going against the wind or which is worse to rise by the fall of your Brethren and fellow Christians do you think to flourish in your private capacities must the publick suffer You know the Apologue the Members conspired against the Belly and were starved themselves 'T is impossible but private interest must sink when publick falls You are not such strangers in our Israel as to be ignorant how the waters have swelled the winds blew the waves have beaten against the ship of the whole Kingdom You well know what Confederacies and Combinations are abroad against our Tranquillity Gabel Ammon Ameleck all are bent upon our ruine Is this a time to cavil one with another dispute in triflles when Hannibal hath been so lately at your gates What makes ye now again so inveterate to preach down Charity to curse O ye Meroz to stand so stifly upon in a rash and false censuring of your Brethren Is this thy Kindness to thy Friend as Absolon said to Hussey Is this your love to your native Country that you had rather barbaras has segetes that the Satyrs should dance here and Forreigners should inhabit our dwellings rather than you will come short of your wills What makes you now so spleenish have you felt the shaving of Selymus his Beard or been subject to Neroes or Dioclesians who would threaten to mingle your blood with your Sacrifices Whose Ox or Ass was taken from him Why should you grudg at Papists peace and protection when they give no just occasion to violate yours Is it not a meer piece of Sophistry or Satanical stratagem if any thing be amiss still to cast all the odium and imputation upon them like those Heathens that sent the Christians to the Lyons if Nilus did not swell high enough to make their fields fruitful or if their legions miscarried in the field So unhappy are they if their Teeth must be â—et on edge as oft as the people eat sowr grapes When Pirrhus proposed to himself to win Rome Sicily and Carthage Cyneus asked him what he would do at last Pirrhus said be merry Cyneus replied So you may be already if you would be contented with what you have I must like another Cyneus tell you if you would rest satisfied with that spatious liberty allowed you already you may be as religious as you will who hinders you Why should you murmur at the least indulgency to others that are as studious of a virtuous life as your selves Why should you then still suspect Popery and Superstition and cry to Magistrates for Oppression to others Charity thinketh no evil It is a strong suspition where there is no evident cause of such Envy it doth rather proceed from or argue guilt Thus we are still afraid of shadows and by our active fancies frame such Chimera's of danger which have no footing in nature Like untoward and unhappy Children help forward to our own affliction As the perfidiousness of the Donatists and Manichees in Hippo by their surmised jealousies were the cause it was made a pray to the Vandals Thus having proved that the Doctrine and Principles of Roman Catholicks are not repugnant to any Government whatsoever but very consonant to all moral and pious living and Christian peace and society I shall now in the sequent Chapters search without partiality and with all sincerity into the depth and bottom of the usuall and common aspersions mistakes and objections so often and undeservedly cast in their teeth taking measures of their manners actions c. without any due regard or examination CAP. X. Sheweth how widely we are deceived in our undue measures and censures I Am not so unadvised as to think their innocence stands in need of my pen since it 's strong enough to rescue it self from the usual accusations and tempestuous Hurricanoâ—s of Calumnies groundlesly imputed Yet being by justice and title of this Apology obliged to this duty my chief design in this Treatise being true Charity I shall speak more freely and candidly to justifie the innocent to remove that popular odium to allay that plebeian passion to wipe away such impious Stains Maculations and polluted Characters and take away those unjust jealousies and rectifie those unlearned prejudices which by so many are taken up and urged daily against them Whereby Christian Charity according to the Gospel our Profession and promise in Baptism by which we are graduated Christians may be maintained that we as true Servants of our great Master may wear the Badg and Livery of Unity Peace and Concord Suppositions and meer conjectures have been the best measures that most have taken of them their Prâ—ctices Principles or Doctrines Whatever is said of Papists is generally believed how aâ—e they traduced what Stories are told of Popes how many things of the whole body of Catholicks and all taken for Gospel yet have no solid foundation of truth in them Whence one of our English Church truely noteth saying We heighten little things of concern to Religion to make them odious fill Books with trivial Stories and Fables pick'd out of Authors without any discretion make it our business to seek out Calumnies and Reproaches which good Authors cannot furnish us with in the sepulchres and common shoars of Schismaticks of private and disavowed persons Controversies in our time saith Doctor Field are grown so many in number and in nature so intricate that few have time and leisure fewer strength and
ages she hath had some glorious company professing her Religion even in points their adversaries now impugne There makes for them all that may or can be of any Christian man required Literal Text of holy Scripture approved Tradition general Councils ancient Fathers Ecclesiastical Histories Christian Laws Conversion of Nations divine miracles heavenly Visions Vnity Vniversality Antiquity Succession their true Mission Ordination c. all Monuments all Substance all accidents of Christianity No wit of man can find out Arguments more convincing in themselves the truth of Religion than plain Texts and literal Sense of holy Writ the infallible Decrees of Church and general Councils the indubitable Writings and unanimous consent of ancient Fathers the credible Histories of all times and places and often the common light of Nature and Reason it self And ad hominem for prevention of all evasions no victory more certain no objection more unanswerable than the plain confession of their adversaries themselves The Volumes of Fathers and Councils in the eldest and purest times be so clear in themselves for Romish Faith that the primest and most learned Reformists studying the same are enforced through evidence of their words and deeds to acknowledg as Master Bierly in King James's time produceth clear testimonies If that Church erred or changed by little and little or that the true Church was invisible c. they require some humane reason to shew it catigorically In what time in what Articles what Pope changed what tumults rise thereupon what Councils withstood c. which in all innovations they can shew easily a total change and in what particular points as by Arrians Sabellians Donatists Pelagians Protestants c. What places what Countries changed with them what Catholicks set against them what kept the old paths To say the Church was extinct a thousand years or unknown is expresly against the Scripture Christs Promises and Providence and Reason it self If the Church were invisible whether should Gentiles address for their Conversion or the doubtful for resolution or all faithful for their direction was our Saviour who was promised to all Nations brought to that streight that he had not a visible