it selfe from Worldly works will bee then no part of our positive happines but onely a privative helpe to our absolute glorifying God there as it is to our better sanctifying of the Sabbath here And yet for all this as I have said before not to rest on that day but to imploy our selves worldlily in inward or outward works of mind or body in thought word or deed â—ill prove our sinne * To prove that the Lords day is to bee observed with the like strictnes of us as the ancient Sabbath was among the Iewes a neighbour Minister brings this argument If saith hee the reasons of the command of strict rest to the Iewes on the Sabbath belong as well to us as to them Then the command it selfe belongs as well to us as to them But the reasons rendered in the 4. commandement in the 58. of Isa. 13. Because it is the Sabbath of the Lord and because it is the Lords Holy-day and other reasons also as because carnall works anâ— imployments are impediments to the solemne and spirituall performance of Gods holy worship and service and againe all those duties which were commanded them as essentiall to a Sabbath such as were abstinence from carnall labours and pleasures which destroy the nature of a Sabbath which is 1. to rest 2. to rest a spirituall and holy rest to God These reasons saith hee belong as well to us as to them if any Sabbath or holy-day of the Lords remaineth to bee observed of us which there doth Revel 1. 10. Where by the way take notice it is called the Lords day and not the Lords time to answer an objection of some that say wee are not bound to keepe a whole day holy-day or Sabbath and therefore not to rest saving in the time of publicke assemblies besides wee find not any time in all the Scriptures set apart as holy-day to the Lord but a whole day was the space of time Therefore the commandement it selfe both in the negative part thereof not to follow labour not to follow pleasure and in the affirmative part to follow holy exercises is required of us Christians not onely by way of Analogy but as precise commands by just consequence For because hereby wee both falsifie our present duty which wee owe to the commandement which injoyneth it us as a significant privative meanes for sanctifying the Sabbath and also make void the usefull signification of the typicall sense which consisteth in our resting from all Worldly affaires that wee may the more fully devote our selves to things spirituall and heavenly such as are praising God meditating of the life and rest to come c. for of that nature shall bee our heavenly imployment Wee know the Israelites separation from the heathen did not make them the true Israel of God for they were made such onely by their faithfull and true serving of God and yet if they intermixed themselves with the heathen it was a prophanation and sin unto them So a cessation or separation of the Sabbath-day from Worldly imployments is no positive part of our sanctifying the Sabbath though it might bee in the time of the Iewes for that our sanctification consisteth in Spirit and truth not in the literall and outward performance of rest and yet must wee of necessity and duty cease that wee may sanctifie it For it is with the Lords-day as with all other things that if it bee sanctified to the end then it is sanctified to the meanes And as the Scripture saith a man cannot serve God and Mammon especially on this Day but wee should utterly forsake the one that wee may more compleatly cleave to the other By Mammon I meane as well our carnall pleasures all profits for on that day according to the Anti-type all should bee heavenly If ever wee did the will of God as it is done in heaven it should bee on that day And as Master Hildersham observes Lect. 51. Psalme pag. 710. Hildersham God hateth rioting on the Sabbath much more then hee doth working on the Sabbath as it is plaine by Isaiah 58. 13. where in one verse hee names and forbids twice the following of our pleasures as the chiefe prophanation of the Sabbath-day If thou turne away thy foote from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on mine holy-day and call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable and shalt honour him not doing thine owne wayes nor finding thine owne pleasure nor speaking thine owne words c. But Bishop White pag. 257. Obi. objects against Sunday Sabbatizers precepts as hee calleth them concerning the crying downe of carnall recreations and setting up spirituall duties to bee actually and without intermission continued the whole space of a naturall day which saith hee can bee no branch of the Law of Christ nor yet consentaneous thereunto for this reason Because the Law of Christ is sweet and easie Matth. 11. 30. and his commandements are not greevous 1. Ioh. 5. 3. I answer Ans. I never knew that this was to bee expounded after the flesh but after the Spirit By the same rule hee may cry downe all fasting all abstaining from beloved lusts and heavenly mindednes now under the Gospell and quite blot out the Apostles advice to use the things of this World as if wee used them not But may some say Obi. if rest bee no part of sanctifying the Sabbath how then are wee said to sanctifie it at night when wee goe to bed Not that your rest is any sanctification of it Answ. no more then your spirituall labour is a breach of it but because that in so doing thou dost an act of mercy to thy body when thou sleepest as well as when thou eatest at due times in a due measure And indeed thou oughtest to doe it with this or some such like consideration and not meerely sensually as an oxe or an asse for God should have speciall glory by every thing wee doe that day And whatsoever wee doe without a speciall and spirituall relation to God on that day that may properly bee called our worke and so our sin For though things necessary bee lawfull to bee done yet not as on the weeke day but with much more spiritualized affections and heavenly mindednes * To the same purpose speaks one that writ upon this subject saying men may not doe the lawfull works of their calling neither in providing meat drinke cloaths or other necessaâ—ies on the Lords-day with a bare respect of naturall good and worldly pâ—ofit because this is doing of his owne wayes and works and not the worke of God unto which Gods Holy-day it wholly consecrated and set apart So no bodily sports recreations and pleasures are to bee used meerely to cherish the flesh and refresh the body but only such as are in very deed needfull in themselves and used and intended by Gods people with this purpose and â—o this end that they may with more ability alacrity
particular Conclusions To your last End I answer That it is most true that the Sabbath was a Type of the Heavenly Sabbath and a shadow of that blessed Rest to come and therefore transcendent to those Types which were properly lewish and of a Temporary nature whereas this Sabbath had its beginning with time and shall receive its ending with time when the workes are finished from the foundation of the World When as the Church of God is possessed of the Antitype then shall this universall Type vanish by the second comming of Christ as the Iewish Types have already vanished by his first comming Broad CHAP. V. 1. The Sabbath was a shadow SAint Paul in his second Chapter of the Epistle to the Coloss. hath these words Let no man judge you in Meat Coloss 2. 16. 17. or Drinke or in respect of an holy Day or of the new Moone Hoc est figurae fuerunt quae portenderent ea quae post essent verè exbiÌ„henda à Christo. Marlor or of the Sabbaths which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ. Here by Sabbath the Weekely Sabbaths are meant as I gather 1. Because St. Paul useth another word which doth most properly signifie the festivall Dayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Vnles by Sabbaths in this place the weekly Sabbaths be meant * Vide Tractâ— de Sab. cap. 2. erg 1. wee have not the least warrant in Gods word for working on the Iewes Sabbath The Sabbatarians heretofore might with more colour have put of any Text then this 3. Taking it for granted that wee 〈◊〉 not keepe the Iewes Sabbath how it is credible that S. Paul being Christs only Doctour about Dayes Rom 14. Gal 4. Coloss 2. and handling this matter purposely in three Epistles should not give us to understand as much in one of them and if in any in this 4. Thus it is taken by very many great Divines S. Aug termeth the Sabbath Sacramentum ambratile spir lit Instit lib 2. cap. 8. sect 28. cap 14. Calvin speaking of the fourth Commandement sayth umbratile veteres nuncupare solent so that it seemeth the Fathers generally for Sabbaths here understood the Weekely Sabbaths and therefore tearmed the fourth Commandement umbratile shadowish 5. I know no more but two or three in Print who take it otherwise and all that they can say is that it is Sabbaths in the plurall number See Math 28. 15. Acts 13. 14 16. 13. but Sabbaths importeth the Weekely Sabbath in many places Againe that with Sabbaths are adjoyned Meates and Drinkes and therefore that S. Paul speaketh of such Sabbaths as are in ranke with them which manner of arguing is tearmed Petitio principis This is all that ever I knew alledged by any which is so little that it only argueth a will to say something it is not so much as a shadow of sound proofe Besides this Text Coloss 2. There are other pregnant enough to prove that the Sabbath was a shadow Type or Ceremony as that Exod 31. 13. and and the like may be gathered by Heb 4. * See what I have written of this Textâ—â— my questions but of these Texts more shall bee said hereafter Answer 1. However there may be another word used to signifie Festivall Dayes yet you cannot deny but it is frequent to name their festivalls Sabbaths Because of the Rest and analogy which they had common with the Weekly Sabbath * Like as Magistrates are called Gods though there be other words to signify them And such is the sence of this Text as may probably appeare by these following reasons which you so slightly evade 1. Because it is Sabbaths in the plurall number for the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where it signifieth the Weekely Sabbath and not the Weeke it selfe is for most part either expressed in the singular number or if in the plurall then it is joyned with a word singular as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and after this manner it is also every where translated both in English and Latine but in this 2. Coloss 16. there are none of all these 2. Because Sabbaths are adjoyned with such things in this place of the Coloss which are indisputably abrogative and meerly Iewish * Such as are termed in the 14 verse the handwriting of ordinances and in the 17 verse are termed the shadowes of such things to come whose body is of Christ that is which are fulfilled in Christ and whose significations end when hee commeth But we know the signification as you your selfe confesse out of 4. Heb of the Sabbaths Rest is Heaven our Rest there which remaineth unfulfilled yet to the People of God as the same 4. Heb sheweth and therefore are these the likelier to be such For as Dr. Andrewes saith of the Sabbath how that it had beene folly to have put a ceremoniall Law amongst the Morall so say I in this case that it were strange if God who is the God of order and not of confusion should by his Apostle in this place mixe one of the ten Morall Commandements with the hand writing of Ordinances things meerely ceremoniall and abrogated To which two Reasons I adde these which follow 1. The Apostle himselfe did condescend to keepe the Weekely Sabbath with the Iewes not only for a time as he did some of the Iewish Holy-dayes as also their other rites but at all times and in all places as occasion offered as being a thing of a different nature from their Sabbaths which he taught 2. These three Holy-dayes New-moones and Sabbaths are but as I may so say Synonimies in sence signifying as it were one and the same thing in the intention of the Apostle by divers expressions for were not New moones Holy-dayes and Holy-daies Sabbaths so that if you dispâ—â—e from a seeming Tautology you may as well argue against New-moones as Sabbaths And I would know why Holy-daies and Sabbaths may not be as well one and the same in this place of the Coloss as in the 58. Isa 13. both of them in the one place signifying the Weekely Sabbath and in the other place the Iewish Sabbaths Which Synominy doth the rather appeare from that 4. Gal 16 which is the same in effect with this of the Coloss where the Apostle by Dayes Moneths Times and Yeares meaneth things of the same nature and Ordination to wit the Iewish abrogated Types and Ceremonies such as begun with Mans Fall or rather with Moses and ended with Christs Resurrection unto which the converted Gentiles did too much adhere not such as began in Paradice and shall end in Heaven But whereas it may bee objected that doubtlesse had not the Apostle intended all Sabbaths in the word plurall he would have made some particular exception of the Weekely Sabbath considering how considerable it was so to do if he would have had the Weekely Sabbath to bee understood to bee still of force To this I
It is a signe betweene mee and the children of Israel for ever For in sixe dayes the Lord made Heaven and Earth and in the seaventh day hee rested Now wee know it was never the property of the Iewish types to looke backward to the state of innocency but forward But you will say that the first institution of the Sabbath was but a prophecy or fore-runner of the second To this I answer That it is very ill likely that any thing that was proper to the Iewes as a ceremony and not common to the whole Church of God for whose sake the World was made was prophecyed or fore-ordained in innocency For all the things that are made use of in Scripture from the state of innocency are spoken of as appertaining to the whole Church of God and not proper to any one People or time And so is the Sabbath made use of in the fourth Hebr. to signifie an everlasting rest to whom but to the People of God But you will aske mee how I know that this Law of the Sabbath was given in innocency and not after the fall I answer that this one reason may serve for all Because that whatsoever Moses maketh mention of before the fall wee have good reason to thinke it to bee done in innocency and to allow as well his Method as his matter in that particuler But hee placeth the Law of the Sabbath before the fall Ergo c. Besides your owne Hypothesis stoppeth this objection For if Adam should have kept the Sabbath had he continued in innocency as you suppose hee should its like it was revealed to him in that state And the rather was the Sabbath given in innocency that it might bee understood to bee equall with the Law of nature and to appertaine to the whole Church of God which afterwards was to bee of a double condition and so the Sabbath serves for a double end answerable to these conditions to wit in memoriall of the creation as it is in the 20. Exod. 11. and also in memoriall of our redemption as in the 5. Deut. 15. and as is the Sabbath such is the Law of a double obligation to us in respect both of our creation and redemption Note It is very observable in those two places how an order is kept which giveth authority to our second Sabbath and to the reason thereof for in the first giving the Law Exod. 20. the Sabbath is inforced by the creation and in the repetition or second giving of it in the 5. Deut. it is altogether inforced upon the redemption the creation not being once named or mentioned there in the Law of the Sabbath or fourth commandement lively intimating the subsistence of the fourth commandement under the Gospell and the binding authority of it in our dayes by the incorporation and addition of the reason of our new creation or spirituall deliverance by Christ into the commandement in stead of the old reason which is utterly omitted as if it were forgotten or at least overtopped and triumphed over by us that are the second generation of Israel * Answerable to that 65. of Isaiah 17. I will create new Heavens and a new Earth the â—ormer shall not bee remembred nor come into mind I wish our Antisabbatâ—rians to consider well that such a repetition of the fourth commandement not seorsim or by it selfe but together with the whole Decalogue in its proper place with such a materiall omission and addition or alteration cannot but bee significantly and doctrinally meant by the holy Ghost there But some argue from this connexion of the Sabbath to their deliverance out of Egypt that the Sabbath was therefore given to them for a memoriall of a particuler benefit to them and so belonged to the Ecclesiasticall Government of the Iewes and therefore though it were not typicall yet for that cause it ought to bee done away To whom I answer that upon the same reason they may as well abolish the whole Law and turne Antinomians if they ponder it connexed with its preface I will borrow Master Richard Bifield to conclude this point pag. 88. who saith that the Sabbath in those places of Exod. 31. 13. and Exod. 20. 12. 20 is called a signe in two respects First in that it is an Argument and Document betweene God and Israel and so betweene God and his People for ever whereby they may know that God hath sanctified them Secondly it is a signe not of any future thing but of a thing present as every adjunct that is a visible concomitancy is a signe of the subject present For in the observation of the Sabbath there is a publicke profession of that communion which intercedeth betweene God and us As then every solemne profession is a signe of that thing of which profession is made so also is the Sabbath called in this respect a signe Broad ARG. IV. GOd resting on the seaventh day it became his Sabbath or Day of rest as wee tearme that a mans birth-day wherein hee was borne and as the other dayes of the Weeke were Gods working dayes This his resting as I have shewed before Chap. 5. was typicall and it was the reason why God did sanctifie the day and commanded men to sanctifie it as appeareth by Gen. 2. 3. and Exod. â—0 11. Hence I thus reason such as the foundation is such is the building The foundation Gods resting on the seaventh day was typicall The Sabbath doctrin is builded on the sands and therefore his sanctifying it presently and mans sanctifying it afterwards was no lesse Finally consiner whether more then this may bee not spoken of Sion and the Temple then is spoken of the Sabbath This is my rest for ever Psalme 132. 14. My house shall bee called an house of prayer for all People Isa. 56. 7. I doe not know where the Sabbath is tearmed Gods rest for ever and for all People Answer My former Arguments have beene sufficient to give this its answer for I have alwayes granted the Sabbath to bee typicall from the fourth Hebr. Your comparison of the Sabbath with those phrases belonging to the Temple and Sion in holy writ is a meere flourish and readily answered out of the fourth of Hebr. where the typicall rest of the Sabbath is extended farre beyond the typicall rest of Canaan wherein Sion was for the holy Ghost saith there that the Sabbaths-rest still remaineth to the People of God implying the contrary of the other rest Broad CHAP. VII THE chiefest Arguments of the adverse part answered I come now to answer the chiefest Arguments of the adverse part I say the chiefest for with a cloud not of witnesses seeing they prove nothing but of Arguments such as they are whereby some go about to obscure the light I will not at this time have any thing to do hoping that as a mist it shall of it self vanish away from before the eyes of all those that read this Treatise with understanding ARGVMENT I. ADam
therefore for their sakes I have in diverse places inlarged my Booke wherein I have removed those stumbling blockes which seeme to lie in the way of this doctrine of the Sabbath by answering their colourable arguments against it That whereas M r Primerose hath put out another Booke against the Sabbath of later Edition I have also perused it and such things as I found any whit materially to clash de novo against some particulars in this Answer I have particularly answered them not naming him because they are so very few the rest of his Treatise receiving answer herein upon the occasion of other mens Arguments If perhaps you find not every collaterall Argument answered to your mind yet let not that prejudice the maine cause but weigh substances with substances and pull not downe the whole House for the defect of â— Tyle or two Let Circumstances and by-matters have respect accordingly VINDICIAE SABBATHI Broad MAster Breerewood in his Treatise of the Sabbath 1. Nature teacheth to set apart Page 24. 41. some time for the worship of God but not one day in seven nor a whole day neither yet to forbeare all worke in that time as the Israelites were bound to doe on the Sabbath 2 Gods Commandement touching the Sabbath Page 64. 40. 41. was first given in the wildernes it being limited to the Iewes Sabbath only the Iewes Sabbath is vanished and Gods Commandment was not nor could not be translated from the Iewes Sabbath to the Lords day 3 We are bound to keepe the Lords day not by Page 37. any divine Commandement but by the constitution of the Church onely Thus hath Master Breerewood written in his booke and more I doe not write in mine but it will be said yet in answer to an objection he will have the generallity of Gods Commandement to bee morall and perpetuall Answer It is true and I cannot sufficiently marvaile thereat The Objection he frameth against himselfe is this Page 4â— If the old Sabbath vanished and Gods Commandement was limited and fixed to that day only then is one of Gods Commandements perished Hereunto to hee answereth that the generality of that Commandement is a Law of nature and remaineth The law of Nature touching the sanctiâ—ying of some time and Gods command touching the sanctâ—fying of the seventh day were two divers lawes The one a generall law only the other a speciall law only But if there bee a generallity of that commandement how was that commandement limited and fixed to the Sabbath only Further hee should have considered that the like may as well be said of the precepts of Holy-dayes Nature teacheth to have some times of vacancy for one reason God appointed the Sabbath to be a time of vacancy for other reasons the holy-holy-dayes Shall not the law of nature now be the generall of all these precepts indifferently as well of the precepts of the holy-holy-dayes as of the precepts of the Sabbath Answer In this thing I must take Master Breerewoods part against you for hereby is the morall * Dâ—r Heylin quoteth the schoolem n Patt 2. pag. 163. saying that the fourth Commandement is placed in the Decalogue in quantuâ—â— est preceptum morale et naturale that is say they Quantum â—d hoc quod homo depu tet â—â—â—uod tempus vitâ—e sâ—â— ad vac 〈◊〉 diâ—iâ—is pag. 162 So Bishop White maketh the Law o Nature to be involved in the 4 th Commandement pag. 121. and is still obli gaâ—â—y to the worlds end Pag. 1â—0 law of God kept entire without a mayme which is very requisite seeing that the Decalogue is granted to be an explanatory reinforcing of the law of entire Nature imprinted in us by creation but much defacedby our fall and being honoured with those eminences of priority signes of perpetuity immediatly from God himselfe upon Mount Sinai Such as were his twice writing them with his owne finger * Touching this priority of Gods own writing them see how emphatically it is expressed by God himselfe Exod. 24. 12. in way of suâ— ereminency by vertue of that â—râ—viledge to those which Moses had written a little before ver 4 Moreover also sâ—e this difference lively intimâ—ed by Moses Deut. 4. 13 where he maketh the Covenâ—nt to consist in the ten Commandements written by God himselfe and speakes in the following verse in way of dimination of the other lawesin comparison of them calling them statutes and judgements which were 1. taught by him and secondly to be observed in the land whither they went to possesse it and voted also by his Spirit through the mourth of Moses to bee the Tenne Commandements 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Deut. 4. and put into the Arke as perpetuall rules for the Catholique Church whereof it was a Type None of all which Prerogatiues was the Ceremoniall law crowned withall for that it was as a vanishing shadow sutable only to the Hemispheare of those times But the decalogue being the very Law of Nature explained and redelivered must as well now as ever have for its substance a generall ayme at all men though in some circumstances it may bee more peculiar to the Iewes then others by reason of the time place and people to whom it was renewed Like as almost all other Scripture is for substance common and for circumstances proper because they were most an end written occasionaly Put case then that this Commandement was given onely to the Iewes as you affirme and so were abrogatiue yet may the Law of Nature bee well presupposed and included in it as you your selfe afterwards acknowledge it is in your 8. Chapter in the answer you give there to the fifth opinion for who knowes not that in those ten words much more is meant then manifested So that if so it be granted that the Law of Nature and this Law bee not the same in all points yet are they not two divers lawes but the same in substance And thus much in effect Master Breerewood affirmes in his second Tract pag. 3. Morall saith he is that which pertaineth to manners 1. Either by the instinct of Nature as belonging to the inward Law written in our hearts or Secondly by the instruction of Discipline as being of the outward Law pronounced of God as that of observing the seventh Day so that it may beetermed Naturall as being not of the institution of Nature but of the disciplining of Nature Not of Nature as it wâ—s fâ—rst ordained of God but as after informed by him For indeed this fourth Commandement both as it was at first instituted in Paradise and now revived on Mount Sinai is but the law of Nature explained and enlarged according to the will of God in this particular for reasons and uses whereof created nature was not capable but by revelation And what though the Law of nature bee the generality as well to the precepts of the Iewish holydayes as of the Sabbath this shewes the superexcellency of the
the Lords-day more licentiously and so to dishonour God the more when thou hast more cause to honour and praise his holy name If thou dost know assuredly that the Son hath not yet made thee free for none dare wilfully abuse our liberty purchased by Christ unlesse themselves doe still continue the very bond slaves of sinne and Sathan Answer Your admiration is worthy commendation for it is the part of every honest man to preserve the practise of piety and especially in this point of the Sabbath in the which God so often in Scripture involueth the summe of all Religion and indeed it is Gods and the Churches ancient Land-marke which being removed opens a gappe to all licentiousnes and that being once let in which is so much thirsted after by the ignorant and common people then farewell all Religion For as Doctor Denison notes upon the 13. Neh. 2. That where the Sabbath is not sanctified there is neither sound Religion nor a Christian conversation to bee expected as hee is quoted by Edward Chetwin D. D. and Deane of Bristow in his second Edition of the straight gate and narrow way to life Pag. 90. Who himselfe saith in the same page that the prophaning the holy Sabbath of God for so hee termes it is contrary to Gods morall precept still in power And therefore if you have Faith I wish you would have taken Saint Pauls advice and have had it to your selfe in this point For how you will preserve the duties of the Sabbath * Read Master Richard Bifields 13. chap. against Master Breerewoods like protestation and yet with the same breath cry downe the authority of the Sabbath and how you will maintaine solemne worship without solemne time which God ever allotted to that end I see not nor you know not And therefore what you weakely endeavour to build up with one hand you powerfully pull downe with the other for an errour in Doctrine especially tending to libertinisme is likelier to take place among men where alwayes the greater part is the worse then a bare perswasion tending to restriction It is as if a man should let slip a Grayhound at an Hare and then command him to ly downe at his foote And therefore you might have done well like a good Physitian first to have applied that receit how that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lumpe upon your selfe before you had prescribed it unto others But to prevent the spreading of this poisonous leaven I am desirous to give you a timely opposition by contending for the truth Broad CHAP. I. 1. What day God sanctified in the beginning GOd having finished the creation in sixe dayes rested on the seaventh day and was refreshed Gen. 2. Exod. 31. whereupon hee blessed the seaventh day and sanctified it The day which God sanctified in the beginning was the seaventh and no other even as the day wherein hee commanded the Israelites to kill the passeover was the fourteenth day and no other of the first month the one is as expressely set downe as the other and the reasons wherefore God sanctified the seaventh day The reason of the Sabbaths institution vanished as a shadow with the shadow and commanded the Israelites to kill the passeover on the fourteenth day of the first month are alike unchangeable For as it cannot bee that the Angell should passe over the Israelites houses on any other day of the fourteenth so neither can it bee that God should rest on any other day Answer It is no doubt but the seaventh day was the day that God onely rested on and sanctified to a different use from the rest of the dayes for having imployed these in creating things necessary for mans corporall good hee designes him this day for his spirituall benefit and his owne speciall glory whereas it is alleadged by some Bishop White pag. 42. Doctor Heylyn pag. 10. That God imposed no other Law on Adam then that of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge To this I answer 1. That there was another Law imposed upon him even in innocency as appeares Gen. 2. 24. to wit the Law of having but one wife and loving her 2. That this Law of the Sabbath was a Law not of the nature of the other where on his estate depended but a Law of indulgence whereto hee both should and would readily have confented because of the blessing and benefit which should have redounded to him thereby had hee continued in in innocency and not lost himselfe and it before And questionlesse there was no other reason why hee that could have made all the World in a moment should yet contrive and spin out the worke of creation into sixe dayes space but onely to this end that hee might give an example to mankind which was then in Adam for ever to set a part the seaventh day to his more speciall and solemne worship And the reason of Gods resting from the creation why it is annexed as a reason of the commandement is because at that time there was no better thing nor greater commodity no nor any greater worke for God to rest from or thing wherein God was more seene then in the creation And therefore was the Sabbath appointed on that day having the honour to conclude the creation in memory of Gods goodnes to man and upon occasion of his refreshment therein till a greater good should befall him and a worke wherein God should bee more glorified and then that reason to bee subordinated not annulled because the creation still remaineth as a lesse good even unto us under the Gospell but as the Law is to the Gospell or the old Testament to the new or as the Prophets were to the Apostles and Ministers not in the sense as the ceremonies were to Christ to receive an absolute expiration the one by the other for it was of no such shadowish nature and yet not so unchangeable but that it is as well subject to subordination upon occasion as the Iewes deliverance out of Egypt was to their after deliverance out of Babylon For man was more happy and God as I may say more refreshed in ceasing from the worke of our redemption then of our creation And therefore is Anno Mundi worthily changed into Anno Domini And the name of the Sabbath into the Lords-day For denominatio omnis fit a majori And for this cause although in relation to our redemption wee celebrate the first day of the weeke for order yet it is the creation that makes this first day to bee the seaventh in number and good reason For seeing God in the creation divided time into the revolution of seaven how can or dare any that knowes the creation breake the order of time by God established and thinke of another division as of 6. or 8. c. seeing from the beginning it was not so especially seeing it was purposely done of God for the Sabbaths sake who els could have finished the creation in the twinckling
