Selected quad for the lemma: reason_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
reason_n law_n sin_n transgression_n 2,676 5 10.9658 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33929 A compendious discourse about some of the greatest matters of Christian faith propounded and explained between a minister and an enquiring Christian ... : and also may serve for an answer to two books, one called The practical discourse of the sovereignty of God, the other called The death of death, by the death of Christ, written by J.O. : whereunto is annexed a very brief appendix / written by T. Collier. Collier, Thomas, fl. 1691. 1682 (1682) Wing C5274; ESTC R20632 146,911 256

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

as before I said man by sin being fallen into a state of weakness and mortality as a punishment of his sin it 's come to pass as Job 14. 4. Who can bring a clean thing out of an vnclean 15. 14. 25. 4. How can he be clean that is born of a Woman But what this defilement is is by man indeterminable but be it what it is God accounteth those in whom it is before and without act or consent of will to act to be innocent and fit for our imitation in Gospel conversation in order to our obtaining the heavenly kingdom and I think it 's confest by all that infants as such are innocent meek humble teachable c. and yet affirmed by many if not most to be born the children of wrath Christ If it be so I desire them to enquire whence it is that the nature of men is become so bad as that they are thereby rendered in Scripture to be the children of wrath Eph. 2. 3. Min. In this matter it may be meet for us to enquire 1. How far concupiscible nature was by creation and Gods ordinance good and undefiled before the fall and how far it so continues now in the fallen state And as to this it 's apparent there was natural lustings by creation in Adam in themselves sinless and lawful both before and since the fall as 1. To a married state which was lawful and Gods ordinance in the state of innocency before the sin and fall Gen. 1. 28. 2. 23 24. and so continues lawful and Gods ordinance still Heb. 13. 4. It was lawful before the fall to be lawfully imployed in labour to dress or till the garden Gen. 2● 15. So it was after tho fall Gen. 3. 23. to till the ground the same word as chap. 2. 15. It was lawful before the fall to eat and drink Gen. 2. 16 17. and so it was after the fall Gen. 3. 18 19. 1 Tim. 4. 2 3 4. It 's lawful to be angry so was Christ Mar. 3. 5. see Eph. 4. 26. It was lawful both before the fall and since to think meditate speak and act in all which concupiscible nature is exercised But the sin is in breaking Gods allowed rules in all these cases abusing our selves in transgressing by excess in things in themselves in their Original by creation and Gods ordinance good and lawful as in adultery Heb. 13. 4. gluttony drunkenness covetousness swearing lying evil speakings wrath Murders c. so that I think I may safely say that almost all Moral evils consist in out running of and making a breach upon Gods allowed rules and law in nature so that nature in its Original was not nor is not in it self so bad a thing as some do render it but as in Adam and as since continued in us is in it self by Gods creation and ordinance good and lawful and it 's the excess through temptation in which the sin lyeth 2. Then the defilement is from the weakness of nature it self as before I said it being in the fallen state Rom. 7. 24. O wretched man that I am who shall deliver me from this body of death And hence it 's liable to further defilements by occasions and temptations if Adoms nature was so liable to temptation and defilement thereby when pure and free and he in full strength of person and reason and so more capable by far to resist temptation than any since it 's no marvel if nature in the weak and mortal state is by occasions and temptations more infected especially being upon its first tryal in infancy where capableness of resisting is wanting 3. All Infants having prospects before them patterns to learn by parents and others to learn that which by nature they are capable of children while so are capable to learn good as well as evil if rightly taught or else those exhortations to parents are vai● and useless which we may not imagin Pro. 22. 6. Eph. 6. 4. But parents and others instead thereof teach their children pride and folly by which it becomes natural to them 4. It comes to pass as by evil example and bad education so by the temptations of Satan as was the case of Adam Wicked men are called the children of the Devil Joh. 8. 44. not because they have their nature from him so they are the Off-spring of God Act. 17. 28 29 but by yielding to his temptations and doing his work and from hence the enmity and the evil springs 5. The things of this world ensnares 1 Joh. 2. 15 16 17. Jam. 4. 4. by all which means men become bad yea very bad by nature being by example tradition temptation and custom naturalized to sin are thereby become the children of wrath by consenting unto and following after such things as will issue in wrath unless timely faith and repentance prevent and this is most apparently the true sense of Eph. 2. 3. with Col. 1. 21. the Apostle speaking of grown persons thus corrupted and not of Infants Christ Is there not a natural inclination in Infants to vanity and folly Min. We are to distinguish between childish nature as inclined to childish weakness frowardness and folly which is in it self weakness of childhood and want of the exercise of reason and undorstanding and so not their sin and the nature of grown capable persons 1 Cor. 13. 