Chappel reserved to him in the whole world Is it not good reason God would preserve his Church which he had planted and watered with his Blood Is it not a denyal of Gods Providence and to say Jesus Christ was unjust or an Impostor to oblige all men to indispensible obedience to her if erroneous or invisible if men were changed into beasts they may be thus perswaded Is not the Church compared to a City to a Light to the Sun c. can the Church which is a Sun be drawn into a chinâ—k or all her Beams into the center of a Burning-glass Can any Proposition be more reasonable than to ask of those who maintain a thing to be in former ages to produce some marks thereof to shew where they had a being or a Company successively holding the same Articles with them The Building is perpetual where God layeth the Foundation The Church is the Pillar of truth 1 Tim. 3. cannot err Irenaeus l. 3. c. 4. Mat. 28. Act. 3. Go teach all Nations and I am with you all days to the consummation John 17. Father keep them in â—hy name whom thou hast given me See his Petition to keep his Church gathered of all Nations and his continual protection I will give you another Comforâ—â—â— â—o aâ—iâ—e with you for ever John 16. When the spirit of truth cometh he shall â—â—ach you all truth This assistaâ—ce promisâ—d was ever in all ages no Heresie or Jew could ever prevail against it The guard and strength of Truth in point also of antiquity is ever such that she resteth still accompanied attended and fortified with surest friends strongest towers and best munition Priority and ancestry is so specially affected by the Wisdom of God and maligned by the enemy of man that in first planting the Church it s said Mat. 4. 13 24 25. 5. Mat. 13 17. Luk. 8. 12. that he first sowed good seed in the field and after the enemie came and oversowed Cockle not obscurely intimating true Faith and Religion that is good seed was first and ancient to Sects and Heresies Even as temporal nobility is most honourable which is derived from the aâ—cientest Blood and in earthly possessions that Title strongest which pleadeth longest prescription or ancientest evidence So it cannot be denied but truth was before falshood substance before shadows the Gospel Faith Religion c. which is first and eldest is only the true Gospel Faith Church and other Congregations afterwards arising or going out from thence are only malignant inventions of the enemy In which respect to find out truth in all occurring difficulties we are specially forewarned to recurre to antiquity to suspect novelty Moses Deut. 32. before his death leaving documents to the Children of Israel saith Remember the old days ask thy Father c. so Bildab Jobs friend 1 Job 8. advised him in greatest extremities ask the old generation and search diligently Solom Eccl. 9. 8. 11 12. let not the â—â—rration of the ancient escape thee c. and Jer. c. 16. stand upon the ways and ask the old paths which is the good way c. on the contrary God reproveth such as walk in a way not trodden and Solomons lesson is Transgress not the ancient bounds which thy Father hath put So Saint Paul to Timothy to keep the Depositum avoiding profane novelties It 's very ordinary with the Fathers to confute Hereticks by their innovation So Tertullian reproveth Novelists of his time saying to them who are you when and from whence came you what do you in my grounds by what right Marcion didst thou cut down my woods by what licence Valentine dost thou overthrow my Fountains c. It is my possession long since I possessed it I possessed it first So Saint Hierom. of the Luciferians Why do you go about after four hundred years to teach that we knew not before until this day the world was Christian without that Doctrine So Athan. confuteth the Arrians Saint Hilarie and Saint Aug. Donatists These reasons may induce us to take new measures of that ancient Church and may easily perswade persons as Doctor Taylor in his Treatise of Liberty of Prophecying of much reason and more piety to retain that which they know to have been the Religion of their forefathers especially when her Soveraign Rights Titles and Prerogatives are admitted and acknowledged by her professed enemies Whence Chillingworth confesseth that Protestants cannot with coherence to their own grounds require of others the belief of any thing besides Scripture and the plain irrefragable and indubitable consequences of it without most high and schismatical presumption Dr. Bramh. Reply p. 264. We do not saith he hold our 39 Articles to be such necessary truths extra quas non est salus without which there is no salvation nor enjoin ecclesiastical
disloyalty from them that have freely taken them and none in Catholicks that have refused For the Oaths by none more readily taken and earnestly imposed on others than by those who began the Wars and promoted the Covenant and on the contrary by none more scrupled and refused than by those who always assisted the King ¶ Thirdly it may be objected as lately by Doctor Denton c. That Papists suffer not for Religion but because they are not obedient to the Laws c. Resp 1. By a Proviso of the Act 25 and 27. of Eliz. if any Priest committed shall submit to the Laws and take the Oaths they shall be freed from the penalty and not adjudged Traytors if they renounce their Religion Resp 2. Suppose that in the Apostles time a Law had been made by any King or Emperour of a contrary Religion to them that if any of the said Apostles or Priests should enter into their Dominions to preach a contrary Doctrine to to the Religion there received and to exercise any of their Apostolical or Priestly Functions it should be treason and under pain of death Would or could the Apostles have obeyed those Laws or did they obey the Governours of the Jews their lawful Superiours when they commanded them to preach no more in the name of Jesus Christ or to disperse Christian Doctrine which they held for Treason or did they fly out of their Dominions lest their sufferings should be imputed to disobedience and not for the name of Christ Is there not another blood to be respected called by the Prophet the blood of the Soul whereof the Pastor shall be guilty if he fly for fear or forsake his flock in time of danger and persecution Have not the English Priests the same Obligation of Conscience to help their Country-men in spiritual necessities as had the Apostles and Apostolick men to strangers for whose help they were content to offer their lives and incur any danger whatsoever ¶ Fourthly It may be demanded why cannot Papists come to our Churches Resp Unity and Vniformity are two things one being internal the other external therefore if they should conform yet they can have no verity faith or truth but as forced by which Religion is never better'd Truth and falshood are like the clay in Nebuchadonosors Image they may cleave but they will never incorporate Christ's Coat had no seam though the Churches vesture was of divers colours whence a learned Father saith in veste varietas sit scissura non sit The true God hath this attribute that he is a jealous God and therefore his worship and religion will endure no mixture or partner ¶ Fifthly To say or object the Popes Supremacy is dangerous This reflects not only upon the honour of Catholicks but the safety of all the Professors of it They acknowledg the Pope as Successor to Saint Peter is head of the Church and hath supream Authority in matters spiritual but how this can be offensive to the Temporalities of Princes is not understood by me nor