that day or houre wherein some great good hath befalne them And contrary-wise to curse that day that bringeth woe Ier. 10. 14. thus God having felt as it were the sweetnes of rest on the seaventh day in comparison of his labour in the sixe former and being well refreshed is hereupon moved to blesse and sanctifie it Answer You say its probable God pronounced the Sabbath sanctified at the end thereof when hee had rested which for my part I assent unto for â—o in the 2 Gen. 3. it appeares to bee most likely Besides that Moses his manner of expression in that verse compared with the like in the first chapter doe much perswade it for you shall find there that when hee hath related Gods five and sixe dayes workes as finished and compleated by him then followeth the blessing upon them so in this second chapter heâ— makes the blessing to follow upon his resting as before upon his working But what you would gather hence I doe not well perceive yet two things in my opinion follow very naturally 1. That hereby God would give to Adam as well a president as a precept to regulate and invite his subsequent duty in the particular of the Sabbath That seeing God had chosen the seaventh day to finish his creation in and to rest there from and had thus made it knowne to Adam with a promise of a blessing thereunto for after-time upon due observance That therefore Adam and his posterity should bee moved thereby to dedicate the seaventh day from the sublunary imployments of the other sixe to bee a perpetuall Sabbath unto the Lord not by a bare rest for what honour hath God by that but by a sanctified rest 2. That it was not meant that Adam should keepe the seaventh day Sabbath which God rested on for though it was Gods seaventh day yet it was Adams second day which is another reason to prove your probability for it is likely that God himselfe did first rest the seaventh day that so hee might by his example being revealed to that end give mankind a patterne for ever after to doe the like which is very apparant and more confirmed by the Law concerning the Sabbath as it was afterwards renewed upon mount Sinai to the Israelites where wee are commanded after sixe dayes labour to dedicate a seaventh to holines to that end to rest from our worke on the seaventh day as God did from his that so by following his example wee might the better obey his commandement not that wee were to rest the selfe-same day that hee did but onely in similitude and imitation that is to employ sixe dayes in our necessary labour and the seaventh to rest according to his example that so wee might sanctifie it according to his commandement * Which Adam had not done if hee had keâ—t Gods seaventh day Sabbath Which Argument doâ—h much disprove that over-strict tying the Sabbath to the precise seaventh day after the creation and proves the â—umerall day to bee onely morall and perpetuall or the proportion of time which the Lord exemplifieth there which is the seaventh day for number not that seaventh day for time But you will say Obj. did not Gods example as well oblige the order as the number as well the last as the seaventh day Yes Answ. during the supereminency of the worke of creation but when a more excellent worke was finished the worke of our redemption from which it also pleased him exemplarily to rest not on the last but on the first day of the weeke and as exemplarily by his Apostles ever after to preserve thâ— number and proportion of time according to the commandement the substance of the reason which constitutes the commandement still remaining entire to wit Gods resting from or accomplishing his worke onely the terminus à quo varieth the case in respect of order For the transcendency of the latter displaceth the former as the presence of the King doth the Major of a Towne I say at this time did the order vanish and the day of Gods creation give place to the day of Gods redemption as the more worthy worke And if God may bee said in any manner of speech to bee refreshed in his resting from the powerfull worke of creation much more from the painefull worke of redemption Broad 3. When God first commanded man to sanctifie the seaventh day IT is not said in Scripture that God presently commanded Adam to sanctifie the seaventh day If the word sanctified Gen. 23. importeth commanded Adam to sanctifie it why shall not the word blessed import also commanded Adam to blesse it and it is one thing for God to sanctifie a day and another thing to command men to sanctifie it Indeed it is probable that this example of God in working sixe dayes and resting the seaventh Adam and his posterity should alwayes have followed had they continued in the state of innocency But when Adam had now eaten of the forbidden fruite God thrust him out of Paradice cursed the Earth for his sake and set him to get his living in the sweat of his face Answer You say it is not said in Scripture that God presently commanded Adam to sanctifie the seaventh day and that it is one thing for God to sanctifie a day and another thing for him to command man to sanctifie it To which I answer That God here at the institution of the Sabbath did as Christ by his Apostles did at the institution of the Lords-day that is by a declaratory example appoint it as a duty unto the Church for ever after teaching them to set aside the seaventh day which was then the last and is now the first day in the weeke from all secular commerce and imployment wholly to trade with God in giving and receiving spirituall commodities Nor is there any difference in this case betweene Gods sanctifying it and his commanding it to bee sanctified by man For besides that to sanctifie ever signified to set apart to an holy use wee see it to bee the very voyce of of the Scripture how that the Sabbath was made for man that is for his good and benefit For man was to learne from it that all his happines consisted not in his owne labour but also in Gods blessing so that though hee laboured sixe dayes together yet the seaventh day well observed might doe him more availe then all his sixe dayes labour And therefore by Gods blessing that day is implied a reciprocall respect both of our blessing him and his blessing us and by his sanctifying is intended his setting apart that day for a more speciall communion betweene him and us by his more speciall blessing of us and our more solemne worshipping of him For surely you will not say hee sanctified it and blessed it that wee should superstitiously thinke any inherent holines or blessednes to bee in the very day it selfe And if not what followes then but that it must needs bee meant
day especially in seeing them keepe his Sabbaths spiritually and conscionably Certainely they that doe so shall be sure to be blessed and rewarded of God for it To this purpose it is worth the observing that as our Saviour sayth Marke 2. 27. That the Sabbath was at the first made for man for the great benefit and behoofe of man Man could not no not Adam in Innocency have beene without it but with great danger and losse unto him So the Holy Ghost sayth there twice of the Sabbath Gen. 2. 3. and Exod. 20. 11. that he never said of any other Day That the Lord blessed that Day that is appointed it to be a meane of a greater blessing to man if hee kept it as God had commanded him to doe then any other Day or any of the ordinary workes of any other Day can possibly be Two sorts of blessings there be which the conscionable observer of the Sabbath shall be sure to receive by it 1. The first are spirituall and they indeed are the chiefe blessings of all because they are durable and lasting and because they concerne the Soule which is the chiefe and most pretious part of man And for these was the Sabbath chiefely ordained that God might by it in the use of his Ordinances enrich our Soules with spirituall blessings in Heavenly things So the Lord saith Ez 20. 12. that he gave his Sabbaths to his People to that end that they might know that he was the Lord that sanctified them Wee shall find and know that the Lord will sanctifie us both begin and increase saving grace in our Hearts if wee keepe the Sabbath conscionably Yea the Lord hath promised Isaiah 56. 6. 7. to every one that keepeth his Sabbath from polluting that he will make them joyfull in his House of Prayer And Isaiah 58. 13 14. That if a man shall keepe the Sabbath heartily and spiritually then he shall delight himselfe in the Lord. By these two places it appeareth that God hath bound himselfe by promise to them that keepe his Sabbath not only to worke sanctification increase of holines and power over their corruptions which he professeth in that former place of Ezekiel was the very end he gave his Sabbaths for but also by his spirit of adoption to encrease in their hearts a lively sence of his favour assurance that he heareth and accepteth their Prayers Peace of Conscience Ioy in the Holy Ghost which are blessings the Christian Soule prizeth above all things in the World Ob. Why may you say may not a man receive increase of grace and spirituall comfort in the use of Gods ordinances on any other Day but only on the Sabbath Ans. Yes verily but these promises may give him assurance to receive them more richly and plentifully upon the Sabbath then on any other Day 2 The second sorts of blessings that the conscionable observers of the Sabbath receive by it are temporall for concerning them also wee have a promise Isaiah 58. 4. Gen. 18. 13 48. 4. Psa 1. 19. To conclude this point with the authority and judgment of a learned Bishop now living Bishop Hall Decad 6. Epis 1. Gods Day sayth he calleth for another respect then doe common Dayes The same Sunne ariseth on this Day and enlightens it yet because the Sun of righteousnes arose upon it gave a new life unto the World in it and drew the strength of Gods morall precept unto it Therefore justly do wee sing with the Psalmist This is the Day which the Lord hath made Now I forget the World and in a sort my selfe and deale with my wonted thoughts as great Men use who at some time of their privacy forbid the accesse of all suters Prayer Meditation Reading Hearing Preaching Singing good conferences are the businesses of this Day which I dare not bestow on any worke or pleasure but Heavenly I hate superstition on the one side and loosenes on the other But I find it hard to offendin too much Devotion easy in â—rophaneâ—es The whole weeke is sanctifyed by this Day and according to my care of this is my blessing on the rest Broad CHAP. III. I. Whereby the Sabbath was Sanctified THe Sabbath was sanctifyed by resting from worke Thus Zanâ—hy in effect likewise Vicest and D. Boys and this Analysâ—â— naturall Some make two parts the one affirmative the other negative but they are out of the way In the fourth Commandement we have to observe 1. The Commandement it self briefly delivered and is thus Remember the Sabbath to Sanctify it 2. Then followeth the explication in order God shewing what is the Sabbath the seaventh Day is the Sabbath to the Lord thy God And after how it is sanctified In it thou shalt not doe any worke I do not write as many doe that the Sabbath was sanctified by praying hearing of word and if thou marvailest thereat see at the end of the Booke 3. A reason is yeelded why God requireth this service For in the sixe Dayes the Lord made Heaven c. Here thou seest that God himselfe being expositor to sanctifie the Sabbath Day is not to doe any worke on the seaventh Day read also Ier 17 24. II. Whereby the Sabbath was profaned The Sabbath was prophaned by worke as Exod 31. 14. Profanare sine vioâ—are vâ—cat â—o die operari perin de at que professo Mart in Math 1â— 8. Every one that defileth the Sabbath shall surely bee put to Death for whosoever doth any Worke therein that Soule shall bee cut off from among his People Further the Sabbath was profaned by the least worke and thus hee prophaned it who only gathered stickes therein As he that â—ateth the least food may be said to breake his fast as well as he that eateth his belly-full So hee that did the lâ—ast worke brake the rest or Sabbath as well as he that laboured all Day Some would have the Sabbath prophaned by Drunkennes Lasciviousnes Dauncing c. In it God said Thou shalt doe noe Worke not in it thou shalt not worship Idols thou shalt not drinke excessively c. for he needed not these things being forbidden by other Commandements Ans 1. If by one Sinne then by another and then every man profaned the Sabbath 2. Any Day in the Weeke was as well defiled by Sinne as the Sabbath for every Day was alike exempt from Sinne. The punishment for prophaning the Sabbath was Death If then such as haunted the Ale-house and the like prophaned the Sabbath as well as he that gathered stickes they should much rather in reason have undergone the punishment Now although the Sabbath was defiled by worke and whosoever wilfully or carefully did any worke therein was to be put to Death Yet in two cases worke was to be done on the Sabbath In what cases the Sabbath might be prophaned 1. In case of necessity Thus the Disciples being hungry pulled the Eares of Corne and rubbed them in their Hands Math 11. which
we are apter to forget instructions then inclinations 2. Because this more restraineth the naturall liberty then all the rest they restraining only sinfull things this lawfull things yea our very words and thoughts about them 3. Because of the multitude of our sixe daies businesses which had need bee remembred to bee seasonably finisht else they will breed distractions 4. Because the Devill prompts us to forget it so to quench the Memory of the Creation and the Creator and so to bring in the Eternity of the World as he did amongst the Heathen and there with Athisme to prevent which wee are bid to remember to keepe this Commandement as a meanes to preserve the memory of God and to keepe a foote his worship 2. Because it is of most weight to bee remembred and that for three reasons 1. Is taken from the dependancy of the observation of all the rest of the Commandements on this for in keeping of the Sabbath the Lord is wont to sanctifie his People to the keeping of all the rest of the Commandements so that keeping this wee keepe all and neglecting this wee neglect all hence God saith Exod 31. 3. Verily my Sabbaths you shall keepe for it is a signe betweene mee and you throughout all your Generations that you may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie you moreover saith God Exod 20. 12. I gave them my Sabbaths to bee a signe betweene mee and them that they might know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie them Looke all the conversion of sinners and you shall see where one hath beene converted on the Weeke Daies 7 have beene on the Sabbath 7 to one nay 10 to one if not a 100 to one God doth delight most to dispence his grace on that Day so that keepe that Day and you keepe an oportunity where God doth bestow his graces on the Sonnes of men but neglect it and you neglect an oportunity of getting grace of God Heathen Princes are wont on their coronation Day to shew themselves to their People in all their rioalty and cast about Silver and Gold so doth God sometimes in these his solemne Daies shew himselfe to be present with us in holy duties he scatters abroad his holy graces and delights so to do wee are not to appoint God the time when to come downe and speake to his People but they must waite the time he hath appointed now God doth delight to sanctifie Men on this Day of all the rest therefore the text saith He blessed it and hallowed it that is he did blesse it to be a meanes to sanctifie it to his People for else the Sunne shines no hotter on this Day then any other but that God hath blessed it as he blessed the bread to make us blessed to observe it therefore is a means to bring ablessing on our Family Towne Kingdome where wee live take many Men that are dejected for Sinne and 〈◊〉 tell you one of the first and chiefe in their neglect of the Sabbath though it be not written in their Hearts by nature On this Day God drawes nigh to his People and they to him by whom he will be found sooner on this Day then any of the rest and if wee get grace any Day its a thousand to one it is on this Day or else something added to it Esa 36. 4. The way to lay hold of the Covenant is to keepe the Sabbath there is some hope of a Mans salvation when he makes conâ—cience of keeping the Sabbath If thou turne away thy feete c. and consecrate it as glorious c. thou shalt delight thy selfe in the Lord saith Esay implying that a man that hath no delight in keeping of the Sabbath hath no delight nor pleasure in God but the way to get pleasure in God is to keepe the Sabbath 2. Reason why this cómandement is of most weight to be remembred is taken from the efficacy of it in it wee are made most spirituall and heavenly minded it frames our spirits to be fit for every good busines by keeping the Sabbath wee are kept from idle thoughts and by this meanes are moulded up into a Heavenly frame wee are not even of this World there is nothing of it doth hang about us There remaines a Rest to the People Heb 4 9. implying that the Saints in Heaven keepe a Sabbath rest meditating divine things learning from Christ Singing praises and are in a spirituall manner wrapt up in all spirituall busines and minding Heavenly things And wee by keeping it are wrapt up from all incumbrances otherwaies lawfull but now not fitting our spirits 3. Reason is taken from the memory of those things are kept in memory by it for by keeping in mind the Sabbath wee keepe in mind Gods chiefest benefits to us as our Creation and our Redemption by its translation from the seaventh to the eight Day and Ezech 20. 12. that it is a signe that God doth sanctifie us implying thus much that whereas there are three Persons who shew themselves in three Works tending to our Salvation This Sabbath is sanctified to us to put us in remembrance of them and their works as of the Father that Created us of Christ that Redeemed us of the Holy Ghost that Sanctifies us Thus are our chiefest blessings remembred by our keeping of this fourth Commandement and therefore it is of most weight to be remembred The legall Sabbath as you call it and which you speake of in your sixth end was more then to put them in mind of the spirituall Sabbath for it was the properst meanes of bringing it about to cause them actually to keepe a spirituall Sabbath for when as they were not to do any of their owne works nor to thinke any of their owne thoughts what could they construe hence but that they were to doe Gods and thinke Gods * Like as the Apostle collects Heb 11. 14. from our Fathers saying they were strangers and Pilgrims on the Earth that they that say such things declare plainly that they seeke a Countrey And therefore doth not that 58. Isaiah 13. intend only the negative part for so God should allow of Idlenes and take away the nature of the mind which is ever to be in motion but also the spirituall part which also is expressed there but if it had not it being delivered in the Negative they both ought and might thence have deduced the Affirmative and better part like as was done to them in their Typicall ordinances wherein the shell was to be cracked before they could find the kernell * It was Gods ordâ—nary way of delivery in those times like a skilfull Logitian that only mentioneth the Major and the Minor of a Syllogisme and leaveth the Conclusion to be gathered as a thing so easy because so necessary as none but Fooles and Dunces can be ignorant of and thus doth Christ deale with us also under the Gospell he giveth generall Rules for us thence to deduce
also of the Kingdome of Heaven Answer In the 4. of Hebrewes it is beyond the Apostles scope to treate upon the sanctification of the Sabbath for that there he only disputeth upon the typicall use of it So that thence I easily grant you the significary or typicalnes of the Sabbaths rest even from the beginning so you take it not in a Iewish sence as abrogative by Christ his first comming for though Christ then came to destroy the ceremoniall Law yet came hee to fulfill the Morall Law in which the Sabbath hath his seate and whose typicalnes doth not so properly relate to Christ or to our present Rest in him as to our Rest in Heaven * As appeareth in the 4 Hev where by Gods 6 Dayes worke and reâ—ting on the seaventh i signified the travell of Mans Life and his Rest in Heaven if he be of the People of God and thus hath eveu Christ himselfe rested before us as is there also specified is partaker as well as procurer of the benefit of this Type which in Innocency wee were capable of without him although that now our capacity and interest in that Rest being lost and only recovered in and through Christ it may by accident referre to Christ as the Tree of Life is made to doe because he is become our Intermedium to that Rest which yet at first it signified without him and thus is Marriage made a Type of Christ and his Church which in Innocency was properly a Type of the Vnion and Vnity betweene God and his Church immediately till sinne made a divorce and therefore are they not as other Types occasionally taken up and occasionally laid downe but begun as I may say before Christ and shall end after him that is when hee shall give up his Kingdome into the hands of his Father to whom the Creation being appropriated this Type of the Sabbath being grounded thereupon must needs begin and end in him Yet so as that by reason of Christs intervention and the new Creation which he hath made it is by accident of use also towards him because that in and by him only wee now enjoy this Rest and are given in Marriage unto God So that if wee can here prove our Rest and Marriage unto him by Fayth then are wee inchoatively possessed of our everlasting Rest and Marriage which shall be consummated with God in Heaven * whereof these two Institutions in Innocency were figures Touching the time of Adams Fall for my part I cannot thinke it was before Gods seaventh Day and my reason is from Moses his method for he putteth it after and yet I doe beleeve hee never kept Sabbath in Innocency but fell before his owne seaventh Day Touching Adams deprivation I answer That although it be evident by Scripture and the fiery Sword that Adam was deprived of Paradice and the Tree of Life as being properly annexed to the Commandement concerning the Tree of Good and Evill yet doth not the same appeare concerning the Sabbath for that it did partake as well of duty as of commodity and was a coadjutor to the Law of nature besides we see it renewed in its proper kind and upon its primitive reason which the other are not but exempt by a fery Sword also wee see the Scripture saith the Sabbath was made for Man which indefinitely signifieth all Mankind though properly the People of God For God having still a People he hath for them a Rest in Heaven towards which the Sabbath is as helpfull as the Sacrament of the Lords supper is to our Faith in Christ. For as one sayth Even now in this marveilous light of the Gospell wee have our divine Ceremonies and Sacraments God reserving the greatest for the Kingdome of glory Broad 3. The Sabbath was a shadow of our blessed Rest in Heaven SAint Paul saying Coloss 2. that Meate Drinke Holy-dayes and Sabbaths are a shadow of things to come doth not there tell us of what things to come they are a shadow And the only place in my knowledge whereby wee may gather of what the Sabbath was a shadow is Heb 4. by which Chapter it appeareth that the Sabbath was a shadow or Type of the Rest in Heaven The Rests or Sabbaths mentioned in that chapter are three one the first seaventh Day verse 4. another the Land of Canaan verse 8. a third the Kingdome of Heaven verse 9. of the latter Rest the two former were shadowes Some tell us of a legall spirituall and Heavenly Sabbath and the legall with them was a Type of both the other which I dislike not Answer You may well imagine of what things to come Paul meaneth in that 2. Coloss if you consider the context for after he had handled Circumcision both in its Type and Antitype then he concludeth of other things of that nature in these words let no man therefore condemne you in Meat or Drinke c. As if he had said like as Circumcision so all things of that nature and institution are extinguished through Christ the substance of these shadowes and the end of these Ceremonies Amongst whichby an Argument ex non concessis you would draw in the Weekly Sabbath to bee one as if the Iewes had not other Sabbaths which more properly are to bee reckoned in that number and yet confesse it to signifie our Rest in Heaven and to have none other signification but that which signification is still in force also as wee see in the 4. of Hâ—b which properly is true of none of the abrogated Shadowes Which signification I say is still in force and consequently the Sabbath for how should it be other seeing that they are Christs owne words Math 5. 18. That till Heaven and Earth passe one jot or one tittle shall in no wise passe from the Law till all bee fulfilled Now how can the Sabbath be abrogated seeing by your owne confession it signifieth our Rest in Heaven which is not yet fulfilled nor will not be till the second comming of Christ. whereas the Iewish Types therefore vanished at the first comming of Christ because they received the fulfilling in him properly and adequately But perchance it will be objected Obâ— That the abolishment of all the signes of the Old Testament was by this that Christ hath actually acquired all the benefits figured by them though the Elect inherit them not yet totally and perfectly and thus he hath also acquired the benefit of the Sabbaths signification for us though not yet accomplished it to us I answer 1. It is true that the benefits of both are acquired by Christ Answ. but in a different kind For the Iewish Types were since the Fall created de novo for his sake to shadow him forth and so he properly accomplisheth and soe abolisheth them Coloss 2. 17. * Whence D. Taylor observes in his Christ revealed pag 4 But this of the Sabbath was created in the beginning and was since then things so falling out by the Fall only
renewed for his sake like as was the Law also for God makes them go hand in hand and so should wee to the end that both of them may appeare 1 That as the body is the cause of the shadow so Christ was the cause of those Ceremonies by the accident of our Fall to bee now only fulfilled and accomplished on our behalfes through and by Christ. 2 That as the shadow representeth the shape of the body with the actions and motions sod those rites and Ceremonies resemble Christ in all his actions passions motions I say 2 ly It may as well bee said that the whole Law is utterly abolished by Christ as the Sabbathâ— for that he hath fulfilled the righteousnes therof for us and yet we know that to us under the Gospell the Law is still binding in a Gospell sence requiring a willing and an upright though not an absolute and perfect obedience unto it And so are we to celebrate a Gospell Sabbath though not the last of seaven as expecting Rest by workes yet the first day of seaven as having and expecting Rest by Christ for still the Law and the Sabbath fate alike So that as one sayth Christ hath both accomplished and abolished the Ceremoniall Law the 〈◊〉 Law he hath accomplished but not abolished for Christ is the End of the Daw. But as Augustine well distinguisheth the perfecting not the destroying End But by the way I must in this place the better to cleare the truth take in two objections that are made against our acceptation of this 4. Heb First they object that Gods Rest there spoken of on the seaventh Day is not meant as typifying our Rest in Heaven but only is mentioned in way of similitude Ans 1. If the Sabbath be at all a Type it must bee so from the beginning for as M. Broad observeth it appeares not else by Scripture when the Sabbath became a shadow and which was the first Sabbath that was such if the first of all was not And againe that all other shadowes and Types were such from their first institution If the Sabbath be no Type why is it disputed to be no Morall Commandement but abrogated That it is the Churches Type appeares two wayes 1 From the olteration and change which it hath undergone since Christ. 2 By the inference which is made in way of consequence from Gods resting unto his Peoples resting in the connexion of the 9 and 10 verses of this 4 chap. Heb The Sabbath it s said was made for Man that is for his benefit and here to signify his happines hereafter so Mayer in locum saith that in Gods being said to rest there must needs be an alluding to a most joyfull Rest to be had by Man seeing he was never weary neither had he need of Rest so Anselm to prove the rest of the seaventh Day and that it prefigured a further rest to come hee aleadgeth the words saith hee of the history in Genesis The seaventh Day God rested from all his Workes for in that immediately after the making of Man these words were added it is plaine that the resting of man who was last made was meant hereby For as Augustine saith God was not weary so that he had need to rest in regard of his great labour but in those words he hath promised Rest to the labouring or because he made all things very good and then it is said he rested thou maist understand also that after thy good workes thou shalt rest and rest without end Secondly they object that by Rest there is not meant our Rest in Heaven but our Rest from Sinne here upon Earth or our Gospell rest To this I answer It cannot properly beare that sence for 1. It must bee such a Rest as God rested which was not from Sinne but an everlasting Rest in Heaven from the Works of Creation 2. It must be such a Rest as is spoken of in the fourth Commandement which is not properly a Rest from Sinne but a Rest from workes 3. As Mayer observeth it is there called Sabbatismus which signifieth a time of everlasting joy and festivity which cannot bee expressed which is only proper to Heaven 4. To put all out of doubt in the 14 verse of this 4 chap. Heb it is expresly called Heaven and Christ himselfe is implyed to rest it when he ascended into Heaven Nor doth the Apostles speaking in the present tense in the third verse of this chap saying Wee which have beleeved doe enter into Rest afford any Argument against it for that is only a speech of fayth implying the certainty thereof as also intimating the inchoation or entrance which the People of God make into this Heavenly Rest or everlasting Life even in this Life For the Apostles dispute there sheweth that God hath a Rest of everlasting Happines for his People as for himselfe and which now wee are become capable of only by the promise of the Gospell through Faith by reason of Christ our high Priest who is gone thither before us but for farther satisfaction see miâ—e Analâ—â— pag 38. Broad 4. The Sabbath was a shadow in as much as it was a Sabbath that is a day of rest and refreshing THe Sabbath as hath beene said was a shadow of the blessed rest to come and hereof now it was a shadow in respect it was a Sabbath or day of rest even as the Land of Canaan was a type of Heaven in as much as it was a place of rest Some will not have a Sabbath it selfe to bee a shadow but would Saint Paul have said the holy dayes new Moones and Sabbaths are shadowes if not these but circumstances onely about them had been a shadow where is the word Sabbath taken in such a sense The word Sabbath is to bee taken in such a sense Col. 2. as it is to bee taken in other places The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath Matth. 12. Mar. 2. The Sabbath was made for Man was the strict rest precise seaventh day or the like made for Man was the Son of Man Lord of the Sabbath onely in such respects but let us examine their Doctrine better The Sabbath they say was shadowish or ceremoniall in some respects The Sabbath was not a shadow in as much as it was the seaventh day but the seaventh day was a shadow in as much as it was the Sabbath or day of rest consider that the thing shadowed is the rest spoken of Hebr. 4. 9. as first in respect it was the seaventh day and here they say that the number of seaven is mysticall that it is the number of perfection and tell of seaven dayes and of seaven times seaven yeares c. Ans. 1. Why may not I say also that the number of three is mysticall I am sure that three Persons in one God is the greatest mistery of all others and I can tell them of three Persons in one God of three Angels appearing to Abram 2.
