Answ Here you wrong your adversary he speaks of a power and you of an act The Law may actually condemn where and when it cannot actually justifie as it condemneth every transgressor but can justifie onely the innocent and yet the power for to do both is equally in it as a Law Why do you not answer the ensuing Question viz. Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and yet keep it from under the damnatory The Law bids you love your neighbour though your enemy and presuppose you are obedient thereunto yet do you do it so perfectly that the Law hath no power to reprove and condemn you in that particular If the Law condemn you not away with humiliation Confession Repentance Justification and all living by Faith in Christ For now you can so walk according to the rule of the Law that it cannot subject you to the curse and death you are not reproved and judged in your self for any thing your peace and safety is by your just life the Law being curbed and restrained or rather exauthorized or dis-invested of all power to condemn and your life and comfort is not by your Faith in the Son of God who loved you and gave himself for you as Gal. 2.21 There is no condemnation unto you not because you are in Christ as Rom. 8.1 but the reason is in that the Law though a rule yet wanteth power to reign to death We often meet with this groundless and false assertion and now see what is the chief stone that you stumble at Let this now suffice M. B. The same Author again pag. 5. He dare not trust a believer to walk without his keeper c. they are onely kept within compass by the Law but are no keepers of it Answ The word they relates not to believers if you look the place as here you do intimate You onely repeat what we write but confute nothing M. B. The same Author at another time calls it a slander to say they deny the Law who can reconcile such contradictions Answ I see no contradiction nor shew of any you might tell your Reader wherein it lyeth for all are not so quick-sighted as your self But is not this a contradiction in you who say that we grant the Law to be a rule and that a believer is a free keeper of it and yet that we hold and teach the abolition of it Here the task to reconcile is now yours Also that we deny the Law abideth still a slander for which the Law is against you See the the ninth Commandment The Lord layeth it not unto your charge M. B. p. 52. The second interpretation is of the damnatory and cursing power of the Law the Law is not made to a believer so as he should abide under the cursing and condemning power of it Answ You might remember that right now you said The Law a believer is under hath no power to condemn and curse what need he or how can he then be freed from the cursing power See your own instance If the fire had no power to burn what need was there that God should hinder the act You would saign such a fire as is without all power to burn and tell us of such a Law as wanteth power to condemn who will now fear either or rather who can credit such vain words Your sword cuts the throat of the owner for from the removal or restraint of the act or operation the Argument doth not hold for the removal of the thing or the power to condemn but rather on the contrary it strongly and necessarily inferreth and concludeth that there is such a condemning power in the Law in that it is restrained and hindered from the actual doing of it But secondly here is no such miracle wrought upon the Law as was there upon the fire which kept it from burning the three worthies Dan. 3.23 25. though more abundant mercy be shewed for Christ was made under the Law to redeem us from under it Gal. 4.4 Not to take the curse from the Law but to redeem us In what sense and to what end Christ was under as our surety in the same sense are we freed but he was under both the rule and raign of it Yet it will not follow that believers are in no state of subjection and obedience or being enlarged and set at liberty do not run the way of Gods Commandments For they do it though by another efficient from a new principle and for a different end then that of the Law Do and live They are under Christ and moved and led by his Spirit who is the head and husband of his Church But of this more afterwards M. B. Consider some parallel places of Scripture Gal. 5.23 speaking of the fruits of the Spirit Against such there is no Law the Law was not made to these to condemn them Answ And if you refer it to the fruits of the Spirit the Spirit produceth his fruits of himself and of his own accord no outward Law commanding and directing M. B. And if because the godly have an ingenuous free Spirit to do what is good he need not the Law directing or regulating it would follow as well he need not the whole Scripture Answ You would still bear men in hand that we are against the use of the Law which yet we do stand for if lawfully used as your Text requireth and that in all the Authority and Offices of it and this we can and are ready to make good upon occasion yet since this is so often inculcated by you I wish you would give satisfaction in these few things First If the Spirit make the will and affections free to what is good doth it alter and enlighten the understanding also to know what is truth and good and effectually encline move guide and lead aright without the direction and regulating of the Law doth the Spirit which is light and giveth all light and directive power to the Law need the Law in his work 2. You are to prove and cleer better then yet you have done that the Law is instrumental to the Spirit in the works and ways of sanctification 3. Where do you finde that the moral Law doth give help or power unto any jubet non juvat 4. Whereas you say we are flesh and not all spirit c. It may be replyed that by Scripture and all experience sin the wickedness of our nature is rather irritated and strengthened by the Law then weakned and mortified It is such a desperate disease that it makes head more strongly against any legal plaister and application Rom. 7.5 c. M. B. You say it will follow as well that he needed not the Gospel to call upon him to believe Answ Your reason is much unlike for first the Doctrine of the Gospel is not onely the object of Faith but the outward instrument and ordinary means the Spirit useth both to implant faith and to increase it to
