capable of bearing a relation to Christ to come and falling out under the Mediators Kingdom properly then when he cometh in the new World it is meet it should be changed 1. To shew he is come 2. To shew he is absolute over the house and worship of God 3. Some way to preach his Grace and Redemption in the very change of it But it is a piece of Worship and Tribute of our time as is said before and a piece of Worship capable of his Institution and Remembrance therefore called the Lords day which could not be were not a day of Worship capable of that and it falleth under the power of Christ who Mat. 12. Even as the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath and why is that power pleaded in that particular of the day so often if it were not to shew that there is reason by his coming to look on the Sabbath as under him even as all other Worship was which stood by Gods positive Command even as this did Arg. 6. If by this command the day of rest from Gods most solemn work be to be our day of rest then after Christs coming not so before not the Seventh but the first day is to be observed but by the command the former is true Again if that day be to be kept in reference to any solemn work of God which was the First day after his perfecting it then the First day is to be kept but by the command the former is true because our resting day is to be kept in reference to the work of Redemption and therefore must be on the First day which was the day after its closing and perfecting as to Christs suffering and labour though not as to its application even as the Seventh was of Gods resting from the work of Creation though not from his works of Providence Arg. 7. If the Seventh day which the Jews kept had any peculiar tye or motive unto them which by Christ is now taken away then it was meet that at Christs coming that day should be changed We would understand here that there might be somewhat peculiar or typical in their Seventh day and yet nothing so in the fourth command which commandeth one of Seven but not the Seventh And though we could not particularly pitch upon what is typical or peculiar in it yet may we conceive that something there is as in Tythes Offerings c. though the particular thing which is typified be hardly instructed As 1. If its beginning was on the evening to them as some think the reason of it was peculiar to wit their coming out of Egypt at evening Exod. 12. And in so far at least it would be peculiar to them And by Christs rising in the morning is changed 2. It 's pressed peculiarly on the account of Gods redeeming them from Egypt they had that to think on that sometime they were where they got not liberty to rest any day therefore should they ease their Servants as it is Deut. 5.14 15. This holdeth especially if it was on the Seventh day that their freedom from Egypt began Exod. 12. which was after that made the first day of their year that is the morrow after they did eat the Passover as it 's made probable by some 3. It was peculiarly discovered to them by Gods raining Manna from Heaven Six dayes and by his with-holding it from them the Seventh 4. It was peculiarly accompanied with special Ceremonial Services beyond other dayes 5. Gods manner of dealing with them before Christ was to press duties by temporal and external advantages expresly and more implicitly by spiritual mercies therfore it was most agreeable to that way and time to press the Seventh day on them which minded them of the benefit of Creation but it 's otherwise with the Church under the Gospel Hence their Sacraments had respect externally to their deliverance from Egypt and temporal things whereas ours have respect purely to what is spiritual 6. The Apostle Coll. 2.16 taketh in their Sabbaths with their other dayes and though he take not in all dayes alike yet it can hardly be denyed but their Seventh-day-Sabbath cometh in there where all the Jewish times are put together Therefore it would seem there is a type not in the command but in that day though not properly yet accidentally in respect of its worship end application c. complexly taken and that therefore this Seventh-day-Sabbath is expired at least if not repealed seeing that dayes and times kept by the Jews are enumerate with their other Services which were antiquated even as when the Apostle condemneth difference about meat or drink his meaning is not to condemn what difference is made in the Lords Supper in the New Testament but what is from the Old so may the same be said of dayes It 's their old difference he cryeth down Propos. 3. As it 's meet that the day of Worship under the Gospel should be another then what was under the Law and should therefore be changed so it 's meet that the change should be into the First day of the week and to no other day For 1. No other day has been honoured with so many Gospel priviledges as 1. With Christs Resurrection Matth. 28. It was the First day of his victory and rest 2. With Christs appearing twice at least on it to his Disciples fingling it out from other dayes or his appearing is for no purpose particularly recorded by the Evangelist John to have been on that day if there were not something remarkable in it beside what is in another day 3. The Spirits giving at Pentecost Acts 2. will be found to be on the First day of the week now no other day can claim so many priviledges and so many wayes relate to Christ. 2. If the grounds upon which the Seventh day under the Law was preferred during that World do in this renewing of the World agree only to the First day of the Week then is the First day to succeed but these grounds proportionally agree only to the First day under the Gospel which agreed to the Seventh under the Law Ergo That which made the Seventh day preferrable was 1. That God had ended all his vvorks on the Sixth and rested the Seventh It vvas the First day after the Creation so the First day of the Week is that day on vvhich Christ rose having perfected the vvork of Redemption and obtained victory over death under vvhose povver some vvay for a time his body vvas before that and vvas thereby manifestly declared to be the Son of God to vvit by his Resurrection from the dead Rom. 1.4 2. The force of the example vvill hold here God made the World in Six dayes and rested the Seventh therefore rest ye vvith him so Christ having for a time suffered fully overcame the First day and began his estate of exaltation therefore rest vvith him and rejoyce that day it being the beginning of this nevv joyful World 3. No
to none other it being a peculiar piece of worship to him who hath divided time betwixt his worship and our work And although men should keep the day and alter the worship yet this is a taking of that which was once abused and never enjoyned for to apply it to God and wanteth not offence even as the retaining of other things in worship which have been abused and are not necessary is offensive 2. No man can institute any day even to the true God as a part of worship so as to bind consciences to it or to equal it with this day That is a part of Gods royal prerogative and a thing peculiar to him to sanctifie and bless a day 3. Even those dayes which are pretended to be set apart to and for God and yet not as a part of worship cannot be imposed in a constant and ordinary way as Anniversary dayes and feasts are because by an ordinary rule God hath given to man Six dayes for work except in extraordinary cases he shall please to call for some part of them again 4. Yet extraordinarily upon occasions of Humiliation or of Joy and Thanksgiving dayes for that time may be set apart for God without wronging this concession even as in extraordinary times we may work and not rest on the Sabbath day though ordinarily we may not This proportioning of time therefore is for the ordinary rule but yet admitteth of the exception of extraordinary cases 3. We gather that Masters and Parents ought to have a special oversight of their own Children and Families in the worshipping of God and that especially in reference to the sanctifying of this day and that there is a special communion in worshipping of God amongst the several relations of a Family 4. We gather that Magistrates and all who have power over others ought to see to the restraining of Vice and to the performing of outward duties particularly such as relate to the sanctification of the Sabbath as well as to abstain from and to do such and such things themselves in their own persons in and by these over whom they have power and that it 's no less scandalous and sinful for a Magistrate not to see that sin be crushed that the Sabbath be sanctified and the Ordinances of Religion be entertained and received and reverenced in and by those over whom he hath charge then if he committed such sins himself then if he discountenanced the Ordinances and brake the Sabbath himself or suffered his own family or himself to be without the worship of God Why because these are within his gates and he is to account for them He is to rule for God and their good which is mainly spiritual he is to be a terrour to evil doers as well as to be an incouragement to them that do well and men are according to their places and parts to be forth-coming for God and the good of others And yet this cannot be called a constraining or forcing of Consciences for a Magistrate or Master thus to restrain these who are under them it 's but the using of that power vvhich God hath committed to them to make men to do their duty and to abstain from dishonouring God and the punishing of them if they do other ways in vvhich respect he beareth not the Sword in vain The 2. and main reason followeth v. 11. wherein this command is three way â— pressed also 1. By Gods example who during the sp â—ce of six days wrought though he might as easily have made all in one day and rested the Seventh and not before the Seventh on which he wrought none even so it becometh men to do seeing he intended this for their imitation and for that end doth propose it here Gods rest on the Seventh is not absolute and in every respect for John 5 17. he worketh hitherto that is in the works of Providence sustaining preserving and governing the Creatures made by him and their Actions but all things needful for the perfecting of the world vvere then made and finished Whence by the way vve may gather that not only all Creatures vvere made Angels even these that since turned Devils c. but that they vvere made within the Six days of Creation vvhen Heaven Earth Sea and all that was in them was made Therefore all our works that are necessary to be done in the six working days vvould be done and ended that we may rest on the Sabbath as he did The 2. way is by his blessing of it God blessed the Sabbath day which is to be understood not simply in respect of the day vvhich is not properly capable of blessing but in respect of the true observers of it he blesseth it to them and he blesseth them in it which may be in these three 1. That the rest of that day shall not prejudg them in their weeks work but that their labour shall be therefore blessed so that they shall miss nothing by observing that day as the Lord blessed the Seventh year whereon they rested and yet notwithstanding they vvere as vvell provided as vvhen they laboured Lev. 25.20 21 22 And it 's like that if vve vvill compare such as make Conscience to sanctifie the Sabbath with others who think and seem to gain by breaking of it this will be found at the years end to be verified 2. That the Lord hath set a part that day for a Spiritual blessing and the Communication of it to his people so the Bread and Wine are blessed in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to be a mean of conveying Spiritual blessings to the worthy receivers Is. 56. and Psal. 92.3 That God vvill abundantly manifest his gracious presence and multiply his spiritual blessings that day upon it's due observers more then on other days vvherein he is also sought as there is this day a double worship both in respect of the Duty and of the day vvhereon it 's done so there shall be a double blessing beyond what is on other days in vvhich respect even prayers in and towards the Temple while it stood by divine appoin â—m â—nt as a separate place from others had a blessing beyond prayers in other places and thus Christ blessed the loaves and the few small fishes John 6. vvhen he made them by multiplication on the matter to feed far beyond their ordinary proportionableness so service on this day groweth in it's blessing hence vve may see an usual connexion betwixt Vniversal thriving in Religion Grace and Piety and suit â—ble obedience to this command in the tender sanctification of the Sabbath and withall a reason why so few make progress in godliness even little keeping holy the Sabbath as they ought The 3. way is by his hallowing it wherefore he hallowed it or sanctified it that is per modum destinandi or by vvay of appointing of it for holy uses and separating it from other days as is said The inference wherefore as to the hallowing pointeth at the reason or
hear in their sleep yet they are bound not to Murder nor commit Adultery c. in their sleep and the more renewed and holy Christians are in their ordinary walk so are they in their dreams and even in this sanctified persons differ from unrenewed ones 6 The sixth Argument is this we suppose these grounds that prove involuntary lust in the first motions thereof and before they can come to consent to be sin will infer these motions in sleeping men of which we speak to be sinful also For 1. Though these motions of lust be involuntary and weaken not the deliberate use of Reason more than the other And 2. Though they be in the Regenerate wr â—stled against and not approved more than the other yet because these are not according to reason though not brought forth by it and not answerable to that simple purity and Angelick holiness which should be in man and it is hard to imagine the most passing motions of lust running never so swiftly through us not to leave behind them some dreg of defilement by reason of our corruption that sideth still in less or more with temptation which cannot be said of sins objected by the Tempter to our Lord and such lusts or motions of lust have still by the Orthodox according to Paul's Doctrine Rom. 7. been thought sinful upon the foresaid reasons and we see not but these same reasons will hold here Lastly we add that generally the Consciences of the Godly look on this kind of practices although committed in sleep with horrour and no reasoning or disputing will truly quiet them till they be humbled before â—od under them and yet they use not to be so troubled in other things that are meerly Ceremonial How doth Augustine complain of this yea confess and lament it Conf â—ss lib. 1 â— cap. 30. though elsewhere he accounts it no sin yet he crys out of it and that he thought it a mercy that he had not done what in sl â—ep he consented to act reperimus nos non fecisse d â—leamus t â—men quoquo m â—do in nobis factum fuisse It grieves him that it should be any way done in him and he agreeth it thus that he had not always rejected these as sometimes he had done And do not the Godly sometimes in their sl â—ep make opposition to th â—se motions and how often do they in prayer wrestle against this evil and that as I conceive from another apprehension of it than simply because of any punishment or a â—â—liction that is in it for many things more af â—licting do not so affect them and yet even these know the reasons that are made use of against the sinfulness of it which maketh me think there is something directly against Conscience and Purity in these sinful actions or motions To conclude sure we are this Opinion is not unsuitable to the end of the Law and that absolute Purity and Angeli â—al Holiness God calleth for in it namely that not only when we are awake we are to be still with him but that our sleep should not break our Communion with him And certainly it is most safe for man to humble himself under the s â—ns â— of his sinf â—l nature and the sad necessity of sinning both waking and sleeping he hath brought on himself that th â—r â—by he may the better press on himself the necessity of a Mediator for Righ â—eousness which are the great ends and uses of the Law We come now more particularly to the words which the Lord himself spoke concerning the number of these Commandments and general scope of them as hath been said there is no question but there be four things we would sp â—ak a little to for further clearing of the Text b â—fore we come to speak particularly to the first Commandment The first is whether these words I am the Lord thy God c. be a part of the first Commandment or a Preface to all the T â—n Ans. We think it is a ground laid down for pressing and drawing sorth our obedience to all the Commandments yet it hath relation more especially to the first Commandment as the negative expression there cleareth which is Thou shalt have no other gods before me that is no other than Me what Me even Me the Lord thy God that brought thee out of the Land of Egypt So then there is a special relation betwixt this Commandment and the Preface as including the positive part of this negative Commandment and it doth especially clear these three things 1 What is the right object of worship it is Jehova Elohim the Lord that sheweth the Unity of the Divine Essence for so Jehovah being a word in the singular number is ordinarily look't on as pointing out this then Elohim which is a word in the plural number speaketh the plurality of Persons in the God-head so that the Lord commanding and requiring obedience here is one God and three Persons 2 It cleareth what is the right Channel in which our service should run it is in the Channel of the Covenant our obedience is to be directed not to God abstractly considered but to God as our God I am the Lord thy God saith he and thy God by Covenant so the expression is Deut 28.58 That thou mayst fear this glori â—us and fearful Name THE LORD THY GOD. This maketh our service and worship sweet and kindly and without this relation there can be no acceptable service performed by sinful man to God and that relation that by the Covenant of Works once stood betwixt them being broken it saith it must be made up again which only can be done in Christ and it saith also that this relation to God in him and obedience to the Law can consist well together 3 It cleareth what is the right and great motive of obedience to wit the benefit of Redemption love and thankfulness upon that account constraining to the performing of these duties that are commanded that they may be done willingly and in a chearful manner Secondly It may be asked why the second Commandment and the fourth Commandment have reasons pressing obedience annexed to them which none of the other hath at least expresly set down by the Lord Ans. This may be a reason because all the other Commandments are by the Law of Nature determined in mens Consciences and the sins against them are by Natures Light seen to be evil but the substance of these two to wit what way he will be worshipped in externals and on what day as the solemn time of worship being determined by Gods positive Law they are not so impressed on mens Consciences as the duties required in the other Commandments are therefore the Lord addeth reasons to â—ach of these to perswade to the obedience of them as to the second I am a jealou â— God and therefore will not admit of any the least appearance of declining from me even in externals and to the fourth keep the
