certainely belieue such and such Articles of Faith His answere will bee Because the Church which can discerne what is what is not of God hath infallibly decreed such and such things to be belieued Against which impious doctrine we except and say That by this meanes our Faith is resolued either into nothing at all or at the furthest but only into humane Authority 1 That is resolued into iust nothing but runs round in a Circle like a mill-horse For aske a Roman Catholike why doe you belieue the Pope cannot erre His answere is because the Scripture saith so Tues Petrus c. and Orauipro te ne deficiat sides tua and Sum vâ—b scum ad consummationem saculs with such other places But how know you that those places are Scripture and that that is the right meaning of those places He answeres because the Councell of Trent and the Pope say so Yea but how know you infallibly they doe not erre in saying so Hee answeres Because the Scripture affirmes they cannot erre for Thou art Peter vpon this rocke c This is the Fayries dance wherein men smitten with the spirit of giddinesse are led round in a ring being neuer able to free them or finde any resting place whereon to fixe the assurance of their Faith 2 That at best their faith is resolued finally into Mans Authority Which appeares thus aske a Papist Why doe you belieue Purgatory He will say Because God in his word hath reuealed it as an Article of Faith Zach. 9. 11. I haue loosed thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water i. out of Purgatory and Luke 16. Lazarus was carried into Abrahams bosome i. into Purgatory with such like Well but why doe you infallibly belieue that this is Gods word and that this is the meaning of it Hee sayes Because the Church i. Counceis and Popes say so Hee can goe no further vnlesse hee will runne round Here then hee must stay resting his Faith on mans Testimony and Authority Which hee doth manifestly forasmuch as it appeares not by any argument from the Scriptures themselues that such a doctrine as Purgatory is contained in them and therefore he assents to the truth of it finally and onely because the Church for sooth hath conceiued the meaning of those places to be such Now this is not to belieue the Scriptures but to belieue the Opinion of the Church that is to say of men like our selues Heere Becanus helpes at a dead lift by a schoole distinction thus Fidesresoluitur Formaliter in Deumprimam veritatem reuelantem Directiuè in EcclesiaÌ„ propter infallililitateÌ„ proponeÌ„dt The shift of a Sophister What Faith is it that is thus resolued Theologicall or Humane Neither saith hee Theologicall Faith is resolued into Gods authority Humane is resolued into mans authority as to belieue an Article because Caluiâ— or Lutber teach it or say wee because Pope Paul the fift Gregory the 13. or any other Pope Cardinall Bishop or Bishops teach it What saith is it then which is resolued into the Churches authority It is saith the Iesuite neither saith neque purè diuina neque purè humana sed quasi media inferior is cuinsdam ordinis Iust so I take it men vse to speak when they cannot tell what to say It is Quasi and Aliquomodò and Alicuius generis c. It is something if they could tell what But be it what it may be if it be not a diuine Faith What shall become of the vulgar sort in their Church must they bee saued by such a middle kinde of Faith betweene Diuine and Humane This is a new way to heauen of the Iesuiâ—es inuention wherein it will bee a matter beyond his skill so to conduct a poore vnlearned Catholike that he step not aside leaning too much vpoÌ„mans authoriti whereon he should not trust at all and too little on Gods on whom he should altogether relie Plaine folke haue no skill in such nice distinctions of belieuing God Formaliter and the Church Directiuè and it will trouble the authors of them to giue a reasonable meaning of them For what is it to belieue the Church Directiuè is it to be drawne by the Churches direction in the ministeriall Preaching and application of the Scriptures vnto beleefe of the Articles of Faith Wee grant such a resolution of our faith into the Churches authority as a motiue to induce and persivade vs to belieue But Becames denies that the Church is to be reckoned inter motiua fidei and therefore he must needs account it inter formales rationes fidei as a case of reason and proper foundation of our faith whereinto it is resolued formaliter And so it is for there is neuer a Papist that wil belieue any thing that God saith but onely for this reason because the Church allowes of it It is not the light and Euidence of Gods word by it owne selfe Euincing its owne Diuinity and Interpreting its owne meaning t is not this they rest vpon if they did what need they goe further but it is meerely formally and directly the Testimony and Opinion of men whether Fathers Councels Popes or whomsoeuer they please to style the Church This impiery is horrible and so maine an errour in the foundation of Faith that it makes the whole frame to â—otter fastening the consolation and Hope of man vpon the vncertainty of another mans testimony therby throwing him into inextricable difficulties and doubts besides offering intollerable indignity vnto God in giuing such authority vnto his seruant and vassall as tends to the contumely of the Lord and Master For so it is when a few men met together in a Councell-house or one poore sinfull illeterate Pope shal be deemed of power sufficient and iudgement infallible to set themselues downe vpon the bench and to call that word which shall iudge them at the last day vnto the bar and there to interpret ratifie or nullifie what and how themselues best pleaseth Wee might wellbe ashamed of our religion when wee dispute with Athiests and infidels if wee had no better reason to confirme our Religion but our owne testimonie because we say it is the truth and the Romish Church might blush when she pleads for her infallibilitie from those places formerly mentioned yet in sine hath no other warrant from them but onely this it is so and it shall be so because shee her selfe hath decreed that onely to bee the true meaning of those Scriptures But to leaue these absurdities blasphemies and come to the truth that which we maintaine touching the Certaintie of the Scriptures Diuine authoritie is this viz. That we are infallibly ascertained of the Scriptures Diuinitie by the Scriptures themselues I or as in other Sciences there are alwayes some principles Per se not a indemonstrabiliâ— whence other things are proued so in Diuinitie all conclusions in point of Beliefe and Practise are proued by the Scriptures but for the Scriptures they
be found the safest to travel in Mens writings are infinite their opinions changeable their resolutions doubtfull and if wee begin there wee are out of the way at the first entrance and t is hazzard but wee loose truth and our selves among so many turnings and windings of errors heresies opinions conjectures quarrelsome contradictions disputes and brawling controversies as we shall meete withall Who would be so troubled in his way to heaven thus wearied and vexed with endlesse and needlesse discourses which like the envious Amalekites set upon us in our sore travell towards Canaan assaulting the simplicity of our faith disquieting the peace of conscience by strange decisions of doubtfull cases darkning the cleer light of sacred Scripture which shines dimme through such painted glasse and in briefe mingling the sincerâ— milke of the Word with the noisome ingredients of carnall reason and corrupt affections Surely we doe not beleeve when we read that in the 12. of Eccl. v. 12. There is no end of making of bookes and much reading is a wearinesse to the flesh if we did we would hence learne to see a fault which an eager desire of learning not wel guided drawes upon us all that would be schollars A strange curiosity to prie into all books of the same kinde thinking wee never know the truth till wee know what all men have said of it And are we certaine then wee have it It were somewhat if t were in learning as t is in bearing of a burden where many weake men may beare that which one or few cannot But in the search of knowledge it fares as in descrying a thing a farre off where one quicke sight will see further than a thousand cleere eyes It is most usuall in comparing of humane authors for the Scriptures its certaine that they alone without other helpes are sufficient for our direction in all necessary truth and were our hearts inflamed with love of their excellent holinesse and our heads a little more acquainted with study and meditation therein wee should finde by experience that more light shineth in this sunne than in all the starres of the Church which doe but borrow their light from hence For mine owne part I have alwaies wondred at the discord between the doctrine and practice of many Divines who stiffely and truly maintaining against the Papists the all-sufficiency of Scriptures for heavenly instruction doe yet in their private studies condemne them of insufficiency bestowing to say the least three parts of their times and paines in the wearisome reading of those huge volumes of Fathers Schoole-men and other Writers for one part which they spend in the meditation of the Scriptures Wee love to seeke gold among drosse when wee may have it ready tried and purified to our hands yea pure as mettall tryed in a furnace and fined seven times as the Prophet speakes Psal. 12. 6. Blame not my resolution to follow Salomons admonition By these things my sonne bee admonished and to goe to the living not to the dead to the Law and Testimony the lively oracles of God ever speaking loud enough if wee have eares to heare what the Spirit saith and plaine enough if as our Apostle speakes wee had our wits exercised to discerne both good and evill You shall doe mee wrong to conceive any such meaning by my words as if I would dash out all writings of men with one stroke or condemne all Libraries to the fire an arrogant impiety it were so to thinke or speake of mens paines in writing and Gods providence in preserving their bookes No. I touch none but those who consult onely with flesh and bloud men like themselves out of whose discourses they frame to themselves an humane divinity making such to be pillars that should bee but helpers of their faith which how likely t is to faile in time of triall I wish them to forecast betime before they feele it too late Among you my Brethren I suppose there is none who had not rather have his soule saved than his fancy pleased and therefore will bee willing to beleeve where God affirmes to obey where he commands without mans authority to convince your reason or perswade your affections And if so I am eased of the most troublesome least profitable toile the curious search and allegations of Authors which if you do expect you overburden me if I should promise I should belie mine owne knowledge and as I suppose your opinion of my meannesse Furthermore for deeper speculations new-minted Divinity or elder Heresies buried in hell with their authors or strange opinions husht up in silence it will bee a wrong to imbroile the mindes of such an auditory and to shake them with the unseasonable blasts of doubtfull disputes before they have taken deeper roote in the faith You must pardon mee I speake to those whom this exercise most concernes that are the yonguer in age and knowledge And therefore I must beseech you beloved and much respected in the Lord who are the elder and stronger in the Lords stocke to give mee leave to drive on in Iacobs pace so as I weary not nor leave behinde the more tender Lambes I dare say wee may all at last come to Canaan and yet breake no company He that gives to them that want takes not away from them that have and you know that men may bee nourished with milk though infants cannot live with stronger meate Finis Prologi THE NATVRE AND properties of GRACE and FAITH THe summe of all Christian dueties is briefly comprised under these two heads Agenda and Credenda Doing and Beleeving Which the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. 13. makes the two maine parts of all wholesome doctrine Hold fast the form of sound words which thou hast heard of mee in Faith and Love which is in Christ Iesus The Epitome of Love is the morall Law briefly contained in ten more briefly in two precepts Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe The sum of Faith more at large delivered in the Apostolicall writings is shortly drawne into that excellent compendium which wee now use and call the Apostles Creede containing the substance of Evangelicall doctrine Both these Faith and Love have one common adversary Satan by whom they have beene continually assaulted and whether more dangerously it is not easie to determine they seeme both to bee imbarked together in the same bottome and if Conscience suffer shipwrack Faith sinkes too and if Faith the most precious lading be throwne overboard I doubt how Charity will be able to make a saving voiage As Paul said of the Marriners attempting an escape in their dangerous passage so I of those Except they abide in the ship ve cannot be saved and you may observe it equally difficult to find an Hereticke vertuous or an Atheisticall vicious liver a true beleever Wherefore the divell cares not much where he begins his battery yet if I be not deceived
