Selected quad for the lemma: reason_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
reason_n	law_n	sin_n	transgression_n	2,676	5	10.9658	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A85428	Christ set forth in his [brace] death, resurrection, ascension, sitting at Gods right hand, intercession, [brace] as the [brace] cause of justification. Object of justifying faith. Upon Rom. 8. ver. 34. Together with a treatise discovering the affectionate tendernesse of Christs heart now in heaven, unto sinners on earth. / By Tho: Goodwin, B.D.	Goodwin, Thomas, 1600-1680.	1642 (1642)	Wing G1232; Thomason E58_2; Thomason E58_3; ESTC R8966	205,646	392

Peter that he could command millions of Angels to his rescue but he meerly submits unto his Father Not my will but thy will be done sayes he for God had laid upon him the iniquities of us all Esay 53. Let our faith therefore look mainly to this designe and plot of God and of Christ in his suffering to satisfie for our sins and to justifie us sinners When we consider him as borne flesh and bloud and laid in a manger think we withall that his meaning was to condemne sin in our flesh Rom. 8. 4. So when we read of him fulfilling all or any part of righteousnes take we his mind in withall to be that the Law might be fulfilled in us as it follows there who were then represented in him and so the fulfilling of it is accounted ours Behold we him in his life time as Iohn the Baptist did even as the Lamb of God bearing and taking away the sins of the world and when upon the Crosse let our faith behold the iniquities of us all met in him Surely he hath borne our sorrowes bearing our sinnes in his body on the tree and thereby once offered to beare the sinnes of many 1 Pet. 3. Heb. 9. c. This intent of Christ in all that he did and suffered is that welcome newes and the very spirit of the Gospel which faith preys and seiseth on CHAP. III. What support or matter of triumph Christs death affords to faith for Justification NOw having thus directed your Faith to the right object Christ and Christ as dying let us secondly see what matter of support and encouragement faith may fetch from Christs death for Justification And surely that which hath long agoe satisfied God himselfe for the sins of many thousand soules now in heaven The fulnesse of Christs satisfaction may very well serve to satisfie the heart and conscience of any sinner now upon earth in any doubts in respect of the guilt of any sins that can arise We see that the Apostle here after that large discourse of Justification by Christs righteousnes in the former part of this Epistle to the Rom. and having shewed how every way it abounds Chap. 5. he now in this 8. Chap. doth as it were sit down like a man over-convinced as ver 31. What then shall we say to these things He speaks as one satisfied and even astonished with abundance of evidence having nothing to say but onely to admire God and Christ in this work and therefore presently throws downe the Gauntlet and challengeth a dispute in this point with all commers Let Conscience and carnall reason Law and Sinne Hell and Devils bring in all their strength Who is he shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods Elect who shall condemne Paul dares to answer them all and carry it with these few words It is God that justifies It is Christ that dyed And as in ver 37. We are more then conquerours in all these It was this that brought in the Prodigall that in his Fathers house there was bread enough And so likewise he who ever he was who was the Author of the 130. Psal when his soul was in deep distresse by reason of his sins ver 1 2. yet this was it that setled his heart to wait upon God that there was plenteous redemption with him Christs redemption is not meerly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a price or ransome aquivalent or making due satisfaction according to the just demerit of sinne but it is plenteous redemption there is an abundance of the gift of righteousnesse Rom. 5. 17. and unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes 3. 8. Yea 1 Tim. 1. 14. the grace of our Lord that is of Christ as ver 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we translate it was abundant but the word reacheth farther it was over-full redundant more then enough And yet sayes Paul ver 13. I had sins enough to pardon as one would think that might exhaust it I was a blasphemer c. But I found so much grace in Christ even more then I knew what to doe withall I shall not insist so largely on this first Head of Christs dying as upon those three following because it is the main subject of another Discourse which through Gods grace I intend to publish though in another method Onely for a taste to instance in some few particulars How Christs satisfaction may be set against the guilt of any sins and so made use of by faith shewing how Christs satisfaction may be opposed and set against the guilt of a poore sinners offences What is there that can be said to aggravate sin in the generall or any mans particular sins that may not be answered out of this Christ hath dyed and something not be considered in it which the conscience may oppose thereto So that what ever evill which according to the rules of spirituall reason which the righteous Law proceedeth by and containeth as the foundation of its righteousnesse in condemning or aggravating sinne a mans conscience may suggest to be in sinne oppositely hereunto may a mans faith according to the like rules of true spirituall reason shew a more transcendent goodnesse to have been