Sabbath day for I have put a difference betwixt it and other days though before there was none which is further amplified in the Text Now by this reason which is also given by the School-men it may appear that the second Commandment concerning outward worship according to our way of distinguishing them is distinct from the first which requireth the inward worship due to God for the first Commandment is Moral-Natural and can never be altered and has as much impression on a Natural Conscience as any and therefore according to this ground needed no reason Thirdly It may be observed also that some Commandments have Promises added to them which others have not not that any Commandment wants implied incouragements but in some they are expressed as in the second He sheweth mercy to thousands c. and in the fifth That thy days may be long c. The reason given why Promises are particularly expressed in these two is that obedience to these two seemeth to bring most hurt â—o men and is most cont â—ary to th â—ir corrupt wills and affections it seemeth not so prejudicial nor is it so obnoxious to the hatred of the world that men love God and fear him in their hearts c. as it is outwardly to confess him before men and that by adhering close to the true manner of worshipping him This maketh men obnoxious to persecutions prosses losses c. to be seriously taken up in the externals of godliness sometimes bringeth much prejudice with it and is to many troublesome and so to be obedient to Superiours and tender of Inferiours is not easily condescended unto therefore God to counterbalance the difficulti â—s that accompany the obedience of these two Commandments hath added Promises to them the more to incourage and stir up to the obedience of them The fourth thing we would take notice of is that some Commandments have threatnings expressed in them which others have not as the second and the third not that any Commandment wanteth implied threatnings but the reason is because men ordinarily count light of the brea â—h of these two Commandments if they be as they think honest at the he â—â—t though they be very negligent and careless in many outward things and though in the manner of worship they be very slight and perfunctorious yet if it be to the true God they think the less of it And so also men are given to count very light of reverent using God â—s Holy Name therefore he hath put a threatning to both these Commandments to make men know he will not so easily pass them as men oft times imagine and that all these three reasons promises threatnings are added to the second Commandment it doth very clearly and convincingly shew of what conceinment that Commandment is and how ready men are to break it and that there is special consideration and regard to be had to it so far is it from being to be 〈◊〉 to be expunged out of the number Exod. 20.3 Thou shalt have no other Gods before me IN this first Commandment we may consider these two 1. The thing commanded 2. The qualification of the Command The thing commanded is negatively set down Thou shalt have no other Gods directing to the right object of worship and differencing the true God from all supposed Gods for though there be but one God yet are there many who are called Gods 1 Cor. 8.4 5 6. The qualification added is in these words before me which tend not only to the aggravation of the sin here discharged as being done in his presence and done as it were in contempt and despite of God who always sees but especially to shew the extent of the Prohibition that it tyeth up not only from outward Idolatry but even from that which is inward and secret and that men see not and is known to God only and so this Commandment r â—quireth not only external worship but that which is inward and spiritual before God Hence the scope of this first Commandment lieth clearly in these two things wherein it differeth from the second to wit 1. That it sheweth who is the right object of w â—â—ship and directeth men thereto 2. That it r â—gula â—eth 〈◊〉 internal worshipping of God and calleth for that whereas the second Commandment supposeth both these and directeth as to the manner of worshipping the true God in externals and regulateth these This Commandment as all the rest hath a positive part requiring something and a negative part prohibiting something We shall in the first place speak to what is required here and we take it up in these three things 1 And first it requireth the right knowledge of God for there can be no true worship given to him there can be no right thought or conception of him or faith in him till he be known He must be known to be one God in Essence Deut. 6.4 and three Persons 1 John 5.7 He must be known in his Attributes and Essential Properties Infiniteness Immenseness Unchangeableness Eternity Omnipotene Omniscience Wisdom Goodness Justice and Faithfulness He must also be known in his special works whereby his Soveraignty and Majesty appeareth as his works of Creation Providence Redemption and what concerneth it as the Covenant of Grace and its terms the Mediator and his Offices no service or worship can be offered to God nor can we have any ground of Faith in him without some measure of distinct knowledge of these 2 It requireth from us a suitable acknowledging of God in all these his Properties As 1. That he be highly esteemed above all 2. Loved 3. Feared 4. Believed and trusted in 5. Hoped in 6. Adored 7. Honoured 8. Served and obeyed And so 9. He must be the Supreme end in all our actions that should mainly be aimed at by us 3 It requireth such duties as result from his Excellency and our acknowledging him to be such a one As 1. Dependance upon him 2. Submission to him and patience under cross Dispensations from him 3. Faith resting on him 4. Prayers put up to him 5. Repentance for wronging him 6. Communion and a constant walking with him 7. D â—lighting in him 8. Meditating on him and such other as necessarily may be inferred as duties incumbent to Creatures in such a relation to such a God whose Excellency and worth calleth and inviteth men to all suitable duties Next it is necessary that we add some Advertisements to these Generals And 1 That the Commandment requireth all these and in the highest and most perfect degree 2 That it not only requireth them in our selves but obligeth us to further them in all others according to our Places and Callings 3 That it requireth the diligent use of all means that may help and further us in these as Reading Meditation Study c. 4 That these things which in some respect may be given to Creatures as love fear c. yet when they are required as duties to God they
Lord's day standeth in reference to this Command and whether thereby the same sanctification be required as to it though its institution arise from another ground than is required to the Seventh-day-Sabbath Somewhat of all these must needs be spoken unto and we begin to speak first of its morality before we speak of its meaning because all dependeth on this both in respect of exposition and practise for if it be not moral and perpetually binding it 's not necessary either to explicate it or to study and press the practise of it but if it be found to be moral then no doubt it concerneth us and requireth the same moral sanctification of a day now as it did before Our Assertion then in reference to this is that The duty of setting a-part and sanctifying of a portion of time as it is limitted in the fourth Command for God's Service as it recurreth is moral and the obligation thereunto perpetual even as in the duties of the other Commands the obligation to this being no more dissolved than to those though there may be difference in the degree of the obligation which they lay on in respect of the matter contained in them my meaning in a word is that a day or one of seven is as necessary to be kept holy unto God now upon supposition of his determining the particular day as it is necessary to hold and keep up the worship prescribed by God neither without sin can another day be put in the room of it more than other worship can be substituted in the place of divinely prescribed worship for the time is set and fixt by the Fourth Command pointing at a solemne and chief time as the worship it self is by the second For clearing of this consider 1. That we mean not here moral-natural as if without any positive Law such a thing had been binding no but moral-positive that is laid on by a Command which is standing unrepealed and so bindeth by vertue of the authority of the Law-giver as several other commands and precepts do as namely those concerning Sacraments belonging to the second Command and those concerning one Wife and forbidden desires of Marriage belonging to the Seventh which being so often broken by many Saints and dispensed with in some cases cannot be thought to be morally-natural since the Lord dispenseth not so in these nor can it be thought in reason that his Servants would have been ignorant of such a natural thing It is then moral-positive that we mean to wit that which is binding by a positive Law 2. Consider in this question that there is a great difference betwixt these two to say the seventh-day-Seventh-day-Sabbath which the Jews kept is moral and to say the Fourth Command is moral the one may be and is abolished because another is brought in its roome The other to wit the Command may stand and doth stand because it tyeth morally to a Seventh day but suc â— a Seventh day as the Lord should successively discover to be chosen by him and though the Seventh be changed yet one of seven is still reserved 3. There is need to distinguish betwixt the moral substance of a Command and some ceremonial appendices belonging to it So the Fourth Command might then possibly have had something ceremonial in that Seventh day or in the manner used of sanctifying that Seventh day which now is gone as double Sacrifices c. or in its reasons whereby it is pressed as there is somthing peculiar to that People in the Preface to all the Commands as there was in the Sacraments of the old Law belonging to the second Command yet both a Sabbath day and Sacraments may be and are very necessary and moral in the Church it is not then every thing hinging on this Command as proper to that administration and so but accidental to the sanctifying of a Sabbath that we plead for but this is it we plead for that the Command is as to its main scope matter and substance moral-positive and that it standeth as still binding and obliging unto us and cannot without sin be neglected or omitted it might be enough here to say that if this Command were never repealed in the substance of it nor did ever exspire by any other thing succeeding in its place then it must needs be still binding for certainly it was once as obligatory-proclaimed by the Law-giver himself and was never since in its substance repealed nor is it exspired or found hurtful in its nature but is as necessary now as then it is true the Seventh day Sabbath is repealed by instituting and substituting the First day Sabbath or Lord's day in its place but that doth rather qualifie the Command than repeal it for 1. It saith that a day is moral and necessary 2 It saith a day of seven is moral and necessary which is all we say and why necessary as agreeable to this Command no doubt whence we may Argue if the substance of this Command be kept even when the particular day is changed then is the Command moral which this very change confirmeth but the former is true as is clear in experience therefore it followeth that the Law stands unrepealed for it 's palpable that the day as to its number or frequency and duration with the manner of sanctifying of it belongs to the substance of the Commandement but what day as to its order first second or seventh doth not because the first cometh in immediately upon Religion God's Honour and the good of Souls which the other doth not This Argument will stand good against all who acknowledge this Law to have been once given by God till they can evidence a repeal To speak somewhat more particularly to this the way we shall make out the morality of it is by considering 1. How the Scripture speaketh of it in general 2. How it speaketh of the Decalogue 3. How it speaketh of this Command in particular 4. By adducing some Scriptural Arguments for it As for the 1. To wit the Scriptures speaking of it in general we say If the Scripture speak as frequently in clearing the Fourth Command or the Sabbath which is the morality of it and press it as seriously and that in reference to all times of the Church as it doth any other moral duty then for substance this Command is moral and perpetually binding for that seemeth to be the Character whereby most safely to conclude concerning a Command to consider how the Scripture speaketh of it but the Scripture doth as often mention and is as much and as serious in pressing of that Command and that in reference to all states of the Church as of any other Ergo c. We shall make out this by shewing 1. its frequency in mentioning of it 2. It s seriousness in pressing it 3. It s asserting of it as belonging to all times and states of the Church 1. Look through all the Scriptures and ye will find the sanctifying of a Sabbath mentioned as
first Gen. 2. beginneth â— with the very first seventh after the Creation then it is spoken of Exod. 16. before the Law was given then Ezod 20. it is contained expresly in the Law and that by a particular and special Command in the first Table thereof and is often after repeated Exod. 31. and Levit. 23. v. 3. where it is set down as the first Feast before all the extraordinary ones which preference can be for no other reason but because of its perpetuity yea it is made a rule or pattern by which the extraordinary Sabbaths or Feasts in their sanctification are to be regulate again it is repeated Deut. 5. with the rest of the Commands and in the Historical part of Scripture as Nehemiah 9.13 it is also mentioned in the Psalms the 92. Psal. being peculiarly intituled a Psalm or Song for the Sabbath day The Prophets again do not forget it see Isa. 56.58 Jer. 17. and Ezek 20.22 In the New-Testament the sanctifying of a day or Sabbath is mentioned in the Evangelists Math. 24.20 Luk. 23.56 Act. 13.14 15 21. 20.7 in the Epistles as 1 Cor. 16. and in the Revel chap. 1. v. 10. As if all had purposely concurred for making out the concernment and perpetuity of this duty 2. Consider how weightily seriously and pressingly the Scripture speaketh of it first it is spoken of Gen. 2. as backed with a reason 2. Through the Law the sanctification of it in particular is described 3. It is spoken of as a mercy and singular priviledge that God gave to his people Exod. 16.29 Neh. 9.14 Ezek. 20.12.4 Many promises containing many blessings are made to the conscientious and right keepers of it Isa. 56.58.5 The breach of it is severely threatned and plagued Numb 15. Neh. 13. Jer. 17. Ezek. 20.6 Many examples of the Godly their care in keeping it are set down see Nehem. 13. Luk. 23.56 Act. 20.7 Revel 1.10 7 The duties of it are particularly set down as Hearing Praying Reading delighting in God works of mercy c. 8. It is in the Old Testament claimed by God as his own day not ours My Holy day Isa. 58.13 and Nehem. 9.14 it is acknowledged knowledged by the People to be His whole they say Thine holy Sabbath which property is asserted of that Holy day as being Gods besides other dayes Rev. 1.10 And this is asserted also in this same Command where it is called the Sabbath of the Lord in opposition to or contradistinction from the other six dayes all which seemeth to speak out something more than Temporary in this Duty of setting a Seventh day apart for God for we speak not yet of the particular day 3. Look to it in all times and states of the Church and ye will find it remarkably Characterized with a special Observation As 1. In innocency it 's instituted set apart from others and blessed and Heb. 4. It is called the rest from the beginning of the World 2. Before the Law was given the Sanctification of it was intimated as necess â—ry 3. In the giving of the Law it is remembred and a Command given to us for remembring it 4. After the Law it is urged by the Prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah and kept by the Godly Psal. 92. 5. In the time or after the time of the Captivity the breach of it is reproved Ezek. 20. And its Observation restored by Godly Nehemiah Hitherto there is no difficulty the pinch will lye in this If the Scriptures speak of it as belonging to the days of the Gospel In which for making of it out 1. We have these hints Acts 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 Where Christians going about the Moral Duties of the Sabbath is especially observed to be upon one day peculiarly 2. That Title of the direct appropriating of a Day to the Lord Rev. 1.10 Which places will fall in to be considered particularly when we come to the last question Besides these we may produce three places to prove a Sabbath as belonging to the New Testament though not the very Day used or observed for the Sabbath in the Old and this will be enough to make out the Assertion two of them are Prophesies the third of them is in the Gospel The first Prophesie is in the 66. Chap. of Esaiah v. 23. The second is in Ezekiel's Description of the New Temple Chap. 43.44 45 46 c. Where 1. It is clear that these places relate to the Dayes of the Gospel as none can deny but they do so eminently 2. It is clear that though they Prophesie of the Services of the Gospel under the names of Sacrifices c. proper to the Old-Testament-Administration and of the Sanctified and set-apart time of the Gospel under the Name of Sabbath which then was determined and whereto men were then bound by the fourth Command as they were to Sacrifices by the second yet these Prophesies infer not by vertue of the fourth Command the very same Day to be under the Gospel which was under the Law more than the same Services by vertue of the second which none will deny to be in force notwithstanding of the change of Services and there is as little reason to deny the fourth to be still in force as to its substance notwithstanding of the change of the particular Day Yet Thirdly it is clear that from the mentioning of these Services this will follow that there should be set and fixed Ordinances and a way of Worship in the New-Testament as well as in the Old and that there should be a solemn chief set-time for the Sabbath which men ought to sanctifie and that they should no more admit any other times nor so set apart into a parity with it than they were to admit any Service or Worship not allowed by God or that was contrary to the second Command for if any thing be clear in them this is clear that they speak first of Services then of solemn times and Sabbaths and of the one after the other which must certainly infer that both external Services and a solemn chief time for them do belong to the New-Testament Hence it is that many Divines from that Prophesie of Ezekiel do draw conclusions for fundry things out of those places as 1. Concerning the necessity and continuance of a standing Ministry and though Ministers now be neither Priests nor Levites yet â— say they it followeth clearly that there will be a Mini â—try because such are spoken of there 2. Concerning the necessity of and a Warrant for Church Discipline and separating not only Doctrinally but Disciplinarily the Precious from the Vile and debarring of those who are Morally unclean from the Ordinances because these things say they are Typified in the substance by the Porters being set to keep the Doors and by the charge given to the Priests 3. Anent the continuance of a Church and of the Ordinances of Word Sacraments c. And the Congregating of Christians to attend these though there shall