that is not Before but a part of our sanctification nor yet a solitaty Habite infused alone by it selfe but together with the Actus primi or Habits of all supernaturall graces whatsoever T is true in some sense that before faith there is no life nor sanctity in the soule because faith is a part of our life of grace and of sanctity But there are other parts too Hope Charity c. and of these it may be said as well as of faith there 's no grace in the soule till hope charity be wrought in it All are parts of our spirituall life wrought together For as the corporall so the spirituall life is not one distinct but omnes actus primi of every faculty whereby it can worke regularly And though in the body some part may live alone and others bee dead yet in our spirituall life t is farre otherwise all powers are quickned and live together where the habit of one grace is there are all and as soone all as one every Faculty being rectified as well as any and all the operations of each faculty tending to all its objects renued as well as any one operation directed to some one object Wherefore I see not under correction of quicke eyes how Faith can bee accounted the roote whence spring all other fruits of righteousnesse the efficient cause of our sanctification the onely pipe through which the waters of life flow into the soule that first-borne grace in our spirituall regeneration so much that before its actuall operation there is no jot of spirituall life and sanctity in our hearts Many divine Elogies are given to faith in the Scriptures but none such as to cause us to make it the fountaine of all graces That the heart is regenerate before the act of beleeving and other graces wrought therein together with the habit of faith may appear by these reasons 1. It is the true and generall doctrine of all Divines that actuall faith is never wrought in the soule till besides the supernaturall illumination of the understanding the will bee also changed and freed in part from its naturall perversnesse For till this bee done t is utterly impossible it should ever embrace the promise Now the doing away of this ignorance and rebellion what is it but an effect of the grace of sanctification implanted in the soule by which it is sweetly and freely inclined to all heavenly things 2. To beleeve is an action of a man living by grace not dead in sinne The soule therefore is first endued with the life of grace before it can performe this living action 3. There can be no reason given why in our regeneration it should bee necessary first to have faith before we can have any other grace of sanctification no more than that it should be needfull to have some other grace before we can have faith or why we are more fit being unconverted to receive the grace of faith rather than any other grace as of repentance c. A man unregenerate having no preparations at all to any grace is alike disposed to receive every one and so there is no difference on mans part If any say that the Spirit which must worke other graces is not received till wee doe actually beleeve in so saying he confutes himselfe it being most apparant that the Spirit is given to men incredulous to the end to make them beleevers and no man should ever bee converted were not the holy Ghost given to him whilst he is unconverted to worke his conversion Now God that for Christs sake gives faith unto us when we had none without any predisposition in us to receive it can and doth for the same Christs sake give us all other graces as well at the same time 4. It cannot well bee shewne how faith produceth all other vertues in us seeing that all habites of grace are infused not acquired and one habite cannot produce another nor doth one habite bring forth the operations of another T is true that faith lends a hand to helpe forward all gracious actions and does much in their guidance and direction but t is like as the understanding guides the actions of the will and inferiour faculties or as prudence moderates the actions of all other morall vertues which actions notwithstanding come from their proper faculties and habites as their immediate principia and fountaines But of this point more at large when we come to shew the dependance that obedience hath upon faith Against this may be objected That we live by faith Gal. 2. 20. that by faith Christ dwells in our hearts Eph. 3. 17. that through faith we are risen with Christ Col. 2. 12. that by faith we receive the holy Ghost Ioh. 7. 38 39. Eph. 1. 13. So that we have no life till we be in Christ no being in him til we have faith to beleeve on him no sap from the vine no vertue from the body till we be united as branches as members which union is by faith onely no Spirit of grace to give us life till wee have faith to receive it In briefe thus Christ by his Spirit is the author of all our spirituall life sanctification But till we beleeve wee have no participation nor fellowship with Christ and his Spirit Therefore till wee beleeve wee have in us no life at all consequently by faith we are made partakers of all life and grace To which I answer We must carefully distinguish betweene a twofold Vnion and Communion we have with Christ. 1. By the Spirit on his part for Christ as by his Death he is the meritorious cause of life and grace unto the elect so by his Spirit he is the onely efficient of life and grace in the regenerate To whom whilst they are yet dead in sin and destitute of all grace so as they neyther doe nor possibly can beleeve Christ sends his Spirit which breathes life into them changes and purifies their nature by working all holy and rectified abilities in every part Now this first worke of the Spirit creating of grace in the soule doth most apparantly precede not onely the act of beleeving but the habite also for the habite it selfe is infused by this worke And therefore it is also manifest that before all faith we have and must have some participation with Christ even to this end that wee may have faith But this union with him is wrought meerely by the holy Spirit which is that band whereby Christ knits himselfe to us communicating all gracious and quickning vertue from himselfe to us and thereby making us living members of his body 2. By our faith on our parts when being quickned by infused grace wee actually apply our selves to embrace the promise and to relye upon Christ onely And here wee knit our selves to Christ resting upon him alone for all comfort By which uniting of our selves to Christ wee receive a greater increase and larger measure of grace from
him In the first union we were insensible of it and grace is given to us non petentibus that asked not after it in this second union wee are most sensible of its comfort and benefit and here an augmentation of grace is bestowed on us petentes earnestly suing for it and by faith expecting the receiving of it Wherefore I conclude All grace and vertue whatsoever in us is given us from the fulnesse of Christ the fountaine of all supernaturall life but yet all is not wrought by Christ embraced by our faith but by Christ convaying his grace unto us by his Spirit This first quickens us wee then with Lazarus after life put into us can awake stand up come forth and by faith looke on him that raised us fall downe worship and beleeve in him as our Lord and God The places alledged eyther touch not our sanctification at all or speake onely of the increase of grace not of its first infusion faith being a meanes of that but no efficient or instrument of this Having thus shewed the nature of our conversion or sanctification it remaineth that for the further cleering of many doubts and our more easie passage unto other points wee speake somewhat touching three materiall circumstances necessary to bee considered in this point of our conversion and vocation and they are these 1. The cause whereby 2. The manner how 3. The subject wherein conversion is wrought Of the cause first which is double 1. The impulsive or moving cause 2. The efficient or working cause That which moves God to bestow the grace of sanctification upon man is nothing in man but all in God himselfe namely his free-love to his elect in Christ Which love of God is from eternity before the foundations of the world were laid and though it be revealed unto the elect in time or at their conversion yet doth it not then begin when it begins to bee manifested When wee yet lay in the shadow of death strangers from the life of God through ignorance that was in us when wee were cast out polluted in our bloud not yet washed and seasoned with salt even then God looked on us with tender compassions hee pitted us hee loved us as chosen vessels prepared for glory as heires of grace and life and because he thus loved us he said to us Live hee covered our nakednesse and cloathed us with righteousnesse Now that God doth thus actually love the elect before they are regenerate or can actually beleeve may further appeare by these reasons 1. Where God is actually reconciled there he actually loveth for love and reconciliation are inseparable But with the elect before they convert and beleeve God is actually reconciled Ergo He loves them before their faith and conversion The minor is evident because before they are borne much more before they are regenerate a full Attonement and satisfaction for all offences is made by Christ and accepted on Gods part Whereupon actuall reconciliation must needs follow And this the Scriptures make manifest Christ being the Lambe slaine from the beginning of the world and God testifying of him at his Baptisme long before his death in that speech of admirable consolation This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am pleased well pleased with him for the unspotted holinesse of his owne person well pleased with us in him for his unvaluable merits And hence a second reason à pari 2. If God did actually love the elect before Christs time when an actuall reconciliation was not yet made then much more may hee actually love the elect after the attonement is really made by Christs death even before they doe beleeve it But the former is true as appeares by the salvation of the Patriarkes and therefore the latter may not well be denied The reason of the consequence is this Because it is farre more probable that God should love us upon satisfaction made before our faith than love them upon their faith before satisfaction was given Specially seeing neyther their faith nor ours is any efficient cause why God loves either them or us 3. Election effectuall Vocation and Faith all are fruites and consequents of Gods actuall love unto the Elect which graces and favours he therefore bestowes upon them because hee loves them And therefore t is vaine to say Deus elegit homines diligendos non dilectos or that faith and sanctity are bestowed on us onely to make us capable of Gods love Is not the bestowing of them a fruit of his great mercy and love unto us Yea the whole series and chaine of all Gods gracious workes for mans salvation have Gods love for their first linke as is apparant Ioh. 1. 13. 4. These affections of love and hatred in God are perpetuall being eternall and unchangeable acts of his will Whom he loves he loves alwaies whom he hates he hates for ever Nor doth hee as man at any time begin to love that person whom before he hated or hate that person whom before he loved These things agree not with Gods immutability or omnisciency For it cannot be that like a man he should bee deceived in the placing of his affection or that hee should change his minde where the things themselves change not forasmuch as he that is once hated of God will bee for ever hatefull for who should make him otherwise and he that is once beloved shall be for ever lovely for God that loves him will make him so Wherefore Gods love to the regenerate is not a thing of yesterday as themselves are but one of those ancient favours which have been laid up for us in the treasury of his old and everlasting counsells 5. God loves and saves those of his elect who dye infants and cannot have actuall faith Of which more anon Wherefore I conclude that before conversion much more before actuall faith God actually loves the elect and out of that his great love bestowes upon them the grace of conversion But here I would have you observe a twofold distinction 1. Betweene Gods love in itselfe The manifestation of it to us That is perpetuall and One from all to all eternity without change increase or lessening towards every one of the Elect But the manifestation of this love to our hearts and consciences begins in time at our conversion and is variable according to the severall degrees of grace given and our more or lesse carefull exercise of Piety whereby the light of Gods countenance at one time shines bright upon our soules at another time is in the eclipse Which divers degrees of revelation argue no difference in Gods affection nay in earthly Parents it doth not alway for a strong affection may be concealed but we may truly say That Gods love to us when he decreed to save us is one the same without addition with that which he manifesteth unto us when hee glorifieth us That holy flame of divine love towards us doth burne as hote now as then
is exceeding weake The tree must be good before it bring forth good fruits True but what makes vs good trees our Iustification or our Sanctification Surely our Sanctification For though by Iustification wee are accounted good and Holy before God yet wee are not so in our Selues but most euill and Corrupt till we bee indewed with the grace of sanctification And then only wee become Good trees fit to beare the fruite of good workes so that the reason is in effect as if he had said we must first be Sanctified before our workes be Holy and that 's true for euen to Beleeve is a good and Holy worke and therefore though it goe before Iustification yet of necessitie presupposeth Sanctification 2. That faith is suâ—b an instrument of making vs partakers of the Benefites of Christs Mediation as is neither absolutely necessary in al. the Elect nor yet simply anteceding all manner of participation in those benefites That it is not absolutely necessarie in all appeares in the Elect dying infants who enjoy all the benefits of Christs merits in their Iustification Sanctification and Glorification without this instrumentall meanes of their actuall Faith as wee shall see more at large anon That Faith doth not simply precede all manner of Participation with Christ appeares by a double benefit wee enioy by and from Christ before such time as wee doe beleeve 1. Our Sanctification wrought by the Spirit which from Christ convaies Life and Grace into our Soules when wee were utterly devoid of all both Faith and other graces as hath beene shewed before at large And this is the first benefit of Christs death bestowed on us before we so much as aske it 2. Our Iustification in Gods sight which euen long before we were borne is purchased for vs by Christ. For t is vaine to thinke with the Arminians that Christs merits have made God only Placabilem not Placatum procured a freedome that God may be reconciled if hee will and other things concurre but not an actuall reconciliation A silly shift devised to uphold the libertie of mans will and universality of Grace No t is otherwise the Ransome demanded is paid and accepted full Satisfaction to the Diuine justice is giuen and taken all the sinnes of the Elect are actually pardoned Gods wrath for them is suffered and ouercome he rests contented and appeased the debt book is crossed and the hand-writing cancelled This grand transaction betweene God and the Mediator Christ Iesus was concluded upon and dispatcht in heaven long before we had any being either in Nature or Grace Yet the benefit of it was ours and belonged to us at that time though we never knew so much till after that by faith wee did apprehend it As in the like case Lands may bee purchased the Writings confirmed the estate convayed and settled vpon an Infant though it know nothing of all till it come to age and finde by experience the present commoditie of that which was prouided for him long agoe And the reason of all this is because it is not our Faith that workes Gods reconciliation with us but Christ beleeved on by our faith Now his Merits are not therefore accepted of God because we doe beleeve but because they of themselves are of such Worth and sufficiency as doe deserve his most favourable acceptance of them for vs. And what reason have we then to thinke why they have not alwaies procured aswell as deserved Gods love and actuall reconciliation for the Elect not only before their faith as in all but also without their faith as in Infants I proceed to the second cause of our Conversion viz. the Efficient cause which really produceth it and that is the Holy Ghost in whose person not excluding the Father and the Sonne this worke of Sanctification is peculiarly terminated This blessed Spirit are those two golden pipes through which the two Oliue branches emptie out of themselues the golden oyles of all precious graces into the Candlesticke the Church as it is Zach. 4. For which cause all the Graces of God are called the Fruites of the Spirit Gal. 5. 