that they profane Gods ancient Sabbath against the fourth Comm. of this Lavv and this shall be their ansvver that the fourth Comm. is partly Ceremoniall and that the old Sabbathday is Iewish and pertaineth to the Ievves only As for Protestantes vve tread in their steppes vp and dovvne saue that vve are not so impudently audacious as they for vve acknovvledge the second Comm. for Morall but come vnto the fourth Comm. and here vve iumpe vvith them saying the fourth Comm. is partly Morall partly Ceremoniall and the old Sabbath enioyned in the fourth Com. is Ievvish c. In respect therefore of Gods Sabbathes vvhich both they and vve deny vvee yeeld obedience to Gods Lavv but by halues and saying the fourth Comm. is partly Ceremoniall thereby vve are partiall in Gods Lavv against therefore this partiall dealing vvith God in his Lavves and ordinances shall the following partes of this booke be spent SECT II. The thing vvhich Almightie God intendeth generally in this Com. is hovv all the time and dayes of our liues should be spent and imployed in his seruice the vvhich is backed vvith an effectuall reason for my purpose is first to handle the commandement generally as in this second Section and then more particularly as in the thirth Section c. As for the time we haue a distribution of it in the comm and that into the Sixe dayes and into the seuenth day touching both of these God hath ordered it in this comm hovv he vvould be serued to vvit on the seuenth day by Sanctifying and Hallovving of it in the partes of his vvorship and seruice and a cessation from all seruile vvorkes on the sixt dayes by following some lavvfull calling or other vvich may redovvnd to the glorie of God according to that 1 Cor. 10.31 Whither therefore ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer yee doe doe all to the glory of God As for the reason it is a liuely mouing one it being fetched from God him selfe and from his owne ensample In this reason conteined in Exod. 20.11 vve haue also a distribution of time in to the sixe dayes and into the seuenth day vvherein it pleaseth God to declare vnto vs hovv he spent and imployed his time to vvit the first vveeke or seuenth dayes that euer the vvorld savv or heard of the sixe dayes that is those sixe dayes vvhich for order of number order of nature vvent immediatly before the first seuenth day or first Saturday that euer vvas these God spent in vvorking and in making the heauens and the earth and all the hoste of them This God hath reuealed vnto vs vnto this end for one that vve should in imitation of him make choyse of those same sixe dayes vvherin God vvrought that in them and none other vve should vvorke as God vvrought and in them vve should finish all our vvorkes as God in them finished all his vvorkes The seuenth day that is the seuenth day from the Creation or the first Saturday that euer vvas this day God spent in an holy cessation and resting from the vvorkes of creation and therefore this time this day aboue and before all other times dayes God blessed sanctified and this hath reuealed vnto vs to this end and purpose that we should in an holy imitation of God cease from the workes of the sixe dayes before and rest from all seruil labour and that we shold make choise of this very day to Sanctifie it and to hallow it like as God blessed it and hallovved it Novv that we are not left to our liberty in this imployment of the time and dayes of our liefe appeareth here by first because God hath commanded it and secondly God hath backed his commandement by a strong forcible reason dravvne from his owne ensample that we shold so imploy the dayes of the weeke as God him selfe at the Creation imployed them and this is noted by that rationall particle for Exod. 20.11 And this is that which God aimeth at in this com generally namely that we shold spend and imploy euery day and all the dayes of the weeke after the ensample of God or as God himselfe spent them The thing which Almightie God intendeth in this com specially and principally is the hallowing of that sacred time and day called the Sabbath day and the Seuenth day as in the third Comm. God inioyned the hallowing of his Sacred Name so in this fourth com God inioyned the hallowing of his Sacred day to wit the seuenth day the which him selfe had made holy aboue all dayes by his blessing of it and Sanctifying of it as we reade Genes 2.3 like as the king might say to his subiectes Remember my Coronation day to keepe it an holy day or Remember the Gunpowder Treason day to Keepe it an holy day so saith the king of kings Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy Exod. 20.8 Secondly the Sanctification of this day it is inioyned both affirmatiuely and negatiuely affirmatiuely in these words Remember the Sabbath day to Sanctifie it Negatiuely in these words In it thou sholt not doe any worke the affirmatiue parte of the precept requireth sanctity and the parformance of holy duties the Negatiue parte of the precept requireth a resting from laboures in our ordenary callings which hinder and thrust out those holy duties Thirdly the Lord God inioyneth vs in this comm tvvo things the one is the duety of the day the other is the dueties of rest from labours and the perfermance of sondry the parts of Gods worship and seruice in the day I call it the duety of the day because we are no lesse bound in duety to God to that day then to the dueties of rest and holinesse in the day or we are no lesse bound to performe the dueties of rest and holinesse on that day then we are tyed to performe the dueties of rest and holinesse them selues I cleere the point by these examples as in a bond you haue two essentiall parts the one is the some of mony to be paied the other is the day and time when it is to be paied and a man is equally and alike bound to both of these that is as well to the day as to the some of mony as appeareth by this that al though a man bring the full some of mony yet if he omit the day and come the day after his bond is forfeited And as in circumcision there was two things inioyned the one was the cutting off of the foreskine the other was the time and day when it was to be done namely vpon the 8th day Genes 17.12 and as in that other Sacrament of the passouer there was tvvo things commanded the one vvas the slaying and eating of the passouer lamb the other was the time and day when to bedone namely vpon the 14th day of the moneth Exod. 12.6.8 in both which Sacraments of circumcision and passouer the day time was no lesse a duety then were the actions to be performed
fidelity in Exposition as novv they must for they might see by their ovvne eyes plainly For example suppose we the 4th Com. were thus translated Remember the Saturday-Rest to sanctifie it if novv any doubt could be vvhich shold be the day appointed of God for Sabbath day it vvould easily be decided and that by an vnlearned man if any shold offer to corrupt the text by distinguishing of a Saturday and the saturday as they doe of a Sabbath and the Sabbath and of a 7th day and the 7th day as if there were more saturdayes in a vveeke then one he vvould be laught at for his paines Againe if any would goe about to turne Gods Commandement from the Saturday to the Sunday by this deuise because the word Sabbath signifieth a Rest and vve doe Rest now from laboures on the Sunday he vvold presently be ansvvered that that 's a friuolouse reason for the 4th Com. inioyneth not a Sunday-Rest but a Saturday-Rest lastly if any would be so idle as to apply the 4th com to the Lords day and expound it of the Lords day why euery child would see his grosse abuse of the 4th com for it directly speaketh not of the Lords day but of Saturday For it is not the name Lords day that God hath put into the 4th com but the name Sabbath day or Saturday Thus I haue showne what light would come vnto Gods commandement by the translation of the Hebrew word Sabbath and what fruit would come vnto euery one in the Church of God thereby if this I cannot obtaine yet this at least let me preuaile in that Ministers would be pleased hereafter in exposition of those words Sabbathday to signify vnto the people that thereby is meant our Saturday For this I haue proued abundantly and vndeniably both by Scriptures and by the Testimonies of both Iewes and Christians of all sorts Protestants and Papists this duety therefore in the true and faithfull exposition of Gods word vnto the people I require of them as they will answer the contrary before Almighty God at that Day let them bevvare of Sophisticating with Gods lawes when they expound them In the 4th comm God said Remember the Sabbath day but he said not Remember the Sunday or the Lords day nor remember the Monday the Tewsday or the Wednesday c. but remember the Sabbath day Now looke which day of the weeke was euer in ancient time named and called Sabbath day that is the day commanded in the 4th com If then they can shew me that either Sunday Lords day Monday Tewsday Wednesday c. or any day besids Saturday was wont to be named and called Sabbath day then may they haue some culler for their errour but now haue they none A second vse shall be against sueh Ministers as doe either expound the 4th com to belong to the Lords day or Sunday because then we Rest or else when the 4th com is vrged vpon them as requiring the seuenth day rest or Saturday-Rest they turne it off thus the vvord Sabbath signifieth in English a Rest now vpon the Lords day or Sunday we rest wherevnto I reply 1. that thus when God appointed the 7th day for his Sabbath day in his 4th com the people of the Iewes might thus haue answered God that the vvord Sabbath in his 4th com signifieth a Rest now when they keepe any one of those yeerely Sabbaths in Leuit. 23. they might say this vveeke vve haue kept one of those annuall Sabbaths suppose it fell vpon Tewsday or Wensday and in this day we had a Rest by this faire gloose might not God loose in that vveeke his morall weekly Sabbath inioyned by the 4th com which fell vpon Saturday and that because they kept a ceremoniall yeerly Sabbath that weeke vpon the Tevvsday or Wensday for vpon this Tevvsday or Wensday they did Rest What iugling trickes are these vvould a man beleeue it that Puritane Ministers professing the feare of God vvould vse such dissimulation and handle the vvord of God so craftily pardon me good Reader hovv euer I reuerence their holy profession yet I cannot speake of this their vile abuse of Gods sacred vvord vvithout indignation of spirit vvho that sincerly loueth God and his sacred Scriptures can passe it ouer in silence to see his holy vvord thus vvrested and basely abused Christmas day vvhen it falleth vpon some one of the six working dayes and so the Coronation day and so thos common holy dayes S. Mathews day S. Iohns day and the rest t is true we Rest vpon these dayes from our labours and that by an ordinance of our Church but will any be so absurd as to say that these holy dayes stand by vertue of the 4th comm because we Rest on these dayes or suppose the patrones of the Lords day vvho presse the 4th comm vpon it should vrge me to sanctifie the Lords day by the 4th com might not I answer them in their owne answer that the word Sabbath in the 4th com it signifieth a Rest novv on Christmas day and on Coronation day and on S. Matthews day c. vve Rest Secondly I reply be it that on the Lords day we rest vvhy this is not the rest spoken of in the 4th com for this is a Lords-day-Rest but the com calleth for a Saturday-Rest this is a first-day-rest but the com calleth for a Seuenth-day-rest this difference is bigge enough to be seene Finally if such ansvvers be lavvfull then vvhen wee meete with the name Iesus in a text wherin it is manifestly meant of Christ our Lord yet then may vve say vvhy Iesus it signifieth a Sauiour now Ioshua vvas a Sauiour for he saued the Israelits from the Canaanites c. but shall such cauilles goe for currant as by these trickes some men turne off the Lords Sabbathes so by the like may they turne off also the Lord Iesus their Sauiour it is but to play the foole a little with the name Iesus as they doe with the name Sabbath A third vse shall be against such Ministers as doe not onely in priuate but also in publike in their Pulpites call or miscall rather the Lords day Sabbath day in reference to the 4th com by reason of whose errour the people also haue learned to nick-name the Lords day calling it the Sabbath day But vvhat an horrible confusion of times and the proper names of dayes is this If this may goe on err long vvee shall scarce know one day of the weeke from another may not vve as vvell call our Saturday Sunday or our Sunday Saturday as call our Sunday Sabbath day which is Saturday if we shall make proper names of things common names vvhat an intollerable confusion doe we bring in to the vvorld Yet further if vve may call the Lords day which is holden to be a new institution Sabbath day by an old name why may we not call Baptisme which is a nevv institution Circumcision by an old name and vvhy may
for the dueties in the time either they haue vtterly abolished them also as hath bene showne or at the best they haue but counterfeit Sabbath dueties for true Sabbath dueties so much of the dueties Lastly they haue as hath bene showne taken away the very subiect matter of the 4th comm so as now God commandeth vs to Remember a nothing and to sanctify a nothing and so Gods commandement is made ridiculouse Loe this foule errour it is an errour worthy the discouery and high time it is that God should raise vp some man to discouer these things and to stand in defence of his 4th com and for this cause as I haue intitled my booke a defence of the Lords Sabbaths so haue I intitled it also a defence of the 4th com for you see how they haue by blotting out the Lords Sabbaths also defaced the whole commandement with them It is strang to see what violence this one finale portion of Scripture to wit Gods 4th com hath vndergone and it is the more strang considering the learning and knowledge of these times what vaine friuolouse distinctions of a Sabbath the Sabbath of one day in 7 of the Sabbath belonging to vs as it signifieth a Rest as it belongeth vnto all Nations that the time is a ceremony the duties in the time morall by all which they exclud the proper time in this 4th com and yet then againe to contradict themselues though the time of day be abolished yet still they will haue the day and a day out of the 4th com and a day too of 24 houres long and though the Sabbath day be abolished as they hold yet they vvill haue a Sabbath day still out of the 4th com too The 10. commandements they call them the Morall Law but bring them to this point of the Sabbath day and then they are become partly Morall partly ceremoniall they might as well say that that which in common speech they call white as the snovv that it is partly white partly blacke The Papists are blamed for making the 2d com Iewish and Ceremoniall and yet say we this 4th Comm. touching the Sabbath day is Iewish and Ceremoniall thus hauing contradicted our selues then vve fall to botching and cobling of the Commandement first it is fained that the Lords Sabbath day is abolished and vvorne out of vse and then to repaire the losse and breach againe that there may be a full number of ten Commandements the 4th comman wherein the breach vvas must be cobled vp againe the nevv leather where with all it must be amended it is the Lords day and it is put into the roome of the old and ouer vvorne Sabbath day so we haue now a new-old com or an old-new com whither you vvill for it is partly old and partly new Lastly as if all the former were not enough after sondry contradictions and after sondry fine distinctions whereby they haue violently torne a sunder what the Almightie hath inviolably and inseperablie ioyned together at last they cast them all quite away abolishing both time and dueties in the time and commandement all thes with others which I might reckone vp and with other violences and abuses which yet I am to discouer hath this one small portion of Scripture the 4th com vndergone I cannot thinke any one portion of Scripture in controversy betvvixt vs and Papists hath bene more wrested and abused by them then this by vs God amend it Paul telleth Timothy 1. Tim. 1.7 that there were some among them which desiring to be teachers of the law vnderstood not what they said nor whereof they affirmed This Scripture is verified of some Teachers in these dayes as may appeare by the premisses and as shall yet further appeare hereafter I come now to the word Remember and touching this word a reason may be demanded why the Lord should put a Memorandum vnto this com aboue any others of the 10 and why the Commandement should be expressed by this word Remember The common reason hereof rendered by diuins is to preuent carelesnes and forgetfulnesse on the six working dayes of the Sabbath day next ensuing least men should leaue some common workes of the six dayes to be done on the 7th day Sabbath this I confesse a trueth indeed but this is not all I suppose for if one demandeth a reason why God prefixed a Memento to this Com. more then vnto any other of the commandements this cannot be the reason because that by mens not forethinking of the Sabbath some vvorkes are left vndone on the six dayes to be done on the Sabbath day and so the Sabbath is profaned and the 4th com transgressed For seeing that vve are in like danger of breaking euery other of the Commandements by a carelesnes and a not forethinking of our dueties in them enioyned it should haue bene needfull therefore to haue had a Memorandum prefixed vnto euery one of the 10. Com. as vvell as vnto this 4th com least we breake them also through forgetfulnesse but since a Memorandum is put to this com and not vnto others such a reason therefore would be sought as agreeth to this com and not vnto others Novv in this point if I may take leaue to deliuer mine opinion I cannot finde out a better reason then this God foreseeing that after a long time that is about 364 yeeres after Christ for then was the Sabbath day abolished by the Laodicean Counsaile as afterwards you shall heare more this his Sabbath day vvould be not in part violated and profanely kept but that it vvould be vtterly and altogether blotted out of remembrance in all Christian Churches for 1200 yeeres together as it is to this day to preuent which forgetfulnesse and vtter neglect of his Sabbath day it pleased God to prefixe a Memento to this com that so if it be forgotten it might in time by one meanes or other be brought to remembrance againe which God graunt If we take a suruey of all the 10 Com. we shall find that nothing commanded in any of them is so wholly and vtterly buried and forgotten as is the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com vvhen they had buried Christ they laid a stone vpon him and sealed it to make all sure that he might neuer rise againe so haue they buried the Lords Sabbath day and least it rise againe they haue cast an heape of stones vpon it calling it Iewish and Iudaisme and a signe and shaddow and a buried abolished ceremony and vvhat not and all to bring it out of remembrance Now though Papists haue foully forgotten the 2d com yet all Protestants remember it well enough God be thanked I know not any one thing in all the 10. Commandements forgotten by Reformed Churches but this one thing onely to vvit the Lords Sabbath day and as for this this is forgotten of all both Protestants and Papists it was very needfull therefore that the Lord should prefixe a Memorandum to this
comm which vvere reason enough for vs to put a difference of dayes if we had none other We see then it is a friuolouse obiection to say the least of it for men to say it matters not so much which day we giue God for his Sabbath so be he hath one God is in loue with his owne choise no day can so please him as his owne chosen day The Iewes might as well haue said so be we offer Sacrifice in an house by a man it matters not which house nor what man yet God had chosen his Temple before all Housen his Priests aboue all men therefore they durst not alter Gods choise Might not we as well say now it matters not so much what man ministreth the Sacraments so be a man doth it nor what we drinke at the Lords Supper so it be liquor doe wee not abhorre such obiections If vve will keepe a Sabbath by the 4th com vve must betake vs to such a day onely vnto vvhich this reason of the Sabbaths institution mentioned in the 4th com doth properly belong it cannot be said of any of the other 6 dayes Sunday Monday Tewsday Wednesday Thursday or Friday that God blessed or sanctified any of them because he had Rested on them if therefore vve choose any of these 6 dayes 1. vve keepe a day vvhich God did not blesse nor sanctify for that end 2. We defeate disapoint God of his maine reason end vvhich moued him to ordaine command the Sabbath to blesse it and to sanctify it for because God had rested on the 7th day which is Saturday Therefore the Lord blessed the 7th day hallowed it Genes 2.2.3 I pray let this point be well obserued for it is of great consequence Vse 2. is it so that God hath sanctified hallowed this 7th day Saturday Sabbath hovv is it come about that this sacred time is novv euery where in all Churches so strangly profaned for as those Iewes dealt then with the Temple they bought in it sould in it changed their money in it Mat. 21.12 So doe we now profane the Saturday Sabbath by hauing markets therein by buying selling therein yea vve refuse not to doe the most base seruill drudgery vvorkes that the Kitchine hath on the Lords Sabbath day vve are farre vnlike our heauenly Father in the vse of this day he sanctified it we profane it he rested on it we worke on it he commanded vs to Remember it we forget it These things considered it is high time for euery man to make a serch inquisition to know what 's become of the Lords Sabbath and to be well informed of the reason why the Lords Sabbaths are now forgotten so strangly profaned The Priests lippes must preserue knowledge and people must seeke the law at their mouths Mal. 2.7 Wherefore I aduise people to haue recourse to their Ministers in this matter and in most seriouse manner demand of them what 's become of the Lords Sabbaths by what warrant this sacred time is now so profaned and if they cannot for the present giue you a sound reason desire them to take it into consideration to study the point better that so a full satisfaction may be giuen to Gods people in this matter or else a reformation may be sought it is no dallying the matter is weightie that a sacred day so hallowed by God should be now so profaned it standeth euery man vpon to haue sound arguments for it vnlesse he will be guilty of the sinne of profaning Gods Sabbaths weekly and transgression of the 4th com sleiting Gods example and president This one thing I dare confidently auovvch that no Minister is able to shew any text of holy writ which doth necessarily abolish this 7th day Sabbath as for those textes Coloss 2.16 Exod. 31.13 vvhich are their maine textes ther 's no necessity at all in them for abolition of the Morall Sabbath for there be ansvvers enough to them sufficient enough as shall be seene hereafter when we come to ansvver to all their obiections if those that oppose God in his Sabbaths did but please to retaine them and to sanctify them I am confident therefore that it is nothing but their meere willes pleasures that makes them inueigh against the Lords Sabbaths Let people therefore see to it what manner of arguments reasons they admit of from their Ministers for their profaning of the Lords Sabbaths which he hath hallowed sanctified let not euery trifling probable argument be auailable hauing but some liklihod to be so but let them call for such solid substantiall reasons as doe proue the abolishing of the Sabbath day necessarily cleerly vndeniably to the full satisfying of their consciences let Ministers giue them no reasons here for their iustifiable profaning of the Lords hallowed Sabbath but such as will hould currant before God at the day of iudgement when God shall call for an account of his sacred time holy Sabbaths neither let the people rest satisfied till they haue such reasons for their profanation of the Sanctified 7th day Sabbath as they doe verily beleeue are sound warrantable such as God will accept at their hands vvhen they shall be questioned therefore before his Tribunall for no probable contingent doubtfull arguments will then passe for current against an expresse commandement and so ancient sacred an ordinance as is Gods Sabbath I conclud this point with those words of the voyce from heauen to Peter Act. 10.15 The things that God hath purified pollute thou not So say I to Ministers when your people repaire vnto you for reasons to iustify them in the profanation of the Lords sacred holy Sabbaths haue a care least you dravv all the guilt of Sabbath breaking the sinne of transgression of the 4th com vpon your owne soules and that by your reasons you doe not pollute the things which God hath sanctified purified the Lords Sabbaths I meane the things that God hath sanctified pollute thou not SECT IX I come novv to the 3d thing considerable in the reason to the 4th com mentioned in these vvords For in sixe dayes the Lord made heauen earth the sea all that in them is rested the 7th day Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it These words sixe dayes you haue them tvvise mentioned in this 4th com the first time they are mentioned is in Exod. 20.9 and there they are to be considered as a commandement for they are deliuered in commanding termes The second time you haue them mentioned is in Exod. 20.11 and here they are to be considered as a reason and so much is manifest by the rationall particle for prefixed as you see Wherefore novv vve are to consider of these vvords as they are a reason vrged by God to induce vs to the Sanctifying of his Saturday 7th day Sabbath commanded in this 4th comm the reason is
