accusing falsly 2. upon uncertain grounds 3. by prevaricating 4. The Defendant 1. by not confessing the truth 2. by appealing without cause 3. by not submitting to the sentence 5. The 〈◊〉 1. by not declaring all the truth when 〈◊〉 is lawfully called 2. by not delivering the innocent though he be not called 3. by delivering the wicked by false testimony 6. The Advocate 1. by undertaking an evil cause 2. by perverting the Law Of giving false testimony in Elections THE Act of this sin consists specially in words which are as our Saviour speaks according to the treasure of our hearts Now there is not onely an evil treasure of the heart out of which a man brings 〈◊〉 evil things but also an idle treasure out of which a man brings forth idle things viz. idle words for which a man must give an account Under these two heads we may comprehend the branches of this sin which may admit this division of 1. false words and 2. vain or idle words 1. False words are either when our words disagree from the truth and essence of things or when they disagree from our own minde And both may be considered either as they concern our selves or our brethren for whatsoever speech is either prejudicial to ourselves or our neighbour is condemned as against the rule of charity And though it be neither hurtful to us nor to our brethren yet if it contain falshood it is against the truth of God and therein we are as the Apostle speaks found false witnesses against God False doctrine is here included as opposite to true doctrine but not as it is in the third Commandment for there it is forbidden as contrary to Gods glory here as hurtful to our brethren and their spiritual good We must not adde to his word nor take from it nor change it by making any other way of salvation as those false teachers did among the Galatians that preached another gospel which as the Apostle saith is to preach alium Jesum another Jesus This was toucht before and therefore we shall say the lesse 〈◊〉 Onely this we adde that it is a good rule given by S. Basil not onely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not onely all lies and falshoods but also all turnings and wrestings of Scripture are condemned as among others he specially instances in one viz. the making of the litteral sence typical or turning the Scripture into allegories and from thence inferring doctrines which the Holy Ghost never intended This gives occasion to all Heresies when men choose what opinions they themselves please and make the Scripture a nose of wax to patronize them As to make Adam the reasonable part of the soul and Eve the seniual and thereupon to infer this as a positive doctrine That if reason command sense we shall avoid the temptation of the serpent but if the sensual part prevail against reason we shall be overcome by the Tempter as Adam was by hearkning to Eve this is to pervert the Scripture we may indeed 〈◊〉 to such things in Scripture as the Apostle doth to Sarah and Hagar but to say this or that is meant by such texts is to make the Scripture like a 〈◊〉 mans hose or Cothurnum a 〈◊〉 that will serve either leg and makes all Religion uncertain Ezekiel makes it an 〈◊〉 to God to say In obscuris 〈◊〉 I have written to you in dark or doubtful speeches but by this means all is made doubtful so that people shall be doubtful what to hold in any point We come now to false speaking in particular and here we must consider 1. false testimony which is given in judgement and 2 falshood uttered out of judgement This distinction is intimated by Solomon Proverbs 19. 5. where he saith A false witnesse shall not be unpunished and he that speaketh lies shall not escape where we see he make this division that some are false witnesses viz. such as speak falshood from judgement and others speak lies at other times that is out of judgement and the very same we finde by him repeated in the ninth verse The same may be inferd in the words of this Commandment for when it is said Thou shalt not bear false witnesse against thy neighbour that is in judgement this 〈◊〉 that there may be also falsum testimonium false witnesse that is not contra proximum against our Neighbour Before we speak of these in particular we shall onely say this briefly in general concernig all lies That all lyes are from the Devil who was a lyar from the beginning for the first word that ever he spake was a lye those then that utter lyes belong to him The Psalmist makes it the proper mark of wicked men whom he describes by this they speak lies from the very womb And that this is no small sin appears by that fea ful threatning against lyars Perdes omnes qui loquuntur mendacia 〈◊〉 shalt destroy all 〈◊〉 that speak lies All lies whether they concern our selves our Neighbours or none make us false witnesses to God And therefore we finde in the Revel that in the place of torment shall be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every one that loveth or maketh a lye he that either loves to hear it or that speak it so that lies are condemned both actively and passively if we make them or love to hear them Come we now to him that speaks false in judgement And for this false witnesse Solomon gives us a good comparison for he saith A man that beareth false witnesse is a hammer a sword and a sharp arrow Now thus he is compared partly because his face is hardned so that he blushes at nothing be it never so false for having once lost his 〈◊〉 he comes to have frontem meretricium as the Prophet speaks a whores forehead and 〈◊〉 known to the one party viz. to him that hired him to be a Knave he grows impudent and testifies any thing and so strikes like a hammer or a sword or whatsoever doth wound the deepest he sticks at no mischef he can do to the party against whom he speaks and partly because that as S. Bernard speaks there are three parties who are 〈◊〉 by him at once by one and the same tongue 1. Judici est Malleus He is a hammer or maul to the Judge whose judgement and understanding he 〈◊〉 so that like a man astonisht by a blow on the head he knows not how to determine aright 2. To the party that hired him he is gladius a sword for though he speak for him yet 〈◊〉 is a sword to destroy his soul. He makes him beleeve that by his purse he hath prevailed against the truth and having done so once he may do so at other times and so he 〈◊〉 him in this evil course 3. He is a sharp arrow to him against whom he witnesseth though he hath
THE PATTERN OF CATECHISTICAL DOCTRINE AT LARGE OR A Learned and Pious Exposition Of the Ten COMMANDMENTS With An INTRODUCTION Containing the Use and Benefit of Catechizing the generall Grounds of Religion and the truth of Christian Religion in particular proved against ATHEISTS PAGANS JEWS and TURKS By the Right Reverend Father in God LANCELOT ANDREWS late Bishop of WINCHESTER Perfected according to the Authors own Copy and thereby purged from many thousands of Errours Defects and Corruptions which were in a rude imperfect Draught formerly published as appears in the Preface to the Reader Ecclesiastes 12. 13. Fear God and keep his Commandments for this is the whole duty of Man 1. Corinth 7. 19. Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the Commandments of God LONDON Imprinted by Roger Norton and are to be sold by George Badger at his Shop in S. Dunstans Church-yard in Fleet-street Anno Dom. 1650. THE CONTENTS The Exposition of the Introduction CHAP. I. Page 1 1. That Children are to be taught and instructed in Religion proved out of Heathen Philosophers out of the Law the Gospel 2. That this instruction ought to be by way of Catechism What Catechising is How it differs from Preaching Reasons for abridgements or sums of Religion Catechizing used in all ages before the flood after the flood under the Law under the Gospel after the Apostles in the Primitive Church Reasons for this custom of Catechising CHAP. II. Page 9 The duty of the catechized 1. To come and that 1. with a right intent 2. willingly 3. with preparation which must be 1. in fear 2. by prayer Other rules for coming 1. with 〈◊〉 2. with purity of heart 3. in faith 4. frequently The second duty to hear or hearken The necessity of hearing The manner 1. with reverence 2. with fervour of spirit 3. with silence 4. without gazing 5. hear to keep How the word must be kept in our hearts 1. by examination 2. by meditation 3. by Conference CHAP. III. Page 14 Of Religion in general and the foundations of it The four first steps 1 We must come to God as the only way to true happinesse No happinesse in riches proved by divers reasons Nor in Honour Nor in pleasure Nor in moral vertue Nor in contemplation General reasons against them all that felicity cannot be in any of them because they cannot satisfie 2 They are not perpetual but uncertain In God onely is true happinesse to be found CHAP. IIII. Page 19 2. The way to come to God is onely by faith not by natural reason alone as the Manichees held reasons against them The way by faith more certain The necessity of belief Rules for coming by faith CHAP. V. Page 22 3. That we