the Spaniards return'd and depriv'd Peter the second time and slew him in fight hand to hand who proved an excellent Prince and for his great nobility in Conversation and prowess in Chivalry was called El Cavalero the Knightly King and for his exceeding benignity and liberality was Sirnam'd also El delas Mercedes i.e. the King who gave many Gifts or the liberal frank and bountiful King which was a great alteration from King Peter the Cruel his Predecessor In Portugal also before I go out of Spain I will alledge one Example more which is of Don Sancho the 2d fourth King of Portugal lawful Son to Don Alenso Sirnam'd El Gardo 3d King of Portugal This Don Sancho after he had Reigned 34 years was deprived for his defects in Government by the universal Consent of all Portugal Garib lib. 4. de hist Port. cap. 19. and this approved by a general Council in Lions and Don Alonso third Brother to the said Don Sancho succeeded who enjoy'd the Kingdom of Portugal prosperously and peaceably all the days of his life and he was a notable King who among other great Exploits set Portugal free from all subjection Garib hist Port. lib. 34. cap. 20. dependance and homage to the Kingdom of Castile which unto his time it had acknowledged and he left for his Successor his Son and Heir Don Dionysio el Fabricador that is the Great Builder for he built and founded above 44 great Towns in Portgual and was a very excellent Prince In Polonia Henry the 3d who was King of France thô before Sworn King of Poland Vide Gagnen part 1. of which Crown he was deprived by publick Act of Parliament for departing thence without Licence and not returning at his day by the State appointed and denounced by publick Letters of peremptory Commandment This was a clear Abdication and the said State proceeded against him much after the same manner as ours did against the late King James In Denmark Cisternus their lawful King if we respect his descent in Blood being Son to King John who Reigned before him and Crown'd in his Fathers life was deposed for his intolerable Cruelty and driven into Banishment together with his Wife and three Children which were all disinherited and his Uncle Frederick Prince of Holsatia was chosen King and Cisternus thô he married the Sister of Charles the 5th Emperour of Germany and was Related also to Henry the 8th of England yet he could never prevail to be restored but past his time miserably partly in Banishment and partly in Prison till he died Now I think it convenient to end this short Narration with an Example or two out of England being I have not read of more remarkable Accidents concerning this Point than in the History of this Kingdom But for brevities sake I shall content my self with three or four Examples which hapned since the Conquest thô I may well look higher as appears by the deprivation of King Edwin and others Now I might instance King John who the States had deprived first at Canterbury and after at London in the 18th year of his Reign but being he was in actual War with the Barons and had a considerable Party to espouse his Quarrel and not being deprived by Parliament I shall therefore pass it by not accounting it so compleat a Deposition as that of Edward the Seconds was Polydor. lib. 18. it being done by Act of Parliament assembled in London in the year 1326 and his Body adjudg'd to perpetual Imprisonment he being Prisoner at that time in the Castle of Wallingford Stow in the Life of Edw. the 2d whether divers both Bishops Lords and Commoners were sent to him to denounce the Sentence of the Realm against him viz. how they had deprived him and chosen Edward his Son in his stead For which act of chasing his Son he thank'd them heartily and with many Tears acknowledg'd his own unworthiness Whereupon he was degraded his name of King first taken from him and he appointed to be call'd Edward of Carnarvan and then his Crown and Ring were taken away and the Steward of his House brake the Staff of his Office in his presence and discharged his Servants of their Services and all other People were discharged of their Obedience and Allegiance to him and towards his Maintenance he had only 100 Marks a year allowed for his Expences and then he was delivered into the hands of particular Keepers who led him Prisoner from thence to many other places using him with extreme Indignity in the way until at last they took away his Life in Berkley Castle and his Son Edward the 2d Reign'd in his stead who if we respect either Valour Prowess length of Reign acts of Chivalry or the multitude of Famous Princes his Children left behind him was one of the noblest Kings that ever England had After him succeeded Richard the 2d Son and Heir to the renowned Black Prince of Wales who forgetting the miserable end of his Great Grandfather for evil Government and the felicity of his Grandfather for the contrary suffered himself to be abus'd and misled by evil Counsellors to the great prejudice and disquiet of the Realm For which cause after he had Reigned 22 years he was also depos'd by Act of Parliament held at London 1399 and condemn'd to perpetual Imprisonment in the Castle of Pomfret where he was soon after put do death as the other before had been in whose place by free Election was chosen the Noble Henry Duke of Lancaster who prov'd a notable King and was Father to Henry the 5th commonly call'd the Alexander of England for as Alexander the Great conquered most part of Asia in the space of 9 or 10 years so did this Henry conquer France in less time I may also reckon in the number of Princes depriv'd for defect in Government thô otherwise of no ill life Henry the 6th who after 40 years Reign was deposed and imprisoned by Edward the 4th of the House of York and the same was confirm'd by the Commons and especially by the People of London and also by publick Act of Parliament not only in respect of the Title which King Edward pretended but also by reason that King Henry suffered himself to be over rul'd by the Queen his Wife and had broken the Articles of Agreement made by the Parliament between him and the Duke of York and solemnly sworn on both sides in punishment whereof and of his other negligent and evil Government Sentence was given against him and Edward the 4th elected in his place who was an excellent Prince But after this there sell another Accident much more notorious which was That Richard Duke of Gloucester this King Edward's Brother did put to death his two Nephews and made himself King and thô he acted very barbarously by taking the Crown in this wicked manner yet when his Nephews were once dead he might reasonably seem to be lawful King both