our praying that prayer in a literall sense now in our times doth force no such conclusions Not to keepe the Sabbath of the Iewes For though the commandement expresse a seaventh day for number yet it doth not in terminis expresse the order saying Thou shalt keepe the last day in the weeke or of seaven and not the first c. though I acknowledge from other reasons proper to these times the commandement had then that meaning onely so that now the letter of the commandement is intended in our prayer onely with a circumstantiall variation according to the practice of the Church derived from the Apostles which explaines it to the meanest Againe not the seaventh day precisely from the Worlds creation for that hath suffered many variations nor did Adam keepe it but he meanes the seaventh day from the first gathering of Mannah Nor yet in the selfe same manner that the Iewes once did If by once hee meane in the strict time of the wildernes for reasons aforesaid So that by the letter of the commandement wee now may pray the Lord to encline our hearts to keepe holy a Sabbath and not the Iewes a seaventh day and not the last of seaven For the Law in the letter respecteth properly and principally the number implying onely the order occasionally for the season sake because the creation was then the greatest good which number it still retaines in the same letter and upon a new season implies a new order the reason whereon the order was built being circumstantiall as I have proved before nor the day that God rested on after the creation nor the extraordinary rest in the wildernes I say wee may ejaculate this prayer in a literall sense to the fourth commandement as well as to the fifth where weepray Lord encline our hearts to honour our parents that according to thy promise the dayes may bee long in the Land which thou givest us Now wee all knew that by Land there and then is implicitely meant the promised Land or Land of Canaan Yet the manner of expression which God useth in the penning of that Law as of that of the Sabbath admits a latitude Ephes. 6. 2. 3. not appropriating the promise to the Land of Canaan onely by saying that thy dayes may be long in that Land of Canaan which the Lord thy God giveth thee so that the Tribe and the halfe which planted on this side Iordan might have prayed this prayer at the reading of the fifth commandement as well as they with in the Land of Canaan by vertue of the letter of that Law and so in like manner may wee now So excellent is the wisedome of the Lawgiver That though in some temporary implicite circumstantiall sense his Lawes might more properly belong to those people to whom they were immediately given then to us and our times yet hee hath so ordered it that the Law is still usefull and binding for the substance of it even in the letter And therefore they that pray this ejaculation with understanding hearts doe not pray Lord encline our hearts to keepe a Sabbath which 〈◊〉 no Sabbath but Lord encline our hearts to keep a Christian Sabbath a Christian seaventh day and a Christian rest But in the conclusion Doctor Heylyn saith wee may thus expound this prayer viz. to pray unto the Lord to encline our hearts to keepe that Law as farre as it containeth the Law of Nature c. which yet Master Broad his partizan will not allow a pitifull shift to keepe all whole And such is Bishop Whites pag. 159. 160. The generality of whose conclusion there upon this ejaculation saving his private exposition may well serve to set forth the use of it now For saith hee our prayer to God prescribed in the Liturgy is not to beseeth him to encline our hearts to keepe the Law according to the speciall forme and circumstance of time commanded in the old Law which say I is the last day of seaven in memory of our creation but in such a manner as is agreeable to the state of the Gospell and time of Grace which say I is the first day of seaven in memory of our redemption and not as hee interprets it to wit according to the equity and mistery of the fourth commandement and according to the rule of Christian liberty which hath freed Gods people under the Gospell from the observation of dayes months times and yeares saith hee upon legall and ceremoniall principles true if hee meane judaicall ones and then hee cannot meane the Sabbath For to bee freed from it is no part of Christian liberty because not yet fulfilled by Christ Hebr. 4. 9. 10. But to returne to Master Broad by your Marginall note it seemes you could allow the Sabbath not in respect of the Iewes weakenes but of its owne worth and greatnes to bee of longer continuance then the holy-dayes but not perpetuall wherein you exceedingly wrong your cause for if of longer continuance why not perpetuall and if not perpetuall why of longer continuance the Holy-dayes and Iewish Sabbaths say you expired in Christ and if this common Sabbath be no other then a Iewish Holy-day why doth not it expire with the rest and if you can allow it beyond Christ I pray you what should hinder it for being perpetuall neither is it incredible to thinke that the common Sabbath and Iewish Holy-dayes bee of different natures when as they had different institutions different significations different locations and different extensions Broad ARG. I. No morall Commandement may be broken in case of necessity but the fourth Commandement may Ergo it is not morall THe Major is evident for a man may not Ly Steale or the like to save his Life The Minor is no lesse evident In case of necessity the whole Rest may be broken and not the strict only for to save the Life of his Cattle a man may labour all the Sabbath in seeking them covered with Snow in lifting them out of Pits c. Workes of necessity are not forbidden in the intention of the Lawgiver Obj. and therefore such do not breake the fourth Commandement Suppose the King by a generall Law shall forbid the eating of Flesh in Lent Answ. a sicke Man eating Flesh breaketh the Law though no doubt it be in the Kings intention that in such case Flesh may be eaten as it is in the Lawgivers intention that Worke in case of necessity may bee done David brake the Law of shew-bread Math 12. so is it in the Lawgivers intention that the fourth Commandement in case of necessity may be broken as other Ceremoniall precepts might in the time of the Law The whole Rest not the strict Rest only is Ceremoniall Obj. so that if a Man labour all the Sabbath in lifting his Cattle out of Pits in saving his goods from Burning in Fighting against the Enemy c. Yet he breaketh only the Ceremoniall part of the fourth Commandement Vnlesse such breake the
should steale a loafe of bread for pure need he was not so great a sinner as he that through contempt or wilfull neglect omitted or carelesly performed the Sacrifices of the Law or other Ceremonies Broad Againe Touching Gods gracing of the fourth â—ommandement above the other temporary Constitutions He would needs know a reason why God should grace the Commandement of the Sabbath above the other temporary Constitutions Answ. The reason happily was because the Sabbath served more then any of the other I thinke I may say then all the other Ceremonies to the furtherance of the Morall Law True that on the first and last dayes of the Passeover the Israelites were to have holy Convocations as well as on the Sabbath but this Feast as other came but once in the yeere whereas the Sabbath was once in the weeke Answer If the Commandement of the Sabbath had had its beginning with the rest of the Ceremonies you might have had some colour for what you say But seeing it was first set on foot in Innocency and afterwards revived as an equall among and contemporary with the Morall Lawes why now it should only be preferred to be the Master of the Iewish abrogative Ceremonies and so Moses his tale of ten Commandements brought by us into the number of nine I can see small reason to perswade And I know no use the Sabbath was of then for advantage to the Morall Law * In confâ—ssing the Sabbath to be of such furtherance to the Morall law he must needs imply against himself that the Sabbaths Rest was a significant medium to the sanctification of the Sabbath and not the sanctification it self properly and only but it is of the same use to us now especially if it should have been usefull as it should in Innocency So that if the Sabbath faile which is the sinewes of Religion then farewell the power of Godlinesse For doubtlesse it was the very reason why it was given of God as a perpetuall and absolute necessary Concomitant and Appendix to the Morall Law superadded by him in the time of â—nnocency to the Law of Nature as I have said before that it might be a perpetuall help thereto and therefore as it begun with it so it shall end with it Broad Not to stand longer hereupon Consider that the Sabbath was instituted for divers weighty purposes as no other Ceremony the like whereof before Chapter 4. Secondly that it concerned all the Israelites generally both Priests and People and also very often as few Ceremonies the like Thirdly that as soone as it was instituted it was prophaned the like whereof I doe not finde did befall any other Ceremony And if this last consideration did minister sufficient occasion unto God to grace the Sabbath above other Ceremonies seeing the people had already disgraced it more then the other and thereby bewraied what they were likely to doe in time to come how much more the two former considerations concurring herewithall This much to give him and others satisfaction if it may be Answer You say very true of the Sabbaths super-excellency above all other Ceremonies and let me adde one which is That as it was before them in dignity time so shall it be after them to the end of the world But for your third reason of the prophanation of the Sabbath as soone as it was instituted which you say you finde not to befall any other I answer that you need not goe farre to seeke one for their gathering Mannah was prophaned with covetous gathering and disobedient keeping of it before the Sabbath And you may as well say that therefore it was commanded to be put into a golden pot and laid up before the Testimony as that because the Sabbath was prophaned therefore it was put among the ten Commandements Besides offering of incense was prophaned in the very first exercise of Aarons Priesthood by strange fire Levit. 10. 1. Broad Now out of that hath been here said an answer may be taken also unto these words of the Prophet Isaiah 58. 13. 14. No more can be gathered from that Text then from the placing of the fourth Commandement among the morall Commandements in the Decalogue which is that God much respected the keeping of the Sabbath And this I acknowledge but this he did likewise the paying of tythes and offerings Mal. 3. and doth the partaking of the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. Broad ARGVMENT 3. SOme of late would fetch an argument from Christs words Matth. 5. 18. where by the Law they understand the Decalogue only Answ. Then shall the word Law be taken in one sense vers 17. and in another vers 18. for by the Law in the 17. vers is meant * The five bookes of Moses Gen. Exod. Levit c. the whole Law of Moses as likewise Matth. 11. 13. It is altogether improbable that where there is a distribution of Scripture into parts by the Law should be signified the Decalogue only Againe when Christ cometh to instance afterward in many particulars of the law some of the instances are taken out of other places as vers 33. 38. 43. If it be said these particulars may be referred to some Commandements in the Decalogue Answ. So it would be said if Christ had instanced in any Ceremoniall precept throughout the whole Law The instances as also that which is said vers 16. and 20. doe shew that Christ spake of the Law Morall or that which is to be kept of Christians but seeing the instances are taken out of divers places it cannot be gathered by them nor by ought else here what is morall in Moses law * Five books and to be kept of Christians and what not were it that by the law the Decalogue is only meant yet seeing no more is said of the law vers 18. then is said of the Law and Prophets If every tittle of the Decalogue in their meaning be perpetuall then are we to blame that we keepe not the Iewes Sabbath and forbeare all worke therein This text might better have been urged by the Sabbatarianis heretofore vers 17. the meaning cannot be that every thing that is enjoyned in the Decalogue is perpetuall for then it should follow that every thing enjoyned likewise in the Prophets is perpetuall and to be observed of Christians Now that no more is said of the law vers 18. then is said of the Prophets vers 17. is manifest for there Christ saith that he came to fulfill the Prophets which is as much as one tittle of the Prophets shall not passe till all be fulfilled That Christ spake thus as it were vers 17. The Law and the Prophets shall be fulfilled in part and thus vers 18. The Law shall be fulfilled wholly is not to be imagined It would aske a long discourse to shew Christs meaning Let it then suffice to have shewn that this Text maketh nothing for the perpetuitie of the fourth Commandement Answer It is true that
regard of their superstitious resting which they used upon the Sabbath as that they would rather endure to dye then fly especially considering the Religion they put in that tradition of a Sabbath daies journey which was but two miles as they accounted it So that had they fled â—ut two miles further then their stint they would have thought themselves more to have violated the Sabbath then if they had spent the whole day in contentions and seditions within the City For of such force is zeale when it is not according to knowledge of Scripture as that through our corrupt nature it bindeth the conscience more straight then any command of God rightly understood As we may see by those souldiers who when they were besieged rather then they would drinke of the well into which a dog was throwne they would starve or render the City * Turkish History And so doubtlesse would many of the Iewes chuse to dye before they would fly further then their superstitious tradition gave them leave But as I have given truth its due in commending your exposition so give me leave to discover the fallacy of your marginall sophisme by comparing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 already spoken of in the 2 Col. 16. There because it maketh for your advantage you will have it to be meant the weekly Sabbath and yet the Article is not prefixed and in this place you will have it to be meant the lewish Sabbath because the Article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not prefixed This is scarce good dealing But I pray you let one and the same defect beget one and the same sense in both places and so let them both passe alike for the Iewish extraordinary festivals and so your Argument shall not only prevaile with us but evince the truth Broad CHAP. VIII VVHat would follow were the fourth Commandement morall or perpetuall Such as give a different sense of the same Law at sundry times make it like a nose of waxe Were the fourth Commandement morall or perpetuall it would follow that we Christians ought to keep the Iewes Sabbath for the meaning of this Commandement must needs be the same as heretofore it was A Law cannot say one thing to day and another to morrow though a Law-giver may And now the meaning of the fourth Commandement heretofore was * God sanctified the seventh day Gen. 2. not one day of seven or the like the fourth commandement enjoyned the same that the seventh day wherein God rested should be sanctified other meaning this Commandement could have none as the words thereof doe manifestly declare they import this and nothing else Such I know among us as urge the perpetuity of the fourth Commandement will have it bind now to sanctifie the Lords-day but they cannot agree among themselves show this strange matter â—hould come to passe I say this strange matter for there being an old statute for fasting on the Friday if it should be said that hence forward we should be bound thereby to fast upon Saturday would it not seeme wonderfull strange A strange matter it is that the fourth Commandement should bind to sanctifie the Lords-day and how it may come to passe many strange opinions there are which I thinke needfull here briefly to examine 1. Opinion There are who teaching that the fourth Commandement bindeth to sanctifie the Lords-day will have it thus to come about They say that those words in the beginning Remember to sanctifie the Sabbath are for substance the whole fourth Commandement that which followeth being only an explication and a reason and here they take the word Sabbath in a generall sense so that this with them is a more generall Commandement then if God had said Remember to sanctifie the seventh day Ans. I acknowledge that these words are for substance the whole fourth Commandement as you teach but whereas you put a difference betweene Sabbath and seventh day Consider further 1. That once onely before mention is made of the Sabbath and that Sabbath was the seventh day 2. Remember saith God to sanctifie the Sabbath and what Sabbath should they remember to sanctifie but that before mentioned 3. That the word Sabbath is not to be taken againe in such a generall sence throughout tâ—e Scripture this I cannot approve of for these reasons 1. Because then the word Sabbath should be taken in one sense in the beginning of the Commandement and in another towards the end for towards the end by Sabbath must needs be meant the seventh day onely And rested the seventh day wherfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath and sanctified it Here Gods resting on the seventh day is the reason why he sanctified the Sabbath and can it be a reason of sanctifying another day besides the seventh day especially seeing he laboured on all the other Suppose that we had the like speech in the new Testament as thus He rose again on the first day wherefore he blessed the day of resurrection and sanctified it Who would not take the day of resurrection here for the first day only Reas. 2. By this your Doctrine the fourth Commandement should be of larger extent then that Commandement in the beginning suppose it were a Commandement as you would have it for there it is said God blessed the seventh day not the Sabbath Answer In stead of answer to this in this place I referre you to a review of your first Chapter and mine where the selfe same point is largely discoursed Onely a word or two more 1. Touching your consequence of the unchangeablenesse of the Iews day into ours if the fourth Commandement be admitted morall See for this Eatâ—nus de Sabbato pag. 40. de Moralitate Sabbathi Neque enim saith he mutâ—bile cum ceremoniâ—li bene est coniunctum aut cum eo convertendum Quamvis enim omne ceremoniale sit mutabile non é contra tamen Multa enim sunt positiva â—â—â—tabilia quae non sunt Ceremoniâ— huius generis sunt leges Iudiciales Exod. 21. c. Sic etiam totuâ— Decaloguâ— aliquo modo mutabilis fuit ut disertè Apostolus expriâ—it in 3 ad Gal. 13. Christus redemit nos ab execratione legis cap. 4. 30. Ejice ancillam filium eius quâ— ancilla ut vers 25. apparet moâ—â— Sicai erat qui est in Arabia Hoc est lex quae ibi pronunciata fuit Hisce liquet quod lex maleâ—â—ctio eius in Christo sunt abrogata quatenus aliquo modo erant murabilia totam autem legem ceremonialem esse nemo est qui dixerit 2. And touching your instance or similitude of fasting Friday by Statute I answer That indeed it were strange to turn Friday into Saturday by vertue of the letter of the same law Rebus sic stantibus but put case we had some extraordinary Deliverance fell out on Friday as the Gun-powder Treason and were to keepe it weekely as we are the Sabbath then if either
the Parliament sedente curia should alter the law or the King by a non obstante should for this cause publish an alteration or by his and the Courts example should change the day from Friday to Saturday in memory of that Deliverance Friday being made thereby rather a Day of Feasting then Fasting I thinke no wise man will say that the law was repealed or suffered any detriment by this So c. Christ came not to give new lawes but to renew the old upon a new condition and in this sense was it a new Commandement to love one another And thus is the Lords Day a renewed Sabbath not given as a new law but altered by example For ours is a new Sabbath as the Covenant is said to be a new Covenant which is only in exhibition not in substance For there was nothing but by the coming of Christ it was ground under one of these two wheeles either it suffered abrogation or qualification But the Sabbath suffered not abrogation Therefore Qualification And which was proper to Christ who though he came not to give new lawes yet he was to qualifie and renew the old upon Evangelicall tearmes Broad 2. Opinion By this first opinion though the fourth Commandement bindeth to keep the Sabbath yet not the seventh Day but others teach that it bindeth to keep the seventh day as heretofore it did Those have then to prove that the Lords-day is the seventh or last of the weeke Now how can they prove this They deale wisely herein for they have not the least shew of proofe Nay I know not any that hath so much as gone about it hitherto and to save their pains hereafter I would have them know that the Scriptures Fathers and Reason are against them in this matter 1. The Scriptures are against them for they terme the Lords-day the first of the weeke in two places Act. 20. 2 Cor. 16. It is imagined that Christ before his Ascension or the Apostles presently after commanded to keep the Lords-day for Sabbath which if Christ or his Apostles had done and it had been needfull that the Lords-day should be the seventh day Either the Sabbath was not so soone changed into the Lords-day or it was not then needfull that the Lords day should be the seventh day doubtlesse order should have been taken for this also and then Saint Paul would not have tearmed it the first of the weeke well-neere twentie yeeres after this time writing especially unto the Gentiles 2. The Fathers are against them for they tearmed Wednesday the fourth of the weeke Si dies observare non licet Origen Nicephorus have the like saying menses tempora annos nos quoque simile crimâ—n incurrimus quartum Sabbati observantes parascenem diem Dominicum c. Hieron in Gal. 4. 3. Reason is against them for if the Iews Sabbath untill the change were the seventh day how should the next day be the seventh also Consider that the name seventh hath reference to other dayes going before Either there must be once two seventh dayes together or there must be one monstrous weeke consisting of eight dayes or else one day must be in no weeke Answer It is not needfull to prove the Lords-day to be the last day of the weeke It is enough to hold correspondencie with the Commandement if we prove it to be the seventh day not in order but in number For though the Commandement bindeth perpetually to the number it was and is the present condition of the Church in regard of our benefit from God and Gods Covenant to us which bindeth us to the order first or last In which adjournment we as is requisite retain and observe the scope and equitie of the Commandement since God hath afforded us sixe dayes for the dispatch of our own businesses that we should willingly dedicate the seventh to his worship For the altering of the circumstance of time doth not abolish the substance of the Commandement This difference is evident and usuall in other matters as for instance It was one thing to have the Tridentine Councell translated to Bolonia and the ending of it was another thing So there is a difference between the adjourning of the last to the first and the dissolution of the Sabbath day And although the Sabbath be now the first day of the weeke in one respect to wit according to order yet it remaines still the last in another respect to wit as they are seven in number And that it was thus even in the Christians account the last as well as the first appeareth in the 1 Cor. 16. where Paul biddeth them that every first day of the weeke every one should contribute as God had prospered him to wit in the sixe fore-going work-dayes And as touching your reason I answer that every thing must have a time of institution and beginning Had God made Adam the first day then had he kept Gods seventh day Sabbath but God making him the sixth day and he being first to spend sixe dayes in one kinde of imployment and the seventh in another thereupon it is more then likely he was to keepe the thirteenth day from the first day of the Creation as his first Sabbath and not the fourteenth day as his second * Had Adam kept Gods seventh day Sabbath then had he kept a Sabbath in Innocency for it was instituted before his fall Againe if to be God did raine Mannah on the first day according to the computation of the Creation then they kept that seventh day Sabbath But if he did not begin to raine Mannah on that day but on some other in the weeke then was that computation broken and yet the Sabbath rightly kept So had Christ risen on the last day of the weeke but then had not Isaiah his prophecie been fulfilled 65. 17. then had we observed that day but the Sonne of man as you say being Lord of the Sabbath its fit the Sabbath should waite on him and not he on the Sabbath and therefore as he chose the first day to rise on as likewise the morning and not the evening to rise in so have we done well after Saint Pauls rule in imitating him as he imitated Christ in keeping the Lords-day Sabbath ever since which as I have noted before was not darkly prefigured in the keeping the first and seventh day in the time of the Passeover As like wise to being the Sabbath in the morning and not in the evening which yet cannot be done without some losse of time being that the Iewes Sabbath ended at the evening for if we change the day because of Christs resurrection and by Pauls example why not then the terminations of the day according to the time of Christs resurrection and example of Paul in his practice at Troâ—s I speake this as an argument against some that are of opinion the Sabbath still beginneth at evening as in the time of the Iewes and first
words Therefore the Lord thy God commanded thee to keepe the Sabbath day A place of Scripture if soberly consulted especially considering withall the preterition of the Creation in that place whereby this becomes not only a motive but the sole reason not easily answered by our Antisabbatarians For as one saith well In the 5. Deut. The reason of the Redemption from Egypt is put as a cause of sanctifying the Sabbath so that there beginneth a translation though not of the day it self yet of the use and sanctification of the day as to be kept in an holy and thankfull memory of the Redemption from Egypt which was but a Type and figure of our spirituall Redemption by Christ which their Redemption from Egypt if taken only literally was not to be compared to the worke of Creation that it should challenge to it selfe a right in the Sabbath before the Creation but only as it typified and prefigured that glorious worke of Redemption Now if the Redemption from Egypt which was but a Type were so glorious a worke as that the Sabbath day should be kept rather in memory of that then of the Creation then what shall we say of the worke of Redemption it selfe which doth so farre exceed in glory that from Egypt as the Sunne doth the shadow If therefore Gods ancient people were to keep the Sabbath day in memory of their Rest from Egypt how much more when a greater Rest from a greater worke of Redemption even the true and eternall Rest is come in and we in Christ doe enter into it as Heb. 4. 3. ought that day of the weeke be kept holy wherein the Lord rested from his most glorious and gracious worke And this may serve to answer your unanswerable conclusion following if you will weigh it without prejudice Broad To conclude By no wayes or meanes yet found out can it be That the precept of the Sabbath should bind to sanctifie the Lords-day And I could wish my brethren not to busie their braines to finde out more wayes as having busied them too much hereabouts already Were the fourth Commandement a law in force still it should bind to sanctifie the Iewes Sabbath and none other Broad But suppose that the fourth Commandement did bind to sanctifie the Lords-day What would follow were the fourth Commandement a law still in force and did bind to sanctifie the Lords-day See my Latine Tract Chap. 5. what would follow thereupon That we might doe no more work on our dayes then the Iewes might doe on theirs for there is not the least colour of dispensation in Gods word for doing of more and indeed after some mens doctrine we may doe no more not picke up a few sticks nor buy a little oyntment nor step over the doore sill to gather up Mannah c. See M r. Dod and M r. Cleaver on the fourth Commandement Answer It matters not what would follow now no more then what did follow when the Commandement was confessedly of force For certainly if we be to keepe a Sabbath to the Lord if we could herein doe the will of God on earth as it is done in heaven by keeping it here in the Type as they keepe it in heaven in the Antitype it were so much the better wholly heavenly free from all carnall and earthly distractions so farre as necessitie will give leave and to doe even these necessary things with such heavenly mindednesse as that the rules both of Pietie to God and charitie to our selves are fulfilled therein If at any time much more on that day â—it ought to be our meat and drinke to doe the will of our heavenly father in earth as it is done in heaven And it is apparent in Christian experience that he which that day keepeth himself and his heart diligently from terrene thoughts words and actions imploying them contrarily groweth most in grace hath the sweetest Communion with God the greatest measure of Divine comfort for a Christian never feeleth such sound comfort as when he spiritually observeth it and is the ablest to long after his dissolution * For God blessed the Sabbath day that is appointed it to be a day of blessings to them that sanctifie it which they doe that observe to dâ—e these three things 1. That they keep it delightfully not with tediousnesse grudging 2. That they busie themselves in all holy things acting them in the spirit 3. That they spend the whole day wholly and not partly thus These as M. Dâ—d rightly observeth only inhâ—rit the blessings entailed upon the Sabbath by promise which shew it to be Gods ordinance for he is wont to give a blessing to his own ordinance Whereas those that fight so much against it it is like never felt the sweetnesse of it as for your self I will passe no censure of you for I know you not but some I am able to produce that are of this licentious opinion concerning the Sabbath and are as little strict in other things which are uncontroversably naught to the scandall of the Ministery and to the palpable arguing that because they entertaine not the truth in the love of it God hath either given them over to beleeve a lie or else that they take up this opinion more to countenance their corruptions then to maintaine Truth For non-residency a formall and lazy ministery and such like follow as naturally upon this as falling away doth upon free-will Your manner of instancing is naught thus to goe about to lessen the Commandement it self and our obedience to it by a sleightie expression of the things commanded Had Adam thus excused himself to God when he accused him of rebellion and told him why it was but a mouth-full of an apple c. the aggravation had been worse then the fault a few sticks a little oyle c. is it the fewnesse of the sticks the littlenesse of the oyle that give ens and non-ens to the Sin He that hath his eyes anoynted though but with a little of Gods eye-salve knoweth that the thing commanded is to be judged by the commandement and not the commandement by the thing commanded Me thinks that Memento or watchword set at the beginning of the Commandement and so usefully expounded by M. Dod and M. Cleaver to quicken our circumspection in providing for the sanctifying of the Sabbath by prevention and foresight should have answered this Argument in the hatching especially in these petty things you speake of considering that the lesse the temptation the greater the sin But to your instances themselves I answer That in all things whatsoever a lawfull necessity granteth a lawfull liberty on the Sabbath as for gathering of Mannah I have formerly shewed you why it did bind and for what time And therefore instead of further answer I will insert for a conclusion the positive truth of such workes as may be done on the Sabbath day as you shall find it in M r. Richard Byfeild pag. 95 96. There are saith he
first day of the weeke from the worke of our Redemption and re-creation therefore did he blesse and hallow it by his example to his Apostles whom he had extraordinarily called that they by their example should doe the like to others with those many manifestations of himselfe and admirable blessings which he then bestowed on them Which practice of Christ doth wonderfully make good both the Morality of the Sabbath and justifieth the alteration of it also to the first day of the weeke For whereas God at the first blessed it that is appointed it to be a day wherein he would especially confer spirituall blessings We see Christ accordingly doth still on this day blesse and enlighten his Apostles by appearing to them being together glorifying God Now if you will say that Adams posterity whom in your first Chapter you say it is probable had they continued in Innocency should alwayes have followed Gods example in working sixe dayes and resting the seventh should have sanctified the last of seven by Tradition from God and Adâ—ms examples I will easily yeeld you that by the like tradition from Christ and his Apostles example we doe now keep the first day of the weeke Broad CHAP. II. The latter Opinion maintained THe Primitive Christians for the most part held the latter opinion as I gather by this that followeth Iustin Martyr in his second Apologie writeth after this manner * Apol. ad calcem We hold these assemblies on the Sunday because on that day God began to make the world and also our Saviour Iesus Christ arose from the dead Hereby it is manifest that Iustin knew not of a Commandement from Christ or his Apostles for should a Rabbin yeeld a reason of their meeting on the Sabbath would it not be because God had so commanded it who on that day rested after the Creation and sanctified it And so would Iustin no doubt had he tooke their meeting to be enjoyned by Christ or his Apostles we hold these Assemblies on the Sunday because Christ hath so commanded who on that day rose againe from the dead Thus I am sure some would be ready to write in these dayes Answer The opinion of the Ancients how-ever you may force them to speake was that one day in a weeke or the seventh day was still of force by vertue of the fourth Commandement and that the individuall first day of the weeke was from Christ or his Apostles or both as appeareth in that they call the sanctifying of the Lords-day a keeping of the Sabbath So Ignatius who ad Magnes chargeth those Christians to worke on the Iewes seventh day doth yet say Let every of us keepe Sabbath spiritually * 〈…〉 ad Magnâ—s 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking in opposition to the Iews manner of superstitious Sabbatizing so that he cryeth down both their day and manner of hallowing it * 〈…〉 of this page 50. in margin 〈…〉 temp â—51 if his and yet maintaineth the Sabbath to be yet still on foot and exhorteth them to the right keeping it S t. Augustine also saith So we also sanctifie the Sabbath the Lord saying Ye shall not doe any worke therein And as M t. Richard Byfeild saith The Apostle to the Heb. 4. 9. Doubted not to apply the name of Sabbath to the Christian people and our Reâ—â— saying That the people of God have their Sabbatisme left unto them For humane authorities in this point I further referre you to the 21 and 26. Chap. of M r. Richard Byfeild But to shew your leger-de-maine I proceed to that of Iustin Martyr In which I say he doth as Paul sometimes doth concerning his Apostleship Demonstrating it by such arguments as do properly constitute an Apostle So Iustin in his Apologie for Christians doth first shew the reason of the Christian Sabbath i. e. Our new Creation by Christ who by his resurrection brought light out of darknesse in the first day of the Creation But had you looked further as no doubt you did you might have seen his opinion to be more then you make it even witnessing Christ to have taught it to his Apostles as you shall finde it quoted by M r. Richard Byfeild Chap. 21. pag. 124. So that you deale with Iustin Martyr as men deale with Mag-pyes cut their tongues shorter to teach them to speake what they would have them And yet a Râ—bbin might have laid down the Reason and concealed the Commandement without solloecisme or errour unlesse you will say it was a fault in Rabbi Moses for so he proscribeth the Israelites to answer their children when they should aske them concerning the Passeover as you may see in the 12. Chap. of Exod. 26. 27. so also in the 13 Exod. 13 14 15 16. You shall see the reason of a dutie delivered from the parent to the children by precept from Moses without any specification of the Commandement it self Broad Si dies observare non licet menses 〈◊〉 lib. Com. 〈◊〉 Eâ—â—st ad Gâ—â— tempora annos nos quoque simile crimen incurrimus quartum Sabbati observantes parascenem diem dominicum ieiunium Quadragesima See the place and note that he doth not yeeld a peculiar reason for the observation of the Lords-day Constantinus imperator concessit rusticis Euseb. de vita Coâ—st lib. 4. Cap. 19. ut diebus dominicis agrorum culturae pro ut ipsi viderint fore necessarium inservirent Idoneum vero precationi tempus salutarem diem dominicum constituebat quippe qui tum verè praecipuâ—s est tum haâ—d dubie primus Note the reason Eusebius rendereth of this constitution of Constantine and consider withall that Constanâ—ine would not have so constituted if in his judgement our Saviour Christ had before appointed the Lords-day to this end Did ever a Christian Prince simply decree that the Lords Supper should be administred As many Christian Princes and Councels as have simply decreed the observation of the Sunday were doubtlesse of this opinion Answer For answer to this I referre you to M r. Richard Byfoild Chap. 29. where the Reader may herein receive satisfaction Broad As touching moderne writers Calvin saith 〈◊〉 lib. 2 cap. 8. sect 34. Veteres subrogarunt diem dominicum in locum Sabbati Zanchius saith In 4 Preceâ—t that the Lords-day Nullum habet Domini mandatum D r. Feild saith Book 4. Church Chap. 20. that the Lords-day is an Apostolicall tradition not precept The Book of Homilies not to stand upon other saith Homily of the place and time of prayâ—r That Christian people chose the first day which is as much in effect as that it is not Christs Commandement Will any man say that the people of Israel chose the seventh day Now of this opinion I am and these are my reasons 1. Had Christ or his Apostles commanded to sanctifie the Lords-day mention should have been made thereof in Gods word for the Scripture containeth in it all things