must believe there is a God Misbelief in four things 1. Autotheisme 2. Polytheisme 3. Atheisme 4. Diabolisme The reasons of Atheists answered Religion upholds all states The original of Atheisme from 1. Discontent 2. sensuality CHAP. VI. Page 25 That there is a God proved 1. By reasons drawn out of the writings of the Heathens themselves 2. By the frame of the World Objections answered 3. By the beginning and progresse of arts c. 4. By the necessity of a first mover The beginning of things cannot be 1. By Chance nor 2. By Nature 5. By prophecies fulfilled 6. By the artificial framing the bodies of all Creatures 7. By the soul of man Reasons why so many Atheists Natural notions of a diety The Conscience 8. From the miserable ends of Atheists CHAP. VII Page 29 The fourth step That God hath a providence over man Reasons against divine providence answerd why God permitts evil general reasons for a providence particular reasons from all sorts of creatures That second causes work not nor produce their effects of themselves without God That Gods providence reacheth to particulars That God is to be sought and that he rewards them that seek him CHAP. VIII Page 34 The four religions in the world Of Paganisme reasons against the plurality of Gods That there can be but one God proved out of their own Philosophers that their religion was false How man came to be worshipped How beasts Of the Miracles and Oracles of the Gentiles CHAP. IX Page 37 Of Judaisme The positions of the Jews 1. That the Messias shall have an earthly kingdom at Jerusalem confuted 2. That Jesus is not the Messias The contrary proved by Jacobs prophecy Gen. 49. 11. By Daniels seventy two weeks Dan. 9. 25. By diverse other reasons 3. That the Messias is not yet come The contrary proved by sundry arguments CHAP. X. Page 41 Of Christian. This religion proved to be false by seven reasons CHAP. XI Page 42 Of Christian religion The truth thereof in general proved 1. By the antiquity of it out of the Heathen authors themselves 2. By the continuance and preservation of it 3. By the certainty 4 By the end it leads to viz. to God it gives all honour to him Deprives man of all Other reasons It restraines carnal liberty allowed by false Religions reaches to the heart It contains mysteries above mans capacity Teaches contempt of the world requires spiritual worship Confirmed by miracles beyond exception Prophecies CHAP. XII Page 48 Special reasons for the Christian Religion as differing from the Jewish It purgeth the soul shews that God is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the testimony of the Apostles and Evangelists the knowledge of what they wrote their honesty the credit of the story testimony from Pagans the star at Christs birth the crosse sacred with the Egyptians the miracles at Christs death the Progresse of Christianity by weak means opposed by power and learning contrary to flesh and blood the excellency of the promises power in conversions the truth of Christs miracles the constancy of Martyrs the ends of the Apostles the Devils testimony against himself CHAP. XIII Page 52 Of the two chief parties that lay claim to Christian Religion Papists and Protestants Their difference about interpretation of Scriptures The Churches authority in expounding Scriptures An additional Observation out of the Authors other works Rules about the sense of the Scriptures Means for finding out the true sense other means controverted Addition about the Churches power in matters of Faith whether infallible Decrees of Councels Consent of Fathers The Pope not infallible CHAP. XIIII Page 58 Christian religion divided into the Law and the Gospel Additions about the use of the Law That the Law of Christ is part of the second Covenant c. The judgement of the Author out of his other books That the Gospel is lex Christi The Law handled first Reasons for this order What the Law teacheth and what the Gospel CHAP. XV. Page 62 In the Law four things 1. The work to be done The Decalogue the Pandects of moral Laws The Laws moral known before Moses written in mens hearts proved in particular In every Law there is evil to be avoided and good to be done
by 1. his power 2. his jealousie How jealousie is ascribed to God Why humane affections are ascribed to God CHAP. IX page 224 Of the Commination wherein 1. The censure of the sin 2. The punishment 1. In the censure The sin viz. of Idolatry Is called 1. Hatred of God How God can be hated 2. Iniquity The punishment visitation upon the children The 〈◊〉 of this punishment by 1. The greatnesse 2. The multiplicity 3. The continuance Of Gods justice in punishing the sins of the fathers upon the children That it is not unjust in respect of the father nor 2. of the sin The use of all CHAP. X. page 228 The third part of the sanction a promise of mercy Gods rewards proceed from mercy which is the fountain of all our happinesse His mercy is promised to the 1000 generation the threatning extends onely to the third and fourth The object of his mercy such as love him Our love must be manifested by keeping his Commandements How they must be kept The benefit they will keep and preserve us The Exposition of the third Commandement CHAP. I. page 231 The general scope of the third Commandement Of glorifying the name of God by praise The manner how it must be done Several motives to stir men up to the duty CHAP. II. page 234 What is meant by Gods name The use of names 1. To distinguish 2. To dignifie Gods name in respect of his Essence Attributes and works and how they are to be reverenced What it is to take his Name as glorious as necessary Glorifying his Name inwardly outwardly by confessing defending it remembring it honourable mention of it threefold it must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 often 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 well spoken of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 venerable Applyed to our own actions by prayer and to others by blessing c. Of glorifying it in our lives What it is to take Gods Name in vain in respect of 1. the end 2. agent 3. the work CHAP. III. page 239 Of taking Gods Name by an oath The causes and grounds of an oath The parts of it Contestation Execration How God is glorified by an oath What is here commanded 1. To swear In what cases For Gods glory Mans necessity For the publick good The Oath Ex Officio whether lawful or no. Of private and voluntary oathes 2. To swear by God not by Idols or Creatures 3. Not to take his Name in vain but to swear in 1. Truth in oathes assertorie promissorie 2. Judgement 3. Justice Against voluntary oathes whether lawful Of swearing from the heart The means to be used against vain swearing The signes of keeping this Commandement Of drawing others to keep it CHAP. IV. page 250 What a vow is Whether a bare purpose without a promise Whether a thing commanded may be the matter of a vow The necessity and use of vows in respect of God of our selves What things a man may vow se suos sua Vows in the times of the Gospel Of performing vows Qualifications in a vow for the person the matter The time of vowing Of paying our vows CHAP. V. page 255 Of glorifying Gods Name from the heart The means of glorifying it The signes Of causing others to glorifie it The second part of this precept the Commination Reasons why such a threatning is here denounced Gods punishing the breach of this Commandment by visible judgements God is jealous of his Name The Exposition of the Fourth Commandement CHAP. I. page 259 The excellent order of the Commandements Why God himself appointed a set time for publick worship Why this Commandement is larger then the rest Six special things to be observed in this Commandement which are not in the rest The general parts of it 1. The precept 2. The reasons In the precept 1. The affirmative part what is meant by Sabbath what by sanctifying How things sanctified differ from other things God sanctified it not for himself but for us We must sanctifie it 1. In our estimation of it 2. In our use of it CHAP. II. page 262 What is commanded here 1. A rest 2. Sanctification Rest is required not for it self but for the duties of sanctification Reasons that the Sabbath is not wholly nor principally remonial Addition 21. out of the Authors other works declaring his meaning in two things 1. That the Lords day is Jure Divino 2. That the Jewish Sabbath is abolisht by Christs death proved by him at large out of Scriptures and Antiquity in his Speech against Trask in Star-Chamber CHAP. III. page 268 Additional considerations upon the doctrine of the Sabbath laid down in seven conclusions 1. It is certain some time is to be set apart for publick worship proved by Schoolmen Canonists and Reasons 2. Certain that the law of Nature doth not dictate the proportion of seven or any other in particular 3. It is most probable that the seventh day was appointed by God from the beginning as a day of publick worship in memory of the creation and did oblige all mankinde though the symbolical or typical rest afterwards was