not kill and Whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgement But I say unto you That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shalt be in danger of the judgement and whosoever shall say to his brother Racha shall be in danger of the counsel but whosoever shall say Thou fool shall be in danger of hell-fire I Wonder at an Antinomian who is so apt to oppose the doing of things in love M. B. p. 173. and doing them by the law together for doth not the law command every duty to be in love Answ Did not Christ taxe and reprove the Pharisees for their alms prayers sacrifices c. which were things commanded in the law because they wanted pureness of love and did them in hypocrisie for praise and self-ends 2. It is the chief point of wisdom in the teacher to discover want of truth of affection and love to things done according to the outward precept of the law 3. Whoso doth a thing simply being moved thereunto by the authority of the law doth it not in love 4. Though the law require love in every duty yet it both findes us in enmity and yet it cannot breed nor work love in the heart though it be often pressed to be done where no such affection is found nor once spoken of thus most are suffered to bless themselves in that kinde of doing M. B. Yea we are to love God by the law because he hath given Christ for us for the law commandeth to love God for whatever benefit he bestoweth upon us Answ If God command love by the law because he hath given Christ then you must presuppose that Christ was given before promise to give him in future it had been more probable for the promise of the Messiah was before the giving of the Law 2. But neither you nor I if we understand what love in truth is can love God because the law requireth it though that be a reason alledged and used for it for it is his love shed abroad into the heart that causeth love in us We love him because he loved us first Natural enmity whatever we profess otherwise cannot be destroyed and abolished but by faith which purifieth the heart and worketh by love M. B. God doth work grace in us by this the law as well as by the Gospel God doth use the law instrumentally for to quicken up grace and increase it in us as Psal 1 19. sheweth Answ Paul rendereth that as the onely reason why righteousness cannot come by the law because it cannot vivifie quicken or give life Gal. 3.21 the quickening spirit is not adjoyned to it The proper office and end of the law is to convince us of sin and death that we may seek righteousness and life in Christ by faith the branch liveth and groweth in the vine and so fructifieth John 15. But this controversie you do professedly and with all your forces of Scripture and Arguments enter upon and largely handle in your 20 Lecture therefore let us pass on unto it for the whole 19 nothing concerneth us LECT XX. Mat. 5.21 22. Ye have heard it hath been said by them of old c. THE Antinomian doth directly derogate from the profitable effect and benefit of the law M. B. Pa. 187. Answ Your accusation and charge will prove too directly peremptory bold and unjust he that acknowledgeth all the effects and benefits of the Law that the Orthodox or God himself in his word do mention cannot derogate any jot from it M.B. This therefore is the assertion which an Antinomian Author maintaineth viz. that the law is not an instrument of true sanctification and that the promise of the Gospel is the seed or doctrine of the new birth and it may not be denied but that many speeches might fall from some men which might seem to comply with that opinion Answ Here is strange insolency and loftiness of spirit All mens eyes must be put out but yours or theirs who see as you see you pretend learning and reading but how is the judgement of the learned slighted and contemned by you you stand up as a zealous advocate pleading for the Law but what illegality and injustice is this with what scorn and lordliness do you insult over your Adversary and would bear and beat down him the truth and his innocency under the foot of pride and disdain Your single opinion must be preferred before all and received by all in your conceit it carrieth in it the light of the Sun here is the Popes spirit all erre but he all is Gospel that comes from him his word is a law onely his Chair is wanting But what mean the Presisident and Fellows of Sion-Colledge to do in the end who so approve and applaud this man and his Book Intend they hereby to bring in and establish a piece of new and strange divinity and to reject and overthrow what is old and true 1. It may not be denyed say you Answ But if it might then perhaps it would be denyed but there is that convincing power in the light of simple truth that will force even the most impudent somewhat to yeeld 2. Yet see what mincing he useth and how loth he is to grant the whole truth and that the world should know that his Adversary hath any of the learned Orthodox truly and really for him or that he himself opposeth any in this but a vilified and despised Antinomian Many speeches might fall saith he from some men as if they were half a sleep or not so considerate as he is when they let such speeches fall or at least intended no such thing or not in our sense as he often saith for it is in him to put what sense or gloss he pleaseth upon their words that so they may not be for us whenas the same truth yea totidem ipsissimis verbis is asserted by both 3. From some men And are they not men of least worth and account too in the Church I dare say you do think no better of them for it They are but some then perhaps you mean few and yet I think you can hardly name one learned and sound Author from whose pen the same assertion hath not fallen 4. Might seem to comply with that opinion Multa videntur quae non sunt What do they seemingly accord with us but in truth and reality are all for you or as you will have them who have learned to make quidlibet ex quolibet yet why do you not produce one for you because you scarce can do it Reader If thou hast the Assertion of grace and wouldst turn to page 166. and 170. thou maist find there Augustine Luther Calvin Bullinger Cornerus Perkins Cudworth Brentius Piscator Fox Tindal and Rollock unto which it is easie to add as many more Orthodox all punctual and full to the point affirming what I say and their words are direct full and exclusive denying this power and work to the
is that the Hebrew word doth signifie largely any doctrine and so may comprehend the whole word of God Answ You say that others as well as they Antinomian take the law so largely so that you see your Adversarie is not single in his opinion as you are who can produce no Author but onely say It seemeth good to expound that phrase in such a manner And otherwise it seemeth it would cross your designe else I see nor you do shew no reason But Luther and some others upon that place Psal 19.7 do take the law for the moral law but I dare say you will not stand to their exposition of it Luther saith This is no absolute commendation of the law but it is to be understood legem talem factans esse per fidem non talia facit lex The law worketh not these it self but they are effected by the influence of the Sun of righteousness inwardly quickning reviving and comforting the soul through the faith of the Gospel The law giveth nor hath no such heat or vertue of it self but produceth contrary effects It may indeed saith he convert the eye mouth hand ears omnes vires sed magis avertit cor odio paenarum indignatione prohibitae concupiscentiae sed cor non est rectum spiritus non est fidelis In brief his judgement is that after the soul is justified and converted by the Gospel then it loveth the law which it hated before and now it doeth not avert or as being afraid she from God in his law but with confidence and delight draweth nigh unto him and observeth the things of the law because the Spirit of Christ in the Gospel maketh them sweeter to the soul then all the riches and pleasures of this life Thus it s the doctrine of reconciliation by Christ believed on that marvelously altereth the Christians heart causing it to convert and turn to God as being thereby