those great Monarchs that are of his Church and submit to his authority and and yet are zealous and jealous of their own power and temporal Regalities as any Princes can possible be Our graver and more learned Divines distinguish between the inward power of the Keys and the outward jurisdiction by temporal penalties this they assign to the King in all causes and over all persons that they reserve to the Clergy as neither derived from or dependent of the Civil Magistrate And if I rightly understand the Religion of the English Church although they allow the King to be supream Governour of their Church yet they do not confer any Pastoral Office or Jurisdiction upon him and consequently he is one of the Flock and therefore as such he is subject to Pastors Wherefore if this be not looked on by Protestants as derogatory to the Kings authority I hope by the same reason Roman Catholicks will not be found guilty for owning the Popes Supreamacy in matters meerly spiritual There can be no just fear or jealousie that spiritual jurisdiction should supplant secular obedience because the Church-Discipline in it self is so innocent and passive We our selves acknowledg a spiritual authority in the Bishops promise a Canonical obedience to them and not to the King admit Jurisdiction in their spiritual Courts c. nay the Presbyterians in their Consistory and ecclesiastical Courts will allow the King no authority at all more than the meanest Subject and so do other Sects Now if a Subject v. g. the Bishop of Canterbury may be supream in Spirituals without any derogation to the Prince may not the Pope with less danger and inconvenience be truely called as King James did the Patriarch or Superintendent of the West For if that power be purely spiritual being of a different nature as is said before it cannot in the least degree be prejudicial to the Kings civil power but rather oblige those that acknowledg it faithfully to obey the King Therefore it ought to be no obstacle to Toleration otherwise no Christians or Sect whatsoever ought to be tolerated for let them be Presbyterians Independents Anabaptists c. do not they depend upon and own a power distinct from his Majesties Civil Power I mean a Power meerly spiritual or pastoral not subordinate to the King but to which the King himself if he be of your Religion ought to be subject as no Pastor but a Sheep no Teacher but a Hearer no Administer of Sacraments but a Receiver Such a Power all Sects and Religions seem to own no Catholick depends on or can own more The spirituall Primacy of the chief Pastor preserves peace and unity and is a greater defence to them than many Armies in subduing their minds to civil obedience without such a spiritual authority there is no influence on the people all preaching and Laws are but shaking Bulwarks to support Monarchy No Kingdom hath been more happy at home or glorious abroad than when the Pope was their spirituall Father When such a Primacy purely spiritual was acknowledged in England the Church here was never torn in pieces with Schismes nor poisoned with Heresies the honour and safety of our Dominions were far from being prejudiced or invaded It is denied then the owning Supremacy should worse their condition shall notions convince experience when a demonstration it self often gives way to practice Let 's summon the Kings of Europe of Catholick Profession to decide the contrary unanimously and proclaim their people are not rebellious by reason of any ecclesiastical dependance abroad Roman Catholicks did ever renounce any temporal power or jurisdiction belonging to the Pope over any Subject of his Majesties But since there is a Power purely spiritual as is shewed before from which Princes are not exempted Is it not more for their temporal security that the spiritual power should reside in one single person that usually is both learned and discreet and withal is a thousand
miles removed than in many thousand within his own Kingdom not all of them Angels The King of France esteems it a priviledg granted him in a Concordate by the Pope that no particular Bishop should have power in any case to excommunicate him Never was there greater supporters to the Crown than English Catholicks have been ever against the least encroachment offered by the Bishop of Rome himself as it is to be seen in the Statâ—t Laws of King Richard the Second wherein you find in many businesses the Pope was interessed the Roman Catholicks flatly denying the Crown of England to be subject to any immediately but to God yet acknowledged in the very same Parliament the Bishop of Rome's spiritual Jurisdiction And Bishop Bilson in his Defence between Christ and Antichrist brings in the Parliament consisting then altogether of Roman Catholicks expressing their loyalty to their Soveraign Prince in these words we will with our said Soveraign the King and his said Crown and Regality in cases aforesaid and in all other cases attempted against Him his Crown or Dignity in all points live and dye p. 3. p. 243. And in Holinshed 2. Volume of the last Edition p. 309. we find in the Reign of King Edward the First all the Catholick Lords assembled in Lincolne in Parliament in the name of all estates did answer the Popes right to judg c. that they would not consent their King should do any thing tending to the disinheriting of the Crown or right of England And that it was never known and consequently never practised that the King of this Land had answered or ought to answer for their rights in the said Realm before any Judg ecclesiastical or secular Yet at the same time they stiled Pope Boniface the high Bishop of the Roman universal Church and themselves his devout sons c. Therefore Catholick Religion hath no headship prejudicial to temporal Supremacy If this were a Check to the Glory of Kings why do the Kings of France Spain Poland Portugal the Emperour and other great Princes in Germany uphold it and glory in it the Duke of Savoy with the Florentine and the rest of Italian Princes living under the Popes Nose absolute and arbitrary in their Dominions dispute with Sword in their hand for their Temporalities And for the Catholick Church in England in Catholick times Stat. 25. Edward 3. Statut. 16. Richard did not admit the Pope's deposing power in temporals made it a preeminence to appeal to Rome or to submit to a Legates jurisdiction without the Kings License or on the Popes summons to go out of the Kingdom or receive any mandates or brief from Rome or purchase Bulls for Preserments to Churches c. and the reason was given because the Crown of England is free from earthly subjection and immediately subject to God Our Catholick Lords of England have in the name of the whole Body made oft protestations of eternal fidelity to the King and renouncing all dependance of any forreign power that can any way be prejudicial to him Many Protestations Professions Declarations have been printed by several Catholicks that no authority on earth can absolve them from their necessary and natural Allegiance and that his fidelity was a duty of their Religion have made and will be ready to give all security of peaceable obedience and sincere integrity that any words or actions can confirm But you will object and say they allow a power in the Pope to excommunicate Princes and thence follows a train of pernicious consequences of deposing raising his Subjects against him c. Resp That the power of Excommunication is indeed necessarily annexed to the pastoral Function and therefore to be allowed in the cheife