to celebrate both the death and resurrection of Christ the one by the Sacrament and the other by the Sabbath as appeareth Acts 20. 7. And therefore Saint Paul when he speaketh of it still mentioneth it as a thing granted and not doubted of although the Ceremoniall or Iewish temporary Sabbaths as like wise the Ceremoniall meats were which maketh the Apostle so often and so largely handle that point Thus Eatonus pag. 69. Nullum praeceptum de ritu aliquo Iudaico abrogando à Domino nostro Apostolis Discipulis suis relictum legitur Nusquam dicitur Pascham non comedetis non circumcidemini similia Solum enim controversia in Ecclesiiis de illis orta est ex occasione ista Apostoliritus illos prohibuerunt iam autem cum in confessâ— est diem nostrum dominicum à nullo Christiano impugnatum fuisse non mirandum est si nullum de illo observando vel abrogando Sabbato Iudaico mandatum expressum reperimus Est tamen generale mandâ—tum de illo observando comprehensum in illo Apostoli Estote imitatores mei sieut ego sum Christi And thus much may serve for answer both to your opinion and reasons as also for the remainder of your Treatise excepting some short observations for what followeth hath been mostly spoken of before both by you and me Broad CHAP. III. The former Opinion confuted 1. CHrist did not command us to sanctifie the Lords-day Such as would have us beleeve that our Saviour Christ himselfe enjoyned the Lords-day goe about to prove it by his practice 1. Because he appeared to his Disciples on the first day as they were assembled together Iohn 20. Answ. This assembling was for feare of the Iewes and it was a very strange kinde of teaching them by his practice to observe the day not to come unto them till late in the Evening about halfe an houre before the end thereof for the night following belonged unto the second day other wise either that first day had two nights belonging to it or else I cannot see how Christ lay three dayes in his grave Answer Had this record of the Apostles being assembled and Christ appearing at this time been alone recorded there might have been some probable conjecture that it might be but accidentan although the Text is very exact and expressive concerning the time for having in the first verse of the 20. Iohn spoken of the first day of the weeke the 19. verse reduplicateth that with a significant explanation as if the Evangelist would be loth to be mistaken in that point of Time saying The same day then at night which was the first day of the weeke c. But being seconded with the like afterwards it argueth it to be ordered by God of a purposed providence especially if we take along the event and succeeding practice of the Apostles and Church ever after which to all sober minds putteth it past doubt And as touching that you say their meeting was for feare of the Iewes happily the privacy of it was so but why they should feare the Iewes more on that day then on any other I see no reason and therefore can it be no reason of their then assembling And now concerning Christs appearing to them at the Evening of the same day it is so farre from lessening the authority of this institution as that being compared with Gods institution of the first Sabbath which according to your own confession was about the end thereof it giveth much force thereto And although I meane to be briefe in what followeth yet I must needs by the way shew you M. Breerewoods refutation in this point by M r. Richard Byfeild pag. 211. Saith he there Concerning the authority that translated the Sabbath you say it is certaine that the translation thereof was actually and immediately prescribed by the Church deale ingenuously and shew me where if in Scripture then I answer that it was not immediately prescribed by the Church for the Apostles were not Authors of the institution but ministers of Christ and pen-men of the holy-â—host If in Ecclesiasticall writers I answer they all referre us to the Apostles and the Scriptures This opinion therefore is so farre from certaine that it is certainly false You say againe That certainly Christ never gave his Apostles particular charge of instituting a new Sabbath either while he conversed with them on earth or afterwards by Revelation How know you this The Apostles delivered many things that the Evangelists did not set downe not themselves expressely say that they received them from the Lords mouth That they concealed Christs command from the Church that is this particular expression in so many words that Christ commanded it this maketh to prove that it was given them in charge by Christ for else when the Apostles enjoyned it they would have said of that their injunction as of other things 1 Cor. 7. 6 12 25. We speake this by permission and not by Commandement We have no Commandement of the Lord but we speake our iudgement Herein speak we not the Lord. This institution then to use your owne language of a new day of solemnity instead of an old Sabbath was of the 〈◊〉 and necessity of the Apostles Commission not of the libeâ—ty The Apestles did nothing in ordering the Church but from and by Christ either by precept or example or divine inspiration And it is more then probable they had speciall warrant from Christ in expresse change when we compare together their precept and practice with these two Texts Matt. 28. 20 Acts 1. The first enjoyning the Apostles to teach what he commanded and to teach and baptize in which Ordinances teaching such things he would be with them to the worlds end â— The later declaring that Christ spake the things pertaining to the kingdome of God to his Disciples in these forty dayes before his ascension * Besides this in the 2. verse of 1 Acts it is said untill the day that hee was taken up after that he through the holy Ghost had given Commandements to the Apostles whom he had chosen For all that you say therefore it is certaine the Sabbath was translated by the same authority that first commanded it Broad 2. Because after eight dayes he came to them againe Iohn 20. 26. Ans. This were more strange for how can they prove that a weeke is meant thereby A weeke after is but seven dayes and should thy friend departing from thine house on Sunday at night promise to come again after eight dayes wouldst thou expect his coming upon that day seven-night either it was not a weeke or Saint Iohn dreamt not of such a collection for otherwise he would have said so plainly Matthew and Marke have the like phrase Matt. 17. 1. Mark 92 compared with Luk. 9. 28. and seeing by after six dayes they meane on the seventh it is some likelyhood that Iohn by after eight dayes may meane on the ninth this is more
Sabbath above them therefore and its equality with nature seeing God makes use of it so especially to exhibite the commandement of nature by amongst the Lawes thereof But now in that opinion wherein you and Master Breerewood jumpe I must differ from you both to wit that now onely the generall Law of nature remaines which is that some time is to bee sanctified to Gods worship and that this fourth commandement which you call Gods speciall commandement is utterly abrogated For as for the Law of nature which consisteth onely in an indefinite sequestring of some time to the service of God it comes infinitely short of that compleatnes and solemnity of time which our necessity requireth and which God deserveth at our hands and which if hee may bee his owne spokesman hee commandeth also Indeed to set apart some time as perhaps an houre in a Day or some such like time for prayer or meditation it may bee nature or conscience would affirme it requisite but to set a part so much time and in so solemne manner as it seemes God lookes for and our state requires neither nature nor conscience will so prompt us either now or as I thinke in innocency And therefore as I may well conclude that that first institution of God concerning the Sabbath was rather a supply to nature then any Law in nature which our Antisabbatarians unnecessarily labour to disprove * Though I must say of some argumâ—nts of some former Writers of this subject of the Sabbath who not then finding opposition which hath beene an ordinary meanes in the course of Gods providence for the more diligent inquisition after the truth of God and happy discovery thereof as Hierome saith of the Fathers How that before Arrius rose up They delivered some things innocently yet lesse varily and such as cannot avoid the calumny of peâ—verse persons and superadded of God after created nature by immediate and speciall revelation So I have just cause to beleeve that this was for many speciall and perpetuall respects For left God his solemne and publicke worship to have beene arbitrarily ordered by nature and not have by himselfe determined a speciall time therefore it would have falne out very crosse to Gods intentious either being slenderly and seldomely performed or at least very confusedly and disjoyntedly seeing that so many men have so many mindes and so many severall and various occasions which by man would never have beene determined at once to have kept so solemne and compleat a portion of time as it seemes God expected especially seeing nature never suggested it if God by an over-ruling mandat had not put it past posse and velle * As he did the eating of the Passeover though a man were in a journey or were uncleane by a law made Numb 9. which hee who is not the God of confusion wisely foresaw and prevented So that though some time even by nature is taught to bee set apart for Gods worship which I deny not yet I say that this is more private and personall not so solemne and publicke as God would have it and therefore may bee arbitrary without disorder and distraction which the other cannot if left to mans free-will and therefore is purposely revealed of God and is no law innate in nature because of the reason aforesaid for nature doth not discerne of numbers or why God should chose to be worshipped on the seventh day rather then on the eight or ninth but a commandement on the by of equall force antiquity and perpetuity with nature prescribed as a rule coincident with nature for the Church of God in all ages to imitate And to this purpose speakes Marius Marius in Gen. 2. Since saith hee it is the Law of nature that some time bee peculiarly insinuated for the worship of God it was meete that that should bee determined by a positive Law But against this it will be objected Why might not time as well as place bee left to the disposition and authority of Man to appoint seeing that time and place bee alike necessary in nature to all actions I answer Answ. time and place are in nature alike necessary to all actions in genere but so is not this or that particuler time or place save where by positive Law it is made so God did appoint the seaventh day for solemne worship and left all places at liberty till it pleased him to designe one onely place for Sacrifice-worship under the Law the necessity whereof being now abrogated by the Gospell the place is left to choyce One time may agree to all the world for worship but so cannot one place Againe it will be objected Obj. that Bishop White pag. 33. layeth it downe as an essentiall Character that Lawes and Preceps meerely positively morall oblige onely the Persons or State or Nation and Republike upon which they are imposed by the Lawgiver or to whom they are published by a legall promulgation So pag. 38. If it be a precept meerely positive it can oblige those people onely upon whom it was imposed Also pag. 77. hee saith flatly that although the seaventh day Sabbath had not beene a legall Ceremony yet if it were onely a positive morall precept the obligation hereof ceased under the Gospell So that by this rule the Sabbath should not bee of universall obligation being onely positively morall To all which himselfe gives the Answer pag. Answ. 27. where hee saith Lawes positive are common and generall either for all mankind as the Law of Polygamy and Wedlocke with in some degrees mentioned or els for one nation Republicke or Community of people So that wee see through forgetfulnesse his Character doth not hold but that a positive morall Law may bee perpetuall and universall as well as nationall of which sort we have reason to reckon the Sabbath because it and the Law of Polygamy which hee instanceth in were Twins both brought forth in the state of Adams innocency Broad I praise God for the comming forth of Master Breerewoods booke The difference is in â— manner onely verball for wee both hold that the generall law of nature remaineth and againe that Gods speciall Commandementis abrogated for though there bee some difference betweene us yet meane Schollers are able to judge of it might I have spoken with him I doubt nothing but that wee should soone have accorded in lesse then an houâ—es space Answer I could wish you had perused Master Richard Byfields reply to Master Breerewoods booke before you had sent abroad this Manu-script that so you might have thanked God for that which had beene thanke worthy But that you may not bee a stranger to him I will bee bold to bring you acquainted by putting you the oftner in mind of him in this my Answer Touching the substance of your difference mentioned in the Margin I have already spoken to it and shall have more occasion as I goe along Broad I published not long since a
treatise of the Sabbath having this Title Tractatus de Sabbatho in quo doctrina Ecclesiae primitivae tractatur defenditur And for proofe that the Doctrine of the primitive Church was such as is therein taught and declared besides certaine sayings of Augustine and others I alledged the testimony of Master Calvin in his institutions Vâ—bratile veteres nâ—ncuâ—are sâ—lent The ancients not onely some of the ancients accounted the fourth commandement shadowish not onely partly shadowish Inst. lib. 2. Cap. 8. Sect. 28. If any bee able to shew that wee Master Calvin I meane and my selfe have mistaken the Doctrine of the primitive Church in this matter I greatly marvaile that they have not gone about it hitherto If none bee able to shew this as it seemeth none are for doubtlesse many want no will then is it no lesse to bee marvailed at That the Doctrine of the primitive Church findeth no better entertainment amongst English Protestants Is it credible that the primitive Church should not keepe one of Gods Commandements That such a greevous errour should befall the godly learned Fathers as to esteeme that Commandement shadowish and temporall which is morall and perpetuall Answer Here you would seeme to beg credit to your opinion by Master Calvins authority who because hee quoteth the exposition of the ancients in this case you would insinuatingly perswade to give some countenance to your Tenet But that the World may know how he held in this particular his opinion is sufficiently manifested in his commentary on Gen. 2. where hee saith that first God rested and that then hee blessed this rest that in all ages among men it might be holy or he deâ—icated every seventh day to rest that his example might bee a perpetuall rule Moreover wee must know saith hee this exercise is not peculiar to one either age or people onely but common to all mankind Wherefore when wee heare that by Christs comming the Sabbath was abrogated this distinction must bee taken to What appertaineth to the ordering of humane life and what peculiarly agreeth to the old signes That the Sabbath figured the mortification of the flesh I say was temporall but that from the beginning it was commanded men that they should exercise themselves in the worship of God it ought deservedly to endure even to the end of the World And besides this hee that observeth what followes upon ' his instance of the ancients in his institutions shall find that there hee saith how that though they say true yet they touch but halfe the matter And therefore doth hee largely discusse it afterwards wherein hee sheweth his opinion to bee thus much that the institution of the Sabbath for the better and more solemne performance of Gods worship and refreshment of his creature was with a perpetuall intent because of necessary use to all men in all times * Sect. 32. but in regard it was againe given to the Iewes it had somewhat peculiar in it which by Christ is abrogated and yet the force use and reason of the commandement in regard of its substance as it was given both at the first and as it was repeated doth still remaine So that hee confesseth that there was something peculiar to the Iewes which hung at it but that withall there is a substance in the commandement it selfe which it is sacriledge to violate the use thereof being universall both to persons and times so that in alledging him you bring in testem sine testimonio And put case there was some what that was more proper to those people and those times then to these in this fourth commandement as well as in the first and fifth for as I have said almost all scripture had some circumstantiall peculiarity and propriety to those people and those times to whom it was immediately given which yet nothing hindered the universality of the substance yet as the reasons in those commandements evangelically construed are of present force and being even in these our times though the letter strictly construed bee not so this commandement or the Sabbath may have somewhat more proper to them in it for so is that manner of expression the stranger within they gates or at least belonging to it such as was their not preparing Mannah and kindling of fires which yet is so farre from extinguishing the whole commandement * For it cannot be denied but a commandement may bee of force to mee though every circumstance of it doe not concerne mee as that the very type it selfe is of lively use to us under the Gospell and of present force and being also although not therefore of a like religious nature to us as it was to them but in an Evangelicall sense that is in respect of the inward and spirituall holines thereof not properly of the outward and literall For though the outward Sanction * By this word sanction I meane positive holines which was in their carnall externall worship of that rest being admitted to bee typicall may bee extinct because that the typicalnes of things are not properly parts but accidents and conducing helps to our profession and worship that live under the Gospell which if true and reall is spirituall Iohn 4. * See Master Hildersham lect 39. 40 upon the place where he opposeth the Spirit wherewith wee are to worship God in our times to the Ceremoniall worship which was in the time of the Iewes in respect it was an externall and carnall worship see also Rom. 7. 6. Yet is not the holy use of this rest extinct either as it is conducing or necessary to the present sanctifying of the Lords day or as it is significative pointing us to and minding us of our heavenly Sabbatisme Obj. But you will say how can we reject the typicall holines and yet retaine the sense Answ. 1. We refuse the whole Law as a covenant and yet wee retaine it as a rule for the perfection of that Church respectively to the foregoing times which is called the time of nature belongs to us but the imperfection of it respectively with our Church ended with it selfe and belongs not to us 2. If the Sabbath had had its originall after a Iewish manner to have beene instituted upon the fall and so to relate to Christ then wee could have retained it no more then the rest but wee derive this from the primitive institution in paradice principally and from the Iewes onely by way of enforcement or conveyance as wee doe water first from the fountaine and then from the pipe And though this rest had in it a typicall signification at first yet never a typicall sanction but onely by accident of the Iewish discipline then when types were in fashion as I may so speake like a fresh River which running through a peece of the Sea is made brinish but being quit of it it re-assumes its owne nature So that then the commandement is not abrogated as a speciall commandement but the speciality *
I meane not such a speciality as Master Brâ—â—râ—wood doth which belonged to the Sabbath or to this generall commandement is rather ended which did consist of those occasionall interventions of Mannah kindling fires and double sacrifices and if you will of the foresaid sanction of the very rest it selfe which as I have said being significative happily had in their times an holines belonging to it which did peculiarly belong unto the Iewes and which were no parts of the substance of this commandement which in that respect is as well common to us as to them the reason annexed being of like and equall force to all from the creation For the annexing of extrinsecall and adventitious circumstances doth not any whit harme the nature and morality of the Sabbath no more then Pauls circumcising of Timothy which in respect of the season was needfull did annull or doe injury to baptisme nor then a signe of an Inne or shoppe being pulled downe annulles or impaires an house So that their rest is common to us but in a riper sense for the grouth and stature of our times so much overtopping theirs the Lord lookes that wee should answer his expectation as well as obey his commandement in sanctifying a more excellent and Evangelicall Sabbath to him then ever they were able to doe The Church of the new Testament saith Master Perkins hath more knowledge and more grace then the people of the old Testament had and in that regard ought to have more zeale and greater alacrity in the worship of God then they had that it may exceed the Iewes according to the measure of grace * Greater mercies require greater and better duties received The Arguments of love being not so forcible to prompt obedience in the time of the Iewes as in ours they being under the old covenant and the Spirit not so stirring then as now the obedience was rather performed to the commandement then to the commander For God in their time passed under the name of a Lord implying them to bee servants and their obedience to bee serviceable obedience but now in our times hee passeth under the name of a Father implying us to bee sons and our obedience to bee filiall and spirituall And yet as spirituall obedience was even then due to God and expected by him though not with that eminency of expectation as of us So the types and Sacramentall umbrages which now are of use to us being performed in conscience to Gods commandement have their holines suteable and respective to our times but not in that degree not in that kind of positive and intrinsecall holines as in the times of the Iewish nonage Like as in the spring time while the sappe is weake and but comming all that wee expect from trees is flowers but when a riper seasoninsueth then wee looke for riper fruit so that then the prime and beauty of these flowers ceaseth though their vertue remaine And by the punishment that God so severely annexed to the not performing the rites of the two Sacraments wee may see the extraordinary nature of things of that kind then in the time of their Pedagogie for he that was uncircumcised and that eate leavened bread in the passeover was to be cut off And therefore did God intend their rest as may well bee gathered to bee a positive part of their sanctification because of the typicall use thereof which yet hee doth not doe to us and yet hee accounts our not resting a prophanation of the Sabbath and all imployments which hinder his worship and conduce not to the sanctifying of that day to bee sinnes Like as Christ who whilest hee was upon the earth accepted small things at his Apostles hands but after hee was ascended and had given gifts unto men hee looked for other services or as a Pater-familias that having a boy and a man to waite at his table the boy if hee can fill a cup of beere and shift a trencher by reason of his non-age hee is willing to take it as a good part of his service but to his man hee gives better wages and therefore expects better service at his hands hee lookes that hee should bee able to furnish and disfurnish the table with grace to his Master and yet not to neglect those lesser things Or which better expresseth my meaning as of children wee require a bodily service in saying their prayers and graces and catechisme and though they have little or no understanding and sense of that they say yet wee take it in good part till they attaine to more knowledge and ripenes of yeares and then wee looke for sutable performance thereto Even so the Lord hee expects from us an high degree of sanctifying his Sabbath even a ravishment of Spirit which service wee can never performe if wee doe not rest A Christian and Evangelicall use therefore of this Sabbaticall rest is still in force to us though the Iewish sanction may bee determined for their precise resting was with respect to the formall holines in the rest but wee are to rest with respect to its finall holines of furthering Gods more substantiall worship and the spiritualizing our owne mindes by it and thus doth the whole commandement for substance and use remaine to us the difference being onely in some occasionall circumstances * Like as one in answer to an Antiâ—oniâ—n that objects because the Tables of stone wherein the Morall Law was written were removed with the Tabernacle other like adjuncts therefore the Mosaicâ—l Law is â—â—erly abolished saith Must it needs follow that because the Tables of stone wherein the Law was written bee abolished that therefore the Lawâ— it selfe is utterly abolished together with them were the Tables of stone so essentiall to the Morall Law that it had neitheâ— birth before them nor being after them wee know that the putting them into the Arke was typicall though the Law it selfe was â—orall â—o that so â—aâ—re as these Tables of the Covenant had any thing ceremoniall in them or any thing concerning other circumstances or persons time place terrour rigor and the like being peculiar to the Church of the Jewes in thaâ— estate of the Mosâ—â—cal Pedagogy so farre I say they are removed with the 〈◊〉 Buâ— the morall Law contained in the 10. commandements could not bee ceremoniall for then should the morall and ceremoniall have beene confounded whereas even by their writtings in tables of stone and by the finger of God they were distinguished neither was there then any thing for the substance of it nor is now as now it stands upon record in the booke of God but it doth concerne us as well as them and therefore though the Tables of stone bee removed the morall Law is yet continued and hath except is excipiendis his properuse and force still as 1. Because the Sabbaths rest was significative from the beginning it might in their times as I have said carry with it a typicall or externall holines as their
other types had which notwithstanding were of afarre different nature and institution to this for they were appointed since the fall and occasioned by it and in themselves temporary but this was before the fall and given for ever to the whole Church for a standing type which yet it doth not to us and yet so as the primary force and use of this is no lesse appertaining to us then them For so that other ordinance which was instituted in innocency marriage it also lasted in respect of diverse circumstances of their times and discipline which yet wee retaine pure from the first institution Secondly wee under the Gospell have also an alteration made of the individuall but not of the numerall day for wee now keepe the seaventh day according to the commandement remember that thou keepe holy the seaventh day but not theirs Thirdly in respect also of the reason whereupon the commandement was inforced upon them to wit Gods resting from the creation For whilest the law or first covenant was in force the creation was in force which still remaines with us but subordinated to the adequate reason of our Sabbath where to use Master Dowes words pag. 24. All lawes being onâ—ly positive though made by God himselfe admit mutation at least when the matter concerning which or the conditions of the persons to whom they were given is changed For as the Iewish types so many grosse and sensitive grounds and reasons are pilled of and swallowed up by the comming of Christ and more spirituall ones risen in their stead As wee see it very apparant in the 65. Isa. 17. I will saith God create a new Heaven and a new Earth and the former shall not bee remembred nor come into mind * Old things are possed away behold all things are become new Which to mee seemes a pertinent prophecy of the alteration of the Sabbath from the Iewes day to ours it being as much as to say that in comparison of the excellency of the things that shall bee under the Gospell the other things shall bee nothing worth Sence shall bee swallowed up of Spirit types of truth And though the creation bee admirable of it selfe and so also is at this day the consideration of it being exceeding usefull yet nothing comparable to our redemption Our rejoycing in the one is nothing comparable to our rejoycing in the other * So that the â—lteration of the Iewes Sabbatâ— into ours by reason of the new creatiâ— which God made 〈◊〉 the time of the Gospell doth further typisâ—â—â—nâ— assure us of the last and best alteration of new Heaven and new Eaâ—â—h â—â—okâ—n of in thâ—â— of the first of 〈◊〉 which we shall be made partakers of by the Goâ—spell As a right worthy Doctor Sibbes by name observes Gods last works are his best works the first being but preparatives and occasions of the later the new Heaven and the new Earth are the best the second wine that Christ created himselfe was the best Spirituall things are better then naturall And Master Dow pag. 27 saith as mucâ— that the reason Drawne from the example of God who rested upon the Sabbath namely when the creation was finished endured onely till the time of the new creation in which all things were made new by Christ at which time it ceased or at least a second reason taken from the new covenant comming in place the former both reason and day become now old are passed away And behold all things are become new For this worke of redemption or new creation being the greater may deservedly take place of the other and as the Prophet Ieremy speaking of the deliverance that God would vouchsafe his people from the Babylonish captivity saith Behold the dayes shall come saith the Lord that it shall no more bee said the Lord liveth that brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt but the Lorth liveth that brought them up from the land of the North so may wee say of the day appointed for his worship that the day wherein hee finished the worke of creation shall no more bee observed but the day wherein our Lord Christ by his resurrection from the dead finished the worke of our redemption Thus speakes Master Dow. And how ever in other things the constitution of the Iewish Church and ours differ yet in this they are united the Sabbath being first ordained before there was distinction made or wall of partition built for an ever-lasting signe betweene God and his Church for his sanctifying it and a perpetuall rule of duty and practise chalked out to his Church for the direction of his more solemne worship Like as was his marrying of Adam and Eve in innocency both a perpetuall type of that union which is betweene God and his Church as also a perpetuall rule for the ordering of that affaire amongst mankind ever after both which were alike given in innocency and were alike both perpetuall rules and perpetuall types unto his Church Broad This booke beeing the last I intend to write of this Argument my desire is it should bee read of many before it bee published that if just exceptions can bee taken to ought I have written or that an objection of moment bee not here fully answered I may know it and afterwards may alter or adde as there shall bee cause Iohn 3. 21. Hee that doth truth commeth to the light that his deeds may bee made manifest that they are wrought in God Broad 2. Treatises 1. Concerning the Sabbath or seaventh day 2. Concerning the Lords day or first of the Weeke Gal. 4. 10 11. YEe observe dayes and monthes and times and yeares I am afraid of you least I have bestowed on you labour in vaine Answer You play the Souldier in the On-set at first discharging your greatest ordinance to impresse the greater feare but as you use the matter you misse the marke For this place of the Galath fals farre short of your aime as you might have perceived if without prejudice you would have perused Master Perkins upon that place whose whole discourse thereof is worth inserting if it were not too long And if you examine the context you may perceive how that the Apostle was angry at the Galathians for leaving Christ the substance and betaking themselves even in point of justification to the carnall observation of Iewish shadowes and ceremonies which in comparison hee calleth beggerly Rudiments and hee the rather tearmed them so because they were then utterly uselesse and insignificative being fulfilled and so abrogated But the Sabbath is for the equity and substance of it still of the same use as ever to wit fit for the beâ—ter procuring of mans refreshing and Gods more solemne worship Nor is it in-significative or ever shall bee till wee sing a requiem to our soules in heaven For as it concluded our creation so shall it our salvation And therefore by no meanes to bee numbred with the observation of dayes and monthes and yeares seeing that the