enjoyned to the Jews onely This proved from Scripture Fathers Jewish Doctors late Divines reasons c. How the Fathers are to be understood that deny Sabbatizing before the Mosaical Law 4. The Lords day is of divine institution proved by Scripture Fathers publick Declarations of the Church Edicts of Princes Canonists some Schoolmen late Divines 5. The fourth Commandement is in force for the moral equity that at least a seventh part be given to God literally it requires onely the seventh day from the creation not a seventh day The day altered by the Apostles by special authority 6. The rest of the Iewish-sabbath partly moral which continues still partly symbolical which is expired How the rest of the Lords day differs from the rest of the Sabbath rest from ordinary labours forbidden by God but the special determination left to the Church How the Lords day succeeds the Sabbath 7. The Sabbath kept with the Lords day by the Primitive Christians till the Councel of Laodicea was not in a Jewish manner CHAP. IV. page 276 Reasons of this Commandement 1. Gods liberality in allowing us six dayes and requiring but one for himself 2. The seventh is his own proper day Who are comprehended in the prohibition 1. The Master of the family 2. Children 3. Servants 4. Cattel 5. Strangers The general reasons of this precept 1. Gods rest from the creation Addition 22. Moral reasons sometimes given of a ceremonial precept The reason why a rest and why on this day are different things out of Maimon Abenezra 2. Reason the benefit coming to mankinde by the creation 3. Reason God blessed the seventh day CHAP. V. page 280 How far this rest is to be kept Why this word remember is prefixed Such work to be forborn which may be done before or after Necessity of a vacation from other works that we may attend holy duties Mans opposition to God when
means 4. Observe the rules for getting and using of riches CHAP. X. page 488 Rules to be observed 1. in just getting 1. By Donation 2. By Industry 3. By Contracts wherein must be considered 1. The need we have of the thing sold. 2. The use Three degrees of a just price 1. Pium. 2. Moderatum 3. Rigidum 2. In just using wherein are rules 1. Concerning our selves 1. For preserving our estate 2. For laying it out 2. Concerning others giving 1. to God from whom we receive all 2. to the poor Rules for the measure and manner of giving Motives to stir us up to give to the poor Of procuring the keeping of this Commandment by others The Exposition of the Ninth Commandment CHAP. I. Page 493 The words expounded What is mean tby Non respondebis in the Original Addition 34. about the meaning of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 respondere What is meant by witnesse Four witnesses 1. God 2. The Conscience 3. Men and Angels 4. The Creatures What is meant by false what by contra against what by Proximum Neighbour The coherence and dependance of this Commandment The scope and use of it 1. In respect of God 2. Of the Church 3. Of the Common-wealth 4. Of private persons CHAP. II. Page 498 The necessity of a good name The sin forbidden in general Wherein 1. The root of it 2. The suppuration or rankling of it 〈◊〉 by false surmises and suspitions 3. The fitting of the soyl by readinesse to hear false reports 4. The watering of the soyl by busying our selves in other ones affairs CHAP. III. Page 501 The outward act of which two branches 1. False words 2. Idle and vain words Of false speaking in general this is two fold 1. In judgement 2. Out of judgement In judgement by false witnesse Of lyes in general Six persons in every judgement who may be guilty of false witnessing 1. The Judge 1. By cherishing Law suits 2. By deferring justice 3. If his judgement be 1. usurped 2. rash 3. perverse 2. The Register by making false records 3. The Accuser 1. by accusing falsly 2. upon uncertain grounds 3. by prevaricating 4. The defendant 1. by not confessing the truth 2. by appealing without cause 3. by not submitting to the sentence 5. The Witnesse 1. by not declaring all the truth when he is lawfully called 2. by not delivering the innocent though he be not called 3. by delivering the wicked by false testimony 6. The Advocate 1. by undertaking an evil cause 2. by perverting the Law Of giving false testimony in Elections CHAP. IIII. Page 507 Of false witnessing out of judgement Four things to which the tongue may do harme The branches of this kinde of false witnessing 1. Contumelious speaking 2. Taunting 3. Backbiting which is 1. By words 2. By letters 3. By deeds 4. In all these a may be false witnesse though he speak the truth CHAP. V. Page 509 Of reproof or fraternal correption the vertue opposite to flattery Of flattery which is 1. In things uncertain 2. In things certain and those either good or evil Of boasting and vaunting a mans self and its extream CHAP. VI. Page 512 Of a rash lie an officious lye a merry lye Four cases wherein a man seems to speak contrary to the truth but doth not Of Mendacium Facti the real lye by 〈◊〉 CHAP. VII Page 514 The second general branch of the sin forbidden viz. Vain speech Three ends of speech 1. Edification 2. Profit 3. Grace and delight Of the means whereby this Commandment may be kept Of suspition Rules about it 1. For the manner The Exposition of the Tenth Commandment CHAP. I. Page 521 Reasons against the dividing of this Commandment into two The dependance of it The scope and end of it CHAP. II. Page 523 The thing prohibited Concupiscence which is two fold 1. Arising from our selves 2. From the spirit of God The first is either 1. from nature or 2. from corruption of nature Corrupt desires of two sorts 1. vain and foolish 2. hurtful or noisome The danger of being given up to a mans own lusts CHAP. III. Page 525 How a man comes to be given up to his own desires Thoughts of two sorts 1. Ascending from our own hearts 2. Injected by the Devil The manner how we come to be infected Six degrees in sin 1. The receiving of the seed 2. The retaining of it 3. The conception 4. The forming of the parts 5. The quickning 6. The travel or birth CHAP. IV. Page 528 The wayes whereby a man is tempted of his own lust 1. There is a bait 2. A hook The same wayes used by the Devil and the World The affirmative part of this precept Renewing the heart and minde The necessity of this Renovation The meanes of Renovation A Table of the Supplements or Additions Wherein the sence of the Author is cleered in some places where it was obscure or doubtful and some things are handled more fully which were omitted or but briefly touched c. Introduct CHAP. XIII 1. Concerning points cleer and controverted p 52 2. Of peoples submitting to the judgement of the Church p 55 3. Of the Churches power to interpret the Scriptures p 57 CHAP. XIV 4. That the Moral Law is an essential part of the Gospel or second Covenant p 58 CHAP. XVII 5. About mans ability to keep the Law of Christ by his Grace p 71 Com. 1. CHAP. I. 6. That the 4 fundamental articles of all Religion are implyed in the four first Precepts p 88 CHAP. III. 7. Of the force of Church Customs p 95 CHAP. IIII. 8. About the distinction of inward and outward worship p 100 CHAP. VII 9. Concerning the evidence of faith and freedom of assent p 111 10. Concerning the nature of Faith p 115 CHAP. VIII 11. Of the seat of faith p 121 Com. 2. CHAP. I. 12. That the making of Images was absolutely forbidden the Jews and in that respect that the precept was partly positive and reached onely to them p 193 13. Whether all voluntary and free worship be forbidden under the name of will-worship p 194 CHAP. III. 14. Of S. Chrysostomes Liturgie p 202 15. Of the second Councel of Nice p 203 CHAP. IV. 16. How preaching is a part of Gods worship p 205 17. About the Eucharist whether it may be called a Sacrifice p 207 CHAP. V. 18. Concerning customs and traditions of the Church p 210 19. Of Images for memories sake p 214 Com. 3. CHAP. I. 20. What is litterally meant by taking Gods Name in vain p 231 CHAP. IV. 21. Concerning the nature of a vow p 250 Com. 4. CHAP. II. 22 The Jewish sabbath ceremonial the Lords day unchangeable p. 263 23 Of ceremonies p. 265 CHAP. III. 24 The whole doctrine of the Sabbath and Lords day largly handled in seven conclusions p. 268 CHAP. IIII. 25 That moral reasons are sometimes given of ceremonial precepts p. 279 CHAP. IX 26 Of adorning Churches p. 299 27 Of