Bishop over his Flock But they deny and renounce any further extent of that power unto those things which appertain to Caesar 5 and therefore they declare as firmly that notwithstanding any such excommunication they will bear true faith to our Prince and him maintain and defend against all opposers whatsoever You may again object the Council of Lateran decreed Princes that savoured Hereticks after admonition given the Pope might discharge the Subjects from allegiance and give away the Kingdom to some Catholick to root out Heresie Resp 1. Councils are not infallible in every point even in matter of fact and other Constitutions not concerning faith or doctrine being but human Laws are changeable and oft admit exceptions 2. Council's Ordinations are to be taken according to the prudent meaning of the Legislators which bear another sense than the words taken lye In this case suppose the Emperours of the East and West Kings of England France Hungary Hierusalem Cyprus Arragon c. agree together to purge their Kingdoms of Heresies and upon forfeiture the Church should give their Dominions to another that will perform their Compact these Princes being present by their Embassadors at the Councils and what was there done was done by their consent The Albigensian Heresie beginning to be so numerous and even dangerous those Monarches thought themselves in no worse a condition for that decree nor did any Catholick King since complain or protest against this Council for it 3. Note the Decrees of some Councils not received or acknowledged universally by the Catholick Church are not obligatory but that which is principally to be considered is that in the Decree of this Lateran under Innocent the Third it is ordained not Supream Princes but temporales potestates dominos which bear Offices in States and Kingdoms to take Oaths to root out all Hereticks under the penalty of being denounced to be deprived of their Estates c. yet reserving the right of the supream Lord. 4. This pretended Article of Faith hath been disclaimed by a world of unquestionable Catholicks and all allegations confuted by learned Authors of our Nation Doctor Bistop writ a Book purposely against it 5. No proof can be given that it was ever received or executed by any Catholick Kingdom out of Italy The reason is because those decrees were never published by Pope Innocent nor a Copy of them extant either in the body of the Councils or Vatican Library or elsewhere till a certain German three hundred years after said he found them in a Manuscript compiled he knows not by whom 6. By testimony of all Historians at that time Pope Innocent suffered in Reputation having convoked so many Prelates to no purpose 60 Capitula were recited in the Assembly and many penned in a stile as if they had been concluded but nothing at all could plainly be decreed no Conciliary determinations made but one or two viz. about the recovery of the holy Land and subjection of the Greek Church to the Roman for a War began then between them of Pisa and Genua which called the Pope from the Council 7. Be it granted a conciliary decree it is so far from looking like an Article of Faith which saith Bellarmine and Canus may easily be discovered by
honesty It would fill a volume it self to recount all the benefits priviledges honours and advantages this Nation hath received from the Popes and See of Rome See Bishop Smith in his Epist Histor ad regem Jacobum of the Pope's favours to England Hence our first Protestant Archbishop of Canterbury Parker in Eliz. lib. antiq Britan. ait hanc insulae nobilitatem atque gloriam Dei providentiae atque beneficentiae c. The nobleness of this Island for being the first of all Provinces of the World that received the Christian Faith and the glory thereof is to be acknowledged to have proceeded from the providence and goodness of God yet the way it self and means by which this nobility and glory was won unto it it was first and always laid open unto us from the See of Rome we have always from that time persevered in the unity of the Roman Faith and our subjection to the Roman Church is most ancient Haec ille Abbot Fecknam in his Oration to the Parliament of the first of Eliz. saith thus Damianus and Fugatianus as Embassadours from the See of Rome did bring into this Realm a thousand four hundred years past the very same Apostolical Religion we are now in possession of For then the Roman Religion was not voted down he would not have dared to have uttered in that time and place but that he could produce good witness and antiquity to his warrant Let not now their Adversaries be so unreasonable as to quote Mariana Suarez or Bellar. or any other private Author that may have enlarged the jurisdiction of Popes to the prejudice of Kings and then lay their particular Opinions to the charge of all For were this a just and fair way of dealing they could with as much ease requite them with Text for Text out of Luther Calvin Knox Buchanan and many more whose Opinions are at least as dangerous to the safety of Monarchy The difference betwixt them being only this whereas the former lodge the deposing power in the Pope only whose person is at a safe and sufficient distance at least from us the latter bring the danger home to the doors of Princes and place it in the people whom they make both judges and parties in the case Secondly Mariana's personal fault and his opinion were condemned by a Provincial Council of the same Society held at Paris 15 16. and that confirmation ratified by Claudius Aquaviva the General of the Order and the Doctors of Sorbon in the same year declared it an ungodly position Thirdly Mariana was not resolute in that opinion neither but handled it problematically Fourthly It was not for deposing of Kings but Tyrants which alters the case In France 1614. a Book written by Suarez against the Oaths in which the deposing power was asserted was by Decree of the Parliament of Paris condemned to be burnt by the publick Executioner as containing scandalous seditious positions c. and Armandus Cotton Front and Symond four chief Jesuits were to take order their General should renew a prohibition to teach like Doctrines and the whole Order after disavowed them Eight Universities viz. Paris Valentia Tholouse Poicteirs Burdeaux Burges Reims and Caen did of their own accord not expecting a command from the Court 1626. brand this Doctrine of Pope's deposing power with titles of impious seditious infamous c. And Fossart of the Society in a publick Act advancing the proposition although it was interpreted to extend only to Tyrants by decree of the whole University of Caen the Proposition and Expositions were censured impious and condemned Fossart imprisoned and sentenced bareheaded to acknowledg the said positions false and contrary to the decrees of Councils c. But to silence all impertinent objections in this nature or in any other matter they declare to the whole world that no private authors but only the Decisions of lawful general Councils have any influence upon their Faith or Doctrin in any point whatsoever Therefore if their adversaries will conclude any thing against them from their own Principles they must do it from their own proper uncontradicted confession or from the Decrees of General Councils from which they only take the Rule of their Faith The Project of the Gunpowder Treason undertaken only by a few male-contents in justice might rather be burned in oblivion with the offenders than objected perpetually to innocent men who abhor the fact