22. and Eph. 5 9 For the Fruit of the Spirit is in all goodnesse and righteousnesse and truth yea the whole worke of sanctification and renued Grace is styled by the name of the Spirit Gal. 5. 17. The flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh id est Grace fights against corruption and this opposeth against Grace In respect of this opperation which the Holy Ghost hath in Sanctifying the Elect he is in Scripture set forth vnder a double Similitude of Water and Fire which are Elements most apt to cleanse The similitude is from the custome of the Leuiticall Purifications which were done by the use of both Elements For all vessells and utensills polluted by any legall uncleanenesse were to bee purged by Water if they were of wood but by Fire if made of metall or other materialls that might endure it as you may reade Num. 31. 23. So what euer filthinesse cleaves unto us or how deeply soever incorporated into our natures the Holy Ghost by his most blessed vertue as by water washeth away as by fire consumeth Then I will poure cleane water upon you and yee shall bee cleane from all your filthinesse and from your Idols will I cleanse you saith God unto the Church Ezech. 36. 25. And what is this water in Verse 27. he interprets himselfe in these words And I will put my Spirit within you Hence wee are said to bee baptized with the Holy Ghost Ioh. 1. 33. to bee baptized by one Spirit into one body 1 Cor. 12. 13. to bee borne of water and of the Spirit Ioh. 3. 5. Which baptizing of washing by the Holy Ghost is in plainer tearmes our Sanctification wrought by his power cleansing us from inherent corruption and creating in us Purite and Holinesse as is cleare out of that of the Apostle 1 Cor. 6 11. And such were some of you but yee are washed what 's that the next words tell us But yee are sanctified but yee are justified in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the Spirit of our God Hence the bestowing of the abundant gifts of the Holy Ghost is metaphorically described by Effusion or pouring out as Esa. 44. 3. I will poure water upon the thirsty and flouds upon the dry ground I will poure my Spirit upon thy seed and my blessing upon thy buds Ioel 2. 18 I will poure out my Spirit vpon aâ—l flâ—sh fulfilled Act. 2. For that other appellation of Fire we haue it expresly Mat. 3. 11. Hee will baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire and implied Marc. 9 49. Euery man shall bee salted with fire and euery sacrifice shall be salted with salt Grace therefore is of a diuine off-spring the immediate effect of the all-powerfull vertue of Gods Spirit whereby he replants inherent Holinesse in our Soules having purified them from
and effect to the Word preached which wee maintaine and plead for This point will fall in more fitly to be discussed afterwards in the handling of a few Questions touching the manner of the Working of grace in mans conversion Whereinto though I am somewhat unwilling to enter because that Positive rather than Polemicall Divinity befits this place yet considering the danger whereinto mindes not rightly informed in these points may unhappily fall and that herein it is easie to slip from the truth to Arminianisme and thence to Popery there 's but a threed betweene them I have thought it would not bee unprofitable briefly and plainly to touch upon such materiall controversies as are moved in this matter that even the younger sort might have something to oppose against cauilling gainsayers of the truth and crafty seducers of the uninstructed You are therefore to understand that in point touching Mans conversion there is scarce any circumstance that wee have formerly spoken of but it is quarrelled at and corrupted with false opinions Not the nature and substance of our conversion which say they is not by the infusion of Habituall sanctity into the Soule but through Grace acquired by much paines and industrious actions of our own excited assisted by some helpe of the Spirit Not the moving Cause which is affirmed by them to bee not Gods speciall and actuall Love to his Elect but his common and equall love to all mankinde alike Not the Efficient cause which wee affirme to be the worke of Gods Spirit they say is the Freedome of our wills Not the manner of it without and above the strength of our naturall abilities as wee hold but so farre is the compasse of our owne power that we may helpe or hinder it at our pleasure Not the instrument of it the Word by the worke of the Spirit but as they would have it the Word working by it selfe without any inward vertue of the Spirit besides Lastly not the Subject the Elect only as we maintaine but all in Common upon whom sufficient grace to Conversion is bestowed if we will beleeve them All these Erroneous opinions are founded upon other rotten and unsound principles which are chiefly these 1. That God hath not precisely determined of any mans salvation or damnation in particular but hath left it to be decided by the libertie of their owne wills 2. That God doth not beare any speciall favour to one more than another but that his love is equall to all in generall and his desire of the salvation of all mankinde alike 3. That Christ hath dyed for all men alike procuring so much by his death that God is Placabilis toward all and all men indifferently are Salvabiles if they list to make use of the benefit purchased for them 4. That God requires Faith in Christ of all men whatsoever even of such Infidells as to whom Christ was never preached 5. That God cannot in justice demand of Man the performance of those things which since his fall hee hath no strength to performe and that if God require any such service he is bound in equitie to give unto man new strength for to performe it I doe but only name these articles of the Arminian Faith though even that 's enough to shew their weaknesse and untruth to any that can judge of sound doctrine but I say I mention them only that you may the better perceive what is that maine issue whereinto they are finally resolved and that in plaine termes is this That all men whether Christians or Infidells within or without the Church may bee converted and saved if they will You will say this is broadly spoken but I doe them no wrong reade their bookes compare their tenents and you shall see that this is the upshot of all their discourses God hath excluded none hee loves all alike Christ hath dyed for all Faith is required of all sufficient ability to beleeve and repent is given to all who then or what should hinder the Conversion or Salvation of any one but himselfe his owne meere free-will Surely an opinion that should not bee gainsaid by any but readily embraced by all if it had as much truth in it as it carries shew of Pity and Commiseration to mankinde Wee would be loth to be judged cruell but t is folly not pitie to take upon us to bee more mercifull than God hath declared himselfe to be and t is impiety to tell a lie for God by magnifying the glorious largenesse of his mercy beyond the bounds which himselfe hath prescribed unto it Wherefore against this wide and vast Conclusion of Arminianisme that God hath given sufficient grace to all the world to convert and beleeve if they will I oppose this directly contradictory God hath not given sufficient grace to all and in those to whom hee hath given such grace it depends not on their Free-will whether they will be converted or no. These two propositions destroy one another and one is confuted by that which confirmes the other I will proceed in the handling of them in this order Men that are capable of Vocation are of two sorts 1. Out of the Visible Church and of these the Question will bee Whether God have given to all Pagans and Heathens grace sufficient for their conuersion 2. Within the precincts of the Visible Church and of these the question will be double 1. Whether God doe give unto all Christians grace sufficient to worke their conversion 2. Whether those upon whom such sufficient grace is bestowed may if they list hinder their conversion by the power of their free-will Within the compasse of these three Questions will bee included all that is materiall touching this businesse I will use as much brevity in each as the matter will give leave of the first at this time viz. Whether the Gentiles out of the Church have grace given unto them sufficient for their conversion Wee maintaine the Negative part the Arminians affirme that all Pagans and Infidells have so much grace given unto them that by it they may be converted beleeve and worship God rightly in some sort even without the knowledge of the Gospell A monstrous assertion every way repugnant to Reason and Scriptures For 1. Let it be demanded what this sufficient Grace is that is given to the Gentiles Is it that knowledge of God and goodnesse whereto the Gentiles might come by the light of nature or it is some other supernaturall Revelation If the former there is a double error in it 1. That they call that Grace which is but Nature for if Vniversall Grace given to Heathens be but that knowledge of God and his worship which is attainable by the right use of the light of Nature through the contemplation of the creatures and remainders of the Morall Law in mans heart what is this grace but Nature what this opinion but Pelagianisme 2. In that they suppose this light of Nature well used is a sufficient
opposite which at most are but subordinate and differ only as the cause and effect For is it not the fancy of some crackt braine to affirme that there is a Grace every way sufficient and powerfull enough in it selfe to worke the conversion of a Sinner and yet when this grace is given to such a sinner with a purpose and intent to convert him by it it shall be found to be utterly unsufficient to Effect it T is strange whence or how men should conceit a sufficiency in the power of such grace when they finde insufficiency in the performance of the worke 2. By the word Grace we understand some Supernaturall gift freely given unto man from God himselfe 3. By the word Christians wee meane all those that live in externall communion with the militant Church enjoying the ministery of the Word and being of yeares to make use of it for this Question toucheth not Infants 4. Lastly by Conversion as heretofore hath beene shewed we are to understand two things either 1. The Roote and Cause of that act namely the Sanctification of all the Faculties by the Infusion of Habituall Holinesse 2. The Fruite or Act of Conversion properly so called when a man regenerate and renued in all parts doth actually imploy them in loving and obeying God The first is Gods worke upon us the next our worke performed toward him when by the strength of inward Grace given we after convert our selves in Thought and Worke towards God This latter is not here to bee understood in this Question but the former namely that Conversion of a man which God workes in him by infusion of the grace of Regeneration into all parts This infusion of Grace into the Soule by an immediate act of Gods Spirit the Arminians can by no meanes endure to heare of in this businesse of our Conversion and therefore they burden this assertion with odious but untrue imputations of Anabaptisticall Enthusiasmes and of a Lazy expectation of all Grace to be poured into us sleeping without any endeavour of our owne to get it Which slanders are only devised for the countenance of that impious opinion of their owne namely That mans Conversion to God begins in some act which man himselfe performes and not in a worke first wrought in us by God Now that act of man is his assent and actuall Faith given to the promise A lewd imagination sufficiently confuted and cryed downe in the venerable assembly of the last Synod as most derogatory to the whole worke of Grace in our Vocation most repugnant to reason and Scriptures which tell us That the tree must bee good before the fruit can bee so it being impossible that an action so Holy and good as is the yeelding of Assent and Beliefe to the promises of the Gospell should be done by a man unlesse he be first regenerate and sanctified in all his faculties The termes thus explaned the state of the Question is more fully thus Whether God doe bestow upon all such as Heare the Word preached any such Supernaturall gift as is sufficiently powerfull to worke in them true Sanctification though it doe not alwayes effectually produce it Our Adversaries affirme it but we truly maintaine the Negative part opposing against their assertion these two Conclusions 1. That there is no supernaturall gift given unto the unregenerate which is Sufficient to worke his Sanctification but that only which is Effectuall to worke it This hath appeared manifestly enough in the explication of the termes of this Question and will bee more and more evident to us if we consider that maine mistake of our Adversaries in this businesse of our Conversion which is that they imagine our Conversion to begin in some act of ours namely our Assenting and Beleeving not in some act of God sanctifying the Soule before it can Assent and Beleeve Now because this act is good and therefore must be done by Gods helpe for to salve this they have found a daintie new devise of Spirituall strength infused into the Soule by the Holy Ghost which strength when it is inherent in the soule a man may use it if hee will to the producing of the act of Faith If he doe use it then by that act he is converted if not yet that was sufficient to bring forth the Act if it had beene thereto applied As in a like Case when Christ said to the sicke man Arise take up thy bed and walke Hee gave him bodily strength sufficient to doe what he bad him but yet the man might have let his bed lie and stood still if hee list So when God commands us to beleeve he gives us strength sufficient so to doe it albeit we may if we will neglect to make use of it This foule error hath bred all that confusion and darknesse wherein this controversie is wrapped up and it containes two grosse absurdities in it 1. That they suppose a supernaturall abilitie of beleeving infused into the soule by the Holy Ghost which yet shall be no sanctifying grace of the Spirit an opinion altogether new and against reason For aske them is not the inward disability of our soules to beleeve and convert a part of our corruption It cannot bee denied Well is not then the infusion of an Ability to Beleeve and Convert the doing away of that corruption It is And then shall not that gift which abolishes our sinfull infirmities bee justly called a Sanctifying grace It is most evident and none but such as are possest with the Spirit of wilfull contradiction to all manifest truth will affirme That the Rectifying of our weake and corrupt faculties by a supernaturall ability put into them and disposing them to the most excellent worke of Faith can be any thing else than the grace of Regeneration An Act so Holy must come from an Habit as Holy 2. That they suppose the Act in Divine graces goes before the Habit an assertion in Divinitie not tolerable which tells us that the Tree must be good before the fruit can be good And that Question which Christ put to the Pharisees Mat. 12. 34. How can yee that are evill speake good things is more than any Arminian cau tell how to answer This pincheth them and puts them to this choyce either that an unregenerate man who certainely is utterly Evill may by the helpe of such a gift as hath not sanctified nor made him Good not only speake but doe that which is eminently Good namely Beleeve and Convert or that the Act of Faith performed by such a one is not good and sound and so no beginning of true Conversion or that they doe confesse the Habit of Faith as of other graces to be first implanted in our soules in the universall renovation of all the Faculties thereof whence the operation of faith doth afterwards issue And this is the truth which under those obscure and unexplicated termes of Supernaturall strength to Beleeve they grant in effect for the strength is either Nothing