lest at the quitting them from the outward they have neither the inward nor the outward but be like the sons of Belial that is be under no yoke nor government at all 9. The very Heathen could see an aptnesse and disposition in their children to vice and we may perceive their inclinations and propensity to prophane and scurrilous jeasts Therefore we are to take the advantage of their dispositions betimes and to imploy and exercise them in things that are good to which if they be well ordered they will be as apt as to bad For no doubt but if children can say of themselves Bald-head to Elisha they may be easily taught to say Hosanna to Christ. 10. That time is ever to be taken which fitteth any thing best but the time of youth is most fit to learn in respect of the docibility of it They are like to a new Mortar which savoureth most of that spice which is first beaten in it and to a new vessell that retaines the sent of the first Liquor which was put into it Quo semel est imbuta recens servabit 〈◊〉 Testa diu As also in respect that this age is free from those cares and passions which the world infuseth into men of elder age as ambition malice adultery covetousnesse and the like which have been great remoras and impediments in matters of religion to those of riper yeares So much for the time when now for the manner how children are to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will teach or catechize you saith David in this text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Although an argument from the name proveth little yet it explaineth well the English and the Latine follow well the Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which seemeth also to be proportioned from the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to iterate or to doe any thing the second time or of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth first acuere to whet or sharpen to make it the fitter to enter And 2. repetere to goe over and over the same thing as we use to doe with our knives upon a whetstone And in both these are contained the duties both of Catechist and Catichized Of the first by making his doctrine the easier to enter by giving it such an edg by a perspicuous method as that children may not onely understand but carry away also what he delivereth to them of the later by often going over that which he is taught as a knife doth a whetstone and to repeate and iterate it till he have made it his own So that we see that in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to resound is included an iteration from which word we have our Eccho in English 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is indeed to sound the last syllable and such sounders happily there are enough but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to sound the whole after one againe And such is the repetition which is required of the right and true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 young catechised Christians and those places are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that give the whole verse or word againe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Catechism is the doctrine of Godlinesse or Religion first declared by the Catechiser to learners of which afterwards account is given by the learners to their instructer And it is thus distinguished from Preaching 1. Preaching is a dilating of one Member or point of Religion into a just Treatise Catechising is a contracting of the whole body of Religion into an 〈◊〉 or Summe 2. Preaching is applyed for the capacity of all sorts of people old and young Catechising is appointed onely for the younger sort and those which are ignorant 3. In Preaching there 's no repetition required from the Auditors In Catechising an accompt or repetition is to be exacted from the Catechised Now upon these differences 3 things are to be considered or 3. queres are to be made 1. By what warrant Abridgments or Summes are made 2. What we have to warrant teaching of children by way of Catechising 3. Upon what grounds answers are to be made by the Catechised 1. The warrant for the first we have from Christ himselfe who in his answer to the Lawyer reduced the whole Law under two heads The love of God and our neighbour 2. Againe our Saviour catechising Nicodemus made an Epitome or Abridgment of the Gospel under one head Sic Deus dilexit Mundum So God loved the world that he gave 〈◊〉 onely begotten Son that whosoever beleeved on him might not perish but have everlasting life 3. Solomon also in his booke of the Preacher reduceth the whole duty of man into two heads 1 feare God 2 and keep his commandments 4. Saint Paul in his speech to the Elders of Ephesus draweth the principles of Religion to these two 〈◊〉 and Repentance Repentance towards God and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ. And in another place Repentance from dead works and faith towards God 5. The 〈◊〉 are of opinion that teaching by way of Summe is meant by Saint Paul when he speaketh of the forme of sound words and of That form of Doctrine and the proportion or analogy of faith 6. Lastly 〈◊〉 we know have their 〈◊〉 Lawyers their 〈◊〉 Philosophers Isagoges and therefore Divines may have their Epitomes If we demand a reason hereof our Saviour sheweth us one that we may be able 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to have a dependance or be able to referre all our readings and hearings to certain principall head thereby to enclose or limit our study And the Rabbins say that the 2 heads to which Christ reduced the Law and the Prophets were 〈◊〉 legis an hedg of the Law containing the heads of the generall doctrine lest we should wander in infinito campo in too large a field and so waver Clemens calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 basis a foundation or groundplot 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a first or rough draught of a Picture And as these abridgments are for our shorter so for our more easy attayning to the knowledg of that which may 〈◊〉 us to salvation And such were the sermons of the Apostles when they baptized so many hundreds in one day Concerning which it is well aid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thanks be to our blessed God who hath made necessary doctrines compendious and doctrines which are not compendious not so necessary But here we must take with us a double Proviso 1. That we remain before Gods judgement seat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 inexcusable if we seek not his knowledge being made easy by a short compendium 2. We must grow in grace and in the knowledge of Christ And we must not be ever hildren but men in understanding And after we have heard the word of truth so compe diously delivered we must trust and beleeve in it being the Gospel of our salvation We are not
of having but three commandments in the first Table in reference to the Trinity as may be seen in his division of the Decalogue For the Councils which are divided into Action or Agitation of a point and Canon 1. In the Action commonly is such errour that they are forced to lay all upon the Canon and say that it matters not much what the premises be so the Conclusion be good 2. And for the Canon we may finde in some Councils that the Canons of one are flat and direct against another as in the case of marriages of Priests some for them some against them We see the two Councils of Constance and Basile both 〈◊〉 and both confirmed one by Pope Martin the fifth and the other by Eugenius the fourth The Bulls of which though the Canons agree be opposite to each other The one holding Concilium posse errare non Papam that the Council may but the Pope cannot erre the other Papam errare posse non Concilium that the Pope may erre but the Council cannot And the Canon of the Council of Ferrara holding against that of the Council of Florence one that the Pope is above the Council and the other that the Council is above the Pope All this shewes that Councils are not simply infallible but may erre now where it is evident that they erre being drawn into parties and factions by corrupt interests none is bound to beleeve their determinations but where there is no such evidence they ought to be obeyed as those authorised by Christ to direct and guide us in matters of salvation and even when we are not bound to believe their decisions yet for the peace of the Church their decrees tye us to external obedience that is not to oppose them if there be no fundamental errour For the Church and the practise thereof This is as uncertain as the other For the Churches of the East and West agree not in diverse points and among other in the case of the Popes supremcay the Eastern Church totally opposing it And if we urge the practise of the Church it will be found that at some time most of the Bishops were Arrians So that in this there 's both ambiguity and peril And Basile saith that in the case of Baptism the Children at the first were dipped but once and afterwards thrice and we know at this day they are but once dipped It is true these shew that the Church is not simply infallible especially in such points as these which touch not any fundamental article and that particular Churches may differ in some lesser points and yet maintain the same faith and keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace but all this hinders not but that the Church is the ordinary interpreter of Scripture to her children and that they ought to submit to her because she is accountable to God for them Heb. 13. 