what is the true sense of those passages that are in dispute but by that same Church which conveys it to you This is S. Austin's method in many places but above all in his Book De utilitate Credendi and in his Book Contra Epistolam fundamenti In which he says I would not believe the Gospel if the authority of the Church did not oblige me to it This Method is handsomely managed in the Treatise of the true Word of God joyned to the Peaceable Method Remarks 1. GReat difference is to be made between the conveyance of Books and an Oral Tradition of Doctrine It is very easie to carry down the one in a way that is Morally Infallible An exact copying being all that is necessary for that Whereas it is morally impossible to prevent frauds and impostures in the other in a course of some Ages especially in times of Ignorance and Corruption in which the Credulity of unthinking people has made an easie game to the Craft and Industry of covetous and aspiring Priests Few were then at the pains to examine any thing but took all upon Trust and became so ready of belief that the more incredible a thing seemed to be they swallowed it down the more willingly 2. If this way of reasoning will hold good it was as strong in the mouths of the Iews in our Saviours time for the High Priest and Sanhedrim might have as reasonably pretended that since they had conveyed down the Books in which the Prophecies of the Messiah were contained they hâ—d likewise the right to expound those Prophecies 3. A Witness that hands a thing down without Additions is very different from a Judge that delivers things on his own Authority We freely own the Church to be such a Witness that there is no colour of reason to disbelieve the Tradition of the Books but we see great cause to question the credit of her decisions 4. In this Tradition of Books we have not barely the Tradition of the Church for it We find in all ages since the Books of the New Testament were written several Authors have cited many and large passages out of them We find they were very quickly translated into many other Languages and diverse of those are conveyed down to us There were also so many Copies of these Books every where that though one had resolved on so Sacrilegious an attempt as the corrupting them had been he could not have succeeded in it to any great degree Some additions might have been made in some Copies and so from those they might have been derived to others but these could not have bâ—en considerable otherwise they had been discovered and complained of and when we find the Church engaged in contests with Hereticks and Schismaticks we see both sides appealed to the Scriptures and neither of them reproached the other for violating that Sacred Trust. And the noise we find of the small change of a Letter in the Aâ—ian Controversie shews us how exact they were in preserving these Records As for the Errours of Transcribers that is incident to the Nature of Man and though some Errours have crept into some Copies yet all these put together do not alter any one point of our Religion so that they are not of great consequence Thus it appears how much reason we have to receive the Scriptures upon the credit of such a Tradition But for Oral Tradition it is visible how it might have been so managed as quickly to change the whole Nature of Religion Natural Religion was soon corrupted when it passed down in this Conveyance even during the long lives of the Ancient Patriarchs who had thereby an advantage to keep this pure that after ages in which the life of Man is so shortned cannot pretend to We also see to what a degree the Iewish Tradition became corrupted in our Saviours time particularly in one point which may be called the most essential part of their Religion to wit concerning their Messias what the nature of his Person and Kingdome were to be So that they all expected a Great Conquerour a second Moses or a David so ineffectual a mean is Oral Tradition for conveying down any Doctrine pure or uncorrupted The Ninth Method IS to tell them the Church in which they were before they made the Separation was the true Church because it was the only Church so that they could not Reform the Doctrine without making another Church For then she must have fallen into Errour and by consequence the Gates of Hell must have prevailed against her which is directly contrary to the Promise of Iesus Christ that cannot fail The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against her Remarks 1. A Church may be a True Church and yet be corrupted by many Errours for a â—rue Church is a Society of men among whom are the certain means of Salvation and such was the Iewish Church in our Saviours time For their Sacrifices had still an Expiatory Vertue and the Covenant made with that people stood still and yet they were over-run with many Errours chiefly in their notions of the Messias And thus as long as the Church of Rome acknowledges the Expiation made by the Death of Christ and applied to all that truly believe and amend their lives so long she is a True Church So that those of that Communion who adhere truly to that which is the great fundamental of the Christian Religion may be saved But when so many things were added to this that it was very hard to preserve this fundamental truth pure and entire then it was necessary for those who were better enlightned to call on others to correct the abuses that had crept in 2. It is hard to build a great super-structure on a figurative expression of which it is not easie to find out the true and full sense And in this that is cited there are but three terms and about every one of them great and just grounds of doubting do appear 1. It is not certain what is meant by the Gates of Hell which is an odd figure for an assailant If by Gates we mean Councils because the Magistrates and Courts among the Iews sate in the Gates then the meaning will be that the Craft of Hell shall not prevail against the Church that is shall not root out Christianity or if by Gates of Hell or the Grave according to a common Greek Phrase Death be to be understood it being the Gate through which we pass to the Grave then the meaning is this that the Church shall never die or be extinguished Nor is there less difficulty to be made about the signification of the word Church Whether it is to be meant in general of the body of Christians or of the Pastors of the Church and of the majority of them The Context seems to carry it for the Body of Christians and then the meaning will be only this That there shall still be a Body of Christians in the World And
