CHAP. IV. Christ performed all these Promises to his Apostles and gave them his Spirit to enable them to all their commissioned work p. 11 CHAP. V. The Apostles did actually separate and appoint the first day of the Week for Holy Worship especially in Church Assemblies Which is explained in several subordinate Propositions And proved 1. By Scripture 2. By unquestionable History And the validity of this proof evinced and the denyers of it proved to subvert the Churches certainty of greater matters p. 12 CHAP. VI. This act of the Apostles appointing the Lords Day for holy Worship was done by the especial inspiration and guidance of the Holy Ghost p. 69 CHAP. VII Whether the seventh day Sabbath should be still kept by Christians as of Divine obligation Neg. proved Where is shewed how far the fourth Commandment is abrogated and all the Law of Moses p. 71 CHAP. VIII Of the Beginning of the Day p. 91 CHAP. IX How the Lords Day should be kept Of the length of the time and the Objection about weariness p. 93 CHAP. X. How the Lords Day should not be spent or what is unlawful on it Of worldly business Of recreations of Idleness c. p. 108 CHAP. XI What things should not be scrupled as un lawful on the Lords Day p. 129 CHAP. XII Of what importance the due observing of the Lords Day is Many great Reasons for it p. 139 CHAP. XIII What other Church Festivals or separated Dayes are lawful p. 148 THE CONTENTS OF THE Appendix CHAP. I. An Answer to certain Objections against the Lords Day p. 157 CHAP. II. An Answer to more Arguments for the seventh day Sabbath p. 180 CHAP. III. Whether the seventh day Sabbath be part of the Law of Nature or only a Positive Law p. 202 CHAP. IV. Whether every word in the Decalogue be of the Law of Nature and of perpetual obligation And whether all that was of the Law of Nature was in the Decalogue p. 214 CHAP. V. Whether the truest Antiquity be for the seventh day Sabbath as kept by the Churches of Christ p. 220 The Divine Appointment of the LORDS DAY proved as a separated Day for holy Worship especially in the Church-Assemblies And consequently the Cessation of the Seventh-day-Sabbath CHAP. I. Though the principal thing desired by the Enquirers is That I would prove to them the Cessation of the Seventh-day Sabbath yet because they cast off the Lords day which I take to be a far greater error and sin than the observation of both dayes and because that when I have proved the Institution of the Lords Day I shall the more easily take them off the other by proving that there are not two weekly dayes set apart by God for holy Worship Therefore I will begin with the first Question Whether the Lords day or first day of the week be separated by Gods Institution for holy Worship especially in publick Church-conventions Aff. And here for the right stating of the Question let it be noted 1. That it is not the Name of a Sabbath that we now meddle with or stand upon Let us agree in the Thing and we shall easily bear a difference about the name Grant that it is A day separated by Gods Institution for holy Assemblies and Worship and then call it a Sabbath or the Lords day as you please Though for my self I add That the Lords day is the name that the Holy Ghost hath set upon it and the name which the first Churches principally used and that they call it also sometimes by the name of the Christian Sabbath but that is only Analogically as it is resembled to the Jewish Sabbath and as they used the names Sacrifice and Altar at the same time for the Christians Commemoration of Christs Sacrifice in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and for the Table or as Dr. Young saith pag. 23. As in Scripture Baptism is called Circumcision And that very rarely too 2. That the Question of the manner of observing the Lords day and what exercises of Worship it must be spent in and what Diversions are lawful or unlawful as also when the day beginneth are not to be here medled with in the beginning but afterwards when the Divine Institution of the Day it self is first sufficiently proved Which is done as followeth Arg. That day which was separated to holy Worship by the Holy Ghost was separated to holy Worship by God the Father and the Son But the first day of the Week was separated to holy Worship by the Holy Ghost Therefore the first day of the Week was separated to holy Worship by God the Father and the Son The Minor only needeth proof among Christians That day which was separated to holy Worship by the Apostles by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost was separated to holy Worship by the Holy Ghost But the first day of the Week was separated to holy Worship by the Apostles by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost Therefore the first day of the Week was separated to holy Worship by the Holy Ghost The Minor which only needeth proof is thus proved That day which was separated to holy Worship by the Apostles who had the Holy Ghost promised them by Christ and given them to lead them into all truth and to bring all his Doctrines to their remembrance and to teach the Churches to do all his Commands and to feed and guide and order them as his principal commissioned Church-Minister was separated to holy Worship by the Apostles by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost But such is the first day of the Week Therefore the first day of the Week is separated to holy Worship by the Apostles by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost I have five Propositions now distinctly to be proved four for the proof of the Major and one for the proof of the Minor The first Proposition is That Christ commissioned his Apostles as his principal Church-Ministers to teach the Churches all his Doctrine and deliver them all his Commands and Orders and so to settle and guide the first Churches The second Proposition is That Christ promised them his Spirit to enable them to do what he had commissioned them to do by leading them into all truth and bringing his words and deeds to their remembrance and by guiding them as his Churches Guides The third Proposition is That Christ performed this promise and gave his Spirit accordingly to his Apostles to enable them to all their commissioned work The fourth Proposition is That the Apostles did actually separate or appoint the first day of the Week for holy Worship especially in Church-assemblies The fifth Proposition is That this act of theirs was done by the Guidance or inspiration of the Holy Ghost which was given them And when I have distinctly proved these five things no sober understanding Christian can expect that I should prove any more towards the proof of the Question in hand Whether the first day of the Week be separated by Gods
Original is not known 4. That the Antients joyn not the Lords day with these but take the Lords day for an Apostolical institution written in Scripture though the universal practice of all Churches fullier deliver the certain History of it But the rest they take for unwritten Customs as distinct from Scripture Ordinances As Epiphanius fully sheweth 5. That most Christians are agreed that if these later could be proved Apostolical Institutions for the Church universal it would be our duty to use them though they were not in Scripture So that we reject them only for want of such proof But the proof of the Lords dayes separation being far better by concurrence of Scripture and all antient History it followeth not that we must doubt of that which hath full and certain proof because we must doubt of that which wants it 6. And if it were necessary that they stood or fell together as it is not it were necessary that we did receive those three or four Ceremonies for the sake of the Lords day which â—ath so great evidence rather than that we cast off the Lords day because of these Ceremonies Not only because there is more Good in the Lords dâ—y than there is evil to be any way suspected by a doubter in these Ceremonies but especially because the Evidence for the day is so great that if the said Ceremonies had but the same they were undoubtedly of Divine authority or institution In a word I have shewed you somewhat of the evidence for the Lords day Do you now shew me the like for them and then I will prove that both must be received But if you cannot do not pretend a parity 7. And the same Churches laying by the Customs aforesaid or most of them did shew that they â—â—ok them not indeed for Apostolical institutions as they did the Lords day which they continued to observe not as a Ceremony but as a necessary thing 8. And the ancient Churches did believe that even in the Apostles dayes some things were used as Indifferent which were mutable and were not Laws but temporary customs And some things were necessary setled by Law for perpetuity Of the former kind they thought were the greeting one another with a holy kiss the Womens praying covered with a Veil of which the Apostle saith that it was then and there so decent that the contrary would have been unseemly and the Churches of God had no such custom by which he answereth the contentious yet in other Countreys where custom altereth the signification it may be otherwise Also that a man wear not long hair and that they have a Love Feast on the Lords day which yet Paul seemeth to begin to alter in his rebuke of the abusers of it 1 Cor. 11. And if these ancient Churches thought the Milk and Honey and the white Garment and the Station and Adoration Eastwards to be also such like indifferent mutable customs as it is apparent they did this is nothing at all to invalidate our proof that the Lords day was used and consequently appointed in the dayes of the Apostles Obj. At least it will prove it mutable as they were Answ. No such matter Because the very nature of such Circumstances having no stated necessity or usefulness sheweth them to be mutable But the reason of the Lords dayes use is perpetual And it is founded partly in the Law of nature which telleth us that some stated dayes should be set apart for holy things and partly in the positive part of the fourth Commandment which telleth us that once God determined of one day in seven yea and this upon the ground of his own Cessation of his Creation-work that man on that day might observe a Holy Rest in the worshipping of the great Creator which is a Reason belonging not to the Jews only but to the whole world Yea and that Reason whatever Dr. Heylin say to the contrary from the meer silence of the former History in Genesis doth seem plainly to intimate that this is but the repetition of that Law of the Sabbath which was given to Adam For why should God begin two thousand years after to give men a Sabbath upon the reason of his rest from the Creation and for the Commemoration of it if he had never called man to that Commemoration before And it is certain that the Sabbath was observed at the falling of Manna before the giving of the Law And let any considerate Christian judge between Dr. Heylin and us in this 1. Whether the not falâ—ing of Manna or the Rest of God after the Creation was like to be the Original reason of the Sabbath 2. And whether if it had been the first it would not have been said Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day for on six dayes Manna fell and not on the seventh rather than For in six dayes God created Heaven and Earth c. and rested the seventh day And it is causally added Wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it Nay consider whether this annexed Reason intimate not that the day on this ground being hallowed before therefore it was that God sent not down the Manna on that day and that he prohibited the people from seeking it And he that considereth the brevity of the History in Genesis will think he is very bold that obtrudeth on the world his Negative Argument The Sabbath is not there mentioned therefore it was not then kept And if it was a Positive Law given to Adam on the reason of the Creation Rest it was then such a Positive as must be next to a Law of Nature and was given to all mankind in Adam and Adam must needs be obliged to deliver it down to the world So that though the Mosaical Law even as given in Stone be ceased yea and Adams Positives too formally as such yet this is sure that once God himself determined by a Law that one stated day in seven was the fittest proportion of time to be separated to holy Worship And if it was so once yea to all the world from the Creation it is so still Because there is still the same reason for it And we are bound to judge Gods determination of the proportion to be wiser than any that we can make And so by parity of Reason consequentially even those abrogated Laws do thus far bind us still not so far as abrogated but because the record and reason of them is still a signification of the due proportion of time and consequently of our duty Now the Lords day supposing one weekly day to be due and being but that day determined of and this upon the Reason of the Resurrection and for the Commemoration of our Redemption and that by such inspired and authorized persons it followeth clearly that this is no such mutable ceremony as a Love Feast or the Kiss of Love or the Veil or the washing of feet or the anointing of the sick which were mostly occasionall actions and
as he nailed the hand-writing of Ordinances to his Cross so he buried the Sabbath in his Grave by lying buried on that day And therefore the Western Churches who had fewer Jews among them did fast on the Sabbath day to shew the change that Christs burial intimated Though the Eastern Churches did not lest they should offend the Jews And that the ancient Christians were not for sabbatizing on the seventh day is visible in the writings of most save the Eastern ones before mentioned Tertull. cont Marcion li. 1. cap. 20. Chrysost. Theodoret Primasius c. on Gal. 4. expound that Text as that by Dayes is meant the Jewish Sabbath and by Moneths the New Moons c. Cyprian 59. Epist. ad Hidum saith that the eighth day is to Christians what the Sabbath was to the Jews and calleth the Sabbath the Image of the Lords day Athanasius de Sab. Circumcis is full and plain on it See Tertullian Advers Judae c. 4. Ambros. in Eph. 2. August Ep. 118. Châ—ysâ—st in Gal. 1. Hâ—m 12. ad pop Hilary before cited Prolog in Psalm Origen Hom. 23. in Num. Item Tertull. de Idol c. 14. Epipban l. 1. num 30. noting the Nazaraei and Ebionaei Hereticks that they kept the Jews Sabbath In a word The Council of Laodiâ—aea doth Anathematize them that did Judaize by forbearing their Labours on the Sabbath or seventh day And as Sozomen tells us that at Alexandria and Rome they used no Assemblies on the Sabbath so where they did in most Churches they communicated not in the Sacrament Yea that Ignatius himself true or false who saith as aforecited After the Sabbath let every lover of Christ celebrate the Lords day doth yet in the same Epistle ad Magnes before say Old things are passed away behold all things are made new For if we yet live after the Jewish Law and the Circumcision of the flesh we deny that we have received Grace Let us not therefore keep the Sabbath or sabbatize Jewishly as delighting in Idleness or Rest from labour For be that will not labour let him not eat In the sweat if thy brows thou shalt cat thy bread I confess I take the cited Texts to have been added since the body of the Epistle was written but though the Writer favour of the Eastern custom yet he sheweth they did not sabbatize on the account of the fourth Commandment or supposed continuation of the Jewish Sabbath as a Sabbath For bodily labour was strictly forbidden in the fourth Commandment Dionysius Alexandr hath an Epistle to Basilides a Bishop on the Question When the Sabbath Fast must end and the observation of the Lords day begin Biblioth Patr. Graec. Lat. Vol. 1. p. 306. In which he is against them that end their Fast too soon And plainly intimateth that the seventh day was to be kept but as a preparatory Fast being the day that Christ lay in the grave and not as a Sabbath or as the Lords day I cite not any of these as a humane authority to be set against the authority of the fourth Commandment But as the certain History of the change of the day which the Apostles made Qu. How far then is the fourth Commandment Moral you seem to subvert the old foundation which most others build the Lords day upon Answ. Let us not entangle our selves with the ambiguities of the word Moral which most properly signifieth Ethical as distinct from Physical c. By Moral here is meant that which is on what ground soever of perpetual or continued obligation And so it is all one as to ask how far it is still obligatory or in force To which I answer 1. It is a part of the Law of Nature that God be solemnly worshipped in families and in holy assemblies 2. It is a part of the Law of Nature that where greater things do not forbid it a stated time be appointed for this service and that it be not left at Randome to every mans will 3. It is of the Law of Nature that where greater matters do not hinder it this day be one and the same in the same Countreys yea if it may be through the world 4. It is of the Law of Nature that this day be not so rarely as to hinder the ends of the day nor yet so frequently as to deprive us of opportunity for our necessary corporal labour 5. It is of the Law of Nature that the holy duties of this day be nâ—t hindered by any corporal work or fleshly pleasure or any unnecessary thing which contradiâ—teth the holy ends of the day 6. It is of the Law of Nature that Rulers and in special Masters of families do take care that their inferiours thus observe it In all these points the fourth Commandment being but a transcript of the Law of Nature which we can yet prove from the nature of the reason of the thing the matter of it continueth not as Jewish but as Natural 7. Besides all this when no man of himself could tell whether one day in six or seven or eight were his duty to observe God hath come in and 1. By Doctrine or History told us that he made the world in six dayes and rested the seventh 2. By Law and bath commanded one day in seven to the Jews by which he hath made known consequentialâ—y to all men that one day in seven is the fittest proportion of time And the case being thus determined by God by a Law to others doth consequentially become a Law to us because it is the determination of Divine Wisdom unless it were done upon some reasons in which their condition differeth from ours And thus the Doctrine and Reasons of an abrogated Law continuing may induce on us an obligation to duty And in this sense the fourth Commandment may be said still to bind us to one day in seven But in two points the obligation even as to the Matter ceaseth 1. We are not bound to the seventh day because God our Redeemer who is Lord of the Sabbath hath made a change 2. We are not bound to a Sabbath in the old notion that is to a day of Ceremonial Rest for it self required but to a day to be spent in Evangelical Worship And though I am not of their mind who say that the seventh day is not commanded in the fourth Commandment but a Sabbath only yet I think that it is evident in the words that the Ratio Sabbati and the Ratio diei septimi are distinguishable And that the Sabbath as a Sabbath is first in the precept and the particular day is there but secondarily and so mutably as if God had said I will have a particular day set apart for a holy Rest and for my Worship And that day shall be one in seven and the seventh also on which I rested from my works And thus I have said as much as I think needful to satisfie the considerate about the day Again professing 1. That I believe that