of mercy and necessity which Christ allowed on the Sabbath which was made for man and not man for the Sabbath 3. Yet care would be had lest under pretext of these we exceed and apply too much of what is the Lords unnecessarily for our selves and on our lusts and if we will wake for ordinary business and keep upon such and such a Dyet other Dayes yea if we might do it or others no more strong then we do it the pretence of infirmity will not excuse u â— especially seeing hardly it can be often instanced that timeousness at Gods Work in that day or earnestness and continuance in it hath proved hurtful which we may account as a part of Gods blessing on the seventh day that less meat and sleep may be as refreshful as more at another time thus much for the quamdiu or the Continuance of the day Secondly it may be inquired how often by vertue of this command that day doth recur if it be one of seven or if it be the very seventh And so if this day be to be taken definitely for the very seventh day after the Creation or indefinitely for one day of seven as the Lord should other wayes determine or had elsewhere determined astricting then to a day but not any particular day by vertue of this command but to such a day as was formerly described or prescribed from the beginning during the Jewish State and to such another day as God should after Christs coming reveal unto them and pitch upon for his service for taking it for granted that a Seventh day as moral is commanded it followeth to be inquired whether it be the Seventh in number that is one of seven or the seventh in order that is the Seventh day For answering this we would premit 1. That there is a great difference betwixt these two the one to wit that there be a Seventh doth concern the matter and substance of piety the other to wit which of these Seven it be is more circumstantial and is alike if it be appointed by God and have the blessing 2. That it is usual for God in his commands concerning worship not at first to express a particular definitely but to deliver it in the bosome of a general indefinitely mediately and by clear consequence as it were several Species under one Genus As for instance 1. when Deut. 12.5 he commandeth his people to offer their Sacrifices in the place which he should choose here there is a stinting or astricting of them to the place which God should reveal unto them this before the Temple was built tyed them to the Ark and sometimes to one place and sometimes to another as it was removed and placed till it was brought to Jerusalem but after the Temple was built and chosen for the place it astricted men to that yea when the Temple is destroyed and Christ come it astricteth men to no place by another but it obligeth men to worship God every where in spirit and truth It 's true this is a Ceremonial precept and will not hold in all things especially as to its abolition yet while it stood by a positive Authority or Precept it sheweth that God may command a particular as one day of seven and yet not instantly so determine but that one and the same command may inforce to diverse dayes at diverse times upon supposition o â— God 's manifesting his mind even as by one command men were astricted successively to diverse places 2. See it instanced in the second Command wherein God requireth such a worship as he himself should prescribe which is the moral affirmative part of it and dischargeth all worship by Images that is its moral negative part thereof by vertue whereof Believers were then tyed to offer Sacrifices to Circumcise to keep the Passover c. but now Believers are tyed to Baptize to celebrate the Lords Supper c. yet by vertue of one and the same command so here that command which requires the Seventh day from the Jews may require the First day from us Christians for the Sabbath because these particulars are not expresly directly and immediately called for by these commands but indirectly and by consequence yet this second command tyed the Jews to abstain from blood and to circumcise before the ceremonial Law was added to them because these commands were formerly revealed to them but it tyed them to these accidentally to say so and by consequence only even so we say of the fourth command as to the Seventh day it being instituted before consider for this Exod. 16.26 where six dayes for gathering of Manna and a seventh for rest are spoken of A third Instance is in Tithes which was the Lords requiring a part of their Means or Substance as this was a part of their time he there required the tenth part of their increase as here he doth the seventh part of their time yet God in proportioning their estates did not particularly limit to any exact and precise order but as to this proportion of their estates whatever they were so we say here had not the day been determined otherwayes then by this command it would not have implyed any particular definite day of the Seven 3. We premit that though the Seventh day be called moral as is expressed in the command or understood yet it is but moral-positive and so alterable at the will of the Law-giver and therefore the question would not be much different if acknowledging the Seventh day to be commanded to the Jews as well as one of seven we yet asserted the seventh to be discharged and one of seven to be still retained for so one of seven would be binding now and not the Seventh 4. Yet lest we should seem to admit somewhat changeable in the very command it self precisely considered we would put difference betwixt the commanding part of the Law and its explicatory part the command may be moral and indefinite although some things in reasons and motives were not so as in the preface which inforceth all the commands and in the promise annexed to the fifth there was somthing peculiar to that people yet cannot we cast off all because of that suppose there had no more been in this fourth command but remember the day of rest to keep it holy that would not have inferred the Seventh day though we think the Jews because of its former sanctification would have been obliged to keep that day by vertue of this command And suppose that in the explications or reasons there may be something added peculiar to that people which cannot be a Seventh day but at the most if any thing the Seventh day yet that which is in the commanding part will still stand moral to wit that the day of rest should be remembred and if it can be made out that it was determined to the Jews to sanctifie the Seventh day though it were in the reasons added and to us afterward to sanctifie the First day
they will be both found to be a Seventh day and a day of rest and therefore to be remembred and to be sanctified this would resolve into the same thing on the matter yet we conceive it safest to assert that in this command God hath set apart a Seventh day to himself which is to be sanctified by us by our application of it to holy uses but doth not by it expresly directly and primarily bind to the Seventh day but secondarily and by consequence to wit as it was otherwayes before declared by him and so it bindeth now that same way to the sanctifying of the First day of the week as being now revealed by God just as in the former instances or examples we touched upon That a Seventh day whatever it be which is chosen of God and not the Seventh day in order is to be sanctified by vertue of this command as injoyning that as the substance and matter of it may be made out by these Arguments Arg. 1. That which is the substance of this command is moral and bindeth perpetually as we have formerly proved for if its substance be not moral then it self is not so either but that a Seventh day should be sanctified hath been maintained in the Church by the Apostles in their retaining the First day of the week while the Seventh hath been laid by and never used therefore it was not the Seventh but a Seventh day which was primarily commanded in this command so that no particular day is instituted here more then any positive service is prescribed in the second command yet the observation of what was prescribed or should be prescribed was included Even so it is here in reference to that day and as we may inferr that the second command injoyned not such and such ordinances primarily because they are abolished and that such as were negative or prohibited as not making of Images are moral because they are continued and Images are to be rejected just so may we conclude that a Sev â—nth day here was primarily commanded and is moral because it it is continued and that the Seventh was not so commanded because it is rejected and laid aside This Argument especially made out in the designation of the Lords day will prove this for if that Seventh day was the substance of this command then either it is to be continued as moral which were against the current of the New Testament wherein as Christ hath set forth different ordinances so a different chief solemn time for worship or we must say that this fourth command belongeth not to us at all the contrary whereof we have made out It must then follow that it was not the Seventh day but a Seventh day which this command respecteth which therefore belongeth to us as it did to the Jews as well as any other command and particularly the second command doth Arg. 2. If God hath put a difference some way betwixt the Sabbath commanded here and the day of his own rest the Seventh day then it would seem it 's not that day which it commanded But he hath put a difference first in the mandatory part Remember what not the Seventh day but the Sabbath day or day of rest 2. In the blessing it is not said he blessed the Seventh day but the Sabbath therefore is that difference so palpable as being specially intended whereas if the scope of the comm â—nd were only the Seventh day it had been much more clear to have set it down otherwayes and no other probable reason of the difference can be given Arg. 3. Either a Seventh day is commanded primarily and then the Seventh but secondarily and consequentially or the Seventh was commanded the Jews primarily and one of Seven but consequentially for both were commanded to them and the first to wit the Seventh as being in use before But it cannot be said that the Seventh day was primarily commanded and one of Seven consequentially only because the general is first commanded and then the particular as when God required Tithes of Increase and Cattle by the command of Tithes he first required the proportion and then what particular proportion as to order he himself should carve out to them and so consequently came in the tenth Beast which passed under the rod by a particular command Levit. 27.32 33. because there God determined but if that tenth had not been set down the general command had but determined upon the tenth of Cattle as of Sheaves or bolls of Corn even so it is as to the day the command requireth one of Seven primarily but that it is this Seventh followeth from another determination Arg. 4. If the moral grounds and reasons which press this command do most directly respect a Seventh day and not the Seventh then it 's not the Seventh day but a Seventh day which is primarily commanded in it for the reasons bear out especially what is moral in it and principally intended but the moral reasons pressing it plead more strongly and directly for a Seventh day and but indirectly for the Seventh day as it was then instituted Ergo c. That the reasons do directly press a Seventh day and in a manner stick closely to it may thus be made out 1. â—f the reasons equally press on us the First day and the observation of it supposing it now to be observed according to Divine warrant then they do not primarily press the Seventh but the reasons equally press on us the First day Ergo c. the major is clear for the same thing cannot press two different dayes primarily nor equally that the reasons concern us as well as them upon the supposition aforesaid may thus appear 1. They are universal and do not belong to that people more then any other for the concession of Six dayes is to all and Gods example of resting concerneth all 2. If the breaking of that command be equally sinful to us with them and strike against the equity of the command and Gods example in us as well as in them then these reasons concern us also and us as well as them Now that they do so and agredge the sin of prophaning our Lords day as they did the sin of prophaning their Sabbath we must either grant or we must deny that they concern us at all Beside the weight of a challenge from the conscience by vertue of them will put a tender heart out of question of it seeing God giveth us Six dayes to our selves as he did to them and his example proposed to us ought to be respected by us as well as by them and the same general equity is in both 3. If the reasons be a sufficient ground of allowance to us for Six working dayes together even the last Six of the week as they were to them for the first Six then they determine not the Seventh day to be the day of rest primarily but a Seventh following these Six of labour but they do allow us warrantably to work
It may be objected But God rested the Seventh day Answ. Gods rest is not principally proposed as the reason of that Seventh day but that he rested one day after six imployed in the works of Creation It 's to inferr the number not the order otherwaies it would not concern us 2. The Seventh relateth not to the order of the dayes of the week one two three c. but it 's called the Seventh with respect to the former Six of work Thus much for the quoties and quamdiu how osten the Sabbath recurreth and what is the day It remaineth here to be inquired what is the beginning of the sancti â—ication of this day which belongeth to the quando or wherefrom we are to reckon it seeing it 's granted by all to be a natural day Now it is questioned mainly whether its beginning is to be reckoned from evening about Sun-setting or darkness to Sun-setting the next day or if it be to be reckoned from morning that is as we fix it when the Sun beginneth to ascend towards us after midnight which is morning largely taken as it 's evening largely taken when the Sun beginneth to decline after mid-day In this debate then we take morning and evening largely as they divide the whole natural day so the morning is from twelve at night to twelve in the day and the evening from twelve in the day to twelve at night And it must be so here for 1. Moses Gen. 1. divideth the natural day in morning and evening which two put together make up the whole day and these Six days made up each of them of morning and evening are natural dayes the whole week being divided in Seven of them and that reckoning from Gods example is no doubt proposed for our Imitation in this Hence the morning watch was before day and the morning Sacrifice about nine of the clock so the evening sacrifice was about three in the afternoon and the evening watch about nine at night 2. It is granted by all and is clear from this command that as we account the Six working dayes of the week so must we account the Seventh for one must begin where another endeth and if one of them begin at the evening or morning all the rest must do so likewise 3. We suppose the sanctifying of the ordinary Sabbath was from morning to evening I say of the ordinary Sabbath because for extraordinary Sabbaths as of the Passover Exod. 12. and of the Atonement Levit. 