17. and that none ought to reject her doctrine upon probable or doubtful reasons but upon such as are evident that is such as not onely seem evident to them for every contradicting spirit will affirm the most doubtful things to be evident to him but such as to other pious and learned men not interested seem evident Reginald l. 17. c. ult n. 234. This seems to have been the judgement of this learned Prelate in his latter thoughts As serm on Act. 2. 42. p. 27. where he hath these words fit to be written in letters of gold The ancient fathers thought it meet that they that took upon them to interpret the Apostles doctrine should put in sureties that their senses they gave were no other then the Church in former time hath acknowledged It is true the Apost spake from the spirit and every exposition of theirs was an oracle but that was their peculiar priviledge but all others after them are not to utter their own fancies and to desire to be beleeved upon their bare word but onely on condition that the sense they now give be not a feigned sense but such an one as hath been before given by our Fathers and fore-runners in the Christian faith Say I this of my self Saith the Apostle saith not the Law so too give I this sense of mine own head hath not Christs Church heretofore given the like which one course if it were strictly held would rid our Church of many fond imaginations which now are stamped daily because every man upon his own single bond is trusted to deliver the meaning of any Scripture which is many times nought else but his own imagination This is the disease of our age Thus he The last way they prescribe is that of the Popes And that they may erre in their interpretation may appear in that many of them were not sound in the faith Saint Jerome saith that Damasus Pope did consent ad subscriptionem hereseos to the subscription of heresy and Ambrose reporteth that Liberius the Pope though for a while he was orthodox and for not subscribing to the condemnation of Athanasius he was banished into Thrace but shortly after he became an Arrian and at one of their Councels subscribed to heresy Honorius the first after his death was accursed and condemned in the thirteenth Action of the sixth general Council of Constantinople held anno 680. under Constantinus Pogonatus the Emperour quia impia dogmata confirmavit for confirming wicked opinions which were those of the Monothelites But to shift off these things they have nothing to say but that the Councils were corrupt and not onely they but the writings of Beda shall be corrupt So that we see that none of these rules severally are infallible Let us see them a little together In the administration of the Sacrament of the Lords supper to infants we may see they fail for S. Paul saith Let a man examine himself and so eat c. which a Childe cannot do And in this and other things wherein they fail they are forced to say We beleeve not the Fathers because they say it but because they say it according to rules And if they beleeve it in respect of the person that speaketh not the quid the reality of the thing they erre much though Stapleton say that the interpretation of a Bishop though unlearned is to be prefer'd before that of a learned Divine because of his office and authority Andradius yet saith The Fathers are to be beleeved not in whatsoever they say but in whatsoever they say according to their rules and so say we And thus much for the Preface CHAP. XIIII Christian Religion divided into the Law and the Gospel Additions about the use of the Law That the Law of Christ is part of the second Covenant c. The judgement of the Authour out of his other Books That the Gospel is Lex Christi The Law handled first Reasons for this order What the Law teacheth and what the Gospel Summa Religionis IN the next place we are to
God bestowed a further light upon him So that if men use Cornelius means and not suppresse the light they have God will give them his grace and further light to lead them into all necessary truthes 3. The third is Apollos means to have paratum cor to be ready and willing to encrease the knowledge we have already These are the principal means other means were mentioned before when we spake of knowledge The signes of true religion were foure of which formerly we have spoken and therefore will but name them 1. The Antiquity 2. The purging of the soul. 3. The beginning and growth of it And 4. Lastly the examples of excellent vertues in the professors All these Saint Augustine accounteth the especial signes The sixth rule for purging it in others King David desired that he might not die yet because the dust could not declare Gods truth And our Saviour saith that he was borne and came into the world to beare witnesse unto the truth And on the contrary we are commanded to mark and avoyd those which cause division and offences contrary to true doctrine CHAP. XVI The third thing required in the 1. Commandement is to have onely the true God which includes Sincerity Reasons hereof The Contraries to sincerity Means of sincerity Signes of sincerity Of procuring it in others Thus much for the second general proposition and the vertue therein required viz religion Now for the third Habebis me solum Deum We must have him onely for our God and this includes Sincerity It is not enough to have him for our God but we must have him alone for our God none but me as the Chaldee and Septuagint read Our Saviour saith thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serve which is 〈◊〉 one with Deut. 6. 13. and 10. 20. onely there is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 him onely but it is supplied by our Saviour and all comes from the same spirit The reasons were touched before yet we will mention some of them again 1. The first is because it trencheth upon Gods honour and glory to have a partner and that men should worship other gods The Apostles end their 〈◊〉 with Soli Deo 〈◊〉 et gloria Rom. 2. Peter and Saint Iude. And the reason the Prophet gives My glory saith God will I not give to another his glory is indivisible if any will adde a partner see the conditions 1 Sam. 7. 3. God promiseth 〈◊〉 the people will leave serving of other gods he will be their deliverer but if they serve any other gods he will deliver them no more but bids them go to them and let them save them 2. Another is taken from the titles given to God as a father a king a 〈◊〉 O hearken to the voice of my calling My king A husband I will marry thee 〈◊〉 me saith God by the Prophet A Master If I be a Master where is my feare And of all these we can have but one but one father one husband one king one master We cannot serve God and Mammon And therefore we can have but one God 3. The third was touched before To joyne any with him who is below him and whosoever he is he must be below him is to abase him if we could joyn any that were equal or his match it were otherwise If we joyn worse with better it disgraces it wine with water is the weaker If you go to Bethel and erect an altar to Jehovah you must put a way other strange gods No halting with the Israelites between God and Baal No swaering by Jehovah and Malcom with one breath No keeping the feast with leaven no mixture in religion but our passeover must be kept with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth saith the Apostle And therefore all mixture was forbiden under the Law both in figure Deut. 22. 9 and by expresse precept Deut. 4. 10. there must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Apostle speaks 2. Cor. 1. 22. a judging of mixt and counterfeit wares by bringing them to the sun God will search with lanthorns sincerity is sine cera pure honey without waxe such must our religion be The thing forbidden and opposite to sincerity is 1. Mixture in religion and that both in respect of the matter of it and of our affections towards it 1. For the matter Our Saviour saith No man putteth new and old cloth together in a garment or new wine into old vessells This mixture of religion corrupteth it as that of the Turks is a religion compounded of all and the Pagans worship diverse gods The whore of Babylon is said to have a mixt cup Rev. 18. 6. 2 For the mixture of affections As our religion ought to be sincere so our affections A mixture of hot and cold maks lukewarm which temper is lothsome to Christ. The religion of such is for their ends not for Gods glory as they which sought Christ for the loaves They are duplici corde as Saint Iames calls them There is no worse fault then to be lukewarm therefore we must be resolved to be either hot or cold 2. The other extreame forbidden is the defect as that of mixture in excesse that is when men will so reforme and purifie religion that they destroy it Pro. 〈◊〉 23. The wringing of the nose bringeth forth blood qui mungit nimium sanguinem elicit he that will make his nose too cleare makes it bleed so when men will cleanse the church too much instead of purifying it from mixtures in composition they give it a bloody nose as sectaries and hereticks usually do who alwayes pretend reformation when they rend the church and make it bleed sometimes to death The means of sincerity in religion 1. There is no better then that which is implied in that wish of Christ I would thou wert cold or hot we must avoyd lukewarmnes which causes wavering in religion and come to a resolution we must resolve to be what we professe and to stick to the truth then we shall be mel sincerum pure hony sine cera purified from all mixture 2. When we are resolved to adhere to the truth then we must come to the price and value aright It is true that Job saith Man knoweth not the price of it Though we would give our selves and all we have for it yet we cannot give a full price for it and therefore must not for any price part with it Merchants use to set a mark upon their clothes or other wares of the lowest price they will sell them at now the truth is of such a value that we cannot set any price whereupon to part with it How high soever our price be if we part with it God may say to us as the Prophet doth in the person of Christ when they weighed for his price thirty pieces of silver a goodly price it is