and were publickly acquitted thereof by the King himself in the Parliament following See the Kings Speeches That the Catholick Body had no hand in this Treason appears by the quality of the actors and number of them being but four Gentlemen The Catholick Noblemen then were the most considerable of the Nation their first Marquess viz. Winchester The first Earl viz. Arundel Their first Vicount viz. Mountague Their first Baron viz. Abergaveny c. Now none of these or any chief of the party had any intrigue in the design though all imaginable industry was used by the Commons Lords and Privy Council and by Cecil their plotting enemy to bring them in Therefore to call this an universal Popish plot is in it self a contradiction because no plot can be looked on as geneneral when no number of the chiefest part are intrigued in the design If then some four necessitous or loose persons have been of the Gun-powder Treason to infer thence all other of the same profession are of the same stamp Do not all rational men see this inference is irrational That it may be retorted against any other profession in England in other things Is it not unreasonable and uncharitable to infer from thence an imputation upon all others Can any one in his right senses accuse the whole Church of England for incestuous or drunkards because some of them have been guilty of those crimes Stow Chron. p. 882. noteth by many factious people it was given out this Treason was attempted by consent of the King of Spain French King and Archduke Catesby at his Death said the plot and practice of this Treason was only his and that others were but his assistants saith Stow. And the Council perceived it was practiced by some discontented Papist Staw 879. many untruths were divulged hoping to have drawn into their rebellion those of their Religion and other malecontents In all their examinations none else were discovered though they revealed several secret particulars as is seen in their printed confessions they would not have spared others seeing they accused their Confessour Garnet saith Stow Provincial of the Jesuits for concealing it in confession only was executed Acknowledged to God his offence was heartily sorry asked God and the King forgiveness and beseeched God to bless the King and his issue exhorted all Catholicks not to attempt any Rebellion or Treason c. for all such courses said he are utterly against Catholick Faith and Religion Vide Stow. To find out the depth of the plot they left no stone unrolled to shew how nice they
affect Whence Master Howes in his Hist makes relation A great Protestant had more or not much inferiour knowledg of it than some that were put to death for concealing it Thus the crimes of a few miserable wretches necessitous and loose persons are perpetually objected to the innocent and made their guilt though by none more detested than themselves but how unreasonable and how great a solecism it is in Christianity to conclude all guilty of every horrid crime which some few are known to have perpetrated none but injudicious furies and such as in some measure may deserve to be ranged in the categories of fools or mad-men but must needs acknowledg And unless we will renounce all charity justice and humanity we must not impute particular mens actions either of this or other matters to Catholick Religion and for their faults expose them to common hatred and violence For in common sense if Catholicks refuse to go to Church in respect of Conscience they will far more refuse Treason to attempt or consent to any desperate act against our Countrey or State or commit such sins as hazard both body and soul O but bloody Queen Mary O what cries against the days of Queen Mary as if her cruelty were unparallell'd when it plainly appears to any impartial inquirer that more Catholicks have died by Protestants than of them by Papists and that since the exclusion of the Pope there hath been a greater quantity of blood judicially spilt among us on the score of Religion than from the Conversion of England to Hen. 8. Why do we then cry out like men in the fit of fury of the bloody Papists It s suspition some radicated hatred obfuscates our intellect as the Poet saith Impedit ira animum nec potest cernere verm Queen Mary put none to death but by the known Laws established many hundred years before the malefactors were born and which are still used to this day by Protestants against Hereticks None were then put to death but by virtue of antient Laws of Christian Emperours and Kings of England therefore not the Queen nor Bishops but the Law was cruel yet the said Laws are still in force still continue and were made use of since the Reformation by Elizabeth and King James to burn Hereticks in their time as Stow and Baker note Why did King James put Legat and Wightman to death but because he religiously thought it unfit they should live any longer to blaspheme why did Queen Elizabeth 1587. hang Coppinger and Thacker at Saint Edmundsbury for publishing Brown's Book saith Cambden which saith Stow p. 1174. was written against the Common Prayer I will not apologize for any extravagancies done by our predecessors in the beginning of Reformation He that will judg let him lay his hand on his own breast and examine what he would do in this condition Suppose he were of a Religion he thought the whole visible Church from age to age delivered to his ancestors and saw Profess'd in all Kingdoms Suppose then the preaching of two or three men base in rank and taxt in moralities broaching forth new and dangerous opinions to Church and State obstinately and would not be silenced by any satisfactory means would he think it then cruelty to put Laws in execution against such novelties the consequences whereof proved seditious and rebellious as is seen in History There died of the Reformists in the the whole but two hundred seventy seven as Baker in Queen Mary p. 467. and Speed in Queen Mary p. 833. and other Protestant Writers record And were there two hundred of those now living they would suffer for extravagancies and perpetrated villanies as most of those did in the voluminous Legend of Fox stuffed with Wicliffians and Waldenses whom Philip Melancton and other Protestants disown with Tinkers Coblers Butchers Taylors and prating Wives very few of them put to death on the score of Religion as the Records testifie Cranmer and Ridley so much spoken of were attainted of Treason defending the Title to the Lady Jane Cranmer being a Counsellor in the business and Ridley Bishop of London preaching a Sermon for it at St. Pauls Cross the Sunday after King Edward died So Cranmer was condemned of Treason and arraigned with the Lady Jane He was also an Instrument of divorce to bring Anna Bullein to the Kings appetite and afterward he and Cromwel the chief actors for her death as p. 3. Statut. 