Roman Bishop but directly against the sense of the Ancient Fathers whom he was bound by solemn Oath to follow who as a learned Man h Iv. Launoy Epist ad Raimundum Formentinum pars 2. of the Roman Communion hath largely proved understand hereby every faithful Pastor in the Church of Christ Who according to the way and method of the Divine Counsels which is to give unto those that have to bestow more on those who make a good use of what they have already received immediately hereupon opens to the Apostles his purpose of gathering a Church and drawing more disciples to him besides themselves who should perpetually keep and preserve this Confession and withal declares that he would use Peter as an eminent instrument in this great undertaking 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and I also or moreover say unto thee beside what I have said already I tell thee further Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church His Speech is directed to Peter but it is evident from what hath been said that in him he comprehends all the Apostles as they were all comprehended in his Confession Who knew already that he was Christ the Son of the Living God but did not understand his intention of gathering a Church by their means This Name of Peter we met withal before Matth. x. 2. being given him at his first coming to our Saviour John i. 42. Where he told him Thou shalt be called Cephas which is by interpretation a stone or Peter Concerning which Justin Martyr a Dialog cum Tryh p. 333 334. See also Tertullian L. iv adv Marcionem c. 13. hath this Excellent Observation That it was to show our Saviour was the very same God who in the beginning had given new Names to Abraham and Sarah to Jacob and Joshua And for the same reason he called other two Disciples by the name of Boanerges to signify that he had the same Authority by which names were anciently changed and that he was their Lord and Soveraign of which the imposing a name on any person was a mark So that the Words of our Saviour in this place are to be understood as if he had said Thou art he to whom when thou first camest to me I gave a new Name and called Peter a Stone and truly my Church shall be built on a bottom as firm as any stone or rock It was the custom of our Lord when he was about to declare any Divine Truth to lay hold on some sensible similitude then near at hand the better to represent it to the minds of those that heard him As discoursing with the Woman of Samaria at the Well-side he takes occasion to tell her of living water that he had to bestow upon her Such as should be in those that drank it a well of water springing up into everlasting life John IV. 10 14. And at another time feeding a Multitude miraculously with a few Barly Loaves and Fishes he thence lays hold of the opportunity to discourse of the bread of life which came down from heaven which he admonishes them to labour after because if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever John VI. 26 27 50 51. In like manner here from the Name he had given Peter he takes the occasion of representing the stedfastness of that Foundation on which his Church should be built saying on this rock will I build my Church There was something in Peter no doubt which was the motive to the bestowing this Name upon him and that was the forwardness of his Faith which carried him to Christ meerly upon the report which his Brother Andrew gave of him Which was the reason S. Gregory Nyssen thinks that though Abraham's Name was not changed till after long acquaintance with God and many Divine Apparitions to him Peter's was changed at the very first sight of our Saviour he at the same time hearing his Brother and believing on the Lamb of God was consummated by Faith and being knit to the rock viz. Christ was made Peter * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hom. XV. in Cantic Canticorum p. 691. For our Lord intended to imploy him though not him alone as an eminent instrument to bring others to the Faith and build them on the same Rock that he himself was built till they became a Church The word CHURCH signifies the whole company of Believers united unto Christ as their Lord and Master who are here compared to a House The building of this Church is nothing else but the joyning these Persons with their Pastors into Company and Society one with another in such good order as the Stones which make an House are laid in upon their Foundation All the difficulty is about the Rock or the Foundation upon which this Society stands and by holding fast to which it remains a Church Which is the second thing I undertook to treat of unto which I now proceed PART II. What is here meant by the Rock COncerning this there are various expositions among the ancient Fathers as is manifest to every one that hath read their Writings though in truth as you shall see before I have done