23. there were special reasons and though otherwayes they were to be sanctified as Sabbaths yet that they were to begin in the evening before was added as a special solemnity of these solemn times and therefore the example or instance of these will not be concludent here to the prejudice of what we assert but rather to the contrary seeing there is a particular excepting of them from the ordinary rule and the particular intimation of their beginning in the evening will rather confirm our assertion that the ordinary Sabbaths did begin in the morning 4. It 's not questioned if on the evening before people should be preparing for the Sabbath following we said that this is included in the word remember but if we speak of the Sabbath to begin at the evening before then it will be comprehended as a part of the very day and so it will conclude the work or observation of the day to close at the next evening We conceive especially to us Christians the day is to begin in the morning as is said and to continue till the next morning for which we reason thus Arg. 1. As other dayes begin or as dayes began at the first so must this but dayes ordinarily begin in the morning Ergo c. If the first Six of Moses's reckoning begin so then this beginneth so also but they do begin so which may be cleared from Gen. 1. where the evening and the morning make the First day after the Creation 1. If there the morning and the evening do fully divide the natural day then the morning must go before the evening every morning being for its own evening But they do divide the natural day all being comprehended under Six days Ergo c. the consequence is clear to natural sense for the forenoon which is the morning must be before the afternoon which is the evening the ascending of the Sun is sure before its declining and seeing the morning natural to speak so of the natural day is from the twelfth hour at night this must be the beginning of the day Again the question then being only whether to reckon the evening or the morning first it would seem necessary to reckon the morning first for if the evening be first that evening must either be 1. the evening of a day preceding morning seeing every evening supposeth a morning to go before it in proper speech and I suppose the History of the Creation Gen. 1. is not set down in metaphorical termes or 2. it must be an evening without a morning and that in proper speech here used is absurd and seems also to be as impossible i â— nature to wit that there should be a consequent and posterior evening or afternoon without a preceding morning or forenoon as that there should be an effect without a cause or 3. it must be the evening following its own morning and so that morning must be last preceding the first evening recorded Gen. 1. the evening and the morning were the first day which to affirm would not only be absurd but would also manifestly fasten the loss of a dayes time on the Scriptures calculation and it seemeth hard in all speech and Scripture-phrase to put the evening before its own morning seeing there must be both morning and evening in each day neither doth the Scripture speak any way of evening but when it 's drawing towards night which still supposeth the morning of that same day to be passed or else we must divide the day in the middle of the Artificial day and make the Natural day begin at twelve of the noon day which will be as much against the Scripture phrase that reckoneth still the whole Artificial day as belonging to one Natural day the Artificial day and night being the two parts of one whole natural day All the force of the opposite reason is this the evening is first named Ergo it is first Answ. Moses his scope is not to shew what part of one day is before another but to divide one day from another and to shew what goeth to make a whole day to wit an evening and a morning not a morning alone but an evening added to the morning which preceded that made the first second third day c. as one would reckon thus there is a whole day because there is both evening and morning In this account it 's most sutable to begin with the evening because it presupposeth the morning and being added to it cannot but
designation of that day inserted seeing to no other day hath it been applyed nor can it be applyed This truth has been uncontroverted in all Antiquity and almost by all Writers till of late Gomarus beginneth to question it as Rivet cleareth on this command against him Now supposing it as unquestionable that this is the very First day we are to inquire if the title applyed to this day be the same with that in the command and which usually was given to the old Seventh-day-Sabbath or that then Lords day And it is clear 1. That this title claimeth this day to God as his day it being possessively exprest as when we say the Lords Throne the Lords Altar the Lords Sabbath c. 2. It contradistinguisheth that day from other dayes as if they were not so the Lords but ours like that in the command Six dayes shalt thou labour c. but the Seventh is tho Lords so it 's the Lords in a peculiar way we having lesser right to imploy that day for our own use then any other day and this claim of the First day to be the Lords inferreth a condescension or dispensation whereby the last day becometh ours for had there been two dayes belonging to him one day could not have been peculiarly called his in which respect ◠Cor. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper is distinguished from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their own Supper even so the Lords day is distinguished from other dayes 3. It layeth on a necessity of using it for the Lord and not for our selves because it 's his and will infer the same moral duties and ends which the command obligeth to 4. It will infer an appointment of Christs whereby he appropriateth that day to his Service and claimeth it to himself why because he calleth it his even as in the fourth command there is no express institution of the Seventh day yet because the Seventh was called the Lords and in his former way and dispensations intimated as a day to be kept for him therefore it 's understood and taken for granted by the Jews to be instituted seeing he calleth it his so may we conclude here that there is an institution and appointment of the First day to be the Lords because it 's claimed by him as his although no such plain express institution be of it as of other Ordinances it being clear that the institution of dayes i ◠left more generally to be gathered From all which we may gather the conclusion to wit that the First day of the week is stiled by the same peculiar Titles claimed by the Lord expresly as his right and due and upon as valid grounds under the New Testament as the Seventh day was under the Old Therefore now the Seventh day is changed and the First is come in its room which was the thing to be proved In the last room we argue from the Apostles ordinance 1 Cor. 16.1 2. concerning contributions for the Saints As I have saith Paul given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye that is the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him c. I say we argue thus That not the Seventh but the First day is the chief solemn day for worship after Christs Resurrection If the First day of the week be particularly and eminently pitched on by the Apostle and that in diverse Churches as the fittest time for expressing their Charity then must there be somewhat eminent in the First day giving ground for such an appointment and ordinance as the Apostles singling that from other days for such an end and no other reason can be given but that that day being more especially and immediately appointed for God is most fit for that Duty which is a Work of Mercy but it 's there clear that the Apostle pitcheth singularly on that day beside other days Ergo c. For strengthening of the Argument consider 1. That it 's clear to be the first day of the week since that same phrase which is used by the Evangelists Matth. 28.1 Mark 16.2 Luk ◠24.1 is made use of here by the Apostle who no question followeth the Evangelists phrase yea his following that phrase may hint at a reason why he commandeth Charity to be on that day or sets it apart for that use as beyond other dayes to wit our Lords Resurrection 2. It 's clear that he thinketh it not indifferent what day it be done on nor that all days are alike therefore he pitcheth on that day the First day and that not in one Church only but in many 3. That this is not commended only to them but commanded and enjoyned even in reference to the day and will the Apostle load Churches with Commands in that circumstance without ground and universally to speak so prefer one day to another and so as he will have uniformity in the very day in the Church of Corinth with other Churches unnecessarily Let it not be said nay nor thought 4. That this day was commanded even in the Churches of Galatia in which Churches he had condemned the observation of days whereby it would seem to be clear that he counteth not the preferring of this first day as one of these days the observation whereof is prohibited and condemned by him nor willeth it to be laid aside and that purposely he passed the Seventh day as amongst these days which were not to be observed and retained but laid aside 5. That the thing required is a Duty of the Sabbath being a work of mercy as Isa. 58. giving Bread to the hungry is mentioned particularly as one of the Duties of Gods Holy day 6. That the mentioning of the First Day of the week must be looked on as relating to and as compared with the practise of keeping solemn meetings on that day and this command of doing this on the First day of the week must be more strong and infer somewhat more being compared with other places then if such things were not recorded other ways of the First day 7. This command supposeth them to be already acquainted with some special priviledges of the First day beyond others when he commendeth this as a motive to them to be more charitable to wit that it was to be done on that day 8. That there must be some peculiar thing in this day making it fit yea more fit for such a purpose as doing works of Charity on it rather then on any other And the Apostles commanding this and that in many Churches doth necessarily presuppose a reason why he doth it drawn from some fitness of this day by another Now if we will enquire no reason can be given but that the Seventh day Sabbath was expired and that this First day was instituted in it's place for otherwise any day was alike yea the Seventh day being the last day of the week and the day when men usually reckon their weeks success it would seem more reasonable for this end
that men at the close of the week should lay up by them as God had blessed them then to reserve it to the beginning of another week were not the First day more especially to be sanctifyed then the last and the last to be accounted but an ordinary working day The fitness then floweth from this that the first day of the week being the day of their solemn Communion with God and with one another and the day of their partaking most liberally of spiritual blessings from him that therefore they should be most readily warmed in their affections and be most liberal in their Communications to such as wanted especially if we consider the Jews to be parties for whom that Collection or Contribution was It 's the Apostles great Argument whereby he pleadeth for Charity to the poor Jews from the Christian Gentiles Rom. 15.26 27. That the Gentiles were their Debtors in temporals because they had received spiritual things from them now this argument is most fresh and powerful when believers do on the First day of the week record Gods priviledging them with his Ordinances and giving them his day in place of the Ordinances and day â— which the Jews once had and yet deriving these unto them by the Jews I say this Argument will then be most fresh to incite to that duty in particular If any say that it was accidental that the first day was chosen or named rather then another because one behoved to be named and it was alike which But 1. I demand why is it universal If it were from one Church only it might possibly have been thought so but he doth call for this Duty on that day from more Churches 2. Why doth he not recommend it but command it as having more then an indifferency in the very day And 3. Can it be by guess or accident to speak so that so many priviledges are fallen on that day And that so many things are recorded of it and astricted to it by commands which is not done of and to any other days And if one place would not suffice to prove that the First day and not the Seventh day was preferred by the Apostles as the chief day of solemn publick worship yet all these things put together must prove a preference in that day or we must say that the Penmen of Holy Scripture have been very partial who have marked many things and recorded them concerning Gods Worship on that day and have never so much as once for solemn Service named what was done on the second third fourth fifth dayes we must either say that this is inadvertently done which were blasphemy considering by what Spirit they wrote or we must say it 's done to put a preference on that day and to shew that it 's especially to be taken notice of as the most solemn day for God's worship by Christians which is the thing to be confirmed for the day that 's claimed as the Lords kept for him and singularly marked to be priviledged beyond other days must be his day but this First day is such Ergo c. Propos. 5. This change of the day whereby the Seventh is laid aside and the first substituted in its room is of divine authority and institution and not by any meer human or Ecclesiastick Constitution I conceive there is indeed no mids here betwixt a divine Institution which hath Gods warrant and authority stamped on it and for Conscience sake is to be observed as being obligatory thereof and that immediately and human or Ecclesiastick Constitutions which may reach the external m â—n but in the matters of worship cannot bind the Conscience or impose them as necessary Now that this change is not by the last but by the first we prove these ways 1. Thus if it be not human or Ecclesiastick t â—â—n it must be divine but it is not human or Ecclesiastick ergo it's divine That it is not human will appear 1. If it reach the Conscience and that immediately then it 's not human but divine but it doth so 2. If no man or Church on earth have power to alter Gods day now nay nor simply or at all then it 's not human or Ecclesiastick but first none can change it as we might clear from great absurdities that would follow 2. If any Church have this power let them shew it the Old Church had it not neither the new as is cleared in the first question 2. We proceed to evince this change to be by divine institution these four ways 1. From reasons flowing from Scripture or Consequences drawn from it 1. Thus where by genuine and native Consequences drawn from Scripture any thing is so imposed as it cannot without sin be altered or neglected there is a divine institution but in the change of the Seventh day-day-Sabbath to the First such Consequences may be drawn from Scripture as will upon supposition of the change a strict it to the First day so as that cannot be altered or neglected without sin Ergo it 's of divine institution The question can be only of the minor which is made out from what is said in the third Proposition thus If these very grounds which plead the conveniency of the change simply do plead the conveniency of that change to the First day then by clear and unforced Consequence the first day is chosen and cannot without sin be passed by altered or neglected except we say these reasons have no weight but these very grounds will be found to plead for and to be applicable to the First day of the week a lonely and therefore beside all other days in the new world it m â—y be called the day which God specially made as it is the day of Christs rest from the work of Redemption answerable to Gods rest a â—ter the Cre â—tion c. and therefore as being most conducible to that end the First day cannot be without sin past by neglected or altered 2. Thus if the very day of Christs rest in the new world be to be rested on and sanctified as the Sabbath then the First day is to be rested on and sanctified but by Analogy from the works of Creation we may see that the First day of rest after the finishing of the work of Redemption is to be sanctified Ergo c. and Psal. 118. is very considerable to this purpose wherein there is 1. a Prophecy of Christ. 2. Of a day which God hath singularly made for us to joy in 3. That day is the day wherein the rejected stone is made the head of the corner which day is clear from Rom. 1.4 to be the resurrection day yea suppose that day there doth signifie the time of the Gospel wherein we should joy yet even that way the First day is by proportion that day eminently wherein Christs Victory was manifested and so the day wherein Christians ought especially to rejoyce The second way we may reason for the change to be by divine Institution is
