Selected quad for the lemma: reason_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
reason_n believe_v faith_n revelation_n 2,830 5 9.5573 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33729 A reply to the Answer of the man of no name to His Grace the Duke of Buckingham's paper of religion, and liberty of conscience by G. C. ... Care, George. 1685 (1685) Wing C504; ESTC R6951 14,712 36

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

precarious is all this First Assert and then If he mistakes not the Duke meant so But if the Duke meant not so then he is mistaken and the Duke could not mean as he states his understanding of it For though he takes leave to mistake the Duke the Duke does not mistake himself There is not one Word of Humane Reason in the Question nor is Humane Reason that Instinct of the Deity We have a Natural Capacity to apprehend Divine things but 't is that Instinct which gives us the Religious use of it All Men that have Eyes have the Capacity of seeing but without light they cannot see Pray who was he that said There is a Spirit in Man but the Inspiration of the Almighty gives Vnderstanding and that Whatsoever may be known of God is manifested in Man Rom. 1. By what else is it that the Prophet declares That God tells unto Man his thoughts And St. Paul expresly says That those that had not the Law became a Law unto themselves By what if not by this Instinct this Synteresis their Conscience accusing or exeusing them before God And St. John goes farther who says If our Hearts condemn us God is greater but if our Hearts condemn us not then have we boldness before God And does this make as much for the Alcoran as for the Scripture and Pythagoras's Writings as St. Pauls's Epistles The Duke spoke to a peculiar Rank of Men Wits without much Religion to give Religion the beginnings of Credit with them He did not say That was enough That Scripture or other external helps were useless or not requisite And yet when all is done we must chuse for our selves and not by the Political Reason of Community or else we shall believe upon Authority and not upon Conviction which was not the Christian way St. Paul bids us Pray with understanding and if so surly our understanding ought to be satisfied to whom and how to pray And this Gentleman makes it an Error not to pray knowingly and if so certainly we should have some Reason for our Hope too And therefore I cannot perswade my self to believe that Noble Peer writ like a Minor when he proceds to this Deduction That it is one of the greatest Crimes a Man can be guilty of to Force us to act against that Instinct of Religion and something a kin to the Sin against the Holy Ghost This Notion the Gentleman throws with scorn at the Quakers an Honest and well-meaning People and if this be a Kin to their Doctrine they are sounder than he that despises them And to say true He does them greater Honour than it may be he is aware of But why not believe upon Conviction For Whatever is not of Faith St. Paul tells us is Sin And Force upon any Man's Conscience must overthrow the Reason of this Fear Faith and Hope For how dark and feeble any Man's Conscience is Force brings no Light no Knowledge It may distract doubt and so damn But I cannot enough admire at the Conclusions this Gentleman draws from this most Inoffensive and Orthodox Expression The First is this That Reason is the Guide of every Man's Religion This is spurious For though he that embraces a Religion without Reason has no more Religion than my Horse yet a Man 's own Reason so rectified is not the Guide of Man in his Religion for his Reason is that which is to be Guided His Second is yet more Extravagant viz. That Divine Revelation is not necessary to Salvation In which he has bid boldly for there is not a word in the Duke's Discourse about it He asserts the Divine Instinct That it inclines and disposes Men to be Religious That they are to be commended that beat a sincere Respect to it But not a word that Men should not crave further Help or read the Holy Scriptures that contain our Revealed Religion On the contrary he tells us He therefore wav'd the Vse of them in this Discourse because of the Persons to whose Condition he calculated it Were it not a sine Conclusion in this Doctor to say A Man that goes to Rochester shall never come to Canterbury though it be in the Way and the better part of it Just so Reasonable his Consequence is against the Duke But he advances in his Humour of perverting his Words for the Third Consequence he draws in his Name is this That it is a most horrid Sin to lead Men out of Errors pag. 13. when there is not one word of Leading in the Question For the Duke says To Force and he infers To Lead His Words are That it is one of the greatest Crimes a Man can be guilty of To Force us to act or sin against that Instinct of Religion and something a-kin to the Sin against the Holy Ghost The Duke says To force Men to sin he says To lead Men out of Errors As if Leading and Forcing were the same when one is the way of Perswasion and the other of Fines and Prisons I cannot tell what this Gentleman would not say he may as honestly apprehend a Beggar on the Road for an High-way-Man His Fourth and last Consequence he bestows upon this Noble Peer is this pag. 13. That Men who believe a God and follow the Dictates of Reason in his Worship may be saved in any in all Religions provided they know not a better And what if he had said so It had shewn his Charity Does not God wink in times of Ignorance And what is Knowing no better but a State of Ignorance Is there no Allowance for Times Places and Conditions Certainly this Man thinks Aristotle and St. Paul are as much below him as he is above the Duke of Buckingham This is riding Tantivy through thick and thin But to Answer his short yet full This Charge upon his Grace charges himself First That Faith in God and the Dictates of Reason can swallow all sorts of Religion for he excepts not the most Idolatrous yet sets up Reason elsewhere to judge of true Religion pag. 14 36. And Men must leave Reason when they fall under Superstition and Idolatry Secondly That this Hero is for chusing his Religion without Reason And that 's not worth a Fig with his leave Thirdly That the Duke does not prefer Christianity by the Course of his Deductions which he plainly does pag. 18. But after he hath shewn the Duke's Weakness or Mistake in his Opinion to make him abler than he found him and the Book worthier the Reader 's notice with a Modesty almost equal to his Reason he tells us NOW IF I WERE TO DISCOVRSE AN ATHEIST pag. 9. and IF I HAD BEEN TO FOLLOW HIS GRACE's BLOW I would have urged This and I would have done That c. By which I perceive this Gentleman is better natur'd than Sir Jo. Falstaff that being call'd upon for a Reason for what he said answer'd That if Reasons were as rife as Black-Berries he would not give him one I have seen