able to abide his sight and presence and to love his saw Et Amans legem non potest eam satis landare adeo placet quae prius adeo displicuit You say nothing that hath any strength in it against the truth held out and maintained by us And by this you may see whence it was that David so commended the law strictly taken because his heart was so altered by the faith of the operation of God It is remarkable saith Luther that the way to love and keep the law is to believe and receive the Gospel from this belief issueth love and all true obedience and it is not bred and effected by the law commanding and requiring it By faith we establish the law Rom. 3. ult M. B. That opinion which would make Christ not take an instrumental way for conversion of men in his first Sermon wherein he was very large that must not be asserted but to hold that the preaching of the law is not a Medium to conversion must needs be to say Christ did not take the nearest way c. Answ You answer your self page 169. where your words are That our Saviours intent was only to explicate the law better then did the Scribes and Pharisees that so they might be sensible of sin and discover themselves to be fouler and more abominable then ever they judged themselves unto which let me add And that by requiring and so letting the hearers see a necessity of a more absolute righteousness then was held forth even in the doctrine of the Scribes and Pharisees he might so destroy all confidence in their own works prevent the establishing of mans righteousness and prepare and dispose them to hearken after his righteousness for he is the end of the law for righteousness to al that believe Rom. 10.4 And by this it may appear that he used the law preparatorily to justification and conversion as you in part are forced to grant it to be the opinion and doctrine of all Orthodox Divines and yet it is thwarted by you who love to have a way by your self M. B. If the law of God have that objectively in it that may work exceedingly upon the heart when set home by Gods Spirit then it may be used instrumentally as well as the Gospel but it hath c. Answ Here is nothing but the vain reason of man If God be otherwise pleased what is it how glorious fit and worthy soever it may seem for this in our eyes The Sun in the firmament is a glorious object to look upon when we have eyes but God useth it not therefore to give and restore the use of sight to those that be blind the seeing man findeth variety of delightful objects to look at among the creatures but they finde him not eyes therefore M.B. 5. If the law of God may be blessed after a man is converted to the increase of his grace and holiness why not then to the first beginning of it That it is for the increase of of Godliness appeareth by experience Answ Every Christians experience teacheth him that the more he inwardly seeth and feeleth that divine love that pardoneth reconcileth and preserveth the soul in that everlasting covenant of sure mercies and peace the more it loveth againe and in love hateth evil escheweth it doth good is every way cheerfully obedient I love the Lord saith David because he heard me when I called upon him in the time of trouble and delivered my soul from death my eyes from tears and my feet from falling What bred and caused love and gained the heart to God at the first that same is of continual force still to enlive and enlarge the affections towards him But because sins are forgiven it is said she loved much Luke 7. and if this Candle be put under a bushel if this Sun the light of Gods countenance do not shine forth upon the Solissequium the soul of a believer it will be dark dull and indisposed to whatever good you can propound to it therefore is it requisite that faith be nourished and ever operative and lively in apprehending and feeding upon that exceeding kindness of God in Christ that so it may be more quick and free in all holy expressions Faith works by love if faith dye or wax cold by which the soul liveth the law can but little work upon or affect the heart Besides as the Christians beginning so his building up and increasing is in another way and by other means then are meerly legal he lives and grows in the Vine Christ and thereby fructifieth M. B. It is hard to think that a Minister having opened any moral duty of the law may not pray to God to cloath that word with power to change the heart of the hearers Answ Why should man thinke it hard or be offended at any thing where he findeth it Gods will that it be so and no otherwise 2. If God reveal not his minde and willingness to put forth any renewing power in the law how can you then pray in faith to be
believing Faith onely is the condition or instrument that doth receive the Covenant but yet that a man believe is required the change of the whole man Answ They qualifie the subject believing in some sense is true but do they qualifie before he believe in believing or after Faith this you should have told us it may be concluded from your words that they must qualifie the subject before he believe and this is your reason because that a man believe is required the change of the whole man as if good works did change the man and so were pre-required to believe I answer 1. That the heart must be first changed I grant for the natural heart is evil and unbelieving And secondly It is a good work to renew and change it yet that is no work of ours but Gods Thirdly Do our good works qualifie towards God Coram judicio Dei as Melanct. or towards others Or to our own sight and sense Is not Christ in us put upon us formed and dwelling in us qualification sufficient for acceptance to salvation M. B. Vse Answ You are still ministring your vain Antidotes Take you heed of that spiritual Anti-Christ within man which strongly maketh head against the true Christ What you preach and profess may be a deceitful flourish you bid reconcile Law and Gospel Justification and holiness c. I know none making such jars between one and the other as doth your self Is the Law then against the Promise Gal. 3.21 That is a blinde conceit Christ was ordained to be the Righteousness of the sinful and lost soul of man and to be received by it in the feeling of the failing and want of all goodness in it self He dwelleth in the poor meek low and broken heart to receive heal and satisfie it We may think and talk of him out of us as held forth in the letter and outward Ministry and all this to small and no effectual consolation or purpose LECT V. 1 Tim. 1.9 Knowing this that the Law is not made for a righteous man M. B. COncerning the righteous man here we must not interpret it of one absolutely righteous but one that is so quo ad conatum desiderium Answ Why may we not understand it as well of one who hath attained to righteousness by Faith which is absolute and perfect as of inherent sanctification which is inchoat and imperfect or why is it that you do altogether exclude this passive and imputed righteousness You do not with the Papists hold it onely to be a putative and not real righteousness And you erre if you take that which is sensible inchoat and so defective to be yet more worthy to give the denomination M. B. pag. 49. The Antinomian and Papist do both concur in this errour though upon different