Apostles themselves observed the Lords day weekely or Sabbatically and not monthly or yearely as were the Iewes Sabbaths and Holy-dayes but in relation to the fourth commandement one in seaven as knowing it to bee a perpetuall rule not a temporary and vanishing ordinance which pertained to the bondage and servitude of weake and beggerly Rudiments of which the Apostle here onely speakes And as it was farre from the Apostles thought to reckon any of the ten commandements as a weake and beggerly Rudiment so let it bee abhorred of all Christian hearts and eares But may some say Obj. is not the signification of the Sabbaths institution abrogated by Christs resurrection and the comming of the Lords day The Sabbath is altered not abrogated Answ. and the signifâ—cation subordinated not annulled being instituted upon an universall and perpetuall reason for the Sabbath was no proper Iewish type but the Churches type in that wherein it was typicall as wee may see in the fourth Hebr. 9. There remaineth therefore Sabbatismus a Sabbath-rest to the people of God which words Willet in 2. Gen. saith conclude that both the type remaineth that is a Sabbatisme and the signification of the type everlasting rest And as you may further see 12 Matth. 8. in these words The Sonne of man is Lord even of the Sabbath-day which words compared with the verses foregoing shew that the Sabbath is of a ceremonious nature for Christ there rankes it among things ceremoniall in a ceremoniall sense but with a note of inequality as it is implyed in that word Even of the Sabbath-day and is as the rest of the morall Law of equall continuance with the Church which for this cause was reviued to the Iewes because at that time they were the onely Israel and Church of God but now translated to us under the Gospell the partition wall being broken downe with an alteration of circumstance according to the season as Isay was prophecied in the foreâ— quoted place of Isa. 65. 17. And whereas Doctor Heylyâ— part 2. pag. 27. saith That it is not probable that the Apostle Paul who so opposed himselfe against the Sabbath would erect a new this had not beene saith hee to abrogate the ceremony but to change the day I answer that by the comming of Christ some things suffered alteration as well as others abrogation wherefore the Apostles were to preach onely the abrogative types and ceremonies to bee abrogated of which sort I prove the Sabbath to bee none and according to the nature of the new creation to alter the other of which sort the Sabbath was and therefore suffered subordination not abrogation And therefore hath the Scripture recorded it to us 〈◊〉 the name of the first day of the weeke or the first day of seaven before it stile it the Lords day in a sâ—gnificant opposition to the old antiquated last day of the weeke I will conclude this Answer with Master Hookers authority who was a confident maintainer of the morality of the fourth commandement as you may see in his Eccles. Pol. pag. 377. who speaking upon this place of the Galath Hooker saith That for as much as the Law of the Iewes by the comming of Christ was changed and wee thereunto no way bound Saint Paul although it were not his purpose to favour invectives against the speciall sanctification of dayes and times to the service of God and to the honour of Iesus Christ doth notwithstanding bend his forces against that opinion which imposed on the Gentiles the yoake of Iewish legall observations as if the whole World ought for ever and that upon paine of condemnation to keepe and observe them such as in this perswasion hallowed the Iewish Sabbaths the Apostle sharply reproveth saying yee observe dayes and monthes and times and yeares c. Thus you see how Master Hookers opinion was concerning this text of Paul onely to cry downe those obsolete Iewish observations and nothing lesse then to impeach the authority of the fourth commandement or the Lords day as you may plainely discerne by turning over leafe to pag. 378. where hee layeth downe three sorts of holy times thus saith hee Hooker It pleased God heretofore to exact some part of time by way of perpetuall homage never to bee dispenced withall nor remitted againe to require some other parts of time with as strict exaction but for lesse continuance and of the rest which were left arbitrary to accept what the Church should in due consideration consecrate voluntarily unto religious uses Of the first kind amongst the Iewes was the Sabbath-day Of the second those feastes which were appointed by the Law of Mosâ—s The Feast of Dedication invented by the Church standeth in the number of the last kind The morall Law requiring therefore a seaventh part throughout the age of the World to bee that way imployed although with us the day bee changed in regard of a new revolution begun by our Saviour Christ yet the same proportion of time continueth which was before because of reference to the benefit of creation and now much more of renovation thereunto added by him which was Prince of the World to come wee are bound to account the sanctification of one day in seaven a duty which Gods immutable Law doth exact for ever Thus you have Master Hookers opinion both of this text of the Gal. The morality of the fourth commandement the perpetuity of the Sabbath and the authority of the Lords-day Broad A little leaven leaveneth the whole lumpe Gal. 5. 9. Chrysost. on Gal. Why but they retained the Gospell onely they would have brought in a Iewish rite or two and yet the Apostle saith that thereby the Gospell is subverted to shew how but a little thing being untowardly mingled marreth all Luther on Gal. 2. Paul had note here his owne busines in hand but a matter of faith Now as concerning faith wee ought to bee invincible and more hard if it might bee then the Adamant stone but as touching charity wee ought to bee soft and more flexible then the reed or leafe shaken with the wind and ready to yeeld to every thing Broad A treatise of the Sabbath FOr as much as I know not whether taking my booke in hand thou mindest to read it over to the end I have therefore thought good by way of prevention in the beginning to let thee understand that howsoever there bee difference in opinion among the Godly learned yet they all for ought I know agree in this namely that the Lords-day had his beginning in the time of the Apostles and being of so great antiquity so generally received and so profitable to the Church of Christ that it ought to be observed of thee according to the practice of good Christians from time to time and the godly lawes of our most Christian governour living at this present I charge thee therefore as thou wilt answer it before Gods judgement â—ear that thou dost not take occasion hence to spend
of an eye which solemne contrivement sure was not to create a Iewish abrogative type and therefore is accordingly observed under the Gospell onely mutatis mutandis But to come to that which you would inferre which is that onely the last day of the seaven is to bee kept Sabbath I answer First that in respect of the point of time I thinke I need not bee large to prove the variation of it For I thinke it will be granted upon this one instance 10. Ios. 13. how that the Sabbath was not alwayes observed answerable to the first institution in respect of the point of time for that by the Suns standing still the weeke was lengthened beyond its due proportion Doctor Heylin pag. 48. alleadgeth that a man travailing the World Westward may lose a whole day now what shall that man doe at his returne saith hee if to sanctify one day in seaven bee morall I answer first Let him tell mee what a Iew should have done in that case when the Sabbath was confessedly obligatory and so should that man doe now Secondly I answer that though things that are morall by nature because they bind alwayes and in all places alike are ever the same Yet things that are morall onely by Discipline admit variety through exigency of time and occasion Thus it was lawfull for Adams immediate posterity to conjugate with their consanguinity which now the exigency of those times being over is utterly unlawfull by disciplinary morality Nay nature her selfe being disciplined from the alteration of time and variety of choyce now abhorres it as utterly undecent so the man that having in his lawfull calling of merchandizing lost a day and had during his travell in his particuler practise rent from the Church in her computation of time without a schisme being lawfully necessitated thereunto by the course of nature may as lawfully at his returne reduce himselfe againe unto the conformity and practise of the Church to avoid a wilfull rent and disorder like as they that were in a journey were to keepe the Passeover on a different time by themselves from the Church of the Iewes but at their returne they were to returne to the Churches observation Secondly but in regard of the order which I thinke you labour to maintaine to wit that the Sabbath ought to bee the last and not the first day of the weeke or else not to bee at all To that I answer that some reasons and circumstances even in the morall Law are occasionall and so changeable and yet the substance of the commandement is perpetuall and immutable * And as one well observes Diverse positive lawes which are morall perpetuall and bind all men in their generations though they bee firme and immutable in themselves and in their obligation yet because the duties of obedience which they impose upon men and the men upon whom the duties are imposed are in their state and condition mutable and changeable and the changes and alterations of things commanded in times places and other relations and respects doe not at all change the Law nor prove it ceremoniall and changeable As for instance the Law of beleeving in Christ is firme and unchangeable from the first promise that was made of him and yet the duty which hee requires is changeable and is changed now under the Gospell from that it was under the Law in circumstance for they were to beleeve in Christ to come but we as come for the changing of the day now since Christ does not make vâ—id but establish the Law of the Sabbath As in the first commandement where Israels corporeall deliverance is now changed into Israels ghostly deliverance So in the fifth commandement the land of Canaan is properly the land meant which had that promise belonging to it But now it is enlarged to all that in the feare of God obey that commandement throughout the World So this commandement had the reason of Gods resting from the creation occasionally affixed unto it because that then the creation was Gods greatest and eminentest worke and being occasionall and appointed for commemoration was therefore changeable whensoever he should rest from a greater worke that better deserved commemoration then that And yet the substance of the commandement remaineth unalterable which substance or unalterable part of the commandement consisteth in the number as seaven is opposed to all othâ—r numbers and not in the order But may some say Obj. those allegations out of the first and fift commandements hold not paralel with this reason of the fourth commandement because they were onely given in the time of the Iewes but this was from the beginning I answer both the one and the other was given for the Churches sake Answ. and therefore alterable according to Gods good pleasure and the state of the Church But you will further object When doe you find any thing altered that was as this is from the beginning I answer I find the curse which was annexed to the fall of man to bee taken away and brought under by the death and resurrection of Christ And well then may the reason of the then Sabbath bee altered by it when the curse is annulled it being the Churches type or ceremony and that thing changed wherein the ceremony consisted to wit the order from last to first according to the different state of the Church Like as it may bee supposed of the Iewes when they came to bee a sedentary Church they altered their gesture from standing to sitting but still retained the Passeover So wee still retaine the substance of the fourth commandement though wee have altered the ceremony which was grounded upon Gods example And now God having given us another example of another rest upon another day wee imitate his example and still keepe his commandement by observing the number but altering the order For indeed as by Gods ordination and disposition the Law and Sabbath goe together so they fare alike for the Law was to continue in the nature of a covenant till Christ came and so the Sabbath on the last day who bâ— fulfilling the righteousnes of the one did inherite the rest of the other being annexed thereunto and entailed thereupon whereof man failed by his fall and thereupon changed the natures of both subordinating the Law to the Gospell making it in stead of a cause procuring life to bee a rule and an effect of life and grace received and so the last day Sabbath to the first changing rest by workes into working by rest A happy change if wee make not our selves unhappy by allowing a rest to the Law but none to the Gospell for whereas before wee held by a tenure of feare our happines being all in the future for wee were all our life long to doe this and then to live now wee hold by the tenure of faith and our happines is in present for saith the Apostle Hebr. 4. 3. wee which have beleeved doe enter into rest according to
the day of resurrection For the Apostle saith that if Christ bee not risen wee are yet in our sins And so againe whereas hee saith pag. 298. This great worke of humane redemption was not effected by the resurrection of Christ but by his obedience and sacrifice on the crosse and it was fully wrought and finished upon the passion friday after our Saviour had said consummatum est I aske how wee had beene redeemed from and how hee had conquered our last enemy death if hee had not risen And againe put case it were so so was the worke of creation fully finished on the sixth day and yet God sanctified the seaventh day and on that day 2. Gen. 2. it is said Hee ended his worke which hee had made because that day gave manifest declaration of his compleating the works of creation and so did the day of Christs resurrection manifest the compleating of the worke of our redemption And this day thus prophetically extolled by David was answerably honoured by Christ himselfe and kept by his Apostles So that in answer to Bishop White pag. 302 there was at least an implicite vertuall and interpretative command in the act of Christs resurrection For why should not wee thinke that Christ had a significant meaning in prolonging his resurrection to the third day which was the first of the weeke as well as God had in spinning out his creation to the seaventh day which was the last of the weeke seeing Christ could have raised himselfe out of the grave so soone as hee was in it like as God could have created all things in the twinckling of an eye So that then seeing God by this his resting from the worke of our redemption hath given us a new reason in respect of eminency of a new day and by the example of his Apostles preserving still the number wee in doing the like obey his good pleasure and his Law which is not destroyed by the comming of Christ for not one tittle of it shall passe away till Heaven and Earth passe which is the time of the Sabbaths period but fulfilled and explained by him according to the will of God and his purpose though not according to our carnall reasonings and opinions For thus is all kept whole The reason of the commandement hereby standing still good but not in cheife For Gods resting from his worke is now the occasion of our Sabbath not from the worke of his creation but from the worke of his redemption wherein hee was most remonstrated and even redoubled in the manifestation of all his attributes to our view and therefore worthy of a select day which yet altereth nothing of the substance of the Sabbath Alexander tertius Pontifex Rom. affirmat tam veteris quam novi testamenti paginam septimam diemad humanam quietem specialiter deputâ—sse id est Interprete suarez de diebus festis cap. 1. utrumque testamentum approbavit moreâ— deputandi ad quietem humanam septimum quemque diem hebdomadis quâ—d est formaliter deputare septimum diem licet materialiter non idem dies fuerit semper deputatus hoc modo verum est septimum â—llum diem in lege vâ—teri esse Sabbathum in nova vero esse diem Dominicum For as our changing of the bounds of the Sabbath which in the Iewes time was from evening to evening and now in our time is from morning to morning in relation to the time of Christs resurrection is no materiall change but that still the day remaines entire even so the change of the Iewes seaventh day to our seaventh day altereth not any whit the substance of the Sabbath or fourth commandement But you will say Obj. why was the day translated and not rather both the dayes celebrated Because that would have crossed the good pleasure of God Answ. who from the beginning thought it a meetâ— proportion to afford man sixe dayes for his necessary labour and to exact one of seaven for his more solemne worship which also is the reason why the Lords day was continued in the same number but not in the same order so that it was not transpâ—sed to bee observed in any other number but onely in another order in the same number that so the will of God in that commandement might bee observed and yet his resting from the wonderfull worke of our redemption worthily celebrated And therefore whereas Bishop White saith pag. 277. that if the fourth commandement concerning the keeping of the seaventh day bee morall and perpetuall then it is not such in respect of the first and eight dâ—y but of that one onely day which it specifieth in the commandement I answer Neither of both is morall and perpetuall as considered in the order but occasionall and changeable as the event hath shewne and that each of both is morall and perpetuall as considered in their number being unchangeable to any other number and therefore still so continueth by vertue of the morality of the Law of the Sabbath given to Adam and re-given in the fourth commandement Now whereas you urge the appointed day of the Passeover to bee unalterable in paralel to the day of Gods rest from the creation wee clearely see the contrary for upon occasion the precise individuall day of the Passeover was altered as in the 9. of Numb where hee that was uncleane or in a journey was not to eate it till the fourteenth day of the second month where the number is preserved entire whereof God was ever curious but the day is changed even thus upon occasion is the Sabbath altered the number of seaven being kept entire in this as in the other the number of fourteene and yet a change made and so both the Sabbath and Passeover for substance preserved notwithstanding the circumstantiall alteration upon occasion Yea Hezekiahs great Passeover was kept in the second month upon the exigency of the times 2 Chro. 30. 2 3. And now that you have made mention of the Passeover besides this foresaid livâ—ly illustration which it affords to set forth my meaning in this thing I would commend it as a notion worthy your consideration whether Gods ordaining the first and seaventh day of the Passeover as also of other feasts to bee kept holy might not propheâ—yâ—â—â—â— Sabbath of the true Paschall lambe Christ Iesâ—â— after his being slaine as well as theirs under the typicall the one to bee the first of the seaven as the other was the last Broad 2. When in likely hood God sanctified the seaventh day VVHen God sanctified the seaventh day Some conâ—idently teach that Adâ—a kept the first seaventh day whereas it is probable that God sanctified it not till about the end thereof I meane whether as soone as it began or about the end thereof is doubtfull of the two the latter sâ—emes most probable for God blessed and sanctified the seaventh day because therein hee had rested not would reâ—â— and was refreshed It is the manner of men to blesse
as touching Circumcision and Sacrifices and the other Commandements of the breach and punishment whereof you say wee read I answer that they were either the very Lawes of Nature or els Lawes given since the Fall and upon that occasion for so was Circumcision and Sacrifices neither of which is the Sabbath Not the Law of Nature as I have said for that is only to sanctify some indefinite time to the service of God as it is likely all those did in that time of nature betweene Adam and Moses where by the way take notice of the necessarines of the Sabbath to be in the nature of a Law for the better performance of Gods solemne worship and not to be left at mans liberty nor is it a Law instituted since the Fall for its roote groweth in Paradice and therefore not of force with either in that time of little light but lay dormant all that while till it pleased God againe to reveale his more solemne worship to his more solemne Church * Nehem 9. 13. 14. And not without good reason too for besides that our rest was lost by our Fall till our deliverer tipified in Moses renewed it unto us the Sabbath was significative in its manner of exhibition for during the time of the Covenant of workes wee see how it was appointed in order after them following the workes foregoing both in the primitive institution from Gods owne example and also in the second exhibition of it to the Israelites to signify and imply our Heavenly Sabbatisme then to be as well the reward of workes as cessation from workes and now the Covenant of Grace is come it is made to precede the working Dayes being celebrated now on the first Day of the Weeke as before on the last to signify that now Heaven is no longer the reward of workes exâ—ept in an Evangelicaâ—â— sence and so wee still rest from our Labours and our Workes follow us now who seeth not a speciall providence like that of Adams not eating of the Tree of Life during his abode in Paradise implied Gen. 3. â—2 in the non ens of the Sabbath during the interim betweene the Fall and Moses which was a time when the World as the Apostle Paul saith was without the Law that is without the Covenant of the Law openly revealed to them as afterwards it was to Israel so in the same sence I may say too it was without the Gospell that is without the Covenant of Grace openly revealed to them as not it is to us because therein it had beene clouded and insignificative Which signification Bishop White * Pag 120 121. doth even now commend to us from the fourth Commandement for saith he it is not now a Cypher but the letter of the commandement figureth representeth and consequently teacheth the leading of an holy and religious life that wee may at last enter the Rest of Heaven Heb. 4. 11. c. Againe I would aske you where you find the breach of Wedlocke found fault withall for their multiplicity of Wives or punishment executed therfore which being no Law of nature but a positive Law appointed in Innocency by God as also was the Sabbath not by instinct but by revelation therefore in those times of darknes were they alike winked at by God for herein they sinned not against any knowne commandement after Adams transgression but of simple ignorance And therfore as the Apostle speaketh Sinne was not imputed when there was no Law Here by the way let mee take in a passage of Dr. Heylins pag. 123. hee sayth that the Iewes thought the Sabbath to be no part of the Morall Law because they brake it by Circumcision as thinking Circumcision to be the older Ceremony and therfore gave precedency to it not because it was of Moses but of the Fathers Nay saith he the Iewes so farre prized the one above the other that by this breaking of the Sabbath they were perswaded verily they kept the Law These things he observes out of that text Iohn 7. 22. Moses saith Christ gave unto you Circumcision not because it was of Moses but of the Fathers and you on the Sabbath Day Circumcise a man that the Law of Moses should not be broken To this I answer 1. That from this text it cannot be gathered that the Iewes thought the Sabbath no morall Law no more then that they can be said to thinke Christs charitable aâ—â— of healing the Sick man to be no morall action because they persecuted him for it or if they did it was their wilfull blindnes For Christ makes it plaine that howsoever Circumcision might and ought as a part of Gods service bee done no doubt on the Sabbath Day when it fell out to be the eighth Day according to the Law that it was their errour so to overvalew Circumcision out of their superstitious respect of Moses who they made the Author of it to them above other Lawes which are both in their Natures higher then that and which also Moses gave them as well as that as wee see in the 19 verse of that Chapter saith Christ there Did not Moses give you a Law and yet none of you keepeth the Law by which is meant the Morall Law which commandeth Charity and Mercy which is above Circumcision and yet you quarrell with mee for observing this Law of Moses or rather of God and yet for all that are your selves so nice in observing the performance of Circumcision for Moses his sake which is so farre inferiour So in the 24 verse he exhorts them to consider it better that if they might and ought to observe the ceremoniall Law on the Sabbath by doing the workes thereof much more ought he to doe the workes of charity thereon which are the duties of the Morall Law 2 By the same rule he affirmes the Iewes not to beleeve the Weekely Sabbath to be a part of the Morall Law he may affirme them not to beleeve the Sabbaths of Yeares to bee any commandement of God at all for a man may say of them in that case as he saith in this that surely had they beleeved them to be the Commandements of God that could not bâ— affirmed of them which hee saith Pag 143. to wit that they were long neglected and almost forgotten if observed at all 3. Neither did they prize Circumcision as the ancienter Ceremony because it was of the Fathers by any thing that can be gathered from that text for it meanes no such thing but the quite contrary For Christ brings these words not because it was of Moses but of the Fathers in the way of Parenthesis in the 22 verse to shew them their errour in setting so high a price upon Circumcision for Moses his sake seeing Moses was not the first founder of it but received it by derivation from the Fathers So that the Iewes blind conceit of Circumcision in comparison of the Sabbath were it so as D r. Heylin alleadgeth detracts no more from the
what you thinke sufficient for the present day and for the rest let it bee laid up to bee baked or boyled to morrow Which 〈◊〉 bee the meaning for these reasons 1. Because of the example of the man aforesaid that was stoned for gathering stickes it is probable to that end 2. 〈…〉 the difference betweene this Sabbath and their other Sabbaths would bee confounded whereas they were distinctly in expresse termes allowed to make ready what they should eate And thirdly because it would have clouded the significancy of their gathering and preparing a large proportion of Christ to assure them of the Sabbatisme to come And fourthly because when the Sabbath day came Moses in the 25. verse of 16. Chap. said not as before in the 23. versâ— Bake that yee will bake to day and seeth that yee will seeth But hee saith onely eate that to day to wit which they had layed up baked or sodden since the day before And fifthly Those words bake what yee will bake to day and seeth what yee will seeth and that which remaineth lay it up is not meant in respect of the indifferency of proportion as if hee had said bake what proportion and seeth what proportion yee thinke good and lay up the rest raw but it respects the indifferency of their cooking it intimating that they might either bake it and seeth it or bake it or seeth it as their fancy liked best so that they did it on that day before the Sabbath for on the Sabbath they were not to alter the property but to eate what they had leâ—â— as they left it In this new-sangled fancy you shall find Doctor 〈…〉 Brahourne agreed part I. pag. 100. 101. where to backe this exposition Doctor Heylyn objectâ— that it were no wonder if being baked it purified not To which I answer that the wonder was that 〈…〉 kept it untill the morning 〈…〉 to the command 〈…〉 either raw or baked a great deale longer time without putrifying Though it having the formerly 〈…〉 first which among so many it is like was reserved of all sorts some raw some baked some boyled all which yet purified alike it was then indeed a wonder that it did not the like the second time when they kept it lawfully which sheweth that it was of God and not of the nature of the thing both that it putrified the first time and that it putrified not the second time that it was kept But to put this upstart exposition utterly out of question besides the reasons aforesaid Let them compare the 23. verse with the 5. verse whither Moses relates and there they shall find God commanding them to prepare that which they bring in on the 6. day and what was that why it followeth twice so much as they gather daily So that they were to prepare all they brought in and they brought in all they gathered and they gathered twice as much as they gathered on the other dayes So that in summe it is euident that on the sixth day they were to prepare that is to cooke or make ready by seething or baking the whole double proportion which they had gathered on that day Nor is it without ground as you affirme to say of this mans gathering stickes that his manner of doing it did aggravate his offence for there are these grounds to induce it 1. Because if it had beene necessary it had not beene unlawfull no more then Davids eating the Shew-bread for Christ sayth in this very case of the Sabbath That God will have mercy and not Sacrifice 2. It is more then probable by the context that his Sinne was out of Presumption for in the verses immediatly foregoing it is said Hee that doth ought presumptuously shall bee cut off from his people and then followeth the instance of this mans fact as it were an example of this fault and this punishment which wee never read afterwards to be inflicted upon any 3. Wee find no excuse he made for his fact so that it either was not necessary or if necessary yet occasioned by his wilfull and carelesse neglect of making his Mannah ready the day before according to the Commandement and so not excusable Now as touching your marginall consideration how that the Sabbath was ordained in memoriall of Gods resting To this I answer That wee doe not celebrate on the Sabbath the memory of Gods bare resting no more then wee do Christs bare rising but wee celebrate the consummation of the worke of Gods goodnes in the Creation and of his Mercy in our Redemption for Gods resting on that Day from the Creation was no part of the Sabbaths sanctification but a cause in him why he appointed the seaventh Day to be a sanctifyed Sabbath unto us no more then Christs Resurrection on the first Day of the Weeke was a part of the sanctification of that Day but only the cause why wee sanctify it or dedicate it to Rest and Divine imployment ever since And therefore in vaine doth B. White object p. 302. that Christs Resurrection was no Commandement containing an institution of a new Sabbath in that he erringly saith as elsewhere I shew that it was not spent in resting but in action seeing saith he the ground of the old Sabbath was Rest. But wee doe not simply celebrate Gods rest but his Rest or accomplishment of our Creation as it hath relation to us not as that rest simply respecteth God for so it is meant only as a patterne and serves as an occasion to beget this ordinance of the Sabbath as wee may see by the manner of expression that is used to set forth the Sabbaths first institution Gen. 2. 2. 3. where Gods rest is not only mentioned to be on the seaventh Day but also his compleating the worke of Creation verse 2. upon both which joyntly followeth the institution of the Sabbath verse 3. and as wee may also see by the prophecy in Isai. 65. 17. where the commemoration of the benefit of one Creation shall eate out the other Indeed Gods resting the seaventh Day was of twofold use The one of illustration for thereby was signified the Rest of Gods Church in Heaven as appeareth in the 4 of Heb. The other was to give us an example of retiring our selves from earthly things on that Day * For so on that Day God as it were returned to Heaven againe only to be conversant there for ever after having as it were been absent during the Creation As it is said Gen. 17. 22. And he left of talking with him and God went up from Abram that so wee might devote it to his glory for this Resting of God was only set as an example for us to imitate the better to obey his Commandement But more are willing to observe his example then to obey his precept that is to cease from bodily labour then to be spiritually imployed in the sanctifying of that Day by making it a Day of holy businesses and consequently a day of