he is in the right that maketh Conscience of the Lords day only 2. But yet I will not break Charity with any Brother that shall in tenderness of Conscience keep both dayes especially in times of prophaness when few will be brought to the true observation of one 3. But I think him that keepeth the seventh day only and neglecteth the Lords day to sin against very evident light with many aggravations 4. But I think him that keepeth no day whether professedly or practising contrary to his profession whether on pretence of avoiding Superstition or on pretence of keeping every day as a Sabbath to be far the worst of all I shall now add somewhat to some appendant Questions CHAP. VIII Of the beginning of the Day Quest. 1. When doth the Lords day begin Answ. 1. If we can tell when any day beginneth we may know when that beginneth If we cannot the necessity of our ignorance will shorten the trouble of our scruples by excusing us 2. Because the Lords day is not to be kept as a Jewish Sabbath ceremoniously but the Time and the Rest are here commanded subserviently for the work sake therefore we have not so much reason to be scrupulous about the hours of beginning and ending as the Jews had about their Sabbath 3. I think he that judgeth of the beginning and ending of the day according to the common estimation of the Countrey where he liveth will best answer the ends of the Institution For he will still keep the same proportion of time and so much as is ordinarily allowed on other dayes for work he will spend this day in holy works and so much in rest as is used to be spent in rest on other dayes which may ordinarily satisfie a well informed Conscience And if any extraordinary occasions as journeying or the like require him to doubt of any hours of the night whether they be part of the Lords day or not 1. It will be but his sleeping time and not his worshipping time which he will be in doubt of and 2. He will avoid all scandal and tempting others to break the day if he measure the day by the common estimate whereas if the Countrey where he liveth do esteem the day to begin at Sun-setting and he suppose it to begin at Midnight he may be scandalous by doing that which in the common opinion is a violation of the day If I thought that this short kind of solution were not the fittest to afford just quietness to the minds of sober Christians in this point I would take the pains to scan the Controversie about the true beginning of dayes But left it more puzzle and perplex than edifie or resolve and quiet the Conscience I save my self and the Reader that trouble CHAP. IX Quest. 2. HOw should the Lords day be kept or used Answ. The Practical Directions I have given in another Treatise I shall now give you but these generals I. The day being separated or set apart for Holy Worship must accordingly be spent therein To sanctifie it is to spend it in holy exercises How else should it be used as a Holy Day I was in the Spirit on the Lords day saith St. John Rev. 1. 10. II. The principal work of the day is the Communion of Christians in the publick exercises of Gods worship It is principally to be spent in holy assemblies And this is the use that the Scripture expresly mentioneth Acts 20. 7. and intimateth 1 Coâ— 16. 1 2. And as most Expotors think John 21. when the Disciples were gathered together with the door shut for fear of the Jews And all Church History assureth us that in these holy Assemblies principally the day was spent by the ancient Christians They spent almost all the day together 3. It is not only to be spent in holy exercises but also in such special holy exercises as are suitable to the purposes of the day That is it is a day of Commemorating the whole woâ—â— of our Redemption but especially the Resurrection of Christ. Therefore it is a day of Thanksgiving and Praise and the special services 〈◊〉 it must be Laudatory and Joyful exercises 4. But yet because it is sinners that are called to their work who are not yet fully delivered from their sin and misery these praises must be mixed with penitent Confessions and with earnest Petitions and with diligent Learning the will of God More particularly the publick exercises of the day are 1. Humble and penitent Confessions of sin 2. The faithful and fervent prayers of the Church 3. The Reading Preaching and Hearing of the Word of God 4. The Communion of the Church in the Lords Supper 5. The Laudatory Exhortations which attend it And the singing and speaking of the praises of our Creator and Redeemer and Sanctifier with joyful Thanksgiving for his wonderful benefits 6. The seasonable exercise of holy Discipline on particular persons for comforting the weak reforming the scandalous casting out the obstinately impenitent and absolving and receiving the penitent 7. The Pastors blessing the people in the name of the Lord. 8. And as an appurtenance in due season Oblations or Contributions for holy and Charitable uses even for the Church and Poor which yet may be put off to other dayes when it is more convenient so to do Qu. But who is it that must be present in all these exercises Answ. Where there is no Church yet called the whole day may be spent in Preaching to and teaching the unconverted Infidels But where there is a Church and no other persons mixt the whole exercises of the day must be such as are fitted to the state of the Church But where there is a Church and other persons Infidels or impenitent ones with them the day must be spent proportionably in exercises suitable to the good of both yet so that Church-exercises should be the principal work of the day And the ancient laudable practice of the Churches was to Preach to the Infidel auditors and Catechumens in the morning on such Subjects as were most suitable to them and then to dismiss them and retain the faithful or baptized only And to Teach them all the Commands of Christ To stir them up to the Joyful commemoration of Christ and his Resurrection and to sing Gods praises and celebrate the Lords Supper with Eucharistical acknowledgments and joy And they never kept a Lords day in the Church without the Lords Supper In which the bare administration of the signes was not their whole work but all their Thanksgiving and Praising exercises were principally then used and connexed to the Lords Supper which the Liturgies yet extant do at large express And I know no reason but thus it should be still or at least but that this course should be the ordinary celebration of the day Qu. But seeing the Sabbath was instituted in the beginning to commemorate the work of the Creation must that be laid by now because of our commemoration of the work of
IX And when we think it unlawful to joyne in the positive Celebration of unlawful dayes as the Mahometan Sabbath yet it may become a duty for the civil peace and our own safety to obey the Magistrate in forbearing open opposition or contempt or working upon that day And so Paul justifieth himself against the Jews accusations that they found him not in the Temple disputing with any man nor raising up the people nor in the Synagogues nor in the City Act. 24. 12. unless it be when we have a special call to reprove the errour which we forbear complying with X. It is long agoe decided by the Holy Ghost Rom. 14. 15. that we must not be contentious contemptuous nor censorious against one another about things of no greater moment than the Jewish dayes were though some observed them without just cause Because the Kingdom of God consisteth not in Meats and Drinks and Daies but in righteousness and peaceableness and joy in the Holy Ghost And he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and received by him and approved of wise men and should be received to Communion with them Rom. 14. 17 18. 15. 7. We must therefore follow after the things that make for peace and things wherewith one may edifie another Rom. 14. 19. XI The Controversie whether it be lawful to separate an Anniversary day for the Commemoration of Christs Nativity Circumcision and such like things which were equally existent in thâ— Apostles dayes and the reason for observing them equal with following times and so the Apostles had the same reason to have appointed such dayes had they thought it best as we have I acknowledge too hard for me to determine not being able to prove it lawful I cannot own and justifie it And not seeing a plain prohibition I will not condemn it nor be guilty of unpeaceable opposing Church Customes or Authority in it but behave my self as a peaceable doubter XII But that no earthly power may appoint a weekly day in commemoration of any part of our Redemption besides the Lords day and so make another separated weekly stated Holy day I think plainly unlawful Because it is a doing the same thing for one day which God hath done already by another And so seemeth to me 1. An usurpation of a power not given and 2. An accusation of Christ and the Holy Ghost as if he had not done his work sufficiently but man must come after and do it better But especially if such or any day or Ceremony be by an universal Law imposed on the Universal Church it is arrogant usurpation of the Divine Authority there being no Vicarious Head or Monarch under Christ of all the World or all the Church nor any Universal Governour who may exercise such Legislation whether personal or Collective The same I may say of any that would presume to abrogate the Lords day And so much shall suffice in great haste of this subject And to thee O most Glorious and Gracious Creatour and Redeemer I humbly return my unfeigned thanks for the unspeakable mercies which I have received on thy day And much more for so great a Mercy to all thy Churches and the World And craving the pardon among the rest of the sins which I have committed on thy Day I beseech thee to continue this exceeding mercy to thy Churches and to Me and restore me and other of thy Servants to the priviledges and comforts of this Day which we have forfeited and lost And let me serve thee in the Life and Light and Love of thy Spirit in these thy Holy Dayes on Earth till I be prepared for and received to the Everlasting Rest in Heavenly Glory Amen Octob. 11. 1670. FINIS AN APPENDIX For further Confirmation of Gods own Separation of the Lords day and Disproving the Continuation of the Jewish Seventh day Sabbath Written since the Treatise went to the Press upon the Invitations of some latter Objections Heb. 7. 12. For the Priesthood being changed there is made of necessity a change also of the Law 2 Cor. 3. 7 11. But if the Ministâ—ation of Death in Letters Engraven in Stones was glorious c. If that which was done away was glorious much more that which remaineth is glorious Act. 15. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater Buâ—den than these necessary things Col. 2. 16. Let no man judge you in Mat or in Drink or in respect of an Holy day or of the New Moon or of the Sabbath which are a shadow of things to come but the Body is of Christ. LONDON Printed for Nevil Simmons at the three Crowns near Holborn Conduit 1671. CHAP. I. An Answer to certain Objections against the Lords Day THough they are answered before the Reader must pardon me if upon the particular urgencies of some Objectors I again make answer to these that follow Obj. Act. 20. 7. The first day 〈◊〉 the Week Gr. one of the Sabbaths That 〈◊〉 breaking of Bread there was common Eating â—mpare the like greek phrase Act. 27. 35. â— 42. see Esa. 58. 7. However it was but an â—ample of Preaching and breaking Bread upon a â—ecial occasion Answ. 1. That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signiâ—â—â—th on the first day of the week the Generality 〈◊〉 the ancients both Greek and Latine agree â—hose testimony about the sense of a word is the â—st Dictionary and evidence that we can expect â—nd the same phrase used of the Day of Christs â—surrection by the Evangelists proveth it â—hough I am sorry to hear of one that denyeth â—at also and asserteth that Christ rose on the second day morning because else he could not as Jonah be three dayes and nights buried But I am not so proud as to think my self capable of convincing that man in such a matter of fact who will not believe the historical witness of the whole Church of Christ and expecteth to be believed against them all at â—uch a distance in the end of the World 2. There is no doubt but that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 breaking of Bread was both a Common and a Sacred action And the phrase is to be interpreted by the context to know when it signifieth the common and when the Sacred In Act. 27. 35. the context teacheth us to interpret iâ— of common eating But that it doth not so Act. 2. 42 46. or Act. 20. is plain to him that considereth 1. That it was then usual to communicate Sacramentally in all their Church Assemblies 2. That these mentioned were Church-assemblies the Church being met purposely for Sacred works Yet it is to be remembred that the Love feasts did usually concurr in the beginning with the Sacrament and the name might be used with respect to both 3. That it was not a meer occasional meeting is apparent to the unprejudiced 1. Because they stayed at â—roas seven dayes v. 6. and in all the seven make no mention of this
twentieth because of the Belief of the Lords Resurrection which the Church truly believed was on the first day of the week for the hope of our Resurrection and which they believed will fall out on the same first day of the week which is now called the Lords day So cap. 25. the King and the Queen kept Easter on several Lords dayes and the difference made the stir And Wilfrid in his Speech there saith the same that the Scots kept Ester only on the Lords day by whom the King at that time was changed And li. 3. c. 26. Beda saith that Tuda another holy follower of the Scots being made Bishop On the Lords daies the people flockt by crowds together either to the Church or to the Monasteries not to refresh their bodies but to learn the word of God and if any Priest hapt to come into a Village presently the Inhabitants Congregati in unum gathered together took care to seek from him the word of life Cap. 2. li. 4. Theodorus his Consecration on the Lords day is mentioned Lib. 4. cap. 5. In the Synod at Herudford the first Canon is that all keep Easter on the Lords day next after the fourteenth Moon of the first Month. Lib. 5. cap. 22. Ceolfridus sendeth an Epistle to the King of the Picts in which are these words Postquam verò Pasâ—ha nostrum immolatus est Christus Diemque nobis Dominicam quae apud antiquâ—t una 〈◊〉 prima Sabbati sive Sabbatorum vocatur gaudio suae Resurrectionis fecit esse solennem ita hanc nunc Apostolica traditio festis Paschalibus inseruit that is But when Christ our Passover was sacrificed for us and by the Joy of his Resurrection made the Lords day which by the Ancients was called one or the first of the Sabbath or Sabbaths to be a solemn day to us so now Apostolical Tradition hath ingraffed it into the Paschal Festivals Where you see that the Lords day settled as solemn by the Resurrection he taketh for uncontroverted but the graffing it into the Easter Festivals he ascribeth to Apostolical Tradition meaning St. Peters And after in the same Epistle Qui tertia post immolationem suae passionis die resurgens à mortuis hanc dominicam vocari in eâ nos annuatim Paschalia ejusdem Resurrectionis voluit festa celebrare that is Christ rising from the dead the third day after the Sacrifice of his passion would have this called the Lords day and would have us on it to Celebrate the Paschal Feast of his Resurrection The like is after again in that Epistle with this addition that we hold that our own Resurrection will be on the Lords day By this Epistle the King of the Picts was brought to Conformity in that day and made Laws for it And Cap. 23. The Scots of Hy who stood out so long were brought to it by the perswasion of Eigbertus Judge now of your Historical note of England But that you may see more of this you may Read Beda's mind that lived in England in other of his Works On Act 20. In una Sabbathi eum convenissemus ad fraugendum pâ—nem id est Die Dominico qui est primus a Sabbate cum ad mysteria celebrandae Congregâ—ti essemus that is On the Lords day which is the first from the Sabbath when we were Congregated to Celebrate the Mysteries And he thinks it called The Lords day because it is the Remembrance of the Lords Resurrection or ours And on Luc. 6. fol. 78. he saith The observation of the Legal Sabbath ought of it self to cease and the natural liberty of a Sabbath to be restored which till Moses time was like other dayes That as it is not circumcision or the Ceremonies of the Law that save the Church but the faith of Abraham working by Love by which being uncircumcised he was justified so he calleth the second Sabbath after the first no other but the spiritual Sabbath in which as on other daies it is lawful to do any profitable work for distinction from the Jewish Sabbath in which it was not lawful to travel to gather Wood nor to do other needful things Pardon his Errour about that word I only cite it for the historical use And on Luc. 24. 1. fol. 143. One of the Sabbaths or the first of the Sabbaths is the first day after the Sabbath which the Christian custome hath called the Lords day because of the Lords Resurrection And ibid. fol. 143. Whence Ecclesiastical custome hath obtained that either in memory of Christs Resurrection or for the hope of ours we Pray not with bended knees but only with faces declined towards the Earth on every Lords day and all the quadragesimae And in Act. 2. 1. The Holy Ghost sent the example of the ancient sign returning did himself by his own coming most manifestly Consecrate the Lords day And on Col. 2. fol. 308. he sheweth that the Sabbath was a shadow and Christ that made it was Lord of it and ended it and that to abstain from sin is now our Sabbath See him also on Rev. 1. 10. Heb. 4. fol. 308. 2 Cor. 3. fol. 176. D. And because he was a Scot I will adde Sedulius who lived 430. In Col. 2. fol 91. The Sabbath being a shadow ceased when the Body came because the Truth being present the Image is needless And on Heb. 4 9. There remaineth a Rest that is The Eternal Rest which the Jewish Sabbath signified See Philastrius Hâ—res 8. Abundance more of this kind I might Cite but for making the Book tedious to those that need it not And so much of the History to satisfie your Objections and Mistakes CHAP. II. An Answer to more Arguments for the seventh day Sabbath Reasons 1. THat the Lord Jesus Christ is Jehovah Zach. 11. 13. 12 4 10. Gen. 19. 24. Act. 2. 25. compared with Psal. 16. 8 c. The Lord our Righteousness Jer. 23. 6. Answers 1. THis is no Controversie among us meaning of Christs Divine Nature and his person in respect thereof Reasons 2. That the World was made by Jehovah Christ Joh. 1. 3 10. Heb. 1. 2 3 10. Col. 1. 14 15 16 17. Eph. 3. 9. Psal. 102. 22 24 25. Heb. 3. 4. Rom. 11. 36. 1 Cor. 8. 6. Gen. 2. 4 c. Answers 2. Nor is this any Controversie if meant of the second person in the eternal Trinity not yet Incarnate nor in the flesh Annointed Christ. Reasons 3. The seventh day Sabbath was instituted by Jehovah Christ and kept by him Gen. 2. 2 3 4. whilest man was in innocency before the Fall Gen. 3. 6. and before any Types Answers 3. Though this have long been doubted in the Church some thinking it mentioned but by Anticipation yet I deny it not but believe that it was Sanctified and kept from the beginning because the Reason of the Consecration was from the beginning But 1. The second Person is not called Christ before the fall nor without respect to his