to be applied to the com on this manner 1. On the 7th day thou shalt rest from thy labours because I the Lord thy God at the Creation rested from my worke on the same day or on the 7th day 2. On the sixe dayes thou shalt labour finish all thy workes so as nothing be left to be done on the 7th day because on the six dayes I the Lord thy God did worke finish all leauing nothing to be done on the 7th or Sabbath day Thus stands the reason in relation to the com as I conceiue it as in the former part of the 4th comm God presseth vs to the obseruation of the Saturday Sabbath by virtue of the 4th com in commanding termes saying Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it so in the latter part thereof God presseth vs to the obseruation of the same day by his owne example so then if either precept or president will auaile with vs if either an imperiouse commandement or a sweete gentle reason will auaile any thing with vs then vve must keepe Gods Saturday Sabbath and such with whom neither Gods commandement no nor yet his patterne example proposed for vs to follow will preuaile they shew themselues not children of God but rebelles to God God is pleased many times in Scripture to propound himselfe for our patterne as 1. Pet. 1.15 As he which hath called you is holy so be ye holy c. Our Sauiour Christ exhorteth vs to doe good to those which harme vs that so we may be the children of our heauenly father c. then he concludeth thus you shall therefore be perfect as your father which is in heauen is perfect Matth. 5.48 and so in this 4th com God hath set forth himselfe for our patterne saying Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it for I the Lord sanctified it on the 7th day thou shalt rest for on the 7th day I the Lord rested if therefore you will be led by reasons as reasonable men shold then let Gods reason take place with you or if you vvill be led by examples let Gods example be of force vvith you to keepe his Saturday Sabbath Wherefore laying aside Gods commandement I now vrge onely Gods reason vpon you and Gods example vpon you exhorting you in the vvords of the Apostle Be yee therefore followers of God as deere children Eph. 5.1 Hee kept the Sabbath day doe you so too But if yet you shall enquire which is the day I ansvver see but vvhich day of the vveeke it vvas on vvhich God rested at the Creation Genes 2.2.3 that is the day vvhich God persvvadeth vs to keepe else it vvere impertinent for God to persvvade vs to keepe the 8th or 9th day because he kept the 7th day The premisses the conclusion must be vnderstood of the same thing as Logiceans know well the 7th day therefore is the day to vvit the 7th day from the creation vvhich is Saturday for on this day God rested and to this day God persvvaded vs. The vse of this point is for the iust reproofe of our times vvith vvhom neither precept nor president vvill preuaile for neither Gods commandement nor Gods example can doe any thing now a dayes no nor yet Gods reasons can moue any whit if any of these 3 or if all of them together would take place with vs behold vve haue them all in this 4th com For 1. God commanded the Sabbath day 2. God kept it himselfe 3. He allureth vs by a strong reason taken from his ensample noted by the particle for How could a point be more thorowly pressed of all sortes of people vvhich come vnder this reproofe I find none more guilty then some of the Clergie for as for the Laity though they be guilty hereof yet a little matter would soone reclaime them but as for these of the Clergie they are intoxicated and euen drunken with reason Sophistry for Gods reason which he vseth here in this com to allure men to keepe his Sabbaths it is vvith them as no reason for either they will make this reason no parte of Gods comman or but as some needlesse appendix vnto it or let it stand still for a cipher as no reason at all so they make a shevv to imbrace Gods 4th com but not his reason which hee added to the same cōmandement it is the property of an vnreasonable man to reiect Gods reasons Or else by their subtill vse of reason they can tosse it as a man doth a Tennis bale from one day vnto another as if the reason must runne thus Therefore God blessed sanctified the 7th day because vve should keepe the 8th day therefore God hallowed the Sabbath day because we should sanctifie the Lords day As absurd as it is for the conclusion to be vnderstood of one day the premisses of an other yet can they put some culler or other on it whereby the simple yea themselues too are deceiued and this deceipt is the more dangerouse in that it is cullered ouer vvith a shevv of learning common people verily beleeue that because they are so learned conscionable therefore they vse their learning conscience in euery matter they medle withall I wish it were so Oh that Lot Dauid and Peter had alwayes vsed that knowledge conscience that was in them Were it the common people that violated Gods Sabbathes vve could soone check them with the 4th com with the example reason of Almightie God to the contrary but novv since it is the syne of Ministers no bonds nor reasons of God can hould them for they haue fond out so many distinctions answers obiectiones as they can both violate profane the Sabbath day yet againe make God man beleeue that they keepe the Sabbath day as you see none cale more for it then they witnesse their Sermons so these can profane Gods Sabbathes with a grace they can doe it defend it when they haue done they can doe it neuer blush at it these therfore are in a most dangerouse well nigh desperate case smale hope of repentance This one thing I demand of them let them put all their lerning all their honestie together try if by them both they can tell hovv to apply this example reason which God addeth here to this 7th day Sabbath vnto their 8th day Lords day Sabbath God hath vrged his Sabbaths 1. with a Memorandum prefixed to them more then to any other thing Commanded 2. with a Commandement 3. with his owne example 4. with a strong reason what may be the reason why these Clerkes professing to be Masters of reason Artes should not see or acknowledge these most reasonable things or should so foully misapply them as formerly we haue shovvne they doe It cannot be the difficulty of the point for that 's easy familiar nor can it be the strength of Scriptures against the Lords Sabbaths for
the abolishing them for they haue none necessarily prouing that point nor can it be the strength of Scriptures for the alteration of the day for they haue none to that purpose neither wherefore it must needs follow that the eyes of their reason are blinded with some sinister by respects or other I will propound some let their owne hartes iudge whither I haue hit the marke or not Many looke vpon the antiquity of the pointe rather then vpon Gods Commandement verely beleeuing the abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath the erecting of the Lords day Sabbath cannot possible be an errour it is so auncient as if errour could no be ancient Many looke vpon the vniuersality of the point an other Popish argument verily beleeuing it cannot possibly be an errour vvhich is so vniuersally receiued espetially many of them being religiouse Godly men as if a Godly man could not erre Many looke vpon the learning of such as haue professed it an other Popish argument as if lerned men could not erre Thus they that looke asquint at thes by respectes when they goe to iudg of the case in question rather then at those 4 maine things euen novv propounded to be considered in Gods 4th Com. it is no maruaile they cannot see the vvood for Trees Many looke before they will reade my booke or scane the point at the vtter impossibility of any reformation as if our dayes vvere vvorse then euer were any before therfore they haue no mind to vnderstand it thus they looke vpon Gods matters vvith carnall eyes vvho in other cases teach men to doe their duety leaue the successe to God should all men treade their steppes they would make all sure against any reformation since they vvill receiue no information Some are of opinion that God will vvincke at vs as he did at the Patriarks hauing many vviues since it is the practise of all Churches to doe as we doe therfore they vvill goe on regardlesse of any further knowledge of the point But such men may liue in adultery at this day vpon the same growndlesse opinion if but many others would consent ioyne vvith them in this wicked practise so as they might but haue this plea that all men doe so or that all Curches doe so I would not be thought to speake at rouers to guesse only in these obiections by respectes at what men may think for these myne eares haue heard men make the most of these obiections which here I propound Many before they vvill open the doore of their vnderstanding to this point first cast in their mindes vvhat a scandale it vvill be to their Ministry vvhat a discredit to their persones that they haue misledd the people so long therfore iudge it better to goe on still as they haue begunne they shall answer all a swell as theire forefathers vvho haue done the like and their people shall get to heauen in this wrong vvay as well as the people of former times did therfore they will none of the knowledge of this point but I should think people would more relye vpon their Ministers honestie fidelity credit their Ministry more if they saw them so farre to neglect themselues their credit as for Gods glorie the good of their people to reueale a trueth to them though it crosse what they had formely taught them Many thinke what shall I learne what I that haue thaught others novv in myne old age it is better to hould this for an errour so to reiect all thoughts of it but I should esteme that man not worthy to teach others vvho scorneth to learne of others Many thinke if they should giue any way to the knovvledge of this point they should but disturb the peace of the Church vve are novv at a swete concord it is better therfore to be ignorant of it c. But by this reason vve might haue remained all Papists vnto this day for had our forefathers vpon this grownd reiected Luthers doctrine had vve not all bene deeply guilty still of the syne breach of the second Com. Popish Idolatry yea what I pray is this better then grosse temporizing pleasing of the times Many thinke possibly it may come to passe that the profession of this point may cost them losse or hazard of their liuings wherby they are now comfortable maintained therfore it is good not to be first in the knovvledge profession hereof they think they may know it soone enough 10 or 20 yeeres hence to their cost let others breake the yee in the meane time But these men set more by a good liuing then by a good conscience they loue to serue God but it shall be no further then they may serue theire owne turnes they will serue God if they be suer once it will cost them nothing Many thinke it is not safe to be acquainted with this point least it intangle their consciences c. But thes men vvhilst they seeme to be of tender consciences bewray they haue no conscience or very corrupt consciences for if they had any conscience or any good conscience vvould it suffer them to refuse such a light in to Gods Lavv as vvould cause them to make a conscience of it were Gods Lawes and the knowledg of them made think you to intangle mens consciences doe not Ministers people both pray vse meanes to increase in knovvledge of Gods Lavvs are they novv afraid of the knowledge them when of tendred vnto them least their consciences should be intangled with them Many thinke happily it is a trueth it vvere not amisse if it vvere preformed for vve haue little to say for our Lords day as little against the Sabbathday but that such a meane obscure fallow as this Brabourne is vvho is such such vve knovv him vvell enough both vvhat he is vvhat he was c. that such a one should attempt this reformation our Spirits cannot brooke it But bretheren I haue often still doe vvish vnfeinedly in many respectes that God had put it into the harte of some other man an eminent person to haue informed in this case that so my meanenesse should haue bene no impediment to the progresse of Gods cause but God is vvont to glorify himselfe by weake instruments that so the praise may be to God not to the instrumēt that our times are no changlinges that they differ not from former times shall appeare by a storie I reade of in Peter Heylyns Microcosmos pag. 291. where it is thus reported In the time of Luthers reformatiō one Matheo Langie A Cardinal A Byshop of A Bishopricke of the greatest reuenews of any in all Germany ingenuously confessed that the Masse was not void of its faultes that the Courts of Rome were corrupted that a generall reformation of the liues of priests fryers was necessary But that a poore rascall Munke
for so he thought Luther saith the Author should beginne all that hee deemed intollerable not to be indured Thus you see scandall hath formerly bene taken at the meanenesse of the person great Clerkes will neither attempt the reformation of abuses them selues nor yet can they beare it that their inferioures should doe any thing neither the reason I take to be because in the former they are in danger to loose their greatnesse in the latter to loose their goodnesse it is lamentable to see how now a dayes the word trueth of God is receined with respect of persones and that among the best both Ministers people they inquire not now a dayes vvhat hee saieth and hovv agreeablie to the rule of Gods vvord hee speaketh but vvhat is hee whence comes hee is hee a lofte in the vvorld benifised with a good liuing richly attired is hee a man of note can hee coutenance vs and the point he speakes for these the like carnall childish respectes haue Christians in receiuing Gods vvord it would discourage any man almost that is lesse then A Doctour of Diuinity of the highest ranke for honour vvorldly dignities to be industriouse in the study of the Scriptures so as thereby to ad further light vnto profession because vvhat he saith shall be as meanly accounted of as his person is S. Iames saith my brethren haue not the saith of our Lord Iesus Christ in respect of persones Iam. 2.1 Who that looketh vpon these so many stumbling blockes with many others that might be showne can wonder that men of a sharp sight yea holy liefe should haue their eye sight dazâ—lled not see such a trueth as is encountered with so many difficulties were it such a trueth as the knovvledge publike profession thereof vvould stand vvith antiquity vniuersality publike applause approbation facility of reformation credit reputation liueings preferments then should I wonder vvonder againe if Ministers should not find it out presently professe it publikly but this is such a trueth as is at the first thoughts of it oppugned by a vvhole army of gaine saying obiections all vvhich are preualent vvith manes naturall corruptiones let not people therfore think it a thing altogether impossible for many Godly lerned Ministers to side it together against such a trueth to bewillingly ignorant of it and let such Ministers themselues serch out which of these obstacles here mentioned or the like to them hath so blinded their mindes dazelled their reason as neither Gods Memorandum prefixed to the Saturday Sabbath nor Gods Commandement nor Gods ensample no nor yet Gods reason perswasion all written in the Morall Lavv can preuaile with them to take in to Remembrance againe the Lords Sabbath day for doubtlesse there must besome beame or other in the eye of their reason which cannot see reason in Gods reason Before I conclud this section one thing more I would commend to your consideration this it is vvheras this 4th com generally considered hath two partes the one is the Commandement it selfe the other is the reason of the commandement as formerly I haue showne you that our Ministers haue by their renovvncing of the time in the Com. renownced abolished by iust consequence the whole 4th com also so much I am to discouer a further errour of theirs which is that by their abolishing of the time in 4th com to wit the Saturday 7th day Sabbath hereby also they haue nullified abolished the reason to the com which is taken from Gods owne example and conteined in these words For in sixe dayes the Lord made the heauen the earth the sea all that in them is rested the 7th day Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it All these words I say they haue vtterly nullified so as now they stand but for a cipher to fill vp an empty place What I haue charged them with I thus make good The argutum thing which God would persvvade his people vnto it is the obseruation sanctification of the 7th day Sabbath as you may see in the com foregoeing this reason to this end it pleaseth God to frame propound vnto vs a most notable liuely reason taken from his owne example to this effect Remember you to sanctifie the Sabbath day for because I sanctified the Sabbath day Doe you rest from vvorke on the 7th day for because I rested from worke on the 7th day therefore I hallowed sanctified the 7th day Sabbath Now suppose we that the 7th day Sabbath were abolished as they say it is which is the argutum or thing argued wherevnto God did by this reason perswade then what vse can there be of this reason which God here propoundeth for example now that Circumcision the Passeouer Sacrifices are ceased what vse is there now of those reasons wherby Gods people the Iewes were then perswaded to those dueties of Circumcision the Passeouer Sacrifices such is the case here take away the Sabbath day you take away the reasons that belonged to it to perswade vnto the sanctification thereof for what need reasons motiues to perswad vnto that which is not But happily they will say though vntruely that the Sabbath day is not abolished it is only but changed vnto the Lords day Well say we for this time grant them this for argument sake then thus I make it good against them the reason of the 4th comm cannot possible be a reason vnto the Lords day for it is most absurd for any man to thinke God should perswade vs to keepe the Lords day because hee kept the Sabbath day or that God should perswade vs to keepe the first day of the weeke because kept the 7th last day of the weeke Thus the conclusion the premisses should not be of the same but of sondry things For the day vvhereof the question is as novv they would haue it to vvit the Lords day it differeth much from the day mentioned in the reason to the com that thus 1. The day in the reason God rested in it but the day in the question God vvrought in it 2. The day in the reason God sanctified it and hallovved it but the day in their question to vvit the Lords day vve no vvhere reade that God blessed it sanctified it so the one differeth from the other as much as an hallovved or holy day doth from an vnhallovved or vvorking day If it be so then that this reason proposed by God cannot be applied vnto the Lords day then it follovveth that this reason is made by such as oppose the Lords Sabbaths a very cipher of none vse but to fill vp a voide place A very vvicked fact it is vvhosoeuer are guilty of it Yet further that this reason stands now a dayes since our Lords day is come into vse and the Sabbath day abolished as a meere cipher it
vvill further appeare if you doe but take a suruâ—y of the Sermons of Ministers in the Pulpit of their writings in bookes for of all the arguments reasons vvhereby they vrge people to the obseruation of the Lords day you shall neuer heare them make any vse at all of this reason the vvhich God himselfe hath thought most meete to be vrged and hath therefore annexed it to his com When did you heare any say it is your duety to sanctify the Sabbath day we now keepe because on it God Almightie rested from his worke and it is your duetie to keepe this Sabbath day because God did at the Creation blesse it and sanctify it No if they should vse these reasons their davvbing vvould be seene into euery man can tell them this Day that vve keepe is not the day wherein God rested but the day vvhere in he vvrought and this day is not the dâ—y vvhich God blessed sanctified for this day is the 8th day but God sanctified the 7th day vvherefore they are ashamed to vse this reason therefore they let it stand vntoucht thus it hath stood for a Cipher this many hundreth of yeeres me thinketh the consideration but of this one point should be enough to certify them that they are wrong for asmuch as they dare not presse this Sabbath we novv keepe vvith Gods reason annexed to his 4th Comm. now of all reasons that men can inuent what reason more forcible then that which is taken from Gods owne example that he rested on that day sanctified it but now this argument from the example of God is stale in the Churches is quite out of vse vvho doth excite stirre vs vp in thes our dayes from the example of God saying let vs keepe the Sabbath day for God Almightie kept it let vs rest from our laboures on the Lords day because God rested from his workes on this day let vs sanctifie hallovv the Lords day because God Sanctified hallowed it at the Creation Genes 2.2.3 let vs keepe the Sabbath day an Holly day for God made it an Holly day by hallowing it Exod. 20.11 Genes 2.2.3 Let vs honour it as the most auncient holly day it being as auncient as the world Genes 2.2.3 as the most honourable holly day it being made an holy day by God himselfe not by man Genes 2.2.3 all men follow the example of the king who would not follow this example of God the king of kings if it were vrged if therfore the Lords Sabbaths be neglected for want of forcible most preualent argumeÌ„ts reasons let such Ministers beare the blame who depriue the people of this so effectuall mouing an argument what a maruailouse thing is it that God should in his wisedome goodnesse to vs besids his Com. perswade vs by such mouing powerfull reasons as he hath annexed to his Com. yet Ministers are Mute silent as if ther were no such things in the Law word of God is it not meete that such af oule errour as this is should be discouered But suppose that some haue Sophistically by playing with the Homonymie of the word Sabbath improperly applied to our Lords day both deceiued themselues others so vrged a farre off this reason vpon our day surly they haue toucht it but lightly as glad when they are safely got off it againe least they should bewray all for example suppose a man that knowes the difference betwixt the day called Sabbath day in scripture and the day called Lords day the one being the 7th last day of the weeke the other the first day of the weeke the one being the day before the other the one being for memory of the Creation the other for memory of the Redemption if now a Minister should tell him it is his dutie to sanctify the Lords day because God sanctified the Sabbath day would not the man think the Minister iesteth vvith him since he knowes God sanctified the 7th day of the weeke but our Lords day is the 8th day or first day of the weeke since he knowes that the reason which he vseth speakes of the day named Sabbath day but the day he applieth this reason vnto it is of another name to wit the Lords day vvould he not thinke the Minister hath foully mistaken himselfe to misapply so the example of God to a wrong day for if the Minister would presse a man to sanctify the Lords day from the example of God he must bring an example where God rested on the Lords day and where God blessed sanctified the Lords day Wherfore to conclud this point either they are a shamed of Gods reason dare not vse it at all or if they doe they must play the egregiouse Sophisters vvith the peopse by playing with the Homonymie of the vvord Sabbath vseing it in an other sense then it is vsed by God thereby to couer their doubling from the eyes of the people but for the most parte of them I am suer they vse not this reason at all these doe lesse euill then those which abuse it Thus then you see they haue first abolished the whole 4th Commandement as elsvvhere I haue proued here againe you see they haue abolished the reason to the Com. Gods example now then let vs put them together then the totall some vvill be that they haue by abolishing the Time in the 4th Com. abolished also the vvholl Commandement not onely that but also the reason example of God annexed to the Com. so they haue made cleere vvorke for they haue taken away all euen all roote branch Thus you see then the time and 7th day in the Com. is of some consequence euen as the foundation is to the building vvhen as it being once remoued all comes tumbling downe let this time therfore be more regarded if you vvill haue the 4th com at all regarded SECT X. Hauing finished the Exposition of the 4th Com. discouered the manifould erroures shamfull abuses of it that I might yet further make these erroures appeare I purpose here to mention two things The former is to shew how our Congregations which is much to be lamented vvill for the must parte of them come shorte of their hoped for reward for Sabbath keeping that the residue doe but dally if not mocke vvith God this cogitation doth present it selfe to me when I think of the publike prayers of the Church for there the Mimister in the name of God with loude audible voice a mongst other of Gods 10 Com. pronounceth these words being the 4th com Remember the Sabbathday to keepe it holy Sixe dayes shalt thou labour doe all thy worke But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sone nor thy daughter nor thy man seruant nor thy maide seruant nor thy eattell nor thy stranger that