they differ rather in words than in sense and quite overthrow all the pretensions of the Church of Rome from this place of Holy Scripture I will name four I. It is confessed by all Protestants that some of the ancient Fathers by the Rock do understand Peter No Body that I know of disputes about this but only about their meaning when they say he was this Rock on which Christ said he would build his Church Which undoubtedly is not such as they of the Church of Rome would have it because other Persons far more in number and of as eminent rank in the Christian Church expound it of the Faith which S. Peter confessed So that he was the Rock and the Foundation only as he preached this Faith which is the second interpretation and shall be made appear to be the meaning of those who call Peter the Foundation of the Church II. If numbers are to be followed there are most I am sure for this sense of these words that by the Rock we are to understand that faith which S. Peter now confessed It is mentioned by Fortunatus an African Bishop in a Council at Carthage * De Baptizanâ—is Hareticis apud Cyprian p. 233. edit Oxon. where he saith the Lord hath built his Church Supra petram non super haeresin upon a Rock not upon Heresie In which words Rock being opposed to Heresie without all doubt he understood our Saviour to speak of a sound and solid Faith in him when he said he would build his Church upon this Rock Which is exactly the sense of Epiphanius also who by the Gates of Hell understanding all sorts of Heresies adds immediately †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres LXXIV n. 14. but they cannot prevail against the Rock that is against the Truth To whom I
ever All which shows how true it is that Peter himself was not that Rock on which Christ promised to build his Church unless we understand thereby only his Ministerial Function which he did not exercise solely but had all the rest Co-workers with him VI. But let us in the last place suppose once more that he was the Rock more than the rest yet it is a strange Conclusion from hence that Christ made him the Lord and sole Governour of his Church For what relation hath a Rock to Power Government and Dominion We may as soon draw Water out of a Pumice as any such Doctrine out of this word Rock which hath relation only to Solidity Firmness Stedfastness or something of that kind as appears from the very nature of the word and the use of it in all Authors where it never imports any thing of that which is now so much pleaded for and made the Subject of the greatest Contests And therefore those Writers who expound these words of Peter say nothing of his Dominion much less of the Dominion of the Popes of Rome for which there is now so much stickling but they give us quite another reason why he is called the Rock Because of the solidity of his Devotion saith one because he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as hard as a Rock or stone in the Faith saith another because of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the firmness of his Faith saith a third because of his Faith in the true Rock saith a fourth because also he laid the first Foundation of Faith among the Gentiles and because that this Faith which he professed viz. That Jesus Christ is the Son of God is the first Principle of our Religion the beginning of Christianity the Foundation and Bottom of all that we believe In which Faith he was so stedfast that he did not fluctuate in uncertainty like the rest of the Jews some of which said he was Elias others Jeremias others John the Baptist but was setled in this constant Perswasion that Jesus was the Son of God which he as constantly preached unto others and converted unto this Faith. I have not thought it necessary to quote the Authors where all these things may be found I will only name Epiphanius a Haeres lix num 7 8. who speaking of St. Peter whom he calls the most principal of the Apostles he adds Who truly was to us a firm Rock founding the Faith of the Lord upon which the Church is altogether built First when he confessed Christ to be the Son of the Living God and heard our Saviour say Vpon this Rock of an unshaken Faith will I build my Church And again he was a firm Rock the Foundation of the House of God when denying Christ he returned and had those words said unto him Feed my Sheep For Christ saying this draws us to Repentance that on him may be built again a well-grounded Faith which doth not deny Life to those that truly repent Who doth not see that this Father thought he was the Rock because he laid the Foundation of Faith in us And there are those who think he had the Name of Peter given him to show also the Difficulties and Dangers he was to go through in that Imployment unto which he was called of preaching the Faith. But more than such things as these is not to be drawn out of these words No such thing