humane Nature 2. It is uncertain whether it was before the fall because we know not whether man fell on the same day in which he was Created which is the commonest opinion though unproved Whereupon Mr. ◠Walker in his Treat of the Sabbath maintaineth that the fall and promise went before the Sabbath and so that Gods rest had respect to Christ promised as the perfection of his works and that the Sabbath was first founded on Christ and the promise But because all this is unproved Opinion I incline to the Objectors and the common sense Reasons 4. The seventh day Sabbath was kept by Abraham Gen. 26. 5. by the Israelites Exod. 5. 5. The Law for the seventh day was repeated Exod. 16. 22 23. Answers 4. I am of the same opinion but it is uncertain so far as it is uncertain whether it was instituted actually at first But the rest Ex. 5. 5. seemeth plainly to referr to no Sabbath but to the peoples neglect of their tasks while Moses kept them in hope of deliverance and treated for them And their tasks with their desire to go into the Wilderness to Sacrifice maketh it probable that Pharaoh never allowed them the Sabbaths rest Reasons 5. The Decalogue was spoken by Jehovah Christ Exod. 20. 1. see the Assemblies lesser Catechisme on the Preamble in the Commands Because the Lord is our God c. Redeemer c. therefore we are bound to keep c. Exod. 19. 3. compared with Act. 7. 38. Esa. 63. 9. Ex. 19. 17. The Decalogue written by his Finger Ex. 31. 18. On Tables of Stone Ex. 32. 15 16 19. 34 1 28. and kept by all the Prophets Answers 5. All true and uncontroverted with these suppositions 1. That the Father as well as the Son gave the Decalogue 2. That the second person was not 〈◊〉 Incarnate Christ. 3. That the Law was given by the Ministration of Angels who its like are called the Voice and Finger of God 4. That God our Redeemer did variously Govern his Kingdom by his Law and Covenant in various Editions of which more anon Reasons 6. The Decalogue was confirmed by Jehovah Christ Ma◠5. 17 18 19. Luk. 16. 17. Mat. 28. 20. Joh. 14. 15. 15. 14. Rom 3. 31. 7. 12. Jam. 2. 8 12. NewCovenant Heb. 8. 10. 1 Joh. 3. 22 24. 1 Joh. 5. 3. 2 Ep. Joh. 5. 6. Rev. 12. 17. 14. 12. 22. 14 18. compared with Mal. 4. 4. Answers 6. Here beginneth our fundamental difference I shall first tell you what we take for the truth and then consider of what you alledge against it 1. We hold that every Law is the Law of some one some Law-maker or Soveraign power And therefore Christ being now the Head over all things to the Church Eph. 1. 22 23. whatever Law is now in Being to the Church must needs be the Law of Christ. 2. We hold that Christs Redeemed Kingdom hath been Governed by him with variety of Administrations by various Editions of his Law or Covenant That is I. Universally to Mankind viz. 1. Before his Incarnation which was first To Adam and secondly to Noah and to mankind in them both 2. After his Incarnation II. Particularly to the seed of Abraham even the Jews as a particular Political society chosen out of the World not as the only people or Church of God on Earth but for peculiar extraordinary mercies as a peculiar people 3. We believe that each of these Administrations was fittest for its proper time and subject according to the manifold Wisdom of God But yet the Alterations were many and great and all tended towards perfection so that the last Edition of the Covenant by Christ Incarnate and his Holy Spirit much excelled all that went before in the Kingdom of the Mediatour And all these changes were made by God-Redeemer himself 4. As it was the work of the Redeemer to be the Repairer of Nature and recoverer of man to God so in all the several Administrations the great Laws of Nature containing mans duty to God resulting from and manifested in our Nature as related to God and in the Natura rerum or the Works of God was still made the chief part of the Redeemers Law so that this Law of Nature whose summe is the Love of God and of his Image is ever the Primitive unchangeable Law and the rest are secondary subservient Laws either Positive or remedying or both And no tittle of this shall ever cease if nature cease not 5. But yet there are temporary Laws of Nature which are about Temporary things or where the Nature of the thing it self is mutable from whence the Natural duty doth result As it was a duty by the then Law of Nature it self for Adams Sons and Daughters to Marry Increase and multiply being made a natural Benediction and the means a natural Duty And yet now it is incest against the Law of Nature for Brother and Sister to Marry So it was a Natural duty for Adam and Eve before their Fall to love each other as innocent but not so when they ceased to be innocent For cessanie materiâ cessat obligatio 6. So also some Positive Commands made to Adam in Innocence ceased on the fall and sentence As to dress that Garden And some positives of the first Administrations of Grace did cease by the supervening of a more perfect administration As the two Symbolical or Sacramental Trees in the Garden were no longer such to man when he was turned out so no positive Ordinance of Grace was any longer in force when God himself repealed it by the introduction of a more perfect Administration 7. Accordingly we hold that a change is now made of the sanctified day Where note 1. That we take not the seventh day no nor one day in seven though that be nothing to our Controversie to be a Duty by the proper Law of Nature but by a Positive Law 2. That the seventh day is never called a Sahbath till Moses time but only a Sanctified and blessed day the word Sabbath being ever taken in Scripture for a day of Ceremonial Rest as well as of spiritual Rest and Worship 3. That Christ himself hath continued a seventh day but changed the seventh day to the first not as a Sabbath that is A day of Ceremonial Rest for he hath ended all Sabbaths as shadows of things that were to come even of rest which remained for the people of God Heb. 4. 9. Col. 2. 16. And this is it which is incumbent upon us to prove and I think I have fully proved already 4. That having proved the thing done the positive Law of the seventh day changed by the Holy Ghost to the first day it concerneth us not much to give the reasons of Gods doings But yet this reason may secondarily be observed That God having made the whole frame of Nature very good did thereby make it the glass in which he was to be seen by man and the Book
Indeed all Labour is that is all the Motion of any Creature which is out of its proper place and moveth towards it But if you will call the Action of Active natures such as our souls are by the name of spiritual motion or Metaphysical motion as many do then no doubt but cessation is as contrary to their nature as corporal motion is to the nature of a stone And the Rest that is the perfection pleasure and felicity of Spirits consisteth in their greatest activity in good They rest not saying Holy Holy c. 3. You transfer the case from a day of Worship to a day of Rest. And so make your cause worse Because nature saith much for one stated day of Worship but not for one stated day of Rest from labour further than the Worship it self must have a vacancy from other things For reason can prove no necessity to humane nature of Resting a whole day any more than for a due proportioning of Rest unto Labour every day The Rest of one hour in seven is as much as the Rest of one Day in seven Or if some more additional conveniences may be found for Dayes than Hours there being no convenience without its inconvenience this will but shew us that the Law is well made when it is made but not prove a priore that there is or must be such an universal Law As you can never prove that Nature teacheth men the distribution of Time by Weeks 1. It being a thing of Tradition Custom and Consent 2. And no man naturally knoweth it till others tell him of it 3. And many Nations do not so measure their time 4. And no man can bring a Natural Reason to prove that it must be so which they might do if it were a Law of Natural Reason so also that every Family or Countrey at least should not have leave to vary their dayes of Rest according to diversity of Riches and Poverty Health and Sickness Youth and Age Peace and War and other such cases you cannot prove necessary by Nature alone though you may prove it well done when it is done 4 You cannot prove the last day more necessary for Rest than the first or any other For there are few Countreys where Wars or some other necessities have not constrained them sometimes to violate the Sabbaths Rest which when they have done it is as many dayes from the third day to the third as from the seventh to the seventh 5. If Time were naturally measured by Weeks yet it followeth not that Rest must be so some Countreys are strong and can labour longer and others tender and weak and can labour less 6. And seeing that the Reason of a day for worshipping Assemblies is greater and more noble than the Reason of a day for Bodily Rest Nature will rather tell us that God should have the first day than the last A Jove principium As God was to have the first born the first fruits c. 7. If we might frame Laws for Divine Worship by such conceits of convenience as this is of the last day in seven as fittest for Rest and call them all the Laws of Nature what a multitude of additions would be made and of how great diversity whilst every mans conceit went for Reason and Reason for Nature and so we should have as many Laws of Nature as there are diversities of conceits And yet that there is such a thing as a Law of Nature in which all Reason should agree we doubt not But having in vain expected your proof that the seventh day Sabbath is the Law of Nature or of universal natural obligation I shall briefly prove the Negative that it is not 1. That which is of natural obligation may be proved by Natural Reason that is by Reason arguing from the nature of the thing to be a duty But that the seventh day must be kept holy as a Sabbath cannot be proved from the nature of the thing Therefore it is not of Natural obligation He that will deny the Minor let him instance in his natural proof 2. That is not an universal Law of Nature which Learned Godly men and the greatest number of these yea almost all the world know no such thing by and confess they cannot prove by Nature But such is the seventh day Sabbath c. It is not I alone that know nothing of any such Law nor am able by any Natural Evidence to prove it but also all the Divines and other Christians that I am or ever was acquainted with Nay I never knew one man that could say that he either had such a Law in his own nature unless some one did take his conceit for a Law nor that he could shew such 3 Law in natura rerum And it is a strange Law of Nature which is to be found in no ones Nature but perhaps twenty mens or very few in a whole age nor is discerned by all the rest of the world If you say that few understand nature or improve their reason I answer 1. If it be such a Law of Nature as is obliterated in almost all mankind it is a very great argument that nature being changed the Law is changed How can that oblige which cannot be known 2. Are not we men as well as you Have not several Ages had as great improvers of nature as you If grace must be the improver are there or have there been none as gracious If Learning must be the improver have there been none as learned If diligence or impartiality must be the improvers of nature have there not been many as diligent studious and impartial as your selves Let all rational men judge which of these is the better argument I and twenty men more in the world do discern in Nature an universal obligation on mankind to keep the seventh day Sabbath Therefore it is the Law of Nature Or The world of mankind godly and ungodly learned and unlearned discern no such natural obligation except you and the few of your mind Therefore it is no Law of Nature 3. That is not like to be an Universal Law of Nature which no one man since the Creation can be proved to have known and received as such by meer natural reasons without tradition But no one man since the Creation can be proved to have known and received the seventh day Sabbath by meer natural reason without tradition Therefore it is not like to be an Universal Law of Nature If you know any man name him and prove it For I never read or heard of such a man 4. If the Text mention it only as a Positive Institution then it is not to be accounted a Law of nature But the Text mentioneth it only as a Positive institution As is plain Gen. 2. 3. God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it because that in it he had rested from all his work c. If it had been a Law of nature it had been made in Nature and the making
of Nature would have been the making of the Law But here are two arguments against that in the Text. 1. Blessing and sanctifying are positive acts of supernatural institution superadded to the works of nature They are not Divine Creating acts but Divine instituting acts 2. That which is blessed and sanctified Because God rested in it from all his works is not blessed and sanctified meerly by those works or that Rest And if neither the works of Nature nor the Rest of God from those works did sanctifie it then it is not of natural sanctification and so not of natural obligation 5. If the very Reason of the day be not of natural but of supernatural Revelation then the sanctification of the day is not of natural but supernatural revelation and obligation But the former is certain For no man breathing ever did or can prove by Nature without supernatural Revelation that God made and finished his works in six dayes and rested the seventh Aristotle had been like to have escaped his Opinion of the worlds eternity if he could have found out this by nature 6. The distinction of Weeks is not known by nature to be any necessary measure of our time Therefore much less that the seventh day of the Week must be a Sabbath The Antecedent is sufficiently proved in that no man can give a cogent reason for the necessity of such a measure And because it hath been unknown to a great part of the world The Peruvians Mexicans and many such others knew not the measure of Weeks And Heylin noteth out of Jos. Scaliger de Emend Temp. li. 3. 4. and Rossinus Antiq. and Dion that neither the Chaldees the Persians Greeks nor Romans did of old observe Weeks and that the Romans measured their times by eights as the Jews did by sevens Hist. Sab. P. 1. Ch. 4. p. 83 84. And p. 78. he citeth Dr. Bounds own words p. 65. Ed. 2. confessing the like citing Beroaldus for it as to the Roman custom Yea he asserteth that till near the time of Dionys. Exig an 500. they divided not their time into Weeks as now In which he must needs except the Christians and consequently the ruling powers since Constantine And if they were so unsetled through the world in their measure by Moneths as Bishop Vsher at large openeth in his Dissert de Macedonum Asianorum Anno solari see especially his Ephemeris in the end where all the dayes of each Moneth are named without Weeks the other will be no won-wonder I conclude therefore 1. That one day in seven rather than in six or eight may be Reason be discerned to be convenient when God hath so Instituted it But cannot by Nature be known to be of natural universal obligation 2. That this one day should be the seventh no Light of Nature doth discover Therefore Dr. Bound Dr. Ames and the generality of the Defenders of one day in seven against the Anti-sabbatarians do unanimously assert it to be of Positive supernatural institution and not any part of the Law of Nature Though stated dayes at a convenient distance is of the Law of Nature CHAP. IV. Whether every word in the Decalogue be of the Law of Nature and of perpetual obligation And whether all that was of the Law of Nature was in the Decalogue BUt the great argument to prove it the Law of Nature is because it was part of the ten words written in stone To which I say that the Decalogue is an excellent summary of the Generals of the Law of Nature as to the ends to which it was given but that I. It hath more in it than the Law of Nature II. It hath less in it than the Law of Nature And therefore was never intended for a meer or perfect transcript of the Law of Nature but for a perfect general summary of so much of that Law as God thought meet to give the Jews by supernatural revelation containing the chief heads of Natures Law lest they should not be clear enough in Nature it self with the addition of something more I. That the Decalogue written in stone hath more than the Law of Nature is proved 1. By these instances 1. That God brought them out of the Land of Egypt and out the house of servants and that he is to be worshipped in that relation is none of the Law of Nature universally so called 2. That God is merciful and therefore reconciled to thousand Generations of them that Love him notwithstanding mans natural state of sin and misery and all mens actual sin this is of supernatural Grace and not the Law of meer Nature 3. The great difference between the wayes of Justice and mercy expressed by the third and fourth Generation compared to Thousands is more than the meer Law of Nature 4. Those Divines who take all Gods positive Institutions of Worship to be contained in the Affirmative part of the second Commandment must needs think that it containeth more than the Law of nature Though I say not as they but only that as a General Law it obligeth us to perform them when another Law hath instituted them 5. To rest one day in seven is more than the Law of Nature 6. To rest the seventh day rather than the sixth or first is more than the Law of Nature 7. The strictness of the Rest to do no manner of Work is more than a Law of Nature 8. That there be Man servants and Maid servants besides natural inferiours is not of the primitive or universal Law of Nature 9. The distinction of the Israelites from strangers within their Gates was not by the Law of Nature 10. That Cattle should do no manner of work as for a Dog to turn the spit in a wheel or such like is more than a Law of Nature 11. That God made Heaven and Earth in six dayes and rested the seventh is not of Natural Revelation 12. That this was the reason wherefore God blessed the Sabbath day aud hallowed it is not of Natural Revelation 13. Some will say that more Relations than Natural being meant in the fifth Commandment maketh it more than a Law of Nature 14. That the Land of Canaan is made their reward is a positive respecting the Israelites only 15. That length of dayes in that Land should be given by Promise is an act of Grace and not of Nature only 16. That this promise of length of dayes in that Land is made more to the Honouring of Superiours than to the other commanded duties is more than Natural 2. I prove it also by the Abrogation of the Law written in stone which I proved before If the Decalogue had been the Only and Perfect Law of Nature it would not have been so far done away as the Apostle saith it is of which before II. All the Law of Nature was not in the Tables of Stone Here I premise these suppositions 1. That a General Law alone obligeth not to all particulars without a Particular Law E.