they inlighten the understanding it stirres up the Sensuall affections for as touching the Will it meddles not with that and so gives unto the heart Sensum verbi and by an inward power infused doth move and dispose the heart to Beleeve and Convert Yea but how is all this done Is it by any proper worke of the Spirit distinct from the power of the Word By no meanes say they It is done by a morall perswasion per Representationem objectivam by a proposall of what is to bee done with commands exhortations intreaties promises thereto annexed And is this sufficient to our regeneration Yea there is not there needs not any other immediate inward invincibilis actio as they stile it of the Holy Ghost upon the Soule The Word only the Word begins continues and consummates our Conversion Nay if an inward worke of the Spirit be granted they affirme that the preaching of the Word can by no meanes possible bee accounted any meanes at all of our Conversion What then Inward Calling there is none No say they there is no other inward regenerating grace but onely the forenamed Morall Perswasion to goodnesse by the outward Ministery of the VVord This is the summe of their opinion and that Chaos of confused errors which t is hard to distinguish into any good order I will touch upon them in these three propositions manifestly opposing their fundamentall suppositions in those their Assertions The first shall be this 1. That not so much as common Illumination and stirring up of the affections is given to all in hearing of the Word preached Shall wee goe any further than experience to prove this in thousands that heare the Word yet understand no more of it and are no more affected with it than the seates they sit on The Arminians as they 'le deny any thing reject this argument from experience except that though they doe not understand yet they might understand if they would To which I answer that t is true Such men shall bee condemned of wilfull ignorance because the meanes God afforded were sufficient to have brought them to more knowledge if they had done but as much as they might but yet the exception is here altogether vaine because here we inquire of the Act whether all men bee inlightned not de Potentià whether they may bee or no. For the Arminians hold that the Vnderstanding is inlightned and the affections moved in all and that Irresistably men cannot choose but know and be affected with the Word preached And this they stiffely maintaine because that God hath infallibly given unto all Potentiam Vires Credendi and this strength is nothing but Illumination of the Vnderstanding and Exciting of the Affections and therefore all must infallibly be illuminated and excited Wherefore when they affirme that a man may choose whether he will understand and be affected or no though it be true in part yet they contradict their owne maine position and confirme ours That God though he have given the outward meanes yet hath not given so much grace unto all as to make use of them for the gaining of ordinary knowledge in the Word The second proposition shall be this 2. That bare Illumination in the understanding of the sense of the Word preached is not sufficient for Sanctification of the heart i. e. to move to renue to quicken those affections with true love of goodnesse and desire of grace which before were disordered by reason of the darkenesse of the understanding This they affirme we deny it as a new and uncouth opinion and that upon these grounds 1. Because it presupposeth that in the affections there is no other vitiousnesse but that onely which is bred in them by the errour of the understanding which being deceived misguides the affections but being once rightly informed the affections are presently brought in order to follow the directions thereof Than which nothing can be more absurd and contrary to all experience 2. If bare Illumination or Morall Perswasion be sufficient to Sanctifie it shall work that effect either by it own simple vertue or by the help of something else besides If by it self then why are not the Divels sanctified who know more of Divinity than haply the learnedst man And why are not all learned Divines sanctified also what should hinder Or if there must be some speciall grace beside how can they affirm that to be of it self sufficient which helps not without the help of another thing And yet this is that wherto they are driven namely to confesse there must be a Special grace to make the Generall effectuall so in one word they dash all their dispute about the sufficiency of Vniversall grace Or if they like not that will fall to that shift to say that Bare illumination is sufficient though not to Sanctifie yet to worke true Faith and Conversion which is nothing else but to affirme that there is Faith Conversion before and without Sanctification Which opinion is a kind of phrensie The third proposition shall be this 3. That besides the Common illightning of the Vnderstanding and Motion of the affections in ordinary preaching of the Word there is necessarily required another immediate worke of the Holy Ghost upon the soule for its Sanctification throughout without which the preaching of the Word will bee utterly unable to worke true grace in the hearers This I prove by Scriptures and Reason The Scriptures are many I will name but one or two of the plainest places 1. Iohn 6. 36. Where Christ speaketh to the Vnconverted Capernaites thus But I say unto you that yee have also seen me there 's their knowledge of the Gospell by Christs preaching and miracles but yet yee beleeve not What was the reason of that t was this God had not given the Capernaites to Christ and therefore he gave them not grace to come unto Christ for All that the Father giveth me commeth unto me and he that commeth unto mee I cast not away vers 37. Yea will an Arminian say They came not because they were not willing to come there wanted nothing on Gods part but they might have come Yes but there did if wee beleeve Christ God did not draw them therefore they came not For No man can come unto mee except the Father which hath sent me draw him and I will raise him up at the last day vers 44. But what is this Drawing it is the same which in the next verse he call Gods Teaching of us It is written in the Prophets They shall all be taught of God Every man therefore that hath heard and learned of the Father commeth unto mee Nothing can be more manifest than in this place the plaine distinction of an inward Drawing from an outward Morall Perswasion an inward Teaching of God from the outward Preaching of man Which is effectuall to true Conversion in all and onely those that are inwardly so drawne and taught of God which the Capernaites were
not 2. Deut. 29. 3. 4. The Israelites in the wildernesse had all instruction and perswasion that might be by the VVord and by Miracles from God and his servant Moses they had heard Moses and God speake and seene the great tentations miracles and wonders with their eies But was this sufficient to convert them No there wanted that within which God denied them for saith Moses Yet tho Lord hath not given you an heart to perceive and eyes to see and eares to heare unto this day vers 4. Parallell to which is that touching the Iewes among whom Christ had preached so much and so plainely done so many so singular miracles Yet they beleeved not in him Ioha 1â— 37. But what was the cause of that was not the meanes sufficient No God had denied to reveale unto them his arme or power in giving them the knowledge of the Gospell That he proves out of the Prophet Esay who of all the Prophets preacht the Gospell plainest and yet found small credit to his doctrine That the saying of Esaias the Prophet might be fulfilled that he saith Lord who hath beleeved our report and to whom is the arme of the Lord revealed vers 38. A very unreasonable complaint saith the Arminian if we construe it so for t is as if Esay had said Lord only the Elect to whom thine arme was revealed they have beleeved it but none of the Reprobates have beleeved it because thine arme was never revealed to them and so they could not beleeve And what reason had Esay then to complaine of them for not doing that which they could not doe I thinke the wisedome of God hath of purpose to checke these pestilent gainsaying Spirits added in the next words vers 39. Therefore they could not beleeve because thus Esaias saith againe He hath blinded their eyes and hardned their hearts that they should not see with their eies and understand with their hearts and should be Converted and I should heale them So Gods Spirit brings that for a good reason which these men count an absurdity They did not beleeve and the Prophet complaines of it yet it was because they could not beleeve And why could they not â—was the want of that Inward worke of grace wee stand for God had not inlightned their mindes nor softned and sanctisied their hearts and therefore they could not beleeve 3. 2. Tim. 2 24 25 26. And the servant of the Lord must not strive but bee gentle unto all men apt to teach patient In meekenesse instructing those that oppose themselves Here 's the Ministers dutie to preach uncessantly using all gentle and good meanes to bring men to repentance but will this diligence in perswasion and patient industry bee effectuall at last It may prove so but when it doth 't is not by it selfe but by Gods speciall grace If â—od peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth After all outward meanes used an inward gift is still to be expected Let vs in the next place come unto reason and experience where we have these perswasive arguments to confirme us in this truth 1. From the like experience in Christs calling of his Disciples to whom he useth no other words but Follow mee or Follow me I will make you fishers of men it is wonderfull that so shortan Invitation should worke so strange so speedy an alteration Sraightway they leave all and follow him what forsake all to follow after a stranger they never knew before with such constancy and yet through so much perill and disgrace and all for a word spoken Follow mee Nay in that word there was more then a word there went with it that Power which could have commanded the attendance of the Armies of Heauen and Earth And those few words accompanied with this secret vertue did more upon the hearts of the Disciples than many a long Sermon upon the Pharisees and obdurate Iewes where Christ was not pleased to shew the like effect of his power So Christ appearing to Saul accosts him with this expostulatorie salutation Saul Saul why persecutest thou mee hee saith no more but only tells him being asked That hee was Iesus of Nazareth whom hee persecuted and that it was hard for him to kicke against the prickes But see what a change these few words have made in a fierce raging persecutor hee is on the sudden as meeke as a Lambe and now all for obedience to that name which before hee furiously persecuted Lord what wilt thou have mee to doe command what thou wilt I am ready to obey Was it externall morall perswasion trow yee that hath made this wonderfull alteration Nor are these examples to bee accounted so extraordinary as if for the substance the same course were not ordinarily observed Were not men wilfully perverse they would confesse that when of many thousands that heare one and the same Sermon some one or two it may be the worst in the company are in a moment so changed that they are not the same men they were new hearts new desires new affections all new in them they would I say confesse that this is the very â—inger of God touching the Heart and not the force of any outward perswasion whatsoever 2. If only a bare proposing of Divine things to the understanding joyned with perswasions of command threatning and the like towards the Will bee all that is needfull to mans conversion it would bee knowne what difference wee shall make betweene the working of Gods word and of Mans of a Divinitie Sermon and a good morall speech Nay more what difference can be made betweene Sathans temptations and all the sacred suggestions of Gods word yea whether Sathans seducements to evill are not likely to prove alwayes more powerfull than Gods perswasions to goodnesse because in both cases the worke it selfe is left wholly to our arbitrement and then Sathan hath the advantage of our naturall Corruption cleerely on his side So that by this Arminian doctrine mans conversion is even desperate seeing Sathan is as powerfull and certainely he is as willing to Pervert as God is to Convert This blasphemous absurditie the Arminians cannot shift their hands of though they strive in vaine about it 3. The old rule must here be remembred Passio râ—cipitur non tam per conditionem agent is quà m dispositionem patient is all exhortations promises commands take effect not according to their owne but according to the quality of him towards whom they are used And so wee see a word doth more with some than a frowne or sharp menace towards another All Speech workes as the Heart of the Hearer is affected not as he intends that utters it Wherefore if there be nothing more to be done on Gods part towards our Conversion but the only proposall and perswasion of the acceptance of Grace it is manifest to all that can judge of the state of Corrupted nature that wee shall never accept of Gods offer but out