as the Infallibility of the Bishop of Rome which is another Presumption built upon this word Rock For supposing Peter to be the Rock that is saith Bellarmine the Foundation of the Church thence it follows he could not err because then the Foundation would prove ruinous and the Church which is the Building would fall to the ground And consequently his Successors cannot err for the same reason because they are what he was the Foundation upon which the Church relies and if they should fail the Christian Religion might come to nothing Which is so wretched a sort of reasoning that it shows the greatest Wits were not able to say any thing considerable in this cause For it supposes that which hath no proof at all that Peter was the sole Foundation of the Church If he were not then if this reasoning be good it proves all Bishops who are the Successors of the Apostles and frequently so called by ancient Writers to be infallible But I shall say no more of this for there are so many flaws in such Discourses as derive to the Successors all that was in Peter or the rest of the Apostles that they are not easily numbred and I have said enough I hope to show that all the pretensions of the present Church of Rome grounded upon this place are weak and without any bottom They fall to the ground when we come to touch them with one rational thought and prove like a Building that hath no Foundation Or they are not like a Structure built on a Rock but like a House that Men build on the Sand. There is nothing of solidity nothing of strength in their Arguments upon this Subject but after much pains to connect a great many things together they fall asunder like a Rope of Sand. There is no solid reason to make us think that our Lord spake here of Peter and not of Himself Or if he spake of Peter that he meant his Person and not that Doctrine which he preached And no reason in the Earth that he spake concerning himself or his Doctrine only to Peter and not to them all Or if we should make this large grant that he spake only of Peter there is not the least shadow of reason to make us think he spake of his Dominion and supream Power but only of his stedfastness in the Faith and his being the first Instrument in gathering a Church among the Gentiles tho he was not the prime Instrument if we thereby understand the chiefest and greatest for that was St. Paul. Some Vses of what hath been said I. And therefore we are a true Church though we have nothing to do with the Bishop of Rome This is no part of the definition of a Church that it is united to him as its Head but it is intire without it The Bishop of Rome makes all his claim from St. Peter who it is plain had no Universal Jurisdiction granted or promised in these words and therefore the Pope can get nothing by them Faith in Christ Jesus Communion with our Christian Brethren and Subjection to those Pastors who are over us in the Lord are sufficient to make us a Church whether the Pope will or no. Though there were no such Bishop in the World though the Chair of St. Peter were overturned and no where to be found the Church of Christ would be where it was built upon the Foundations of the Apostles and Prophets There is not one of the Apostles that say a word in their Writings of the Prerogative of St. Peter Among all their Admonitions
neither in Paul 's nor in Peter 's but in the name of Christ that Peter might be built upon the Rock not the Rock upon Peter The like we meet withal in another place †Tract CXXIV in evang Johannis The Church is founded upon the Rock whence Peter received his Name For the Rock is not denominated from Peter but Peter from the Rock * Non enim à Petro Petra sed Petrus à Petra directly contrary to Card. Baronius who confidently says non Petrus à Petra sed ipse Petra not Peter from that Rock but he is the Rock Ad An. 31. n. 24. as Christ hath not his name from Christian but a Christian from Christ for therefore the Lord said Vpon this Rock I will build my Church because Peter had said Thou art Christ the Son of the living God. Vpon this Rock therefore saith he which thou hast confessed will I build my Church FOR THE ROCK WAS CHRIST upon which foundation even Peter himself is built For other foundation can no Man lay than that is laid which is Christ Jesus I will not trouble you with any more Authorities such as that of Venerable Bede †In Cap. XXI Johan who hath transcribed these last words of S. Austin into his own Book because I have a fourth exposition to add which will help to clear the rest especially the first IV. There are those who having what I have now said in their mind expound these words of all the Apostles and their Successors that is of all Christian Bishops who laid this foundation stone and continued to build upon it after it was laid Thus S. Cyprian * Ad Lapsos Epist XXXIII Edit Oxon. most expresly Our Lord whose precepts we ought to