28. Hen. 8. c. 1. where Cranmers Sentence is recorded judicially as of his own knowledg convincing her of the foul fact Or if there were some at that time put to death for their conscience only which can hardly be proved and that there was no faction exteriour disobedience or innovation in the case yet they could not be properly Protestant Martyrs because they suffered before the thirty nine Articles or Church of England was established Reformed Historians viz. Bishop Goodman Baker Speed c. do agree Queen Mary was a marvellous good Woman had many troubles Cranmer and Ridley with a thousand more set up as busie as Bees against her when she was to be invested in her Rights Reformists would not receive her as their Queen but upon condition as Suffolke people nor assist her without Indentures Stow annal p. 1064. nor acknowledg her but upon such and such terms yet her Right was indubitable How Wars were waged against her by the Dukes of Northumberland and Suffolke Bills spread abroad and several treacherous practices contrived against her and her Dignity by Archbishop Cranmer see Stow Annal. printed 1592. p. 1039 1042 c. What great commotions and insurrections were made against her by Wiat on the score of Religion How Towns and Castles were taken and held out against her by Stafford p. 1047. ibid. How Daggers were throâ—n and Guns shot off at Priests of her Religion whiles they were preaching at Pauls Cross viz. Doctor Pendleton and Master Bourne How many treasonable Books writ against her after she came to the Crown by Goodman insomuch that more open rebellion and insurrection was in five years of her short Government from such as were not affected to her Religion than Queen Elizabeth had from Catholicks in forty years vide Stow 1039 1058. How plain and sincere her Government was how free from tricks and such strains of Policy as were afterward used is manifest to all the world How just was she if severe for a time that severity was necessary not only by the judgment of Parliament which a little before had enacted the Laws on which she proceeded and before which she acted nothing in that kind but also in respect of her own safety and of the State And to vindicate their Clergy let all the Canons of the Church be examined and searched if there be one to be found that justifies the shedding of blood simply on the account of Religion That She was withal a merciful Princess is evidenc'd by the compassion shew'd to such as deserved not
well of her as the Dutchess of Sommerset to Sir John Cheeke to Sir Edward Mountague Lord chief Justice who had subscribed and counselled her disinheriting to Sir Roger Cholmey to the Marqness of Northampton to the Lord Robert Dudley to Sir Henry Dudley to Sir Henry Gates c. who stood attainted and the Duke of Suffolke all obnoxious to her Justice she knew very well neither affected her Religion nor Title they being her prisoners in the Tower she released them all But for all this the Zealots of her time would not be quieted they libel against the Government of Women they pick quarrels and murmur at her Marriage they publish invectives and scurrilous Pamphlets against Religion yet forbear not to plot and conspire her deprivation Goodman writ a pernitious Book to have her put to death William Thomas a Gospeller conspires to Out of Fox his Martyrs kill the Queen and when hanged said he died for his Country Stow in Queen Mary p. 1056. On the contrary in Queen Elizabeths time although Catholicks then were the chief Ministers in Church and State and might have used indirect means against her she being of a contrary Religion and not of so clear a Title yet Catholick Bishops who set the Crown upon her head are commended by Holinshed a Prot. Hist ann Eliz. 26. pag. 1358 1360. for peaceable quiet Bishops and the Catholick temporal Lords there by him recorded to be far from opposing themselves against her interest as they are said there to offer her Majesty in her defence to impugne and resist any â—orreign force though it should come from the Pope himself Insomuch that they are commended by Holinshed for loyalty and obedience And Stow testifies how diligent Catholicks were to offer their service in that great action 88. neither were they altogether refused by her Majesty How the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury and Chancellour of England Doctor Heath a Catholick Bishop instead of inveighing against her or casting forth of Libels as Cranmer did against Q. Mary her entrance and Government made a publick oration in her behalf to perswade the people to obedience and to acknowledg her power and authority Holin ib. 1170. whence the said Archbishops faithfulness was left to commendation also by Protestant Bishop Goodman in his Catalogue of Bishops How all Catholick Lords and Bishops repaired to London to proclaim her Queen who not long after turned them out of several Offices and Bishopricks Holinshed p. 1171. To use Cambdens own words and phrase the world stood Cambdens Britann p. 163. amazed and England groaned at it what would flesh and blood move him to was it not strange in the beginning to behold Abbies destroyed Bishopricks gelded Chaunteries Hospitals Colledges turned to profaneness change of Liturgies Rites c. to see people renounce their pious vows such unexpected alterations it being a pitiful thing as Stow saith to hear the Lamentations in the Country for religious Houses Stâ—w p. 964. Notwithstanding the loyalty and obedience of Catholicks towards her appeared undeniable in all things not only in their humble petitions but by their constant and general conformity unto her temporal Government in 88. and by their Protestations made at Ely 1588. as by other offers made to the Lord North the Queens Lieutenant there and by their just actions afterwards by their submission as to the Lords of the Privy Council and profession of all due acknowledgment to her Majesty notwithstanding the Sentence of Excommunication Whence the Author of Execution of English Justice acknowledges their obedience and loyalty to Elizabeth in a time when they wanted no matter of complaint Any man of candour and integrity may easily convince the vulgar error the unevenness of Queen Elizabeths nature and severity to that of Queen Marys Queen Elizabeth made new Laws against Catholicks and put them to death for not embracing a new heresie which has been condemned to the fire here and in all other Christian Countries She embrued her hands in the blood royal of Mary Stewart lawful Heir to the Crown put to death many noble persons by their blood to colour her Supremacy raised up upstarts Hereticks from nothing annihilated the antient Nobility and Gentry c. to use a Protest Historiographers words the bloody practices of Queen Eliz. if not so barbarous in appearance though more wicked in substance as being exhibited under the colour and pretext of Law in the starving and racking so many innocent worthy learned persons tearing out their hearts and bowels in publick view upon suborned witnesses base vagabond and perjured Catchpoles hired to swear Neither was there any reason then for persecution on the account of the Catholicks misdemeanours For as Cambden her own Historiographer noteth The reason of the penal Statutes in Eliz. was 1. the opinion of the Queens Illegitimation abroad 2. Jealousies had of the Queen of Scots her nearness to the Crown 3. the Bull of Pius 5. 