had mett with the reward of their dawbing doubling For as I suspected them so I find them like Moab Ierem. 48.11 setled on their lees like the men in Ierusalem Zephan 1.12 frozen in their dreges The second thing I purpose to mention for the further appearance of the abuse of this Comm. here follovveth wheras words argumentes vvill hardly auaile I purpose in the last place to try if sense will be informed for which purpose I will giue you an occular demonstratioÌ„ so as the sense of seing shall be conuinced of the abuse of this Com. That this may be I will set heere before your eyes the whole 4th com intirly as God wrote it in the Tables of stone furthermore as for these things vvhich so many Ministers say are ceremoniouse abolished in this Com. those things I will compasse about with a parenthesis or two halfe moone circles that so you may se which partes of the Com. they hold for Morall which for ceremoniall behould it thus Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it Holy Sixe dayes shalt then labour doe all thy worke But the Scauenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sone nor they daughter thy man seruant nor thy maide nor thy beast nor thy stranger that is with in thy gates for in six dayes the Lord made heauen carth the sea all that in them is and rested the 7th day Therfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it Loe which partes of this 4th Com. they make Ceremoniall abolished to wit all those wordes which are inclosed vvith in the parenthesis for the vvord day this they abolish for a ceremony by these Textes Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 for the vvord Sabbath that they hould for an abolished ceremony by these Textes Col. 2.16.17 Exod. 31.13 and for these words these 7th day is the Sabbath this is that vvhich of all other partes of the commandement they abhorre as a Ievvish ceremony so much for the commandement come we next vnto the reason of the com noted by the vvord for vvhich conteineth a most effectuall persvvasion from Gods ovvne example herin these vvords rested the 7th day doe stand for a Cipher no Minister at any tyme in these our dayes vseing thes vvords as a reason to moue and excite vs to rest on the 7th or 8th day because God rested at that time secondly these vvords the Sabbath day doe stand for a Cipher also for no Minister doth perswade vs in these dayes to sanctify the Sabbath day because God sanctified the Sabbath day to vvit the Saturday Sabbath for it is the Saturday vvhich God hallovved sanctified at the Creation Novv cast thine eye backe good Reader see the com behold vvhat they allow of it to be morall and hovv much of it they will needs haue to be ceremoniall like a cipher did thine eyes euer before behold such a mingle mangle such a hotch potch the 4th com is by these Interpreters become halfe fish halfe flesh A Lynsey wolsey A morrall Ceremoniall Commandement partly lasting partly faded There be many Statute Lavves in this Kingdome t is said many Lavvyers vvill doe much for money but can such an instance as this be showne vvhere the Lavvyers haue by their expositions pleadings so mangled any of the Kings Lawes as haue our diuine Lawyers who in this case haue taken away the key of knowledge Luk. 11.52 How can a mans eyes but abhorre to looke vpon behold any vvriting thus interlaced with parenthessese many hundreth of yeeres after it was written but how should a Christian looke vpon any of Gods ten commandemeÌ„ts vvith any patience to see them or any of them thus mangled defaced vvas God so mindfull to place all the morales by themselues in the Tables of stone to exclud the Ceremonials and vvright them elsewhere as vnsit to be matched vvith the lasting Morals and are there novv so many Ceremoniall words crept into this Morall law We reade in 2. Sâ—m 10.4 how King Hanun tooke Dauids seruants and shaued off the halfe of their beards and cutt off their garments in the midle euen to their buttocks and sent them away me thinke these men could not looke more ill fauouredly disguisedly then doth this 4th com Now it is thus barbared and notched by our late barbers If I would haue a thing vgly done indeed these men shall doe it for me Furthermore the indignity offred vnto this com is such as it is not now onely shamefull to looke vpon but also it is by their corrupt exposition made very non-sense ridiculouse to this purpose let vs collect together so much of this comm as they allovv to be memorall and omit that vvhich they make ceremoniall that is so much as is put within the halfe moone circles see what a peece of senselesse stufe there will be and this then it is Remember to keepe holy Sixe dayes shalt thou labour doe all thy worke But of the Lord thy God thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sonne nor thy daughter c. see if by their distinctions subtilties they haue not picked out the heart and sense of this com by picking out the time Thus for the comm but further for the reason which God hath annexed to his com taken from his resting on the 7th day and from his sanctifying and hallowing of the 7th day this reason I say hath not onely some vvords pickt out of it as had the com but vvhich is more the vvholl reason it selfe as God laid it dovvne vvrote it in Tables of stone is vtterly by them abolished vselesse no mention of it in these our dayes thereby to excite persvvad people to the obedience of the 4th com Wherefore by your eye sight you may behold the abuse of this comm and by your obseruation you may take notice how the reason to the com is nullified two remarkable things to be obserued The consideration of these things me thinke should plead strongly against all the enemies to the Lords Sabbaths that so all their reasons they bring against them should be suspected reiected because by their abolishing his Sabbaths they must needes make such hauocke of Gods 4th com as you see Their textes of Scripture also Col. 2.16.17 and Exod. 31.13 with the rest are to be suspected as corrupted grosly abused by them seeing that they vvill so vrge presse them against the 7th day Sabbath in the 4th com as that by one text of Scripture they will mangle another so vnderstand one text of Scripture as it shall eate out the very bowels of an other so setting Scripture against Scripture the text Col. 2.16 shall eat out the bowels of the 4th com yea this text Col. 2.16 with other the like certain reasons they haue shall picke out the very heart sense of the
for counsaile aboute the matter and all their vvites frends should be imployed for to find it out as they vvould haue it if it vvere possible but novv the Tyeth of Gods Lavv or a portion of the tieth at least is detayned from God and from themselues by themselues and here they vvill neither runne nor ride nor aske for Counsaile in this case no nor accept vvelcome it vvhen it is brought thrust in to their heades it giues a man to suspect that these loue more vnfeinedly a good liuing then Gods law Nay I cannot but thinke that if I had tendered vnto some Ministers a liuing of 50l. or 60l. a yeere that vpon no better euidence title then in my former booke I tendred them the Lords Sabbaths I cannot thinke I say that any man in the kingdome could wrest it out of their hands In a word these that are so mindelesse of Gods lavv vvhen they are so mindfull of their owne liuings like as God said vnto his people the Iewes when they neglected the building of the Temple yet were diligent to builde themselues houses Is it time for you to dwell in your seiled houses and this house lie waste Hagg. 1.4 So may I say vnto them Is it time for you yee Ministers to enioy your liuings when the Lords Sabbaths lie waste God must haue a rekoning of you for these things This rule being applied to common people will detect them also Is it so that whosoeuer loueth Gods law in trueth he will with all redinesse willingnesse imbrace the knowledge of the vnknowne partes thereof Then if I shall make it appeare that most men are vnwilling to imbrace the knowledge of the vnknovvne partes of Gods lavv it vvill follovv very suspiciously that most men doe not loue the law of God in trueth what euer they say thinke to the contrary Thus I make it good against them The doctrine of Gods Sabbaths is a parte of the lavv it is the vnknovvne part of Gods lavv Novv the knowledge of this being tendered vnto men they bevvray their vnwillingnesse to be taught instructed in it that two wayes the one is in that vvhen the matter cometh to tryall they admit of insufficient Artificiall arguments for they preferr feeble and weake reasons before strong and able reasones the other is in that they admit of insufficient Inartificiall argumēts for they admit and allow of dissallowable and vnsufficient Testimonyes to decide this controuercy by vvhen these two things are made plaine the case vvill goe cleere against them for a foundation first of all suppose we the point in controuercy to wit this vnknowne parte of Gods Law touching his Sabbathes is as disputable contingent questionable as doubtfull as you will in so much as in your very consciences you thinke it may be it may not be a trueth and that it is as likly not to be true as to be true let all this be granted perhaps there is some reason it shold be granted seeing that it is a point not heard of before by common people neither haue they euer spent any time in the study of the point Well be it so I proceed then For the first to vvit that vvhen the point of Gods Sabbaths comes to be argued people yea Ministers also admit of insufficient arguments preferring them before able strong reasons and this shall appeare by comparing together the reasons brought onboth sides the reasons brought for the Lords Sabbaths among others are these 1. Gods expresse Com. Exod. 20.8 Remember the Sabbath day and In it thou shalt not doe any worke 2. Christ ratified it vvhen he vvith so vehement an Asseueration auovvched the duration of euery iot and title of the Lavv vnto the vvorlds end saying Verily I say vnto you vntill heauen earth perish one iote or one title of the Law shall not escape vntill all things be fulfilled And againe whosoeuer therfore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.18.19 On the other side the reasons brought against Gods Sabbathes by those which are the enemies therof are these Gal. 4.10 ye obserue dayes and moneths and times and yeeres c. and Col. 2.16 let no man condemne you in meate drinke or in respect of an holy day or of the new Moone or of the Sabbath dayes Novv let these argumēts on both sides be laid into the ballances they for the Lords Sabbath in to the one ballāce they against the Lords Sabbath in to the other ballance and then iudg thou good Reader vvhither hath the greater weight For breuitysake we wil compare onely these two textes Exo. 20.8 and Col. 2.16 The one thou seest is a Commandement and a Morall Commandement it toucheth the very point in question to vvit the 7th day Sabbath yea that the 4th Com. intendeth the seauenth day Saturday Sabbath is so plaine as vvas it neuer doubted of by any The other thou seest is a dissvvasion from Sabbath dayes indefinitly that is from some Sabbath dayes for the Apostle saith not all Sabbath dayes in generall but Sabbath dayes as of some Sabbath dayes in speciall so then this texte toucheth not the point in question to wit the 7th day Sabbath but other annuall ceremoniall Sabbaths if this Text did make ought against the Morall 7th day Sabbath it must speake of all Sabbathes generally in the largest sense that so the Morall Sabbath might be included condemned too but the text doth not mention the note of generallity all neither is it necessarily to be collected for 1. their owne expositers as Perkins Dod Greenham Elton Ames with diuerse others as shall be shovvne doe limite this text vnto some Sabbaths as vnto the ceremoniall yeerly Sabbaths and. 2. The text giueth light vnto it for it condemneth onely such things as neuer vvere vvrote in the Morall Law as meate and drinke and new moones c. and therefore vve iudge the Sabbaths condemned in this Text to be onely such Sabbaths also as vvere neuer vvrote in the 10 Commandements as their yeerly Sabbaths so the vveekly Sabbaths in the 4th Com. stand still vntoucht by this text 3 suppose vve that the Apostle had spake not onely of Sabbaths plurally but also of Sabbaths generally had vsed the particle all saying all Sabbaths yet vve knovv that the particle all is often times restrained in Scripture is not taken in the largest sense that may be witnesse these Scriptures 1. Cor. 6.12 1. Cor. 9.25 1. Corint 10.23.33 1. Cor. 13.2.7 1. Cor. 15.22 vvhereby vve see that this their text Col. 2.16 may be vnderstood of some Sabbaths onely as namely of the yeerly Sabbaths and so ther 's no necessity it should touch the morall vveekly Sabbaths at all Iudge novv good Reader whither of these two textes are more for the purpose for the 4th com it is vnderstood directly of the 7th
new Sabbath come into its roome with out a Commandement was God more carefull to institute a Sabbath in memory of the Creation then Christ was to set vp a Sabbath in memory of the Redemption Furthermore the new ordinances which Christ set vp in the Gospell as Baptisme and the Lords Supper Christ was mindfull to leaue commandements for them expresly as for Baptisme Goe therefore and teach all nations baptizing them c. Mat. 28.19 for the Lords Supper Take eate this is my body whith is broken for you c. 1 Cor. 11.24.26 now this Lords day is affirmed by them to be an ordinance of the Gospell a new ordinance of the new Testament instituted in memory of the Redemption is it likely that Christ would leaue commandements for some of his new ordinances not for the rest This Lords day if it be as they make vs beleeue it may well be counted by the Church a third Sacrament for it is to be kept in remembrance of Christ like as are the two other Sacraments of Baptisme the Lords Supper yea and this new Sabbath wich is or may well be a nevv Sacrament also is of as great vse if not of greater then the tvvo Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper for Baptisme remembreth a man of Christ but once in his life time in a speciall sorte the Lords supper putteth vs in minde of Christs death but once a quarter but this nevv Sabbath nevv Sacrament should put vs in minde of Christ once a weeke so as this vvould be very vsefull aboue the others novv can vvee thinke that Christ vvould be so mindfull as to leaue Comm. for the ij Sacraments be altogether vnmindfull to leaue a commandement for the Lords day to be a Sabbath if euer he had meant it should be a Sabbath and for the Apostles some fansy that Christ left a commandement vvith them Act. 1.2 but let it then be shovvne vvhere is it vvritten I marueile nay can vve thinke that if Curist had giuen the Apostles a commandement to deliuer to the Church that they durst haue concealed it could this haue stood vvith their faithfulnesse The consideration of this one point is enough to make any man to stagger the vvhole building to totter their case is aboue 50 in the 100 the vvorse for this that they are inforced at the first onset to confesse that they can shevv no commandement for the Lords day from either Christ the founder of it or his Apostles The Saturday Sabbath hath a commandement to authorise it but the Sunday Sabbath hath none vvherefore I shall make my choise of the Saturday Sabbath let them that list choose the Sunday Sabbath Hence this one note vvould be obserued that since there is no Commandement for the Lords day therfore it followeth that the Patrones thereof must fetch all their grownds for it by reason collections consequences out of Scripture now how feeble a thing mans blind reasons is vvho knoweth not that knowes himselfe how liable are vve to mistake yea how subiect to fallacies to be deceiued thereby are the best Logiceans especially in the Matters of God so that if reason may possibly err be deceiued thē may they be deceiued that stand for the Lords day yea though I in stead of opposition should ioyne with them all men say Amen to them for reason and consequences are their best guide direction so then at the best the foundation of our Lords day Sabbath hath but the sandy foundation of mans blinde shallow reason But here vnto they are redy to reply that necessary consequence out of Scripture is as sound as Scripture it selfe vvhere vnto I answer 1. That the comparison made of mans reason with Gods vvord is vnbefitting for be it that necessary consequence is sound and very sound yet seing consequence is by force of manes reason it is not fit that it should be compared equalled with the neuer erring vvord of God 2. I answer t is true that necessary consequence is very sound indeed but then the difficulty is to knovv when a consequence is necessarily true and vvhen not for many men take their consequences to be necessarily true which are but contingent and doubtfully true But to passe by this point let it be noted that these men vvho doe so aduance mens reason and consequences and talke so much for consequences and of necessary consequences ther 's no men vse necessary consequences lesse then they doe in somuch as I begine to question it that they talke beyond their skill vvhen they talke so before the people of necessary consequences for if they knew vvhat they said vvhen they so speake vve should sinde them vse this necessary consequence in their disputations and arguments framed by them for the Lords day Sabbath for it is in this argument and vpon this occation that they talke so of necessary consequences thereby insinuating vnto common people that they haue neuer erring Necessary consequence for their Lords day Sahbath But heere I challeng them any of them all to shew me but one argument out of any Text of Scripture for the Lords day Sabbath vvhich standes by force of necessary consequence vvhich if they can not doe as I know vvell they cannot doe it then are they but vngodly bragadoceans proud boasters to prattle of necessary consequences as if forsooth they meant it to proue all they say by necessary consequence but when they come to it they flinch giue in and doe nothing lesse this is but one of their trickes to delude the people withall Because vve are vpon the point let me shew you some of their necessary consequences as 1. Christ appeared to his Disciples vpon the Lords day Therefore the Lords day must of necessity be a Sabbath day 2. Christ rose vpon the Lords day ergo euery Lords day after must necessarily be a Sabbath 3. The holy Ghost descended on the Lords day ergo it cannot possibly be otherwise but it must be a Sabbath 4. Peter preached once on the Lords day at an other time I know not how many yeeres after Paul preached a sermon too on the Lords day Therefore of necessity it must be a Sabbath day 5. There vvas a collection for the poore on the Lords day Therefore it must be a Sabbath a poore consequence 6. It vvas called the Lords day therefore it must be a Sabbath day As much as if they had argued thus necessarily it vvas called Sunday therefore it must be Saturday These the like are the necessary consequences which they vse who talke so much of necessary consequence the very mention whereof is enough to loath a mans stomake vnto vomiting Here cometh in an obiection say they if you must haue a command for the Lords day shew vs you then where we haue a com for the Baptisme of infantes 1. I answer you doe vvell to confesse that you haue no comm for your
an expresse commandement to the Iewes to keepe that Sabbath in memory of the Creation but there can be no commandement showne vs from Christ or his Apostles for vs to keepe the Lords day in remembrance of the redemption wherefore we are not bound vnto this new Sabbath as they were vnto the old Sabbath for there is not the like reason this sophistry euery man may see I come now to their reason they say the Redemption is greater then the vvorke of Creation Herevnto I answer to know vvhither it be greater or not vvould cost more labour then this their reason is worth vvherefore for argument sake I suppose it is greater but heere I demaund of them to whom it is greater Whither it be greater vnto all men or but vnto some men their answer vvill be that the vvorke of Redemption is greater vnto the elect vnto the redeemed and to those onely vvhich haue faith Well then the Redemption is neither greater nor great nor any thing at all to those vvhich are not elected not redeemed and vvhich liue dye vvithout faith of these ij sortes of people the elect are the fewer number the vnbeleeuers are the greater number Well then see how these things hange together the thing they must proue is that we Christians that is all we Christians euen euery one vvithin the pale of the Church that is baptised all these ought to keepe the Lords day for a Sabbath in memory of the redemption vvhen as the one halfe of these are not redeemed and their reason to bind all euery man thus to keepe a remembrance of this redemption is because the vvorke of redemption is greater vnto some onely of these men How absurd is this that euery man should be bound to keep a ioyfull memory of that thing which doth belong but vnto some of them onely as not to the one halfe of them this is as if they would vndertake to perswade not onely English men but also Dutch men French men to keepe a yeerly ioyfull remembrance vvith vs for our deliuerance from the Spanyard in 88 Why vvhat haue French Dutch to doe vvith our deliuerance in 88 this concerned not them it vvas not their deliuerance so vvhat haue such to doe to keepe a ioyfull remembrance euery Lords day for the redemption vvhen it belongeth not vnto them they being vnbeleeuers and such as loue not the Lord Iesus Wherefore they cannot presse this their new Sabbath of Lords day by this their reason vpon any but vpon such as they see by their fruits doe alredy beleeue such as doe not yet beleeue vvhich commonly are the greater number these are not tyed vnto the keeping of this Lords day behold vvhat a Sabbath they haue then to vvit such a one as onely the fewer number of the Church Parish are tied to keepe it as for the greater number of our Citties Townes Parishes these are not bound to keepe it this their reason therefore doth bewray the idlenesse of the cause for vve must haue such a Sabbath as the reason of it doth belong vnto all and to euery man none excepted and such is the Saturday Sabbath vvhich is to be kept in memory of the Creation now all euery man hath a benefit by the Creation and therefore all are bound to it none excepted but it is not so with the Sunday Sabbath for a fewe onely haue reason to keepe it Yet further to discouer the vanity of this argument since they vvill haue vs keepe a Sabbath in remembrance of the Redemption I demaund of them hovv often they vvould haue vs keepe a Sabbaah in memory of the Repemption once euery 7th day ofter or seldomer they vvill answer once euery 7th day vvhy say I that is Iewish and sauoureth of Iudaisme to obserue a 7th day this they haue learned from the Iewish Sabbath vvherefore since they doe so abhorre Iudaisme the 7th day Sabbath vvhy doe they imitate the Jewes herein and the 7th day Sabbath by choosing a 7th day the 7th day is in imitation of Gods rest on the 7th day and in memory of the Worlds creation finished at the 7th day but vve are Christians and as they say all things are become new old things are passed away vvell then vve must now imitate Christ the Redeemer as the Iewes did God the Creatour and we must fetch light from the vvorke of Redemption to know how often to keepe our new Sabbath as the Iewes did by Gods direction from the vvorke of Creation If then we must imitate Christ the Redeemer as did the Iewes God the Creatour then must we trauaile too fro vpon the Lords day for so did Christ himselfe 2. If we must fetch light hovv often to keepe our nevv Sabbath from the vvorke of redemption as the Iewes did from the worke of Creation then must we since all things are become new take vp a new account of time also vve must no longer regard a 7th day but now we must regard the third day for as God was sixe dayes in the worke of creation rested the 7th so Christ vvas three dayes in the worke of redemption rose rested the third day on good friday he suffred vpon the crosse on Saturday on a parte of the Lords day he lay in the graue so you see the vvorke of redemption cost Christ 3 dayes worke vvherefore if they vvill imitate Christ they must keepe euery third day for a Lords day for a new Sabbath so they shall keepe two Sabbathes in a weeke or thereabouts if they doe not thus they may talke vvhat they vvill that all things are become new that as the Iewes kept a Sabbath in imitation of God at the Creation so vve in imitation of Christ in the redemption but vvhere is their imitation of Christ doe they trauaile too fro follow their callings on the Lords day as Christ did doe they keepe euery third day a Lords day and Sabbath day as Christ rose vpon the third day no such matter Furthermore whereas they suppose that we haue as greate neede of a Sabbath to keepe a memory of the Redemption as the Iewes had of a Sabbath to keepe in memory the Creation I deny it for God had giuen the Jevves the Sabbath day and it alone to keepe in memory his Creation therfore it vvas necessary because they had no other helpes but for vs for the Redemption vve haue two Sacraments Baptisme the Lords Supper to keepe in memory the Redemption these are helps enough so as there is no necessity of a Sabbath day also for the same end Doe this in Remembrance of mee so hereby then the Redemption shall be kept in memory all though vve haue no Lords day Sabbath at all There is neede therfore to haue a Sabbath to keepe memory of the Creation when there is no neede to haue one to keepe memory of the Redemption They haue also an