VINDICATION OF THE Parliamentary Proceedings Against the Late KING JAMES II PROVING That the Right of Succession to Government by Nearness of Blood is not by the Law of God or Nature but by Politick Institution WITH Several Instances of Deposing Evil Princes Shewing That no Prince hath any Title Originally but by the Consent of the People Ad generum Cereris sine caede aut sanguine pauci Descendunt Reges sicca morte Tyranni Licensed July 20. 1689. J. Fraser LONDON Printed and Sold by Randall Taylor at Stationers-Hâ—â—â— 1689. THE PREFACE TO THE READER I Should not think it necessary to prefix a Preface before this small Treatise especially since it handles only Matters of Fact such as the Judicial Acts of Commonwealths did I not suspect that some Malicious Persons whose Inclinations and Opinions are hereby thwarted would brand it with the Name of Seditious and Antimonarchical therefore I shall here enter my Protestation against such malicieus Aspersions by declaring That nothing herein mentioned has the least design to lessen the Duty and Obedience of Subjects toward their Princes And I do sincerely abhor the Principles of those Men who make so little account of their Duty that upon the least private Disgust or Discontent do invent a thousand Calumnies to the discredit of their Prince without Conscience or Reason intending only the revenge of private Injuries and not the publick Good as they would plausibly insinuate These men I take to be such as the Apostles S. Peter and S. Jude spake of when they said God knoweth how to reserve the Wicked unto the day of Judgment to be there tormented but yet much more those which do contemn Domination or Government and are bold and liking of themselves Nay further I am of Opinion That whatsoever a Princes Title be if once he is setled in the Crown and admitted by the Commonwealth every man is bound to settle his Conscience to obey him in whatsoever he lawfully Commands without examination of his Title or Interest For God disposes of Kingdoms and brings many things to pass in the Affairs of Princes by great and extraordinary means so that if we should examine the Titles at this day of all the Princes in Christendom by the ordinary Rule of private Mens Rights Successions or Tenures we should find so many knots and dissiculties with which they are perplext that it would be impossible to reconcile them And this is my Opinion for true and quiet Obedience dand yet on the other side I am as far off from the abject and wicked Flatteries of such as affirm Princes to be subject to no Law or Limitation either in Authority Government or Succession as thô by Nature they had been created Kings from the beginning of the World or as thô the Commonwealth bad been made for them and not they for the Commonwealth or as thô they had begotten or purchased or given life to the Publick and not that the Publick had exalted them or given them their Authority Honours and Dignity These and such like are the absurd Paradoxes which some Men have writ in flattery of Princes who in my Opinion deserve no Commendation or Reward since such Assertions destroy all Law Reason Conscience and Commonwealths and do bring all to such an absolute Tyranny as no Realm ever did or could suffer no not under the Dominion of the Turk himself at this day where some proportion of Equity is held between the Prince and People both in Government and Succession thô nothing near so much as in Christian Kingdoms It is therefore the intent of the ensuing Treatise to evince that our Predecessors have not been such Slaves to their Kings as some men would perswade us and that the Deposition of King James granting it to be so and waving the advantage of the Abdication is no new and unheard of thing as we hope to make appear beyond all doubt or exception For if we can prove that most Christian Common-wealths have upon just and reasonable Causes and to prevent Tyranny and Oppression excluded Princes from Reigning when their Title by Succession was apparent and also Deposed Evil Princes when they had lawful possession of the Crown If common-wealths I say have in all former Ages exerted this ample and transcendent Jurisdiction what Reason imaginable is there why they should not do so still and save themselves from Publick ruin and desolation by resisting and removing their evil Heads whensoever they are able so to do since God hath wonderfully concurred for the most part with such Judicial Acts of the Commonwealths against their Evil Kings not only in prospering the same but by giving them also some notable Successor in place of the Deposed thereby both to justifie the Fact and remedy the Fault of the Predecessor as is evident by the following Examples and also by this last of our own Country where in place of a King that endeavored nothing so much as the utter subversion of our ancient and fundamental Laws and Liberties the extirpation of our Religion and the subjecting us to the unsufferable Toke of the See of Rome our Old and Capital Enemies Instead of such a King I say it has pleased God to bless us with one as it were in token of his approbation of our late Proceedings who designs nothing but the universal Interest and Welfare of the Nation as is apparent since in six Months he has confirm'd and establish'd those Laws and Constitutions which his Predecessors have been 60 years undermining who instead of suspending Laws has only suspended his Negative Voice And we may send the same Message to the late King James which the States of France sent unto Charles of Lorain after their Election of Hugh Capet â—ard lib. 6. and his Exclusion which Gerard the French Historian records in these Words Every Man knows Lord James that the Crown and Realm of England and Scotland belong'd unto you according to the ordinary Law of Succession but yet the very same Laws which gave unto you this Right of Dominion have judg'd you also unworthy of the same being you have not endeavour'd to frame your Life and govern your People according to the prescript of those Laws nor according to the use and custom of your Country of England but rather have allyed your self with the French Nation our old and inveterate Enemies and acquainted your self with their vile and base Manners Wherefore seeing you have forsaken and abandon'd the ancient Interest of England we have also abandon'd and left you and have chosen the Prince of Orange for our King and this without any scruple or prejudice of our Consciences at all esteeming it far better and more just to live under WILLIAM the present possessour of the Crown with enjoyment of our ancient Laws customs Priviledges and Liberties than under you the Inheritour by Propinquity of Blood in Oppression strange Customs and Cruelty This is the Speech made by Command of the States to Charles of