reverence and observe ordering the honour of the Bishop and the rule of his Church saith in the Gospel unto Peter I say unto thee thou art Peter and upon this Rock c. From hence through the course of times and successions runs down the Ordination of Bishops and the rule of the Church THAT THE CHVRCH MAY BE CONSTITVTED VPON BISHOPS and every affair of the Church be governed by those Overseers The very same is affirmed by S. Austin who in several places looks upon the whole order of Bishops as comprehended in S. Peter particularly in an Epistle to three †Epist CLXV vide Launoii Epist Par. V. ad Carolum Magisirum p. 47. c. ad Gulielâ—â— Voellum p. 12. c. great persons where he saith Christ spake these words to him sustaining the figure of the whole Church It will not be fit to mention all the rest of the antient Writers who thus extend the sense of this place I shall only note that Paschasius Radbertus the founder of Transubstantiation was of this mind For thus he writes * L. IV. in Matt. v. 26. p. 18. The Church of God is not built upon Peter alone but upon all the Apostles and the Successors of the Apostles Unto these four Expositions I might add a fifth there being those who have understood every Christian Man and Woman by this Rock they being the stones and materials as I may call them of which the Church consists But I will pass this by though it have more great names to support it besides Origen because I have said enough already to expose the foul dealing and unworthy reasonings and conclusions of greatest Doctors of the Church of Rome which I shall represent in these following Considerations PART III. Reflections upon what hath been said concerning these Interpretations I. IF these things be certainly true as I assure you they are and themselves cannot deny that there are these several interpretations of this Scripture among the ancient Doctors then there can be no excuse made for their partiality who receive and adhere only to one of these interpretations as the Catholick Exposition and lay aside all the rest even those which are far more Catholick Thus doth Bellarmine * L. 1. de Pontif. Rom. C. X. who finding fault with Erasmus for contradicting their Exposition of the Church being founded upon Peter saith that all the Fathers teach it And thus doth Cardinal Baronius †Ad An. 33. n. XXVII to name no more who is not ashamed to say that it is an interpretation received and approved by the consent of the whole Catholick Church What truth can you expect from such Men or who can think it safe to give up himself to the conduct of such Guides who thus notoriously falsifie in a matter so evident that for one antient Father or Ecclesiastical Writer that by the Rock understands Peter himself there are two nay very near three that interpret it of the Faith which S. Peter confessed For to all those which a very learned and ingenuous Doctor of the Roman Church hath collected which are XLIV in number * V. Jo. Launoii Epist P. V. ad Guil. Voellum p. 18. c. others may be added besides Fortunatus and Epiphanius before mentioned For example Euagrius seems to have had this in his thoughts who speaking of Anastasius Bishop of Antioch where S. Peter sat before he was at Rome to whom such fierce assaults were given as if they thought in his overthrow to subvert the Church it self saith he manfully withstood them all †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. IV. C. 40. for he stood firm upon the impregnable Rock of Faith. If the sense of the Antients be to be reverenced at all why not one sense as well as another And why not that most of all which hath the most to assert it With what conscience do they fix upon one and throw away nay detest all the other which are of more credit Is it not highly unjust to make Peter this Rock here spoken of rather than Christ our Lord when there are so many reasons as well as great Authority for the last more than for the other And yet they not only do this but most immodestly say all the Fathers are of their mind And which is worse they make this an Article of the Faith That the Church is founded upon S. Peter nay the prime Article of all unto which it is evident the Church hath never agreed but manifestly contradicted it Upon this Bellarmine grounds the Infallibility of the Bishop of Rome because Peter is the Rock and the Foundation of the Church as the Supreme Governor of it and therefore every Successor of his is in like manner the Rock and Foundation of the Church And thus he saith all the Fathers have expounded it * L. IV. de Pontif. Rom. C. III. And hence proceeds so far as to say this is the summ of Christian affairs †Praefat. in illos Libros the whole frame of the visible Church depending so much upon the Roman Bishop that if he be taken away the Church falleth Upon this Foundation also they have raised to him such an Authority they make him by Christs