proued in the Section before this Then also should not those Churches vvhich doe keepe it keepe it as a Sabbath but as an holy day remisly so as they might make hay in Hay seile and reape their corne in haruest and plough their Lands in Wheate seile vpon the Lords day for so did the primitiue Churches in Constantins time they did their vvorkes of husbandry on the Lords day But some in our Church are growne more strict then euer the primitiue Churches were and yet these are holden the purest Churches we must doe no worke in Hay-seile Barley-seile Haruest nor Wheate-seile all in conscience of the 4th com if vve should imitate the primitiue Churches in these dayes either by neglecting the Lords day altogether as some of them did or by doeing the vvorkes of hus bandry on the Lords day as othersome of them did these our Ministers who vse more zeale then knowledge would damne vs to the pit of hell for it To conclud this Section vvhereas Ministers haue formerly frequently abused the Churches of God deceased slaundred them by fathering this their errour vpon them as if they had bene of their minds keeping the Lords day for a Sabbath vvhich is false as you see hereby they haue vvronged the dead yea those pure primitiue Churches of God made thē speake vvhat they neuer thought to the boulstering vp of a late sprung vp errour an errour of 40 or 50 yeeres old by some in our Church of 7 or 10 yeers old in some other Churches they must consider also hovv many thowsand soules they haue seduced partly by this golding tale of the constant practise of all Churches and for time to come let these things be reformed that so those primitiue Churches be no more abused nor our Christian auditours deluded SECT XXI All this while you haue heard their Testimonies alleaged for the Lords day to be a Sabbath now at last let me haue leaue to alleage some Testimonies against the Lords day for being a Sabbath and here in I will not produce you Diuines of the lowest ranke but such onely as are of the formost ranke of the chiefe Diuines that haue wrote I. My first Testimony shall be that recorded by M. Perkines on the 4th com in his first volume in the order of the Causes of Salvation and Damnation pag. 48. which before I touched vpon where caleing the Lords day by the name of Sabbath he thus writeth The observation of the Sabbath was neglected of those Churches which succeeded the Apostles but after wards was established by Christian Emperours as a day most apte to celebrate the memorie of the Redemption And for this he quoteth his Author Leo and Anton. Edict of holie daies Here it is to be noted 1. that this Testimony is not of what some priuate persones did or thought of the Lords day but what was done by an wholl Church yea by Churches in the plurall number 2. The thing recorded of these Churches is that they neglected the observation and sanctification of the Lords day Sabbath 3. The time is to be noted how longe they continued without obseruation of the day and this is gatherable to be about Three hundreth yeeres for it is said it was neglected vntill it was established by Christian Emperours now it is well knowne that the first Christian Emperour that made any Decree for the honourable Religiouse observation of the Lords day was Constantine who liued about 300 yeeres after Christ 4. The last thing remarkable is to consider what Churches these were which so neglected the Lords day they were not any of those later Churches who were corrupted with the dregges of popery but they were the most ancient the primitive Churches and so the most pure Churches Thus farr of my first Testimony whereby you haue seene what opinion these Ancient Churches held of our Lords day Sabbath for the first 300 yeeres II. My second Testimony shall be to shew what esteeme the Church of God had of our Lords day in the time of Constantine at vvhat time it flourished most Constantinus Imperator concessit Rusticis ut diebus Dominicis agrorum culturae prout ipsi viderine fore necessarium inservirent In Cod. tit 12. de Feriis Which Decre M. Foxe recordeth in his booke of Martyres at the end of the first booke in the tene first persecutions pag. 93. in the last Edition and pag. 105. in the old Edition thus Constantine commanded the Sunday to be kept holy of all men and free from all Iudiciary causes from Markets Martes Fayers all other manuall labours onely husbandry excepted The which Decree M. Brerewood in his Treatise of the Sabbath against M. Byfield thus reporteth that Constantine the Great licenced the Country people by his Decree freely libere liciteque are the words of the Constitution to attend their sowing of graine setting of Vines other husbandry on the Lords day Now would Constantine thinke you assisted vvith the advice no doubt of his lerned Clergie haue giuen free license liberty vnto his Subiectes to haue followed their vvorkes of husbandry as ploughing and the like on the Lords day if those times had iudged the Lords day to be a Sabbath day by diuine institution and to be sanctified in conscience of the 4th Commandement Why the 4th com directly forbiddeth all seruile labours such as are ploughing carteing sowing setting and the like they could not be so voide of reason therefore as to giue liberty yea and that freely to doe seruile vvorkes and laboriouse on the Lords day if the Lords day had in their iudgment stoode by virtue of the 4th Com. as many now a dayes faine it We heare now a dayes much sownd of that famouse Decree of Constantine made for the sanctification of the Lords day but behold vvhat it was hee required none other sanctification of it then we now a dayes make of our common Holy dayes S. Mathew S. Johns day the rest if so much for then it was not vnlawfull to plough on the Lords day What therefore if I should say that the Lords day is not of Gods ordination and therefore we may lawfully safely plough sowe our Lands in Wheate-seile mowe our grasse and make baye in baye-seile reape our Corne worke in haruest euery Lords day vvhy may I not be as free from censure as Constantine and the Church in his time vvhat say I more then was then decreed and established by law yea and that by Constantine who was the most holy Emperour and best patron of the Lords day that euer Prince was An other Testimony is a Decree of Constantine recorded by Eusebius de vita Constant. lib. 4. cap. 18. and also by Sozom. lib. 1. cap. 8. vvherein hee decreed by one the same law without any difference making that all his Empire should sanctifie both the Friday and the Sunday the day before the Iewes Sabbath the day after it The Sunday because
against them saying well ye reiect the commandement of God that ye may obserue your owne Tradition Mark 7.9 For they trample downe the Lords Sabbath day that they may keepe their owne Lords day My 4th reason disswasiue is because by the vphoulding of this Lords day Sabbath the sacred Scriptures vvord of God is profaned I make that appeare thus Ministers doe daily vrge the 4th Com. vpon the Lords day doe presse mens consciences to the Sanctifying of the Lords day by the 4th Comm. now the 4th Com. doth speake as he that hath but halfe an eye may see of the day called Sabbath day but this is a day called Lords day the 4th Com. was made for a sanctified hallowed day for God himselfe blessed it sanctified it Genes 2.3 but this Lords day is a profane day a common day neuer sanctified by God but on the contrary appointed for labour it being one of the sixe working dayes mentioned in the 4th Com. Christ himselfe trauailing on it c. Now for Ministers to apply this sacred word of Gods 4th Com. vnto a profane common and vnsanctified day time this or nothing is to profane the Sacred word of God Secondly many portions of Scripture in the New Testament with some also out of the old are hereby also wrested abused profaned the Spirit of God is made to speake for that which neuer came into his minde to thinke a most horrible vnsufferable thing in a Christian Church as for example these Texts Psal 118.24 Ioh. 20.1.19.26 Act. 1.2.3 Act. 2.1.14 c. Act. 20.7.1 Cor. 16.2 2. Cor. 5.17 and Reuel 1.10 these eight Textes at least besids the 4th Com. are abused for the maintenance of a forged new coined and counterfait Sabbath day who that hath any zeale of Gods glory or loue vnto his Holy word can endure it that Gods word and trueth should be thus profanly vsed profaned abused wherfore if you beare any reuerence vnto the sacred word of God let a reformation be made Looke vpon the third Com. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine now Gods word is a parte of his name wherby he is knowne Act. 9.15 therfore for men to abuse profane Gods word it is to abuse profane Gods name so a sinne against the third Com. now the reward of such profanation is this that God will not hold him guiltlesse that taketh his name in vaine hee shall surely therfore be punished vvithout repentance amendement But vvhat doe I speaking to deafe Adders men will not be charmed what they haue holden they will hold as for me I am but one meane they are many mighty so that I almost despaire of remedy howeuer I haue discouered their sinne vnto them at their perill be it whither they will amend it or not I abhorre to thinke of it yet this I am sure of that that is true amongst vs which the Lord once complained of by his Prophet Ieremiah that is that an horrible filthy thingis committed in the land the Prophets prphecy lies people delight therein Ierem. 5.30.31 that the Prophets prophecy lyes this is apparent as hath bene showne and the people delight therein this is manifest in asmuch as many that are both religiouse also counted wise are not ashamed to speake it that they wish from their hearts that I had neuer medled in this point so we haue for the most parte like Priest like people both delighting in this counterfait Sabbath both like vnto Nadab Abihu who offered straung fier before the Lord which hee had not commaunded them Leuit. 10.1 My 5th and last reason disswasiue is because it is a sinne for Ministers to preach for the Lords day This I proue because they cannot speake for it in faith now whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne saith the Apostle Rom. 14.23 now that they cannot preach for it in faith is plaine by this that they haue no word of God for the grownd of their faith we haue alredy showne that they haue no word of God for this Lords day Sabbath for they can not shew vs where Christ or any of his Apostles left any commandement for it no nor yet haue they any necessary consequences for it so often therefore as A Minister presseth the people to sanctify the Lords day Sabbath so often he sinneth And so much touching this Lords day Sabbath CHAP. IIII. An answer vnto all those textes of Scripture reasones arguments which are vsually profanly brought against the Sabbath day mentioned in the 4th com to wit the 7th day Sabbath I Haue now finished the 3 first partes of my booke the first whereof was in defence of the morall law the second was an exposition of the 4th com with adiscouery of the corrupt expositiones thereof the third was an answer to those Scriptures reasones that are brought for the Lords day and now I am by order come vnto the fourth parte of my booke herein I am to answer to the Scriptures and reasons whereby the enemies of the Lords Sabbathes goe about most wickedly vngodlily to throw them downe and here my purpose is not onely to make answer vnto those textes reasones which these 10 Ministers or any of them in the name roome of the rest haue impiously obiected against the Lords Sabbathes but also I purpose to answer vnto all obiectiones generally what soeuer I can heare or reade of Gods Ancient Sabbaths are not abolished or The Lords ancient 7th day Saturday Sabbath is not abolished SECT I. IN the first place let me discouer an high point of folly in these Antisabbatharians for a seruant to forsake his old Master before he knows where to haue a new or for any man to pull downe his old house before he had found for certaine that he was able to build vp a new house is a greate folly into this folly are falne not onely those other 9 Ministers by caling the Lords Sabbaths Ceremonies Iewish Iudaisme to bring them into reproch but especially M. Chappel by preaching against them openly now what an egregiouse folly is this in them to throw downe the old Sabbath before they knew where to find a new Sabbath to abolish the 7th day before they were able to raise vp the 8th day me thinke a smale portion of discretion should haue taught them to haue made sure worke that they were well able to defend the Lords day before they had aduentured to debase and abolish the Sabbath day I wish all men to learne wisedome by their folly that is neuer to debase striue to abolish the old Sabbath vntill they know how to proue the Lords day to be a Sabbath so to set vp a new Sabbath That with the moreculler and shew of trueth men might abolish Gods Sabbathes besides their loading of them with reprochfull termes of Iudaisme and abolished Shaddowes and Ceremonies and
is this The time of the 7th day it was and also it may now againe if men so please be an helpe and a furtherance vnto these Morall dueties of Rest from laboures and the worship of God commanded in the 4th Comm. for the 7th day furthereth these dueties as time and place doe further all dueties and is it not to be wondered at that men will reiect and abolish such a thing or things as be helpes and furtherances vnto Gods worship and vnto Morall dueties Diuines teach that not onely the dueties expressed in the Decalogue are to be obserued but also all helpes and furtherances vnto those dueties but behold here they reiect as Iewish and Ceremoniall the 7th day which was in ancient time and may be againe an helpe vnto Gods worship and the other Sabbath dueties Yea such an helpe as no other day cā be so fit for no day but it is a sanctified day Genes 2.3 nor a commanded day Exod. 20.8.10 nor that hath Gods president Exod. 20.10.11 I might here alleage the Testimony of many but I will content my selfe with iij or iiij who though no friends to the ancient Sabbath yet herein iustify me Doctour Bownde in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 40. saith That the 4th Com. can no more be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall then the same liuing creature can be partly a man partly a beast Yea as well may one suppose the second Com. also to be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall To the same effect hee in pag. 36. citeth Wolph Chron. lib. 2. ca. 1. saying but the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes because it is commanded in the Decalogue which conteineth in it nothing ceremoniall nothing typicall nothing to be abrogated M. Richard Byfield in his Doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated against M. Brerewod pag. 88. saith the 4th com is parte of the law of nature and so parte of the Image of God and is no more capable of a ceremony to be in it then God is For conclusion you shall heare doctour Ames speake in the name of all best diuines In his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. Thus he writeth This is a most certaine rule receiued by all the best Diuines that the morall commandements were thus differenced in their deliuery from the ceremoniales that all onely the morales were proclaimed publikly before the people of Israel from Mount Sinay by the voyce of God himselfe after also were written the second time written as it were by the finger of God that in Tables of stone to declare their perpetuall and immutable continuance Now doe you not heare how these mē affirme it that the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes that all best diuines hold that all onely morales were wrote in the Tables of stone and that the 4th com is no more capable of a ceremony in it then God is and that you may as absurdly say the same liuing creature is partly a man partly a beast as to say the 4th com is partly morall partly ceremoniall Before I produce their argumēts I desire to propound iiij things more both vnto our opponentes also vnto my Reader The for most is this before they begine their opposition wicked worke I desire them to cast their eyes first vpon the vglinesse of it to viewe it well for they fight not for God blessed for euer but against God my warfare is for God to defend his Title touching his Sabbaths but theirs is alltogether to defeate God of his Title and Sabbaths my strift is to defend Gods law in the Integrity and perfection vnto a iot title of it but their strife is with might and maine to lame Gods law and to clype it as traitoures doe the Kings coyne they will none of the law in its integrity and perfection that so they may serue God by halues by peece-meale An other thing I would propound is this I desire to know of these who are such implacable enemies to the Lords Sabbaths if they haue any Countermand or contrary commandement vnto the 4th com and that in as plaine expresse termes as the 4th com you know that a law enacted in parliament cannot be reuoked but by an other law enacted for the reuersing of it in the court of parliament so it must be in this case for the 7th day Sabbath there was a law to wit the 4th com enacted from heauen in the old Testament they must therefore shew vs a law from heauen againe countermanding it in the new Testament against the 7th day Sabbath or if in case they cannot shew vs A law in exprese words against the Sabbath day the which they cannot doe then if they be enforced in stead of a commandement to flie to reasones consequences made out of textes of Scripture they must make suer that their reasones collectiones and consequences be so cleere and apparent so sound and so necessarily true that they may be as vndoubtedly true as a commandement it selfe the reason hereof is because these consequences must stand in the roome of a commandement for the reuoking of that Sabbath day which was commanded in the 4th com euery sleity probable reason therefore collected out of a text is not enough to ouerturne an expresse commandement yea a morall commandement shall a sleity collection or consequence fetched by mans feeble shallow reason out of these the like textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 Colos 2.16.17 ouerturne a sacred time expresly commanded in the morall law Exod. 20.8 God forbid We must shew more loue and honour vnto those 10 commandements which God hath honoured aboue all portions of Scripture by writing them with his owne finger deliuering them by his owne voyce then to suffer them or any parte of them to be snached wrested out of our hands by probabilities likelihoods feeble reasones A man may well doubt of it whither any man or Church may abolish any things expresly commanded in the Morall Law by any collection or consequence of mans reason whatsoeuer yea albeit it be thought of all men to be a necessary consequence for how often doe men take that to be sound of necessary trueth which once within a fewe yeeres after the same men find to be faulty let men know therefore that they who dare attempt so bould an enterprise as to diminish any iot or title of the 10. morales by reasones fetched out of these the like textes Exod. 31.13 and Colos 2.16.17 they must be such reasons as be as cleere as the Sunne in its brightnesse so satisfactory as euery one that heareth them cannot but applaud imbrace them saying God is in these reasones and collectiones the reason hereof is because these reasones and consequences they must beare downe confront an expresse commandement written by the finger of God