and a Prince Ruling by his Will is less than a Man or a man Brutified In another place the same Philosopher saith Aristot lib. 1. cap. 2. That a Prince who leaveth Law and Ruleth himself and others by his Appetite is of all Creatures the worst and of all Beasts the most furious and dangerous For that nothing is so outragious as Injustice Arm'd and no Armour is so strong as Wit and Authority the first he hath as Man the other as a Prince For this cause all Commonwealths have prescribed Laws unto their Princes whereby to govern as by a most excellent certain and immutable Rule to which sense Cicero said Leges sunt inventoe Lib. 2. Offic. ut omnibus semper una eadem vâ—ce loquerentur For which reason they have been called by Philosophers a Rule or Square inflexible But the Prophet David who was also a King seemeth to call them by the Name of Discipline for that as Discipline keeps all the parts of a Man or of a particular House in order so Law duly administred keeps all the Members of a Commonwealth in Peace and Plenty And to shew how severely God exacteth this at all Princes hands Psal 2. he uses these Words And not learn ye Kings and be instructed ye Princes of the Earth Serve God in fear and rejoyce in him with trembling Embrace the Discipline lest he enter into wrath and so ye perish from the way of Righteousness Which Words being spoken by a Prophet and a King contain many Points worthy of Consideration As first That Kings are pound to learn Law and Discipline Secondly To observe the same with great humility and fear of Gods Wrath And Thirdly That if they do not they shall perish from the way of Righteousness As if the greatest Plague imaginable to a Prince were to lose the Way of Righteousness Law and Justice in his Government and to give himself over to Passion and his own Will whereby he is sure to come to Shipwreck From like Authority and for like Consideration have come the Limitation of all Kings and Kingly Power in all Times and in all Countries both touching themselves their Posterity and Successors Which is apparent in the two most Renowned States of the World that of the Romans and Grecians who both began with Kings but yet with far different Laws and Restraints about their Authorities For in Rome the Kings that succeeded Romulus had great Authority but yet their Children or next in Blood succeeded them not unless chosen by the Senate and People so as of the Three most excellent Kings that ensued immediately after Romulus viz. Numa Pompilius Tullius Hostilius and Tarquinus Priscus Tit. Liv. lib. 1. doe 1. none of them were of the Blood Royal nor of Kin to one another nor yet Romans born but chosen rather from amongst Strangers for their Vertue and Valour In Greece among the Lacedemonians which was the most eminent Kingdom at that time the Succession of Children was most certain but yet their Power was so restrain'd by the Ephori as they were not only checked and chastned by them if occasion served but also Deprived and sometimes put to Death For this Cause Aristotle did justly mislike this eminent Jurisdiction of the Ephori over their Kings but yet we see hereby what Authority the Commonwealth had in this case and what their meaning was in making Laws and restraining their Kings Power viz. thereby the more to bind them to do Justice We may repeat a multitude of such Examples in Heathen Kingdoms but being they may be rejected as being no President for us we shall haste to shew How Christian Kingdoms have limited their Princes Now if we consider the Roman Empire as it is at this day annexed to the German Electors thô it be the first in Dignity amongst Christian Princes yet we shall see it so restrained by particular Laws as the Emperour cannot do so much as other Kings for he can neither make War nor exact any Mony but by the free leave and consent of the German Dyer or Parliament and as for his Children or next of Kin they have no Interest or Pretence to succeed in their Fathers Dignity but only by free Election if they shall be thought worthy Nay one of the chiefest Points that the Emperour must Swear at his Entrance is Sleyden lib. 8. That he will never go about to make the Dignity of the Empire Peculiar or Hereditary to his Family but leave it to the Electors free in their power to chuse his Successor according to the Law made by Pope Gregory the Fifth and the Emperour Charles the Fourth The Kingdom of Polonia is much of the same manner with the Empire both for its restraint of Power Cromenias lib. 3. hist Polo and successions of its King for they have great Limitations being they can do nothing of great moment without the consent of certain Principal Officers called Palatines or Castellans neither may their Children succeed them unless they are Chosen as in the Empire in Spain France and England the Priviledges of Kings is much different from the former The Kings of Spain and France have greater Power than the Kings of England for that every Ordination of these two Kings is Law it self without the Approbation of the Commonwealth But in the Point of Succession it appeareth that the restraint is far greater in those two Countreys than in England for in Spain the next of Blood cannot succeed but by a new Approbation of the Nobility and Bishops of the Realm as it is expresly set down in the two Ancient Councils of Toledo the 4th and 5th In France the World knows that Women are not admitted to succeed in the Crown be they never so near in Blood neither any of their Issue thô it be Male. For which cause Edward the Third of England thô he were Son and Heir to the Daughter of France whose three Brothers were Kings and left her sole Heir to her Father Philip the Fourth yet was he put by the Crown and Philip de Valois a Brothers Son of Philip the 4th preferr'd to it by general Consent of the whole Parliament of Paris And thô the Salic Law is not very ancient as the French themselves do confess and much less made by Pharamond their first King or in those ancient Times as some without ground do affirm yet we see its sufficient to bind all Princes and Subjects of that Realm to observe the same and alter the course of Natural Descent and Nearness of Blood as we have seen but such things are not suffered in England for that our Laws are otherwise which were made by the Commonwealth By all which it is manifest that most Kingdoms have different Laws and Customs both as to their Authority and Succession and it is not enough for a man to alledge bare propinquity of Blood for that he may be excluded for several other Reasons which we shall hereafter discuss I