4. the doubt of the house of Guise in behalf of their Neece 5. the offence given to the King of Spain in assisting Orange These causes induced the Queen with her Pauculi intimi saith Cambden We cannot excuse the persecution therefore under Queen Elizabeth against Catholicks for any cause given by them or just fear of their fidelity nor from the example of Christian Emperours and Kings that both for zeal of Religion and human policy to avoid danger of Rebellion made Laws and Statutes against Hereticks and innovators of the antient faith and sense of Scripture which descended to them by Tradition from the Apostles Queen Elizabeth taking a contrary way made Laws and Statutes against the ancient Religion and known sense of Gods word delivered from age tâ— age which practice destroys the order of Justice to persecute Christians for professing a Religion confirmed by the publick testimony and practice of the Christian world from the first propaâ—â—tion of Christianity to this present tâ—â—e No part of their Dectrine being â—â—er judged an heresie or novelty by antiquity otherwise they had not escaped the rigour of penal Laws made against Hereticks and Novelists in former ages But no History did or can ever mention any person that suffered as an Heretick for broaching or maintaining any one point which they now believe and profess Whereas Q. Mary her predecessors Emperours and Kings punished Novelists only that made Religons of their own heads condemneâ— as Hereticks by the Church in ancient times The disparity therefore was great Catholick Princes standing as defenders of their ancient Faith others as invaders and introducers of a new Belief They seek to keep what de jure they had Calvinists what they had not they possessors of the traditum and depositum left by Christ and his Apostles others descissors and injurious infringers of those Apostolick tyes and regulations so carefully delivered to all posterity Laws indeed have been made in Catholick Countries very severe against those the Church calleth Hereticks but they were none of the Churches
present Age no Sectaries can be lawful Witnesses for their own lately modelled Religion or against the ancient Catholick because their testimonies cannot be valid against so constant an universal Tradition and practice Secundo It s ridiculous and unjust in a Judge to pronounce sentence against Roman Catholick upon the evidence and testimony of Calvin Luther c. as in open Court to condemn men to forfeit their Estates and ancient inheritances upon the word of a mad fellow that produceth no other evidence to confirm his claim but interior motions of the Spirit or some obscure Text of Law appliable to all Cases and Subjects for all the Protestant evidence is reduced to the private Spirit and the pretended clearness of Scripture Tertio The Legislative power ought to be subordinate to Christian Religion but Statutes against Catholicks are evidently against the Law of God and Christian Religion if we may credit Antiquity and stick to the Faith and practice of the Church and Princes that went before us not only in England but all other Christian Kingdomes This way therefore of proceeding is different from all other Nations and altereth the Stile of natural reason humane nature and the practice of all Antiquity and consequently destroyes the foundation of justice and form of Judicature Quarto The common temporal Municipal Laws which Science above all others next to Divinity doth confirm and evince unto the understanding of an Englishman the Truth of Catholick Religion Forasmuch as from our first Christian Kings and Queens which must needs be the origin and beginning of all Christian Common Laws in England unto the reign of Henry the eight all our Princes and People being of one and the same Catholick Religion their Laws must needs be presumed to have been conformed to their sense and judgment in that behalf and our Lawyers to our Laws So as now to see an English temporal Lawyer to impugn the said Catholick Religion by the antiquity of the common Laws throughout the times and reigns of the said Kings and Queens to favour and countenance Luther Calvin c. or any new Opinions not known before is as great an absurdity novelty and wonder as to see a Philosopher brought up in Aristotles School to impugn Aristotle by Aristotles learning in favour of Petrus Ramus Descartes or some other new Adversary Catholick Religion never prejudiced any Nation or State where it had free passage in the least degree but hath ever been their safety happiness and honour No People or Church in the World so great a friend to loyalty and obedience they have the repute of honest men patient and charitable carry themselves civilly and religiously nothing is heard from their mouths of Blasphemy or Atheism or that may have ground of not believing or adoring God alone or of not hoping to be saved by the merits of Jesus Christ They have lived without just complaint sociable and amicable If they meet you not at Church they meet you at Market Do they not buy and sell with you Are ready to perform all Offices of good neighbourhood and civility Do they refuse any kind of temporal duties or payments Do ye not find them at home and abroad as strict to their promises as any others you converse withall They cannot be persecuted by any Government that understands its own interest unless first abused by false Teachers nor can we deny them what ancient and good Laws have ever allowed theâ— being no innovators but Professors of the same Religion which made this Nation Christian If there were no other Apology for peaceable men but only those Pleas of Conscience tendered to publick view those ought not to be unconsidered by such as profess Christianity Never any Acts of Vniformity could expel Papists out of heretical Countries Do ye know what you ask when you are still urging the execution of pressures against Catholicks even their blood life and fortunes can any Christian zeal be so irregular Can this come from the Spirit of the Gospel Is this wisdome from above Whence comes all this anger What evil have they done What maximes have they so rough and unreasonable that they must be taken away by the Sword Why should we be so bloody in our Tenets How can our passions be so intemperate Our mercies so cruel To them whose Faith was established by our Fundamental Laws and maintenance of it sworn to at least by twenty of our Monarchs even by Queen Elizabeth her self Why must the Papists be thus singled out from all the rest and forced to forfeit all advantages or forsake his Conscience They only exposed to publick hatred and rigour though they only least deserve it Shall we extinguish all considerations of equity and charity towards them of whose honesty we are assured by their Long and Patient Sufferings rather than they would renounce their Conscience towards God who are ready to abjure what is or may be objected as only dangerous in their Religion who have given evidences already they will perform those Oaths and that they cannot be absolved from them If we apprehend their principles and doctrines are inconsistent with the Gospel or Civil Government grant them a free Conference about the points in question which are those Tenets carry an opposition to either and if upon impartial enquiry they are found so Heterodox as represented then inflict penalties If their Ecclesiasticks are not able to justisie both their Religion and Principles let them renounce all mercy This offer is very fair and equal a Vindication of Justice and a legal proceeding against the Criminal And the contrary how plausible soever represented pretending thereby to do God good service is most injurious to the Peace Christian meekness Reason Religion or Charity and destructive to that prudential Ballance the wisest and best States have ever carefully observ'd Who always after questions of Religion freely discussed relieved the distresses of tender and innocent Consciences We must not judge of them or any other by the private and perhaps misinterpretable assertions of some particular Doctors but by the avowed principles of their belief This is the basis on which they build the rule by which they walk in point of obedience to God and man or if you would judg of them by their proceedings and addresses their frequent petitions professions protestations of all just obedience will sufficiently clear them If by their practice and manner of lives their quiet deportment and manner of living and conversing with all men yea even their prayers and wishes which they dayly make unto Almighty God in behalf of their Prince and Country do shew how innocent they are and how little they deserve those black aspersions and calumnies some rash Satyrists are so diligent to cast upon them In charity we are bound to believe the best of others and also to think they speak true when we cannot prove the contrary Some destine them to destruction and extirpation as Agapete did the Jews Are so eager declaimers