himselfe saying Remember the Sabbath day c. The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt not worke The 3d thing which I would propound shall be an Appeale vnto the consciences of all such as dare sharpen their witts against the Lords Sabbaths which he hath placed in his Morall Law my desire vnto them is that they would ransake and serch their hearts to see if they can find themselues compelled constrained by their consciences vpon the reading seriouse perpending of these and the like textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 and Colos 2.16.17 in the New Testament to abolish the 7th day Sabbath or no let them examine their consciences whither all those textes of Scripture which they bring against that Sabbath day placed by God in his Morall Law be so directly against forciblie opposite vnto Gods Sabbath day as by no honest meanes of a fit sense or a Lawfull distinction it can possibly be preserued from an vtter ruine finall ouerthrow or no now the reason why men must goe thus seriously to worke is to free themselues of a fearefull censure that they doe wilfully malitiously and vnnecessarily impugne an ordināce of Gods because we must not lightly sleitily make innouationes and alterationes in Gods worship and seruice Gods ordinances once established in his Church as this Sabbath day was must not vpon euery vaine conceit and by respect be remoued out or holden out of his Church men must deale with their consciences therfore in these pointes be suer to goe no further against them then necessity vrgeth compelleth them if in case an errour must be it is by farr the safer to erre vpon the right hand then vpon the left that is rather to giue God his Sabbaths still then to abridge him of them shall God fixe his 7th day Sabbath amongst his Morales and shall we put to our wites to roote it out thence and ranke it amongst vanished ceremonies God forbid The 4th thing to be propounded you know it is a Maxime a ruled case in diuinity that one text of Scripture it must not be so expounded and vrged as it should ouerthrow contradict an other text now if this rule hath place in any portion of Scripture it must haue place in the 10. commandements the Lords prayer in the Articles of our faith for these 3. are esteemed to containe the foundation life and Soule of all religion and that plainly wherfore no text of Scripture is to be vrged or expounded so as it should infringe contradict or ouerturne any portion of these three principles of Christian religion nay these three are made as a Rule to expound other Scriptures by therefore not to be gainsaied opposed by other scriptures well then the 7th day Sabbath it is one of those ordinances of God established of old in his Church placed amongst his Morall Lawes and in the first Table also and there expresly commanded by one of the 10. commandements wherefore since it is a parte of the 10. commandements neither these textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 Col. 2.16.17 nor any other text of Scripture must be so vrged expounded as that this commanded 7th day Sabbath be there by abolished or accounted as a vanished ceremony this stands firme by our owne Rule for the exposition of Scripture and therefore I might well iustifiablie spare to giue them any other answer to their textes brought against the Lords Sabbath then this that they abuse wrest the sense of Scripture making one text to contradict an other contrary to this aproued rule for no text may be admitted against the 4th com One absurdety more I would add whosoeuer goeth about by theise the like textes Rom. 14.5 Exod. 31.13 and Col. 2.17 to abolish Gods ancient Sabbath he maketh a godly prayer of our Church frustrate mere babling before God for when the 4th com is rehearsed in the Church the people āswer to it saying Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our heartes to keepe this Law now since the 4th com cannot be vnderstod of any day or dueties but those done on the ancient Sabbath day abolish that day thē our prayer is but babling 2. Doctour Prideaux in his booke on the Sabbath pag. 140. affirmeth that the Church following the Apostles kept the Sabbath and M. Brerewod in his book of the Sabbath pag. 77. affirmeth that the old Sabbath was religiously obserued 300. yeeres after Christ this I shall proue towards the latter end of this booke by sondry other Testimonies they therefore who by these textes Exod. 31.13 and Col. 2.16 doe attempt to ouerthrow the ancient 7th day Sabbath they doe thereby not only make frustrate an holy prayer of our Church but also they do condemne the practise of the most ancient pure and primitiue Churches which liued next vnto the Apostles Thus you see how many foule absurdeties they rune into who cale the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath Iudaisme Iewish ceremoniall attempt to roote it out of the Morall Law by these texts Exod. 31. Col. 2.17 SECT II. And now we come vnto their arguments textes of Scripture out of which they collect arguments against the Lords Sabbaths but this note in the first place that of them all they can not shew vs any expresse commandement or prohibition against the Sabbath day to countermand it therefore it followeth that what they haue against it the same is but collectiones and consequences framed by mans feeble reason and this one thing that they haue no expresse countermand against the Sabbath day doth weaken their cause exceedingly it is the worse by aboue 50. in the 100. for this wante and so I proceede There are two thinges which they labour to make ceremoniall and so abolished in the 4th com the one is the Rest the other is the time of the 7th day first let vs see what they haue against the Rest they doe not say the Rest from labour is simply abolished least so they should dashe in peeces the whole 4th com by one word therfore they haue refined it and they desire to proue the rigorouse strictnesse of the Rest onely to be a ceremony and questionlesse this conceipt of the rigorouse strictnesse of the Rest was therefore invented least they should seeme onely to deny the question namly the time of the 7th day for now thers is a little more culler put vpon the matter when they can deny ij things as ceremonies in the 10 commandements now to this purpose euery text that may seeme to sauour of any extraordenary strictnesse about the Iewish rest as they cale it those textes are not expounded as they say with a graine of Salte or any dramme of qualification but like men that had sworne to it to forsake the golden meane they are carried all wide vpon the left hand these textes are stretched vpon the Tainter hoocks vnto the vtmost tending to a
then what doe we with the old Testament it seemeth then that not onely the old Sabbath is abolished but also the whole old Testament is abolished also now it standeth for a cipher if this arguing be good why did S. Paul send vs to the old Testament saying whatsoeuer is written a fore time is written for our lerning Rom. 15.4 2. If you will acknowledge no more of the morall Law then what is particularly repeated in the new Testamēt then what will become of the 10th com where is it repeated in euery branch thereof particularly in all the new Testament I know it is found writtē Thou shalt not lust but to come to particulars where is it written thou shalt not lust after or couet thy neighbours house thy neigbours wife his man seruant maide oxe asse or any thing that is thy neigbours you may as well therfore conclude against sondry things cōmanded in the 10th com as agaimst the Sabbath commanded in the 4th com for neither of them are repeated in the new Testament particularly in an expresse commandement 3. I will shew you how the 4th com is repeated in the new Testament generally consequently the Sabbath is there vrged also in a generall manner see Mat. 5.18 where Christ prophecieth of the lasting of the Morall Law and of euery iot title of it to the worlds end now in these words is the 4th com and the 10th com euery commandement yea euery iot title of euery commandement conteined the like may be proued by Rom. 3.31 Iam. 2.10 It is to be obserued that of all the 10. commandements there was the least need nay there was no neede to repeate the 4th cō nor to vrge the obseruation of the Sabbath day in particular for in the daies of Christ his Apostles both Iewes Gentiles were very zealouse for the obseruation of the Sabbath day for the Iewes they were more strict for the keeping of the Sabbath if I may so say then Christ him selfe was for Christ would allow the plucking and rubbing eares of corne on the Sabbath day to carry a bedd and the like but the Iewes could not endure it what hote contentions did the Iewes moue against Christ his Disciples for doeing some petty workes on the Sabbath day yea vpon a time they would haue slaine our Sauiour for healing of a sicke man vpon the Sabbath day Ioh. 5.16 what neede then was there that Christ or his Apostles should repeate the 4th com to the Iewes or vrge them to keepe the Sabbath day since they were so hote for it alredy it was enough that the 4th com the obseruation of the Sabbath day should be spoken of onely in some generall termes as you haue it Mat. 5.18 Ia. 2.10 And for the Gentiles there was no need to presse them neither for they coming into the Inheritance of the Iewes ioyning in communion with the beleeuing Iewes did redely imbrace the very ceremonies of the Iewes as circumcision the like how much more then did they imbrace the Morals with the Iewes as the Sabbath day as you may see Act. 13.42.44 Act. 16.13 looke therfore wherin the Iewes were very zealouse it is to be thought that the beleeuing Gentiles were zealouse also therefore was it needlesse that the Sabbath day or 4th com of all the commandements should be vrged pressed in the new Testament Neuerthelesse somthing we find touching the Sabbath in particular in the new Testament as Mat. 24.20 Pray saith our Sauiour that your flight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day In which words Christ alloweth a conscience to be made of the Sabbath day for aboue 40. yeers after his death 2. we find that it was the constant practise of the Apostles after Christ his ascention to obserue and keepe the Sabbath day see for this purpose Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 that the Apostles did here keepe the Sabbath with the Iewes to beare with their weaknesse is a weakenesse in any to thinke so they cā neuer proue it I am suer when the Apostles yeelded obbediēce vnto Magistrates which was commanded in the 5th com worshiped God which was cōmāded in the first Table may any absurdly growndlesly say they did these things to beare with the weaknesse of the Iewes and why then should any say when the Apostles performed the things commanded in the 4th com that they did this for the weaknesse of the Iewes where as some say the Apostles kept not the Sabbath in cōscience of the 4th com they hauing no grownd for what they say may as well say when they worshiped the true God obeyed the Magistrate that they did not these in conscience of the first 5th cōmandements 3 In the new Testament and after the death of Christ and abolition of ceremonies we find the Sabbath day kept in cōscience of the 4th com the Holy Ghost commending it by rekoning it among ranking it with other commendable actiones saying they rested the Sabbath day according to the commandement Luk. 23.56 SECT XV. 11. They fetch an argument from Deut. 5.15 where the 4th com is repeated and at the end of it there is added as a reason these words For remember that thou wast a seruant in the Land of Egypt that the Lord thy God brought the out thence by a mightie hand Therefore the Lord thy God commanded thee to obserue the Sabbath day Hence they argue to this effect that because the Sabbath doth depend vpon the deliuerance out of Egypt therefore since the deliuerance out of Egypt belongeth not vnto vs no more doth the Sabbath day this text M. Chappell vrged Herevnto I answer it is true indede that therfore God commanded the Iewes in this place to obserue the Sabbath day because he brought them out of the Land of bondage but if hence men may gather that we Christians are not bound vnto the Sabbath day as M. Chappell did then 1. it followeth that we now haue no Sabbath day by the 4th com and so the 4th com is vselesse as a cipher or abolished for this reason of Gods deliuerance of the Iewes out of Egypt it is added not to any parte of the 4th com onely but vnto all the 4th com wholly now in the 4th com the aduersaries of Gods trueth doe distinguish betwixt the time of the 7th day and the dueties of holinesse and Rest now the time is that which they would faine trample downe as for the duetie of an holy Rest this they would haue still morall but if this their argument be good then haue they hereby at once ouerthrowne not onely the time but also the dueties of holinesse Rest in the time and so quite nullified the 4th com the reason hereof is plaine for that argumēt of Gods deliuerance of Israel out of Egypt which they bring to abolish one parte of the com to wit the time it doth also
word day in Exod. 31.13.14 for it mentioneth onely the word Sabbaths whenc I gather that though the word day be implied yet because it is not mentioned therefore if any thing be made a signe of Christ it is rather the Sabbaths then the day wherefore if the Sabbaths be a signe of Christ which signify Restes then are the Restes ceremonies and abolished signes of Christ so the Rest in the 4th com which they hold to be morall by this text they make to be ceremoniall so we haue a morall ceremoniall Rest a contraicted Rest A third absurdety that these meÌ„ fale into who will haue God serued by halues and by peecemeale is this that whilst they make a gloriouse shew to the people that they stand for the 4th com as well as for the rest of the commandements they doe notwithstanding so gelde it picke out the life soule of it as they leaue it but like a deade corpse for by their consequences such as they are they would out of this text Exod. 31.13 make the Sabbath day a signe so a ceremony and so then abolished well then be it so hence then I argue If that Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com be an abolished signe ceremony theÌ„ is the 4th com nullified like a dead corpse for it standeth for a cipher and commandeth iust nothing for the cleering of this point let vs see the 4th com thus it is written Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifi it Exod. 20.8 let any man now take out of these words in this commandement these ij words Sabbath day then let him tell me what it is which the 4th com commandeth you may as well take away these ij words Sabbath day which they say are a signe and ceremony and abolished in stead of them put so many ciphers in the commandement as there be letters in these ij words that is tenn then we may write this commande thus Remember the 0000000000 to sanctifie it Exod. 20.8 I remember our Sauiour Christ hath a similitude wherin he likeneth such hearers as heare but doe not vnto a foolish man who builded his howse vpon the sande Mat. 7.26 but I now tell you of builders builders in Gods house too who are more foolish then this foolish man for he built though not vpon a rocke yet he built vpon the Sande so as his house might stand vntill the floodes came the winds blewe but these meÌ„ would build Gods 4th com vpon worse then sand for they build it vpon nothing 0000000000 and make it to command nothing 0000000000. all this must needs be true against them vnlesse they can shew vs that there were two Sabbath daies spoken of in the 4th com one vpon the 7th day an other vpon the 8th day and this they cannot doe seing the Lord spake in the singular number in his 4th com saying Remember the Sabbath day and not in the plurall number Remember the Sabbaths or Remember the Sabbath daies now forasmuch as they haue robbed the 4th com of one Sabbath day there must now be no Sabbath day in the 4th com vnlesse they cane by helpe of their magnified reason consequences proue vnto vs that God commanded ij Sabbaths in his 4th com A fourth absurdety that these men fale into who are aduersaries to the Integrity perfection of Gods Law by reiecting his Sabbaths is this that they set Scriptures togeather by the eares text against text and God against himselfe for whereas it is a rule that no exposition by like reason no consequeÌ„ce or collectioÌ„ is to be giuen of and from any text which is contrary vnto other plaine texts of Scripture as for example the 10. commandements the analogie of faith c. yet these aduersaries of Gods trueth haue giuen such expositiones of consequences from this one text Exod. 31.13 as whereby they doe vtterly nullify something plainly expresly commanded in the 10 commandements as for example the 7th day Sabbaths First then their absurdety appeareth in sweruing from the common receiued approued rule secondly in making one portion of holy write to contradict an other yea to contradict an ordinance commanded in the Morall Law which is yet worst of all they make their owne idle brained consequences fetched out of this text which neuer were in it to contradict an expresse commandement of the greate Gods so that now mans sawcy reason friuolouse collections shall confront a plaine commandement of his Gods yea it shall sit in equall throne with God I which is worse it shall take the right hand of God also for their consequences doe more auaile with men then Gods expresse commandement their collections shall be a Counter mand to Gods commandement yea they shall take the vpper hand of it shoulder it qui e out of place as we see to our hearts astonisâ—ment it doth when we looke vpon the ruined 7th day Sabbath on times oh manners oh wicked manners of these sinefull times some men doe so pride themselues in their wit beare themselues so strongly vpon their lerning as by these they dare make an assault vpon God and Syllogistically crush to nothing what God once establisht in his Church with terrible thunder and lightening were this done by some profane person it were not so much to be thought on but the Authores stife Agents in this most horrible fact are such as drawe nere vnto God and called puritane Ministers oh that they shewed more purity then this comes to it grieueth me thus to blow vp the Skirtes of my bethren but I haue none other way left vnto me now but onely this one to discouer them vnto the world that they may be ashamed of their folly to preuent men in following them else they will leade the world after them so mad they are in their dotages so vnmouable the Prophet Dauid hath a passage which will beare me out in this fill their faces with shame that they may seeke thy name o Lord. Psal 83.16 I might for these reasons absurdeties of theirs reiect their arguments as vnworthy any answer at all for they deserue none yet as Salomon saith Least they be wise in their owne conceit Pro. 26.5 and thinke there is worth and excellency in their arguments I will misespend some time and waste some paper and inke to shew them their vanity so I come to their arguments I conceiue they may argue out of this text Exod. 31.13 these wayes the first whereof is this All Signes are abolished But the 7th day Sabbath is a Signe Exod. 31.13 Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is abolished To this argument I answer as for the minor it shall be answered in the after passages but as for their Major I deny it for they can not proue it I giue instances to the contrary shewing that all Signes are not abolished for example the Raine bow God made it
you in meate drinke or in parte of a feast or of the new moone or of the Sabbath daies c. Now the question is to know what daies are signified by these words in parte of a feast for this purpose looke into Leuit. 23.34.39 where you haue two feastes mentioned either of them were to last 7 daies a peece now the first day of the 7 should be a Sabbath day likewise the 8th day should be a Sabbath day as the text speaketh v. 35.36.39 now forasmuch as the first 7 daies were the whole feast when the first day of those 7 was taken out for a Sabbath day then the 6 daies remaining which went betwen the two Sabbaths these were the parte of a feast and these 6 daies being the parte of that ceremoniall feast these were those which S. Paul might say were a Shaddow of Christ so abolished so now you see what daies they were which S. Paul speaketh of vnder these words translated Holy day which may be translated in parte of a feast hereby is nothing else signified but those 6 festiuall daies which went betwene the two Sabbaths were a parte of the whole feast which lasted by the Law 7 daies so then whereas they would haue all the ceremoniall Sabbaths comprised vnder the words Holy day inconclusion you see ther 's none of them at all comprised in them for the Apostle may be vnderstod to speake onely of those 6 daies which went betwen the 2 Sabbaths but were no Sabbaths themselues so it will not follow that by the word Sabbaths in Colos 2.16.17 must be vnderstood the 7th day Sabbath In conclusion let me shew you what may be vnderstod by these words holy day or in parte of a feast and these words Sabbath dayes by those words holy day or in parte of a feast may be meant those 6 festiuall dayes which went betwen the ij Sabbaths but were no Sabbaths themselues then by those other words in the text Col. 2.6 Sabbath dayes may be meant these ij Sabbath dayes which were the bounds of the 6 festiuall dayes to wit the first day and the 8th day v. 35.36.39 together with all other annuall Sabbath dayes But if this pleaseth not then thus by the words holy day or rather feast you may vnderstand the Apostle to speake of those ij feastes of 7 dayes a peece in v. 34.39 ioyning the first day Sabbath with the following 6 dayes and both these to make vp one feast consisting of 7 dayes onely then these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be translated rather in respect then in parte for the words may be rendered both wayes now if you put the first day Sabbath vnto the 6 festiuall dayes then by these words Sabbath dayes in Col. 2.16 may be vnderstod the 8th day Sabbaths which followed the 7 festiuall dayes and also all other yeerly Sabbaths with it as those mentioned Leuit. 23.7.8.21.24.27.32 Or if this yet pleaseth not for they are hard to please so eagre they are against the Lords Sabbaths then thus if by holy day or feast you will needs vnderstand all dayes both the feastes of 7 dayes a peece and all other single Sabbath dayes forementioned then by the word Sabbaths 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Col. 2.16 the Apostle may be vnderstod to speake not of the Sabbath of dayes but of the Sabbaths of yeeres of which you may reade Leuit. 25.4.8.10.11 where you haue mention of the 7th yeere to be kept for a Sabbath likewise of the 50th yeere the yeere of Iubile so in all these wayes the 7th day Sabbath is not spokē of By all which answers it may appeare that it is no impossible thing to reconcile these two Scriptures Exod. 20.8.10 Col. 2.16.17 for it appeareth how many wayes the Apostles words may be taken and still the Sabbath day written in the Morall Law not touched at all by this text Col. 2.16 and are they not wilfull and malitiouse enemies to the perfection of Gods Law to his ordinance the Sabbath day who when the Apostles words may be taken any of these wayes or some of these at least so as Gods morall Sabbath may be preserued but yet none of them will please them but some other vnnecessary sense must needs be violently thrust vpon vs and namly such an one as may perpetually destroy the Lords Sabbath why is there no way to expound one text of Scripture but so as it must ouerthrow an other doe men delight themselues to make collectiones and gather conclusiones out of one portion of Scripture which shall ouerturne for euer that expresly commanded in an other portion of Scripture where is the feare of God all this while and reuerence to his word and ordinances are not these men guilty of the sinne of adding to Gods word Deut. 12.32 of that curse threatened for the same cause Reuel 22.18 for like as they haue added diuerse inventions to that text Exod. 31.13 against Gods Sabbaths so haue they added Gods 7th day Sabbath to this text Col. 2.17 for the ruine of it and they haue added this their invention to S. Pauls words that he spake vniuersally of all Sabbaths when he spake but indefinitly of some Sabbaths Thre things more I haue to add by way of answer vnto this text Col. 2.16 the formost is this that there are reasones in this text why it cannot be that this word Sabbaths should be vnderstod of the Sabbath written in the morall law the former reason is this that all the other things mentioned in this text Col. 2.16 are such things as neuer came into the Morall Law as 1. meate drink 2. holy day or feast 3. new Moones wherefore this giueth vs an hint to conclude that the other thing mentioned in this text namly the Sabbaths should be of like kind to wit such Sabbaths as neuer came into the Morall Law neither for who could thinke that all the other words and things in this text should be pure ceremonies and such as neuer came into the morall law and this one word onely to wit Sabbaths should conteine in it a Morall day and ceremoniall dayes or dayes some whereof were neuer wrote by the finger of God as the yeerly Sabbaths and some such as God wrote with his owne finger in the morall law as the 7th day Sabbath An other reason fetched from the text is this that if in this word Sabbaths they will includ the 7th day Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law then doe they abolish by this text Col. 2.16 Not onely the 7th day and also the Rest but also the very commandement it selfe the 4th com that is abolished vnder these words where it is said that Christ hath Put out the handwriting of ordinances v. 14. In which words the written 4th com is abolished and this I make appeare thus the 16th verse of this second Chapter to the Colossians is a conclusion as you may perceiue by the