11. and hence it is that children in their weak and childish state are under no Law and where 〈◊〉 Law is there is no transgression but the law of their parents who are to deal with them according to their capacities and when capable to instruct them in the Law of Christ and as need requireth to correct them thereby to cure their childish folly Pro. 22. 6. 15. Eph. 6. 4. Christ The Scripture sometimes speaks of good to be in the nature of man Rom. 2. 14. 1 Cor. 11. 14. and sometimes of evil Is there no difference to be made in the nature Min. I think it meet and according both to Scripture and reason that we distinguish in the nature of man viz. that there is a two fold nature in man Rational and Sensitive that which I call rational is that wherein man differs from other sensitive creatures the Sensitive is that part of the soul which is the life of and animates the body as in other creatures and is by some called the concupiscible lower or worser part of the soul which is only capable of lustings and such like sutable natural motions and Actions in and with the body as in other creatures and it is in this sensitive concupiscible part of the soul as in conjunction with the body in which the lustings after evil lyeth and the enmity to that which is good by reason of which men become the children of wrath And hence it is that those who follow the unlawful lusts of this sensitive part of the soul are called sensual persons Jam. 3. 15. Jude v. 19. The Rational part of mans
to be Hypocrites 2. We may not understand John so as to contradict himself who plainly states the danger and the way of safety and preservation 1 Joh. 2. 28. 2 Joh. vers 8. In which he speaks very much as Christ did i● the same matter 3. Therefore we may understand John to intend either 1. That they were not of them when they went out from them if they had they would no doubt have continued with him he saith not that they were not at all of them Or 2. If they were not at all of them but Hypocrites which is not affirmed he might speak in an infallible Spirit as sometimes Peter did of Ananias Act. 5. 3 4. Which is no common rule for us but that Persons have and may fall from Grace in this imperfect state is so apparent if we believe the Scripture that it 's past all just ground of doubt and may warn us not to be high minded but fear Ro. 11. 20. 1 Tim. 1. 19. 2 Pet. 2. ●8 20 21. 3. 17. 3. Yet notwithstanding there is a way of safety and certain preservation to the Glory promised stated in the Scripture viz. If we with purpose of heart cleave to the Lord in the Faith Love and Life of the Gospel in this way he will accept us assist and preserve us to the Glory His Grace and our duty uniting will be our safety there being no promise of Preservation out of but in the way of Gospel-Faith and Obedience Christ Some will say this is Nonsense it 's as much as to say keep and preserve your selves and you shall be preserved continue your selves in the Faith and Obedience of the Gospel and you shall be kept Min. This reproach lighteth on Christ and Scripture who will take it all away Joh. 15. 7. If ye abide in me and my words abide in me and my words abide in you c. Verse 5. He that abideth in me and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruit Verse 6. If a Man abideth not in me he is cast forth as a Branch that withereth And vers 10. Sheweth us the way to abide in Christ If ye keep my Commandments ye shall abide in my love not else 1 Pet. 4. 19. Let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their Souls to him in a way of well doing and in this way he will keep them Jude vers 21. Keep your selves in the love of God And the way so to do see Joh. 15. 10. 14. 21 23. So that the Scripture justifieth this great and needful truth to be known and taketh away the reproach The sum of the whole is let us look to our duty therein looking for and believing Divine acceptance and assistance therein and God will not fail us Psal 125. 1. 1 Pet. 1. 5. But keep us safe to the Glory promised Joh. 10. 27 28 29. Where Christ states the certainty of our preservation in hearing his voice and following of him such shall never perish It stands both with Scripture and Reason that Gods Grace and our Duty unite there being no promise of safety or Salvation out of the way of Gospel-Duty Rev. 22. 14. Blessed are they that do his Commandments that they may have right unto the Tree of life c. Without this there can be no right by any Gospel-Law of Grace and as Faith and Obedience constitutes right by Divine Ordination so Perseverance therein continueth that right by the same Law of Grace without which can be no entrance Mat. 10. 22. Luk. 9. 62. And mercy it is that God has assured us of Acceptance Assistance and Preservation in his Son in this way of Gospel-Faith and Obedience Isa 64. 5. Heb. 5. 9. CHAP. VI. Of the Nature of Man and the Original Defilement thereof Christ IN as much as there are differing Notions about the Defilement of our Nature some affirming the Nature of Man to be so Defiled by the first transgrassion as that simply from its Original it 's a sink of filth and abomination and layeth liable to the second Death others think Nature in it self to be a pure and undefiled thing I desire your apprehension in this matter Min. That there is a Defilement in the Nature of Men I suppose is most Evident and that both from Scripture and Reason 1. From Scripture Job 14. 