know it hath been confidently asserted by some base Flatterers that in all successive Monarchs the Heir should enter by title of Birth without condition consent or approbation of the Realm as also without Coronation Oath or Obligation to fulfil any Law or to observe any Priviledges of Church or State. These are things which only serve to terrisie the People and set them more against his Entrance than to advance his Title Another of their Propositions is That albeit the Heir apparent which is next by Birth to any Crown should be never so impotent or unfit to govern or if it should be known that he were most Malicious and Wicked and should go about to destroy the Commonwealth and drown the Ship he had to guide yet say they he must be Sacred and admitted without contradiction to his Inheritance which God and Nature hath designed him and his direction restraint or punishment must only be remitted to God alone for that no Man or Common-wealth may reform or restrain him This Doctrin one would think should be no sooner delivered but contemn'd by any Rational man who regards the end why all Commonwealths and Kingdoms and all Governments were ordained by God and Nature and not the flattering or adoring of any one miserable Man who shall endeavour to destroy the whole But to come to the particular Matter we are to treat of which is What is to be attributed to Succession or Propinquity of Birth alone First therefore I am perswaded that Succession is much to be preferred not for that it wanteth all all Difficulties and Inconveniences but like as before I have shewed of the particular Government of Monarchy in respect of other Forms viz. that it wanted not all but had sewer Inconveniences than other Forms of Regiment have so I say also of this That thô some Inconveniences are not wanting in Succession yet they are commenly far less and fewer than would follow by meer Election which is subject to great and continual danger of Ambition Emulation Division and Sedition which do evidently threaten the universal destruction and desolation of the whole Body at the Death of every Prince which Inconveniences have no place in Succession Secondly The Prince who is in present possession knowing that his Son or next of Kin is to succeed takes care to leave the Realm in good order as the Husbandman doth to Till and Manure the Ground which is his own and must remain to his Posterity Thirdly There are less alterations in Common-wealths where Succession prevails for that the Son commonly retains the same Friends Counsellors and Officers which his Father had before him and often pursues the same Actions and Intentions Fourthly He that entreth by Succession is either born a Prince or hath been much respected for his Title to the Crown and bringeth less Passions of Hatred Emulation Anger Envy or Revenge against particular Men for that no man durst offend him than he who entreth only by Election for he having been a Subject and equal to others before his Advancement and therefore had contention with many especially about his Election which he will seek to revenge when he is in Authority As on the other side also such as were his Equals before will bear him less respect and be more unwilling to obey him than if by Birth he had been their Sovereign Now as by Succession we remedy the difficulties of Election yet there remains one great and manifest Inconveniency in the former namely That some unapt impotent or evil Prince may offer to enter by priority of Blood which is to be prevented by adding Election Consent and Approbation of the Realm to Succession so as Succession by Election and Election by Succession will be help'd and the one made a Preservative and Remedy against the other And this is the wisdom and high Policy left by God and Nature to every Commonwealth for their own Conservation and Maintenance and every Man that is void of Passion will not only allow but also commend the same Now we shall proceed and shew what Interest a Prince hath before he 's Crown'd or Admitted by the Realm which I take to be the same as the King of the Romans hath to the German Empire after his Election and before he is Crown'd Or to use a more familiar Example to Englishmen as the Mayor of London hath to the Majoralty after he is Chosen and before he is admitted or taken his Oath For as this Man in rigour is not truly Mayor nor hath his Jurisdiction before his Oath and Admission nor the other properly Emperour before his Coronation so is not the Heir truly King though his Predecessor be dead and he next in Succession until he is Crown'd or Admitted by the Commonwealth thô for better keeping of Order and avoiding Tumults and Consusion most Commonwealths that have their Princes by Succession have consented that from the Death of the former Frinces all Matters of Government shall pass in the Name of the Successor if his Succession be clear under supposition of the Confirmation and Approbation of the Commonwealth afterwards Now as for the Princes of England it 's expresly noted by English Historians that it only hapned to Henry the Fifth among all his Predecessors to have Homage done unto him before his Coronation and oath taken and that for the exceeding Love and Affection the People had for him Whereof Polydore writeth in these words Polydor. Virgil lib. 22. Prince Henry after he had finisht his Fathers Funeral caused a Parliament to be conven'd at Westminster where whilst Consultation was had according to the ancient Custom of England about Creating a new King behold on a sudden certain of the Nobility of their own free wills began to Swear Obedience and Loyalty to him Which demonstration of love and good will was never shewed to any Prince before until he was declared King. And Stow expresseth the same thing in his Chronicle Stow in the beginning of the Life of Henry the 5th in these words To this Noble Prince by assent of the Realm the Nobles after three days offered to do Fealty before he was Crown'd or had solemniz'd his Oath well and justly to govern the Commonwealth which Offer before was never found to be made to any Prince of England Thus much Stow. In whose Narration as also in that of Polydore it may be noted that King Henry was not called King till after his Coronation thô his Father had been dead almost a Month before As secondly That the Parliament consulted about making a new King according to the Custom of their Ancestors which argueth that he was not yet King thô his Father was dead and that the manner of our Old English Ancestors was not to account him so before his Admission Thirdly That this good Will of the Nobility to acknowledge him for King before his Coronation and Oath solemniz'd truly and justly to govern the Realm was very extraordinary and meer kindness And lastly