trueth of Gods and espetially his Majestie and if once God shallincline his heart to the loue of this trueth a word from his mouth may reforme it his Decree proclamation or the like were enough to make this impossible thing possible OBIECT IV. An other obiection is that Gods Church is now at a sweete peace and concord and the bringing of this point to light will but make a greate hurly burly and disturbance in the Church wherefore the Author might be better occupied or else be silent Herevnto I answer this obiection is indeed euery where heard of and indeed the peace of the Church is to be sought to the vtmost but yet we must not be so mindfull of peace as to forget holinesse for the Apostle hath ioyned these ij together saying Follow peace with all men and holinesse without the which no man shall see the Lord Heb. 12.14 peace with the Church in keeping the Lords day and warre with God in profaning of his Sabbath day is no comfortable nor safe peace Let me desire such as rest vpon thes obiection to reade perpend what the Lord spake by his Prophet Isaiah against the people that would not heare Gods Law but rather such things as might please them make no disturbance amongst them saying It is a rebelliouse people children that would not heare the Law of the Lord which say vnto the Seers see not and to the Prophets Prophesy not vnto vs right things but speake flattering things vnto vs Isa 30.9.10 The gloriouse Gospell the Gospell of peace the word of Trueth did it bringe peace into the world no I am come saieth our Sauiour to put fier on the earth Luk. 12.49 againe Thinke not that I am come to send peace into the earth but the sword to set a man at variance against his father the daughter against hir mother Mat. 10.34 such is the frowardnesse of mans nature as this trueth of Gods Sabbath will neuer enter neither with the peace of men OBIECT V. An other obiection is this what shall we doe say some Ministers are at variance one saith the old Sabbath day is in force still others say that it is abolished longe agone by the coming of Christ wherefore I shall giue no regard to this new Doctrine vntill Ministers can agree among themselues and till all men be at one accord in this matter for they bring reasones on both sids so as a man cannot tell which to beleeue Herevnto I answer if men shall tarry till all men are agreed so they shall professe no trueth nor any Religion for all men are not at accord in any Religion nor almost in any point of Religion wherefore it is a better way first to consider of the matter in question whither it be a difference about words or about things and whither about things substantiall or circumstanciall as ceremonies are and as the matter is of weight more or lesse so to regard it more or lesse for such may the controuercy be as it may concerne not some men but all men such it may be as may concerne all men very neerly now of this kind is this controuercy for it is not a difference about words or vnnecessary circumstances or about that which concerneth but some few men onely but it is about an ordinance of God expresly commanded in his morall Law and therefore it is a substanciall matter and concerneth all and euery man neerly like as doe all the 10 commandements and therefore people must not put off the matter vntill Ministers be agreed vnlesse they will be wilfully ignorāt in a matter off greate importance and which so nerely concerneth them as doth all the things commanded in the 10 commandements It is a Catechisme point to know Gods Sabbath day and a point of greate consequence neerly concerning vs all as appeareth not onely because it is an ordinance established by the Morall Law but also in this that it is put downe in euery Catechisme as behofefull for euery one to be acquainted with all now if such a point come into controuercy all men should giue attendance vnto it and study it vntill the trueth be boulted out Neither let this be any stumbling blocke because this Doctrine is new for albeit it be new vnto our times yet it is as old Doctrine as is any in the 10 commandements but what if it be new to thee the Doctrine of the Gospell was as new to the Bereanes as the Doctrine of the Sabbath can be to thee and yet they did not argue thus carelesly as you doe saying Paul hath broched a new point of one Christ c. And he is singular and all alone all our Doctoures teachers are contrary to him wherefore we will not harken to what he saith but contrarywise they tooke the matter presently into consideration they fell to serch and examine the Scriptures to see if the things Paul taught were so or not and are therefore commended by the holy Ghost vnto all Posterity oh that men in these times would turne Bereanes and serch the Scriptures to see if I speak according to them or not if I bring not an expresse commandement for that I cale for let me be reiected or try whither they or I come with Thus saith the Lord in our mouthes I bring you the plaine Scripture to wit the 4th com and they bring you nothing but their reasones and consequences which they say come out of Scripture if one may beleeue them but since their reasons and consequences doe thwart and crosse a plaine commandement of Almightie Gods therefore their reasons consequences against the Sabbath day are to be reiected for mans reason must not contradict Gods expresse word vnlesse we will set reason aboue Scripture would people but marke these things they should not be long in doubt vnlesse they will Neither should they neede care that Ministers are at variance for they might easily see which side to take parte withall side it with him which bringeth the expresse word of God rather then with them which haue no word but onely a fewe reasones in vented by mans cauilling braine OBIECT VI. An other obiection is this to say that the old Sabbath day is still in force is to say by consequence that our Church is in an errour now can it be thought that the Church of God can lay in such an errour as this touching Gods Sabbath day it is impossible Herevnto I answer that it is meete we should hold as honourable an opinion of our Church as may be and yet for all that we are not bound to beleeue that it is a thing impossible for our Church to be in an errour in as great an errour too as is this there are ij sortes of erroures there is an errour of maliciousnesse wilfulnesse against the light of conscience there is an errour of frailty ignorance this latter kindof errour may doth befale euery godly person and
vs to sanctify the Lords day it is no where said in the new Testament Remember the Lords day to sanctify it 2. As there is no expresse commandement for the Lords day so is there no collection or consequence that can be made out of any text of Scripture whereby it can be necessarily infalliblie proued that euer Christ ordeined this day or left any commandement touching it with his Disciples or Apostles that this is so I proue 1. by the third parte of this my booke where by way of answer I haue showne that none of all their Scriptures nor reasons which they doe alleage for the Lords day will or can proue it any more then a Lecture day at the most they cannot proue it a Sabbath day this first argument is of greate consequence and much to be thought on I proue it also by the Testimony of Diuines of note first of M. Perkines who thus doubtfully argueth for the Lords day in his second reason for it in his Cases of Conscience Chap. 16. Sect. 2. pag. 106. The Sabbath day in the new Testament saieth he in all likelihood is tied to that which we cale the Lords day that as J take it saith he by Christ himselfe And then by by he addeth these words for in these points still we must goe by likelihoods by all which doubting speeches you may see that M. Perkins was of opinion that it could not be proued out of the Scriptures necessarily infallibly that the Lords day is a Sabbath as for doubtfull probable proofes and likelihoods what haue we to doe with them in points of this consequence for if the matter be doubtfull then it cannot be done in faieth Rom. 14.23 He that doubteth eateth not of faith saith Paul and whatsoeuer is not of faieth is a sinne 2. Doctour Prideaux in his worke vpon the Sabbath day thus writeth where finde you saith he amongst the Euangelists or Apostles any distinct institution of the Lords day yea where is the text of Scripture saith he whereby you can necessarily proue it pag. 143. Herevnto add the Testimony of Caluine of Zanchie of Vrsinus with many others who I haue formerly cited as S. Augustine Peter Martyr Paraeus Chemnitius Zuinglius Melanchton Hemingius Bastingius the two godly Matyrs M. Fryth M. Tindall with the whole Parliament assembled in the daies of Edward the Sixte all saying that the Lords day cannot be found in the Scriptures for a Sabbath My second profe of the minor is from this that our Sauiour Christ made the Lords day a trauailing day for he trauailed too fro in the Country from Ierusalem to Emmaus a matter of 15 miles vpon the Lords day as you may reade Luk. 24.13.15.29.36 so also the Disciples of Christ made this day a trauailing day as you reade in the fore alleaged text Luk. 24.13.15.29.36 yea which is more the Disciples and Apostles of Christ they were altogether ignorant that the Lords day was a Sabbath day this I thus proue the Lords day as the Patrons thereof hold is celebrated in memory of the resurrection of Christ now the Apostles themselues did not beleeue that Christ was risen from the dead vntill the day was past or vntill night as you may see Mark 16.10.11.13.14 Luk. 24.36.38.41.45.46 Ioh. 20.19.26.27 Now since Christ his Apostles did not know beleeue that Christ was risen from the deade vntill this Lords day was past how could they keepe this Lords day in memory of Christ his resurrection wherefore since Christ his Disciples made this Lords day a trauailing day since the Apostles themselues did not so much as know that this Lords day was a Sabbath day therefore no man fearing God may defend the Lords day to be a Sabbath day vnlesse he will reproue not onely Christ but also his Disciples for traualing vpon it and vnlesse hee will be thought to be wiser then the Apostles were that is by knowing the Lords day to be a Sabbath day which they were ignorant of My third profe of the Minor is from the 4th com for there the Lord commandeth vs to labour Sixe dayes saying Sixe dayes shalt thou labour c. Now this commandement was neuer repealed the Lords day is one of these 6 dayes and by name it is the first of the 6 or the first day of the weeke wherefore by Gods ordinance and commandement this Lords day is a labouring day a working day therefore no man fearing God may speake to defend the Lords day to be a Sabbath day a resting day vnlesse he will contradict Almightie God ARGVM II. My 2d argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath still in force is because it was neuer yet abolished thus it may be framed Euery man fearing God must maintaine defend either that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force or else that is was abolished But no man fearing God may maintaine defend that the 7th day Sabbath was abolished Therefore euery man fearing God must maintaine defend that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force For the Major or first of these propositiones it is of vndeniable trueth for either the 7th day Sabbath must be abolished or else it must be in force one of these two must be a trueth for there is no third way so then this first proposition cannot be denied I come to proue the minor or second proposition to wit that no man fearing God may maintaine defend that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished and my reason hereof is because it cannot be defended in faieth no man can say in faieth that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished this I proue because there is no word of God for the grownd of their faieth for there is not in all the new Testament any commandement or Prohibition as a Countermand to the 4th com where it is expresly written Thou shalt not sanctify the 7th day Sabbath no neither is there any text of Scripture out of which it can be necessarily proued that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished that this is true it appeareth by the 4th parte of my booke where by way of answer vnto all their abused textes which they brought against the 7th day Sabbath I haue showne the vanity and absurdety of their arguments wherefore since they cannot soundly infallibly proue that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished therefore may not any mā speake against the 7th day Sabbath for if he doth he speaketh against it not of faieth whatsoeuer is not of faieth it is sinne Rom. 14.23 no man fearing God will wilfully vse his tounge or penne sinnefully 2. I proue the point by many absurdeties that such doe rune into who defend the 7th day Sabbath to be abolished as 1. hereby they deface Gods royall Law mancle it rob it of its Integrity perfection diminish the compleate number of Tenn commandementes make it a morall ceremoniall Law a very monstre among
Gods lawes this no man fearing God should doe 2. Since the Lords day is no Sabbath day they that defend the 7th day Sabbath to be abolished they cast downe all Sabbaths of Gods and so draw vs to Anabaptistry and open a flood gate to all impiety prophanesse among people which no man fearing God should doe 3. Since no day can be Sabbath day by the 4th com but the old Sabbath day as hath bene proued therefore they that hold and make it abolished they make that holy prayer of our Church a meere babling with God for the 4th com being rehearsed in vaine we say Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our heartes to keepe this Law now no man fearing God should make frustrate such a deuout and ancient prayer of our Church by his absurd tenentes I might mention other absurdeties but I list not to repeate them ARGVM III. My third argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force is because so much is confessed by Diuines that are no friends but enemies vnto it thus it may be framed If such as are no friends but enemies vnto the 7th day Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force then the 7th day Sabbath is still in force But such as are no friends but enemies vnto the old Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is still in force As for the consequence it is cleere for albeit the Testimony of a man in his owne case and for his owne aduantage be of smale esteeme yet a testimony which a man giues against himselfe is euer accounted strong wherefore if I shall proue that such as mislike of the 7th day Sabbath doe for all that affirme that it is still in force then the point must needes be yeelded to me And so I come vnto the Minor here I shall proue that such as are no friends to the 7th day Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force and this I shall proue either by their expresse words or else by necessary consequence from their words for albeit they neuer intended to speake a word in defence of Gods Sabbath yet so cleere and apparent hath bene the trueth as they could not but speake for it albeit they fauoured it not my first Testimony shall be that of Doctour Prideaux in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 140. It is manifest saith he that our Sauiour did often contend with the Pharisies about the superstitiouse obseruation of the Sabbath day but where is there any thing about the abrogation of it at vbi de abrogatione ipsius suspicio and where is there any mention of setting the Lords day in the roome of it did not the Apostles keepe the Sabbath of the Iewes with the Iewes without any scruple after the ascention of Christ did not the followinge Churches doe the like for many yeeres If then there be no suspicion of the abrogation of the Sabbath day in the new Testament as Doctour Prideaux saith then it necessarily followeth that the Sabbath day is still in force My second Testimony shall be that of M. Perkines on the Creede speaking of the Creation Pag. 152. where he speaketh of the place of Gods worship then to wit the garden of Eden also of the time of Gods worship to wit the Sabbath day Touching the time of Gods worship it was the 7th day from the begining of the Creation the Sabbath day And here we must note saith he that the keeping of the Sabbath is morall some indeed saith he doe pleade that it is but a ceremony yet falslie for it was ordeined before the fale of man at which time ceremonies signifying sanctification had no place Here is no speech of the Lords day the 8th day it was not knowne at the Creation but all this is spoken of the Sabbath day the 7th day and M. Perkins doth plainly affirme that this 7th day Sabbath is morall and contesteth against those who hold it to be a ceremony saying they speake falsly c. Now if it be morall no ceremony then it must needs be still in force My third Testimony shall be that of M. Dod on the commandements who in his exposition of the 4th com pag. 122. saith that the Sabbath is morall perpetuall againe Arguments to proue the Sabbath day to be perpetuall Now that all this must be true of the old Sabbath day not of the Lords day is plaine 1. Because he nameth the Sabbath day the SeaueÌ„th day 2. Because he fetcheth reasons to proue the morality froÌ„ Gods rest at the creatioÌ„ because it was a day blessed now these things cannot agre to our Lords day 3. In pag. 129. he thus concludeth So that these reasones doe most euidently confirme to the artes of all Gods childereÌ„ that the keeping of the Sabbath day is a morall Law and bindeth vs and all men to the end of the world as much as it did the Iewes afore Christ 4. In pag. 124. he brings an other reason for the morality of the Sabbath from the time of its first institution in Adams innocency saying Now then since it was instituted in Paradise c. it may not be reputed among ceremonies Now this cannot be vnderstod of the Lords day other reasons of his I spare well if the old Sabbath day be morall as it must be by these his words and reasones then it is still in force My 4th Testimony shall be that of Doctour Bownd in his booke of the Sabbath pag. 40. The 4th com saith he caÌ„ no more be partly morall partly ceremoniall then the same liuing creature can be partly a man partly a beast yea as well may one suppose saith he the second Commandement to be partly morall partly ceremoniall also If then the 4th com be not partly ceremoniall as touching the 7th day then is the 7th day still in force My 5th Testimony shall be that which I find quoted by Doctour Bownd in his booke of the Sabbath pag. 46. out of Wolph Chron. lib. 2. cap. 1. saying But the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes because it is commanded in the Decalogue which conteineth in it nothing ceremoniall nothing Typicall nothing to be abrogated If the Decalogue conteineth nothing ceremoniall or to be abrogated then is not the 7th day ceremoniall but still inforce My 6th Testimony shall be that of M. Richard Byfield on the Sabbath against M. Brerewod pag. 88. where he thus writeth The 4th com is parte of the Law of nature so a parte of the Image of God 〈…〉 capable of a ceremony to be in it then God is If â—â—n there can be no ceremony in the 4th com then is not the 7th day therein a ceremony therefore it must be still in force so absurd it semeth to me it semed vnto these Diuines to suppose a ceremony to be in
parte of the Law and may challeng it of right then are the commandements of murther adultery stealing 2. In a bond there the debitor is bound vnto ij things the one is the summe of money the other is the Time day when it must be paid now will any man say that the Time and day mentioned in the bond is no parte of the bond there is the same reason of the thinges in a bond and of the things in the bond of the 4th com 3. The Iewes were commanded to circumcise vpon the 8th day to eate the passouer on the 14th day now will any man thinke that these daies commanded were no partes of those Commandements 4. An other reasoÌ„ to proue the time day to be a parte of the Law is because if it be taken away then the Law is vnperfect lame for take away these words But the Seauenth day from the 4th com then you leaue the 4th com imperfect and lame for it wanteth those words which the Almighty wrote in it to wit these words But the Seauenth day 2. As hereby the Law is lamed in its words so also is it in things for our new Sabbatharians when they haue abolished the old Sabbath the 7th day Sabbath then they thinke the Law is imperfect for it wanteth a day therfore they haue patched it vp againe with a new day to wit the Lords day saying the 4th com commandeth now the Lords day wherefore themselues are my witnesses that the Time day is a parte of the Law and also a parte so necessary as they hold the Lawe vnperfect vntill they haue put in a new peece to make vp the breach when a stud or pillar of an howse is taken away so as they must set in a new stud or pillar into its roome then that old stud surely was in right account a parte of the house so is it here since a new day must be put into the 4th com in the roome of the old day surely the old day was a parte of the 4th com a man may therefore as well take away the studes or pillars of an house as abolish the 7th day Sabbath and as the one tendeth to the ruine of the house so the other tendeth to the ruine of the whole Law of God but specially of the 4th com 5. If these words But the 7th day is the Sabbath be no parte of the Law or 4th com then are we not now bound to giue God one day in 7 for a Sabbath for one day in 700 may suffice more we are not commanded if so much 6. Those words which expresly forbid seruile labour are a parte of the Law or 4th com But these words The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt doe no manner of worke doe expresly forbid seruile labour Therefore these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. are a parte of the Law 4th com 7. Those words the breach whereof are punishable with death are a parte of the Law or 4th com for punishment implieth sinne and sinne presupposeth a law But these words The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt doe no worke are punishable by death see Exod. 31.15 Exod. 35.2 Therefore are these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. a parte of the Law or 4th com 8. If these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. be no parte of the Law or 4th com then by so saying you condemne all Expositors for they affirme that in these words one day in 7 is commanded c. which could not be if these words were no part of the Law or 4th com and thus much for my 5th argument ARGVM VI. My 6th argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because it is the 7th day besides which there is no 7th day thus I frame it That day which is a 7th day besids the which there is no 7th day that day must be our Sabbath day But Saturday the 7th day is a 7th day besids which there is no 7th day Therefore Saturday the 7th day must be our Sabbath day For profe of the Maior or first proposition many Diuines are of iudgement that the 7th parte of time is Gods to be consecrated to his worship seruice as morall wherefore all such Diuines must approue of this Major to wit that that day which is a 7th day besids which there is none other 7th day that day must be our Sabbath day consecrated to Gods worship and seruice my reason hereof is because that day which is the 7th day besids which there is no 7th day it is the 7th parte of time in the strictest and best accounte 2. All Diuines in expounding of the 4th com doe expound these words The 7th day is the Sabbath Exod. 20.10 to be vnderstod of a 7th day and so they would haue a 7th day to be in force though not the 7th day wherefore since they hold a 7th day to be in force they must needs grant that that day which is a 7th day besids which there is none other 7th day it must be our Sabbath day and thus all Diuines doe iustify my Major wâ—ither hey hold a 7th parte of time to be Morall or that a 7th day is Morall and so much for proofe of the Major I come now vnto the profe of the Minor or second proposition to wit that Saturday the 7th day is a 7th day besids which thereis no 7th day For this purpose note that a 7th day must be so accounted either Naturally or Diuinly first for the account Naturall Saturday must needs be a 7th day naturally besids which there is none other 7th day for Saturday is the 7th day from the Creation and there is no 7th day besids it from the Creation now the account which fet cheth its begining from the Creation that is the naturall account because time and dayes begane at the begining of the Creation and he that counteth daies in number as they were in being he followeth the Naturall computation Further as Saturday is naturally the 7th day besids which there is none other so Saturday is the 7th parte of time in a naturall accounte besids which there is no 7th parte of time this is very apparent at the first viewe 2. For the account Diuine Saturday must needs be a 7th day in Diuine account besids which there is none other 7th day for the Scriptures whose computation is Diuine doe informe vs that Saturday is a 7th day inasmuch as they cale the day whereon Christ rose the first day of the weeke Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 that is our Sunday now if Sunday be the first day of the weeke in a Diuine account then Saturday which went before it or the Saturday which comes after it must be the last and a 7th day of the weeke in a Diuine account forasmuch as the Scripture