4. 15. 14. Psal 71. 5. 2. From Reason which will tell us that in as much as by the first transgression we are fallen into a state of weakness mortality and death our nature must needs be weak and Defiled and so more liable to sin than before yet what the Defilement is and how far it extends it self is that which I think none can truly determine yet I believe it 's not wholly free from Original Defilement from the grounds mentioned nor that it is distinct from all occasions of further Defilement so bad as some do render it Christ I desire you to give your apprehension herein with as much light and evidence as you can Min. 1. I doubt whether any are capable to determine of Adams nature before his fall and so of our nature in him for as his was so was ours or else we could not have fallen in him nor have suffered loss by his sin and fall tho it 's granted by all that he was created in an upright sinless estate and so we in him yet that his nature was capable of defilement and sin is likewise apparent else he had not sinned 2. What Acts he did in resisting the temptation before be sinned or whether the first temptation was not too hard for him we find not in Scripture record but most probably that he fell by the first temptation 3. What we find in Scripture of the badness of his nature after his fall more than before or of the badness of his actions I think we find nothing of either and if so Whether we may not in charity suppose that he learned by his sin and fall to be more wise and ●eedful than he was before as David Peter and other holy men have done and so did better after his fall then before 4. If the nature of man in its original defilement did become such a heap of filth and sin as some pretend Then whence it is that Christ had so much respect to little Infants and direct us to become as such Mat. 18. 3 4. and that of such is the kingdom of Heaven Mat. 19. 4. If the nature was thus defiled what pattern does the Lord direct us to in order to the obtaining of the kingdom And further they are said to be innocent Jer. 19. 4 5. they have filled the place with the blood of Innocents and chap. 2. 34. in thy skirts is found the blood of the poor Innocents Then they were not such a sink of filth and abomination as some pretend but such a● God accounted innocent Yet 5. Doubtless there is something in this matter something of defilement
themselves to do to others as they would they should do to them and the Gospel teaches the same Mat. 22. 37. to 40. and 7. 12. and this is written in all men by nature and is true rational and moral Philosophy and true Gospel Divinity and where it 's not effected it 's by the souls captivation by irrational immoral and sensual lusts and how would the Divine Law of Christ and in the Gospel united to our understandings and reason effect it if taken heed unto A sin and shame it is and dreadful will be the issue thereof that many Learned men who account themselves above others both in Philosophy and Divinity and yet are more immoral than many moral Heathens And as both moral Philosophy and Gospel Divinity unites in teaching the abhorrency of all ungodliness with the practice of all the contrary vertues and duties so would it teach us to abhor all persecution for Conscience sake if attended to it would teach us in this matter to do to others as we would they should do to us the contrary being not only unchristian but irrational No man in his right reason would be content to be forced to believe and worship God as others do contrary to his own light and conscience such in Justice reason it self and light of nature abhors and it 's likewise contrary to the Protestant Doctrine and Faith which is to make the Scriptures our rule in all matters of Faith and practice and not to be compelled to believe as the Church believeth which is condemned by Protestants to be the Popish Faith and not the Faith of Christ And strange it seems to be that Learned men who profess themselves to have most both of Philosophy and Divinity should be so great miscarriers herein I think it may be said without all just occasion of offence that throughout all ages of Christianity Learned men has lien at the bottom of most of the persecutions for Conscience sake surely it came not from their Philosophy or Divinity but from their enmity pride and prophaneness Ps 10. 2. or from some carnal and corrupt ends within themselves must be irrational and irreligious or at best from blind and ignorant zeal Joh. 16. 2. Phi. 3. 6. It 's true the Scripture warns us to take heed of being spoiled by Philosophy and vain deceit after the traditions of men and the rudiments of the World and not after Christ Col. 2. 