to what he hath appointed and so they will be wiser then God 2. The second is a shew of humility when a man will be so humble as not onely to prostrate himself before God but to bow down to an Image Saint Angel or the like But these howsoever they carry a shew of wisdom and humility yet are they no wayes for us to use if we entend to be exempt from the penalty of this Commandment Although all will-worship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be taken in an evil sense by many upon the vulgar exposition of that place in Colos. 2. 23. yet that there may be some voluntary or free worship acceptable to God though not specially commanded provided it be not corruptive of or contrary to any right or worship commanded by him but subservient or agreeable thereto is the judgement of learned Divines for under the law they had their voluntary and free-will-offerings besides those commanded by God and though things were more particularly prescribed in the Levitical worship then now under the Gospel the Church being then in its childehood and confined to one Nation and the spirit not then so plentifully given as now since the ascension of Christ yet even then the Church prescribed diverse things in Gods worship not specially commanded as in fasts and festivall dayes as that of the dedication of the Temple approved by Christs own observance John 10. and sundry other things all which were never taxed as unlawful unlesse the worship appointed by God himself were thereby corrupted or neglected and so the continual practise of the Christian Church hath been to prescribe and order severall things in Gods Worship which no peaceable and holy men ever found fault with provided that they were agreable to those general rules of morall worship required by God and no wayes repugnant to those rites by him appointed but rather subservient to them and contained nothing either impious and forbidden or vain and ridiculous nor the observance of them preferred before the commandments of God or made equal to them but a difference observed between things of immediate divine institution and those of Ecclesiastical institution to adde to Gods institution any thing as from God is forbidden Deuteronomy 12. 10. but to adde something for the more decent and orderly performance of what God hath apointed and to observe the same as an ecclesiastical institution is no where forbidden but rather commanded in al those texts that require us to hear the Church and to give obedience to her and to observe this is also to obey God who hath given his Church power to ordain such things and that that place in Colos. 2. 23. condemns not all voluntary or free worship no more then it doth humility and chastening or keeping under the body which are joyned therewith but rather that it makes for it hath been lately proved by juditious and learned Divines and by one in a full tract upon this subject of will-worship for the Apostle there condemning certain Jewish and Pythagorean observances about touching tasting c. saith ver 23. that they had a shew of wisdom if due cautions were observed viz if they were freely and voluntarily undertaken not as necessary to salvation and without rejecting what God had made and if they were used in humility or modesty not condemning others which used them not and if they sought thereby onely to keep under the flesh The contrary to all which those Pythagoreans and Jews practised By which exposition which I take to be the most true it is plain that the Apostle is so far from condemning all voluntary or will-worship that he rather approves and commends it and condemns their forbearance of meats and other things because it was not freely or voluntarily undertaken but as a thing necessary to salvation c See Grotius in Colos. 2. 23. Et votum pro pace p. 100. 101. 102. 103. Et Apol. Rivet discuss p. 101 110 c. Dr Hammon of will-worship See also our Reverend Authour in his sermon on Matthew 6. 16. p. 124 c. and on 1. Corinth 11. 16. The affirmative part of this Commandment included in the prohibition S. Stephen in the Acts and the Authour to the Hebrews after him citeth out of the Law where Moses receiving order how to build the Tabernacle was admonished by God to make it according to the pattern precisely as it was shewed him in the Mount 1. Because God after the delivery of the moral law declared to him the particulars concerning the outward worship 2. And secondly he gave him charge at his departure to square and order it accordding to the form by him prescribed And it is probable that if he had such a care in the Type he will also not be worshipped in the substance otherwise then himself hath prescribed The negative part is that we mingle none of our will-worship with his precept that is in such things as God hath particularly prescribed not to vary from his command but hoc tantum facere quod Deus 〈◊〉 do that onely which God hath commanded and these words may be taken for the inward worship also but they especially concern the outward worship of God I here follows in the 〈◊〉 before cited to make Gods meaning herein more plain Thou shalt not adde nor diminish If we do either or both of them that will follow which our Saviour tells the Scribes and Pharisees that if it be mans doctrine that is preferred before the commandments of God or made equal therewith 〈◊〉 colitis 〈◊〉 worship him we may but all in vain and as the Prophet speaks 〈◊〉 ista 〈◊〉 e 〈◊〉 vestris who hath required these things at your 〈◊〉 Now the reason both of Negative and Affirmative is Because that seeing honour is to be given to God it is most reasonable that it should be given after that manner which he best liketh and not contrary to his will The Question being propounded Whether God should be honoured as he or we thought 〈◊〉 Socrates could answer that every God will be worshipped 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that manner that best liketh him And so Saint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ratur is maxime eo honore 〈◊〉 quem ipse 〈◊〉 non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if a man be to be honoured his delight is in that which himself fancieth and not in what we without looking to the rules in Gods word think most convenient and therefore as we ought in all acts of worship to see first what is prescribed by God so if the the Church prescribe any thing she ought to look to those general rules given by God that it may be the more acceptable to him when there is nothing in particular determined in the Word Therefore when we come to do any man honour we enquire what kinde of honor pleaseth his humour best and shall we allow that to man which we will deny unto God
be placed among the ten Commandments One of the Fathers upon the words Nunquid Saul 〈◊〉 inter Prophetas Is Saul also among the Prophets saith that Saul being no Prophet by profession est heterogeneus of another kinde and an irregular person among the Prophets so it will fall out to be against order for a meer ceremonial Precept to stand in the midst of moral Commandments For every ceremony or type of the Law is as it was a foretelling of something in the Gospel so it must be referred to the Gospel as the shadow to the body And indeed no typical ceremonies are in their own nature for the type or ceremony is to cease when the substance comes as the shadow when the body appears But this Commandment for the substance of it continues in the time of the Gospel 3. Thirdly this being a principle that the Law of Moses expressed in the Decalogue is nothing but the Law of nature revived and the Law of nature being a resemblance of Gods image If we say this precept is in its substance ceremonial then we must also say that in the image of God something is ceremonial not to abide but for a time onely but all things in him and in his image are eternal according to his Nature 4. In the Law of grace Christ delivering the sum of the ten Commandments to the Scribes and Pharisees Thou shalt love the Lord c. there 's no question but that it is the sum of the Decalogue and therefore therein is included the