shew what he intendeth effectually to bring to passe But yet here they urge further How can God in justice command unto a man by his Word the Performance of that which cannot be done by him without the inward helpe of the Spirit and yet in the meane time God denies this inward grace unto him I answer Gods justice will herein be as free from accusation of tyranny as before his truth was from falshood and collusion God may without blemish to his justice Command man to performe his dutie although hee have now no strength to doe it because once hee had strength and he hath now lost it Yea will they say that were true did not two things hinder 1. Man indeed had strength and hath lost it but how himselfe did not decoquere wastefully spend his Patrimonie and by the Act of his sinning abolish the Image of God within him but God for a punishment of his fault did by an immediate act take away his originall abilities And it is then as great injustice in God to command us Conversion Faith and Repentance when himselfe hath taken away our abilities whereby wee should performe it as for a Iudge after he hath put out an offenders eyes yet to command him under paine of further punishment to read such a booke If hee had put out his owne eies the case had beene otherwise the Iudge being not bound to take notice of that his fact To which we answer that t is true God for our sinne hath deprived us of his image so that we cannot doe his will without new strength restored unto us yet we must remember though this deprivation be an act of God yet it happens through our merit by reason of our sinne and in this case how harsh soever it may seeme to us yet God the Iudge of the world doth not unjustly To command us the doing of that which wee cannot performe without those abilities restored which himselfe for our transgression hath taken from us and will not give us againe This is proved by that one instance beyond all exception The perfect obedience to the Morall Law is required of all and yet t is madnesse to affirme that God gives or is bound to give unto all that strength to doe it which they had in Adam without which it cannot bee done Further that God may justly command what man cannot performe is manifest by Gods commanding Pharaoh to let the Israelites goe which yet Pharaoh could not doe for God himselfe hardened his heart that hee should not be willing to let them depart 2. When God commands man to beleeve the Gospell here 's a duety injoyned that man never had strengh in Adam to performe And therefore if God doe require a new duety he is bound to afford new strength because by that which he had and lost he was never inabled to doe it To which we answer that it is an errour to affirme that Faith which is the condition of the new Covenant is not commanded in the Morall Law Legall and Evangelicall or the Faith of Adam in innocency and of man since his Fall is for the substance of the grace one and the same viz. Credence and Confidence of and in all things whatsoever that God shall reveale unto man The difference is onely in the Vse and in the particular object as we shall see in the handling of that point of Faith Now Adam being commanded in all things to beleeve his Creator whether revealed or to be revealed and having ability so to doe so that if God had told of him the mystery of the Gospell he would have beleeved it we also are bound by the Law of our Creation and so the Morall Law to beleeve in Christ as soone as God reveales vnto us this thing to be beleeved and God may require it of us because wee had power once to doe it and what is lost God is not bound to restore 2. Reason If the Word at any time be destitute of the quickning Spirit it will follow that the Word shall be of it selfe a dead letter and the â—avour of death because it is destitute of the Spirit which only puts life unto it But this is not to be affirmed for as much as it is only our fault that the Word proves the â—avour of death c. To this we answer That the Word is never of it selfe the â—avour of death no not then when it is without the vertue of the Spirit and we reject those assertions as utterly erroneous That the Word should bee preached unto some to damne them or with this intent to make them inexcusable The Gospell is not published with any such purpose at all for the judgement of our English Divines in the Synod is â—ound that those who being called refuse to convert should be made more inexcusable Neque enim ea singi potest homines reddere inexcusabiles per Verbum Spiritum vocatio quae eo tantum Fine exhibetur ut reddat inexcusabiles No there 's no such matter The end of the VVord preached is to shew unto man what is that good and that acceptable will of God which he requires man should performe and the declaration of the will of God to man is alwaies in it selfe most good and excellent nor doth it vary in its owne nature whether the vertue of the Spirit goe with it or no. For as I touched before the power of the Spirit doth not worke upon the VVord to put life into it but it workes upon our soules to put life into them So that whether our hearts be sanctified or not sanctified t is all one to the VVord it makes no alteration in the nature of that All the difference lies in the Effect where the heart is sanctified there the VVord is heard with obedience where t is not sanctified there t is heard and disobeyed But the cause of this difference is meerely in the disposition of mans heart not any jot from the VVord the preaching whereof is good and to a good intent but unto some it becomes hurtfull not because the VVord hurts them but they hurt themselves by their owne sinnefulnesse leaving themselves inexcusable in their fault and aggravating their damnation by wilfull disobedience The VVord is neither dead nor deadly in it selfe but wee are dead and by our sinnes against the VVord slay our selves 3. Reason If the preaching of the VVord be sometimes destitute of the vertue of the Spirit it will follow that men should bee condemned for not beleeving and being converted by that which hath no power to cause them to beleeve and convert as the VVord without the Spirit hath not But that were injustice so to doe c. Ergo. To this slight argument we answer that the default of mens not beleeving and converting is not through want of any thing in the VVord which is onely to tell them what God requires of them and this the VVord doth fully and sufficiently If they obey not
so with us that wee know not what these things meane if to our apprehension there appeare more terror in the angry words of a King than the most peremptory threatnings of God if a reproofe of a knowne fault will be rejected by us with contempt and gall if we sleight the sweetest exhortations and the Consolations of God seeme a small matter to us if wee can with a Confident scorne of all Gods counsells hold a resolution to goe on still in our owne courses let God and his Ministers say what they list if our Corruptions trouble us not and of all things in this life we take least notice of the sinfull estate of our soules or of all pleasures and studies wee finde least content in hearing reading meditating on the Word These things are infallible Symptomes of Spirituall death that hath seazed on us and that as yet wee have not so heard the Word the Voyce of the Sonne of God as to be made alive by the hearing of it This tryall is certaine and this Change that the Word and Spirit worke in our regeneration is very sensible if wee be not sensible of it we may be bold to Censure our selves that as yet wee have it not To conclude they only heare the Word as the word of God which finde in it Gods power working Sanctification in their hearts others heare it only as the word of man which goes no further than the naturall care and understanding Where this change of the heart is not all reformation in the life is but counterfeit and hypocriticall In the two former Questions wee have examined the pretended sufficiency of Grace universally bestowed on all whether within or without the Church and shewed you that all those gifts which are ordinarily given either to Christians or Heathens are utterly insufficient for to worke their true Conversion unlesse there bee a further aide of the speciall grace of the Holy Ghost working on the Soule to the sanctification thereof Wee are at this time to come unto our third and last Question whether or no supposing such grace to be given as is truly sufficient to convert it be notwithstanding in mans power freely to choose whether he will be converted or not converted by it The Arminian affirmes that it is so and that when God directly intends to Convert a man and for that purpose affords him all gracious helpes needfull to be given on his part then Man by the liberty of his Will may resist Gods will and worke so as they shall not worke his Conversion A desperate error which whosoever maintaines it is impossible that Christian Humilitie and thankfulnesse can have any place in that mans heart Wherefore it behooves us much to be rightly informed in a point of such consequence wherein it is so easie to become an enemy against the grace of God The Question then is this Whether it be in mans power so to resist the grace of God as finally to hinder his owne Conversion In the explication of this Controversie I shall with Gods helpe proceed in this order 1. To shew unto you in briefe the Opinion and Errours of our Adversaries in this point 2. To unfold and confirme that Truth which the orthodox Church defends as touching this matter 3. To answer such Arguments as are made against it The Opinion of the Arminians touching the power of Mans free Will in the worke of Conversion is most fully and freely expressed by that perverse Sectary Iohannes Arnoldi Corvinus in these words of his so often mentioned in the acts of the late Synod and which are most worthy to be had in everlasting detestation Positis saith he omnibus operationibus gratiae quibus ad Conversionem in nobis eâ—â—iciendam Deus utitur manet tamen ipsa Conversio it a in â—ostra Potestate libera ut possimus non converti id est nosmetipsos vel convertere vel non converters id est Suppose all the operations of Grace which God useth to worke conversion in us bee present yet Conversion it selfe remaines in that sort free in our power that wee may be not converted that is we may convert or not convert our selves This is plaine dealing without ambiguity and doubling When God hath done all that is to be done for his part 't is still on our free choyce whether wee will convert or not Their explication of this conclusion is as strange as the conclusion it selfe is hereticall It is thus there are two operations of Grace precedent to a mans Conversion 1. Illumination of the Vnderstanding in the cleere knowledge of the Law and Gospell Sinne and Grace Which illumination is not you must thinke wrought by any immediate worke of the Holy Ghost opening the understanding to discerne of Spirituall things but by the very plaine evidence of the things themselves so cleerely declared and represented to the Vnderstanding that every man having the use of reason aâ—d judgement and being attentive in the hearing or reading of the Word may by the help of his naturall reason without other Supernaturall light understand the sense of all things delivered in Scripture needfull to be knowne beleeved hoped for or practised This is the first worke of Grace upon the Vnderstanding the next is in the 2. Renovation of the Affections which are quickened and rectified with new motions towards spirituall things So that a man not yet converted may truly Sorrow for his offending of God Bewaile his spirituall death in sinne be inflamed with the love of the truth Desire Grace and the Spirit of regeneration hunger and thirst after righteousnesse and eternall life truly wish for deliverance out of his sinfull estate in briefe offer up to God the Sacrifice of a contrite and broken heart in Humilitie in Confession of sinne in Prayers for mercy in a Purpose and an Assay of amendment of life And thus farre the heart or affections may be changed and quickened when yet a man is not Converted Now this alteration which is wrought in affections is if you will beleeve them not any immediate effect of the Holy Ghost working this change in them but the proper cause of it is the Illumination of the understanding whereupon followes necessarily the stirring up of the affections in their right orderly motions which formerly were dead and disordered by reason of the darknesse of the minde misguiding them These two workes goe before mans Conversion and are wrought in all that heare the Word Vniversally and Irresistably the plainesse of Divine truth is such that men though they would cannot avoide the knowledge of it and the dependance of the affections on the Vnderstanding is such that their motions must needs bee conformable to the knowledge and apprehensions thereof When these two effects are wrought in a man hee is then furnished with sufficient strength to Beleeve and Convert if he will This power and strength is given him irresistably will he nill hee but for the Act of