admit the Succession of Etheldred both in respect of the Murther of King Edward his elder Brother committed for his sake as also for that he seem'd a Man very unsit for Government and of this Opinion was that holy Man Dunstand Archbishop of Canterbury who in flat words denied to Consecrate him but seeing the most part of the Realm incline to his side he told that it would repent them afterwards and that in his Life the Nation should be destroy'd as indeed it was and he forc'd to Normandy and left Sweno and his Danes in the possession of the Realm thô after Sweno's Death he return'd and died in London He had two Wives the first an English Woman by whom he had prince Edmond Sirnam'd Ironside for his great strength and courage Now he that will consider the passage of the Crown of England from the death of Edmond Ironside eldest Son of King Etheldred until the acquisition thereof by William Duke of Normandy will easily se what Authority the Commonwealth hath had to alter Titles of Succession according as publick necessity required Now since King William the First commonly call'd the Conquerour thô in truth he never grounded his Title upon any thing but the Election of the Confessor and Consent of the people the exclusion of Princes against the ordinary course of Succession is more notorious than in elder times therefore I shall only refer the Reader to their particular Lives who succeeded before the lawful Heirs by propinquity of Blood. As first William Rufus and henry the First before Robert their elder Brother King Stephen before Henry the Second and King John before Arthur Duke of Britain Some years afte when the Barons and States of England dislik'd the Governent of King John they rejected him and chose Lewis the Prince of France to be their King and swore Fealty to him at London and depriv'd the young Prince Henry his Son but after the death of his Father king John they recall'd again that Sentence and admitted this Henry to the Crown by the name of Henry the third and disannull'd the oath and Allegiance made to Lewis of France Now from this Henry the Third the Houses of Britany Lancaster and York do seem to issue as a triple Branch our of one Tree Now if we consider the Titles of the Kings of the House of York and those of Lancaster we shall see plainly that the best of all their Titles after the deposition of King Richard the Second depended most or the Authority of the Commonwealth for as the People were affected and the greater part prevailed so were their Titles either confirm'd altered or disannulled by Parliament and yet we may safely affirm that either part when they were in possession of the Crown and confirm'd therein by parliament were true and lawful Kings and that God concur'd with them as with true Princes for government of their People For if we should deny this Point great Inconveniences would follow and we should shake the States of most princes in the World at this day as by Examples which I have already alledg'd may appear And sO I shall end this point affirming That as propinquity of Blood is a great preheminence towards the attaining of any Crown yet it doth not bind the Commonwealth to admit it if weightier Reasons should urge the contrary Now it will be a further proof of what I have before alledg'd viz. That all Commonwealths have prefix laws to their Princes which they are as much bound to keep as any Subject if we consider their oaths at their Admission or Coronation And first of the Emperour who Swears to defend the Christian Religion to minister Justice equally to all Men to keep and observe all laws and priviledges of the Empire not to alienate or engage the possessions of the Empire to condemn no man but by course of Law and that whatsoever he does otherwise shall be void and of no validity Unto these Articles he Swears first by his Legates and he gives a Copy of his oath to each Elector and after he goes to be Crown'd where in the middle of Mast the Archbishop of Colen asks in the presence of all the the People Whether he is ready to Swear to the aforesaid Articles and he answers that he is then the Archbishop leads him to the high Altar where he Swears to them in express words which being done the Archbishop turning to the princes of the Empire and People there present asks them Whether they be content to swear Obedience and Fealty to him who answers Yes then he 's Anointed and the other two Archbishop lead him into the Vestry where Deacons are ready to put on his Robes then the Bishop of Colen delivereth him a drawn Sword and puts a Ring on his Finger and a Scepter in his Hand and then the three Archbishops put the Crown on his head and so he 's plac'd on the Imperial Throne where all the Princes swear Obedience to him Now it 's to be noted that the Emperour Swears three times twice himself and once by his Deputies before his Subjects Swear once to him In Polonia the manner of Crowning thieir King is in substance the same as of the Emperour His Oath is in these Words I do promise and swear before God and his Angels that I will do Law and Justice to all and keep the Peace of Christ's Church and the Vnion of his Catholick Faith and if which God forbid I should break my Oath I am content that the Inhabitants of this Kingdom owe no Duty or Obedience unto me as God shall help me and gods Holy Gospel In Spain I find that the manner of admitting their Kings was different and not the same before and after the destruction thereof by the Moors but yet in both times their Kings did Swear in effect the self-same Points which before have been mentioned in other Kingdoms Now Ambrosio Moral reports Ambro. Moral lib. 13. cap. 2. That a certain law was found writen in the Gothish Tongue and left since the time of Don Pelayo the first King after the Moors which prescrib'd how Men must make their King in Spain and how he must swear to the priviledges and Liberties of that nation Before all things it 's establisht for a law Liberty and Priviledge of Spain that the Kings shall be made by Voices and Consent perpetually to the intent that no Evil king may enter without the Consent of the people seeing they are to give him that which with their Blood and Labours they have gain'd from the Moors Thus far goes the first Article of this Law which is the more to be noted because the most ancient of the Spanish Historians do say that from this Don Pelayo the Succession of their Kings was ever by propinquity of Blood and yet we see that Election was joyned with it in express terms The second part of that Law contain'd the Ceremonies us'd in those old times at the admission of their