religious observation of the Sabbath and so it will be for the substance moral as the love of God is in which it is contained or else our Saviour had delivered an imperfect sum 5. Again it is dangerous to hold that any precept in the Decalogue is ceremonial for by this the Papists as Parisius and Politianus will bring another of them to be so and will say that the second Commandment concerning images is ceremonial and then why not three as well as two and so four and five and all The best way therefore to hold the duties eternall and to keep them without blemish is to deny that any of these ten precepts is ceremonial in the substance or nature of the Commandment but that they are plainly moral 6. To come to the time of the Gospel We hold that all typical ceremonies of the law are ended and abrogated by Christs death Then if the day of rest be not abrogated by his death it is not a meer Ceremony or ceremonial And that it is not is plain by our Saviour himself for his denouncing the destruction of Jerusalem bids them pray that their calamity fall not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day Now we know that Jerusalem was destroyed many years after Christs death when all ceremonies were ended Therefore if Christ knew that the Sabbath as a ceremony should be wholly abrogated by his death his counsel might well have bin spared that they should pray that their flight might not be on the Sabbath day Matth. 24. 20. which if it had been quite abolished should have been no day Again in things meerly ceremonia ' there is not commutatio a change but abrogatio an abrogating of them wholly but we see in this matter of the Sabbath there is commutatio not abrogatio the Lords day is appointed instead of the Sabbath but no total abrogation of the Sabbath Thus the seals of the Covenant though they had something typical yet being in their general nature moral therefore they are changed but not quite abrogated whereas in things meerly typical there 's no maner of commutation but they are clean taken away for Christ having broken down the partition wall Ephes. 2. 14 15. hath wholly taken away the law of ordinances c. But it is manifest that instead of the Jews seventh day another seventh day was ordained in the Apostles dayes therefore as the ministery and seals of the Covenant and the chief place of it to wit the Temple were not abolished but changed as having a moral 〈◊〉 in them so also was the day of the Covenant for we read Acts 20. 7. that the 〈◊〉 and Disciples came together on the first day of the week to hear the word and to break bread and in 1 Corin. 16. 2. the Apostle wills them in their meetings on the first day of the week to lay aside for the poor and Revel 1. 10. it is plainly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day So that we see in the whole time of the Apostles it was not taken away but changed by them and therefore cannot be a meere ceremonie nor of the nature of the types of the Law But when the old Covenant ceased then ceased the Ministery thereof the Priesthood of Levi was changed and given to choice men of all Tribes and instead of it is our Ministery And as the seals of the Covenant ceased as of Circumcision and the Paschal lamb and in place thereof came our Sacraments of Baptism and the Lords supper so the day of the old Covenant is taken away and instead thereof is put the Lords day none of them in the first end being ceremonial but having a continual use and to last as long as the Church militant The reasons which might seem to have moved the Apostles to change this day may be fitly taken from the Institution of the Sabbath in the time of the law For as then nothing was more memorable then the day of the creation so when it pleased God that old things should cease and that there should be a new creation and that there was a benefit that did overshadow the former the benefit of redemption therefore when that was accomplished by Christs resurrection from that day we celebrate the memorial of it on the first day of the week and whereas that other great work of the sending the holy Ghost which was fifty dayes after concurd on the same day whereby that inestimable benefit of sanctification and speaking with strange tongues was conferred upon the Church and because the memory of the benefit of the creation may also be kept on the first day of the week as well as on the last Hence we may see upon what great reasons this day is establisht wherein do concur the three special works and benefits of the three persons to be for ever thankfully remembred viz. that of Creation by the Father Redemption by the Son and Sanctification by the holy Ghost And so much for the clearing of that point ¶ CHAP. III. Additionall considerations upon the doctrine of the Sabbath laid down in seven conclusions 1. It is certain some time is to be set apart for publick worship 〈◊〉 by School-men Canonists and reasons 2. Certain that the law of nature doth not dictate the proportion of seven or any other in particular 3. It is most probable that the seventh day was appointed by God from the beginning as a day of publick worship in
memory of the creation and did oblige all mankinde though the symbolical or typical rest afterwards was enjoyned to the Jews onely this proved from Scripture Fathers Jewish Doctors late Divines reasons c. How the Fathers are to be understood that deny Sabbatizing before the Mosaical Law 4. The Lords day is of divine institution proved by Scripture Fathers publick declarations of the Church Edicts of Princes Canonists some School-men late Divines 5 The fourth Commandment is in force for the moral equity that at least a seventh part be given to God literally it requires onely the seventh day from the creation not a seventh day The day altered by the Apostles by special authority 6. The rest of the Jewish sabbath partly moral which continues still partly symbolical which is expir'd How the rest of the Lords day differs from the rest of Iewish sabbath rest from ordinary labours forbidden by God but the special determination left to the Church How the Lords day succeeds the sabbath 7. The sabbath kept with the Lords day by the Primitive Christians till the Council of Laodicea was not in a Jewish manner The whole doctrine of the sabbath and Lords day handled in seven conclusions FOr the more cleare understanding of this point of the sabbath and of the reasons which are here produced and of this discourse upon that subject I shall briefly lay down that which I conceive most agreeable to the truth in certain propositions or conclusions distinguishing things certain from such as are onely probable and submitting all to the iudicious and learned reader 1. It is certain that some time ought to be set apart for publick worship and that this is required by the law of nature which dictates to every one that as God ought to be worshipped so some special time must be set apart for that imployment and therefore as when God created the world he is said to have concreated time with it so when he commands a publick worship he commands withall some time for that use without which it cannot be performed and therefore it is confessed by all divines ancient and modern and by men of all professions except familists and such fanatick spirits that some time ought to be set apart for holy duties as due by the immutable law of nature morale est quantum ad hoc quod homo 〈◊〉 aliquod tempus ad vacandum divinis c. saith Aquinas secunda secundae q. 112. It is moral that every man depute some time for religious duties and with him joyntly agree all the rest of the Schoolmen modern divines and others The very law of nature saith our learned Hooker requires no lesse the sanctification of times then of places persons and things for which cause it hath plased God heretofore as of the rest so of times likewise to exact some part by way of perpetual homage And so we finde the Heathen which had no other then the law of nature to direct them had their solemne feasts and set dayes appointed for the worship of their supposed deities This therefore I lay down as certain because questionedby none 2. I conceive it to be likewise certain that the law of nature doth not in particular dictate what day or time ought to be set apart for publick worship but that the determination of the time or dayes in special is from positive laws either of God or men and therefore that the limitation of a seventh day or the 7 th day from the creation or any other particular proportion cannot be deduced necessarily from any natural principle but must be referrd to some positive law either divine or humane This appears in that there can no natural reason be given why one day more then another or why a seventh rather then a sixth or eighth should necessarily be consecrated to God all dayes being in themselves alike and none in themselves more excellent then others those things which are natural and simply or purely moral are evident to all by the light of nature or may by necessary consequence be deduced from some principle which is evident such laws concern things good or evil in themselves and therefore do immutably binde all persons in all places alike but the limitation of a special day is not it is neither a principle evident in it self nor can by necessary consequence be derived from any such principle and therefore cannot be referred to any natural law or dictate of reason Therefore not only the schoolmen generally nemine contradicente with the Casuists and Canonists but the most modern divines some few excepted do generally agree in this as well as in the former conclusion and though some make the observation of the Lords day under the Gospel to be unchangable and so in some sort moral as the sabbath was under the law yet this they ground not upon any natural law but upon positive divine Law and those that seem to make it a dictate of nature mean nothing else but that there is a congruity in reason and that this time being fixt by Christ is unalterable by any humane power The reason given by some why a memento is prefixed before the fourth Commmandement and none else is because that Nature doth not dictate any particular day and therefore men need to be put in minde of the day appointed by God Filencius tract 27. cap. 1. n. 4. Ex Thom. 1. 