of conscience for at the day when God shall iudge the secretes of men their consciences will beare witnesse their thoughtes accuse or excuse them Rom. 2.15 ARGVM IX My 9th argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because vnlesse it be in force the whole 4th com with euery parte percell of it is abolished nullified altogether vselesse And thus it may be framed If the 7th day Sabbath be not now in force Then is the whole 4th com nullified altogether vselesse But the 4th com is not nullified become vselesse Therefore is the 7th day Sabbath now in force First a word or two of the minor or second proposition for the trueth of it namely that the 4th com is now in force this is plaine first by the Testimony of our Sauiour who ratifieth the very least of the commandements as you may see Math. 5.19 secondly it is ratified by our Church which hath ordered that the 4th com be reade in our Churches also that the people shall vse this prayer at the rehearsall of it by the Minister Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our hearts to keepe this Law Thirdly I know no Diuine one or other that denieth it or doubteth of it it were heinouse impiety for any to deny it for it were to deny one of the tenn Morall Lawes of Almighty God So much therefore for profe of the Minor I come then vnto the Major or first proposition wherein I affirmed that the abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath doth draw after it the nullifying of the whole 4th com now I proue it In the 4th com are ij things to be considered the one is the commandement it selfe the other is the reason of the com and I shall proue that both these are nullified by abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath or by denying that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force To begine with the commandement it selfe that I may shewhow this is nullified first we must see what it is which they deny namely the 7th day Sabbath in which words we will consider that they deny the Sabbath day that is the old Sabbath day to be in force now then we will consider how they deny the 7th day that is the 7th day from the Creation to be in force now for both these they doe deny in denying that the 7th day Sabbath is now in force of these two I will begine with the Sabbath day that is the old Sabbath day which they doe deny by these textes Exod. 31.13 Col. 2.16.17 now I proue that if the old Sabbath day specified in the 4th com be abolished not in force now then is the 4th com made nonsense and to stand for a Cipher and that this may appeare you shall see it made plaine to your very eyesight The Lord God said Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it Exod. 20.8 Now the Sabbath day here mentioned it was the old Sabbath day but this old Sabbath day say these new Sabbatharians is abolished not in force now which if it be so then in this commandement Exod. 20.8 the Lord God commandeth now at this time iust nothing at all for take away these ij words Sabbath day from out the commandement and in steade thereof put so many Ciphers as you haue letters in the two words as you may doe if those words or the thing meante by those words be abolished then the commandement is no more but thus much Remember the 0000000000 to sanctify it Thus you see by deniall of the old Sabbath day they haue made the word of God of none effect Gods commandement to become nonsense and a bundle of Ciphers this must be so vnlesse they can shew vs that God commanded vs two Sabbath dayes in his 4th com the one caled Sabbath day the other caled Lords day which all the Logick in their heads can neuer doe And so much for their deniall of the Sabbath day I come now vnto the other thing that they deny to wit the 7th day from the creation in this I will consider aparte these ij things first the word day then the word Seauenth first for the word day they say that the day to wit the old day is abolished as by other textes so also by these textes Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 secondly for the word Seauenth they say that the 7th day in order of time is abolished to wit the 7th day from the Creation whence it followeth 1. That if the day be abolished then is there no day now inioyned in the 4th com for take away that day which was commanded to wit the old day then is there now no day required for a Sabbath in the 4th com so then now an howre in a day may be sufficient for a Sabhath so a Sabbath day may be turned into a Sabbath howre Loe then if by deniall of the 7th day they haue not nullified the 4th cō or as good as nullified it for the Lord was wont to haue an whole day celebrated for his worship by the 4th com but now we need giue him but an howre in a day for his worship by the 4th com thus Sabbath daies may be turned into Lecture daies is not this a manifest violence done vnto Gods Law and thus it must be by their denial vnlesse they can shew vs that God commanded ij daies in his 4th com an old day a new day the 7th day the 8th day 2dly it followeth that if the 7th day from the Creation be abolished as they say it is then now a daies we are not bound by the 4th com to giue God one day in euery 7 daies for a Sabbath but we may giue God one day in 7 or one day in 14 or one day in a moneth or one day in a yeere or one in 7 yeeres or one in a mans life time for being that the 7th day in the cō is abolished none other day there is specified or put into its roome we are now left at randome to take a day when we please for the 4th com doth not tell vs how often we should keepe a Sabbath since those words the 7th day are abolished which teld vs how often we should giue God a Sabbath now iudge thou good Reader if they haue not as good as nullified Gods 4th com by abolishing the 7th day since God was wont to haue a 7th day once a weeke by his 4th com but now we need not by that com giue him a Sabbath aboue once in a yeere or once in 7 yeeres or once in a mans life for the time how often being abolished there remaineth in the 4th com no more but the duty to keepe a Sabbath day and that we may performe if we keepe but one in our whole life But we haue not yet done In the 4th cō there is ij thinges to be obserued the one is
the duety of an Holy Rest the other is the duety of an Holy time to wit the 7th day now of these two things they hold the time a ceremony and abolished but the duety of an Holy Rest this they hold morall and this they carefully performe on the Lords day as they perswade thē selues well but if now I shall proue vnto you that their performance of this Holy Rest vpon a wrong day is not the Sabbaths duety nor the duety required by God in his 4th com then you will say with me that their abolishing of the time the 7th day is the abolishing of the 4th com also for there are but ij things inyoned in the Com. they deny the one expresly and the other by iust consequence For this purpose note that the like is not the same for example A counterfaite is like a current shilling yet it is not a current shilling Sauls Sacrificing was like to Samuels sacrificing but not the same and so the Lords day Holy Rest may be like the Sabbath daies Holy Rest but yet for all that it is not the Sabbath daies Holy Rest It is to be obserued that the Lords day Rest differeth from the Sabbath daies Rest three wayes the first is in the name for the name Rest receineth its denomination most properlie from the day wherin it is done thus the Rest performed on a Fast day is called a Fast daies rest the Rest on a common Holie day is to be called an Holy day rest not Sabbath day rest the worke done on a Saturday is called Saturdaies worke and the worke done on a friday it is called Fridaies worke and so the Rest performed on the Lords day it is the Lords day rest not the Sabbath day rest it is absurd to misename things for if you may call the Rest performed on the Lords day the Sabbath daies rest why may you not by the like reason call the Fridaies worke Saturdaies worke and the rest on a common holy day the Sabbath day rest and a Fastdaies rest or any day of publike thanksgiuings rest the Sabbath daies rest and why may we not call Sauls sacrificing Samuels sacrificing the Lords daies Rest therfore is not the Sabbath daies Rest The other way whereby the Lords day rest differeth from the Sabbath daies Rest is in respect of the 4th Comm. for the rest performed on the Sabbath day is properlie the rest of the 4th Com. because the 4th Com. inioyneth its rest to be vpon the Sabbath day but the rest performed on the Lords day cannot be a rest belonging to the 4th Comm. because the 4th Comm. doth not command any rest vpon that day which is named Lords day it commandeth onelie such a rest as is on the day named Sabbath day and it commandeth labour worke on the day called Lords day it being one of the sixe working daies Happily they will say that they performe this rest on the Lords day in conscience to the 4th Com. But I answer that it cannot belong therfore vnto the 4th Com. for it is not mens conscience but Gods ordinance that maketh a rest to be the rest of the 4th Com. which I thus declare if mens keeping a rest with a respect vnto the 4th Com. would therfore make it a rest commanded in the 4th Com. then it shall follow that if any man in his ignorance will obserue the rest on a fast day on a Coronation day in a conscience of the 4th Com. faineing to himselfe that it is commanded in the 4th Com. then it shall come to passe that Fast dayes Coronation dayes shall stand by virtue of the 4th Com. and be Sabbathes too further by this deuise whereas the Iewes had many Sabbaths some weekly others yeerly they might haue obserued their yeerly Sabbaths in conscience of the 4th Com. The third way whereby the rest of the Lords day differeth from the Rest of the Sabbath day is in regard of the ends wherfore they are obserued for the Holy rest of the Sabbath day is kept to preserue in Gods Church the memory of the Creation but the Holy rest of the Lords day is to preserue the memory of the Redemption the Sabbath daies rest mindeth vs of Gods rest vpon the Sabbath day but the Lords daies rest mindeth vs of Christs Resurrection vpon the Lords day Thus you haue sene it manifested that the Holy rest which we now performe on the Lords day it is not that Holy rest required in the 4th Comm. it is onely like vnto it but it is not the same for it differeth 1. in the name the one being properly called the Sabbath daies Rest the other the Lords daies Rest 2. It differeth in respect of the 4th Com. for the Rest proper to the 4th Com. is a rest vpon the 7th day vpon a day whose name is properly Sabbath day but our rest is vpon the 8th day vpon a day whose proper name is Lords day 3. It differeth in the vse end for the Rest on the Sabbath day is to preserue a memory of the Creation but the rest on the Lords day is to preserue a memory of the Resurrection or Redemption 4. I will add a 4th difference which is this the rest vpon the Sabbath day which is commanded in the 4th com is a rest to be obserued in imitation of Gods Rest on the 7th day at the Creation Genes 2.3 Exod. 20.11 but the Rest on the Lords day is not done in imitation of Gods rest at the Creation nor can be for God rested on the 7th day our Lords daies rest is on the 8th day now this is farr from imitating of God when he rested vpon one day and we will Rest vpon an other And thus in these four respects it is euident that the Rest which now we keepe it is none of Gods Rest ordeined in his 4th Comm. it is but like it as a counterfaite shilling is like a currant shilling let no man therfore any longer deceiue himselfe by thinking he keepeth Gods rest when he resteth on the Lords day To conclude forasmuch as the Holy rest we now keepe on the Lords day it is not that Holy rest required in the 4th com hereby you see plainly that now we neither giue God the time no nor the dueties of the time and that by abolishing of the sacred sanctified time of the 7th day they haue also abolished the Holy rest required of God in this 4th Com. and thus there being but two things inioyned vs in the 4th Comm. they haue reiected them both iudge then good Reader if they haue not by abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath made voide and nullified also the 4th Commandement for they obserue iust nothing of all that God commandeth but haue reiected both the time the dueties in the time And thus much for proofe that by abolishing the 7th day Sabbath they haue made voide nullified the 4th Com. it selfe I come now vnto the reason of the 4th Com. to shew you how they haue nullified made voide that also for they haue made most horrible hauocke with Gods Commandement by reiecting the Saturday Sabbath The
body of the 4th Com. is conteined in iij. verses Exod. 20.8.9.10 and I haue showne how these iij. verses of the xx Chapter of Exodus are made voide and nullified and now I come to shew how they haue made frustrate also an other whole verse to wit verse the 11th and so they shall haue filled vp the mesure of their iniquity fulâ— by a sacrilegiouse robbing God of iiij whole verses out of his Morall Law by taking away the key of knowledge from them for I account it all as one to rend iiij verses of sacred Scripture out of the Bible to peruert the sense of them or to turne the sense vse of them into Ciphers That I may shew you how by denying and abolishing the 7th day Sabbath they haue nullified made voide the reason of the 4th Com. also first I will recite the reason for in sixe daies the Lord made the heauen the earth the sea all that in them is and rested the 7th day Therfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it Exod. 20.11 This 11th verse is a reason giuen by Almightie God thereby to perswade vnto the obedience of the 4th Com. The Commandement was this that we should worke vpon those sixe daies which were the first sixe daies from the begining of the Creation that we should rest from labour on the 7th day from the Creation now the reason whereby God would perswade vs herevnto is a reason drawne from his owne example because that in those sixe daies God himselfe laboured and in the same 7th day God himselfe rested yea and therfore hallowed sanctified this 7th day Now what reason can be more liuly then a reason drawne from Gods example what argument can be more moueing with the sonnes daughters of God then an argumeÌ„t fetched from the example of their heauenly fathers but let the oldest man liuing tell me if euer he heard any Minister in the pulpit presse the keeping of the 4th com by this reason which God hath here added vnto his 4th com or let any man tell me if euer he heard the sanctification of the Lords day which is the first day of the weeke pressed by this reason here added by God vnto his 4th com Nay what Minister will not be ashamed to perswade men either to the keeping of the 4th com or to keeping of the Lords day by this reason which heere God hath propounded for we neither worke on those 6 dayes wherin God wrought neither doe we rest on that 7th day wherein God rested for we rest on the 8th day or first day not as God did on the 7th day our Lords day God did not rest on it for our imitation but he laboured on it for our imitation so as there is no correspondency betwixt our Lords day Sabbath our now keeping of the 4th com Gods example reason propounded vnto vs. When did you euer heare any Minister say thus Let vs rest from our laboures on the Lords day because God himselfe as our Patterne rested on the Lords day and let vs sanctify hallow the first day because God blessed sanctified the first day you see how God hath added a most liuely effectuall reason to his 4th com drawne from his owne example to moue vs to rest on the Lords day to sanctify the first day tell me if euer you heard any Minister thus presse this reason Gods example or if yee haue heard any houer aboute it as loath to touch it he hath nicknamed dayes caling the Lords day Sabbath day the 8th or first day the 7th day wherefore because Ministers cannot deuise how to make Gods example and exemplary reason to fit square to our new Sabbath therefore they are mute sileÌ„t touching it and thus you see the reason of the 4th com standeth in our Bibles but for a Cipher men are a shamed to vse it least they should shame themselues is it not a lamentable thing that Ministers are ashamed to deliuer the whole will counsaile of God least thereby they should both shame themselues bewray vnto the people their foule errour in abolishing of Gods Sabbaths for if this reason were vsed men would easily see how wide we are from the marke in keeping the Lords day in conscience of the 4th com when as the very reason of the 4th com would plainly â—each vs that it is the 7th day Sabbath wherein God himselfe rested that we should rest and not on the 8th day Sabbath To summe vp all you haue seene how they that abolish the 7th day Sabbath they haue turned the body of the 4th com into a company of Ciphers this hath bene declared proued many wayes yea they haue also turned the reason to the 4th com into so many words so many Ciphers for it standeth in the booke of God for a mute and is like a blanke in a Lottery no Minister vseing this reason of God before his people to perswade them to the keeping of the Lords day or of the Sabbath day by it So then since they haue not onely nullified the commandement but also made voyde and vselesse the reason annexed to the commandemeÌ„t hereby you see they haue by reiecting Gods hallowed and sanctified time the Saturday Sabbath reiected also the whole 4th com with euery parte and persell of it roote and branch There are not many verses in the Morall Law and behold how of those fewe verses they haue turned into Ciphers made voyde vselesse no lesse then iiij whole verses v. 8.9.10.11 there are not aboue 15 or 16 verses in all the Morall law now whosoeuer reiecteth the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath you see he maketh voyde frustrate no lesse then 4 of those verses it is an errour caling for deepest consideration a speedy reformation Thus much for my 9th argument ARGVM X. My 10th Argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath mentioned in the law is still in force is because our Sauiour Christ ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law to endure for euer Mat. 5.18 thus it may be framed He that ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law vnto the least letter to last for euer he ratified the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force But Christ ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law vnto the least letter to last for euer Therefore Christ ratified the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force As for the Major or first proposition it is cleere of it selfe for nothing therin can be doubted of for admit that the 7th day Sabbath be the least thing commanded in the Morall Law why then hee that ratified euery thing commanded in the Law vnto the very least
to deale against the enemies of Gods law who would abolish the whole law as Libertines Anabaptists our new vpstart Eatonists they doe defend Gods law to be Morall perpetuall by this text for one Math. 5.18 Nay I know not any text we haue in all the new Testament that is more auailable for this purpose theÌ„ is this one text but if now our diuines will stand to defend these 4 answeres which I haue confuted then why may not any of these Libertines or the rest make the same answers to them when they produce this Text Mat. 5.18 to defend the perpetuity of Gods Law as first why may not these Libertines answer saying by the word Law in Mat. 5.18 may be meant both the Morall the Ceremoniall Laws and so Christ should ratify the Morall Law no more then he did the Ceremoniall Law 2. And why may they not answer also that the duration of the Law here spoken of by Christ is but vntill Christs passion 3. And why may they not answer you also that there are some iotes things in the Law that belong not vnto vs Christianes as in the preface to the Commandements Gods deliuerance of the Israelites out of Egypt And the reason to the 5th com that thy daies may be long in the Land that the Lord thy God giueth thee that is in the Land of Canaan that so you shall not from this text defend all and euery of the tenn commandemeÌ„ts Wherefore either they must withdrawe renounce these 3 answers made to mee or else they must receiue them at the hands of Libertines Anabaptists Antinomians Thus much for my 10th Argument whereby I haue proued that our Sauiour Christ ratified the 7th day Sabbath coÌ„manded in the Morall Law because hee ratified the very least things commanded in the Morall Law ARGUM. XI My eleauenth argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath still in force is because our Sauiour Christ would haue it obserued for about â—0 yeeres after the death of all Ceremonies saying Pray that your flight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day Mat. 24 20. and it may be thus framed He that commanded his Disciples to vse all meanes possible that they might not profane the Sabbath day by working trauailing moileing toileing on it for about 50 yeeres after the death end of all Ceremonies hee would haue the Sabbath day sanctified still in force But Christ commanded his Disciples to vse all possible meanes that they might not profane the Sabbath day by working crauailing moiling toiling on it for about 50 yeeres after the death and end of all Coremonies Therefore Christ would haue the Sabbath day sanctified and still in force For the Major or first proposition two things are there in considerable as for the former it is a most cleere case for he that would not haue the Sabbath day profaned he would haue it sanctified and obserued like as in the 7th com in that God would not haue a man commit adultery it followeth that God would haue him liue chastly the remouing of one contrary is the bringing in of the other the forbidding of a sinne is the commanding of its contrary virtue And further he that willeth all possible meanes to be vsed for the auoiding of any euill he would that that euill should be auoided the contrary good brought in so he that commanded all possible meanes to be vsed that the Sabbath day might not be profaned he would not haue the Sabbath day profaned but that the contrary good should be brought in which is that the Sabbath day should be sanctified for to that very end that it might not be profaned but sanctified he appointed the meanes to be vsed now no man commandeth meanes to be vsed for the obtaining of that thing which he would not obtaine The other thing considerable is that he that willed the Sabbath day should be sanctified and kept from profanation 50 yeeres after the death of all Ceremonies he willed that the Sabbath day should be still in force vnto this day the reason hereof is because there was but one proper time for the abolishing of all ceremonies all ceremonies they were abolished together at once therefore whatsoeuer was ratified to be obserued 40 or 50 yeeres after the proper time for the death end of all ceremonies that thing was no ceremony for if it were it should not haue suruiued all ceremonies neither was it abolished with ceremonies as a ceremony for then no care shoul haue bene vsed so long after for its obseruation now if it was not a bolished with ceremonies at the proper time when all ceremonies were abolished then was it no ceremony but a Morall consequently to last perpetually I grant that many ceremonies were in vse in the Church long after they were abolished but it was by connivency and by sufferance onely for the weakenesse of those times but neuer by the authority of the Lord of them as this is for the Sabbath day it was not by conniuency for Christ commanding his Disciples to pray against the profanation of the Sabbath day doth thereby warrant the sanctification of it Furthermore whatsoeuer was authorized to be vsed in the Church 40 or 50 yeeres after Christ his death that is still to be retained vsed in the Church for all things which the Apostles did either erect or continue in the Church for 10.20.30 or 40 yeeres after Christ his Passion not as conniued at but as authorized as a duety those things are still in force in the Church no instance can be showne to the contrary And so much for proofe of the Major I come now vnto the Minor or second proposition this I proue out of Mat. 24.20 But pray that your flight be not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath day Which wordes of our Sauiour doe fully proue my Minor for 1. these words are a commandement of Christs in that he biddeth them pray But pray c. 2. This commandement it was directed vnto his Disciples as you may see Mat. 24.1.2 3dly This commandemeÌ„t was that they should vse all possible meanes to auoid their flight vpon the Sabbath day for there was none other meanes to be vsed for the auoiding of this flight but onely prayers to God for their study care and other humane naturall meanes could doe nothing in this matter for the Preuention of this flight so then prayer being all the meanes that possiblie could be vsed Christ commanded his Disciples to vse all meanes that was possible to be vsed yea since prayer must be accompanied with all meanes indeauores of man if more meanes could haue bene vsed Christ would haue had more vsed 4. This meanes of prayer to God which Christ commanded them to vse was to this end that they might not profane the Sabbath day for so saith the text pray that your flight be not on the Sabbath day Whereby you