Day of atonement to make an atonement for you before the Lord. For whatsoever Soule it is that shall not be afflicted in that same Day hee shall bee cut off from among the people As who say yee have other matters in hand then worldly busines on that Day which yee must wholy intend and therefore surcease such things and such imployments as may take you of from such matters or hinder the fitnes of your hearts in them which is a thing too well knowne to them that worship God in spirit how that a small carnall imployment is found oft times an hurtfull distraction to their spirit and therefore it followes in the 30 verse whatsoever Soule it bee that doth any worke on that same Day c. Which is a lively demonstration of the nature of the Sabbath Rest in iâ—s first and chiefe respect And observe by the way how here at large as in the fourth Commandement in briefe though in other places of Scripture it also is manifested at large God first layeth downe the maine sanctification of the Sabbath before he prescribe the meanes Secondly in that this rest is so farre approved of God as it conduceth to spirituall labour and againe spirituall labour is no where condemned though it bee a breach of rest For rest take it as it was primarily intended in its first institution without the intervening holines which it contracted in the time of the Iewes is no ordinance or part of Gods worship abstractively considered for so it neither aâ—swereth the Antitype nor fulfilleth the commandement but relatively for it relateth to Gods solemne worship on the Sabbath as fasting doth to prayer upon solemne occasions * And this you may see to bee Master Breerewoods opinion in his second tract pag. 15. The commandement of the Sabbath saith hee enjoyâ—eth 1. outward worship of God 2. Cessation from works as a necessary preparation for that worship that as thee end this as the meanes which if it bee used is no part of prayer and yet omitted is an impeachement to it because joyntly considered it is an ordinance and of necessary and seasonable use at that time And as in fasting wee must not onely fast from things nourishing reall necessity ever excepted but much more from things pleasing so in keeping the Sabbath wee ought not to rest onely from profitable labours but more especially from distracting bodily recreations because the Sabbath should bee both our full delights and full imployment as Heaven shall be hereafter For the commandements being Synecdochicall as therefore in the commandements touching adultery and murder the thoughts and words conducing thereunto are forbidden So in this commandement touching the Sabbath as works are forbidden so worldly thoughts whence worldly works issue as adultery from lust and the discourse of worldly things so likewise paritate rationis pleasure must needs bee included For labour being forbidden as an impediment consequently therefore whatsoever proveth an impediment is forbidden This commandement as the rest being Synechdochicall And thus Musculus least saith hee God should seeme to speake of some prophane idlenes hee saith not remember that thou keepe the Sabbath day but that thou hallow the Sabbath-day Now to hallow saith hee that day is to make the rest of it devout holy and imployed to godly exercises whereby the mind may bee instructed exercised and grounded in things concerning godlines And Cyrill quoted by Doctor Heylyn pag. 141. in Amos 8. and Gaudentius Brixianus speake to the selfe same purpose The Iewes saith Gaudentius neglecting those spirituall duties which God commanded on that day abused the Sabbath rest unto ease and luxury For whereas being free from temporall cares saith Cyrill they ought to have imployed that day to spirituall uses and to have spent the same in modesty and temperance and in the repetition and commenmoration of Gods holy Word they on the other side did the contrary wasting the day in Gluttony and Drunkennes and idle delicacies And whereas you would bring the reason which God alleadgeth from himselfe in the commandement to make it good That to rest on the Sabbath is the adequate sanctification with this I would have you compare that speech of Christ who by your owne acknowledgement was Lord of the Sabbath I will have mercy and not sacrifice where hee blameth the Iewes notwithstanding the typicall holines of this rest in their times for their not sanctifying the Sabbath with acts of mercy through their superstitious misprison of this rest Also consider how that God intended his spirituall service and worship in the very commandements of the second Table much more then in those of the first Againe I oppose hereunto the reason which God giveth from his owne example in the fourth of Deut. to wit his not appearing to them in any likeness to cry downe their making of Images to worship them which yet is no argument to prove that their not making of Images though hee was to bee obeyed and imitated therein was his proper worship or any part thereof but onely in a negative sense which doth exclude some thing but conclude nothing And therefore that which Zanchy saith of strangers rest is proper to the busines in hand Isti jubebantur non simpliciter quiescere sed quiescere ut ipsi suo modo Sabbatum sanctificare possent * Whereby you may see how hee seâ—vâ—th your turne though put in your margent This suo modo is of different sense to different sorts and conditions of people for the strangers that knew not the true worship had their suo modo nay and the Cattle theirs and so the Iewes that knew it under types and figures had also their suo modo and so have wee now ours And indeed if that rest was principally respected why was not other cattle and creatures commanded to bee kept from labouring as well as the Oxe and the Asse Why were they not as well to stoppe up the Bee-hives on the Sabbath-day to keepe them from working like as they doe in Winter to preserve them from destroying But wee see that onely the labours of those beasts are forbidden which might bee a distraction to mans better imployments and sanctified rest which appeareth in that for the better accommodating us to holy duties as for the hearing of a Sermon wee may interrupt the rest of our Cattle though other wayes commanded and use their labour on that day as in the example of the Shunamite 2 Kings 4 22. 23. Lastly I would aske you wherein wee shall sanctifie our everlasting Sabbath in Heaven whether by a bare resting from our works or by positive worship Surely you will say by positive worship And yet I deny not but our rest will bee an happy meanes thereunto And so much is signified now by our Sabbaths rest For such as is the Antitype such is the type Thirdly touching your proofe cut of Ier. 17. 24. I answer 1. That the reason of Gods taxing them with this was because it was
I meane lawfull though Christ had not commanded it being necessary because happily hee had never a one else being a poore man to ly on at night Or els in his absence his bed might have beene wronged or stolne * See paâ—alell to this Matth. 9. 6. And put case hee had left it and in his absence it had beene stolne and hee meeting the theife the theife threw it downe and runne away might not hee in your opinion have then taken it up and carried it home And why then might not hee lawfully carry it home before to prevent stealing as after it was stolne And wee have reason to beleeve it to bee commanded by Christ to one of these ends For it is like hee was poore or had no body to watch it nor yet to carry it for him for then hee might have had some man to have put him into the Poole when the water was troubled but hee had none In like case I appeale to your opinion whether you thinke it a breach of the Sabbath for a Iew in his Sabbath-dayes journey finding a cloake-bagge or a bagge of money to take it up and carry it away least if hee leave it there till the next day to avoide carriage on the Sabbath another that hath as little right to it as hee find it and carry it for him Secondly I answer that Christ neither could nor did command him to breake the Sabbath or prophane it First I say hee could not for that tye which the Law hath upon us by the condition of our nature because wee are borne under it it had upon Christ by the condition of his office and voluntary susception because hee was made under it So that it behoved him to fulfill all righteousnes And therefore hee is said in that respect to have beene obedient to his parents though hee were not onely the Son of Mary but the Lord of Mary Therefore when Scripture denieth all sin to have beene in him it implieth that hee was exactly conformable to the Law in doing all that it requires and in leaving undone all that it forbids Secondly I say hee did not upon that reason which you alleage to wit as being Lord of the Sabbath For 1. Though indeed hee was Lord of the Sabbath yet in his humane nature wherein hee was under the Law hee was not to shew his foveraigne authority to the breach of any part of it either morall or ceremoniall for so it behoved him to fulfill all righteousnes Secondly that place of Scripture whence you borrow your reason is mistaken by you For those words the Son of man is Lord even of the Sabbath-day doe not intend that Christ is Lord of it as you meane for him to keepe or breake it at pleasure But Son of man signifieth mankind as is evident 1. by comparing the 27. and 28. verses of the second of Mar. The 27. verse saith The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath and then in the 28. verse it followeth with this word of coherence therefore the Son of Man is Lord c. where the one and the other doe intend man in genere and for Christ if you will secondly because that in that action it was not Christ himselfe that Lorded it over the Sabbaths-rest but his Disciples for though it was done in his service yet not by his commands as you reason but of themselves for the releife of their necessity But to conclude I see not then by these arguments how your first * To wit in the sense proposition can be made good For if so bee rest sanctifieth the Sabbath then doth man and beast sanctifie it alike then is there no difference betweene the stranger and the Israelite nor betweene the Israelite and his oxe If you had said that not resting in the prophaning of the Sabbath as bowing to Images is the prophaning of Gods worship wee had easily agreed But that by the sense of the fourth commandement it is properly or principally * Though occasionally and by accident I acknowledge it to be a part of the Sabbaths sanctification in the 〈◊〉 of the Iewes the sanctifying of the Sabbath I can no more yeild you then that not bowing to Images is properly or principally the worship of God by the sense of the second commandement Ohi. But you will say is not Gods commandement kept in both these when they doe not bow to Images and when they doe not labour but rest Ans. I answer that the things which the commandements properly and principally strike at are not observed thereby For these are rather preventions of Gods dis-worship then any parts of his worship And hee that knoweth these commandements aright knoweth they intend doing as well as not doing And therefore hee that out of a good conscience forbeareth to doe the one wherein indeed he negatively keepeth the commandement will by vertue of the same conscience set you the other For otherwise hee should give but a poore account to his Master at the last day who when hee asketh him what hee hath done answereth him with what hee hath not done and when hee asketh him an account how hee hath imployed his Sabbaths and what glory and worship hee hath done him in them hee answereth him I never prophaned thy Sabbaths with bodily labour but alwayes rested on that day neither did I ever bow to an Image surely his wayes shall bee as his that hid the talent in a napkin for hee hath reason to looke for no better thinking of God as hee did that hee was hard in his commandements and therefore hee kept them as hardly in the negative and not in the affirmative * Whereas Bishop Lake in his Sermons pag. 213. saith that negatives are but to attend affirmatives and God doth not reward the ferbearance of â—vill but the doing of good Master Dod pag. 74. saith one may forbeare the sins of the second commandement and yet bee a damnable breaker of that commandement for God commands not onely to turne from dumbe Idols but also that wee should serve the true and living God 1 Thes. 1. 9. else such are as well guilty of the breach of this Law as Idolaters they for doing that they should not wee for not doing that wee should So of the fourth commandement And for authority sake take notice what Thomas Aquinas saith to this purpose In the observance of the Sabbath saith hee two things are to bee considered one whereof as the end and this is that man bee vacant to divine things which is signifiâ—d in that which hee saith remember that thou sanctifie the Sabbath for those are said to bee sanctified in the Law which are applied to divine worship But the other is the cessation of works signified when it 〈◊〉 added on the seaventh day of the Lord thy God thou shalt not doe any workâ— And againe saith hee Spirituall works are not forbidden on the Sabbath-day for therefore doth a man abstaine
from other works on that day that hee might bee vacant to works pertaining to the service of God And saith hee yet further servile works as they respect either the service of sin or the service of man doe contrary the observanâ—e of the Sabbath in so much as they hinder mans application to divine things For a closure to perswade the spiritualizing of the Sabbath observe what one speaking of the word remember as it is prefixed to the fourth commandement saith To remember the keeping of the Sabbath saith hee is so to keepe it in mind as to prevent worldly busines falling on that day to desire after it to prepare for it to delight and glory in it as wee doe in those things wee keepe much in remembrance for when hee speaks of remembrance hee cals on us for such affections and actions as become remembrance therefore when God bids you remember the Sabbath hee commands you to desire it Thus David still explainâ— himselfe by the word remember in the Psalmes as Psalme 44. 4. and in other places For it is a rule amongst the Hebrewes in eâ—pounding of Scripture that verbâ— seâ—suâ— cum affectâ—◠〈…〉 so that by remembring the Sabbath wee should desire it delight in it and account the busines and imployment thereof honourable to us glorifying God in the consecrating it to him being joyfull in it and the duties of it both as the soules market day to provide it necessaries like as the Husband man is glad of the market to buy and sell in and as the soules holy-day for to procure it refreshing as Schoole-boies joy in a play-day and not bee weary of the day nor heavily doe the dutieâ— of it Broad CHAP. IV. Wherefore God ordained the Sabbath THe ends and purposes for which God ordained the Sabbath were many 1. That the Israelites might celebrate the memoriall of the Worlds creation as Exod. 31. 〈◊〉 It is a signe betweene me and the children of Israel for â—ver for in â—ixe dayes the Lord made Heaven and Earth and on the seaventh day rested and was refreshed 2. That they might remember their deliverance Consider whether God commanding the Israelites to keepe the Sabbath because hee had brought them out of Egypt this bee an Argument that the Sabbath was then first enjoyned out of Egypt where 〈◊〉 doubt they might not rest any day from their burdens And remember that thoâ— wâ—st a servant in the Land of Egypt and that the Lord thy God brought theâ— out thence through a mighty hand and outstretchâ—d arme therefore the Lord thy God 〈…〉 3. â— That Servants and 〈◊〉 might rest and bee refreshed after their hard labour in the weeke before as Exod. 23. 12. sixe dayes thou shalt doe thy worke and 〈◊〉 the seaventh day thou shalt rest that thine Oâ—e 〈◊〉 Asse may rest and the Son of thine hand 〈◊〉 and the stranger may bee refreshed 4. That the Israelites might have more leisure to serve God who on this day as also on festivall dayes commanded them to have an holy convocation Sixe dayes shall worke bee done but the seaventh day is a Sabbath of rest and holy convocation Levit. 23. 5. That they might know how that hee was the Lord that did sanctifie them as Exod. 31. 13. Verity my Sabbaths yee shall keepe for it is a signe betweene mee and you throughout your generations that yee may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie you 6. By some mens Doctrine the legall Sabbath served to put the Israelites in mind of keeping a spirituall Sabbath as the legall circumcision served to put them in mind of the spirituall circumcision of the heart hereof now in their understanding the Prophet Isaiah speaketh Chap. 58. 13. truly this spirituall Sabbath is the onely Sabbath in the judgement of Augustine Tertullian Chrysotome c. which Christians ought to keepe 7. The legall Sabbath was a type of the heavenly Sabbath it was a shadow of the blessed rest to come of which matter in the next Chap. Answer To the first of these I answer That the Israelites were a people contenting themselves with the outward part not savouring the inward and spirituall strength of things which is naturally the fault of all men till they bee better taught of God and for this reason God ever and anon made the Sabbath to follow as a Counter-checke to their carnall zeale And therefore when the making of the Tabernacle was commanded the Sabbath was even then exempted from its very worke to shew them that it was other worship that hee expected and that they were not to repose their happines and confidence in outward things but in God And as therefore in the time of Mannah hee commanded his Sabbath to shew them how that it was hee and not that which nourished them So likewise when the Tabernacle was commanded the Sabbath was urged upon them in this 31. Exod. to shew them how that it was God and not it that sanctified them And therefore did the one give place to the other So that the end of the Sabbath as it is expressed in this portion of Scripture betweene the 12. and 18. verses seemeth rather to consist in these words of the 13. verse for it is a signe betweene mee and the children of Israel for ever that yee may know that I the Lord do sanctifie you Those words which in the 17 verse make mention of the Worlds creation and Gods rest being rather added as a reason in this place to enforce this end For here it is not the meaning of the holy Ghost to discourse of the Sabbath simply but onely occasionally as appeareth by the coherence of the 11. 12. and 13. verses where the Sabbath is urged with a verily or a notwithstanding as it is in the Geneva that though hee had commanded the making of the Tabernacle yet hee would not have them repose their Religion or content in this outward Tabernacle or Temple for God dwelleth not in things made with hands but that they should looke to the spirituall part the Temple of their hearts that they should bee more carefull to build up and keepe that in repaire which did more properly distinguish them to bee the sanctified Israel of God Whosoever therefore is an Israelite indeed let him looke to make good this signe of his sanctification the sanctifying of the Sabbath by spirituall worship and service which doth excellently approve it to his conscience that God hath sanctified him that is chosen him to bee his and thus it is made holy to him as it is phrased in the 14. verse that is a day of blessing and sanctification for therein God bestoweth the best of his blessings because on that day wee are or ought to bee wholly imployed in the best of his ordinances such as belong to our soules and not to our bodies Therefore ought not this day to bee defiled with bodily imployments by such as are the Israel of God but to bee dedicated from earthly
labour to an heavenly rest after the example of God For when the hands cease from one imployment the heart is fittest for another And as one well observeth The Sabbath-day signified that they themselves were the Lords and therefore they abstained from their owne works to doe the Lords To the second end gathered out of the 5. of Deut. That they might remember their deliverance out of Egypt I answer that this is an Argument to incite them to the better observance of this duty of sanctifying the Sabbath and their more willing allowance of it in their servants For the 15. verse is thus much That whereas when thou wast a servant in the Land of Egypt thou couldst not have sanctified a Sabbath unto mee having no rest for thy selfe because of thine intolerable pressures which I who am the Lord thy God have set thee free from and therefore command no more then I have enabled thee to fulfill therefore doe I now expect that according to my commandement and for my mercies sake shewne to thee in working thy deliverance thou shouldest observe the Sabbath to sanctifie it For Gods mercie thus preached unto them must needs conduce much to the gaining backe from them both mercy and obedience And for this cause it is that this their deliverance is made the Preface to the whole Law sutable to that in the Gospell that wee being delivered from the hands of our enemies might serve him without feare And both this which was a signification of our redemption and that other example of Gods resting from the creation are propounded as fit Theames for them to improve and exercise their minds upon to the glorifying of him and bettering themselves on that day both which were much to one purpose to shew forth the wonderfull loving kindnes of God to his people and Church in that hee made all things for them even for them whom hee had delivered out of Egyptian thraldome which admirable mercies of his hee would have them take speciall notice of and turne to praisefull Haleluiahs on that day which hee hath sanctified to himselfe without wearisomnes cheerefully and with delight as the Angels and Saints in Heaven keepe their Sabbath If this typicall and corporall deliverance of the Iewes bee such a perswasive reason of their sanctifying the Sabbath shall not our deliverance much more stirre us up to doe the like The substance of your marginall consideration hath beene handled before onely I adde this that a commandement is not made speciall by every motive but that it may bee in force to mee though every motive brought to enforce it properly concerne not my particular Else a man may oppresse a stranger that hath not beene himselfe stranger in the Land of Egypt Though this motive bee onely proper to them in the letter yet common to us in the spirituall and better sense and therefore enforceth the commandement upon us as well as on them Touching your third end deduced from Exod. 23. 12. where God commanded the Iewes to rest from their sixe dayes worke on the seaventh day that so their Cattle Servants and Strangers might bee refreshed To this I answer that this commandement doth neither imply that a bare rest doth sanctifie the Sabbath nor that they were to use the Sabbath as a Parenthesis betweene two weekes the better to passe from labour to labour but the intent of it was 1. The better to set forth the heavenly rest which the Sabbath signified for it being thus absolutely and universally commanded both to them and every thing that was properly theirs it sheweth the absolute and universall rest which every one that belongeth to God shall bee possessed of in Heaven as well as God himselfe For as God rested from his works so shall they from theirs to enjoy an absolute and perpetuall refreshment with him in Heaven 2. That to the practices of piety which they were to performe towards God on this day they should adjoyne the practices of charity humanity to man and beast not that mercy was the proper end of the Sabbatical-rest for so you confound the two Tables the first whereof immediatly respects God the second Man And in this respect was God curious of the due observance of his Sabbaths because the right keeping of them did involue the whole Law of God Your fourth end drawne from the 23. Levit. doth refute your position of the Sabbaths being sanctified by rest For if so bee this rest of the Sabbath served properly as a meanes to further the holy duties of that day how can the holines of that day bee properly or principally said to bee included in the rest it selfe which if it bee not an holy rest that is used to an holy end and purpose it neither fulfilleth the duty of the commandement which commandeth us as well to sanctifie the Sabbath as to forbeare worke nor the signification of the Sabbath it selfe For in Heaven when there shall bee the convocation of the universall Church of God the perpetuall Sabbath shall thenbee sanctified not in that wee shall rest but in that wee shall holyly rest Your fifth end fell out to bee discoursed of in your first which shall suffice concerning it onely thus much further that I suppose it cannot bee proved that all signes of covenants were abolished by Christs comming For the Rainebow was given for a signe of Gods covenant with Noah The Sabbath for a signe of Gods covenant with Israel from which I inferre that this cannot therefore bee judged abolished because a signe because the other signe as wee see is yet remaining Catonus pag. 45. De iride autem si concedemus quod doctissimi nonnulli negant illam ante diluvium fuisse induisse à postea raâ—ionem signi sequetur tamen inde quòd nos contendimus essentiam iridis non à signo dependisse imo si promissio Dei ad certum tempus restricta fuisset expleto tamen illo iridis natura non minus integra remansisset Similiter de Sabbatho dicendum est And to give further light to that same place of Scripture Exod. 31. 3. I will here insert the discourse of a divine of prime note upon the word remember shewing the reasons wherefore it is prefixt to the foâ—rth commandement wherein he handles the aforesaid text This word remember saith hee is prefixed to the fourth commandement rather then to the rest for 2. reasons 1. Because wee are apter to forget it then any of the rest for marke it in Scripture and where any duty is charged by God with Remember it argues a pronenes to forget it as that Remember thy Creator in the daies of thy youth when many lusts are ready to draw us of And the reasons why wee are so apt to forget this Commandement and why there is need of a Memento are foure 1. Because the rest of the Commandements are written in our Hearts by light of Nature but this only was given by outward ordinance of divine instruction
answer That the first Day of the Weeke or Lords Day having taken footing among the convert Gentiles to whom the Apostle wrote he might with lesse scruple use the word Sabbaths absolutely without exception considering that all Sabbaths eo nomine were outlawed Though now as the case stands we in these times are forced to re-assume the name Sabbath not thereby to shoulder out the more worthy name of Lords Day but to vindicate the authority of the fourth Commandement and to testify our judgements touching the new Sabbath like as the primitive times are reported to take up the wearing of the Crosse to testifie their profession and Confession of a Crucified Christ against their opposers 2. To your second Reason I answer That our warrant to worke on the Iewes seaventh Day is the fourth Commandement which proportioneth us out sixe Dayes for our worldly affaires and the seaventh for an holy rest which is the totall and morall sence and summe of that Commandement and which wee still observe the order being occasionall and temporary but the number morall and perpetuall as I have proved before And therefore the Apostles did imply a nullity of the one by the bringing in of the other according to the nature of the Commandement and the Prophecy of Isaiah 65. 16. So that if you thinke it meet to retaine the Lords Day in our Church as you do in your premonition then must you grant the order to be changed For it was never the Apostles meaning nor in their power when God by a perpetuall Law from the beginning had given us sixe Dayes for labour and destined the seaventh to an holy Rest to have turned it into five Dayes labour and two Dayes Rest. For amongst the Iewes when Holy-dayes were so frequent there was never any weekely Holy day ordayned to go cheeke by jole with the Sabbath but either Monethly or Yearely So that as Moses his Serpent eate up the Sorcerers so hath our seaventh Day eaten up theirs * As the Apostle sayth in another case 2 Cor 3. 10. Even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect by reason of the glory which excelleth Generatio unius est corruptio alterius Our new Heaven and new Earth have given us a new Sabbath and new Rest. For old things are passed away and all things are become new 3. To your third reason I answer That Paul in like case speaketh in divers places of Ministers maintenance and yet saith never a word to cleare the controversy of Tythes whether they bee or bee not Iure divino but he preacheth the substance to wit a meet maintenance to be necessary So in Pauls discourse of times and Dayes as also of other things although he satisfy not our Fancies who cannot see afâ—rre of yet doth he answer the will of the Holy Ghost who for reasons whereof wee are uncapable spareth to doe what wee expect And indeed the reason of Pauls not Preaching the Sabbaths alteration might be because it was neither safe nor convenient For it must needes have given great offence to the Iewes seeing it had a place amongst the morall Commandements who were so precise in the punctisioes of times as that they would have beene of your opinion that either their seaventh Day or none was morall and so would have taken advantage to vilifie his doctrine as if he had gone about to overthrow as well the Morall as Ceremoniall Law the sun shine of the Gospell being too bright for their weake Eyes to behold all at once And therefore the Aposile condescending to their infirmities chose rather to insinuate the Lords Day tâ—citly by his practice then by his doctrine For so iâ— behoved him in those times wherein hee became all to all that he might win some And therefore did he take occâ—â—â—on on the Iâ—â—ish Sabbaths to Preaâ—h the Gospell in their Synagogues when yet wee see how that privately hee sanctified the Lords Day with Châ—istians Therefore I conclude that this Scripture is nothing concerning the Weekely Sabbath whereof he writeth nothing at all directly for the reasons aforesaid but of the Iewish Ceremoniall Sabbaths which hee must needs cry downe if he set up Christ. The shadow must vanish when the substance comes in place And of this the converted Iewes were mostly as well perswaded without offence as the converted Gentiles But of this sort was not the Weekely Sabbath as I have proved elsewhere and as further is evident from the 92. Psal which is dedicated to the Sabbath Day but none of the rest of the Psalmes to any of the legall Ceremonies from which I may thus reason That seeing the Booke of the Psalmes was ordained for the consolation of the militant Church unto the Worlds end as may appeare by the Apostles exhortation it seemeth not consonant to reason that a part of Gods perpetuall worship should be dedicated to a temporary Ceremony To your fourth and fifth I answer that how the Sabbath is said to be shadowish wee have shewne before and shall have more occasion hereafter to enlarge it Amongst those two or three which justifie the morality of the Sabbath I would have you take in D r. Andrewes in his exposition of the fourth Commandement and M r. Hooker in his Eccles Pol and Bishop Hell whom I have already alleadged Broad 2. The Sabbath was a shadow from the beginning FOr Gods very Resting was Typicall as appeareth Heb 4. 4. observe that the Apostle there speaketh os the seaventh Day as rested upon by God and not as sanctified by him or enjoyned to be sanctified by Man so that the seaventh Day then became a Type when God rested therein the seaventh Day in order if not in time before it was sanctified was Gods rest and Consequently a shadow of the Rest remaining to the People of God Consider further that it doth not appeare by the Scripture when the Sabbath became a shadow and which was the first Sabbath that was such if the first of all were not Againe that all other shadowes and Types were such from their first institution If any thinke there was no shadow or Ceremony of Christ before Sin Ans Suppose that before there had beene no shadow or Type at all yet might the Sabbath bee a shadow or Type from the beginning thereof for it is very profitable that Adam fell the Day before Againe though there were no Ceremony of Christ before Sinne yet might there be a shadow of things to come that now shall be exhibited by Christ which had not Adam sinned God would have exhibited by himselfe There were it seemes three Types or shadowes in the beginning Paradice the Tree of Life and the seaventh Day Gods Rest of the comfort of all which Adam for his Sinne was deprived But afterwards God being mercifull to the posterity of Abraham they had the same Sabbath Mannah for the Tree of Life and the Land of Canaan for Paradice which was as it were another Paradice and a figure
morall part Answ. none ever did nor can do and consequently there is no morall part consider that to breake the fourth Commandement and to profane the Sabbath are the same and now that the Sabbath is profaned only by worke was shewed before * Chap. 3. those Lawes only are to bee tearmed Morall whereby the observation of Morall duties such as are Prayer Almes c. are prescribed as for Time and Place they are necessary circumstances about the performance of Morall duties and their Lawes are to be tearmed Circumstantiall M r. Iacob in his reply to some notes of mine above twenty yeares since acknowledged that the fourth Commandement was circumstantiall and not morall And I suppose that many other when they have a little considered the matter will easily acknowledge as much but yet as he so they will have it perpetuall neverthelesse wherefore I come to prove that the fourth Commandement is abrogated Answer In answer to your Argument I say that the fourth Commandement can be no more broken then the first second or third For as in the first other things may be loved but not unlawfully loved and as in the second Images may be made but not unlawfully made and in the third the Name of God may be used and taken but not abused and taken in vaine so in this fourth Commandement wee may do worke and â—et breake this no more then the other if so be not unlawfull worke but such as agreeth with the sence of the Lawgiver and may bee gathered by comparing places of Scripture which wee find to bee such as may promote Piety Mercy and Charity And therefore is that following Objection of moment For in all Lawes the meaning of the Lawgiver and sence of the Law it selfe is principally to be respected not the Letter for that thing may be contradictory to the Letter of the Law which yet is no breach of the meaning of the Law if so bee it bee agreeable to the rules of Right Reason and Piety * For it is supposed that all Lawes ought to bee such and if otherwayes then they cannot in a right sense be said to bind and so consequently not to bee broken As where wee are comanded not to Sweare at all you might well imagine what would follow thence if this doctrine of yours might take place that therefore to Sweare at all is to breake this Commandement and so in this fourth Commandement where wee are bid to doe no manner of Worke if you will cleave to the Letter you may soone find your errour to your cost But God giveth his Lawes and Commandements to reasonable Creatures who should therefore be able to judge of them according to the Rules of Truth and Reason A London Marchant chargeth his Apprentice upon a Shrovetuesday that all that Day he stirre not out of his House if so bee the Apprentice upon occasion goe into the backe Court you will not say hereupon he breaketh his Masters commandement That therefore which one affirmes of mens writings is true touching Lawes to wit that wee must seeke for the meaning by the matter as well as by the Letter and lend our Eares to listen and observe what they desire to speake and not make them speake only what w 're desire to heaâ—e unlesse wee will be like 〈◊〉 Children who having some fancy running in their Heads imagine the Bells to ring and sing as they thinke and speake See that where Christ sayth Math 12. 5. That the Priests profaned the Sabbath in the Temple and â—ere blamlesse it is spoken according to the Capacity and misprision of the superstitious Pharisees * See â— Ioh 15. 16. 18. the better to convince their errour 〈◊〉 that if they counted the actions which his Dâ—â—ples did in his service to be a breach of the Sabbath they must by the same Reason account the actions which the Priests did in the service of the Temple to be a breach of the Sabbath for he had more authority to use their service then the Temple had to use the service of the Priests but that they did not therefore nor ought they to thinke this a breach of the Sabbath for indeed such workes as tend to Mercy and Piety * I conclude workes of necessity within these termes of Piety and Mercy wherto I limit the works of the Sabbath because whatsoever works are done on that Day though they be workes of necessity as â—â—dering Beasts c. ought to bring forth some speciall glory to God by some Sabbaticall and holy use under one of these two heads and therefore doth Christ turne that Act of necessity when his Apostles for hunger sake rubbed the Eares of Corne into an act of Mercy saying I will have mercy and not sacrifice are so farre from breaking the Sabbath which commandeth an holy Rest as that they are the proper fulfillings of it even as to do the will of our Father in Heaven will be no impeachment to our Rest there And indeed the just intermission of Rest on the Sabbath is most improperly called a dispensation of the keeping of the Sabbath for in nothing ought Rest to bee intermitted on the Sabbath but in such things as tend more to the sanctifying of the Sabbath such were Christs Sabbath Day cures which he might else have suspended till the next Day for Rest being principally ordained to remove the impediments of the Sabbaths sanctifying ought of right to give way to its furtherances whereas the dispensing with a duty is to prejudice that for the advantage of some other But by the way take notice that from the Pharises reproving Christs Disciples in the beginning of this 〈◊〉 Math for rubbing the Eares of Corne on the Sabbath Day Obâ— it is objected by some that that Law given in the Wâ—â—dernes in the time of Mannah touching their not preparing their Food on the Sabbath Day was then of force and a foote in the opinion and practice of the Pharises else they would not have reproved the Disciples for so doing to which I answer That they did not reprove this action of Christs Disciples in reference to that Law Answ. or with any such opinion that it was of force or in respect of any such practice of their owne but as a worke and so a breach of Rest as M r. Broad rightly observes in his third chapter nay as a needlesse and cursory worke or action as may appeare 1. In that they themselves were not so ill instructed in the lawfulnes of workes of mercy and necessity seeing they led their Oxen to watering on the Sabbath Day that they would have found fault with it had they conceived it to have beene a worke of necessity 2. In Christs excuse or justification of them from the necessity of what they did implying first that it was not needles and superfluous as they by their Pharisaicall carping and misprision conceived but necessary and secondly that it was not unlawfull because not needlesse