to which the Council of Chalcedon assented is an entire contexture of authorities drawn from Scripture without so much as any one citation of any Father It is true there is added to the end of that Letter a Collection of some sayings of six Fathers Hilary Ambrose Nazianzene Chrysostome Austin and Cyril who had all except one lived within sixty years or a little more of that time So it is certain they founded their Faith only on the Scripture and not on Tradition otherwise they had taken more pains to have made it out and had not been so easily satisfied with what a few late Writers had said And thus it may be presumed that all the end for which they cited them was only to shew that they did not broach new and unheard of opinions And S. Austin could noâ— think that S. Cyprian's opinion alâ—ne was a sufficient proof of the Doctrine of the first three Centuries for Original Sin and yet he citeâ— no other that lived in those Ages Noâ— could S. Ambrose and Nazianzene that had lived in his own time be cited tâ— prove the Tradition of former Ages And whereas it is insinuated that he cited others one would expect to finâ— a Catalogue of many other Fatherâ— wrapt up in this plural whereas alâ— resolves into Hilary alone And we have a more evident Indication of S. Austin's sense as to the laâ—t resort in matters of Controversie than this they offer in that celebrated saying of his when he was writing against Maximinus the Arian Bishop But neither may I make use of the Nicene Council nor you that of Arimini as that which ought to pre-judge us in this matter for neither am I held by the authority of the one nor you by the authority of the other Let the one side and cause and their reasons be brought against the other from the authorities of the Scriptures that do not belong to either side but are Witnesses common to both The Fourth Method IS to tell them that their Ministers can never do this nor shew in the Scriptures any of their Articles that are controverted and this is very true For example they can never bring any formal Text to prove that Original Sin remains as to the guilt of it after Baptism that we receive the Body of Iesus Christ only by Faith that after the Consecration the Sacrament is still Bread that there is no Purgatory and that we do not merit any thing by our good works And to this it may be added that among all those passages that are on the Margent of their Confession there is not one that says that which they cite it for either in express or equivalent terms or in the same sense This is the Method of Mr. Veron which he took from S. Austin who says to the Manichaeans Shew me that that is in the Scripture and in another place Let him shew me that that is to be found in the Holy Scripture We must then boldly tell them That they cannot prove any of their Articles that are in dispute nor dispute against any of ours by any passages of Scripture neither in express terms nor by sufficient consequences so as to make their Doctrine be received as the Faith and ours pass for Errour Remarks THe first part of this Article proceeds upon Veron's Method of putting us to prove our Doctrines by express words of Scripture but some more cautious person has added in the conclusion a Salvo for good consequences drawn from them upon which we yield that this is a very good Method and are ready to joyn issue upon it If they intend still to build upon that notion of express words we desire it may be considered that the true meaning of all passages is not to be taken only from the bare words but from the contexture of the Discourse and the design upon which they are made use of and that Rule of Logick being infallibly true That what things soever agree in any third thing they do also agree among themselves it is certain that a true consequence is as good a proof as a formal passage Thus did our Saviour prove the Resurrection from the Scriptures by a very remote consequence since God was said to be the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and was the God of the Living and not of the Dead So did the Apostles prove Christ's being the promised Messias and the obligation to observe the Mosaical Ceremonies to have ceased upon his coming by many consequences but not by the express words of Scripture All the arguings of the Fathers against the Heretiâ—ks run on Consequences drawn from Scripture as may appear in all their Synodical Letters more particularly in that formerly cited of Pope Leo to Flavian to which the Fourth General Council assented This Plea does very ill become men that pretend such reverence to Antiquity since it was that upon which all the Ancient Hereticks set up their strength as the most plausible pretence by which they thought they could cover themselves So the Arians at Arimini give this reason for rejecting the word Consubstantial because it was not in the Scriptures The Macedonians laid hold of the same pretence Nestorâ—us gives this as his chief reason for denying the Virgin to be the Mother of God And Eutyches covered himself also with this question In what Scripture were the two Natures of Christ to be found And his followers did afterwards insist so much on this Plea that Theodoret wrote two large Discourses on purpose to shew the weakness of this pretence So that after all the noise they make about the Primitive Church they follow the same tract in which the Hereticks that were condemned by the first four General Councils went and they put us to do the same thing that the Hereticks then put on the Orthodox But we make the same answer to it which the Fathers did That the sense of the Scriptures is to be considered more than the words So that what is according to the true sense is as much proved by Scripture as if it were contained in it in so many express words And yet this Plea had a much greater strength in it as it was managed by those Hereticks for those contests being concerning mysteries which exceed our apprehensions it was not an unreasonable thing at first view to say that in such things which we cannot perfectly comprehend it is not safe to proceed by deductions or consequences and therefore it seemed safer to hold strictly to Scripture Phrases but in other points into which our understandings can carry us further it is much more absurd to exact of us express words of Scripture 2. Most of the points about which we dispute with the Church of Româ— are additions made by them to the simplicity of the Christian Religion So much as we own of the Christian Religion they own likewise In the other particulars our Doctrine with relation to them is made up of Negatives