grounds that our righteousness and works be perfect c. and that not only in Justification but in Sanctification also Answ Though the righteousness of Faith in Christ and sanctification by his Spirit which are inseparable in regard of the subject be two distinct things yet they argue not the party to be in a twofold estate towards God for acceptance to favour and life but his estate is peaceable and safe onely by the free grace of Justification You grant your sanctification is imperfect and defective Now sith the sinfulness remaining in us doth dispread it self throughout all the powers of the soul all parts actions and passages of the whole man When you then have gathered and summ'd up all in one do you not bring all your works in the end to yur Justification by your confession of weaknesses wants pollutions c. and so seek forgiveness of the sins of your Prayers Etiam bona opera egent remissione peccati your failings in your Sermons errours of heart and life And this is in effect to have all healed and justified by free justification or the blood of Christ knowing that otherwise all is damnable and in law and justice to be rejected know it and cause also your hearers to learn it that though Justification be one individual act yet the vertue and efficacy of it is necessarily to be extended throughout all the life and wayes of man It purifieth the man and maketh all pure also and acceptable Tit. 1.15 To the pure all things are pure Thus may you see that it is a truth that all are become perfect and the manner also how and lastly that all is in Justification and not in Sanctification and so know your mistake If you receive not this how shall what is imperfect be accepted except either by some mitigation of Gods Justice contrary to that place so much and that without cause urged against us Matt. 5.17 18 or that you will so far be beholding to the new Covenant with the Arminian as to seek for the Grace of it which may pardon or pass by our defects or in effect to deny the extent and continuance of the force and vertue of Justification and Christs blood unto the last end What you charge upon your old Antinomian Islebius I pass by as an Author I never read M. B. As for the latter Antinomian he speaketh very uncertainly and inconsistently Sometimes he grants the Law is a rule but very hardly and seldom then presently kicketh all down again for saith he it cannot be conceived that it should rule but that it also should reign and therefore thinks it impossible that one act of the Law should be without the other the damnatory power of the Law is inseparable from it Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and keep it from the damnatory Assert of Gr. p. 33. Answ None can speak more uncertainly and inconsistently then you in these Lectures you make neither to appear in your adversary but he proveth you guilty of both For when you use these expressions Good works are necessary in the justified and then presently They are necessary in him that is to be justified Again onely Faith in Christ is necessary to salvation the promises of life are made to the believer and good works have the promises of life every good work thou canst do hath a promise made to it of eternal life c. you both leave your reader uncertain what your opinion is and these will in no wise consist together besides many other like passages Also here you say he grants it a rule and yet do charge him with the total abolition of it pag. 43. Is not this inconsistency You say he granteth it hardly nay doth it freely without constraint B. And seldom Ans If need require he will do it toties quoties This is not to kick all down again to say the Law if it rule it doth also reign the latter doth not overthrow the former but onely it crosseth and overthroweth your vain and ayry conceit of a Law ruling and not reigning You say he thinks it impossible that one act of the Law should be without the other
by him then you canonize him for Orthodox M. B. But they never used such expressions in the Antinomian sense as if hereby we were made not only perfectly righteous but also holy and without sin Answ When the Authors have the same expressions and use the same words yet if you may be the Glossary your sinister mind can make their sense to vary and differ 2. They who say we are persectly righteous do affirme us to be holy also and without sin in the same sense and manner but not inherently for if the law require holiness and righteousness how can we be justified in Christ from what the Law hath against us and yet not be as well holy as righteous in him and so without sin what can be spoken by the Spirit of God more plainly then this Christ hath loved us and washed us from our sins in his blood Rev. 15. See also Col. 1.22 And read Luther on Psal 130. vers 3. who there saith They that put not their trust herein alone that by the death of Christ their sins are taken away and Gods eyes closed that he cannot see their sins must needs perish for this onely do the Scriptures set forth that our life resteth wholly and alonely in the remission of sins and in that the Lord will not see our sins but in mercy cover them c. In the reading of which words the said Author of the Honey-comb was much convinced and sore terrified and troubled as he confessed But your carnal reason can put a lower and strange sense upon all such places and so present them in your own shape that nothing may offend any beyond a carnal sense no truth can be admitted what God speaketh plainly will be received no further then wit conceiveth and letteth us see how it may be true and then we will say we belive it but that is not to give credit unto God in what in his word he propoundeth but to assent unto reason as it comprehendeth LECT XV. Exod. 20.1 And God spake c. M. B. HAppily the Law will be more extolled in its digninity then ever by those opinions which would overthrow it Answ It is impossible for any to extoll the Law above the dignity due and proper to it but what you attempt for that purpose doth neither gaine glory to the Law nor commendation to your self 2. You tell us of opinions overthrowing it yet can let your reader see none more subverting and injurious then your own Indeed you bear the world in hand that the adversaries which you have made or feigned to your self do speak against the use of the Law and preaching of it cry down the Law utterly abolish it c. all which with more such-like interwoven stuff is fasly suggested by you to render them erroneous and odious but you can make no such things appear M. B. page 139. For we may either take the word Law for the whole dispensation of the commandments moral judicial and ceremonial or else more strictly for that part we call the moral law yet with the preface and promises added to it And in both these respects the law was given as a covenant of grace which is to be proved in due time or else most strictly for that which is meer mandative and preceptive without any promise at all Answ It is granted the word Law is capable of the two former significations but that in both those respects it was given as a covenant of grace especially in the later more strict sense for the moral law Is a new-coyned and bold assertion lately come out of the mint having as