beleeving that depends wholly on his free will which after the forenamed illumination of the minde and motions in the affections remaines Free to choose or not to choose to consent or not consent unto the promise of Grace Which wondrous doctrine they unfold unto us in this manner The will of man say they never had hath nor can have any other qualitie inherent in it but only that which is alwayes Essentiall unto it namely Liberty Indifferenti◠indeterminati◠ad actus oppositos Wherefore as in Adam it had no spirituall gifts of Holinesse inherent in it so it lost none in the fall nor hath it now any inherent corruption as the other faculties have nor is it in our regeneration re-indued with any sanctified qualities whatsoever Only a pure naked Liberty there is in it to choose or refuse any good or evill whatsoever Spirituall Morall or Naturall after it is once knowne This Freedome though it bee so Naturall to the will of Man that Salvâ essentià it cannot be taken away yet in the exercise thereof the Will depends on the Vnderstanding and Affections So long as the understanding is darke and the affections distempered the Will though it have in it selfe a naturall abilitie to choose that which is good yet it cannot exercise it by reason of those impediments Even as the eye hath in it selfe a naturall power to see even in the darke but yet cannot make use of it till the object be inlightened So in the Vnregenerate the Will hath a naturall freedome in it selfe towards all Spirituall good or evill but it wants the free exercise of this power so long as the Vnderstanding is without Knowledge and the affections are disordered But as soone as the Vnderstanding is inlightened and the affections reneued then the Will is restored to the use of her Naturall libertie So that whereas Life and Death Good and Evill is now set before her shee may by her owne free power without any further help from God choose the good if she list or the evill if she please And this is that whereon they affirme consists Vivisicatio Voluntatis the quickening of the Will which is not the giving of some new power unto it which it had not before but only the restoring of it to the free use of that Power which it alwayes had but could not exercise Here 's then the summe of their opinion in briefe When a man unconverted heares the word of the kingdome hee understands it and is affected with it irresistably and necessarily By so doing hee hath a power to beleeve given him that is His will hath recovered the use of that naturall freedome which it alwaies had so that now hee stands indifferent hee may if hee will assent to the promise of grace he may if he will dissent from it this Act is absolutely in his owne power to doe or not to do it and by this Act done he is converted and not till then This is that leaven of Arminianisme wherewith of late the whole lumpe of sound doctrine hath beene sowred this is that fretting leprosie which will scarce ever bee healed but in the ruine of those our neighbour Churches wherein the disease first bred Let us alwaies pray that God wil keep this our Church us her Children safe from the danger of this infection That we may the better avoide it let us rippe up this swelling ulcer and wring out the rottennesse and corruption that is gathered together in it taking a particular view of the severall errors which are like a bed of snakes folded one in another in this dunghill They are these 1. That there is no other illumination of the understanding in divine things but the ordinary apprehension of the sense and meaning of the Word wrought in us by the cleere evidence of the things delivered and the ordinary helpe of the Spirit perfecting and assisting naturall reason and judgement For herein they all agree that although the Gospell could not possibly have been found out by naturall reason yet being once revealed it may be fully understood by naturall reason In so much that he who is industrious and hath a good judgement may know all that is needefull to be knowne without any Supernaturall light infused into his understanding by the Holy Ghost It seemes these men in their study of Divinity never sought after nor ever did finde any other helpe besides their owne naturall abilities and therefore they thinke other men have no more helpe than themselves had Wee may probably judge so by those Hereticall opinions the immediate off-spring of their naturall reason wherewith they have now so troubled the quiet of the Christian Church Had they beene taught of God and the eyes of their understanding opened to follow the directions of Gods Spirit more than their owne Naturall wisdome they might have learned to have judged otherwise of themselves and all their opinions too But how partiall soever their judgements are wee know the judgement of God to be just and infallible who knowes us better than wee doe our selves and He tells us That wee are blinde that wee are darknesse till wee be made light in the Lord that when the Light shineth in darknesse the darknesse comprehendeth it not that the Naturall man cannot perceive the things of the Spirit for they are foolishnesse unto him neither can hee know them because they are spiritually discerned Besides this censure of God upon our naturall ignorance in divine things wee have the practice of the Saints acknowledging their naturall disability and praying for the illumination of the Spirit which the Arminians scorne Hence those frequent supplications of the Prophet David Open mine eyes that I may see the wonders of the Law O give mee understanding that I may live Teach mee O Lord the way of thy statutes Make mee to understand the way of thy precepts with many such like prayers wherein it were much perversnesse to affirme that David prayed only for that knowledge of the meaning of the Law whereto by study and use of his Naturall parts he might possibly attaine And what shall we say to that prayer of the Apostle Paul which he makes for the Ephesians That God would give them the Spirit of Wisdome and Revelation in the knowledge of Christ the eyes of their understanding being inlightened that they might know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the Saints Surely an Arminian will hardly say Amen to this Prayer For to what end is it had not Paul preached the Gospell to the Ephesians plainly enough had not they heard and beleeved it were they not men of reason and judgement that could understand what Paul meant when he preached or wrote unto them what need then to pray yet for the spirit of Wisdome and Revelation and inlightening their eyes when things were so revealed as they could not choose but know and see
Faith or Beliefe in generall as this word is taken in the largest extent in relation to all civill or naturall things 2. In the next place explaining the meaning of this word Faith as it is used in speciall about Divine and Supernaturall things declared to us in Scriptures The opening of the nature of Beliefe in generall will give much light for the understanding of the speciall consideration thereof therefore I begin with that first Not to trouble you with reckoning up all the improper acceptions of this word Fides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to tell you that sometime it is taken for Fidelity or Trustinesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as when a thing is done or spoken bonafide faithfully or trustily and in that exclamation Vestram fidem c. sometimes for Arguments or Proofes from Reason or Authority brought to breed beliefe in another which acception is usuall in Rhetoritians Arist. 1. Rhet. c. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Quintil. l. 5. cap. 10. Haec omnia argumenta generaliter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 appellant c. Faith or Beliefe in the proper acception of the word is an Assent to such matters a◠are knowne only by Revelation from another This definition agrees to beliefe as it is taken in the largest sense the Genus i◠Assent the difference is taken from the object whereto Assent is yeelded and that is such things as wee understand onely by anothers revelation Both parts will be plainly understood if we distinguish between three sorts of knowledge Cognitionis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are incident unto man 1. The first is Scientia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Knowledge properly so called which is bred in us by the evident certainety of things presented unto our reason or sense When wee understand such principles and conclusions in all arts and sciences as are demonstrable by evident and infallible reason or when we know such particulars as come under our senses when they are rightly disposed 2. The second is Opinio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Opinion an imperfect knowledge of things not cleerely presented unto reason or sense when we apprehend things in part and obscurely so that wee cannot absolutely say t is this or t is that 3. The third is Fides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beliefe which is a knowledge grounded on testimony and authority of others when wee assent to those things whereof by our owne sense and reason we have no certainety nor evidence only we beleeve them because such and such have told us they are so These three divers apprehensions of things wee expresse in formes of speech agreeable the first when we say I know this to be so the second thus I thinke it is so the last in this I beleeve it is so A great difference there is betweene these three apprehensions of the understanding as every one may easily discerne but more cleerly thus it stands 1. Knowledge whether it be of things past present or to come hath evermore certainety in the subject and evidence in the object accompanying it For the things that are knowne must bee alwaies apparant to the senses or to the understanding To the senses by the proportionablenesse of the qualities in the Object and due application of them to the Organ To the understanding by the bright light of reason shining in the things themselves Wherefore the Object of knowledge is evermore evident and being thus evident and apparant the apprehension thereof in the Subject by the sense and understanding must needs bee cleere and most distinct whence ariseth such an assent unto the truth of the thing as is most firme and certaine excluding all doubting whatsoeuer as for instance that the Fire is hot the Water moist the Sunne light that Quicquid dicitur vel negatur de Vniversali dicitur vel negatur de Particulari Quae conveniunt in uno tertio inter se conveniunt with the like these things are evident making such a lively impression upon the senses and so cleerly discovering their reasonablenesse to the understanding that we strongly assent unto their truth without all doubting 2. Opinion is contrary unto knowledge and alwayes hath uncertainetie in the Subject and inevidence in the Object attending on it For some things there are of their owne nature uncertaine and contingent whereof our best knowledge is but a doubtfull conjecture as that a red evening and a gray morning should bring a faire day Againe those things that are in themselves certaine enough and necessary yet unto us they will be but onely probable and conjecturall if either our senses through weakenesse and distemper perceive them not throughly or our understanding doe not cleerely apprehend the nature and reason of them Whence it followes that for want of cleere evidence in the things themselves our assent unto their truth will be alwayes wavering doubtfull without any fixed determination to embrace any side resolvedly but so holding it selfe to that part which for the present seemes most probable as that it is ready to shift it selfe unto the other side when better reason shall bee discovered 3. Beliefe partly agrees partly differs both from the one and the other for it partakes but of one property namely certainety in the Subject though very variable but never of evidence in the Object Both shall appeare unto you in order For the Object of beliefe it may bee certaine and necessary in it selfe but quâ tale it is never evident to the beleever For evident as I said before those things onely are which by their owne proper qualitie and light worke a cleere apprehension of themselves in the senses or understanding or both Now such things are not beleeved but knowne as for instance what wee see heare touch taste or smell by these senses orderly disposed we doe not say we beleeve it but we know it as that the Fire is hot the Water cold He that relates unto mee an accident that himselfe hath seene He knowes it but I that heare him doe beleeve it Againe things that wee understand by manifest and infallible reason those also we know we doe not beleeve as for example If an Astronomer foretell an Eclipse to fall out an hundred years hence hee doth not beleeve but he knowes this effect will ensue by the infallible motion of the Heavens but an unlearned man that findes this in an Ephemerides hee onely beleeves it But now that which is the Object of Beliefe so farre as it is the Object thereof doth not fall under the cleere apprehension either of sense or understanding by its owne naturall light For things beleeved are of three sorts Past Present or to Come Of things Past before we were and of things to Come t is not possible for us to get any knowledge from the things themselves by our sense or reason unlesse it be Astronomicall demonstrations as was touched before or such Physicall effects as depend upon necessary connexion of their causes Touching things
not properly an assent of Christian faith I prove thus To assent or dissent is an action of the Vnderstanding or of the Will if of the Vnderstanding the object of it is Truth or Falsehood if of the Will the object of it is goodnesse or evill For the assent of the Will the case is manifest that it doth never assent unto and allow of the goodnesse of the obiect or dissent from and disallow the evill of it untill there be knowledge and apprehension of both For this approbation or reprobation of any thing by the Will cannot bee without Election nor Election without foregoing deliberation and judgement of the understanding upon the thing that is chosen or refused Againe for the Vnderstanding how can it assent unto the Truth or dissent from the Falsehood of such things whereof it hath no apprehension at all For so here should be an Act without an Object at least an irrationall act of the rationall part of man For if the Vnderstanding assent or dissent without understanding of whereto or from what is not a non-ens the object of such an act and is not such an act more like the naturall propensions of senslesse creatures whereby they are carried to unknowne ends than the judiciall determination of a reasonable man Though the things beleeved exceed reason yet the revelations of them are not above our knowledge and our assent unto them must be so farre forth rationall that if wee cannot give a reason of the thing beleeved yet wee must give a reason of our beliefe A reason of our beliefe is then rendred when we understand that testimony and authority wherein the thing to be beleeved is revealed unto us This only makes our assent reasonable For as in Scientificall knowledge and opinion the understanding never assents till the nature of the thing it selfe be knowne either fully or in part so in beliefe the understanding assents not till the meaning of the relation or testimony be understood what that thing is distinctly whereto it must assent In the two former wee give the reason of our assent from the thing it selfe knowne in the last wee give the reason of our assent from the authority of the revealer In every one our assent presupposeth knowledge in the former of the thing it selfe in the later of the Revelation Wherefore that implicite faith of the ordinary Papist who following the doctrine of his Teachers contents himselfe that he gives his assent in grosse unto all what ever is in the Bible Churches traditions that it is true whilst yet he understands scarce any Article of his religion distinctly this their implicite assent is meerely bruitish and unreasonable Contrary to the expresse precept of the Apostle Paul Rom. 12. 1. commanding us to offer unto God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a reasonable service and Peter 1 Pet. 3. 