till the morrow but not till the day following and therefore they behoved to dress it also yea Jesus Christ went himself to a Feast on the Sabbath Luke 14. that he might take that opportunity by his spiritual discourse to edifie the Company as he did notably which he would not have done had it been unlawful to dress any meat on the Sabbath yet his carriage was such at that Feast most remarkably that it would be followed as a pattern by such as may be invited by others to eat with them and shall be disposed to go on the Sabbath And if this were the design of the inviters and invited mens eating together on that day would not readily prejudice the sanctification of it as very often it doth Such is â—lying on the Lords day from a destroying enemy and in other warranted cases Matth. 24. defending our selves against unjust violence c. 6. Works of comliness tending to honest or decent walking as putting on of clothes honestly making the house clean from any uncleanness that may fall in it throughout the Sabbath c. By all which Believers have allowance 1. for piety 2. for charitie 3. for what is needful for their beasts 4. what is needful and convenient or comly for themselves and more is not necessary In these the Lord hath not streightned them neither hath he pinched and pinned them up to absolute necessitie but hath left them to walk by Christian prudence yet so as they may not exceed for the Disciples possibly might have endured that hunger and not pluck't the ears of Corn or beasts may live a day without water and not be much the worse or some sort of Victuals may be provided to be set beside men on the Sabbath needing no dressing or preparing yea a man may live on little or nothing for one day but the Lord hath thought good not to streighten them so as to make his day and worship a weariness and burden unto them seeing he hath made the Sabbath for man to be refreshing to him and not man for the Sabbath nor will he have their Consciences to be festered with inextricable scruples He leaveth it to men on other dayes how much to eat and drink by a Christian prudence yet allovveth them not to exceed even on these so here there is some latitude left to conscientious reason to vvalk by for some may do something at one time and not at another yea one man may take more pains in upholding his body then is called for from another vvho is stronger so that it 's impossible to set particular rules vvhich vvill agree to all but men vvould look 1 to their end 2. to their need 3. to vvhat may conveniently attain the end Yet it is needful here to add some qualifications or caveats lest folk indulge themselves too much and exceed under the pretext of the former libertie vvhich the Lord hath condescended to leave men at 1. That men vvould see that the necessity be real that real sickness keepeth at home that real hazard maketh them flie or maketh them bide at home that it be such a necessitie as they cannot contrive a vvay conveniently to evite vvhen it cometh or could not foresee before it came 2. Men vvould see that that necessitie be not brought on by themselves If the thing might have been done at another time that necessity vvill not excuse though if the sin be taken vvith and repented of and Christ fled unto for the pardon of it vve may go about the doing that lavvfully vvhich sinfully vve have necessitated our selves unto as suppose one had got vvarning to slie the day before to bring such a Physician or to provide such drugs c. if he did it not then he sinneth yet vvhen necessity cometh he may still do it but not vvith a good conscience till he first acknovvledge the former fault of his neglect 3. It vvould be adverted if that thing may be done as vvell another time or may not vvithout prejudice that is considerable be delayed till the next day Thus taking or giving of physick on the Lords day making ordinary civil visits beginning voyages c. vvill not sustein and bear vveight before God vvhen folk do them that day to have their ovvn vvork day free and so put by the proper duties of the Lords day for some things that may be done the day or daies follovving Thus rest is commanded Exod. 34.21 even in sovving time and harvest because the necessitie is not clear but dependeth on ordinary providence and folks are to expect occasion and opportunities for them aftervvard 4. Men would take heed that they have not a tickling complacencie that such necessities fall on the Sabbath and be not glad to have diversions from the proper duties of the day They would go about such works with a sort of sadness though yet with clearness and peace of conscience as to their lawfulness Therefore Christ saith to his Disciples Matth. 24.20 pray that your flight be not on the Sabbath day because it would be heavy to Gods people to slie on that day though it was lawful 5. We would see that it marr not a spiritual frame and that in doing these we turn not to mind the World as on other dayes There would be still a respect to the day in our frame which is called for in the word remember and even when our hand is otherwayes imployed the heart should not be taken up with these things but so far as is necessary to the acting of them 6. It would be adverted to that they be done without irregularity and so as not to give offence by them hence it was that Christ ever gave the reasons of what he did on the Sabbath lest others not knowing our necessity judge us guilty of Sabbath-breaking or be involved without necessitie to do the like 7. Folks would have great respect to the end in these works and to the motive which swayeth and putteth them on If it be outward gain or fear of some temporal loss as if for gaining money a Physitian should go rather on the Sabbath then on another day to save the life of a man that turneth then to be a servile work and one of his ordinary Week day calling to speak so So if a Minister should preach with respect to gain or applause on the Sabbath or if any man should make a visit for a meer civil end as we visit on other dayes without a sutable respect to spiritual edification or furtherance of Piety it will marr all and will be found a breach of the Sabbath 8. We would beware of spending too much time in these things but would endeavour timely and quickly to expede and dispatch them and rightly to trust them Dressing of meat and trimming adorning and busking of folks bodies will not be found a well spent part of the Sabbath when it shutteth out other duties and getteth too much time as it doth with many By all
Gospel neither vvas it as vve conceive ordinary to stone the presumptuous prophaneners of the Sabbath even amongst the Jews yet vvill this be no good reasoning men do not now execute punishments upon Transgressours of the first Table as on Transgressours of the second therefore Transgressions of the second Table are greater sins then Transgressions of the commands of the first for so vve vvould be in hazard to postpone all the Lavvs or Commands of the first Table to these of the second but vve are to consider that temporal punishments are heightened or lessened according as the peace and order of civil Societies may be more or less therein concerned so that it is not by these measures that we are to make the estimate of the greatness or smalness of sins in the sight of God and in order to his righteous and absolute judgments and therefore it 's enough that vve enquire vvhat God hath done and vvill do and vvhat sinners may expect from him hovvever men may over-look and pass them by yet before God they are often taken notice of and plagued even in this life and vvill be for ever â—ereafter if they repent not We may novv therefore in the close exhort beseech obtest and charge you all as in the sight of God vvho is a severe avenger of them that ye vvould be avvare of the sins vvhereby this command is transgressed Particularly guard against 1. Not preparing for it or not remembring of it many prophane the Sabbath ' ere they come to publick yea before it come in some respect 2. Carnal thoughts and a common frame of heart yea even to speak so a particular frame that looketh both to our ovvn condition or case As not stirring it self to be over and above that to be affected vvith God and his glorious vvorks of Creation and Redemption to give him praise for his marvellous goodness on that day there is alass generally little delight and praise in his vvorship even on his ovvn holy day 3. General unedifying discourses of the news of the time of health and other things not necessary to that day 4. Little profiting under the Gospel and not growing in knowledge and practise many a Sabbath is thus prophaned few getting or seeking the blessing of it or on it 5. Going to the fields and visiting of Neighbours to put off a piece of time that so much time may be saved on other dayes of the Week wherein many men think they have more to do and not seeking to edifie or to be edified when they visit Certainly by this going abroad and running up and down the streets unnecessarily ye indispose your selves ye offend others and tempt them to follow you ye slight either duties in your families or in secret or it may be both in a great measure I suppose that if ye made conscience of these there would not be so much time to go abroad Take some other day for recreating your selves â—f ye say ye have then somewh â—t else to do And have ye nothing to do this day Or will ye t â—ke more boldly from Gods day then from your own Is Sacriledge less then taking what is your own What if all did so gad abroad And it m â—y be they have no less reason What a Sabbath day would we have There is a remarkable word Exod. 16.29 that on the Sabbath none might go out of his place which though it be not to be understood as restraining exercises of piety or works of necessity and mercy as we shewed before yet it would seem to be the meaning of the words that on that which we call taking the air and on visiting there was a restraint thereby intended 6. Mens sitting upon choice in the Church at such a distance that they can scarcely hear and that they may the more securely confer together on common purposes so that they do not so much as aim to profit of whom we may appositely say as Christ said of the Priests that they prophaned the Sabbath and are blameless That they some way keep it and are guilty many also sleep vary and wander in their thoughts and are as stones and statutes in the Church 7. Little ones and boyes going and running up and down playing and making a noise and servants gadding all which will be charged on Magistrates Ministers Elders Masters and Parents who are not conscionably aiming and endeavouring in the diligent use of all sutable means to amend and prevent such abuses and to punish continuance in them â—specially look to it when few plead or appear against such sins 8. Much idle loitering over of the Sabbath doing nothing and much sleeping it over Idleness is a sin any day much more on this day 9. Little care of sanctifying the Sabbath when men are from home or when they are not in their own Congregations when they are not in their own Houses or have not any to take the oversight of them There is much liberty taken this way and there are many complaints of it What my Brethren Doth not the Sabbath require as strict sanctification abroad as at home If any should ask remedies of all these and such like evils I know none better then these that are in the Command it self The first is remember what 1. Remember by-gone failings and repent of them 2. Remember coming to Judgment that ye may be found of it in peace as to this or any other guilt and endeavour to prevent it 3. Remember to be all the Week over in your worship and walk minding it A second is be well imployed throughout the Week and be not given to idleness or laziness in your particular Callings nor in spiritual Exercises there will be no sanctifying of this day without that be not therefore slothful in business but fervent in spirit serving the Lord Rom. 12.11 3. See that nothing unbecoming the rest of the day be admitted no manner not only of deeds but of words or thoughts 4. Let every one take inspection of others and seriously mind it in your several places as ye are called 5. Follow Gods example in other things as it 's proposed to you for your Imitation and ye will do it the better in this 6. Aim at the blessing as well as at the duty hang on himself for life and strength to discharge the duty and for the blessing since he is the Author and Bestower of both and do the duty delightsomly and with joy through the faith of his blessing and acknowledge his unspeakable goodness in priviledging you with his day and the worship thereof still waiting on him and trusting in him for whatever good may come to you in it THE FIFTH COMMAND Exodus 20.12 Honour thy Father and thy Mother that thy dayes may be long upon the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee OUR Lord Jesus Christ Matth. 22.37 summeth up the whole Law in these two words which he calleth the two great Commandements Thou shalt love the Lord thy
be no material or Typical Temple because of the Moral things there being expressed and Prophesied of under the names of the Old-Levitical-Services yet could not a Warrant be inferr'd from them for these and that Jure Divino if the things were not Morally to bind which were so signified Hence I argue if the Sanctifying of a Sabbath as a piece of worship to God be Prophesied of to belong to the New-Testament then are we bound to the Sanctification of a Sabbath as a necessary Duty but the continuance of Sanctifying a Sabbath unto God is specially Prophesied of and foretold as a piece of worship under the New-Testament Ergo c. The third place is Matth. 24. v. 20. Pray that your flight be not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath-day where the Lord insinuateth that as Travelling is troublesome to the Body in Winter so would it be to the minds of the Godly for he is now speaking to his Disciples alone to Travel on that Day specially and solemnly set apart for God's worship now if there were no Sabbath to continue after Christs Ascension or if it were not to be Sanctified there would be no occasion of this grief and trouble that they behoved to Travel on the Sabbath and durst not tarry till that Day were by-past and so no cause to put up this Prayer which yet by our Lords Exhortation seemeth to infer that the Sabbath was to be as certain in its time as the Winter And doubtless this cannot be meaned of the Jewish-Sabbath For 1 ◠That was to be abolished shortly 2. Travelling on the Jewish-Sabbath was to be no cause of Grief unto them if indeed all dayes were alike neither would it be scrupled in such a case by the Apostles to whom he now speaketh 3. Besides if no Sabbath were to be it had been better and clearer to say Stand not and griev not to Travel any day but his words imply the just contrary that there was to be a solemn Sabbath 4. He mentioneth the Sabbath-day only and not the other Festivals of the Jews which were to be kept holy also and by this he distinguisheth the ordinary Sabbath from those other dayes and opposeth it to many as being now the only Holy day on which they should eschew if possible to Travel and would therefore pray to have it prevented for in the New-Testament the Sabbath spoken of as the solemn time for worship is ever meaned of the Weekly Sabbath and other Holy dayes are called the first or last day of the Feast and therefore if the Lords meaning were that they should pray that their flight might not be on any of the Jewish Holy dayes to mention the Weekly Sabbath only would not be sufficient for that end To say that it was for fear of scandal that they should pray not to be put to flye will not remove the former reasons besides at that time the Apostles and other Christians had given up with the Jews and stood not on scandal in such things in reference to them on whom as the Apostle faith 1 Thes. 2.16 Wrath had come to the uttermost and who were not infirm but malicious and so in respect of offence to be dealt with as the Lord did with the Pharisees and therefore all things being considered it appeareth from our Lords words that a Sabbath among Christians was to be Sanctified 40. years or there-about after his death which proveth that the Scripture mentioneth a Sabbath to be Sanctified under the New-Testament We come unto the second way of making out the Morality of this Command to wit by shewing how the Scripture speaketh of the whole Decalogue and thus we reason 1. If all the Commandments of the Decalogue be Moral then must this be so also for it is one of them and if it were not Moral and binding there would not now be Ten words as they are called by the Lord Deut. 10.4 but Nine only which at first blush will and cannot but seem strange and absurd to those who have from Gods word drunk-in that number But all these are Moral and binding as is granted by all except the Papists who deny the second and therefore score it out of their Catechisms And that they must be all alike Moral and binding may be made out these two wayes 1. All of them in the Old-Testament had alike Authority Priviledges and Prerogatives which neither the Judicial nor Ceremonial Law had as 1. To be distinctly pronounced by God himself without adding more Deut 5.22 2. To be written by His own finger in Tables of Stone Exod. 29.18 3. To be laid up and kept in the Ark Exod. 25.1 ◠And if these and other Prerogatives did put a difference and shew a difference to be put betwixt the other Nine Commands and all Judicial or Ceremonial Laws Why not betwixt them and this also 2. In the New-Testament they are all alike confirmed when the Law in general is spoken of none of them is excepted and therefore this Command is necessarily included For which we should look first to that place Matth. 5.17 Where our Lord in a special manner intendeth to vindicate the Moral Law and to press holiness in Moral Duties upon His Hearers even in another sort than the Pharisies did Think no ◠saith He That I am come to destroy the Law and the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfill Verily he that breaketh one of the least of these Commands and teacheth Men so shall be called least in the Kingdom of God c Where by Law must necessarily be understood the Moral law for he was thought to be a Transgressor of that and especially of this Command in it for that Sermon in Mathew cometh in in order after His being challenged for breach of Sabbath Joh. 5.10 c. And His scope is to wipe off that Imputation and how by shewing that He still presseth the Moral law even beyond what the Pharisies did 2. It was the Moral law especially which the Pharisie s corrupted and whereof he undertaketh the Vindication and it is Holiness in Obedience to that which he presseth as necessary beyond what the Scribes and Pharisies did and indeed it was in that law they failed mainly and not in the Ceremonial law 3. The offence and mistake that Christ is to praeoccupie and rectifie amongst His Hearers requireth this for many of them sancied that by the Messiah there should be a Relaxation from the Duties of Holiness called for in the Moral law and therefore saith He think not so now a Relaxation from some other laws might have been thought of warrantably 4. It is such a law whereof to teach the Abrogation at any time is sinful and pernicious therefore it is certainly the Moral law Secondly We reason thus when He speaketh of the law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or by way of eminency meaning no doubt the Decalogue He speaketh alike of all its Commandements even of the least of them and so