yet no image or superscription upon it save onely ipse dixit to make it currant If your spirits be grown so wanton and confident by reason of some supposed parts or abilities more eminent in your self that you will not keep tract of the Orthodox but slight and reject all humane authority as falling too short of that height you aime at in your aspiring thoughts yet reason requireth it of you to shew your reader some clear text of Scripture upon which you ground your distinction and positions If the moral law strictly and properly so called was given as a covenant of grace Why is it called a law of works requiring mans righteousness And then Paul argued nothing solidly when he said If it be of works it is no more of grace and if of grace it is no more of works else grace is no more grace To admit the one is to exclude and deny the other so inconsistent they be in this point Rom. 11.6 But you take time to prove it and you have your asking and we wait your leisure In the interim you present us with as uncouth and unwarrantable an assertion viz. that the word Law is taken for that which is meer mandative without any promise at all c. It will prove as difficult as bold an enterprize to undertake the proof and defence of this The Scriptures define the law in these words Do and live and so implyeth the contrary viz. He that doth not shall dye so that the mandative is not without the promise nor threatning When Paul saith They that are of the works of the law are cursed Gal. 3.10 doth he not argue convincingly that the works of the law which we do in obedience to its command cannot be secured and set free from the curse And that the law is ever invested with divine authority to promise and threaten to curse and bless to kill and give life I should be afraid so to limit the Lords Soveraignty and to devest him of so much power in his just and holy law as to make him some petite and under-ruler or commander allowing him in his law onely a jurisdiction to make and impose a law without a full and due reigning power having no more light to clear it then as yet you hold forth unto us And now with this wittily-devised key you can pick out and give us the right sense of all those assertions which the learned have concerning the difference between the Law and the Gospel and putting your sense into their words can make them speak as you please But though you can shew us no text to ascertaine the verity of any thing yet you give us a reason as weak and unsound as is your affirmation viz. M. B. For if you take as for the most part they do all the precepts and threatnings scattered up and down in the Scripture to be properly the law and then all the gracious promises where-ever they are to be the Gospel then it is no marvel if the law have many hard expressions cast upon it Answ This reason seemeth to occasion your forged distinction And 1. You would father this upon the learned but tell us of no Author book nor testimony It would have been to your credit and the justification of your weak and questioned cause to have produced one sentence or sillable sounding that way 2.
it M. B. A third and last instance out of Scripture in answering of which all is answered from Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith that of the Gospel or doctrine of Faith In the opening of this Text we must take heed of three errors Answ A Caveat against all error is necessary but it is well that you accuse your Antinomian of none of those three And it had been wisdom in you to have taken heed of affectation of singularity for in rejecting all other of the Orthodox you substitute a most doubtful opinion of your owne as may appear by and by M. B. First I may demand whether any under the old Testament were made partakers of Gods Spirit or no. If they were how came they by it there can be no other way found but that God did give his Spirit in all those publick Ordinances unto the believing Israelites so that although they did in some measure obey the Law yet they did it not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace Answ You might beware of co-incidency with the first error you named of having Faith before the Spirit for ever we come not to Faith by our reason and will yet you grant a giving of the Spirit to believers as if they first believed then received the Spirit but the gifts and operations of the Spirit are divers It s by the Spirit that the soul cometh to union with Christ and after the woman touched the hem of his garment she received a healing vertue but let this pass 2. By your next expression you might seem to be an Antinomian for They obeyed the Law say you but not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace what difference now but I like not to force the joyning of hands where the parties hearts be not first linked yet the Reader may take it as if you contradicted your self for why are your words so exclusive but if it be not by the power of the Law originally as by the first and principal efficient yet you mean still it is a subordinate and secondary cause or mean of conveyance Egregie sane M.B. Again in the next place which hath alwayes much prevailed with me did not the people of God receive the grace offered in the Sacraments in the Circumcision Paschal Lamb They were partakers of Christ as well as we and yet the Apostle doth as much exclude Circumcision and these Jewish Ordinances from grace as any thing else wherefore that there may be no contradiction in Scripture some other way is to be thought upon about the exposition of these words Answ When a man willingly of himself is going down a steep place every thing will further him If you had not first conceived this silly and weak opinion of your self out of a humour of contradiction and desire to be accounted the vindicator of the Law you needed not to be so puzled and put to such shifts nor to seek out such sandy grounds and tottering Pillars to support what you see cannot be upholden I may so far credit you that this hath prevailed with you as you tell us but I cannot think it alway did so for you have not alway thought of this nor alway been of this private opinion that the Law is the doctrine of regeneration 2. Grant that this prevailed to keep and continue you in that minde yet would I learn if I might be so bold what brought you into it at first sure it came by some immediate inspiration for I see neither clear Scripture nor Author for it 3. As it hath so prevailed with you so I am sensible of no force at all in it whether to incline or carry the judgement unto it at first or to keep the minde the same still Consider better of it It is granted the people of God did receive the grace offered in their Sacraments c. and were partakers of Christ as well that is as truly and as really as we now what is this to your purpose I ingenuously profess I see not wherein it maketh one jot for you or to confirm your tenet what would you infer hence you say the Apostle did as much exclude these ordinances from grace as any things else and as well as much as the Law that must be your meaning Answ Your self have seemed still to exclude the Law from Grace and to make a direct opposition between them 2. As for Circumcision and these Ordinances being in their prime institution