8 i. e. When our reason turns us aside from the Gospel either in matters of Faith or practice being corruptly exercised and so becomes vain and deceitful and is not pure reason that submits it self to the Divine Law of Christ in all things so far as it understands it And although Rational and Moral Philosophy was and yet is excellent in its time and place and in itself in its degree spiritual being of and from God yet the Gospel is more spiritual and by it men formerly arrived to much of the knowledge of God and themselves and so to a good life in moral virtues and yet might arrive to the same and doubtless were then accepted of God and may yet be so where the Gospel is not known yet where the Gospel comes it will not serve or avail us without the true faith and life of the Gospel but if it being captivated by sensual lusts reject or neglect the Grace of life it renders such the more liable to the Judgment and damnation threatned therein Learned Sirs The Reasons of my dedicating the ensuing Christian discourse unto you are 1. Because the things discoursed on are matters of great if not of greatest concern to the name of God and Christ the glorious Gospel of the blessed God and the spiritual and eternal good of men and therefore of weighttest concern to have the precedency in your meditations 2. Because most of the things discoursed on are not Novel but the controverted things of the past and present times the Doctrine of the Sovereignty of God as exercised towards men the Doctrine of Election and reprobation the general and special grace of God c. being the substance of the discourse and that on which all depends The eighth chapter may at first probably with some seem most difficult yet I doubt not but is founded in and fully comports with the universal design of God and undertaking of Christ in the general grace to the World in the restitution and world to come in times to be effected and seems to be of very great weight to be understood and to have room in our Christian Faith as the top-stone and glory thereof and without which we shall lose the understanding of and Faith in the greatest if not the most glorious part of Scripture and Gospel truth In the discourse I sometimes mention what some others have said about some of the things discoursed on and especially two Books viz. The Practical Discourse of the Sovereignty of God and The Death of Death by the Death of Christ Not designing a particular answer to them nor had I at all mentioned them had they not been sent in by some designedly to lead us aside from that which we believe to be the truth of the Gospel but have stated the truth about these matters to the best of mine understanding from Scripture light which if true the substance of both are answered and must fall to the ground And let none count it strange or tautologies that I so often go over the same things in the discourse it is to shew the incongruity of those invented principles and practices with Scripture light and right reason in all the ways mentioned it likewise being the method of God in Scripture frequently to mention the same things over and over again designedly thereby to inculcate it on the memory and heart that it might not be forgotten 3. Because I think we have ground enough at least to suppose that the Apostasie from the Primitive faith as it was then delivered to the Saints has been too much ushered in by learned ●●●en I suppose that it will easily appear that in all the parts thereof whether the Papabor others some learned man or men lieth at the bottom thereof And likewise has been chief actors in its propagation and therefore it greatly concerns you now at last to be at work for God Christ the Gospel and good of men in good earnest for discovery thereof and reformation therein O that you might have your share in this matter how might you honour God and season the Nation with the truth of the Gospel both in faith and life having the greatest opportunities and advantages in order thereunto in the sincere endeavours of which you may expect Divine direction assistance and blessing and O that this little Essay may tend to encourage herein it being the common advantage and good of all I really design I hope I have not I am sure I would not follow cunning devised Fables for the world and if I am in any
nature is that wherein he was especially made in the image of God which consisted not only in rule and government as some say but in a capableness thereunto by reason and understanding which is still in its remainders the glory of man which reason should rule the lower and worser part of the soul and body likewise and when and where any Moral good is found it 's when and where this better part of the soul prevails from whence all Moral good among men is by divine creation and ordination and such is its created excellency that if men lived purely to it there would be no need of Human Laws among men Human Laws being but as an help to keep this sensitive Nature in subjection for common society among men it would teach men to do as they would be done unto and this we may suppose to be perfect in Adam before his sin and fall and Nature in this sense is not so bad in it self as some do render it it being that without which we could not be rational Men but as the Brutes as some affirm nor could we ever have been Christian Men. Therefore it behoves us to take heed how we cry down Nature in this sense lest we dishonour the God of Nature in whose Image we are made Jam. 3. 9. Unless it be for ruling no better over sensual Nature but suffering it self to be corrupted and captivated thereby The sensual Nature is spoken of in such Scriptures as these Rom. 1 26 ●7 Gal. 5. 19 20 21. Some of which following their Brutish Lusts even against concupiscible Nature it seh doing such things as Brutes refuse to do Nature in this sense is frequently called Carnal and Flesh and that which is not subject to the Law of God neither indeed can be Rom. 8. 7. But the rational part should rule it because that from Nature as thus considered arise all the unlawful Lusts and Actions of Men which if Reason did rule would prevent much And this Nature it is by which Adam fell Lust captivated reason Gen. 3. 