Selected quad for the lemma: prince_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A52764
|
A Letter from Oxford concerning Mr. Samuel Johnson's late book
|
N. N.
|
1693
(1693)
|
Wing N40; ESTC R4251
|
12,066
|
31
|
in the Clouds were set at work by the Court to perswade the Nation that what the Clergy taught us as the Law of God was really and truly the Law of this Realm likewise Our Gentlemen here have not used to trouble their Heads much with humane Laws which they are apt to look down upon with Contempt and account of them as a Knack only by which one sort of Men amongst us pick Money out of other Mens Pockets but they had heard at a Distance of Fundamental Laws and were very ready to believe such Men as Brady Iohnson Filmer c. who told them as from History Records and the utmost Antiquity that our Government was the same by our Law that it was or ought to be by their Divinity Thus they were lull'd asleep till the Consequences of their Principles came to stare them in the Face in King Iames his time Slavery they could digest for that was what they had professedly own'd preach'd and printed But they were not aware that Slavery would bring in Popery or whatever the Soveraign had a mind to till they saw by Experience that a Slave is a Dog that must leap over a Stick and back again as his Master bids him Being thus at a stand and having no Remedy left them but their Prayers and Tears it pleased God to stir them up a Deliverer whom indeed they accepted at first with open Arms tho some of them thought afterward he delivered them more than he needed however neither the Providence of God nor the Authority of the States of the Realm nor the Vox Populi would be limited and restrained by the Dreams of our Men of Theory The Revolution being thorowly wrought they were glad to find themselves in the Condition they were in and as the Wit of Man is fruitful of Inventions they cast about how to come in to the Interest of this present Government without renouncing what they had formerly so openly avow'd to be the Law of God and according to their several Judgments Wits Apprehensions Fancies Whimsies Fooleries c. one submits to Providence another to an Usurper another to a King de facto another to a Conqueror one says King Iames left us another we turn'd him out another Gallio-like cares for none of these things but submits to the Powers that are Now this Book of Mr. Iohnson's has so effectually even in their own Judgments and by their own Acknowledgments beat them out of all these weak Strong-holds that they begin to be satisfied that what all the rest of Mankind believe is true to wit that there is no safe Rule for Conscience in Civil Affairs but the several Laws of Nations and this makes them see the necessity of enquiring into our Laws if they will be Dogmatical in Matters of this nature or else of submitting their Judgments to the States of the Realm Assembled in Parliament This great Work Mr. Iohnson's Book has done with many here it has convinced them that Law is Law and that heretofore they did not understand the difference betwixt Law and no-Law And this Conviction having put some of them upon bending their Studies towards an Enquiry into the Laws of this Government we may hope to see fulfill'd what was said by the Prophet The Priest's Lips should keep Knowledg and they should seek the Law at his Mouth for he is the Messenger of the Lord of Hosts The two Positions which Mr. Iohnson lays down in the beginning of his short Book at the end of his Preface viz. That the People of England did actually Dethrone King Iames the Second for Misgovernment and promoted the Prince of Orange in his stead And That this Proceeding was according to the English Constitution and prescribed by it Have used to be traduced by our Clergy as Republican Principles and as such are branded by a Reverend Prelate of our Church in a Preface of his to three Treatises concerning the Iesuits Loyalty Where according to the Genius of the Court as it then was he expresseth himself thus viz. It is allowed by all Friends to our King and his Government that the Commonwealth-Principles are destructive to it and that none who own them can give any sufficient Security for their Allegiance All the mischievous Consequences of the Republican Principles do follow upon the Pope's owning the Power of deposing Princes However the Primitive Christians thought it no Flattery to Princes to derive their Power immediately from God and to make them accountable to him alone as being superiour to all below him yet after the Pope's Deposing Power came into Request the Commonwealth-Principles did so too and the Power of Princes was said to be of another Original and that therefore they were accountable to the People These Principles and Practices we of the Church of England profess to detest and abhor The Power of the People and the Deposing Power of the Pope are two fundamental Principles of Rebellion The Commonwealth's-men when they are asked how the People having once parted with their Power come to resume it presently run to an implicit CONTRACT betwixt the Prince and the People by virtue whereof the People have a fundamental Power left in themselves which they are not to exercise but upon Princes Violation of the Trust committed to them Who made Conditional Settlements of Civil Power upon Princes Who keeps the ancient Deeds and Records of them For in all the first Ages of the Christian Church this Conditional Power and Obedience was never heard of Here we see the Foundation upon which this Government stands and under which this Author has accepted Preferment and all the Proceedings of the Lords and Commons and of the People towards the effecting the late Revolution are branded as Republican Principles destructive to the Government such as none who own can give sufficient Security for their Allegiance such as the Church of England professeth to detest and abhor a CONTRACT betwixt Prince and People turn'd into Ridicule and what not Now this Gentleman took another Course in his Politicks than Mr. Iohnson has done A few Years after he wrote this Preface he might perhaps enquire a little into our Antient Laws and Government which it is to be presumed he was in a great measure in the dark concerning when he let fly thus at random against Republican Principles of his own Christning If he had consulted the Examples of our Forefathers and the Provisions made by them from time to time even with the Concurrence and Assent and by the Authority of our Princes themselves for the securing the Laws and Liberties of the People and for a due and impartial Administration of Justice according to settled and established Laws he would hardly have traduced Positions as new upstart Commonwealth-Principles which have so deep a Root in the Legal Government of this Nation and which whoever shall deny does as far as in him lies set this present Government upon a rotten sandy Foundation He would then perhaps have learn'd