in Christs death which the Gospel reveales and so may oppose the one to the other and have as good reason to shew why sinne should not condemne from CHRISTS death as Conscience can have that the Law may condemne As first 1. Against the hainousnesse of sin in the generall Is sinne the transgression of the Law Christ dying the Law-maker was subjected to the Law and will not that make amends Is sin the debasement of Gods glory manifested in his Word and Works Christs dying was the debasement and emptying of the brightnesse of his glory in the highest measure being personally manifested in the flesh The one of them is but as the darkning the shine or lustre of the Sun upon a wall but the other is as the obscuring of the Sun it selfe Sins highest evill lies in offending God but Christs righteousnesse is oppositely the righteousnesse of God himselfe or Iehovah made our righteousnesse So that God in our sinne is considered but as the object against whom but God in this our righteousnesse is the subject from whom and in whom this righteousnesse comes and is feated And so his God-head answerably gives a higher worth to it by how much the alliance which the subject hath to an action of its owne that proceeds from it is nearer then that which an object hath against which the action is committed Or secondly 2. Against any aggravation of particular sins what peculiar aggravations or circumstances are there in thy sinnes to weigh down with which some circumstances in Christs obedience and death may not be paralleld to lift thee up againe As first 1. Against the greatnesse of the act of any particular sin what ever Is it the greatnesse of thy sinne in the substance of the fact committed hath there been

Resurrection ibid. CHAP. II. A digression Wherein for the explanation of both these is shewne how Christ sustained a double relation 46 1. Of a Surety for us 2. Of a Common person in our stead 47 The difference of these two and the usefulnesse of these two considerations for the explaining what followes throughout this Discourse 48 49 Chap. 3. The first Head The EVIDENCE of Justification which Christs Resurrection affords to Faith explained by two things 1. How Christ was made a Surety for us 2. How his Resurrection as he was a Surety holds forth this evidence 50 sect 1. How Christ became a Surety for Debt Punishment ibid. The Covenant of Grace made with Christ alone as a Surety for us 52 Whereby God requires payment of Christ first 53 sect 2. How the consideration of this becomes an evidence to Faith through Christs Resurrection 54 The Resurrection an evidence 1. That the debt is paid ibid. 2. That God will never claime it from the sinner 55 Chap. 4. The second Head The INFLVENCE that Christs Resurrection hath into our Justification The Demonstration of this hath two branches 1. Bran. The Christ was a Common Person representing us in all that he did did suffered Handled at large but more especially in his Resurrection 56 This is proved 1. In generall By a Parallel with Adam Christs Type herein 57 2. Particularly Adam and Christ were common Persons 1. In their Qualification and estates 58 2. In what they did and in what befell them 59 Christ a common Person in his Death we dying in him as in Adam his Condemnation we were condemned in 60 That Christ was more especially a Common Person in his Resurrection we being considered as rising in him 64 Chap. 5. The second Branch How Christs representing us as a Common Person in his Resurrection hath an Influence into our Justification made forth by two things 66 1. That Christ himselfe was justifyed from our sin at his Resurrection made forth by three things ibid. 1. There was a solemne Act passed from God towards Christ of justifying him from our sins 67 2. There was some speciall time or season wherein this was done 68 3. That this was first past upon him at his Resurrection 69 2. That all Beleevers were then justified by God in this Iustification of Christ as a Common Person representing them 72 Proved 1. From the Common and like analogie this holds with the former instances of our dying in his death c. ibid. All things which God doth to us were first done to Christ for us ibid. 2. From the equity of that Law that in Adams condemnation we were condemned 74 Chap. 6. How our Faith may from hence raise matter of Triumph for its justification Together with an explanation how we are justified by Faith although justified in Christ at his Resurrection 76 Chap. 7. How all this both our justification at Christs Resurrection and the support of our faith there from are sealed up to us in Baptisme The Conclusion How faith may make use of Christs Resurrection in its going to God for pardon of sin 82 SECT IV. Faith supported by Christs being at Gods Right hand Chap. 1. A connexion of this third Head with the two former Two things involved in it 1. Christs Ascension 2. Christs power and authority in Heaven 87 Chap. 2. Shewing 1. What EVIDENCE for our Justification 1. Christs ASCENSION into Heaven affords unto our faith upon that first fore-mentioned consideration of his being a SVRETY for us 91 And this 1. By considering what was the last action he did when he was to ascend namely blessing his Disciples ibid. For in blessing them he blessed all Beleevers 92 2. From the very act of ascending 93 3. From the first entertainment that God gave Christ when he made his entry into heaven 97 Chap. 3. 