6. And still rebels in true Christians and is not will not be subject to the Law of God longer than the Watch and War is maintained yet this is to be noted that we cannot be without this concupiscible part of Nature in this world there being as before I said a Natural good therein being in it self good in its first Creation and still is were it not abused without it we cannot live nor the world be continued all worldly Actions in order thereunto being effected thereby as eating drinking procreating the world and the like which in it self as guided and ruled by Reason and Religion is good and Lawful Heb. 13. 4. There being a Lawful sinless use thereof which God alloweth yea and commandeth but the abuse thereof is the sin in breaking Gods allowed rules which Reason and Conscience much more Christianity should regulate and order according to Divine rule but alas this unruly part of Nature not only captivates Reason but even Persons professing high in Christianity are too often shamefully captivated thereby and the most serious and sincere Christians have their groanings and complainings by reason thereof Rom. 7. 24. Let us learn from hence not to quarrel with reason any more unless it be for not doing its Work and Office but suffering sensual and sinful Lusts to corrupt and captivate it for the new Birth viz. Faith Repentance even the whole of Regeneration here is effected in the rational understanding part of Man even in the Spirit of the mind Eph. 4 23. and so rules in and over the whole Man 2 Cor. 5. 17. Christ I am greatly satisfied in this distinction and likewise that it has been a great errour and mistake to render whole Nature to be Brutish which I perceive is contrary both to Scripture and Reason but do you understand that the first sin and the Original Natural Defilement thereof what ever it be did of it self bring under the second death or damnation of Hell 〈◊〉 some affirm without the act or consent of mind to sin since the fall Min. This Natural Defilement in it self simply considered what ever it be without act or consent since the first sin and fall extendeth only to the first death it coming in by the first trangression can in it self be no greater nor so great as the actual sin nor produce any greater effects than the actual sin the Original Corruption and Defilement being in Adam and 〈◊〉 before the actual transgression as the cause thereof Gen. 3. 6. And was all but one and the same defect and sin according to Jam. 1. 14. 15. And the punishment of that sin we find stated Gen. 3. 19. And the Nature being mortal effects the same death in all Rom. 5. 18. As by one offence into all men unto Condemnation so in the Greek and this is certain that whatever death came into the World by the first sin and the Nature thereof into us as called Original sin shall be cured by that one Sacrifice as in the same Text even so by one Righteousness or by the Righteousness of one into all men unto justification of life vers 19. For as by one mans disobedience the many were made sinners so the Margent that is all so by the obedience of one shall the many be made Righteous If all came under the second death thereby all shall be justified there from for justification unto life is and shall come upon or into all that Condemnation came into or upon by the first transgression which is a Resurrection from the first Death 1 Cor. 15. 21 22. And indeed those that hold this unscriptural and irrational Notion it might for ever deter them from a Married state which is Gods Ordinance and in it self undefiled Heb. 13. 4. If they are certain to beget Children if any that must by Nature and Birth be Heirs of the second and eternal Death without hope or help especially if they dye in infancy before capable of Faith and Repentance it 's true we all know that we procreate Children like our selves in a mortal state liable to the first Death but no further without their own actual transgressions and unbelief So that I conclude it to be a great ignorance and errour in any to assert the second Death to be the wages of the first transgression and very cruel and hard thoughts of God to damn all or any Infants Eternally so dying for they know not what and that which they could no more prevent than their Conception in the Womb and further it 's apparent there had been no second Life but by the second Man and then there could have been no second Death to any so that is the second and new life came in by Christ the second Adam so will the second Death come in as a punishment of Mens actual sinning against God since the first sin and fall so that I conclude that neither Adam's Transgression nor the Defilement
Just and Good a God to make Creatures designedly for so bad an end And whether this Principle of Christian Faith do not destroy the very Foundation of the Gospel Being contrary to the whole manifested design of God therein Quer. 2. Whether to believe that God loved not the World in the gift of his Son but a few only And that Christ gave not himself for the life of the World nor a ransom for all but for a few only i● not contrary to the express Letter Reason and Scope of the Scripture Joh. 6. 51. 1 Tim. 2. 6. And whether so to believe do not root up the Foundation of Gospel-Faith 2 Cor. 2. 2. 15. 3 4 11. Quer. 3. Whether we have not sufficient ground to believe that the general love of God to the World in the gift of his Son and the general Sacrifice of Christ for the World is the alone Foundation of the general Commission for Preaching the Gospel to the World If so it being granted by all that the Commission Mar. 16. 