the 31. of Exod. wee read thus Verely my Sabbaths yee shall keepe for it is a signe betweene mee and you throughout your generations that yee may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie you The like was signified by cleane meats Levit. 〈◊〉 24 25 26. Act. 〈◊〉 12 13 14 15 20. Here by sanctifying is meant separating from other Nations to bee a peculiar people to himselfe In this sense Aaron and his Sons are said to bee sanctified Exod. 29. 44. Aaron and his Sons were sanctified and severed from the other Levites to bee the Lords Priests and the Israelites were sanctified and severed from other Nations to bee the Lords people of which sanctifying the Sabbath was a signe in as much as it was a day sanctified and seperated from other dayes of the weeke for the Lords service Now if God gave the Sabbath for a signe to the Israelites the Sabbath could not bee common to other Nations and consequently was a meere ceremony as was circumcision Abraham received the signe of circumcision and the Israelites received the signe of the Sabbath Hence I thus argue such as is the Sabbath such is the precept thereof The Sabbath is a signe therefore the precept thereof is significative or ceremoniall and is abrogated Here consider that if Noah had taught his household and Lot his Sons Abraham his Sons by Hagar and Keturah Isaack his son Esau and Melchisedech his people to keepe the Sabbath the Sabbath could have beene no signe to the Israelites for the World would have beene replenished with Sabbath-keepers at that time and a long time after so that no doubt wee should often read of this matter in Heathen writers Answer You say the Sabbath was given to the Israelites as a signe of their peculiar sanctifying or seperating to bee the people of God from all others and hence you fallaciously conclude that therefore it cannot bee common to others * See this confuted in Master Richard Bifield pag. 87 88. where hee sheweth how every signe of separation or consecration is not ceremoniall Nor doth every seperating or sanctifying marke oblige onely those that haâ—e that marke pag. 1 â—0 For though it be true that as a signe it was proper to them onely in their times and so also was the whole Law as it was renewed and given of God for a covenant betweene him and them * The giving them to the Israelites was a signe the Lord was nigh to them and therefore in vaine doth Master Dow alledge pag. 15. That in that the Sabbath is called a signe betweene God and the Israelites that hee was their Sanctifier and Deliverer out of Egypt which it could not bee if it were given to all Nations in Adam seeing the Law was the like and therefore doth hee say Psalme 147. 19 20. Hee hath shewne his word to Iacob and to Israel his judgements and statutes and that hee hath not dealt so with every Nation that is with any Nation neither have they knowne his judgements so that the Sabbath and the whole Law are alike significative and indeed have somewhat of signification in them in this second exhibition For as the Church it selfe was then typicall signifying the Church of Gods elect So was the Law as given to them as may appeare in that it was twice written to shew the double writing of it by nature and grace in the hearts of the elect So that both the Sabbath and the rest of the Decalogue as they are morall Lawes are forever common to the universall Church of God being not onely bare signes but of a double nature For the same thing may bee both proper and common in diverse respects As the Land of Canaan was proper to the Iewes as it was the Land of promise and yet it was common to many Nations in the use thereof to wit as it was a place of commerce and habitation and so is to this day And so the whole Decalogue wee know was common as it was the Law of nature to all Nations and People even in those times of the Iewes but yet is it in the fourth Chap. of Deut. 13. verse appropriated to the Iewes because it was given in a speciall manner as a Covenant betweene God and them and in that respect it is opposed to things that are common to all People in the 19. verse of that Chapter as the thing wherefore and whereby God will bee especially worshipped even for that very cause because as hee himselfe layeth downe the reason there they are distributed unto all People under the whole Heaven And yet is this Law no man will deny in the morall sense of it common to us now 〈◊〉 whereof the Sabbath is a part nay * For though wee refuse the Law as a Covenant yet wee entertaine and honour it as a rule of obedience Nor surely are wee to say that the Law because it was given to the Iewes must bee in the same respect to us as to the Iawes else it bindeth not at all if so bee it bee qualified according to our times and turned from a covenant to a rule Then granting this change and yet retention of the whole why not also of that part thereof which concernes the Sabbath and was also common to them that were not Iewes even in the time of the Iewes though not in nature of a speciall Covenant yet so as it was a Law of nature which the precise Sabbath I confesse is none but onely made equivalent by revelation and therefore did they then observe though set times of worshipping God yet happily not the whole day or at least not every seaventh for that most properly is the Churches right and rite Moreover the very Sabbath it selfe was of force by vertue of the fourth commandement to all that came with in the cognizance of it as well stranger as Iew And therefore could it not bee meant a signe of separation in your sense so as to appropriate it solely to them and thereupon to create it a meere ceremony Many things there were indeed among the Iewes that bare this sense expressely as the Paschall-Lambe whereof by expresse words no stranger was to eate untill hee was made as one that was borne in the Land by circumcision Exod. 12. 48. But it was other wayes in the commandement of the Sabbath for the stranger quatenus stranger was â—o observe it if they were within their gates * Nehem. 13. 16 19 20 21. Iubebantur feriari eo die qâ—emadmodum Iudaei indigenae saith Zanchy And not as the Antisabbatarians of our age would perswade that it belonged to the proselite stranger onely Againe I argue against you out of your owne place 31. Exod. That if God menat it as a bare signe peculiar to the Iewes why then doth hee fly backe to the primitive institution of it in the seaventeenth verse re inforcing the commandement there upon that reason which is common to all mankind The words are these
was commanded to sanctifie the seventh day in the state of Innocency therefore it is morall to sanctifie one day in a weeke I thinke it best to make answer to this Argument particularly 1. Adam was commanded to sanctifie the seventh day Answ. It doth not appear that Adam received such a Command as is said before As I commanded your fathers Ier. 17. 22. rather we would thinke as I conmanded Adam in the beginning if it had been true Consider also this saying and made known to them thy holy Sabbath Nâ—hem 9 14. Chap. 1. And had God given such a Command why should it not be recorded He that will have us believe more then is set downe must alledge some Scripture or some reason why it was not set down It will be said unlesse Adam was commanded to sanctifie the seventh day wherfore did God sanctifie it in the beginning Answ. Because thou a man knowest not a reason of Gods doings this is not a sufficient reason or warrant for thee to affirme that he did more then thou findest that he did in the Scriptures And consider that others may know some reason hereof though thou and I do not This that followeth whether they be reasons or not I leave it to thy consideration I dare not say so I was not with God when he laid the foundations of the earth 1. It appeareth by Heb. 4. as is said before that Gods Resting the seventh day wherein God rested and which he sanctified was a Type of the Rest that remaineth to the people of God 2. God might sanctifie the seventh day in the beginning for a purpose not present but to come namely that the Israelites should sanctifie the same when they came into the land of Canaan another Paradise as it were and a Type also of the kingdome of heaven A blessed time and a blessed place an holy day and an holy land sort well together When a man shall stand before Christs judgement seat and being demanded wherefore didst thou say that God commanded Adam to sanctifie the seventh day when the Scripture saith not so in any place Consider whether this answer I could see no other reason of Gods sanctifying the seventh day will not prove like Adams breeches of fig-leaves I am well assured it will Answer To your answer I rejoyne That this example of God thus declared by himself was in the nature of a Command as appeareth plainly by the paralel case We see Gods creating Man male and female was a law justly inferred thence obligatory enough to binde one man to marry but one woman at once and to love her and live with her as appeareth Gen. 2. 23 24. compared with Marke 10. 6 7. where there is concluded from this exemplary action of God a perpetuall binding dutie to all mankinde without any expresse Commandement to that purpose But Gods blessing and hallowing the seventh day must needs enforce a Command if we consider that as Christ saith the Sabbath was made for man that is saith M r. Hilder sham for the great benefit and behoofe of man so that man could not no not in Innocency have been without it And if this of the Sabbath were of no obligatory â—orce I pray you then why doe you as before say that Adam if he had continued in Innocency should have kept it Me thinks he should rather then have kept every day Sabbath then we now and yet you say It is likely he should have wrought sixe dayes and sanctified the seventh Therefore as Christ saith in the case of separation it was not so from the beginning So say I in this case of the Sabbath that it was so from the beginning on Gods part actually and on mans part it both should and would have been so had he continued upright And thereforâ— as well in this of the Sabbath as in that of Marriage ought it to be so now Nor did mans fall abrogate the Sabbath any more then it did the rest of the morall Law * Know that all the Commandements given in Innocency were morall either by a naturall or positive moralitie as you would seeme to perswade in your first Chapter For God used the self same authoritie to reinforce it when he gave the Law the second time to wit his own example and the Creation both which he used in his first institution And therefore however we may think of the Sabbath in our corrupt reasonings or by other mens examples as the lewes might doe of Marriage from the example of the Patriarchs polygamy or the toleration of Moses yâ—t it was other wayes from the beginning and let God be true though men be lyers As touching your marginall note God as I may so speake had no reason to goe so farre of for an inforcement as to Adam especially it having been so long intermitted when he might have it fresh and neerer hand which he the rather chose to use for that this iteration of the Law was more peculiar and a greater Demonstration of his speciall love to them in way of Covenant and so more pressing and remarkable And yet doth he not utterly omit to make use of the first institution for he useth the same Arguments to them as to Adam for the observing it to wit his own example and the memory of the Creation which sheweth that it was to be understood as a Commandement laid then upon Adam as well as now upon the Israelites And by this rule you may say The promise and Covenant of Grace was not given to Adam because Gal. 3. 17. The Apostle draweth his Argument of refutation from that Covenant which God confirmed with Abraham 430 yeeres before the Law was given and not from the Covenant made with Adam at the first Touching the latter part of your marginall note I have answered it a little before from Psal. 147. 19 20. It may well be said as a Rejoynder to your second answer that unlesse the sanctifying of the Sabbath was instituted as an Ordinance for Adam to observe wherefore did God sanctifie it for Christ saith The Sabbath was made that is appointed or created in the beginning for man And if God had a reserved and secret intent in this why was it revealed especially when the thing was done and past seeing things revealed belong to us and to our children And from your own reason That the Sabbath was a Type of the Rest that remaines to the people of God a man may justly argue the use of it to the Church and consequently the necessitie and universalitie of it For by the people of God is not meant any visible particular but the whole Catholike Church And why God who instrict sense rested no more on that day then on others did yet so declare himself to have done ad captum vulgi and did also spin out the creation into six dayes which else he could have done in a trice if it were not for example sake I leave to any indifferent judgement And
as touching your second reason why God should thus antedate the Sabbath and have such a speciall eye to Israel in the time of Innocency when there was no partition wall built up I see no reason nor could the ancient Iewes ever dreame of such an interpretation neither can you produce the like example in any thing else from all the Scripture to give some colour of probability to your conceit But some there are who screw their wits further then you to foyle this Doctrine of the Sabbath Ob. and for want of other objections stick not to say that those words Gen. 2. ver 3. were not at all delivered by God in Innocency but are onely by Moses speaking there of Gods rest aptly introduced in way of Anticipation declaring what God did then the better to give authority to the Sabbath that was instituted in his time To which I answer three things as followeth Ans. 1. That they may as well and better affirme the the foure and twentieth verse of that Chapter to be a deduction drawn and inserted orbiter by Moses Had these objectors lived in the time of the Iewes before this Gospell of Math. 19. 5. was written they would doubtlesse readily have sided for the maintenance of Moses his bill of divorce and have invented tricks against the law of marriage mentioned Gen. 2. vers 24. as now they doe against the law of the Sabbath mentioned vers 3. In both which Moses doth alike couple the example and duty whereas had it not been then preceptive why should Moses pussle our faith and transgresse the rules of method not contenting himselfe with the relation of the history alone as it is penned vers 2. especially seeing he needed not have begged any credit to the duty of the Sabbath by inserting it into that place For God had sufficiently warranted it under his owne hand in the Tables of stone from mount Sinai I say they have farre lesse reason to make this a Prolepsis of Moses his inserting then that of 24. vers of this second of Genesis which rather seemes to be an inference of Moses his owne collecting from Adams former words in the verse foregoing then this a Prolâ—psis of his inserting from Gods resting on the seventh day And the reason likewise is the same for whereas it was done saith D. Heylyn pag. 10. by Moses because of the Iewes adversenesse to observe that day and therefore they are minded of it by an intimation of the equity and reason of it even in the entrance of Gods book derived from Gods first resting on that day after all his works So in like manner they may alleadge this to be a minding of them of their duty in this from the equity and reason of Gods making them male and female at first because of the aversenesse of the Iewes to this conjugall law seeing that Moses was faine to grant them a bill of divorce for the hardnesse of their hearts besides the Polygamy that even the Patriarchs gave example of But I know no man affirme this later and if any doe let them compare this 24. verse with Math. 19. 4 5. and their mouthes will soon be stopped and as little reason have they to affirme the former but to grant this its being from the beginning as well as that 2. I answer That if these words Gen. 2. 3. were onely inserted of Moses and were not institutive but that Gods giving the law of the Sabbath to the Iewes was the first institution of it then these words of the fourth Commandement mentioned Exod. 20. 11. would have run in the present tense thus therfore the Lord blesseth or doth now blesse the seventh day and halloweth it and not in the preter tense thus therefore the Lord blessed the seventh day and hallowed it for this hath a reference with it implying it to have been done aforetime of God as indeed it was like of those last words of the third verse of the second of Gen. which God had created and made imply a precedent Creation in Innocency not referring to its institution upon the fall of Mannah as some object for then there was no mention made of blessing and hallowing 3. I answer That this appeares plainly to be the meaning of the Church of England though opposed by our late Doctors which in the Bible allowed by Canon Canon 80. in the contents prefixed to the second chapter of Gen. calleth it peremptorily the first Sabbath But Bish. White brings in this objection p. 42. That the Law of the fourth Commandement was not agreeable to the state of Innocency 1. For that in that happy estate there was no toylesome labour c. Sweat of face entred into the world after the fall and before the fall mans labour was matter of delight and pleasure To which I answer 1. That this is a good argument with those that grant him rest to be either the onely or principall sanctification of the Sabbath 2. That there was labour enjoyned Adam which though it was not toylesome yet as we have elsewhere observed it must necessarily take him off from immediate contemplation and more solemne service and worship and that he was so farre capable of wearisomnesse even in Innocency as to have found other manner refreshment in divine and spirituall things then in worldly affaires 3. No more was Gods labour in the worke of creation toilesome but delightfull and yet he saith of himselfe that he rested the seventh day Secondly he objects That Adam being a free man might have intermitted labour at any time when himself pleased To which I answer 1. So no doubt might God in his worke of Creation 2. And so Adam by voluntary worship in keeping every day Sabbath and not this should have lost an excellent and significant ordinance as I have proved the Sabbath to be Iust as they would now have an every day Sabbath under the Gospell to blow up the weekly Sabbath As if because that under the Gospell God hath promised that he will teach us * Or as if because it is promised that now under the time of the Gospell wee shall have the Law written in our hearts in opposition to it as it was graven in stone and so given to the Israâ—lites We should turne Antinomians and not allow the Law in a sutable sense to our times viz. as a rule of obedience and a repaire to decayed nature to belong to us Ier. 31. 31 34. therefore we might cast away the use of meanes whereby we are to get knowledge But as the best way to be taught of God is to use the meanes whereby he workes knowledge So the best way to keep this every day Sabbath is to sanctifie the Sabbath of the Lord that so the Lord of the Sabbath may sanctifie us as he hath promised And those that most truly and conscionably desire to keep an every day Sabbath to the Lord finde most need of a Sabbath being built up sensibly thereby the
better to performe that duty Thirdly he objecteth There was no necessity of having one set day in every weeke for performing religious offices for man lived in Paradise in a fruition of God To which I answer 1. By the same rule seconded by their position The Church need appoint no Holy-dayes now under the Gospell * Which thei le hardly yeeld to for say they we are to keep every day Sabbath or Holy-day to the Lord which surely we cannot doe without spirituall fruition of God 2. That though Gods children enjoy now a constant fruition of God as a friend yet is this fruition much maintained increased and inlarged by their sanctifying the Sabbath And so doubtlesse should Adams it representing to him and us the perfection of our happinesse and his Fourthly he objecteth All Gods creatures were as living books to preach to man the majesty and bounty of the Creator To which I answer We account it not a needlesse action in God when he had made his creatures which we knew and saw well enough so solemnly notwithstanding to overlook them as is recorded Gen. 1. 31. Neither is there any cause why Adam should not have a solemne day of contemplation and service appointed him because of the time and meanes he had of serving God on other dayes seeing the Sabbath intimated most doctrinally what we ought to God to wit our whole selves and what service we should doe him in heaven to wit absolute without any interruption the better to enamourus of our change To conclude it is evident that the Sabbath was a Law in Commandment in time of Innocency else it could not have suffered losse and detriment by Adams fall which it did as is evident in that First It was one of the Lawes written in Moses his first Tables which were broken and spoyled to signifie as much Secondly Because there were renewed in the second Tables the very self same lawes which were at first whereof the Sabbath was one For the Sabbath waites as an handmaid on the morall Law in which respect chiefly it was made for man that is given to mankinde to be helpfull to his obedience So that seeing as a Law the Sabbath is concomitant with the Law in the second exhibition of it consequently it was so at first especially seeing it is reported that God writ the same things in the second Tables as he did in the first which signifyeth Gods twice giving the Law once in Adam which was defaced and so the Sabbath as well as the rest which he repaired as before And again work was commanded in Innocencie and consequently the Sabbath It is true that an Holy land and an Holy day suite well together but an Holy Church and an Holy Sabbath suite better and you shall finde this Holy Church keeping the Sabbath in the wildernesse before they came into the Holy land and more strictly too When God lastly asketh me that reason why I thought the Sabbath to be a Commandement I think it good to answer him 〈◊〉 his own example especially seeing he grounded an expresse Commandement thereupon afterwards And if God like not this answer he will then doe by it as he did by Adams breeches give me a better In the meane time I will chuse rather to erre by obeying then â—y disobeying and I am sure I shall give a better account of the one then you shall of the other Broad 2. In the state of Innocencie Answ. It hath been I suppose the generall opinion untill of late yeers that Adam fell the day before and otherwise his first childe had not been conceived in sin again the Devill doubtlesse would be â—empting as soone as might be his malice was so great that every houre seemed a twelve moneth before he could become a murderer and the sooner he set upon our first parents after they were created the likelier he was to prevaile the more easily should he have taâ—â—yed a day or two the woman might have learned by experience that the Creatures could not speake of themselves which had Eve known she would rather have been affrighted then deceived Further who and without curiositie would not be desirous to heare how Adam and Evâ— carryed themselves in that first Sabbath Had not this bin a notable pattern to all his posteritie In mans reason Adam should be ill dealt withall to have his evill deeds and not his good deeds committed to History Answer Let us herein be wise with Sobrietie and be content to receive it as God by Moses delivereth it to wit what was done before the fall as done in Innocency whereof the Sabbath was a part which silenceth your conjecturall reasons And therefore I will forbeare to refute conjectures with conjectures and satisfie my self with divine authoritie Though I could tell you that it is very unlikely that seeing in Gods dayes works in the first Chap. of Genesis who did yet but command and it was done so few things are recorded to be done on every day That Adam besides the businesse of his temptation fall and punishment together with the circumstances belonging to them which you may read in the third of Genesis took up no small time could receive his blessing Gen. 1. 28. and his regiment and libertie 29 30. and his putting into Paradise Chap. 2. 8. and his law of Commandement 16 17. and could give names to all Cattle fowles of the heaven and beasts of the field 19 and all on the day of his own Creation especially if we consider how much time God spent of it proportionably to the work that Moses allotteth to other dayes in creating the living things of the earth according to their kinde as Cattle creeping things and beasts and Adam himself and casting him into a sleep and creating Eve out of him and the view he took after of all that he had made Nor is it so considerable concerning Adam and 〈◊〉 keeping the first Sabbath seeing they kept none for God as your self observed made known his example at the evening of his seventh day and Adam fell before the the seventh day camâ— about If you aske 〈…〉 he fell Obiect if 〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 Answ. but the third which was the first day of the weeke followâ—ng and 〈◊〉 which leads me thus to thinke 〈…〉 Adam in opposition to the first * And is opposed to his â—all even in his resurrection it selfe in the 1 Câ—r 15. 21. Since by man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead I rose on that day 〈◊〉 I thinke Adam fell And that he fell not on the first of his Creation which was Gods sixth and last day appeareth not only by the Sabbaths institution in time of innocencie as aforesaid but also by the last verse of the first Chapter of 〈◊〉 Where after God had finished the works of that Day he viewed every thing that he had made and seeing all was Good presently there followeth upon that as upon the other dayes of
Creation when they were finished this Conclusion And the Evening and the Morning were the sixth day Besides that it is likely God could not be said to be refreshed on the seventh day and Adam new fallen for whom all things were made and by whom all things were accursed which would have been a displeasure to God and would have taken of his refreshment Broad 3. And therefore it is Morall Answ. Suppose that it had been commanded Consider that there need not any Morall Commandement be given to Adam in the state of Innocency and in the state of Innocency yet would it not follow that this Commandement was Morall for Adam received a Commandement concerning the Tree of Knowledge of good and evill and yet was not that a Morall Commandment Answer To this I answer That all the Commandements which were given in Innoâ—encie were Morall they were both common to all mankinde and perpetuall to all ages * The Jewish â—awes were neither common nor perpetuall but expressely coâ—trary and so was that of the forbidden Tree Though M r. Dâ—w pag. 15. saith he supposeth no man will affirme it And therefore did Eve sinne a particular sinne in eating of it * The woman was first in the transgression and so should conceive whosoever of Adams posteâ—itie had eaten thereof though none but Adam could sin the publicke and Epidemicall sinne because the Covenant was made with him in the day that he should eat thereof c. but with this difference that some of them in Gods intention were proper to that state and were not to be renewed by Christ after the fall of which sort this of the forbidden Tree was one and therefore was Adam thrust out upon his fall by God from having to doe with any thing that is peculiar to that state But other Commandements there were which were intended to remaine as common to man falling or standing by meanes of Christ and of this sort was the created Law of nature in the mind of man the ordinance of marriage and then why not this of the Sabbath For this is most true that whatsoever God giveth as a law afterwards we have no reason to thinke that to be utterly abolished by the fall for from all such things we are kept by the fiery sword never to have commerce with them againe For thus we are utterly deprived of something which in Innocency signified Heaven to shew us our desert and Gods justice And something againe is renewed unto us which likewise did and doth signifie Heaven to manifest our hope and his mercy through Christ. So that then if the Sabbath be not abolished by the fall neither is it abrogated as a Type because not yet fulfilled For the Rest which it did signifie doth yet remaine to the people of God To your marginall note I answer That there was no need of a Morall Commandement to be given so farre as nature was capable but if Gods will extended further as it did in this particular of the Sabbath as I have formerly shewne then it was necessary it should be revealed as positively Morall and part of natures discipline Broad 4. To sanctifie one day in a weeke Answ. Nay rather to sanctifie the seventh day Note God commanded Adam to sanctifie the seventh day Arguments drawne from Gen. 2. Exod. 20. prove it morall perpetuall to sanctifie the seventh day wherein God created and which the Iewes sanctified or nothing ergo it is morall to sanctifie the seventh day is a neerer inference then thus ergo it is Morall to sanctifie one day of the seven or weeke And now if any deny the neerer inference the further of may better be denyed Why I marvell shall the sanctifying of one day of the weeke be rather Morall then of the seventh day What reason can they alleadge of the least moment As for Text of Scripture they can produce none Answer For your full answer to this I refer you backe to your first chapter Were the Sabbath morall naturall then the Iewes Sabbath were to be kept of us Christians but being morall positive it is alterable to the will of the law-giver For nature being one without change to all of necessity prescribeth no binding rule to any in particular but to all in generall No man being able to say This natures Lâ—w commands me to do and yet bâ—nds not another â—o do the like onely with this summary addition That the Sabbath being the Churches perpetuall Type it is to vary according to the constitution of the Church even as the shadow of a man doth according to the disposition of his body or the Sunnes shining The substance of the Commandement and the signification of the Sabbath being still kept inviolate though circumstances alter in this as in other Commandements as hath already been observed in the first Chapter And so it is with us Christians in whose time since the consummation of our redemption by Christs resurrection the last day hath been changed into the first of the weeke only to take in better loading and to fignifie how that by Christ we are assâ—redly possessed of that heavenly Rest even now in this life before our works be ended For whereas formerly by the Covenant of the Law we were to doe this and live now we must first live and then doe Broad ARGVMENT 2. THe Commandement of the Sabbath is placed among the Morall precepts in the Deoalogue therefore it is Morall like unto them Ans. Then must it be wholly Morall and then must the Iewes Sabbath be kept of us Christians Againe the Commandement of the Sabbath is placed among the Ceremoniall prâ—cepts Levit. 23. therefore be like it is ceremoniall like unto them also Answer You doe wrongfully conclude us necessarily to keep the Iewes individuall seventh day from the morality of the Sabbath For though they were bound to observe that order because they were under the Covenant of works like as Adam was when it was given him in Innocency in which time the work of Creation was the thing most worthy commemoration yet notwithstanding we being freed fâ—om the one are likewise freed from the other for as the â—ast day of seven was significative to them so is the first to us So that our new Creation being finished the first day of the weeke it hath priviledged us to sanctifie a new seventh day though an old Sabbath For in this case alteration is no dissolution no more then to adjourne the Parliament to another time is to dissolve it especially considering the Sabbath is not naturally but positively morall And whereas you say That the Sabbath is found in Scripture among the ceremoniall precepts and specially in that Levit. 23. where yet it is spoken of Paramount although because of Analogy it is reckoned amongst them I answer That I deny not but there may be found in Scripture a mixture of morall and ceremoniall Lawes without danger of confounding their natures after they had
been once formally instituted But that the ten Commandements which God himselfe both spake and gave after such an extraordinary manner with such majesty and terrour and in regard of the place for all the world to take notice of it and which he calleth his Covenant and himselfe in a speciall manner recordeth them to be ten in number Deut. 4. and with his owne finger wrote them twice in Tables of stone signifying as well their lasting nature as any other thing and commanded them to be put into the Holy of Holies in the Arke under the Mercy-seate and which were all of them institute in Innocency either by created Nature or immediate Revelation whereas all other Ordinances were delivered by the mediation of Moses a mortall man but that immediately by the immortall God as witnesseth Iosephus in his Iewish antiquities Moses saith hee received the ten Commandements from the high and unexcessible mountaine Sinai with thundrings but other Lawes he received in the Iewish Tabernacle ascending no more the mountaine Now that one of these should be temporary and the other nine perpetuall is doubtlesse in any reasonable mans opinion very ill likely I am sure Bishop Andrewes in his Chatechisticall doctrine saith That it were not wise to set a Ceremony he meanes a Iewish abrogative Ceremony in the midst of morall precepts And one saith Certainly God did intend something extraordinary by this great odds of conveyance and what more proper then that these were mortall and dependant upon those those immortall and independant especially if we weigh the manner how Moses concludeth his repetition of the ten Commandements with these words God added no more but wrote them in Tables of stone to shew that these words be valued of a greater rate then those which should be added by the hands of Moses which were either to be explanations of these or shadowes of Christ And as God did not adde so man may not diminish from these words and so consequently there is no reason without sacriledge to suspect the morality of the fourth Commandement Broad One heretofore required me to shew a satisfactory reason why if the fourth Commandement be of no higher rancke then the other temporary constitutions of Moses Touching Gods gracing the fourth commandement as much as the nine morall God should grace it as much as the nine morall Ans. I dare not take upon me to yeeld a reason of Gods doings And I would gladly know what reason themselves can yeeld wherefore God should use so many words touching abstinence from worke on the Sabbath and not one word of comming together to pray and to heare the word preached Yet this I say In mans judgement it is great reason that one Ceremoniall Commandement at the least should be placed amongst many morall precepts in the Tables of the Covenant seeing God made a Covenant with the Israelites after the tenour of both sorts indifferently as is to be seen Exod. 24. There we read how that Moses having written in a book sundry Lawes as well Ceremoniall as other the booke is called the booke of the Covenant vers 7 8. Behold the blood of the Covenant which the Lord hath made with you concerning all these words See also Chapter 34. from the 10. verse to the end of the 27. Answer You say you daâ—e not give a reason of all Gods doings I could with you were as modest in not reasoning against God as you are in reasoning for him As concerning your question why God speaketh so much of rest and so little of holy duties Answ. You are sufficiently answered out of the Commandement it self For those words Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath day are a most plenary expression of the sanctifying of that day with the duties of holinesse which being thus premised then followeth after in the Commandement the urging of Rest or abstinence from work both as a meanes to further the Sabbaths sanctification like as in the Sabbath of Atonement Levit. 23. 27 28. and as a significant part thereof conjunctively considered and spiritually * Thâ—ugh by reason of the minoâ—tyof the Iewish pedagogy as aforesaid there was then interpretatâ—vely by God 〈…〉 abâ—tract holinesse of this Rest being sâ—â—cowish and significative as of other Types improved For as fasting joyned with prayer is a necessary medium of Gods extraordinary worship by removing impediments and also a significant medium concerning our extraordinary humiliation So is the Sabbaths Rest both a medium and a significant medium to Gods extraordinary worship and our extraordinary happinesse And it is not rare to finde fasting urged in Scripture without expresse mention of Prayer as in Ester 4. 16. Where when Ester gave Mordecai in charge to assemble the Iewes and to fast for her three daies and nights there is no mention of prayer And yet no man can deny but it is most necessarily understood and implyed though it be not expressed So it is As for your Arguments drawn from the Covenant which because it consisted both of Morall and Ceremoniall Lawes therefore say you it is reason that one Ceremoniall Commandement at least should be placed among many Morall precepts in the Tables of the Covenant Answ. Nay rather it is good reason that both the Lawes should be written together in the Booke of the Covenant as indeed they were in regard that the two Tables were to be laid up in the Holy of Holies and so not to be come by but the copies of that Book were of continuall use And again seeing the Covenant of the Iews consisted of both it is the more reason that they should be carefully distinguished as likewise they were then confounded seeing you cannot deny but that which was Morall was to appertain to after ages and if they had then been undistinctly mixed how could after ages tell which was which But this was prevented through Gods good providence by their disjunction and distinct exhibition at the first Broad If this will not satisfie him or any other then as Christ answered some Questioners Matt. 21. let them first tell me wherefore God should appoint a greater punishment for the breach of a Ceremoniall Law then he did of some Morall And I will afterwards tell them wherefore he should grace a Ceremoniall Commandement as much as a Morall Answer There may be very good reason for it for though sometimes God doth inflict the most grievous temporall punishment upon the greater sins to aggravate the danger of committing them So other some times he ordaineth a great punishment for a lesser sinne least according to our corrupt judgements we should thinke it small and if it were not for the punishment threatned be the carelesser to observe it And secondly to shew that it is not so much the Nature of the thing commanded as the Will of the Commander that gives weight to the Commandment And thirdly A man may commit some morall offence with lesse guilt then the Iewes might a Ceremoniall As if a man