as that without which we can never be certain of the Faith But if this is true then into what desperate scruples must all men fall For the resolution of their Faith turns to that which can never be so much as made probable much less certain The efficacy of the Sacraments depending on the intention of the Priest none can know who are truly Baptized or Ordained and who are not And it is not to be much doubted but that many profane Priests may have in a sort of wanton Malice put their Intention on purpose cross to the Sacrament For the Impiety of an Atheistical Church-man is the most extravagant thing in the World Beside this what Evidence can they give of the Canonical Ordination of all the Bishops of Rome The first Links of that Chain are so entangled that it is no small difficulty to find out who first succeeded the Apostles And it is not certainly known who suceeeded them afterwards for some few Catalogues gathered up perhaps from report by Historians is not so much as of the nature of a Violent presumption If we consider Succession only as a matter of Order in which we go on without Scrupulosity I confess there is enough to satisfie a reasonable man But if we think it indispensable both for the conveyance of the Faith and the vertue of the Sacraments then it is impossible to have any certainty of Faith all must be sounded on conjecture or probability at most It is but of late that formal Instruments were made of Ordinations or that those were carefully preserved and transmitted In a word difficulties can be rationally enough proposed concerning Succession that must needs drive one that sets up his Faith on it to endless scruples of which it is impossible he should be ever satisfied There is one thing of great consequence in this matter that deserves to be well considered Under the Mosaical Law God limited the Succession to the High Priesthood so that the first-born was to succeed and the great Annual Expiation for the whole people was to be performed by him Yet when in our Saviours time this was so interrupted that the High Priesthood was become Annual and wassold for money God would not suffer the people to perish for want of such Expiation but the Sacrifice was still accepted though offered up by a Mercenary Intruder And Caiaphas in the year of his High Priesthood prophesied So that how great soever the sin of the High Priest was the people were still safe in him that was actually in that Office And if this was observed in a dispensation that was chiefly made up of positive Precepts and carnal Ordinances it is much more reasonable to expect it in a Religion that is more free from such observances and is more Spiritual and Internal 2. Another ground on which those of the Roman Church build is this That a True Church must hold the truth in all things Which is so Sophistical a thing that it might have been expected wise and ingenious men should have been long ago ashamed of it It is certain the Iewish Church was the true Church of God in our Saviours time for their Sacrifices had then an Expiatory Vertue in them So that they had the certain means of Salvation among them which is the formal notion of a True Church And yet in so great a point as what their Messias and his Kingdome were to be we find they were in a very fatal errour The opinion of his being to be a Temporal Prince had been handed down among them so by Oral Tradition that it had run through them all from the Priests down to the Fisher-men For we find the Apostles so possessed with it that at the very time of Christs Ascension they were still dreaming of it And yet this was a gross Errour and proved of most mischievous consequence to them Of this they were so persuaded that the Supream Judicature or Representative of their Church the Sanhedrim that had much more to shew for its authority than a General Council can shew in the New Testament erred in this fundamental point and condemned Christ as a Blasphemer and declared him guilty of Death So that while they continued to be the True Church of God yet they erred in the point which was of all others the most important upon which it is evident that it is no good Inference to conclude that because a Church is a True Church therefore it cannot be in an Errour 3. Another pretence in that Church on which they build much and which makes great Impression on many weak minds is the Churches Infallibility in deciding Controversies by which all disputes can be soon ended and they conclude that Christ had dealt ill with his Church if he had not provided such a Method for the end of all Disputes But it is certain they have lost this Infallibility if they ever had it unless it be acknowledged that it is lodged in the Pope against which the Gallican Clergy has so lately declared And yet it can be no where else if it is not in him for as they have had no General Council for about one hundred and twenty years so they cannot have one but by the Popes Summons and if the Pope is averse they cannot find this Infallibility so at best it is but a Dormant Priviledge which Popes can suspend at pleasure In the Intervals of Councils where is it Must one go over Europe and poll all the Bishops and Divines to find their Opinions So in a word after all the noise about Infallibility they can only pretend to have it at the Popes Mercy And indeed he that can believe a Pope chosen as he generally is by Intrigues and Court factions to be the Infallible Judge of Controversies or that a Council managed by all the Artifices of crafty men as that at Trent appears to have been even by Cardinal Pallavicini's History was Infallibly directed by the Holy Ghost is well prepared to believe the only thing in the World that is more Incredible which is Transubstantiation There was as good reason for lodging an Infallible Authority among the Iews as among Christians for their Religion consisting of so many External Precepts concerning which Disputes might rise it seemed more necessary that such an authority should have been established among them than under a Dispensation infinitely more plain and simple And the Supream Authority was lodged with the Sanhedrim in much higher expressions under the Old Testament than can be pretended under the New as will appear to any that will read the fore cited place in Deuteronomy There was also a Divine Inspiration lodged in the Pectoral by which the High Priest had immediate Answers from the Cloud of Glory and when that ceased under the Second Temple yet as their Writers tell us that was supplyed by a degree of Prophecy which is also confirmed by what S. Iohn says concerning Caiaphas's Prophecying and yet after all this thâ—t