15. is general and ought not to be limited then whether to understand the Commission for Preaching the Gospel to be larger than the Foundation and Basis thereof viz. The Fathers Love and the Sons Sacrifice without which could have been no such Commission tends not to null and make void the Commission it self for Gospel Preaching it out-running of and being larger than the Foundation thereof or at least to render the Lord inconsiderate in stating so large a Commission on so narrow a Foundation it behoves those who deny the general Love and Sacrifice to ponder this Quer. 4. Whether to believe that Men have no power to believe and obey the Gospel with its own helps without a mighty miraculous and irresistible power which God does not effect and yet will damn People Eternally for not believing be not contrary to the whole Reason Light and Truth of Scripture and contrary to the whole Name and Nature of God and contrary to the whole Light and Law of Nature and Reason placed in Man by God Then whether these things are not meet to be exploded by all true Christians Quer. 5. Whether to believe any other terms between the Father and the Son about the work of Gospel Redemption and Salvation than what are the exprest terms thereof in the Gospel does not tend to null and make void the Gospel it self Or at least and best render it uncertain if we suppose any other secret terms besides and contrary to what is exprest or a secret will contrary to his revealed Will. Quer. 6. Whether to deny Jesus Christ in his Person to be the Son of God and the Son of David the true Messias promised and as Crucified Raised and Ascended to be the alone Foundation of Gospel-Faith head Lord and Lawgiver to his Church without mens inventions or additions And whether to deny him in Word or Deed in any of these be not deeply dangerous Quer. 7. Whether to assert there is no such thing in God as Love or a natural propensity to do us Good from his Goodness or any other property And that he intends not as he speaketh either in his precepts or his promises that they declare our Duty not his intentions is not wholly contrary to the Scripture And the Right and Reverend thoughts we ought to have of God And whether it does not tend to root up the Foundation of all Christian Faith and Religion of all hope and trust in God And whether it does not really make God a lier if his Commands and promises be not his intentions Quer. 8. Whether to believe that when Christ the Lord and Judge of the World comes again from Heaven to raise and Judge the Quick and the Dead and when that is over will burn up the World so as not to restore it and make it new and carry away the Saints with him to Heaven and send all the World besides to Hell with the Devil there to be tormented Eternally is not contrary to the whole Body of Scripture contradicting the Restitution World to come and the Kingdom and Glory of Christ therein with his Church and the Glory of his great undertaking for the World And if so Whether this Faith be right or vain Quer. 9 Whether those who grant the thousand years reign and limit the Restitution World to come and the Glory of that Estate to the thousand Years are not much mistaken And whether the Kingdom and Glory of Christ and the Saints in the World to come shall not be Eternal Dan. 7. 14 27. Mar. 10. 30. And whether they do well to confine the Eternal Kingdom Life and Glory within the compass of a thousand Years There being no other World Life and Glory promised beyond that in the World to come Quer. 10. Whether those who grant that after the Conflagration of the World by fire that there shall be new Heavens and new Earth follow wherein dwelleth Righteousness after the Judgment according to the Scripture 2 Pet. 3. 13. And yet affirm that Christ will send away all the wicked of the World to Hell with the Devil eternally to be tormented and carry away all the Saints with him to Heaven I say whether they have considered who shall be the inhabitants of this New and Restored World wherein shall dwell Righteousness or whether it shall be the habitation only of Birds and Beasts or of nothing And whether it it does not concern us prudently to consider whether the Traditional Faith of going away to Heaven has not led us besides and so in our Faith lost the true inheritance and heirship promised in the World to come Quer. 11. Whether it is to any sort of Faith that owns Christ in Name to which the promise of Life is made or to the true Faith and Life of the Gospel If to any Faith that owns the Name of Christ then why may not all the World called Christian be saved as well as any If not but that the Life of the Gospel is promised to the true Faith thereof called the Faith of God's Elect. Then whether it does not greatly concern all without delay to endeavour to come right in the Faith and Life of the Gospel to which the promise is made And not to content our selves with any sort of Faith and Life Quer. 12. Whether bad and corrupt Principles of Faith tho attended with a good life be not as dangerous and pernicious as good Principles of Faith attended with a bad life Rom. 10. 2. Phi. 3. 4 5 6. Quer. 13. Whether some of those Principles of Faith before mentioned viz. the reprobation of the World by Eternal Decree both to sin and Judgment does not really tend to render God to be most Cruel most Unholy most Unrighteous and most False c. in Decreeing and so in being the first and Foundation cause of all the Cruelties Unholiness Unrigheousness Falseness and Wickedness either in Devils or Men It being a maxim that the