unperform'd to his Prince The first when the Prince observes not the Promise or Oath made to the Common-wealth at his Admission or Coronation the second when it should turn to the great damage of the Weal publick for whose sake only good Princes were ordain'd as often before hath been said and proved if the Subject should keep his Promise and Oath made unto him For if in my Opinion he is an Enemy to the Truth and that his Religion obliges him in Conscience to destroy and extirpate all that are not of it shall act against my Conscience and sin damnably in the sight of God if I do not endeavour to render him incapable of destroying others that are not of his own erroneous Opinion and of bringing their to perdition wherein I am perswaded he remains This Doctrin is founded upon the discourse of S. Paul to the Romans and Corinthians against such Christians as were invited to the Banquets and Tables of Gentiles 〈◊〉 14. Cor. 10.14 and finding Meats offered to Idols which they esteemed unlawful to eat did yet eat the same against their own Judgment and Conscience which the Apostle saith was a damnable Sin not because the thing it self was evil or unlawful but because they judg'd it so and yet did it And now to apply all this to our present purpose affirm and hold That for any man to give his help consent or assistance to the making or upholding of a King whom he believes to be of a wrong Religion and obliged to root out and extirpate those he thinks Hereticks and who consequently will endeavour all he can to promote it and ruin ours our Liberties Propertie and what else is valuable to us is a most grievous and damnable Sin For if S. Paul has plainly and absolutely pronounc'd in the place before alledged that even in eating a piece of Meat that its damnable for a man to discern and yet eat What may we think will it be in so great and important matter as he making of King if for a man to dissemble or act against his own Conscience or Judgment that is to say to discern and judge that he 's a declared Enemy of our Religion and obliged t destroy the Professors oâ— it and yet to further or uphold his Authority and Government over Protestants where he may be able to ruin or pervert many and to obstruct all Honour and true Worship due to God and whether he does this or not yet I shall be guilty of it all for that knowing and perswading my self that he is like or disposed to do it by the Principles of his Religion yet for fear slattery carelesness emulation against others vain pretence of Title want oâ— Zeal to Gods true Religion and Worship or for such other passions or temporal respects I favour or further his Pretences or do not resist him when it 's in my power by which I do justly make my self guilty of all the Evils Miseries and Calamities both Temporal and Spiritual which afterwards by his evil Government do or may ensure for that I knowing him to be such an one did notwithstanding assist his promotion And thus much for matter of Conscience But if we respect Reason of State also and Worldly Policy it must be great folly and oversight for a man to promote to a Kingdom in which he must live one of so pernicious and destructive Religion to himself for let the Bargains and Agreements be what they will and fair Promises and vain Hopes never so great yet seeing the Prince once made and setled must needs proceed according to the Principles of that Religion and consequently must soon break with the other Party thô before he loved him never so well which perhaps is very hard if not impossible for two of so opposite Religions to love sincerely but if it were so many suspicions accusations calumniations and other aversions must needs light on the Party who is of so opposite and different Religion from his King as not only he cannot be capable of such preferments and honours which he may desire and deserve in his Country but also he shall be in continual danger and subject to a thousand Molestations and Injuries always incident to those men who are not currant with the course of their Prince in matters of Religion Which to remedy they must either dissemble deeply and against their own Conscience pretend to favour and forward the Designs of the Government how pernicious soever they may be to the welfare of the Kingdom or else to avoid this slavish dissimulation they must wave all the temporal Commodities of this life and leave the benefits which their Country might afford them and live Exiles in a forein Kingdom which has been the fate of many brave Men in our time So as of all the disabilities which serve to exclude or remove a Prince the adhering to so destructive and pernicious a Religion as Popery is is the principle and ought to be the first and chiefest thing consider'd by the Commonwealth especially he being of that Religion which denies all charity peace happiness or security of Life or Property to such as are not of its Communion whose growth and increase the State hath 〈…〉 〈…〉 â—â—â—nicious a Doctrin which notwithstanding 〈…〉 useless and ineffectual for our security when 〈…〉 James a protest Papist was admitted to 〈…〉 who with one breath suspended and annull'd 〈◊〉 the Laws of the Reformation And thô we have been â—uilty of great oversight and failure and been wanting to the security and support of the true Protestant Religion when he was but Heir apparent and as I said before a Spouse betrothed only and not married to the Common-wealth yet to pursue the Allegory we have made as good reparation as such an oversight could permit by divorcing him and taking a new Husband of our Perswasion Now S. Paul to the Corinthians determines plainly That if two Gentils married together in their Gentility which none can deny to be a true Marriage for so much as concerns the Civil Contract and after one is made a Christian the other will not live with him or her or if he do nor without blaspheming God and temptation to Sin In this case I say the Apostle teacheth and out of him the Canon Law decrees that this is sufficient to break and dissolve utterly this Heathen Marriage and that the Christian may marry again and this only for want of Religion in the other party which being so in an actual Marriage which is so much favoured by Christ when he said Whom God hath joyned let no man separate it is much cleaver in this Metaphorical Marriage of a King to the Common-wealth which may be dissolved for many more Reasons and with infinite less danger of incurring Gods Anger than the former So that I hope all ingenuous Readers who peruse this Treatise and throughly weigh and consider the Examples and Arguments herein mentioned will think themselves free from all obligations of Duty or Allegiance to the late King James being his Authority is expired to which Allegiance was inseparably incident and seated in the Royal Persons of Willian and Mary our most renowned King and Queen whom we are bound to obey without the least scruple FINIS