2. q. 100. a. 7. 2. 2. q. 122. a. 4. ad 3. Bonavent Richard aliis in 3. Sent. Dist. 37. and before them S. Chrysost. saith that the Sabbath is a precept not made known to us by our Consciences as the other precepts are and that God therefore gives reasons of this as because he rested the seventh day and because they were servants in Egypt c. whereas in those that are purely moral as Thou shalt do no murther c. he gives the Precept barely without any reason at all and that because our consciences had taught us this before and because he speaks to those that knew reason sufficient Tom. 6. p. 542. Edit Savil. 3. It is probable that the seventh day was appointed by positive divine law from the begining as the day for publick worship to praise God for the creation of the world c. and so did oblige all mankinde though as a Sabbath or day of symbolical rest it was afterward particularly given to the Jews by Moses For it is the opinion not only of some Jewish Doctors but of learned men among our selves that in the 4 h Commandment the sanctifying of the seventh day and the rest then commanded are several distinct things and that the first refer to the creation of the world as the cause the other to the Egyptian bondage out of which they were delivered and that therefore the one belonged to all men the other onely to the Jews for which cause the Sabbath is said to be a signe between God and
treat of the Summe of Christian Religion it self in it self And this according to the ancient division consists of 1. The Law 2. The Gospel The Law that is the moral Law as it is explicated and enlarged by Christ is a part of the condition of the second covenant and therefore an essential part of the Gospel which consists not barely of promises but of precepts too and those more high and perfect then any before Christ and therefore is the Gospel in the Scripture often called the Law of Christ and so usually stiled inall antiquity The moral Law as it shews men their sins and so convinces them of the necessity of Christ so the knowledge of it may be needful before the Doctrine of faith but as it is the rule of Christian obedience and a condition of the second covenant which is the most proper consideration of it so it ought to follow the doctrine of faith and so it doth in the most authentick Catechism of this Church viz. that in the common prayer Book It is true that Luther and after him many Protestant Divines in their heat against the Church of Rome about the matter of justification seem to make the Gospel a Doctrine consisting meerly of promises and to say that Christ gave no Law but onely explicated and vindicated the Law from the false glosses of the Scribes and Pharisees in Matth. 5. 6. and 7. as if the moral Law were no part of the Gospel or what Saint Paul speaks of the Law of Moses and the works of that Law were to be extended to the Laws of Christ also and the works of the Gospel and that the onely or chief use of the Law now is to bring men to Christ from which and other the like principles unawares by them laid and by the vulgus of our Divines swallowed without examination the Antinomians Libertines Familists and other Sectaries have by necessary consequence drawn those damnable Doctrines which these Divines little dreamt of or if they had considered I suppose they would have revised these principles and retracted them or else have spoken more warily then they have done The truth is that in that sermon on the mount Christ delivers the new Law or Law of the Gospel wherein the substance of Christian religion and the way to salvation is contained and that he doth not therein onely barely expound the Decalogue given by Moses but as a Legislator delivers his Law to be observed by all that beleeve on him according to the tenure of the second Covenant was the constant opinion of all the Fathers and of the whole Church as among others is fully proved by the incomparable H. Grotius both in his comments on Matth. 5. and in his book de 〈◊〉 belli pacis l. 1. c. 2. n. 6. and if any desire a list of names and testimonies of Fathers and ancient writers to that purpose they may read them in a tract written by a learned and judicious Divine D r Hamond in the passages between him and M r Cheynel p. 129 130 c. And that this learned Prelate was of the same minde is evident in his other works perfected by himself especially in his sermon on Psalm 2. 7. p. 16 17. where among other things we read thus The very Gospel hath her Law a Law Evangelical there is which Christ preached and as he did so must we do the like It is not without danger to let any such conceit take head as though Christian Religion had no Law-points in it consisted onely of pure narratives beleeve them and all is well And true it is that such points there be but they are not all there is a law besides and it hath precepts and they are to be preached learned and as a Law to be obeyed by all Look but unto the grand commission by which we all preach which Christ gave at his going out of the world Go saith he preach the Gospel to all nations teaching them to observe the things which I have commanded you lo here is commanding and here is observing so the Gospel consists not onely of certain Articles to be beleeved but of certain commandments also and they are to be observed Now I know not how we are clean fallen from the tearm Law that we are even fallen out with it the name of Law we look strangely at we shun it in our common talk to this it is come when men seek to live as they list We have Gospel'd it so long that the Christian Law is clean gone from us and I shall tel you what is come by drowning this tearm Law Religion is even come to be counted res precaria no Law no no but a matter of mere entreaty general perswasion c. The reverend regard the legal vigour the power the penalties of it are not set by The rules no reckoning made of them as of Law writs none but onely as of Physick bills if you like them you may use them if not lay them by and this comes by drowning the tearm Law If the name once be lost the thing it self will not long stay And after Christian Religion was in the very best times called Christiana Lex the Christian Law and the Bishops Christianae Legis Episcopi Bishops of the Christian Law and all the ancient fathers liked the tearm well and took it upon them To conclude Gospel it how we will if the Gospel hath not the Legalia of it acknowledged allowed and preserved to it if once it loose the force and vigour of a Law it s a signe it declines it growes weak and unprofitable and that is a signe it will not long last we must go look our salvation by some other way c. Thus we see how he contradiets the popular errours of these times about Law and Gospel and therefore it cannot be conceived that his discourse here tends to the nourishing of such dangerous and novel opinions as our solifidians do now cry up If we have the summe of these two we may assure our selves that we have as much as is needful for our salvation and the summe of them both are necessary principles The Evangelist hath them both in one verse The Law was given by Moses but Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. Seeing then that these are the two parts we are to consider in the first place which of them is first to be handled We say we must speak first of the Law 1. First because the Law and the Gospel are nothing else but two Covenants which God made with mankinde and in that respect are called the Old and New Testaments considering them not as they are in the Books for so in the old Testament there is the Gospel also the Law being as S. Aug. saith Evangelium absconditum and the Gospel Lex revelata the Law revealed the Gospel the new law and the Law the old Gospel but as they be Covenants Now taking them as Legacies in a will there are