2. What EVIDENCE Christs SITTING AT GODS RIGHT HAND he having beene our Surety affords to our faith for Justification 99 In shewing 1. That CHRIST had compleatly performed all the worke that was to be done by him for our justification 100 2. That God accepted his satisfaction and was infinitely well pleased with it 101 Chap. 4. Demonstrating 2. What INFLVENCE 1. Christs ASCENSION hath into a beleevers noncondemnation upon that second premised consideration of Christs being a Common Person for us 102 By considering two things 1. The great end of his Ascending and entring into Heaven that it was to prepare a place for us and to bring us thither 103 2. That he entred into Heaven and tooke possession of it in our very names and stead 104 So that we may by Faith behold our selves as in Heaven already 105 Chap. 5. Demonstrating 2. What INFLVENCE Christs SITTING AT GODS RIGHT HAND hath into our justification upon that second consideration of his being a Common Person 106 And this by considering 1. The prerogatives imported in that his sitting at Gods right hand As 1. Soveraignty of power all things being subdued to him 107 2. Soveraignty of Iudgement all judgement and authority being committed to him 109. 2. That these Prerogatives mentioned are his as he is considered an Head and so sits representing us and therefore all his elect shall one day come up to him 111 In what sense we are said to sit with him and in what sense it is Christs priviledge alone to sit at Gods right hand 112 The Triumph of Faith from this ibid. SECT V. The Triumph of Faith from Christs INTERCESSION Chap. 1. A connexion of this with the former And how this adds a further support to faith Two things propounded to be handled out of the Text 1. The concurrency of Influence that Christs In tercession hath into our Salvation 2 The Security that Faith may have therefrom for our Justification 114 Chap. 2. The first Head The concurrencie of influence Intercession hath into our salvation explained by two things 1. Intercession one part of Christs Priesthood and the most excellent part of it 116 Two parts of Christs office of Priesthood as there was of the High-Priests office under the Old Law 1. To offer up himselfe 2. To intercede 117 Without Intercession Christ had not been a perfect High-Priest 119 His Oblation would otherwise have been ineffectuall 124 Chap. 3. 2. The speciall peculiar influence that Intercession hath into our Salvation and Justification And the Reasons why God appointed it to be added unto all the former 125 Which are of three sorts 126 1. Respecting God 1. In generall God will be dealt with like himselfe ibid. 2. Particularly 1. In that it is for the glory of his free grace 127 Which looks to be entreated 128 2. In that Gods justice stood upon such a respect to be performed to it 130 2. Respecting us Intercession being requisite to and the best way to effect our salvation ibid. This demonstrated 1. In generall God would have us saved all manner of wayes 131 And the application of Redemption unto us is from Christs

Common person with or for another hee goes for is one who represents personates and acts the part of another by the allowance and warrant of the Law so as what he doth as such a common person and in the name of the other that other whom he personates is by the Law reckoned to doe and in like manner what is done to him as being in the others stead and roome is reckoned as done to the other Thus by our Law an Attorney appears for another money received by him is reckoned as received by him whom it is due unto Thus the giving possession of an estate a re-entry made and possession taken of land c. if done by and to a man who is his lawfull Attorney it stands as good in Law unto a man as if in his owne person it had been done So Embassadours for Princes represent their Masters what is done to them is reckoned as done to the Prince and what they do according to their Commission is all one as if the Prince whose Person they represent had done it himselfe In like manner also the marriages of Princes are transacted solemnized by Proxie as a Common person representing his Lord and in his name is married to a Princesse in her Fathers Court and the Lawes of men authorize it and the marriage is as good as if both Princes themselves had been present and had performed all the Rites of it The difference betweene these two And thus to be a Common person is more then simply to be a Surety for another it is a farther thing and therefore these two relations are to be distinctly considered though they seem to be somewhat of a like nature Thus an Attorney is a different thing from a Surety A Surety undertakes to pay a debt for another or the like but a Cōmon person serves to perform any common act which by the Law is reckoned and virtually imputed to the other and is to stand as the others act is as valid as is he had done it So as the good and benefit which is the consequent of such an act shall accrew to him whom he personated and for whom he stood as a Common person Adam was not a Surety for all Man-kind Adam a Common person but not a Surety he undertook not for them in the sense fore-mentioned but he was a Common person representing all Man-kind So as what he should do was to be accounted as if they had done it Now the better to expresse and make sure our Justification in and by Christ according to all sorts of Laws the equity of all which God usually draws up into his dispensations God did ordain Christ both to be a Surety for us Christ ordained to be both and the reason why and also a Common person representing us and in our stead That as Christ tooke all other relations for us as of an Husband Head Father Brother King Priest Captain c. that so the fulnesse of his love might