these 17. and 18. verses of the 5 th Matt. doe intend as well the Ceremoniall as the Morall Lawes for Christ going about to bring himself into liking with the Iewes by removing the impediment of their Law shewing that he made for and not against it First concerning the Ceremoniall whereas they thought Christ had meant to have made those Laws to be no laws but to have brought in a new way of Righteousnesse and Salvation into the world he telleth them his coming was not to disparage or annihilate those lawes but rather to ratifie them by fulfilling them not so much to take away their being as to give them a better being Secondly concerning the morall Law whereas they trusted to it to their own destruction and misinterpreted it in favour to their carnall and corrupt mindes he came to shew them the true sence and meaning of God in it to wit that they were not to be saved by their own but by his fulfilling it and that God will as well be served in spirit as in letter So that he was so farre from abolishing this Morall law as that he did more enforce it and gave life to that which they had made to be but a dead letter And thus this text maketh for the perpetuitie of the fourth Commandement for that Christ fulfilled both the Lawes the one by adding the substance to the shadow the other by delivering men from the curse of it through grace and confirming it by a new exposition * New I meane to them and a manifestation of the spirituall part of it as a rule of manners for all ages which is evinced out of the 19. verse where notwithstanding he had formerly said how that he had fulfilled the Law yet doth he there presse them to obedience which must needs be of the Morall Law Moreover as Christ meant not to destroy the law so neither did he meane to confound the natures of lawes perpetuall and temporary which was a way to destroy them and consequently not to annihilate the use and being of any thing save only such as did help to build the partition wall and were ordained for the state and time of the Iewish Church before Christs coming Much lesse the Sabbath which sprung out of Paradise before any promise of Christ was made and which now in our State or Church is every whit as usefull and proper as ever serving to cherish the Morall law and to help us to heavenly mindednesse by its signification Nor doe we say as you would force upon us in your Margine that every tittle in the Decalogue is perpetuall to wit striâ—tly for that the Law like other Scripture being occasionally written in the strictnesse of the Letter did partake of those times and of the state of the Church to which it was then given but Evangelically and in a sutable sence to our times it is perpetuall Broad ARGVMENT 4. A Fourth Argument is taken from Christs words Mat. 24. 20. but this Text being rightly understood maketh nothing for them neither An exposition of Christs words Math. 24. 20. Pray that Your not of the Apostles only who were all well nigh dead or departed out of Iury before that time not of the Disciples alone who before the siege departed to Pella but of the Citizens of Ierusalem and generally of all the Iewes Flight that is calamity from which I councell you to fly there being no hope by any meanes to avoid the same He tearmeth it flight to note the certainty of their overthrow Be not in the Winter neither On a Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a feast or festivall Sabbath and I am induced thus to expound this Text. 1. Did Christ mean the weekly Sabbath yet this Text would stand them in no stead See M. 〈◊〉 Tract pag. 73. Because Christ seemeth not to meane any one particular day for he speaketh of daies as before vers 19. and again after ve 22. except those daies should be shortened 2. Because he counselleth them to fly as soone as they see Ierusalem besieged Luk. 21. 20. And indeed it had been a great folly knowing that the City should be destroied not to shift for themselves whilest they might but to tarry untill the last brunt 3. Because the calamity befalling at the Passeover became came farre more grievous then other wayes it would have been for a great number repairing to Ierusalem at that feast were shut in by the Romanes and thus Totâ— gente velut in carcerem conclusa as Iosephus speaketh it came to passe 1. Bâ—ll lud lib. 1. cap. 1. That the aire was infected and many died of the pestilence 2. That they sooner wanted food and many miscarryed through famine 3. That there was greater dissention among them for quot homines tot sententiâ—e and many perished by this meanes 〈…〉 Some of late restraining Christs words to the Disciples onely hold the reason of his counsell to be that so they might not be hindred from the sanctifying of one Sabbath which say they would be grievous to the soule as to 〈◊〉 in winter would be grievous to the body Answ. As though they might not be as well hindered from sanctifying the Sabbath in defending themselves against the Romans as in flying from them and againe in hiding themselves after their flight being scattered here and there as the manner is of such If the Disciples following Christs counsell Luke 21. would depart out of Ierusalem as soone as it began to be besieged it is likely that they might then depart in what day almost best pleased themselves or rather indeed in what night they would which is the time wherein men usually seeke to depart out of Cities besieged If they would tarâ—y untill the city were ready to be taken which in them had been extreame folly there is no likelihood that they could fly and escape at all But not to stand longer hereupon the verses both before and after doe sufficiently convince that Christ gave this counsell for the better avoiding of bodily calamities and the event hath manifested the same Answer I will not much dispute what Sabbath was meant by Christ in these words of his Math. 24. 20. For admitting the conclusion how that Christ gave this counsell for the better avoiding of bodily harmes and calamities and the increase of those troubles which at the least was such as was not from the beginning of the world to this time nor ever should be For that they were to typifie the calamities that should befall the wicked and unbeleevers at the last day I confesse this exposition of yours to be in my conceit very genuine and yet it may for that very reason intend the weekly Sabbaths as well as any of their festivals For as by the one the Iewes should be multiplyed at Ierusalem at that time and so should their misery be increased So againe by the other might their consciences be so straitned in
Nay I thinke if the case were put to you of a man in a farre countrey who by some or other accident losing that computation of Mannah should notwithstanding have dedicated every seventh day which yet happily might be the first second or third of the week as well as the last to an holy rest in obedience to tho Commandement I thinke I say you would grant this man to observe the fourth Commandement in substance Broad 5. Opinion Others speake of the Morality and Ceremonies of the fourth Commandement By this opinion only the Ceremonies are mentioned in the Decalogue the fourth Commandement hath as it were a peece of Moses vaile on the face thereof when it is read in the Church by the Ceremonies they meane the seventh day and strict rest by the morality the sanctifying of some times or the having of set appointed dayes Ans. There is no Morality of the fourth Commandement as is said before Indeed I acknowledge the Law of Nature here Nature taught the Gentiles and doth teach Christians to set apart some times as places for the publike worship of God But there is a * Suppose that God had said to Sem thou shalt sanctifie some time to Ham thou shalt sanctifie one day in a week and to Iaphet thou shalt sanctifie the seventh day had he not given divers Lawes to them there Should Sem have kept the morality Ham the substance and Iaphet the ceremony or circumstance of one and the same Law this were presently doctrine I trow difference betweene the generall Law of Nature written in mans heart at the Creation and the peculiar precept of the Sabbath written since in Tables of stone Should God now say to the Iewes you shall sanctifie the seventh day wherein I rested and to us Christians you shall sanctifie the first day wherein my Sonne rose The Iewes sanctifying their Sabbath and we the Lords-day should doe that is enjoyned by the Law of Nature in a generall manner but as they should not doe that were enjoined by our particular Law so then neither should we doe that were enjoined by their particular Law Answer That there were some intervening Ceremonies befell the Sabbath in the Iewish Church you I thinke will not I am sure cannot justly deny which now like an old suit of clothes are dropt off * Nay even in the very time of the Iewes the extreame strict Rest ceased when Mannah ceased for Christ hath pruned the Law of her Mosaicall branches and the Sabbath remaineth naked and pure For as the Sabbath it selfe was a super-addition or handmaid to the Law of Nature that is of necessary use and service to preserve our obedience to the will of God revealed in it and especially to the first Table as I have observed in the beginning of this Tract So had it selfe also many additions which were proper to the state of the Iewish Church in which time it was reinforced as likewise had every thing else Which additions were some of them Ceremonies some meere occasionall circumstances and thus was the strict rest in the wildernesse and the stranger within thy gates mentioned in the fourth commandement some whereof were abrogative some changable according to the severall natures as appeares by their severall events in this new created Church of ours In the Commandement it selfe as it is laid downe in the Decalogue I know nothing properly Ceremoniall in a Iewish sence and to bee abrogated properly by Christ For whatsoever was abrogated by Christ was ordained by reason of Christ since the fall which the Sabbath was not Heb. 4. Yet is it no other then a Ceremony and for this cause it is so changable in diverse particulars upon occasion but of that nature and so annexed to the Church as the shadow to the body inseparable though alterable according to the condition of the party and degree of the Sunne Touching your first marginall note with which I will couple your conclusion of the fourth Opinion You say That by these two opinions Not substance but either circumstance or ceremony are only mentioned in the fourth Commandement and hath as it were a peece of Moses his vayle when it is read in the Church Answ. In the order there is included the substance * In the first Table it is ordinary to include the greater in the lesse the affirmative in the negative like as in the second Table the lesse is mostly included in the greater For the seventh day cannot be commanded but one of seven must necessarily and principally be intended as when God commanded the Tenth surely any man will thinke he hath more respect to the number then to the order Neither can the fourth Commandement be said any more nay not so much for the one was common and the other proper to have a peece of Moses his vayle over it for the seventh day being a Ceremony then all the Law hath by its preface of the Egyptian deliverance I wish you had considered what a vayle you cast upon the fourth Commandement when it is read with the Prayer As concerning your secōd marginal note I have formerly shewne in what relation the Sabbath and the Law of Nature stand And as touching the difference of the commanding of one day in a weeke and the seventh day I answer That in substance they are the same and the difference is only in manner of exhibition For Ham hath only the substance it selfe mentioned and commanded him and the order left arbitrary which if he of his own accord should designe to be every seventh or last day then I pray you what difference for substance But Iaphet hath both the substance and order assigned him of God so that the difference lyeth only in manner of exhibition Like as the Covenant of Grace was both one to the Iewes and us in substance onely as it was given to them it was cloathed with many circumstances and ceremonies though they were Lawes they were no better but to us naked All which circumstances I grant did bind during their significancy and though now the Ceremonies be annulled and the Sacraments changed which were Appendices to the Covenant yet is the substance of the Covenant the same and distinct from its circumstances So though the Sabbath admit an annulling of some additaments and a change of some circumstances or ceremonies yet may and doth the fourth Commandement in substance remain the same distinct and unconfounded Nay this very change doth discover to us the substance from the circumstances and ceremonies as well of the Sabbath as of the Covenant if we had not understood them before And though the Morality and Ceremonies of the fourth Commandement relish not with you yet your Partizans of later Edition passe it in Verbo Magistrî That it is abrogated in the speciality of it because it was ceremonious and so serve their turnes to pull downe the Sabbath and yet affirme it stands good in the morality or equity of it to
keep unraced the ejaculation annexed to it in our Liturgy And M r. Dow pag. 9. saith in absolute tearmes They more fully expresse the nature of this Commandement who say It is partly Morall and partly Ceremoniall Broad 6. Opinion M r. Cleaver will have this strange matter come to passe by a Trope whereby one part is put for the rest He saith That in the precepts and prohibitions more is meant then in words is expressed Moral of the Law Chap. 4. Answ. I acknowledge that in the other nine Commandements more is meant then is expressed in words but here in the fourth Commandement that which is expressed in words is not meant It is a kind of Trope to put one part for the rest but when no part is put for the rest what manner of Trope may that be For this thou shalt sanctifie the seventh day wherein I rested is no part of Gods Law in these dayes and yet this in effect is all that God spake from Sinai Answer Although the fourth Commandement be a Law still in force yet as I said it bindeth us not to keep Sabbath the last day of the weeke though the seventh For the order was foretold to be altered in the 65. Isaiah 17. where it is prophecyed that Gods creating new heavens and a new earth shall make the old to be forgotten that is there shall be a wonderfull alteration and that which now men make most account of to wit the Creation then they shall account it the least sanctifying the memory of my resting from their Redemption in stead of my resting from their Creation And thus you wilfully slander us when you say that Thou shalt sanctifie the seventh day wherein I rested is no part of Gods Law in these dayes for we grant it but with an Orthodox distinction of Rest. For the Commandement it self looketh with a double face both wayes both to the Iewish Church and ours both to the old and new Creation And beareth his Title in the very front in that word Remember And as one well observeth There is no Commandement ushered with such a Memento as that of the Sabbath wherein saith he I thinke we may discerne Gods providence forearming weake Christians against the strong assaults of their own affections strugling against the restraint of a whole dayes libeâ—tie and of mans inventions oppugning Gods institutions for it is a Commandement of Remembrance so that as once we were to remember our Creation by it as appeareth bâ— the first promulgation of it in Exodus for there the Creation is only mentioned so like wise are we now to remember our Redemption by it as appeares by the second proâ—nulgation of it in Deuâ—eronomie where the old Creation is quite forgotten not a word mentioned of it and the new set forth in its Type of their â—gyptian deliverance Which observation taken from the various reasons annexed at severall times and in such an order for the inforcing of this Commandement compared with this Text of Isaâ—ah 65. 17. and the present event sutable doth both very much illustrate the perpetuitie of the Sabbath and yet prophecie the change both in one which also if we consider the nature of those times doth well prove the thing For though Christ speaketh plainly to us now yet to them he spake and prophecyed as I may so say in parables which rightly understood are no lesse proofes then ours And thus is the substance of the fourth Commandement preserved that is the dedicating of the seventh day to duties of Pietie and Mercy and sixe dayes to our other affaires as also prophecie fulfilled and the Apostles imitated But may some say Object Our Redemption was not finished on that day for that it still remaineth in acting by Christs intercession which is Bishop Whites objection page 299. Christs intercession after his dying and rising is as Gods providence was Answ. and is after his sixe dayes Creation And as notwithstanding his continuall providence his Creation was finished on the last day of the week So Now notwithstanding Christs intercession at Gods right hand our Redemption was finished on the first day of the weeke by his Resurrection And whereas Bishop White further objecteth pag. 299. That the day of Christs resurrection cannot properly be called a Sabbath or day of Rest because our Saviour was in action on that day about the necessary works of perfecting mans Redemption by applying teaching inspiring authorizing his Disciples I answer They were all Sabbath-day works and so was the seventh day a working day to God in many such like respects sutable to the first Creation and yet it was his Sabbath for this reason because he rested and ceased from that which he did before as M r. Hildersham noteth upon the Hebrew word Sabbat in his 135. Lect. on the 51. Psalme which holds in respect of Christ. Furthermore page 300. Bishop White saith That the Primitive Church devoted the first day of the weeke to the honour and service of Christ not because of Christs cessation from redemptive actions but because it was primus dies laetitiae The first day of joy and gladnesse for the resurrection of the Lord True But the cause of this joy was the perfection of our Redemption and Deliverance which we celebrate with a congratulatory commemoration on the first day like as we were to doe the perfection of our Creation on the last day of the weeke And pag. 303. hâ— saith That Christ rested upon his resurrection day no more then he did upon every day after untill his ascension and since his ascension untill the worlds end Answ. So he may say that God rested no more from his worke of Creation on the seventh day then he hath done ever since where by the way take notice That it is the consummation of the Creation and Redemption which is meant by their Resting and which we celebrate for else if Rest should respect barely their cessation then all the after time should be of equall estimation with the last day in respect of the Creation and with the first day in respect of the Redemption And now indeed I wonder why the Egyptian deliverance being in Deut. annexed by the dictate of the spirit as a reason to inforce the duty of the fourth Commandement or Sabbath in its second promulgation should not be thought a sufficient reason to inforce the same duty law upon us as well as the obedience of the whole Law is urged upon us by the same reason contained in the Preface * Deny the one and â—eny both but reâ—son and sobrietie will deny neither seeing that in both places it signifieth alike our spirituall Redemption and deliverance Especially seeing the holy Ghost in the fifteenth verse of the fifth of Deut. after he hath there affixed to the fourth Commandement our deliverance out of spirituall Egypt in its Type as the reason of it concludeth upon it mandatorily a duty not a libertie imposed upon us therefore in these
down the writings of the Apostles and turne Anabaptist in point of baptizing of Infants For as for the Scriptures what expresse precept of Christs have we to his Apostles for writing of them and 〈◊〉 the Epistles were most of them occasionally written by the Apostles and yet who of us for these reasons denyeth them to be the work of God universall and 〈◊〉 diviâ—o Fâ—urth Poâ—ke Church châ—p 〈◊〉 For as Feild saith in answer to the Papists 〈◊〉 the imperfection of the Scriptures because they were written by the Apostles and Apostolicall men of their own motions and not by Commandement from Christ which is a paralel argument to this of the Christian Sabbath and the answer equall to both who knoweth not saith he that the Scriptures are not of any private motion but that the holy 〈◊〉 of God were moved impelled and carryed by the Spirit of truth thâ— the performance of this worke doing nothing without the instinct of the Spirit which was 〈◊〉 theâ— a Commandement And why may not all these reasons and grounds warrant and give equall force to their practice in the point of our Christian Sabbath or Lords-day as well as to their writing of Scripture So speaketh D r. Ames med pag. 359. Si dies bac dominica concedâ—â—ur fuisse Apostoâ—â—◠〈◊〉 author it as 〈…〉 est divina quia divino Spiritâ— agebantur Apostoli non minus in Sacris institutionibus quam in ipsa doctrina Evâ—ngelii vel verbo vel script is proponenda Especially seeing that the same things that accompanied the Gospel did accompany the Sabbath the better to approve it to be of God to wit The gift of the holy Ghost And now we know there is nothing more ordinary in Scripture then for God to grace the first institutions of his Ordinances with extraordinary tokens of his savour which are of an argumentative nature and of an establishing and instituting force As at the first setting up of the Sanâ—drin among the Iewes Numb 11. 25. Every one of the seventy Elders prophecyed for a while to testifie that their calling was from heaven And though divers others besides these have had the Spirit of Prophecy bestowed on them that yet nothing detracts from Gods sealing the ordination of this Councell or Sanedrin by the Seventies prophecying So though Christ appeared to his Disciples on other dayes besides the first day of the weeke yet it detracteth not from his instituting and authorizing that day by his remarkable apparitions and operations thereon as D r. Heylyn would insinuate part 2. pag. 13. Againe at the instituting of the Leviticall priesthood and sacrifices there came a fire from the Lord and consumed the burnt offering also at Christs baptizing we see how extraordinarily the Spirit came down in likenesse of a Dove and so at Peters first preaching to the Gentiles what an extraordinary worke was there wrought Acts 10. 44. And may not we well conclude the divinity of the Lords-day from these manifold rare occurrences which fell out in the practice or usage of it * We have Davids example in a like case for in the 1 Chron. 22. he there concludeth Ieruselem to be the place that God had chosen for his more solemne worship by that speciall token of Gods favour to it in delivering it from the destroying Angell and such as are most remarkably and eminently recorded in Scripture mentioning the Time as well as the things themselves As That Christ appeared to them on the first day of the weeke and the first day of the weeke they had the gifts of the Holy Ghost given them and on the Lords day Saint Iohn was ravished in the Spirit not any other day in the weeke having the honour to be denominated the day of his appearance in all the New Testament though no doubt he did appeare to them on other dayes of the weeke besides the first in those other times of his appearances And why is all this But to give the better authority and estimate to that day Which we may the rather judge because that since then God hath shewne extraordinary judgements upon the breakers and prophaners of it which being frequently and remarkably instanced I will referre you for them to the Martyr-booke Practice of Piety and M r. Richard Byfeild pag. 99. 100. 101. As also if we consider the benefits which nationally we have enjoyed therby above all other Protestant Churches of Peace Plenty and also powerfull Preaching and Professing * Which now begin to leave us and to decline together with the Sabbaths declension For as one piously observeth The Ark shaketh through the old Sinnes and new Doctrines of our land for a long season and which doe experimentally and personally redound to the due observers of it how extraordinarily and feelingly they delight themselves in the Lord according to that promise Isai. 58. ult So that then beleeve it for the works sake as Christ saith in another case And indeed Argumentum ab effectis is an argument of no small evidence and power with those that professe Christianity in the power of it The want of which medium in the experiences of men either not at all wrought in them or else not taken notice of by them is the cause of so many false conclusions in these dayes as well as it was amongst the Galathians till Paul a man of spirit put them in minde Gal. 3. 2. And observe it as a maine argument in this way of experience That at the first beginning of mens conversions when God enlighteneth and convinceth the Conscience commonly the first thing the Conscience fastens on is the mispending the Sabbath and the first duty that he conscionably putteth in practice upon his conversion is commonly the better sanctifying and keeping the Sabbath Now as touching the baptizing of Infants there is neither an expresse precept for it nor yet an example of expresse practise delivered in Scripture and yet the grounds causes and reasons of the necessity of that practice and the benefit or good that followeth on it are evidently contained in the Scripture and for this respect it is named a tradition But yet the grounds of it being in Scripture as Feild in the fore-quoted place observes it is not therefore a bare tradition but is therefore of Divine authority and unalterable in the Church of God The same in all respects holdeth good concerning the Sabbath and with some advantage for that there is the expresse practice of the Apostle Paul in this point mentioned in the Scripture which is not so in the baptizing of Children And this is apparant that those things which had their grounds and reasons in Scripture the Apostles were not curious or exact in commanding them expressely nor intreating of them largely except they were then controverted and scrupled at which it seemeth the Lords-day was not but was currantly received and practised among the Gentile converts the Infant Iewes being born withall for on that day they ordinarily were wont
a fault most obvious as may appeare in that amongst other workes hee instanceth most their bearing of burthens as the thing most frequent and abusive so doth hee complaine of their prophaning the Sabbath by working in it because that being a fault most obvious they would bee the soonest convinced thereby For man can naturally better conceive of his outward grosse and sensitive errours then of his spirituall ones which notwithstanding was implyed therein Like as at the day of judgement hee will judge us by our works and yet therein wee shall answer for our infidelity for in the one hee involues the other God tooke the same order with the Iewes under the Law that Christ did under the Gospell that is still to blame them for those faults which were either most apparant or most proper to those times and persons knowing that if they failed in those they must needs faile in the more materiall But when they were diligent to doe the outward duty and neglected the inward then God blameth them in that respect also As wee may see by that which hee telleth them touching their sacrifices how that hee that sacrificed a sheepe was as if hee cut of a dogs necke whereas had they neglected to have sacrificed hee would first have called on them for his outward service because without that the inward could not bee performed So of the Sabbath-rest hee must first bring them from prophaning the Sabbath before hee could bring them to a due sanctifying of it For except they made good their bodily rest according to the commandement they could never meditate rightly their rest in Heaven Againe in the second place I say that though God in this 17. Ier did thus sharpely reprove their prophaning the Sabbath by working yet hee never meant that in resting consisted its chiefest sanctification as may appeare by the 58. of Isa. 13. Which Master Calvin in his institutions upon the fourth commandement bringeth to prove that we were to rest from our works that day that God might worke his works in us and that the Prophets did call backe the Iewes from thinking themselves discharged by their carnall rest In the third place I answer that this rest being a transcendent type and of speciall sanctitie in those times could not bee neglected no not in the letter of it without grosse prophanation of the Sabbath besides the injury done to the usefull signification of it because that then it was a part of the Sabbaths sanctification I meane of its very positive sanctification And therefore had God just cause to complaine his Sabbaths were not sanctified when they were so notoriously prophaned Fourthly now I come to speake to your third proofe touching the prophanation of the Sabbath which is say you by working to which I answer First that a man by working if it bee seasonable sanctifieth the Sabbath and againe by resting if it bee carnall and unfruitfull he may prophane it Secondly to argue from the prophaning to the sanctifying is no good argument as because works prophane it therefore rest onely sanctifieth it It may as well bee argued from the second commandement that hee that doth not make Images to bow to them is consequently a true worshipper of God For though it bee most true that every one that resteth not from worldly imployments on the seaventh day doth prophane the Sabbath and breake the commandement Yet on the contrary every one that doth rest cannot bee said to sanctifie it no more then every one that doth not make Images to bow to them may bee said to worship God aright and yet every one that doth make Images to bow to them doth prophane the true worship of God So Master Hisdersham to keepe a bodily rest on that day from all our owne works is but the outside of the commandement and concerneth onely the outward man and the outward and bodily observation of the fourth commandement which as the whole Law is spirituall and may bee performed by a man which hath no truth of Grace in him at all Thus also Musoulus on the fourth commandement after hee hath shewne how those words of the commandement Thou shalt in it doe no manner of worke doe forbid all manner of lets which may hinder the sanctifying of the Sabbath because saith hee that is to bee done not with a patched mind but with all our indeavour and with a whole mind In his conclusion speaking against such as prophane the Sabbath by licentiousnes the very cattle saith hee doe use the Sabbath-day better then wee which though they doe nothing towards the sanctifying of it yet their rest is so farre forth to bee preferred that they doe nothing whereby the holy rest is prophaned and defiled and the eyes of Gods Majesty offended As concerning the proofe you bring to backe this last argument withall to wit the example of Gods severe punishing worke though but a small one when yet sins and other things which might seeme more to prophane it were passed over I answer First that God was curious in maintaining in violate their discipline in their dayes which was then both his owne ordinance and the proper meanes of their instruction for shadowes were then substances so that if they were remisse in observing to doe the type such as was this rest they sinned both against God and their owne soules and under went a double guilt of punishment and losse like as wee under the Gospell doe sin more in not beleeving in Christ then in breaking the whole Law Secondly I say that God was the severer in menacing and punishing this because else they would have beeue apter to thwart it judging of it rather by matter of fact then by matter of duty or command which I thinke was a notable aggravation of his sin that gathered stickes judging the offence by the thing As its like Adam did and as you doe afterward when hee ate the apple which happily God fore seeing imposed the greater judgement to over-awe him And this Sabbath-rest as that of eating the apple not being a Law written in the conscience and therefore they not having their conscience so lively in that as in other sins had need of the stronger barre to keepe them of from breaking it Thirdly this instance you give was whilest they were in the wildernes as the Scripture phraseth it Num. 15. 32. when the type was more lively and significative and they better in abled to observe it and therefore was the sin so much the more offensive and presumptuous and consequently worthy of severer punishment * Hee himselfe typifying that the neglect of Gods rest brings certaine and unavoidable ruine Which you never read of to bee executed after they came out of the wildernes and yet were their prophanations in regard of their works farre greater As for the mans carrying of his bed I answer to it two things First that it was no breach of the Sabbath but a manifestation of the miracle by a lawfull action