we shall treade in his footestepes But this is no imitation of God to consider how hee rested on the 7th day and for vs to rest on the 8th day or when hee rested on the 7th last day of the weeke for vs to rest on the first day of the weeke this is rather to thwarte and crosse God then to imitate follow God To imitate God is to doe as like him to come as neere him as possible we can now no day of the weeke is so like the day wherin God rested as our Saturday the 7th day because God rested on the Saturday 7th day nor can we come so nere God in practise on any day of the weeke as we may on our Saturday which is the 7th day So much for the Maior I come to the Minor to wit that we must imitate God in his keeping of the 7th day Sabbath and this I proue 1. in generall for the Scriptures doe frequently set God before vs for our pattorne exhorte vs to be imitators followers of him as Eph. 5.1 Be yee followers of God as deere children c. Math. 5.48 Yee shall therfore be perfect as your Father which is perfect 1. Pet. 1.15.16 But as he which hath called you is holy so be yee holy in all manner of connersation Because it is written be yee holy for I am Holy Luk 6.36 bee yee therfore mercifull as your Father also is mercifull Thus we see how frequent the Sacred Scriptures are in exhorting vs to be followers imitators of God doubtlesse God doth delight to be imitated by menn to see them follow his ensamples in such things as hee hath set him seâ—fe forth vnto vs to be imitated in if then we must imitate God in one thing then why not in an other Yea if we must imitate God in things more difficult as in his Holinesse Mercifulnesse in his perfection much rather should we imitate him in things most facile easie to be done now what is more easie for vs to doe then to change the Sunday Sabbath into the Saturday Sabbath so should we imitate God indede and keepe the 7th day as hee did at the Creation 2. I proue the Minor in particular from the 4th Com. where God Almightie commandeth vs to rest vpon the 7th day Exod. 20.10 and then he fetcheth a reason to moue vs to doe so from his owne example because himselfe rested on the 7th day Exod. 20.11 as if he had thus said Rest you on the 7th day as I did for I at the Creation rested on the 7th day I shall further proue the same by the Testimony of Diuines of note Musculus in his Exposition vpon the 4th Com. fol. 66. The imitation of the example of God saith he standeth in this that in the same Sixe daies in which God wrought all his workes wee worke ours and in the seauenth day when hee rested from his we doe rest also from our workes according to his example Thus you see Musculus expounding the 4th Com. so as he saith we must imitate the example of God and rest vpon the same 7th day in which God himselfe rested M. Perkins on the 4th Com. in his first volume pag. 47. vpon these words of the Com. for in sixe daies c. saith thus This is the third reason of this Com. taken from the like example That which I did thou also must doe but I rested the 7th day Therfore thou must doe the like Againe Perkins in his Cases of conscience pag. 106. D. saith thus The second reason is taken from Gods Example That which the Lord himselfe hath done in person the same must man doe by his Commandement But the Lord himselfe rested the 7th day Therfore man must doe the same This reason made by God to the creature must stand in force till hee reuerse it which yet he hath not done nor doth Thus M. Perkins affirmeth the trueth of my Minor most fully M. Dod on the Commandements vpon these words of the 4th Com. for in sixe daies c. pag. 121. saith thus The third reason is taken from Gods example c. as if he should say if thou wilt follow examples then follow the example of the best now what better example can there be then of God himselfe who when he made the world rested on the 7th day Therefore from his example learne thou that on the 7th day thou giue thy selfe wholly to the dueties of sanctification To the same essect he speaketh againe in pag. 167. where he saith that God proposed himselfe for a President to be imitated of vs God ceased from creating on the 7th day therefore hee would haue vs cease from our workes also on the 7th day In which words M. Dod affirmeth that we must imitate God in his keeping of the 7th day Sabbath so much for profe of the Minor Herevnto some may say the example of God was for the old day for the 7th day c. To them I say they say the trueth what other day is commanded in the 4th com then the old day the 7th day can they thinke the 4th old com should command any new day as the 8th day or can Gods example agree to any new day surely this old 4th com is for none other then for an old day and so is Gods old example Happily some will answer that reason annexed to the 4th com where vpon this argument leaneth is no parte of the 4th com it is onely an appurtinance vnto it c. I reply will you therefore reiect this reason annexed by God then fall you into these absurdeties 1. That you will retaine the Sabbath day mentioned at the begining of the com Exod. 20.8 yet reiect Gods reasoÌ„ annexed therto to stirre vp to the obseruatioÌ„ thereof as if Gods reason were forcelesse vselesse these thinke they haue no need of Gods exsamples to leade moue them to obedience 2. They absurdly faine that this reason taken from Gods Rest on the 7th day at the Creation is Iewish and Gods ensample belonging vnto the people of the Iewes onely or else why will they reiect Gods example loue they not to be followers of God or shall the Iewes onely be the followers of God but not Christianes 3. If you say this reason belongeth not vnto vs Christianes then doe you cast a foule blurre vpon our Diuines Musculus Perkines Dod with many others who haue expounded applied this reason from Gods example vnto vs Christianes yea M. Perkins saith expresly that This reason made by God vnto the Creature it must stand in force vntill hee reuerse it which yet he hath not done nor doth So much for this answer I conclude if we will become followers of God imitate him as he hath prescribed in his 4th com then must we sanctifye the Saturday 7th day Sabbath ARGVM XIV My 14th argument for maintenance of the Saturday Sabbath is
because wee may together with Antinomiās Libertines Anabaptists as well abolish all the Morall Law by the Scriptures as with them abolish the Saturday Sabbath and thus I argue If wee may together with Libertines Antinomians Anabaptists abolish by the Scriptures the Saturday Sabbath as a Jewish Ceremony Then may wee with them also abolish by the Scriptures the wholl Law of God euen all the tenn commandements as Jewish Ceremonies But neither wee may nor yet may those lawlesse Christians of Libertines Antinomians Anabaptists abolish by the Scriptures the wholl Law of Gods tenn commandements as Iewish ceremonies Therefore wee may not together with Libertines Antinomians Anabaptists those lawlesse Christians abolish by the Scrïptures the Saturday Sabbath as a Iewish Ceremony For profe of the consequence it is well knowne that those Lawlesse Christians of Libertines Antinomians Anabaptistes doe reiect the Santification of all Sabbaths not but that they keepe the Lords day as a Sabbath together with those Protestant Churches amonge whom they liue but they keepe it onely as an ordinance of the Magistrate and as in obedience to their gouerners yet so too as in case they could doe any common seruile worke on the Lords day without offence to any they would and doe professe it that they would but to keepe any Sabbath as a Diuine institution and as an ordinance of Gods and by virtue of the 4th commandement this they doe reiect as Iewish and Ceremoniall and for their warrant among other textes of Scripture as wee doe so doe they alleage Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 against the Saturday Sabbath shewing that it is abolished as a signe and shaddow c. Thus they bring Scripture against the old Sabbath as well as wee the same Scriptures that we bring so then wee are iustly ranked with Libertines Antinomians and Anabaptists for abolishing by the Scriptures the ancient Sabbath day Now J procede to proue the Major for as for the Minor it needeth no profe if wee may by these Scriptures Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 Together with these Sectaries abolish the Saturday Sabbath which is one thing commanded in the morall Law then may we together with them also by these Scriptures Eph. 2.15 Heb. 7.12 Heb. 10.1 Col. 2.14 Abolish the wholl Morall Law all things commanded therein the reason hereof is plaine and manifest for these Sectaries doe bring Scripture against the wholl Law of God as well as against that one parte thereof which commandeth the Saturday Sabbath now if we will shake hands with them in the one why not in the other also if we will ioyne with them in vrging pressing these textes Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 Against the 7th day Sabbath which is one branch of the Law why then should we not by the same reason ioyne with them also in vrging pressing these other textes Eph. 2.15.7.12 Heb. 10.1 Col. 2.14 Against the wholl Law euery branch thereof and so abolish it too ther 's the same equity for both let vs not therefore abolish Gods Sabbath day vnlesse we minde to turne Anabaptists and Antinomians and abolish the wholl Law also Happily it will be thought ther is not so good reason to abolish the wholl Law by these Scriptures which these Sectaries doe alleage against it as there is in those other Scriptures which they alleage against the Saturday Sabbath But for this matter I shall make it appeare that as these Sectaries haue as little cause to vrge these textes against the wholl Morall Law as they or wee haue to alleage those textes against the old Sabbath day so they haue as good cause as strong reasons to alleage these textes against the wholl Law as they and we haue to alleage those textes against the old Sabbath day for this purpose let vs compare the textes on either partes First for the textes brought against the Sabbath day Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 Here say they wee the Sabbath in the Morall Law is made a signe a shaddow now all signes Shaddowes are abolished at Christs coming hee being the substance of those shaddowes 2. In the text Col. 2.16.17 Say they and wee here we haue the very thing in question expressy mentioned namly Sabbaths and Sabbaths too in the plurall number so all Sabbaths both weekly annuall in the Morall Law and in the Ceremoniall Law are abolished Now on the other parte for the textes brought against the wholl lawsee Heb. 10 1. for the Law hauing a shadow of good things to come c. Where the things commanded by the Law are called a shadow hence I thus reason if the Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law be abolished because Sabbaths commanded in a Law are a shadow Col. 2.16.17 Then are all things commanded in the Morall Law abolished and consequently the Law also because things commanded in a Law are a shadow Heb. 10.1 Is not there as good reason for the one as for the other come we to the other textes also see Eph. 2.15 Col. 2.14 Heb. 7.12 Where it is said there is a chang of the Law that the handwriting of ordinances is put out that the Law of commandements is abrograted In which texts it is affirmed that the law is abolished here then may they say in like manner in these textes we haue the thing in question expresly mentioned namly the Law by Law in Scripture is somtimes meant both the Morall Ceremoniall Law Mal. 2.7 And so the wholl Law is abolished both Morall and Ceremoniall well then hence I thus reason if the Sabbath in the Morall Law be abolished by Col. 2.17 Because there is mention of Sabbaths abolished then must not the Morall Law be abolished also by Eph. 2.15 Col. 2.14 Heb. 7.12 Because here is mention made of the law abolished is there not the same reason in both for if you will extend the word Sabbaths which is onely vnderstod of the Sabbaths in the Ceremoniall Law vnto the Sabbath inioyned in the Morall Law why may not they extend the word Law which is onely vnderstode of the Ceremoniall Law vnto the Morall Law whereas you alleage that in Col. 2.16.17 There is mention of Sabbaths in the plurall number and therefore all kinds of Sabbaths weekly and anniuersary must be abolished why may not they and you with them argue also and say that in Eph. 2.15 and in Col. 2.14 There is mention of ordinances commandements in the plurall number and therefore are all Gods ordinances and all Gods commandements whither in the Morall Law or in the Ceremoniall abolished Thus you see then there is as good reason for vs to ioyne with Antinomians and Anabaptistes in casting away the Morall Law as to ioyne with them in casting away the Sabbath day commanded in the Morall Law we may as well cast away by the Scriptures misapplied euen all Gods commandements and all Gods ordinances as Gods Sabbath day we may as well turne Anabaptists in
speciall notice commendation in all liklihode it had bene most fit to haue bene passed ouer in silence or at the most to haue made a bare and sparing relation of it as to haue said they rested the Sabbath day and added no more but surely the addition of these words according to the commandement 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haue an emphasis in them for as in diuinity these words to doe a thing against or contrary to a Commandement doe carry with them a dispraise and are a note of a discommendable action so on the contrary to doe a thing according to a commandement doth carry with it a praise and are a note of an action laudable and commendable where did we euer reade that either Prophets or Apostles did make reporte of any mans action added this therevnto that it was done according to a commandement or according to Gods will minde but that this was added by way of praise commendation for this end looke the vse of this addition in these scriptures Luk. 2.22.23.24.39 ij Ioh. 4. Gal 1 4. Luk. 1.6 Dan. 9.5 Ezra 3.4 Ezra 10.3.5 So much for profe of the Minor Happily some may say that it mattereth not so much what these women did at that time considering that they then knew not of the abolition of any ceremonies c. But for the auoiding of this I doe build the weight of my argument as you may see not vpon the action of those women but vpon the allowance approbation of the same by the Holy Ghost now the Holy Ghost knew well enough that all ceremonies were abolished the day before this Sabbath was kept Col. 2.14 ARGVM XIX My 19th argument in defence of the Sabbath of the Lord proueth that it must be morall because if you make it a ceremony abolished then you rase out one of Gods Tenn commandements by making it but a tautologie and needlesse repetition of what was commanded in other of the commandements and thus I argue That doctrine which teacheth and affirmeth such things as make one of Gods Tenn commandements a tautologie needlesse repetition of what is commanded in other of the same 10 commandements that doctrine is false and erroniouse But the doctrine which teacheth that that ancient ordinance of Gods the old Sabbath day is a ceremony abolished is that doctrine which maketh one of Gods 10 commandements by name the 4th com a tautologie needlesse repetition of what is elsewhere commanded in other of the 10 commandements Therefore the Doctrine which teacheth affirmeth that that ancient ordinance of Gods the old Sabbath day is a ceremony abolished is erroniouse false For the Major none will deny it since it were to ouerturne the number of Gods commandements which are Tenn Deut. 10.4 to make things differing in number one and the same in nature so make an horrible confusion yea no man can indure to heare on it that there should be a tautologie in the Morall Law I come therefore vnto the Minor to shew that they which hold the old Sabbath day to be a ceremony they make one of Gods tenn command by name the fourth to be a tautologie needlesse repetition of that which is commanded in other of the command for this purpose we will consider all the things commanded in the 4th com then shew you that if that time of the 7th day be a ceremony abolished then there is nothing left in the 4th com but what is commanded in the other of the 10 commandements All the things then commanded in the 4th com are three the one is holy religiouse exercises the other is a rest from labour the third is the time wherein these are to be performed as for the first of these to wit holy religiouse exercises as prayer preaching singing of Psalmes with the like these being partes of Gods worship and furtherances thereof are commanded in the second Commandement for the second commandement forbiddeth all false worship commandeth the true worship of God as prayer preaching Psalmes and Sacraments as Diuines acknowledge so then we neede not rune to the 4th com for these dueties of the Sabbath to wit holy exercises of prayer singing of Psalmes preaching and reading of Gods word for we haue them inioyned in the affirmatiue parte of the second commandement thus for the first point you see that as touching the duetie of holy exercises the 4th com inioyneth nothing but what was before inioyned in the 2th com and so the 4th command in thes respect is but a tautologie needlesse repetition of what is else where commanded in other of the to commandements As for the second thing inioyned in the 4th com it is Rest from laboures now this duety if you consider it as a naturall Rest for the refreshing of the body being toiled spent with laboures then so it is inioyned in the sixte commandement in the affirmatiue parte thereof but if you consider it as a spirituall rest it being a vacancy from corporall laboures that so way may be made for holy exercises then so it is inioyned in the second commandement also for when the second commandement inioyneth Gods worship it necessarily inferreth a rest and cessation from how shold and field workes from merchandizing buying and selling that so men may be at liberty fredome to worship God thus for the second thing to wit Rest you see the 4th cō inioyneth nothing but what was before cōmanded in the 2th com therefore the 4th cō in this point is but a tautologie and needlesse repetition of what is else where inioyned in other of the 10 commandements The third last thing is the time inioyned in the 4th com which since they say it is abolished it followeth that there is no time or day now in the 4th com inioyned touching which I thus argue if the time to wit that 7th day from the Creation or the last day of the weeke inioyned in the 4th com be a Iewish Ceremony and abolished then is there no day inioyned now by the 4th commandement for take from a Law the thing it inioyneth then that Law inioyneth nothing for example those anniuersary and Ceremoniall Sabbaths mentioned in Leuit. 23. and abolished by Colos 2.17.18 when God abolished those very daies commanded in those Lawes he vtterly abolished all daies that were inioyned in those commandemēts those dayes being Ceremonies when they were abolished not other daies came in the roome of them by those commandements Ther 's the same reason for the day and time in the 4th com if it be supposed a Ceremony and abolished wherefore the old day being abolished and no new day inioyned by the 4th com there is now nothing lefte in the 4th com peculiar vnto it nor can they shew vs any thing in it as now which is not else where commanded in the Decalogue thus you see if you hold the old Sabbath day to be abolished
then is this 4th commandement a tautologie and needlesse repetition of things before commanded Or if you would suppose that that particular time in the 4th com is abolished but yet that a time or some time still remaineth in the 4th com why still it will come to the same for a time or some time is inioyned in the 2th com for where God requireth his worship there it is necessarily inferred that he there requireth a time or some time for his worship without which it cannot be Thus I haue proued it that if you hold the old Sabbath day for an abolished ceremony then you rase and deface the 4th com by making it but a tautologie and a needlesse repetition of such things as are commanded before in the 2th com it remaineth therefore that that doctrine which affirmeth the old Sabbath day to be a Iewish Ceremony is false erroniouse the contrary whereto is the very trueth ARGVM XX. My 20th argument for defence of the Lords Sabbath proueth that it must be morall or else there is no day at all commanded now by the 4th com and thus I argue If we abolish Saturday the old Sabbath day which was commanded in the 4th com then we leaue no day as commanded now by the 4th com But we must leaue a day as commanded now by the 4th commandement Therefore we must not abolish Saturday the old Sabbath day For the Minor it is confessed by all that there is a day commanded now by the 4th com therefore I passe that point as granted and so come vnto the Major the consequence whereof I proue to be sound by an Induction of particulares of which â—here is one and the same reason First for their new-moones which God commanded the Israelites Numb 28.11 wherein they were on euery first day of the moneth to rest from laboures Amos. 8.5 And to repaire vnto the Minister for instruction ij King 4.23 Now when God abolished by the text Col. 2.16.17 that very day commanded in that Law Numb 28.11 then hee left no day as commanded still by that law Numb 28.11 In the next place come we vnto all those anniuersary Sabbaths commanded in the Ceremoniall Law the Israelites had one Sabbath on the first day of the 7th moneth Leuit. 23.24 againe the Israelites had two other Sabbaths in the 7th moneth as we reade Leuit. 23.39 besides diuers other Sabbaths there mentioned in Leuit. 23. Now when by this text Col. 2.16.17 euery of those daies commanded in those lawes were abolished there were no daies left as commanded still by those commandements in Leuit. 23. Now there is the same reason of the day commanded in the 4th com if you hold it a Ceremony as there was of those other dayes which were Ceremonies Leuit. 23. for as the time in these anniuersary lawes was a Ceremony so my aduersaries hold the time in this 4th com is a Ceremony wherefore there is the same reason in all that is abolish that speciall time specified in any of these commandements and you leaue no day as commanded in these lawes commandements 2. I proue it from all those textes which are vsually brought against the Lords Sabbaths as Exod. 31.13 Col. 2.16.17 Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 In which texts our Anti-Sabbatharians or enemies to Gods Sabbaths say that the Sabbath day of the Iewes commanded in the 4th com is abolished as a signe and shaddow c. And that text of esteeming one day aboue an other Rom. 14.5 And that text also reprouing the Galatianes so obseruing of daies Gal. 4.10 are spoken against that day mentioned in the 4th com wherefore since the word day is of as larg an extent in these texts as the same word day is of in the 4th commandement it is as cleere as the sunne at noone day that if that day commanded in the 4th com be an abolished Ceremony then is there now no day commanded by the 4th com and if the obseruation of those daies commanded in the 4th com be reprouable and abolished by Gal. 4.10 c. Then are there no dayes now in vse by virtue of the 4th com the reason is because those dayes which were commanded are abolished as they say It is more then manifest then that if we abolish Saturday the old Sabbath day once commanded in the 4th com then we leaue no day as commanded now by the 4th com we must therefore cleaue vnto Saturday which God hath sanctified hallowed Genes 2.2.3 or else bid farewell vnto all daies Sabbaths as diuinly instituted ARGVM XXI My 21th argumeÌ„t for the defence of Gods Sabbath proueth that it must be morall still in force or else we mancle lame the royall Law of Gods commandements receiuing acknowledging but but some parceles peeces thereof onely doe deny that intire and whole Law of God to be whole intire to vs or to belong vnto vs in the Jntegrity perfection thereof And thus I argue If any man abolish the 7th day Saturday Sabbath commanded in the Law of Gods 10 commandements hee must also mancle and lame that royall Law of God receiuing acknowledging but some parceles and peeces thereof onely and he must deny that intire and whole Law of God which was vttered by the voice of God wrote in Tables of stone by the finger of God to be whole and intire to vs or to belong to vs in the Jntegritie and perfection thereof But no man may mancle lame that royall Law of Gods 10 commandements receiuing but some parceles and peeces thereof onely nor deny that intire whole Law of God to be whole and intire to vs or to belong to vs in the integrity and perfection thereof Therefore no man may abolish the 7th day Saturday Sabbath commanded in the Law of Gods 10 commandements