be set forth to us in that what is defective in any one of these relations is supplyed and expressed by the other Even thus did God ordaine Christ to take and sustaine both these relations of a Surety and a Common Person in all he did for us thereby to make our justification by him the more full and legall and justifie as I may so speake our Justification it selfe or his justifying of us by all sorts of legall considerations what ever that hold commonly among men in like case and that which the one of these relations or considerations might not reach to make good the other might supply what fel short in the one the other might make up and so we might be most legally and formally justified and made sure never to be condemned CHAP. III. The first Head The EVIDENCE of Iustification which Christs Resurrection affords to faith explained by two things 1. By shewing how Christ was made a Surety for us 2. How his Resurrection as a Surety holds forth this evidence COncerning the first of those two Heads at first propounded namely the Evidence which Christs Resurrection affords unto our faith in point of non-condemnation I have two things to handle in this Chap. to make this out First how Christ was made a Surety for us and what manner a Surety he did become secondly what the consideration hereof will contribute to that evidence which faith hath from Christs Resurrection For the first §. 1. Christ was appointed by God and himselfe also undertook to be our Surety 1. How Christ was made and became a Surety for us This you have Heb. 7. 22. He was made Surety of a better Testament or Covenant namely of the New The Hebrew word for Covenant the Septuagint stil translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Testament the word in the Hebrew being of a large signification comprehending both a Covenant and Testament and so in the New Testament it is used promiscuously for either And indeed this new Covenant of Grace is both Of this Covenant Christ is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the plighter of his troth for it the Surety the Promiser the Undertaker The Verb this comes of is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 promittere which comes form 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in manibus striking hands or giving ones hand as a signe of a covenant and so to bargaine with or make up a covenant Prov. 22. 26. Be not thou one of them that strike hands or of them that are sureties for debts Which whole verse the Septuagint reads Give not thy selfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to Suretyship The same word that is here used by the Apostle It was the manner both of the Jews and Romanes also to make Covenants by striking of hands And in Testaments the Heire and Executor shook hands or the Executor gave his hand to fulfill it Suretiship not onely used in matters of debt but in criminall causes punished with death and is put for being a pledge for another And the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used not onely in promising to pay a debt for another but also in becomming a pledge for another for to undergoe death or a capitall punishment in anothers roome as in that famous story of friends namely Euephenus and Eucritus Eucritus did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 willingly become a surety for Euephenus when condemned to dye by Dionysius the tyrant This very word is used by Polyenus the Historian of that fact Now such a Surety every way did Christ become unto God for us Christ undertook as a Surety for both to satisfie God to work all in us also both to pay the debt by undergoing death in our stead and so to satisfie God and then as the Heire to execute his Will and Testament He became a Surety of the whole Covenant and every condition in it take it in the largest sense and this of all both on Gods part and on ours For us he undertook to

can be For he was under those bonds and bolts which if it had been possible would have detained him in the grave as Act. 2. 24. The strength of sin and Gods wrath and the curse against sin Thou shalt die the death did as cords hold him as the Psalmists phrase is Other debtours may possibly breake their prisons but Christ could not have broke through this for the wrath of the All-powerfull God was this prison from which there was no escaping no baile nothing would be taken to let him goe out but full satisfaction And therefore to hear that Christ is risen so is come out of prison is an evidence that God is satisfied and that Christ is discharged by God himself and so is now without sin he walking abroad again at liberty And therefore the Apostle proclaimes a mighty victory obtained by Christs Resurrection over Death the Grave the strength of sinne the Law 1 Cor. 15. 