chosen Souldiers to reduce the Rebels as he called them to their Obedience God appeared to one Semia an holy Man and commanded him to go to the Camp of Rehoboam and tell them that they should not fight against their Brethren who had chosen another King but that every Man should go to his House and live quietly under the King they had chosen and so they did and this was the end of that Tumult which God for the Sins of Solomon had permitted and allowed of And thus much I thought good to relate concerning the Jewish Commonwealth for that it may give light to all the rest I am to treat of for if God permitted and allowed this in his own Commonweal that was to be the Example and Pattern of all others that should ensue no doubt but he approveth also the same in other Realms when just occasion offers either for his Service the good of the People or for the punishment of the Sins and Wickedness of some Princes that the Line of Succession should be altered Now then to pass on further and to begin with the Kingdom of Spain which hath had three or four Races or Descents of Kings as France also and England have had First Race And the first Race was from the Goths which began their Reign in Spain after the expulsion of the Romans about the year of Christ 416 to whom the Spaniard referreth all his Nobility as the French doth to the German Franks and the English to the Saxons who entred France and England in the same Age as the others did Spain and the Race of the Gothish Kings endured Three hundred years until Spain was lost unto the Moors The second Race is from Don Pelago Second Race that was chosen first King of Austria after the destruction of the Kingdom by the Moors about the year of Christ 717 which Race continued and added Kingdom unto Kingdom for the space of Three hundred years until the year of Christ 1034 when Don Sancho King of Navarre got the Earldom of Aragon and Castile and made them Kingdoms dividing them among his Children to his second Son Don Ferdinando Sirnamed afterwards The Great he gave not only the Earldom of Castilia but by Marrying also the Sister of don Dermudo King of Leon and Asturia he joyned all those Kingdoms together Third Race and so from that Day began the third Race of the Kings of Navarre to Reign in Castile and so endured for Five hundred years until the year of Christ 1540 when the House of Austria entred to Reign by Marriage of the Daughter of Don Ferndinando Sirnamed The Catholick Fourth Race and this was the fourth Race of the Spanish Kings after the Romans Now in these four Ranks of Regal Descents divers Examples may be alledged for my purpose yet I shall pass by my first Race for that its evident by the Councils of Toledo which were held in those Times That express Election was joyned with Succession for in the 4th Council of Toledo Cap. 74. are these Words Let no man among us snatch the Kingdom by presumption but the former King being dead let the Nobility of the Kingdom together with the Priests and Clergy appoint the Successour of the Kingdom by Common Council Which is as much as if they had said Let no man enter upon the Kingdom by presumption of Succession alone but let the Lords Spiritual and Temporal by Common Voice see what 's best for the Weal-publick Don Pylao the first King after the destruction of the Kingdom by the Moors died and left a Son named Don Favilla who was King after his Father and Reigned two years aftes whose Death none of his Children werre admitted for King thô he left many but Don Alonso was chosen by the unanimous Consent of the Gothish Nation and for no other Reason Ambro. Moral lib. 13. cap. 6. 9. 10. but that the Kings Sons were young and unable to govern and this Alonso proved an excellent King and as Sebastianus Bishop of Salamancha who lived in the same time writes was for his Valiant Acts Sirnamed The Great To this Famous Don Alonso succeeded his Son Don Fruela who was a Noble King for Ten years and had many great Victories over the Moors but after declining to Tyranny he became odious to his Subjects and was Deposed and put to Death Anno Domini 768 Moral l. 13. cap. 17. and tho' he left two Sons yet for the Prejudice conceived against their Father neither of them were admitted by the Realm to succeed him but rather his Cousin Don Aurelio who Reigned Six years and died without Issue and because the Hatred which the Spaniards conceived against the Memory of Don Fruela was not yet extinguish'd they would not yet admit any of his Generation but excluded them a second time and chose Don Silo a Brother-in-Law of his so that the right Heirs of Don Fruela were twice put back for his evil Government But Don Silo being dead without Issue as also Don Aurelio was before him and the Anger of the Spaniards against Fruela being well asswaged they admitted his Son Don Alonso whom they had twice put back But he dying without Issue Don Ramiro his Cousin was chosen Moral cap. 33. and thô Don Ramiro was next in Blood to Alonso yet he was elected by the States as the Historian expresly writes But in the time of Don Ramiro the Law of Succession by propinquity of Blood was much reviv'd and strongly confirm'd and from this time forward the King always caus'd his eldest Son to be named King or Prince and to be always Sworn by the Realm and Nobility yet we shall find this Ordinance to have been frequently broken upon several Considerations As for Example after some Descents from Don Ramiro which were Don Ordonio this Mans Son and Don Alonso the Third Don Garzia and Don Ordonio the Second all four Kings by orderly Succession It hapned that in the year of Christ 924 Don Ordonio the Second dying left four Sons and one Daughter lawfully begotten and yet the State of Spain displaced them all and gave the Kingdom to their Uncle Don Fruela second Brother to their Father and for no other Reason but their being young and not so able to govern as their Uncle was But after a year this Fruela died leaving many Sons of a full Age yet the Spaniards put them all by the Crown and those Don Alonso the Fourth And this shall suffice concerning the Race of Don Pylao first Christian King of Spain after the Entrance of the Moors Now for avoiding prolixity we 'll omit many Instances that are for our purpose and be content to repeat a few of latter Date And First In the year of Christ 1276. Don Sancho Sirnamed El Bravo for his great Valour was chosen and his Nephews who were Heirs apparent put back because he weas a great Warriour and more like to manage better the Matters of War than they