one of these wayes set down 3. It hath the Particularity in it that all the rest have to wit To be in the Singular Number Thou shalt c. To shew That it speaketh to every one in particular Yea though all the Commands concern all Ranks yet only here are Son Daughter Man-Servant Maid Servant and Stranger expresly mentioned as comprehended in it 4. There is a special Equity holden out here in the Proportioning of this time There are Six Dayes given us to Labour on and therefore it is all the Reason in the World that the Lord have the Seventh And if this Concession of God's of Six Dayes to work on be Moral For all the time is God's and we cannot for our use take any part of it but by His grant and there is no other Grant But this dividing and proportioning of Time betwixt him and us in which Division too he hath given us by far the large â—t Share to wit Six parts of Seven Then must the setting a part of a Seventh Day be Moral also And so the Command it self wherein both are comprehended viz. The Sixt given to us and the Seventh reserved for him they must needs stand and fall together For they Mutually put each other Thou shalt labour Six Dayes and Rest on the Seventh Thou shalt Rest on the Sabbath Day and Labour Six 5. This Day is claimed by the Lord as a thing wherein he hath a special Propriety It 's the Lords Day â—or though he did give Six yet he reserved a Seventh And can or dare any say That he discharged that or dispensed it away from Himself to any other If not it must be His still and cannot without Sacriledge be other wayes applyed Obedience to this Command is pressed by an exceeding Weighty Reason drawen from God's own Example which maketh it clearly Relative to it 's First Institution Gen. 2. Where it is said That He Rested after Six Dayes Work the Seventh Day viz. the whole Seventh Day and so should we which is the more effectual for proving the Morality of this Command Because 1. It 's a Reason that took place even in Innocency and so respecteth no Type or Ceremony 2. It is Universal belonging to all Men who are God's Creatures And therefore since the Reason is perpetual so must the Command be like-wise 7. This Command alone and beside all others is expresly pressed in the observation of it not only on Masters and Rulers for themseves but as taking burden on them for all under them and within their Families to endeavour the sanctifying of the Lord's day with them and by them as well as by themselves whereby the extent of this Command is clearly and earnestly holden forth in more express terms than in any other of all the Commands though this be implyed in them also 8. The observation of it is pressed and encouraged unto by a special blessing which He hath annexed to the time set a-part by himself He blessed it that is He made and still maketh it useful and refreshing as a special blessing to his people who keep his Ordinances seeking Him therein this day has a double portion and increase beside any other day for his Peoples Repose Edification Comfort finding of His Presence c. And to say now that this Solemn-time were not moral were to â—ob the Church of a great blessing seeing this day set a part by God for his Service hath the blessing beyond any other day commanded on it and in the experience of his People often hath it been found to be so 9. It is specially and singularly ushered in with a M â—mento or Remember which is not expressed in any other Command and Shall we think that where God saith Remember there is nothing to be taken notice of or shall we think that it saith not Remember now as well as then and if so Who can warrantably forget that which he biddeth remember which is not to keep the Seventh day but the Sabbath holy unto the Lord And may not all these Characters putt together in one Command so many not being to be found in all the other Commands if put together May not all these I say convince us that it is the Lord's purpose to have this Command standing obligatory in its substance to the end of the world Which is so pressed that if there be little help from Nature's light to determine the day or to press its observation it may be strongly born-in by the more clear and weighty reasons And so we come to the fourth way proposed for making out the morality of this Command which is by adducing some Arguments drawn from Scripture The first whereof is If the Law bind under the New-Testament not only in respect of its matter as its natural nor only as it is repeated in the New-Testament but also by vertue of the Authority enacting it then this Law of the fourth Command though not explicitly determined by nature and though it were not mentioned particularly in the New-Testament must be binding also for it hath that same Authority But the first is true and is acknowledged generally by Divines excepting a few and is clear by Christ and his Apostles their citing of it as supposing it to be binding Therefore the last must be true also 2. Arg. If this Command be founded on moral grounds then it self must be moral But the grounds on which it is founded are moral Ergo c. 1. It is moral that God should have a solemn and chief set-time 2. That he himself and none other should determine that time seeing no other could do it and bless it 3. These reasons-in the Command it self dividing time into six parts of it to us and a seventh part to God and God's resting after six days working with his making only seven days in the week and employing six of them to work c. these reasons I say are all moral and bin â—ing now as before 3. Arg. If all moral duties be contained in the ten Commands then this Command must needs be moral But the first is true Ergo c. This Command containeth a moral duty which is in none of the preceding Commands to wit the stinting and determining of the solemn and chief time to be set a part for God's worship to be one day of s â—ven It is true Time is commanded to be allowed to God's worship in those other Command â— wherein the duties of worship themselves are commanded for worship cannot be performed more than any other duty without some time but that the chief time should be so much and so often is only determined in this Command from which it appeareth 1. That an indefinit time of worship or for it is not the morality of this Command because this followeth necessarily as being supposed needful for the performance of every positive duty contained in the other Commands its morality therefore must be The determining of â—hat definit time 2. We may hence
see a reason why there is no new Command for this in the New-Testament because this standeth in the Law neither are Thou shalt not Swear Kill c. mentioned as new Commands more than this so â—hat had they not been mentioned in the New-Testament as some are not yet had they still obliged It is just so as to this and the reason why they are mentioned may be supposed to be because the main fault about them was defect and short coming but in this it was excess which our Lord also regulateth by holding forth the right observance of it and clearing what was wrong and so is supposed to confirm what he repealeth not 4. Arg. If it be not free for men to carve out God's solemn chief time of worship at their pleasure then is this Command moral for that liberty is restrained by this Command and no other But it is not free for them to choose what time they please or to carve it out This seemeth to be only questionable which is therefore thus confirmed If it be free to men to carve out what solemn and chief time is to be given to and set a part for God's worship then either it is free to them to choose no time at all or it is free for them to choose a longer or a shorter than this But neither of these can be said not the first as is clear not the second because it will not so quadrat â— with the end for if the time be shorter it incroacheth on God's due if it be longer it incroacheth on God's concession of six days to work in If it be shorter it incroacheth on God's due as is said and our souls good if longer it incroacheth on our temporal Calling and Can any restrain man when God giveth him liberty Again If it be free to men so to cut and carve at pleasure on the solemn and chief time for God's worship it s either free for all men together to agree on a day even one and the same or its free for each Country or each man to choose what day they please but neither of these are either possible or practicable to edification therefore must the day be determined to them and if so then sure by this Command And so it s still binding and cannot in that respect be altered without sin which was the thing to be proved 5. Arg. That there is a morality in a Seventh day we may argue from four famous and main Witnesses The 1. whereof is the general practise of all Christians I say nothing of Heathens Apostles and generally all in the Primitive times have ever thought that one day of seven is to be observed and have in less or more accordingly observed it 2. As the Pra â—tise of all so the Judgment and opinion which is often more sound than m â—ns practises of all doth confirm it Was there ever any Churches that did not in all their Catechisms and Canons take in this fourth Command with the rest do not all Writers who comment on the Decalogue comment on this Command and urge the sanctifying of the Lor â—â— day from it 3. Take men â— Consciences for a third Witness and it will be found that for no sin do they more frequently and more sharply challenge then for Prophaning of the Lord's day The Conscience directly making use of this Command and of the M â—mento and other reasons in it for aggravating of that sin when yet it will say nothing for the Seventh day but this first-first-day of seven it presseth most exactly neither will any reason all â—aged against its morality quiet it and the more te â—der that Christians be the more will they find a pressure of Conscience for obedience to this Command and the more easily will they be convinced of and sadly challenged for the least breach of this Command 4. God's Dispensations of Blessings or Plagues especially in spiritual things bear witness to this Truth Doth not experience tell us that those who make mo â—t Conscience of keeping this Command are often yea ever the most thriving Christians as to universal holiness and tenderness and most near and intimate Communion with God and will not the unsutable sanctification of but one Sabbath or the interruption of their wonted seriousness therein give them a sore back-set and on the contrary doth it not appear that those who are gross and untender in this are often gross and untender in all manner of Conversation and are followed with spiritual plagues of hardness deadness and Hypocrisie at the best or else fall into gross outward acts of prophanity or into errours in judgment which are the bad and sad effects of prophaning this day on them who pr â—judg themselves of the bl â—ssing of it and if the blessing of this Law continue must not the Law it self be moral and perpetually binding the obedience whereof hath this blessing perpetually more or less annexed to it as the prophanation thereof hath usually Plagues at least spiritual There are some Objections that are moved against the morality of this Command I shall speak to three of them which are most insi â—â—d on 1. Obj. This Law is not mentioned as being renewed or confirmed in the New-Testament Answ. 1. It 's Authority dependeth not on the mentioning of it so in the New-Testament the Law is God's Word and hath its Authority as well as the New-Testament 2. What if some other clearly mo â—al and binding Law had been omitted or not mentioned in the New-Testament as there seemeth to be no palpable and expre â—s Command again â—t Images though there be against will worship sure it is enough that it is not repealed in it so it is here as is said 3. Sundry other positive Laws are binding which are not mentioned in the New-Testament such as these For a man not to Marry his Sister or his Aunt c. 4. It will be â—ound on the matter to be confirmed when we shall see what warrant there is for the Lord's day which is one of seven and yet is clearly holden forth in the New-Testament But this Command as also that relating to Idolatry are so little mentioned because the I â—w â— after the Captivity were not so much in the defect of obedience to these Commands but were rather disposed to a superstitious excess which maketh Christ often rectifie that abuse of the fourth Command but never to annul it The third Command also anent Swearing might be said to be abrogated because it is not so positively asserted in the New Testament 2. Obj The Apostle Rom. 14.5 6. Gal. 4.10 Col. 2.16 seemeth to cast away difference of times especially of Sabbath-days which could not be if this Command were moral Answ. The Apostle cannot be understood simply to cast away the observation of all days as a bondage so to make all times alike For 1. That would contradict his own practise and the practise of the other Apostles for it is clear
Six dayes even the last Six of the week Ergo they do not determine the Seventh day primarily the connexion of the major seemeth to be very clear For first these must stand and fall together if the concession to call it so concern us in the Six working dayes so must the reservation of a Seventh 2. As the concession concerneth us in the Six working dayes so must the prohibition of work on a Seventh of rest for the one determineth the other if the concession be for Six in number so must the prohibition be for a Seventh in number but if the concession be of Six in order then it is the Seventh that is to be reserved and if the Seventh be related to in the prohibition of work then the concession must look to the first Six dayes which it doth not as we have shewed And therefore 3. seeing the Six dayes concession looketh to Six in number so many thou mayest or shalt work together and no more the prohibition must also respect the number to wit a Seventh and not the Seventh day the minor will be clear to the Judicious considerer by a particular application of the reasons of the fourth command Further if the concession respect not the number but the order as it must if the prohibition of work on the Seventh respect the order and not the number then 1. what warrant have we for our Six work dayes if it be not here where is it for sure we cannot take Gods time without his order and warrant 2. and more especially then could not we by vertue of this command plead allowance for working Six dayes different from the first Six if so we would not be astricted by the command to sanctifie one seeing the one inferreth and determineth the other and they must go together which were absurd Yet again it may be made out that the reasons press a Seventh and not the Seventh by considering the words and force of the consequence in both The first reason is Six dayes shalt thou labour but the Seventh is the Lords 1. It sayeth not take the first Six but of Seven take Six to labour and give the Lord the Seventh for he has reserved it to himself 2. The same equity is in the inference for a Seventh that is for the Seventh if not more he has given thee Six therefore give thou him a Seventh will conclude more formally then give him the Seventh a Seventh is the seventh part of time as well as the Seventh which is the equity the command goeth on 3. Had the command intended to inferr the Seventh primarily it would have been more clearly expressed thus he hath given thee the first six therefore give thou him the Seventh The second reason from Gods example inferreth the same he wrought Six and rested the Seventh do thou so likewise and so these that work Six and rest a Seventh as we now do follow Gods example as well as they that wrought Six and rested the Seventh did Arg. 5. If the positive part of the command must be expounded by the negative contra then it concerneth one of Seven and not the Seventh But the first is true 1. The positive part commandeth a day without respect to its order therefore the negative doth so 2. The negative is to be resolved thus ye shall not work above Six not thus ye shall not work above the first Six as the event cleareth 3. If it be not the first Six but Six that is in the concession then it is not the Seventh but a Seventh that is in the inhibition but the first is clear Ergo c. Arg. 6. If this command for the substance of it concern us as being moral and bind us to the First day and the sanctifying of it equally as it obliged the Jews to the Seventh then it 's one day of Seven and not the Seventh which is intended primarily by it But it bindeth us to the First Ergo That it 's moral and bindeth us now is cleared Thus 1. it either bindeth to this day or to nothing therefore it primarily granteth Six and not the â—irst Six for labour and by clear consequence intendeth primarily a Seventh and not the Seventh for a day of rest 2. If it be a sin against th â—s command to break the Lords day or Christian Sabbath and prophane it then it obligeth us to it and that directly â—or indirectly and by consequence the breach of the Sabbath is a sin ag â—inst any or all of the three former commands 3. If the prophaning of the Sabbath be forbidden on this ground because it is the Lords as it is in this command then prophaning of the Lords day is equally forbidden in it because it 's the Lords and is now appropriated to him according to his own will 4. The Testimony of mens Consciences and the constant challenges of all when tender as being guilty of breaking this command whenever they prophane the Lords day do convincingly hold forth that this command concerneth us and are as so many witnesses of it and consequently prove that it is not the Seventh day but a Seventh day whether instituted or to be instituted by God which is the substance of it and primarily commanded in it for it 's never counted a breach of this command to neglect to sanctifie the Seventh day neither do the Consciences of well-informed Christi â—ns challenge for that though they do most bitterly for the other as is said In sum suppose now the first day being instituted that the command were to sanctifie the Sabbath we would understand it of the First day because it 's already instituted and the s â—me reasons will inforce it even so the Seventh day came in then because it was formerly instituted beside the Sabbatisme signifieth not this or that day but what day soever shall be by God solemnly set or is set apart for holy rest and the comm â—nd will run for our observing the Lords day supposing its institution a â— well as it did for that although it more directly tye them yet it doth so but as a reason even as the preface prefixed to all the commands and the promise affixed to the fifth concern them literally yet are binding in so far as they are moral as appeareth by the Apostles applying the last Ephes. 6.2 without relation to that particular Land or People but as applicable and common to any Land or People making conscience of obedience to Gods commands But here it may be objected 1. The Jews kept the Seventh day Answ. 1. Not by vertue of this command but by its prior institution even as they were obliged to S â—crifices and Circumcision by the second command though they were not particularly named in it 2. So we are obliged to the keeping of the First day of the week by this fourth Commandement yet it followeth not therefore this is expresly commanded in it there being indeed no particular day primarily at least instituted in it 2.