day And for the most part they Celebrated not the Lords Supper on that day And they abhorred the keeping it as a day of Rest. 2. They met on that day for all these Reasons 1. Because having been used in the beginning to meet every day in the Week when they had all things common and were to shew the power of the Evangelical Doctrine to the height Act. 2. 44 45 46. 4. 33 34 35. as they found cause to retrive their community so did they to meet seldomer and yet not so seldome as once a Week And therefore as we now keep other meetings for Lectures and Prayers besides the Lords day so did they then on Wednesdayes Fridayes and Saturdayes 2. Because the Conversion of the Jews was a great part of their work and hope And therefore to win them they would with Paul become Jews that is not affect an unnecessary distance but come as neer them as Lawfully they could 3. Because Converted Jews were no small part of the Eastern Churches who could not easily be quite brought off from Jewish Customes And the rest were unwilling to offend them being taught not to despise the weak that observed meats and days Rom. 14. 15. Gal. 2. 4. Because the Assemblies on the seventh day were taken as fit preparatories to the sanctifying of the Lords day on which account the Church of England now appointeth them These things one that is acquainted with Church History needeth no proof of And they are sufficiently proved before Ignatius words before cited are full And those of the Council of Laodicea Can. 29. are more full who do at once appoint meetings on the seventh day and yet Anathematize them that Judaize thereon by bodily rest and would have men labour on it and preferr the Lords day before it Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho doth largely shew that Circumcision and the Sabbath are ceased by the coming of Christ and his Institutions and are not now to be used by Christians And what writer have we of full reputation and credibility more ancient than Justin from whom any testimony in this case might be sought Tertullian one of the next li. 2. against Marcion saith that the Sabbath was for that Time and present occasion or use and not for perpetuity Athanasius was one that was for meeting on the Sabbath And yet writeth his Book de Sab. Circum purposely to prove that the Sabbath is ceased with Circumcision as a Shadow and that now the Lords day is the sanctified day And the like he hath most expresly in Homil. de Semente as is cited before saying that The Master being come the Vsher was out of use and the Sun being risen the Lamps are darkened Basil Ep. 74. Writeth against Apollinaris for holding that after the Resurrection we should keep Sabbaths and Judaizeâ— As if that were the perfection to which Christ would restore men See Greg. Nazianz. Orat. 43. And Chrysoft Hom. 19. in Mat. 12. against the use of the Sabbath Cyril Hieros cat 4. Epiphan against the Nazaraei condemn them for keeping the Sabbath and Circumcision though withal they kept the Lords day The same doth Epiphanius li. 1. Haer. 30. nâ— 2. and before him Eusebius Hist. li. 3. say of the Ebionites Augustine oft telleth us that the observation or keeping of the seventh day Sabbath is ceased and not to be done by Christians Qu. ex N. Test. 69. Ad Bonif. l. 3. Contr. Faust. Manich. li. 6. c. 4. De Genes ad lit l. 4. c. 13. de spir lit c. 14. de util Cred. c. 3. 3. And as for the Abassians keeping the Sabbath It s true they keep that day in some sort But it is as true that they use Circumcision and many other Jewish Ceremonies besides oft Baptizings And that they profess not to use these as the Jews do but only as ancient Customes and as Paul did while he complyed with them using the outward action for other ends than Judaizers do And the rather because they think their Emperours descended from Solomon But the Lords day they keep on the same account as other Christians And if this instance make any thing for Sabbatizing it will make as much for Circumcising and other Jewish rites but nothing against the Sanctifying of the Lords day 4. And as for the matter of Fasting on the Sabbath the Churches greatly varyed in their Customes The Eastern Churches and Millan in the West were against Fasting on the Sabbath on two accounts 1. Because as is said they would not offend the Jewes Even as many peaceable Non-Conformists who are against many Holy dayes now established do yet forbear labouring and opening their Shops on those dayes because they will not give offence Yea and go to hear the Sermons on those dayes though they keep them not Holy as such dayes 2. Because there were many sorts of Hereticks in those times who held that the World was made by an evil God and thence came evil and so they Fasted on the seventh day on that reason Which made the Christians avoid it lest they should Symbolize with those Hereticks And therefore the real or pretended Ignatius speaketh so severely against Fasting on the Sabbath as well as on the Lords day And so do the Constitutions called the Apostles yea and the Canons called theirs Can. 65. But in the Western Churches as is aforesaid both Jews and Hereticks were more distant or less considerable for numbers and therefore they fasted on the seventh day and that the rather lest they should seem by Sabbatizing to Judaize Which was before Antichrists appearing unless you think all the holy Doctors before cited and all the Western Churches to be Antichristian Having gone thus far I here add two more Scripture Arguments to prove the abolition of the Jewish Sabbath The first is because it is frequently made as Circumcision is a sign of the particular Covenant between God and that Nation as they were a political body and peculiar people Therefore if their Policy cease and Gods relation to them as a Political body and peculiar people and so that Political Covenant with them then also the signe of the Covenant and Relation ceaseth And though the word for ever is sometime added it is no other than is oft added also to the Jewish Law and Ceremonies 2. From Act. 15. Where the case is determined by a Council of Apostles Elders and Brethren yea by the Holy Ghost V. 28. It appeareth by V. 24. that the thing asserted by the false Teachers was that the Gentiles must be Circumcised and keep the Law that is of Moses V. 1. Now the seventh day Sabbath was part of that Law As Sacrificing was though it was a Law before But the Holy Ghost determineth the case to lay on them no greater burden than these necessary things after named where the Sabbath is none of them and therefore hereby shut out The precepts given to Noah are named of which the Sabbath was not
THE Divine Appointment OF THE Lords Day Proved As a separated Day for Holy Worship especially in the Church Assemblies And consequently the Cessation of the Seventh day Sabbath Written for the satisfaction of some Religious Persons who are lately drawn into Error or doubting in both these Points By Richard Baxter Rev. 1. 10. I was in the Spirit on the Loras Day Col. 2. 16 17. Let no 〈◊〉 judge you in Meat or in Driak or in respect of an Holy day or Feast or of the New 〈◊〉 or Sabbaths which are a shadow of things to come but the Body is of Christ. LONDON Printed for Nevil Simmons at the three Crowns near Holborn Conduit 1671. THE PREFACE Reader IF thou think this Treatise both superfluous and Defective when so many larger have better done the work already I shall not at all gainsay the latter nor much the former The reason of my writing it was the necessity and request of some very upright Godly persons who are lately faln into doubt or Errour in point of the Sabbath day conceiving that because the fourth Commandment was Written in Stone it is wholly unchangeable and consequently the seventh day Sabbath in force and that the Lords day is not a Day separated by God to holy Worship I knew that there was enough written on this Subject long agoe But 1. Much of it is in Latine 2. Some Writings which prove the abrogation of the Jewish Sabbath do withal treat so loosly of the Lords day as that they require a Confutation in the latter as well as a commendation for the former 3. Some are so large that the persons that I write for will hardly be brought to read them 4. Most go upon those grounds which I take to be less clear and build so much more than I can do on the fourth Commandment and on many passages of the old Testament and plead so much for the old Sabbatical notion and rest that I fear this is the chief occasion of many peoples Errours who when they find themselves in a wood of difficulties and nothing plain and convincing that is pleaded with them do therefore think it safest to stick to the old Jewish Sabbath The friends and acquaintance of some of these persons importuning me to take the plainest and nearest way to satisfie such honest doubters I have here done it according to my judgement not contending against any that go another way to work but thinking my self that this is very clear and satisfactory viz. to prove 1. That Christ did Commission his Apostles to Teach us all things which he commanded and to settle Orders in his Church 2. And that he gave them his spirit to enable them to do all this Infallibly by bringing all his words to their remembrance and by leading them into all truth 3. And that his Apostles by this spirit did de facto separate the Lords day for holy Worship especially in Church-Assemblies and declared the cessation of the Jewish Sabbaths 4. And that as this change had the very same Author as the Holy Scriptures the Holy Ghost in the Apostles so that fact hath the same kind of proof that we have of the Canon and the integrity and uncorruptness of the particular Scripture Books and Texts And that if so much Scripture as mencioneth the keeping of the Lords day expounded by the Concent and Practice of the Universal Church from the dayes of the Apostles all keeping this day as holy without the dissent of any one Sect or single person that I remember to have read of I say if all this History will not fully prove the point of fact that this day was kept in the Apostles times and consequently by their appointment then the same proof will not serve to evince that any text of Scripture is Canonical and uncorrupted nor can we think that any thing in the world that is past can have Historical proof I have been put to say somewhat particularly out of Antiquity for this evidence of the fact because it is that which I lay the greatest stress upon But I have not done it so largely as might be done 1. Because I would not lose the unlearned Reader in a Wood of History nor overwhelm him instead of edifying him 2. Because it is done already in Latine by Dr. Young in his Dies Dominica under the name of Theophilus Loncardiensis which I take to be the moderatest soundest and strongest Treatise on this subject that I have seen Though Mr. Cawdry and Palmer joyntly have done well and at greater length and Mr. Eaton Mr. Shephard Dr. Bound Wallaeus Rivet and my dear friend Mr. George Abbot against Broad have said very much And in their way Dr. White Dr. Heylin Bishop Ironside Mr. Brierwood c. 3. I chose most of the same Citations which Dr. Heylin himself produceth because he being the man that I am most put to defend my self against his confessions are my advantage 4. And if I had been willing I could not have been so full in this as the Subject will bespeak because I have almost eleven years been separated from my Library and long from the neighbourhood of any ones else I much pitty and wonder at those Godly men who are so much for stretching the words of Scripture to a sense that other men cannot find in them as that in the word Graven Images in the second Commandment they can find all set Formes of Prayer all composed studyed Sermons and all things about Worship of mans invention to be Images or Idolatry and yet they cannot find the abrogation of the Jewish Sabbath in the express words of Col. 2. 16. nor the other Texts which I have cited nor can they find the Institution of the Lords day in all the Texts and Evidences produced for it But though Satan may somewhat disturbe our Concord and tempt some mens Charity to remissness by these differences he shall never keep them out of Heaven who worship God through Christ by the Spirit even in spirit and truth Nor shall he I hope ever draw me to think such holy persons as herein differ from me to be worse than my self though I think them in this to be unhappily mistaken much less to approve either of their own separation from others or of other mens condemning them as Hereticks and inflicting severities upon them for these their opinions sake THE CONTENTS CHAP. 1. THE state of the Question with the summary proof of the Divine separation of the Lords Day page 1. CHAP II. That Christ commissioned his Apostles as his principal Church-Ministers to teach the Churches all his Doctrine and to deliver them all his Commands and Orders and so to settle and guide the first Churches p. 5. CHAP. III. Christ promised his Spirit to his Apostles to enable them to do what he had commissioned them to do by leading them into all truth and bringing his words and deeds to their remembrance and by guiding them at his Churches Guides p. 9.
Church before as what day goeth over their head The Historical hints of the New Testament must be taken together and not a part only that they may prove a usage And 1. That Christ rose on that day is past doubt among Christians Joh. 20. 1. Luk. 24. 1. Mar. 16. 2. Matth. 28. 1. 2. On that same day he taught the two disciples Luk. 24. 13. And the same day he appeared to the Disciples and instructed them and did eate with them Luk. 24. 33 36. Theâ— the Disciples were assembled and theâ— he blessed them gave them their Commission and the Holy Ghost Joh. 20. 19 20 21 22. 3. The next first day of the week Christ chose to appear to them again when Thomas was with them and convinced him Joh. 20. 26. 4. In Act. 20. 7. It is mentioned as the day of their Assembling to break bread which though they did oft on other daies yet no day else was peculiarly appointed for it As for the dissenters cavil about the Translation of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beza hath given them Reason enough against it And Grotius and almost all expositors are against them And most that translate it literally una Sabbatorum take Vna and Prima here to be all one And Calvin with others noteth that the same phrase being used of the day of the Resurrection Matth. 26. 1. Luk. 24. 1. Joh. 20. 1. will direct us to expound this unless you mean also to deny the Resurrection to have been on the first day And 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must needs have the same signification And Mark 26. 9. compared with the other Evangelists so expounds them as Beza noteth who also telleth us that in one old Copy he found added the Lords day and citeth Hierome adv Vigilant saying Per unam Sabbati hoc est in die Dominico c. And Dr. Hammond well noteth that it plainly relateth to the Christian assemblies to which they were not to come empty but to deposite what they brought into the treasury of the Church or if it were in their private repositories it doth not much difference the case Calvins exception against Chrysostome here is groundless as the reasons before evince So that by this Text the custome of holding Church meetings on the Lords day as a peculiar day is intimated though but on the by as most Expositors agree And the denomination of the Lords day Joh. 1. 10. being the same which the Christian Churches ever used of the First day puts it yet further out of doubt As for his conjecture who doubteth whether it may be meant of the Anniversary day of Christs Resurrection when as the constant use of the name by all the Churches sheweth that it was taken ever since for the weekly day it deserveth no other refutation Now though all this set together shew that Scripture is not silent of the matter of fact yet it is the full and unquestionable expository evidence of the practice of all Churches in the world since the very daies of the Apostles which beyond all doubt assureth us that de facto the Lords day was by the Apostles separated for holy Worship especially in publick Church-assemblies But these several intimations being seconded with so full an Exposition tell us that the Scripture is not silent in the case nor doth pass it by I was loth to name the day of the sending down of the Holy Ghost as a proof Because that some do controvert it But it seemeth to me a very considerable thing 1. That the day that year 〈…〉 of Pentecost on which the Holy Ghost was given was indeed the first day of the week even Dr. Heylin granteth without any question or stop And the Churches observation of Whitsunday as the day and that so very early as Epiphanius and many others say from the Apostles doth seem a very credible history or tradition of it 2. It s agreed on that the Passoever that year fell on the Sabboth day and that Pentecost was fifty daies after the Passover which falleth out on the Lords day And Grotius noteth from Exod. 19. 1. that it was the day that the Law was given on and so on which the Spirit was given for the new Law 3. And considering that this great gift of the Holy Ghost which was to make the Apostles Infallible and to enable them for their commission-work and bring all Christs Doctrines and Commands to their remembrance was so memorable a thing that it was as it were the Beginning of the full Gospel-state of the Church and Kingdom of Christ which through all Christs abode on Earth was as the Infant existent indeed but in the womb and on this day was as it were Born before the world and brought into the open light the Lords day also seemeth to me to be as it were Conceived on the day of Christs Resurrection but Born on this day of the Holy Ghosts descent But Dr. Heylin hath one poor reason against it viz. Because it was but an accidental thing that the day fell out that year on the first day Answ. 1. Was it not according to the course of Nature How then can that be called Accidental 2. But however it was no contingent accidental thing in his sense that the Holy Ghost was sent down on that day rather than another If a sparrow fall not to the ground without Gods providence did God choose that day He knew not why Or did it fall out hap hazard or by chance I need not insist on the confutation of his Caviâ—s about the other Texts forecited Note only 1. That as to his exception about Christs travel on his Resurrection day I have after answered it 2. That he freely granteth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifiâ—th The first day of the week both in Act. 20. 7. and 1 Cor. 16. 2. 3. That he himself citeth afterward many testimonies that oblations and contributions were in the Churches a usual Lords dayes work 4. That he confesseth that Rev. 10. 1. is meant of the Lords day as by that time grown into reputation 5. That he thinketh it was in small reputation before because Paul chose the Sabbath so often to Preach on to the Jews and Hellenists or Greeks whereas he himself is forced to confess that it was not for the days sake but the Assemblies to do them good 6. That he vainly conceiteth that Because the Lords day was kept on the account of Christs Resurrection it implyeth that it was not kept by Gods command which needeth no confutation 7. That his labour to prove that Paul meant the Jewish Sabbath as abrogated is vain for we deny it not 8. That he cannot deny that Christians had all that time of the Apostles a stated day as Pliny himself witnesseth for solemn worship above other daies 9. That he vainly snatcheth a little countenance from Calvin and Beza c. when as no man since Cochlaeus writeth more detestably of them 10. That after he