15. bidding us be ready to give an answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not a bare answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but with a defence to every one that demandeth of us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Reason of our Faith Now it would be knowne of the Romish Laiety what reason they can give for their faith what Apologie they are able to make for it when as they are utterly ignorant of Scriptures the only reason and defense of our Faith And is not their service and worship of God the very unreasonable motion of an unintelligent beast that 's ordered by his driver but understands not why and for what reason and ground Where particulars are not knowne there may be a generall kinde of beliefe But this generall beliefe is not an actuall assent to the truth of any particular thing revealed till that particular bee knowne and understood Actuall assent to particular truths is then only when they are knowne and according to the increase of distinct knowledge so this assent increaseth Before there is this distinct knowledge there can be no more but Praeparatio animi a resolution of the minde to yeeld assent to any particular if it bee once knowne Which though it be good when wee can doe no otherwise by reason of unavoydable ignorance yet to teach that this is sufficient to true faith is to teach men to be carelesse of all religion T is good where there is knowledge in part and when for the rest ignorance is seene bewayled and avoyded by all earnest desire and possible endevour to get knowledge in all points but t is monstrous flothfulnesse to bee content with this that in generall we beleeve all though we assent to nothing in particular This were indeed a short cut to heaven if no more were required to Christian faith but to force upon ones selfe such a resolution as this Here is the Bible I am resolved to beleeve all that it saith but for particulars I le looke no further let the Church and those that are learned looke to that How farre such a blinde resolution is from Christian faith and pietie besides experience which testifies that all those who have true faith in some things doe alwayes much lament their ignorance and eagerly desire the increase of distinct knowledge the Scriptures also doe abundantly witnesse unto us Wherein no exhortation more common then this unto the encrease of Knowledge yea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. as the Apostle prayes for the Collosians Col. 2. 2. And for the Corinthians hee wisheth the like 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 8. 7. How many prayers of the Saints doe wee finde they have made for knowledge every where mentioned How often is Faith and Knowledge coupled together Ioh. 10. 38. 1 Ioh. 4. 16. c. yea many times confounded and taken one for the other 2 Cor. 4. 14. Esa. 53 â—1 Ioh. 17. 3. c Againe this knowledge is easie to be had by the ayde of the holy Spirit inwardly inlightening and teaching the faithfull when they use such meanes as hee hath appointed See for that purpose Ier. 31. 33 34. 1. Cor. 2. 10. 12. 2. Cor. 4. 6. Ioh. 14. 21. where Christ promiseth to shew himselfe visibly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to those that love him Were knowledge a thing impossible or very difficult or unprofitable some pretence there were to pleade for ignorance but when t is so often commanded us when it may be so easily had when t is so usefull in the having so dangerous to want it it s now impudence to patronize ignorance as a friend to Religion which is a professed enemy to mans reason Wherefore it is a shamelesse assertion of Bellarmine De Iustif. l. c. 5. That Faith may better be defined by ignorance than by knowledge A pestilent conceit which once rooted in men breeds in them an horrible contempt distaste and neglect of Scriptures and all Religion as matters not possible nor necessary for them to comprehend But this is a gull put upon poore people by the Clergy thereby to excuse their owne idlenesse in not teaching them or to gaine the
our assent vnto Diuine Truths springs from these three fountaines 1 From the Infallible Authority of the Reuelation 2 From the excellent greatnesse and worth of things Reuealed 3 From the manifest experiment of some part of their Truth knowne vnto vs. Of these in order The first and chiefest ground whereon is built the Certainty of faiths assent is The Infallible truth and Authority of Diuine Reuelations I call this the chiefest ground because it is that whereunto finally all our Beliefe is resolued For aske the question wherefore do you firmely belieue the Articles of the â—reed The answere is Because God hath reuealed them in Scriptures to be belieued The reason of which answere is this because What euer God saith istrue Now this is a principle in Nature aswell knowne to the reasonable creature as that they haue reason it is grauen deepe vpon the conscience of euery one which tels him That God is so infinitely Wise that hee can be ignorant of nothing that none can circumuent and ouer each him And againe that he is so infinitely good holy and Iust that no â—ie can come of this truth as Iohn speaketh Iohn 2. 21. Wisedome it selfe cannot bee deceiued Truth it selfe cannot deceiue and God is both Wherefore none but a Iesuite like Becaâ—… whose wits haue serued an apprentiship in the mystery of lying and aequiuocation vnder the Father of â—ies would haue affirmed that the Prophets and Apostles though they knew it was God that reuealed heauenly mysteries vnto them yet they knew not Euidently whether God was not deceiued himselfe or would not deceiue them Alying surmise much like that of the Serpent when hee tempted the Woman Yea saith he hath God indeed said so Yes the woman answeres God hath said so and we know it But Satan replies Are you sure that God spake true when hee said it The Diuell then denyed it and Becanus staggers at it as a thing very doubtfull telling vs that when God speakes man cannot be euidently certaine whether he speaks true or false But we reiect with abomination such a suggestion to Infidelity that strikes at the roote of all Christian Faith and shakes the lowest foundation-stone in all that building we know and are euidently assured That God is truth and in him or of him there is no Lie From this first ground of faith in Gods Essentiall truth wee draw another that whersoeuer any Reuelation is certainely known or belieued to be of God there the reasonable creature doth fully assent to the truth of things reuealed Whence all the holy Pen-men of Scriptures did for themselues most certainely belieue the truth of all things they deliuered though sometimes they vnderstood but darkely what was the meaning of that which they spake and wrote because they knew that they were taught them immediatly from God Yea the diuels themselues when they know as they doe these reuelations to be from God howeuer they tempt men to distrust and out of malice raises vp lies and slanders vpon Gods truth yet in the meane time are themselues cleerely conuinced of this truth and doe assent vnto it in their consciences The diuell knew well that Gods threatning to Alam was a certaine truth euen whilst he perswaded him it was but a lie And when he inspired the Pharisies to call Christ. Samaritan Belzebub a possessed Daemoniacke a Deceiuer and all to nought euen then himselfe could not but confesse that he was that Christ Iesus the Sonne of the most high God Mar. 5. 7. But this is the malice of Hell to sight against the Light and furiously to oppose what we cannot but acknowledge to be truth Well Thus far then our Faith goes vpon a sure ground That whatsoeuer God saith is true And againe When wee know euidently that God sayes it wee are ready to belieue it without further question But here in the next place is all the doubt How know wee infallibly that God is the Author of the Scriptures and that such things as therein are proposed for vs to belieue are reuealed by God himselfe This is a fundamentall Question wherein it greatly behoues euery Christian to be rightly informed It would require a large discourse to bee prosecuted through euery particular I shall but onely touch vpon the generall and giue occasion to each one carefully to bethinke himselfe that his faith be built on the rocke and not vpon the Sand. The Question is How is it knowne certenly that the Scriptures are the very word of God it hath two braÌ„ches 1 Toaching each seuerall part of Scripture as it was reuealed and giuen to the Church of God How did the People of the Iewes know that what was deliuered by Moses and other Prophets after him from time to time was the word of God To which I answere they knew the writing and Preaching of Moses and the Prophets to be of diuine Inspiration partly by the holinesse of the Doctrine which they taught the liuely power and worke whereof the hearts of the godly then felt partly by the miracles which they wrought for confirmation of their propheticall office partly by the certaine and infallible accomplishment of all their prophecies Of which triall of Prophets and their prophesies wee haue a generall rule set downe Deut. 18. 18. c. I will raise them vp a Prophet from among their brethren like vnto thee and will pur my words in his mouth and hee shall speake vnto them all that I command him 19. And whosoeuer will not hearken vnto my words which hee shall speake in my name I will require it of him 20. But the Prophet that shall presume to speake a word in my name which I haue not commanded him to speake or that speaketh in the name of other gods euen the same Prophet shall die 2â— And if thou thinke in thine heart How shall wee know the word which the Lord hathnot spoken 22. When a Prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord if the thing follow not nor come to passe that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken it presumptuously thou shalt not so be afraid of him By the same meanes were the preaching of Christ also the preaching and writing of the Apostles knowne in their times 2 Touching the whole Scripture as it is now compleatly deliuered vnto vs in writing How can it euidently and infallibly appeare vnto vs that what wee finde written in the Bible is of diuine inspiration the very oracles of God not mans Inuentions In the solution of this Question our aduersaries of the Romish and wee of the Reformed Churches differ irreconcileably Wee affirme that the Scriptures are knowne to be of God by themselues they maintaine that we cannot bee certaine of the Scriptures Diuinity by any other argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propose vnto vs what is to be belieued what is not to be belieued So that ask a Roman Catholike Wherfore do you
doth not teach that 't is honest to beleeve him Can any thing be more senselesse or will not every man in the world excepting a Iesuite confesse that the very light of nature teacheth him to acknowledge that it is a very good and honest thing to beleeve Gods authority let him reveale his will unto us which way hee please But t is the fashion of these writers to dorre their readers with a distinction and so to leave them with a prius conceditur posterius negatur distracted and confounded rather than any whit satisfied This of the first reason That a man may beleeve without the helpe of Gods grace the second followes which also confirmes the former viz. 2. That is no act of Iustifying Faith which is found in Divells Heretickes Hypocrites and Reprobates But this assent unto divine Revelations because of Gods authority is in those both divells and men Ergo It is no act of Iustifying Faith The major is agreed upon that the acts of Iustifying Faith are found onely in those who are justified which cannot be said those persons mentioned The minor is likewise evident That Divells Hereticks Hypocrites and Reprobates may and doe assent unto such propositions as God reveales and that because of Gods authority who doth reveale them This hath beene formerly shewed unto you in the explication of the nature of a generall Faith and t is so cleere by Scriptures and experience that our adversaries cannot deny it The forenamed Schoole-man grants it manifestly as concerning Hypocrites and wicked livers who yet professe the Catholicke Faith for disputing Cap. 8. de Habit. Fidei touching that vertue which is infused into the Will whereby it may if it list command the Supernaturall assent of the Vnderstanding heetelleth us that this Vertue is a distinct vertue from all others and is neither Charity nor Obedience § 10. in conclus and that it is perfect in it selfe though it be without them according as other morall habites of justice temperance c. are Whence hee tells us § 11. in plaine termes Potest esse sinâ— charitate ut patet in Christiano peccatorâ— qui Fidem habet siue gratia charitate A Christian that is a sinner may have Faith without grace and charity What Iustifying Faith yea according to the Romish Divinity for he may beleeve the truth of the articles of Religion because of Gods authority who hath revealed them and to do this is a Supernaturall assent and the proper act of Iustifying Faith as these men teach Now touching the Divells and Heretickes the man is a little more coy He will not confesse that the Divels yeeld that assent of Faith he speakes of They doe not beleeve the mysteries of Religion Per assensum supernat uralem i. e. because of Gods authority but Per assensum quendam naturalem qui non oritur ex pio affectu sed ex vi pondere argumentorum quibus intellectus illorum convincitur cap. 11. quaest 2. § 4. We grant willingly that they doe not assent out of any good affection nor is that needfull to make their assent supernaturall for in hypocriticall impenitent and reprobate Catholickes there 's no pious affection moving them to beleeve and yet if wee beleeve their Doctors there is in them a supernaturall assent of Faith But for that other thing That the divells beleeve onely ex vi pondere argumentorum t is utterly false seeing it cannot be doubted but that they beleeve the truth of many future contingents wherof they are not convinced by any force of argument from the things themselves but from authority of Gods Revelations in his Word or otherwise Which infallible truth of God in all his revelations is so cleerely apprehended by these damned Spirits that it makes them to acknowledge the truth and goodnesse of that which otherwise they abhorre Wherefore that comparison which hee makes betweene the faith of 〈◊〉 and wicked Christians is most vaine and erroneoâ—… 〈◊〉 â—…ith hee you consider the faith of either of them wâ—…â—egard to the Object there 's par ratio both being â—…d about the same things But if you take it with râ—â—ard 〈◊〉 honesty of the act so the assent of the Divells is farrâ—… 〈◊〉 than that of bad Christians who have faith anâ—â—…rkes But wherein He tells us The Faith of Châ—… Supernaturalis Voluntaria Honesta The Faith of Divells is Naturalis Coacta pravis circumstantijs vitiata All which are false For the Faith of Divells is Supernaturallas much as that of wicked Christians seeing both beleeve propter authoritatem Dei revelantis which is formalis ratio of Supernaturall assent Againe the Faith of divells is as voluntary as that of wicked men for it cannot bee wrought in either by compulsion simply and if the Majesty of Gods infallible truth command the assent of Divells to that which they love not doth not the same cause also prevaile with ungodly men who beare as little true affection to God and Goodnesse as the divells doe Lastly the Faith of Divells is as Honest as that of wicked men For let any man speake Is it not as Honest a thing for wicked angâ—lls to beleeve what God saith as it is for wicked men If not wherein lies the dishonesty of that act in the angells or wherein stands the honesty of that act in men Can there be named any circumstances which make the Divels Faith dishonest but that the same or as bad may bee alledged against the honesty of the Faith of wicked Christians Sure I am what everthese men conceit of the Honesty of Faith without workes in men Saint Iames is plaine in his comparison that t is no whit better than the Faith of Divells Iames 2. 19. Thou beleevest that there is one God thou doest well the Divells also beleeve it and doe not they doe well too Yes haply better than thou for they beleeve and tremble which thou doest not To conclude in the last place we object that Heretickes have such a kinde of Faith as the Romanists call Iustifying For though they erre in some articles of Faith yet others they assent unto because of Gods authority revealing them This Becanus denies telling us that Heretici qui veâ— in uno articulo sunt infideles omnem fidem amiserunt cap. 11. quaest 3. § 4. which answer hee makes upon this ground That the Habite of Faith is lost by any one act of infidelity § 2. and therefore whereas Heretickes beleeve many things t is but upon a kinde of custome and by a humane faith We reply and say that that position One act of infidelity destroyes the habit of Faith is false and contrary to reason and Scriptures as hereafter I shall have occasion to shew speaking of the opposites of Faith For the point we grant that He who is a persevering Heretick though but in one fundamentall article he hath no justifying faith not because he hath lost it but because he never had it But