the change and its consistency with this command To the first then this command doth morally and perpetually oblige to these â— That there be a solemn time set apart and observed for Worship 2. That this should be one day of Seven 3. That it should be such a day the very day which God commandeth the Sabbath of his appointment whatever day it should be 4. That it be a whole natural day of twenty four hours yet having an Artificial day together undivided 5. That six and no more but six working dayes intervene and that these be together in a Week and therefore 6. That the Sabbath be a bounding day dividing one working Week from another if then six working days must be in one week and go together this will follow also that the Sabbath must be the first or last day of the Seven As for the Propositions clearing the change and consistency of it with this command the first shall be this The Sabbath may be changed from the last or Seventh day to the First day of the week without any derogation to this command or inconsistency with it for all that is moral in it to wit a day and one day of Seven and a bounding Seventh day leaving six for work together remaining untouched by the change beside the Seventh day not having its Institution from this command expresly and directly but only accidentally the particular day whether the Jews Seventh day or the Christians First day of the week being supposed by the fourth Commandement as instituted or to be instituted elsewhere as is said and it 's first Institution Gen. 2. being only a positive and temporary Law may be therefore changed and yet the fourth Commandement keept intire we need not insist in further prosecution of this Proposition much being spoken to it on the matter already 2. Propos. Not only may the Seventh be altered from what it was under the Law to another Seventh day under the Gospel but it is meet and convenient from good reasons even in the Command that it should be so For 1. If these two ages before Christ and after him be looked on as diverse worlds and if the Redemption by Christ at his coming be accounted the making of the one as Gods Creation was of the other then it 's meet that when the world is renued by Redemption the Sabbath day should be changed for memory of that as well as it was instituted at first for the memory of the former there being the same reason for both But they are looked on as two distinct worlds and called so in the Plural number Heb. 11.2 and this last world distinguished from the former Heb. 2.5 and the redeeming of the one is looked upon as the making of the other therefore from that day forth the day of rest is to be such as may relate to both now the day being changed to the first it remembreth us of Gods rest at the Creation by distinguishing Six days from the Seventh and it remembreth us of the new Creation by putting Christs Resurrection in the room of the former Arg. 2. If the new world be a work as much for the Glory of God and as comfortable to men vvhen it s begun and closed or finished by the vvork of Redemption as the making of the old World vvas then the day of rest of the new World is to be made to relate to that much more if the Redemption of the World be more for the Glory of God and for the comfort of men then by the ground on which the Seventh day was at first instituted it 's also again to be changed to vvit the memory of Gods great vvork but both the former are true Ergo or thus if the ground that made the Seventh to be chosen for the Sabbath in the old World be changed in the new and that ground agree better to another then to it then it is to be changed But the ground whereupon the old Seventh day vvas preferred is now changed and there are grounds to prefer another day to it for the same ends therefore it is meet the day be changed also Or thus if the perfecting of the vvork of Redemption and the rest of the Mediator after it be as much to be remembred as the vvork of Creation and Gods resting after it then the day is to be changed but so it is Ergo. Arg. 3. If by Christ in the new World all the Levitical Services be changed and the Ceremonial Worship of that day then it is meet that the day also should be changed 1. For shewing the expiration of that Worship and Law it being hard to keep that day and to distinguish it from the Jewish former Worship 2. To keep Christians more from Judaizing and to abstract them even from former Services of the Sabbath now abolished just as now no particular family hath the Priesthood as Levi had it before nor no particular Nation hath the Church confined in it as that of the Jews had though these vvere not typical properly yea it vvould be such a day as vvould point out the evanishing of former Ceremonies vvhich the in-bringing of the first day abundantly doth Arg. 4. If the Worship and Ordinances of the new Gospel-world be eminently to hold their Institution of Christ the Mediator and to be made some vvay relative to his Redemption past then it is meet for that end that the Sabbath day be changed so as it may be dependant on him as all other worship is that is moral-positive or positive moral and that cannot be done vvell if the former day be kept unchanged at least not so vvell as vvhen it is changed but the former is true all Gospel-worship holdeth of him Sacraments Prayers Praises Ministry c. now Sacraments as they â—eal are not ceremonial for the tree of life vvas instituted to be a seal of the Covenant of vvorks in the state of Innocency before the fall vvhile there vvere no typical Institutions of a Saviour to come and so Sacraments as they are Seals may be continued as perpetual pieces of Worship vvithout hazard of typifying a Saviour to come therefore he instituted new ones and that with relation to his work of Redemption considered as past Hence also his Prayer or Pattern is called the Lords Prayer and his Sacrament of the Supper is called the Lords Supper because instituted by him and relating to him in this Sence it is peculiarly said Heb. 2.5 That God put in subjection to him the vvorld to come different from vvhat vvas before and he is put as the Son in the Nevv Testament in the place of Moses vvho vvas the Lavv-giver and faithful Servant in the Old Heb. 3. upon this ground vve think that day is called Heb. 1.10 the Lords day to bring it in a dependance on Jesus Christ and to make it respect vvhat is past of the vvork of Redemption Arg. 5. If the day of solemn publick Worship be a piece of Gods Worship
that day and by mentioning of the day for that end that that day was their most solemn day and that the Old Seventh day was not so at least necessarily imployed by them 5. Neither is it like That Paul who was ready to depart would have stayed for the first day of the week if there had not been some solemn worship in that or that he would have passed the old seventh day-Sabbath especially to the marring of his other occasions had they been equal if more sanctification had been required in it then in the First day of the week or that he would have so much insisted in religious publick worship on that day if the former Seventh had been imployed in that service but here the Church being constituted of believing Gentiles there is no mention of the old Sabbath but as of another common day of the week yea 6. Pauls spending this whole day in that service and continuing his Sermon till midnight yet accounting it still one day in solemn meeting doth confirm this day to be more than an ordinary day or then other days of the week as being specially dedicated to these Services and Exercises and totally spent in them 7. It 's said that the Disciples c â—me together they were not sent for that day but they came together being called and accustomed so to do on that day and as being put to these duties by the day as the proper Exercises in which it is to be spent Hence we may argue If the Apostles and primitive Christians did observe the First day of the week as their prime and chief time for solemn publick Worship and did pass over the old Seventh day then is the day changed from the Seventh to the First day of the week but the first is cleared by the former Instances Ergo c. And if these meetings on that First day were not such as used to be formerly on the seventh day I desire to know a reason 1. Why their meetings on that day should be particularly recorded rather than their meetings on any other day and then 2. Why the one is so oft mentioned and the other never to vvit that they met the second third day c. of the week Or 3. If their meeting on this First day now after Christs Ascension be not like his going to the Synagogue on the Seventh day-Sabbath and doing such and such things on the Sabbath that day being most frequently mentioned before whereas now there is deep silence of that day and the first day is reco â—ded in its room neither can the Scriptures speaking of the one and silence in the other be for no purpose or for any other purpose And as the practice of the Church holdeth out the change of the day so doth the Title given Rev. 1.10 to the first day of the week to wit the Lords day confirm the same whence we argue If the Title which by the Lord and his people was given to the Seventh day-Sabbath under the old Testament and under which and by vvhich he claimeth a Seventh day in this command If I say that Title in the New Testament be not given unto the Seventh but unto the First day of the week then is the day changed from the Seventh day to the First and the First falleth now under this command as the Seventh formerly did but the former is true the First is styled as the Seventh was and as this command styleth and claimeth the day to the Lord to be observed for him therefore now is the Sabbath changed from the Seventh day to the First day of the Week The Titles whereby the Sabbath is distinguished from other days and peculiarly claimed and marked by God as his and that in this same command must certainly evidence that day which he hath set apart and doth claim as he applyeth them And therefore if these Titles be given and applyed to the first day now it must needs shew a succeeding of that day unto the former Seventh for during the Observation of the Seventh day these Titles were not nay could not be applyed to the First no day being then the Lords but the Seventh Now we find that the Seventh day-Sabbath is in the Old Testament styled by the Lord under these Titles and so claimed by him 1. It 's called here the Sabbath of the Lord or to the Lord that 's the Lord's as contradistinguished from the Six days he hath given unto us a day that he hath right to and not we therefore called the Lords Sabbath 2. Isaiah 58.3 It 's claimed by the Lord as his my Holy Day which is so called 1. to distinguish it from other days 2. To stamp it with the Lords mark in respect of it's use for it is not to be applyed to our use but to his own it being his in a special manner But in the New Testament after Christs Resurrection the Seventh day is not so styled and claimed but the First day of the Week is Rev. 1.10 I vvas saith John in the Spirit on the Lords Day In which place these things are clear 1. That after Christs Ascension there vvas a peculiar day belonging to the Lord beside and beyond other days 2. That it was not the old Sabbath for 1. Johns scope being particularly to clear the time of the Vision by the Circumstance of the day the particular day as distinct from other days to call the Sabbath then used amongst the Jews the Lords day had more obscured it then cleared it yea 2. In that it 's called the Lords according to the phrase of the new Testament it supposeth some relation to Christ the Mediator as being derived from him which cannot be said of the Seventh day Sabbath 3. That it was not any indefinite day of the Lord For 1. there is great odds betwixt the Lords Day and the Day of the Lord the former looketh to a constant special right and peculiar interest that God hath in that day beside other daye â— even as when the Seventh day was called his Day before the Temple his Temple the prescribed Service his Service and the Sacrament of the Supper his Supper c. 2. That day would be still dark to the Church if it were indefinite contrary to Johns scope 4. That it is and must be such a day as was commonly set apart by Christians to God as his and that with respect to Christ the Mediatour and such a day as was known to them And by the former practises it is clear that this day is the first day of the Week being the Lord Christ's day who now having conquered death and gotten the victory He doth therefore claim this day as a tribute to him This being clear that no other day can claim this title and that the First day hath good ground to claim it we may put it out of question that it is the First day or no day or if it were not the First that to no purpose were the
from this command If supposing still a change by the morality of this command the Seventh can be changed into no day but the first day of the week then is the change into the first day of divine institution for so that must necessarily be which is by vertue of a command but by this command no other day can be admitted for each week is divided in six working days and these together to us and one of rest and that to God now by changing it to the First God getteth one and we six and that together but if the day were the second third fourth c. it would not be so for the six working days would be interrupted which is contrary to that morality of the Command whereby our days are distinguished from his that ours for one week being fully by we may with the greater freedom give God his The third way we take to prove the change of the day to be by divine Institution is this â— If by the practise of the Apostles who were guided and inspired by the Spirit in things belonging to their Office infallible this day was observed as different from other days then there is a divine institution of and warrant for this day but by the practise of the Apos â—les this day is celebrated as different from and preferred to other days or as divine therefore it 's of divine Institution If the divine practise and example of the Apostles in things moral and common to all do not either suppose a divine antecedent institution or infer a subsequent then their practise and example which in these things is infallible and unerring will have no more force then the example of others which were absurd their examples being especially pressed on us and if in any thing their example be divine it must be in this so particularly and so well circumstantiated and where their meeting is not recorded to have been on any other second third c. day certainly their practise must be not only more then nothing but very significant and indeed in positive worship the Lord hath been pleased to be more sparing to say so and to leave us more to gather from Examples then in negatives as in the positive part of swearing admitting of Church members in government baptism and admission to the Supper yet none can say that there is no Scripture-institution in these where there may be such grounds or examples 4. The divine Institution of the chang may be argued from the title thus if that which is called the Lords be his by divine institution and separation from other things not so called then this first day must be his by divine institution and separation from other days but all that is called the Lords is his after this manner Ergo Let the minor be confirmed these three ways 1. By looking to what is called the Lords generally in the Old Testament as his house his Altar his Priests his Tithes c. are they not still his because by him separate for distinct uses in his worship 2. By looking more particularly how the Seventh day was called his day or the Sabbath his is not this the reason because it was appointed by him for his worship beside other days And can can any reason agree better to this 3. By looking how any thing is called the Lords in the New Testament there is no other or better phrase or designation to try by then that 1 Cor. 11.20 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is opposed to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 even as this First day called the Lords day is opposed to our dayes or common days and that is called the Lords Supper because instituted by him for such and such spiritual ends and uses And therefore there can be no better ground gotten for shewing why this is called the Lords day beside others th â—n by comparing it with other Scriptures and if in other things that phrase import a divine institution why not in this I do not mean that this is an institution or that it will prove that there must be a clear and express institution shewn but I mean this that it will inferr there is one and that it is divine seeing God is to choose and not we We might here again produce the four Witnesses already attested for the morality of this fourth Command to wit 1. the general practise of primitive Christians 2. their general opinion and judgment 3. mens consciences 4. the dispensations of God which will also all clearly depone in this about the change of the day Propos. 6. Although we know not the peremptory and precise time when this day was instituted and the very first day sanctified nor whether it was immediately by Christ or mediately from him by the Apostles instituted which is of no great concernment to the main of its institution yet we think it most probable that our Lord did from the very day of his Resurrection either himself institute it while as Acts i. v. 3. he taught them what concerned the Kingdom of God or did inspire his Apostles to observe it from that time forth Because 1. If it was not then instituted the Church had for some time wanted a Sabbath the Seventh-day-Sabbath being expired by the Resurrection 2. The reason moving the change and preferring the First day before others as in a nearer capacity of sanctification for that end was from that time forth 3. The Apostles practise of meeting and Christs keeping with them hath been from the first change even on the first two first dayes of the week John 20.19 26. 4. All the practises and other grounds whereby the change is evidenced suppose still the institution to precede which maketh i â— appear to be very ancient And so we resume and close these six propositions 1. The day may be changed from the last to the first 2. It 's meet it should be so and there is good reason for it 3. It can only be to the First 4. It 's so changed actually 5. It 's change is not by Human but by Divine institution 6. It s institution seemeth to be from the rise of the Gospel Church and the very day of Christs Resurrection Hence vve infer 1. Good vvarrant even Gods vvarrant for imploying the Seventh day to our selves seeing God seeketh but one day in Seven and novv has chosen and claimeth the First 2. Gods vvarrant for sanctifying the First-day-Sabbath or the Lords day as his institution 3. That the Lords day is to be sanctified by us Christians and that by vertue of this command as the Seventh day vvas by the Jevvs on its grounds We come novv to speak of the sanctification of this day vvhich is the main thing and for vvhich all the rest is intended vve shall first consider the precept and then 2. the reasons vvhereby it is inforced The precept is sanctifie it or keep it holy sanctifying of it is twice mentioned in this command 1. In the end it 's said God