types yea signes exhibitive of Christ and if not essential parts yet appendances of their Covenant of Grace which cannot be said of the Law it being a doctrine of another nature and use therefore neither the Apostles nor Prophets in that case and sense did exclude them from Grace but onely as the hypocrites Ceremonia Legis in sua natura consideralae non autem quatenus suo tempore Sacramenta erant gratiae Pisc Gal. 3. and unbelievers did use them as resting in the things done or using them being antiquated and our of date or joyning them with Christ and Faith as necessary observances to salvation c. Now as this assertion will be too bold as unjustifiable That the Apostle doth as much exclude the Jewish Sacraments in their prime pure and right use from Grace as he doth the Law so that Argument is too childish viz. If the believing Jewes were partakers of Christ and did receive grace by these Ordinances so did they receive grace by the Moral Law also If you look again there is neither contradiction in Scripture nor occasion given to seek out such an uncouth and unwarrantable exposition of the words M. B. Some there are that understand by the Spirit c. Answ Here you first present your Reader with Beza's interpretation but that is misliked as not to your purpose Again say you thus it may be explained As by faith is meant the doctrine of faith so by the works of the Law is to be understood the doctrine of the works of the law thus far I approve which the false Apostles taught viz. That Chrict was not enough to justification unless the works of the law were put in as a cause also Answ If you look into Act. 15. and compare vers 1. and 5. it seemeth that they taught Christ for justification for it is said vers 5. they believed and what should they believe in Christ for but for righteousness and yet they required Circumcision and the keeping of the Law of Moses as necessary to salvation vers 1 5. when we are justified we must work to get heaven So many now hold and teach that good works and observing of the Law are not needfull to justification but they are to salvation of which sort you will prove one if I mistake not Contrary to Act. 15.10.11 Now why tempt ye God to lay a yoak on the Disciples necks c. that is as though he
not unto themselves but unto us they did Minister the things that are now reported unto you 1 Pet. 1.12 Mr. B. There are two notorious falshoods 1. That God indeed saw sin in believers in the old Testament but not in these of the new Answ To see sin is as an Act of Gods justice in the legall Ministration under which they were in the old Testament but now as is cleared we are not under that Ministration as sometime you yeeld so that it may follow that God might see sin in those and not in these You conceive and think of God without reference to his word and would have sin the object of his eternall and incomprehensible sight in a carnall sense and imagination Can you believe that God remembreth the sinnes of his people no more as his Covenant is Heb. 8.12 And why not then be perswaded of this Mr. B. Was not that place God seeth not iniquity in Jacob spoken of the Church in the old Testament and besides If the Godly were in Christ then doth it necessarily follow by his principles That God must see no sin in them Answ The Authour took that place as I remember to be a Prophesie of a future state 2. Though they were in Christ yet not being adulti but in their time of minority under that legall government God might see and impute sin temporally unto them so there appeareth no absurdity or contradiction but that you love to have your own words Mr. B. The second difference he maketh is that God seeing did therefore punish and afflict for it but he doth not so now So Moses was stricken with death c. Now who seeth not how weak and absurd these Arguments are for doth not the Apostle 1 Cor. 11. speaking of those under the new Testament say That some were sick some did sleep were not Ananias and Sapphira struck dead immediately Answ Your words indeed are that his Arguments are weak and absurd but you make no such thing to appear As for that of 1 Cor. 11. his Answer to it still may suffice for you shew not any invalidity of it nor regard his distinctions there given Besides It will not be granted that those Corinthians nor yet Ananias and Sapphira were believers And so your reason falleth short of the point in question Mr. B. The Arguments of the Antinomians for the greater part do not onely overthrow the use of it to believers but to unbelievers also Answ Their Arguments if rightly conceived of and used do not overthrow the use of the Law to either but then you must keep it within its own proper limits and use it lawfully I grant if you understand those words The Law is a Schoolmaster to Christ historically onely for some make a mysticall and spirituall sence of them also then the meaning is that the same believing Jew who before was under the Law yet since Christ is freed from that servitude and so his state is changed that Pedagogy is no longer yea and believer or unbeliever in the daies of the Gospel we are not to meddle with that administration by Moses but onely to give care to the Gospel which is preached to all for the obedience of faith Rom. 1.2 5. but then it will necessarily follow that he that believeth is actually freed from the yoke of the Law if from the whole occonomy then from every part And he liveth by his faith onely under meer free grace Rom. 6.14 Mr. B. We will grant that to a believer the Law is as it were abrogated in these particulars 1. In respect of justification 2. Condemnation 3. Rigid obedience 4. It s no terrour nor are the godly slavishly compelled to obey 5. It doth not work nor increase sin as in the wicked 6. It is abrogated in many accessaries and circumstances Answ You say you had rather use the word Mitigation then Abrogation as being proper c. And I mislike both as they are used in reference to the Law for both Scripture and experience shew that neither word is incident nor can possibly befall the Law of God for it is inviolable If the Fire burn you not not Sea drown you it s not because they have lost that naturall power to do it but in that you happily are kept out of either such as abide under the Law find no true abrogation or mitigation And if the Law justifie not it 's not because the power of it to do it is lost or lessened for then it could not promise life to the observers saying Do. and live but in that it doth not justifie and give life actually to any that weakness is not in the Law but in man through the flesh Rom. 8.3 for the Law neither can nor ever yet had power to justifie a sinner nor one that failed the least in the observance of it And the like may be said in respect of condemnation The Law curseth and threatneth upon Sinai but cometh not on Mount Sion In Christ we are freed from the Law and so from its Condemnation so the change is in the state of a Christian but no alteration in the Law at all Your own expression cleareth it While the Law by reason of sinne doth pursue me I runne to Christ for refuge and seek to be found in him this I implyeth that the Law hath not lost any of its threatning or cursing power and that my security is not that the Law wanteth power to