understanding to examine them It 's hard for the most judicious and learned men to give a right judgment of many points and yet notwithstanding many engaged persons are ready to force Dissenters by coercive Power or blacken them with opprobrious terms The Controversies of Justification by faith or good works hath filled volumes with Arguments Definitions and Distinctions but it is hard to find whether the difference be not de nomine and of words only The Controversie of free-will since neither part doth absolutely exclude Divine Grace or concurrence of the will with it may be called verbal if understood cum grano salis and by those who carrie no partial biass on their judgments Some rigid Calvinists indeed though not all conclude an absolute fate by Predestination to Salvation or Reprobation to those I answer they need not trouble themselves but let every one go quietly to his destinie since by their own Principles all their Praying Preaching c. can neither help nor hurt Seeing it is not in their power to avoid evil or do good Worship of Images exclaimed as Idolatrous the scandal is chiefly as I conceive taken from the word Adoration which in the Grammar sense is but adorare to pray to but the generality of Rome disown that acceptation and told them chiefly as Memorials as I shewed before The Pope to be Antichrist the Etymology of the very word is repugnant to it the being by us acknowledged likewise the great Patriarch of the most Christian and Western Church and every one that hath but an ordinary reason sense or knowledge of Scripture can own but one Antichrist to come the Prophet Daniel spoke of And that he should give pardon for Sins or Sinners whatsoever without first having remission from God by Sorrow Repentance and Amendment is so great a Calumny that I pray God to pardon such malicious ignorance I tremble to hear such horrid blasphemies out of Christian mouths to derogate and scandalize their fellow Christians with more than Hâ—athenish impleties Many and other great things have been objected against them through ignorance weakness mistakes or malice which unjust men scatter too and fro as chasse to blinde the eyes of simple and credulous people The crimes of a few miserable wretches by none more detâ—sted than themselves are made their guilt but it is the fashion Papists and Popery must be brought in by head and shoulders and sit down under any affronts what ever the difference be to exasperate mens spirits and make odious and suspected those whom we can never confute It is hard they should alwaies lie under such undeserved imputations and be persecuted without liberty of a just defence The Morality of the Heathens was more equitable and less envious where the Emperor Adrian commanded unto Minutius his Proconsul of Asia as a thing of great importances ne nomen condemnaretur sed crimen A Divine of our English Church exclaiming against such proceedings saith Our affections change our thoughts and our imaginations fit the scene and what we call reason is many times but a chain of phantasms and we are guided by prejudices and overwhelmed by Authority and formed by education and suck in opinions carelesly are deeply setled before we examine them and when we examine them it is but by halfes we see but few things and judg all things by them and either seek not truth at all or are unable to manage a due and impartial search When we stumble upon it we are afraid and run away from it or stand to pelt it with dirt and vile names In the mean time we catch at shadows and grow fond of the imaginations of our own fancies Doctor Taylor one of our late and most eminent Divines in Treatise of Liberty of Propheâ—ying § 2. 10. p. 249. Collecting some considerations inducing persons saith he of much reason and more piety to retain the Religion of their forefathers Their Doctrines having had a long continuance and possession of the Church which therefore cannot easily be supposed in the present Professors to be a design for Covetousness Ambition c. since they have received it from so many ages and it is not likely that all ages should have the same purposes or that the same Doctrine should serve the several ends of diverse ages It s long prescription which is such a prejudice as cannot be retrenched as relying upon these grounds that truth is more ancient than falshood that God would not for so many ages forsake his Church and leave her in error I add not such gross errors as are imputed on them as Idolatry c. Again the beauty and splendor of that Church their pompous Service the stateliness and solemnity of the Hierarchy their name of Catholicks which they suppose and claim as their own due and to concern no other Sect of Christians The antiquity of many of their Doctrines the continual succession of their Bishops their immediate derivation from the Apostles their title to succeed Saint Peter and in this regard chiefly honoured and submitted to by antiquity the supposal and pretence of his personal prerogatives much spoken of by the Fathers the flattering expressions of minor Bishops in modester language honourable expressions which by being old records have obtained credulity The multitude and variety of people which are of their perswasion apparent consent with elder ages in many matters doctrinal the advantage which is derived by entertaining some personal opinions of the Fathers the great consent of one part with another in that which they affirm to be de fide The great differences which are commenced among their adversaries their happiness of being instruments in converting divers Nations The advantage of Monarchical Government the benefit of which they daily enjoy The piety and austerity of their religious Orders of men and women the single life of their Priests and Bishops the severity of their Fasts and their exterior observances The great Reputation of their Bishops for Faith and Sanctity The known holiness of some of those persons whose institutes the religious persons preâ—end to imitate Their Miracles false or true substantial or imaginary The causalities and accidents that have happened to their adversaries the oblique acts and indirect proceedings of some of those who departed from them To which join that of Sir Edwine Sands in his relation of the western Religion p. 29. saying Beside the Roman Church and those Churches united with her we find all other Churches to have had their end and decay as Hussits Sollards Waldenses Albigenses Berengarians c. or their beginning but of late This being founded by the Prince of the Apostles with promise to him by Christ c. much more to that purpose ibid. What Church but one can shew the fulfilling of innumerable Scriptures touching the Churches Infallibility Vniversality by time place and person Which can spread before your eyes her Line and Pedigree descendâ—ng from the Apostles to these times which can declare that in all