Certainty from Most certainly abundance of testimonies might be produced to prove that they came together early in the Morning and stayed till Evening if not till within Night The former Pliny and many others witness And the later many accusations of the Heathens that censured them for night-crimes at their meetings And all that report it almost tell us of the Sacrament administred and Tertullian and others of their feasting together their Love Feasts as a Supper before they parted Now let but the time be measured by the work By that time the Scriptures of the Old Testament and New were read and all the prayers then made and all the Preaching and Exhortations and then all the Prayers and Praises at the Celebration of the Lords Supper especially if they were half as long as the Liturgies ascribed to Basil Chrysostom and the rest in the Biblioth Patrum and by that time the Sacrament it self was administred with all the action and singing of Psalms and all the Oblations and Collections made and besides this all the Church Discipline on particular persons exercised where Questions and Answers and Proofs must take up a great deal of time sure one day would be at an end or very near it And after when the Love Feasts were left off and the Church met twice and made an intermission they did as we do now And the very Custom of Preaching all the Morning to the Audientes and Catechumens till almost Noon when they were dismist with a Missa est and spending the rest of the day in Teaching the Church and Celebrating the Sacrament with all the larger Eucharistical acts do fully shew how the day was spent Which I would quickly prove by particular Testimonies but that I am separated from my Library and Dr. Young hath fully done it to my hand The very Context of these testimonies with what Albaspinaeus hath of their Catechizing and Church order will soon satisfie the impartial searcher As for what he saith out of Justin of returning to their labours I can find no such word in him nor do I believe there is any such to be found unless of returning to their six dayes weekly labour when the Religious work was ended with the day And I imagine the Reader will find no more if so much 9. The next proof is universal even the consent of all the Christian Churches without one contradicting Vote that ever I read of that the Lords dayes worship was to be performed standing and that it was not allowed them to pray or worship kneeling upon any Lords day in the year or any week day between Easter and Whitsontide And the difficulty of these stations is expressed see Albaspinaeus of it which sheweth that it was for a long time Whatever they did in Hearing its like they sate for Justin saith We rise to pray but it is certain they stood in worshipping acts as prayer and praise This Justin Martyr hath before mentioned Tertullian hath it expresly and Heylin himself citeth him de Coron Mil. Basil l. de Spir. S. c. 27. Hieron advers Luciferian August Epist. 118. Hilar. Praef. in Psal. Ambros. Serm. 62. To which he may add Epiphanius and divers Councils especially Nic. 1. Trul. of which after I once pleaded this ancient custom with them that would have all excluded from the Sacrament that kneel not to prove that kneeling at the Sacrament on the Lords dayes could not be in the Church of many hundred years after the Apostles when the universal Church condemned kneeling on all Lords dayes worship And Dr. Heylin himself saith What time this custom was laid by I can hardly say but sure I am it was not laid aside in a long time after not till the time of Pope Alexander the third who lived about the year 1160. c. Now from all this it is most evident that the Lords day was then observed 10. In this place though by anticipation I add the two General Councils now named The first great General Council at Nice Can. 20. which reneweth and confirmeth this antient custom of not kneeling in prayer on the Lords dayes that there might be an uniformity kept in the Churches And the Canoâ— Conâ—â—â— Trul. have the same again which proveth what we seek the matter of fact of the dayes general observation 11. The next is Origen who is not denyed to witness to the matter of fact but Heylin thinks he was against the Right of it But his mistake is the same as about Clemens Alex. Origen did but desire that other dayes might be kept also as profitably as they could as our Lecture dayes are 12. Cyprian is the next whose testimonies for matter of fact are full and Heylin hath nothing to say against him but that it is his private opinion that the Lords day was prefigured in the eighth day destined to Circumcision Which is nothing at all to our business in hand 13. And he himself cites Pope Fabians Decretal Anno 237. a testimony therefore that he is not to refuse for every man and woman on the Lords dayes to bring a quantity of bread and wine to be first offered on the Altar and then distributed in the Sacrament The Canon of Clem. before mentioned I now pretermit But saith Dr. Heylin 1. All days between Easter and Whitsunday had adoration by genuflection also prohibited on them 2. And the Church had other Festivals also Answ. 1. The Reason of Station was to signifie Christs Resurrection and ours Therefore it continued for these dayes But that was for the short occasional meetings of those dayes which he himself will not say were separated to worship 2. And the other Festivals of the Church make nothing against us For 1. Some of them as Easter and Whitsunday were but the same Lords day 2. And some of them were but Anniversary and not weekly Holy dayes as the Nativity c. 3. And he confesseth even these were brought in long after the Apostles dayes and therefore can lay no claim to Apostolical institution Pag. 62. he himself saith that The Feast of Christs Nativity was ordained or instituted in the second Century and that of his Incarnation in the third And besides Easter and Whitsunday which are the Lords day Christmas is all that he nameth out of Beda so long after as the Majora Solennia The Eves were but hours for preparation 14. To these though in the fourth Century I may add Epiphanius who recordeth the Station and Adoration to the East on the Lords dayes as those Traditions received by the Universal Church And here I would have it specially noted that when Tertullian Epiphanius and others note standing on the Lords dayes to be an unwritten Tradition received by the whole Church they do not say the same of the Lords day it self though the Antients oft say that we received it from the Apostles Now by this it is plain that they took the Lords day to be of Apostolick Institution past all question
customs taken up upon reasons proper to those times and places Obj. But by the reason aforesaid you will prove the continuance of the seventh day Sabbath as grounded on the Creation rest Answ. This is anom to be answered in due place I only prove that it continued till a successive dispensation and Gods own change did put an end to it but no longer Obj. But to commemorate the Creation and praise the Creator is a Moral work and therefore ceaseth not Answ. True but that it be done on the seventh day is that which ceaseth For the same work is transferred to the Lords day and the Creator and Redeemer to be honoured together in our Commemoration For the Son is the only way to the Father who hath restored us to Peace with our Creator And as no man cometh to the Father but by the Son and as we must not now worship God as a Creator and Father never offended but as a Creator and Father reconciled by Christ so is it the appointment of Christ by the Holy Ghost that we commemorate the work of Creation now as repaired and restored by the work of Redemption on the Lords day which is now separated to these works That the Sabbath was appointed to Adam Wallaeus on the fourth Commandment cap. 3. and Rivet dissert de sab c. 1. have most copiously proved And Clem. Alex. Strom. l. 5. out of Homer Hesiod Callimachus and others proveth that the Heathens knew of it We may therefore summ up the prerogatives of the Lords day as Leo did Ep. 81. c. 1. On this day the world began on this day by Christs Resurrection Death did receive Death and Life its beginning on this day the Apostles take the trumpet of the Gospel to be preached to all Nations on this day the Holy Ghost came from the Lord to the Apostles c. See more in Athanas. de Sab. Circ August Serm. 154. de Tempore Therefore saith Isychius in Levit. l. 2. c. 9. The Church setteth apart the Lords day for holy Assemblies And in the times of Heathenish persecution when men were asked Whether they were Christians and kept the Lords dayes they answered that they were and kept the Lords day which Christians must not omit as you may see Act. Martyâ— apud Baron an 303. n. 37 38 39. They would die rather than not keep the holy assemblies and the Lords dayes For saith Ignatius After the Sabbath every lover of Christ celebrateth the Lordâ— day 〈◊〉 to or by the Lords resurrection the Queen and chief of 〈◊〉 dâ—yes as is afore cited For saith Augustine The Lords Resurrection hath promised us an eternal Day and consecrated to us the Lords day which is called the Lords and properly belongeth to the Lord Serm. 15. de Verb. Apost And saith Hilary Prâ—leg in Psalm Though the name and observance of a Sabbath was placed to the seventh day yet is it the eighth day which is also the first on which we rejoyce with the perfect festivity of the Sabbath Of the fâ—â—l keeping of the whole day and of the several Exercises in which it was spent and of the more numerous testimonies of Antiquity hereupon Dr. Yâ—ung in his Dies Dominica hath said so much with so much evidence and judgement 〈◊〉 I purposely omit abundance of such Testimonies because I will not do that which he hath already done The Learned Reader may there find unanswerable proof of the matter of fact that the Lords day was kept in the Apostles dayes and ever since as by their appointment And for the unlearned Reader I fear lest I have too much interrupted him with Citations already I only tell him in the Conclusion that If Scripture Hiâ—tory interpreted and seconded by fullest practice and History of all the Churches of Christ and by the consent of Heathens and Heretickâ— and not contradicted by any Sect in the world be to be believed then we must say that the Lords day was commonly kept by the Christians in and from the Apostles times Prop. 11. This evidence of the Churches universal constant usage is a full and sufficient proof of the matter of fact that it was a day set apart by the Apostles for holy Worship especially in the publick Church-assemblies 1. It is a full proof that such Assemblies were held on that day above others as a separated day For if it was the usage in Anno 100. in which the Apostle John dyed it must needs be the usage in the year 99. in which he wrote his Revelations where he calleth it the Lords day For all the Churches could not silently agree on a sudden to take up a new day without debate and publick notice which could not be concealed And if it was the universal usage in the dayes of Ignatius or Justin Martyr it was so also in the dayes of St. John and so before For the Churches were then so far dispersed over the world that it would have taken up much time to have had Councils and meetings or any other means for agreement on such things And it is utterly improbable that there would have been no dissenters For 1. Did no Christians in the world so neer to the Apostles daies make any scruple of superstition or of such an addition to Divine institutions 2. Was there no Countrey nor no persons whose interest would not better suit with another day or an uncertain day or at least their opinions when we find it now so hard a matter to bring men in one Countrey to be all of one opinion 3. And there was then no Magistrate to fâ—rce them to such an Union And therefore it mast be voluntary 4. And they had in the second age such Pastors as the Apostles themselves had ordained and as had conversed with them and been trained up by them and knew their mind and cannot soberly be thought likely to consent all on a sudden to such a new institution without and contrary to the Apostles sense and practice 5. Yea they had yet Ministers that had that extraordinary spirit which was given by the laying on of the Apostles hands For if the aged Apostles ordained young men it is to be supposed that most of those young men such as Timothy overlived them 6. Yea and the ordinary Christians in those times had those extraordinary gifts by the laying on of the Apostles hands as appeareth evidently in the case of Samaria Act. 8. and of the Corinthians 1 Cor. 12. 14. and of the Galathians Gal. 3. 1 2 3. And it is not to be suspected that all these inspired Ministers and people would consent to a superstitious innovation without and against the Apostles minds 2. Therefore this history is a full proof that these things were done by the consent and appointment of the Apostles For 1. As is said the inspired persons and Churches could not so suddenly be brought to forsake them universally in such a case 2. The Churches had all so high an esteem of the Apostles
not obliged to the observation of the seventh day as a Sabbath by any Law of God The Minor I must prove by parts For I think none will deny the sufficient enumeration in the Major And 1. That the Law of Nature bindeth us not to the seventh or any one day of the seven more than other appeareth 1. In the nature and reason of the thing There is nothing in nature to evidence it to us to be Gods will 2. By every Christians experience No man findeth himself convinced of any such thing by meer nature 3. By all the Worlds experience No man can say that a man of that opinion can bring any cogent evidence or argument from nature alone to convince another that the seventh day must be the Sabbath Nor is it any where received as a Law of Nature but only as a Tradition among some few Heathens and as Law positive by the Jews and some few Christians I am not solicitous to prosecute this argument any further because I can consent that all they take the seventh day for the Sabbath who can prove it to be so by meer natural Evidence which will not be one II. That the Positive Law made to Adam before or after the fall or to Noah bindeth not us to keep the seventh day as a Sabbath is proved 1. Because we are under a more perfect subsequent Law which being in force the former more imperfect ceaseth As the force of the Promise of the Incarnation of Christ is ceased by his incarnation and so is the precept which bound men to believe that he should de future be incarnate and the Law of Sacrificing which Abel doubtless received from Adam though one of late would make it to be but will-worship so also is the Sabbath day as giving place to the day in which our Redemption is primarily commemorated as the imperfect is done away when that which is more perfect cometh 2. Because that the Law of Christ containeth an express revocation of the seventh day Sabbath as shall be shewed anon 3. Because God never required two dayes in seven to be kept as holy Therefore the first day being proved to be of Divine institution the cessation of the seventh is thereby proved For to keep two dayes is contrary to the command which they themselves do build upon which requireth us to sanctifie a Sabbath and labour six dayes 4. And when it is not probable that most or many Infidels are bound to Adams day for want of notice at least For no Law can bind without promulgation though I now pass by the question how far a promulgation of a positive to our first Parents may be said to bind their posterity that have no intermediate notice It seemeth leÃs probable that Christians should be bound by it who have a more perfect Law promulgate to them 5. Nor is it probable that Christ and his Apostles and all the following Pastors of the Churches would have passed by this Positive Law to Adam without any mention of it if our universal obligation had been thence to be collected Nay I never yet heard a Sabbatarian plead this Law any otherwise than as supposed to be implyed or exemplified in the fourth Commandment III. And that the fourth Commandment of Moses Law bindeth us not to the seventh day Sabbath is proved 1. Because that Moses Law never bound any to it but the Jews and those Proselites that made themselves inhabitants of their Land or voluntarily subjected themselves to their policy For Moses was Ruler of none but the Jews nor a Legislator or deputed officer from God to any other Nation The Decalogue was but part of the Jewish Law if you consider it not as it is written in Nature but in Tables of Stone And the Jewish Law was given as a Law to no other people but to them It was a National Law as they were a peculiar people and holy Nation So that even in Moses daies it bound no other Nations of the World Therefore it needed not any abrogation to the Gentiles but a declaration that it did not bind them 2. The whole Law of Moses formally as such is ceased or abrogated by Christ. I say As such Because Materialy the same things that are in that Law may be the matter of the Law of Nature and of the Law of Christ of which more anon That the whole Law of Moses as such is abrogated is most clearly proved 1. By the frequent arguings of Paul who ever speaketh of that Law as ceased without excepting any part And Christ saith Luke 16. 16. The Law and the Prophets were untill John that is were the chief doctrine of the Church till then Joh. 1. 17. The Law was given by Moses but grace and truth cometh by Jesus Christ. No Jew would have understood this if the word Law had not contained the Decalogue So Joh. 7. 19 23. Act. 15. 5 24. It was the whole Law of Moses as such which by Circumcision they would have bound men to Gal. 5. 3. The Gentiles are said to sin without Law even when they broke the Law of Nature meaning without the Law of Moses Rom. 2. 12 14 15 16. In all these following places its not part but the whole Law of Moses which Paul excludeth which I ever acknowledged to the Antinomians though they take me for their too great Adversary Rom. 3. 19 20 21 27 28 31 4. 13 14 15 16. 5. 13. 20. 7. 4 5 6 7 8 16. 9. 4 31 32. 10. 5. Gal. 2. 16 19 21. 3. 2 10 11 12 13 19 21 24. 4. 21. 5. 3 4 14 23. 6. 13. Eph. 2. 15. Phil. 3. 6 9. Heb. 7 11 12 19. 9. 19. 10. 28. 1 Cor. 9. 21. 2. More particularly there are some Texts which express the cessation of the Decalogue as it was Moses Law 2 Cor. 3. 3 7 11. Not in Tables of Stone but in fleshly tables of the heart But if the Ministration of death written and engraven in stones was glorious so that the Children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his Countenance which was to be done away or is done away They that say the Glory and not the Law is here said to be done away speak against the plain scope of the Text For the Glory of Moses face and the glorious manner of deliverance ceased in a few daies which is not the cessation here intended But as Dr. Hammond speaketh it that Glory and that Law so gloriously delivered is done away And this the eleventh verse fullyer expresseth For if that which is done away was glorious or by Glory much more that which remaineth is glorious or in glory so that as it is not only the Glory but the Glorious Law Gospel or Testament which is said to remain so it is not only the Glory but the Law which was delivered by Glory which is expresly said to be done away And this is
the Law which was written in Stone Nothing but partial violence can evade the force of this Text. So Heb. 7. 11 12. Vnder it the Levitical Priesthood the people received the Law And the Priesthood being changed there is made of necessity a change also of the Law 18. For there is verily a disanulling of the Commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof For the Law made nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better hope 22. By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better Testament In all this it is plain that it is the whole frame of the Mosaical Law that is changed and the New Testament set up in its stead Heb. 9. 18 19. Neither was the first Dedicated without blood For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the Law c. Here the Law which is before said to be changed is said to contain Every Precept And Eph. 2. 15. It is the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances which Christ abolished in his flesh which cannot be exclusive of the chief part of that Law Obj. This is the Doctrine of the Antinomians that the Law is abrogated even the Moral Law Ans. It is the Doctrine of the true Antinomians that we are under no Divine Law neither of Nature nor of Christ But it is the Doctrine of Paul and all Christians that the Jewish Mosaical Law as such is abolished Obj. But do not all Divines say that the Moral Law is of perpetual obligation Ans. Yes Because it is Gods Law of Nature and also the Law of Christ. Obj. But do not most say that the Decalogue written in stone is the Moral Law and of perpetual obligation Answ. Yes for by the word Moral they mean Natural and so take Moral not in the large sense as it signifieth a Law de moribus as all Laws are whatsoever but in a narrower sense as signifying that which by Nature is of Vniversal and perpetual obligation So that they mean not that it is perpetual as it is Moses Law and written in Stone formally but as it is Moral that is Natural And they mean that Materially the Decalogue containeth the same Law which is the Law of Nature and therefore is materially still in force But they still except certain points and circumstances in it as the prefatory reason I am the Lord that brought thee out of the Land of Aegypt c. And especially this of the seventh day Sabbath Q 1. How far then are we bound by the Decalogue Answ. 1. As it is the Law of Nature 2. As it is owned by Christ and made part of his Law Therefore no more of it bindeth directly than we can prove to be either the Law of Nature or the Law of Christ. 3. As it was once a Law of God to the Jews and was given them upon aâ— reason common to them with us or all mankind we must still judge that it was once a Divine determination of what is most meet and an exposition of a Law of Nature and therefore consequentially and as that which intimateth by what God once commanded what we should take for his will and is most meet it obligeth still And so when the Law of Nature forbiddeth Incest or too near marriages and God once told the Jews what degrees were to be accounted too near this being once a Law to them directly is a Doctrine and Exposition of the Law of Nature still to us and so is consequentially a Law by parity of reason And so we shall shew anon that it is by the fourth Commandment IV. The Law of Christ bindeth us not to the observation of the seventh day Sabbath Proved 1. Because it is proved that Christ abrogated Moses Law as such and it is no where proved that he reassumed this as a part of his own Law For it is no part of the Law of Nature as is proved which we confess now to be part of his Law Object Christ saith that he came not to destroy the Law and Prophets but to fulfill them and that a jot or tittle shall not pass till all be fulfilled Answ. He is the end of the Law for righteousness to every one that believeth Rom. 10. 4. The Law was a Schoolmaster to bring us to Christ Gal. 3. 24. He hath therefore fulfilled the Law according to his word by his incarnation life death and resurrection It is past away but not unfulfilled And fulfilling it is not destroying it The ends of it are all attained by him 2. And though having attained its end it ceaseth formally as Moses Law yet materially all that is of natural obligation continueth under another form that is as part of his perfect Law Therefore as our childish knowledge is said as knowledge to be increased and not done away when we come to maturity but as childish to be done away so the Mosaical Jewish Law as Gods Law in general is perfected by the cessation of the parts which were fitted to the state of bondage and by addition of more perfect parts The natural part of it is made a part of a better Covenant or frame But yet as Mosaical and imperfect it is abolished Briefly this much sufficeth for the answer of all the allegations by which any would prove the continuation of Moses Law or any part of it formally as such I only add That all Moses Law even the Decalogue was Political even Gods Law for the Government of that particular Theocrcratical Policy as a Political body Therefore when the Kingdom or Policy ceased the Law as Political could not continue 2. It is proved that Christ by his Spirit in his Apostles did institute another day And seeing the Spirit was given them to bring his words to remembrance and to enable them to teach the Churches all things whatsoever he commanded them it is most probable that this was at first one of Christs own personal Precepts 3. And to put all out of doubt that neither the Law of Nature nor any Positive Law to Adam Noah or Moses or by Christ doth oblige us to the seventh day Sabbath it is expresly repealed by the Holy Ghost Col. 2. 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meats or in drink or in respect of an Holy day or Feast or of the New Moon or of the Sabbaths which are a shadow of things to came but the body is of Christ. I know many of late say that by Sabbaths here is not meant the weekly Sabbath but only other Holy dayes as Monethly or Jubilee rests But 1. This is to limit without any proof from the word of God When God speaks of Sabbaths in general without exception what is man that he should put in exceptions without any proof of Authority from God By such boldness we may pervert all his Laws Read Dr. Young upon this Text. 2. Yea when it was the weekly Sabbath which then was principally known by the Name of a Sabbath above all