And this was done in a General Parliament which was held at Segovia in the year 1276. and the two Princes his Nephews were put in Prison but afterwards by the intercession of their Uncle King Philip of France they were releas'd and had certain Lands given them and of them came the Dukes of Medina Coeli and all the rest of the House of Cerda which are of great Nobility in Spain Not long after this Garab lib. 15. 〈◊〉 1. An. 1363. when Don Pedro Sirnamed The Cruel King of Castile was driven out and his Bastard-Brother Henry the Second set up in his place John of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster having Married Dono Constantia the said King Peters Daughter and Heir pretended by Succession to the said Crown of Castile which was really his Right but yet the State of Spain denyed it flatly and defended it by Arms and prevailed against John of Gaunt as did also the Race of Henry the Bastard against his lawful Brother and the Race of Don Sancho the Uncle against his lawful Nephews and this hapned in the third and principal Descent of the Spanish Kings when this Matter of Succession was most assuredly and perfectly establisht and yet who will deny the Kings of Spain who held under the latter Titles To be true and lawful Kings By which it appears how frequently the Line of Succession has been altered in Spain upon any reasonable Consideration which they imagined to be for the Publick good And the like we shall find in France and England which we shall begin to treat of Now concerning the State of France thô since the Entrance of King Pharamond with his Franks out of Germany which was about the year of Christ 419. they have never had any Stranger come to wear the Crown which they attribute to their Salick Law that forbids Womens Reign yet they have twice chang'd their whole Race and Linage of Kings once by the Entrance of King Pepin who put out the Line of Pharamond about the year 751. and again in the promotion of Hugo Capetus who put out the Line of Pepin in the year 988. so as they have had three Descents and Races of Kings as well as the Spaniards Now I 'le pass over all the first Race of the Franch Kings as I also did the Spanish because some men may say That the Commonwealth and Law of Succession was not so well setled in those days as it was afterwards in the time of Pepin Charles the Great and their Descendents Therefore I shall only mention the second Rank which began with the Exclusion and Deposition of their lawful King Childerick the Third and Election of King Pepin in the year of Christ 781 after 22 Kings which had Reigned of the first Line of Pharamond for the space of Three hundred years This King Reigned 18 years being a famous King as all the World knows left his Kingdom by Succession to his eldest Son Charles Sirnamed aster The Great for his Famous and Heroical Acts. And thô the whole Kingdom belong'd to him by right of Succession yet did the Realm of France shew her Authority in his Admission â—â—rard du â—ilan lib 3. as the Historian relates in these Words King Pepin being dead the French chose for their King his two Sons Charles and Carlomon on condition that they should divide the Realm equally betwixt them which was a heavy Condition to the elder Brother to part with half his Kingdom After these Brothers had Reigned together three years King Carlomon died and left many Sons but the Lords Spiritual and Temporal of France Swore Allegiance to Charles without any respect to the Children of Carlomon who by right of Succession should have been preferred After Charles the Great Reigned his Son Lewis the First Sirnamed Debonnaire of his Courtesie who entred with great Applause of all Men for the exceeding grateful Memory of his Father but he was Deposed by the means of his Sons and was put in a Monastery thô after he came to Reign again â—erard lib. 5. â—n 834. and his fourth Son by his second Wife named Charles the Bold succeded him in the Crown after many Battels against his elder Brother Lothair to whom it belong'd by Succession After Charles the Beld succeeded Lewis the Second who was the third Son for the Second died before his Father and the Eldest was put by for his ill Demeanour This Lewis also had like to have been deprived by the States at his Entrance for the Hatred conceived against his Father Gerard. lib. 1. had he not call'd a Perliament at Campeigne and sweetned the People and Nobility with many fair Promises This Lewis left two Bastards by a Concubine who were call'd Lewis and Carlomon as also an Infant newly born of his lawful Wife Adeltrude Daughter to King Alfred of England which Infant was King of France after by the Name of Charles the Simple thô not immediately after the Death of his Fahter For the Nobles of France said They had need of a Man to be King and not a Child and so the whole State of France chose for their Kings the two aforesaid Bastards and they were Crowned most solemnly and divided the whole Realm between them An. 881. and Queen Adeltrude with her Child true Heir of France fled into England to her Fahter and there kept him many years in which time she saw four or five Kings Reign in his place successively Of these two Bastards the Elder named Lewis Reigned but Four years and died without Issue the second named Carlomon lived but one year after him and left a Son called Lewis which succeeded him in the Kingdom by the name of Lewis the Fisth and Sirnamed Faineant for his idle and slothful Life for which as also for his vicious Behaviour and in particular for taking out and Marrying a Nun of the Abby of S. Saveour he was depriv'd and made a Monk in the Abby of S. Denis where he died and in his place was chosen King of France and Crown'd with great Solemnity Charles the Fourth Emperour of Rome who was Nephew to Charles the Bold before mentioned and therefore the French. Historians say That he came to the Crown partly by Succession and partly by Election but for Succession we see it was of no account being Charles the Simple the right Heir was alive in England and as it were forgotten being they had thrice excluded him and would not receive him after they had deprived Charles for his evil Government and rather chose one Odo Earl of Baris and Duke of Angiers and caused him to be Crown'd But after a few years being weary of this Man's Government and moved with Compassion towards the Youth in England they Deposed him while he was absent in Gascony and call'd Charles the Simple out of England and restor'd him to the Kingdom of France leaving only to Odo the State of Aquitain with Title of a Duke wherewith in rine he contented himself seeing