55 56. and cryes out Thanks be to God who giveth us the victory through Iesus Christ our Lord ver 57. You may now rest secure indeede Christ is risen who therefore shall condemne CHAP. IV. The second Head propounded the INFLUENCE CHRISTS Resurrection hath into Iustification Two Branches of the Demonstration of this First that Christ was a Common person representing us in all he was or did or suffered handled at large More especially a Common person in his Resurrection NOw secondly to come to that other Head propounded the Influence Christs resurrection hath into our justification The demonstration or making out of which depends on two things put together The first how Christ was appointed by God and himselfe acted the part of a Common person representing us in what he did more particularly in his Resurrection Of this in this Chapter The second is how from that consideration ariseth not onely an evidence to our faith but a reall influence into our justification and non-condemnation So as Who shall condemne because CHRIST is risen againe as a Common person representing us therein For the first of these §. I. to illustrate and prove it in the generall That Christ was a Common person proved that instance of Adam serves most fitly and is indeed made use of in the Scripture to that end Adam as you all know was reckoned as a common publique person 1. In generall by a parallel with Adam not standing singly or alone for himselfe but as representing all Man-kind to come of him So as by a just Law what he did was reckoned to his posterity whom he represented And what was by that Law threatned or done to him for what he did is threatned against his posterity also Now this man was herein a lively type of our Lord Christ the Type of Christ herein as you have it Rom. 5. 14. Who was the type of him who was to come Unto which purpose the titles which the Apostle gives these two Christ and Adam 1 Cor. 15. 47. are exceeding observable he calls Adam The first man and Christ our Lord The second man and both for that very purpose and respect which we have in hand For first he speaks of them as if there had never been any more men in the world nor were ever to be for time to come except these two and why but because these two betweene them had all the rest of the sons of men hanging at their girdle because they were both Common persons that had the rest in like though opposite considerations included and involved in them Adam had all the sons of Men borne into this world included in himself who are therefore called earthly men ver 48. in a conformity to him the earthly man ver 47. and Christ the second man had all his Elect who are the first-borne and whose names are written in heaven and therefore in the same ver are oppositely called heavenly men included in him You see how he summes up the number of all men in two and reckons but two men in all these two in Gods account standing for all the rest And farther observe that because Adam was in this his being a common person unto his the shadow and the lively Type of Christ who was to come after him that therefore he is called The first man of these two and Christ The second man as typified out by him Now if you aske Particularly In what things Christ was a Common person wherein Christ was a Common person representing us and standing in our stead I answer If in anything then in all those conditions and states wherein he was in what he did Especially in what he was or did upon earth or befell him whilst here on earth especially For he had no other end to come downe into this world but to sustaine our persons and to act our parts and to have what was to have been done to us acted upon him Thus first §. 2. in their two severall conditions qualifications 1. Adam and Christ Common persons in their conditions and qualifications and states and states they both were Common persons That is look what state or condition the one or the other was made in is by a just Law to be put upon those whom they represented So the Apostle reasons from it ver 48. As is the earthly man namely the first man Adam such are the earthly namely to be earthly men as well as he because he who was a Common person representing them was in his condition but an earthly man And oppositely by the same Law it follows As is the heavenly man namely the second man Christ such are and must be the heavenly who pertaine to him because he also is a Common person ordained to personate them and Adam who came after him was therein but his Type And as thus in this place to the Corinths the Apostle argues Christ to be a Common person in respect of his condition and state by an argument of parallels taken from his Type Adam So secondly in that 5. to the Romanes he argues Christ to have been a Common person 2. Christ a Common person in respect of what he did or what he suffered illustrated by the parallel of Adam in his actions which he did on earth and this also from the similitude of Adam whom ver 14. he therein makes to have been Christs Type And he speaks of Adam there as a Common person both in respect of what he did namely his Sinne and also in respect of what befell him for his sin namely Death and condemnation And because he was in all these not to be considered as a single Man but as one that was All men by way of representation Hence both what he did they are said to doe in him and what condemnation or death was deserved by his sin fell upon them all by this Law of his being a publique person for them 1. For what he did He sinned 1. Adam a Common person in what he did