Scriptures and to learn their Catechisms and the Word of God Surely it better beseemeth any man that believeth another life a Heaven and a Hell to say Poor Labourers have so little time to Learn to Meditate to Read to Pray on the week dayes that if they do not follow it close upon the Lords day they are like to perish in their ignorance For if the Gospel be hid it is hid to them that are lost 2 Cor. 4. 3. which do you think it better to leave undone if one of them must be left undone Whether the learning of Gods Word or the Pleasures and Recreations of the flesh 3. It is either their Bodies or their Minds that need Recreation When the Body is tired with toilesome labour it is ease rather than toilesome Dancings or Plays that are fit to recreate it Or else God will be charged with mistake in the reasons of the ancient Sabbath But if it be the Mind that needeth recreation why should not the Learning of Heavenly truth and the Joyful Commemoration of our Redemption and the foresight of Heaven and the Praises of God be more delightful than the noise of Thornes under a pott even than the laughter and sport of fools or than the Dancings and Games that now you plead for But the truth is It is not the Minds of poor labouring men that are over-workt and tired on the week dayes but it is their bodies And therefore there is no Recreation so suitable to them as the ease of the body and the holy and joyful exercise of the mind upon their Creator their Redeemer and their Everlasting Rest. 4. But if you will needs have daies of temptation and sinful sports and pleasures for them let Landlords abate their Tenants as much Rent as one dayes vacancy from labour in a Month or a Fortnight will amount to or let the Common ` Saints dayes which of the two are more at mans disposal be made their sporting dayes and rob not their souls of that one weekly day which God hath separated for his Worship Obj. But there are Students and Lawyers and Ministers and Gentlemen whose labour is most that of the Brain and not the Plow-mans bodily toile and these have need of bodily Recreation Answ. And there are few of these so poor but they can take their bodily Recreation on the week dayes And many of them need as much the whole Lords day for their souls Edification as any others And no one that knoweth himself will say that he needs it not If any men need remission of Studies and bodily Exercise it is Ministers themselves And is it themselves that they plead for Sports and Dancing for Would they be companions of the vain in such like vanities Obj. But the mind of man is not able to endure a constant intension and elevation of devotion all the day long without recreation and intermission And putting men upon more than they can do will but hinder them when a little recreation will make them more fresh and fervent when they return to God Answ. O what an advantage is it to know by experience what one talketh of And what an inconvenience to talk of Holiness and Heavenliness by hearsay only 1. To poor people that have but one day in seven that one day should not seem too long 2. If it be from a Carnal enemity to God and spiritual things shortness and seldomeness will be no Cure But they have need rather to be provoked to diligence till they are cured than to be indulged in that averseness and floth which till its cured will prevail when you have done your best against it 3. But if it be a weariness of the flesh as the Disciples when they slept while Christ was Praying or a weariness through such imperfection of Grace and Remnant of Carnality which the sincere are lyable to then giving way to it will increase it and resisting it is the way to overcome it 4. How many necessary intermissions are there which confute this pretense of weariness Some time is taken up in dressing And some with poor Servants in waiting on their Masters and Mistrisses and in preparing Meat and drink some in going to Church and coming home some in eating usually more than once some in preparing again for sleep besides what Cattle and by-occasions will require And is the remainder of one day in a week yet too much for the business which we are Created preserved and Redeemed for and on which our endless life dependeth O that we knew what the Love of God is and what it is to regard our souls according to their worth Would not a soul that loveth God rather say Alas how short is the Lords day How quickly is it gone How many interruptions hinder my delight Shall I think a Week short enough for my worldly labours and one day thus parcelled too long to seek the face of God I see blind Worldlings and sensualists can be longer unwearied at Market in their Shops and Fields especially when their gain comes in and at Cards and Dice and Bowling and idle Prating c. And shall I be weary so soon of the most noble and necessary Work and of the sweetest pleasures upon Earth An Hypocrite that draweth near to God but with the lips whilest his heart is far from him as he never truly seeketh God so he never truly findeth him and hath none of the true spiritual delights of holiness nor ever feeleth the pleasure of exercising his Love to God by the help of faith in the hopes of Heaven And therefore no wonder if he be weary of such unprofitable sapless and unpleasant work as his dead formalities and affectations are But it is not so with the sincere experienced Christian who serving God in spirit and truth hath true and spiritual recreation pleasure and benefit in and by his Service And therefore we see that the holy experienced believers are still averse to these sensual diversions and do not think the Lords da or his Service too long And O Christian what happy advantage in such controversies have you in your holy sincerity and sweet experience 5. But yet I am not such a stranger to man to my self or others as to deny that our naughty hearts are inclined to be weary of well doing But mark what a cure God in Wisdom and mercy hath provided for us As it is but one day in seven which is thus to be wholly employed with God and as much of this day is taken up with the bodily necessaries aforesaid so for the rest God appointeth us variety of exercises that when we are weary of one another may be our recreation When we have heard we must pray and when we have prayed we must hear again We must Read we must Sing and speak Gods Praises we must celebrate the memorial of Christs death in the Sacrament we must Meditate we must Conferr we must instruct our Families And we have variety of subjects for each
subjects obedience to this Law it will make men to be in some sort Religious whether they will or not Though they cannot be truly Religious against their will it will make them visibly religious Yea Gods own Law if mans did nothing would lay arrawe on the Consciences of most who believe that there is a God that made that Law And the weekly Assemblies keep up the knowledge and profession of the Christian faith and keep God and Heaven in the peoples remembrance and keep sin under constant rebukes and disgrace And were it not for this Heathenisme Infidelity and prophaneness would quickly overspread the world The Lords day keepeth up the Christian Religion in the World III. The lamentable Ignorance of the generality in the world doth require the strict and diligent observation of the whole Lords day Children and Servants and ordinary Countrey people yea and too many of higher quality are so exceeding Ignorant of the things of God and their Salvation that all the constantest diligence that can be used with them in Preaching Exhorting Catechizing c. will not overcome it with the most The most diligent Masters of Families lament it how Ignorant their Families are when they have done the best they can Let those that plead for dancing and sporting away much of the day but do like men that do not secretly scorn Christianity nor despise their servants souls and let them but try what measure of knowledge the bare hearing of Common Prayer yea and a Sermon or two with it will beget in their servants if the rest of the day be spent in sports and let them judge according to experience If ever knowledge be propagated to such and families made fit to live like Christians it is likest to be by the holy improvement of this day in the diligent teaching and Learning the substance of Religion and in the Sacred exercises thereof IV. The great Carnality Wordliness and Carelesness of the most and their great averseness to the things of God doth require that they be called and kept to a close and diligent improvement of the Lords day Whatever unexperienced or carnal persons may pretend that such constant duty so long together will make them worse and more averse reason experience and Scripture are all against them If there be some backwardness at the first it is not sports and idleness that will cure it but resisting of the slothful humour and keeping to the work For there is that in Religion that tendeth to overcome mens averseness to Religion And it must be overcome by Religion and not by playing or idleness if ever it be overcome It is want of knowledge and experience of it which maketh them loath it or be weary of it when they have tryed it more and know it better they will if ever be reconciled to it Six dayes in a Week are a sufficient diversion Apprentices and Pupils and School-boyes will hold on in learning though they be averse And you think not all the six dayes too much to hold them to it A School-boy must learn daily eight or nine hours in a day and yet some wretched men yea Teachers would perswade poor souls that must learn how to be saved or perish for ever that less than eight hours one day in seven is too much to be spent in the needfullest excellentest and pleasantest matters in all the World If you say that the sublimity or difficulty maketh it wearisome I answer that Philosophers do much longer hold on in harder speculations If you say Divinity being unsuitable to carnal minds their sick Stomachs must take no more than they can digest I answer 1. Cannot a Carnal Preacher for his gain and honour and fancy hold on all the year in the study even of Divinity perhaps eight or ten hours every day in the week And may not ignorant people be brought one day to endure to be taught as long 2. That which you call Digesting is but Vnderstanding and believing and receiving it And one truth tendeth to introduce another And he that cannot learn with an hours labour may learn more in two 3. And it is hearing and exercise that must cure their want of appetite Experience telleth us that when people take the liberty of playes and sports and idleness for a recreation they come back with much more want of Love to holy exercises than they that continue longer at them Gratifying sloth and sensuality increaseth it and increaseth an averseness to all that is good For who are more averse than they that are most voluptuous If ever people be made seriously holy it is a due observation of the whole Lords day that is like to bring them to it I mean observing it in such Learning and seeking duties as they are capable of till they can do better For when the mind long dwelleth on the truth it will sink in and work And many strokes will drive the nail to the head Let the Adversaries of this day and diligence but observe And if true experience tell not the World that more souls are Converted on the Lords dayes than on all other dayes besides and that Religion best prospereth both as to the Number and the knowledge and serious Holiness of the professours of it where the Lords day is carefully sanctified rather than where Idleness and playing do make intermission than I will confess that I am uncapable of knowing any thing of this nature by experiences But if it be so fight not against the common light V. The Poverty Servitude and worldly necessities of the most do require a strict observation of the whole Lords day Tenants and Labourers Carters and Carryers and abundance of Tradesmen are so poor that they can hardly spare any other considerable proportion of time much less all their Children and Servants whose subjection with their Parents and Masters poverty restraineth them Alas they are fain to rise early and hasten to their work and scarce have leisure to eat and sleep as nature requireth And they are so toiled and wearied with hard labour that if they have at night a quarter of an hour to read a Chapter and Pray they can scarce hold open their eyes from sleeping What time hath the Minister then to come and teach them if we had such Ministers again as would be at the pains to do it And what time have they to hear or learn You must teach them on the Lords day or scarcely at all Almost all that they must learn must be then learnt I deny not but in those former years when the Law forbad me not to Preach the Gospel the people came to me on the week day house by house and also that they Learned much in their shops while they were working But 1. It came to each Families turn but one hour or little more in a whole Year For about fourteen families a week so Catechized and instructed did no sooner bring their course about 2. And our people were mostly Weavers whose
labour was not like the Plowmans Masons Carpenters Carryers c. to take up their thoughts but they could lay a Book before them and read or meditate or Discourse to Edification whilest they were working But this is not the case of the Multitude And let any sober man but consider whether with people so ignorant and averse as the most are should he be never so diligent on the Lords day the six dayes intermission be not a great cooling of affection and a great delayer of their growth in knowledge when they are like by the weeks end to forget all that they had learned on the Lords day What then would these poor people come to if the Lords day it self must be alsoloitered or played away VI. The tyranny of many Masters maketh the Lords day a great mercy to the world For if God had not made a Law for their Rest and Liberty abundance of worldly impious persons would have allowed them little Rest for their bodies and less opportunity for the good of their souls Therefore they have cause with great thankfulness to improve the holy liberty which God hath given them and not cast it away on play or idleness VII The full improvement of the Lords dayes doth tend to breed and keep up an able faithful Ministry in the Churches on which the preservation and glory of Religion much dependeth When there is a necessity of full Ecclesiastical performances imposed on Ministers they are also necessitated to prepare themselves with answerable abilities and fitness But when no more is required of them but to read the Liturgie or to say a short and dry Discourse they that know no more is necessary to their ends are so strongly tempted to get ability and preparations for no more that few will overcome the temptation And therefore the World knoweth that in Moscovy Abassia and for the most part of the Greek and Armenian Churches as nothing or little more than Reading is required so little more ability than to Read is laboured after And the Ministers are ordinarily so ignorant and weak as is the scorn and decay of the Christian Religion VIII Yea it will strongly encline Masters of Families to labour more for abilities to instruct and Catechise their Families and pray with them and guide them in the fear of God when they know that the whole day must be improved to the spiritual good of their Families And so knowledge abilities and family-holiness will increase Whereas those that think themselves under no such obligations what ignorant profane and ungodly families have they because for the most part they are such themselves IX A multitude of gross sins will be prevented by the due observation of the Lords day Nothing more usual than for the sports riots idleness and sensuality of that day to be nurseries of Oathes Curses Ribaldry Fornication Gluttony Drunkenness Frayes and Bloodshed And is not Gods Service better work than these X. Lastly This holy order and prosperity of the Churches and this knowledge and piety in individual Subjects will become the safety beauty order and felicity of Kingdomes and all Civil societies of men For when the people are fit but duly to use and sanctifie the Lords day they are fit to use all things in a sanctified manner and to be an honour to their Countrey and an ease and comfort to their Governours and a common blessing to all about them CHAP. XIII What other Church Festivals or separated daies are lawful I Shall conclude this Discourse with the brief answer of this Question I. No sober Christian doubteth but that some part of every day is to be spent in Religious exercises And that even our earthly business must be done with a spiritual intent and mind And that every day must be kept as like to the Lords day as our weakness and our other duties which God hath laid upon us will allow II. Few make any question but the whole dayes of Humiliation and of Thanksgiving may and must be kept upon great and extraordinary occasions of Judgements or of mercies And that many Churches may agree in these And I know no just reason why the Magistrate may not with Charity and Moderation to the weak impose them and command such an agreement among his Subjects III. Few doubt but the Commemoration of great Merâ—ies or Judgements may be made anniversary and of long continuance As the Powder-plot day Nov. 5. is now made among us to preserve the memorial of that deliverance And why may it not be continued whilest the great sense of the benefit should be continued And so the second of Sept. is set apart for the Anniversary humbling remembrance of the Firing of London And so in divers other cases IV. The great blessing of an Apostolick Ministry and of the stability of the Martyrs in their sufferings for Christ being so rare and notable a Mercy to the Church I confess I know no reason why the Churches of all succeeding ages may not keep an Anniversary day of Thanksgiving to God for Peter or Paul or Stephen as well as for the Powder plot-deliverance I know not where God hath forbidden it directly or indirectly If his instituting the Lords day were a virtual prohibition for man to separate any more or if the prohibition of adding to Gods Word were against it they would be against other daies of Humiliation and Thanksgiving especially Anniversarily which we confess they are not If the reason be scandal lest the Men should have the honour instead of God I Answer 1. An honour is due to Apostles and Martyrs in their places in meet subordination to God 2. Where the case of scandal is notorious it may become by that accident unlawful and yet not be so in other times and places V. The Devil hâ—th here been a great Vndoer by Overdoing When he knew not how else to cast out the holy observation of the Lords day with zealous people he found out the trick of devising so many dayes called Holy dayes to set up by it that the people might perceive that the observation of them all as holy was never to be expected And so the Lords day was jumbled in the heap of holy dayes and all turned into Ceremony by the Papists and too many other Churches in the World Which became Calvins temptation as his own words make plain to think too meanly of the Lords day with the rest VI. In the lawful observation of daies it is most orderly to do as the Churches do which we live among and are to joine with VII But if Church tyranny would overwhelm any place with over-numerous daies or Ceremonies which are singly considered lawful we should do nothing needlesly to countenance and encourage such usurpation VIII Yet is it lawful to hear a Sermon which shall be Preached on a humane Holy day which is imposed by Usurpation Seeing such a a Moral duty may be done and so great a benefit received without any approbation of the inconvenient season