condemn but that I am in Christ and under his protection Phil. 3.9 As for your third respect of mitigating the rigid obedience as you call it yet I see you are forced to yeeld what D. Tailer and others did not that it cannot be maintained If we fail in the least tittle we are presently gone by the Law And as Christ hath not obtained at Gods hand that the Law should not oblige and tye us to a perfect obedience so you might as truly say he hath not procured that the Law should not justifie us being sinners for this it could not do before But I am glad to have such words from you that all our obedience is accepted not because of any mitigation in Gods justice or for dignity in the duty but onely in and through Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 the best piece of Divinity I find in your Book but then there is no mitigation of rigid obedience in the Law To the fourth To speak properly the Law is therefore no terrour because a believer is not under it for it is a terrour to all that be under it the Christian being under grace is free from terrour And if he be sometime or something afraid that is not because there is not fulness of security in his condition but through the imperfection of faith as children we fear where and when we have no true cause neither doth it argue any less terrour in the Law And you have some strange add unsound expressions in this Section for grant a regenerate and ungenerate part
in that you say that this made the great commotion at first between the Orthodox and the Antinomians Before I entermeddle with this dispute let me deliver my opion Which is That Repentance cannot be said properly to be the doctrine of the Law and yet the Law is not by this wholly excluded as you say it is by the old Antinomians whom you mean or what their Tenets were I know not neither think it much material I shall love the truth in any and maintain them no further Now my inducement hereunto is because the Law never mentioneth Repentance nor hath any word to exhort and call thereunto It worketh indeed preparatorily in the soul by revealing sin and misery so as a man findeth himself undone without help or hope in great distress but this is not Repentance for here Man is a Patient being convinced subdued and brought in his spirit under the work of the Law And this may well be called the former Mortification which is not of sin in Man but in the Man for sin as Rom. 7.11 But to repent is an act a thing to be done put upon man being plunged into this great depth of woe and horrour as a hopeful and initial mean to obtain mercy pardon and salvation this is clear to me from Act. 2.37 38. Where those Jews being beaten down and exceedingly terrified in the conscience of that horrid fact the killing of the Lord of Life and crying out as sinking in despair for advice and councell presently Peter said unto them Repent c. whence I collect with Ambrose that all that former sight and sence of sin and legall terrour was no part of Repentance It was yet to begin yea and secondly It was prescribed as the first course to be taken with hope of recovery Not that Repentance was in their or any mans power for it is God that giveth it 2 Tim. 2.25 26.3 None are bid to Repent without a promise of mercy annexed withall to move him to it which promise holding forth the grace of the Gospel is doubtless first hearkened unto received and credited and so the burthened conscience conceiving now a good hope through Faith in this promise begins to repent and seek unto the Lord. Hence Isaiah saith chap. 55.7 Let the wicked man return unto the Lord and he will have mercy upon him and to our God for he will abundantly pardon and Joel 2.13 Rent your hearts and not your garments and turne to the Lord your God for he is gracious and mercifull c. So that to me it is clear that in order of nature the doctrine that holdeth forth the graciousness of the Name and nature of God in Christ in whom he is propitious ought first to be published both because our conceits naturally are that God will not favour and receive sinners but the just and good are they onely unto whom the promises of acceptance and blessing do belong And also in that God in that Ministry of the Law hath already appeared unto the dejected soul in another forme and under a contrary notion revealing wrath threatning a casting off and shutting up all mercies in displeasure against it because of sin for how else possibly can these naturall and inbred conceits and imaginations of God be raised out of the mind and the soul be perswaded that notwithstanding and beyond all that it apprehends of God in his Law and is become sensible of yet there is hope of mercy forgiveness and redemption with the Lord So that the effectuall and immediate incentive and introduction to repentance and turning to God is the promise of Grace by Jesus Christ When Benhadad King of Syria and his servants being in great strait and danger of losing their lives considered what they had heard of the Kings of Israel how that they were mercifull see their humble resolution Let us put ackcloth on our loynes and ropes upon our heads and go out to the King of Israel 1 King 20.31 But on the other side Adam not so conceiving of God out of the inward privity of his disobedience and being then altogether ignorant of any mercy to be shewed by God in that way that afterward God acquainted him with he in stead of repenting and falling down in a sorrowfull confession of what he had done and crying peccavi In his inward horrour and fear ranne away hid himself and then would fain have excused the matter Now if the way be thus freely set open for all he that comes not in is inexcusable and he that desireth may come but this is not that any soul should rest contented with hearing that it may be freely welcome but that it come indeed and so it find an effectuall entrance into that state and kingdom of Grace for too many do hover and dally with these weighty things and the inward terrours ceasing to pursue the soul to the utmost the bare knowledge and having of the letter of this word of Grace sufficeth them being never truly converted healed and comforted And this is the main reason of their hankering after the legall way for a supply of what they want or of turning this Grace into wantonness So that I cannot but marvell that you or any experienced Christian should so oppose D. Crisp whom the Lord raised up and used as a choice instrument to open this free way to poor sinners that if God had given them a heart to come whatever their sins were they might come and welcome and nor be rejected nor denied what they defired as if his doctrine were against repentance whereas it tendeth to breed and bring forth true Repentance not to be repented of I had thought to have writ a Treatise onely upon this Subject seeing how opposite mens minds are to that so acceptable truth of God Who will seek unto him that smiteth him humbling and casting down himself at the foot of the Lord willingly if he do not first hear and know that God pardoneth iniquity and delighteth in shewing mercy God draweth the froward heart of man with the Cords of his love and overcometh his evill and rebellious nature by shewing and commending his kindness even as afterward he frameth their heart and putteth his own into the same way to follow him in labouring to overcome evill with good Rom. 12.21 Ephes 5.1 2. And lastly who will not be contented to be numbered amongst transgressors yea and willingly sit down with the greatest and chiefe of sinners when he heareth that God is mercifull to sinners justifieth the ungodly and where sinne aboundeth maketh his Grace to abound the more thereby taking occasion to manifest and magnifie his graciousness in the eyes of all the World as Rom. 5.20 Ephes 2.7 Ephes 1.6 By this you may see still that the Law excludes and keeps out the sinful soul and that it may convert and turne unto God the word of his Grace onely is to be preached Now I come to consider what you write Mr. B. The word repentance is