end wherefore God did it to vvit that there might thereby be an excitement left to men to imitate God and that man might not only have Gods command but his example also to bind this duty on him If it be asked here vvhy God vvill have a day set apart for holy Exercises beside other days It may be answered 1. It 's meet that God be acknowledged Lord of our time by this Tribute being reserved to himself 2. Because man having but a finite understanding beside the now corruption of it cannot be intensely taken up with spiritual and heavenly things and with temporal and earthly things both at once o â— at the same instant for even Adam in innocency could not do that therefore the Lord hath graciously set apart a day for mans help in that 3. It 's to teach man that his chief end is to converse with God and to live vvith him and that he ought to care in his own affairs along the week and order things so as the Sabbath may be duly sanct â—fied vvhen it shall come in that sweet soul reposing converse with him 4. To shew man wherein his happiness consisteth it 's even in this to vvalk and converse with God and to be in his worship this i â— his rest 5. To shew the excellency of Religion and of the Works of Piety or of Gods Worship above mens Employments in earthly and worldly things It vvas a Sabbath to Adam in innocency to be abstracted from his labour for the worship of God the one is mens toyl the other is mens spiritual rest and ease far contrary to that which men in the vvorld ordinarily think and judge We see now how great and grievous a sin it is to break this command and vvith vvhat care this day should be hallowed For 1. It 's a Command of the first Table and so the breach of it is in some respect more then murther Adultery Stealing c. it 's included in the first and great Commandement 2. Amongst all the commands of the first Table yea all the commands this religious observance of the Sabbath is most forcibly pressed vvith more reasons and vvith more full and particular explication Because 1. All the commands hang some vvay on this and obedience is ordinarily given to them vvith the same readiness as this day is employed in Gods Service 2. It keepeth life as it vvere in all the rest and vvhen men are could in this so are they in all the rest 3. This tryeth men in their love to God best If indeed his company and service be more delighted in then the World And is a notable indication of the frame of the soul it maketh proof both of their state and frame as men are usually and habitually on the Sabbath so in effect are they as to these 3. No breach of any command hath more aggravations for 1. It is against reason and equity vvhen God hath given us so many and so good reasons for it 2. It 's high Ingratitude the Sabbath being a Mercy and a great Mercy indeed it is to be priviledged vvith access to converse vvith God a vvhole day of every vveek in duties of vvorship 3. It 's against Love God's Love hath instituted it and our Love should in a special manner vent it self to him on it 4. It 's cruelty against our selves for the Sabbath kept holy is backed with the promise of a special blessing and we by this sin prejudge our selves of that yea the Sabbath rightly spent is a mean both of holiness and of nearness to God of conformity to him and of communion with him it promoteth both So that it is eminently verified here that these who sin against this command â—in against and forsake their own Mercy 4. No sin doth more evidence universal untenderness and as it 's a sin in it self so it evidenceth especially when gross a very sinful and some way Atheistical frame and disposition as may be gathered from Neh. 13. Yea 5. It occasioneth and breedeth other sins it habituateth to sinning and hardneth against challenges so that men ordinarily become very gross and loose and fall in scandalous sins who neglect the sanctification of the Sabbath which is the quickner and fomenter some way of all duties and knitteth the two Tables of the Law together hence it cometh to pass that vve often hear men that have turned to be very loose gross and scandalous and some of them on Scaffolds and at Gibbets cry out of Sabbath-breaking imputing the one to the other as a main cause for by this sin men grow stout against challenges and formal in secret duties a â—d so at length sit quite up 6. No sin hath more sharp challenges for it and more sad Judgments avenging it then sins against this command have there been any men deeply challenged for sin or at death whether ordinary or violent brought to express and utter their challenges but sins against this command have been main ones The slighting of the Lords Sabbath made Jerusalem to be burnt with fire Jer. 17. last for this sin they are threatned with terrible plagues Ezek. 20.21 24. not only in temporal things v. 23. but with spiritual plagues to which they are given up v. 25.26 You know that a man was stoned for gathering of sticks on the Sabbath Numb 15. see also Exod. 16.28 and Ezek. 22.8 where the Lord accounteth Sabbath-breaking a refusing to keep his Commandements and Laws and a despising of his holy things O is it possible that a man can be well that breaketh the Sabbath or to vvhom it is not a delight If any should ask here if indeed the breaches of this command be greater sins then the br â—aches of the comm â—nds of the second Table and if so if God will be avenged on these severely For Answer premitting this one word that in comp â—ring breaches of the commands of the two Tables vve vvould compare sins of a like nature together that is sins of presumption vvith sins of presumption and sins of infirmity vvith sins of infirmity vve say that a presumptuous sin against the fourth Command if it vvere but to go unnecessarily to the door or to gather sticks is a greater sin then a presumptuous murther because it s â—riketh more immediately against God And that a sin of infirmity against the fourth command is greater then a sin of Infirmity against the sixth Yet we grant that presumptuous Murther is a greater sin then a sin of infirmity against the fourth command because presumption and high handedness in the manner of sinning in a sin little on the matter comparatively dareth God as it were and striketh immediately against him and so is an additional high aggravation of it beside vvhat it is in the nature of it And though our censures against presumptuous breaches of the Sabbath which are now as great sins as formerly as is clear from what is just now said be often more mitigated now under the
Eccles. 10.16 17. and the Land is cursed that hath Princes that keep not the bounds allowed which implyeth that the using of meat or drink without respect to its end and that in due season as God giveth all things Psal. 145.15 and as we should pray for all things Matth. 6. is a breach and excess 10. Consider eating and drinking either as going the length of evil or as having the appearance of evil where either of these is there is a breach since we ought not only to abstain from evil but from all appearances of it 1 Thess. 5.11 What hath been said agreeth both to sins of drinking and eating We shall now give some general rules the observing whereof will further discover the sins that are in the use of meat and drink either in the excess or defect The first is we should look to a right end both in eating and drinking which is threefold 1. Supream Eat and drink to the glory of God saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 10.30 thus vve may sin either in the defect or excess by disinabling our selves for any duty of his worship or by not adverting to this end this rule therefore saith we should be so swayed in quality quantity time c. of our eating and drinking as we may most glorifie God 2. Subordinate and so we ought to have a respect to others in all these hence it is that 1 Cor. 8 9. Rom. 14.20 there is a woe to him that eateth with offence thus by frequenting Taverns though we exceed not in drinking we strengthen others to follow our example to a greater length or it giveth them occasion to misjudge and misconstruct us so also the using of unlawful enjoyments in a too carnal and joval a way before carnal men give them occasion to think that we place some happiness in these things as they do 3. Our own strengthening and refreshing is an end to be looked to in the use of meat and drink and so when we weaken and indispose our selves by them we sin against this end 2. Consider the act it self of eating and drinking if it be excessive for the kind of meat or drink as too delicate c. or for the quantity too much or for the time that is spent too long c. it is sinful 3. Consider the manner If creature enjoyments be with delight sought for or excessively delighted in and folks become restless and anxious about them Matth. 6.25 and too eager in pursuing these things and too much taken up with them so that the seeking after them marreth contentment and the quiet frame of the mind then there is sinful excess â— Consider the effects in diverse respects 1. In respect of 〈◊〉 â—s outward estate or family and so a man sinneth when he eateth or drinketh beyond that which he may uphold or his condition in the world will allow and when his eating or drinking so may make himself or his wife and children fast for it afterward or to be much pinched 2. In respect of his calling if it divert a man from that and marr the work in his hand and make him break appointments set by him for finishing of other mens work which he might otherwayes have kept and much more if it indispose him for speaking of or doing that which concerneth his calling it is then sure in the excess 3. In reference to his body if it be weakned dulled or indisposed by the excess of meat or drink This is called Isa. 5.12 inflaming of them and is not allowable 4. Look to it as it affecteth folks reason and in less or more indisposeth them to conceive or judge of things aright much more when it raiseth a fury or madness and maketh them as reasonless beasts in their carriage it is excessive and to be eschewed no doubt 5. Look on it in reference to the spiritual duties of a mans christian calling as of praying reading hearing repenting c. the obligation to these duties laying on alway and our refreshments being in themselves midses to lead to the more chearful performance of them when by them we become more indisposed for them so as either to forbear them or to be formal or drousie in them that is sure not good but to be evited 6. Look to it in reference to the serious inward frame of the mind which these should have who ought to walk alwayes with God keep communion with him and be filled with the spirit whatsoever marreth that or obstructeth spiritual consolation or is inconsistent with it cannot certainly be good Hence Ephes. 5.18 to be filled with the spirit is opposed to excess in wine or drunkenness so that what is inconsistent with the one may be understood as belonging to the other and although this sensible joy of the spirit cannot be alwayes carried alongst yet none should incapacitate themselves for keeping up with it 7. Look on it in reference to our corruptions and the promoving of mortification when it either marreth this by dulling and weakning of the graces of the spirit or indisposing for their exercise or strengthneth and provoketh the former it cannot be but sinful being a feeding of the flesh a making of provision for the flesh as if we fostered our corruptions of laziness sensuality and other lusts when we feast our selves 8. Look on it with respect to its opposite sobriety and temperance what is not sobriety is excess and contrarily and sobriety being not only no excess but a denyed sober use of creatures there must be excess when the mind as well as the body is not sober in the use of these things 9. Look on it with respect to its end with which we began when it leadeth not to and fitteth not for honouring of God when it marreth our being useful to our relations and others either by taking up our time or spending our means that we cannot provide for them and supply them or indisposeth us for duties or hindereth a man from considering his own last end thus it is sinfully excessive 10. Look on it in reference to death and Christs second appearing for certainly our frame and posture in every thing should be such as we may not be surprised with that Hence is Christs warning Luke 21.34 Take heed that ye be not overcharged with surfetting gluttony and drunkenness and the cares of this life and that day come upon you unawares where he maketh not only the coming of the Lord an aw-band to keep from gross out-breaking into these sins but joyning them with the cares of the world he sheweth that there may be and oft is an indisposition for that day even from the inward frame of the mind occasioned by sensual inclinations and desires when nothing doth outwardly appear Now put what hath been said to tryal and ye will find that it is not only he who by surcharging himself staggereth vomiteth or hath no use of reason who in Scripture is accounted guilty of these evils but many more as will be
deliberation and choice and that on this ground drunkenness may in part extenuate the resolute pertinaciousness of the fact yet it aggredgeth guilt upon the person on the former account It was once answered by one who being desired to spare a person that had committed murther in his drunkenness and to impute it to his wine that he should so do but he would hang up the flagon wherein the wine was and seeing the man made himself so his punishment was just for had he not been the flagon of that vvine that sin might have been prevented Let me touch on some particular ills which it is possible are more abounding and less looked to then beastly drunkenness yet hateful to God and take not I pray the mentioning of them ill for they will by unstrained consequence follovv to be condemned by the former rules The 1. is the liberty that is taken by all sorts of persons in respect of meat as if only appetite or lust were their rule vvhich may be seen in that excessive and superfluous vanity which is in feasting wherein that is sensually spent which might be usefully imployed and often they that are most prodig â—l and profuse that way are least in charity and if they may pamper their own flesh or get the name of Good-fellovvs and good House-keepers though it be to such as have no need and though there be nothing or very little allovved for the supply of the necessities of the Saints or of others and much more vvith-held that vvay then is meet yet they think all is vvell 2. There is your tipling though ye drink not drunk your four hours as ye call them this drinking as ordinarily used is certainly not for strength and therefore as is clear Eccles. 10.16 17. by the opposition there it must be for drunkenness If many men vvere put to search in this particular it vvould be found that there is more expended on these in the year then is bestovved in charitable uses more time taken up in them then in religiou â— duties and more inclination to attend them then to hear sermons men cannot come abroad for this end they cannot shift their business vvithout hurt but for their company they can do both Prov. 23.29 30. Who hath woe who hath sorrow who hath contentions who hath babbling who hath wounds without cause who hath redness of eyes They that tarry long at the wine they that go to seek mixt wine Here you see vvho are the persons that have a vvoe and Gods curse on them and other inconveniencies are they not the tiplers even they that tarry long at the strong drink drink hovv much or hovv little they vvill Isa. 5.22 Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine and men of strength to mingle strong drink Certainly God hath made man and given him time for another end then that and hath not for that end given his creatures to men to be thus abused this cannot be eating or drinking in due season and I am persvvaded it is not for neâ—â—â—sity for our own health for the edification of others or for the glory of God What then can be said for it that it helpeth to pass the time which is pretended by many as an excuse is a part of its guilt and just accusation for it maketh the time to be lost which ought to be more thriftily and carefully spent and what chearfulness it is accompanied with is often carnal when is their spiritual discourse and what may be edifying and minister grace to the hearers at such meetings when do ye pray for the sanctifyed use of that time fellowship or drink if at all it is but seldom many a cursed four-hours is taken by some though all Gods creatures be good being sanctified by the word and prayer be exhorted therefore to forbear this especially ye who have place in government either Civil or Ecclesiastick do not ye make others to offend with your example nor strengthen these in their wickedness to whom ye should be examples of good incouraging them to go in and drink drunk in Taverns or Ale houses when they see you go in to tiple it is a shame to hear what drunkenness of this sort is to be found even amongst young men and others from whom we would least expect it 3. There is your drinking at bargains making so frequently without respect to the end wherefore drink was appointed and given as if ye were to honour drinking as a help to you in your bargains although this evil be now alas epidemick and hardly will a man that hath much business get it at all times shunned considering the humours of others he dealeth with yet certainly if ye would all set to it there would be no great difficulty of reforming it but if some begin not how shall it be done It is an uncouth and strange thing and even unnatural that neither a mans appetite nor his health nor the time of the day nor his ordinary dyet shall be the reason or occasion of a mans drinking or the rule whereby to try the convenient wh â—n or season of it but when ever a man shall make such or such a bargain with me or pay me for or get payment from me of such and such things that must be the rule of my eating and drinking what beast will be thus dealt with O how many irrational and almost infra â—brutal practises are amongst us 4. There is drinking of healths and constraining a pledging as it is called of them and thus by this means forcing or tempting or occasioning although it be willingly done by them drinking in others this is one of the highest provocations in drunkenness and a dreadful perverting of the end for which God hath given meat and drink neither health nor necessity calling to it For 1. this hath the woe appropriated to it that is pronounced Hab. 2.15 Woe to him that giveth his neighbour drink this is a great incitement and provocat â—on to drinking and how many times hath it occasioned drunkenness Again 2. whereas every mans own appetite should rule his drinking this maketh one man prescribe the quantity and quality to others and so one man or several men drinketh by the measure will and appetite of another which is unreasonable it being contrary to nature that men should drink all at one time and precisely so much and of such drink This even in Ahasuerus his Feast Esther 1.8 was forbidden Beside what can be the use of drinking of healths it cannot be the health of another whom we respect because that is to be expected in the approved way of prayer which is the mean that Christians ought to keep fellowship in for the health one of another and we suppose they are readiest to drink healths who are least in prayer for such whom they pretend to respect It was a notable saying of a great man solicited belike to drink the Kings health By your leave I will pray for the Kings health