exercise but on one only which was the first 2. Because as is said it was not a family or by-meeting but a Churchâ—meeting The Disciples came or assembled togetherâ— 3. Because it said that they assembled for this very end to bâ—â—â—k bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. The great length of time which was spent in the holy exercises Besides the rest of the Worship and breaking of Bread Paul Preaching till midnight which intimateth that such work took up the day 5. Because it is mentioned as a matter of their custome They did not assemble because Paul called them to hear him only as being to depart on the morrow But Paul assembled with them at the time of their assembling to break Bread And it seemeth that he deferred his journey for that opportunity 6. Because other Texts as joyned with this and infallible Church History following do prove past all doubt that it was the constant custome of all the Churches so to do Obj. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. The first day of the week c. gr one of the Sabbaths It is an ordinance to lay aside for charitable uses but not one word about changing of the Sabbath Answ. The abolition of the Sabbath we prove not by this Text but by others All that we bring this for is but to shew in conjunction with others as part of the Sacred History that the first day was the Churches separated day And I pray mark the strength of the proof that the Apostle did give order that all the Churches of Galatia as well as the Corinthians should deposite their Almes on one and the same day viz. on the first day Was it not enough to tie them to the contribution but he must tie them all to one set day to lay it by or deposite it if it had not been because the Churches used to assemble on this day and not to appear before God empty as Dr. Hammond noteth on the Text Whoever heard else that God or man tyed several Countreys to one set day for the private depositing of their own moneys afterward to be distributed With such Sacrifices God is well pleased And therefore it was ever accounted by Christians a fit work for the sanctified day But no other day was ever appointed peculiarly for the set time of laying by mens gifts of Charity Obj. Rev. 1. 10. John was in the Spirit on the Lords day Compare Exod. 20. 10 c. Esa. 58. 13 c. Luk. 6. 5. Mark 2. 28. Mat. 12. 8 c. And if the Scriptures be the rule to judge resolve whether that day be not the Lords day of which day and of which only as distinguished from the other dayes of the week the Son of man is Lord. Answ. We are not upon a Controversie of title or propriety whether God be Lord of other dayes For so no doubt he is Lord of all and therefore no more of one than another because his propriety in each one is absolute And it can be no more in any Thus also he is absolute Lord of all things all places all persons c. And yet some things some places some persons have been separated to his service by a peculiar Dedication and Relation and thence have been peculiarly called The Lords And the Texts cited by you out of the old Testament prove that such was the seventh day Sabbath then But not that it is so now or was to be so for perpetuity And the words of the new Testament cited The Son of man is Lord also or even of the Sabbath day shews no more then that it was in his power He giveth it as a reason for his doing that which the Pharises counted Sabbath-breaking By which he oftentimes offended them and not as a reason of his astablishing it And it seemeth plainly to mean that being but a Positive Law and a Law of Moses he had power to change it and dispense with it as well as with other Positives and Mosaical Laws As it is said Ephes. 1. 22 23. he hath made him Head over all things to the Church not Head to all things so he is Lord over or of all dayes But all are not separated to his Worship As it is said Joh. 17. 2. As thou hast given him power over all flesh that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him so it may be said he hath power over all dayes that he may sanctifie one to his peculiar service and use the rest in more common works But that which we bring this text for is but to know what day is notified to the world by this title of The Lords day and consequently was then accounted his separated peculiar day Now the signification of words is known but by use They are not Natural signes but Arbitrary You know not the sense of one word of Hebrew Greek or Latine but by the History of their use by Dictionaries Authors or other Tradition Now it is unquestionable to any man verst in antiquity that all the Churches and Authors Greek and Latine Syriack Aethiopick Persian Arabick that have been known among us and speak of such things do unanimously call the first day of the week by the name of the Lords day as being so called from the beginning even from the Apostles And all old expositors so interpret this present Text. And you may as well question what day the word Sabbath signified in the Old Testament almost as what day the name of The Lords day signified in the new Or what sort of people they were that were called Christians first at Antioch when only one sort hath ever since been notified by that name Even the Disciples of Christ. The Greek with the Syriack Translation the Arabick the vulgar Latine have all The Lords day and the Ethiopick as equipollent hath the first day And Dr. Heylin who would find something against it if any thing were to be found speaking of some of late that otherwise expound it is so ingenious as to say Par. 2. cap. 1. p. 37. Touching this we will not meddle Let them that own it look to it The rather since St. John hath generally been expounded in the other sense Aretas and Andr. Caesariensis on the place and by Bedae de rat temp c. 6. and by the suffrage of the Church the best expositor of the word of God wherein this day hath constantly since the time of the Apostles been honoured with that name above other daies And I know no one man nor many that at 1600 years distance almost is so worthy to be believed for the bare sense of a word as the constant use and universal testimony of all ages from that time till now As Christ is the Lord of all our Suppers yet all are not named The Lords Supper so is it in this case I must needs conclude therefore that if I should cast off the evidence of this Text upon no greater reason than you offer me I think I should resist the
holy Ghost and use violence against Gods word which I should obey Obj. There is no Law in the Scripture to observe the first day no promise made to observers of it no threatning against the breakers of it c. shew it And if no Law no transgression Rom. 4. 15. Sin is a transgression of the Law Answ. I have shewed you full proof of a Law for it before Though it is not Christs way to enact his Laws in that Majestick Commanding forms as God did to Moses on the Mount But as he condescended into flesh to be a Teacher and Saviour in the form of a Servant under the Law himself to redeem those that were under it so he maketh his Laws in a merciful Teaching stile All that is revealed by him as his will appointing our duty is his Law But that we observe the Lords day is revealed by him as his will making it our duty These are his Laws requiring us to Hear and obey his spirit in his Apostles Joh. 20. 21 22. As the Father hath sent me so send I you And when he had said this be breathed on them and said Receive ye the Holy Ghost c. Luk. 10. 16. He that heareth you heareth me And this is his Law requiring his Apostles by that spirit to promulgate his Laws and make known his will Mat. 28. 19 20. Go disciple me all Nations Baptizing them c. Teaching them to observe all things whatever I have commanded you and loe I am with you alwaies to the end of the world or age with the other Texts forecited And that the Spirit in the Apostles hath setled the Lords day as the separated day for holy assemblies and Worship I have proved to you both by the Texts which you now sought in vain to make void and by the unquestionable practice and history of the universal Church from that age untill this And withal by other Texts which you omit which not alone but all set together make up the proof because it is historical evidence of a matter of fact which we have to seek after 1. Christs Resurrection laid the foundation or gave the Cause as Gods ceasing from his works did of the Sabbath 2. Christs appearing to them assembled on that day began the actual separation 3. The Holy Ghost coming down on them on that day did more notably sanctifie it 4. The Holy Ghost as an infallible spirit in them did cause them to make a publick settlement of that day in all the Churches which was the full and actual establishment 5. This settlement is fully proved de facto in Scripture and infallible history 6. And that there are promises and threatnings to the obeyers and rejecters of Christs commands whom the Father commanded us to hear and who is the great Prophet of the Church I hope you believe Rev. 20. 14. Happy are they who do his commandments that they may have right to the tree of life c. Heb. 12. 25. See that yee refuse not him that speaketh For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth much more c. Act. 3. 23. It shall come to pass that every soul that will not hear that Prophet shall be destroyed from among the people 1 Joh. 4. 6. We are of God He that knoweth God heareth us he that is not of God heareth not us Hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of Errour If besides all this you must have particular precepts promises and threatnings in the form which you imagine to be fittest you may for want of those deny many other Gospel Laws as well as this Have you not much more for the separation of the Lords day than you have for Infants Baptism for a Christian Magistrate for Christians wageing Warr for prohibited degrees as to Marriage c. I am perswaded the sober study of these points would do much to convince the contrary minded 1. How much of Christs work as to the settlement of Church-Orders was committed to the Apostles to be done and how little he publickly setled himself in person before his Resurrection 2. How much the Gospel administration excelleth that of the Law And what eminent Glory God designeth to himself by the work of mans Redemption and how much more now he calleth man to Read and Study and Know him in the face of Jesus Christ than in the Creation And how largely the change of the Covenant is proved in the Epistle to the Hebrews 3. What a change is made herein as to mans duty since the fall of man under the wrath of the Creator who is not now his Rest but his terrour and a consuming fire till Reconciled and Adopting us in Christ And since the Earth is cursed to us as a punishment for our sins 4. How much of the certainty and Glory of the Christian faith and of all our Rest and Consolation in it is laid in the Gospel on the RESURRECTION of our Lord as beginning a new World or Creation as it were and as conquering and triumphing over death and Satan and sealing the promise and bringing Life and Immortality to Light and opening the Kingdom of Heaven to Believers 5. How much of Christs Legislation and administration of his Church-settlement and Government was to be done by the Holy Ghost And how glorious this office of the Holy Ghost is and of what grand importance to be understood As he was the promised Paraclete or Advocate or Agent of our glorified Lord to do his Work on Earth in his bodily absence To whom the Infallibility of the Scriptures the sealing operation of Miracles the Sanctification of Believers and forming them for Glory in the Image of God is to be ascribed Whom to Blaspheme is the unpardonable sin 6. How dangerous a thing it is made by the Holy Ghost to seek to set up Moses Law as the whole Epistle to the Gal. besides most of the other Epistles testifie as intimating a denyal of Christ and a falling from Grace and a perverse setting up of that which Christ came to take down as part of our own redemption And how large and plain Paul is upon this Subject and how the spirit in all the Apostles did determine it Act. 15. And how the Cerinthians Nicolaitans Ebionites Nazaraeans and many more of the condemned Heresies of that age which troubled the Churches and whom the Apostles wrote against went all that way of mingling the Jewish Law with the Gospel 7. How plainly and expresly Paul numbreth Sabbaths with the shaddows that cease Col. 2. 16. to pass by other Texts And what violence mens own wits must use in denying the evidence of so plain a Text. Their reason that he saith not Sabbath but Sabbaths is against themselves the plural number being most comprehensive and other Sabbaths receiving their name from this And the word Sabbath alwaies used in Scripture for a Rest which was partly Ceremonial See what Dr. Young in his excellent Dies Domin saith of this
33. 18. 34. 19. 〈◊〉 7. 6. 14. 26. 10. 3 Neh. 8. 2 7 9 〈…〉 10. 29 13. 3. Mal. 2. 6 7 8 9. 〈…〉 11. 13. 12. 5. 26. 36 40. 〈…〉 Luk 2. 22. 27. Joh. 1. 17 45. 7 19. 23. â—1 8. 5. 10. 34. 12. 34. â—5 25 Act. 6. 13. 13. 15 39. 15. 5 24. 21. 20 28. 22. 3 12. 23. 3 29 〈◊〉 23. Rom. 2. 12 13 14 17 18 20 23. 3. 19 20 21 28 31. 4. 13 14 15 16. 5. 13. 7. 1 2 3 4. 5 6 c. And so to the end of the New Testament which I need not fâ—rther number 7. That the seventh day Sabbath was kept by the Lord Jehovah Christ during his life Maâ—k 1. 21. 6. 2. Luk. 4 31. 6. 6. 1. 5. 13. 10. Mat. 12. 1 9. 13. 1 2. and constantly Luk. 4. 16. 17. See Christs counsel which was to come to pass about forty years after his death Mat. 24. 20. 7. 1. So Christ was Circumcised and joyned in the Synagogue Worship and held Communion with the Jewish Church and Priesthood and observed all the Law of Moses never violating any part For he was made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law Gal. 4. 4 5. Do you think that all this is established for us 2. And his Counsel Mat. 24. 20. had respect to the Jews misery and not to their duty He therefore foretelleth their destruction because they would reject him and his Law in a perverse zeal for Moses Law And therefore intimateth that even Moses should condemn them and their misery should be increased by their zeal for his Law For their City was taken on the Sabbath day which increased their Calamity who scrupled on that day to fight or fly And can you think Christ approved of that opinion who had so oft before condemned the like about their over rigid sabbatizing Or as Dr. Hammond thinks it is liker to be spoken of a Sabbath year when the War and Famine would come together However it be it only supposeth their adherence to their Law and Sabbath but justifieth it not at all Though yet the total and full abrogation of the Jewish Law was not fully declared till at that time of the destruction of their City and Temple their policy more fully ceased 8. That after Jehovah had finished the work of Redemption Joh. 19 30. his body rested in the Grave Mat. 27. 66. and himself in Heaven Luk. 23. 42 43. as he rested when he ended the work of Creation Gen. 2. 2 4. 8. You again adde to the Word of God It is not said that he had finished the work of Redemption But only It is finished which seemeth to mean but that 1. This was the last act of his life in which he was actively to fulfill the Law and offer himself a Sacrifice for man 2. And in which all the Law and Prophets were fulfilled which foretold this Sacrifice For that it is not meant of the whole work of Redemption as finished when he spoke those words is evident 1. Because after those words he was to die 2. Because his state in death and his burial were part of his humiliation as is implyed 1 Cor. 15. 4. Joh. 17 7. Rom. 6. 4. Col. 2. 12. Isa. 53. 9. 1 Cor. 1â— 35. Act. 2. 24. 1 Cor. 15. 26. Phil. 3. 10. 2 Tim. 1. 10. Heb. 2. 14 15. 3. Because his Resurrection was his victorious act and a part of the work of mans Redemption 4. And so is his Intercession For Redemption is larger than Humiliation or Sacrifice for sin As Exod. 6 6. Luk. 24. 21. Rom. 3. 24. 8. 23. 1 Cor. 1. 30. Eph. 1. 14. Luk. 21. 28. It is the Resurrection by which we are made Righteous and receive our hope of life and victory over death and Satan Rom. 1. 4. Phil. 3. 10 11. 1 Pet. 1. 3. 3. 21. Rom. 4. 25. 2. The clean contrary therefore to your Collection is true viz. That God did indeed end the Work of his Creation on the sixth day and rested in it as finished on the seventh But Christ was so far from ending his on the sixth and resting in it on the seventh that on that day above all other he seemed conquered by men and by him that had the power of death Heb. 2. 14 and was held as Captive by the Grave so that his Disciples hopes did seem dead with him Luk. 24. 21. This State of Death being not the least if not the lowest part of his Humiliation Whence came the Churches Article that he descended into Hades 3. I did more probably before prove from Christs own words compared with his burial a casting down of the seventh day Sabbath thus That day on which the Disciples are to fast is not to be kept as a Sabbath For that is a day of Thanksgiving But on the day of Christs Burial the Disciples were to fast that is to walk heavily Which appeareth from Mark 2. 20. When the Bridegroom is taken from them then they shall fast Now though this meant not to command any one day for fasting much less the whole time of his bodily absence yet both the sense of the words themselves and the interpretation of the Event tell us that as there was no day in which he was so sadly taken from them as that Sabbath day which almost broke their hearts and hopes for the next day he was restored to them So there was no day in which they were so dejected and unlike to the Celebraters of a Gospel day of Joy or Sabbath Do you call the day of Satans power and triumph and of the Discples greatest fear and grief that ever befell them the Celebration of a Sabbath rest It had indeed somewhat like an outward Rest but so as seemed plainly to burie in his Grave the seventh day Ceremonial Sabbath And from the Reasons now pleaded it was that the Western Churches kept the seventh day as a Fast. 9. Whilest the Lord Jehovah Christ rested private believers rested according to the Commandment Luk. 23. 55 56. Mar. 15. 42. 16. 1. compared 9 A. They did indeed keep yet the Jewish Sabbath till Christs Resurrection and the coming down of the Holy Ghost And so they did the rest of the Jewish Law For they yet knew not that it was abrogated But must we do so too You may as well argue from their keeping the Sabbath before Christs Death as on that day when he was dead The change of the day was made by Degrees by three several acts or means 1. The Resurrection of Christ was the founding act which gave the Cause of changing it Like Gods finishing his works of Creation at first 2. The Inspiration of the Holy Ghost in the Apostles doth teach them and bring all things to their remembrance which Christ commanded and was the authorising means of the change And
hath allowed them so liberal a portion of time wherein to provide for themselves and their families There being no other proportion of time that can so well provide for the necessities of families as six dayes of every Week and that is so well fitted to all Functions Callings and Employments And the light of Nature when cleared up will tell men that all labour and motion being in order to rest and rest being the perfection and end of labour into which labour work and motion doth pass that therefore the seventh day which is the last day in every Week is the fittest and properest day for a religious rest unto the Creator for his Worship Gen. 2. 1 c. Exod. 20. 9. Deut. 5. 13 14. Heb. 4. 1. 11. Exod. 31. 17. Rom. 14. 13. Exod. 23. 12. 34. 21. Answ. How far a day is of Natural due I have shewed before In all the words of this reason which I set down as I received them there is much which is no matter of Controversie betwen us As that there is a Light and Law of Nature which few men doubt of who are worthy to be called men And that by this Law of Nature God should be solemnly worshipped and that at a set or separated time I hope the Reader will not expect that I weary him with examining the Texts which prove this before it is denyed But the thing denyed by us is that the seventh day Sabbath as the seventh is of Natural Obligation The proofs which are brought for this I must examine For indeed this is the very hindge of all our Controversie For if this be once proved we shall easily confess that it is not abrogate For Christ came not to abrogate any of the Law of Nature though as I have said such particles of it may cease whose Matter ceaseth by a change in Nature it self The first proof is Exod. 20. 10. The stranger To which I answer Our question is not whether the Sabbath was to be rested onâ— by Strangers that are among the Jews but Whether it was part of the Law of Nature If it be intended that whatever such strangers were bound to was of the Law of Nature But strangers were bound to keep the Sabbath Ergo I deny the Major which they offer not to prove And I do more than deny it I disprove it by the Instances of Exâ—d 12. 19. Was eating leavened bread forbidden by the Law of Nature V. 48. 49. One Law shall be to him that is home-born and to the stranger that sojourneth among you Circumcision was not of the Law of Nature Lev. 16. 29. Resting from all work on the tenth day of the seventh Moneth was not of the Law of Nature though made also the strangers duty So eating blood and that which dyeth or was torn Lev. 17. 12 15. So Lev. 25. 6. Numb 15. 14 15 16 26. 29. 19. 10. 35. 15. Deut. 31. 12. Jos. 8. 33 34 35. 20. 9 c. The next pretended proof is Rom. 2. 14 c. where there is not one syllable mentioning the Decalogue as such but only in general The Law so far as it was written in the Gentiles hearts But where is it proved that the Law or the Decalogue are words of the same signification or extent any more than the whole and a part are Or where is it proved that none of the rest of the Law is written in Nature but the Decalogue only Or else that every word in the Decalogue it self is part of the Law of Nature which is the question I shall prove the contrary anon In the mean time the bare numbring of Chapters and Verses is no proof 3. It is next said that Adam was made and framed to the perfection of the ten words Answ. Adam was made in the Image of God before the ten words were given in stone But so much of them as is of the Law of Nature and had matter existent in Adams dayes no doubt was a Law to him as well as it is to us But that 's nothing to the question Whether all things in the ten words are of Natural Obligation 4. It is said that the Law of the seventh day Sabbath was given before the ten words were preclaimed in Sinai Answ. So was Circumcision and so was sacrificing yea so was the Law about the dressing of the Garden of Eden and about the eating or not eating of the fruit thereof even in innocency which yet were no parts of Natures Laws but Positives which now cease 5. It is said that it was given to Adam in respect of his humane nature and in him to all the world of humane creatures Answ. So was the Covenant of Works or Innocency which yet is at an end But what respect is it to his humane nature that you mean If you suppose this Proposition Whatever Law is given with respect to humane nature and to all men is of natural and perpetual Obligation I deny it The Law of Sâ—crinces and Oblations was given with respect to humane nature that is in order to its reparation and it was given to mankind and yet not of natural perpetual obligation The Law of distinguishing clean Beasts from unclean and the Law against eating blood were given to Noah and to all mankind with respect to humane nature Gen. 8. 20. 9. 4. and yet not wholly of natural or perpetual obligation All common Laws have some respect to humane nature But if your meaning be that this Law was given in and with the Nature of Man himself or that it is founded in and provable by the very essentials of mans nature or any thing permanent either in the nature of man or the nature of the world I still deny it and call for your proof Positives may have respect to humane Nature as obliged by them and yet not be written in humane nature nor provable by any meer natural evidence 6. It is said Set times of Divine appointment for solemn assembling c. are directed to by the great Lights c. Psal. 19. Rom. 10 c. Ans. But the question is not of set times in general that some there be But of this set time the seventh day in particular It will be long before you can fâ—tch any cogent evidence from the Lights of Heaven for it Nor do any of the Texts cited mention any such thing or any thing that can tempt a man into such an opinion It must be the Divine appointment and institution which you mention that must prove our obligation to a particular day and not any nature within us or without us 7. The only appearance of a proof is at the end that time being measured by Weeks and the end of the Weeks being fittest for Rest therefore nature points us to the last day Answ. But 1. You do not at all prove that nature teacheth all men to measure their time by Weeks 2. Nor is your Philosophy true that all motion is in order to rest