to practise what he tells us the best Teachers of Christianity did viz. They never meddled with Crowns and Scepters but left Mankind under those Forms and Rules of Civil Government in which they found them What greater and better Argument can be given against Church-mens introducing Religion or Christianity into the Forms and Rules of Civil Government than what this Gentleman acknowledges viz. that our Saviour and his Apostles meddled not with it They left the several Civil Governments to depend upon their own Laws Policies and Constitutions and there and no where else are we to seek for a Rule and Guide to our Consciences in Matters relating to Allegiance and Protection the Power of the Prince and the Duty of Subjects I am not here professedly taking upon me to maintain either of Mr. Iohnson's Positions which no Man is better able to make good than himself though there is no great need of his undertaking it neither unless some or other should have the Impudence to contradict him But I must beg leave to observe that heretofore under the Reigns of Princes whose Accession to the Throne was occasion'd by the Removal of their Predecessors the Doctrine contain'd in Mr. Iohnson's second Position was never look'd upon as dangerous to Princes but countenanced and openly a vowed In the first Year of King Edward the Third there are these observable Words in a Stature of that King viz. Whereas it was necessary for our Soveraign Lord the King that now is and the Queen his Mother seeing the Destructions Damage Oppressions and Disherisons which were notoriously done in the Realm of England upon Holy Church Prelates Earls Barons and other Great Men and the Comminalty by the said Hugh and Hugh Robert and Edmund Arundel by the incroaching of such Royal Power to them to take as good Counsel therein as they might And seeing they might not remedy the same unless they came into England with an Army of Men of War and by the Grace of God and with such Puissance and with the Help of Great Men and Commons of the Realm they have vanquished and destroyed the said Hugh and Hugh Robert and Edmund Wherefore our Soveraign Lord the King that now is at his Parliament holden at Westminster c. hath provided ordained and established That no Great Man nor other of what Estate Dignity or Condition he be that came with the said King that now is with the Queen his Mother into the Realm of England nor none other then dwelling in England that came with the said King that now is and the Queen in Aid of them to pursue their said Enemies IN WHICH PURSUIT THE KING HIS FATHER WAS TAKEN AND PUT IN WARD AND YET REMAINETH IN WARD shall not be impeached molested nor grieved in Person nor in Goods in the King's Court nor other Court FOR THE PURSUIT OF THE SAID KING TAKING AND WITHHOLDING OF HIS BODY nor Pursuit of any other nor taking of their Persons Goods c. This same Parliament reversed the Attainders of several Persons who had assisted Thomas Duke of Lancaster towards the Removal of the Spencers Father and Son from the Presence and Councils of King Edward the Second and particularly the Attainder of Thomas Duke of Lancaster himself who as Lord High Steward of England had betaken himself to Arms to drive the Spencers out of the Realmor to bring them to Justice and had given the King Battel And they not only reverse his Attainder but in a Letter to the Pope give an Account of his Worth of the Justice of his Cause that he died a Martyr that Almighty God had been pleased to give a Testimony of his Innocence c. by permitting several Miracles to be wrought at his Tomb which they desire the Pope to issue a Commission to enquire whether they were real or not and to canonize him for a Saint The Reversal of his Attainder and this Letter are yet extant upon Record Nor could I ever meet in any of our Histories or Monuments that give any Account of that Revolution that King Edward the Third claimed the Crown either by Conquest though he came from beyond Sea with a Force too and routed and dispersed those evil Counsellors who had got the King into their Interest or by Right of Inheritance though he was indeed the next Heir but could have no Title by Descent as long as his Father was alive or that any other Hypothesis was invented to colour his Accession to the Crown than what was really true in Fact which was no other than his being set up by the States of the Realm who had deposed his Father for his Misgovernment upon formal Articles of Impeachment which are yet to be seen in Adam Orleton's Apology at the end of Henry Knighton's Chronicle Much less would that King have endured such as should charge him to his Face with Usurpation and that he was a King de facto only but not de jure We know how his Successor King Henry the 4th treated a couple of Prelates that opposed his Title which was the same with that of his Grandfather the Victorious King Edward the Third The Bishop of Carlisle was proceeded against in Parliament and sentenced to Death though the King was pleased to remit that But for the Archbishop of York the more virulent and bitter Adversary of the two he made no more ado but chopp'd his Head off Queen Elizabeth's Title to the Crown was by virtue of a Remainder settled upon her by Act of Parliament other she had none nor ever pretended to any for she stood Illegitimated by an Ecclesiastical Sentence confirmed by Act of Parliament And so sure a Title she took this to be and was so little ashamed to own it that it was made Higk-Treason during her Reign to deny that the Succession of the Crown might be altered by Act of Parliament and a Praemunire for ever I mention these things because we hear to our Astonishment that Mr. Iohnson's Book is not well receiv'd at Court where of all other places in our poor Opinions it ought to meet with the kindest Entertainment because it justifies his Majesty's Proceedings which were previous to the Revolution and represents him as the Truth is to be a King who has a Just and a Legal Right to the Crown by the Laws of this Realm By what Logick it can be made ill Doctrine to assert the Lawfulness of removing bad Princes under the Government of good Ones and those such as upon a supposition of the Unlawfulness of removing bad Ones can have no good Title to the Crown themselves is what we cannot easily comprehend But I have ever thought that Courtiers see farther into a Mill-stone than other Men and that their way of Reasoning differs from that of the rest of Mankind since I saw King Charles the Second heal I took notice that when the King put the Gold about their Necks that came to be Touch'd the Bishop repeated over and over these