all his so that I see not how you can make his Elect singly and simply to be any partys in undertaking and promising any thing You say Dr. Cr. giveth this reason why it is not on condition of our believing because man may fail in believing and so the condition failing Covenant faileth Reply His reason is good and sound for of it selfe faith is failing else Christ needed not to have prayed that Peters faith might not fail Luke 22.32 But all the whole Covenant being grounded on Christ as the foundation it is established on a firm Rock and so is everlasting Mr. Rutherf They object that God promiseth all as to give faith to put Law in the inward parts to cause to walk in his waies as Jer. 31. Ezek. 36.26 27. To circumcise our hearts Deut. 30.6 which the Arminians deny yet is the clear day-light of Scripture so that all lyeth on God Reply But you return not one syllable of a direct and satisfactory answer unto it you cannot deny but what God promiseth he is faithful to perform and do it You inferre some indirect and undue consequences as if you would rather wrangle against the truth which you cannot resist or were offended that it shineth forth so gloriously and convincingly in your face What if Dogs abuse it and Pharisaical Spirits otherwise principled spurne against it or mis-construe it as occasioning Libertinisme the sin be theirs yet this is the onely right ground and reason of prayer and using all Gods Ordinances in which the soul carrying it self passively waiteth that God may communicate and pour out his blessings according to his word Because God had promised first and that freely the building of Davids house and the King saw thereby that God had a gracious mind and purpose to do it and that it should be his act therefore David prayed that the Lord would bless his house that it might continue for ever before God For thou O Lord hast spoken it 2 Sam. 7.27 28 29. If all fulness be in the fountain and free access may be had it standing open to all It is an effectual invitation to come As for those opinions bred and breathed in New-England I know nothing of them neither am I so credulous or uncharitable towards any as to receive whatever an Adversary reporteth for if the liquor be never so pretious and pure yet if it come out of a fusty and tainted vessel it will taste of the Caske I see none of you so candid but in some things you wrong the Author in perverting his words or meaning even when it is printed and obvious to every eye But here you let all see that you cannot outwrangle the truth for at last you chide your self to agree and yeeld to it for 1 you say I grant God worketh the condition Then how is it mans condition or how can it be said to lye on him 2 Truth is say you It 's an unproper condition for the whole bargain is pure Grace Thus you are brought to grant all and no thanke to you for you would fain have it a condition still An unproper one must serve rather then none God indeed worketh orderly one thing after another the former as is said we may call a State-condition but not otherwise properly and without danger But ere you cease you tell us again of Libertinisme c. Reply Well receive the love of the truth and here shake hands and cast your stones against abusers of Free-grace if your side be not guilty of the like or worse You have a watchfull eye to look into our waies if in love to us we thanke you It might occasion us at least if we had any unfeigned desire that the good and fair way of the Lord might not be evil spoken of to walk more circumspectly but if the word of Grace leaven not the heart it will abide graceless And I rest perswaded that if it had not been either the licentious or loose life of some who are noted or because such as had been formerly wicked and prophane did flock after Dr. Crisp and attend to his Ministery as they did in Luke 15.1 2. and that it was more glorious and effectual then others else that you and your fellows would never have used tongue or pen against this way My reason is because it is so clear and undenyable that having searched and sifted it with all diligence there is found no solid and material cause of exception against it but all is resolved into envy and prejudice As for that question of justification before faith or after I have spoken to it in answer to Mr. Burgess It 's true God in his Gospels-dispensation onely pronounceth the sentence of absolution to the believer for he dealeth in it with men of actual understanding and the main end is to quiet and comfort the conscience for which purpose faith is mainly useful as to give glory unto God But you grant that the Covenant is with Christ and all his Heirs and kindred in him he being a publique person in whom all were acquitted and that is sufficient 4 Exception in pag. 102. Mr. Rutherf Can we saith Mr. Towne separate the directing or commanding power of the Law from the condemning power Is it a Law and hath no power to condemn Answ Actual condemnation may be separated as a Lyon is a Lyon though chained that he cannot actually devour it could not condemn Adam before sinne c. Christ hath removed the curse Reply The question is whether the Lyon be a devouring beast and you answer He cannot actually devour because he is chained but doth chaining change his devouring nature and so hath not the Law a condemning power still though it condemn not actually alway you see power to do it is not taken from it That it did not condemn Adam in innocency hath no more sinew of Argument in it then that the Law of the Land hath no power to condemn murther because there is no actual murtherer It hath power to do it but it is to exercise and put forth its power in a way of justice that is when the sinne is actually committed You say but they are vain words without light or weight that to condemn is accidental to a Law I reply as truely and in the like sense That to command and direct be as accidental so the whole of the Law in all its parts and offices shall be accidental for the Law doth not actually rule and govern Lawless rebels may not I then as solidly inferre It hath no authority nor power to do it yea in Hell among the damned as in our prisons there is Law onely actually condemning and tormenting but not ruling and directing in its way of holiness Lastly You should prove that Christ hath removed the curse from the Law he hath redeemed his from under it but left the Law with all the power it had But you speak what Mr. Burgess objected also If need be see more in Answer to