Churches unanimously agreed in the holy use of it as a separated day even from and in the Apostles dayes Obj. But the Emperour Constantines Edict alloweth Husbandmen to labour Answ. Only in case of apparent hazard lest the fruits of the Earth be lost as we allow Sea-men to work at Sea in case of necessity And so though by his second Edict Manumission was allowed to the Judges as an act of Charity yet they were forbidden Judging in all other ordinary causes lest the day be profaned by wranglings Gratian Valentinian and Theodosius by their Edict forbad publick spectacles or shews on the Lords day And all seeking and judging of Debts and litigious Suits and afterward Valentinian and Valens make an Edict that no Christian should on that day be convented by the Exactors or Receivers Ob. But saith H. for 300. years there was no Law to bind men to that day Answ. The Apostles Institution was a Law of Christ by his spirit Mat. 28. 20. And how should there be a humane Law before there was a Christian Magistracie Obj. Saith H. p. 95. The powers which raised it up may take it lower if they please yea take it quite away c. Ans. True that is Christ may And when he doth it by himself or by new Apostles who confirm their Commission by Miracles we will obey But we expect his presence with the Apostolical constitutions to the end of the World Mat. 28. 20. Theodosius also enacted that on the Lords day and in the Christmas and on Easter and to Whitsuntide the publike Cirques and Theaters should be shut up For we grant that when Christian Magistrates took the matter in hand other Holy dayes were brought in by degrees whereas before the Christians indeed met yea and Communicated as oft as they could even most daies in the week but did not separate the daies as holy to Gods service as they did the Lords day Only Christmas day and the Memorials of those Martyrs that were neer them to encourage the people to constancy they honoured somewhat early But those were anniversary and not weekly And the Wednesdays and Fridays were kept by them but as we keep them now or as a Lecture day I grant also that when Christian Magistracie arose as the Holy dayes multiplied the manner of the dayes observation altered For whereas from the beginning the Christians used to stay together from morning till night partly through devotion and partly for fear of persecution if they were noted to go in and out Afterward being free they met twice a day with intermission as we do now Not that their whole dayes Service was but an hour or two as Heylin would prove from a perverted word of Chrysostomes and another of Origenes or Ruffinus and from the length of their published Homilies For he perverteth what was spoken of the length of the Sermon as spoken of the length of all the Service of the whole day whereas there was much more time spent in the Eucharistical and Liturgick offices of Prayer Praise Sacraments and Exhortations proper to the Church than was in the Sermon When I was suffered to exercise my Ministry my self having four hundred or five hundred if not six hundred to administer the Sacrament to though twice the number kept themselves away it took up the time of two Sermons usually to administer it besides all the ordinary Readings Prayers and Praises Morning and Evening Heylin noteth by the way 1. That now officiating in a white garment begun 2. And Kneeling at the Sacrament which last he proveth from two or three words where Adoration only is named But 1. A late Treatise hath fully proved that the White garment was not a Religious Ceremony then at all but the Ordinary splendid Apparel of honourable persons in those times which were thought meet for the honour of the Ministry when Christian Princes did advance them 2. And he quite forgot that Adoration on the Lords dayes was ever used standing and that he had said before that it was above a thousand years before the custome was altered The inclinations to overmuch strictness on the Lords day The destruction of the Gothish Army by the Romans in Africa because they would not fight on that day c. see in Heylin p. 112 113 c. His translation of the words of the Synod or Council at Mascon 588. I think worthy the transcribing It is observed that Christian people do very rashly slight and neglect the Lords day giving themselves thereon as on other dayes to continual labours c. Therefore let every Christian in case he carry not that name in vain give eare to our instruction knowing that we have care that you should do well as well as the power to bridle you that you do not ill It followeth Custodite Diem Dominicum qui nos denuo peperit c. Keep the Lords day the day of our new birth whereon we were delivered from the snares of sin Let no man meddle in Litigious Controversies or deal in actions or Law suites or put himself at all on such an exigent that needs he must prepare his Oxen for their daily work but exercise your selves in Hymnes and singing praises unto God being intent thereon both in mind and body If any have a Church at hand let him go unto it and there pour forth his soul in tears and Prayers his Eyes and Hands being all that day lifted up to God It is the everlasting day of rest insinuating to us under the shadow of the seventh day or Sabbath in the Law and Prophets And therefore it is very meet that we should celebrate this day with one accord whereon we have been made what at first we were not Let us then offer to God our free and voluntary service by whose great goodness we are freed from the Goal of error not that the Lord exacts it of us that we should celebrate this day in a corporal abstinence or rest from labour who only looks that we do yield obedience to his holy will by which contemning earthly things he may conduct us to the Heavens of his infinite mercy However if any man shall set at naught this our Exhortation be he assured that God shall punish him as he hath deserved and that he shall be also subject unto the Censures of the Church In case he be a Lawyer he shall lose his cause if that he be an Husbandman or Servant he shall be corporally punished for it But if a Clergy-man or Monk he shall be six Moneths separated from the Congregation His reproof of Gregorius Turonensis for his strictness for the Lords day sheweth but his own dissent from him and from the Churches of that Age. King Alfreds Laws for the observation of the Lords day and against Dicing Drinking c. on it are visible in our own Constitutions in Spelman and others And many more Edicts and Laws are recited by H. himself of other Countreys Two are worthy the observation for
the Reasons of them 1. A Law of Clâ—tharius King of France forbidding servile labours on the Lords day Because the Law forbids it and the holy Scripture wholly contradicteth it 2. A Constitution of the Emperour Leo Philosophus to the same purpose Secundum quod Spiritui sancto ab ipsoque institutis Apostolis placuit As it pleased the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instructed by him You see that then Christian Princes judged the Lords day to be of Divine Institution Yea to these he addeth two more Princes of the same mind confessing that Leo was himself a Scholar and Charles the Great had as Learned men about him as the times then bred and yet were thus perswaded of the day yea and that many Miracles were pretended in confirmation of it yet he affirmeth that the Church and the most learned men in it were of another mind Let us hear his proofs 1. Saith he Isidore a Bishop of Sevil makes it an Apostolical Sanction only no Divine Commandment a day designed by the Apostles for Religious Exercises in honour of our Saviours resurrection and it was called the Lords day therefore to this end and purpose that resting in the same from all earthly acts and the temptations of the world we might intend Gods holy Worship giving this day due honour for the hope of the resurrection which we have therein The same verbatim is repeated by Beds l. de Offic. and by Raban Maurus l. de inst Chr. l. 2. c. 24. and by Alcuinus de Die Offic. c. 24. which plainly shews that all these took it only for an Apostolical usage c. Answ. Reader is not here a strange kind of proof This is but just the same that we assert and I am proving save that he most grosly puts an Apostolical usage and sanction sanxerunt as distinct from and exclusive of a Command which I have fully proved to be Christs own Act and Law to us by vertue of 1. Their Commission 2. And the infallible Spirit given them And having brought the History to so fair an account by our chief Adversaries own Citations and confessions I will not tire my self and the Reader with any more but only wish every Christian to consider whether they that thus distinguish between Apostolical Sanctions and Divine Institutions as this man doth do not teach men to deny all the holy Scriptures of the New Testament as being but Apostolical writings and go far to deny or subvert Christianity it self by denying the Divine Authority of these Commissioned Inspired men who are foundations of the Church and sealed their Doctrine by Miracles and from whom it is that our Christian Faith and Laws and Church constitutions which are Universal and Divine are received I only remember you of Pliny a Heathens testimony of the Christians practice stato die No man can question Pliny on the account of Partiality And therefore though a Heathen his Historical testimony as joyned with all the Christian Church History hath its credibility He telleth Trajan that it was the use of Christians on a stated day before it was light to meet together to sing a Hymn to Christ as to God secum invicem among themselves by turns and to bind themselves by a Sacrament not to do any wickedness but that they commit not Thefts Robberies Adulteries that they break not their word or trust that they deny not the pledge or pawn which being ended they used to depart and to come again together to take meat but promiscuous and harmless Epist. 97. p. 306 307. Where note 1. That by a stated day he can mean no other than the Lords day as the consent of all other History will prove 2. That this is much like the testimonies of Justin and Tertullian and supposing what they say of the use of Reading the Scripture and Instructing the Church it sheweth that their chief work on that day was the Praises of God for our Redemption by Christ and the celebration of the Lords Supper and the Disciplinary exercises of Covenanters thereto belonging 3. That they had at that time where Pliny was two meetings that day that is they went home and came again to their Feast of Love in the Evening Which no doubt was varied as several times and places and occasions required sometimes departing and coming again and sometimes staying together all day 4. That this Epistle of Pliny was written in Trajans dayes and it is supposed in his second year And Trajan was Emperour the year that St. John the Apostle died if not a year before so that it is the Churches custom in the end of the Apostles dayes which Pliny here writeth of 5. That he had the fullest testimony of what he wrote it being the consent of the Christians whom he as Judge examined even of the timorous that denyed their Religion as well as of the rest And many of them upon his prohibition forbore these meetings 6. And the number of them he telleth Trajan in City and Countrey was great of persons of all degrees and ranks So that when 1. Christian History 2. And Heathen acquaint us with the matter of fact that the day was kept in the Apostles time 3. Yea when no Hereticks or Sects of Christians are found contradicting it but the Churches then and after universally practised it without any controversie what fuller historical evidence can there be And to say that 1. The Apostles would not have reproved this if it had not been their own doing 2. Or that it could be done and they not know it 3. And that all Christians who acknowledged their authority would have consented in such a practice superstitiously before their faces and against their wills and no testimony be left us of one faithful Church or Christian that contradicted it and stuck to the Apostolical authority even where the Churches received their writings and publickly read them all this is such as is not by sober Christians to be believed But the great Objection will be That other things also were then taken for Apostolical Traditions and were customs of the universal Church as well as this which things we now renounce as superstitious Answ. Though I answered this briefly before I now give you this fuller answer I. It is but few things that come under this charge viz. the Unction white Garment with the taste of Milk and Honey at Baptism Adoration towards the East and that standing and not kneeling on the Lords dayes and the Anniversary Observation of Easter and Whitsuntide And the last is but the keeping of one or two Lords dayes in the year with some note of distinction from the rest so far as there was any agreement in it 2. That these are not usually by the Antients called Apostolical Traditions but Customs of the Vniversal Church 3. That when they are called Traditions from the Apostles it is not with any assertion that the Apostles instituted them but that they are supposed to be from their times because their
g. If the second Command say Thou shalt perform all Gods instituted Worship Or Thou shalt Worship me as I appoint thee This bindeth no man to Baptism the Lords Supper c. till another Law appoint them Therefore there is not so much in the general Law alone as is in that and the particular also 2. All that is presupposed in a particular Law is not part of that Law 3. It is not so much to inferr a duty indirectly and by far fetcht Consequences as to command it directly Now I prove the assertion by instances All these following are Natural duties and commanded also in other parts of Scripture and yet are not in the Law of Moses as Written in Stone 1. To believe that the soul is Immortal 2. To believe that there is a Heaven where we shall be perfectly blessed in the Knowledge Love and Fruition of God 3. To believe that there is a Hell or life of future punishment for all the impenitent 4. To Love ourselves with a just and necessary Love as such 5. To take greatest care to save our souls above our bodies 6. To tame and mortifie all our fleshly lusts in order to our own Salvation 7. To deny all bodily pleasure profit honour liberty and life for the securing of our salvation 8. To forbear all outward acts of Gluttony Drunkenness Sloth c. as they tend to our own damnation 9. To rejoice in persecution because of our great reward in Heaven 10. To pray constantly and servently for Heaven as the means of our obtaining it Let none say that many of these same things are commanded in order to God and our neighbour For I grant that the same material acts be so as they are expressions of Love to God and Man But to do them in Love to our selves and for our own Salvation is another principle and end not contrary to but necessarily conjunct with the former two And indeed all the duties of self-love as such are past by as supposed in Moses Decalogue because they are deeply written in mans Nature and because the Law was Written as Political for another use Obj. But these are all supposed in the first Command of Loving God and in the second Table Thou shalt Love thy Neighbour as thy self Answ. 1. These last are not the words of the Decalogue but a part of the summary of all the Law 2. Both Tables indeed suppose the Love of our selves but that which is supposed is not a part of them Obj. But it is the Socinians that say the Old Testament speaketh of no reward or punishment but in this life Answ. True But Camero de tripl faed and others that rightly understand the matter affirm that 1. The Law of Nature containeth future rewards and punishments in another life 2. And so doth the Covenant of Grace made with Adam and all mankind in him and renewed to Noah Abraham and the Israelites which by Paul is called The Promise as distinct from the Law 3. But the Law of Moses in its own proper Nature as such was only Political and spake but of Temporal Rewards and Punishments 4. Though yet all the faithful were bound to take the Law and Promise together and so to have respect both to Temporal and Eternal things For the Law it self connoted and supposed things Eternal as our great concernment III. There is more of the Law of Nature in other parts of Moses Law conjunct with the Decalogue than is in the Decalogue alone I will stay no longer in the proof of this than to cite the places as you do Exod. 23. 13 32. 22. 18 20. Lev. 20. 1 4 6. Deut. 13. 17. Exod. 23. 24. Deut. 12. 23. Lev. 24. 23. 3. Exod. 12. 16. Deut. 23. 18. Exod. 22. 28. 23. 20. 21. 15 17. Lev. 19. 32. Deut. 21. 1. 16. 6. 11. Exod. 21. 12 13 18 20 22 c. 22. 2 3. Lev. 13. 14. 17. Deut. 21. Exod. 22. 19. Lev. 18. 19. 29. 20. Deut. 22. Exod. 21. 16 21 32 35. 22. 1. 4. to 17. Lev. 19. 30 35. Deut. 24. 29. 14. 21. 25. Exod. 23. 1. to 9. Deut. 23. 24. Lev. 19. 11 15. Exod. 22. 21 22. 25. 26. 23. 4. Lev. 19. 14 16 18 c. By all this I shew you why 1. I allow not of your making the word Law in the New Testament to signifie the Decalogue only or taking them for equipollent terms 2. Why I take not the Decalogue and the Law of Nature for equipollent termes or their matter to be of the same extent And consequently why I take it for no proof that all things in the Decalogue are perpetual because all things in the Law of Nature are so CHAP. V. Whether the truest Antiquity be for the seventh day Sabbath as kept by the Churches of Christ IT is here further objected that the seventh day Sabbath hath the truest testimonies of Antiquity that it is controvertible when and how the Lords day came in but the Antiquity of the seventh day Sabbath is past Controversie that the Eastern Christians long observed it and Antichrist in the West did turn it into a Fast that the Empire of Abassia keepeth it to this day Answ. There is enough said of this before were it not that some Objectors causlesly look for more I answer therefore 1. That it is true that the Sabbath is more ancient than the Lords day And so is Moses more ancient than Christ Incarnate and his Law than the Gospel as delivered by Christ and his Apostles and Circumcision than Baptism and the Passover than the Lords Supper And so every mans Conception Nativity Infancie and Ignorance was before his Maturity and Knowledge And what can you gather from all this Thus the Papists say that their way of Religion was in England before ours and that the reliques of it in our Monuments Orate pro animabus c. is their standing witness which we cannot totally deface And its true if by our way they mean the Reformation of theirs as such For the Cure is ever after the disease Though its false if they speak of our Religion it self which was here before their errours as Health is before sickness But they should consider that by this prerogative the Heathens excell us both And that they may say you have yet many Monuments of our more ancient Religion which you have not been able to obliterate You still call your Week dayes by our ancient names Sunday Munday c. Your adoration towards the East was fetcht from us and so were abundance of your Customes Which we hope may recover the reputation of our Religion 2. I have shewed you already how and why the Eastern Christians kept the Sabbath 1. They kept it not as a Sabbath but only met on that day as they did on the fourth and the sixth dayes Wednesdayes and Fridayes as it is used in England to this