wee affirme that for that other generall faith in assenting to the truth of divine things because of Gods authority this faith as he had when hee was a Catholike so hee still hath it in part now he is an Hereticke and by the same faith he beleeved matters of Religion before his Heresie by the same he beleeves them afterward And those that are Heretickes indeed or such whom wee stile by that name let them bee asked why they beleeve such and such points of religion they 'le answer truly and resolutely they beleeve them because of Gods authoritie that hath revealed them in his Word and for such things wherein they dissent could they be perswaded the Scripture did teach the contrary they would for the same authority sake beleeve the contrary The Iesuite is yet urgent upon us and tells us that no Calvinist or Lutheran beleeves Gods authority but doubts of it Wee tell him againe that 's a foule slander and more than hee can make good yes that he will by a distinction too Gods authority considered Abstractivè in it selfe so indeed we doubt not of But Gods authoritie considered practicé in respect of the Church as it is proposed unto us by the Pastors of the Church so we doubt of it because wee admit not the judgement of the Church but follow our owne phantasie ibid. § 7. To this we answer that we passe very little to be judged Infidells upon such a ground because wee call in question the supposed infallibility and authority of the Romish Church We finde in Scriptures no such straight relation betweene her authority and Gods authority that if wee call hers in question wee must needs doubt of his Wee doubt not of the authority of Scriptures but we denie that the Romish Church hath any infallible authority of judging and interpreting them No one man nor all men ought to usurpe such authority over our faith And let the truth be judge who be the greater Insidells Calvinists and Lutherans that beleeve the Scriptures authority for its owne sake or popish Catholikes that will not beleeve but for mans saying Thus you have this second reason somewhat largely that Faith which our Adversaries call Iustifying is in Divells and ungodly men therefore it is not that justifying faith which the Scriptures speake of and appropriate unto the Elect Tit. 1. 1. Here it is but a vaine shift our Adversaries make to runne unto that poore distinction of Fides Formata and Informis namely that Faith may exist two wayes 1. Vt est conjuncta cum charitate ut in homine iusto and then Faith is called formata viva because Charity is Vita animae In this case Faith can Elicere operationes vitales seu aeternae vitae moritorias Gal. 5. 6. Faith worketh by Charity 2. Vt est separata à charitate quod fit in homine peccatore qui amissa per peccatum mortale charitate retinet fidem quamdin Catholicus est This Faith is called Informis mortuâ— nec potest habere operationes vitales seu meritorias Iam. 2. 17. Faith if it have no workes is dead in it selfe and ver 26. as the body without the spirit c. Becan tom 3. cap. 10. § 4. 5. 6. Thus they would have the quality and proper act of justifying Faith to be in reprobate men and divells but yet it doth them no good because t is without Charity Faith without Workes may be in its nature justifying Faith because t is an assent to the articles of Religion upon Gods authority but yet it justifies not because t is without workes Hereunto we reply that in this distinction there is not a syllable of sound doctrine nor yet of reasonable sense Thus much we grant that there is according to St. Iames. a kinde of â—aith without Workes namely a generall assent unto the truth of divine things but we denie that this kinde of Faith is for the substance one and the same with that Faith which is properly called Iustifying Faith without workes is of one kinde Faith with workes is of another not onely in regard of consequent because one hath workes the other hath not but in regard of their proper nature because the quality and acts of the one differ from the quality and acts of the other Wherefore in vaine doe they tell us that the same Faith is sometime with sometime without Charity Iustifying Faith is never without Charity and that which is is not Iustifying Vnto that conceit that Charity is the forme of Faith wee say t is Metaphysicall and such as no good construction can be made of it He saith Charity is Vita animae hee would say Vita fidei but take his meaning Faith lives by Charity as the body by the forme or soule Here 1. T is absurd to make one habite of the minde the forme of the other wee may as well say that Temperance is the forme of Liberality Each habite of the minde is distinguished by its proper object and actions and this the Schooleman cap. 18. quaest 2. § 3. grants in the strict sense 2. How doth Faith live by Charity We say it lives with Charity as its fellow-grace not by Charity as its soule We say without Charity it is dead yet t is not Charity that gives it life The Iesâ—it saith it doth for being joined with it Faith can elicere vitales operationes performe vitall acts Yea but what are these actions Faith hath but two acts 1. proper and immediate viz. Credere seu Assentiri 2. by consequent Iustificare Neither of these comes from Charity even by these mens owne doctrine Not the first for Catholickes without Charity may assent to the articles of Faith for Gods authority sake Not the second for to Iustifie in the Popish sense is to Sanctifie of a bad man to make a good Now how absurd is it to say Faith by Charity Iustifies i. e. Faith by the love of God and our neighbour sanctifies us or taking Charity for the Act not the Habite Faith by good workes of prayer fasting almes-deeds c. sanctifies us Both these are senselesse propositions for t is manifest that hee who hath Charity i. e. loves God and his Neighbour and doth good workes is not as yet to bee sanctified and made good of bad but is thereby sanctified already T is true that Faith is one part of our sanctification or inherent grace and Charity is another but neither doth Faith sanctifie by Charity nor Charity by Faith but we are sanctified by both together If there by any other vitall acts of Faith they should have beene named The glosse which the Iesuit addeth whereby he interpreteth what hee meaneth by vitall operations viz. aeternae vitae meritorias such as deserve eternall life carrieth with it as absurd a sense as the other Thus Charity is the forme and life of Faith i. e. Charity makes the acts of Faith to be Meritorious sâ—il our love of God and man or our good
it is injoyned and that in the first Commandement as a singular part of that inward worship due unto our Creator consisting principally in those three graces of Faith Love and Feare These things thus explaned let us proceede to the unfolding of Faith taken in the forenamed double relation and first as it hath reference to the whole Will and Word of God True â—aith respects all this and onely this Only this because in divine revelations onely is to be found that Infallible truth which gives satisfaction to the soule And againe all this because every part of Divine truth is Sacrosancta worthy of all Beliefe and Reverence threatnings as well as promises precepts exhortations admonitions historiâ—s every part of the Word falls in some degree or other within the compasse of Saving Faith By the same holy Faith whereby a penitent sinner beleeves the promise of mercy of Christ doth hee also beleeve all other promises of this life with other inferiour matters declared in Scriptures This is certaine but the chiefe point to bee noted here is an essentiall property of true Faith which standeth in Vniversality and Vniformity of assent to all things that are from God This Vniversality of assent is to be taken in a twofold regard 1. Of the Object the things beleeved when the faithfull soule gives full assent unto all things revealed by God not onely to such as it may assent unto without crossing its owne desires and purposes but unto those also that directly crosse and oppose carnall reason carnall affections worldly pleasures and all other provocations to infidelity 2. Of the Time and other particular circumstances whilst it doth most heartily and inwardly acknowledge the truth and goodnesse of these things not then alone when this may bee done without any contradiction and resistance but even then also most eagerly fixing the aâ—â—iance of the heart upon them when temptations rise when Heretickes dispute and cavill when humane reason failes and falls to arguing of impossibilities and unlikelihoods when sinnefull lusts hale this way and that when the world threatens or slatters when Satan rages or speakes faire then doth true Faith supported by the Spirit of grace stand fast as Mount Sion or if shaken a little t is not moved out of his place but looking beyond all present temptations to unbeliefe unto the everlasting and infinite truth and goodnesse of God it preferres that which he saith above all that the flesh the world the divell can promise or threaten to the contrary Now in this point stands an essentiall difference betweene the faith of Gods Elect and of Hypocrites These have alwayes their limitations they beleeve something but not all if all t is but in generall when it comes to particular proofe they bid â—arewell to saith when such circumstances come in the way as they love or feare more than they doe God But the faith of Gods Elect is sincere faire open universall without distinctions equivocations mentall reservations or other hypocriticall and Iesuiticall shâ—fts The reason is because the sanctified soule rightly apprehends the soveraignty of Gods truth and wisedome outstripping in Certainty and Excellency all things that can be set against it it judgeth than no good can be equall to that which God promiseth no evill so great as what hee threatens no course so safe as what hee prescribes whereupon absâ—lutely without all qualifications the soule casts it selfe upon God resolving to beleeve and doe as hee pleaseth Whereupon though in particular practice it may be ignorant of some things and weake in the application of others yet in the Habituall resolution and disposition of the heart it doth willingly yeeld assent and conformity to all T is most true that David in a passion may call Samuel a lying Prophet for 〈◊〉 him hee should be King and after abusie dispute maintained upon politicke worldly considerations câ—nciâ—de that therâ—â— no remedie but he must one day perish by thâ— hand of Sâ—â—l So Peter in a bodily feare may chance denie him in whom yet hee truly beleeves so in aâ—l a strong sit of pleasures or other violent incounter may push their buckler of faith aside but yet it cannot strike it out of their hands if they give a little ground they will not flye the field but because the heart is holy and entire they returne to themselves and their standing where the shame of a foyle taken makes them knit their strength together and stand more stoutly in the combat But my brethren here 's the mischiefe and miserie of all when there is a false heart within that keepes it selfe in an habituall resolution not to beleeve and trust God in such things or upon such and suchoccasions For in this case what ever shew of true faith they seeme to have in the generality or some few particulars t is most certaine that there is indeed nothing at all in that heart but horrible hypocrisie and infidelitie Such neverthelesse is the temper of all those who having not thoroughly searched out and resolved to renounce their evill affections nor exactly calculated what the profession and practise of Religion will cost them nor yet duly considered upon what grounds they undertake this profession are become their owne carvers in matter of Religion taking only so much of it into their beliefe and practice as the love of the world and their deere lusts will give leave These men are just of the Samaritans Religion that feared God and served their Images so they will beleeve God yet obey their lusts But as it was then none were found more bitter enemies to the restoring of the Iewish Church and State than these Samaritans who by reproaches accusations and conspiracies cruelly vexed that poore people and hindered the restauration of their afflicted estate even then when with fained flattery they proffered their service telling the Iewes they would build with them because they also sought the Lord the God So fares it with these men whose beliefe and forwardnesse in some things cannot make demonstration of so much friendship to Religion as their constant baulking and faltering in others testifies their hearts to be full of rottennesse and corruption bearing hatefull enmity against God and his Grace Take me any man who bewitched with custome commodity or pleasure gives himselfe scope and liberty to live in the breach of any of Gods commandements be it secret or open as constant neglect of the duties of religion in private accustomed mispending of pretious houres due to the businesse of our studies and callings usuall swearing secret thoughts and practices of uncleannesse unsatiable desires of earthly greatnesse and abundance unjust increase of wealth by usury bribery or other secret indirect courses excusing love of some though lawfull pleasures c. I say take me such a man that allowes himselfe in these or the like practices contrary to Gods most holy law and hee will be found though in name a Christian yet in heart an Infidell For trie now