this worke of Intercession for us and that in heaven to be added to all the former For the first I will proceede therein by degrees First It is one part of his Priest-hood You must know that Christ is not entred into heaven simply as a fore-runner which hath been explained to take up places for you but as a Priest also Made a Priest after the order of Melchisedec which is more then simply a Forerunner Yea his sitting at Gods right hand is not onely as a King armed with power and authority to save us but he sits there as a Priest too Thus Heb. 8. 1. We have such an High Priest who is set downe at the right hand of the Majesty on high In the old Leviticall Priest-hood Two parts of the High-Priests office the High-Priests office had two parts both which concurred to make them High-Priests First Oblation or offering the Sacrifice Secondly Presentation of it in the Holy of Holies with Prayer and Intercession unto God to accept it for the sinnes of the people The one was done without the other within the Holy of Holies This you may see in many places especially Levit. 16. 11 15 16. where you have the Law about the High Priests entring into the Holy of Holies he was not to come into the holy place till first he had offered a Sacrifice for himselfe and the people ver 11. and 15. and this without Then secondly when he had killed it he was to enter with the bloud of it into the Holy of Holies and sprinkle the Mercie-seat therein with it ver 14 17. and to go with Incense and cause a cloud to arise over the Mercie-seat And this you have also Heb. 13. 11. it is said that The bloud of those beasts that were burnt without the Camp was brought into the Sanctuary by the High-Priest And in that 16. of Levit. you shall finde the Atonement made as well by the bloud when brought into the Holy place ver 16. as by the killing of the beast ver 11. Both these were acts of the High-priesthood for Atonement And this was done in a Type of the Priestly office of Christ and the parts thereof So Heb. 9. 23. he cals all those transactions under the Ceremoniall Law the patterns of things heavenly instancing in this part of Christs office ver 24. For Christ sayes he is not entred into the Holy places made without hands as that was which are the figures of the true but into heaven it selfe to appear in the presence of God for us Now then in answer to this Type there are two distinct parts of Christs Priesthood First 1. Christs offering up himselfe the offering himselfe a Sacrifice up to death as Heb. 9. 26. which answers to the killing of the Sacrifice without the Holy of Holies for answerably he was crucified without the City Heb. 13. 12. Secondly 2. Entring into the Heavens to Intercede he carryed this his bloud into the Holy of Holies namely the Heavens Heb. 9. 12. where he appeares ver 24. and there also prayes in the force of that bloud And the Type of those prayers was that cloud of Incense made by the High-Priest so it is expresly interpreted Rev. 8. 3. c. The Angel Christ is said to have had much Incense to offer it with the prayers of all the Saints Which Incense is his owne prayers in heaven which he continually puts up when the Saints pray on earth and so perfumes all their prayers and procures all blessings for them Both these parts of his Prist-hood the Apostle Iohn mentions in his first Epistle Both proved Chap. 2. ver 2. where as he cals Jesus Christ a propitiation for our sins that is an Oblation or Sacrifice offered up for us So likewise he cals him our Advocate both going to make up this his office And indeed this latter of Intercession and bringing his bloud into the Holy of Holies or heaven is but the same action continued That bloud which he offered with tears and strong cryes on the Crosse where he likewise interceded the same bloud he continues virtually to offer up with prayers in the heavens and makes Atonement by both onely with this difference On earth though he interceded yet he more eminently offered up himselfe In heaven he more eminently intercedes and doth but present that Offering Secondly this was so necessary a part of his Priest-hood that without it he had not been a compleat Priest Without Intercession he had not been a perfect Priest Thus Heb. 8. 4. If he were on earth he should not be a Priest That is If he should have abode on earth he should not have been a compleat Priest Paul saith not that if he had offered that his sacrifice on earth he had not been a Priest for that was necessary but that if he had staid still on earth after he had offered it he had not been a Priest that is a perfect Priest for he had then left his office imperfect and had done it but by halves seeing this other part of it the work of Intercession lay still upon him to be acted in heaven Thus the High-priest his Type if he had only offered Sacrifice without the Holy of holies had not been a perfect High-Priest For to enter into the Holy of holies and to act the part of a Priest there This the peculiar work of the High-Priest who was in this Christs Type was the proper peculiar work of the High-Priest as such Which shews that Christ had not been an High-Priest if he had not gone to heaven and Priested it there too as I may so speak as well as upon earth Yea if Christ had not gone to heaven and were not now become a Priest there then the Leviticall Priest-hood were still in force and should share the honour with him and the High-priest must continue still to goe into the Holy of holies To this purpose you may observe that so long as Christ was on earth though risen the Types of the Law held in force and were not to give way till all the truth signified by their Ministery was fully accomplisht and so not untill Christ was gone into heaven as a Priest and there had begun to doe all that which the High-priest had done in the Holy of holies and as his Type fore-signified And this is plainly the meaning of what follows in that Heb. 8. ver 4. as the reason or demonstration why that Christ should not have been a Priest if he had not gone to heaven not onely as a King but as a Priest too as he had affirmed ver 1. Seeing sayes he that there are Priests upon earth that doe offer gifts according to the Law The force of the Reason lyes thus There are already Priests and that of a Tribe he was not of that offer gifts on earth before he came into the world And therefore if that had beene all his Priest-hood to be a Priest on earth